1
|
Suh EH, Probst MA, Tichter AM, Ranard LS, Amaranto A, Chang BC, Huynh PA, Kratz A, Lee RJ, Rabbani LE, Sacco DL, Einstein AJ. Flexible-Interval High-Sensitivity Troponin Velocity for the Detection of Acute Coronary Syndromes. Am J Cardiol 2023; 203:240-247. [PMID: 37506670 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.06.080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
Many algorithms for emergency department (ED) evaluation of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) using high-sensitivity troponin assays rely on the detection of a "delta," the difference in concentration over a predetermined interval, but collecting specimens at specific times can be difficult in the ED. We evaluate the use of troponin "velocity," the rate of change of troponin concentration over a flexible short interval for the prediction of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) at 30 days. We conducted a prospective, observational study on a convenience sample of 821 patients who underwent ACS evaluation at a high-volume, urban ED. We determined the diagnostic performance of a novel velocity-based algorithm and compared the performance of 1- and 2-hour algorithms adapted from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) using delta versus velocity. A total of 7 of 332 patients (2.1%) classified as low risk by the velocity-based algorithm experienced a MACE by 30 days compared with 35 of 221 (13.8%) of patients classified as greater than low risk, yielding a sensitivity of 83.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 68.6% to 93.0%) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 97.9% (95% CI 95.9% to 98.9%). The ESC-derived algorithms using delta or velocity had NPVs ranging from 98.4% (95% CI 96.4% to 99.3%) to 99.6% (95% CI 97.0% to 99.9%) for 30-day MACEs. The NPV of the novel velocity-based algorithm for MACE at 30 days was borderline, but the substitution of troponin velocity for delta in the framework of the ESC algorithms performed well. In conclusion, specimen collection within strict time intervals may not be necessary for rapid evaluation of ACS with high-sensitivity troponin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Hyun Suh
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
| | - Marc A Probst
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Aleksandr M Tichter
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Lauren S Ranard
- Seymour, Paul, and Gloria Milstein Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrew Amaranto
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Hackensack School of Medicine, Hackensack, New Jersey
| | - Betty C Chang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Phong Anh Huynh
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Alexander Kratz
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Rebekah J Lee
- Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Leroy E Rabbani
- Seymour, Paul, and Gloria Milstein Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Dana L Sacco
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrew J Einstein
- Seymour, Paul, and Gloria Milstein Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Probst MA, Janke AT, Haimovich AD, Venkatesh AK, Lin MP, Kocher KE, Nemnom MJ, Thiruganasambandamoorthy V. Development of a Novel Emergency Department Quality Measure to Reduce Very Low-Risk Syncope Hospitalizations. Ann Emerg Med 2022; 79:509-517. [PMID: 35487840 PMCID: PMC9117517 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Revised: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE Emergency department (ED) evaluations for syncope are common, representing 1.3 million annual US visits and $2 billion in related hospitalizations. Despite evidence supporting risk stratification and outpatient management, variation in syncope hospitalization rates persist. We sought to develop a new quality measure for very low-risk adult ED patients with syncope that could be applied to administrative data. METHODS We developed this quality measure in 2 phases. First, we used an existing prospective, observational ED patient data set to identify a very low-risk cohort with unexplained syncope using 2 variables: age less than 50 years and no history of heart disease. We then applied this to the 2019 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) to assess its potential effect, assessing for hospital-level factors associated with hospitalization variation. RESULTS Of the 8,647 adult patients in the prospective cohort, 3,292 (38%) patients fulfilled these 2 criteria: age less than 50 years and no history of heart disease. Of these, 15 (0.46%) suffered serious adverse events within 30 days. In the NEDS, there were an estimated 566,031 patients meeting these 2 criteria, of whom 15,507 (2.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.48% to 3.00%) were hospitalized. We found substantial variation in the hospitalization rates for this very low-risk cohort, with a median rate of 1.7% (range 0% to 100%; interquartile range 0% to 3.9%). Factors associated with increased hospitalization rates included a yearly ED volume of more than 80,000 (odds ratio [OR] 3.14; 95% CI 2.02 to 4.89) and metropolitan teaching status (OR 1.5; 95% CI 1.24 to 1.81). CONCLUSION In summary, our novel syncope quality measure can assess variation in low-value hospitalizations for unexplained syncope. The application of this measure could improve the value of syncope care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc A Probst
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
| | - Alexander T Janke
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Adrian D Haimovich
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Arjun K Venkatesh
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Michelle P Lin
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Keith E Kocher
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Marie-Joe Nemnom
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sacco DL, Probst MA, Schultebraucks K, Greene MC, Chang BP. Evaluation of emergency department visits for mental health complaints during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open 2022; 3:e12728. [PMID: 35505927 PMCID: PMC9051864 DOI: 10.1002/emp2.12728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Revised: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in over 6 million deaths worldwide as of March 2022. Adverse psychological effects on patients and the general public linked to the pandemic have been well documented. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of adult emergency department (ED) encounters with diagnoses of anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes at a tertiary care hospital in New York City from March 15 through July 31, 2020 and compared it with ED encounters during the same time period in the previous 3 years (2017-2019). The relative risk (RR) of these diagnoses was calculated comparing a prepandemic sample to a pandemic sample, accounting for total volume of ED visits. Results A total of 2816 patient encounters met the inclusion criteria. The study period in 2020 had 31.5% lower overall ED volume seen during the same time period in the previous 3 years (27,874 vs average 40,716 ED encounters). The risk of presenting with anxiety during the study period in 2020 compared to prior 3 years was 1.40 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21-1.63), for depression was 1.47 (95% CI 1.28-1.69), and for suicidal ideation was 1.05 (95% CI 0.90-1.23). There was an increase in admissions for depression during the pandemic period (15.2% increase, 95% CI 4.6%-25.7%). Conclusion There was a relative increase in patients presenting to the ED with complaints of anxiety and depression during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, while absolute numbers remained stable. Our results highlight the importance of acute care-based mental health resources and interventions to support patients during this pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana L Sacco
- Department of Emergency Medicine Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York City New York USA
| | - Marc A Probst
- Department of Emergency Medicine Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York City New York USA
| | - Katharina Schultebraucks
- Department of Emergency Medicine Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York City New York USA.,Department of Psychiatry Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York City New York USA
| | - M Claire Greene
- Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health New York City New York USA
| | - Bernard P Chang
