A phase 1b study of zilovertamab in combination with paclitaxel for locally advanced/unresectable or metastatic Her2-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Zilovertamab is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting ROR1, an onco-embryonic antigen expressed by malignant cells of a variety of solid tumors, including breast cancer. A prior phase 1 study showed that zilovertamab was well tolerated and effective in inhibiting ROR1-signaling, which leads to activation of ERK1/2, NF-κB, and NRF2 target genes. This phase 1b study evaluated the safety and tolerability of zilovertamab with paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic HER2- breast cancer with Eastern Cooperative Group performance status of 0-2 and without prior taxane therapy in the advanced setting. Study treatment included 600 mg of zilovertamab administered intravenously (IV) on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 and then Day 1 of each 28-day cycle along with paclitaxel weekly at 80 mg/m2 IV.

RESULTS

Study patients had received a median of 4 prior therapies (endocrine therapy + chemotherapy) for locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic disease. No patient discontinued therapy due to toxicity ascribed to zilovertamab. Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of paclitaxel. Of 16 patients, 6 (38%) had a partial response, and 6/16 (38%) patients had stable disease as best tumor response.

CONCLUSION

The combination of zilovertamab and paclitaxel was safe and well tolerated in heavily pre-treated advanced breast cancer patients. Further evaluation of ROR1 targeting in breast cancer patients with zilovertamab is warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02776917. Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov on 05/17/2016.

Abstract 1062: Inhibition of ovarian and endometrial cancer cell proliferation by an anti-ROR1 monoclonal antibody

The non-canonical Wnt signalling receptor ROR1 has been shown to be aberrantly expressed in numerous cancers, including ovarian and endometrial cancer (EC). Cirmtuzumab is a humanised monoclonal antibody against ROR1 that blocks Wnt5a-induced ROR1 signalling. It has demonstrated safety and efficacy in several Phase I/II clinical trials for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and Her2-negative breast cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate any anti-proliferative effect of cirmtuzumab in combination with commonly-used gynaecological cancer therapies (cisplatin, paclitaxel and the PARP inhibitor, olaparib) on high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) and EC cell lines including models of platinum resistance. The ROR1 positive HGSOC cells lines CaOV3, CaOV3CisR PEO1, PEO4 and EC cell lines Ishikawa, KLE were used in this study. First, IC50 for cisplatin, paclitaxel and olaparib in each cell line at 72h was determined using the cell counting kit 8 (CCK-8). Then, cells were seeded in 12-well plates and treated with cirmtuzumab at 25µg/ml or 50µg/ml for 4h prior to the addition of the chemotherapeutic agents at IC70 concentration. The effect of cirmtuzumab +/- agents was quantified using the IncuCyte S3 Live Cell Analysis System. Phase contrast cell images were obtained using a 10x objective lens within the instrument every 3h for 72h in total. The average confluence of each well was calculated and normalised against the baseline (time 0). Two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-test was performed to evaluate the effect of treatments. RNA and protein were extracted at the end of the incubation for qRTPCR and Western blot analysis. Single dose cirmtuzumab at both 25µg/ml and 50µg/ml significantly inhibited proliferation of CaOV3, CaOV3cisR, PEO1 and Ishikawa cells. 50µg/ml of cirmtuzumab decreased proliferation of KLE. Compared to paclitaxel alone, addition of 50µg/ml of cirmtuzumab significantly inhibited proliferation of CaOV3, CaOV3CisR, PEO1 and PEO4. Compared to cisplatin alone, addition of 25µg/ml of cirmtuzumab significantly inhibited proliferation of CaOV3CisR, PEO4; addition of 50µg/ml of cirmtuzumab significantly inhibited proliferation of CaOV3, CaOV3CisR, PEO4. Compared to olaparib alone, addition of 25µg/ml of cirmtuzumab significantly inhibited proliferation of CaOV3CisR; addition of 50µg/ml of cirmtuzumab significantly inhibited proliferation of CaOV3 and CaOV3CisR. No significant change in ROR1 or ROR2 expression levels was observed following cirmtuzumab treatment, however treatment did result in alterations to markers of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Cirmtuzumab alone inhibited proliferation of ovarian cancer and EC cells in vitro, and could enhance the activity of commonly-used chemotherapeutic agents. This study supports the potential of cirmtuzumab or other ROR1 targeting therapies for treating women with HGSOC and EC.

Citation Format: Dongli Liu, Gunnar F. Kaufmann, James B. Breitmeyer, Kristie-Ann Dickson, Deborah J. Marsh, Caroline E. Ford. Inhibition of ovarian and endometrial cancer cell proliferation by an anti-ROR1 monoclonal antibody [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 1062.

