Defining a role for systemic chemotherapy in local and advanced appendix adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Appendix adenocarcinomas (AAs) are rare tumours that often present late, with a propensity for peritoneal metastases (PMs). This study aimed to evaluate outcomes of AA patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with curative intent and determine the role of systemic chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were collected from a prospective database and classified according to World Health Organization (WHO) 2019 classification. Tumour clearance from CRS was described using a completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score ranging from 0 [no residual disease (RD)] to 3 (>2.5 cm RD). Patients with CC0-2 CRS received hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Systemic chemotherapy was categorised as 'prior' (>6 months before), 'neoadjuvant' (<6 months before), 'adjuvant' (<6 months after CC0-1 CRS) or 'palliative' (after CC2-3 CRS). Analyses used Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods.

RESULTS

Between January 2005 and August 2021, 216 AA patients were identified for inclusion. Median age was 59 years (21-81 years). CRS/HIPEC was carried out in 182 (84%) patients, of whom 164/182 (76%) had mitomycin C HIPEC. CC0-1 was achieved in 172 (80%) patients. Systemic chemotherapy was given to 97 (45%) patients from the whole cohort and to 37/46 (80%) patients with positive nodes. Median overall survival (OS) was 122 months (95% confidence interval 61-182 months). After multivariate analysis, patients with acellular and lower-grade PM had similar OS to those with localised (M0) disease (P = 0.59 and P = 0.19). For patients with positive nodes, systemic chemotherapy was associated with reduced risk of death compared to no chemotherapy (P < 0.0019).

CONCLUSION

This study identifies AA patients with positive lymph nodes derive the most benefit from systemic chemotherapy. We confirm the prognostic importance of stage and peritoneal grade, with excellent outcomes in patients with acellular mucin and lower-grade PM.

ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale for haematological malignancies (ESMO-MCBS:H) version 1.0

BACKGROUND

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO)-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (MCBS) has been accepted as a robust tool to evaluate the magnitude of clinical benefit reported in trials for oncological therapies. However, the ESMO-MCBS hitherto has only been validated for solid tumours. With the rapid development of novel therapies for haematological malignancies, we aimed to develop an ESMO-MCBS version that is specifically designed and validated for haematological malignancies.

METHODS

ESMO and the European Hematology Association (EHA) initiated a collaboration to develop a version for haematological malignancies (ESMO-MCBS:H). The process incorporated five landmarks: field testing of the ESMO-MCBS version 1.1 (v1.1) to identify shortcomings specific to haematological diseases, drafting of the ESMO-MCBS:H forms, peer review and revision of the draft based on re-scoring (resulting in a second draft), assessment of reasonableness of the scores generated, final review and approval by ESMO and EHA including executive boards.

RESULTS

Based on the field testing results of 80 haematological trials and extensive review for feasibility and reasonableness, five amendments to ESMO-MCBS were incorporated in the ESMO-MCBS:H addressing the identified shortcomings. These concerned mainly clinical trial endpoints that differ in haematology versus solid oncology and the very indolent nature of nevertheless incurable diseases such as follicular lymphoma, which hampers presentation of mature data. In addition, general changes incorporated in the draft version of the ESMO-MCBS v2 were included, and specific forms for haematological malignancies generated. Here we present the final approved forms of the ESMO-MCBS:H, including instructions.

CONCLUSION

The haematology-specific version ESMO-MCBS:H allows now full applicability of the scale for evaluating the magnitude of clinical benefit derived from clinical studies in haematological malignancies.

Methodological and reporting standards for quality-of-life data eligible for European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) credit

BACKGROUND

The European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) has been developed to grade clinical benefit of cancer therapies. Improvement in quality of life (QoL) is considered relevant, especially in the non-curative setting. This is reflected by an upgrade of the preliminary ESMO-MCBS score if QoL is improved compared to the control arm or a downgrade if an improvement in progression-free survival is not paralleled by an improvement in QoL or overall survival. Given the importance of QoL for the final score, a need to ensure the robustness of QoL data was recognised.

DESIGN

A checklist was created based on existing guidelines for QoL research. Field testing was carried out using clinical trials that either received an adjustment of the preliminary ESMO-MCBS score based on QoL or had QoL as the primary endpoint. Several rounds of revision and re-testing of the checklist were undertaken until a final consensus was reached.

RESULTS

The final checklist consists of four items and can be applied if three prerequisites are met: (i) QoL is at least a secondary endpoint, (ii) evidence of reliability and validity of the instrument is provided, and (iii) a statistically and clinically significant improvement in QoL is observed. The four items on the checklist pertain to the (i) hypothesis, (ii) compliance and missing data, (iii) presentation of the results, and (iv) statistical and clinical relevance. Field testing revealed that a clear QoL hypothesis and correction for multiple testing were mostly lacking, while the main statistical method was always described.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of the ESMO-MCBS QoL checklist will facilitate objective and transparent decision making on QoL data within the ESMO-MCBS scoring process. Trials published until 1 January 2025 will have to meet the prerequisites and at least two items for crediting QoL benefit in the final ESMO-MCBS score. Trials published thereafter will have to meet all four items.