- Department of Emergency Medicine Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York City New York USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Billah T, Gordon L, Schoenfeld EM, Chang BP, Hess EP, Probst MA. Clinicians' perspectives on the implementation of patient decision aids in the emergency department: A qualitative interview study. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open 2022; 3:e12629. [PMID: 35079731 PMCID: PMC8769071 DOI: 10.1002/emp2.12629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Revised: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Decision aids (DAs) are tools to facilitate and standardize shared decision making (SDM). Although most emergency clinicians (ECs) perceive SDM appropriate for emergency care, there is limited uptake of DAs in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to explore barriers and facilitators identified by ECs regarding the implementation of DAs in the emergency department (ED). METHODS We conducted a qualitative interview study guided by implementation science frameworks. ECs participated in interviews focused on the implementation of DAs for the disposition of patients with low-risk chest pain and unexplained syncope in the ED. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. We then iteratively developed a codebook with directed qualitative content analysis. RESULTS We approached 25 ECs working in urban New York, of whom 20 agreed to be interviewed (mean age, 41 years; 25% women). The following 6 main barriers were identified: (1) poor DA accessibility, (2) concern for increased medicolegal risk, (3) lack of perceived need for a DA, (4) patient factors including lack of capacity and limited health literacy, (5) skepticism about validity of DAs, and (6) lack of time to use DAs. The 6 main facilitators identified were (1) positive attitudes toward SDM, (2) patient access to follow-up care, (3) potential for improved patient satisfaction, (4) potential for improved risk communication, (5) strategic integration of DAs into the clinical workflow, and (6) institutional support of DAs. CONCLUSIONS ECs identified multiple barriers and facilitators to the implementation of DAs into clinical practice. These findings could guide implementation efforts targeting the uptake of DA use in the ED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tausif Billah
- Department of Emergency MedicineIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiMount Sinai HospitalNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Lauren Gordon
- Department of Emergency MedicineIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiMount Sinai HospitalNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Elizabeth M. Schoenfeld
- Department of Emergency MedicineUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School–BaystateSpringfieldMassachusettsUSA
| | - Bernard P. Chang
- Department of Emergency MedicineColumbia University Medical CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Erik P. Hess
- Department of Emergency MedicineVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTennesseeUSA
| | - Marc A. Probst
- Department of Emergency MedicineIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiMount Sinai HospitalNew YorkNew YorkUSA
- Department of Emergency MedicineColumbia University Medical CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schimmel J, Vargas‐Torres C, Genes N, Probst MA, Manini AF. Changes in alcohol-related hospital visits during COVID-19 in New York City. Addiction 2021; 116:3525-3530. [PMID: 34060168 PMCID: PMC8212089 DOI: 10.1111/add.15589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Revised: 12/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Increased alcohol consumption has been proposed as a potential consequence of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. There has been little scrutiny of alcohol use behaviors resulting in hospital visits, which is essential to guide pandemic public policy. We aimed to determine whether COVID-19 peak restrictions were associated with increased hospital visits for alcohol use or withdrawal. Secondary objectives were to describe differences based on age, sex and race, and to examine alcohol-related complication incidence. DESIGN Multi-center, retrospective, pre-post study. SETTING New York City health system with five participating hospitals. PARTICIPANTS Adult emergency department encounters for alcohol use, alcoholic gastritis or pancreatitis or hepatitis, alcohol withdrawal syndrome, withdrawal seizure or delirium tremens. MEASUREMENTS Age, sex, race, site and encounter diagnosis. Encounters were compared between 2019 and 2020 for 1 March to 31 May. FINDINGS There were 2790 alcohol-related visits during the 2019 study period and 1793 in 2020, with a decrease in total hospital visits. Of 4583 alcohol-related visits, median age was 47 years, with 22.3% females. In 2020 there was an increase in percentage of visits for alcohol withdrawal [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.07-1.67] and withdrawal with complications (aOR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.14-1.72), and a decline in percentage of hospital visits for alcohol use (aOR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.59-0.85) and use with complications (aOR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.58-0.88). It is unknown whether use visit changes mirror declines in other chief complaints. The age groups 18-29 and 60-69 years were associated with increased visits for use and decreased visits for withdrawal, as were non-white race groups. Sex was not associated with alcohol-related visit changes despite male predominance. CONCLUSIONS In New York City during the initial COVID-19 peak (1 March to 31 May 2020), hospital visits for alcohol withdrawal increased while those for alcohol use decreased.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Schimmel
- Department of Emergency MedicineIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Carmen Vargas‐Torres
- Department of Emergency MedicineIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Nicholas Genes
- Department of Emergency MedicineIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Marc A. Probst
- Department of Emergency MedicineIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Alex F. Manini
- Division of Medical Toxicology, Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiElmhurst Hospital CenterNew YorkNYUSA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Musey PI, Bellolio F, Upadhye S, Chang AM, Diercks DB, Gottlieb M, Hess EP, Kontos MC, Mumma BE, Probst MA, Stahl JH, Stopyra JP, Kline JA, Carpenter CR. Guidelines for reasonable and appropriate care in the emergency department (GRACE): Recurrent, low-risk chest pain in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2021; 28:718-744. [PMID: 34228849 DOI: 10.1111/acem.14296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Revised: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
This first Guideline for Reasonable and Appropriate Care in the Emergency Department (GRACE-1) from the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine is on the topic: Recurrent, Low-risk Chest Pain in the Emergency Department. The multidisciplinary guideline panel used The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations regarding eight priority questions for adult patients with recurrent, low-risk chest pain and have derived the following evidence based recommendations: (1) for those >3 h chest pain duration we suggest a single, high-sensitivity troponin below a validated threshold to reasonably exclude acute coronary syndrome (ACS) within 30 days; (2) for those with a normal stress test within the previous 12 months, we do not recommend repeat routine stress testing as a means to decrease rates of major adverse cardiac events at 30 days; (3) insufficient evidence to recommend hospitalization (either standard inpatient admission or observation stay) versus discharge as a strategy to mitigate major adverse cardiac events within 30 days; (4) for those with non-obstructive (<50% stenosis) coronary artery disease (CAD) on prior angiography within 5 years, we suggest referral for expedited outpatient testing as warranted rather than admission for inpatient evaluation; (5) for those with no occlusive CAD (0% stenosis) on prior angiography within 5 years, we recommend referral for expedited outpatient testing as warranted rather than admission for inpatient evaluation; (6) for those with a prior coronary computed tomographic angiography within the past 2 years with no coronary stenosis, we suggest no further diagnostic testing other than a single, normal high-sensitivity troponin below a validated threshold to exclude ACS within that 2 year time frame; (7) we suggest the use of depression and anxiety screening tools as these might have an effect on healthcare use and return emergency department (ED) visits; and (8) we suggest referral for anxiety or depression management, as this might have an impact on healthcare use and return ED visits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul I. Musey
- Department of Emergency Medicine Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis IN USA
| | | | - Suneel Upadhye
- Division of Emergency Medicine McMaster University Hamilton Canada
| | - Anna Marie Chang
- Department of Emergency Medicine Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia PA USA
| | - Deborah B. Diercks
- Department of Emergency Medicine UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX USA
| | - Michael Gottlieb
- Department of Emergency Medicine Rush Medical Center Chicago IL USA
| | - Erik P. Hess
- Department of Emergency Medicine Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville TN USA
| | - Michael C. Kontos
- Department of Internal Medicine Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond VA USA
| | - Bryn E. Mumma
- Department of Emergency Medicine UC Davis School of Medicine Sacramento CA USA
| | - Marc A. Probst
- Department of Emergency Medicine Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY USA
| | | | - Jason P. Stopyra
