1
|
Jakobsen LM, Molewijk B, de Snoo-Trimp J, Svantesson M, Ursin G. What is a High-Quality Moral Case Deliberation?-Facilitators' Perspectives in the Euro-MCD Project. HEC Forum 2024:10.1007/s10730-023-09519-w. [PMID: 38315250 DOI: 10.1007/s10730-023-09519-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
The evaluation of the European Moral Case Deliberation Outcomes project (Euro-MCD) has resulted in a revised evaluation instrument, knowledge about the content of MCD (moral case deliberation), and the perspectives of those involved. In this paper, we report on a perspective that has been overlooked, the facilitators'. We aim to describe facilitators' perceptions of high-quality moral case deliberation and their Euro-MCD sessions. The research took place in Norway, Sweden, and the Netherlands using a survey combined with interviews with 41 facilitators. Facilitators' perceived that attaining a high-quality MCD implies fostering a safe and respectful atmosphere, creating a wondering mode, being an attentive authority, developing moral reflective skills, reaching a common understanding, and ensuring organisational prerequisites for the MCD sessions. Our central conclusion is that efforts at three levels are required to attain a high-quality MCD: trained and virtuous facilitator; committed, respectful participants; and organizational space. Furthermore, managers have a responsibility to prepare MCD participants for what it means to take part in MCD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena M Jakobsen
- Department of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Harstad, Norway.
- Faculty of Nursing and Health Science, Nord University, Bodø, Norway.
| | - Bert Molewijk
- Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Center of Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Janine de Snoo-Trimp
- Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mia Svantesson
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University Health Care Research Centre, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Gøril Ursin
- Faculty of Nursing and Health Science, Nord University, Bodø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vaismoradi M, Fredriksen Moe C, Ursin G, Ingstad K. Looking through racism in the nurse-patient relationship from the lens of culturally congruent care: A scoping review. J Adv Nurs 2022; 78:2665-2677. [PMID: 35441739 PMCID: PMC9544978 DOI: 10.1111/jan.15267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Revised: 03/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
AIM This review aimed to identify the nature of racism in the nurse-patient relationship and summarize international research findings about it. DESIGN A scoping review of the international literature. DATA SOURCES The search process encompassed three main online databases of PubMed (including MEDLINE), Scopus and Embase, from 2009 until 2021. REVIEW METHODS The scoping review was informed by the Levac et al.'s framework to map the research phenomenon and summarize current empirical research findings. Also, the review findings were reflected in the three-dimensional puzzle model of culturally congruent care in the discussion section. RESULTS The search process led to retrieving 149 articles, of which 10 studies were entered into data analysis and reporting results. They had variations in the research methodology and the context of the nurse-patient relationship. The thematical analysis of the studies' findings led to the development of three categories as follows: bilateral ignition of racism, hidden and manifest consequences of racism and encountering strategies. CONCLUSION Racism threatens patients' and nurses' dignity in the healthcare system. There is a need to develop a framework of action based on the principles of culturally congruent care to eradicate racism from the nurse-patient relationship in the globalized context of healthcare. IMPACT Racism in the nurse-patient relationship has remained a relatively unexplored area of the nursing literature. It hinders efforts to meet patients' and families' needs and increases their dissatisfaction with nursing care. Also, racism from patients towards nurses causes emotional trauma and enhances job-related stress among nurses. Further research should be conducted on this culturally variant phenomenon. Also, the participation of patients and nurses should be sought to prohibit racism in healthcare settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gøril Ursin
- Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Bodø, Norway
| | - Kari Ingstad
- Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Bodø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kreimer AR, Ferreiro-Iglesias A, Nygard M, Bender N, Schroeder L, Hildesheim A, Robbins HA, Pawlita M, Langseth H, Schlecht NF, Tinker LF, Agalliu I, Smoller SW, Ness-Jensen E, Hveem K, D'Souza G, Visvanathan K, May B, Ursin G, Weiderpass E, Giles GG, Milne RL, Cai Q, Blot WJ, Zheng W, Weinstein SJ, Albanes D, Brenner N, Hoffman-Bolton J, Kaaks R, Barricarte A, Tjønneland A, Sacerdote C, Trichopoulou A, Vermeulen RCH, Huang WY, Freedman ND, Brennan P, Waterboer T, Johansson M. Timing of HPV16-E6 antibody seroconversion before OPSCC: findings from the HPVC3 consortium. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:1335-1343. [PMID: 31185496 PMCID: PMC6683856 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16)-E6 antibodies are detectable in peripheral blood before diagnosis in the majority of HPV16-driven oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), but the timing of seroconversion is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS We formed the HPV Cancer Cohort Consortium which comprises nine population cohorts from Europe, North America and Australia. In total, 743 incident OPSCC cases and 5814 controls provided at least one pre-diagnostic blood sample, including 111 cases with multiple samples. Median time between first blood collection and OPSCC diagnosis was 11.4 years (IQR = 6-11 years, range = 0-40 years). Antibodies against HPV16-E6 were measured by multiplex serology (GST fusion protein based Luminex assay). RESULTS HPV16-E6 seropositivity was present in 0.4% of controls (22/5814; 95% CI 0.2% to 0.6%) and 26.2% (195/743; 95% CI 23.1% to 29.6%) of OPSCC cases. HPV16-E6 seropositivity increased the odds of OPSCC 98.2-fold (95% CI 62.1-155.4) in whites and 17.2-fold (95% CI 1.7-170.5) in blacks. Seropositivity in cases was more frequent in recent calendar periods, ranging from 21.9% pre-1996 to 68.4% in 2005 onwards, in those with blood collection near diagnosis (lead time <5 years). HPV16-E6 seropositivity increased with lead time: 0.0%, 13.5%, 23.7%, and 38.9% with lead times of >30 years (N = 24), 20-30 years (N = 148), 10-20 years (N = 228), and <10 years (N = 301 cases) (p-trend < 0.001). Of the 47 HPV16-E6 seropositive cases with serially-collected blood samples, 17 cases seroconverted during follow-up, with timing ranging from 6 to 28 years before diagnosis. For the remaining 30 cases, robust seropositivity was observed up to 25 years before diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS The immune response to HPV16-driven tumorigenesis is most often detectable several decades before OPSCC diagnosis. HPV16-E6 seropositive individuals face increased risk of OPSCC over several decades.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R Kreimer
- Infections and Immunoepidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA.
| | - A Ferreiro-Iglesias
- Genetic Epidemiology Group (GEP), International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France
| | - M Nygard
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population-Based Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway
| | - N Bender
- Infections and Cancer Epidemiology, Research Program Infection, Inflammation and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - L Schroeder
- Infections and Cancer Epidemiology, Research Program Infection, Inflammation and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A Hildesheim
- Infections and Immunoepidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - H A Robbins
- Genetic Epidemiology Group (GEP), International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France
| | - M Pawlita
- Infections and Cancer Epidemiology, Research Program Infection, Inflammation and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - H Langseth
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population-Based Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway
| | - N F Schlecht
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo; Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx
| | - L F Tinker
- Public Health Sciences, Cancer Prevention Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, USA
| | - I Agalliu
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx
| | - S W Smoller
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx
| | - E Ness-Jensen
- HUNT Research Center, Department of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Levanger, Norway
| | - K Hveem
- HUNT Research Center, Department of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Levanger, Norway
| | - G D'Souza
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
| | - K Visvanathan
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
| | - B May
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
| | - G Ursin
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population-Based Cancer Research, Majorstuen, Oslo; Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - E Weiderpass
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population-Based Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway; Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Genetic Epidemiology Group, Folkhälsan Research Center, and Faculty of Medicine, Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - G G Giles
- Cancer Epidemiology and Intelligence Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne; Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne
| | - R L Milne
- Cancer Epidemiology and Intelligence Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne; Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville; Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Q Cai
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, USA
| | - W J Blot
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, USA
| | - W Zheng
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, USA
| | - S J Weinstein
- Infections and Immunoepidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - D Albanes
- Infections and Immunoepidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - N Brenner
- Infections and Cancer Epidemiology, Research Program Infection, Inflammation and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - R Kaaks
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A Barricarte
- Navarra Public Health Institute, Pamplona; Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA), Pamplona; CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health CIBERESP, Madrid, Spain
| | - A Tjønneland
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - C Sacerdote
- Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Città della Salute e della Scienza University-Hospital and Center for Cancer Prevention (CPO), Turin, Italy
| | | | - R C H Vermeulen
- Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University; Julius Centre for Public Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht University Medical Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - W-Y Huang
- Infections and Immunoepidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - N D Freedman
- Infections and Immunoepidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - P Brennan
- Genetic Epidemiology Group (GEP), International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France
| | - T Waterboer
- Infections and Cancer Epidemiology, Research Program Infection, Inflammation and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M Johansson
- Genetic Epidemiology Group (GEP), International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
de Snoo-Trimp JC, Molewijk B, Ursin G, Brinchmann BS, Widdershoven GA, de Vet HC, Svantesson M. Field-testing the Euro-MCD Instrument: Experienced outcomes of moral case deliberation. Nurs Ethics 2019; 27:390-406. [PMID: 31177947 DOI: 10.1177/0969733019849454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Moral case deliberation is a form of clinical ethics support to help healthcare professionals in dealing with ethically difficult situations. There is a lack of evidence about what outcomes healthcare professionals experience in daily practice after moral case deliberations. The Euro-MCD Instrument was developed to measure outcomes, based on the literature, a Delphi panel, and content validity testing. To examine relevance of items and adequateness of domains, a field study is needed. AIM To describe experienced outcomes after participating in a series of moral case deliberations, both during sessions and in daily practice, and to explore correlations between items to further validate the Euro-MCD Instrument. METHODS In Sweden, the Netherlands, and Norway, healthcare institutions that planned a series of moral case deliberations were invited. Closed responses were quantitatively analyzed. The factor structure of the instrument was tested using exploratory factor analyses. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS The study was approved in Sweden by a review board. In Norway and the Netherlands, data services and review boards were informed about the study. RESULTS The Euro-MCD Instrument was completed by 443 and 247 healthcare professionals after four and eight moral case deliberations, respectively. They experienced especially outcomes related to a better collaboration with co-workers and outcomes about individual moral reflexivity and attitude, both during sessions and in daily practice. Outcomes were experienced to a higher extent during sessions than in daily practice. The factor structure revealed four domains of outcomes, which did not confirm the six Euro-MCD domains. CONCLUSION Field-testing the Euro-MCD Instrument showed the most frequently experienced outcomes and which outcomes correlated with each other. When revising the instrument, domains should be reconsidered, combined with theory about underlying concepts. In the future, a feasible and valid instrument will be presented to get insight into how moral case deliberation supports and improves healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bert Molewijk
- Amsterdam UMC, location VU Medical Center, The Netherlands; University of Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schoemaker MJ, Nichols HB, Wright LB, Brook MN, Jones ME, O'Brien KM, Adami HO, Baglietto L, Bernstein L, Bertrand KA, Boutron-Ruault MC, Chen Y, Connor AE, Dorronsoro M, Dossus L, Eliassen AH, Giles GG, Gram IT, Hankinson SE, Kaaks R, Key TJ, Kirsh VA, Kitahara CM, Koh WP, Larsson SC, Linet MS, Ma H, Masala G, Merritt MA, Milne RL, Overvad K, Ozasa K, Palmer JR, Riboli E, Rohan TE, Sadakane A, Sund M, Tamimi RM, Trichopoulou A, Ursin G, Van Gils CH, Visvanathan K, Weiderpass E, Willett WC, Wolk A, Yuan JM, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Sandler DP, Swerdlow AJ. Abstract P1-08-01: Withdrawn. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p1-08-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
This abstract was withdrawn by the authors.