Indications and outcomes for repeat cytoreductive surgery and heated intra-peritoneal chemotherapy in peritoneal surface malignancy

INTRODUCTION

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is offered in specialist centres as a treatment for peritoneal surface tumours. Despite its demonstrated efficacy, intra-abdominal recurrence occurs in 31-57% of patients. The aim of this study is to review the early and long-term outcomes in patients who undergo repeat CRS/HIPEC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients who had undergone repeat CRS/HIPEC for appendiceal neoplasms and colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM) from 2003 to 2019 was performed at a single specialist centre. Data pertaining to both short term outcomes and survival were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 1259 patients who had undergone CRS/HIPEC, 84(6.7%) underwent repeat surgery: 45(53.6%) had pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) secondary to low grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMN), 21(25.0%) had appendix carcinoma and 18(21.4%) had CRPM. Demographics, intra-operative findings and short-term outcomes were comparable across tumour types and between procedures. Median (95% CI) interval between procedures was 22.7(18.9-26.6) months and was comparable between tumour types. Median (95%CI) overall survival was not reached for the cohort overall or for those with PMP, but was 61.0(32.6-89.4) months for those with appendix cancer and 76.9(47.4-106.4) months for CRPM (p=<0.001). Survival was favourable in the PMP group (HR [95%CI] 0.044 [0.008-0.262]; p = 0.000) and unfavourable in the CC2-3 at index CRS procedure group (HR [95%CI] 25.612 [2.703-242.703]; p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate that repeat cytoredutive surgery with HIPEC can result in favourable survival, especially for patients with PMP when complete cytoreduction is achieved at index operation. We recommend that detailed patient assessment is performed through an expert multidisciplinary team meeting (MDT).

Biases in study design, implementation, and data analysis that distort the appraisal of clinical benefit and ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) scoring

Background

The European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) is a validated, widely used tool developed to score the clinical benefit from cancer medicines reported in clinical trials. ESMO-MCBS scores assume valid research methodologies and quality trial implementation. Studies incorporating flawed design, implementation, or data analysis may generate outcomes that exaggerate true benefit and are not generalisable. Failure to either indicate or penalise studies with bias undermines the intention and diminishes the integrity of ESMO-MCBS scores. This review aimed to evaluate the adequacy of the ESMO-MCBS to address bias generated by flawed design, implementation, or data analysis and identify shortcomings in need of amendment.

Methods

As part of a refinement of the ESMO-MCBS, we reviewed trial design, implementation, and data analysis issues that could bias the results. For each issue of concern, we reviewed the ESMO-MCBS v1.1 approach against standards derived from Helsinki guidelines for ethical human research and guidelines from the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, the Food and Drugs Administration, the European Medicines Agency, and European Network for Health Technology Assessment.

Results

Six design, two implementation, and two data analysis and interpretation issues were evaluated and in three, the ESMO-MCBS provided adequate protections. Seven shortcomings in the ability of the ESMO-MCBS to identify and address bias were identified. These related to (i) evaluation of the control arm, (ii) crossover issues, (iii) criteria for non-inferiority, (iv) substandard post-progression treatment, (v) post hoc subgroup findings based on biomarkers, (vi) informative censoring, and (vii) publication bias against quality-of-life data.

Conclusion

Interpretation of the ESMO-MCBS scores requires critical appraisal of trials to understand caveats in trial design, implementation, and data analysis that may have biased results and conclusions. These will be addressed in future iterations of the ESMO-MCBS.

•

We reviewed trial design, implementation, and data analysis issues that could bias the results of trials.

•

These issues could skew the results of ESMO-MCBS scores.

•

Six design, two implementation, and two analysis issues were reviewed, and seven shortcomings were identified.

•

These issues will be addressed in future versions of the MCBS scale.

•

Interpretation of MCBS scores requires critical appraisal of trials.

Obesity and Cancer Treatment Outcomes: Interpreting the Complex Evidence

A wealth of epidemiological evidence, combined with plausible biological mechanisms, present a convincing argument for a causal relationship between excess adiposity, commonly approximated as body mass index (BMI, kg/m²), and incident cancer risk. Beyond this relationship, there are a number of challenges posed in the context of interpreting whether being overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9 kg/m²) or obese (BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m²) adversely influences disease progression, cancer mortality and survival. Elevated BMI (≥ 25.0 kg/m²) may influence treatment selection of, for example, the approach to surgery; the choice of chemotherapy dosing; the inclusion of patients into randomised clinical trials. Furthermore, the technical challenges posed by an elevated BMI may adversely affect surgical outcomes, for example, morbidity (increasing the risk of surgical site infections), reduced lymph node harvest (and subsequent risk of under-staging and under-treatment) and increased risk of margin positivity. Suboptimal chemotherapy dosing, associated with capping chemotherapy in obese patients as an attempt to avoid excess toxicity, might be a driver of poor prognostic outcomes. By contrast, the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibition may be enhanced in patients who are obese, although in turn, this observation might be due to reverse causality. So, a central research question is whether being overweight or obese adversely affects outcomes either directly through effects of cancer biology or whether adverse outcomes are mediated through indirect pathways. A further dimension to this complex relationship is the obesity paradox, a phenomenon where being overweight or obese is associated with improved survival where the reverse is expected. In this overview, we describe a framework for evaluating methodological problems such as selection bias, confounding and reverse causality, which may contribute to spurious interpretations. Future studies will need to focus on prospective studies with well-considered methodology in order to improve the interpretation of causality.