- Department of Emergency Medicine Wake Forest School of Medicine Winston‐SalemNC USA
| | - Jeffrey A. Kline
- Department of Emergency Medicine Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis IN USA
| | - Christopher R. Carpenter
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Emergency Care Research Core Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis MO USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kea B, Johnson A, Lin A, Lapidus J, Cook JN, Choi C, Chang BP, Probst MA, Park J, Atzema C, Coll‐Vinent B, Constantino G, Pozhidayeva D, Wilson A, Zell A, Hansen M. An international survey of healthcare workers use of personal protective equipment during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open 2021; 2:e12392. [PMID: 33817687 PMCID: PMC8002904 DOI: 10.1002/emp2.12392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2020] [Revised: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Little is known regarding the specific ways personal protective equipment (PPE) has been used and reused during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The objective of this study was to evaluate the patterns of PPE use and the impact of PPE availability on the attitudes and well-being of an international population of healthcare workers. METHODS This was an online, cross-sectional survey of healthcare workers. The survey was disseminated internationally using social media, specialty society list-serves, and email augmented by snowball sampling to healthcare workers who provided direct care to patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. The survey was conducted between April 13 and May 1, 2020. The primary outcome was self-reported PPE use during aerosol-generating medical procedures. Other outcomes included PPE use during care for respiratory patients in general, PPE reuse, PPE decontamination, and healthcare worker impressions related to their work and the pandemic. RESULTS A total of 2227 healthcare workers from 23 countries completed the survey. The N95 was the most common respirator among the 1451 respondents who performed aerosol-generating procedures (n = 1050, 72.3%). Overall, 1783 (80.1%) of providers reported general reuse of PPE, which was similar across US regions but less common in Canada, Italy, and Spain. The most commonly reused item of PPE was the N95 respirator, with the majority of respondents who reused PPE reporting N95 reuse (n = 1157, 64.9%). Of the 1050 individuals who wore an N95 mask while performing an aerosol-generating medical procedure, 756 (72%) reported re-using an N95, and 344 (45.5%) reported reuse for >3 days. Qualitative results identified several common themes, including (1) lack of availability of PPE, (2) fear and anxiety as a result of inadequate PPE, (3) potential exposure to family members, and (4) concerns regarding workload and pay. CONCLUSIONS This international survey of healthcare workers found that N95 respirators were commonly used to care for patients with respiratory symptoms with and without aerosol-generating medical procedures. Healthcare workers reported an unprecedented need to reuse PPE that was designed for single-use, specifically the N95 respirator. The reuse of PPE increased the perceived risk for COVID-19 infection and harmed mental health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bory Kea
- Center for Policy and Research in Emergency MedicineOregon Health and Science University Department of Emergency MedicinePortlandOregonUSA
| | - Alicia Johnson
- Biostatistics and Design ProgramOregon Health and Science University‐Portland State University School of Public HealthPortlandOregonUSA
| | - Amber Lin
- Center for Policy and Research in Emergency MedicineOregon Health and Science University Department of Emergency MedicinePortlandOregonUSA
| | - Jodi Lapidus
- Biostatistics and Design ProgramOregon Health and Science University‐Portland State University School of Public HealthPortlandOregonUSA
| | - Jennifer N. Cook
- Center for Policy and Research in Emergency MedicineOregon Health and Science University Department of Emergency MedicinePortlandOregonUSA
| | - Calvin Choi
- Center for Health Systems Effectiveness ResearchOregon Health and Science University Department of Emergency MedicinePortlandOregonUSA
| | - Bernard P. Chang
- Department of Emergency MedicineColumbia University Irving Medical CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Marc A. Probst
- Department of Emergency MedicineIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Joel Park
- Department of Emergency MedicineNewYork‐Presbyterian Weill Cornell MedicineNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Clare Atzema
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, ICESand University of TorontoTorontoONCanada
| | | | - Giorgio Constantino
- Dipartimento di Medicina Interna, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ GrandaOspedale Maggiore PoliclinicoMilanItaly
| | - Dar'ya Pozhidayeva
- OHSU Evaluation Core, Oregon Clinical and Translational Research InstituteOregon Health and Science UniversityPortlandOregonUSA
| | - Amy Wilson
- OHSU Evaluation Core, Oregon Clinical and Translational Research InstituteOregon Health and Science UniversityPortlandOregonUSA
| | - Adrienne Zell
- OHSU Evaluation Core, Oregon Clinical and Translational Research InstituteOregon Health and Science UniversityPortlandOregonUSA
| | - Matt Hansen
- Center for Policy and Research in Emergency MedicineOregon Health and Science University Department of Emergency MedicinePortlandOregonUSA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Probst MA, Lin MP, Sze JJ, Hess EP, Breslin M, Frosch DL, Sun BC, Langan M, Thiruganasambandamoorthy V, Richardson LD. Shared Decision Making for Syncope in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial. Acad Emerg Med 2020; 27:853-865. [PMID: 32147870 DOI: 10.1111/acem.13955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Revised: 02/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Significant practice variation is seen in the management of syncope in the emergency department (ED). We sought to evaluate the feasibility of performing a randomized controlled trial of a shared decision making (SDM) tool for low-to-intermediate-risk syncope patients presenting to the ED. METHODS We performed a randomized controlled trial of adults (≥30 years) with unexplained syncope who presented to an academic ED in the United States. Patients with a serious diagnosis identified in the ED were excluded. Patients were randomized, 1:1, to receive either usual care or a personalized syncope decision aid (SynDA) meant to facilitate SDM. Our primary outcome was feasibility, i.e., ability to enroll 50 patients in 24 months. Secondary outcomes included patient knowledge, involvement (measured with OPTION-5), rating of care, and clinical outcomes at 30 days post-ED visit. RESULTS After screening 351 patients, we enrolled 50 participants with unexplained syncope from January 2017 to January 2019. The most common reason for exclusion was lack of clinical equipoise to justify SDM (n = 124). Patients in the SynDA arm tended to have greater patient involvement, as shown by higher OPTION-5 scores: 52/100 versus 27/100 (between-group difference = -25.4, 95% confidence interval = -13.5 to -37.3). Both groups had similar levels of clinical knowledge, ratings of care, and serious clinical outcomes at 30 days. CONCLUSIONS Among ED patients with unexplained syncope, a randomized controlled trial of a shared decision-making tool is feasible. Although this study was not powered to detect differences in clinical outcomes, it demonstrates feasibility, while providing key lessons and effect sizes that could inform the design of future SDM trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc A. Probst
- From the Department of Emergency MedicineIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY
| | - Michelle P. Lin
- From the Department of Emergency MedicineIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY
| | - Jeremy J. Sze
- From the Department of Emergency MedicineIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY
| | - Erik P. Hess
- the Department of Emergency Medicine University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham AL
| | | | | | - Benjamin C. Sun
- the Department of Emergency Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA
| | - Marie‐Noelle Langan
- and the Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY
| | | | - Lynne D. Richardson
- From the Department of Emergency MedicineIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Probst MA, Caputo ND, Chang BP. Behind the Scenes of Successful Research in Emergency Medicine: Nine Tips for Junior Investigators. AEM Educ Train 2020; 4:S75-S81. [PMID: 32072110 PMCID: PMC7011424 DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2019] [Revised: 07/23/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Education related to clinical research often focuses on methodology, statistics, ethics, and study design. While knowledge of these conventional skills is essential to the operationalization of research, many "soft" skills related to leadership, communication, and team management are critical to the successful conduct research in the real world. Conducting clinical research in the emergency department is generally a challenging endeavor. Based on our prior experience as clinical researchers and a narrative review of the published literature, we offer nine practical strategies to help junior investigators conduct research. To successfully execute a research study, investigators must know how to motivate their team, create a brand around their study, communicate effectively, maximize clinician and patient engagement, and celebrate victory, among other skills. These skills and strategies are often missing from the formal research education and in peer-reviewed manuscripts but are, in fact, invaluable to the successful development of junior investigators. Thus, we offer the "story behind the study" in an effort to contribute to research education with material that is not typically covered in formal curricula.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc A. Probst