Citation Format: Schoemaker MJ, Nichols HB, Wright LB, Brook MN, Jones ME, O'Brien KM, Adami H-O, Baglietto L, Bernstein L, Bertrand KA, Boutron-Ruault M-C, Chen Y, Connor AE, Dorronsoro M, Dossus L, Eliassen AH, Giles GG, Gram IT, Hankinson SE, Kaaks R, Key TJ, Kirsh VA, Kitahara CM, Koh W-P, Larsson SC, Linet MS, Ma H, Masala G, Merritt MA, Milne RL, Overvad K, Ozasa K, Palmer JR, Riboli E, Rohan TE, Sadakane A, Sund M, Tamimi RM, Trichopoulou A, Ursin G, Van Gils CH, Visvanathan K, Weiderpass E, Willett WC, Wolk A, Yuan J-M, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Sandler DP, Swerdlow AJ. Withdrawn [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-08-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- MJ Schoemaker
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - HB Nichols
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - LB Wright
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - MN Brook
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - ME Jones
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - KM O'Brien
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - H-O Adami
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - L Baglietto
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - L Bernstein
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - KA Bertrand
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - M-C Boutron-Ruault
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - Y Chen
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - AE Connor
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - M Dorronsoro
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - L Dossus
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - AH Eliassen
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - GG Giles
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - IT Gram
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - SE Hankinson
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - R Kaaks
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - TJ Key
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - VA Kirsh
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - CM Kitahara
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - W-P Koh
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - SC Larsson
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - MS Linet
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - H Ma
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - G Masala
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - MA Merritt
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - RL Milne
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - K Overvad
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - K Ozasa
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - JR Palmer
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - E Riboli
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - TE Rohan
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - A Sadakane
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - M Sund
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - RM Tamimi
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - A Trichopoulou
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - G Ursin
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - CH Van Gils
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - K Visvanathan
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - E Weiderpass
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - WC Willett
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - A Wolk
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - J-M Yuan
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - A Zeleniuch-Jacquotte
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - DP Sandler
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| | - AJ Swerdlow
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston; CESP Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris, France; New York University School of Medicine, New York; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, San Sebastian, Spain; International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of To
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Qureshi S, Kumar B, Ursin G. 7.10-P10Incidence and associated risk factors for cancer in immigrants to Northern Europe; a review. Eur J Public Health 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/cky048.243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - G Ursin
- NAKMI, Oslo, Norway
- The Cancer Registry Norway, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tønnessen S, Ursin G, Brinchmann BS. Care-managers' professional choices: ethical dilemmas and conflicting expectations. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17:630. [PMID: 28882150 PMCID: PMC5590170 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2578-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2017] [Accepted: 08/29/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Care-managers are responsible for the public administration of individual healthcare decisions and decide on the volume and content of community healthcare services given to a population. The purpose of this study was to investigate the conflicting expectations and ethical dilemmas these professionals encounter in their daily work with patients and to discuss the clinical implications of this. METHODS The study had a qualitative design. The data consisted of verbatim transcripts from 12 ethical reflection group meetings held in 2012 at a purchaser unit in a Norwegian city. The participants consist of healthcare professionals such as nurses, occupational therapists, physiotherapists and social workers. The analyses and interpretation were conducted according to a hermeneutic methodology. This study is part of a larger research project. RESULTS Two main themes emerged through the analyses: 1. Professional autonomy and loyalty, and related subthemes: loyalty to whom/what, overruling of decisions, trust and obligation to report. 2. Boundaries of involvement and subthemes: private or professional, care-manager or provider and accessibility. CONCLUSIONS Underlying values and a model illustrating the dimensions of professional responsibility in the care-manager role are suggested. The study implies that when allocating services, healthcare professionals need to find a balance between responsibility and accountability in their role as care-managers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siri Tønnessen
- University College of Southeast Norway, Campus Vestfold, 3603 Kongsberg, Norway
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fjeldheim FN, Frydenberg H, Flote VG, McTiernan A, Furberg AS, Ellison PT, Barrett ES, Wilsgaard T, Jasienska G, Ursin G, Wist EA, Thune I. Polymorphisms in the estrogen receptor alpha gene (ESR1), daily cycling estrogen and mammographic density phenotypes. BMC Cancer 2016; 16:776. [PMID: 27717337 PMCID: PMC5055696 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2804-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2016] [Accepted: 09/22/2016] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) involved in the estrogen pathway and SNPs in the estrogen receptor alpha gene (ESR1 6q25) have been linked to breast cancer development, and mammographic density is an established breast cancer risk factor. Whether there is an association between daily estradiol levels, SNPs in ESR1 and premenopausal mammographic density phenotypes is unknown. Methods We assessed estradiol in daily saliva samples throughout an entire menstrual cycle in 202 healthy premenopausal women in the Norwegian Energy Balance and Breast Cancer Aspects I study. DNA was genotyped using the Illumina Golden Gate platform. Mammograms were taken between days 7 and 12 of the menstrual cycle, and digitized mammographic density was assessed using a computer-assisted method (Madena). Multivariable regression models were used to study the association between SNPs in ESR1, premenopausal mammographic density phenotypes and daily cycling estradiol. Results We observed inverse linear associations between the minor alleles of eight measured SNPs (rs3020364, rs2474148, rs12154178, rs2347867, rs6927072, rs2982712, rs3020407, rs9322335) and percent mammographic density (p-values: 0.002–0.026), these associations were strongest in lean women (BMI, ≤23.6 kg/m2.). The odds of above-median percent mammographic density (>28.5 %) among women with major homozygous genotypes were 3–6 times higher than those of women with minor homozygous genotypes in seven SNPs. Women with rs3020364 major homozygous genotype had an OR of 6.46 for above-median percent mammographic density (OR: 6.46; 95 % Confidence Interval 1.61, 25.94) when compared to women with the minor homozygous genotype. These associations were not observed in relation to absolute mammographic density. No associations between SNPs and daily cycling estradiol were observed. However, we suggest, based on results of borderline significance (p values: 0.025–0.079) that the level of 17β-estradiol for women with the minor genotype for rs3020364, rs24744148 and rs2982712 were lower throughout the cycle in women with low (<28.5 %) percent mammographic density and higher in women with high (>28.5 %) percent mammographic density, when compared to women with the major genotype. Conclusion Our results support an association between eight selected SNPs in the ESR1 gene and percent mammographic density. The results need to be confirmed in larger studies. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2804-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F N Fjeldheim
- The Cancer Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, N-0424, Norway. .,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, N-0316, Norway.
