Patient Portal Use Among Family Caregivers of Individuals With Dementia and Cancer: Regression Analysis From the National Study of Caregiving

Background

Family caregivers are often inexperienced and require information from clinic visits to effectively provide care for patients. Despite reported deficiencies, 68% of health systems facilitate sharing information with family caregivers through the patient portal. The patient portal is especially critical in the context of serious illnesses, like advanced cancer and dementia, where caregiving is intense and informational needs change over the trajectory of disease progression.

Objective

The objective of our study was to analyze a large, nationally representative sample of family caregivers from the National Study of Caregiving (NSOC) to determine individual characteristics and demographic factors associated with patient portal use among family caregivers of persons living with dementia and those living with cancer.

Methods

We conducted a secondary data analysis using data from the 2020 NSOC sample of family caregivers linked to National Health and Aging Trends Study. Weighted regression analysis by condition (ie, dementia or cancer) was used to examine associations between family caregiver use of the patient portal and demographic variables, including age, race or ethnicity, gender, employment status, caregiver health, education, and religiosity.

Results

A total of 462 participants (representing 4,589,844 weighted responses) were included in our analysis. In the fully adjusted regression model for caregivers of persons living with dementia, Hispanic ethnicity was associated with higher odds of patient portal use (OR: 2.81, 95% CI 1.05-7.57; P=.04), whereas qualification lower than a college degree was associated with lower odds of patient portal use by family caregiver (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.18-0.71; P<.001. In the fully adjusted regression model for caregivers of persons living with cancer, no variables were found to be statistically significantly associated with patient portal use at the .05 level.

Conclusions

In our analysis of NSOC survey data, we found differences between how dementia and cancer caregivers access the patient portal. As the patient portal is a common method of connecting caregivers with information from clinic visits, future research should focus on understanding how the portal is used by the groups we have identified, and why.

A rationale and framework for addressing physician cognitive impairment

Medical error is costly, in terms of the health and wellbeing of the patient, their family, and the financial burden placed on the medical system. Reducing medical error is paramount to minimizing harm and improving outcomes. One potential source of medical error is physician cognitive impairment. Determining how to effectively assess and mange physician cognitive impairment is an important, albeit difficult problem to address. There have been calls and attempts to implement age-based cognitive screening, but this approach is not optimal. Instead, we propose that neuropsychological assessment is the gold standard for fitness-for-duty evaluations and that there is a need for the development of physician-based, normative data to improve these evaluations. Here, we outline the framework of our research protocol in a large, academic medical center, in partnership with hospital leadership and legal counsel, which can be modeled by other medical centers. With high rates of physician burnout and an aging physician population, the United States is facing a looming public health crisis that requires proactive management.

Validity of the NIH toolbox cognitive battery in a healthy oldest-old 85+ sample

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the construct validity of the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery (NIH TB-CB) in the healthy oldest-old (85+ years old).

METHOD

Our sample from the McKnight Brain Aging Registry consists of 179 individuals, 85 to 99 years of age, screened for memory, neurological, and psychiatric disorders. Using previous research methods on a sample of 85 + y/o adults, we conducted confirmatory factor analyses on models of NIH TB-CB and same domain standard neuropsychological measures. We hypothesized the five-factor model (Reading, Vocabulary, Memory, Working Memory, and Executive/Speed) would have the best fit, consistent with younger populations. We assessed confirmatory and discriminant validity. We also evaluated demographic and computer use predictors of NIH TB-CB composite scores.

RESULTS

Findings suggest the six-factor model (Vocabulary, Reading, Memory, Working Memory, Executive, and Speed) had a better fit than alternative models. NIH TB-CB tests had good convergent and discriminant validity, though tests in the executive functioning domain had high inter-correlations with other cognitive domains. Computer use was strongly associated with higher NIH TB-CB overall and fluid cognition composite scores.

CONCLUSION

The NIH TB-CB is a valid assessment for the oldest-old samples, with relatively weak validity in the domain of executive functioning. Computer use's impact on composite scores could be due to the executive demands of learning to use a tablet. Strong relationships of executive function with other cognitive domains could be due to cognitive dedifferentiation. Overall, the NIH TB-CB could be useful for testing cognition in the oldest-old and the impact of aging on cognition in older populations.

Contributions of rare and common variation to early-onset and atypical dementia risk

We collected and analyzed genomic sequencing data from individuals with clinician-diagnosed early-onset or atypical dementia. Thirty-two patients were previously described, with sixty-eight newly described in this report. Of those sixty-eight, sixty-two patients self-reported white, non-Hispanic ethnicity and six reported as African American, non-Hispanic. Fifty-three percent of patients had a returnable variant. Five patients harbored a pathogenic variant as defined by the American College of Medical Genetics criteria for pathogenicity. A polygenic risk score was calculated for Alzheimer's patients in the total cohort and compared to the scores of a late-onset Alzheimer's cohort and a control set. Patients with early-onset Alzheimer's had higher non-APOE polygenic risk scores than patients with late onset Alzheimer's, supporting the conclusion that both rare and common genetic variation associate with early-onset neurodegenerative disease risk.

Contributions of rare and common variation to early-onset and atypical dementia risk

We collected and analyzed genomic sequencing data from individuals with clinician- diagnosed early-onset or atypical dementia. Thirty-two patients were previously described, with sixty-eight newly described in this report. Of those sixty-eight, sixty-two patients reported Caucasian, non-Hispanic ethnicity and six reported as African American, non-Hispanic. Fifty-three percent of patients had a returnable variant. Five patients harbored a pathogenic variant as defined by the American College of Medical Genetics criteria for pathogenicity. A polygenic risk score was calculated for Alzheimer's patients in the total cohort and compared to the scores of a late-onset Alzheimer's cohort and a control set. Patients with early-onset Alzheimer's had higher non- APOE polygenic risk scores than patients with late onset Alzheimer's, supporting the conclusion that both rare and common genetic variation associate with early-onset neurodegenerative disease risk.

