Capmatinib plus nivolumab in pretreated patients with EGFR wild-type advanced non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Dysregulated MET is an established oncogenic driver in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MET signaling may also suppress anticancer immune responses. Concomitant MET inhibition with capmatinib (a MET inhibitor) synergistically enhanced the efficacy of immunotherapies in murine cancer models, regardless of tumor dependency to MET signaling. Here, we report results of a multicenter, open-label, phase 2 study of capmatinib plus nivolumab (a PD-1 inhibitor) in patients with EGFR wild-type advanced NSCLC, previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients were allocated into high-MET or low-MET groups according to MET expression determined by immunohistochemistry, MET gene copy number as assessed by fluorescence in-situ hybridization, and presence of MET exon 14 skipping mutation, then received capmatinib 400 mg, oral, twice daily in combination with nivolumab 3 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate per RECIST v1.1.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint was met in both the high-MET (N = 16) and low-MET (N = 30) groups. In the high-MET and low-MET groups, respectively, the estimated mean 6-month PFS rate (95 % credible interval) by Bayesian analysis was 68.9 % (48.5-85.7) and 50.9 % (35.6-66.4). The Kaplan-Meier median PFS (95 % CI) was 6.2 months (3.5-19.2) and 4.2 months (1.8-7.4). The overall response rate (95 % CI) was 25.0 % (7.3-52.4) and 16.7 % (5.6-34.7). Most frequent treatment-related adverse events (≥30 % any grade, N = 46) were nausea (52.2 %), peripheral edema (34.8 %), and increased blood creatinine (30.4 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Capmatinib plus nivolumab showed clinical activity and manageable safety in pretreated patients with advanced EGFR wild-type NSCLC, independent of MET status.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02323126.

Non-small cell lung cancer: an update on emerging EGFR-targeted therapies

INTRODUCTION

Current research in EGFR-mutated NSCLC focuses on the management of drug resistance and uncommon mutations, as well as on the opportunity to extend targeted therapies' field of action to earlier stages of disease.

AREAS COVERED

We conducted a review analyzing literature from the PubMed database with the aim to describe the current state of art in the management of EGFR-mutated NSCLC, but also to explore new strategies under investigation. To this purpose, we collected recruiting phase II-III trials registered on Clinicaltrials.govand conducted on EGFR-mutated NSCLC both in early and advanced stage.

EXPERT OPINION

With this review, we want to provide an exhaustive overview of current and new potential treatments in EGFR-mutated NSCLC, with emphasis on the most promising newly investigated strategies, such as association therapies in the first-line setting involving EGFR-TKIs and chemotherapy (FLAURA2) or drugs targeting different driver pathways (MARIPOSA). We also aimed at unearthing challenges to achieve in this field, specifically the need to fully exploit already available compounds while developing new ones, the management of new emerging toxicities and the necessity to improve our biological understanding of the disease to design trials with a solid scientific rationale and to allow treatment personalization such in case of uncommon mutations.

Repotrectinib's Clinical Benefit and Its Brain Penetration in a Patient with Meningeal Carcinomatosis from G2032R-Mutated ROS-1 Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

In this work, we report on a clinically significant response of meningeal carcinomatosis to repotrectinib in a woman with a heavily pretreated ROS1-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that harbored the concomitant solvent front G2032R mutation. Meningeal carcinomatosis has a higher incidence in oncogene addicted NSCLC due to increased life expectancy, yet no report has ever documented the activity of repotrectinib in this context. In line with its activity, we documented the presence of the drug at potentially active concentrations in the cerebrospinal fluid. Nevertheless, the short-lived response reported by our patient highlights the importance for novel ROS1-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) to be specifically developed to be able to penetrate the blood-brain barrier.

APOLLO 11 Project, Consortium in Advanced Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Innovative Therapies: Integration of Real-World Data and Translational Research

INTRODUCTION

Despite several therapeutic efforts, lung cancer remains a highly lethal disease. Novel therapeutic approaches encompass immune-checkpoint inhibitors, targeted therapeutics and antibody-drug conjugates, with different results. Several studies have been aimed at identifying biomarkers able to predict benefit from these therapies and create a prediction model of response, despite this there is a lack of information to help clinicians in the choice of therapy for lung cancer patients with advanced disease. This is primarily due to the complexity of lung cancer biology, where a single or few biomarkers are not sufficient to provide enough predictive capability to explain biologic differences; other reasons include the paucity of data collected by single studies performed in heterogeneous unmatched cohorts and the methodology of analysis. In fact, classical statistical methods are unable to analyze and integrate the magnitude of information from multiple biological and clinical sources (eg, genomics, transcriptomics, and radiomics).

METHODS AND OBJECTIVES

APOLLO11 is an Italian multicentre, observational study involving patients with a diagnosis of advanced lung cancer (NSCLC and SCLC) treated with innovative therapies. Retrospective and prospective collection of multiomic data, such as tissue- (eg, for genomic, transcriptomic analysis) and blood-based biologic material (eg, ctDNA, PBMC), in addition to clinical and radiological data (eg, for radiomic analysis) will be collected. The overall aim of the project is to build a consortium integrating different datasets and a virtual biobank from participating Italian lung cancer centers. To face with the large amount of data provided, AI and ML techniques will be applied will be applied to manage this large dataset in an effort to build an R-Model, integrating retrospective and prospective population-based data. The ultimate goal is to create a tool able to help physicians and patients to make treatment decisions.

CONCLUSION

APOLLO11 aims to propose a breakthrough approach in lung cancer research, replacing the old, monocentric viewpoint towards a multicomprehensive, multiomic, multicenter model. Multicenter cancer datasets incorporating common virtual biobank and new methodologic approaches including artificial intelligence, machine learning up to deep learning is the road to the future in oncology launched by this project.

Clinical evidence and adverse event management update of patients with RET- rearranged advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with pralsetinib

Current non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) management relies on genome-driven precision oncology thus shifting treatment paradigm towards biomarker-guided tumor-agnostic approaches. Recently, rearranged during transfection (RET) has been endorsed as tissue-agnostic target with sensitivity to RET inhibition. There are currently two selective RET tyrosine kinase inhibitors, pralsetinib and selpercatinib. The recent introduction of pralsetinib in the treatment algorithm of RET-rearranged tumor along with the mounting clinical evidence of pralsetinib durable activity from both randomized and observational studies holds the potential to disclose new avenues in the management of RET fusion positive NSCLC patients. Our narrative review aims to discuss the available clinical evidence on pralsetinib efficacy, particularly on brain metastases, and tolerability profile. In addition, our work explores the relevance of detecting RET fusions upfront in the disease history of patients with NSCLC.

