1
|
Weber M, Fendler WP, Ravi Kumar AS, Calais J, Czernin J, Ilhan H, Saad F, Kretschmer A, Hekimsoy T, Brookman-May SD, Mundle SD, Small EJ, Smith MR, Perez PM, Hope TA, Herrmann K, Hofman MS, Eiber M, Hadaschik BA. Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-detected Disease Extent and Overall Survival of Patients with High-risk Nonmetastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: An International Multicenter Retrospective Study. Eur Urol 2024; 85:511-516. [PMID: 38490855 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
Previously, we demonstrated that prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) revealed distant metastases in 109/200 patients (39% distant nodes, 24% bone, and 6% visceral organ) with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) and high-risk features (International Society of Urological Pathology score ≥4 and/or prostate-specific antigen doubling time ≤10 mo) without metastases by conventional imaging. However, the impact of disease extent determined by PSMA-PET on patient outcomes is unknown. We followed these 200 patients for a median of 43 mo after PSMA-PET and retrospectively assessed the association between patient characteristics, PSMA-PET findings, treatment management, and outcomes using a Kaplan-Meier model and Cox multivariable regressions. Among assessed disease characteristics, polymetastatic disease (five or more distant lesions on PET) was independently associated with shorter overall survival (OS; median 61 mo vs not reached; hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.81 [1.00-3.27]; p = 0.050) and time to new metastases (median 38 vs 60 mo; 1.80 [1.10-2.96]; p = 0.019), and initial pN1 status with shorter OS (55 mo vs not reached; 1.94 [1.12-3.37]; p = 0.019). Following PSMA-PET, locoregional salvage therapies were used most commonly in no/local disease (58%), and androgen receptor signaling inhibitors were used in distant metastatic disease (51%). PSMA-PET provides additional risk stratification for patients with nmCRPC. Polymetastatic disease (five or more distant lesions) is associated with worse outcomes. PATIENT SUMMARY: A novel sensitive imaging technology, called prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET), allows doctors to detect the spread of prostate cancer, known as distant metastases, earlier and more accurately than in the past. In our study, PSMA-PET detected none to many metastases in patients who were considered free of distant metastasis by conventional imaging. These findings predicted outcomes and were used to select appropriate treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Aravind S Ravi Kumar
- Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence (ProsTIC), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jeremie Calais
- University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Fred Saad
- Department of Surgery, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Alexander Kretschmer
- Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, USA
| | - Turkay Hekimsoy
- Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sabine D Brookman-May
- Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, USA
| | | | - Eric J Small
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Matthew R Smith
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Paola M Perez
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence (ProsTIC), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Boris A Hadaschik
- Department of Urology, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gennari A, Brain E, De Censi A, Nanni O, Wuerstlein R, Frassoldati A, Cortes J, Rossi V, Palleschi M, Alberini JL, Matteucci F, Piccardo A, Sacchetti G, Ilhan H, D'Avanzo F, Ruffilli B, Nardin S, Monti M, Puntoni M, Fontana V, Boni L, Harbeck N. Early prediction of endocrine responsiveness in ER+/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC): Pilot study with 18F-Fluoroestradiol (18F-FES) CT/PET. Ann Oncol 2024:S0923-7534(24)00057-7. [PMID: 38423389 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND 18F-FES PET/CT is considered an accurate diagnostic tool to determine whole-body endocrine responsiveness. In the ET-FES trial, we evaluated 18F-FES PET/CT as a predictive tool in ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS Eligible patients underwent a 18F-FES PET/CT at baseline. Patients with SUV≥2 received single agent ET until PD; patients with SUV<2 were randomized to single agent ET (Arm A) or chemotherapy (CT) (Arm B). Primary objective was to compare the activity of first line ET versus CT in patients with 18F-FES SUV <2. RESULTS Overall, 147 patients were enrolled; 117 presented with 18F-FES SUV≥2 and received ET; 30 pts with SUV<2 were randomized to ET or CT. After a median follow up of 62.4 months, 104 patients (73.2%) had disease progression and 53 died (37.3%). Median PFS was 12.4 months (95%CI 3.1-59.6) in patients with SUV <2 randomised to Arm A versus 23.0 months (95%CI 7.7-30.0) in Arm B, (HR = 0.71, 95%CI 0.3 - 1.7); median PFS was 18.0 months (95%CI 11.2-23.1) in patients with SUV≥2 treated with ET. Median OS was 28.2 months (95%CI 14.2-NE) in patients with SUV <2 randomized to ET (Arm A) versus 52.8 months (95%CI 16.2-NE) in Arm B (CT). Median OS was not reached in patients with SUV≥2. 60-month OS rate was 41.6% (95%CI 10.4-71.1%) in Arm A, 42.0% (95%CI 14.0-68.2%) in Arm B and 59.6% (95%CI 48.6-69.0%) in patients with SUV≥2. In patients with SUV≥2, 60-months OS rate was 72.6% if treated with aromatase inhibitors versus 40.6% in case of fulvestrant or tamoxifen (p<0.005). CONCLUSIONS The ET-FES trial demonstrated that ER+/HER2- MBC patients are a heterogeneous population, with different levels of endocrine responsiveness based on 18F-FES CT/PET SUV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Gennari
- Department of Traslational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy;; Division of Medical Oncology, Maggiore University Hospital, Novara, Italy.
| | - E Brain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie - Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - A De Censi
- Medical Oncology, E.O. "Ospedali Galliera, Genova, Italy
| | - O Nanni
- Biostatistics and Clinical Trials Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - R Wuerstlein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - A Frassoldati
- Clinical Oncology, S. Anna University Hospital, Ferrara, Italy
| | - J Cortes
- International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Pangaea Oncology, Quironsalud Group, Barcelona, Spain; Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - V Rossi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Maggiore University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - M Palleschi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - J L Alberini
- Nuclear Medicine Department Centre Georges-Francois Leclerc, Dijon Cedex, France
| | - F Matteucci
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo studio dei tumori (IRST)- Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy
| | - A Piccardo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, E.O. "Ospedali Galliera, Genova, Italy
| | - G Sacchetti
- Division of Nuclear Medicine Unit, Maggiore University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - H Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - F D'Avanzo
- Division of Medical Oncology, Maggiore University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - B Ruffilli
- Department of Traslational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - S Nardin
- Medical Oncology Unit 1, IRCCS - Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - M Monti
- Biostatistics and Clinical Trials Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - M Puntoni
- Clinical and Epidemiological Research Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - V Fontana
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, IRCSS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa 20900, Italy
| | - L Boni
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, IRCSS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa 20900, Italy
| | - N Harbeck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Holzschuh JC, Mix M, Ruf J, Hölscher T, Kotzerke J, Vrachimis A, Doolan P, Ilhan H, Marinescu IM, Spohn SKB, Fechter T, Kuhn D, Bronsert P, Gratzke C, Grosu R, Kamran SC, Heidari P, Ng TSC, Könik A, Grosu AL, Zamboglou C. Deep learning based automated delineation of the intraprostatic gross tumour volume in PSMA-PET for patients with primary prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2023; 188:109774. [PMID: 37394103 PMCID: PMC10862258 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 06/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE With the increased use of focal radiation dose escalation for primary prostate cancer (PCa), accurate delineation of gross tumor volume (GTV) in prostate-specific membrane antigen PET (PSMA-PET) becomes crucial. Manual approaches are time-consuming and observer dependent. The purpose of this study was to create a deep learning model for the accurate delineation of the intraprostatic GTV in PSMA-PET. METHODS A 3D U-Net was trained on 128 different 18F-PSMA-1007 PET images from three different institutions. Testing was done on 52 patients including one independent internal cohort (Freiburg: n = 19) and three independent external cohorts (Dresden: n = 14 18F-PSMA-1007, Boston: Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH): n = 9 18F-DCFPyL-PSMA and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI): n = 10 68Ga-PSMA-11). Expert contours were generated in consensus using a validated technique. CNN predictions were compared to expert contours using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Co-registered whole-mount histology was used for the internal testing cohort to assess sensitivity/specificity. RESULTS Median DSCs were Freiburg: 0.82 (IQR: 0.73-0.88), Dresden: 0.71 (IQR: 0.53-0.75), MGH: 0.80 (IQR: 0.64-0.83) and DFCI: 0.80 (IQR: 0.67-0.84), respectively. Median sensitivity for CNN and expert contours were 0.88 (IQR: 0.68-0.97) and 0.85 (IQR: 0.75-0.88) (p = 0.40), respectively. GTV volumes did not differ significantly (p > 0.1 for all comparisons). Median specificity of 0.83 (IQR: 0.57-0.97) and 0.88 (IQR: 0.69-0.98) were observed for CNN and expert contours (p = 0.014), respectively. CNN prediction took 3.81 seconds on average per patient. CONCLUSION The CNN was trained and tested on internal and external datasets as well as histopathology reference, achieving a fast GTV segmentation for three PSMA-PET tracers with high diagnostic accuracy comparable to manual experts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julius C Holzschuh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Faculty of Computer Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Juri Ruf
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Tobias Hölscher
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg Kotzerke
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Alexis Vrachimis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, German Oncology Center - University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Paul Doolan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center - University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital - Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Ioana M Marinescu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Simon K B Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine - University of Freiburg, Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Tobias Fechter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dejan Kuhn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Peter Bronsert
- Department of Pathology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christian Gratzke
- Department of Urology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Radu Grosu
- Cyber-Physical Systems Division, Institute of Computer Engineering and Faculty of Informatics, Technical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Computer Science, State University of New York at Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Sophia C Kamran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Pedram Heidari
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiology, Boston, USA
| | - Thomas S C Ng
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiology, Boston, USA; Joint Program in Nuclear Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital - Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute - Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Arda Könik
- Joint Program in Nuclear Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital - Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute - Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; German Oncology Center, European University of Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Graner FP, Fischer M, Ilhan H, Bartenstein P, Todica A, Lehner S. Assessment of left ventricular function with gated myocardial perfusion SPECT and gated myocardial FDG PET in patients with left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 67:230-237. [PMID: 34881846 DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4785.21.03398-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony (LVMD) and left ventricular function are intertwined. Gated myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) and gated fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission computed tomography (FDG PET) is an elegant way for repeated assessment of myocardial dyssynchrony and myocardial function. To the knowledge of the authors at the time this manuscript was prepared, there was no comprehensive evaluation of the interplay of LVMD and left ventricular function as measured by gated MPS and gated FDG PET; as well as no evaluation of the agreement between the two methods. METHODS Patients were assigned to the reference cohort (RC) and the dyssynchrony cohort (DC) based on the phase analysis results of gated MPS datasets. Subsequently left ventricular function was analyzed. RESULTS We demonstrated that LVMD as detected by gated MPS is associated with a significantly higher end-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV) as well as a significantly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) both in gated MPS and gated FDG PET imaging. In the RC and the DC SPECT and PET showed good agreement and generally high linear correlations with regard to left ventricular volumes and LVEF. In the combined cohort (RC and DC) increasing amounts of LVMD were associated with increasing left ventricular volumes as well as a decreasing LVEF. The association was strongest for the dyssynchrony parameter Entropy. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated that gated SPECT and gated PET are useful tools in the evaluation of left ventricular function in patients with LVMD as detected by gated MPS. Increasing amounts of dyssynchrony were associated with an increasingly reduced myocardial function. For repeated measurements or therapy monitoring, the methods should not be used interchangeably.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank P Graner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Fischer
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andrei Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian Lehner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany -
- Ambulatory Health Care Center Dr. Neumaier & Colleagues, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, Radiation Therapy, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Resch S, Takayama Fouladgar S, Zacherl M, Sheikh GT, Liubchenko G, Rumiantcev M, Unterrainer LM, Wenter V, Bartenstein P, Ziegler SI, Ilhan H, Beyer L, Böning G, Delker A. Investigation of image-based lesion and kidney dosimetry protocols for 177Lu-PSMA-I&T therapy with and without a late SPECT/CT acquisition. EJNMMI Phys 2023; 10:11. [PMID: 36757516 PMCID: PMC9911578 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-023-00529-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND 177Lu-PSMA therapy has been successfully used to prolong the survival of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Patient-specific dosimetry based on serial quantitative SPECT/CT imaging can support the understanding of dose-effect relationships. However, multiple SPECT/CT measurements can be challenging for patients, which motivates the investigation of efficient sampling schedules and their impact on dosimetry. In this study, different time samplings with respect to the number and timing of SPECT/CT acquisitions with and without a late measurement were investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS In total, 43 lesions and 10 kidneys of 5 patients receiving 177Lu-PSMA-I&T therapy were investigated. Whole-body SPECT/CT measurements were performed at 1, 2, 3 and 7 days post-injection. For both lesions (isocontour-based segmentation) and kidneys (CT-based segmentation), a reference model was employed including all four time points. To identify the best-matching fit function out of a pre-defined set of models, visual inspection, coefficients of variation and sum of squared errors were considered as goodness-of-fit criteria. Biologically effective doses (BEDs) calculated with different time samplings (days 1, 2, 3/1, 2, 7/1, 3, 7/2, 3, 7 and 1, 2/1, 3/1, 7) were compared to the reference. RESULTS The best-fit function was found to be a mono-exponential model for lesions and a bi-exponential model with a population-based parameter and two free parameters for kidneys. The BEDs calculated with the time sampling 1, 3, 7 days showed the lowest deviations from the reference for lesions with 4 ± 5%. Without day 7, still 86% of all lesions showed deviations from the reference < 10%. The outlier deviations showed a positive correlation with the effective half-life of the respective lesions. For kidneys, including days 1, 2, 3 achieved the best results with 0 ± 1%. Generally, deviations for kidneys were found to be small for all time samplings (max. 13%). CONCLUSIONS For combined optimization of the SPECT/CT time sampling for kidney and lesion dosimetry during 177Lu-PSMA-I&T therapy, the sampling with days 1, 3, 7 showed the smallest deviation from the reference. Without a late acquisition, using the schedule with days 1, 2, 3 is likewise feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Resch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Sarah Takayama Fouladgar
- grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mathias Zacherl
- grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Gabriel T. Sheikh
- grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Grigory Liubchenko
- grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mikhail Rumiantcev
- grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena M. Unterrainer
- grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Vera Wenter
- grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sibylle I. Ziegler
- grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Leonie Beyer
- grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Guido Böning
- grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Astrid Delker
- grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Trapp C, Oliinyk D, Rogowski P, Von Bestenbostel R, Ganswindt U, Li M, Eze C, Bartenstein P, Beyer L, Ilhan H, Sheikh G, Unterrainer L, Stief C, Westhofen T, Kunz WG, Unterrainer M, Belka C, Schmidt-Hegemann NS. An analysis of PSMA-PET/CT-positive lymph node distribution and their coverage by different elective nodal radiation volumes in postoperative prostate cancer patients. J Nucl Med 2023:jnumed.122.265159. [PMID: 36732055 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.265159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Salvage elective nodal radiotherapy (sENRT) is a treatment option for biochemical persistent or recurrent patients with lymph node metastases (LN) after prostatectomy. Possible ENRT templates were proposed by the RTOG (2009), the PIVOTAL trialists (2015) and the NRG Oncology Group (2021). The goal of this study was to analyze the distribution of PSMA-PET/CT-positive LN and to compare the templates with regard to their LN coverage. Methods: We analyzed PSMA-PET/CT scans of 105 patients with PET-positive LN treated with sENRT from 2014 to 2019. All LN were mapped in an exemplary dataset, classified by region, and assessed with regard to their potential coverage by the three ENRT templates. Primary endpoint was the number of missed LN. Secondary endpoint was the number of patients with full coverage. To compare the templates, t-test and McNemar test were used. Results: Three hundred and thirty-five LN were contoured (3.19 per patient, 95%-CI 2.43 - 3.95). Most frequently, LN were seen in the internal iliac (n = 94, 28.1%), external iliac (n = 60, 17.9%), periaortic (n = 58, 17.3%), common iliac (n = 55, 16.4%), perirectal (n = 26, 7.8%) and presacral (n = 19, 5.7%) region. The NRG template missed less LN per patient (1.01, 31.7%) than the RTOG (1.28, 40.1%, p<.001) and PIVOTAL templates (1.19, 37.3%, P = .003). No difference was observed in the number of patients with full coverage of all LN: 52 (49.5%) with the NRG template vs. 50 (47.6%) with the RTOG (P = .625) and 49 (46.7%) with the PIVOTAL template (P = .250). Conclusion: The NRG template showed better coverage than the RTOG and PIVOTAL templates. Nevertheless, in this cohort it would have missed almost one third of all contoured LN and would have resulted in incomplete coverage in half of the patients. This result underlines the importance of advanced imaging, such as PSMA-PET/CT, before sENRT and shows the need for further individualization of ENRT fields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Trapp
- LMU Munich, University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Germany
| | - Dmytro Oliinyk
- LMU Munich, University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Germany
| | - Paul Rogowski
- LMU Munich, University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Germany
| | | | - Ute Ganswindt
- Medizinische Universitaet Innsbruck, Department of Radiation Oncology, Austria
| | - Minglun Li
- LMU Munich, University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Germany
| | - Chukwuka Eze
- LMU Munich, University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- LMU Munich, University Hospital, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Germany
| | - Leonie Beyer
- LMU Munich, University Hospital, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- LMU Munich, University Hospital, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Germany
| | - Gabriel Sheikh
- LMU Munich, University Hospital, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Germany
| | - Lena Unterrainer
- LMU Munich, University Hospital, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Germany
| | - Christian Stief
- LMU Munich, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Germany
| | - Thilo Westhofen
- LMU Munich, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Germany
| | - Wolfgang G Kunz
- LMU Munich, University Hospital, Department of Radiology, Germany
| | | | - Claus Belka
- LMU Munich, University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Eschbach RS, Hofmann M, Späth L, Sheikh GT, Delker A, Lindner S, Jurkschat K, Wängler C, Wängler B, Schirrmacher R, Tiling R, Brendel M, Wenter V, Dekorsy FJ, Zacherl MJ, Todica A, Ilhan H, Grawe F, Cyran CC, Unterrainer M, Rübenthaler J, Knösel T, Paul T, Boeck S, Westphalen CB, Spitzweg C, Auernhammer CJ, Bartenstein P, Unterrainer LM, Beyer L. Comparison of somatostatin receptor expression in patients with neuroendocrine tumours with and without somatostatin analogue treatment imaged with [ 18F]SiTATE. Front Oncol 2023; 13:992316. [PMID: 36793617 PMCID: PMC9924143 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.992316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Somatostatin analogues (SSA) are frequently used in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumours. Recently, [18F]SiTATE entered the field of somatostatin receptor (SSR) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging. The purpose of this study was to compare the SSR-expression of differentiated gastroentero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NET) measured by [18F]SiTATE-PET/CT in patients with and without previous treatment with long-acting SSAs to evaluate if SSA treatment needs to be paused prior to [18F]SiTATE-PET/CT. Methods 77 patients were examined with standardised [18F]SiTATE-PET/CT within clinical routine: 40 patients with long-acting SSAs up to 28 days prior to PET/CT examination and 37 patients without pre-treatment with SSAs. Maximum and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmax and SUVmean) of tumours and metastases (liver, lymphnode, mesenteric/peritoneal and bones) as well as representative background tissues (liver, spleen, adrenal gland, blood pool, small intestine, lung, bone) were measured, SUV ratios (SUVR) were calculated between tumours/metastases and liver, likewise between tumours/metastases and corresponding specific background, and compared between the two groups. Results SUVmean of liver (5.4 ± 1.5 vs. 6.8 ± 1.8) and spleen (17.5 ± 6.8 vs. 36.7 ± 10.3) were significantly lower (p < 0.001) and SUVmean of blood pool (1.7 ± 0.6 vs. 1.3 ± 0.3) was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in patients with SSA pre-treatment compared to patients without. No significant differences between tumour-to-liver and specific tumour-to-background SUVRs were observed between both groups (all p > 0.05). Conclusion In patients previously treated with SSAs, a significantly lower SSR expression ([18F]SiTATE uptake) in normal liver and spleen tissue was observed, as previously reported for 68Ga-labelled SSAs, without significant reduction of tumour-to-background contrast. Therefore, there is no evidence that SSA treatment needs to be paused prior to [18F]SiTATE-PET/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralf S. Eschbach
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Markus Hofmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lukas Späth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Gabriel T. Sheikh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Astrid Delker
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Simon Lindner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Klaus Jurkschat
- Fakultät für Chemie und Chemische Biologie, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Carmen Wängler
- Biomedical Chemistry, Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Björn Wängler
- Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Molecular Imaging and Radiochemistry, Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Ralf Schirrmacher
- Department of Oncology, Division of Oncological Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Reinhold Tiling
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Vera Wenter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Franziska J. Dekorsy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mathias J. Zacherl
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andrei Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Freba Grawe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Clemens C. Cyran
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Knösel
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Tanja Paul
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Boeck
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Benedikt Westphalen
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Christine Spitzweg
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine 4, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph J. Auernhammer
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine 4, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena M. Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Leonie Beyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lehner S, Graner FP, Fischer M, Ilhan H, Bartenstein P, Todica A. The assessment of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony from gated 99mTc-tetrofosmin SPECT and gated 18F-FDG PET by QGS: a comparative study. J Nucl Cardiol 2022; 29:2350-2360. [PMID: 34282536 PMCID: PMC9553767 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-021-02737-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to partly conflicting studies, further research is warranted with the QGS software package, with regard to the performance of gated FDG PET phase analysis as compared to gated MPS as well as the establishment of possible cut-off values for FDG PET to define dyssynchrony. METHODS Gated MPS and gated FDG PET datasets of 93 patients were analyzed with the QGS software. BW, Phase SD, and Entropy were calculated and compared between the methods. The performance of gated PET to identify dyssynchrony was measured against SPECT as reference standard. ROC analysis was performed to identify the best discriminator of dyssynchrony and to define cut-off values. RESULTS BW and Phase SD differed significantly between the SPECT and PET. There was no significant difference in Entropy with a high linear correlation between methods. There was only moderate agreement between SPECT and PET to identify dyssynchrony. Entropy was the best single PET parameter to predict dyssynchrony with a cut-off point at 62%. CONCLUSION Gated MPS and gated FDG PET can assess LVMD. The methods cannot be used interchangeably. Establishing reference ranges and cut-off values is difficult due to the lack of an external gold standard. Further prospective research is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Lehner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
- Ambulatory Health Care Center Dr. Neumaier & Colleagues, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, Radiation Therapy, Bahnhofstraße 24, 93047, Regensburg, Germany.
| | - Frank Philipp Graner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Fischer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Andrei Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lehner S, Nowak I, Zacherl M, Brosch-Lenz J, Fischer M, Ilhan H, Rübenthaler J, Gosewisch A, Bartenstein P, Todica A. Quantitative myocardial perfusion SPECT/CT for the assessment of myocardial tracer uptake in patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease: Initial experiences and results. J Nucl Cardiol 2022; 29:2511-2520. [PMID: 34341952 PMCID: PMC9553851 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-021-02735-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate quantitative myocardial perfusion SPECT/CT datasets for routine clinical reporting and the assessment of myocardial tracer uptake in patients with severe TVCAD. METHODS MPS scans were reconstructed as quantitative SPECT datasets using CTs from internal (SPECT/CT, Q_INT) and external (PET/CT, Q_EXT) sources for attenuation correction. TPD was calculated and compared to the TPD from non-quantitative SPECT datasets of the same patients. SUVmax, SUVpeak, and SUVmean were compared between Q_INT and Q_EXT SPECT datasets. Global SUVmax and SUVpeak were compared between patients with and without TVCAD. RESULTS Quantitative reconstruction was feasible. TPD showed an excellent correlation between quantitative and non-quantitative SPECT datasets. SUVmax, SUVpeak, and SUVmean showed an excellent correlation between Q_INT and Q_EXT SPECT datasets, though mean SUVmean differed significantly between the two groups. Global SUVmax and SUVpeak were significantly reduced in patients with TVCAD. CONCLUSIONS Absolute quantification of myocardial tracer uptake is feasible. The method seems to be robust and principally suitable for routine clinical reporting. Quantitative SPECT might become a valuable tool for the assessment of severe coronary artery disease in a setting of balanced ischemia, where potentially life-threatening conditions might otherwise go undetected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Lehner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.
- Ambulatory Health Care Center Dr. Neumaier & Colleagues, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, Radiation Therapy, Bahnhofstraße 24, 93047, Regensburg, Germany.
| | - Isabel Nowak
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Mathias Zacherl
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Julia Brosch-Lenz
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Fischer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Astrid Gosewisch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Andrei Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gennari A, Brain E, Nanni O, Harbeck N, Cortés J, De Censi A, Piccardo A, Alberini J, Matteucci F, Sacchetti G, Ilhan H, Monti M, Wuerlestein R, Saggia C, Rossi V, D'Avanzo F, Maggiora P, Iacozzi M, Frassoldati A, Boni L. 221P Early prediction of efficacy of endocrine therapy (ET) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC): Pilot study with [18F]fluoro-estradiol-17β (18F-FES) PET/CT. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
|
11
|
Ilhan H, Kroenke M, Wurzer A, Unterrainer M, Heck M, Belka C, Knorr K, Langbein T, Rauscher I, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Schiller K, Bartenstein P, Wester HJ, Eiber M. 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET for the Detection of Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Curative-Intent Radiation Therapy: A Bicentric Retrospective Study. J Nucl Med 2022; 63:1208-1214. [PMID: 35273094 PMCID: PMC9364349 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
This bicentric, retrospective analysis investigated the efficacy of PET/CT with a novel theranostic prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)--targeting ligand, 18F-rhPSMA-7, in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer after curative-intent primary radiotherapy. Methods: Datasets from patients with BCR of prostate cancer after external-beam radiation therapy or brachytherapy who underwent 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET/CT at either Technical University Munich or Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich were retrospectively reviewed by experienced nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists at both centers. The median injected activity was 299 MBq (range, 204-420 MBq), and the median uptake time was 77 min (range, 46-120 min). All lesions suggestive of recurrent prostate cancer were noted. Detection rates were correlated with patients' prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, primary Gleason score, and prior use of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). Results: Ninety-seven patients were included (65 at Technical University Munich and 32 at Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich). The median prescan PSA was 4.19 ng/mL (range, 0.1-159 ng/mL). The primary Gleason score was ≤6 in 19 patients, 7 in 25, ≥8 in 33, and unknown in 20. Thirty patients received ADT in the 6 mo preceding PET/CT. 18F-rhPSMA-7 identified lesions in 91 of 97 (94%) patients. Detection rates stratified by PSA were 88% (22/25), 97% (30/31), 90% (19/21), and 100% (20/20) for a PSA of <2, 2-<5, 5-<10, and ≥10 ng/mL, respectively. Detection rates in the subgroup of patients not meeting the Phoenix criteria for BCR were 80% (4/5), 90% (9/10), 100% (4/4), and 83% (5/6) for a PSA of <0.5, 0.5-<1, 1-<1.5, and 1.5-2 ng/mL, respectively. There were no significant differences in detection rates between patients with and without prior ADT (100% vs. 91%, P = 0.173) or patients with a Gleason score of ≤7 and a Gleason score of ≥8 (98% vs. 91%, P = 0.316).18F-rhPSMA-7 revealed local recurrence in 80% (78/97); pelvic lymph node metastases in 38% (37/97); retroperitoneal and supradiaphragmatic lymph node metastases in 9% (9/97) and 4% (4/97), respectively; bone metastases in 27% (26/97); and visceral metastases in 3% (3/97). In the subgroup of patients with a PSA of <2 ng/mL above nadir, local recurrence occurred in 76% (19/25) and pelvic lymph node metastases in 36% (9/25). Conclusion:18F-rhPSMA-7 PET/CT demonstrates high detection rates in prostate cancer patients with BCR after primary radiation therapy, even at low PSA values. Its diagnostic efficacy is comparable to published data for other PSMA ligands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany;,Die Radiologie, Munich, Germany
| | - Markus Kroenke
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Wurzer
- Chair of Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany;,Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Heck
- Department of Urology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; and
| | - Karina Knorr
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Langbein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Isabel Rauscher
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Kilian Schiller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Hans-Jürgen Wester
- Chair of Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Katharina Ingenerf M, Karim H, Fink N, Ilhan H, Ricke J, Treitl KM, Schmid-Tannwald C. Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) in response assessment of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) for liver metastases of neuroendocrine tumors (NET): a feasibility study. Acta Radiol 2022; 63:877-888. [PMID: 34225464 PMCID: PMC9194807 DOI: 10.1177/02841851211024004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background In patients with hepatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) locoregional therapies
such as transarterial radioembolization (TARE) are increasingly applied.
Response evaluation remains challenging and previous studies assessing
response with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) have been inconclusive. Purpose To perform a feasibility study to evaluate if response assessment with
quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in patients with liver
metastases of NETs after TARE will be possible. Material and Methods Retrospectively, 43 patients with 120 target lesions who obtained abdominal
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with DWI 39±28 days before and 74±46 days
after TARE were included. Intralesional ADC (ADCmin,
ADCmax, and ADCmean) were measured for a maximum
number of three lesions per patient on baseline and post-interventional DWI.
Tumor response was categorized according to RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST. Results TARE resulted in partial remission (PR) in 23% (63%), in stable disease (SD)
in 73% (23%), in progressive disease (PD) in 5% (7%) and in complete
response (CR) in 0% (1%) according to RECIST 1.1 (mRECIST, respectively).
ADC values increased significantly (P<0.005) after TARE
in the PR group whereas there was no significant change in the PD group.