Abstract 1235: Selective androgen receptor degraders for the treatment of androgen receptor-positive, triple-negative breast cancer

Introduction: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive breast cancer with shorter overall survival compared to other breast cancer types. One of the six molecularly-classified TNBC subtypes is the luminal androgen receptor subtype (LAR), which overexpresses androgen receptor (AR) and is dependent on AR for its growth. About 10-20% of TNBCs belong to the LAR subtype. Competitive AR antagonists, enzalutamide and bicalutamide, were effective in preclinical models of LAR TNBC and in clinical trials. This led us to hypothesize that potent selective AR degraders (SARDs), due to their ability to inhibit and degrade the AR, could provide a novel therapeutic approach for the treatment of LAR subtype of TNBC.

Description: Western blots, cell line proliferation assays, and gene expression analyses were performed to evaluate novel small molecule SARDs. LAR TNBC cell lines and patient-derived xenografts (PDX) were utilized for in vivo evaluation of the SARDs. Once tumors grew to ~100-300 mm3, mice were randomized and treated orally for four weeks with vehicle, SARD UT-34, SARD UT-105, enzalutamide, or bicalutamide. Tumor volumes were measured twice weekly and tumors were collected at sacrifice for further analyses.

Summary: SARDs bind to the N-terminus of the AR and have been characterized in preclinical advanced prostate cancer models. In this study, the SARDs were evaluated in preclinical models of LAR TNBC. Western blot for AR in LAR MDA-MB-453 cells demonstrated degradation of the AR protein by SARDs at low micromolar concentrations. Gene expression studies showed a complete inhibition of androgen-induced AR target gene transcription by the SARDs. Androgen-induced proliferation of MDA-MB-453 cells was inhibited by SARDs. MDA-MB-453 cells implanted subcutaneously in NOD SCID Gamma female mice grew robustly to 100-300 mm3 in 15-20 days. Treatment of tumor-bearing animals with the SARDs completely inhibited or regressed the tumors.

Conclusion: These results support the findings that AR is the driver of MDA-MB-453 cell and tumor growth. SARDs with their unique mechanism of action may provide a new therapeutic option to women affected by the LAR subtype of TNBC.

Disclosure: This work was partially supported by Oncternal Therapeutics and by an NCI supplement award to R01 (CA229164S1 to author RN). The SARD program has been licensed to Oncternal Therapeutics, Inc. by the University of Tennessee Research Foundation. Author RN is a consultant to Oncternal Therapeutics.

Citation Format: Sarah Asemota, Kirsten Young Young, Suriyan Ponnusamy, Thirumagal Thiyagarajan, Dong-Jin Hwang, Yali He, James B. Breitmeyer, Gunnar F. Kaufmann, Duane D. Miller, Ramesh Narayanan. Selective androgen receptor degraders for the treatment of androgen receptor-positive, triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 1235.

Abstract P3-10-18: Phase 1b trial of cirmtuzumab and paclitaxel for locally advanced, unresectable and metastatic breast cancer

Background: Cirmtuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets the receptor tyrosine kinase like orphan receptor 1 (ROR1), which is expressed on poor prognosis breast cancer, ovarian cancer, other solid tumors, CLL and mantle cell lymphoma. One clinical study showed increased expression of ROR1 in breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and a preclinical PDX breast cancer model showed cirmtuzumab and paclitaxel to have at least additive efficacy1. A recently completed Phase 1 trial of cirmtuzumab in CLL showed the antibody to be both safe and effective in inhibiting tumor cell ROR1 signaling in patients with CLL2.

Methods: The primary aim of this trial was to determine the safety of cirmtuzumab and weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced Her2 negative breast cancer based upon dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) in the first cycle of treatment. Secondary endpoints were clinical activity, pharmacokinetics and correlative biomarkers on tumor specimens. Eligible patients were those with locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic Her2 negative breast cancer who had not received paclitaxel in the metastatic setting, had not developed metastatic disease within 6 months of (neo)adjuvant paclitaxel, had ECOG performance status of 0-2, and had adequate laboratory parameters. Any number of prior lines of therapy were allowed. Study treatment included fixed dose 600 mg cirmtuzumab given days 1 and 15 of cycle 1 and then day 1 of each subsequent 28-day cycle. Paclitaxel was given weekly at a dose of 80mg/m2. Patients were evaluated in dose cohorts of 5 for DLTs with a target of 15 evaluable patients.

Results: To date, 6 patients evaluable for safety and 5 patients evaluable for DLTs were treated. Age range was 30 to 59 years. Three of 6 safety-evaluable patients had triple negative breast cancer at study enrollment. Prior lines of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting ranged from 0-3. No discontinuations for toxicity and no DLTs have been observed to date. Adverse events (AEs) have been consistent with the known safety profile of paclitaxel, with 3 episodes of grade 3 neutropenia in 2 patients and 1 episode of grade 3 hyperglycemia. All other AEs were grade 1 or 2. Partial responses have been observed in 2/5 patients with one patient response ongoing with cirmtuzumab alone for at least 17 weeks after stopping paclitaxel. Pharmacokinetic analysis of serial plasma samples for free unbound antibody from two patients provided results similar to those observed in CLL patients treated with cirmtuzumabwith a projected half-life of 30 days2. No decline in antibody concentration over time was observed consistent with the absence of neutralizing antibodies.