Biomarker concordance between primary colorectal cancer and its metastases

Background

The use of biomarkers to target anti-EGFR treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) is well-established, requiring molecular analysis of primary or metastatic biopsies. We aim to review concordance between primary CRC and its metastatic sites.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis of all published studies (1991–2018) reporting on biomarker concordance between primary CRC and its metastatic site(s) was undertaken according to PRISMA guidelines using several medical databases. Studies without matched samples or using peripheral blood for biomarker analysis were excluded.

Findings

61 studies including 3565 patient samples were included. Median biomarker concordance for KRAS (n = 50) was 93.7% [[67], [68], [69], [70], [71], [72], [73], [74], [75], [76], [77], [78], [79], [80], [81], [82], [83], [84], [85], [86], [87], [88], [89], [90], [91], [92], [93], [94], [95], [96], [97], [98], [99], [100]], NRAS (n = 11) was 100% [[90], [91], [92], [93], [94], [95], [96], [97], [98], [99], [100]], BRAF (n = 22) was 99.4% [[80], [81], [82], [83], [84], [85], [86], [87], [88], [89], [90], [91], [92], [93], [94], [95], [96], [97], [98], [99], [100]], and PIK3CA (n = 17) was 93% [[42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67], [68], [69], [70], [71], [72], [73], [74], [75], [76], [77], [78], [79], [80], [81], [82], [83], [84], [85], [86], [87], [88], [89], [90], [91], [92], [93], [94], [95], [96], [97], [98], [99], [100]]. Meta-analytic pooled discordance was 8% for KRAS (95% CI = 5–10%), 8% for BRAF (95% CI = 5–10%), 7% for PIK3CA (95% CI = 2–13%), and 28% overall (95% CI = 14–44%). The liver was the most commonly biopsied metastatic site (n = 2276), followed by lung (n = 438), lymph nodes (n = 1123), and peritoneum (n = 132). Median absolute concordance in multiple biomarkers was 81% (5–95%).

Interpretation

Metastatic CRC demonstrates high concordance across multiple biomarkers, suggesting that molecular testing of either the primary or liver and lung metastasis is adequate. More research on colorectal peritoneal metastases is required.

SEOM clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroenteropancreatic and bronchial neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) (2018)

NENs are a heterogeneous family of tumors of challenging diagnosis and clinical management. Their incidence and prevalence continue to rise across all sites, stages and grades. Although improved diagnostic techniques have led to earlier detection and stage migration, the improved prognosis documented over time for advanced gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors also reflect improvements in therapy. The aim of this guideline is to update practical recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroenteropancreatic and lung NENs. Diagnostic procedures, histological classification and therapeutic options are briefly discussed, including surgery, liver-directed therapy, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, and systemic hormonal, cytotoxic or targeted therapy, and treatment algorithms are provided.

Urgent need for consensus: international survey of clinical practice exploring use of platinum-etoposide chemotherapy for advanced extra-pulmonary high grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (EP-G3-NEC)

BACKGROUND

Platinum-etoposide (PE) chemotherapy (CH) is a globally established combination for extra-pulmonary high grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (EP-G3-NEC); the optimal schedule has not been established.

METHODS

An international survey was designed, and completed by clinicians with an expertise in the field to assess consistency in clinical practice.

RESULTS

Seventy-five replies were received (June-Nov'17). A minority of physicians (13; 17.6%) did not take Ki-67 or morphology (9; 12.0%) into consideration for selection of CH. Most (72; 96.0%) selected PE-CH as first-line treatment for EP-G3-NEC. CH schedules varied: cisplatin-based (37/71; 52.1%), carboplatin-based (34/71; 47.9%); intravenous etoposide (64/71; 90.1%), oral etoposide (7/71; 9.9%). Choice of second-line CH depended on time to progression on PE-based first-line: if > 6 months, re-challenge with PE was the preferred choice (34; 45.9%); if < 6 months, alternative combinations such as fluoropyrimidine/irinotecan (21; 29.2%) or temozolomide/capecitabine (22; 30.6%) were used.

CONCLUSION

Significant variation in PE regimen employed exists. Standardising clinical practice would facilitate clinical trial development.

A novel, highly efficient β-glucosidase with a cellulose-binding domain: characterization and properties of native and recombinant proteins

BACKGROUND

Cellulose, the most abundant biopolymer on earth, is an alternative for fossil fuels as a renewable feedstock for the production of second-generation biofuels and other chemicals. The discovery of novel, highly efficient β-glucosidases remains as one of the major bottlenecks for cellulose degradation. In this context, the ascomycete Talaromyces amestolkiae, isolated from cereal samples, has been studied as a promising source for these enzymes.

RESULTS

BGL-2 is the major β-glucosidase secreted by this fungus in the presence of cellulosic inductors. This enzyme possesses a CBD (Cellulose Binding Domain), an unusual feature among this type of proteins. Besides, when growing on cellulose, the fungus produced two different bgl-2 mRNAs that were cloned and expressed in Pichia pastoris. A complete recombinant protein (BGL-2*) and its truncated form, lacking CBD (BGL-2T*), have been purified, characterized and compared with the native enzyme (BGL-2). The three BGL-2 forms studied are highly stable in a wide pH range, but BGL-2T* showed an improved thermal stability at 50 °C after 72 h. Using p-nitrophenyl-β-d-glucopyranoside as a substrate, the steady-state kinetic characterization of the three proteins showed a similar K_m and k_cat for BGL-2 and BGL-2*, while the truncated protein displayed a threefold higher value for k_cat . All tested BGL-2 enzymes were as well highly efficient using cellobiose and other short oligosaccharides as a substrate. In view of biotechnological applications, the recombinant T. amestolkiae enzymes in saccharification of brewers' spent grain were studied, being comparable to commercial β-glucosidase cocktails.

