1
|
Lipton RB, Croop R, Stock DA, Madonia J, Forshaw M, Lovegren M, Mosher L, Coric V, Goadsby PJ. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of zavegepant 10 mg nasal spray for the acute treatment of migraine in the USA: a phase 3, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled multicentre trial. Lancet Neurol 2023; 22:209-217. [PMID: 36804093 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(22)00517-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intranasal formulations can provide treatment options for people with migraine in whom oral drugs are ineffective, slow-acting, or intolerable because of nausea and vomiting. Zavegepant, an intranasally administered small molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist, was previously assessed in a phase 2/3 trial. This phase 3 trial aimed to compare the efficacy, tolerability, safety, and timecourse of response for zavegepant nasal spray with placebo in the acute treatment of migraine. METHODS This double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre phase 3 trial, conducted at 90 academic medical centres, headache clinics, and independent research facilities in the USA, recruited adults (aged ≥18 years) with a history of two to eight moderate or severe migraine attacks per month. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to zavegepant 10 mg nasal spray or matching placebo and self-treated a single migraine attack of moderate or severe pain intensity. Randomisation was stratified by the use or non-use of preventive medication. Study centre personnel entered eligible participants into the study using an interactive web response system that was operated and managed by an independent contract research organisation. All participants, investigators, and the funder were masked to group assignment. The coprimary endpoints, freedom from pain and freedom from the most bothersome symptom at 2 h after the treatment dose, were assessed in all randomly assigned participants who took the study medication, had a migraine attack of moderate or severe pain intensity at baseline, and provided at least one evaluable post-baseline efficacy datapoint. Safety was analysed in all randomly assigned participants who received at least one dose. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04571060, and is closed to accrual. FINDINGS Between Oct 27, 2020, and Aug 20, 2021, 1978 participants were recruited and assessed for eligibility. 1405 participants were eligible (703 were assigned to zavegepant and 702 to placebo), and 1269 were included in the efficacy analysis set (623 in the zavegepant group and 646 in the placebo group). 2 h after the treatment dose, more participants in the zavegepant group than in the placebo group had pain freedom (147 [24%] of 623 participants vs 96 [15%] of 646 participants, risk difference 8·8 percentage points, 95% CI 4·5-13·1; p<0·0001) and freedom from their most bothersome symptom (247 [40%] vs 201 [31%], risk difference 8·7 percentage points, 3·4-13·9; p=0·0012). The most common adverse events in either treatment group (≥2%) were dysgeusia (129 [21%] of 629 in the zavegepant group vs 31 [5%] of 653 in the placebo group), nasal discomfort (23 [4%] vs five [1%]), and nausea (20 [3%] vs seven [1%]). No signal of hepatotoxicity due to zavegepant was identified. INTERPRETATION Zavegepant 10 mg nasal spray was efficacious in the acute treatment of migraine, with favourable tolerability and safety profiles. Additional trials are needed to establish the long-term safety and consistency of effect across attacks. FUNDING Biohaven Pharmaceuticals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard B Lipton
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Peter J Goadsby
- NIHR South London and Maudsley Clinical Research Facility at King's, King's College London, UK; Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Croop R, Madonia J, Stock DA, Thiry A, Forshaw M, Murphy A, Coric V, Lipton RB. Zavegepant nasal spray for the acute treatment of migraine: A Phase 2/3 double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial. Headache 2022; 62:1153-1163. [PMID: 36239038 PMCID: PMC9827820 DOI: 10.1111/head.14389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of zavegepant nasal spray in the acute treatment of migraine. BACKGROUND Calcitonin gene-related peptide-targeting agents are a novel class of therapeutics for migraine, but none are currently available as a nonoral option for acute treatment. Zavegepant, a high-affinity, selective, and structurally unique calcitonin gene-related peptide-receptor antagonist in late-stage development, is formulated as a nasal spray for the acute treatment of migraine. METHODS This randomized, dose-ranging, placebo-controlled, Phase 2/3 trial in adults aged ≥18 years with migraine (NCT03872453) was conducted at US study sites. Participants were randomized by an interactive web response system and treated a single attack of moderate to severe pain intensity with zavegepant nasal spray 5, 10, 20 mg, or placebo. Coprimary efficacy endpoints were pain freedom and freedom from the most bothersome symptom at 2 h postdose. RESULTS Of the 1673 participants aged 18 to 79 years who were randomized, 1588 were treated with study medication, and 1581 (mean age 40.8 years, 85.5% female) were analyzed for efficacy: zavegepant 5 mg (n = 387), 10 mg (n = 391), 20 mg (n = 402), and placebo (n = 401). Zavegepant 10 and 20 mg were more effective than placebo on the coprimary endpoints of pain freedom at 2 h postdose (placebo: 15.5% [98.3% confidence interval (CI), 11.1, 19.8]; 10 mg: 22.5% [98.3% CI, 17.5, 27.6; p = 0.0113]; 20 mg: 23.1% [98.3% CI, 18.1, 28.2; p = 0.0055]) and freedom from the most bothersome symptom at 2 h postdose (placebo: 33.7% [98.3% CI, 28.0, 39.3]; 10 mg: 41.9% [98.3% CI, 36.0, 47.9; p = 0.0155]; 20 mg: 42.5% [98.3% CI, 36.6, 48.4; p = 0.0094]). Findings for the 5 mg dose were not significant. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events with zavegepant 10 and 20 mg and placebo were dysgeusia (13.5% to 16.1% vs. 3.5%), nausea (2.7% to 4.1% vs. 0.5%), and nasal discomfort (1.3% to 5.2% vs. 0.2%). Most adverse events were mild or moderate and resolved without treatment. There was no signal of hepatotoxicity. CONCLUSION Zavegepant nasal spray, in single doses of 10 or 20 mg, was effective for the acute treatment of migraine, with a favorable safety profile. Additional research is needed to confirm its potential as a nonoral medication for the acute treatment of migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Croop