Post-therapeutic ADC values of SD lesions increased significantly when
evaluated by RECIST 1.1 but not if evaluated by mRECIST. Percentual changes
of ADCmean values were slightly higher for responders compared to
non-responders (P<0.05). Conclusion ADC values seem to represent an additional marker for treatment response
evaluation after TARE in patients with secondary hepatic NET. A conclusive
study seems feasible though patient-based evaluation and overall survival
and progression free survival as alternate primary endpoints should be
considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Katharina Ingenerf
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, Munich, Germany
| | - Homeira Karim
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, Munich, Germany
| | - Nicola Fink
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, Munich, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, Munich, Germany
| | - Karla-Maria Treitl
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, Munich, Germany
| | - Christine Schmid-Tannwald
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ahmadzadehfar H, Ilhan H, Lam MGEH, Sraieb M, Stegger L. Radioembolization, Principles and indications. Nuklearmedizin 2022; 61:262-272. [PMID: 35354218 DOI: 10.1055/a-1759-4238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Radioembolization is the selective application of radionuclide-loaded microspheres into liver arteries for the therapy of liver tumours and metastases. In this review, we focused on therapy planning and dosimetry, as well as the main indications of 90Y-glass and resin microspheres and 166Ho-microspheres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany.,Die Radiologie, Practice for Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, and Radiation Oncology, Munich, Germany
| | - Marnix G E H Lam
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Utrecht Faculty of Medicine, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Miriam Sraieb
- Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Germany
| | - Lars Stegger
- Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Unterrainer LM, Beyer L, Zacherl MJ, Gildehaus FJ, Todica A, Kunte SC, Holzgreve A, Sheikh GT, Herlemann A, Casuscelli J, Brendel M, Albert NL, Wenter V, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Kunz WG, Cyran CC, Ricke J, Stief CG, Bartenstein P, Ilhan H, Unterrainer M. Total Tumor Volume on 18F-PSMA-1007 PET as Additional Imaging Biomarker in mCRPC Patients Undergoing PSMA-Targeted Alpha Therapy with 225Ac-PSMA-I&T. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10050946. [PMID: 35625683 PMCID: PMC9138410 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10050946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: PSMA-based alpha therapy using 225Ac-PSMA-I&T provides treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), even after the failure of 177Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy (RLT). In clinical routine, the total tumor volume (TTV) on PSMA PET impacts therapy outcomes and plays an increasing role in mCRPC patients. Hence, we aimed to assess TTV and its changes during 225Ac-PSMA-I&T RLT. Methods: mCRPC patients undergoing RLT with 225Ac-PSMA-I&T with available 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT prior to therapy initiation were included. TTV was assessed in all patients using established cut-off values. Image derived, clinical and biochemistry parameters (PSA, LDH, AP, pain score) were analyzed prior to and after two cycles of 225Ac-PSMA. Changes in TTV and further parameters were directly compared and then correlated with established response criteria, such as RECIST 1.1 or mPERCIST. Results: 13 mCRPC patients were included. The median overall survival (OS) was 10 months. Prior to 225Ac-PSMA RLT, there was no significant correlation between TTV with other clinical parameters (p > 0.05 each). Between short-term survivors (STS, <10 months OS) and long-term survivors (LTS, ≥10 months OS), TTV and PSA were comparable (p = 0.592 & p = 0.286, respectively), whereas AP was significantly lower in the LTS (p = 0.029). A total of 7/13 patients completed two cycles and underwent a follow-up 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT. Among these patients, there was a significant decrease in TTV (median 835 vs. 201 mL, p = 0.028) and PSA (median 687 ng/dL vs. 178 ng/dL, p = 0.018) after two cycles of 225Ac-PSMA RLT. Here, percentage changes of TTV after two cycles showed no direct correlation to all other clinical parameters (p > 0.05 each). In two patients, new PET-avid lesions were detected on 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT. However, TTV and PSA were decreasing or stable. Conclusion: PET-derived assessment of TTV is an easily applicable imaging biomarker independent of other established parameters prior to 225Ac-PSMA RLT in these preliminary follow-up data. Even after the failure of 177Lu-PSMA, patients with extensive TTV seem to profit from RLT. All but one patient who was eligible for ≥2 cycles of 225Ac-PSMA-RLT demonstrated drastic TTV decreases without direct correlation to other biomarkers, such as serum PSA changes. Changes in TTV might hence improve the response assessment compared to standard classifiers by reflecting the current tumor load independent of the occurrence of new lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena M. Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.B.); (M.J.Z.); (F.J.G.); (A.T.); (S.C.K.); (A.H.); (G.T.S.); (M.B.); (N.L.A.); (V.W.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-89-4400-74646
| | - Leonie Beyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.B.); (M.J.Z.); (F.J.G.); (A.T.); (S.C.K.); (A.H.); (G.T.S.); (M.B.); (N.L.A.); (V.W.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Mathias J. Zacherl
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.B.); (M.J.Z.); (F.J.G.); (A.T.); (S.C.K.); (A.H.); (G.T.S.); (M.B.); (N.L.A.); (V.W.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Franz J. Gildehaus
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.B.); (M.J.Z.); (F.J.G.); (A.T.); (S.C.K.); (A.H.); (G.T.S.); (M.B.); (N.L.A.); (V.W.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Andrei Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.B.); (M.J.Z.); (F.J.G.); (A.T.); (S.C.K.); (A.H.); (G.T.S.); (M.B.); (N.L.A.); (V.W.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Sophie C. Kunte
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.B.); (M.J.Z.); (F.J.G.); (A.T.); (S.C.K.); (A.H.); (G.T.S.); (M.B.); (N.L.A.); (V.W.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.B.); (M.J.Z.); (F.J.G.); (A.T.); (S.C.K.); (A.H.); (G.T.S.); (M.B.); (N.L.A.); (V.W.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Gabriel T. Sheikh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.B.); (M.J.Z.); (F.J.G.); (A.T.); (S.C.K.); (A.H.); (G.T.S.); (M.B.); (N.L.A.); (V.W.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Annika Herlemann
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (J.C.); (C.G.S.)
| | - Jozefina Casuscelli
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (J.C.); (C.G.S.)
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.B.); (M.J.Z.); (F.J.G.); (A.T.); (S.C.K.); (A.H.); (G.T.S.); (M.B.); (N.L.A.); (V.W.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Nathalie L. Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.B.); (M.J.Z.); (F.J.G.); (A.T.); (S.C.K.); (A.H.); (G.T.S.); (M.B.); (N.L.A.); (V.W.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Vera Wenter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.B.); (M.J.Z.); (F.J.G.); (A.T.); (S.C.K.); (A.H.); (G.T.S.); (M.B.); (N.L.A.); (V.W.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany;
| | - Wolfgang G. Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (W.G.K.); (C.C.C.); (J.R.); (M.U.)
| | - Clemens C. Cyran
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (W.G.K.); (C.C.C.); (J.R.); (M.U.)
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (W.G.K.); (C.C.C.); (J.R.); (M.U.)
| | - Christian G. Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (J.C.); (C.G.S.)
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.B.); (M.J.Z.); (F.J.G.); (A.T.); (S.C.K.); (A.H.); (G.T.S.); (M.B.); (N.L.A.); (V.W.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.B.); (M.J.Z.); (F.J.G.); (A.T.); (S.C.K.); (A.H.); (G.T.S.); (M.B.); (N.L.A.); (V.W.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU Munich), 81377 Munich, Germany; (W.G.K.); (C.C.C.); (J.R.); (M.U.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ilhan H, Royce T, Qiu X, Zamboglou C. Editorial: Exploring the Potential of PSMA-PET Imaging on Personalized Prostate Cancer Treatment. Front Oncol 2022; 12:832747. [PMID: 35186765 PMCID: PMC8847759 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.832747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwigs-Maximilian Universitaet (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Trevor Royce
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.,Flatiron Health, New York, NY, United States
| | - Xuefeng Qiu
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Oncology Center, European University Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Monti M, Degenhardt T, Brain E, Wuerstlein R, Argusti A, Puntoni M, Rollandi GA, Corradengo D, Boni L, Ilhan H, Nanni O, Cortes J, Piris-Gimenez A, Piccardo A, Iacozzi M, Matteucci F, Di Iorio V, Alberini JL, Schröder C, Harbeck N, Gennari A. ERANET JTC 2011: Submission and Activation of an International Academic Translational Project in Advanced Breast Cancer. Experience From the ET-FES Study. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 8:817678. [PMID: 35096909 PMCID: PMC8794579 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.817678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Academic research is important to face unmet medical needs. The Oncological community encounters many hurdles in setting up multicenter investigator-driven trials mainly due to administrative complexity. The purpose of a network organization at a multinational level is to facilitate clinical trials through standardization, coordination, and education for drug development and regulatory approval. Methods: The application of an European grant foresees the creation of a consortium which aims at facilitating multi-center academic clinical trials. Results: The ERA-NET TRANSCAN Call 2011 on “Validation of biomarkers for personalized cancer medicine” was released on December 2011. This project included Italian, Spanish, French and German centers. The approval process included Consortium constitution, project submission, Clinical Trial Submission, and activation on a national level. The different timescales for submitting study documents in each Country and the misalignment of objections by each Competent Authority CA, generated several requests for changes to the study documents which meant amendments had to be made; as requested by the 2001/20/EC Directive, the alignment of core documents is mandatory. This procedure impacted significantly on study activation timelines. Time to first patient in was 14, 10, 28, and 31 months from the date of submission in Italy, France, Spain, and Germany, respectively. Accrual was stopped on 22nd January 2021 due to an 18F FES shortage as the primary reason but also for having exceeded the project deadlines with consequent exhaustion of the funds allocated for the project. Conclusions: Pharmaceutical companies might be reluctant to fund research projects aimed at treatment individualization if the approval for a wider indication has already been achieved. Academic trials therefore become fundamental for promoting trials which are not attractive to big pharma. It was very difficult and time consuming to activate an academic clinical trial, for this reason, a study may become “old” as new drugs entered into the market. National institutions should promote the development of clinical research infrastructures and network with competence in regulatory, ethical, and legal skills to speed up academic research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuela Monti
- Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scienteifico Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "DinoAmadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Tom Degenhardt
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ludwig Maximilians University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Etienne Brain
- Department of Clinical Research and Medical Oncology, Institut Curie-Hopital "René Huguenin", Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ludwig Maximilians University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alessandra Argusti
- Clinical Trial Research Unit, Ente Ospedaliero Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | - Matteo Puntoni
- Clinical Trial Research Unit, Ente Ospedaliero Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Davide Corradengo
- Clinical Trial Research Unit, Ente Ospedaliero Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | - Luca Boni
- Clinical Trials Unit, Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro Istituto Scientifico Tumori, Genoa, Italy
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Die Radiologie (Centre for Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Radiotherapy), Munich, Germany
| | - Oriana Nanni
- Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scienteifico Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "DinoAmadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Javier Cortes
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alejandro Piris-Gimenez
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Arnoldo Piccardo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ente Ospedaliero Galliera Hospitals, Genoa, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Iacozzi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ente Ospedaliero Galliera Hospitals, Genoa, Italy
| | - Federica Matteucci
- Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scienteifico Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "DinoAmadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Valentina Di Iorio
- Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scienteifico Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "DinoAmadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Jean Louis Alberini
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Centre "Georges-François Leclerc", Dijon, France
| | - Carolien Schröder
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dutch Cancer Institute Nederlands Kanker Instituut - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ludwig Maximilians University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alessandra Gennari
- Department of Translational Oncology, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kirchner MA, Holzgreve A, Brendel M, Orth M, Ruf VC, Steiger K, Pötter D, Gold L, Unterrainer M, Mittlmeier LM, Barci E, Kälin RE, Glass R, Lindner S, Kaiser L, Maas J, von Baumgarten L, Ilhan H, Belka C, Notni J, Bartenstein P, Lauber K, Albert NL. PSMA PET Imaging in Glioblastoma: A Preclinical Evaluation and Theranostic Outlook. Front Oncol 2021; 11:774017. [PMID: 34869017 PMCID: PMC8635528 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.774017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET imaging has recently gained attention in glioblastoma (GBM) patients as a potential theranostic target for PSMA radioligand therapy. However, PSMA PET has not yet been established in a murine GBM model. Our goal was to investigate the potential of PSMA PET imaging in the syngeneic GL261 GBM model and to give an outlook regarding the potential of PMSA radioligand therapy in this model. Methods We performed an 18F-PSMA-1007 PET study in the orthotopic GL261 model (n=14 GBM, n=7 sham-operated mice) with imaging at day 4, 8, 11, 15, 18 and 22 post implantation. Time-activity-curves (TAC) were extracted from dynamic PET scans (0-120 min p. i.) in a subset of mice (n=4 GBM, n=3 sham-operated mice) to identify the optimal time frame for image analysis, and standardized-uptake-values (SUV) as well as tumor-to-background ratios (TBR) using contralateral normal brain as background were calculated in all mice. Additionally, computed tomography (CT), ex vivo and in vitro18F-PSMA-1007 autoradiographies (ARG) were performed. Results TAC analysis of GBM mice revealed a plateau of TBR values after 40 min p. i. Therefore, a 30 min time frame between 40-70 min p. i. was chosen for PET quantification. At day 15 and later, GBM mice showed a discernible PSMA PET signal on the inoculation site, with highest TBRmean in GBM mice at day 18 (7.3 ± 1.3 vs. 1.6 ± 0.3 in shams; p=0.024). Ex vivo ARG confirmed high tracer signal in GBM compared to healthy background (TBRmean 26.9 ± 10.5 vs. 1.6 ± 0.7 in shams at day 18/22 post implantation; p=0.002). However, absolute uptake values in the GL261 tumor remained low (e.g., SUVmean 0.21 ± 0.04 g/ml at day 18) resulting in low ratios compared to dose-relevant organs (e.g., mean tumor-to-kidney ratio 1.5E-2 ± 0.5E-2). Conclusions Although 18F-PSMA-1007 PET imaging of GL261 tumor-bearing mice is feasible and resulted in high TBRs, absolute tumoral uptake values remained low and hint to limited applicability of the GL261 model for PSMA-directed therapy studies. Further investigations are warranted to identify suitable models for preclinical evaluation of PSMA-targeted theranostic approaches in GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian A Kirchner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Orth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Viktoria C Ruf
- Center for Neuropathology and Prion Research, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Katja Steiger
- Institute of Pathology, Technische Universität München (TUM) School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Dennis Pötter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lukas Gold
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena M Mittlmeier
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Enio Barci
- Neurosurgical Research, Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Roland E Kälin
- Neurosurgical Research, Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Rainer Glass
- Neurosurgical Research, Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Simon Lindner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena Kaiser
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jessica Maas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Louisa von Baumgarten
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Johannes Notni
- Institute of Pathology, Technische Universität München (TUM) School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kirsten Lauber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Grawe F, Cahya A, Fabritius MP, Beyer L, Wenter V, Ruebenthaler J, Geyer T, Burgard C, Bartenstein P, Ilhan H, Spitzweg C, Todica A. Course of Disease and Clinical Management of Patients with Poorly Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13215309. [PMID: 34771473 PMCID: PMC8582377 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13215309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Revised: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma (PDTC) represents a rare but aggressive variant of thyroid carcinoma and contributes to a significant proportion of thyroid carcinoma-associated deaths. Studies on PDTC are rare; therefore, we aim to assess the clinical course of these patients, evaluate the prognostic value of response to initial radioiodine therapy and identify risk factors for poor prognosis to optimize the clinical management of patients with PDCT. Abstract Background: In patients with poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma, the clinical course and prognostic value of response to initial radioiodine therapy is evaluated. Methods: In 47 patients, clinical and imaging features were analyzed. Patients were stratified in no (NED), biochemical (B-ED) and structural evidence of disease (S-ED) assessed at the first diagnostic control and its impact on survival was evaluated. Further, possible risk factors for a shorter disease-specific survival rate (DSS) were analyzed. Results: In total, 17/47 patients consisted of NED, 10/47 were B-ED and 20/47 S-ED patients. At the last follow-up, 18/47 patients were NED, 2/47 patients B-ED and 27/47 patients S-ED. The median survival time was only reached for the S-ED group (median 3.9 years, 95%CI 2.8–5.1 years) and was not reached in the B-ED and NED groups. Metastases were diagnosed by a 18F-FDG-PET/CT scan in all cases and a multivariate analysis showed that the PET-positivity of metastases was the only significant predictor of DSS (p = 0.036). Conclusion: The response to initial surgery and radioiodine therapy in PDTC patients can achieve an excellent outcome and a further follow-up should be refined based on findings at the first diagnostic control. However, patients with an incomplete response and metastatic patients who become mostly radioiodine refractory show a significantly shorter survival, which makes accurate staging by 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Freba Grawe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.G.); (A.C.); (L.B.); (V.W.); (C.B.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Atika Cahya
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.G.); (A.C.); (L.B.); (V.W.); (C.B.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Matthias P. Fabritius
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.P.F.); (J.R.); (T.G.)