Conclusions: Preliminary information indicates that the combination of fixed dose cirmtuzumab plus paclitaxel is well-tolerated and safe. Responses to therapy have been observed and preliminary pharmacokinetic results are consistent with sustained potentially therapeutic levels. Updated safety, clinical activity, pharmacokinetics and biomarker analyses will be presented.

1Zhang S et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 116(4): 1370-1377. PMID 30622177.

2Choi MY et al. Cell Stem Cell 22(6): 951-959. PMID 29859176.

Funding sources:

CIRM UC San Diego Alpha Stem Cell Clinic and Sanford Stem Cell Clinical Center; Oncternal Therapeutics, Inc.; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center Padres Pedal the Cause Grant; Gonick Breast Cancer Research Fund

Citation Format: Rebecca A Shatsky, Richard B Schwab, Teresa L Helsten, Emily I Pittman, Ruifeng Chen, James B Breitmeyer, Catriona HM Jamieson, Thomas J Kipps, Barbara A Parker. Phase 1b trial of cirmtuzumab and paclitaxel for locally advanced, unresectable and metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-10-18.

A randomized study of the efficacy and safety of intravenous acetaminophen compared to oral acetaminophen for the treatment of fever

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and dynamics of the onset of antipyretic efficacy of intravenous (IV) acetaminophen versus oral (PO) acetaminophen in the treatment of endotoxin-induced fever.

METHODS

This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, single-dose study was conducted at a single center in the United States in healthy volunteer adult males with an endotoxin-induced fever to assess the antipyretic efficacy and safety of IV acetaminophen 1 g versus PO acetaminophen 1 g over 6 hours. Subjects who achieved a sufficient fever response to a test dose of reference standard endotoxin were randomly assigned to receive either IV acetaminophen and PO placebo (n = 54) or PO acetaminophen and IV placebo (n = 51). The primary efficacy outcome was the weighted sum of temperature differences from baseline at time T0 through T120 minutes. Safety evaluations included adverse event (AE), physical exam, and laboratory assessments.

RESULTS

Of 105 subjects receiving study medication, 24 vomited within 2 hours postdose (PO acetaminophen, n = 15; and IV acetaminophen, n = 9) and were excluded from the modified intent-to-treat population that consisted of 36 and 45 subjects treated with PO and IV acetaminophen, respectively. While this was done to not confer an advantage to the IV formulation, a sensitivity analysis including these subjects did not change the overall efficacy results. Statistically significant results favoring IV acetaminophen were observed for the primary endpoint (weighted sum of temperature differences over 120 minutes, p = 0.0039) and also at each time point from T30 to T90 minutes, although the maximum mean observed temperature difference was only 0.3°C. The study drugs were well tolerated. The AE frequency was comparable between the IV and PO groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A single dose of IV acetaminophen is as safe and effective in reducing endotoxin-induced fever as PO acetaminophen. IV acetaminophen may be useful where patients are unable to tolerate PO intake or when an earlier onset of action is desirable.

A randomized study of the efficacy and safety of intravenous acetaminophen compared to oral acetaminophen for the treatment of fever

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and dynamics of the onset of antipyretic efficacy of intravenous (IV) acetaminophen versus oral (PO) acetaminophen in the treatment of endotoxin-induced fever.

METHODS

This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, single-dose study was conducted at a single center in the United States in healthy volunteer adult males with an endotoxin-induced fever to assess the antipyretic efficacy and safety of IV acetaminophen 1 g versus PO acetaminophen 1 g over 6 hours. Subjects who achieved a sufficient fever response to a test dose of reference standard endotoxin were randomly assigned to receive either IV acetaminophen and PO placebo (n = 54) or PO acetaminophen and IV placebo (n = 51). The primary efficacy outcome was the weighted sum of temperature differences from baseline at time T0 through T120 minutes. Safety evaluations included adverse event (AE), physical exam, and laboratory assessments.

RESULTS

Of 105 subjects receiving study medication, 24 vomited within 2 hours postdose (PO acetaminophen, n = 15; and IV acetaminophen, n = 9) and were excluded from the modified intent-to-treat population that consisted of 36 and 45 subjects treated with PO and IV acetaminophen, respectively. While this was done to not confer an advantage to the IV formulation, a sensitivity analysis including these subjects did not change the overall efficacy results. Statistically significant results favoring IV acetaminophen were observed for the primary endpoint (weighted sum of temperature differences over 120 minutes, p = 0.0039) and also at each time point from T30 to T90 minutes, although the maximum mean observed temperature difference was only 0.3°C. The study drugs were well tolerated. The AE frequency was comparable between the IV and PO groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A single dose of IV acetaminophen is as safe and effective in reducing endotoxin-induced fever as PO acetaminophen. IV acetaminophen may be useful where patients are unable to tolerate PO intake or when an earlier onset of action is desirable.

Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody with enhanced affinity for CD16 activates NK cells at lower concentrations and more effectively than rituximab

Growing evidence indicates that the affinity of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for CD16 (FcgammaRIII) plays a central role in the ability of the mAb to mediate antitumor activity. We evaluated how CD16 polymorphisms, and mAb with modified affinity for target antigen and CD16, affect natural killer (NK) cell phenotype when CD20(+) malignant B cells were also present. The mAb consisted of rituximab (R), anti-CD20 with enhanced affinity for CD20 (AME-B), and anti-CD20 with enhanced affinity for both CD20 and CD16 (AME-D). Higher concentrations of mAb were needed to induce CD16 modulation, CD54 up-regulation, and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) on NK cells from subjects with the lower affinity CD16 polymorphism. The dose of mAb needed to induce NK activation was lower with AME-D irrespective of CD16 polymorphism. At saturating mAb concentrations, peak NK activation was greater for AME-D. Similar results were found with measurement of CD16 modulation, CD54 up-regulation, and ADCC. These data demonstrate that cells coated with mAb with enhanced affinity for CD16 are more effective at activating NK cells at both low and saturating mAb concentrations irrespective of CD16 polymorphism, and they provide further evidence for the clinical development of such mAbs with the goal of improving clinical response to mAb.

A phase I study of recombinant interferon-beta in patients with advanced malignant disease

To evaluate the safety, toxicity, and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of IFN beta-1a (Rebif, Serono Laboratories, Inc.) in patients with malignant diseases unresponsive to standard therapies and to assess the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics associated with IFN beta-1a administration, an open-label, single-center phase I study was designed. Thirty-four patients were enrolled and treated with IFN beta-1a. All had measurable solid neoplasms or evaluable hematological malignancies. All patients received a single i.v. bolus dose of IFN-beta-1a on day 1, followed 7 days later by daily s.c. injections for 28 consecutive days. Successive groups of three patients received increasingly higher doses (in geometric progression from 1.5 million international units (MIU)/m2 to 24 MIU/m2) until dose-limiting toxicities were noted. Pharmacokinetic and biological studies, including measurement of the activity of 2',5'-oligoadenylate synthetase (2',5'-OAS) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and serum levels of soluble Tac (CD 25) and beta-2 microglobulin, were performed on patients who agreed to participate. i.v. and s.c. doses of IFN beta-1a up to 24 MIU/m2 were administered. The most frequent adverse events (AEs) were constitutional symptoms. Grade III AEs during i.v. dosing included fever, elevation of bilirubin, and infection unrelated to therapy. No grade IV events were seen. AEs noted during continuous s.c. therapy included fever, liver transaminase increase, albuminuria, fatigue, nausea, myalgia, and rigors. Dose-limiting toxicities were encountered during s.c. dosing at the 24-MIU/m2 and 18-MIU/m2 dose levels and included gastrointestinal toxicity, elevations of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase, and albuminuria. The s.c. MTD was determined to be 12 MIU/m2, although there was great variability in the individual patient's ability to tolerate IFN beta-1a. 2',5'-OAS activity, thought to be indicative of IFN activity, increased within hours after i.v. and s.c. dosing, with the level remaining persistently elevated during the s.c. daily injections. The highest peak level was attained in the 6-MIU/m2 group. There was no evidence that the increase in 2',5'-OAS activity decayed with repetitive dosing, nor was there evidence of accumulation in this pharmacodynamic marker. Serum beta-2-microglobulin levels showed a modest time- and dose-dependent increase after s.c. administration of IFN beta-1a, with the largest increase seen at the 24-MIU/m2 dose level. There were no clear dose-dependent responses noted in soluble Tac serum levels. IFN beta-1a was well-tolerated when administered by a single i.v. bolus injection at doses up to and including 24 MIU/m2. Daily s.c. injections for at least 28 days were well-tolerated at doses up to and including 12 MIU/m2, with some patients tolerating doses twice as high as this. The MTD for the i.v. route could not be clearly determined according to the guidelines of the protocol. However, i.v. bolus doses up to 24 MIU/m2 were relatively well-tolerated. For the s.c. route, the MTD was determined to be 12 MIU/m2, but there was great interpatient variability, with some patients able to tolerate higher doses.

Recombinant human growth hormone in patients with HIV-associated wasting. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Serostim Study Group

BACKGROUND

Body wasting, particularly loss of body cell mass, is an increasingly prevalent acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-defining condition and is an independent risk factor for death in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Treatment with growth hormone for 7 days resulted in weight gain and nitrogen retention, but the long-term effects of this treatment in patients with HIV-associated wasting are not known.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term effect of treatment with growth hormone on weight, body composition, functional performance, and quality of life in patients with HIV-associated wasting.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial.

SETTING

Outpatient university and community-based patient care facilities.