- Research and DevelopmentBiohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc.New HavenConnecticutUSA
| | - Jennifer Madonia
- Research and DevelopmentBiohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc.New HavenConnecticutUSA
| | - David A. Stock
- Research and DevelopmentBiohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc.New HavenConnecticutUSA
| | - Alexandra Thiry
- Research and DevelopmentBiohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc.New HavenConnecticutUSA
| | - Micaela Forshaw
- Research and DevelopmentBiohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc.New HavenConnecticutUSA
| | - Abigail Murphy
- Research and DevelopmentBiohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc.New HavenConnecticutUSA
| | - Vladimir Coric
- Research and DevelopmentBiohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc.New HavenConnecticutUSA
| | - Richard B. Lipton
- Neurology, Epidemiology and Population Health, and Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesAlbert Einstein College of MedicineBronxNew YorkUSA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Messerschmidt K, Barthel H, Brendel M, Scherlach C, Hoffmann KT, Rauchmann BS, Rullmann M, Marek K, Villemagne VL, Rumpf JJ, Saur D, Schroeter ML, Schildan A, Patt M, Beyer L, Song M, Palleis C, Katzdobler S, Fietzek UM, Respondek G, Scheifele M, Nitschmann A, Zach C, Barret O, Madonia J, Russell D, Stephens AW, Koglin N, Roeber S, Herms J, Bötzel K, Bartenstein P, Levin J, Seibyl JP, Höglinger G, Classen J, Sabri O. 18F-PI-2620 Tau PET Improves the Imaging Diagnosis of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy. J Nucl Med 2022; 63:1754-1760. [PMID: 35422444 PMCID: PMC9635682 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Revised: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is a 4-repeat tauopathy movement disorder that can be imaged by the 18F-labeled tau PET tracer 2-(2-([18F]fluoro)pyridin-4-yl)-9H-pyrrolo[2,3-b:4,5-c']dipyridine (18F-PI-2620). The in vivo diagnosis is currently established on clinical grounds and supported by midbrain atrophy estimation in structural MRI. Here, we investigate whether 18F-PI-2620 tau PET has the potential to improve the imaging diagnosis of PSP. Methods: In this multicenter observational study, dynamic (0-60 min after injection) 18F-PI-2620 PET and structural MRI data for 36 patients with PSP, 22 with PSP-Richardson syndrome, and 14 with a clinical phenotype other than Richardson syndrome (i.e., variant PSP) were analyzed along with data for 10 age-matched healthy controls (HCs). The PET data underwent kinetic modeling, which resulted in distribution volume ratio (DVR) images. These and the MR images were visually assessed by 3 masked experts for typical PSP signs. Furthermore, established midbrain atrophy parameters were measured in structural MR images, and regional DVRs were measured in typical tau-in-PSP target regions in the PET data. Results: Visual assessments discriminated PSP patients and HCs with an accuracy of 63% for MRI and 80% for the combination of MRI and 18F-PI-2620 PET. As compared with patients of the PSP-Richardson syndrome subgroup, those of the variant PSP subgroup profited more in terms of sensitivity from the addition of the visual 18F-PI-2620 PET to the visual MRI information (35% vs. 22%). In quantitative image evaluation, midbrain-to-pons area ratio and globus pallidus DVRs discriminated best between the PSP patients and HCs, with sensitivities and specificities of 83% and 90%, respectively, for MRI and 94% and 100%, respectively, for the combination of MRI and 18F-PI-2620 PET. The gain of sensitivity by adding 18F-PI-2620 PET to MRI data was more marked in clinically less affected patients than in more affected patients (37% vs. 19% for visual, and 16% vs. 12% for quantitative image evaluation). Conclusion: These results provide evidence for an improved imaging-based PSP diagnosis by adding 18F-PI-2620 tau PET to structural MRI. This approach seems to be particularly promising at earlier disease stages and could be of value both for improving early clinical PSP diagnosis and for enriching PSP cohorts for trials of disease-modifying drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Henryk Barthel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Site Munich, Bonn, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology, Munich, Germany
| | - Cordula Scherlach
- Department of Neuroradiology, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Karl-Titus Hoffmann
- Department of Neuroradiology, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Michael Rullmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Victor L Villemagne
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jost-Julian Rumpf
- Department of Neurology, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Dorothee Saur
- Department of Neurology, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Matthias L Schroeter
- Clinic for Cognitive Neurology, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Andreas Schildan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Marianne Patt
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Leonie Beyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mengmeng Song
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Carla Palleis
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sabrina Katzdobler
