Pazopanib stimulates senescence of renal carcinoma cells through targeting nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2)

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common kidney cancer with high mortality rate. Pazopanib has been approved for the treatment of RCC. However, the underlying mechanism is not clear. Here, we report a novel finding by showing that treatment with Pazopanib could promote cellular senescence of the human RCC cell line ACHN. Cells were stimulated with 5, 10, and 20 μM Pazopanib, respectively. Cellular senescence was measured using senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-β-Gal) staining. Western blot analysis and real-time polymerase chain reaction were used to measure the mRNA and protein expression of nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), γH2AX, human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT), telomeric repeat binding factor 2 (TERF2), p53 and plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI). First, we found that exposure to Pazopanib reduced the cell viability of ACHN cells. Additionally, Pazopanib induced oxidative stress  by increasing the production of reactive oxygen species, reducing the levels of glutathione peroxidase, and promoting nuclear translocation of Nrf2. Interestingly, Pazopanib exposure resulted in DNA damage by increasing the expression of γH2AX. Importantly, Pazopanib increased cellular senescence and reduced telomerase activity. Pazopanib also reduced the gene expression of hTERT but increased the gene expression of TERF2. Correspondingly, we found that Pazopanib increased the expression of p53 and PAI at both the mRNA and protein levels. To elucidate the underlying mechanism, the expression of Nrf2 was knocked down by transduction with Ad- Nrf2 shRNA. Results indicate that silencing of Nrf2 in ACHN cells abolished the effects of Pazopanib in stimulating cellular senescence and reducing telomerase activity. Consistently, knockdown of Nrf2 restored the expression of p53 and PAI in ACHN cells. Based on these results, we explored a novel mechanism whereby which Pazopanib displays a cytotoxicity effect in RCC cells through promoting cellular senescence mediated by Nrf2.

Non-destructive testing of interfacial stiffness based on spring model for diffusion bonding interface of titanium alloy components with complex surface

Ultrasonic testing is an important non-destructive testing method, which is sensitive to the defects in the diffusion bonding interface. Ultrasonic testing of diffusion bonding interfaces in complex-surface components is a challenge due to the geometry and the weak echo signal of the diffusion bonding defects. This paper proposes an interfacial stiffness characterization method based on the spring model for the ultrasonic testing of the diffusion bonding interface of titanium alloy complex-surface component. Finite element models for ultrasonic field are established to analyze the diffusion bonding defects response, the effect of complex surface, and the inconsistency of the bonding interface depth in ultrasonic testing of the titanium alloy complex-surface component. 15 MHz is recommended as the testing frequency of the diffusion bonding interface. Ultrasonic C-scan experiments are conducted using specimens with embedded artificial defects and a titanium alloy complex-surface component. The simulation and experimental results show that the novel interfacial stiffness characterization method can be applied to ultrasonic testing of the diffusion bonding interface (inclination angle less than 14°) in complex-surface components, and the ability to test defects at the diffusion bonding interface can be improved.

[Deep learning-based dose prediction in radiotherapy planning for head and neck cancer]

OBJECTIVE

To propose an deep learning-based algorithm for automatic prediction of dose distribution in radiotherapy planning for head and neck cancer.

METHODS

We propose a novel beam dose decomposition learning (BDDL) method designed on a cascade network. The delivery matter of beam through the planning target volume (PTV) was fitted with the pre-defined beam angles, which served as an input to the convolution neural network (CNN). The output of the network was decomposed into multiple sub-fractions of dose distribution along the beam directions to carry out a complex task by performing multiple simpler sub-tasks, thus allowing the model more focused on extracting the local features. The subfractions of dose distribution map were merged into a distribution map using the proposed multi-voting mechanism. We also introduced dose distribution features of the regions-of-interest (ROIs) and boundary map as the loss function during the training phase to serve as constraining factors of the network when extracting features of the ROIs and areas of dose boundary. Public datasets of radiotherapy planning for head and neck cancer were used for obtaining the accuracy of dose distribution of the BDDL method and for implementing the ablation study of the proposed method.

RESULTS

The BDDL method achieved a Dose score of 2.166 and a DVH score of 1.178 (P < 0.05), demonstrating its superior prediction accuracy to that of current state-ofthe-art (SOTA) methods. Compared with the C3D method, which was in the first place in OpenKBP-2020 Challenge, the BDDL method improved the Dose score and DVH score by 26.3% and 30%, respectively. The results of the ablation study also demonstrated the effectiveness of each key component of the BDDL method.

CONCLUSION

The BDDL method utilizes the prior knowledge of the delivery matter of beam and dose distribution in the ROIs to establish a dose prediction model. Compared with the existing methods, the proposed method is interpretable and reliable and can be potentially applied in clinical radiotherapy.

Initial experience with surrounding en bloc transurethral resection of bladder tumor and simultaneous intravesical treating for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

Purpose

The high recurrence rate after traditional transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) remains a challenge for management of non-muscle invasive bladder tumor (NMIBC). The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility, efficacy and safety of surrounding en bloc resection using a general wire bipolar loop electrode and simultaneous intravesical chemotherapy.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data of 111 consecutive patients with NMIBC treated from June 2018 to December 2021. These patients underwent conventional TURBT and immediate intravesical chemotherapy (n = 45) or surrounding en bloc TURBT and simultaneous intravesical chemotherapy in the Urology Department of Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, The former and latter were defined as the conventional TURBT group and the surrounding en bloc TURBT group, respectively. All patients were followed up from 6 to 40 months, with an average of 24 months. Demographic characteristics, location and number of tumors, perioperative and postoperative data, pathological results and recurrence were documented.

Results

There were no significant differences in clinicopathological data between the conventional TURBT group (n = 45) and the surrounding en bloc TURBT group (n = 66). Operative time and complications associated with TURBT were comparable in the two groups. Recurrent tumors were found during follow-up in 2 (3.0%) of 66 patients in the surrounding en bloc group and 9 (20%) of 45 patients in the conventional group (p < 0.05). Lower urinary tract symptoms developed in 2 (3.0%) of 66 patients after surrounding en bloc TURBT and in 11(24.4%) of 45 patients after conventional TURBT (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Surrounding en bloc TURBT and simultaneous intravesical chemotherapy might significantly decrease the recurrence rate of NMIBC, and showed favorable safety and tolerability profiles. The general bipolar loop electrode was appropriate to complete the procedure.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12894-022-01140-2.

Surrounding en bloc TURBT combining simultaneous intravesical chemotherapy might decrease recurrent rate in intermediate-term.

Surrounding en bloc TURBT can be completed with general bipolar electrode loop.

Simultaneous intravesical chemotherapy might increase efficacy and compromise uncomfortability of agents Surrounding en bloc TURBT can be completed with general bipolar electrode loop.

The novel technique is feasible and safe for patients with NMIBC.

[The impact of the dosage of intraoperative opioids on postoperative survival outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer]

Objective: To investigate the impact of the dosage of intraoperative opioids on postoperative survival of pancreatic cancer patients who underwent pancreatectomy. Methods: The clinical data of 95 patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent pancreatectomy at Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital from September 2013 to August 2018 were retrospectively collected. Dosage of intraoperative opioid medications was converted to fentanyl equivalent dose. Patients were divided into high-dose group (fentanyl consumption ≥2.21 mg, n=46) and low-dose group (fentanyl consumption<2.21 mg, n=49) according to the median intra-operative fentanyl equivalents. The relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) between the two groups were compared. Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to analyze the impact of important covariates on RFS and OS. Results: RFS of patients in low-dose group at 1, 3 and 5 years was 75.5%, 26.5% and 15.2% respectively. OS of patients in low-dose group at 1, 3 and 5 years was 77.6%, 32.5% and 24.4% respectively. RFS of patients in high-dose group at 1, 3 and 5 years was 76.1%, 23.9% and 12.0% respectively. OS of patients in high-dose group at 1, 3 and 5 years was 76.1%, 37.0% and 15.0%. There was no significant difference in RFS and OS between the two groups (all P>0.05). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that dosage of intraoperative fentanyl was not associated with RFS (HR=1.205, 95%CI: 0.737-1.970, P=0.456) or OS (HR=1.062, 95%CI: 0.634-1.778, P=0.818). Conclusion: Dosage of intraoperative opioid has no effect on RFS and OS in pancreatic cancer patients undergoing pancreatectomy.