| | - H Frydenberg
- The Cancer Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, N-0424, Norway
| | - V G Flote
- The Cancer Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, N-0424, Norway
| | - A McTiernan
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Public Health Sciences Division, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - A-S Furberg
- Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Tromsø, Norway.,Department of Microbiology and Infection Control, University Hospital of North Norway, 9038, Tromsø, Norway
| | - P T Ellison
- Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, 11 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA
| | - E S Barrett
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA
| | - T Wilsgaard
- Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Tromsø, Norway
| | - G Jasienska
- Department of Environmental Health, Institute of Public Health, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Grzegorzecka 20, Krakow, 31-351, Poland
| | - G Ursin
- Cancer Registry of Norway, PO Box 5313, Majorstuen, Oslo, N-0304, Norway
| | - E A Wist
- The Cancer Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, N-0424, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, N-0316, Norway
| | - I Thune
- The Cancer Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, N-0424, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Burton A, Silva IDS, Hipwell J, Flugelman A, Kwong A, Peplonska B, Tamimi RM, Bertrand K, Vachon C, Hartman M, Lee CPL, Chia KS, Nagata C, Salem D, Sirous R, Maskarinec G, Ursin G, Dickens C, Lee JW, Kim J, Giles G, Krishnan K, Pereira A, Garmendia ML, Perez-Gomez B, Pollan M, Lajous M, Rice M, Van Gils C, Wanders H, Teo S, Mariapun S, Vinayak S, Ndumia R, Ozmen V, Stone J, Hopper J, Boyd N, McCormack V. PP01 International pooling project of mammographic density - insights of a marker of breast cancer risk from 22 diverse countries. Br J Soc Med 2015. [DOI: 10.1136/jech-2015-206256.99] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
10
|
Dowty JG, Lee E, McKean-Cowdin R, Henderson BE, Bernstein L, Ursin G, Hopper JL. Estimating risks for variants of unknown significance according to their predicted pathogenicity classes with application to BRCA1. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014; 144:171-7. [PMID: 24481681 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-2845-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2013] [Accepted: 01/17/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Sequence-based testing of disease-susceptibility genes has identified many variants of unknown significance (VUSs) whose pathogenicity is unknown at the time of their measurement. Female breast cancer cases aged 20-49 years at diagnosis and who have VUSs in BRCA1 and no mutations in BRCA2 have previously been identified through the population-based Los Angeles County Cancer Surveillance Program. These nominal BRCA1 VUSs have been classified as "low," "medium," and "high" risk by four classification methods: Align-GVGD, Polyphen, Grantham matrix scores, and sequence conservation in mammalian species. Average hazard ratios (HRs) for classes of variants, i.e., the age-specific incidences of cancer for carriers of such variants divided by the population incidences, were estimated from the cancer family histories of first- and second-degree relatives of the index cases using modified segregation analysis. The study sample comprised 270 index cases and 4,543 of their relatives. There was weak evidence that the risk of breast cancer increases with the degree of sequence conservation (P = 0.03) and that missense variants at highly conserved sites are associated with a 5.6-fold (95 % confidence interval 1.4-22.2; P = 0.05) increased incidence of breast cancer. An upper bound of 2.3 is given for the average breast cancer HRs corresponding to variants classified as "low risk" by any of the four VUS classification methods. In summary, we have given a method to estimate cancer risks for groups of VUSs by combining existing classification methods with traditional penetrance analyses. This analysis suggests that classification methods for BRCA1 variants based on sequence conservation might be useful in a clinical setting. We have shown in principle that our method can be used to classify VUSs into clinically useful risk categories, but our specific findings should not be put into clinical practice unless confirmed by larger studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J G Dowty
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Level 3/207 Bouverie St., Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
<p class="Toverskrift3" style="margin: 6pt 0cm;"><strong><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;" lang="EN-US">Abstract</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US;" lang="EN-US"></span></span></span></strong></p><p class="Toverskrift3" style="margin: 6pt 0cm;"><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;" lang="EN-US"><strong><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">A nurse’s experience of encountering the next of kin - and herself.</span></span></strong></span></p><p class="MsoNormalCxSpFirst"><em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;" lang="EN-US"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">The purpose of this scientific essay is to show how emotions embedded in events and experiences may be significant to nursing practice. Through dialogs and reflections it is possible to relate actively to our own emotions and thus reveal important knowledge about oneself and others. The story in this essay is told by the nursing staff in a reflection group from a rehabilitation department. The reflections were on the staff’s experiences of ethical challenges in their everyday practice. Based on the conversation, we have written a story. </span></span></span></em></p><p class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle"><em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;" lang="EN-US"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">The story is examined through a critical investigating method, using a dialogical and hermeneutical method. The analysis in this essay shows how challenging events may give a greater understanding of the persons acting in practice by systematically reflect on experiences. The essay further demonstrates how systematic investigation on narratives contributes significantly to practical knowledge. Personal experiences may be transformed into public knowledge. </span></span></span></em></p>
Collapse
|
12
|
Frydenberg H, Flote VG, Iversen A, Finstad SE, Furberg AS, Fagerland M, Wist EA, Schlichting E, Ellison PT, McTiernan A, Ursin G, Thune I. Abstract P3-01-01: Insulin, Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 and cycling estrogen predict premenopausal mammographic density. Cancer Res 2012. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs12-p3-01-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Mammographic density, a strong biomarker for breast cancer risk, represents epithelial and stromal proliferation. Insulin and insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 are suggested to influence cellular proliferation, while estrogen is a key factor in breast cancer development. However, whether the effects of these hormones among premenopausal women are mediated through mammographic density is less known.
Material and Methods: Fasting serum insulin, IGF-1, and IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-3 were assessed among 202 healthy premenopausal women (Norwegian Energy Balance and Breast cancer Aspects study-I (EBBA-I). Daily salivary levels of 17β-estradiol throughout an entire menstrual cycle were measured at the reproductive Ecology Laboratory, Harvard University, USA. Computer-assisted mammographic density (Madena) was obtained from digitized mammograms taken at day 7–12 of the menstrual cycle. Uni- and multivariable regression models were used to study the associations between hormones and premenopausal percent mammographic density.
Results: Among women with a mean age of 30,7 years, a mean premenopausal percent mammographic density of 29.8 % was observed. Throughout the menstrual cycle when comparing women with a high percent mammographic density (≥28.5%) to women with a low percent mammographic density (<28.5%), we observed insulin, IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 independently and in combination with cycling 17β-estradiol to predict premenopausal percent mammographic density. We observed among women with either serum insulin ≥89 pmol/, IGF-1 ≥24 nmol/l, IGFBP-3 ≥ 100 nmol/l, having a high (≥28.5%) versus a low (<28.5%) percent mammographic density was associated with an increase in overall average 17β-estradiol of 4.0 %, 10.9 % and 14.9%, respectively. Moreover, we observed a higher adjusted Odds Ratio (OR) for having a high percent mammographic density for each standard deviation (SD) increase in overall average 17β -estradiol, insulin, IGF-1 and IGFBP-3: 17β-estradiol, 1.55 (1.06–2.27); insulin, 1.62 (0.76–3.48), IGF-1, 1.90 (1.10–3.27); IGFBP-3, 1.88 (1.05–3.37) (adjusted for age, body mass index-BMI kg/m2)).
Conclusion: Our study supports that insulin, IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 independently, and in combination with cycling estrogen, predicts premenopausal mammographic density. These hormones may be important biomarkers in breast cancer control and clinical practice.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-01-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Frydenberg
- Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University of Tromsø, Norway; Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; The Norwegian Cancer Registry, Oslo, Norway
| | - VG Flote
- Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University of Tromsø, Norway; Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; The Norwegian Cancer Registry, Oslo, Norway
| | - A Iversen
- Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University of Tromsø, Norway; Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; The Norwegian Cancer Registry, Oslo, Norway
| | - SE Finstad
- Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University of Tromsø, Norway; Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; The Norwegian Cancer Registry, Oslo, Norway
| | - A-S Furberg
- Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University of Tromsø, Norway; Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; The Norwegian Cancer Registry, Oslo, Norway
| | - M Fagerland
- Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University of Tromsø, Norway; Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; The Norwegian Cancer Registry, Oslo, Norway
| | - EA Wist
- Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University of Tromsø, Norway; Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; The Norwegian Cancer Registry, Oslo, Norway
| | - E Schlichting
- Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University of Tromsø, Norway; Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; The Norwegian Cancer Registry, Oslo, Norway
| | - PT Ellison
- Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University of Tromsø, Norway; Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; The Norwegian Cancer Registry, Oslo, Norway
| | - A McTiernan
- Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University of Tromsø, Norway; Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; The Norwegian Cancer Registry, Oslo, Norway
| | - G Ursin
- Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University of Tromsø, Norway; Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; The Norwegian Cancer Registry, Oslo, Norway
| | - I Thune
- Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University of Tromsø, Norway; Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; The Norwegian Cancer Registry, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Qureshi S, Ellingjord-Dale M, Hofvind S, Wu A, Ursin G. 1179 Recreational Physical Activity and Mammographic Density in a Cohort of Postmenopausal Norwegian Women. Eur J Cancer 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(12)71774-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
14
|
Qureshi S, Wu A, Hofvind S, Ursin G. 3513 POSTER Alcohol Intake in Norwegian Women and Mammographic Density. Eur J Cancer 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(11)71169-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
15
|
Qureshi S, Couto E, Hilsen M, Hofvind S, Aase H, Bjorndal H, Skaane P, Ursin G. 55 Association of mammographic density with selected nutrients in Norwegian women. EJC Suppl 2010. [DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6349(10)70864-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
16
|
Haakensen V, Lingjærde O, Holmen M, Frantzen J, Chen Y, Solvang H, Kristensen V, Ursin G, Børresen-Dale A, Helland A. 144 UGT-expression in breast tissue from healthy women is associated with mammographic density. EJC Suppl 2010. [DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6349(10)70952-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
|
17
|
Aune D, Ursin G, Veierød MB. Meat consumption and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Diabetologia 2009; 52:2277-87. [PMID: 19662376 DOI: 10.1007/s00125-009-1481-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 235] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2009] [Accepted: 07/02/2009] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS Diet is thought to play an important role in the aetiology of type 2 diabetes. Previous studies have found positive associations between meat consumption and the risk of type 2 diabetes, but the results have been inconsistent. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies of meat consumption and type 2 diabetes risk. METHODS We searched several databases for cohort studies on meat consumption and type 2 diabetes risk, up to December 2008. Summary relative risks were estimated by use of a random-effects model. RESULTS We identified 12 cohort studies. The estimated summary RR and 95% confidence interval of type 2 diabetes comparing high vs low intake was 1.17 (95% CI 0.92-1.48) for total meat, 1.21 (95% CI 1.07-1.38) for red meat and 1.41 (95% CI 1.25-1.60) for processed meat. There was heterogeneity amongst the studies of total, red and processed meat which, to some degree, was explained by the study characteristics. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION These results suggest that meat consumption increases the risk of type 2 diabetes. However, the possibility that residual confounding could explain this association cannot be excluded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Aune
- Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, PO Box 1122, 0317 Oslo, Norway.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Stuedal A, Ma H, Bjørndal H, Ursin G. Postmenopausal hormone therapy with estradiol and norethisterone acetate and mammographic density: findings from a cross-sectional study among Norwegian women. Climacteric 2009; 12:248-58. [DOI: 10.1080/13697130802638458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
19
|
Lu Y, Sullivan-Halley J, Cozen W, Chang ET, Henderson K, Ma H, Deapen D, Clarke C, Reynolds P, Neuhausen SL, Anton-Culver H, Ursin G, West D, Bernstein L. Family history of haematopoietic malignancies and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma risk in the California Teachers Study. Br J Cancer 2009; 100:524-6. [PMID: 19156148 PMCID: PMC2658543 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Family history of haematopoietic malignancies appears to be a risk factor for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), but whether risk varies by family member's gender is unclear. Among 121 216 women participating in the prospective California Teachers Study, NHL risk varied by type of haematopoietic malignancy and gender of the relative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Lu
- Department of Preventive Medicine, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center NOR-3429, University of Southern California, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90089-9175, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Biong M, Brill I, Johansen F, Bremnes Y, Burdette L, Yaeger M, Ursin G, Gram I, Kristensen V. Genotypes and haplotypes in the insulin-like growth factors, their receptors and binding proteins in relation to plasma metabolic levels and mammographic density. EJC Suppl 2008. [DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6349(08)71354-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
21
|
Biong M, Edvardsen H, Dragseth V, Berg P, Gram I, Ursin G, Børresen-Dale A, Kristensen V. Genetic markers for the prediction of breast density and breast cancer risk. EJC Suppl 2008. [DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6349(08)71888-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
22
|
Gail MH, Bernstein L, Costantino JP, Pee D, Ursin G. Response:Re: Projecting Individualized Absolute Invasive Breast Cancer Risk in African American Women. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008. [DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djn110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
23
|
Gail MH, Costantino JP, Pee D, Bondy M, Newman L, Selvan M, Anderson GL, Malone KE, Marchbanks PA, McCaskill-Stevens W, Norman SA, Simon MS, Spirtas R, Ursin G, Bernstein L. Projecting Individualized Absolute Invasive Breast Cancer Risk in African American Women. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007; 99:1782-92. [DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djm223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 234] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
24
|
Andreopoulou E, Ursin G, Carapetyan K, Utate M, Alvear M, Rosell M, Muggia F, Smith J. Effects of letrozole on mammographic density (MD) in post-menopausal (PM) women at high risk for breast cancer (BC). J Clin Oncol 2007. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.1548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
1548 Background: Letrozole BC chemoprevention is supported by reductions in contralateral cancer in aromatase inhibitor adjuvant BC trials. Decreased MD may be a surrogate for efficacy in prevention trials. Objective: to evaluate the effects of 12-mo letrozole on MD in PM women at high risk for BC. Methods: 20 healthy PM women had Gail model risk profile and baseline MD prior to letrozole 2.5/d for 1 y. MD was determined by a computer assisted method (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers and Prevention 2003;12:332–338) and read blindly (baseline, 6mo films and eventually also 12mo by GU). Health status, lipid profile, bone density, and cognitive function were monitored. Results: by December (<1y): 14 Caucasian, 1 Hispanic, 3 Asians, and 2 Blacks were accrued. The table shows changes in MD at baseline & 6mo in the first 6 women: * reader considered this MD technically unsatisfactory (insufficient contrast). Conclusions: One woman discontinued treatment at 3 mo due to muscle aches. Six and 12mo comparisons will be ready in June 2007. Concordant results and decrease in density are suggested by the available data. Acknowledgements: This work is supported in part by The Lynne Cohen Foundation. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E. Andreopoulou
- New York University Cancer Institute, New York, NY; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - G. Ursin
- New York University Cancer Institute, New York, NY; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - K. Carapetyan
- New York University Cancer Institute, New York, NY; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - M. Utate
- New York University Cancer Institute, New York, NY; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - M. Alvear
- New York University Cancer Institute, New York, NY; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - M. Rosell
- New York University Cancer Institute, New York, NY; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - F. Muggia
- New York University Cancer Institute, New York, NY; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - J. Smith
- New York University Cancer Institute, New York, NY; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kimler BF, Ursin G, Fabian CJ, Anderson JR, Chamberlain C, Mayo MS, O’Shaughnessy JA, Lynch HT, Johnson KA, Browne D. Effect of the third generation selective estrogen receptor modulator arzoxifene on mammographic breast density. J Clin Oncol 2006. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
562 Background: Arzoxifene (ARZ) is currently being studied for treatment of breast cancer patients in a Phase II trial because of tamoxifen-like efficacy but lack of uterine agonist effect. We conducted a Phase II chemoprevention trial in women at high risk for development of breast cancer on the basis of personal or family history. Methods: Potential subjects had multiple biomarkers assessed, including random periareolar fine needle aspiration (RPFNA) with breast epithelial cells processed for cytomorphology and immunocytochemistry. Women who exhibited cytologic hyperplasia ± atypia were eligible for enrollment. Subjects were stratified on the basis of atypia, estrogen receptor expression, menopause status, germline BrCa1/2 mutation status, and accrual site. Subjects were randomized (double-blind) between placebo and ARZ (LY353381.HCI, 20 mg daily) for 6 mo, with an option to continue on study for another 6 mo while receiving open-label ARZ. Assessments conducted at baseline, 6 mo, and 12 mo included mammographic breast density. Mammograms were digitized to image files which were cropped to remove labels and dates, and then identified by a study subject ID number and a random coding for baseline, 6 or 12 mo. This allowed the reader (GU) to view the three files for a subject, but to remain blinded as to the sequence of the films or the study agent. The files were assessed for mammographic density using the Madena computer-assisted system. Results: Of 199 subjects enrolled on the study, 52% were pre-menopausal; with 101 women randomized to placebo and 98 to ARZ. At baseline, mean values were comparable for placebo and ARZ groups for breast area (∼244 cm2), total dense area (∼100 cm2), and the percent of the breast at increased density (41.3% vs 46.2%). After 6 mo, there were minimal changes in total breast area (P=0.13); but statistically significant decreases (P<0.001) for the comparison of placebo vs ARZ (2-sided T-test) for change in both dense area (+3.8 vs −12.9 cm2) and percent breast density (+0.8% vs −4.6%). Conclusions: The 3rd generation SERM arzoxifene administered for 6 mo produces statistically significant decreases in mammographic breast density relative to placebo in women at high risk for development of breast cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B. F. Kimler
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Creighton University, Omaha, NE; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - G. Ursin
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Creighton University, Omaha, NE; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - C. J. Fabian
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Creighton University, Omaha, NE; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - J. R. Anderson
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Creighton University, Omaha, NE; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - C. Chamberlain
