AB1051 CLINICAL OUTCOMES AND HEALTHCARE RESOURCE UTILIZATION OF UNCONTROLLED GOUT PRIOR TO PEGLOTICASE THERAPY

Background

By definition, uncontrolled gout (UG) cannot be managed with oral urate lowering therapies (ULTs) and is associated with substantial morbidity. UG, also known as refractory gout, results in escalated treatment and management. Recent American College of Rheumatology guidelines recommend treating gout to serum uric acid targets; if targets are not achieved or patients continue to have symptoms, pegloticase is recommended. There is a paucity of data documenting the clinical and economic burden of UG patients.

Objectives

Assess clinical outcomes and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) of UG prior to pegloticase initiation.

Methods

A retrospective observational database analysis was conducted among patients initiating pegloticase between April 1, 2011 and August 31, 2020 using the PharMetrics Plus database. Eligible subjects had ≥1 pegloticase claim (first claim = index date) and continuous enrollment for 24 months prior to index. Relevant clinical and economic (HCRU) outcomes were evaluated over a 24-month pre-index period and compared between two different time intervals prior to index: time interval 1 (Day -720 to Day -361) and time interval 2 (Day -360 to Day -1). Assessment of comorbid disease burden included Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and relevant health conditions. Dependent pairwise comparisons were conducted to compare clinical and economic outcomes between time intervals prior to pegloticase initiation. To assess statistical differences, paired t-tests (continuous variables) or McNemar’s tests (categorical variables) were used.

Results

Of the 408 eligible subjects, most were male (88.5%), with an average age (SD) of 55.2 (11.3) years, 66.9% were between the ages of 45-64 years and 78.2% had a preferred provider organization (PPO) health plan. Most often (34.8% of patients), a rheumatologist was associated with initiation of pegloticase therapy, while primary care physicians accounted for 23.8% of initiations. Mean (SD) CCI score was 2.4 (2.4) with 37.3% of subjects having a CCI score of >3. Prevalence of relevant health conditions over the 24-month pre-index period included tophi (62.5%), urolithiasis (8.6%), chronic kidney disease (34.6%) and chronic pain/fibromyalgia (76.5%), all of which significantly increased from time interval 1 (Day -720 to Day -361) to time interval 2 (Day -360 to Day -1) prior to pegloticase initiation (Table 1). Of patients initiating pegloticase, 57.4% had 1 ULT (excluding probenecid), 11.3% had >2 ULT (excluding probenecid), and 10.3% UG patients had ≥1 probenecid claim over the 24-month pre-index period. Most patients (98.3%) had ≥1 physician office visit, 27.2% had ≥1 hospitalization and 45.3% had ≥1 emergency room (ER) visit over the 24-month pre-index period. HCRU significantly increased from time interval 1 to time interval 2, prior to pegloticase (Figure 1).

Table 1.

Relevant Health Conditions and Disease-specific Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU)

Overall N= 408Time Interval 1Time Interval 2Tophi62.5%15.4%61.5%***Urolithiasis8.6%4.2%6.9%*Chronic kidney disease34.6%22.5%31.6%***Cardiovascular disease32.6%21.3%28.4%**Type 2 diabetes mellitus31.4%23.3%28.9%**Hypertension76.2%58.1%70.3%***≥1 gout flare87.7%48.5%83.8%***Mean number of gout flare (SD)3.5 (2.4)1.02.1***Gout-related medications ≥1 claim for colchicine56%39.5%63.7%***≥1 claim for opioids71%52.9%60.3%*≥1 claim for oral corticosteroids80%50.2%75.7%***≥1 claim for injectable corticosteroids64%38.5%53.7%***

†Time Interval 1: Day -720 to Day -361 prior to pegloticase initiation; ††Time Interval 2: Day -360 to Day -1 prior to pegloticase initiation

***, p<0.0001; **, p<0.001; *, p<0.05

Conclusion

Overall, these data demonstrate the progressive nature of UG as confirmed by significant increases in gout-related conditions and healthcare resource utilization prior to pegloticase initiation. Further research is needed on healthcare resource utilization among patients with UG post-pegloticase use.

Disclosure of Interests

Robert Morlock Consultant of: Horizon Therapeutics, Victoria Divino Grant/research support from: Horizon Therapeutics, Mitchell DeKoven Grant/research support from: Horizon Therapeutics, Brian LaMoreaux Shareholder of: Horizon Therapeutics, Employee of: Horizon Therapeutics, Atsuko Powers Shareholder of: Horizon Therapeutics, Employee of: Horizon Therapeutics, Naina Barretto Shareholder of: Horizon Therapeutics, Employee of: Horizon Therapeutics, Robert Holt Shareholder of: Horizon Therapeutics, Employee of: Horizon Therapeutics, Stephanie Taylor Shareholder of: Horizon Therapeutics, Employee of: Horizon Therapeutics

Improved real-world glycaemic outcomes with liraglutide versus other incretin-based therapies in type 2 diabetes

AIM

Liraglutide (LIRA) once-daily has provided greater A1C reductions than either exenatide (EXEN) twice-daily or sitagliptin (SITA) once-daily in head-to-head trials. The objective of this analysis is to compare the real-world clinical effectiveness of these agents in the USA.

