Epidemiological Characteristics and Outcomes Predictors for Intensive Care Unit COVID-19 Patients in Al-Madinah, Saudi Arabia. Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction

The global pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19) increased the demand for intensive care unit (ICU) services. Mortality and morbidity rates among ICU COVID-19 patients are affected by several factors, such as severity, comorbidities, and coinfections. In this study, we describe the demographic characteristics of COVID-19 patients admitted to an ICU in Saudi Arabia, and we determined the predictors for mortality and prolonged ICU length of stay. Additionally, we determined the prevalence of bacterial coinfection and its effect on the outcomes for ICU COVID-19 patients.

Methods

We retrospectively studied the medical records of 142 COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU at a tertiary hospital in Madinah, Saudi Arabia. Data on demographics, medical history, mortality, length of stay, and presence of coinfection were collected for each patient.

Results

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and intubation were reliable predictors of mortality and ICU length of stay among these ICU COVID-19 patients. Moreover, bacterial coinfections were detected in 23.2% of the patients and significantly (p < 0.001) prolonged their ICU length of stay, explaining the 10% increase in the length of stay for these patients. Furthermore, mortality reached 70% among the coinfected patients, and 60.8% of the isolated coinfecting pathogens were multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Staphylococcus aureus.

Conclusion

Increased NLR and intubation are predictors of mortality and prolonged length of stay in COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU. Coinfection with MDR bacterial strains potentially results in complications and is a high-risk factor for prolonged ICU length of stay.

Addition of pioglitazone or bedtime insulin to maximal doses of sulfonylurea and metformin in type 2 diabetes patients with poor glucose control: a prospective, randomized trial

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of adding pioglitazone or bedtime isophane (NPH) insulin to maximal doses of metformin and an insulin secretagogue in patients with poor glucose control.

METHODS

We conducted a nonblinded, open-label, randomized controlled trial involving 62 patients with type 2 diabetes and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels >8.0%. Patients received either pioglitazone or bedtime NPH insulin in addition to their usual diabetes medication for 16 weeks. Outcome measurements of glycemic control, hypoglycemia, blood pressure, lipid levels, microalbuminuria, and quality of life were assessed at baseline and at 16 weeks.

RESULTS

HbA1C levels were lowered to a similar degree in each treatment arm (pioglitazone: -1.9% +/- 1.5%; insulin: -2.3% +/- 1.5%; P = 0.32), but hypoglycemia was less common among patients who received pioglitazone than those who received insulin (37% [11/30] vs. 68% [19/28], P=0.02). Pioglitazone, but not insulin, resulted in an increase in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels. Both treatments had similar effects on weight, other lipid values, blood pressure, and urine microalbumin levels.

CONCLUSION

Adding pioglitazone or bedtime insulin for 16 weeks improved glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients with secondary oral agent failure. Pioglitazone was associated with less hypoglycemia and improved HDL cholesterol levels.