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Creighton University, Omaha, NE; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - M. S. Mayo
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Creighton University, Omaha, NE; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - J. A. O’Shaughnessy
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Creighton University, Omaha, NE; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - H. T. Lynch
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Creighton University, Omaha, NE; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - K. A. Johnson
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Creighton University, Omaha, NE; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - D. Browne
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Creighton University, Omaha, NE; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ma H, Hill CK, Bernstein L, Ross RK, Ursin G. Low-Dose Medical Radiation and Breast Cancer Risk in Women Under age 50 Years Overall and by Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Status -Results from a Case-Control and a Case-Case Comparison. Am J Epidemiol 2006. [DOI: 10.1093/aje/163.suppl_11.s99-d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
27
|
Ursin G, Bernstein L, Lord SJ, Karim R, Deapen D, Press MF, Daling JR, Norman SA, Liff JM, Marchbanks PA, Folger SG, Simon MS, Strom BL, Burkman RT, Weiss LK, Spirtas R. Reproductive factors and subtypes of breast cancer defined by hormone receptor and histology. Br J Cancer 2005; 93:364-71. [PMID: 16079783 PMCID: PMC2361558 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Reproductive factors are associated with reduced risk of breast cancer, but less is known about whether there is differential protection against subtypes of breast cancer. Assuming reproductive factors act through hormonal mechanisms they should protect predominantly against cancers expressing oestrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptors. We examined the effect of reproductive factors on subgroups of tumours defined by hormone receptor status as well as histology using data from the NIHCD Women's Contraceptive and Reproductive Experiences (CARE) Study, a multicenter case–control study of breast cancer. We estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as measures of relative risk using multivariate unconditional logistic regression methods. Multiparity and early age at first birth were associated with reduced relative risk of ER + PR + tumours (P for trend=0.0001 and 0.01, respectively), but not of ER − PR − tumours (P for trend=0.27 and 0.85), whereas duration of breastfeeding was associated with lower relative risk of both receptor-positive (P for trend=0.0002) and receptor-negative tumours (P=0.0004). Our results were consistent across subgroups of women based on age and ethnicity. We found few significant differences by histologic subtype, although the strongest protective effect of multiparity was seen for mixed ductolobular tumours. Our results indicate that parity and age at first birth are associated with reduced risk of receptor-positive tumours only, while lactation is associated with reduced risk of both receptor-positive and -negative tumours. This suggests that parity and lactation act through different mechanisms. This study also suggests that reproductive factors have similar protective effects on breast tumours of lobular and ductal origin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Ursin
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Hamajima N, Hirose K, Tajima K, Rohan T, Calle EE, Heath CW, Coates RJ, Liff JM, Talamini R, Chantarakul N, Koetsawang S, Rachawat D, Morabia A, Schuman L, Stewart W, Szklo M, Bain C, Schofield F, Siskind V, Band P, Coldman AJ, Gallagher RP, Hislop TG, Yang P, Kolonel LM, Nomura AMY, Hu J, Johnson KC, Mao Y, De Sanjosé S, Lee N, Marchbanks P, Ory HW, Peterson HB, Wilson HG, Wingo PA, Ebeling K, Kunde D, Nishan P, Hopper JL, Colditz G, Gajalanski V, Martin N, Pardthaisong T, Silpisornkosol S, Theetranont C, Boosiri B, Chutivongse S, Jimakorn P, Virutamasen P, Wongsrichanalai C, Ewertz M, Adami HO, Bergkvist L, Magnusson C, Persson I, Chang-Claude J, Paul C, Skegg DCG, Spears GFS, Boyle P, Evstifeeva T, Daling JR, Hutchinson WB, Malone K, Noonan EA, Stanford JL, Thomas DB, Weiss NS, White E, Andrieu N, Brêmond A, Clavel F, Gairard B, Lansac J, Piana L, Renaud R, Izquierdo A, Viladiu P, Cuevas HR, Ontiveros P, Palet A, Salazar SB, Aristizabel N, Cuadros A, Tryggvadottir L, Tulinius H, Bachelot A, Lê MG, Peto J, Franceschi S, Lubin F, Modan B, Ron E, Wax Y, Friedman GD, Hiatt RA, Levi F, Bishop T, Kosmelj K, Primic-Zakelj M, Ravnihar B, Stare J, Beeson WL, Fraser G, Bullbrook RD, Cuzick J, Duffy SW, Fentiman IS, Hayward JL, Wang DY, McMichael AJ, McPherson K, Hanson RL, Leske MC, Mahoney MC, Nasca PC, Varma AO, Weinstein AL, Moller TR, Olsson H, Ranstam J, Goldbohm RA, van den Brandt PA, Apelo RA, Baens J, de la Cruz JR, Javier B, Lacaya LB, Ngelangel CA, La Vecchia C, Negri E, Marubini E, Ferraroni M, Gerber M, Richardson S, Segala C, Gatei D, Kenya P, Kungu A, Mati JG, Brinton LA, Hoover R, Schairer C, Spirtas R, Lee HP, Rookus MA, van Leeuwen FE, Schoenberg JA, McCredie M, Gammon MD, Clarke EA, Jones L, Neil A, Vessey M, Yeates D, Appleby P, Banks E, Beral V, Bull D, Crossley B, Goodill A, Green J, Hermon C, Key T, Langston N, Lewis C, Reeves G, Collins R, Doll R, Peto R, Mabuchi K, Preston D, Hannaford P, Kay C, Rosero-Bixby L, Gao YT, Jin F, Yuan JM, Wei HY, Yun T, Zhiheng C, Berry G, Cooper Booth J, Jelihovsky T, MacLennan R, Shearman R, Wang QS, Baines CJ, Miller AB, Wall C, Lund E, Stalsberg H, Shu XO, Zheng W, Katsouyanni K, Trichopoulou A, Trichopoulos D, Dabancens A, Martinez L, Molina R, Salas O, Alexander FE, Anderson K, Folsom AR, Hulka BS, Bernstein L, Enger S, Haile RW, Paganini-Hill A, Pike MC, Ross RK, Ursin G, Yu MC, Longnecker MP, Newcomb P, Bergkvist L, Kalache A, Farley TMM, Holck S, Meirik O. Alcohol, tobacco and breast cancer--collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 58,515 women with breast cancer and 95,067 women without the disease. Br J Cancer 2002; 87:1234-45. [PMID: 12439712 PMCID: PMC2562507 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 675] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2002] [Revised: 08/08/2002] [Accepted: 08/23/2002] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Alcohol and tobacco consumption are closely correlated and published results on their association with breast cancer have not always allowed adequately for confounding between these exposures. Over 80% of the relevant information worldwide on alcohol and tobacco consumption and breast cancer were collated, checked and analysed centrally. Analyses included 58,515 women with invasive breast cancer and 95,067 controls from 53 studies. Relative risks of breast cancer were estimated, after stratifying by study, age, parity and, where appropriate, women's age when their first child was born and consumption of alcohol and tobacco. The average consumption of alcohol reported by controls from developed countries was 6.0 g per day, i.e. about half a unit/drink of alcohol per day, and was greater in ever-smokers than never-smokers, (8.4 g per day and 5.0 g per day, respectively). Compared with women who reported drinking no alcohol, the relative risk of breast cancer was 1.32 (1.19-1.45, P<0.00001) for an intake of 35-44 g per day alcohol, and 1.46 (1.33-1.61, P<0.00001) for >/=45 g per day alcohol. The relative risk of breast cancer increased by 7.1% (95% CI 5.5-8.7%; P<0.00001) for each additional 10 g per day intake of alcohol, i.e. for each extra unit or drink of alcohol consumed on a daily basis. This increase was the same in ever-smokers and never-smokers (7.1% per 10 g per day, P<0.00001, in each group). By contrast, the relationship between smoking and breast cancer was substantially confounded by the effect of alcohol. When analyses were restricted to 22 255 women with breast cancer and 40 832 controls who reported drinking no alcohol, smoking was not associated with breast cancer (compared to never-smokers, relative risk for ever-smokers=1.03, 95% CI 0.98-1.07, and for current smokers=0.99, 0.92-1.05). The results for alcohol and for tobacco did not vary substantially across studies, study designs, or according to 15 personal characteristics of the women; nor were the findings materially confounded by any of these factors. If the observed relationship for alcohol is causal, these results suggest that about 4% of the breast cancers in developed countries are attributable to alcohol. In developing countries, where alcohol consumption among controls averaged only 0.4 g per day, alcohol would have a negligible effect on the incidence of breast cancer. In conclusion, smoking has little or no independent effect on the risk of developing breast cancer; the effect of alcohol on breast cancer needs to be interpreted in the context of its beneficial effects, in moderation, on cardiovascular disease and its harmful effects on cirrhosis and cancers of the mouth, larynx, oesophagus and liver.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Hamajima
- Cancer Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Gibson Building, Radcliffe Infirmary, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6HE, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
High-risk mammographic patterns represent an increased risk of contracting breast cancer and may be used as a surrogate endpoint for the disease. We examined the relationship between oral contraceptive (OC) use and mammographic patterns among 3218 Norwegian women, aged 40-56 years. Information on ever OC use, duration, and age of first OC use and other epidemiological data were obtained through questionnaires. The mammograms were categorized into five groups. Patterns I-III were combined into a low-risk group and patterns IV and V into a high-risk group. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using logistic regression and adjusted for age, menopausal status, parity, age at first birth, and body mass index. Women who reported ever having used OCs were 20% more likely (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.0-1.6) to have high-risk mammographic patterns compared with those reporting never having used OCs. There was no dose response between different measures of OC use and high-risk patterns. Among nulliparous women, ever OC users were four times more likely (OR 4.65, 95% CI 2.1-10.3) to have high-risk patterns compared with never users. Our findings suggest that, especially among nulliparous women, ever OC use may exert its effect on breast cancer risk through changes in breast tissue, which can be observed on a mammogram.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I T Gram