CONCLUSION

A new β-glucosidase from T. amestolkiae has been studied. The enzyme, containing a functional CBD, has been expressed in P. pastoris. The comparative analyses of the native protein and its recombinant forms, with and without CBD, suggest that they could be suitable tools for valorization of lignocellulosic biomass.

Characteristics and treatment of patients with G3 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Data on gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) G3 (well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET G3) and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC)) are limited. We retrospectively study patients with NET G3 and NEC from eight European centers. Data examined included clinical and pathological characteristics at diagnosis, therapies and outcomes. Two hundred and four patients were analyzed (37 NET G3 and 167 NEC). Median age was 64 (21-89) years. Tumor origin included pancreas (32%) and colon-rectum (27%). The primary tumor was resected in 82 (40%) patients. Metastatic disease was evident at diagnosis in 88% (liver metastases: 67%). Median Ki-67 index was 70% (30% in NET G3 and 80% in NEC; P<0.001). Median overall survival (OS) for all patients was 23 (95% CI: 18-28) months and significantly higher in NET G3 (99 vs 17 months in NEC; HR=8.3; P<0.001). Platinum-etoposide first line chemotherapy was administered in 113 (68%) NEC and 12 (32%) NET G3 patients. Disease control rate and progression free survival (PFS) were significantly higher in NEC compared to NET G3 (P<0.05), whereas OS was significantly longer in NET G3 (P=0.003). Second- and third-line therapies (mainly FOLFIRI and FOLFOX) were given in 79 and 39 of NEC patients; median PFS and OS were 3.0 and 7.6 months respectively after second-line and 2.5 and 6.2 months after third-line chemotherapy. In conclusion, NET G3 and NEC are characterized by significant differences in Ki-67 index and outcomes. While platinum-based chemotherapy is effective in NEC, it seems to have limited value in NET G3.

SEOM clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) 2014

GEP-NENs are a challenging family of tumors of growing incidence and varied clinical management and behavior. Diagnostic techniques have substantially improved over the past decades and significant advances have been achieved in the understanding of the molecular pathways governing tumor initiation and progression. This has already translated into relevant advances in the clinic. This guideline aims to provide practical recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of GEP-NENs. Diagnostic workup, histological and staging classifications, and the different available therapeutic approaches, including surgery, liver-directed ablative therapies, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, and systemic hormonal, cytotoxic or targeted therapy, are briefly discussed in this manuscript. Clinical presentation (performance status, comorbidities, tumor-derived symptoms and hormone syndrome in functioning tumors), histological features [tumor differentiation, proliferation rate (Ki-67), and expression of somatostatin receptors], disease localization and extent, and resectability of primary and metastatic disease, are all key issues that shall be taken into consideration to appropriately tailor therapeutic strategies and surveillance of these patients.

A phase IIa dose-finding and safety study of first-line pertuzumab in combination with trastuzumab, capecitabine and cisplatin in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab provides a more comprehensive blockade of HER2 signalling than trastuzumab alone. Therefore, we conducted a phase IIa study of the pharmacokinetics and safety of pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer (aGC).

METHODS

Patients received pertuzumab 840 mg for cycle 1 and 420 mg q3w for cycles 2-6 (Arm A) or pertuzumab 840 mg q3w for six cycles (Arm B). Trastuzumab, cisplatin and capecitabine were also given for six cycles, then trastuzumab q3w until disease progression or unmanageable toxicity. The co-primary endpoints were day 43 pertuzumab serum trough concentration (Cmin) and safety.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were randomised. Mean pertuzumab Cmin at day 43 was 40.0 μg ml(-1) (s.d.: 17.3) in Arm A and 62.7 μg ml(-1) (29.1) in Arm B. Mean day 43 Cmin in Arm A was ~37% lower than that seen in metastatic breast cancer. The safety profiles were similar between arms and treatment was well tolerated. Partial responses were achieved by 86% and 55% of patients in Arms A and B, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of the pharmacokinetic and safety data, the 840 mg q3w pertuzumab dose has been selected for a phase III study of pertuzumab, trastuzumab and chemotherapy in HER2-positive aGC.

Multicenter phase II study of oxaliplatin and sorafenib in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma after failure of cisplatin and fluoropyrimidine treatment. A GEMCAD study

BACKGROUND

Cisplatin and fluoropyrimidine (CF) are standard first- line treatment in advanced gastric cancer, but no second-line treatment has yet been established. We present a phase II study in which we evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of Sorafenib (S), and Oxaliplatin as second-line therapy.

METHODS

Patients with progressive gastric adenocarcinoma after CF- first-line, ECOG 0-2, and measurable disease were included. The primary objective was PFS. Treatment doses were Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m²/3 weeks and Sorafenib 800 mg/bid/d.

RESULTS

We included 40 patients. CR was 2.5% and SD was 47.2%. Grade 3-4 toxic effects were neutropenia (9.8%), thrombocytopenia (7.3%), neurotoxicity (4.9%) and diarrhea (4.9%). Median PFS was 3 months (95%CI: 2.3-4.1) and median OS was 6.5 months (95% CI: 5.2-9.6). Time to progression (TTP) to first line therapy was a prognosis factor. Median OS was 9.7 months when time-to-progression during first-line chemotherapy was >6 months and 5.6 m when it was <6 months (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Time-to-progression under a CF-based first-line therapy determines subgroups of GC patients with different prognosis. The combination of Oxaliplatin-Sorafenib in advanced GC patients previously treated with CF appears safe, but our results do not support the implementation of a phase III trial.