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Urban M Fietzek
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Gesine Respondek
- Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Maximilian Scheifele
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Nitschmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Zach
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Sigrun Roeber
- Center for Neuropathology and Prion Research, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jochen Herms
- Center for Neuropathology and Prion Research, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kai Bötzel
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Johannes Levin
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Site Munich, Bonn, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology, Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Günter Höglinger
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Site Munich, Bonn, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology, Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Joseph Classen
- Department of Neurology, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Osama Sabri
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bhardwaj R, Collins JL, Stringfellow J, Madonia J, Anderson MS, Finley JA, Stock DA, Coric V, Croop R, Bertz R. P-Glycoprotein and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein Transporter Inhibition by Cyclosporine and Quinidine on the Pharmacokinetics of Oral Rimegepant in Healthy Subjects. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev 2022; 11:889-897. [PMID: 35304977 PMCID: PMC9311059 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.1088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Rimegepant (Nurtec ODT)—an orally administered, small‐molecule calcitonin gene–related peptide receptor antagonist indicated for the acute and preventive treatment of migraine—is a substrate for both the P‐glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein transporters in vitro. We evaluated the effects of concomitant administration of strong inhibitors of these transporters on the pharmacokinetics of rimegepant in healthy subjects. This single‐center, open‐label, randomized study was conducted in 2 parts, both of which were 2‐period, 2‐sequence, crossover studies. Part 1 (n = 15) evaluated the effect of a single oral dose of 200‐mg cyclosporine, a strong inhibitor of the P‐glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein transporters, on the pharmacokinetics of rimegepant 75 mg. Part 2 (n = 12) evaluated the effect of a single oral dose of 600‐mg quinidine, a strong selective P‐glycoprotein transporter, on the pharmacokinetics of rimegepant 75 mg. Coadministration with cyclosporine showed an increase in rimegepant area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to infinity and maximum observed concentration based on geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals [CIs]) of 1.6 (1.49‐1.72) and 1.41 (1.27‐1.57), respectively, versus rimegepant alone. Coadministration with quinidine showed an increase in rimegepant area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to infinity and maximum observed concentration geometric mean ratios (90% CIs) of 1.55 (1.40‐1.72) and 1.67 (1.46‐1.91), respectively, versus rimegepant alone. Strong P‐glycoprotein inhibitors (cyclosporine, quinidine) increased rimegepant exposures (>50%, <2‐fold). In parts 1 and 2, rimegepant coadministration was well tolerated and safe. The similar effect of cyclosporine and quinidine coadministration on rimegepant exposure suggests that inhibition of breast cancer resistance protein inhibition may have less influence on rimegepant exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - David A Stock
- Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | | | - Robert Croop
- Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Richard Bertz
- Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Baker TE, Croop R, Kamen L, Price P, Stock DA, Ivans A, Bhardwaj R, Anderson MS, Madonia J, Stringfellow J, Bertz R, Coric V, Hale TW. Human Milk and Plasma Pharmacokinetics of Single-Dose Rimegepant 75 mg in Healthy Lactating Women. Breastfeed Med 2022; 17:277-282. [PMID: 35049333 PMCID: PMC8972016 DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2021.0250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Objective: Investigate whether rimegepant-an oral small molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist for the treatment of migraine-is excreted in human milk after a single 75 mg dose and characterize its concentration-time profile in the plasma and milk of healthy lactating women to determine the relative infant dose (RID). Methods: This open-label, single-center study enrolled healthy lactating women aged 18-40 years with a gestation of 37-42 weeks and uncomplicated delivery of a single healthy child ≥2 weeks (14 days) and ≤6 months before study drug administration. Plasma samples were collected 0, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours postdose; human milk samples were collected at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, and 36 hours. The milk:plasma drug concentration ratio was estimated as the ratio of the human milk:plasma areas under the curve. The RID (%) was calculated as 100 times the quotient of the body weight-normalized infant and maternal doses. Results: Subjects (N = 12) were enrolled between 25 January and 15 September 2020. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 29.8 (3.6) years; mean (SD) body mass index was 26.8 (4.9) kg/m2. The mean (SD) RID of rimegepant was 0.51% (0.14). The mean (SD) body-weight normalized infant dose was 0.005 (0.001) mg/kg/day, the mean (SD) body-weight normalized maternal dose was 1.04 (0.18) mg/kg/day, and mean (SD) maternal body weight was 74.0 (13.3) kg. Conclusion: On a weight-adjusted basis, the mean RID of rimegepant was <1% of the maternal dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa E Baker