Specialist Availability and Drug Adherence in Older Adults with Dementia Across Regions of the United States

BACKGROUND

Access to specialists facilitates appropriate Alzheimer's disease and related dementia (ADRD) medication use and adherence. However, there is little information on the impact of specialists' availability on ADRD medication adherence, especially in regions of the United States (US) where specialists are scarce, e.g., the Deep South (DS).

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain whether the availability of specialty physicians in the DS and other US regions predicts ADRD medication adherence among community-dwelling older adultsMethods:We conducted secondary analyses of claims data for 54,194 Medicare beneficiaries with ADRD in 2013-2015. Medication adherence was measured using the proportion of days covered (PDC). Multivariable-adjusted Modified Poisson regression was used to examine associations of adherence with physicians' availability by region.

RESULTS

The race/ethnicity distribution was 81.44% white, 9.17% black, 6.24% Hispanic, 2.25% Asian, and 1% other; 71.81% were female, and 42.36% were older than 85 years. Beneficiaries across regions differed in all individual and contextual characteristics except sex and comorbidities. Neurologists and psychiatrists' availability was not significantly associated with adherence (DS = 1.00, 0.97-1.03 & non-DS = 1.01, 1.00-1.01). Race and having ≥1 specialist visits were associated with a lower risk of adherence in both regions (p < 0.0001). Advanced age, dual Medicare/Medicaid eligibility, and living in non-large metropolitan areas, were associated with adherence in the non-DS region.

CONCLUSION

Among older Americans with ADRD, a context defined by specialist availability does not affect adherence, but other context characteristics related to socioeconomic status may. Research should further examine the influence of individual and contextual factors on ADRD treatment among older adults.

Development of a site readiness framework to improve health system preparedness for potential new Alzheimer's disease therapies

BACKGROUND

The growing Alzheimer's disease (AD) population, the continued emergence of AD biomarkers, and the potential approval of therapies that target the underlying pathophysiology of AD have the potential to transform the diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of AD within health systems. Transformation of the AD patient care pathway will present significant challenges, and resources are needed to help health systems prepare to integrate potential new AD therapies into patient care.

METHODS

Premier Applied Sciences developed a "Site Readiness Framework" for a new paradigm of AD care, with input from key medical experts in AD and select U.S. health systems, as well as financial support and input from Biogen. The development process involved interprofessional contributions from neurology, geriatrics, neuropsychology, psychiatry, radiology, infusion, memory disorders program coordination, and formulary management. Stakeholder interviews were conducted to illuminate the myriad challenges that potential new AD therapies may pose for health systems and guide the development of resources aimed to address those challenges.

RESULTS

Key components of the Site Readiness Framework for AD include a program self-assessment to help health systems identify gaps in preparedness for new AD therapies, and tools for mapping key considerations, such as purposeful referral of patients from primary care to a specialist, biomarker assessment, preparing for infusion therapy, and care coordination. An overview of the resources available within the Site Readiness Framework for AD, as well as a description of their potential application within a large academic health system, will be reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The approval of a disease-modifying therapy for AD will require a transformation of the AD patient care pathway. The Site Readiness Framework for AD may help health systems prepare to integrate potential new therapies.

Integration of Health Information Technology and Promotion of Personhood in Family-Centered Dementia Care: Intervention Trial

Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) often result in communication deficits that can lead to negative health outcomes as well as complications for caregiving and clinical care. Although augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices have demonstrated efficacy in assisting persons living with dementia (PLWD) in communicating, few devices offer customization for the person's care preferences (e.g., clothing, food, activities) or are designed for integration into clinical care and caregiving. To address this issue, our research team is developing a novel electronic AAC prototype with a touchscreen to promote communication and personhood for PLWD. The current article describes the development of this technology and uses the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) 2013 Statement to describe the clinical trial that is planned to test its efficacy.

TARGETS

PLWD and their care partners.

INTERVENTION DESCRIPTION

Use of AAC Plus to promote communication and personhood for PLWD.

MECHANISMS OF ACTION

AAC Plus will provide PLWD and care partners a way to communicate PLWD's daily preferences and provide clinical data for health care providers.

OUTCOMES

Determine whether enhanced communication of daily preferences of PLWD will improve quality of life of PLWD and their care partners.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04571502 (Date of registration October 1, 2020). [Research in Gerontological Nursing, 14(5), 225-234.].

Development and Validation of the Family Quality of Life in Dementia Scale

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

People with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) exhibit losses in daily function, as well as behavioral and psychological symptoms, that place a great deal of burden on family caregivers and exert a major influence on the quality of life of these individuals and their families. Despite years of intervention research in the field, there are few studies related to the impact of providing care for a person with ADRD on the family as the unit of analysis. While numerous findings have reported the effects of the chronic stress of caregiving for an individual, analysis of family quality of life is a concept that has been generally overlooked in the ADRD field. The purpose of the present study was to develop and test the Family Quality of Life in Dementia (FQOL-D) scale.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Face validity was obtained via a Delphi survey of a multidisciplinary team of dementia providers and researchers; initial psychometric evaluation of the instrument was obtained via family respondents (N = 244).