- Institute of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, Breivika N-9037 Norway.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Gram IT, Ursin G, Spicer DV, Pike MC. Reversal of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist induced reductions in mammographic densities on stopping treatment. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2001; 10:1117-20. [PMID: 11700258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Previously, we described the reduction in mammographic densities that occurred in premenopausal women after 12 months on a hormonal regimen designed to be chemopreventive for breast (and ovarian) cancer consisting of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHA) plus low-dose add-back estrogen-progestin. We sought to determine whether the density reduction persisted with continuation of the regimen for 24 months, and, if so, whether the densities would return to baseline after the regimen was discontinued. Twenty-one women, 27-40 years of age, with a 5-fold greater than normal risk of breast cancer, were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to the treatment group (14 women) and to a control group (7 women). The percentage of mammographic densities, calculated as the proportion of the breast area on the mammogram containing densities, were assessed blindly using a computer-based threshold method at baseline, after 12 and 24 months of treatment, and at between 6 and 12 months after treatment was stopped. The previously described percentage of mammographic density reductions of 9.7% (P = 0.012) after 12 months of treatment were increased slightly to 11.4% (P = 0.010) after 24 months of treatment, but the additional change was not statistically significant. Ten of 11 treated women assessed at 24 months had reduced percentages of mammographic densities compared with baseline. Six to 12 months after completion of treatment, the mean percentage of mammographic density in the treated group was no different from that at baseline (mean decline of 2.0%; P = 0.73). The women in the control group had no statistically significant changes in densities over the period of the study. Reductions in mammographic densities engendered by the GnRHA plus a low-dose add-back estrogen-progestin regimen persist as long as the women receive treatment. The densities return to baseline when the women resume normal menstrual cycles. These results confirm that mammographic densities are influenced by ovarian function. Improved efficacy of mammographic screening is to be expected as long as a woman continues on such a regimen. Whether such a regimen is chemopreventive for breast cancer remains to be established, but the recent report on a randomized trial of use of GnRHA alone in premenopausal breast cancer cases showing a marked reduction in incidence of contralateral disease provides strong support for the hypothesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I T Gram
- Institute of Community Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Tromsø, Norway
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer incidence is considerably lower among Japanese and Chinese women than among Caucasian and Native Hawaiian even in second and third generation migrants. Mammographic densities, which refer to the radiological appearance of the healthy female breast, are related to breast cancer risk. The purpose of this project was to explore the hypothesis that women from ethnic groups at high breast cancer risk are more likely to have high levels of densities than women from low breast cancer risk groups. METHODS In a cross-sectional design, 514 pre- and post-menopausal women recruited at mammography screening clinics completed a self-administered questionnaire. We used a computer-assisted method to measure the dense and the total areas of the breast and to compute per cent breast density. Student's t-tests and multiple linear regression were applied to examine ethnic differences and to explore determinants of mammographic densities, respectively. RESULTS The unadjusted mean dense area was 15% smaller in Chinese and Japanese women than in the Caucasian/Hawaiian group. However, because of their smaller breast size, the per cent of the breast occupied by dense tissue in Chinese and Japanese women was 20% higher than in Caucasian women. Body mass index, age, menopausal status, parity, and oestrogen therapy were associated with mammographic densities, but they did not account for all ethnic differences. CONCLUSIONS Whereas this study detected some ethnic differences in mammographic densities, the importance of dense areas and per cent densities as indicators of breast cancer risk in ethnically diverse populations remains to be clarified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Maskarinec
- Cancer Research Center of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96813, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Maskarinec G, Lyu LC, Meng L, Theriault A, Ursin G. Determinants of mammographic densities among women of Asian, Native Hawaiian, and Caucasian ancestry. Ethn Dis 2001; 11:44-50. [PMID: 11289250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/19/2023] Open
Abstract
This cross-sectional study explored the relation between mammographic densities (a predictor of breast cancer risk), ethnicity, and dietary factors among women in Hawaii. Thirty-nine postmenopausal women with Japanese, Chinese, Caucasian, and Native Hawaiian ancestry who had received a screening mammogram completed a medical, reproductive, and dietary history. Using a computerized method, we determined the total and the dense area of the breast and calculated the ratio between the two. Blood lipids were measured using standard methods. For statistical analysis, we applied analysis of variance and multiple linear regression. Whereas the mean dense area of the breast was one third smaller in Asian than in Caucasian and Native Hawaiian women, the percent of the breast occupied by dense tissue in the Asian women was slightly higher than in the Caucasian/Hawaiian group, possibly a result of the Asian women's smaller breast size. The exploratory analysis indicated inverse relations of body mass index, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC), age at menarche, and soy intake with mammographic densities, as well as direct relations of estrogen use and family history with mammographic densities. The results of this study suggest that variations in these factors may be responsible for ethnic differences in mammographic densities and in breast cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Maskarinec
- Cancer Research Center, University of Hawaii, Honolulu 96813, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ursin G, Wilson M, Henderson BE, Kolonel LN, Monroe K, Lee HP, Seow A, Yu MC, Stanczyk FZ, Gentzschein E. Do urinary estrogen metabolites reflect the differences in breast cancer risk between Singapore Chinese and United States African-American and white women? Cancer Res 2001; 61:3326-9. [PMID: 11309288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/19/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer risk is substantially lower in Singapore than in women from the United STATES: Part of the risk discrepancy is probably explained by differences in the production of endogenous estrogens, but differences in the pathway by which estrogen is metabolized may also play a role. We undertook a study to determine whether the ratio of urinary 2-hydroxyestrone (2OHE(1)):16alpha-hydroxyestrone (16alpha-OHE(1)) was higher in Singapore Chinese than in a group of United States (predominantly African-American) women living in Los ANGELES: We also wanted to determine whether any difference in estrogen metabolite ratio between these two groups of women was greater than that in estrone (E(1)), estradiol (E(2)) and estriol (E(3)). The participants in this study were randomly selected healthy, non-estrogen using women participating in the Singapore Chinese Health Study (n = 67) or the Hawaii/Los Angeles Multiethnic Cohort Study (n = 58). After adjusting for age and age at menopause, mean urinary 2-OHE(1) was only 23% (P = 0.03) higher in Singapore Chinese than in United States women, and there were no statistically significant differences in 16alpha-OHE(1) levels or in the ratio of 2-OHE(1):16alpha-OHE(1) between the two groups. The adjusted mean 2-OHE(1):16alpha-OHE(1) ratio was 1.63 in Singapore Chinese and 1.48 in United States women (P = 0.41). In contrast, the adjusted mean values of E1, E2, and E3 were 162% (P < 0.0001), 152% (P < 0.0001), and 92% (P = 0.0009) higher, respectively, in United States women than in Singapore Chinese women. Our study suggests that urinary E1, E2, and E3 reflect the differences in breast cancer risk between Singapore Chinese and United States women to a stronger degree than the estrogen metabolites 2OHE(1) and 16alpha-OHE(1) or the ratio of 2OHE(1):16alpha-OHE(1.)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Ursin
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Suite 4407, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ursin G, Parisky YR, Pike MC, Spicer DV. Mammographic density changes during the menstrual cycle. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2001; 10:141-2. [PMID: 11219771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The ability to detect small tumors is impaired in dense mammograms. It has been suggested that the sensitivity of mammograms could be lower in mammograms obtained during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. We examined the change in mammographic density from the follicular to the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle in 11 women. Although the average increase in densities was quite small (1.2%; P = 0.08), six women had clinically significant increases (1.4-7.8%), suggesting that premenopausal women should undergo mammographic examinations in the follicular part of the menstrual cycle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Ursin
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles 90089, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
|
36
|
Ursin G, Ingles SA, Spencer Feigelson H, Coetzee GA, Bernstein L, Pike MC, Buley A. Does a polymorphism in the CYP17 gene predict mammographic density? Breast Cancer Res 2000. [PMCID: PMC3300869 DOI: 10.1186/bcr171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
|
37
|
Ursin G, London S. RESPONSE: re: urinary 2-Hydroxyestrone/16alpha-hydroxyestrone ratio and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999; 91:1893A-1894. [PMID: 10547402 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/91.21.1893a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- G Ursin
- G. Ursin, Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
Breast cancer incidence has historically been 4-7 times higher in the United States than in Asia. A previous study by the authors in Asian-American women demonstrated a substantial increase in breast cancer risk in women who migrated from Asia to the United States, with the risk almost doubling during the first decade after migration. Increased use of oral contraceptives soon after migration to the United States could possibly explain this rapid rise in risk. In a population-based case-control study of Chinese, Filipino, and Japanese-American women, aged 20-55 years, who lived in San Francisco-Oakland, California; Los Angeles, California; and Oahu, Hawaii during 1983-1987, 597 cases (70% of those eligible) and 966 controls (75%) were interviewed. Controls were matched to cases on age, ethnicity, and area of residence. Oral contraceptive (OC) use increased with time since migration; 15.0% of Asian-born women who had been in the West <8 years, 33.4% of Asian-born women who had been in the West > or =8 years, and 49.6% of Asian women born in the West had ever used OCs. However, duration of OC use (adjusted for age, ethnicity, study area, years since migration, education, family history of breast cancer and age at first full-term birth) was not associated with increased risk of breast cancer. Moreover, neither OC use before age 25 years nor before first full-term birth was associated with increased risk. Results were unchanged when restricted to women under age 45 years or under age 40 years. After adjustment for duration of OC use, women who had been in the United States > or =8 years were still at almost twice the risk of breast cancer compared with women who had been in the United States 2-7 years. This study suggests that OC use cannot explain the elevated risk observed in Asian women who migrated to the United States > or =7 years ago.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Ursin