| | - Leonie Beyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.G.); (A.C.); (L.B.); (V.W.); (C.B.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Vera Wenter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.G.); (A.C.); (L.B.); (V.W.); (C.B.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Johannes Ruebenthaler
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.P.F.); (J.R.); (T.G.)
| | - Thomas Geyer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.P.F.); (J.R.); (T.G.)
| | - Caroline Burgard
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.G.); (A.C.); (L.B.); (V.W.); (C.B.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.G.); (A.C.); (L.B.); (V.W.); (C.B.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC LMU) and Interdisciplinary Center for Thyroid Carcinoma (ISKUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany;
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.G.); (A.C.); (L.B.); (V.W.); (C.B.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC LMU) and Interdisciplinary Center for Thyroid Carcinoma (ISKUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany;
| | - Christine Spitzweg
- Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC LMU) and Interdisciplinary Center for Thyroid Carcinoma (ISKUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany;
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Andrei Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.G.); (A.C.); (L.B.); (V.W.); (C.B.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC LMU) and Interdisciplinary Center for Thyroid Carcinoma (ISKUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany;
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rogowski P, Trapp C, von Bestenbostel R, Eze C, Ganswindt U, Li M, Unterrainer M, Zacherl MJ, Ilhan H, Beyer L, Kretschmer A, Bartenstein P, Stief C, Belka C, Schmidt-Hegemann NS. Outcome after PSMA-PET/CT-based salvage radiotherapy for nodal recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 49:1417-1428. [PMID: 34628521 PMCID: PMC8921036 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05557-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Nodal recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) represents a common state of disease, amenable to local therapy. PSMA-PET/CT detects PCa recurrence at low PSA levels. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of PSMA-PET/CT-based salvage radiotherapy (sRT) for lymph node (LN) recurrence. Methods A total of 100 consecutive patients treated with PSMA-PET/CT-based salvage elective nodal radiotherapy (sENRT) for LN recurrence were retrospectively examined. Patients underwent PSMA-PET/CT scan due to biochemical persistence (bcP, 76%) or biochemical recurrence (bcR, 24%) after radical prostatectomy (RP). Biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) defined as PSA < post-RT nadir + 0.2 ng/ml and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and uni- and multivariate analysis was performed. Results Median follow-up was 37 months. Median PSA at PSMA-PET/CT was 1.7 ng/ml (range 0.1–40.1) in patients with bcP and 1.4 ng/ml (range 0.3–5.1) in patients with bcR. PSMA-PET/CT detected 1, 2, and 3 or more LN metastases in 35%, 23%, and 42%, respectively. Eighty-three percent had only pelvic, 2% had only paraaortic, and 15% had pelvic and paraaortic LN metastases. Cumulatively, a total dose converted to EQD21.5 Gy of 66 Gy (60–70 Gy) was delivered to the prostatic fossa, 70 Gy (66–72 Gy) to the local recurrence, if present, 65.1 Gy (56–66 Gy) to PET-positive lymph nodes, and 47.5 Gy (42.4–50.9 Gy) to the lymphatic pathways. Concomitant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was administered in 83% of patients. One-, 2-, and 3-year BRFS was 80.7%, 71.6%, and 65.8%, respectively. One-, 2-, and 3-year DMFS was 91.6%, 79.1%, and 66.4%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, concomitant ADT, longer ADT duration (≥ 12 vs. < 12 months) and LN localization (pelvic vs. paraaortic) were associated with improved BRFS and concomitant ADT and lower PSA value before sRT (< 1 vs. > 1 ng/ml) with improved DMFS, respectively. No such association was seen for the number of affected lymph nodes. Conclusions Overall, the present analysis shows that the so far, unmatched sensitivity and specificity of PSMA-PET/CT translates in comparably high BRFS and DMFS after PSMA-PET/CT-based sENRT for patients with PCa LN recurrence. Concomitant ADT, duration of ADT, PSA value before sRT, and localization of LN metastases were significant factors for improved outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Rogowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Christian Trapp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Rieke von Bestenbostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Chukwuka Eze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Ute Ganswindt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Minglun Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mathias J Zacherl
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Leonie Beyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lapa C, Nestle U, Albert NL, Baues C, Beer A, Buck A, Budach V, Bütof R, Combs SE, Derlin T, Eiber M, Fendler WP, Furth C, Gani C, Gkika E, Grosu AL, Henkenberens C, Ilhan H, Löck S, Marnitz-Schulze S, Miederer M, Mix M, Nicolay NH, Niyazi M, Pöttgen C, Rödel CM, Schatka I, Schwarzenboeck SM, Todica AS, Weber W, Wegen S, Wiegel T, Zamboglou C, Zips D, Zöphel K, Zschaeck S, Thorwarth D, Troost EGC. Correction to: Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 198:80-82. [PMID: 34617130 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01851-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Constantin Lapa
- Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ambros Beer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rebecca Bütof
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz-Schulze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Miederer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West German Cancer Centre, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Claus M Rödel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Andrei S Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Simone Wegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. .,OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany. .,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. .,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Beyer L, Gosewisch A, Lindner S, Völter F, Mittlmeier LM, Tiling R, Brendel M, Cyran CC, Unterrainer M, Rübenthaler J, Auernhammer CJ, Spitzweg C, Böning G, Gildehaus FJ, Jurkschat K, Wängler C, Wängler B, Schirrmacher R, Wenter V, Todica A, Bartenstein P, Ilhan H. Dosimetry and optimal scan time of [ 18F]SiTATE-PET/CT in patients with neuroendocrine tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:3571-3581. [PMID: 33928401 PMCID: PMC8440281 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05351-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiolabelled somatostatin analogues targeting somatostatin receptors (SSR) are well established for combined positron emission tomography/computer tomography (PET/CT) imaging of neuroendocrine tumours (NET). [18F]SiTATE has recently been introduced showing high image quality, promising clinical performance and improved logistics compared to the clinical reference standard 68Ga-DOTA-TOC. Here we present the first dosimetry and optimal scan time analysis. METHODS Eight NET patients received a [18F]SiTATE-PET/CT (250 ± 66 MBq) with repeated emission scans (10, 30, 60, 120, 180 min after injection). Biodistribution in normal organs and SSR-positive tumour uptake were assessed. Dosimetry estimates for risk organs were determined using a combined linear-monoexponential model, and by applying 18F S-values and reference target masses for the ICRP89 adult male or female (OLINDA 2.0). Tumour-to-background ratios were compared quantitatively and visually between different scan times. RESULTS After 1 h, normal organs showed similar tracer uptake with only negligible changes until 3 h post-injection. In contrast, tracer uptake by tumours increased progressively for almost all types of metastases, thus increasing tumour-to-background ratios over time. Dosimetry resulted in a total effective dose of 0.015 ± 0.004 mSv/MBq. Visual evaluation revealed no clinically relevant discrepancies between later scan times, but image quality was rated highest in 60 and 120 min images. CONCLUSION [18F]SiTATE-PET/CT in NET shows overall high tumour-to-background ratios from 60 to 180 min after injection and an effective dose comparable to 68Ga-labelled alternatives. For clinical use of [18F]SiTATE, the best compromise between image quality and tumour-to-background contrast is reached at 120 min, followed by 60 min after injection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonie Beyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Astrid Gosewisch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Simon Lindner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Friederike Völter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena M Mittlmeier
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Reinhold Tiling
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Clemens C Cyran
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Christoph J Auernhammer
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine 4, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christine Spitzweg
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine 4, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Guido Böning
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - F J Gildehaus
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Klaus Jurkschat
- Fakultät für Chemie und Chemische Biologie, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Carmen Wängler
- Biomedical Chemistry, Department of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Björn Wängler
- Molecular Imaging and Radiochemistry, Department of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Ralf Schirrmacher
- Department of Oncology, Division of Oncological Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Vera Wenter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Andrei Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lehner S, Todica A, Böning G, Buchholz S, Bartenstein P, Hacker M, Ilhan H. [68Ga]DOTA-TATE PET for the detection of early transplant rejection in a heterotopic allograft heart transplantation model of the rat. A pilot study. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 67:174-179. [PMID: 34477347 DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4785.21.03387-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The most important cause of heart transplant loss is early acute allograft rejection, caused by the infiltration of lymphocytes, development of edema and myocardial necrosis. It has been propagated that [68Ga]DOTA-TATE PET might be suitable to quantify the presence of SSTR over-expressing lymphocytes. With heterotopic allogenic heart transplant models in the rat readily available, we aimed to investigate, if monitoring and quantification of acute allograft rejection after heterotopic allogenic heart transplantation was feasible by non-invasive serial [68Ga]DOTA-TATE PET. METHODS 17 Lewis rats (9 for serial PET imaging, 8 for histological correlation) received allogenic heterotopic heart transplants from 17 Brown-Norway rats. On days 4, 6 and 7 a [68Ga]DOTA-TATE PET scan was performed. RESULTS Imaging of acute transplant rejection until 7 days after allogenic heart transplantation in the rat is feasible. Heterotopic allografts showed significantly increased tracer uptake on day 4 until day 7 after transplantation, reflecting the process of histologically detected myocardial lymphocytic infiltration. Both the area of infarction and the amount of necrosis increased over the course of 7 days, with necrosis reaching statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS We purport that the detected PET signal is primarily a specific marker of lymphocyte infiltration and only to a lesser extent an unspecific marker of infarction and necrosis. Thus, [68Ga]DOTA-TATE PET might be a suitable tool for serial imaging and quantification of lymphocyte infiltration as a direct mediator of acute allograft rejection at an early stage after heart transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Lehner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Munich, Munich, Germany - .,Ambulatory Healthcare Center Dr. Neumaier & Colleagues, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, Radiation Therapy, Regensburg, Germany -
| | - Andrei Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Guido Böning
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Buchholz
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marcus Hacker
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Schmidt-Hegemann N, Trapp C, Rogowski P, Eze C, Milow J, Buchner A, Li M, Ilhan H, Wenter V, Stief C, Belka C, Kretschmer A. PD-0810 Salvage Therapies for PSMA PET/CT-positive nodal-only recurrent prostate cancer: Impact on survival, functional outcomes and health-related quality of life. Radiother Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)07089-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
24
|
Unterrainer M, Lindner S, Beyer L, Gildehaus FJ, Todica A, Mittlmeier LM, Jurkschat K, Wängler C, Wängler B, Schirrmacher R, Tonn JC, Albert NL, Bartenstein P, Ilhan H. PET Imaging of Meningioma Using the Novel SSTR-Targeting Peptide 18F-SiTATE. Clin Nucl Med 2021; 46:667-668. [PMID: 33782306 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000003607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT PET using 68Ga-labeled somatostatin receptor (SSTR) ligands adds significant information in meningioma patients. 18F-SiTATE is a novel, 18F-labeled SSTR-targeting peptide with remarkable imaging properties. Here, we present a 72-year-old woman with falx meningioma and transosseous extension. 18F-SiTATE PET/CT was performed 12 months after the previous 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT with comparable quantitative uptake and very good spatial resolution. So far, the widespread use of SSTR ligands for NET and meningioma imaging is hampered by cost-intensive 68Ge/68Ga generators, low activity amounts, lower spatial resolution, and short half-life. 18F-SiTATE might foster widespread use of SSTR ligands, overcoming the shortcomings of 68Ga-labeled ligands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Klaus Jurkschat
- Fakultät für Chemie und Chemische Biologie, Technische Universität, Dortmund
| | | | - Bjoern Wängler
- Molecular Imaging and Radiochemistry, Department of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Ralf Schirrmacher
- Division of Oncological Imaging, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jörg C Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lapa C, Nestle U, Albert NL, Baues C, Beer A, Buck A, Budach V, Bütof R, Combs SE, Derlin T, Eiber M, Fendler WP, Furth C, Gani C, Gkika E, Grosu AL, Henkenberens C, Ilhan H, Löck S, Marnitz-Schulze S, Miederer M, Mix M, Nicolay NH, Niyazi M, Pöttgen C, Rödel CM, Schatka I, Schwarzenboeck SM, Todica AS, Weber W, Wegen S, Wiegel T, Zamboglou C, Zips D, Zöphel K, Zschaeck S, Thorwarth D, Troost EGC. Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:1-23. [PMID: 34259912 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01812-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
This comprehensive review written by experts in their field gives an overview on the current status of incorporating positron emission tomography (PET) into radiation treatment planning. Moreover, it highlights ongoing studies for treatment individualisation and per-treatment tumour response monitoring for various primary tumours. Novel tracers and image analysis methods are discussed. The authors believe this contribution to be of crucial value for experts in the field as well as for policy makers deciding on the reimbursement of this powerful imaging modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantin Lapa
- Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ambros Beer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rebecca Bütof
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz-Schulze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Miederer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West German Cancer Centre, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Claus M Rödel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Andrei S Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Simone Wegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lapa C, Nestle U, Albert NL, Baues C, Beer A, Buck A, Budach V, Bütof R, Combs SE, Derlin T, Eiber M, Fendler WP, Furth C, Gani C, Gkika E, Grosu AL, Henkenberens C, Ilhan H, Löck S, Marnitz-Schulze S, Miederer M, Mix M, Nicolay NH, Niyazi M, Pöttgen C, Rödel CM, Schatka I, Schwarzenboeck SM, Todica AS, Weber W, Wegen S, Wiegel T, Zamboglou C, Zips D, Zöphel K, Zschaeck S, Thorwarth D, Troost EGC. Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy. Nuklearmedizin 2021; 60:326-343. [PMID: 34261141 DOI: 10.1055/a-1525-7029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
This comprehensive review written by experts in their field gives an overview on the current status of incorporating positron emission tomography (PET) into radiation treatment planning. Moreover, it highlights ongoing studies for treatment individualisation and per-treatment tumour response monitoring for various primary tumours. Novel tracers and image analysis methods are discussed. The authors believe this contribution to be of crucial value for experts in the field as well as for policy makers deciding on the reimbursement of this powerful imaging modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantin Lapa
- Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ambros Beer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rebecca Bütof
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz-Schulze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Miederer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West German Cancer Centre, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Claus M Rödel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Andrei S Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Simone Wegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Rogowski P, Trapp C, von Bestenbostel R, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Shi R, Ilhan H, Kretschmer A, Stief C, Ganswindt U, Belka C, Li M. Outcomes of metastasis-directed therapy of bone oligometastatic prostate cancer. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:125. [PMID: 34193194 PMCID: PMC8247211 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01849-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this work was to investigate the outcome of metastasis-directed radiotherapy (MDT) in prostate cancer patients with bone metastases following current ESTRO/EORTC subclassifications for oligometastatic disease. Methods Clinical data of 80 consecutive oligometastatic patients with 115 bone lesions receiving MDT between 2011 and 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Hormone-sensitive (77.5%) and castrate-resistant (22.5%) patients were included. MDT was delivered with conventional fractionated or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) techniques. Kaplan–Meier method, log rank test, as well as Cox regression were used to calculate local control (LC) and biochemical and clinical progression-free survival (bPFS/cPFS). Results At the time of MDT 31% of patients had de-novo synchronous oligometastatic disease, 46% had de-novo metachronous oligorecurrence after primary treatment and 23% had either de-novo oligoprogressive disease, repeat oligometastatic disease or induced oligometastatic disease. The median BED3 was 93.3 Gy (range 75.8–95.3 Gy). Concomitant ADT was administered in 69% of patients. After a median follow-up of 23 months the median bPFS and cPFS were 16.5 and 21.5 months, respectively. The 2-year LC rate was 98.3%. In multivariate analysis, age ≤ 70 (HR = 2.60, 95% CI 1.20–5.62, p = 0.015) and concomitant ADT (HR = 0.26, 95% CI 0.12–0.58, p = 0.001) significantly correlated with cPFS. Category of oligometastatic disease and hormone-sensitivity were predictive for cPFS in univariate analysis. Of 45 patients with biochemical relapse, nineteen patients (42.2%) had repeat oligometastatic disease. Fourteen patients (31%) underwent a second course of MDT. No patients experienced grade ≥ 3 toxicities. Conclusions MDT is safe and offers high local control rates in bone oligometastases of prostate cancer. At 2 years after treatment, more than 2 out of 5 patients are progression-free. Trial registration Retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Rogowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Trapp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Rieke von Bestenbostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Run Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Christian Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ute Ganswindt
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | - Minglun Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ahmadzadehfar H, Matern R, Baum RP, Seifert R, Kessel K, Bögemann M, Kratochwil C, Rathke H, Ilhan H, Svirydenka H, Sathekge M, Kabasakal L, Yordanova A, Garcia-Perez FO, Kairemo K, Maharaj M, Paez D, Virgolini I, Rahbar K. The impact of the extent of the bone involvement on overall survival and toxicity in mCRPC patients receiving [ 177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617: a WARMTH multicentre study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:4067-4076. [PMID: 34031719 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05383-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2020] [Accepted: 04/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based radioligand therapy (RLT) showed in a multicentre WARMTH (World Association of Radiopharmaceutical and Molecular Therapy) study that the presence of bone metastases is a negative prognosticator for the survival. The current multicentre retrospective analysis aims to evaluate the response rate to RLT, the overall survival (OS) of patients and the safety of the treatment according to the extent of bone involvement. METHODS The study included patients with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), who underwent RLT with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and a follow-up of at least 6 months. Tumour burden in the bone was classified prior to RLT as follows: less than 6 lesions, 6-20 lesions, more than 20 lesions and diffuse involvement. The response rate was evaluated using changes of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after the first treatment cycle. Overall survival was calculated from the date of the first treatment. Haematological adverse events were classified according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5.0. RESULTS A total of 319 males were included in the analysis. The extent of bone metastases and PSA response did not correlate significantly. Any PSA decline was observed in 73% patients; 44% showed a decline of ≥50%. The median OS of patient in the different subgroups was 18 months (less than 6 lesions), 13 months (6-20 lesions), 11 months (more than 20 lesions) and 8 months (diffuse involvement), respectively (p < 0.0001). Patients with prior Ra-223-therapy showed longer OS in all subgroups, especially in the subgroups with 6-20 lesions (OS: 16 vs. 12 months; p = 0.038) as well as diffuse involvement (OS: 11 vs. 7 months; p = 0.034). Significant negative prognosticators of OS were the existence of liver metastases in all subgroups and prior chemotherapy in patients with <6 bone lesions. Anaemia and thrombocytopenia correlated positively with the extent of bone metastases: p < 0.0001 and 0.005, respectively. No patient showed a high grade leukopenia. CONCLUSION The extent of bone involvement correlated negatively with the OS after RLT; however, it showed no relevant correlation with the PSA response rate. Prior therapy with Ra-223 may have a positive impact on OS. Haematotoxicity was higher in patients with more than 20 bone lesions; nevertheless, the majority of these patients did not show a relevant haematotoxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany. .,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Westfalen, Am Knappschaftskrankenhaus 1, 44309, Dortmund, Germany.
| | - Ralf Matern
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Richard P Baum
- Center for Precision Radiomolecular Oncology, Bad Berka (ZBB), Germany.,Advanced Theranostics Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Precision Oncology, ICPO Center of Excellence, CURANOSTICUM Wiesbaden-Frankfurt at DKD Helios Klinik, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Robert Seifert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.,West German Cancer Center, Münster and Essen, Germany
| | - Katharina Kessel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Martin Bögemann
- West German Cancer Center, Münster and Essen, Germany.,Department of Urology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Clemens Kratochwil
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hendrik Rathke
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Hanna Svirydenka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Mike Sathekge
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria & Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Levent Kabasakal
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Anna Yordanova
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.,Department of Radiology, Marienhospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | | | - Masha Maharaj
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Imaging and Therapy Centre, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
| | - Diana Paez
- Nuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Imaging Section, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, IAEA, Vienna, Austria
| | - Irene Virgolini
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Kambiz Rahbar
- West German Cancer Center, Münster and Essen, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Mittlmeier LM, Brendel M, Beyer L, Albert NL, Todica A, Zacherl MJ, Wenter V, Herlemann A, Kretschmer A, Ledderose ST, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Kunz WG, Ricke J, Bartenstein P, Ilhan H, Unterrainer M. Feasibility of Different Tumor Delineation Approaches for 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT Imaging in Prostate Cancer Patients. Front Oncol 2021; 11:663631. [PMID: 34094956 PMCID: PMC8176856 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.663631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Delineation of PSMA-positive tumor volume on PET using PSMA-ligands is of highest clinical interest as changes of PSMA-PET/CT-derived whole tumor volume (WTV) have shown to correlate with treatment response in metastatic prostate cancer patients. So far, WTV estimation was performed on PET using 68Ga-labeled ligands; nonetheless, 18F-labeled PET ligands are gaining increasing importance due to advantages over 68Ga-labeled compounds. However, standardized tumor delineation methods for 18F-labeled PET ligands have not been established so far. As correlation of PET-based information and morphological extent in osseous and visceral metastases is hampered by morphological delineation, low contrast in liver tissue and movement artefacts, we correlated CT-based volume of lymph node metastases (LNM) and different PET-based delineation approaches for thresholding on 18F-PSMA-1007 PET. Methods Fifty patients with metastatic prostate cancer, 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and non-bulky LNM (short-axis diameter ≥10mm) were included. Fifty LNM were volumetrically assessed on contrast-enhanced CT (volumetric reference standard). Different approaches for tumor volume delineation were applied and correlated with the reference standard: I) fixed SUV threshold, II) isocontour thresholding relative to SUVmax (SUV%), and thresholds relative to III) liver (SUVliver), IV) parotis (SUVparotis) and V) spleen (SUVspleen). Results A fixed SUV of 4.0 (r=0.807, r2 = 0.651, p<0.001) showed the best overall association with the volumetric reference. 55% SUVmax (r=0.627, r2 = 0.393, p<0.001) showed highest association using an isocontour-based threshold. Best background-based approaches were 60% SUVliver (r=0.715, r2 = 0.511, p<0.001), 80% SUVparotis (r=0.762, r2 = 0.581, p<0.001) and 60% SUVspleen (r=0.645, r2 = 0.416, p<0.001). Background tissues SUVliver, SUVparotis & SUVspleen did not correlate (p>0.05 each). Recently reported cut-offs for intraprostatic tumor delineation (isocontour 44% SUVmax, 42% SUVmax and 20% SUVmax) revealed inferior association for LNM delineation. Conclusions A threshold of SUV 4.0 for tumor delineation showed highest association with volumetric reference standard irrespective of potential changes in PSMA-avidity of background tissues (e. g. parotis). This approach is easily applicable in clinical routine without specific software requirements. Further studies applying this approach for total tumor volume delineation are initiated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena M Mittlmeier
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Leonie Beyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andrei Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mathias J Zacherl
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Vera Wenter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Annika Herlemann
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Wolfgang G Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Seidensticker M, Fabritius MP, Beller J, Seidensticker R, Todica A, Ilhan H, Pech M, Heinze C, Powerski M, Damm R, Weiss A, Rueckel J, Omari J, Amthauer H, Ricke J. Impact of Pharmaceutical Prophylaxis on Radiation-Induced Liver Disease Following Radioembolization. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13091992. [PMID: 33919073 PMCID: PMC8122451 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13091992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Radioembolization has failed to prove survival benefit in randomized trials, and, depending on various factors including tumor biology, response rates may vary considerably. Studies showed positive correlations between survival and absorbed tumor dose. Therefore, increasing currently prescribed tumor doses may be favorable for improving patient outcomes. The dominant limiting factor for increasing RE dose prescriptions is the relatively low tolerance of liver parenchyma to radiation with the possible consequence of a radiation-induced liver disease. Advances in RILD prevention may help increasing tolerable radiation doses to improve patient outcomes. Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of post-therapeutic RILD-prophylaxis in a cohort of intensely pretreated liver metastatic breast cancer patients. The results of this study as well as pathophysiological considerations warrant further investigations of RILD prophylaxis to increase dose prescriptions in radioembolization. Abstract Background: Radioembolization (RE) with yttrium-90 (90Y) resin microspheres yields heterogeneous response rates in with primary or secondary liver cancer. Radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) is a potentially life-threatening complication with higher prevalence in cirrhotics or patients exposed to previous chemotherapies. Advances in RILD prevention may help increasing tolerable radiation doses to improve patient outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of post-therapeutic RILD-prophylaxis in a cohort of intensely pretreated liver metastatic breast cancer patients; Methods: Ninety-three patients with liver metastases of breast cancer received RE between 2007 and 2016. All Patients received RILD prophylaxis for 8 weeks post-RE. From January 2014, RILD prophylaxis was changed from ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and prednisolone (standard prophylaxis [SP]; n = 59) to pentoxifylline (PTX), UDCA and low-dose low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (modified prophylaxis (MP); n = 34). The primary endpoint was toxicity including symptoms of RILD; Results: Dose exposure of normal liver parenchyma was higher in the modified vs. standard prophylaxis group (47.2 Gy (17.8–86.8) vs. 40.2 Gy (12.5–83.5), p = 0.017). All grade RILD events (mild: bilirubin ≥ 21 µmol/L (but <30 μmol/L); severe: (bilirubin ≥ 30 µmol/L and ascites)) were observed more frequently in the SP group than in the MP group, albeit without significance (7/59 vs. 1/34; p = 0.140). Severe RILD occurred in the SP group only (n = 2; p > 0.1). ALBI grade increased in 16.7% patients in the MP and in 27.1% patients in the SP group, respectively (group difference not significant); Conclusions: At established dose levels, mild or severe RILD events proved rare in our cohort. RILD prophylaxis with PTX, UDCA and LMWH appears to have an independent positive impact on OS in patients with metastatic breast cancer and may reduce the frequency and severity of RILD. Results of this study as well as pathophysiological considerations warrant further investigations of RILD prophylaxis presumably targeting combinations of anticoagulation (MP) and antiinflammation (SP) to increase dose prescriptions in radioembolization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (R.S.); (J.R.); (J.R.)
- Correspondence: (M.S.); (M.P.F.)
| | - Matthias Philipp Fabritius
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (R.S.); (J.R.); (J.R.)
- Correspondence: (M.S.); (M.P.F.)
| | - Jannik Beller
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Otto-von-Guericke Universitätsklinikum, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; (J.B.); (M.P.); (C.H.); (M.P.); (R.D.); (A.W.); (J.O.)
| | - Ricarda Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (R.S.); (J.R.); (J.R.)
| | - Andrei Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.T.); (H.I.)
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.T.); (H.I.)
| | - Maciej Pech
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Otto-von-Guericke Universitätsklinikum, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; (J.B.); (M.P.); (C.H.); (M.P.); (R.D.); (A.W.); (J.O.)
| | - Constanze Heinze
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Otto-von-Guericke Universitätsklinikum, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; (J.B.); (M.P.); (C.H.); (M.P.); (R.D.); (A.W.); (J.O.)
| | - Maciej Powerski
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Otto-von-Guericke Universitätsklinikum, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; (J.B.); (M.P.); (C.H.); (M.P.); (R.D.); (A.W.); (J.O.)
| | - Robert Damm
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Otto-von-Guericke Universitätsklinikum, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; (J.B.); (M.P.); (C.H.); (M.P.); (R.D.); (A.W.); (J.O.)
| | - Alexander Weiss
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Otto-von-Guericke Universitätsklinikum, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; (J.B.); (M.P.); (C.H.); (M.P.); (R.D.); (A.W.); (J.O.)
| | - Johannes Rueckel
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (R.S.); (J.R.); (J.R.)
| | - Jazan Omari
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Otto-von-Guericke Universitätsklinikum, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; (J.B.); (M.P.); (C.H.); (M.P.); (R.D.); (A.W.); (J.O.)