Navigating challenges in EGFR exon 20 insertions: The PAPILLON trial unravels the promise of amivantamab-chemotherapy

The PAPILLON trial showed that adding amivantamab to carboplatin-pemetrexed for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations is more effective than chemotherapy. Although safety concerns may arise, this study highlights the need for alternative therapeutic strategies beyond chemotherapy for this subtype of NSCLC.

Sotorasib in KRASp.G12C mutated advanced NSCLC: Real-world data from the Italian expanded access program

BACKGROUND

Sotorasib showed a significant improvement of progression free survival (PFS), safety and quality of life over docetaxel in patients with KRASp.G12C-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) within the CodeBreak-200 study. Here we report real-world efficacy and tolerability data from NSCLC patients who received sotorasib within the Italian expanded access program (EAP).

METHODS

Sotorasib (960 mg, orally, once daily) was available on physician request for KRASp.G12C mutant advanced NSCLC patients. Clinical-pathological and molecular data were collected from the Italian ATLAS real-world registry. Patients underwent CT-scan and responses were evaluated by RECIST criteria. Efficacy and tolerability outcomes have been assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 196 advanced NSCLC patients were treated across 30 Italian centers. Median age was 69 years old (range 33-86). Most patients were male (61 %), former (49 %) or current smokers (43 %), with ECOG-PS 0/1 (84 %) and adenocarcinoma subtype (90 %). 45 % and 32 % of patients received sotorasib in 2nd and 3rd line, respectively. Overall, response rate was 26 % and the median duration of response was 5.7 months (95 % CI: 4.4-7.0). Median PFS and OS were 5.8 months (95 % CI: 5 - 6.5) and 8.2 months (95 % CI: 6.3 - 9.9). Grade 3-4 TRAEs occurred in 16.5 % of patients, with Grade ≥ 3 liver enzyme increase and TRAEs-related discontinuation reported in 12 % and 4.6 % of cases.

CONCLUSION

Real-world data from the Italian EAP confirm the tolerability and effectiveness of sotorasib in patients with KRASp.G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC and highlight the value of the national ATLAS network as source of real-world evidence driving the clinical management of NSCLC patients.

Optimizing the risk stratification of astrocytic tumors by applying the cIMPACT-NOW Update 3 signature: real-word single center experience

Our work reports implementation of a useful genetic diagnosis for the clinical managment of patients with astrocytic tumors. We investigated 313 prospectively recruited diffuse astrocytic tumours by applying the cIMPACT-NOW Update 3 signature. The cIMPACT-NOW Update 3 (cIMPACT-NOW 3) markers, i.e., alterations of TERT promoter, EGFR, and/or chromosome 7 and 10, characterized 96.4% of IDHwt cases. Interestingly, it was also found in 48,5% of IDHmut cases. According to the genomic profile, four genetic subgroups could be distinguished: (1) IDwt/cIMPACT-NOW 3 (n = 270); (2) IDHwt/cIMPACT-NOW 3 negative (= 10); (3) IDHmut/cIMPACT-NOW 3 (n = 16); and 4) IDHmut/cIMPACT-NOW 3 negative (n = 17). Multivariate analysis confirmed that IDH1/2 mutations confer a favorable prognosis (IDHwt, HR 2.91 95% CI 1.39-6.06), and validated the prognostic value of the cIMPACT-NOW 3 signature (cIMPACT-NOW 3, HR 2.15 95% CI 1.15-4.03). To accurately identify relevant prognostic categories, overcoming the limitations of histopathology and immunohistochemistry, molecular-cytogenetic analyses must be fully integrated into the diagnostic work-up of astrocytic tumors.

Lorlatinib beyond progression plus platinum/pemetrexed for ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer patients: report of two cases

Lorlatinib is an active treatment for advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) pretreated with ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (-TKIs). However, there is paucity of data on the activity of platinum/pemetrexed chemotherapy administered at the time of progression on lorlatinib. In addition, it is uncertain whether continuation of lorlatinib beyond progression (LBP) would provide any additional clinical benefit. Here, we describe two cases experiencing an exceptional response to platinum/pemetrexed chemotherapy plus LBP and make an attempt to identify which patients' characteristics and biologic profiles of the tumor could predict benefit from such an approach. In this report, presence of controlled brain metastases, rapidly progressing extracranial disease, and presence of ALK-dependent mechanisms of resistance were associated with benefit from platinum/pemetrexed chemotherapy plus lorlatinib beyond progression.

Resistance to KRAS G12C Inhibition in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although the recent development of direct KRASG12C inhibitors (G12Ci) has improved outcomes in KRAS mutant cancers, responses occur only in a fraction of patients, and among responders acquired resistance invariably develops over time. Therefore, the characterization of the determinants of acquired resistance is crucial to inform treatment strategies and to identify novel therapeutic vulnerabilities that can be exploited for drug development.

RECENT FINDINGS

Mechanisms of acquired resistance to G12Ci are heterogenous including both on-target and off-target resistance. On-target acquired resistance includes secondary codon 12 KRAS mutations, but also acquired codon 13 and codon 61 alterations, and mutations at drug binding sites. Off-target acquired resistance can derive from activating mutations in KRAS downstream pathway (e.g., MEK1), acquired oncogenic fusions (EML4-ALK, CCDC176-RET), gene level copy gain (e.g., MET amplification), or oncogenic alterations in other pro-proliferative and antiapoptotic pathways (e.g., FGFR3, PTEN, NRAS). In a fraction of patients, histologic transformation can also contribute to the development of acquire resistance. We provided a comprehensive overview of the mechanisms that limit the efficacy of this G12i and reviewed potential strategies to overcome and possibly delay the development of resistance in patients receiving KRAS directed targeted therapies.

UNcommon EGFR Mutations: International Case Series on Efficacy of Osimertinib in Real-Life Practice in First-LiNe Setting (UNICORN)

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 10% of EGFR mutations (EGFRmuts) are uncommon (ucEGFRmuts). We aimed to collect real-world data about osimertinib for patients with ucEGFRmuts.