- Departments of Ob/Gyn and Pediatrics, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas, USA
| | - Robert Croop
- Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Lisa Kamen
- Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Patty Price
- Departments of Ob/Gyn and Pediatrics, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas, USA
| | - David A Stock
- Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Andrea Ivans
- Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Richard Bertz
- Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | | | - Thomas W Hale
- Departments of Ob/Gyn and Pediatrics, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Song M, Beyer L, Kaiser L, Barthel H, van Eimeren T, Marek K, Nitschmann A, Scheifele M, Palleis C, Respondek G, Kern M, Biechele G, Hammes J, Bischof G, Barbe M, Onur Ö, Jessen F, Saur D, Schroeter ML, Rumpf JJ, Rullmann M, Schildan A, Patt M, Neumaier B, Barret O, Madonia J, Russell DS, Stephens AW, Mueller A, Roeber S, Herms J, Bötzel K, Danek A, Levin J, Classen J, Höglinger GU, Bartenstein P, Villemagne V, Drzezga A, Seibyl J, Sabri O, Boening G, Ziegler S, Brendel M. Binding characteristics of [ 18F]PI-2620 distinguish the clinically predicted tau isoform in different tauopathies by PET. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2021; 41:2957-2972. [PMID: 34044665 PMCID: PMC8545042 DOI: 10.1177/0271678x211018904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
The novel tau-PET tracer [18F]PI-2620 detects the 3/4-repeat-(R)-tauopathy Alzheimer's disease (AD) and the 4R-tauopathies corticobasal syndrome (CBS) and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). We determined whether [18F]PI-2620 binding characteristics deriving from non-invasive reference tissue modelling differentiate 3/4R- and 4R-tauopathies. Ten patients with a 3/4R tauopathy (AD continuum) and 29 patients with a 4R tauopathy (CBS, PSP) were evaluated. [18F]PI-2620 PET scans were acquired 0-60 min p.i. and the distribution volume ratio (DVR) was calculated. [18F]PI-2620-positive clusters (DVR ≥ 2.5 SD vs. 11 healthy controls) were evaluated by non-invasive kinetic modelling. R1 (delivery), k2 & k2a (efflux), DVR, 30-60 min standardized-uptake-value-ratios (SUVR30-60) and the linear slope of post-perfusion phase SUVR (9-60 min p.i.) were compared between 3/4R- and 4R-tauopathies. Cortical clusters of 4R-tau cases indicated higher delivery (R1SRTM: 0.92 ± 0.21 vs. 0.83 ± 0.10, p = 0.0007), higher efflux (k2SRTM: 0.17/min ±0.21/min vs. 0.06/min ± 0.07/min, p < 0.0001), lower DVR (1.1 ± 0.1 vs. 1.4 ± 0.2, p < 0.0001), lower SUVR30-60 (1.3 ± 0.2 vs. 1.8 ± 0.3, p < 0.0001) and flatter slopes of the post-perfusion phase (slope9-60: 0.006/min ± 0.007/min vs. 0.016/min ± 0.008/min, p < 0.0001) when compared to 3/4R-tau cases. [18F]PI-2620 binding characteristics in cortical regions differentiate 3/4R- and 4R-tauopathies. Higher tracer clearance indicates less stable binding in 4R tauopathies when compared to 3/4R-tauopathies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengmeng Song
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Leonie Beyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena Kaiser
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Henryk Barthel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Thilo van Eimeren
- Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Centre Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
| | - Ken Marek
- InviCRO, LLC, Boston, MA, USA.,Molecular Neuroimaging, A Division of inviCRO, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Alexander Nitschmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Scheifele
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Carla Palleis
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Gesine Respondek
- Department of Neurology, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Maike Kern
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Gloria Biechele
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jochen Hammes
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Gèrard Bischof
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Michael Barbe
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Özgür Onur
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Frank Jessen
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.,Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Center for Memory Disorders, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dorothee Saur
- Department of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Matthias L Schroeter
- Clinic for Cognitive Neurology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.,LIFE - Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.,Max- Planck-Institute of Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.,FTLD Consortium Germany, Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Michael Rullmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Andreas Schildan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Marianne Patt
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Bernd Neumaier
- Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Centre Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Olivier Barret
- InviCRO, LLC, Boston, MA, USA.,Molecular Neuroimaging, A Division of inviCRO, New Haven, CT, USA.,Laboratoire des Maladies Neurodégénératives, Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, MIRCen, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Jennifer Madonia
- InviCRO, LLC, Boston, MA, USA.,Molecular Neuroimaging, A Division of inviCRO, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - David S Russell
- InviCRO, LLC, Boston, MA, USA.,Molecular Neuroimaging, A Division of inviCRO, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | | | - Sigrun Roeber
- Center for Neuropathology and Prion Research, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jochen Herms
