Real-World Dalbavancin Use for Serious Gram-Positive Infections: Comparing Outcomes Between People Who Use and Do Not Use Drugs

Background

Dalbavancin has been used off-label to treat invasive bacterial infections in vulnerable populations like people who use drugs (PWUD) because of its broad gram-positive coverage and unique pharmacological properties. This retrospective, multisite study examined clinical outcomes at 90 days in PWUD versus non-PWUD after secondary treatment with dalbavancin for bacteremia, endocarditis, osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, and epidural abscesses.

Methods

Patients at 3 teaching hospitals who received dalbavancin for an invasive infection between March 2016 and May 2022 were included. Characteristics of PWUD and non-PWUD, infection highlights, hospital stay and treatment, and outcomes were compared using χ2 for categorical variables, t test for continuous variables, and nonparametric tests where appropriate.

Results

There were a total of 176 patients; 78 were PWUD and 98 were non-PWUD. PWUD were more likely to have a patient-directed discharge (26.9% vs 3.1%; P < .001) and be lost to follow-up (20.5% vs 7.14%; P < .01). Assuming loss to follow-up did not achieve clinical cure, 73.1% of PWUD and 74.5% of non-PWUD achieved clinical cure at 90 days (P = .08).

Conclusions

Dalbavancin was an effective treatment option for invasive gram-positive infections in our patient population. Despite higher rates of patient-directed discharge and loss to follow-up, PWUD had similar rates of clinical cure at 90 days compared to non-PWUD.

Neutralizing COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma in Adults Hospitalized With COVID-19: A Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Convalescent plasma has been one of the most common treatments for COVID-19, but most clinical trial data to date have not supported its efficacy.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is rigorously selected COVID-19 convalescent plasma with neutralizing anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies an efficacious treatment for adults hospitalized with COVID-19?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a multicenter, blinded, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial among adults hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 infection and acute respiratory symptoms for < 14 days. Enrolled patients were randomly assigned to receive one unit of COVID-19 convalescent plasma (n = 487) or placebo (n = 473). The primary outcome was clinical status (disease severity) 14 days following study infusion measured with a seven-category ordinal scale ranging from discharged from the hospital with resumption of normal activities (lowest score) to death (highest score). The primary outcome was analyzed with a multivariable ordinal regression model, with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) < 1.0 indicating more favorable outcomes with convalescent plasma than with placebo. In secondary analyses, trial participants were stratified according to the presence of endogenous anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies ("serostatus") at randomization. The trial included 13 secondary efficacy outcomes, including 28-day mortality.

RESULTS

Among 974 randomized patients, 960 were included in the primary analysis. Clinical status on the ordinal outcome scale at 14 days did not differ between the convalescent plasma and placebo groups in the overall population (aOR, 1.04; one-seventh support interval [1/7 SI], 0.82-1.33), in patients without endogenous antibodies (aOR, 1.15; 1/7 SI, 0.74-1.80), or in patients with endogenous antibodies (aOR, 0.96; 1/7 SI, 0.72-1.30). None of the 13 secondary efficacy outcomes were different between groups. At 28 days, 89 of 482 (18.5%) patients in the convalescent plasma group and 80 of 465 (17.2%) patients in the placebo group had died (aOR, 1.04; 1/7 SI, 0.69-1.58).

INTERPRETATION

Among adults hospitalized with COVID-19, including those seronegative for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, treatment with convalescent plasma did not improve clinical outcomes.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT04362176; URL: www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov.

Passive Immunity Trial for Our Nation (PassITON): study protocol for a randomized placebo-control clinical trial evaluating COVID-19 convalescent plasma in hospitalized adults

BACKGROUND

Convalescent plasma is being used widely as a treatment for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the clinical efficacy of COVID-19 convalescent plasma is unclear.

METHODS

The Passive Immunity Trial for Our Nation (PassITON) is a multicenter, placebo-controlled, blinded, randomized clinical trial being conducted in the USA to provide high-quality evidence on the efficacy of COVID-19 convalescent plasma as a treatment for adults hospitalized with symptomatic disease. Adults hospitalized with COVID-19 with respiratory symptoms for less than 14 days are eligible. Enrolled patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to 1 unit (200-399 mL) of COVID-19 convalescent plasma that has demonstrated neutralizing function using a SARS-CoV-2 chimeric virus neutralization assay. Study treatments are administered in a blinded fashion and patients are followed for 28 days. The primary outcome is clinical status 14 days after study treatment as measured on a 7-category ordinal scale assessing mortality, respiratory support, and return to normal activities of daily living. Key secondary outcomes include mortality and oxygen-free days. The trial is projected to enroll 1000 patients and is designed to detect an odds ratio ≤ 0.73 for the primary outcome.