METHODS

This is a multicenter, retrospective study of ucEGFRmut (exon 20 insertions excluded) metastatic NSCLC treated with osimertinib as first EGFR inhibitor. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and response assessment in neuro-oncology brain metastases brain objective response rate (ORR) were evaluated by the investigators. Median progression-free survival (mPFS), median overall survival, and median duration of response (mDOR) were calculated from osimertinib initiation. Mutations found at resistance were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients were included (22 centers, nine countries), with median age of 64 years, 75% females, and 83% Caucasian. The largest subgroups were G719X (30%), L861Q (20%), and de novo Thr790Met (T790M) (15%). The ORR was 61%, mPFS 9.5 months, mDOR 17.4 months, and median overall survival 24.5 months. Regarding patients with no concurrent common mutations or T790M (group A, n = 44), ORR was 60%, mPFS 8.6 months, and mDOR 11 months. For G719X, ORR was 47%, mPFS 8.8 months, and mDOR 9.1 months. For L861Q, ORR was 80%, mPFS 16 months, and mDOR 16 months. For de novo T790M, ORR was 44%, mPFS 12.7 months, and mDOR 46.2 months. Compound EGFRmut including common mutations had better outcome compared with only ucEGFRmut. For 13 patients with a response assessment in neuro-oncology brain metastases-evaluable brain metastases, brain ORR was 46%. For 14 patients, rebiopsy results were analyzed: four patients with additional EGFR mutation (C797S, D585Y, E709K), three with new TP53 mutation, one with c-Met amplification, one with PIK3CA mutation, and one with neuroendocrine transformation.

CONCLUSIONS

Osimertinib was found to have an activity in ucEGFRmut with a high rate of disease control systemically and intracranially. Several resistance mechanisms were identified. This report comprises, to the best of our knowledge, the largest data set of its kind.

RET-MAP: An International Multicenter Study on Clinicobiologic Features and Treatment Response in Patients With Lung Cancer Harboring a RET Fusion

INTRODUCTION

Nearly 1% to 2% of NSCLCs harbor RET fusions. Characterization of this rare population is still incomplete.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study included patients with any-stage RET positive (RET+) NSCLC from 31 cancer centers. Molecular profiling included DNA/RNA sequencing or fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses. Clinicobiological features and treatment outcomes (per investigator) with surgery, chemotherapy (CT), immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs), CT-ICB, multityrosine kinase inhibitors, and RET inhibitors (RETis) were evaluated.

RESULTS

For 218 patients included between February 2012 and April 2022, median age was 63 years, 56% were females, 93% had adenocarcinoma, and 41% were smokers. The most frequent fusion partner was KIF5B (72%). Median tumor mutational burden was 2.5 (range: 1-4) mutations per megabase, and median programmed death-ligand 1 expression was 10% (range: 0%-55%). The most common metastatic sites were the lung (50%), bone (43%), and pleura (40%). Central nervous system metastases were found at diagnosis of advanced NSCLC in 21% of the patients and at last follow-up or death in 31%. Overall response rate and median progression-free survival were 55% and 8.7 months with platinum doublet, 26% and 3.6 months with single-agent CT, 46% and 9.6 months with CT-ICB, 23% and 3.1 months with ICB, 37% and 3 months with multityrosine kinase inhibitor, and 76% and 16.2 months with RETi, respectively. Median overall survival was longer in patients treated with RETi versus no RETi (50.6 mo [37.7-72.1] versus 16.3 mo [12.7-28.8], p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with RET+ NSCLC have mainly thoracic and bone disease and low tumor mutational burden and programmed death-ligand 1 expression. RETi markedly improved survival, whereas ICB may be active in selected patients.

The expanding scenario of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer between emerging evidence and clinical tasks

This Editorial by De Giglio, Ricciuti and Metro introduces the series Treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: one size does not fit all: https://www.drugsincontext.com/special_issues/treatment-of-advanced-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-one-size-does-not-fit-all/.

Pralsetinib in RET fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: A real-world data (RWD) analysis from the Italian expanded access program (EAP)

OBJECTIVES

The selective RET-inhibitor pralsetinib has shown therapeutic activity in early clinical trials in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring rearranged during transfection (RET) gene fusions. To date, the real-world efficacy of pralsetinib in this population is unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective efficacy and safety analysis was performed on data from patients with RET-fusion positive NSCLC enrolled in the pralsetinib Italian expanded access program between July 2019 and October 2021.

RESULTS

Overall, 62 patients with RET-fusion positive NSCLC received pralsetinib at 20 Italian centers. Next-generation sequencing was used to detect RET alterations in 44 patients (73 %). The most frequent gene fusion partner was KIF5B (75 % of 45 evaluable). Median age was 62 years (range, 36-90), most patients were female (57 %) and never smokers (53 %). Brain metastases were known in 18 patients (29.5 %) at the time of pralsetinib treatment. 13 patients were treatment naïve (unfit for chemotherapy), 48 were pretreated (median number of previous lines: 1, range, 1-4). The objective response rate (ORR) was 66 % [95 % confidence interval (CI), 53-81] in the evaluable population (n = 59). The disease control rate (DCR) was 79 %. After a median follow-up of 10.1 months, the median progression free survival was 8.9 months (95 %CI, 4.7-NA). In patients with measurable brain metastases (n = 6) intracranial ORR was 83 %, intracranial DCR was 100 %. Overall, 83.6 % of patients experienced any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), 39 % grade 3 or greater (G ≥ 3). The most common G ≥ 3 TRAEs were neutropenia (9.8 %), dry mouth/oral mucositis (8.2 %), and thrombocytopenia (6.6 %). Seven patients (12 %) discontinued pralsetinib due to TRAEs, twenty-six had at least one dose level modification due to TRAEs. Two treatment-related deaths were observed (1 sepsis, 1 typhlitis).

CONCLUSIONS

In the real-world setting, pralsetinib confirmed durable systemic activity and intracranial response in RET-fusion positive NSCLC. Toxicity profile was consistent with previous reports.

Combi-TED: a new trial testing Tedopi® with docetaxel or nivolumab in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer progressing after first line

Despite the positive results obtained by first-line chemoimmunotherapy in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), only a few second-line options are available after disease progression. Combi-TED is a phase II international study that will assess the efficacy of Tedopi®, a cancer vaccine, combined with either docetaxel or nivolumab and compared with docetaxel monotherapy in patients with metastatic NSCLC after chemoimmunotherapy. The study, currently in the recruitment phase, will assess 1-year overall survival (primary end point), patient's progression-free survival and overall response rate, as well as the correlation of efficacy with several tumor or blood biomarkers. The results will hopefully provide more information on Tedopi combinational treatment compared with current standard of care in NSCLC patients who fail first-line chemoimmunotherapy. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04884282 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Molecular Epidemiology and Treatment Patterns of Patients With EGFR Exon 20-Mutant NSCLC in the Precision Oncology Era: The European EXOTIC Registry

Introduction

Real-world evidence regarding molecular epidemiology and management patterns of patients with EGFR exon-20 mutated, advanced NSCLC outside the context of clinical trials is lacking.