RESULTS

Internal consistency and reliability were established for the instrument. The FQOL-D scale exhibited excellent factorability and concurrent validity with existing scales assessing family psychosocial measures.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

The initial psychometric testing of the FQOL-D instrument is favorable. Additional use of the FQOL-D instrument in health care settings is warranted to evaluate further the clinical utility of the instrument.

Dementia Care in Diverse Older Adults in the U.S. Deep South and the Rest of the United States

BACKGROUND

Use of specialists and recommended drugs has beneficial effects for older adults living with Alzheimer's disease and related dementia (ADRD). Gaps in care may exist for minorities, e.g., Blacks, and especially in the United States (U.S.) Deep South (DS), a poor U.S. region with rising ADRD cases and minority overrepresentation. Currently, we have little understanding of ADRD care utilization in diverse populations in this region and elsewhere in the U.S. (non-DS), and the factors that adversely impact it.

OBJECTIVE

To examine utilization of specialists and ADRD drugs (outcomes) in racial/ethnic groups of older adults with ADRD and the personal or context-level factors affecting these outcomes in DS and non-DS.

METHODS

We obtained outcomes and personal-level covariates from claims for 127,512 Medicare beneficiaries with ADRD in 2013-2015, and combined county-level data in exploratory factor analysis to define context-level covariates. Adjusted analyses tested significant association of outcomes with Black/White race and other factors in DS and non-DS.

RESULTS

Across racial/ethnic groups, 33%-43% in DS and 43%-50% in non-DS used specialists; 47%-55% in DS and 41%-48% in non-DS used ADRD drugs. In adjusted analyses, differences between Blacks and Whites were not significant. Vascular dementia, comorbidities, poverty, and context-level factor "Availability of Medical Resources" were associated with specialist use; Alzheimer's disease and senile dementia, comorbidities, and specialist use were associated with drug use. In non-DS only, other individual, context-level covariates were associated with the outcomes.

CONCLUSION

We did not observe significant gaps in ADRD care in DS and non-DS; however, research should further examine determinants of low specialist and drug use in these regions.

Cognitive Processing Speed Is Strongly Related to Driving Skills, Financial Abilities, and Other Instrumental Activities of Daily Living in Persons With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Dementia

BACKGROUND

Cognitive processing speed is important for performing everyday activities in persons with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, its role in daily function has not been examined while simultaneously accounting for contributions of Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk biomarkers. We examine the relationships of processing speed and genetic and neuroimaging biomarkers to composites of daily function, mobility, and driving.

METHOD

We used baseline data from 103 participants on the MCI/mild dementia spectrum from the Applying Programs to Preserve Skills trial. Linear regression models examined relationships of processing speed, structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and genetic risk alleles for AD to composites of performance-based instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), community mobility, and on-road driving evaluations.

RESULTS

In multivariable models, processing speed and the brain MRI neurodegeneration biomarker Spatial Pattern of Abnormality for Recognition of Early Alzheimer's disease (SPARE-AD) were significantly associated with functional and mobility composite performance. Better processing speed and younger age were associated with on-road driving ratings. Genetic risk markers, left hippocampal atrophy, and white matter lesion volumes were not significant correlates of these abilities. Processing speed had a strong positive association with IADL function (p < .001), mobility (p < .001), and driving (p = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

Cognitive processing speed is strongly and consistently associated with critical daily functions in persons with MCI in models including genetic and neuroimaging biomarkers of AD risk. SPARE-AD scores also significantly correlate with IADL performance and mobility. Results highlight the central role of processing speed in everyday task performance among persons with MCI/mild dementia.

Safety of the tau-directed monoclonal antibody BIIB092 in progressive supranuclear palsy: a randomised, placebo-controlled, multiple ascending dose phase 1b trial

BACKGROUND

Progressive supranuclear palsy is a rare neurodegenerative disease associated with dysfunctional tau protein. BIIB092 is a humanised monoclonal antibody that binds to N-terminal tau and is thus being assessed as a potential novel treatment for progressive supranuclear palsy. We aimed to investigate the safety and tolerability of BIIB092 in individuals with progressive supranuclear palsy.

METHODS

This 12-week, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, multiple ascending dose, phase 1b trial was done at 13 outpatient sites in the USA. Participants aged 41-86 years with probable or possible progressive supranuclear palsy with a score of 20 or greater on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) were enrolled. Three BIIB092 dose escalation cohorts (150 mg, 700 mg, or 2100 mg; eight participants per cohort) were tested sequentially. For each dose cohort, the first two participants were randomly assigned by a computer-generated scheme to receive either BIIB092 or placebo intravenously every 4 weeks for 57 days. After 2 days, the six remaining participants in each cohort were randomly assigned (5:1) to receive BIIB092 or placebo for 57 days. An additional expansion panel of 24 patients was randomly assigned (3:1) to receive 2100 mg or placebo every 4 weeks for 57 days. All participants were followed up to day 85. The primary outcome was safety, which was analysed in the treated population (all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of the study drug). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02460094.

FINDINGS

Between Oct 2, 2015, and Oct 19, 2016, 48 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to the BIIB092 (n=36) and placebo (n=12) groups. No apparent demographic differences were observed between the two groups at baseline. All 48 participants completed the treatment phase of the study. Adverse events were generally mild to moderate in severity; the most common in the placebo and BIIB092 groups were falls (in two [17%] of 12 patients and in ten [28%] of 36 patients), urinary tract infections (in one [8%] of 12 and in six [17%] of 36), contusions (in one [8%] of 12 and in five [14%] of 36), and headaches (in none and in five [14%] of 36). Four serious adverse events resulting in admission to hospital were reported in three participants who received BIIB092 2100 mg: two severe adverse events of urinary tract infection, one severe adverse event of change in mental status, and one moderate adverse event of aspiration pneumonia. None was considered to be related to the study drug, all were resolved, and no deaths were reported.