- Department of Emergency MedicineIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNY
| | | | - Bernard P. Chang
- Department of Emergency MedicineColumbia University Medical CenterNew YorkNY
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Probst MA, Gupta M, Hendey GW, Rodriguez RM, Winkel G, Loo GT, Mower WR. Prevalence of Intracranial Injury in Adult Patients With Blunt Head Trauma With and Without Anticoagulant or Antiplatelet Use. Ann Emerg Med 2020; 75:354-364. [PMID: 31959538 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2019] [Revised: 09/09/2019] [Accepted: 10/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE We determine the prevalence of significant intracranial injury among adults with blunt head trauma who are receiving preinjury anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications. METHODS This was a multicenter, prospective, observational study conducted from December 2007 to December 2015. Patients were enrolled in 3 emergency departments (EDs) in the United States. Adults with blunt head trauma who underwent neuroimaging in the ED were included. Use of preinjury aspirin, clopidogrel, and warfarin was recorded. Data on direct oral anticoagulants were not specifically recorded. The primary outcome was prevalence of significant intracranial injury on neuroimaging. The secondary outcome was receipt of neurosurgical intervention. RESULTS Among 9,070 patients enrolled in this study, the median age was 53.8 years (interquartile range 34.7 to 74.3 years) and 60.7% were men. A total of 1,323 patients (14.6%) were receiving antiplatelet medications or warfarin, including 635 receiving aspirin alone, 109 clopidogrel alone, and 406 warfarin alone. Compared with that of patients without any coagulopathy, the relative risk of significant intracranial injury was 1.29 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88 to 1.87) for patients receiving aspirin alone, 0.75 (95% CI 0.24 to 2.30) for those receiving clopidogrel alone, and 1.88 (95% CI 1.28 to 2.75) for those receiving warfarin alone. The relative risk of significant intracranial injury was 2.88 (95% CI 1.53 to 5.42) for patients receiving aspirin and clopidogrel in combination. CONCLUSION Patients receiving preinjury warfarin or a combination of aspirin and clopidogrel were at increased risk for significant intracranial injury, but not those receiving aspirin alone. Clinicians should have a low threshold for neuroimaging when evaluating patients receiving warfarin or a combination of aspirin and clopidogrel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc A Probst
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
| | - Malkeet Gupta
- UCLA Department of Emergency Medicine, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Antelope Valley Hospital Emergency Department, Lancaster, CA
| | - Gregory W Hendey
- UCLA Department of Emergency Medicine, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; UCSF Fresno, Community Regional Medical Center, Fresno, CA
| | - Robert M Rodriguez
- Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, UCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA
| | - Gary Winkel
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - George T Loo
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - William R Mower
- UCLA Department of Emergency Medicine, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Schoenfeld EM, Probst MA, Quigley DD, St Marie P, Nayyar N, Sabbagh SH, Beckford T, Kanzaria HK. Does Shared Decision Making Actually Occur in the Emergency Department? Looking at It from the Patients' Perspective. Acad Emerg Med 2019; 26:1369-1378. [PMID: 31465130 PMCID: PMC8099042 DOI: 10.1111/acem.13850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2019] [Revised: 08/15/2019] [Accepted: 08/23/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We sought to assess the frequency, content, and quality of shared decision making (SDM) in the emergency department (ED), from patients' perspectives. METHODS Utilizing a cross-sectional, multisite approach, we administered an instrument, consisting of two validated SDM assessment tools-the CollaboRATE and the SDM-Q-9-and one newly developed tool to a sample of ED patients. Our primary outcome was the occurrence of SDM in the clinical encounter, as defined by participants giving "top-box" scores on the CollaboRATE measure, and the ability of patients to identify the topic of their SDM conversation. Secondary outcomes included the content of the SDM conversations, as judged by patients, and whether patients were able to complete each of the two validated scales included in the instrument. RESULTS After exclusions, 285 participants from two sites completed the composite instrument. Just under half identified as female (47%) or as white (47%). Roughly half gave top-box scores (i.e., indicating optimal SDM) on the CollaboRATE scale (49%). Less than half of the participants were able to indicate a decision they were involved in (44%), although those who did gave high scores for such conversations (73/100 via the SDM-Q-9 tool). The most frequently identified decisions discussed were admission versus discharge (19%), medication options (17%), and options for follow-up care (15%). CONCLUSIONS Fewer than half of ED patients surveyed reported they were involved in SDM. The most common decision for which SDM was used was around ED disposition (admission vs. discharge). When SDM was employed, patients generally rated the discussion highly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth M Schoenfeld
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate, Springfield, MA
- Institute for Healthcare Delivery and Population Science, University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate, Springfield, MA
| | - Marc A Probst
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | | | - Peter St Marie
- Office of Research and the Epidemiology/Biostatistics Research Core, University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate, Springfield, MA
| | - Nikita Nayyar
- New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, Old Westbury, NY
| | - Sarah H Sabbagh
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Hemal K Kanzaria
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Schoenfeld EM, Mader S, Houghton C, Wenger R, Probst MA, Schoenfeld DA, Lindenauer PK, Mazor KM. The Effect of Shared Decisionmaking on Patients' Likelihood of Filing a Complaint or Lawsuit: A Simulation Study. Ann Emerg Med 2019; 74:126-136. [PMID: 30611638 PMCID: PMC6599569 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2018] [Revised: 11/06/2018] [Accepted: 11/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE Shared decisionmaking has been promoted as a method to increase the patient-centeredness of medical decisionmaking and decrease low-yield testing, but little is known about its medicolegal ramifications in the setting of an adverse outcome. We seek to determine whether the use of shared decisionmaking changes perceptions of fault and liability in the case of an adverse outcome. METHODS This was a randomized controlled simulation experiment conducted by survey, using clinical vignettes featuring no shared decisionmaking, brief shared decisionmaking, or thorough shared decisionmaking. Participants were adult US citizens recruited through an online crowd-sourcing platform. Participants were randomized to vignettes portraying 1 of 3 levels of shared decisionmaking. All other information given was identical, including the final clinical decision and the adverse outcome. The primary outcome was reported likelihood of pursuing legal action. Secondary outcomes included perceptions of fault, quality of care, and trust in physician. RESULTS We recruited 804 participants. Participants exposed to shared decisionmaking (brief and thorough) were 80% less likely to report a plan to contact a lawyer than those not exposed to shared decisionmaking (12% and 11% versus 41%; odds ratio 0.2; 95% confidence interval 0.12 to 0.31). Participants exposed to either level of shared decisionmaking reported higher trust, rated their physicians more highly, and were less likely to fault their physicians for the adverse outcome compared with those exposed to the no shared decisionmaking vignette. CONCLUSION In the setting of an adverse outcome from a missed diagnosis, use of shared decisionmaking may affect patients' perceptions of fault and liability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth M Schoenfeld
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate, Springfield, MA; Institute for Healthcare Delivery and Population Science, University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate, Springfield, MA.