DISCUSSION

This trial will provide the most robust data available to date on the efficacy of COVID-19 convalescent plasma for the treatment of adults hospitalized with acute moderate to severe COVID-19. These data will be useful to guide the treatment of COVID-19 patients in the current pandemic and for informing decisions about whether developing a standardized infrastructure for collecting and disseminating convalescent plasma to prepare for future viral pandemics is indicated.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04362176 . Registered on 24 April 2020.

Passive Immunity Trial for Our Nation (PassITON): study protocol for a randomized placebo-control clinical trial evaluating COVID-19 convalescent plasma in hospitalized adults

Background: Convalescent plasma is being used widely as a treatment for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the clinical efficacy of COVID-19 convalescent plasma is unclear. Methods: The Pass ive I mmunity T rial for O ur N ation (PassITON), is a multicenter, placebo-controlled, blinded, randomized clinical trial being conducted in the United States to provide high-quality evidence on the efficacy of COVID-19 convalescent plasma as a treatment for adults hospitalized with symptomatic disease. Adults hospitalized with COVID-19 with respiratory symptoms for less than 14 days are eligible. Enrolled patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to 1 unit (200-399 mL) of COVID-19 convalescent plasma that has demonstrated neutralizing function using a SARS-CoV-2 chimeric virus neutralization assay. Study treatments are administered in a blinded fashion and patients are followed for 28 days. The primary outcome is clinical status 14 days after study treatment as measured on a 7-category ordinal scale assessing mortality, respiratory support, and return to normal activities of daily living. Key secondary outcomes include mortality and oxygen-free days. The trial is projected to enroll 1000 patients and is designed to detect an odds ratio ≤ 0.73 for the primary outcome. Discussion: This trial will provide the most robust data available to date on the efficacy of COVID-19 convalescent plasma for the treatment of adults hospitalized with acute moderate to severe COVID-19. These data will be useful to guide the treatment of COVID-19 patients in the current pandemic and for informing decisions about whether developing a standardized infrastructure for collecting and disseminating convalescent plasma to prepare for future viral pandemics is indicated. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04362176. Date of trial registration: April 24, 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04362176.

1482. Local validation of the drug resistance in pneumonia clinical prediction score at a large academic medical center and a community hospital

Background

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is responsible for ~1 million emergency department (ED) visits yearly and the leading cause of infection-related deaths. Given that increasing antibiotic resistance rates complicate appropriate empiric antibiotic selection, clinicians may benefit from tools to help identify patients at risk for drug-resistant pathogens (DRPs). Limitations of traditional tools, such as healthcare-associated pneumonia criteria (HCAP), have led to development of novel scoring tools such as the drug resistance in pneumonia (DRIP) score. Webb et al. showed the DRIP score was more predictive of CAP caused by DRPs than HCAP criteria. The objective of this study was to validate the DRIP score in a local population of hospitalized patients at an academic and a community medical center.

Methods

Patients who presented to the ED between May 2017 and May 2019 were included in this retrospective review. Patients were included if they were ≥ 18 years diagnosed with CAP by radiographic evidence with respiratory culture positivity and susceptibility results. Exclusion criteria were: presence of non-bacterial non-respiratory pathogens, patients with cystic fibrosis, lung transplant or systemic co-infections. The primary outcome was validation of the DRIP score by comparing the sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values (NPV/PPV) to the derivation and validation study by Webb et al. Secondary outcomes were the percentage of CAP cases with DRPs and the predictability of DRP using the DRIP score versus HCAP criteria.

Results

A total of 164 patients were included; 60.4% were male with a median age of 70 years. The primary outcome shown in Table 1 demonstrated similar sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV of the DRIP score to those in the study by Webb et al. Staphylococcus aureus (32.9%) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (27.4%) were the most commonly isolated pathogens and CAP due to DRPs occurred in 30.5% of patients. The DRIP score also demonstrated improved performance in predicting DRPs in CAP compared to the HCAP Criteria as shown in Table 2.

Table 1. DRIP Score Validation

Conclusion

Our results further validate the DRIP score derived by Webb et al. in predicting DRPs in CAP. These results encourage a local prospective evaluation of the DRIP score as an antimicrobial stewardship tool.

Disclosures

All Authors: No reported disclosures

[Fingolimod: effectiveness and safety in routine clinical practice. An observational, retrospective, multi-centre study in the province of Alicante]

INTRODUCTION

Post-authorisation studies are important to confirm whether the outcomes of clinical trials are reproduced in usual clinical practice.