INTERPRETATION

Repeated administration of the anti-tau monoclonal antibody BIIB092, at doses of up to 2100 mg, appears to be well tolerated in participants with progressive supranuclear palsy. Results of this phase 1b trial have informed the design of the ongoing phase 2 PASSPORT (NCT03068468) study to examine the efficacy and safety of BIIB092.

FUNDING

Bristol-Myers Squibb, Biogen.

Reactions to Multiple Ascending Doses of the Microtubule Stabilizer TPI-287 in Patients With Alzheimer Disease, Progressive Supranuclear Palsy, and Corticobasal Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Basket-design clinical trials that allow investigation of treatment effects on different clinical syndromes that share the same molecular pathophysiology have not previously been attempted in neurodegenerative disease.

Objective

To assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacodynamics of the microtubule stabilizer TPI-287 (abeotaxane) in Alzheimer disease (AD) or the 4-repeat tauopathies (4RT) progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and corticobasal syndrome (CBS).

Design, Setting, and Participants

Two parallel-design, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1 randomized clinical trials in AD and 4RT were conducted from December 20, 2013, through May 4, 2017, at the University of California, San Francisco, and University of Alabama at Birmingham. A total of 94 patients with clinically diagnosed AD (n = 39) and 4RT (n = 55) were screened; of these, 3 refused to participate, and 10 with AD and 11 with 4RT did not meet inclusion criteria. A total of 29 patients with AD, 14 with PSP, and 30 with β-amyloid-negative CBS (determined on positron emission tomography findings) were enrolled. Data were analyzed from December 20, 2013, through May 4, 2017, based on modified intention to treat.

Interventions

Randomization was 8:3 drug to placebo in 3 sequential dose cohorts receiving 2.0, 6.3, or 20.0 mg/m2 of intravenous TPI-287 once every 3 weeks for 9 weeks, with an optional 6-week open-label extension.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary end points were safety and tolerability (maximal tolerated dose) of TPI-287. Secondary and exploratory end points included TPI-287 levels in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and changes on biomarker, clinical, and neuropsychology measures.

Results

A total of 68 participants (38 men [56%]; median age, 65 [range, 50-85] years) were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis, of whom 26 had AD (14 women [54%]; median age, 63 [range, 50-76] years), and 42 had 4RT (16 women [38%]; median age, 69 [range, 54-83] years). Three severe anaphylactoid reactions occurred in TPI-287-treated patients with AD, whereas none were seen in patients with 4RT, leading to a maximal tolerated dose of 6.3 mg/m2 for AD and 20.0 mg/m2 for 4RT. More falls (3 in the placebo group vs 11 in the TPI-287 group) and a dose-related worsening of dementia symptoms (mean [SD] in the CDR plus NACC FTLD-SB [Clinical Dementia Rating scale sum of boxes with frontotemporal dementia measures], 0.5 [1.8] in the placebo group vs 0.7 [1.6] in the TPI-287 group; median difference, 1.5 [95% CI, 0-2.5]; P = .03) were seen in patients with 4RT. Despite undetectable TPI-287 levels in CSF, CSF biomarkers demonstrated decreased chitinase-3-like protein-1 (YKL-40) levels in the 4RT treatment arm (mean [SD], -8.4 [26.0] ng/mL) compared with placebo (mean [SD], 10.4 [42.3] ng/mL; median difference, -14.6 [95% CI, -30.0 to 0.2] ng/mL; P = .048, Mann-Whitney test).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial, TPI-287 was less tolerated in patients with AD than in those with 4RT owing to the presence of anaphylactoid reactions. The ability to reveal different tau therapeutic effects in various tauopathy syndromes suggests that basket trials are a valuable approach to tau therapeutic early clinical development.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT019666666 and NCT02133846.

Genome sequencing for early-onset or atypical dementia: high diagnostic yield and frequent observation of multiple contributory alleles

We assessed the results of genome sequencing for early-onset dementia. Participants were selected from a memory disorders clinic. Genome sequencing was performed along with C9orf72 repeat expansion testing. All returned sequencing results were Sanger-validated. Prior clinical diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia, and unspecified dementia. The mean age of onset was 54 (41–76). Fifty percent of patients had a strong family history, 37.5% had some, and 12.5% had no known family history. Nine of 32 patients (28%) had a variant defined as pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) by American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics standards, including variants in APP, C9orf72, CSF1R, and MAPT. Nine patients (including three with P/LP variants) harbored established risk alleles with moderate penetrance (odds ratios of ∼2–5) in ABCA7, AKAP9, GBA, PLD3, SORL1, and TREM2. All six patients harboring these moderate penetrance variants but not P/LP variants also had one or two APOE ε4 alleles. One patient had two APOE ε4 alleles with no other established contributors. In total, 16 patients (50%) harbored one or more genetic variants likely to explain symptoms. We identified variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) in ABI3, ADAM10, ARSA, GRID2IP, MME, NOTCH3, PLCD1, PSEN1, TM2D3, TNK1, TTC3, and VPS13C, also often along with other variants. In summary, genome sequencing for early-onset dementia frequently identified multiple established or possible contributory alleles. These observations add support for an oligogenic model for early-onset dementia.