Analysis of the concordance in the EGFR pathway status between primary tumors and related metastases of colorectal cancer patients:implications for cancer therapy

Patients with metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC), in which primary tumors are KRAS mutated, have no response to anti-EGFR therapy. However, less than half of mCRC patients with KRAS wild-type primary tumors respond to anti-EGFR therapy. Other downstream effectors of the EGFR pathway are being analyzed to fine-tune KRAS predictive value. However, as the primary tumor is the tissue of analysis that determines the use of anti-EGFR therapy in advanced disease, a high concordance in the status of these effectors between primary tumors and related metastases is required. We analyzed the concordances of downstream EGFR effectors in tumoral pairs of primaries and related metastases in a series of KRAS wild-type patients. One hundred seventeen tumoral pairs from patients with CRC were tested for KRAS mutational status. The level of concordance in the presence of KRAS mutations was 91% between the primary tumor and related metastases. The 70 pairs with KRAS wild-type primary tumors were further analyzed for BRAF and PIK3CA mutational status and for EGFR, PTEN and pAKT expression, and the number of concordant pairs was 70 (100%), 66 (94%), 43 (61%), 46 (66%) and 36 (54%), respectively. Our findings suggest that the mutational status of KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA in the primary tumor is an adequate surrogate marker of the status in the metastatic disease. On the other hand, the immunohistochemical analysis of EGFR, PTEN and pAKT showed a much higher degree of discordance between primaries and related metastases.

Phase I study of saracatinib (AZD0530) in combination with paclitaxel and/or carboplatin in patients with solid tumours

Background:

As a prelude to combination studies aimed at resistance reversal, this dose-escalation/dose-expansion study investigated the selective Src kinase inhibitor saracatinib (AZD0530) in combination with carboplatin and/or paclitaxel.

Methods:

Patients with advanced solid tumours received saracatinib once-daily oral tablets in combination with either carboplatin AUC 5 every 3 weeks (q3w), paclitaxel 175 mg m⁻² q3w, paclitaxel 80 mg m⁻² every 1 week (q1w), or carboplatin AUC 5 plus paclitaxel 175 mg m⁻² q3w. The primary endpoint was safety/tolerability.

Results:

A total of 116 patients received saracatinib 125 (N=20), 175 (N=44), 225 (N=40), 250 (N=9), or 300 mg (N=3). There were no clear dose-related trends within each chemotherapy regimen group in number or severity of adverse events (AEs). However, combining all groups, the occurrence of grade ⩾3 asthenic AEs (all causality) was dose-related (125 mg, 10% 175 mg, 20% ⩾225 mg, 33%), and grade ⩾3 neutropenia occurred more commonly at doses ⩾225 mg. There was no evidence that saracatinib affected exposure to carboplatin or paclitaxel, or vice versa. Objective responses were seen in 5 out of 44 patients (11%) receiving carboplatin plus paclitaxel q3w, and 5 out of 24 (21%) receiving paclitaxel q1w.

Conclusion:

Saracatinib doses up to 175 mg with paclitaxel with/without carboplatin showed acceptable toxicity in most patients, and are suitable for further trials.

Immunohistochemical analysis of tumour regression grade for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

AIM

Tumour regression grade (TRG) as defined by Rödel et al. has been used as an independent prognostic factor for rectal carcinoma after preoperative treatment by chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Determination of TRG 2 and 3, semiquantitatively defined as more or less than 50% tumour regression, respectively, does not appear to correlate with prognosis. The purpose of this study was to find an immunohistochemical pattern to permit improved stratification of intermediate responders defined by disease free (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

METHOD

Immunohistochemistry of EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor), VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor), CD133 antibody, p53 antibody and Ki67 antibody was evaluated using tissue microarrays (TMA) on post-treatment surgical specimens from 88 patients. CD133 expression was confirmed in the whole section when available.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 40 months, TRG was found to be an independent predictor of DFS (P = 0.05) and OS (P = 0.001) but no differences were found between TRG 2 and 3 in terms of DFS (P = 0.74) or OS (P = 0.41). The results of TMA showed an immunohistochemically poor prognostic profile for intermediate responders configured by negativity of CD133 expression. However, when examining CD133 expression in the whole section, there was an intermediate correlation with TMA and the prognostic significance was lost.

CONCLUSION

The results did not confirm the value of immunohistochemistry in predicting the prognosis of patients with rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. This questions the accuracy of TMA in detecting CD133 expression in this setting.

Irinotecan-Cetuximab-Bevacizumab as a Salvage Treatment in Heavily Pretreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Observational Study

<i>Background:</i> The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of irinotecan-cetuximab-bevacizumab in combination as a salvage treatment for heavily pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients. <i>Methods:</i> A total of 39 patients resistant to both oxaliplatin and irinotecan were included in this retrospective study. Treatment consisted of irinotecan 180/m² every 14 days, weekly cetuximab standard dose and bevacizumab 5 mg/kg every 14 days. <i>Results:</i> Partial response was observed in 8 patients (20%), stable disease in 24 (61%) and progressive disease in 7 (18%). Overall response rate in KRAS wild type was 6/22 (27%) and in mutated KRAS it was 2/15 (13%). Median time to progression was 8 months (6.4–9.4) and median overall survival 12 months (10.1–13.8). Overall, grade 3–4 adverse events were observed in 24 patients (62%). <i>Conclusions:</i> This regimen is active and moderately well tolerated in heavily pretreated advanced colorectal patients. However, caution is advisable when interpreting these results, because they run against the findings of two large phase III trials.