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.,Center for Neuropathology and Prion Research, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kai Bötzel
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Adrian Danek
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Johannes Levin
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany.,Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
| | - Joseph Classen
- Department of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Günter U Höglinger
- Department of Neurology, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany.,German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany.,Department of Neurology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
| | - Victor Villemagne
- Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.,The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Medicine, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Alexander Drzezga
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
| | - John Seibyl
- InviCRO, LLC, Boston, MA, USA.,Molecular Neuroimaging, A Division of inviCRO, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Osama Sabri
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Guido Boening
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sibylle Ziegler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Brendel M, Barthel H, van Eimeren T, Marek K, Beyer L, Song M, Palleis C, Gehmeyr M, Fietzek U, Respondek G, Sauerbeck J, Nitschmann A, Zach C, Hammes J, Barbe MT, Onur O, Jessen F, Saur D, Schroeter ML, Rumpf JJ, Rullmann M, Schildan A, Patt M, Neumaier B, Barret O, Madonia J, Russell DS, Stephens A, Roeber S, Herms J, Bötzel K, Classen J, Bartenstein P, Villemagne V, Levin J, Höglinger GU, Drzezga A, Seibyl J, Sabri O. Assessment of 18F-PI-2620 as a Biomarker in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy. JAMA Neurol 2020; 77:1408-1419. [PMID: 33165511 PMCID: PMC7341407 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 121] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Importance Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is a 4-repeat tauopathy. Region-specific tau aggregates establish the neuropathologic diagnosis of definite PSP post mortem. Future interventional trials against tau in PSP would strongly benefit from biomarkers that support diagnosis. Objective To investigate the potential of the novel tau radiotracer 18F-PI-2620 as a biomarker in patients with clinically diagnosed PSP. Design, Setting, and Participants In this cross-sectional study, participants underwent dynamic 18F-PI-2620 positron emission tomography (PET) from 0 to 60 minutes after injection at 5 different centers (3 in Germany, 1 in the US, and 1 in Australia). Patients with PSP (including those with Richardson syndrome [RS]) according to Movement Disorder Society PSP criteria were examined together with healthy controls and controls with disease. Four additionally referred individuals with PSP-RS and 2 with PSP-non-RS were excluded from final data analysis owing to incomplete dynamic PET scans. Data were collected from December 2016 to October 2019 and were analyzed from December 2018 to December 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures Postmortem autoradiography was performed in independent PSP-RS and healthy control samples. By in vivo PET imaging, 18F-PI-2620 distribution volume ratios were obtained in globus pallidus internus and externus, putamen, subthalamic nucleus, substantia nigra, dorsal midbrain, dentate nucleus, dorsolateral, and medial prefrontal cortex. PET data were compared between patients with PSP and control groups and were corrected for center, age, and sex. Results Of 60 patients with PSP, 40 (66.7%) had RS (22 men [55.0%]; mean [SD] age, 71 [6] years; mean [SD] PSP rating scale score, 38 [15]; score range, 13-71) and 20 (33.3%) had PSP-non-RS (11 men [55.0%]; mean [SD] age, 71 [9] years; mean [SD] PSP rating scale score, 24 [11]; score range, 11-41). Ten healthy controls (2 men; mean [SD] age, 67 [7] years) and 20 controls with disease (of 10 [50.0%] with Parkinson disease and multiple system atrophy, 7 were men; mean [SD] age, 61 [8] years; of 10 [50.0%] with Alzheimer disease, 5 were men; mean [SD] age, 69 [10] years). Postmortem autoradiography showed blockable 18F-PI-2620 binding in patients with PSP and no binding in healthy controls. The in vivo findings from the first large-scale observational study in PSP with 18F-PI-2620 indicated significant elevation of tracer binding in PSP target regions with strongest differences in PSP vs control groups in the globus pallidus internus (mean [SD] distribution volume ratios: PSP-RS, 1.21 [0.10]; PSP-non-RS, 1.12 [0.11]; healthy controls, 1.00 [0.08]; Parkinson disease/multiple system atrophy, 1.03 [0.05]; Alzheimer disease, 1.08 [0.06]). Sensitivity and specificity for detection of PSP-RS vs any control group were 85% and 77%, respectively, when using classification by at least 1 positive target region. Conclusions and Relevance This multicenter evaluation indicates a value of 18F-PI-2620 to differentiate suspected patients with PSP, potentially facilitating more reliable diagnosis of PSP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Henryk Barthel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Thilo van Eimeren
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany,Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany,German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn-Cologne, Germany
| | - Ken Marek
- InviCRO LLC, Boston, Massachusetts,Molecular Neuroimaging, A Division of InviCRO, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Leonie Beyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mengmeng Song
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Carla Palleis
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mona Gehmeyr
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Urban Fietzek
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Gesine Respondek
- Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Julia Sauerbeck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Nitschmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Zach
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jochen Hammes
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Michael T. Barbe
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Oezguer Onur
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Frank Jessen
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn-Cologne, Germany,Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany,Center for Memory Disorders, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dorothee Saur
- Department of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Matthias L. Schroeter
- Clinic for Cognitive Neurology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany,LIFE–Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany,Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Michael Rullmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Andreas Schildan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Marianne Patt
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Bernd Neumaier
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany,Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Nuclear Chemistry (INM-5), Jülich, Germany
| | - Olivier Barret
- InviCRO LLC, Boston, Massachusetts,Molecular Neuroimaging, A Division of InviCRO, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Jennifer Madonia
- InviCRO LLC, Boston, Massachusetts,Molecular Neuroimaging, A Division of InviCRO, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - David S. Russell
- InviCRO LLC, Boston, Massachusetts,Molecular Neuroimaging, A Division of InviCRO, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | - Sigrun Roeber
- Center for Neuropathology and Prion Research, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jochen Herms
- Center for Neuropathology and Prion Research, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany,German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
| | - Kai Bötzel
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Joseph Classen
- Department of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany,Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
| | - Victor Villemagne
- Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia,Department of Medicine, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Johannes Levin
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany,German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
| | - Günter U. Höglinger
- Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany,German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany,Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany,Department of Neurology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Drzezga
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany,German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn-Cologne, Germany,Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Nuclear Chemistry (INM-5), Jülich, Germany
| | - John Seibyl
- InviCRO LLC, Boston, Massachusetts,Molecular Neuroimaging, A Division of InviCRO, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Osama Sabri
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schmidt ME, Janssens L, Moechars D, Rombouts FJR, Timmers M, Barret O, Constantinescu CC, Madonia J, Russell DS, Sandiego CM, Kolb H. Clinical evaluation of [ 18F] JNJ-64326067, a novel candidate PET tracer for the detection of tau pathology in Alzheimer's disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; 47:3176-3185. [PMID: 32535652 PMCID: PMC7680304 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-04880-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2019] [Accepted: 05/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The accumulation of misfolded tau is a common feature of several neurodegenerative disorders, with Alzheimer's disease (AD) being the most common. Earlier we identified JNJ-64326067, a novel isoquinoline derivative with high affinity and selectivity for tau aggregates from human AD brain. We report the dosimetry of [18F] JNJ-64326067 and results of a proof-of-concept study comparing subjects with probable Alzheimer's disease to age-matched healthy controls. METHODS [18F] JNJ-64326067 PET scans were acquired for 90 min and then from 120 to 180 min in 5 participants with [18F]-florbetapir PET amyloid positive probable AD (73 ± 9 years) and 5 [18F]-florbetapir PET amyloid negative healthy controls (71 ± 7 years). Whole-body [18F] JNJ-64326067 PET CT scans were acquired in six healthy subjects for 5.5 h in 3 scanning sessions. Brain PET scans were visually reviewed. Regional quantification included kinetic analysis of distribution volume ration (DVR) estimated by Logan graphical analysis over the entire scan and static analysis of SUVr in late frames. Both methods used ventral cerebellar cortex as a reference region. RESULTS One of the healthy controls had focal areas of PET signal in occipital and parietal cortex underlying the site of a gunshot injury as an adolescent; the other four healthy subjects had no tau brain signal. Four of the 5 AD participants had visually apparent retention of [18F] JNJ-64326067 in relevant cortical regions. One of the AD subjects was visually negative. Cortical signal in visually positive subjects approached steady state by 120 min. Temporal and frontal cortical SUVr/DVR values in visually positive AD subjects ranged from 1.21 to 3.09/1.2 to 2.18 and from 0.92 to 1.28/0.91 to 1.16 in healthy controls. Whole-body effective dose was estimated to be 0.0257 mSv/MBq for females and 0.0254 mSv/MBq for males. CONCLUSIONS [18F] JNJ-64326067 could be useful for detection and quantitation of tau aggregates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark E Schmidt
- Janssen Research & Development, Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium.