| | - Shelby Mader
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate, Springfield, MA
| | - Connor Houghton
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate, Springfield, MA
| | - Robert Wenger
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate, Springfield, MA
| | - Marc A Probst
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - David A Schoenfeld
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Peter K Lindenauer
- Institute for Healthcare Delivery and Population Science, University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate, Springfield, MA
| | - Kathleen M Mazor
- Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, and Meyers Primary Care Institute, Worcester, MA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Probst MA, Su E, Weiss RE, Yagapen AN, Malveau SE, Adler DH, Bastani A, Baugh CW, Caterino JM, Clark CL, Diercks DB, Hollander JE, Nicks BA, Nishijima DK, Shah MN, Stiffler KA, Storrow AB, Wilber ST, Sun BC. Clinical Benefit of Hospitalization for Older Adults With Unexplained Syncope: A Propensity-Matched Analysis. Ann Emerg Med 2019; 74:260-269. [PMID: 31080027 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.03.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2018] [Revised: 03/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/25/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE Many adults with syncope are hospitalized solely for observation and testing. We seek to determine whether hospitalization versus outpatient management for older adults with unexplained syncope is associated with a reduction in postdisposition serious adverse events at 30 days. METHODS We performed a propensity score analysis using data from a prospective, observational study of older adults with unexplained syncope or near syncope who presented to 11 emergency departments (EDs) in the United States. We enrolled adults (≥60 years) who presented with syncope or near syncope. We excluded patients with a serious diagnosis identified in the ED. Clinical and laboratory data were collected on all patients. The primary outcome was rate of post-ED serious adverse events at 30 days. RESULTS We enrolled 2,492 older adults with syncope and no serious ED diagnosis from April 2013 to September 2016. Mean age was 73 years (SD 8.9 years), and 51% were women. The incidence of serious adverse events within 30 days after the index visit was 7.4% for hospitalized patients and 3.19% for discharged patients, representing an unadjusted difference of 4.2% (95% confidence interval 2.38% to 6.02%). After propensity score matching on risk of hospitalization, there was no statistically significant difference in serious adverse events at 30 days between the hospitalized group (4.89%) and the discharged group (2.82%) (risk difference 2.07%; 95% confidence interval -0.24% to 4.38%). CONCLUSION In our propensity-matched sample of older adults with unexplained syncope, for those with clinical characteristics similar to that of the discharged cohort, hospitalization was not associated with improvement in 30-day serious adverse event rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc A Probst
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
| | - Erica Su
- Department of Biostatistics, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Robert E Weiss
- Department of Biostatistics, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Annick N Yagapen
- Center for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Susan E Malveau
- Center for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - David H Adler
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY
| | - Aveh Bastani
- Department of Emergency Medicine, William Beaumont Hospital-Troy, Troy, MI
| | | | - Jeffrey M Caterino
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Carol L Clark
- Department of Emergency Medicine, William Beaumont Hospital-Royal Oak, Royal Oak, MI
| | - Deborah B Diercks
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas-Southwestern, Dallas, TX
| | - Judd E Hollander
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Bret A Nicks
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Daniel K Nishijima
- Department of Emergency Medicine, UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA
| | - Manish N Shah
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
| | - Kirk A Stiffler
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH
| | - Alan B Storrow
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Scott T Wilber
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH
| | - Benjamin C Sun
- Center for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Probst MA, Gibson TA, Weiss RE, Yagapen AN, Malveau SE, Adler DH, Bastani A, Baugh CW, Caterino JM, Clark CL, Diercks DB, Hollander JE, Nicks BA, Nishijima DK, Shah MN, Stiffler KA, Storrow AB, Wilber ST, Sun BC. Predictors of Clinically Significant Echocardiography Findings in Older Adults with Syncope: A Secondary Analysis. J Hosp Med 2018; 13:823-828. [PMID: 30255862 PMCID: PMC6343846 DOI: 10.12788/jhm.3082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Syncope is a common reason for visiting the emergency department (ED) and is associated with significant healthcare resource utilization. OBJECTIVE To develop a risk-stratification tool for clinically significant findings on echocardiography among older adults presenting to the ED with syncope or nearsyncope. DESIGN Prospective, observational cohort study from April 2013 to September 2016. SETTING Eleven EDs in the United States. PATIENTS We enrolled adults (=60 years) who presented to the ED with syncope or near-syncope who underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). MEASUREMENTS The primary outcome was a clinically significant finding on TTE. Clinical, electrocardiogram, and laboratory variables were also collected. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of significant findings on echocardiography. RESULTS A total of 3,686 patients were enrolled. Of these, 995 (27%) received echocardiography, and 215 (22%) had a significant finding on echocardiography. Regression analysis identified five predictors of significant finding: (1) history of congestive heart failure, (2) history of coronary artery disease, (3) abnormal electrocardiogram, (4) high-sensitivity troponin-T >14 pg/mL, and 5) N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide >125 pg/mL. These five variables make up the ROMEO (Risk Of Major Echocardiography findings in Older adults with syncope) criteria. The sensitivity of a ROMEO score of zero for excluding significant findings on echocardiography was 99.5% (95% CI: 97.4%-99.9%) with a specificity of 15.4% (95% CI: 13.0%-18.1%). CONCLUSIONS If validated, this risk-stratification tool could help clinicians determine which syncope patients are at very low risk of having clinically significant findings on echocardiography. REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01802398.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc A. Probst
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tommy A. Gibson
- Department of Biostatistics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Robert E. Weiss
- Department of Biostatistics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Annick N. Yagapen
- Center for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Heath & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Susan E. Malveau
- Center for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Heath & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Aveh Bastani
- Department of Emergency Medicine, William Beaumont Hospital-Troy, Troy, MI, USA
| | | | - Jeffrey M. Caterino
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Carol L. Clark
- Department of Emergency Medicine, William Beaumont Hospital-Royal Oak, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Deborah B. Diercks
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas-Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA, USA
| | - Judd E. Hollander
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Bret A. Nicks
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, N, USA
| | - Daniel K. Nishijima
- Department of Emergency Medicine, UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Manish N. Shah
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Kirk A. Stiffler
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, USA
| | - Alan B. Storrow
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Scott T. Wilber
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, USA
| | - Benjamin C. Sun