Methods

We created a European registry for patients with advanced EGFR exon 20-mutant NSCLC diagnosed from January 2019 to December 2021. Patients enrolled in clinical trials were excluded. Clinicopathologic and molecular epidemiology data were collected, and treatment patterns were recorded. Clinical end points according to treatment assignment were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models.

Results

Data on 175 patients from 33 centers across nine countries were included in the final analysis. Median age was 64.0 (range: 29.7-87.8) years. Main features included female sex (56.3%), never or past smokers (76.0%), adenocarcinoma (95.4%), and tropism for bone (47.4%) and brain (32.0%) metastases. Mean programmed death-ligand 1 tumor proportional score was 15.8% (range: 0%-95%) and mean tumor mutational burden was 7.06 (range: 0-18.8) mutations per megabase. Exon 20 was detected in the tissue (90.7%), plasma (8.7%), or both (0.6%), using mostly targeted next-generation sequencing (64.0%) or polymerase chain reaction (26.0%). Mutations were mainly insertions (59.3%), followed by duplications (28.1%), deletions-insertions (7.7%), and the T790M (4.5%). Insertions and duplications were located mainly in the near loop (codons 767-771, 83.1%) and the far loop (codons 771-775, 13%) and only in 3.9% within the C helix (codons 761-766). Main co-alterations included mutations in TP53 (61.8%) and MET amplifications (9.4%). Treatment on mutation identification included chemotherapy (CT) (33.8%), CT-immunotherapy (IO) (18.2%), osimertinib (22.1%), poziotinib (9.1%), mobocertinib (6.5%), mono-IO (3.9%), and amivantamab (1.3%). Disease control rates were 66.2% with CT plus or minus IO, 55.8% with osimertinib, 64.8% with poziotinib, and 76.9% with mobocertinib. Corresponding median overall survival was 19.7, 15.9, 9.2, and 22.4 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, type of treatment (new targeted agents versus CT ± IO) affected progression-free survival (p = 0.051) and overall survival (p = 0.03).

Conclusions

EXOTIC represents the largest academic real-world evidence data set on EGFR exon 20-mutant NSCLC in Europe. Indirectly compared, treatment with new exon 20-targeting agents is likely to confer survival benefit than CT plus or minus IO.

KRAS G12 isoforms exert influence over up-front treatments: A retrospective, multicenter, Italian analysis of the impact of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors in an NSCLC real-life population

BACKGROUND

KRAS is commonly mutated in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, the prognostic and predictive impact of each G12 substitution has not been fully elucidated. The approval of specific G12C inhibitors has modified the idea of KRAS "undruggability", and although the first-line standard consists of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with or without chemotherapy, as suggested at ASCO 2022, the outcome in KRAS-mutated population is still controversial.

METHODS

We retrospectively described the clinical and pathological characteristics of a homogeneous G12 mutated cohort of 219 patients treated in four Italian oncologic units. We evaluated the outcome (PFS at 18 months and OS at 30 months) of those who underwent standard first-line treatment according to PD-L1 status, focusing on differences across single mutations.

RESULTS

In the study population, 47.9% of patients harbor the KRAS G12C mutation; 20.5%, G12V; 17.4%, G12D; and 8.2%, G12A. Smoking was a common behavior of patients harboring transversions and transition mutations. PD-L1 expression does not show particular distribution in the case series, although we recorded a prevalence of PD-L1 <1% in G12V (51.4%) compared to G12A (26.7%). ICIs alone was the clinician's choice in 32.7% of patients, and the chemo-immune combination in 17.3% of patients. We described the independent prognostic role of young age (p = 0.007), female gender (p = 0.016), and an ICI-based regimen (p = 0.034) regardless of mutations. Overall, our data confirm the worst prognostic value of G12V mutation apart from treatment choice unlike the other major mutations (C, D, and A) that showed a favorable trend in PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

KRAS G12 mutations are confirmed to have different characteristics, and the outcome is influenced by ICI first-line regimen. This study provides valuable information for further analysis in the future.

Non-small-cell lung cancer: how to manage ALK-, ROS1- and NTRK-rearranged disease

Oncogene addiction in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has profound diagnostic and therapeutic implications. ALK, ROS1 and NTRK rearrangements are found in about 2–7%, 1–2% and 0.2% of unselected NSCLC samples, respectively; however, their frequency is markedly higher in younger and never-smoker patients with adenocarcinoma histology. Moreover, ALK, ROS1 and NTRK rearrangements are often mutually exclusive with other known driver alterations in NSCLC. Due to such a low frequency, diagnostic screening with accurate and inexpensive techniques such as immunohistochemistry is useful to identify positive cases; however, confirmation with fluorescent in situ hybridization or next-generation sequencing is often required due to higher specificity. In ALK-rearranged NSCLC, sequential treatment with second-generation and third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors leads to long-lasting disease control with most patients surviving beyond 5 years with metastatic disease. In ROS1-rearranged NSCLC, first-line treatment with crizotinib or entrectinib and subsequent treatment with lorlatinib at disease progression leads to similar results in patients with metastatic disease. NTRK1–3 fusions are extremely rare in unselected NSCLC. However, treatment with TRK inhibitors yields high response rates and durable disease control in most patients; diagnostic screening through multigene DNA/RNA-based next-generation sequencing testing is therefore crucial to identify positive cases.

This article is part of the Treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: one size does not fit all Special Issue: https://www.drugsincontext.com/special_issues/treatment-of-advanced-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-one-size-does-not-fit-all/

Prognosis of ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer patients carrying TP53 mutations

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the primary cause of cancer-related death. Gene rearrangements involving the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase identify a clinical and molecular subset of NSCLC patients, who benefit from the monotherapy with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Nonetheless, responsiveness to TKIs and prognosis of these patients are influenced by several factors, including resistance mechanisms and mutations affecting genes involved in key molecular pathways of cancer cells. In a cohort of 98 NSCLC patients with ALK gene rearrangements, we investigated the role of Tumor Protein (TP53) gene mutations in predicting patients prognosis. TP53 mutations were evaluated in relation to disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).Results: In patients with available clinical and TP53 mutation information, we found that 13 patients (20.3%) were affected by TP53 mutations. Considered together, even though showing a trend, TP53 mutations were not associated with PFS and OS. Considering the different TP53 mutations by functionality in terms of disruptive and non-disruptive mutations, we observed that TP53 non-disruptive mutations were able to predict worse OS in the overall case series. Moreover, a worse PFS was seen in the subgroup of patients with TP53 non-disruptive mutation, in first-, second-, and third line of treatment. Our results show that mutations affecting TP53 gene, especially non-disruptive mutations, are able to affect prognosis of ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients.