PATIENTS

178 HIV-infected patients with documented unintentional weight loss of at least 10% or weight less than 90% of the lower limit of ideal body weight.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomly assigned to receive either recombinant human growth hormone, 0.1 mg/kg of body weight per day (average dosage, 6 mg/d) (n = 90) or placebo (n = 88) for 12 weeks.

MEASUREMENTS

Weight; body fat, lean body mass, and bone mineral content (measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry); total body water (by deuterium oxide dilution); extracellular water (by sodium bromide dilution); work output (by treadmill exercise); quality of life; and safety of treatment.

RESULTS

Treatment with growth hormone resulted in a sustained and statistically significant increase in weight (mean increase +/- SD, 1.6 +/- 3.7 kg [P < 0.001]) and lean body mass (3.0 +/- 3.0 kg [P < 0.001]), accompanied by a decrease in body fat (-1.7 +/- 1.7 kg [P < 0.001]). In contrast, in patients receiving placebo, weight (increase, 0.1 +/- 3.1 kg), lean body mass (decrease, 0.1 +/- 2.0 kg), and body fat (decrease, 0.3 +/- 2.2 kg) did not change significantly from baseline. Differences between groups at week 12 were statistically significant (P = 0.011 for body weight and P < 0.001 for lean body mass and body fat). A greater increase in treadmill work output was noted in the group receiving growth hormone (increase, 99 +/- 293 kg. m/min) compared with the group receiving placebo (increase, 20 +/- 233 kg.m/min)(P = 0.039). Health status (quality of life) scores did not differ between groups at baseline or after treatment. Days of disability and use of medical resources were the same for both groups. Treatment was was well tolerated; no significant differences were seen between groups in clinical events, progression of AIDS, CD4+ or CD8+ cell counts, or viral burden.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with growth hormone increases body weight, lean body mass, and treadmill work output and appears to be a safe and potentially effective therapy in patients with HIV-associated wasting.

Platelet transfusion and alternatives to transfusion in patients with malignancy

Platelet transfusions have long had an important role in the treatment of patients with thrombocytopenia due to disease or myelotoxic treatment or in patients with reduced platelet function. However, platelet transfusions are associated with numerous risks, both immunologic (e.g., transfusion reactions, alloimmunization, immunosuppression) and infectious (e.g., viral, bacterial). In addition, several laboratory and clinical factors can influence post-transfusion platelet recovery. Recent technological advances have introduced the potential for using alternatives to platelet transfusions, such as cytokines or platelet substitutes, which may avoid the risks of transfusion. Platelet development from megakaryocytes is a process that is highly regulated by cytokines and animal research suggests that selected cytokines involved in this process may be useful in the treatment of thrombocytopenia. Newer developments, including the utilization of recombinant cytokines with relatively selective stimulation of platelet production (e.g., interleukin 6 [IL-6]) and the recent discovery of a megakaryocyte colony stimulating factor (thrombopoietin), represent major therapeutic opportunities in the treatment of thrombocytopenia. Platelet substitutes, e.g., thromboerythrocytes, also show promise in the management of platelet deficiencies.

Adjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer

Many women will not be cured of breast cancer by even the best early detection and surgical techniques because of micrometastases present at diagnosis. Adjuvant therapy has extended the disease-free interval for most patients and lengthens overall survival for many. Combination chemotherapy has become the standard form of adjuvant treatment for premenopausal women with breast cancer and positive lymph nodes after primary therapy. With minimal toxicity, disease-free and overall survival are improved. Results are less impressive or less clear-cut for postmenopausal women or any woman with negative lymph nodes. Long-term toxicities of adjuvant chemotherapy may include second malignancies and cardiac dysfunction. Although these complications probably are rare, they must be considered seriously when weighing chemotherapy for patients in whom its benefits may be slight. Innovations likely to become standard in adjuvant therapy decision making include risk assessment with new prognostic indicators (growth fraction, oncogene expression) and investigation of dose intensification using bone marrow growth factors and autologous stem-cell support.

Comprehensive management of disseminated breast cancer

The management of patients with metastatic breast cancer is best achieved by the judicious use of local and systemic measures that palliate symptoms and improve overall quality of life. When two treatment approaches are known to be equally efficacious, the less toxic should be used. When disease is limited to one or two sites and the patient has an indolent form of the disease, the patient's symptoms are often best palliated with the use of surgery or radiotherapy alone. When multiple sites of disease are evident or the disease is progressing more rapidly, systemic therapy is preferred, and local therapies should be added when the patient is clearly refractory to systemic therapy or when the disease site is unlikely to be adequately palliated with systemic therapy. The use of any of these therapies, including chemotherapy, has a relatively small effect on the median survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer. However, improvements in quality of life are usually greatest with regimens inducing the highest response rates, even when these regimens are associated with greater toxicity. The characteristics of patients likely to respond to endocrine therapy are well defined; in these patients endocrine therapy should be used as the first form of systemic therapy. Among endocrine therapies, the least toxic is used first. The selection of patients for chemotherapy is largely a process of exclusion. When chemotherapy is used, there are a number of different strategies for sequencing chemotherapy that appear to be equally efficacious. In general, patients should be treated with standard doses of drug combinations for a period in excess of 3 months. When used inappropriately, especially in asymptomatic patients, these therapies may actually compromise the patient's quality of life. The use of surgery, radiation therapy, and systemic therapy should be integrated with various types of psychosupport services, especially peer support groups. Patients who want to try new forms of therapy should do so early in the course of the disease when these therapies are most likely to be effective and the patient has the least to lose if the therapy proves ineffective. This is especially true because the use of the most effective regimens at a time when the patient is asymptomatic may mean that the patient is resistant to most or all therapies of proven value when most in need of palliation.