Baseline Disease Activity Predicts Achievement of cDAPSA Treatment Targets With Apremilast: Phase III Results in DMARD-naïve Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis

OBJECTIVE

The probability of achieving Clinical Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (cDAPSA) treatment targets (remission [REM], low disease activity [LDA]) was evaluated following apremilast monotherapy in disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-naïve patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) based on baseline disease activity.

METHODS

This post hoc probability analysis of PALACE 4, a phase III, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled study, evaluated shifting across cDAPSA categories from baseline to week 52 and included DMARD-naïve patients receiving apremilast 30 mg BID with available baseline cDAPSA data. Changes in articular/extraarticular manifestations were evaluated in patients with week 52 cDAPSA components. cDAPSA treatment target achievement was assessed in a subgroup with baseline extraarticular PsA manifestations (skin involvement, enthesitis, dactylitis).

RESULTS

Of 175 apremilast-treated patients in the probability analysis, 66.3% were in high disease activity (HDA) and 31.4% in moderate disease activity (ModDA) at baseline. Approximately twice as many patients in ModDA at baseline reached REM/LDA at week 52 vs those in HDA (61.7% vs 28.2%). Achieving cDAPSA treatment targets was associated with reductions in articular (swollen/tender joints) and extraarticular (skin involvement, enthesitis, dactylitis, functional disability) disease activity. Similar treatment target achievement rates were observed in the subgroup with ≥ 1 extraarticular PsA manifestation (n = 126; ModDA: 66.7%, HDA: 32.2%).

CONCLUSION

Apremilast-treated patients with baseline ModDA had higher probability of achieving cDAPSA treatment targets than patients with HDA. Resolution and/or near resolution of articular and/or extraarticular PsA manifestations was achieved by patients in REM/LDA at week 52. Consistent treatment target achievement was observed in patients with 1 or multiple extraarticular manifestations of active PsA.

Camrelizumab combined with TIP (paclitaxel+cisplatin+ifosfamide) as neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced penile cancer before lymphadenectomy: An exploratory, phase Ⅱ study

TPS5093

Background: Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is a highly aggressive disease that accounts for 95% of penile cancers and is characterized by a high risk of early locoregional spread and morbidity with subsequent potential for distant dissemination. The lymph node invasion is one of the most important factor that affects the prognosis of PSCC. Penile cancer patients with uninvolved inguinal lymph nodes had a 5-year survival rate of 66% compared with 27% for those with involvement, and penile cancer with the pelvic lymph node involvement have a worse 5-year survival rate that is typically less than 10%. Therefore, this study aims to reduce small lesions to reach the radical lymphadenectomy by camrelizumab combined with TIP in the neoadjuvant treatment of PSCC. Methods: In this single-arm, prospective, phase Ⅱ study, 34 patients with histological or cytological diagnosis of locally advanced PSCC (TX, N2-N3, M0), ECOG performance score of 0-1, planned to be recruited. Enrolled patients with inguinal and/or pelvic lymph node metastasis (positive percutaneous lymph node biopsy) after primary tumor resection of penile cancer were treated with combined therapy including camrelizumab (200 mg, iv, Q3W), paclitaxel (175 mg/m2, iv, Q3W), cisplatin (25 mg/m2, iv, Q3W) and ifosfamide (1200 mg/m2, iv, Q3W) for a total of 4 cycles. The primary endpoint is the rate of pathologic complete response (pCR). Secondary endpoints are event-free survival, overall survival, objective response rate, disease control rate and safety. On the basis of a threshold pCR rate of 13.6%, targeting an expected pCR of 34% and assuming 12 months follow-up, 80% power and a one-sided α = 0.05, this design requires 34 evaluable patients to be accrued over 3 years. Clinical trial information: ChiECRCT20210503.

Site-specific therapy in cancers of unknown primary site: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Cancer of unknown primary site (CUP) is a term applied to characterize pathologically confirmed metastatic cancer with unknown primary tumor origin. It remains uncertain whether patients with CUP benefit from site-specific therapy guided by molecular profiling.

Patients and methods

A systematic search in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov, and of conference abstracts from January 1976 to January 2021 was performed to identify studies investigating the efficacy of site-specific therapy on patients with CUP. The quality of included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and Newcastle–Ottawa scale. Eligible studies were weighted and pooled for meta-analysis. Hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed to compare the efficacy of site-specific therapy with empiric therapy in patients with CUP. In addition, subgroup analyses were conducted.

Results

Five studies comprising 1114 patients were identified, of which 454 patients received site-specific therapy, and 660 patients received empiric therapy. Our meta-analysis revealed that site-specific therapy was not significantly associated with improved PFS [HR 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74-1.17, P = 0.534] and OS (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.55-1.03, P = 0.069), compared with empiric therapy. However, during subgroup analysis significantly improved OS was associated with site-specific therapy in the high-accuracy predictive assay subgroup (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.26-0.81, P = 0.008) compared with the low accuracy predictive assay subgroup (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.75-1.15, P = 0.509). Furthermore, compared with patients with less responsive tumor types, more survival benefit from site-specific therapy was found in patients with more responsive tumors (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.97, P = 0.037).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that site-specific therapy is not significantly associated with improved survival outcomes; however, it might benefit patients with CUP with responsive tumor types.

•

Studies evaluating the role of site-specific therapy guided by molecular profiling in CUP provided contradictory results.

•

Site-specific therapy is not significantly associated with improved survival outcomes in the overall CUP population.

•

Molecularly defined site-specific therapy may improve OS only when high-accuracy assays assign CUP to responsive tumor types.

Articular and Extra-Articular Benefits in ACR20 Non-responders at Week 104 Treated With Apremilast: Pooled Analysis of Three Randomized Controlled Trials

Introduction

PALACE 1, 2, and 3 were phase 3 studies aimed to evaluate apremilast efficacy and safety in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) despite prior treatment with conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and/or biologics. The pooled analysis reported here further characterized the clinical outcomes associated with long-term apremilast exposure in patients failing to achieve ≥ 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology response criteria (ACR20) at Week 104.

Methods

Patients randomized to apremilast 30 mg twice daily at baseline and classified as ACR20 non-responders (ACR20NRs) or ACR20 responders (ACR20Rs) at Week 104 were included. Efficacy outcomes included change from baseline to Week 104 in ACR core components and other endpoints.

Results

At Week 104, a total of 109 patients were ACR20NRs and 193 were ACR20Rs. As expected, the ACR20R group had improvements in all indices assessed. The ACR20NR group demonstrated substantial mean improvements from baseline in swollen joint count (SJC; − 58%), tender joint count (TJC; − 42%), and Physician’s Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGA; − 44%); resolution of enthesitis (34%) and dactylitis (68%); and achievement of ≥ 75% reduction from baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index scores (among patients with psoriasis involving ≥ 3% of the body surface area) (36%).

Conclusion

Despite not fulfilling a formal ACR20 response at Week 104, ACR20NRs experienced sustained improvements in several PsA core domains, including SJC, TJC, enthesitis, dactylitis, and psoriasis, as well as the PhGA (visual analog scale) scores, with apremilast treatment.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01172938, NCT01212757, and NCT01212770.

The Role of the Hematopoietic Cell-Specific Protein 1-Associated Protein X-1 in Human Papillomavirus 16 E2-Induced Human Cervical Squamous Carcinoma Cell Apoptosis via a Mitochondria-Dependent Pathway

OBJECTIVES

Human papillomavirus 16 (HPV 16) E2 is a transcriptional regulator that plays a key role in regulating a variety of biological responses. Hematopoietic cell-specific protein 1-related protein X-1 (HAX-1) is a mitochondrial membrane protein, and the HAX-1 gene is involved in the occurrence, growth, invasion, and metastasis of various human malignant tumors. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationships among HPV 16 E2, the role of HAX-1 gene, and the underlying intracellular apoptotic mechanism of human cervical squamous carcinoma cells (C33a and SiHa).