Non-small-cell lung cancer: how to manage EGFR-mutated disease

The treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbouring EGFR mutations has witnessed some major breakthroughs in the last years. On the one hand, the recent advent of the third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) osimertinib has reshaped the therapeutic algorithm both in the first-line and adjuvant settings for patients with common activating Ex19del and L858R EGFR mutations. On the other hand, the availability of new comprehensive next-generation sequencing panels, to be used on tumour tissue or on liquid biopsy, has revealed the existence of uncommon as well as compound mutations that partially explain the onset of resistance. Nevertheless, dissecting the biological mechanisms underlying primary and secondary resistance to EGFR-TKIs is crucial to developing alternative therapeutic strategies and further improving patient outcomes. Herein, we provide an updated and comprehensive summary of the latest advancements in the quest for compounds targeting EGFR-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, discussing the biological rationale underlying the development of a forefront combination of TKI and/or new antibody–drug conjugates. We also suggest a treatment algorithm that could be followed considering the latest published data.

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with carboplatin and pemetrexed as first-line induction therapy followed by anlotinib plus pemetrexed as maintenance therapy in EGFR/ALK wild-type advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in China: a multicenter, single-arm trial

Background

The efficacy and safety of chemotherapy strategies combining the multi-target receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor in patients with advanced EGFR/ALK wild-type non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (nsq-NSCLC) are undetermined. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with carboplatin/pemetrexed-based chemotherapy followed by maintenance therapy (anlotinib plus pemetrexed) in advanced EGFR/ALK wild-type nsq-NSCLC.

Methods

Eligible patients with wild-type EGFR/ALK advanced nsq-NSCLC who received first-line therapy in Henan Province from March 2019 to February 2021 were recruited. All patients were treated with anlotinib in combination with carboplatin/pemetrexed-based chemotherapy, followed by maintenance therapy (anlotinib plus pemetrexed). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs). Response and AEs were assessed based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (1.1) and National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.4.0.3, respectively. The follow-up interval for survival was 6 weeks and the safety follow-up was performed until the end of treatment. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate the median PFS and OS.

Results

Thirty-eight participants with median age of 62 (range, 33–75) years were evaluated. Five participants were still on maintenance therapy until the end of the study. The majority were non-smokers (68.4%). The median follow-up was 13.6 (range, 12.3–14.9) months. The median PFS (mPFS) was 10.5 (95% CI: 4.1, 17.0) months, and the median OS was 23.4 [95% CI: not evaluable (NE), NE] months. The DCR and ORR were 94.7% and 60.5%, respectively. Grade 3 and above treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) happened to 12 participants. The most common TRAEs were hypertension (23.7%), neutropenia (19.4%), and bone marrow toxicity (10.5%). Seven patients discontinued treatment, including two patients during induction and five patients during maintenance treatment. No grade 5 TRAE was reported. In the non-smoker participants, the mPFS was 14.5 (95% CI: 4.0–25.0) months.

Conclusions

Anlotinib in combination with carboplatin/pemetrexed-based chemotherapy followed by anlotinib plus pemetrexed as maintenance therapy might be an effective choice in treating patients with wild-type EGFR/ALK advanced nsq-NSCLC.

Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: how to manage EGFR and HER2 exon 20 insertion mutation-positive disease

EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations (Ex20ins) and HER2 mutations characterize an oncogene-addicted subtype of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) typically associated with a never or light smoking history, female sex, and adenocarcinoma histology. Nevertheless, Ex20ins-mutant and HER2-mutant advanced NSCLCs are still difficult to treat for various reasons. First, there is a need for sophisticated diagnostic tools (e.g. next-generation sequencing) that could allow the identification of these relatively rare molecular drivers. Second, highly active targeted drugs that might support a significant change in patients’ prognosis when used as first-line therapy are required. In fact, although a few targeted drugs have so far demonstrated antitumour activity for these patients, mainly selective human epidermal receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as poziotinib and mobocertinib (for both molecular alterations), monoclonal antibodies such as amivantamab (for Ex20ins), and antibody–drug conjugates such as trastuzumab deruxtecan (for HER2 mutants), they are mostly confined for clinical use in pretreated patients. Finally, Ex20ins-targeted or HER2-targeted drugs might be difficult to access in different countries or regions worldwide. In the present review, we provide a concise but comprehensive summary of the challenges that lie ahead as we move towards personalized treatment of Ex20ins-mutant and HER2-mutant advanced NSCLC, also suggesting a treatment algorithm that could be followed for patients with these genetic aberrations.

Non-small-cell lung cancer: how to manage RET-positive disease

Targeted therapy has dramatically changed the history and outcomes of oncogene-addicted non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). RET rearrangements are typically observed in about 1–2% of NSCLC, resulting in constitutive activation of downstream signalling pathways commonly involved in cell growth and survival. RET-positive NSCLCs are generally associated with young age, non-smoking history, a high rate of brain metastases at diagnosis and an immunologically ‘cold’ tumour microenvironment. Multi-kinase inhibitors, such as cabozantinib, lenvatinib and vandetanib, showed limited efficacy but significant toxicity mainly linked to off-target effects. In contrast, two RET-selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), selpercatinib and pralsetinib, demonstrated high response rates and manageable safety profiles, and have received FDA approval for the treatment of advanced RET-positive NSCLC regardless of previous lines of treatment. Despite the initial high response rate to RET-TKIs, most patients inevitably develop disease progression due to acquired resistance mechanisms by both on-target or off-target mechanisms. To date, new potent and selective next-generation RET-TKIs are currently being evaluated in ongoing clinical trials in order to overcome resistance and improve efficacy and blood–brain barrier crossing. Genomic recharacterization at progression could help guide treatment choice or enrolment in clinical trials of specific next-generation RET inhibitors. Here, we review the biology, clinicopathological characteristics, targeted therapies and mechanisms of resistance of advanced NSCLC harbouring RET fusions to provide treatment guidance for these patients.

Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: how to manage non-oncogene disease

The therapeutic approach to patients affected by advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is facing rapid and continuous evolution. In recent years, the emergence of new treatment strategies, such as immunotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, has revolutionized the treatment algorithm and the prognosis of patients with NSCLC. In the non-oncogene-addicted disease, immune-checkpoint inhibitors, either as single agents or combined with chemotherapy, outperformed standard chemotherapy in both untreated and previously treated patients. However, many patients still do not derive the expected benefit from current treatments. Despite representing the only biomarker currently used in clinical practice to guide treatment selection, PD-L1 expression has been proven an imperfect predictor of immunotherapy outcomes. The evaluation of clinical factors remains essential to detect patients that would benefit the most from a particular treatment approach, but the identification of additional biological and molecular predictive tools is a priority. Herein, we provide a comprehensive though concise review of the current treatment approaches to advanced NSCLC in patients without molecular driver alterations, with an additional focus on special populations, concomitant medications, and other considerations that might be useful for daily clinical practice.