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (R.S.); (J.R.); (J.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Brosch-Lenz J, Uribe C, Gosewisch A, Kaiser L, Todica A, Ilhan H, Gildehaus FJ, Bartenstein P, Rahmim A, Celler A, Ziegler S, Böning G. Correction to: Influence of dosimetry method on bone lesion absorbed dose estimates in PSMA therapy: application to mCRPC patients receiving Lu-177-PSMA-I&T. EJNMMI Phys 2021; 8:36. [PMID: 33847807 PMCID: PMC8044271 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-021-00382-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Brosch-Lenz
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Carlos Uribe
- PET Functional Imaging, BC Cancer, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4E6, Canada.,Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Astrid Gosewisch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena Kaiser
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Andrei Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Franz Josef Gildehaus
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Arman Rahmim
- PET Functional Imaging, BC Cancer, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4E6, Canada.,Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.,Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Centre, 675 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada
| | - Anna Celler
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Sibylle Ziegler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Guido Böning
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Brosch-Lenz J, Uribe C, Gosewisch A, Kaiser L, Todica A, Ilhan H, Gildehaus FJ, Bartenstein P, Rahmim A, Celler A, Ziegler S, Böning G. Influence of dosimetry method on bone lesion absorbed dose estimates in PSMA therapy: application to mCRPC patients receiving Lu-177-PSMA-I&T. EJNMMI Phys 2021; 8:26. [PMID: 33709253 PMCID: PMC7952490 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-021-00369-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) present with an increased tumor burden in the skeleton. For these patients, Lutetium-177 (Lu-177) radioligand therapy targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has gained increasing interest with promising outcome data. Patient-individualized dosimetry enables improvement of therapy success with the aim of minimizing absorbed dose to organs at risk while maximizing absorbed dose to tumors. Different dosimetric approaches with varying complexity and accuracy exist for this purpose. The Medical Internal Radiation Dose (MIRD) formalism applied to tumors assumes a homogeneous activity distribution in a sphere with unit density for derivation of tumor S values (TSV). Voxel S value (VSV) approaches can account for heterogeneous activities but are simulated for a specific tissue. Full patient-individual Monte Carlo (MC) absorbed dose simulation addresses both, heterogeneous activity and density distributions. Subsequent CT-based density weighting has the potential to overcome the assumption of homogeneous density in the MIRD formalism with TSV and VSV methods, which could be a major limitation for the application in bone metastases with heterogeneous density. The aim of this investigation is a comparison of these methods for bone lesion dosimetry in mCRPC patients receiving Lu-177-PSMA therapy. RESULTS In total, 289 bone lesions in 15 mCRPC patients were analyzed. Percentage difference (PD) of average absorbed dose per lesion compared to MC, averaged over all lesions, was + 14 ± 10% (min: - 21%; max: + 56%) for TSVs. With lesion-individual density weighting using Hounsfield Unit (HU)-to-density conversion on the patient's CT image, PD was reduced to - 8 ± 1% (min: - 10%; max: - 3%). PD on a voxel level for three-dimensional (3D) voxel-wise dosimetry methods, averaged per lesion, revealed large PDs of + 18 ± 11% (min: - 27%; max: + 58%) for a soft tissue VSV approach compared to MC; after voxel-wise density correction, this was reduced to - 5 ± 1% (min: - 12%; max: - 2%). CONCLUSION Patient-individual MC absorbed dose simulation is capable to account for heterogeneous densities in bone lesions. Since the computational effort prevents its routine clinical application, TSV or VSV dosimetry approaches are used. This study showed the necessity of lesion-individual density weighting for TSV or VSV in Lu-177-PSMA therapy bone lesion dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Brosch-Lenz
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Carlos Uribe
- PET Functional Imaging, BC Cancer, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6 Canada
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9 Canada
| | - Astrid Gosewisch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Lena Kaiser
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Andrei Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Franz Josef Gildehaus
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Arman Rahmim
- PET Functional Imaging, BC Cancer, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6 Canada
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9 Canada
- Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Centre, 675 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3 Canada
| | - Anna Celler
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9 Canada
| | - Sibylle Ziegler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Guido Böning
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Völter F, Mittlmeier L, Gosewisch A, Brosch-Lenz J, Gildehaus FJ, Zacherl MJ, Beyer L, Stief CG, Holzgreve A, Rübenthaler J, Cyran CC, Böning G, Bartenstein P, Todica A, Ilhan H. Correlation of an Index-Lesion-Based SPECT Dosimetry Method with Mean Tumor Dose and Clinical Outcome after 177Lu-PSMA-617 Radioligand Therapy. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11030428. [PMID: 33802417 PMCID: PMC7999994 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11030428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2021] [Revised: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Dosimetry can tailor prostate-specific membrane-antigen-targeted radioligand therapy (PSMA-RLT) for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, whole-body tumor dosimetry is challenging in patients with a high tumor burden. We evaluate a simplified index-lesion-based single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) dosimetry method in correlation with clinical outcome. Methods: 30 mCRPC patients were included (median 71 years). The dosimetry was performed for the first cycle using quantitative 177Lu-SPECT. The response was evaluated using RECIST 1.1 and PERCIST criteria, as well as changes in PSMA-positive tumor volume (PSMA-TV) in post-therapy PSMA-PET and biochemical response according to PSA changes after two RLT cycles. Results: Mean tumor doses as well as index-lesion doses were significantly higher in PERCIST responders compared to non-responders (10.2 ± 12.0 Gy/GBq vs. 4.0 ± 2.9 Gy/GBq, p = 0.03 and 13.7 ± 14.2 Gy/GBq vs. 5.9 ± 4.4 Gy/GBq, p = 0.04, respectively). No significant differences in mean tumor and index lesion doses were observed between responders and non-responders according to RECIST 1.1, PSMA-TV, and biochemical response criteria. Conclusion: Compared to mean tumor doses on a patient level, single index-lesion-based SPECT dosimetry correlates equally well with the response to PSMA-RLT according to PERCIST criteria and may represent a fast and feasible dosimetry approach for clinical routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Friederike Völter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80331 Munich, Germany; (F.V.); (L.M.); (A.G.); (J.B.-L.); (F.J.G.); (M.J.Z.); (L.B.); (A.H.); (G.B.); (P.B.); (A.T.)
| | - Lena Mittlmeier
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80331 Munich, Germany; (F.V.); (L.M.); (A.G.); (J.B.-L.); (F.J.G.); (M.J.Z.); (L.B.); (A.H.); (G.B.); (P.B.); (A.T.)
| | - Astrid Gosewisch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80331 Munich, Germany; (F.V.); (L.M.); (A.G.); (J.B.-L.); (F.J.G.); (M.J.Z.); (L.B.); (A.H.); (G.B.); (P.B.); (A.T.)
| | - Julia Brosch-Lenz
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80331 Munich, Germany; (F.V.); (L.M.); (A.G.); (J.B.-L.); (F.J.G.); (M.J.Z.); (L.B.); (A.H.); (G.B.); (P.B.); (A.T.)
| | - Franz Josef Gildehaus
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80331 Munich, Germany; (F.V.); (L.M.); (A.G.); (J.B.-L.); (F.J.G.); (M.J.Z.); (L.B.); (A.H.); (G.B.); (P.B.); (A.T.)
| | - Mathias Johannes Zacherl
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80331 Munich, Germany; (F.V.); (L.M.); (A.G.); (J.B.-L.); (F.J.G.); (M.J.Z.); (L.B.); (A.H.); (G.B.); (P.B.); (A.T.)
| | - Leonie Beyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80331 Munich, Germany; (F.V.); (L.M.); (A.G.); (J.B.-L.); (F.J.G.); (M.J.Z.); (L.B.); (A.H.); (G.B.); (P.B.); (A.T.)
| | - Christian G. Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80331 Munich, Germany;
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80331 Munich, Germany; (F.V.); (L.M.); (A.G.); (J.B.-L.); (F.J.G.); (M.J.Z.); (L.B.); (A.H.); (G.B.); (P.B.); (A.T.)
| | - Johannes Rübenthaler
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80331 Munich, Germany; (J.R.); (C.C.C.)
| | - Clemens C. Cyran
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80331 Munich, Germany; (J.R.); (C.C.C.)
| | - Guido Böning
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80331 Munich, Germany; (F.V.); (L.M.); (A.G.); (J.B.-L.); (F.J.G.); (M.J.Z.); (L.B.); (A.H.); (G.B.); (P.B.); (A.T.)
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80331 Munich, Germany; (F.V.); (L.M.); (A.G.); (J.B.-L.); (F.J.G.); (M.J.Z.); (L.B.); (A.H.); (G.B.); (P.B.); (A.T.)
| | - Andrei Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80331 Munich, Germany; (F.V.); (L.M.); (A.G.); (J.B.-L.); (F.J.G.); (M.J.Z.); (L.B.); (A.H.); (G.B.); (P.B.); (A.T.)
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80331 Munich, Germany; (F.V.); (L.M.); (A.G.); (J.B.-L.); (F.J.G.); (M.J.Z.); (L.B.); (A.H.); (G.B.); (P.B.); (A.T.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-89-4400-77655
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Mittlmeier LM, Ledderose ST, Schott M, Brendel M, Beyer L, Theurich S, Mayr D, Walz C, Kunz WG, Ricke J, Bartenstein P, Ilhan H, Staehler M, Unterrainer M. Immature Plasma Cell Myeloma Mimics Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma on 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT Due to Endothelial PSMA-Expression. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:423. [PMID: 33802288 PMCID: PMC8000301 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11030423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Revised: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
We present a 71-year-old female patient who underwent 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT for suspected metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as RCC also shows high PSMA-expression in tumor neovascularization. 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT showed a high PSMA-avidity in the renal tumor, enlarged intra-abdominal and mediastinal lymph nodes. Moreover, PSMA-positive pleural, pulmonal and osseous lesions were found. However, histopathology revealed an immature plasma cell myeloma with an endothelial PSMA-expression of the neovasculature. This case illustrates the increased PSMA-avidity in multiple myeloma and highlights PSMA as a potential theragnostic target in multiple myeloma. For clinical routine, lymphatic diseases such as extramedullary myeloma should be considered as differential diagnosis in PSMA-avid renal masses on PET/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena M. Mittlmeier
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.M.M.); (M.B.); (L.B.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Stephan T. Ledderose
- Institute of Pathology, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (S.T.L.); (D.M.); (C.W.)
| | - Melanie Schott
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.S.); (M.S.)
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.M.M.); (M.B.); (L.B.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Leonie Beyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.M.M.); (M.B.); (L.B.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Sebastian Theurich
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany;
| | - Doris Mayr
- Institute of Pathology, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (S.T.L.); (D.M.); (C.W.)
| | - Christoph Walz
- Institute of Pathology, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (S.T.L.); (D.M.); (C.W.)
| | - Wolfgang G. Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (W.G.K.); (J.R.)
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (W.G.K.); (J.R.)
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.M.M.); (M.B.); (L.B.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.M.M.); (M.B.); (L.B.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.S.); (M.S.)
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (W.G.K.); (J.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Froelich MF, Schnitzer ML, Holzgreve A, Gassert FG, Gresser E, Overhoff D, Schwarze V, Fabritius MP, Nörenberg D, von Münchhausen N, Hokamp NG, Auernhammer CJ, Ilhan H, Todica A, Rübenthaler J. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of 68Ga DOTA-TATE PET/CT, 111In-Pentetreotide SPECT/CT and CT for Diagnostic Workup of Neuroendocrine Tumors. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11020334. [PMID: 33670457 PMCID: PMC7922846 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11020334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Revised: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are relatively rare neoplasms arising from the hormone-producing neuroendocrine system that can occur in various organs such as pancreas, small bowel, stomach and lung. As the majority of these tumors express somatostatin receptors (SSR) on their cell membrane, utilization of SSR analogs in nuclear medicine is a promising, but relatively costly approach for detection and localization. The aim of this study was to analyze the cost-effectiveness of 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT (Gallium-68 DOTA-TATE Positron emission tomography/computed tomography) compared to 111In-pentetreotide SPECT/CT (Indium-111 pentetreotide Single Photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography) and to CT (computed tomography) alone in detection of NETs. A decision model on the basis of Markov simulations evaluated lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) related to either a CT, SPECT/CT or PET/CT. Model input parameters were obtained from publicized research projects. The analysis is grounded on the US healthcare system. Deterministic sensitivity analysis of diagnostic parameters and probabilistic sensitivity analysis predicated on a Monte Carlo simulation with 30,000 reiterations was executed. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) was determined to be $ 100,000/QALY. In the base-case investigation, PET/CT ended up with total costs of $88,003.07 with an efficacy of 4.179, whereas CT ended up with total costs of $88,894.71 with an efficacy of 4.165. SPECT/CT ended up with total costs of $89,973.34 with an efficacy of 4.158. Therefore, the strategies CT and SPECT/CT were dominated by PET/CT in the base-case scenario. In the sensitivity analyses, PET/CT remained a cost-effective strategy. This result was due to reduced therapy costs of timely detection. The additional costs of 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT when compared to CT alone are justified in the light of potential savings in therapy costs and better outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Frank Froelich
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (M.F.F.); (D.O.); (D.N.); (N.v.M.)
| | - Moritz Ludwig Schnitzer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.L.S.); (E.G.); (V.S.); (M.P.F.)
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System (GEPNET-KUM), LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (C.J.A.); (H.I.); (A.T.)
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System (GEPNET-KUM), LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (C.J.A.); (H.I.); (A.T.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Felix Gerhard Gassert
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany;
| | - Eva Gresser
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.L.S.); (E.G.); (V.S.); (M.P.F.)
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System (GEPNET-KUM), LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (C.J.A.); (H.I.); (A.T.)
| | - Daniel Overhoff
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (M.F.F.); (D.O.); (D.N.); (N.v.M.)
| | - Vincent Schwarze
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.L.S.); (E.G.); (V.S.); (M.P.F.)
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System (GEPNET-KUM), LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (C.J.A.); (H.I.); (A.T.)
| | - Matthias Philipp Fabritius
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.L.S.); (E.G.); (V.S.); (M.P.F.)
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System (GEPNET-KUM), LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (C.J.A.); (H.I.); (A.T.)
| | - Dominik Nörenberg
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (M.F.F.); (D.O.); (D.N.); (N.v.M.)
| | - Niklas von Münchhausen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (M.F.F.); (D.O.); (D.N.); (N.v.M.)
| | - Nils Große Hokamp
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany;
| | - Christoph J. Auernhammer
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System (GEPNET-KUM), LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (C.J.A.); (H.I.); (A.T.)
- Department of Internal Medicine 4, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System (GEPNET-KUM), LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (C.J.A.); (H.I.); (A.T.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Andrei Todica
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System (GEPNET-KUM), LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (C.J.A.); (H.I.); (A.T.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Johannes Rübenthaler
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.L.S.); (E.G.); (V.S.); (M.P.F.)