METHODS

In this study, HAX-1 expression was examined using real-time polymerase chain reaction, Western blot, and immunohistochemical staining analysis. Apoptosis of cells was assessed by flow cytometry. The mitochondrial function was assessed by the mitochondrial copy number, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, the mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm), and mitochondrial morphology.

RESULTS

Our study demonstrated that the expression of the HAX-1 gene was significantly increased in human cervical carcinoma tissues relative to noncancerous cervix tissues. HPV 16 E2 inhibited HAX-1 protein expression. Overexpression of HAX-1 increased the mitochondrial copy number, decreased the production of ROS, and maintained the integrity of the mitochondrial membrane and morphology. So, enhanced expression of the HAX-1 gene could abrogate the HPV 16 E2-induced cell apoptosis.

CONCLUSION

Therefore, these data support a mechanism that HAX-1 plays a crucial role in HPV 16 E2-induced human cervical squamous carcinoma cell apoptosis in a mitochondrial-dependent manner.

Apremilast monotherapy for long-term treatment of active psoriatic arthritis in DMARD-naive patients

OBJECTIVES

Apremilast monotherapy was evaluated up to 5 years in PALACE 4 DMARD-naive patients with PsA.

METHODS

Patients with active PsA were randomized (1:1:1) to placebo, apremilast 30 mg or apremilast 20 mg twice daily. Placebo patients were rerandomized to apremilast at week 16 or 24. Double-blind apremilast continued to week 52, with a 4-year open-label extension (≤260 weeks of exposure). Analyses through week 260 were based on observed data.

RESULTS

527 patients were treated. Among patients randomized to apremilast 30 mg at baseline, 45.5% completed week 260. At study end, 24.8% reported csDMARD or steroid use for any reason. At week 260, 65.8%/39.0%/20.3% of apremilast 30 mg patients achieved ACR20/ACR50/ACR70 responses, respectively. PsA sign/symptom improvements were sustained up to week 260 with continued treatment, including reductions in swollen (84.8%) and tender (76.4%) joint counts. Among apremilast 30 mg patients with baseline enthesitis or dactylitis, 71.2% achieved a Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score of 0 and 95.1% achieved a dactylitis count of 0, respectively. Over 50% of patients achieved a HAQ-DI minimal clinically important difference (≥0.35). In patients with ≥3% baseline psoriasis-involved body surface area, 60.3% and 47.6% achieved ≥50% and ≥75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index scores, respectively. Patients continuing apremilast 20 mg also demonstrated consistent, sustained improvements. The most common adverse events were diarrhoea, nausea, headache, upper respiratory tract infection and nasopharyngitis. No new safety concerns were observed long term.

CONCLUSIONS

Apremilast led to sustained PsA efficacy up to 260 weeks and was well tolerated.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (http://clinicaltrials.gov), NCT01307423.

AB0552 PROBABILITY OF ACHIEVING TREATMENT TARGETS WITH APREMILAST MONOTHERAPY IN BIOLOGIC-NAIVE PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS PATIENTS IN ACTIVE WITH MODERATE AND HIGH BASELINE DISEASE ACTIVITY

Background:

Patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in moderate disease activity (ModDA) who are naive to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have a higher probability of achieving the Clinical Disease Activity Index for PsA (cDAPSA) treatment targets after receiving apremilast 30 mg BID (APR) than those in high disease activity (HDA). In Europe, APR is indicated for the treatment of active PsA in adult patients who had an inadequate response or were intolerant to a prior DMARD therapy. Achievement of cDAPSA treatment targets with APR monotherapy in biologic-naive patients with PsA who had previously taken a maximum of 1 conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) has not been evaluated.

Objectives:

To assess the predictive value of baseline clinical disease status on achieving long-term cDAPSA treatment targets at Week 52 among biologic-naive patients with PsA in the phase 3b, randomized, placebo-controlled Assessing Apremilast Monotherapy in a Clinical Trial of Biologic-Naive Patients With PsA (ACTIVE).

Methods:

ACTIVE enrolled adults with PsA who had ≥3 swollen and ≥3 tender joints and were biologic naive with prior failure of a maximum of 1 csDMARD. In this post hoc analysis, we assessed the probabilities of achieving cDAPSA treatment targets of remission (REM; ≤4) or low disease activity (LDA; >4 to ≤13) at Week 52 in patients randomized to APR and stratified by cDAPSA ModDA (>13 to ≤27) or HDA (>27) at baseline. Patients with enthesitis at baseline in each stratum were analyzed separately.

Results:

Of the 109 patients randomized to APR, 35 were in ModDA (32.1%) and 71 were in HDA (65.1%) at baseline (Table 1). For patients with ModDA vs HDA at baseline, swollen (4.6 vs 10.8) and tender (6.7 vs 21.7) joint counts were lower, and the prevalence of enthesitis was lower (42.9% vs 57.7%) (Table 1). Patients in ModDA at baseline were estimated to be more than twice as likely to achieve treatment targets at Week 52 vs patients in HDA at baseline (Figure 1). Consistent with these results, a higher proportion of patients with ModDA + enthesitis at baseline achieved treatment targets at Week 52 than patients with HDA + enthesitis at baseline (58.9% vs 32.8%).

Table 1.

Baseline Demographics and Disease Characteristics

Baseline cDAPSA CategoryModDA (n = 35)HDA (n = 71)Age, mean (SD), years48.5 (12.9)51.6 (11.8)Women, n (%)20 (57.1)36 (50.7)White, n (%)34 (97.1)71 (100.0)PsA duration, mean (SD), years4.5 (4.6)3.8 (4.5)Enthesitis, n (%)15 (42.9)41 (57.7)SJC (0-66), mean (SD)4.6 (1.6)10.8 (4.3)TJC (0-68), mean (SD)6.7 (2.2)21.7 (11.5)PtGA (0-10 NRS), mean (SD)4.9 (1.4)6.5 (2.0)PhGA (0-10 NRS), mean (SD)5.4 (1.2)6.6 (1.5)

The n represents the total sample. The number of patients with data available may vary. Not included are 3 patients in LDA at baseline. NRS = Numeric Rating Scale; PhGA = Physician’s Global Assessment of Disease Activity; PtGA = Patient’s Global Assessment of Disease Activity; SJC = swollen joint count; TJC = tender joint count.

Figure 1.

Conclusion:

Similar to observations in DMARD-naive patients with PsA, patients who were biologic naive but may have had experience with a maximum of 1 csDMARD, including those with enthesitis, and who were in ModDA at baseline had a higher probability of achieving treatment targets (cDAPSA REM or LDA) at Week 52 with continued APR treatment compared with those with HDA.

Acknowledgements:

This study was funded by Celgene. Additional analyses were funded by Amgen Inc. Writing support was funded by Amgen Inc. and provided by Kristin Carlin, RPh, MBA, of Peloton Advantage, LLC, an OPEN Health company.

Disclosure of Interests:

Peter Nash Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Gilead/Galapagos, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Samsung, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Gilead/Galapagos, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Samsung, Sven Richter Employee of: Amgen Inc., Shauna Jardon Employee of: Amgen Inc., Lichen Teng Employee of: Amgen Inc., Jessica A. Walsh Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen Inc., Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen Inc., Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB.