AIMS

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of fingolimod in clinical practice in the province of Alicante.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective multi-centre study was conducted with remitting multiple sclerosis patients treated with fingolimod. Demographic, clinical and pharmacological data were collected. We report on the effectiveness of the drug -annualised relapse rate (ARR) and percentage of patients free from attacks- at one and at two years after treatment in relation to the previous year, and data concerning side effects are also provided.

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 89 patients. Previous treatment was with immunomodulators (interferon beta or glatiramer acetate) in 54 patients and natalizumab in 32. Fifty patients changed due to failure with the immunomodulator and 31 owing to positive serology for JC virus (JCV+). Overall ARR decreased by 67.3% the first year (p < 0.0001) and by 84.1% the second (p = 0.0078). It diminished in patients with immunomodulator failure (85.6% the first year, p < 0.0001; 88.9% the second year, p = 0.0039) and increased in a non-significant manner in JCV+ patients in the first year. The percentage of patients free from relapses in the overall population increased from 32.6% to 68.1% in the first year (p < 0.0019) and to 82.6% in the second (p = 0.0215). This increase was not observed in JCV+ patients. Side effects were reported by 13 patients, which led to the drug being withdrawn in two of them.

CONCLUSION

In clinical practice in the province of Alicante, levels of effectiveness and safety of fingolimod proved to be slightly higher than those found in clinical trials.

[Epidemiology of multiple sclerosis in Spain. Prevalence and incidence data]

INTRODUCTION

Traditionally, Spain has been considered to be an area with a low prevalence of multiple sclerosis. However, the most recent studies show much higher figures than those previously described.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to summarize the current data on prevalence and incidence of the disorder in Spain so as to determine the true situation regarding multiple sclerosis in this country.

DEVELOPMENT

We have evaluated all the epidemiological data published on the descriptive epidemiology of multiple sclerosis in Spain, and analyzed the differences in method which might explain the disparity between the figures quoted. We also studied the data on incidence available, mainly in the Alcoi health district, where we carried out the most prolonged incidence study in Spain.

CONCLUSIONS

The figures for prevalence given by the most recent studies include Spain in the area of moderate risk. The analysis of prevalence figures seem to indicate that these have varied with time and, at least in some zones, the incidence has increased in recent years.

[Familial periodic ataxia with myokymia sensitive to acetazolamide: a family case]

INTRODUCTION

Acetazolamide responsive hereditary paroxysmal cerebellar ataxia with myokymia is a type of autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia which locus was found to be linked to the short arm of chromosome 12 and the etiology is unknown.

CLINICAL CASE

A 12 years-old man who suffered from childhood daily episodes of sudden attacks sport induced with giddiness, ataxia and dysarthria for minutes. The familial history shows the same clinical findings in three generations. Intercritical general neurologic evaluation is otherwise normal. The following tests were performed with normal results: Biochemistry, electroencephalogram, cerebral magnetic resonance imaging. The electromyography showed myokymic discharges. The patient's symptoms improve on treatment with acetazolamide immediately.

CONCLUSIONS

Acetazolamide responsive hereditary paroxysmal cerebellar ataxia with myokymia needs to think on it to be diagnosed. No typical complementary test (electromyography exception) induces to base diagnosis in the clinical findings, the familial history and the fast clinical improvement after starting treatment with acetazolamide.

[A case-control study of multiple sclerosis in Alcoi]

INTRODUCTION

Multiple sclerosis (EM) is a neurological disorder of great epidemiological interest. Considerable variations have been described regarding the initial description of geographical distribution. In the Alcoi health district an epidemiological study showed more cases than would be expected from the latitude. Objective. To care out an analytical study to determine which factors influence this situation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We carried out a case-control study, pairing one case with four controls from the population, as regards age, sex and place of residence. Only current cases were included, under the control of the only Neurology Unit in the area, and which fulfilled criteria defined by EM. The control group was randomly selected from the census.

RESULTS

We analyzed 37 patients and 148 controls. There were no significant differences between the cases and the controls regarding socio-educational level, order of birth within the family, blood group, toxic habits and family history. We found a significantly greater frequency of urinary infections before the age of 15, and of cystitis and pneumonia after reaching the age of 15. Contact with textiles, their finished products and dogs reached significant values. In the patient group there was a significantly higher number of immigrants than in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The correlation found between certain factors such as contact with textiles, their finished products and dogs should be evaluated in further studies in which the immigration factor is controlled.