Alabama Brief Cognitive Screener: Utility of a New Cognitive Screening Instrument in a Memory Disorders Clinic

Objective

We assessed the clinical utility of the Alabama Brief Cognitive Screener (ABCs), an alternative to the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), for cognitive screening in a new electronic medical record. Other available nonproprietary instruments were determined to be more tuned to milder deficits than the MMSE.

Methods

The ABCs was administered as part of routine clinical assessment in the University of Alabama at Birmingham memory disorders clinics from April 30, 2012, to April 30, 2015. Outpatients (N = 1,589) with clinician diagnoses (ICD-9-CM) of memory loss, mild cognitive impairment, neurodegenerative cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's dementia, or dementia not otherwise specified were included in the analysis. Memory disorder clinicians used multiple sources of information for assignment of diagnoses, including interviews with patients and caregivers, the ABCs, figure copy, semantic fluencies, phonemic fluencies, ratings of daily function, imaging, laboratory tests, and medical records.

Results

Scoring distribution by diagnosis was mild cognitive impairment (n = 310): mean (SD) = 25.47 (3.37), median = 26; Alzheimer's dementia (n = 208): mean (SD) = 16.42 (6.33), median = 17; cerebral degeneration (n = 371): mean (SD) = 20.61 (5.90), median = 21; memory loss (n = 583): mean (SD) = 24.90 (5.09), median = 27; and dementia (n = 117): mean (SD) = 15.18 (6.34), median = 15. Mean ABCs scores differed by diagnosis (Wilcoxon signed-ranks Z = 483.5, P < .001). This finding was consistent with a meta-analysis of MMSE performance between groups.

Conclusions

ABCs scores vary appropriately by diagnosis and resemble MMSE scoring distributions. The ABCs provides a nonproprietary alternative to the MMSE to assess the severity of cognitive deficits.

Clinical, imaging, pathological, and biochemical characterization of a novel presenilin 1 mutation (N135Y) causing Alzheimer's disease

We present 2 cases of early-onset Alzheimer's disease due to a novel N135Y mutation in PSEN1. The proband presented with memory and other cognitive symptoms at age 32. Detailed clinical characterization revealed initial deficits in memory with associated dysarthria, progressing to involve executive dysfunction, spastic gait, and episodic confusion with polyspike discharges on long-term electroencephalography. Amyloid- and FDG-PET scans showed typical results of Alzheimer's disease. By history, the proband's father had developed cognitive symptoms at age 42 and died at age 48. Neuropathological evaluation confirmed Alzheimer's disease, with moderate to severe amyloid angiopathy. Skeletal muscle showed type 2 fiber-predominant atrophy with pale central clearing. Genetic testing of the proband revealed an N135Y missense mutation in PSEN1. This mutation was predicted to be pathogenic by in silico analysis. Biochemical analysis confirmed that the mutation caused an increased Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, consistent with other PSEN1 mutations and with a loss of presenilin function.

Qualitative assessment of self-identity in people with advanced dementia

This study aimed to understand the preserved elements of self-identity in persons with moderate to severe dementia attributable to Alzheimer's disease. A semi-structured interview was developed to explore the narrative self among residents with dementia in a residential care facility, and residents without dementia in an independent living setting. The interviews were transcribed verbatim from audio recordings and analyzed for common themes, while being sensitive to possible differences between the groups. The participants with dementia showed evidence of self-reference even though losses in explicit memory were evident. The most noticeable difference between the two groups was time frame reference. Nonetheless, all participants showed understanding of their role in relationships and exhibited concrete preferences. Our findings suggest that memory loss and other cognitive deficits associated with moderate to severe dementia do not necessarily lead to a loss of “self.”

Quality of Life and Deficit Identification in Dementia

Numerous studies have examined self-identification of deficits in persons with dementia. Few of these studies consider the influence of interpersonal and social factors on deficit identification, and most focus on whether or why deficits are ‘underreported’ by persons with dementia. In our studies, we found considerable variation in deficit identification within and among persons with dementia, and some ‘overreporting’ of deficits in comparison with caregiver reports across all of the domains studied. Thus, focusing on ‘underreporting’ and aggregate level data neglects information that could be important to measuring and understanding quality of life in dementia. Current approaches to measuring and understanding quality of life in dementia make divergent assumptions about the impact of deficit identification. Emerging phenomenological perspectives suggest that proactive interventions that treat deficit identification as an interpersonal and social challenge inherent in the experience of dementia would enhance the quality of life of caregiving dyads.

Latent information in fluency lists predicts functional decline in persons at risk for Alzheimer disease

OBJECTIVE

We constructed random forest classifiers employing either the traditional method of scoring semantic fluency word lists or new methods. These classifiers were then compared in terms of their ability to diagnose Alzheimer disease (AD) or to prognosticate among individuals along the continuum from cognitively normal (CN) through mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to AD.

METHOD

Semantic fluency lists from 44 cognitively normal elderly individuals, 80 MCI patients, and 41 AD patients were transcribed into electronic text files and scored by four methods: traditional raw scores, clustering and switching scores, "generalized" versions of clustering and switching, and a method based on independent components analysis (ICA). Random forest classifiers based on raw scores were compared to "augmented" classifiers that incorporated newer scoring methods. Outcome variables included AD diagnosis at baseline, MCI conversion, increase in Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SOB) score, or decrease in Financial Capacity Instrument (FCI) score. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed for each classifier and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. We compared AUC between raw and augmented classifiers using Delong's test and assessed validity and reliability of the augmented classifier.

RESULTS

Augmented classifiers outperformed classifiers based on raw scores for the outcome measures AD diagnosis (AUC .97 vs. .95), MCI conversion (AUC .91 vs. .77), CDR-SOB increase (AUC .90 vs. .79), and FCI decrease (AUC .89 vs. .72). Measures of validity and stability over time support the use of the method.