[Effects of protein disulfide isomerase on hyperglycemia and hypoxia/reoxygenation injury in H9c2 cardiomyocytes]

Objective: To explore the effect of protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) in diabetic ischemic heart disease. Methods: We established an in vitro model of high glucose and hypoxia/reoxygenation in H9c2 rat myocardial cells. Cultured cells were divided into four groups: Control, high glucose (HG), hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R) and HG+H/R. Changes in PDI expression mediated by PDI adenovirus(Ad-PDI) infection and siRNA(PDI-siRNA) transfection in myocardial cells were observed by inverted fluorescence microscopy. We also measured lactate dehydrogenase(LDH) activity and malondialdehyde(MDA) and high molecular weight(HMW)-APN concentrations. PDI, APN, cleaved caspase-3, and glucose regulated protein 78 (Grp78) protein expression were detected. Results: PDI expression was significantly decreased in the HG, H/R and HG+H/R groups compared to the Control group; however, LDH activity[(179.7±10.4) U/L、(218.4±18.4) U/L、(328.2±5.3) U/L vs (91.0±11.0) U/L], MDA concentration[(7.0±0.4) μmol/L、(10.0±1.0) μmol/L、(11.7±1.0) μmol/L vs (4.2±1.8) μmol/L], cleaved caspase-3, and Grp78 expression were increased. Interestingly, APN and HMW-APN expression were decreased [(2.01±0.21) μg/L、(1.64±0.27) μg/L、(1.20±0.14) μg/L vs (2.62±0.12) μg/L, all P<0.05]. Over expression of PDI attenuated high glucose and hypoxia/reoxygenation induced apoptosis and oxidative stress in H9c2 cardiomyocytes(all P<0.05), and simultaneously increased APN and HMW-APN expression [(2.86±0.03) μg/L vs (3.03±0.10) μg/L、(2.06±0.05) μg/L vs (2.31±0.06) μg/L、(1.83±0.07) μg/L vs (1.96±0.11) μg/L、(1.20±0.06) μg/L vs (1.39±0.09) μg/L]. PDI-siRNA transfection increased LDH activity, MDA concentration, and cleaved caspase-3 and Grp78 expression, and decreased APN and HMW-APN expression [(0.75±0.09) μg/L vs (0.59±0.09) μg/L、(0.62±0.04) μg/L vs (0.53±0.05) μg/L、(0.55±0.14) μg/L vs (0.51±0.12) μg/L、(0.48±0.12) μg/L vs (0.35±0.08) μg/L] in response to different treatments in cultured H9c2 cardiomyocytes (all P<0.05). Conclusion: PDI may regulate the expression of APN and HMW-APN, and play an important role in the function of diabetic ischemia-reperfusion cardiomyocytes.

AB0553 BASELINE DISEASE ACTIVITY AS A PREDICTOR FOR ACHIEVING cDAPSA TREATMENT TARGETS WITH APREMILAST IN DMARD-NAIVE PATIENTS WITH MANIFESTATIONS OF ACTIVE PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS

Background:

In PALACE 4, DMARD-naive patients (pts) with moderately active (ModDA) psoriatic arthritis (PsA) at baseline (BL) were more likely to achieve Clinical Disease Activity Index for PsA (cDAPSA) treatment targets (cDAPSA remission [REM] or low disease activity [LDA]) at Week 52 with continued apremilast 30 mg BID (APR) treatment than pts with high disease activity (HDA) at BL. Pts who achieved cDAPSA treatment targets also had no or mild articular and extra-articular disease activity by Week 52. Whether specific PsA manifestations other than arthritis impact the achievement of cDAPSA treatment targets in this population is unknown.

Objectives:

To assess the predictive value of BL clinical disease status on achieving cDAPSA treatment targets in DMARD-naive pts in PALACE 4 with PsA in ModDA or HDA who exhibited manifestations of skin involvement, enthesitis, and/or dactylitis at BL.

Methods:

This post hoc analysis included APR-treated pts in ModDA or HDA with available cDAPSA data at BL and Week 52 who exhibited any of the PsA manifestations at BL, including skin-involved body surface area (BSA) ≥3%, Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score (MASES) >0, or dactylitis count >0. Pts were divided into 4 subgroups based on number of manifestations: ≥1, only 1, any 2, or all 3. The proportions of pts who shifted across ModDA (>13 to ≤27) and HDA (>27) cDAPSA categories at BL to REM (≤4) and LDA (>4 to ≤13) treatment targets at Week 52 were calculated (data as observed).

Results:

In 176 PALACE 4 pts with PsA receiving APR, 165 had involvement in ≥1 PsA manifestation in addition to peripheral arthritis (ie, skin/enthesitis/dactylitis) at BL. This population had a mean age of 48.8 years, PsA duration of 3.6 years, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score of 6.6, MASES of 3.8, and dactylitis count of 3.5 (Table 1). Within this subgroup, 32.7% had only 1 of these non-arthritic PsA manifestations, 50.9% had any 2, and 16.4% had all 3. In pts with ≥1 manifestation, a greater proportion in ModDA achieved REM/LDA at Week 52 than those in HDA (66.7% vs 32.2%; risk difference: 0.34) (Figure 1). Similarly, greater rates of treatment target achievement were observed in subgroups of pts in ModDA vs HDA and only 1 (72.2% vs 39.1%; risk difference: 0.33), any 2 (57.1% vs 28.6%; risk difference: 0.29), or all 3 (75.0% vs 33.3%; risk difference: 0.42) PsA manifestations (Figure 1).

Conclusion:

In DMARD-naive pts exhibiting various non-arthritic manifestations of active PsA (ie, skin/enthesitis/dactylitis), those in ModDA at BL were more likely to achieve cDAPSA REM or LDA at Week 52 of APR treatment than pts in HDA. This observation was consistent whether pts had only 1 or multiple manifestations. These findings are consistent with the probability of achieving treatment targets demonstrated in the overall population in PALACE 4 (61.7% ModDA vs 28.2% HDA).

Table 1.

BL Demographics and Disease Characteristics in Pts With ≥1 Manifestations of PsA (Skin Involvement, Enthesitis, and/or Dactylitis) Treated With APR (N = 165)

Age*, years48.8 (12.5)Women, n (%)87 (52.7)BMI*, kg/m229.9 (6.5)Duration of PsA*, years3.6 (5.0)Duration of psoriasis*, years15.5 (13.3)cDAPSA (0-154)*39.4 (19.7)Swollen joint count (0-66)*10.3 (7.7)Tender joint count (0-68)*18.5 (12.9)Pt’s Assessment of Pain (VAS 0-100 mm)*52.8 (21.5)Pt’s Global Assessment (VAS 0-100 mm)*53.8 (20.1)Physician’s Global Assessment (VAS 0-100 mm)*52.2 (17.6)PASI score (0-72)*,†6.6 (5.1)MASES (0-13)*,‡3.8 (3.0)Dactylitis count (0-20)*,§3.5 (3.3)Corticosteroid use, n (%)13 (7.9)NSAID use, n (%)126 (76.4)

*Mean (SD).†In pts with BSA ≥3% at BL.‡In pts with enthesitis at BL.§In pts with dactylitis at BL.

Acknowledgements:

This study was funded by Celgene. Additional analyses were funded by Amgen Inc. Writing support was funded by Amgen Inc. and provided by Kristin Carlin, RPh, MBA, of Peloton Advantage, LLC, an OPEN Health company.

Figure 1.

Disclosure of Interests:

Philip J Mease Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen Inc., Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, GSK, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, GSK, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun, and UCB, Arthur Kavanaugh Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene, Centocor-Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB, Alexis Ogdie Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen Inc., BMS, Celgene, Corrona, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Novartis and Pfizer, Alvin F. Wells Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Alexion, Amgen Inc., BMS, Celgene, Horizon, Lilly, Novartis, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Alexion, Amgen Inc., BMS, Celgene, Horizon, Lilly, Novartis, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Celgene, and Lilly, Martin Bergman Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen Inc., Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi, Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Genentech, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi, Dafna D Gladman Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Frank Behrens Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Biotest, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Genzyme, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Chugai, Janssen, Roche, and Pfizer, Yuri Klyachkin Employee of: Amgen Inc., Sven Richter Employee of: Amgen Inc., Lichen Teng Employee of: Amgen Inc., Josef S. Smolen Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca, Astro, Celgene, Celtrion, Eli Lilly, Glaxo, ILTOO, Janssen, Medimmune, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Sanofi, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca, Astro, Celgene, Celtrion, Eli Lilly, Glaxo, ILTOO, Janssen, Medimmune, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Sanofi, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Medimmune, Pfizer, and Roche.

Long-Term Safety and Tolerability of Apremilast Versus Placebo in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Pooled Safety Analysis of Three Phase III, Randomized, Controlled Trials

Objective

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) requires long‐term treatment, yet safety concerns and monitoring requirements make maintenance a challenge. This analysis of pooled Psoriatic Arthritis Long‐term Assessment of Clinical Efficacy (PALACE) 1, 2, and 3 data describes 3‐year apremilast safety and tolerability in PsA.