Adjuvant systemic therapy for patients with node-negative tumors

Early adjuvant therapy studies, especially adjuvant chemotherapy studies, were performed almost exclusively on patients with histologically involved axillary lymph nodes ("node-positive" patients). These therapies were restricted to this group of patients because the toxicities of adjuvant therapy were believed too great to justify its use in patients with a very good prognosis until its benefits were fully established. However, after it was demonstrated that adjuvant therapy can significantly prolong the disease-free survival of almost all groups of node-positive patients and the overall survival of some patient subsets, adjuvant therapy trials specifically designed for patients without histologically involved lymph nodes ("node-negative" patients) were initiated. Results from some of the largest of these second generation trials were recently published, and the early results from these studies have generated new questions. For example, will the mature results from these studies be nearly identical to the results seen in node-positive patients, or will node-negative patients derive greater benefits from adjuvant therapy? Is it possible that adjuvant therapy will "cure" node-negative patients but not node-positive patients? (Cure is defined here as an effect of therapy that returns a patient to the life expectancy she might have had if she had never been diagnosed with breast cancer). Is it possible that the added years of life from adjuvant therapy or that the number of node-negative patients who benefit are so small that these benefits will be outweighed by delayed toxicities that appear in patients who might have been cured even without adjuvant therapy? At present the available data to answer these questions definitely are either contradictory or nonexistent.

FcR-mediated crosslinking of Ta1 (CDw26) induces human T lymphocyte activation

Ta1 (CDw26) is a 105-kDa glycoprotein of unknown function whose expression on human T lymphocytes is strongly correlated with activation and proliferation. The subset of peripheral blood T cells expressing Ta1 includes the principal responsive population to proliferative stimulation by recall antigens as well as monoclonal antibodies directed to the CD3/T cell receptor complex and the CD2 (T11) molecule. We now show that the Ta1 molecule is itself an alternate mediator of human T lymphocyte activation. T cell clones were induced to proliferate and exert their cytolytic effector function by anti-Ta1 monoclonal antibodies in the presence of Fc-receptor-positive accessory or target cells. Resting T cells from peripheral blood were also activated to proliferate by anti-Ta1, but only if both Fc-receptor-positive accessory cells and exogenous IL-2 were present. Anti-Ta1 antibodies induced increased expression of IL-2 receptors on purified T cells under these conditions. Activation via Ta1 was shown to be functionally interconnected to CD3/T cell receptor activation mechanisms, because modulation of the CD3/T cell receptor complex inhibited anti-Ta1-mediated cytolysis without affecting Ta1 surface expression. While demonstrating that the CDw26 antigen-mediated pathway of activation is not dependent on one unique epitope, our results suggest that the Ta1 glycoprotein can mediate T cell activation directly, suggesting that it may be associated with an important cellular component of the human T cell regulatory network.

Sheep erythrocyte rosetting induces multiple alterations in T lymphocyte function: inhibition of T cell receptor activity and stimulation of T11/CD2

When T lymphocytes from human blood or lymphoid organs are prepared by the sheep red blood cell (SRBC) rosetting procedure, glycoproteins of the SRBC membrane interact intimately with the CD2 (T11) molecule on the T cell surface. We now show that rosette formation has measurable short- and long-term effects upon the T cells. First, for a period of 24-48 hr after rosetting, the signal transducing and activation functions of the T3/Ti T cell antigen receptor complex is paralyzed for anti-T3-induced calcium mobilization, with a concomitant decrease in proliferative response to mitogens or stimulatory anti-T3 antibodies. Calcium mobilization through the alternate pathway of T cell activation, the T11/CD2 SRBC receptor, was also inhibited by rosetting. Second, rosetting appears to confer a partial stimulatory signal through the T11/CD2 pathway. Thus, 72 hr or more after rosetting, there was increased expression of the T11(3) activation epitope, and rosetted T cells were stimulated to proliferate in the presence of anti-T11(3) antibodies alone. These results provide further details on the effects of SRBC-T cell interactions, with important methodological implications. Moreover, they suggest a hitherto unrecognized down-regulatory effect of engaging the CD2 molecule, and provide further evidence that the T cell receptor is functionally interconnected to the CD2 activation pathway.