CONCLUSION

Latent information in semantic fluency word lists is useful for predicting cognitive and functional decline among elderly individuals at increased risk for developing AD. Modern machine learning methods may incorporate latent information to enhance the diagnostic value of semantic fluency raw scores. These methods could yield information valuable for patient care and clinical trial design with a relatively small investment of time and money.

Donepezil (Aricept®) for treatment of Alzheimer´s disease and other dementing conditions

Alzheimer's disease is common, incurable and disabling. It is expected to grow dramatically in prevalence over the next 50 years. At current, the standard of care for patients with mild and moderately severe Alzheimer's disease includes the use of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. Donepezil (Aricept) is a highly selective acetylcholinesterase inhibitors with a pharmacokinetic profile allowing once-daily dosing. There is an extensive knowledge base derived from published clinical trials of donepezil in Alzheimer's disease, revealing consistent efficacy in cognition, global clinical ratings and daily function. Donepezil is also associated with additional meaningful outcomes such as reduced risk for, or delay to, nursing home placement. Despite a sense of limited efficacy of this drug class among prescribers, number needed-to-treat analyses suggest donepezil is highly effective at reducing the long-term adverse outcomes associated with Alzheimer's disease.

Family composition and expressions of family-focused care needs at an academic memory disorders clinic

Objective. To understand who dementia patients identify as their family and how dementia affects family life. Background. Dementia care is often delivered in family settings, so understanding the constituency and needs of the family unit involved in care is important for determining contributors to family quality of life. Design/Methods. Seventy-seven families receiving care at an academic dementia clinic completed questionnaires regarding the affected person and the family. Responses were categorized as focused on an individual's needs or the family's needs. Results. Respondents identified a mean of 3.77 family members involved in care. Spouse (80.5%), daughter (58.4%), son (46.8%), and stepchild or child-in-law (37.7%) were the most frequently listed family members. Questions regarding the effect of dementia-related changes in cognition and mood were most likely to elicit a family-focused response. Questionnaire items that inquired about specific medical questions and strategies to improve family function were least likely to elicit a family-focused response. Conclusions. Both caregivers and persons with dementia frequently provided family-focused responses, supporting the construct of dementia as an illness that affects life in the family unit. This finding reinforces the potential utility of family-centered quality of life measures in assessing treatment success for people with dementia.

Practical diagnosis and management of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease in the primary care setting: an evidence-based approach

OBJECTIVE

To review evidence-based guidance on the primary care of Alzheimer's disease and clinical research on models of primary care for Alzheimer's disease to present a practical summary for the primary care physician regarding the assessment and management of the disease.

DATA SOURCES

References were obtained via search using keywords Alzheimer's disease AND primary care OR collaborative care OR case finding OR caregivers OR guidelines. Articles were limited to English language from January 1, 1990, to January 1, 2013.

STUDY SELECTION

Articles were reviewed and selected on the basis of study quality and pertinence to this topic, covering a broad range of data and opinion across geographical regions and systems of care. The most recent published guidelines from major organizations were included.

RESULTS

Practice guidelines contained numerous points of consensus, with most advocating a central role for the primary care physician in the detection, diagnosis, and treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Review of the literature indicated that optimal medical and psychosocial care for people with Alzheimer's disease and their caregivers may be best facilitated through collaborative models of care involving the primary care physician working within a wider interdisciplinary team.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence-based guidelines assign the primary care physician a critical role in the care of people with Alzheimer's disease. Research on models of care suggests the need for an appropriate medical/nonmedical support network to fulfill this role. Given the diversity and breadth of services required and the necessity for close coordination, nationwide implementation of team-based, collaborative care programs may represent the best option for improving care standards for patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Pre-diagnosis excess acute care costs in Alzheimer's patients among a US Medicaid population

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Prior research has documented that Alzheimer's disease (AD) is associated with increased costs from comorbid conditions. However, little is known about medical resource utilization and costs among AD patients prior to the onset of cognitive symptoms. This study estimates excess acute care costs among Medicaid AD patients in the year prior to diagnosis.

STUDY DESIGN

Administrative claims data for New Jersey Medicaid patients over the period 1997-2010 were retrospectively analyzed. The study focused on non-institutionalized AD patients and examined their medical costs compared with matched controls with no dementia over the 12 months prior to their preliminary diagnosis. Costs reflect amounts reimbursed by Medicaid to medical service providers, reported in 2010 US dollars.

RESULTS

The study sample included 11,536 AD patients who were matched to controls. Average age was 76 years, and 76.2 % were female. Compared with matched controls, total medical costs over the 12-month pre-index period were US$ 5,549 higher among AD patients (US$ 14,977 vs. US$ 9,428, p < 0.001), of which US$ 3,321 (p < 0.001) was due to outpatient services. Home care and medical daycare services accounted for US $1,442 (p < 0.001) of the difference. Emergency department visits and inpatient care accounted for only a small fraction of the excess costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with controls, Medicaid AD patients incurred higher acute care costs in the 12 months prior to their preliminary diagnosis, suggesting room for beneficial interventions and better disease management should earlier diagnosis become possible. These findings may be especially relevant in light of new criteria facilitating earlier diagnosis of AD.

Efficacy and safety of donepezil 23 mg versus donepezil 10 mg for moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease: a subgroup analysis in patients already taking or not taking concomitant memantine

BACKGROUND/AIMS

A large multicenter trial of donepezil 23 mg/day versus donepezil 10 mg/day for moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease allowed patients taking concomitant memantine. We evaluated the efficacy/safety of donepezil 23 and 10 mg/day in this trial, with respect to concomitant memantine use.