Methods

Patients with active PsA were randomized (1:1:1) to placebo, apremilast 30 mg twice daily, or apremilast 20 mg twice daily. Placebo patients were re‐randomized to apremilast 30 mg twice daily or 20 mg twice daily at week 16 (early escape) or 24. Double‐blind treatment continued to week 52; patients could continue apremilast during an open‐label, long‐term treatment phase.

Results

In total, 1493 patients received at least one dose of study medication and were included in the safety population (placebo: n = 495; apremilast 30 mg: n = 497; apremilast 20 mg: n = 501). Among patients receiving apremilast, 53.2% (767/1441) completed 3 years of treatment. Greater rates of adverse events (AEs) were reported with apremilast (61.1%; exposure‐adjusted incidence rate [EAIR]/100 patient‐years, 265.1) versus placebo (47.5%; EAIR/100 patient‐years, 200.7) in the placebo‐controlled period. During weeks 0 to ≤52, the most common AEs occurring in apremilast‐exposed patients were diarrhea (13.9%; EAIR/100 patient‐years, 18.6), nausea (12.3%; EAIR/100 patient‐years, 16.0), headache (9.4%; EAIR/100 patient‐years, 12.1), upper respiratory tract infection (9.1%; EAIR/100 patient‐years, 11.5), and nasopharyngitis (6.2%; EAIR/100 patient‐years, 7.7). Most AEs were mild/moderate with apremilast exposure ≤156 weeks. Rates of depression remained low (EAIR/100 patient‐years, 1.8). Major adverse cardiac events (EAIR/100 patient‐years, 0.5), malignancies (EAIR/100 patient‐years, 0.9), and serious opportunistic infections (EAIR/100 patient‐years, 0.0) were infrequent over the 3‐year exposure period. Discontinuation rates due to AEs were low (<7.5%) across all apremilast‐exposure periods. Incidences of clinically meaningful abnormalities in postbaseline laboratory values was low; most values returned to baseline levels with continued treatment and without intervention.

Conclusion

Apremilast demonstrated a favorable safety profile and was well tolerated up to 156 weeks.

LncRNA HOTAIR induces sunitinib resistance in renal cancer by acting as a competing endogenous RNA to regulate autophagy of renal cells

Background

Cell autophagy has been proposed to be involved in drug resistance therapy. However, how the long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) reduces risks of drug resistance in renal cancer (RC) cells needs a thorough inquiry. This study was assigned to probe the effect and mechanism of HOTAIR on sunitinib resistance of RC.

Methods

Clinical RC tissues and para-carcinoma tissues were obtained to detect the expressions of miR-17-5p, HOTAIR and Beclin1. Sunitinib-resistant cells (786-O-R and ACHN-R) were constructed using parental RC cells (786-O and ACHN). The resistance of 786-O-R and ACHN-R cells to sunitinib was examined. Western blot and qRT-PCR were assayed to obtain the expressions of miR-17-5p, HOTAIR and Beclin1. The effects of HOTAIR knockdown or miR-17-5p overexpression/knockdown on cell autophagy and sunitinib resistance were measured by MDC staining, immunofluorescence and Western blot. The sensitivity of RC cells to sunitinib and change in cell clone formation after sunitinib treatment were assessed by CCK-8 assay and colony formation assay, respectively. The relationships among HOTAIR, miR-17-5p and Beclin1 were verified by dual-luciferase reporter gene and RIP assay. The role of HOTAIR knockdown in sunitinib resistance was verified in nude mice.

Results

HOTAIR expression in sunitinib-resistant cells is higher than that in parental cells. Knockdown of HOTAIR in sunitinib-resistant cells lead to refrained sunitinib resistance and cell autophagy both in vivo and in vitro. Activation of autophagy could raise resistance to sunitinib in RC cells, while inhibition of autophagy could improve the sensitivity of sunitinib-resistant cells to sunitinib. HOTAIR could compete with miR-17-5p to regulate Beclin1 expression. Knockdown of miR-17-5p in parental cells increases cell resistant to sunitinib, and overexpression of miR-17-5p in sunitinib-resistant cells increases cell sensitive to sunitinib.

Conclusion

HOTAIR negatively targets miR-17-5p to activate Beclin1-mediated cell autophagy, thereby enhancing sunitinib resistance in RC cells.

FRI0352 PROBABILITY OF ACHIEVING LOW DISEASE ACTIVITY OR REMISSION WITH APREMILAST TREATMENT AMONG DMARD-NAIVE SUBJECTS WITH ACTIVE PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS

Background:

Apremilast (APR) is associated with comparable ACR response rates in DMARD-naive vs DMARD-experienced patients (pts) with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).1,2A question that remains is if DMARD-naive pts treated with APR have greater chances of achieving treatment targets than DMARD-experienced pts. cDAPSA is a commonly used treatment target.

Objectives:

To assess the predictive value of baseline (BL) clinical disease status on achieving long-term cDAPSA treatment targets at Wk 52 among DMARD-naive subjects in PALACE 4; to compare these findings vs those recently reported from the PALACE 1-3 studies in subjects with prior exposure to DMARDs; and to provide further evidence that at a group level, achievement of cDAPSA disease targets with APR is associated with no or mild articular and extra-articular disease activity by Wk 52.

Methods:

This post hoc analysis included subjects assigned to APR 30 mg twice daily at BL who had available cDAPSA data at BL. We calculated the probabilities of shifting across different cDAPSA categories (remission [REM]: ≤4; low disease activity [LDA]: >4 to ≤13; moderate disease activity [Mod]: >13 to ≤27; high disease activity [HDA]: >273) from BL to Wk 52. Mean values of articular and non-articular variables (e.g., PASI, SJC/TJC, MASES, dactylitis) from BL to Wk 52 were assessed by cDAPSA category achieved at Wk 52 to determine the association between achievement of targets and control of articular and non-articular manifestations. Results from the current analyses were compared with the previously reported results from PALACE 1-3.

Results:

A total of 175 subjects receiving APR were included; at BL, 66.3% were in HDA, 31.4% in Mod, and 2.3% were in LDA. Overall, subjects who achieved treatment targets (LDA or REM) by Wk 52 had lower levels of disease activity at BL, as shown by a lower number of swollen and tender joints and lower presence of enthesitis and dactylitis. Higher prevalence of psoriasis-involved body surface area ≥3% at BL was observed. Subjects in Mod at BL were estimated to be more than twice as likely to achieve REM or LDA at Wk 52 vs subjects in HDA at BL; for subjects in LDA at BL, the estimated probability of achieving cDAPSA treatment targets was 100% (Figure). PALACE 4 subjects with LDA and Mod at BL exhibited higher estimated probabilities of achieving treatment targets (100.0% and 61.7%, respectively) than those observed in the DMARD-experienced population of PALACE 1-3 (71.1% and 46.9%). Subjects in PALACE 4 who achieved REM or LDA by Wk 52 showed no or mild articular and extra-articular disease activity by Wk 52, similar to what was observed in the PALACE 1-3 population.4

Conclusion:

DMARD-naive subjects in PALACE 4 who had LDA or Mod at BL had the highest likelihood of achieving treatment targets (cDAPSA REM or LDA) by Wk 52 with continued APR treatment. Results from the current probability analyses revealed higher probability rates than those observed in the DMARD-experienced PALACE 1-3 population; control of articular and extra-articular manifestations was observed in the DMARD-naive and DMARD-experienced populations.

References:

[1]Wells AF, et al. Rheumatology. 2018;57:1253-63. 2. Kavanaugh A, et al. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019;21:118. 3. Machado PM. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75:787-90. 4. Mease PJ, et al. Arthritis Care Res. 2020 Jan 7.