- Center for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Heath & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Schoenfeld EM, Kanzaria HK, Quigley DD, Marie PS, Nayyar N, Sabbagh SH, Gress KL, Probst MA. Patient Preferences Regarding Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department: Findings From a Multisite Survey. Acad Emerg Med 2018; 25:1118-1128. [PMID: 29897639 PMCID: PMC6185792 DOI: 10.1111/acem.13499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2018] [Revised: 06/01/2018] [Accepted: 06/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES As shared decision making (SDM) has received increased attention as a method to improve the patient-centeredness of emergency department (ED) care, we sought to determine patients' desired level of involvement in medical decisions and their perceptions of potential barriers and facilitators to SDM in the ED. METHODS We surveyed a cross-sectional sample of adult ED patients at three academic medical centers across the United States. The survey included 32 items regarding patient involvement in medical decisions including a modified Control Preference Scale and questions about barriers and facilitators to SDM in the ED. Items were developed and refined based on prior literature and qualitative interviews with ED patients. Research assistants administered the survey in person. RESULTS Of 797 patients approached, 661 (83%) agreed to participate. Participants were 52% female, 45% white, and 30% Hispanic. The majority of respondents (85%-92%, depending on decision type) expressed a desire for some degree of involvement in decision making in the ED, while 8% to 15% preferred to leave decision making to their physician alone. Ninety-eight percent wanted to be involved with decisions when "something serious is going on." The majority of patients (94%) indicated that self-efficacy was not a barrier to SDM in the ED. However, most patients (55%) reported a tendency to defer to the physician's decision making during an ED visit, with about half reporting they would wait for a physician to ask them to be involved. CONCLUSION We found that the majority of ED patients in our large, diverse sample wanted to be involved in medical decisions, especially in the case of a "serious" medical problem, and felt that they had the ability to do so. Nevertheless, many patients were unlikely to actively seek involvement and defaulted to allowing the physician to make decisions during the ED visit. After fully explaining the consequences of a decision, clinicians should make an effort to explicitly ascertain patients' desired level of involvement in decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth M Schoenfeld
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Springfield, MA
- Institute for Healthcare Delivery and Population Science, Springfield, MA
| | - Hemal K Kanzaria
- University of California San Francisco, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Peter St Marie
- Office of Research and the Epidemiology/Biostatistics Research Core, University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate, Springfield, MA
| | - Nikita Nayyar
- New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, Old Westbury, NY
| | - Sarah H Sabbagh
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Kyle L Gress
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - Marc A Probst
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Probst MA, Tschatscher CF, Lohse CM, Fernanda Bellolio M, Hess EP. Factors Associated With Patient Involvement in Emergency Care Decisions: A Secondary Analysis of the Chest Pain Choice Multicenter Randomized Trial. Acad Emerg Med 2018; 25:1107-1117. [PMID: 29904986 DOI: 10.1111/acem.13503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2018] [Revised: 05/22/2018] [Accepted: 06/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared decision making in the emergency department (ED) can increase patient engagement for patients presenting with chest pain. However, little is known regarding which factors are associated with actual patient involvement in decision making or patients' desired involvement in emergency care decisions. We examined which factors were associated with patients' actual and desired involvement in decision making among ED chest pain patients. METHODS This is a secondary analysis of data from a randomized trial of a shared decision-making intervention in ED patients with low-risk chest pain. We evaluated the degree to which patients were involved in decision making using the OPTION-12 (observing patient involvement) scale and patients' reported desire for involvement in decision making using the Control Preferences Scale (CPS). We measured the associations of patient factors with OPTION-12 and CPS scores using multivariable regression. RESULTS Of the 898 patients enrolled, mean (±SD) age was 51.5 (±11.4) years and 59% were female. Multivariable analysis revealed that only two factors were significantly associated with OPTION-12 scores: study site and use of the decision aid. OPTION-12 scores were 10.3 (standard error = 0.6) points higher for patients randomized to the decision aid compared to usual care (p < 0.001). Higher health literacy was associated with lower scores on the CPS, indicating greater desire for involvement (odds ratio = 0.91, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Patients' reported desire for involvement in decision making was higher among those with higher health literacy. After study site and other potential confounding factors were adjusted for, only use of the decision aid was associated with observed patient involvement in decision making. As the science and practice of shared decision making in the ED moves toward implementation, high-fidelity integration of the decision aid into the flow of care will be necessary to realize desired outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc A. Probst
- Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai Medical Center New York NY
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lin MP, Probst MA, Puskarich MA, Dehon E, Kuehl DR, Wang RC, Hess EP, Butler K, Runyon MS, Wang H, Courtney DM, Muckley B, Hobgood CD, Hall CL, Kline JA. Improving perceptions of empathy in patients undergoing low-yield computerized tomographic imaging in the emergency department. Patient Educ Couns 2018; 101:717-722. [PMID: 29173841 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2017] [Revised: 11/17/2017] [Accepted: 11/19/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We assessed emergency department (ED) patient perceptions of how physicians can improve their language to determine patient preferences for 11 phrases to enhance physician empathy toward the goal of reducing low-value advanced imaging. METHODS Multi-center survey study of low-risk ED patients undergoing computerized tomography (CT) scanning. RESULTS We enroled 305 participants across nine sites. The statement "I have carefully considered what you told me about what brought you here today" was most frequently rated as important (88%). The statement "I have thought about the cost of your medical care to you today" was least frequently rated as important (59%). Participants preferred statements indicating physicians had considered their "vital signs and physical examination" (86%), "past medical history" (84%), and "what prior research tells me about your condition" (79%). Participants also valued statements conveying risks of testing, including potential kidney injury (78%) and radiation (77%). CONCLUSION The majority of phrases were identified as important. Participants preferred statements conveying cognitive reassurance, medical knowledge and risks of testing. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Our findings suggest specific phrases have the potential to enhance ED patient perceptions of physician empathy. Further research is needed to determine whether statements to convey empathy affect diagnostic testing rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle P Lin
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Emergency Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Marc A Probst
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Emergency Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Michael A Puskarich
- University of Mississippi, Department of Emergency Medicine, Jackson, MS, United States
| | - Erin Dehon
- University of Mississippi, Department of Emergency Medicine, Jackson, MS, United States
| | - Damon R Kuehl
- Virginia Tech-Carilion, Department of Emergency Medicine, Roanoke, VA, United States
| | - Ralph C Wang
- University of California San Francisco Department of Emergency Medicine, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Erik P Hess
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Katie Butler
- Carolinas Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Charlotte, NC, United States
| | - Michael S Runyon
- Carolinas Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Charlotte, NC, United States
| | - Hao Wang
- John Peter Smith Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ft. Worth, TX, United States
| | - D Mark Courtney
- Northwestern University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Brandon Muckley
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Cherri D Hobgood
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Cassandra L Hall
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Jeffrey A Kline
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Probst MA, Hess EP, Breslin M, Frosch DL, Sun BC, Langan MN, Richardson LD. Development of a Patient Decision Aid for Syncope in the Emergency Department: the SynDA Tool. Acad Emerg Med 2018; 25:425-433. [PMID: 29288554 DOI: 10.1111/acem.13373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2017] [Revised: 12/11/2017] [Accepted: 12/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective was to develop a patient decision aid (DA) to promote shared decision making (SDM) for stable, alert patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with syncope. METHODS Using input from patients, clinicians, and experts in the field of syncope, health care design, and SDM, we created a prototype of a paper-based DA to engage patients in the disposition decision (admission vs. discharge) after an unremarkable ED evaluation for syncope. In phase 1, we conducted one-on-one semistructured exploratory interviews with 10 emergency physicians and 10 ED syncope patients. In phase 2, we conducted one-on-one directed interviews with 15 emergency care clinicians, five cardiologists, and 12 ED syncope patients to get detailed feedback on DA content and design. We iteratively modified the aid using feedback from each interviewee until clarity and usability had been optimized. RESULTS The 11 × 17-inch, paper-based DA, titled SynDA, includes four sections: 1) explanation of syncope, 2) explanation of future risks, 3) personalized 30-day risk estimate, and 4) disposition options. The personalized risk estimate is calculated using a recently published syncope risk-stratification tool. This risk estimate is stated in natural frequency and graphically displayed using a 100-person color-coded pictogram. Patient-oriented questions are included to stimulate dialogue between patient and clinician. At the end of the development process, patient and physician participants expressed satisfaction with the clarity and usability of the DA. CONCLUSIONS We iteratively developed an evidence-based DA to facilitate SDM for alert syncope patients after an unremarkable ED evaluation. Further testing is required to determine its effects on patient care. This DA has the potential to improve care for syncope patients and promote patient-centered care in emergency medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc A. Probst