Beyond Crizotinib: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Next-Generation ALK Inhibitors as First-Line Treatment for ALK-Translocated Lung Cancer

Background

Second and third-generation ALK inhibitors (ALKIs) have been recently approved for ALK-translocated lung cancer treatment, improving - and expanding - the first-line scenario.

Methods

In this systematic review and metanalysis, we investigated the efficacy and safety of next-generation ALKIs in untreated advanced ALK-translocated lung cancer patients, searching for randomized phase III controlled trials through databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library). Inclusion and exclusion of studies, quality assessment, data extraction, and synthesis were independently accomplished by two reviewers, with discrepancies adjudicated by a third reviewer. Stata (StataCorp., v.16) software was used for the metanalysis.

Results

In total, seven randomized controlled trials met our inclusion criteria. Comparing the results of next-generation ALKIs and control therapy (crizotinib or chemotherapy), next-generation ALKIs significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), any lesion (aCNSRR) and measurable lesions of central nervous system response rate (mCNSRR). Safety results were similar between the experimental and control groups.

Conclusion

Our analysis confirmed that next-generation ALKIs are the preferred first-line treatment option for ALK-translocated lung cancer. They are superior to crizotinib or chemotherapy in several clinical endpoints, including OS, PFS, ORR and CNS disease control, without increased toxicity. In the absence of head-to-head data, the choice between these molecules should be guided by physician experience and preference, drug-specific safety profile and schedule.

Combi-TED: A multicenter, phase II, open-label, randomized trial evaluating efficacy of OSE2021 plus docetaxel or OSE2021 plus nivolumab as second-line therapy in metastatic NSCLC progressing after first-line chemo-immunotherapy

TPS9140

Background: First line combination of chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) improves overall survival (OS) compared with chemotherapy alone in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, only few options are available at chemoimmunotherapy failure, with docetaxel representing the standard of care. Tedopi is a cancer vaccine which stimulates killer T cells, currently under development for the therapy of HLA-A2+ lung cancer. In the ATALANTE-1 Phase III trial (EudraCT no. 2015-003183-36), Tedopi provided clinical benefits in patients with advanced NSCLC who failed to respond to checkpoint inhibitors. Given the need for new therapeutic options in patients failing first-line chemo-immunotherapy and the encouraging preliminary data with Tedopi, there is a strong rationale for investigating the activity of Tedopi plus nivolumab or Tedopi plus docetaxel in patients with metastatic NSCLC failing standard first-line therapy. Methods: This is a phase II, non-comparative, randomized multicenter study assessing the combination of Tedopi with docetaxel or nivolumab in NSCLC patients failing after first-line chemoimmunotherapy (EudraCT no. 2020-005170-10). All NSCLC patient candidates for second-line therapy are considered eligible for the study if they are HLA-A2+, with no evidence of EGFR mutations or ALK/ROS1 rearrangement and if they progressed after at least 4 cycles of previous first-line chemo-immunotherapy. Patients are randomly assigned to Tedopi plus docetaxel, Tedopi plus nivolumab (treatment arms) or docetaxel monotherapy (standard arm). The primary endpoint is 1-year OS rate. Secondary endpoints include OS, 2-year OS rate, progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. An explorative analysis of the correlation of efficacy with several tumor or blood biomarkers (PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden, Tedopi neoantigen expression, T cell infiltration), is also performed. Sample size was calculated assuming a 1-year OS rate in the standard arm of 20%. According to the single-stage design, in both treatment arms a 1-year OS rate of 20% would imply that treatment does not warrant further investigation and a 1-year OS rate of 40%, would imply that treatment has a sufficient activity. With a one-sided significance level of 5% and a power of 80%, a total number of 105 patients (35 per treatment arm) need to be enrolled. At the drafting of this abstract, 7 patients have already been enrolled. Total follow-up will be 24 months from last enrolment, for an approximate duration of 48 months. Clinical trial information: NCT04884282.

Uncommon EGFR mutations on osimertinib, real-life data (UNICORN study): Updated results, brain efficacy, and resistance mechanisms

9109

Background: About 10% of EGFR mutations (EGFRm) are ‘uncommon mutations’ (ucEGFRm). osimertinib is a 3rd generation EGFRi, active against common EGFRm. We aimed to collect real-world data about systemic and brain response and resistance mechanisms to osimertinib for ucEGFRm patients. Methods: This is a multi-center, retrospective study of ucEGFRm mNSCLC treated with osimertinib as first EGFRi. RECIST and RANO-BM response was evaluated by investigators. Progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and duration of response (DOR) were calculated from initiation of osimertinib. Mutations found at resistance were collected. Results: 62 patients (pts) were identified in 22 centers from 9 countries. Median age was 64 (35-91) years, 74% females, 84% Caucasian, never/former/current smokers were 48%/39%/11% respectively, ECOG PS was 0-1/2/3-4 in 84%/10%/5%. Histology was adenocarcinoma in 97%. The largest subgroups were G719X, de novo T790M and L861Q (Table). Compound EGFR mutations were found in 27 pts (44%), TP53 mutations in 21 pts (34%). In 17 cases (27%), compound mutations included the common L858R/deletion19 and/or de novo T790M. Most frequent metastatic sites were lung/bone/brain in 45%/44%/39%. Most frequent toxicities were gastrointestinal (32 pts, 52%) and skin (24 pts, 39%); 8 pts had grade 3-4 AEs. No grade 5 AE occurred. 3 pts had AEs leading to discontinuation. RECIST response (RR) was available for 53 pts, CR - 4 (8%), PR - 27 (51%), SD - 17 (32%), and PD - 5 (9%). Median DOR (mDOR) was 17.4 months (95% CI 9.1-NA). mPFS was 9.5 months (95% CI 8.5–17.4). mOS was 24.5 months (95% CI 17.4-35.1). See Table for efficacy in the major subgroups. 24 pts (39%) had brain metastasis at presentation, for 12 pts a brain response by RANO-BM was available with 25%/25%/33%/17% CR/PR/SD/PD. For 14 pts, rebiopsy mutation analysis at progression on osimertinib was available: 3 pts with an additional EGFR mutation (C797S,D585Y, E709K), 3 pts with a new TP53 mutation, 1 with c-Met amplification and 1 pt with transformation to neuroendocrine carcinoma. Conclusions: Osimertinib demonstrated activity in ucEGFRm with 91% disease control rate and encouraging PFS and DOR. Brain response was seen in 50% of cases. Several resistance mechanisms were identified. This report comprises, to the best of our knowledge, the largest dataset of osimertinib as the first EGFRi for ucEGFRm presented so far. [Table: see text]