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System (GEPNET-KUM), LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (C.J.A.); (H.I.); (A.T.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Wenter V, Albert NL, Ahmaddy F, Unterrainer M, Hornung J, Ilhan H, Bartenstein P, Spitzweg C, Kneidinger N, Todica A. The diagnostic challenge of coexistent sarcoidosis and thyroid cancer - a retrospective study. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:139. [PMID: 33550991 PMCID: PMC7868024 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07745-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sarcoid lesions may mimic metastatic disease or recurrence in thyroid cancer (TC) patients as both diseases may affect the lungs and lymph nodes. We present the first study to systematically evaluate the clinical course of patients with (TC) after adjuvant radioactive iodine therapy (RIT) and concomitant sarcoidosis of the lung or the lymph nodes. METHODS We screened 3285 patients and retrospectively identified 16 patients with TC (11 papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), 3 follicular thyroid cancer (FTC), 1 oncocytic PTC, 1 oncocytic FTC) and coexisting sarcoidosis of the lung and/or the lymph nodes treated at our institute. All patients had undergone thyroidectomy and initial adjuvant RIT. Challenges in diagnosing and the management of these patients were evaluated during long term follow-up (median 4.9 years (0.8-15.0 years)). RESULTS Median age at first diagnosis of TC was 50.1 years (33.0-71.5 years) and of sarcoidosis 39.4 years (18.0-63.9 years). During follow-up, physicians were able to differentiate between SA and persistent or recurrent TC in 10 of 16 patients (63%). Diagnosis was complicated by initial negative thyroglobulin (Tg), positive Tg antibodies and non-specific imaging findings. Histopathology can reliably distinguish between SA and TC in patients with one suspicious lesion. CONCLUSION Physicians should be aware of the rare coexistence of sarcoidosis and TC. Lymphadenopathy and pulmonary lesions could be metastases, sarcoidosis or even a mix of both. Therefore, this rare patient group should receive a thorough work up including histopathological clarification and, if necessary, separately for each lesion.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adenocarcinoma, Follicular/diagnosis
- Adenocarcinoma, Follicular/diagnostic imaging
- Adenocarcinoma, Follicular/metabolism
- Adenocarcinoma, Follicular/surgery
- Adolescent
- Adult
- Aged
- Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism
- Diagnosis, Differential
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Prognosis
- Retrospective Studies
- Sarcoidosis/diagnosis
- Sarcoidosis/diagnostic imaging
- Sarcoidosis/metabolism
- Sarcoidosis/surgery
- Thyroid Cancer, Papillary/diagnosis
- Thyroid Cancer, Papillary/diagnostic imaging
- Thyroid Cancer, Papillary/metabolism
- Thyroid Cancer, Papillary/surgery
- Thyroid Neoplasms/diagnosis
- Thyroid Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
- Thyroid Neoplasms/metabolism
- Thyroid Neoplasms/surgery
- Young Adult
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera Wenter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Freba Ahmaddy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Julia Hornung
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC LMU) and Interdisciplinary Center for Thyroid Carcinoma (ISKUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC LMU) and Interdisciplinary Center for Thyroid Carcinoma (ISKUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christine Spitzweg
- Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC LMU) and Interdisciplinary Center for Thyroid Carcinoma (ISKUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nikolaus Kneidinger
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Comprehensive Pneumology Center (CPC-M), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Member of the German Centre for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany
| | - Andrei Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC LMU) and Interdisciplinary Center for Thyroid Carcinoma (ISKUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Fabritius MP, Hartmann F, Seidensticker R, Pech M, Powerski M, Grosu S, Maurus S, Todica A, Ilhan H, Omari J, Damm R, GROßER O, Albers J, Ricke J, Seidensticker M. Liver Function Changes After Technetium-99m-Macroaggregated Albumin Administration and Their Predictive Value Regarding Hepatotoxicity in Patients Undergoing Yttrium-90-Radioembolization. Anticancer Res 2021; 41:437-444. [PMID: 33419841 DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Intraarterial Technetium-99m-Macroaggregated Albumin (99mTc-MAA) administration is an established method to predict particle distribution prior to radioembolization. This study aimed to analyse the impact of intraarterial administration of 99mTc-MAA on changes in liver-specific laboratory parameters and to assess whether such changes are associated with post-radioembolization hepatotoxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 202 patients treated with radioembolization received prior mapping angiography with 99mTc-MAA administration. All patients underwent clinical and laboratory examinations, including liver-specific parameters at certain times before and after mapping angiography/99mTc-MAA administration, as well as before radioembolization and during follow-up. RESULTS Bilirubin increased temporarily after 99mTc-MAA administration (p<0.001), but was not clinically relevant, and returned close to the initial value before radioembolization. These changes showed no association with subsequent postradioembolic hepatotoxicity or shortened overall survival. CONCLUSION 99mTc-MAA administration results in a significant, however, not clinically relevant transient increase in bilirubin levels, which does not provide a predictive value for subsequent radioembolization outcome or postradioembolic hepatotoxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fabian Hartmann
- Otto-von-Guericke Universitätsklinikum, Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | | | - Maciej Pech
- Otto-von-Guericke Universitätsklinikum, Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Maciej Powerski
- Otto-von-Guericke Universitätsklinikum, Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Sergio Grosu
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Maurus
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andrei Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jazan Omari
- Otto-von-Guericke Universitätsklinikum, Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Robert Damm
- Otto-von-Guericke Universitätsklinikum, Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Oliver GROßER
- Otto-von-Guericke Universitätsklinikum, Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | | | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ahmaddy F, Burgard C, Beyer L, Koehler VF, Bartenstein P, Fabritius MP, Geyer T, Wenter V, Ilhan H, Spitzweg C, Todica A. 18F-FDG-PET/CT in Patients with Advanced, Radioiodine Refractory Thyroid Cancer Treated with Lenvatinib. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13020317. [PMID: 33467085 PMCID: PMC7830971 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13020317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Revised: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary In patients with advanced radioiodine refractory differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC), therapeutic options are limited. In the “Study of (E7080) Lenvatinib in Differentiated Cancer of the Thyroid (SELECT)”, Lenvatinib significantly prolonged the progression-free survival, resulting in a more frequent use in clinical practice for this patient group. Due to considerable side effects, an accurate assessment of response to treatment is crucial in these patients. Therefore, we aimed to improve treatment individualization and reduce unnecessary therapies by selecting patients who will most likely benefit from Lenvatinib treatment using 2-deoxy-2-[18F] fluoro-D-glucose positron-emission-tomography/computed-tomography. Abstract Background: The tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) Lenvatinib represents one of the most effective therapeutic options in patients with advanced radioiodine refractory differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). We aimed to assess the role of 2-deoxy-2-[18F] fluoro-D-glucose positron-emission-tomography/computed-tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) in the monitoring of functional tumor response compared to morphological response. Methods: In 22 patients, a modified Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria In Solid Tumors (mPERCIST) evaluation before treatment with Lenvatinib and at 3 and 6 month follow up was performed. Further PET-parameters and morphologic tumor response using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 were assessed and their prediction of progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) was evaluated. Results: Most patients were rated stable in morphological evaluation and progressive using a metabolic response. All patients who responded to therapy through RECIST showed a decline in nearly all Positron Emission Tomography (PET)-parameters. For both time-points, non-responders according to mPERCIST showed significantly lower median PFS and DSS, whereas according to RECIST, only DSS was significantly lower. Conclusion: Tumor response assessment by 18F-FDG-PET outperforms morphological response assessment by CT in patients with advanced radioiodine refractory DTC treated with Lenvatinib, which seems to be correlated with clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Freba Ahmaddy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.A.); (C.B.); (L.B.); (P.B.); (V.W.); (H.I.)
| | - Caroline Burgard
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.A.); (C.B.); (L.B.); (P.B.); (V.W.); (H.I.)
| | - Leonie Beyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.A.); (C.B.); (L.B.); (P.B.); (V.W.); (H.I.)
| | - Viktoria Florentine Koehler
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (V.F.K.); (C.S.)
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.A.); (C.B.); (L.B.); (P.B.); (V.W.); (H.I.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Interdisciplinary Center for Thyroid Carcinoma (ISKUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias P. Fabritius
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.P.F.); (T.G.)
| | - Thomas Geyer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.P.F.); (T.G.)
| | - Vera Wenter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.A.); (C.B.); (L.B.); (P.B.); (V.W.); (H.I.)
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.A.); (C.B.); (L.B.); (P.B.); (V.W.); (H.I.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Interdisciplinary Center for Thyroid Carcinoma (ISKUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Christine Spitzweg
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (V.F.K.); (C.S.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Interdisciplinary Center for Thyroid Carcinoma (ISKUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Andrei Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.A.); (C.B.); (L.B.); (P.B.); (V.W.); (H.I.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Interdisciplinary Center for Thyroid Carcinoma (ISKUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-89-4400-74653
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Çelik SY, Ilhan H. Thermodynamic and Kinetic Parameters of Thermostable Alkaline Phosphatase from Geobacillus pallidus P26. Russ J Bioorg Chem 2021. [DOI: 10.1134/s1068162021010039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
40
|
Mittlmeier LM, Unterrainer M, Rodler S, Todica A, Albert NL, Burgard C, Cyran CC, Kunz WG, Ricke J, Bartenstein P, Stief CG, Ilhan H, Staehler M. 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT for response assessment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma undergoing tyrosine kinase or checkpoint inhibitor therapy: preliminary results. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; 48:2031-2037. [PMID: 33369689 PMCID: PMC8113284 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-05165-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Tyrosine kinase (TKI) and checkpoint inhibitors (CI) prolonged overall survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Early prediction of treatment response is highly desirable for the individualization of patient management and improvement of therapeutic outcome; however, serum biochemistry is unable to predict therapeutic efficacy. Therefore, we compared 18F-PSMA-1007 PET imaging for response assessment in mRCC patients undergoing TKI or CI therapy compared to CT-based response assessment as the current imaging reference standard. Methods 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT was performed in mRCC patients prior to initiation of systemic treatment and 8 weeks after therapy initiation. Treatment response was evaluated separately on 18F-PSMA-PET and CT. Changes on PSMA-PET (SUVmean) were assessed on a per patient basis using a modified PERCIST scoring system. Complete response (CRPET) was defined as absence of any uptake in all target lesions on posttreatment PET. Partial response (PRPET) was defined as decrease in summed SUVmean of > 30%. The appearance of new, PET-positive lesions or an increase in summed SUVmean of > 30% was defined as progressive disease (PDPET). A change in summed SUVmean of ± 30% defined stable disease (SDPET). RECIST 1.1 criteria were used for response assessment on CT. Results of radiographic response assessment on PSMA-PET and CT were compared. Results Overall, 11 mRCC patients undergoing systemic treatment were included. At baseline PSMA-PET1, all mRCC patients showed at least one PSMA-avid lesion. On follow-up PET2, 3 patients showed CRPET, 3 PRPET, 4 SDPET, and 1 PDPET. According to RECIST 1.1, 1 patient showed PRCT, 9 SDCT, and 1 PDCT. Overall, concordant classifications were found in only 2 cases (2 SDCT + PET). Patients with CRPET on PET were classified as 3 SDCT on CT using RECIST 1.1. By contrast, the patient classified as PRCT on CT showed PSMA uptake without major changes during therapy (SDPET). However, among 9 patients with SDCT on CT, 3 were classified as CRPET, 3 as PRPET, 1 as PDPET, and only 2 as SDPET on PSMA-PET. Conclusion On PSMA-PET, heterogeneous courses were observed during systemic treatment in mRCC patients with highly diverging results compared to RECIST 1.1. In the light of missing biomarkers for early response assessment, PSMA-PET might allow more precise response assessment to systemic treatment, especially in patients classified as SD on CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L M Mittlmeier
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - S Rodler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - A Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - N L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - C Burgard
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - C C Cyran
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - W G Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - J Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - P Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - C G Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - H Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M Staehler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
- Head Interdisciplinary Center on Renal Tumors, Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Brosch J, Gosewisch A, Kaiser L, Seidensticker M, Ricke J, Zellmer J, Bartenstein P, Ziegler S, Ilhan H, Todica A, Böning G. 3D image-based dosimetry for Yttrium-90 radioembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma: Impact of imaging method on absorbed dose estimates. Phys Med 2020; 80:317-326. [PMID: 33248338 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Revised: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To improve therapy outcome of Yttrium-90 selective internal radiation therapy (90Y SIRT), patient-specific post-therapeutic dosimetry is required. For this purpose, various dosimetric approaches based on different available imaging data have been reported. The aim of this work was to compare post-therapeutic 3D absorbed dose images using Technetium-99m (99mTc) MAA SPECT/CT, Yttrium-90 (90Y) bremsstrahlung (BRS) SPECT/CT, and 90Y PET/CT. METHODS Ten SIRTs of nine patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were investigated. The 99mTc SPECT/CT data, obtained from 99mTc-MAA-based treatment simulation prior to 90Y SIRT, were scaled with the administered 90Y therapy activity. 3D absorbed dose images were generated by dose kernel convolution with scaled 99mTc/90Y SPECT/CT, 90Y BRS SPECT/CT, and 90Y PET/CT data of each patient. Absorbed dose estimates in tumor and healthy liver tissue obtained using the two SPECT/CT methods were compared against 90Y PET/CT. RESULTS The percentage deviation of tumor absorbed dose estimates from 90Y PET/CT values was on average -2 ± 18% for scaled 99mTc/90Y SPECT/CT, whereas estimates from 90Y BRS SPECT/CT differed on average by -50 ± 13%. For healthy liver absorbed dose estimates, all three imaging methods revealed comparable values. CONCLUSION The quantification capabilities of the imaging data influence 90Y SIRT tumor dosimetry, while healthy liver absorbed dose values were comparable for all investigated imaging data. When no 90Y PET/CT image data are available, the proposed scaled 99mTc/90Y SPECT/CT dosimetry method was found to be more appropriate for HCC tumor dosimetry than 90Y BRS SPECT/CT based dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Brosch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Astrid Gosewisch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena Kaiser
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Johannes Zellmer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sibylle Ziegler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andrei Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Guido Böning
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Schmidt Hegemann NS, Rogowski P, Eze C, Schäfer C, Stief C, Lang S, Spohn S, Steffens R, Li M, Gratzke C, Schultze-Seemann W, Ilhan H, Fendler WP, Bartenstein P, Ganswindt U, Buchner A, Grosu AL, Belka C, Meyer PT, Kirste S, Zamboglou C. Outcome After 68Ga-PSMA-11 versus Choline PET-Based Salvage Radiotherapy in Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer: A Matched-Pair Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12113395. [PMID: 33207785 PMCID: PMC7698293 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12113395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Revised: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this analysis was primarily to analyze biochemical-recurrence free survival (BRFS) after positron emission tomography (PET)-guided salvage radiotherapy (sRT) in a large cohort, and to further compare BRFS after PSMA vs. choline PET/ computer tomography (CT)-based sRT. This retrospective analysis is based on 421 patients referred for PSMA or choline PET/CT after radical prostatectomy due to biochemically recurrent or persistent disease. BRFS (PSA: 0.2 ng/mL) was defined as the study endpoint. Cox regression analyses were performed to assess the impact of different clinical parameters on BRFS. Additionally, propensity score matching was performed to adjust patient cohorts (PSMA vs. choline PET/CT-based sRT). The median follow-up time was 30 months. BRFS at three years after sRT was 58%. In the multivariate analysis, only PSA before PET imaging and PSA before sRT were significantly associated with BRFS (p < 0.05). After propensity score matching, 272 patients were further analyzed; there was no significant difference in three-year BRFS between patients with PSMA PET-based vs. choline PET-based sRT (55% vs. 63%, p = 0.197). The present analysis confirmed the overall high BRFS rates after PET-based sRT and the strong prognostic effect of PSA level prior to sRT. PSMA PET-based sRT did not have superior BRFS rates when compared with choline PET-based sRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina-Sophie Schmidt Hegemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, 81377 LMU Munich, Germany; (N.-S.S.H.); (P.R.); (C.E.); (C.S.); (R.S.); (M.L.); (C.B.)
| | - Paul Rogowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, 81377 LMU Munich, Germany; (N.-S.S.H.); (P.R.); (C.E.); (C.S.); (R.S.); (M.L.); (C.B.)
| | - Chukwuka Eze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, 81377 LMU Munich, Germany; (N.-S.S.H.); (P.R.); (C.E.); (C.S.); (R.S.); (M.L.); (C.B.)
| | - Christian Schäfer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, 81377 LMU Munich, Germany; (N.-S.S.H.); (P.R.); (C.E.); (C.S.); (R.S.); (M.L.); (C.B.)
| | - Christian Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, 81377 LMU Munich, Germany; (C.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Sebastian Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (S.L.); (S.S.); (A.-L.G.); (S.K.)
| | - Simon Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (S.L.); (S.S.); (A.-L.G.); (S.K.)
| | - Rieke Steffens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, 81377 LMU Munich, Germany; (N.-S.S.H.); (P.R.); (C.E.); (C.S.); (R.S.); (M.L.); (C.B.)
| | - Minglun Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, 81377 LMU Munich, Germany; (N.-S.S.H.); (P.R.); (C.E.); (C.S.); (R.S.); (M.L.); (C.B.)
| | - Christian Gratzke
- Department of Urology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (C.G.); (W.S.-S.)
| | - Wolfgang Schultze-Seemann
- Department of Urology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (C.G.); (W.S.-S.)