Phase II study of a fixed dose-rate infusion of gemcitabine associated with erlotinib in advanced pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility, toxicity and efficacy of the combination regimen consisting of gemcitabine-FDR infusion plus erlotinib, in ACP patients.

METHODS

Forty-two patients with histologically confirmed, locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer were included in this phase II trial. Main objectives were to assess the efficacy and safety of this regimen. Therapeutic regimen consisted of gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m(2) in 120-min infusion on days 1, 8 and 15, plus erlotinib 100 mg orally once daily. Cycles were repeated every 28 days.

RESULTS

A total of 160 courses of gemcitabine-FDR erlotinib were administered (median 3.8 courses per patient). The most common grade 3-4 AEs were neutropenia (21%), thrombocytopenia (10%), skin rash (10%) and asthenia (10%). Complete response was achieved in one patient (2%) and 11 (26%) achieved a partial response. Stable disease and progression disease were observed in 11 patients (26%) and 19 (45%), respectively. Median time to progression was 5 months (95%CI: 3.9-5.8 months) and median overall survival was 8 months (95% CI: 5.1-10.8). One-year survival rate was 35%.

CONCLUSIONS

A regimen consisting of gemcitabine-FDR infusion plus erlotinib is active and well tolerated in APC patients. However, the results do not justify the conduct of a Phase III trial.

Molecular characterization of ovarian cancer by gene-expression profiling

Ovarian cancer is the second most common gynecologic malignancy, and represents the fifth most common cause of cancer death in women in the United States. The age at diagnosis, extent of disease, success of primary surgery, and the histopathological features of the tumor are important prognostic markers. Epithelial ovarian carcinomas are classified into four major categories: serous, mucinous, endometrioid, and clear cell. Each subtypes of ovarian carcinoma are known to have different clinical characteristics and biological behaviour and response to chemotherapy. Molecular studies have supported for the notion that the different histological types of ovarian cancer likely represent histopathologically, genetically, and biologically distinct diseases. Microarray-based profiling technologies have provided an opportunity to simultaneously examine the relationship between thousands of genes and clinical phenotypes. In this review, we will summarise the current gene-expression profiles that address the classification of ovarian cancer into molecular subtypes with different outcomes.

Unplanned hospital admissions as an early surrogate indicator of patient (pt) attrition in phase I trials

2516

Background: We have previously reported a high Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) prognostic score (RPS) of 2- 3 predicts 90-day mortality and reduced overall survival (Arkenau et al BJC & EJC 2008). In this study, we explored the significance of unplanned hospital admissions (UHA) as a potential surrogate indicator of poor clinical outcome. Methods: All pts admitted to RMH Phase I Unit, UK, during 2-month intervals over 3 consecutive years were included in this analysis (2005–2007). We collated pt baseline characteristics, demographic and laboratory profiles, reasons for hospital admissions and relevant clinical trial data. Results: A total of 172 pts accounting for 310 admissions were seen on the Phase I unit during the stipulated time periods (amounting to 6 months in total). Median age: 61 years (range: 19–84); male to female admissions ratio 1.3:1. Pts were on trials of single-agent targeted therapies (69%), cytotoxic combinations (26%), vaccine/viruses (3%) and hormonal modulation (2%). Reasons for planned admissions (n=246) included treatment commencement, PK/PD sampling, paired pre/post treatment biopsies and insertion of central lines. 20.6% (64/310) of overall admissions were unplanned: 50 (78%) were due to disease-associated symptoms/complications and 14 (22%) treatment-related toxicities (TRT). 71% of pts with TRT were on cytotoxic combination trials. Median duration of UHA was 2 days (range:1–20) and there was no relation between length of stay and predicted outcome. 78% of pts in the UHA cohort had a high RPS of 2–3 (i.e. poor outcome) vs 43% in patients whose admission was planned (p=0.001). Of pts who required UHA, only 27% resumed their trial drug after recovery. The main statistically significant risk factors for UHA include >2 metastatic sites, (RR 2.6 [1.64 - 4.38], p=0.001), poor performance status (RR 2.47 [1.48 - 3.72] p=0.003), low albumin (RR 2.17 [1.36 - 3.52] p=0.001) and cytotoxic combination trials (RR 1.7 [1.09 - 2.86] p=0.025). Conclusions: Unplanned admissions constitute 20.6% of Phase I inpatients, with the majority being disease rather than treatment-related. Regardless of length of stay, UHA portend poor outcomes for patients who are on treatment, with a risk profile underscoring the importance of pt and trial selection.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Final results of a pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) phase I trial of ARQ 197 incorporating dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies investigating the antiangiogenic activity of selective c-Met inhibition