Regulation of T cell clone function via CD4 and CD8 molecules. Anti-CD4 can mediate two distinct inhibitory activities

The functional effects resulting from CD4 and CD8 perturbation were analyzed by using a CD4+CD8+ clone and anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 monoclonal antibodies. Perturbation of CD8, but not CD4, by soluble antibody resulted in the inhibition of CD3-T cell receptor (CD3-Ti) triggering as determined by flow cytometric measurements of intracellular free Ca2+ concentrations. In addition, the CD3-T cell receptor-mediated cytotoxic function of the CD4+CD8+ clone was inhibited by anti-CD8, but not by anti-CD4. These results suggest that CD8, but not CD4, was functionally associated with CD3-Ti on the CD4+CD8+ clone. Although CD4 perturbation did not affect CD3-Ti-mediated activities, it resulted in the inhibition of the interleukin 2-dependent proliferation of this clone. Perturbation of CD8 did not affect the interleukin 2 dependent proliferation of the CD4+CD8+ clone. On the other hand, CD4 molecules of another CD4+CD8- clone unlike those of the CD4+CD8+ clone, were clearly linked to T cell receptor function. These results indicate that CD4 perturbation can result in two distinct regulatory activities; one involves the regulation of CD3-T cell receptor function, whereas the other is not directly associated with CD3-T cell antigen receptor function. The data are also consistent with the notion that CD4 and CD8 do not merely function as recognition and adhesion elements for accessory cell major histocompatibility complex molecules, but have a direct role in the regulation of T cell activation.

Regulation of T cell clone function via CD4 and CD8 molecules. Anti-CD4 can mediate two distinct inhibitory activities

The functional effects resulting from CD4 and CD8 perturbation were analyzed by using a CD4+CD8+ clone and anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 monoclonal antibodies. Perturbation of CD8, but not CD4, by soluble antibody resulted in the inhibition of CD3-T cell receptor (CD3-Ti) triggering as determined by flow cytometric measurements of intracellular free Ca2+ concentrations. In addition, the CD3-T cell receptor-mediated cytotoxic function of the CD4+CD8+ clone was inhibited by anti-CD8, but not by anti-CD4. These results suggest that CD8, but not CD4, was functionally associated with CD3-Ti on the CD4+CD8+ clone. Although CD4 perturbation did not affect CD3-Ti-mediated activities, it resulted in the inhibition of the interleukin 2-dependent proliferation of this clone. Perturbation of CD8 did not affect the interleukin 2 dependent proliferation of the CD4+CD8+ clone. On the other hand, CD4 molecules of another CD4+CD8- clone unlike those of the CD4+CD8+ clone, were clearly linked to T cell receptor function. These results indicate that CD4 perturbation can result in two distinct regulatory activities; one involves the regulation of CD3-T cell receptor function, whereas the other is not directly associated with CD3-T cell antigen receptor function. The data are also consistent with the notion that CD4 and CD8 do not merely function as recognition and adhesion elements for accessory cell major histocompatibility complex molecules, but have a direct role in the regulation of T cell activation.

The T11 (CD2) molecule is functionally linked to the T3/Ti T cell receptor in the majority of T cells

Most mature human T lymphocytes express both the multichain T3 (CD3)/Ti T cell receptor for antigen (TCR), and the biochemically distinct 55-kDa T11 (CD2) glycoprotein. Stimulating the T11 molecule causes profound T cell proliferation and functional activation in vitro, but the relationship of T11-mediated activation to antigenic stimulation of T lymphocytes in vivo remains unknown. We now present evidence that T11 function is directly linked to TCR components in T3/Ti+ T11+ human T cells. First, we found that stimulating peripheral blood T cells with the mitogenic combination of anti-T11(2) cells with the mitogenic combination of anti-T11(2) plus anti-T11(3) monoclonal antibodies caused the phosphorylation of TCR T3 chains. The predominance of T3-gamma-phosphorylation that occurred in anti-T11(2) plus anti-T11(3)-treated T cells is similar to the pattern previously observed in antigen-stimulated T cell clones. Second, T11 function depended upon concurrent cell-surface expression of the TCR. Thus, when peripheral blood T cells were deprived of cell surface T3/Ti by anti-T3 modulation, anti-T11(2) plus anti-T11(3)-induced mitogenesis and transmembrane signal generation in the form of calcium mobilization were inhibited. The mechanism of TCR-T11 interdependence was investigated in a series of TCR-deficient variants of a T cell lymphoblastoid cell line. T3/Ti negative variants expressed cell surface T11, but anti-T11(2) plus anti-T11(3) failed to cause detectable calcium mobilization. The TCR-deficient variants also failed to express T11(3) activation epitopes after incubation with anti-T11(2) antibodies, suggesting that T11(3) expression is an essential and TCR-dependent intermediate in the T11 activation mechanism in these cells. Taken together, our results suggest that T11 function depends upon cell-surface expression of TCR in many T3/Ti+ T11+ T lymphocytes, and T11-mediated activation is intimately interconnected with TCR activation mechanisms. A model in which stimulating signals delivered via T11 may be a part of antigenic activation of T lymphocytes is presented.