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, 81377 LMU Munich, Germany; (H.I.); (P.B.)
| | - Wolfgang Peter Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, 47057 Essen, Germany;
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, 81377 LMU Munich, Germany; (H.I.); (P.B.)
| | - Ute Ganswindt
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Innsbruck Medical University, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria;
| | - Alexander Buchner
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, 81377 LMU Munich, Germany; (C.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (S.L.); (S.S.); (A.-L.G.); (S.K.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, 81377 LMU Munich, Germany; (N.-S.S.H.); (P.R.); (C.E.); (C.S.); (R.S.); (M.L.); (C.B.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Philipp Tobias Meyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany;
| | - Simon Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (S.L.); (S.S.); (A.-L.G.); (S.K.)
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (S.L.); (S.S.); (A.-L.G.); (S.K.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
- Bertha-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-761-2709-4610; Fax: +49-761-2709-4720
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Zacherl MJ, Gildehaus FJ, Mittlmeier L, Böning G, Gosewisch A, Wenter V, Unterrainer M, Schmidt-Hegemann N, Belka C, Kretschmer A, Casuscelli J, Stief CG, Unterrainer M, Bartenstein P, Todica A, Ilhan H. First Clinical Results for PSMA-Targeted α-Therapy Using 225Ac-PSMA-I&T in Advanced-mCRPC Patients. J Nucl Med 2020; 62:669-674. [PMID: 33008928 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.251017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 08/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment of advanced metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after failure of approved therapy options remains challenging. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeting β- and α-emitters have been introduced, with promising response rates. Here, we present the first-to our knowledge-clinical data for PSMA-targeted α-therapy (TAT) using 225Ac-PSMA imaging and therapy (I&T). Methods: Fourteen patients receiving 225Ac-PSMA-I&T were included in this retrospective analysis. Eleven of the 14 had prior second-line antiandrogen treatment with abiraterone or enzalutamide, prior chemotherapy, and prior 177Lu-PSMA treatment. Patients were treated at bimonthly intervals until progression or intolerable side effects. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was measured for response assessment. Hematologic and nonhematologic side effects were recorded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Results: Thirty-four cycles of 225Ac-PSMA-I&T were applied (median dose, 7.8 MBq; range, 6.0-8.5), with 1 cycle in 3 patients, 2 cycles in 7 patients, 4 cycles in 3 patients, and 5 cycles in 1 patient. No acute toxicity was observed during hospitalization. Baseline PSA was 112 ng/mL (range, 20.5-818 ng/mL). The best PSA response after TAT (a PSA decline ≥ 50%) was observed in 7 patients, and a PSA decline of any amount was observed in 11 patients. Three patients had no PSA decline at any time. A subgroup analysis of 11 patients with prior 177Lu-PSMA treatment showed any PSA decline in 8 patients and a decline of at least 50% in 5 patients. After TAT, grade 3 anemia was observed in 3 of the 14 patients, with 2 of them presenting with grade 2 anemia already at baseline. Grade 3 leukopenia was observed in 1 patient. Eight patients with preexisting xerostomia after 177Lu-PSMA showed no worsening after TAT. Newly diagnosed grade 1 or 2 xerostomia after TAT was observed in 5 patients. One patient reported no xerostomia at all. Conclusion: Our first clinical data for TAT using 225Ac-PSMA-I&T showed a promising antitumor effect in advanced metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. These results are highly comparable to data on 225Ac-PSMA-617 TAT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lena Mittlmeier
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Guido Böning
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Astrid Gosewisch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Vera Wenter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Jozefina Casuscelli
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; and
| | - Christian G Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; and
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andrei Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ilhan H, Gosewisch A, Böning G, Völter F, Zacherl M, Unterrainer M, Bartenstein P, Todica A, Gildehaus FJ. Response to 225Ac-PSMA-I&T after failure of long-term 177Lu-PSMA RLT in mCRPC. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; 48:1262-1263. [PMID: 32959114 PMCID: PMC7505677 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-05023-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Astrid Gosewisch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Guido Böning
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Friederike Völter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mathias Zacherl
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andrei Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Lindner S, Simmet M, Gildehaus FJ, Jurkschat K, Wängler C, Wängler B, Bartenstein P, Schirrmacher R, Ilhan H. Automated production of [ 18F]SiTATE on a Scintomics GRP™ platform for PET/CT imaging of neuroendocrine tumors. Nucl Med Biol 2020; 88-89:86-95. [PMID: 32828007 DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2020.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Revised: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION [18F]SiTATE (formerly known as [18F]SiFAlin-TATE) was recently introduced as a highly promising imaging agent for the diagnosis of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET) using positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). A high tumor uptake and excellent image quality, the straightforward labeling approach, as well as the economic and logistic advantages of 18F- over 68Ga-labeled compounds predestinate [18F]SiTATE to become a potential new clinical reference standard. A novel state-of-the-art methodology of automated radiopharmaceutical production is required to establish [18F]SiTATE in clinical routine. This work illustrates the development of a novel synthesis procedure of [18F]SiTATE on an automated synthesis unit (ASU) and the clinical applicability of the tracer in human NET imaging. METHODS A new synthesis protocol was generated for the production of [18F]SiTATE on the Scintomics GRP™ platform for clinical NET imaging. The synthesis was carried out according to common Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) guidelines including all quality control measurements. To confirm utility, clinical batches (n = 3) were produced and applied to six patients diagnosed with NET. RESULTS [18F]SiTATE was obtained in 54 ± 4% (n = 3) non-decay corrected radiochemical yield (RCY), with a radiochemical purity of 96.3 ± 0.1% and a molar activity (Am) of 472 ± 45 GBq/μmol (n = 3). Quality control measurements always met the local release criteria. All specifications were taken or adapted from the Ph.Eur. regulations. PET/CT imaging with [18F]SiTATE produced on the GRP™ module confirmed the expected high image quality. The in vivo distribution pattern and excellent tumor to non-tumor contrast observed, matched the quality of the manually prepared [18F]SiTATE batches. CONCLUSIONS The automated manufacture of [18F]SiTATE was developed using the Scintomics GRP™ platform. The high quality of the radiotracer matched stringent quality control requirements adhering to common GMP guidelines, and its clinical applicability was confirmed by human PET/CT investigations. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE The automated process for the manufacture of [18F]SiTATE described herein represents an important contribution to make [18F]SiTATE routinely accessible for its use in clinical NET diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Lindner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Marcel Simmet
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Klaus Jurkschat
- Fakultät für Chemie und Chemische Biologie, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Carmen Wängler
- Biomedical Chemistry, Department of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Björn Wängler
- Molecular Imaging and Radiochemistry, Department of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ralf Schirrmacher
- Department of Oncology, Division of Oncological Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kretschmer A, Buchner A, Eze C, Rogowski P, Schäfer C, Ilhan H, Li M, Fendler W, Bartenstein P, Ganswindt U, Stief C, Belka C, Schmidt-Hegemann N. Salvage therapies for PSMA PET-positive nodal recurrent prostate cancer. EUR UROL SUPPL 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s2666-1683(20)33400-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
47
|
Bösch F, Ilhan H, Pfahler V, Thomas M, Knösel T, Eibl V, Pratschke S, Bartenstein P, Seidensticker M, Auernhammer CJ, Spitzweg C, Guba MO, Werner J, Angele MK. Radioembolization for neuroendocrine liver metastases is safe and effective prior to major hepatic resection. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2020; 9:312-321. [PMID: 32509817 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn.2019.07.11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Background Radioembolization (RE) is well established in the treatment of neuroendocrine liver metastases. However surgery is rarely performed after RE, although liver resection is the gold standard in the treatment of localized neuroendocrine liver metastases. Therefore, aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of liver resection after RE in a homogenous cohort. Methods From a prospective surgical (n=494) and nuclear medical (n=138) database patients with NELM who underwent liver resection and/or RE were evaluated. Between September 2011 and December 2017 eight patients could be identified who underwent liver resection after RE (mean therapeutic activity of 1,746 Mbq). Overall and progression free survival were evaluated as well as epidemiological and perioperative factors. The surgical specimens were analyzed for necrosis, fibrosis, inflammation, and steatosis. Results The mean hepatic tumor load of patients, who had liver surgery after RE, was 31.4% with a mean Ki-67 proliferation index of 5.9%. The majority of these patients (7/8) received whole liver RE prior to liver resection, which did not increase morbidity and mortality compared to a surgical collective. Indications for RE were oncological (6/8) or carcinoid syndrome associated reasons (2/8). Mean overall survival was 25.1 months after RE and subsequent surgery. Tumor necrosis in radioembolized lesions was 29.4% without evidence of fibrosis and inflammation in hepatic tissue. Conclusions This is the first study analyzing the multimodal therapeutic approach of liver resection following whole liver RE. This treatment algorithm is safe, does not lead to an increased morbidity and is associated with a favorable oncological outcome. Nonetheless, patient selection remains a key issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Bösch
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Vanessa Pfahler
- Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Thomas
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Knösel
- Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Valentin Eibl
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian Pratschke
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph J Auernhammer
- Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine 4, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christine Spitzweg
- Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine 4, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Markus O Guba
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Werner
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Martin K Angele
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent years nuclear medicine theranostics using radiolabeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligands have gained increasing importance in the management of prostate cancer. AIM The aim of this work is to highlight the value of theranostic concepts using radiolabeled PSMA ligands for both the diagnostic work-up and treatment of advanced prostate cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS The currently available knowledge in the literature is summarized and presented. RESULTS The use of PSMA in positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) shows a high sensitivity and specificity for prostate cancer imaging, particularly in patients with biochemical recurrences. Furthermore, promising results are also reported for staging of primary prostate cancer and treatment monitoring. In addition, radioligand therapy using alpha and beta emitters is a promising third line treatment option in intensively pretreated patients with metastases. The reduction of side effects and optimization of the treatment sequence of radioligand therapy is of increasing importance. CONCLUSION Nuclear medicine theranostics have an increasing clinical impact on the diagnostics and treatment of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Ilhan
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81375, München, Deutschland.
| | - C la Fougère
- Nuklearmedizin und Klinische Molekulare Bildgebung, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.,Cluster of Excellence iFIT (EXC 2180) "Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - B J Krause
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Rostock, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Unterrainer M, Todica A, Seidensticker M, Beyer L, Bartenstein P, Ricke J, Ilhan H. Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome After 90Y-Resin Microspheres Radioembolization. Clin Nucl Med 2020; 45:202-203. [PMID: 31977487 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000002933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
A 66-year-old man with colorectal carcinoma and liver-only metastases underwent radioembolization using Y-loaded, resin-based microspheres. One day after radioembolization, the patient experienced severe hypertension and multiple seizures. On MRI, symmetric edematous areas in the cerebellum and the parietal and occipital lobe were observed, a typical finding for posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES). The PRES is associated with, for example, renal failure or blood pressure fluctuations leading to cerebral endothelial dysfunction. Antihypertensive and antiepileptic therapies led to normotensive blood pressure and neurological remission. Therefore, newly developed neurological symptoms accompanied by high blood pressure fluctuations after radioembolization should lead to PRES as differential diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Jens Ricke
- Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Ahmadzadehfar H, Rahbar K, Baum RP, Seifert R, Kessel K, Bögemann M, Kulkarni HR, Zhang J, Gerke C, Fimmers R, Kratochwil C, Rathke H, Ilhan H, Maffey-Steffan J, Sathekge M, Kabasakal L, Garcia-Perez FO, Kairemo K, Maharaj M, Paez D, Virgolini I. Prior therapies as prognostic factors of overall survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with [ 177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. A WARMTH multicenter study (the 617 trial). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; 48:113-122. [PMID: 32383093 PMCID: PMC7835179 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-04797-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Introduction The impact of prior therapies, especially chemotherapy, on overall survival (OS) in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) receiving [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 therapy has been the subject of controversy. Therefore, WARMTH decided to plan a multicenter retrospective analysis (the “617 trial”) to evaluate response rate and OS as well as the impact of prior therapies on OS in more than 300 patients treated with 177Lu-PSMA-617. Materials and methods The data of 631 metastatic CRPC (mCRPC) patients from 11 different clinics were evaluated. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, all patients had to have received at least abiraterone or enzalutamide prior to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 therapy. The patients were divided into three groups: patients who had received prior chemotherapy, patients who avoided chemotherapy, and patients for whom a chemotherapy was contraindicated. Results The analysis included the data of 416 patients, with a median age of 71.9 years. At the time of analysis, 87 patients (20,9%) were still alive. A total of 53.6% of patients had received both abiraterone and enzalutamide; 75.5% and 26.4% had a history of chemotherapy with docetaxel and cabazitaxel, respectively. A total of 20.4% had had Ra-223. The median OS was 11.1 months. Prior chemotherapy, the existence of bone and liver metastases, as well as Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status, were significant prognosticators of worse overall survival in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Patients without any prior chemotherapy showed a significantly longer OS (14.6 months). The median OS in patients who received one or two lines of chemotherapy with docetaxel or docetaxel followed by cabazitaxel, respectively, was 10.9 months and 8.9 months. There was no difference in OS between patients who had not received chemotherapy and patients for whom chemotherapy was contraindicated. The other prior therapies did not have any significant impact on OS. Conclusion In the present multicenter analysis, chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC patients receiving [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 therapy had a significantly longer OS than patients with a history of chemotherapy. This remained independent in the multivariate analysis besides presence of bone and liver metastases as negative prognosticators for survival, whereas an ECOG of 0–1 is associated with a longer OS. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00259-020-04797-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Westfalen, Am Knappschaftskrankenhaus 1, 44309, Dortmund, Germany.
| | - Kambiz Rahbar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Richard P Baum
- Center for Radiomolecular Precision Oncology, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany
| | - Robert Seifert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Katharina Kessel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Martin Bögemann
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Münster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Harshad R Kulkarni
- Center for Radiomolecular Precision Oncology, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany
| | - Jingjing Zhang
- Center for Radiomolecular Precision Oncology, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany
| | - Carolin Gerke
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Rolf Fimmers
- Institute for Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Clemens Kratochwil
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hendrik Rathke
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Mike Sathekge
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria & Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Levent Kabasakal
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Francisco Osvaldo Garcia-Perez
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Masha Maharaj
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Imaging and Therapy Centre, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
| | - Diana Paez
- Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, Nuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Imaging Section, IAEA, Vienna, Austria
| | - Irene Virgolini
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|