Disclosure of Interests:

Philip J Mease Grant/research support from: Abbott, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharmaceutical, UCB – grant/research support, Consultant of: Abbott, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharmaceutical, UCB – consultant, Speakers bureau: Abbott, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB – speakers bureau, Arthur Kavanaugh Grant/research support from: Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Centocor-Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, UCB – grant/research support, Alexis Ogdie Grant/research support from: Novartis, Pfizer – grant/research support, Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda – consultant, Alvin F. Wells Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Celgene Corporation, Lilly – grant/research support, Consultant of: AbbVie, Alexion, Amgen, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Horizon, Lilly, Novartis, UCB – consultant, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Alexion, Amgen, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Horizon, Lilly, Novartis, UCB – speakers bureau, Martin Bergman Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson – stockholder, Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Genentech, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi – consultant, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Celgene Corporation, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi – speakers bureau, Dafna D Gladman Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen Inc., BMS, Celgene Corporation, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB – grant/research support, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen Inc., BMS, Celgene Corporation, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB – consultant, Frank Behrens Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Chugai, Janssen, Roche, Pfizer – grant/research support, Consultant of: AbbVie Biotest, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene Corporation, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Genzyme, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB – consultant, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Biotest, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Genzyme, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, UCB - speaker, Sven Richter Employee of: Amgen Inc. – employment; Celgene Corporation – employment at the time of study conduct, Michele Brunori Employee of: Amgen Inc. – employment; Celgene Corporation – employment at the time of study conduct, Lichen Teng Employee of: Amgen Inc. – employment; Celgene Corporation – employment at the time of study conduct, Benoit Guerette Employee of: Amgen Inc. – employment; Celgene Corporation – employment at the time of study conduct, Josef S. Smolen Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Roche – grant/research support, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca, Astro, Celgene Corporation, Celtrion, Eli Lilly, Glaxo, ILTOO, Janssen, Medimmune, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Sanofi, UCB – consultant, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca, Astro, Celgene Corporation, Celtrion, Eli Lilly, Glaxo, ILTOO, Janssen, Medimmune, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Sanofi, UCB – speaker

Racial disparity of Crouzon syndrome in maxilla and mandible

The racial disparity of facial features in craniosynostosis patients is not fully understood. The aim of this study was to explore the difference in maxillary and mandibular morphology and spatial position in Asian and Caucasian Crouzon syndrome patients. Ninety-one computed tomography scans were included (12 Asian Crouzon syndrome patients, 22 Asian controls; 16 Caucasian Crouzon syndrome patients, 41 Caucasian controls) and measured using Materialise software. The maxillary and mandibular volumes of Asian patients were both reduced by 19% (P=0.102 and P=0.187), and those of Caucasian patients were reduced by 15% (P=0.142) and 14% (P=0.211) when compared to the respective race-specific controls. Maxilla length of Asian patients was reduced by 6.36mm (14%, P=0.003), while the reduction in Caucasian patients was 4.88mm (10%, P=0.038). ANS was retracted 11.99mm (P<0.001) in Asian patients and 11.54mm (P<0.001) in Caucasian patients. The ANB angle was narrowed by 13.17° (P<0.001) in Asian patients compared to Asian controls, and by 7.02° (P<0.001) in Caucasian patients compared to Caucasian controls. The retrusive midface profiles of Asian and Caucasian Crouzon syndrome look similar; both result from the combined effect of hypoplastic size and backward displacement. However, the insufficiency was found to be more a failure of the anteroposterior maxillary length in Asian patients, and more due to posterior maxillary positioning in Caucasian patients. Therefore, prognathism in Crouzon syndrome patients is more likely caused by displacement rather than elongation of mandibular length in both races. Crouzon syndrome results in the same extent of overall volume deficiency of the maxilla and mandible in these races.

Total pelvic exenteration and a new model of diversion for giant primitive neuroectodermal tumor of prostate: A case report and review of the literature

The present study reports a rare primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) of prostate. A 27-year-old male was admitted to Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital (Harbin, China) for dysuria and dyschezia. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a large mass that may involve the bladder and rectum next to the prostate. Histopathological analysis of biopsy of prostate indicated mesenchymal origin tumor, and immunohistochemistric staining confirmed diagnosis of PNET of prostate. En bloc total pelvic exenteration and double barrel sigmoidostomy were performed. Double stomas in the skin incision were used for fecal and urinary diversion, respectively. Short-term outcome is satisfactory, while long-term efficacy remains to be poor. Clinical features of PNET of prostate should be paid much more attention and radical surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy should be recommended.

Treatment-to-Target With Apremilast in Psoriatic Arthritis: The Probability of Achieving Targets and Comprehensive Control of Disease Manifestations

OBJECTIVE

The present study was undertaken to evaluate the probability of achieving the Clinical Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (cDAPSA) treatment targets of remission or low disease activity (LDA) with apremilast based on disease activity categories and corresponding responses in arthritis and other domains of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) not included in the cDAPSA.

METHODS

Pooled analyses from the Psoriatic Arthritis Long-term Assessment of Clinical Efficacy studies 1, 2, and 3 were performed. Probability analyses assessing the likelihood of achieving cDAPSA treatment targets by week 52 were performed using multiple imputation for discontinuations and missing values. Longitudinal analyses were performed in patients grouped by cDAPSA category at week 52.

RESULTS

Among 494 patients in the probability analyses, 46.9% with moderate disease activity and 24.9% with high disease activity at baseline achieved treatment targets (remission or LDA) by week 52. For patients with moderate disease activity at baseline, small improvements (cDAPSA reductions ≥30%) by week 16 were associated with achieving targets. Patients achieving remission or LDA by week 16 had high probabilities of remaining at treatment targets at week 52. Of 375 patients with cDAPSA components available at week 52, achieving targets with apremilast was associated with continuous disease activity improvements and no or mild arthritis and other PsA manifestations.

CONCLUSION

The probability of achieving treatment targets (remission or LDA) at week 52 was greater for patients with moderate versus high disease activity at baseline. At a mean level, partial improvements by week 16 were associated with achieving treatment targets. Patients receiving apremilast who achieved cDAPSA targets by week 52 also had no or mild arthritis or other PsA manifestations.

Long-term experience with apremilast in patients with psoriatic arthritis: 5-year results from a PALACE 1-3 pooled analysis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of apremilast were assessed in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in three phase III clinical trials with similar designs (PALACE 1, 2, and 3).

METHODS

Following a 24-week, randomized (1:1:1 to apremilast 30 mg twice daily, 20 mg twice daily, or placebo), double-blind phase and a 28-week blinded active treatment phase, patients could receive apremilast in open-label extension studies for an additional 4 years. Eligible adult patients had active PsA for ≥ 6 months and three or more swollen joints and three or more tender joints despite prior treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs.

RESULTS

A total of 1493 randomized patients received one or more doses of study medication (placebo: n = 496; apremilast 30 mg twice daily: n = 497; apremilast 20 mg twice daily: n = 500). In patients continuing apremilast treatment, response was sustained without new safety issues. At week 260, 67.2% of remaining patients achieved an ACR20 response, and 44.4% and 27.4% achieved ACR50 and ACR70 responses, respectively. Among patients with baseline enthesitis and dactylitis, 62.4% achieved a Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score of 0 and 80.9% achieved a dactylitis count of 0, respectively. In patients who had ≥ 3% baseline psoriasis body surface area involvement, 43.6% achieved ≥ 75% reduction from the baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index scores. The most commonly reported adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea, nausea, headache, upper respiratory tract infection, and nasopharyngitis, with most diarrhea and nausea AEs occurring within the first 2 weeks of treatment and usually resolving within 4 weeks. Reported rates of depression during the study were low (≤ 1.8%). The majority of patients maintained their weight within 5% of baseline during the study. No new safety concerns or increases in the incidence or severity of AEs were observed over the long term.

CONCLUSIONS

Apremilast maintained clinical benefit and a favorable safety profile for up to 5 years among patients with PsA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01172938 , NCT01212757 , NCT01212770.