METHODS

Prespecified analysis of data from a 24-week, randomized, double-blind trial. Patients were randomized to donepezil doses (23 vs. 10 mg/day) and stratified by concomitant memantine use (yes or no). Efficacy and safety were assessed for each donepezil dose in subgroups taking or not taking concomitant memantine.

RESULTS

At week 24, donepezil 23 mg/day provided significant cognitive benefits over 10 mg/day (p < 0.01) on the Severe Impairment Battery, with or without concomitant memantine (ANCOVA adjusted for baseline score, country and treatment). The higher dose showed no benefit on the global function, Mini-Mental State Examination or activities of daily living measures in either memantine subgroup. Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were higher for donepezil 23 mg/day with memantine (80.7%) than 23 mg/day without memantine (69.7%) or 10 mg/day with/without memantine (66.7/62.0%); across all treatment groups, most events were mild/moderate in severity. Individual rates of serious AEs were low (<1.0%), regardless of concomitant memantine use.

CONCLUSION

In this population, concomitant memantine use did not alter the response profile of donepezil 23 vs. 10 mg/day. Donepezil 23 mg was generally safe and well tolerated among patients receiving donepezil alone and among patients receiving a combination of donepezil and memantine therapy.

Challenges and opportunities for characterizing cognitive aging across species

The gradual decline of cognitive ability with age, even in the absence of overt brain disease, is a growing problem. Although cognitive aging is a common and feared accompaniment of the aging process, its underlying mechanisms are not well understood and there are no highly effective means to prevent it. Additional research on cognitive aging is sorely needed, and methods that enable ready translation between human subjects and animal models stand to provide the most benefit. Here and in the six companion pieces in this special issue, we discuss a variety of challenges and opportunities for studying cognitive aging across species. We identify tests of associative memory, recognition memory, spatial and contextual memory, and working memory and executive function as cognitive domains that are age-sensitive and amenable to testing with parallel means in both humans and animal models. We summarize some of the important challenges in using animal models to test cognition. We describe unique opportunities to study cognitive aging in human subjects, such as those provided by recent large-scale initiatives to characterize cognition in large groups of subjects across the lifespan. Finally, we highlight some of the challenges of studying cognitive aging in human subjects.

Characterizing cognitive aging in humans with links to animal models

With the population of older adults expected to grow rapidly over the next two decades, it has become increasingly important to advance research efforts to elucidate the mechanisms associated with cognitive aging, with the ultimate goal of developing effective interventions and prevention therapies. Although there has been a vast research literature on the use of cognitive tests to evaluate the effects of aging and age-related neurodegenerative disease, the need for a set of standardized measures to characterize the cognitive profiles specific to healthy aging has been widely recognized. Here we present a review of selected methods and approaches that have been applied in human research studies to evaluate the effects of aging on cognition, including executive function, memory, processing speed, language, and visuospatial function. The effects of healthy aging on each of these cognitive domains are discussed with examples from cognitive/experimental and clinical/neuropsychological approaches. Further, we consider those measures that have clear conceptual and methodological links to tasks currently in use for non-human animal studies of aging, as well as those that have the potential for translation to animal aging research. Having a complementary set of measures to assess the cognitive profiles of healthy aging across species provides a unique opportunity to enhance research efforts for cross-sectional, longitudinal, and intervention studies of cognitive aging. Taking a cross-species, translational approach will help to advance cognitive aging research, leading to a greater understanding of associated neurobiological mechanisms with the potential for developing effective interventions and prevention therapies for age-related cognitive decline.

Characterizing healthy samples for studies of human cognitive aging

Characterizing the cognitive declines associated with aging, and differentiating them from the effects of disease in older adults, are important goals for human neuroscience researchers. This is also an issue of public health urgency in countries with rapidly aging populations. Progress toward understanding cognitive aging is complicated by numerous factors. Researchers interested in cognitive changes in healthy older adults need to consider these complexities when they design and interpret studies. This paper addresses important factors in study design, patient demographics, co-morbid and incipient medical conditions, and assessment instruments that will allow researchers to optimize the characterization of healthy participants and produce meaningful and generalizable research outcomes from studies of cognitive aging. Application of knowledge from well-designed studies should be useful in clinical settings to facilitate the earliest possible recognition of disease and guide appropriate interventions to best meet the needs of the affected individual and public health priorities.

Treatment guidelines for Alzheimer's disease: redefining perceptions in primary care

BACKGROUND

Current treatment guidelines for Alzheimer's disease (AD) do not reflect more recently collected data on therapeutic outcomes other than cognitive function and memory, and this has led to a limited understanding of the value of drug therapy in AD.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the need to revise treatment guidelines for AD, to review data that have become available since the publication of current guidelines, and to communicate how existing guidelines and relevant new data can be valuable to the primary care provider who assesses and treats patients with AD.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search was conducted to identify existing treatment guidelines using the MeSH headings Alzheimer disease-drug therapy AND practice guidelines. The alternative terms treatment guidelines, practice parameter, and practice recommendation were also searched in conjunction with the MeSH term Alzheimer disease-drug therapy. Additionally, MEDLINE was searched using the term dementia and publication type "practice guideline." All searches were limited to articles published within the last 10 years, in English. A total of 116 articles were identified by these searches. Additional publications were identified by manually searching the reference lists of these articles and of published clinical trials of AD therapies.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Current AD treatment guidelines and clinical trial results for AD treatment options were extracted, reviewed, and summarized to meet the objectives of this article.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Current guidelines support the use of cholinesterase inhibitors in patients with mild to moderate AD. More recent clinical research indicates that cholinesterase inhibitor treatment provides effectiveness across a wide range of dementia severity and multiple symptom domains. These medications also significantly decrease caregiver burden and may lower the risk for nursing home placement.