High familial burden of cancer correlates with improved outcome from immunotherapy in patients with NSCLC independent of somatic DNA damage response gene status

Family history of cancer (FHC) is a hallmark of cancer risk and an independent predictor of outcome, albeit with uncertain biologic foundations. We previously showed that FHC-high patients experienced prolonged overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) following PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors. To validate our findings in patients with NSCLC, we evaluated two multicenter cohorts of patients with metastatic NSCLC receiving either first-line pembrolizumab or chemotherapy. From each cohort, 607 patients were randomly case–control matched accounting for FHC, age, performance status, and disease burden. Compared to FHC-low/negative, FHC-high patients experienced longer OS (HR 0.67 [95% CI 0.46–0.95], p = 0.0281), PFS (HR 0.65 [95% CI 0.48–0.89]; p = 0.0074) and higher disease control rates (DCR, 86.4% vs 67.5%, p = 0.0096), within the pembrolizumab cohort. No significant associations were found between FHC and OS/PFS/DCR within the chemotherapy cohort. We explored the association between FHC and somatic DNA damage response (DDR) gene alterations as underlying mechanism to our findings in a parallel cohort of 118 NSCLC, 16.9% of whom were FHC-high. The prevalence of ≥ 1 somatic DDR gene mutation was 20% and 24.5% (p = 0.6684) in FHC-high vs. FHC-low/negative, with no differences in tumor mutational burden (6.0 vs. 7.6 Mut/Mb, p = 0.6018) and tumor cell PD-L1 expression. FHC-high status identifies NSCLC patients with improved outcomes from pembrolizumab but not chemotherapy, independent of somatic DDR gene status. Prospective studies evaluating FHC alongside germline genetic testing are warranted.

Host immune-inflammatory markers to unravel the heterogeneous outcome and assessment of patients with PD-L1 ≥50% metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and poor performance status receiving first-line immunotherapy

Background

Patients with programmed cell death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) ≥50% metastatic non‐small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) and ECOG performance status (PS) of 2 treated with first‐line immunotherapy have heterogeneous clinical assessment and outcomes.

Methods

To explore the role of immune‐inflammatory surrogates by the validated lung immuno‐oncology prognostic score (LIPS) score, including the neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the pretreatment use of steroids, alongside other prognostic variables. A retrospective analysis of 128 patients with PS2 and PD‐L1 ≥50% mNSCLC treated between April 2018 and September 2019 with first‐line pembrolizumab in a real‐world setting was performed.

Results

With a median follow‐up of 15.3 months, the 1‐year overall survival (OS) and median progression‐free survival (PFS) were 32.3% (95% CI: 30.9–33.9) and 3.3 months (95% CI: 1.8–4.7), respectively. The NLR, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and pretreatment steroids results were the only significant prognostic factors on the univariate analysis and independent prognostic factors by the multivariate analysis on both OS and PFS. The LIPS score, including the NLR and pretreatment steroids, identified 29 (23%) favourable‐risk patients, with 0 factors, 1‐year OS of 67.6% and median PFS of 8.2 months; 57 (45%) intermediate‐risk patients, with 1 factor, 1‐year OS 32.1% and median PFS 2.7 months; 42 (33%) poor‐risk patients, with both factors, 1‐year OS of 10.7% and median PFS of 1.2 months.

Conclusions

The assessment of pre‐existing imbalance of the host immune response by combined blood and clinical immune‐inflammatory markers may represent a way to unravel the heterogeneous outcome and assessment of patients with mNSCLC and poor PS in the immune‐oncology setting.

PD-L1 expression and immune cells infiltration in primary tracheobronchial neoplasm

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

[Management of small cell lung cancer patient in the regions of Lazio, Umbria and Sardinia.]

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive disease, difficult to treat. There have been no significant therapeutic advances over platinum and etoposide chemotherapy in the last 20 years until the introduction of immunotherapy. In 2020 atezolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor against PD-L1 was approved in Italy in combination with carboplatin and etoposide for the first-line treatment of patients with extensive stage disease (ES-SCLC), becoming the new standard treatment. On May 20, 2021, a virtual meeting, directed by profs. Federico Cappuzzo and Emilio Bria, was held in which 14 clinicians from different oncology centers in Lazio, Umbria and Sardinia discussed the issues of ES-SCLC patients treatment, after the advent of immunotherapy. The aim of the meeting was to share their clinical experience and to provide a series of practical indications that can support clinicians in the management of ES-SCLC patients in first-line with chemo-immunotherapy.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors for unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma

Unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive disease with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 10%. Recent data suggest that MPM is an immunologically active tumor, in which checkpoint inhibition through the blockade of the anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (-CTLA-4) or anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) could play a major therapeutic role. Initially, clinical trials evaluated immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the salvage setting after platinum-based chemotherapy with mixed results in terms of efficacy. More recently, the combination of the anti-CTLA-4 agent ipilimumab plus the anti-PD-1 agent nivolumab was tested in the front-line setting, and reported a superior survival as compared to platinum/pemetrexed. While other clinical trials ore ongoing in order to investigate ICIs for MPM, it seems now evident that we have entered a new "era" for the treatment of MPM. In the future, a few issues need to be solved with regard to the use of ICIs for MPM. Among them, there is the identification of biomarkers of sensitivity to immunotherapy that may help enrich the patient population who could benefit the most from treatment, while avoiding for some other patients the potential occurrence of immune-related side effects from therapies that are anticipated to be ineffective.

Predictive ability of a drug-based score in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving first-line immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

We previously demonstrated the cumulative poor prognostic role of concomitant medications on the clinical outcome of patients with advanced cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, creating and validating a drug-based prognostic score to be calculated before immunotherapy initiation in patients with advanced solid tumours. This 'drug score' was calculated assigning score 1 for each between proton-pump inhibitor and antibiotic administration until a month before cancer therapy initiation and score 2 in case of corticosteroid intake. The good risk group included patients with score 0, intermediate risk with score 1-2 and poor risk with score 3-4.

METHODS

Aiming at validating the prognostic and putative predictive ability depending on the anticancer therapy, we performed the present comparative analysis in two cohorts of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), respectively, receiving first-line pembrolizumab or chemotherapy through a random case-control matching and through a pooled multivariable analysis including the interaction between the computed score and the therapeutic modality (pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy).