The role of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A-1 (eIF5A-1) gene in HPV 16 E6 induces cell growth in human cervical squamous carcinoma cells

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is considered as the major risk factor for the development and progression of cervical cancer. The high expression of HPV 16 E6 may be the causative factor for induction and maintenance of the transformed phenotype. These oncoproteins would interact with several intracellular proteins, such as eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A-1 (eIF5A-1) that is essential for proliferation of eukaryotic cells. Our study explored the expression level of HPV 16 E6 and eIF5A-1 in human cervical squamous carcinoma samples and the adjacent non-cancerous cervix samples. Both C33a cells and SiHa cells transfected with a vector encoding HPV 16 E6 resulted in increase of eIF5A-1 expression level and enhancement of viability, migration and proliferation of these cells, furthermore, these effects in both C33a cells and SiHa cells could be abrogated by treatment with eIF5A-1 small-interfering RNA (siRNA) or the specific inhibitors ciclopirox (CPX) that was used to inhibit the function of eIF5A-1 via blocking the main enzymes deoxyhypusine hydroxylase (DOHH). Our results support that the silencing the eIF5A-1 gene or blocking the DOHH could induce the apoptosis of HPV 16 E6-infected cervical carcinoma cells. Thus might provide a new approach to preventing and treating cervical cancer.

Therapeutic benefit of apremilast on enthesitis and dactylitis in patients with psoriatic arthritis: a pooled analysis of the PALACE 1-3 studies

Objective

The Psoriatic Arthritis Long-term Assessment of Clinical Efficacy (PALACE) clinical trial programme findings demonstrated that apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, is effective for treating psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Enthesitis and dactylitis are difficult-to-treat features of PsA leading to disability and affecting quality of life. PALACE 1, 2 and 3 data were pooled to assess the efficacy of apremilast on enthesitis and dactylitis outcomes in patients with these conditions at baseline.

Methods

Patients with enthesitis (n=945) or dactylitis (n=633) at baseline were analysed after receiving double-blind treatment with placebo, apremilast 30 mg two times per day or apremilast 20 mg two times per day up to 52 weeks and continuing up to 5 years. Data were analysed through 156 weeks. Enthesitis was evaluated by Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) and dactylitis via dactylitis count.

Results

At week 24, patients receiving apremilast 30 mg two times per day demonstrated a significantly greater mean change in enthesitis (−1.3 vs −0.9; p<0.05) and dactylitis (−1.8 vs −1.3; p<0.01) vs placebo. Patients in the 30 mg dose group showed significantly greater mean (−23.6% vs −7.0%; p<0.05) and median (−50.0% vs −21.1%; p<0.05) per cent changes in MASES; mean and median per cent changes in dactylitis count were numerically, but not significantly, different for either apremilast dose in patients with dactylitis. In the patient population remaining on apremilast, observed mean and median improvements in both conditions were sustained through 156 weeks.

Conclusion

Apremilast is effective for the treatment of active PsA, including improvements in enthesitis and dactylitis up to 3 years.

Trial registration numbers

NCT01172938, NCT01212757 and NCT01212770.

Caspase-10, matrix metalloproteinase-9 and total laminin are correlated with the tumor malignancy of clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is a common malignant kidney tumor, the pathogenesis of which remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether caspase-10, matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) and total laminin (LM) were involved into the pathogenesis of ccRCC. The levels of caspase-10, MMP-9 and total LM were analyzed by ELISA in tumor tissues and adjacent non-malignant tissues of 27 patients with ccRCC. The results revealed that caspase-10 levels in the tumor tissues were significantly higher than those in the adjacent non-malignant tissues (P<0.05). The MMP-9 levels in the tumor tissues were significantly lower than those in adjacent non-malignant tissues (P<0.01). The total LM levels in tumor tissues revealed no statistical difference with those in the adjacent non-malignant tissues (P=0.757). Additionally, caspase-10 levels were positively correlated with MMP-9 levels (P<0.001), but negatively correlated with total LM levels (P<0.05) in tumor tissues. Correlation analyses with clinical data of patients with ccRCC, revealed that caspase-10 levels (P<0.05) and MMP-9 levels (P<0.001) in tumor tissues were positively correlated with tumor grades of ccRCC, whereas total LM levels were positively correlated with tumor size (P<0.05). The results of the present study suggested that interactions between caspase-10, MMP-9 and LM are likely involved in the pathogenesis of ccRCC. A deeper understanding of the correlation between caspase-10, MMP-9 and LM would aid the clarification of pathogenesis of ccRCC.

Apremilast monotherapy in DMARD-naive psoriatic arthritis patients: results of the randomized, placebo-controlled PALACE 4 trial

Objectives

The PALACE 4 trial evaluated apremilast monotherapy in patients with active PsA who were DMARD-naive.

Methods

Eligible patients were randomized (1:1:1) to placebo, apremilast 20 mg twice a day or apremilast 30 mg twice a day. At week 16 or 24, placebo patients were rerandomized to apremilast. Double-blind apremilast treatment continued to week 52, with extension up to 4 years. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving ⩾20% improvement in ACR response criteria (ACR20) at week 16; secondary endpoints included the mean change in the HAQ Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score at week 16.

Results

A total of 527 patients with mean disease duration of 3.4 years and high disease activity were randomized and received treatment. More apremilast patients achieved ACR20 response at week 16 [placebo, 15.9%; 20 mg, 28.0% (P = 0.0062); 30 mg, 30.7% (P = 0.0010)]. The mean HAQ-DI improvements were −0.17 (20 mg; P = 0.0008) and −0.21 (30 mg; P < 0.0001) vs 0.03 (placebo). Both apremilast doses showed significant ACR50 responses vs placebo at week 16 and improvements in secondary efficacy measures (swollen/tender joint counts) and psoriasis assessments, with sustained improvements through week 52. Common adverse events (AEs) over 52 weeks were diarrhoea, nausea, headache and upper respiratory tract infection; most events were mild or moderate. Serious AEs and AEs leading to discontinuation were comparable between groups. Laboratory abnormalities were infrequent and transient.

Conclusions

In DMARD-naive patients, apremilast monotherapy improved PsA signs/symptoms over 52 weeks and was generally well tolerated.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov (http://clinicaltrials.gov), NCT01307423.

Clinicopathological significance of galectin-1 expression and percentage of galectin-1-expressing T cells in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

This study investigates the clinical significance of galectin-1 expression in carcinoma tissues, plasma, and lymphocytes of patients with clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

METHODS

Galectin-1 expression was investigated, using immunohistochemistry, in 91 clear-cell RCC tissue sections, five angioleiolipomas tissue sections, and three oncocytomas tissue sections. As controls, normal tissue sections adjacent to each tumour and six benign renal tumour sections were examined. Plasma galectin-1 levels as measured by ELISA were compared in 39 patients. Proportions of galectin-1 expressing CD4⁺ and galectin-1 expressing CD8⁺ T lymphocytes in peripheral blood of these patients were detected by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

The positive expression rate of galetin-1 in 91 clear-cell RCC tissues sections by immunohistochemistry was 87 (95.6%), with weak expression rate of 35.2 (32/91), moderate expression rate of 51.6% (47/91), and strong expression rate of 13.2% (12/91); whereas 25% (2/8) of renal benign tumour sections showed weak galectin-1 expression, 91.2% (83/91) of non-tumor tissues adjacent to carcinomas had negative expression of galectin-1, and another six (75%) renal benign tumour sections had negative galectin-1 expression. Plasma galectin-1 levels between patients with clear-cell RCC and with benign tumours were not significantly difference (p>0.05). In patients with clear-cell RCC, we found a significantly higher proportion of galectin-1-expressing CD4⁺ lymphocytes (p<0.05) and galectin-1-expressing CD8⁺ lymphocytes (p<0.05) than in patients with benign tumours. Moreover, the level of galectin-1 expression was positively associated with stage and Fuhrman grade of clear-cell RCC.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that high level of galectin-1 expression in clear-cell RCC tissues may be a useful marker for clear-cell RCC. Our findings also reveal a new clinical significance of galectin-1 - that high proportions of galectin-1-expressing CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ lymphocytes were positively associated with poor clinicopathological features.