The T11 (CD2) molecule is functionally linked to the T3/Ti T cell receptor in the majority of T cells

Most mature human T lymphocytes express both the multichain T3 (CD3)/Ti T cell receptor for antigen (TCR), and the biochemically distinct 55-kDa T11 (CD2) glycoprotein. Stimulating the T11 molecule causes profound T cell proliferation and functional activation in vitro, but the relationship of T11-mediated activation to antigenic stimulation of T lymphocytes in vivo remains unknown. We now present evidence that T11 function is directly linked to TCR components in T3/Ti+ T11+ human T cells. First, we found that stimulating peripheral blood T cells with the mitogenic combination of anti-T11(2) cells with the mitogenic combination of anti-T11(2) plus anti-T11(3) monoclonal antibodies caused the phosphorylation of TCR T3 chains. The predominance of T3-gamma-phosphorylation that occurred in anti-T11(2) plus anti-T11(3)-treated T cells is similar to the pattern previously observed in antigen-stimulated T cell clones. Second, T11 function depended upon concurrent cell-surface expression of the TCR. Thus, when peripheral blood T cells were deprived of cell surface T3/Ti by anti-T3 modulation, anti-T11(2) plus anti-T11(3)-induced mitogenesis and transmembrane signal generation in the form of calcium mobilization were inhibited. The mechanism of TCR-T11 interdependence was investigated in a series of TCR-deficient variants of a T cell lymphoblastoid cell line. T3/Ti negative variants expressed cell surface T11, but anti-T11(2) plus anti-T11(3) failed to cause detectable calcium mobilization. The TCR-deficient variants also failed to express T11(3) activation epitopes after incubation with anti-T11(2) antibodies, suggesting that T11(3) expression is an essential and TCR-dependent intermediate in the T11 activation mechanism in these cells. Taken together, our results suggest that T11 function depends upon cell-surface expression of TCR in many T3/Ti+ T11+ T lymphocytes, and T11-mediated activation is intimately interconnected with TCR activation mechanisms. A model in which stimulating signals delivered via T11 may be a part of antigenic activation of T lymphocytes is presented.

Growth inhibition of human T cells by antibodies recognizing the T cell antigen receptor complex

Monoclonal antibodies that bind to the T cell MHC-antigen recognition complex (anti-T3 or anti-Ti) are known to either mimic ligand binding and activate T cells or block ligand binding, leading to an inhibition of T cell activation. In the present experiments, we demonstrate a direct inhibitory effect on the growth of human T cells by anti-T3 or anti-Ti antibodies. The proliferation of human peripheral blood T cells preactivated by exposure to PHA was inhibited in a specific manner by anti-T3. Colony formation in soft agar by REX cells, a leukemic cell line of early T cell phenotype, was completely inhibited by anti-T3 or anti-Ti antibodies, whereas isotype-matched antibodies to a variety of other T cell markers had no effect. Growth of REX cells in suspension culture was not affected by anti-T3 or anti-Ti. A cell line, T3.N1, was established from an agar colony of anti-T3-resistant REX cells. T3.N1 was phenotypically identical to REX except for failure to express any detectable T3 or Ti surface antigen. T3.N1 colony formation in soft agar was not inhibited by anti-T3 or anti-Ti. There was no rise in [Ca2+]i of T3.N1 cells after anti-T3 or anti-Ti exposure. These results indicate that in addition to the well-known positive regulatory effects of ligand binding to the T3/Ti complex, T3/Ti binding can also result in a down-regulatory signal for human T cell growth.

Growth inhibition of human T cells by antibodies recognizing the T cell antigen receptor complex

Monoclonal antibodies that bind to the T cell MHC-antigen recognition complex (anti-T3 or anti-Ti) are known to either mimic ligand binding and activate T cells or block ligand binding, leading to an inhibition of T cell activation. In the present experiments, we demonstrate a direct inhibitory effect on the growth of human T cells by anti-T3 or anti-Ti antibodies. The proliferation of human peripheral blood T cells preactivated by exposure to PHA was inhibited in a specific manner by anti-T3. Colony formation in soft agar by REX cells, a leukemic cell line of early T cell phenotype, was completely inhibited by anti-T3 or anti-Ti antibodies, whereas isotype-matched antibodies to a variety of other T cell markers had no effect. Growth of REX cells in suspension culture was not affected by anti-T3 or anti-Ti. A cell line, T3.N1, was established from an agar colony of anti-T3-resistant REX cells. T3.N1 was phenotypically identical to REX except for failure to express any detectable T3 or Ti surface antigen. T3.N1 colony formation in soft agar was not inhibited by anti-T3 or anti-Ti. There was no rise in [Ca2+]i of T3.N1 cells after anti-T3 or anti-Ti exposure. These results indicate that in addition to the well-known positive regulatory effects of ligand binding to the T3/Ti complex, T3/Ti binding can also result in a down-regulatory signal for human T cell growth.