| | - Luc Janssens
- Janssen Research & Development, Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium
| | - Diederik Moechars
- Janssen Research & Development, Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium
| | | | - Maarten Timmers
- Janssen Research & Development, Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium
| | - Olivier Barret
- Invicro, a Konica Minolta company, New Haven, CT, USA.,Laboratory of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Molecular Imaging Research Center, French Atomic Energy Commission, Fontenay-aux-roses, France
| | | | - Jennifer Madonia
- Invicro, a Konica Minolta company, New Haven, CT, USA.,Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mueller A, Bullich S, Barret O, Madonia J, Berndt M, Papin C, Perrotin A, Koglin N, Kroth H, Pfeifer A, Tamagnan G, Seibyl JP, Marek K, De Santi S, Dinkelborg LM, Stephens AW. Tau PET imaging with 18F-PI-2620 in Patients with Alzheimer Disease and Healthy Controls: A First-in-Humans Study. J Nucl Med 2019; 61:911-919. [PMID: 31712323 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.236224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2019] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
18F-PI-2620 is a PET tracer with high binding affinity for aggregated tau, a key pathologic feature of Alzheimer disease (AD) and other neurodegenerative disorders. Preclinically, 18F-PI-2620 binds to both 3-repeat and 4-repeat tau isoforms. The purpose of this first-in-humans study was to evaluate the ability of 18F-PI-2620 to detect tau pathology in AD patients using PET imaging, as well as to assess the safety and tolerability of this new tau PET tracer. Methods: Participants with a clinical diagnosis of probable AD and healthy controls (HCs) underwent dynamic 18F-PI-2620 PET imaging for 180 min. 18F-PI-2620 binding was assessed visually and quantitatively using distribution volume ratios (DVR) estimated from noninvasive tracer kinetics and SUV ratio (SUVR) measured at different time points after injection, with the cerebellar cortex as the reference region. Time-activity curves and SUVR were assessed in AD and HC subjects, as well as DVR and SUVR correlations and effect size (Cohen's d) over time. Results: 18F-PI-2620 showed peak brain uptake around 5 min after injection and fast washout from nontarget regions. In AD subjects, focal asymmetric uptake was evident in temporal and parietal lobes, precuneus, and posterior cingulate cortex. DVR and SUVR in these regions were significantly higher in AD subjects than in HCs. Very low background signal was observed in HCs. 18F-PI-2620 administration was safe and well tolerated. SUVR time-activity curves in most regions and subjects achieved a secular equilibrium after 40 min after injection. A strong correlation (R 2 > 0.93) was found between noninvasive DVR and SUVR for all imaging windows starting at more than 30 min after injection. Similar effect sizes between AD and HC groups were obtained across the different imaging windows. 18F-PI-2620 uptake in neocortical regions significantly correlated with the degree of cognitive impairment. Conclusion: Initial clinical data obtained in AD and HC subjects demonstrated a high image quality and excellent signal-to-noise ratio of 18F-PI-2620 PET for imaging tau deposition in AD subjects. Noninvasive quantification using DVR and SUVR for 30-min imaging windows between 30 and 90 min after injection-for example, 45-75 min-provides robust and significant discrimination between AD and HC subjects. 18F-PI-2620 uptake in expected regions correlates strongly with neurocognitive performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Caroline Papin
- Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany.,Invicro, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bullich S, Barret O, Constantinescu C, Sandiego C, Mueller A, Berndt M, Papin C, Perrotin A, Koglin N, Kroth H, Pfeifer A, Tamagnan G, Madonia J, Seibyl JP, Marek K, De Santi S, Dinkelborg LM, Stephens AW. Evaluation of Dosimetry, Quantitative Methods, and Test-Retest Variability of 18F-PI-2620 PET for the Assessment of Tau Deposits in the Human Brain. J Nucl Med 2019; 61:920-927. [PMID: 31712324 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.236240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2019] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