3523

Background: ARQ 197 (ARQ) is a selective non-ATP competitive inhibitor of c-Met, a receptor tyrosine kinase implicated in tumor cell proliferation, invasion and angiogenesis. Preclinical data and declines in circulating endothelial cell (CEC) levels in patients (pts) receiving ARQ suggest antiangiogenic potential of c-Met inhibition. Methods: ARQ was administered orally twice daily (bid) to pts with advanced solid tumors. Pre and post-therapy tumor biopsies were mandated for c-Met and FAK immunohistochemical studies during dose escalation (n = 16). CEC enumeration was evaluated. 12 pts are being investigated in the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) expansion cohort with DCE and Diffusion Weighted (DW) MRI. Results: 29 pts (14 F/15 M; mean 54.4 yrs) received ARQ at doses of 100 (n = 3), 200 (n = 6), 300 (n = 16), and 400 (n = 4) mg bid. 3 pts experienced dose limiting toxicities of CTCAEv3 grade (G)3 fatigue (200 mg bid); G3 hand-foot syndrome, G3 mucositis and G3 febrile neutropenia (400 mg bid). This established the ARQ MTD/recommended phase II dose (RP2D) at 300 mg bid. Other toxicities were G1–2, such as fatigue (n = 5); diarrhea, nausea and vomiting (n = 3). Mean AUC0–12h and Cmax increased linearly through the MTD. Statistically significant post-ARQ inhibition of high baseline phosphorylated c-Met and FAK expression in tumor tissue was seen in all dose cohorts confirming target inhibition. Disease stabilization (SD) was seen in 11 pts for up to 23 weeks with tumor regressions up to 12.4%. 13 of 20 pts had post-ARQ CEC declines of up to 100%. In the DCE-MRI cohort to date, preliminary analyses of ktrans histograms from pelvic lesions were consistent with antiangiogenic effects, with a ktrans median reduction of 20.1% on day 7 of ARQ (intrapatient baseline variability: 2.8%). This effect was still present (ktrans median decline: 8.3%) on day 56 of ARQ. Conclusions: ARQ is well tolerated with MTD/RP2D of 300mg bid, linear PK and evidence of phosphorylated c-Met and FAK inhibition. CEC and preliminary DCE-MRI data support the antiangiogenic effects of c-Met inhibition with ARQ. Correlation with other DCE parameters and DW changes will be presented.

[Table: see text]

Is hepcidin involved in anemia of advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients treated with platin-based chemotherapy? An exploratory study

e19086

Background: Anemia is a common complication in NSCLC patients. Hepcidin, a liver-produced peptide, acts to cause a block on cellular iron export by internalisation and degradation of ferroportin.This results in iron sequestration and interrupts iron delivery to erythroid precursor cells thus causing anemia. To date there are no studies addressing whether hepcidin expression contributes to the anemia in NSCLC. Methods: to investigate whether hepcidin is implicated in NSCLC anemia, hemoglobin (Hb), iron metabolism and serum hepcidin levels, were studied in newly diagnosed advanced NSCLC patients. Blood samples of each patients were collected before starting cisplatin based chemotherapy treatment. Serum was separate by centrifugation at 2,500 g for 10 min at 4ºC. Hepcidin was detected by a solid phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) on the serum of each patient. The ELISA test is based on the principle of competitive binding. The microtiter wells are coated with a polyclonal antibody directed towards an antigenic site on the hepcidin prohormone molecule. Endogenous hepcidin prohormone of patient sample competes with a hepcidin prohormone biotin conjugate for binding to the coated antibody. Hepcidin absolute quantitation was achieved using a standard curve. Hepcidin results were correlated with serum parameters related to iron metabolism. Results: In a exploratory analysis, 20 patients with advanced NSCLC were selected for hepcidin prohormone detection. Only 10% were anemic at the diagnosis but 70% developped anemia during the treatment. 50% of the patients had iron deficiency. 70% received treatment for anemia (40% erythropoetin and iron, 20% iron, 10% erythropoetin). Median serum hepcidin levels was 151 ng/ml (range 99–308). The serum hepcidin level correlated with serum ferritin but no correlation was found with other iron metabolism parameters. An inverse correlation was seen between serum hepcidin level and Hb evolution after 4 cycles of chemotherapy. Conclusions: These results support a potential relationship between hepcidin expression and anemia in NSCLC patients. Further confirmatory study is ongoing and final results will be presented in the meeting.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Pazopanib and lapatinib in patients with relapsed malignant glioma: Results of a phase I/II study