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles 90033-0800, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ursin G, London S, Stanczyk FZ, Gentzschein E, Paganini-Hill A, Ross RK, Pike MC. Urinary 2-hydroxyestrone/16alpha-hydroxyestrone ratio and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999; 91:1067-72. [PMID: 10379970 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/91.12.1067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It has been suggested that women who metabolize a larger proportion of their endogenous estrogen via the 16alpha-hydroxylation pathway may be at elevated risk of breast cancer compared with women who metabolize proportionally more estrogen via the 2-hydroxylation pathway. However, the supporting epidemiologic data are scant. Consequently, we compared the ratio of urinary 2-hydroxyestrone (2-OHE1) to 16alphahydroxyestrone (16alpha-OHE1) in postmenopausal women with breast cancer and in healthy control subjects. METHODS Estrogen metabolites were measured in urine samples obtained from white women who had participated in a previous population-based, breast cancer case-control study at our institution. All P values are from two-sided tests. RESULTS All of the urinary estrogens measured, with the exception of estriol, were higher in the 66 case patients than in the 76 control subjects. The mean value of urinary 2-OHE1 in case patients was 13.8% (P = .20) higher than that in control subjects, 16alpha-OHE1 was 12.1% (P = .23) higher, estrone was 20.9% higher (P = .14), and 17beta-estradiol was 12.0% higher (P = .36). The ratio of 2-OHE1 to 16alpha-OHE1 was 1.1% higher in the patients (P = .84), contrary to the hypothesis. Compared with women in the lowest third of the values for the ratio of urinary 2-OHE1 to 16alpha-OHE1, women in the highest third were at a nonstatistically significantly increased risk of breast cancer (odds ratio = 1.13; 95% confidence interval = 0.46-2.78), again contrary to the hypothesis. CONCLUSION This study does not support the hypothesis that the ratio of the two hydroxylated metabolites (2-OHE1/16alpha-OHE1) is an important risk factor for breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Ursin
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles 90033, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Maskarinec G, Meng L, Shumay D, Ursin G. Ethnicity, diet, and mammographic density patterns. Eur J Cancer 1998. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(98)80091-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
41
|
Abstract
Many studies have shown that oral contraceptive (OC) use increases a young woman's risk of breast cancer, although some studies suggest that the risk may be limited to recent use. The objective of this study was to determine what particular aspects of OC use could be important for breast cancer development at an early age in the cohort of women who had the opportunity to use OCs all of their reproductive life. The cases were first diagnosed with breast cancer at age 40 or younger between 1983 and 1988, and identified by the Los Angeles County Cancer Surveillance Program. Control subjects were individually matched to participating cases on birth date (within 36 months), race (white), parity (nulliparous versus parous), and neighborhood of residence. Detailed OC histories were obtained during in-person interviews with subjects. In general the risk estimates were small, and not statistically significant. Compared to no use, having used OCs for 12 years or more was associated with a modest non-significant elevated breast cancer risk with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.4 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.8-2.4). Long-term (12 years or more) users of high-dose estrogen pills had a non-significant 60% higher breast cancer risk than never users (CI = 0.9-3.2). Early use was associated with slightly higher ORs among young women (age < or =35), and among parous women. Recent use was associated with somewhat higher ORs among parous women and women above age 36. Analyses by stage, body weight, and family history yielded similar results. This study is consistent with a modest effect of early OC use on breast cancer risk in young women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Ursin
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles 90033-0800, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Ursin G, Astrahan MA, Salane M, Parisky YR, Pearce JG, Daniels JR, Pike MC, Spicer DV. The detection of changes in mammographic densities. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1998; 7:43-7. [PMID: 9456242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
We previously reported reductions in mammographic densities in women participating in a trial of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHA)-based regimen for breast cancer prevention. In our previous report, we compared (by simultaneous evaluation) three basic elements of mammographic densities. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether a standard (expert) method of measuring mammographic densities would detect such changes in densities and whether a novel nonexpert computer-based threshold method could do so. Mammograms were obtained from 19 women at baseline and 12 months after randomization to the GnRHA-based regimen. The extent of mammographic densities was determined by: (a) a standard expert outlining method developed by Wolfe and his colleagues (Am. J. Roentgenol., 148: 1087-1092, 1987); and (b) a new computer-based threshold method of determining densities. The results from both the expert outlining method and the computer-based threshold method were highly consistent with the results of our original (simultaneous evaluation) method. All three methods yielded statistically significant reductions in densities from baseline to the 12-month follow-up mammogram in women on the contraceptive regimen. The difference between the treated and the control group was statistically significant with the expert outlining method and was of borderline statistical significance with the computer-based threshold method. The computer-based results correlated highly (r > 0.85) with the results from the expert outlining method. Both the standard expert outlining method and the computer-based threshold method detected the reductions we had previously noted in mammographic densities induced by the GnRHA-based regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Ursin
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles 90033, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Vatten LJ, Ursin G, Ross RK, Stanczyk FZ, Lobo RA, Harvei S, Jellum E. Androgens in serum and the risk of prostate cancer: a nested case-control study from the Janus serum bank in Norway. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1997; 6:967-9. [PMID: 9367072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
We tested the hypothesis that serum levels of testosterone (T), dihydrotestosterone (DHT), and the DHT metabolite 3 alpha,17 beta-androstanediol glucuronide are positively associated with the risk of prostate cancer. This nested case-control study was based on the cohort of men who donated blood to the Janus serum bank at Oslo University Hospital (Oslo, Norway) between 1973 and 1994. Cancer incidence was ascertained through linkage with the Norwegian Cancer Registry. The study included sera from 59 men who developed prostate cancer (cases) subsequent to blood donation and 180 men who were free of any diagnosed cancer (controls) in 1994 and were of similar age (+/- 1 year) and had similar blood storage time (+/- 6 months) to the cases. Neither T, DHT, nor the ratio T:DHT was associated with risk of developing prostate cancer. Compared to the bottom quartile, the odds ratio (OR) associated with the top quartile of T was 0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.36-1.93]; the OR for the top (compared to the bottom) quartile of DHT was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.36-1.94), and the equivalent OR for T:DHT was 1.31 (95% CI, 0.58-2.97). Similarly, 3 alpha,17 beta-androstanediol glucuronide showed no association with prostate cancer risk; the OR for the top (compared to the bottom) quartile was 1.10 (95% CI, 0.41-2.90). These results showed no association, positive or negative, between androgens measured in serum and the subsequent risk of developing prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L J Vatten
- Department of Community Medicine and General Practice, University Medical Center, Trondheim, Norway.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ursin G, Henderson BE, Haile RW, Pike MC, Zhou N, Diep A, Bernstein L. Does oral contraceptive use increase the risk of breast cancer in women with BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations more than in other women? Cancer Res 1997; 57:3678-81. [PMID: 9288771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
We conducted a study to determine whether the risk of breast cancer associated with oral contraceptive (OC) use is higher in women with BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations than in other women by examining whether breast cancer patients with these mutations were more likely than breast cancer patients without mutations in BRCA1/BRCA2 to have used OCs. We tested for BRCA1 185delAG and 5382insC and BRCA2 6174delT mutations in a population-based sample of 50 young Ashkenazi Jewish breast cancer patients. Nine patients (18%) had a BRCA1 mutation, and five patients (10%) had a BRCA2 mutation. Long-term OC use (>48 months) before a first full-term pregnancy was associated with an elevated risk of being classified as a mutBRCA carrier (odds ratio, 7.8; trend, P = 0.004). The results suggest that OC use may increase the risk of breast cancer more in mutBRCA carriers than in noncarriers; however, they must be interpreted with caution given the small sample size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Ursin
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles 90033, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ursin G, London S, Stanczyk FZ, Gentzschein E, Paganini-Hill A, Ross RK, Pike MC. A pilot study of urinary estrogen metabolites (16alpha-OHE1 and 2-OHE1) in postmenopausal women with and without breast cancer. Environ Health Perspect 1997; 105 Suppl 3:601-605. [PMID: 9168002 PMCID: PMC1469909 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.97105s3601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
The two main pathways for metabolizing estrogen are via 16alpha-hydroxylation and 2-hydroxylation. The 16alpha-hydroxy metabolites are biologically active; the 2-hydroxy metabolites are not. It is suggested that women who metabolize a larger proportion of their endogenous estrogen via the 16alpha-hydroxy pathway may be at significantly elevated risk of breast cancer compared with women who metabolize proportionally more estrogen via the 2-hydroxy pathway. In particular, it is suggested that the ratio of urinary 2-hydroxyestrone (2-OHE1) to 16alpha-hydroxyestrone (16alpha-OHE1) is an index of reduced breast cancer risk. This pilot study compared this ratio in postmenopausal women diagnosed with breast cancer to those of healthy controls. Urinary concentrations of estrone (E1), 17beta-estradiol (E2) and estriol (E3) were also quantified. White women who were subjects in a previous breast cancer case-control study at our institution were eligible for inclusion. All participants provided a sample of their first morning urine. The results from the first 25 cases and 23 controls are presented here. The ratio of 2-OHE1 to 16alpha-OHE1 was 12% lower in the cases (p=0.58). However, urinary E1 was 30% higher (p=0.10), E2 was 58% higher (p=0.07), E3 was 15% higher (p=0.48), and the sum of E1, E2, and E3 was 22% higher (p=0.16) in the cases. These preliminary results do not support the hypothesis that the ratio of the two hydroxylation metabolites (2-OHE1/16alpha-OHE1) is an important risk factor for breast cancer or that it is a better predictor of breast cancer risk than levels of E1, E2 and E3 measured in urine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Ursin