18F-PI-2620 is a next-generation tau PET tracer that has demonstrated ability to image the spatial distribution of suspected tau pathology. The objective of this study was to assess the tracer biodistribution, dosimetry, and quantitative methods of 18F-PI-2620 in the human brain. Full kinetic modeling to quantify tau load was investigated. Noninvasive kinetic modeling and semiquantitative methods were evaluated against the full tracer kinetics. Finally, the reproducibility of PET measurements from test and retest scans was assessed. Methods: Three healthy controls (HCs) and 4 Alzheimer disease (AD) subjects underwent 2 dynamic PET scans, including arterial sampling. Distribution volume ratio (DVR) was estimated using full tracer kinetics (reversible 2-tissue-compartment [2TC] model and Logan graphical analysis [LGA]) and noninvasive kinetic models (noninvasive LGA [NI-LGA] and the multilinear reference tissue model [MRTM2]). SUV ratio (SUVR) was determined at different imaging windows after injection. The correlation between DVR and SUVR, effect size (Cohen's d), and test-retest variability (TRV) were evaluated. Additionally, 6 HCs received 1 tracer administration and underwent whole-body PET for dosimetry calculation. Organ doses and the whole-body effective dose were calculated using OLINDA 2.0. Results: A strong correlation was found across different kinetic models (R 2 > 0.97) and between DVR(2TC) and SUVR between 30 and 90 min, with an R 2 of more than 0.95. Secular equilibrium was reached at around 40 min after injection in most regions and subjects. TRV and effect size for SUVR across different regions were similar at 30-60 min (TRV, 3.8%; Cohen's d, 3.80), 45-75 min (TRV, 4.3%; Cohen's d, 3.77) and 60-90 min (TRV, 4.9%; Cohen's d, 3.73) and increased at later time points. Elimination was via the hepatobiliary and urinary systems. The whole-body effective dose was 33.3 ± 2.1 μSv/MBq for an adult female and 33.1 ± 1.4 μSv/MBq for an adult male, with a 1.5-h urinary bladder voiding interval. Conclusion: 18F-PI-2620 exhibits fast kinetics, suitable dosimetry, and low TRV. DVR measured using the 2TC model with arterial sampling correlated strongly with DVR measured by NI-LGA, MRTM2, and SUVR. SUVR can be used for 18F-PI-2620 PET quantification of tau deposits, avoiding arterial blood sampling. Static 18F-PI-2620 PET scans between 45 and 75 min after injection provide excellent quantification accuracy, a large effect size, and low TRV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Caroline Papin
- Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany.,Invicro, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Brendel M, Barthel H, van Eimeren T, Marek K, Beyer L, Song M, Palleis C, Respondek G, Sauerbeck J, Hammes J, Barbe M, Onur OA, Jessen F, Saur D, Schroeter ML, Rumpf JJ, Rullmann M, Schildan A, Patt M, Barret O, Madonia J, Russell D, Stephens AW, Roeber S, Herms J, Boetzel K, Levin J, Classen J, Höglinger G, Bartenstein P, Drzezga A, Seibyl J, Sabri O. P2-376: 18F-PI2620 TAU-PET IN PROGRESSIVE SUPRANUCLEAR PALSY: A MULTI-CENTER EVALUATION. Alzheimers Dement 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.06.2783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
12
|
Barret O, Seibyl J, Stephens A, Madonia J, Alagille D, Mueller A, Berndt M, Kroth H, Capotosti F, Muhs A, Pfeifer A, Tamagnan G, Dinkelborg L, Marek K. [IC‐01–05]: FIRST‐IN‐HUMAN PET STUDIES WITH THE NEXT GENERATION TAU AGENT 18‐F PI‐2620 IN ALZHEIMER's DISEASE, PROGRESSIVE SUPRANUCLEAR PALSY, AND CONTROLS. Alzheimers Dement 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2017.06.2625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Barret
- Molecular NeuroimagingA division of inviCRONew HavenCTUSA
| | - John Seibyl
- Molecular NeuroimagingA division of inviCRONew HavenCTUSA
- Institute for Neurodegenerative DisordersNew HavenCTUSA
| | | | | | - David Alagille
- Molecular NeuroimagingA division of inviCRONew HavenCTUSA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Kenneth Marek
- Molecular NeuroimagingA division of inviCRONew HavenCTUSA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kolb HC, Moechars D, Rombouts F, Schmidt ME, Szardenings AK, Timmers M, Barret O, Madonia J, Marek K, Sandiego C. P2‐372: IMAGING ALZHEIMER'S TAU PATHOLOGY IN HUMANS: [18F]JNJ‐067—A PHASE 0 EXPLORATORY STUDY IN HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS AND SUBJECTS WITH PROBABLE ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE. Alzheimers Dement 2006. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.06.1063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Olivier Barret
- Molecular Neuroimaging a division of inviCRONew HavenCTUSA
| | | | - Kenneth Marek
- Molecular Neuroimaging a division of inviCRONew HavenCTUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Stephens A, Seibyl J, Mueller A, Barret O, Berndt M, Madonia J, Kroth H, Bullich S, Pfeifer A, Muhs A, Tamagnan G, Marek K, Dinkelborg L. IC‐P‐220: CLINICAL UPDATE:
18
F‐PI‐2620, A NEXT GENERATION TAU PET AGENT EVALUATED IN SUBJECTS WITH ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND PROGRESSIVE SUPRANUCLEAR PALSY. Alzheimers Dement 2006. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.06.2287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Olivier Barret
- Molecular Neuroimaging, a division of InvicroNew HavenCTUSA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Kenneth Marek
- Molecular Neuroimaging, a division of InvicroNew HavenCTUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Madonia J. Universal hearing screening: a community obligation. Neonatal Netw 1998; 17:46. [PMID: 9934097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
|