2040

Background: Pazopanib (paz) is an oral angiogenesis inhibitor targeting VEGFR, PDGFR, and c-kit; and lapatinib (lap) is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of EGFR (ErbB1) and HER-2 (ErbB2). Combination of VEGFR, PDGFR, and ErbB1 inhibitors may provide synergistic antitumor activity in malignant glioma. Phase I determined the optimally tolerated regimen (OTR) of paz and lap when given with enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants (EIACs). Phase II, which evaluated the efficacy of daily paz/lap (400 mg/1000mg) in relapsed grade 4 glioma without EIACs, was previously reported. Methods: Patients (pts) with grade 3 or 4 glioma, on EIACs, and with adequate organ function were eligible. Doses of paz and lap were escalated in a 3 + 3 design. OTR was defined as the highest dose of paz/lap at which no more than 1 of 6 pts had dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and target concentrations were achieved. Results: 32 pts have been enrolled at doses of paz/lap (mg, daily unless specified) of 200/1500 (N = 4), 800/1500 (N = 6), 800/500 bid (N = 5), 800/750 bid (N = 7), 800/1000 bid (N = 6), and 600 bid/1000 bid (N = 4). Data on 28 pts: the most common adverse events (AEs) were: fatigue (25%); diarrhea (25%); headache (21%); ALT increase (18%); nausea (18%); and insomnia (14%). Hepatobiliary lab abnormalities were reversible, uncomplicated, and included: AST elevation (11%), hyperbilirubinemia (7%), ALT elevation (36%; 7% Gr 3), and Alk phos elevation (14%). DLTs were elevated liver enzymes (800/1500; 1 pt), elevated lipase (800/750 bid; 1 pt) and thrombocytopenia, fatigue, diarrhea, confusion (800/1000 bid; 1 pt). 2 pts dose reduced and 3 pts had a dose interruption. At 600 bid/1000 bid, the target paz Cmin of 17.5 μg/mL was achieved; median lap Cmin of 0.447 μg/mL approached the target of 0.5 μg/mL. Phase I best response (MacDonald criteria) was PR in 3 pts (11%) and SD ≥ 8 weeks in 5 pts (18%). Two pts remain on the phase II, at 21 months (PR) and 23 months (CR) of therapy. Conclusions: The paz/lap combination has a manageable safety profile with a preliminary OTR with EIACs of paz 600 mg bid/ lap 1000 mg bid. EIACs decreased plasma paz and lap concentrations. Responses and lengthy periods without disease progression were seen in some pts in phase I and II.

[Table: see text]

Concordance of K-Ras status between colorectal cancer (CRC) primaries and related metastatic samples considering clinicopathological features

4053

Background: K-Ras mutations in CRC primaries may predict resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies, but we don´t know its behaviour in metastatic tissue. The aims of this study were: 1) Evaluate the grade of concordance of K-Ras status between primary and related metastatic samples 2) Establish a correlation between k-ras status and individual clinicopathological features Methods: K-ras mutations were retrospectively analysed in primary tumours of 124 patients and 138 related metastatic sites. The primary tumour site was colon in 87 patients and rectum in 37. Sites of metastases were liver (115 samples,83.3%) and lung (23 samples,16.7%). Some patients underwent surgery several times. We analyzed K-Ras point mutations in codons 12 and 13 by direct DNA sequencing from paraffin-embedded tumour and studied its relation with 13 clinicopathological features Results: K-Ras mutation was observed in 42(33.6%) primary tumours and in 52(39.1%) related metastatic sites, being the grade of concordance between primary and metastatic sites of 93% (95% CI: 97.5–88.3%). Discordance was observed in 9 (7%) patients: in 2, K-Ras status was wild type in metastatic site and expressed a mutational pattern in the primary tumour; vice versa, in 7, the mutation status was detected in the metastases meanwhile primary tumour was wild type. We also found statistically significative differences in mutation patterns regarding the site of the metastasic tissue: K-ras mutations were detected in 13 lung samples (61.9%) and in 39 liver samples (34.8%) (p=0.028). Of all the clinicopathological features analyzed we confirmed an increase of mutated K-ras status in tumours which had presented as perforation (p=0.044). No other relation with clinicopathological data was detected Conclusions: With this observational analysis, we confirm the high concordance (superior to 90%) between primary and related metastatic sites in terms of K-Ras status; for the first time, we have reported a higher mutational pattern in lung metastases than in liver disease, founds that may have important relevance regarding clinical/treatment decisions. For the realization of this study we received a grant from Amgen.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Immunohistochemical analysis of tumor regression grade for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

e22089

Background: Tumor regression grade (TRG) as defined by Rodel et al. has been suggested as an independent prognostic factor for rectal carcinoma patients treated by preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). However TRG 2 and 3 determination, semiquantitatively defined as more/less than 50% tumor regression, respectively, do not clearly correlate with prognosis. TRG 2 vs 3 discrimination is largely subjective hurdling prognostic analysis. The purpose of our study was to find an immunohistochemical pattern to better stratify these patients according to prognosis in term of disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods: Immunohistochemistry of EGFR, VEGF, CD133, p53 and Ki67 was evaluated by tissue microarrays on surgical specimens from 88 patients. Preoperative chemotherapy was UFT-LV (30%) or oxaliplatin-based (70%) plus pelvic radiotherapy (50 Gy) followed by mesorectal excision. TRG was determined by the amount of viable tumor versus fibrosis, ranging from TRG 4 when no viable tumor cells were detected, to TRG 1 when regression was less than 25%. TRG 2 and 3 were defined as described above. Univariate analyses were performed according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparisons between curves were evaluated by the log-rank test. Cox regression was used for the multivariate analysis. Results: At a median follow-up of 39 months, the TRG was an independent predictor of DFS (p=0.05) and OS (p=0.001) but no differences were found between TRG 2 and 3 in terms of DFS (p=0.74) or OS (p=0.41). Our results show an immunohistochemical bad prognostic profile for tumors TRG 2 and 3 configured by double negativity of EGFR and CD133 expression (less than 5% of tumor cells membrane immunoreactivity for both antibodies). 3-year DFS and OS for these patients (vs. TRG 2 and 3 not-double negative) were 33 vs 65% (p=0.05) [HR=2.4 (95%CI, 0.9–6.1) p=0.06] and 77 vs 95% (p=0.06) [HR=4.1 (95%CI, 0.7–21.5) p=0.09]. Conclusions: The EGFR/CD133 double negative rectal tumors with TRG 2 or 3 after chemoradiotherapy show a higher risk of relapse or death. These results can help clinicians to determine better individual prognosis and are worth to confirm prospectively.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.