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles 90033-0800, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Witte JS, Ursin G, Siemiatycki J, Thompson WD, Paganini-Hill A, Haile RW. Diet and premenopausal bilateral breast cancer: a case-control study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1997; 42:243-51. [PMID: 9065608 DOI: 10.1023/a:1005710211184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
We investigated associations between diet and premenopausal bilateral breast cancer in a familial matched case-control study. We studied 140 cases from population-based registries in Los Angeles County (California) and Connecticut, and from the major hospitals in the southern parts of the Province of Quebec. Unaffected sisters of the cases served as matched controls (222 total). Dietary intake were assessed with a food frequency questionnaire. Total fat, monounsaturated fat, polyunsaturated fat, oleic acid, and linoleic acid intake was inversely associated with premenopausal bilateral breast cancer risk. Consumption of carbohydrates (and sweetened beverages) was associated with an increased risk. We observed no associations for dietary fiber, antioxidants, or major food groupings, but we did observe inverse associations for intake of low fat dairy products and tofu. These findings suggest that monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats, as well as soy foods, might reduce the risk of premenopausal bilateral breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J S Witte
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44109-1998, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Byrne C, Ursin G, Ziegler RG. A comparison of food habit and food frequency data as predictors of breast cancer in the NHANES I/NHEFS cohort. J Nutr 1996; 126:2757-64. [PMID: 8914946 DOI: 10.1093/jn/126.11.2757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
We compared two methods of assessing dietary fat and breast cancer incidence in the first complete follow-up of the National Health Epidemiologic Follow-up Study (NHEFS) cohort. Between 1982 and 1984, 6156 women aged 32-86 y completed the NHEFS survey, which included a 93-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). In addition, women answered questions regarding food habits, such as choice of salad dressing, trimming fat from meat, and eating skin on poultry. In the 4 y of follow-up, these women contributed a total of 23,949 person years, during which 53 women reported a breast cancer diagnosis. The rate ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each quartile of percentage of energy from fat were 1.0, 0.96 (0.5-2.1), 1.0 (0.5-2.2) and 0.98 (0.5-2.1). Thus the breast cancer rates for women in the upper three quartiles, who reported a diet with higher than 30% of energy from fat, were not different from those of women in the lowest quartile of intake (< or = 29.4% energy from fat). In contrast, the "high-fat" response to three of the four food habit questions identified women at increased risk of developing breast cancer: women who used salad dressings other than low fat had a RR and 95% CI of 1.3 (0.7-2.3), women who reported eating the skin on poultry had a RR and 95% CI of 1.7 (0.9-2.9), and women who did not use lean or extra lean ground beef had a RR and 95% CI of 2.2 (1.2-4.0). These food habit questions may be less subject to misclassification than dietary information of fat intake derived from the FFQ. Further investigation is needed to evaluate what is measured by the food habit questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Byrne
- Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Ursin G, Henderson BE. Breast cancer prevention in African-American women. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996; 88:1332-3. [PMID: 8827006 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/88.19.1334-a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
|
49
|
Calle EE, Heath CW, Miracle-McMahill HL, Coates RJ, Liff JM, Franceschi S, Talamini R, Chantarakul N, Koetsawang S, Rachawat D, Morabia A, Schuman L, Stewart W, Szklo M, Bain C, Schofield F, Siskind V, Band P, Coldman AJ, Gallagher RP, Hislop TG, Yang P, Duffy SW, Kolonel LM, Nomura AMY, Oberle MW, Ory HW, Peterson HB, Wilson HG, Wingo PA, Ebeling K, Kunde D, Nishan P, Colditz G, Martin N, Pardthaisong T, Silpisornkosol S, Theetranont C, Boosiri B, Chutivongse S, Jimakorn P, Virutamasen P, Wongsrichanalai C, McMichael AJ, Rohan T, Ewertz M, Paul C, Skegg DCG, Spears GFS, Boyle P, Evstifeeva T, Daling JR, Malone K, Noonan EA, Stanford JL, Thomas DB, Weiss NS, White E, Andrieu N, Brêmond A, Clavel F, Gairard B, Lansac J, Piana L, Renaud R, Fine SRP, Cuevas HR, Ontiveros P, Palet A, Salazar SB, Aristizabel N, Cuadros A, Bachelot A, Leê MG, Deacon J, Peto J, Taylor CN, Alfandary E, Modan B, Ron E, Friedman GD, Hiatt RA, Bishop T, Kosmelj K, Primic-Zakelj M, Ravnihar B, Stare J, Beeson WL, Fraser G, Allen DS, Bulbrook RD, Cuzick J, Fentiman IS, Hayward JL, Wang DY, Hanson RL, Leske MC, Mahoney MC, Nasca PC, Varma AO, Weinstein AL, Moller TR, Olsson H, Ranstam J, Goldbohm RA, van den Brandt PA, Apelo RA, Baens J, de la Cruz JR, Javier B, Lacaya LB, Ngelangel CA, La Vecchia C, Negri E, Marbuni E, Ferraroni M, Gerber M, Richardson S, Segala C, Gatei D, Kenya P, Kungu A, Mati JG, Brinton LA, Hoover R, Schairer C, Spirtas R, Lee HP, Rookus MA, van Leeuwen FE, Schoenberg JA, Gammon MD, Clarke EA, Jones L, McPherson K, Neil A, Vessey M, Yeates D, Beral V, Bull D, Crossley B, Hermon C, Jones S, Key T, Reeves CG, Smith P, Collins R, Doll R, Peto R, Hannaford P, Kay C, Rosero-Bixby L, Yuan JM, Wei HY, Yun T, Zhiheng C, Berry G, Booth JC, Jelihovsky T, Maclennan R, Shearman R, Wang QS, Baines CJ, Miller AB, Wall C, Lund E, Stalsberg H, Dabancens A, Martinez L, Molina R, Salas O, Alexander FE, Hulka BS, Chilvers CED, Bernstein L, Haile RW, Paganini-Hill A, Pike MC, Ross RK, Ursin G, Yu MC, Adami HO, Bergstrom R, Longnecker MP, Farley TMN, Holck S, Meirik O. Breast cancer and hormonal contraceptives: further results. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Contraception 1996; 54:1S-106S. [PMID: 8899264 DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(15)30002-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
The Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer has brought together and reanalysed the worldwide epidemiological evidence on breast cancer risk and use of hormonal contraceptives. Original data from 54 studies, representing about 90% of the information available on the topic, were collected, checked and analysed centrally. The 54 studies were performed in 26 countries and include a total of 53,297 women with breast cancer and 100,239 women without breast cancer. The studies were varied in their design, setting and timing. Most information came from case-control studies with controls chosen from the general population; most women resided in Europe or North America and most cancers were diagnosed during the 1980s. Overall 41% of the women with breast cancer and 40% of the women without breast cancer had used oral contraceptives at some time; the median age at first use was 26 years, the median duration of use was 3 years, the median year of first use was 1968, the median time since first use was 16 years, and the median time since last use was 9 years. The main findings, summarised elsewhere, are that there is a small increase in the risk of having breast cancer diagnosed in current users of combined oral contraceptives and in women who had stopped use in the past 10 years but that there is no evidence of an increase in the risk more than 10 years after stopping use. In addition, the cancers diagnosed in women who had used oral contraceptives tended to be less advanced clinically than the cancers diagnosed in women who had not used them. Despite the large number of possibilities investigated, few factors appeared to modify the main findings either in recent or in past users. For recent users who began use before age 20 the relative risks are higher than for recent users who began at older ages. For women whose use of oral contraceptives ceased more than 10 years before there was some suggestion of a reduction in breast cancer risk in certain subgroups, with a deficit of tumors that had spread beyond the breast, especially among women who had used preparations containing the highest doses of oestrogen and progestogen. These findings are unexpected and need to be confirmed. Although these data represent most of the epidemiological evidence on the topic to date, there is still insufficient information to comment reliably about the effects of specific types of oestrogen or of progestogen. What evidence there is suggests, however, no major differences in the effects for specific types of oestrogen or of progestogen and that the pattern of risk associated with use of hormonal contraceptives containing progestogens alone may be similar to that observed for preparations containing both oestrogens and progestogens. On the basis of these results, there is little difference between women who have and have not used combined oral contraceptives in terms of the estimated cumulative number of breast cancers diagnosed during the period from starting use up to 20 years after stopping. The cancers diagnosed in women who have used oral contraceptives are, however, less advanced clinically than the cancers diagnosed in never users. Further research is needed to establish whether the associations described here are due to earlier diagnosis of breast cancer in women who have used oral contraceptives, to the biological effects of the hormonal contraceptives or to a combination of both. Little information is as yet available about the effects on breast cancer risk of oral contraceptive use that ceased more than 20 years before and as such data accumulate it will be necessary to re-examine the worldwide evidence.
Collapse
|
50
|
Ursin G, Pike MC, Preston-Martin S, d'Ablaing G, Peters RK. Sexual, reproductive, and other risk factors for adenocarcinoma of the cervix: results from a population-based case-control study (California, United States). Cancer Causes Control 1996; 7:391-401. [PMID: 8734834 DOI: 10.1007/bf00052946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the cervix increased steadily in young women in the United States between the early 1970s and the mid-1980s. Despite this increase, little is known about the etiology of this cancer, although a role for risk factors for both squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix and endometrial adenocarcinoma has been suggested. Incident cases of adenocarcinoma of the cervix diagnosed in women born after 1935 (ages 42 to 56 at diagnosis) were identified from the Los Angeles (California) County Cancer Surveillance Program (LACCSP). Data from personal interviews with 195 cases and 386 controls (matched on age, race, and neighborhood) were analyzed. Compared with women in the highest categories of education and income, women in the lowest categories had a 2.5 and 3.1-fold elevated risk of adenocarcinoma of the cervix. Number of sexual partners, especially before age 20, was strongly predictive of risk (odds ratio = 5.6, 95 percent confidence interval = 1.4-22.0 for 10 or more compared with no partners before age 20). Smoking was not associated significantly with risk. Weight gain and long-term use of oral contraceptives increased risk, while long-term diaphragm use was protective. This study suggests that both sexual and hormonal factors are important etiologic factors for adenocarcinoma of the cervix.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Ursin
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|