METHODS

Using the IMS Health (Alexandria, VA, USA) integrated claims database, A1C outcomes in patients aged ≥ 18 years with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who initiated either LIRA, EXEN or SITA (including SITA/metformin) were retrospectively compared. Patients included in the analysis had ≥ 1 prescription for LIRA, EXEN or SITA between January and December 2010 (index period) and persisted with their index treatment regimens for 6 months post-index. Outcomes included changes in A1C from baseline (45 days pre-index through 7 days post-index) to follow-up [6 months post-index (± 45)] and the proportion of patients reaching A1C<7%. Multivariable regression models adjusted for confounding factors (e.g. age, comorbidities, baseline A1C and background antidiabetic therapy).

RESULTS

The predicted change in A1C from baseline was greater for LIRA patients compared with both SITA (-1.08 vs. -0.68%; treatment difference 0.40%, p < 0.0001) and EXEN (-1.08 vs. -0.75%; treatment difference 0.32%, p < 0.001). Predicted A1C goal achievement, derived from the multivariate logistic regression model, was higher with LIRA compared with both SITA [64.4% (95% confidence interval, CI: 63.5-65.3) vs. 49.4% (95% CI: 48.5-50.4); p < 0.0001] and EXEN [64.4% (95% CI: 63.5-65.3) vs. 53.6% (95% CI: 52.6-54.6); p < 0.0001].

CONCLUSIONS

In clinical practice, LIRA was associated with significantly greater reductions in A1C and improved glycaemic goal attainment compared with either EXEN or SITA among adult patients with T2D.

Health-related quality of life in haemophilia patients with inhibitors and their caregivers

Data on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of congenital haemophilia patients with inhibitors (CHwI) and their caregivers are limited. To understand the association between patient demo-graphics/clinical characteristics with HRQoL among CHwI patients and caregivers, a survey was developed to assess HRQoL with haemophilia-specific QoL questionnaires (HAEMO-QoL/HAEM-A-QoL). In the cross-sectional study, paper-pencil questionnaires were mailed to 261 US CHwI patients/caregivers in July 2010. Descriptive analyses were performed to characterize HRQoL by age and to identify drivers of impairment, from both patient/caregiver perspectives. HRQoL scores were transformed on a scale of 0-100, with higher scores indicating higher impairment in HRQoL. Ninety-seven respondents completed the HRQoL assessment. HRQoL impairment was higher in adult patients. In children ages 8-16 years, mean HAEMO-QoL total score was 33.8 (SD = 15.5), and 35.0 (SD = 16.1) in children ages 4-7 years; for adult patients the mean HAEM-A-QoL total score was 42.2 (SD = 14.8). Adults reported highest impairment in the 'sports/leisure' subscale (Mean = 62.5, SD = 18.7), whereas patients 8-16 years reported highest impairment in the 'physical health' subscale (Mean = 50.8, SD = 30.5).Caregivers of patients ages 4-7 years reported greatest impairment within the 'family' subscale (Mean = 55.6, SD = 19.4). Caregivers were ''considerably/very much'' bothered by their child's inhibitors and reported higher QoL impairment for their child than parents who were not bothered. Within ChwI patients, HRQoL impairments increased with age and existed across a range of physical/psychosocial domains. In addition, caregiver burden also affected the perceived HRQoL of paediatric CHwI patients. Additional research is considered necessary to further understand the support caregivers need while caring for children with CHwI.

Patient/caregiver perceived benefits and barriers to elective orthopedic surgery (EOS) in patients with congenital hemophilia with inhibitors

OBJECTIVE

Congenital hemophilia patients with inhibitors are at greater risk for developing arthropathy and orthopedic complications compared to those without inhibitors. Elective orthopedic surgeries (EOS) may be an option for these patients and may provide long-term cost savings due to reduced bleed frequency. However, patient motivations and goals for undergoing or delaying such surgeries are not well understood. A US-based patient/caregiver survey was designed to describe inhibitor patient experiences and outcomes following EOS and to develop a comprehensive understanding of patient preferences for EOS, which are lacking in the literature.

METHODS

The paper-pencil questionnaire was mailed to 261 US inhibitor patients/caregivers and included history and timing of EOS, quality-of-life (QoL) and potential benefits of and barriers to receiving EOS. Univariate/bivariate descriptive analyses were performed to characterize those with/without a history of EOS.

RESULTS

For 103 subjects who responded, the mean age was 20.9 years. Approximately 25% (n = 26) of respondents underwent EOS, most commonly on the knee (21, 81%); 73.1% of surgery recipients reported the surgery improved or greatly improved their QoL based on single-item response. The highest ranked perceived benefits were less pain, fewer bleeds, and improved mobility. However, the leading concerns reported were lack of improved mobility (62.2%), fear of uncontrolled bleeding (61.3%), and surgical complications, such as blood clot (60.0%).

LIMITATIONS

The study consisted of a small sample size, primarily due to the difficulty in trying to reach inhibitor patients or their caregivers, thereby restricting inferential and stratification analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

QoL improved for most inhibitor patients who reported having EOS. For those considering surgery, there is optimism about the potential benefits, but realistic concerns associated with bleed control and post-op complications.