- Department of Emergency Medicine; Mount Sinai Medical Center; New York NY
| | - Erik P. Hess
- Department of Emergency Medicine; Mayo Clinic; Rochester MN
| | | | | | - Benjamin C. Sun
- Center for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine; Department of Emergency Medicine; Oregon Heath & Science University; Portland OR
| | - Marie-Noelle Langan
- Department of Medicine; Division of Cardiology; Mount Sinai Medical Center; New York NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Between 1997 and 2011, there was a nearly 50 percent reduction in US emergency department mortality rates for adults. This trend likely has many causes, related to advances in palliative, prehospital, and emergency care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hemal K Kanzaria
- Hemal K. Kanzaria is an assistant professor in the Department of Emergency Medicine at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)
| | - Marc A Probst
- Marc A. Probst is an assistant professor in the Department of Emergency Medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, in New York City
| | - Renee Y Hsia
- Renee Y. Hsia is a professor in the Department of Emergency Medicine and the Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, both at UCSF
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Probst MA, Kanzaria HK, Schoenfeld EM, Menchine MD, Breslin M, Walsh C, Melnick ER, Hess EP. Shared Decisionmaking in the Emergency Department: A Guiding Framework for Clinicians. Ann Emerg Med 2017; 70:688-695. [PMID: 28559034 PMCID: PMC5834305 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.03.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2017] [Revised: 03/22/2017] [Accepted: 03/27/2017] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Shared decisionmaking has been proposed as a method to promote active engagement of patients in emergency care decisions. Despite the recent attention shared decisionmaking has received in the emergency medicine community, including being the topic of the 2016 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference, misconceptions remain in regard to the precise meaning of the term, the process, and the conditions under which it is most likely to be valuable. With the help of a patient representative and an interaction designer, we developed a simple framework to illustrate how shared decisionmaking should be approached in clinical practice. We believe it should be the preferred or default approach to decisionmaking, except in clinical situations in which 3 factors interfere. These 3 factors are lack of clinical uncertainty or equipoise, patient decisionmaking ability, and time, all of which can render shared decisionmaking infeasible. Clinical equipoise refers to scenarios in which there are 2 or more medically reasonable management options. Patient decisionmaking ability refers to a patient's capacity and willingness to participate in his or her emergency care decisions. Time refers to the acuity of the clinical situation (which may require immediate action) and the time that the clinician has to devote to the shared decisionmaking conversation. In scenarios in which there is only one medically reasonable management option, informed consent is indicated, with compassionate persuasion used as appropriate. If time or patient capacity is lacking, physician-directed decisionmaking will occur. With this framework as the foundation, we discuss the process of shared decisionmaking and how it can be used in practice. Finally, we highlight 5 common misconceptions in regard to shared decisionmaking in the ED. With an improved understanding of shared decisionmaking, this approach should be used to facilitate the provision of high-quality, patient-centered emergency care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc A Probst
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
| | - Hemal K Kanzaria
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA
| | - Elizabeth M Schoenfeld
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Baystate Medical Center/Tufts School of Medicine, Springfield, MA
| | - Michael D Menchine
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Southern California/Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | - Edward R Melnick
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Erik P Hess
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Probst MA, Noseworthy PA, Brito JP, Hess EP. Shared Decision-Making as the Future of Emergency Cardiology. Can J Cardiol 2017; 34:117-124. [PMID: 29289400 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2017] [Revised: 09/11/2017] [Accepted: 09/12/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Shared decision-making is playing an increasingly large role in emergency cardiovascular care. Although there are many challenges to successfully performing shared decision-making in the emergency department, there are numerous clinical scenarios in which it should be used. In this article, we explore new research and emerging decision aids in the following emergency care scenarios: (1) low-risk chest pain; (2) new-onset atrial fibrillation; and (3) moderate-risk syncope. These decision aids are designed to engage patients and facilitate shared decision-making for specific treatment and disposition (admit vs discharge) decisions. We then offer a 3-step, practical approach to performing shared decision-making in the acute care setting, on the basis of broad stakeholder input and previous conceptual work. Step 1 involves simply acknowledging that a clinical decision needs to be made. Step 2 involves a shared discussion about the working diagnosis and the options for care in the context of the patient's values, preferences, and circumstances. The third and final step requires the patient and provider to agree on a plan of action regarding further medical care. The implementation of shared decision-making in emergency cardiology has the potential to shift the paradigm of clinical practice from paternalism toward mutualism and improve the quality and experience of care for our patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc A Probst
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
| | - Peter A Noseworthy
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Heart Rhythm Section, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Juan P Brito
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Erik P Hess
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Division of Healthcare Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lin MP, Nguyen T, Probst MA, Richardson LD, Schuur JD. Emergency Physician Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior Regarding ACEP's Choosing Wisely Recommendations: A Survey Study. Acad Emerg Med 2017; 24:668-675. [PMID: 28164409 DOI: 10.1111/acem.13167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2016] [Revised: 01/25/2017] [Accepted: 01/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In 2013, the American College of Emergency Physicians joined the Choosing Wisely campaign; however, its impact on emergency physician behavior is unknown. We assessed knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported behaviors regarding the Choosing Wisely recommendations. METHODS We performed a cross-sectional survey of emergency physicians at a national meeting. We approached 819 physicians; 765 (93.4%) completed the survey. RESULTS As a result of the Choosing Wisely campaign, most respondents (64.5%) felt more comfortable discussing low-value services with patients, 54.5% reported reducing utilization, and 52.5% were aware of local efforts to promote the campaign. A majority (62.97%) of respondents were able to identify at least four of five recommendations. The most prevalent low-value practices were computed tomography (CT) brain for minor head injury (29.9%) and antibiotics for acute sinusitis (26.9%). Few respondents reported performing lumbar radiograph for nontraumatic low back pain (7.8%) and Foley catheter for patients who can void (5.6%). Respondents reported patient/family expectations as the most important reason for ordering antibiotics for sinusitis (68%) and imaging for low back pain (56.8%). However, concern for serious diagnosis was the most important reason for performing CT chest for patients with normal D-dimer (49.7%) and CT abdomen for recurrent uncomplicated renal colic (42.5%). A minority (3.8% to 26.7%) of respondents identified malpractice risk as the primary reason for performing low-value services. CONCLUSIONS Despite familiarity with Choosing Wisely, many emergency physicians report performing low-value services. Primary reasons for low-value services differ: antibiotic prescribing was driven by patient/family expectations, while concern for serious diagnosis influenced advanced diagnostic imaging. Greater efforts are needed to promote effective dissemination and implementation; such efforts may be targeted based on differing reasons for low-value services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle P. Lin