RESULTS

Nine hundred fifty and 595 patients were included in the pembrolizumab and chemotherapy cohorts, respectively. After the case-control random matching, 589 patients from the pembrolizumab cohort and 589 from the chemotherapy cohort were paired, with no statistically significant differences between the characteristics of the matched subjects. Among the pembrolizumab-treated group, good, intermediate and poor risk evaluable patients achieved an objective response rate (ORR) of 50.0%, 37.7% and 23.4%, respectively, (p < 0.0001), whereas among the chemotherapy-treated group, patients achieved an ORR of 37.0%, 40.0% and 32.4%, respectively (p = 0.4346). The median progression-free survival (PFS) of good, intermediate and poor risk groups was 13.9 months, 6.3 months and 2.8 months, respectively, within the pembrolizumab cohort (p < 0.0001), and 6.2 months, 6.2 months and 4.3 months, respectively, within the chemotherapy cohort (p = 0.0280). Among the pembrolizumab-treated patients, the median overall survival (OS) for good, intermediate and poor risk patients was 31.4 months, 14.5 months and 5.8 months, respectively, (p < 0.0001), whereas among the chemotherapy-treated patients, it was 18.3 months, 16.8 months and 10.6 months, respectively (p = 0.0003). A similar trend was reported considering the two entire populations. At the pooled analysis, the interaction term between the score and the therapeutic modality was statistically significant with respect to ORR (p = 0.0052), PFS (p = 0.0003) and OS (p < 0.0001), confirming the significantly different effect of the score within the two cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Our 'drug score' showed a predictive ability with respect to ORR in the immunotherapy cohort only, suggesting it might be a useful tool for identifying patients unlikely to benefit from first-line single-agent pembrolizumab. In addition, the prognostic stratification in terms of PFS and OS was significantly more pronounced among the pembrolizumab-treated patients.

Differential influence of antibiotic therapy and other medications on oncological outcomes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with first-line pembrolizumab versus cytotoxic chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Some concomitant medications including antibiotics (ATB) have been reproducibly associated with worse survival following immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in unselected patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (according to programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and treatment line). Whether such relationship is causative or associative is matter of debate.

METHODS

We present the outcomes analysis according to concomitant baseline medications (prior to ICI initiation) with putative immune-modulatory effects in a large cohort of patients with metastatic NSCLC with a PD-L1 expression ≥50%, receiving first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy. We also evaluated a control cohort of patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with first-line chemotherapy. The interaction between key medications and therapeutic modality (pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy) was validated in pooled multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

950 and 595 patients were included in the pembrolizumab and chemotherapy cohorts, respectively. Corticosteroid and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy but not ATB therapy was associated with poorer performance status at baseline in both the cohorts. No association with clinical outcomes was found according to baseline statin, aspirin, β-blocker and metformin within the pembrolizumab cohort. On the multivariable analysis, ATB emerged as a strong predictor of worse overall survival (OS) (HR=1.42 (95% CI 1.13 to 1.79); p=0.0024), and progression free survival (PFS) (HR=1.29 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.59); p=0.0192) in the pembrolizumab but not in the chemotherapy cohort. Corticosteroids were associated with shorter PFS (HR=1.69 (95% CI 1.42 to 2.03); p<0.0001), and OS (HR=1.93 (95% CI 1.59 to 2.35); p<0.0001) following pembrolizumab, and shorter PFS (HR=1.30 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.56), p=0.0046) and OS (HR=1.58 (95% CI 1.29 to 1.94), p<0.0001), following chemotherapy. PPIs were associated with worse OS (HR=1.49 (95% CI 1.26 to 1.77); p<0.0001) with pembrolizumab and shorter OS (HR=1.12 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.24), p=0.0139), with chemotherapy. At the pooled analysis, there was a statistically significant interaction with treatment (pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy) for corticosteroids (p=0.0020) and PPIs (p=0.0460) with respect to OS, for corticosteroids (p<0.0001), ATB (p=0.0290), and PPIs (p=0.0487) with respect to PFS, and only corticosteroids (p=0.0033) with respect to objective response rate.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we validate the significant negative impact of ATB on pembrolizumab monotherapy but not chemotherapy outcomes in NSCLC, producing further evidence about their underlying immune-modulatory effect. Even though the magnitude of the impact of corticosteroids and PPIs is significantly different across the cohorts, their effects might be driven by adverse disease features.

The lung immuno-oncology prognostic score (LIPS-3): a prognostic classification of patients receiving first-line pembrolizumab for PD-L1 ≥ 50% advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Background

To stratify the prognosis of patients with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) ≥ 50% advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) treated with first-line immunotherapy.

Methods

Baseline clinical prognostic factors, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), PD-L1 tumour cell expression level, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and their combination were investigated by a retrospective analysis of 784 patients divided between statistically powered training (n = 201) and validation (n = 583) cohorts. Cut-offs were explored by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and a risk model built with validated independent factors by multivariate analysis.

Results

NLR < 4 was a significant prognostic factor in both cohorts (P < 0.001). It represented 53% of patients in the validation cohort, with 1-year overall survival (OS) of 76.6% versus 44.8% with NLR > 4, in the validation series. The addition of PD-L1 ≥ 80% (21% of patients) or LDH < 252 U/l (25%) to NLR < 4 did not result in better 1-year OS (of 72.6% and 74.1%, respectively, in the validation cohort). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 2 [P < 0.001, hazard ratio (HR) 2.04], pretreatment steroids (P < 0.001, HR 1.67) and NLR < 4 (P < 0.001, HR 2.29) resulted in independent prognostic factors. A risk model with these three factors, namely, the lung immuno-oncology prognostic score (LIPS)-3, accurately stratified three OS risk-validated categories of patients: favourable (0 risk factors, 40%, 1-year OS of 78.2% in the whole series), intermediate (1 or 2 risk factors, 54%, 1-year OS 53.8%) and poor (>2 risk factors, 5%, 1-year OS 10.7%) prognosis.

Conclusions

We advocate the use of LIPS-3 as an easy-to-assess and inexpensive adjuvant prognostic tool for patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50% aNSCLC.

•

Immunotherapy/chemoimmunotherapy combinations are currently not superior to immunotherapy alone for high PD-L1 aNSCLC.

•

NLR with a cut-off of 4 was validated as an independent prognostic factor for immunotherapy in high PD-L1 aNSCLC.

•

The addition of either PD-L1 ≥ 80% or LDH < 252 U/l to NLR < 4 did not result in better prognostic stratification.

•

The LIPS-3 is a validated 3-class prognostic classification based on the NLR, ECOG PS and pretreatment steroids.

•

The LIPS-3 is a routinely assessable adjuvant prognostic tool for high PD-L1 aNSCLC patients.