CONCLUSIONS

The expanding literature on AD medications suggests that treatment guidelines need to be reexamined. Recent data emphasize preservation of abilities and delay of adverse outcomes in AD patients rather than short-term improvements in cognitive test scores. Treatment appears to provide the greatest benefit when it is initiated early in the course of the disease and maintained over the long term. Revised treatment guidelines should address newer medications and more recent outcomes considerations, as well as provide guidance on how long to continue and when to discontinue pharmacotherapy for AD.

Family quality of life in dementia: a qualitative approach to family-identified care priorities

OBJECTIVE

To characterize factors contributing to quality of life (QOL) in families providing care to people with dementia.

BACKGROUND

Assessing QOL in dementia has proved difficult. Individuals with dementia often possess limited insight, leading them to self-rate QOL differently from those who provide care for them. A majority of people with dementia receive care in the context of family units, but measures of whole-family QOL have not been previously described in the literature on dementia. The concept of family quality of life (FQOL) was developed and validated among families caring for children with developmental disabilities. FQOL measures have the potential to improve determinations of effectiveness in dementia care.

DESIGN/METHODS

Fifty-four questionnaires requesting information on priorities for care were collected from families of patients obtaining care at an academic dementia clinic. Forms were completed by family members, patients, or both. The mean age of the patients was 73.6 years; 61% were women. Qualitative analyses of the responses were conducted by two evaluators. Comments from 54 questionnaires were assigned by consensus to five categories based on domains validated for FQOL in families of individuals with developmental disabilities. Eleven cases from the 54 were rated by both evaluators to assess inter-rater reliability.

RESULTS

Five domains were identified as follows: (1) family interactions, (2) direct care/activities of daily living support, (3) emotional/behavioral well-being, (4) physical and cognitive well-being, and (5) disability-related support/medical care. Not surprisingly for clinic encounters, medical care requests and inquiries were expressed by a high proportion of families. Concerns about physical and cognitive well-being were expressed nearly as often. Issues regarding family interactions and emotional well-being were less frequently raised.

CONCLUSIONS/RELEVANCE

A FQOL model developed for developmental disability provided useful information for qualitative characterization of priorities among families receiving dementia care. Ongoing research will be useful to explore the validity and utility of the FQOL concept in dementia, especially in domains not well addressed by the current questionnaire.

Alzheimer disease prevention: focus on cardiovascular risk, not amyloid?

Autosomal dominant (early-onset) Alzheimer disease and the much more common sporadic Alzheimer disease share a common pathology but not necessarily a common pathophysiology. Common cardiovascular comorbidities are associated with increased risk for Alzheimer disease and offer opportunities for intervention. Class I evidence for prevention is extremely limited. The overall body of evidence suggests the best time to intervene is in midlife, not in old age.

A randomized pilot clinical trial of the safety of pioglitazone in treatment of patients with Alzheimer disease

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonist pioglitazone in nondiabetic patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) and to explore treatment effect sizes on clinical outcomes.

DESIGN

Double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial of 18-month duration.

SETTING

Two academic medical center outpatient clinics.

PATIENTS

Nondiabetic patients meeting research criteria for probable AD were enrolled. Twenty-five of 29 subjects completed the study; no withdrawals were attributable to adverse effects.

INTERVENTION

Subjects received pioglitazone (Actos), titrated to 45 mg daily, or matching placebo, and 200 IU of vitamin E daily. Patients maintained treatment with cholinesterase inhibitors and could begin memantine therapy when it became available during the study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was frequency of reported adverse effects (AEs). Secondary outcomes were measures of cognition, activities of daily living, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and global function.

RESULTS

Peripheral edema was the principal AE occurring more frequently in subjects taking pioglitazone than placebo (28.6% vs 0%). This is consistent with the known AE profile of pioglitazone. No group differences in laboratory measures were identified. No significant treatment effect was observed on exploratory analysis of clinical efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Pioglitazone was generally well tolerated in this pilot study. There were no serious or unanticipated adverse events or clinical laboratory changes attributable to pioglitazone over a long-term exposure in nondiabetic patients with AD. The tolerability of pioglitazone in this population and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma effects in laboratory models of AD support further study of this drug class in earlier disease stages.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00982202.

Cost-effectiveness of drug therapies for Alzheimer's disease: A brief review

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is an important and rapidly expanding public health problem. Its large economic burden is a result of its disabling nature, chronicity, and high prevalence in older segments of the population. Current treatments of AD have been criticized for providing insufficient benefit to justify their costs, but variability in assessing both costs and benefits make evaluation of the existing data problematic. Inclusion of the value of caregiver time is a major driver of the determination of cost-effectiveness. Population-based studies and those based on application of economic models to other study outcomes tend to identify greater cost-effectiveness than prospectively collected data. Differences in healthcare economics across countries also limit generalization of specific study findings. The current state of evidence suggests that treatment decisions in AD should be based on assessment of benefit in individual patients rather than broader societal economic factors.

Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer’s disease

Acetylcholinesterase inhibitor drugs are now a mature treatment approach for Alzheimer’s disease, although they remain controversial. This review addresses the available data on acetylcholinesterase inhibitor treatment in patients with Alzheimer’s disease across multiple outcome types. It addresses rational and evidence-based expectations for treatment in this population.