Overexpression of ATP citrate lyase in renal cell carcinoma tissues and its effect on the human renal carcinoma cells in vitro

ATP citrate lyase (ACLY) is a key enzyme of lipogenesis in cells. However, ACLY expression in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and its association with clinicopathological parameters remain unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate ACLY expression levels in RCC and adjacent normal tissues. This study included 33 patients with clear cell RCC (ccRCC). ACLY protein was assayed using immunohistochemistry and western blotting methods. ACLY mRNA expression was determined by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Serum ACLY concentrations were measured using the ELISA. Compared with adjacent normal tissues, significantly higher levels of ACLY protein expression were observed in all of the ccRCC tissues (P<0.05). ACLY protein levels were positively associated with the T stage and nuclear grade of RCC. ACLY immunostaining was located in the cytoplasm and nucleus. ACLY protein levels and ACC1 mRNA expression in RCC tissues were significantly higher compared with that in adjacent normal tissues (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in serum ACLY concentrations between patients with RCC and health controls (P>0.05). Preliminary evaluation of ACLY function showed that ACLY small interfering RNA downregulation inhibited RCC cell proliferation and migration, but promoted RCC cell apoptosis. ACLY may be a novel biomarker for the evaluation of biological aggressiveness and may be a potential target for RCC treatment.

Early and sustained efficacy with apremilast monotherapy in biological-naïve patients with psoriatic arthritis: a phase IIIB, randomised controlled trial (ACTIVE)

Objective

Evaluate apremilast efficacy across various psoriatic arthritis (PsA) manifestations beginning at week 2 in biological-naïve patients with PsA.

Methods

Patients were randomised (1:1) to apremilast 30 mg twice daily or placebo. At week 16, patients whose swollen and tender joint counts had not improved by ≥10% were eligible for early escape. At week 24, all patients received apremilast through week 52.

Results

Among 219 randomised patients (apremilast: n=110; placebo: n=109), a significantly greater American College of Rheumatology 20 response at week 16 (primary outcome) was observed with apremilast versus placebo (38.2% (42/110) vs 20.2% (22/109); P=0.004); response rates at week 2 (first assessment) were 16.4% (18/110) versus 6.4% (7/109) (P=0.025). Improvements in other efficacy outcomes, including 28-joint count Disease Activity Score (DAS-28) using C reactive protein (CRP), swollen joint count, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), enthesitis and morning stiffness severity, were observed with apremilast at week 2. At week 16, apremilast significantly reduced PsA disease activity versus placebo, with changes in DAS-28 (CRP) (P<0.0001), HAQ-DI (P=0.023) and Gladman Enthesitis Index (P=0.001). Improvements were maintained with continued treatment through week 52. Over 52 weeks, apremilast’s safety profile was consistent with prior phase 3 studies in psoriasis and PsA. During weeks 0–24, the incidence of protocol-defined diarrhoea was 11.0% (apremilast) and 8.3% (placebo); serious adverse event rates were 2.8% (apremilast) and 4.6% (placebo).

Conclusions

In biological-naïve patients with PsA, onset of effect with apremilast was observed at week 2 and continued through week 52. The safety profile was consistent with previous reports.

Trial registration number

NCT01925768; Results.

[Study of neuron-protective effect and mechanism of neuregulin1β against cerebral ischemia reperfusion-induced injury in rats]

Objective: Thecurrent study is to explore the neuron-protective mechanism of neuregulin1β (NRG1β) in a rat model of middle cerebral artery occlusion/reperfusion (MCAO/R) through inhibiting the c-Jun phosphorylation. Methods: After 24 h of MCAO/R (referring to Longa's method), neurobehavioral function was measured by modified neurological severity score (mNSS) test; the cerebral infarction volume was detected by triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining; the blood brain barrier (BBB) permeability was measured by Evans Blue (EB); the neuron morphology of brain tissue was observed by Nissl stain; the ultra-structures of the neurons were observed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM); the apoptotic neurons were counted by in situ cell death detection kit colocalized with NeuN; the expressions of phospho-c-Jun was determined by immunofluorescent labeling and Western blot analysis. Results: Compared with the sham-operation rats, the rats receiving MCAO/R showed increased mNSS (9.7±1.2), cerebral infarction volume (41.4±3.0)%, permeability of BBB, deformation of neurons, ischemia-induced apoptosis (0.63±0.04), and enhanced expression of phospho-c-Jun protein (0.90±0.07) (all P<0.05). Our data indicated that NRG1β attenuated neurologic deficits (6.4±0.9), decreased the cerebral infarction volume (10.4±0.5), reduced EB extravasation (1.55±0.13) and the deformation of neurons, protected the ultra-structure of neurons, blocked ischemia-induced apoptosis (0.23±0.02), through down-regulated phospho-c-Jun expression (0.40±0.03) in MCAO/R rats (P<0.05). Conclusion: NRG1β exerts neuron-protective effects against ischemia reperfusion-induced injury in rats through inhibiting the c-Jun phosphorylation.

[Effects and related mechanism of quercetin on thrombin-induced proliferation and migration of rat vascular smooth muscle cells]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects and related mechanism of quercetin on thrombin-induced proliferation and migration of rat vascular smooth muscle cells(VSMCs).

METHODS

Third to fifth generation VSMCs were divided into three groups, including control group (with PBS on the base of medium DMEM), thrombin group (with 1 U/ml thrombin on the base of medium DMEM) and quercetin group (treated with 100 μmol/L quercetin before 1 U/ml thrombin on the base of medium DMEM). The proliferation and migration capacitities were tested by CCK-8 kit and transwell chamber, respectively. The protein level of phospho-extracellular signal regulated kinase 1/2 and phosphor-p38 were measured by Western blot.

RESULTS

(1) According to the CCK-8 results, optical density value was significantly higher in thrombin group than that of control group(2.59±0.16 vs. 1.97±0.18, P<0.01), which could be significantly attenuated by pretreatment with quercetin(2.13±0.19, P<0.01), and there was no significant difference between quercetin group and control group(P>0.05). (2) The transwell results showed that the migrated VSMCs were significantly higher in thrombin group than in control group (1 337±162 vs. 99±26, P<0.01), which could be significantly reduced by pretreatment with quercetin (926±111, P<0.05), but still significantly higher than control group (P<0.01). (3) The protein expressions of phospho-extracellular signal regulated kinase 1/2 and phosphor-p38 were significantly upregulated in thrombin group compared to control group (both P<0.05), which could be significantly downregulated by pretreatment with quercetin (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Quercetin can effectively attenuate thrombin-induced vascular smooth muscle cells proliferation and migration, possibly through inhibiting the phosphorylation of extracellular signal regulated kinase 1/2 and p38 pathway.

Identification of biological targets of therapeutic intervention for clear cell renal cell carcinoma based on bioinformatics approach

Background

We aimed to discover the potential microRNA (miRNA) targets and to explore the underlying molecular mechanisms of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

Methods

Microarray data of GSE16441 was downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus database. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and differentially expressed miRNAs between ccRCC tumors and matched non-tumor samples were analyzed. Target genes of differentially expressed miRNAs were screened. Besides, functional enrichment analysis of DEGs was performed, followed by protein–protein interaction (PPI) network construction and sub-module analysis. Finally, the integrated miRNA-DEGs network was constructed.

Results

A total of 1758 up- and 2465 down-regulated DEGs were identified. Moreover, 15 up- and 12 down-regulated differentially expressed miRNAs were screened. The up-regulated DEGs were significantly enriched in pathways such as cell adhesion molecules and focal adhesion. Besides, the down-regulated DEGs were enriched in oxidative phosphorylation, and citrate cycle (TCA cycle). Moreover, eight sub-modules of PPI network were obtained. Totally, eight down-regulated miRNAs were identified to significantly regulate the DEGs and miRNA-200c that could regulate collagen, type V, alpha 2 (COL5A2) as well as COL5A3 was found to be the most significant. Additionally, 10 up-regulated miRNAs were identified to be significantly associated with the DEGs. Thereinto, miRNA-15a that could regulate ATPase, H⁺ transporting, lysosomal 21 kDa, V0 subunit b (ATP6V0B) and miRNA-155 were found to be the most significant.

Conclusions

miRNA-200c that could regulate COL5A2 and COL5A3, miRNA-15a that could regulate ATP6V0B and miRNA-155 may play key roles in ccRCC progression. These miRNAs may be potential targets for ccRCC treatment.