- Department of Emergency Medicine; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; New York NY
| | - Thomas Nguyen
- Department of Emergency Medicine; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; New York NY
| | - Marc A. Probst
- Department of Emergency Medicine; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; New York NY
| | - Lynne D. Richardson
- Department of Emergency Medicine; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; New York NY
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; New York NY
| | - Jeremiah D. Schuur
- Department of Emergency Medicine; Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School; Boston MA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Probst MA, McConnell JK, Weiss RE, Laurie AL, Yagapen AN, Lin MP, Caterino JM, Shah MN, Sun BC. Estimating the Cost of Care for Emergency Department Syncope Patients: Comparison of Three Models. West J Emerg Med 2017; 18:253-257. [PMID: 28210361 PMCID: PMC5305134 DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2016.10.31171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2016] [Revised: 08/25/2016] [Accepted: 10/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We sought to compare three hospital cost-estimation models for patients undergoing evaluation for unexplained syncope using hospital cost data. Developing such a model would allow researchers to assess the value of novel clinical algorithms for syncope management. METHODS We collected complete health services data, including disposition, testing, and length of stay (LOS), on 67 adult patients (age 60 years and older) who presented to the emergency department (ED) with syncope at a single hospital. Patients were excluded if a serious medical condition was identified. We created three hospital cost-estimation models to estimate facility costs: V1, unadjusted Medicare payments for observation and/or hospital admission; V2: modified Medicare payment, prorated by LOS in calendar days; and V3: modified Medicare payment, prorated by LOS in hours. Total hospital costs included unadjusted Medicare payments for diagnostic testing and estimated facility costs. We plotted these estimates against actual cost data from the hospital finance department, and performed correlation and regression analyses. RESULTS Of the three models, V3 consistently outperformed the others with regard to correlation and goodness of fit. The Pearson correlation coefficient for V3 was 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81, 0.92) with an R-square value of 0.77 and a linear regression coefficient of 0.87 (95% CI 0.76, 0.99). CONCLUSION Using basic health services data, it is possible to accurately estimate hospital costs for older adults undergoing a hospital-based evaluation for unexplained syncope. This methodology could help assess the potential economic impact of implementing novel clinical algorithms for ED syncope.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc A Probst
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Emergency Medicine, New York, New York
| | - John K McConnell
- Oregon Heath & Science University, Center for Health Systems Effectiveness, Department of Emergency Medicine, Portland, Oregon
| | - Robert E Weiss
- University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Biostatistics, Los Angeles, California
| | - Amber L Laurie
- Oregon Heath & Science University, Center for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine, Portland, Oregon
| | - Annick N Yagapen
- Oregon Heath & Science University, Center for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine, Portland, Oregon
| | - Michelle P Lin
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Emergency Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Jeffrey M Caterino
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Manish N Shah
- University of Wisconsin, Madison, Department of Emergency Medicine, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Benjamin C Sun
- Oregon Heath & Science University, Center for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Melnick ER, Probst MA, Schoenfeld E, Collins SP, Breslin M, Walsh C, Kuppermann N, Dunn P, Abella BS, Boatright D, Hess EP. Development and Testing of Shared Decision Making Interventions for Use in Emergency Care: A Research Agenda. Acad Emerg Med 2016; 23:1346-1353. [PMID: 27457137 DOI: 10.1111/acem.13045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2016] [Revised: 06/30/2016] [Accepted: 07/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Decision aids are evidenced-based tools designed to increase patient understanding of medical options and possible outcomes, facilitate conversation between patients and clinicians, and improve patient engagement. Decision aids have been used for shared decision making (SDM) interventions outside of the ED setting for more than a decade. Their use in the ED has only recently begun to be studied. This article provides background on this topic and the conclusions of the 2016 Academic Emergency Medicine consensus conference SDM in practice work group regarding "Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department: Development of a Policy-Relevant, Patient-Centered Research Agenda." The goal was to determine a prioritized research agenda for the development and testing of SDM interventions for use in emergency care that was most important to patients, clinicians, caregivers, and other key stakeholders. Using the nominal group technique, the consensus working group proposed prioritized research questions in six key domains: 1) content (i.e., clinical scenario or decision area), 2) level of evidence available, 3) tool design strategies, 4) risk communication, 5) stakeholders, and 6) outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward R. Melnick
- Department of Emergency Medicine; Yale University School of Medicine; New Haven CT
| | - Marc A. Probst
- Department of Emergency Medicine; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; New York NY
| | | | - Sean P. Collins
- Department of Emergency Medicine; Vanderbilt University; Nashville TN
| | | | | | - Nathan Kuppermann
- Department of Emergency Medicine; University of California; Davis School of Medicine; Sacramento CA
| | - Pat Dunn
- Patient and Healthcare Innovations and Center for Health Technology and Innovation; American Heart Association; Dallas TX
| | - Benjamin S. Abella
- Department of Emergency Medicine; University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia PA
| | - Dowin Boatright
- Department of Emergency Medicine; Yale University School of Medicine; New Haven CT
- Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholar Program; Yale University School of Medicine; New Haven CT
| | - Erik P. Hess
- Department of Emergency Medicine; Mayo Clinic College of Medicine; Rochester MN
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Affiliation(s)
- Hemal K Kanzaria
- University of California, San Francisco San Francisco, California
| | - Renee Y Hsia
- University of California, San Francisco San Francisco, California
| | - Marc A Probst
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Cui LW, Probst MA, Hoffman JR, Mower WR. Sensitivity of plain radiography for pediatric cervical spine injury. Emerg Radiol 2016; 23:443-8. [DOI: 10.1007/s10140-016-1417-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2016] [Accepted: 06/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
27
|
Probst MA, Kanzaria HK, Frosch DL, Hess EP, Winkel G, Ngai KM, Richardson LD. Perceived Appropriateness of Shared Decision-making in the Emergency Department: A Survey Study. Acad Emerg Med 2016; 23:375-81. [PMID: 26806170 PMCID: PMC5308213 DOI: 10.1111/acem.12904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2015] [Revised: 10/12/2015] [Accepted: 11/16/2015] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective was to describe perceptions of practicing emergency physicians (EPs) regarding the appropriateness and medicolegal implications of using shared decision-making (SDM) in the emergency department (ED). METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional survey of EPs at a large, national professional meeting to assess perceived appropriateness of SDM for different categories of ED management (e.g., diagnostic testing, treatment, disposition) and in common clinical scenarios (e.g., low-risk chest pain, syncope, minor head injury). A 21-item survey instrument was iteratively developed through review by content experts, cognitive testing, and pilot testing. Descriptive and multivariate analyses were conducted. RESULTS We approached 737 EPs; 709 (96%) completed the survey. Two-thirds (67.8%) of respondents were male; 51% practiced in an academic setting and 44% in the community. Of the seven management decision categories presented, SDM was reported to be most frequently appropriate for deciding on invasive procedures (71.5%), computed tomography (CT) scanning (56.7%), and post-ED disposition (56.3%). Among the specific clinical scenarios, use of thrombolytics for acute ischemic stroke was felt to be most frequently appropriate for SDM (83.4%), followed by lumbar puncture to rule out subarachnoid hemorrhage (73.8%) and CT head for pediatric minor head injury (69.9%). Most EPs (66.8%) felt that using and documenting SDM would decrease their medicolegal risk while a minority (14.2%) felt that it would increase their risk. CONCLUSIONS Acceptance of SDM among EPs appears to be strong across management categories (diagnostic testing, treatment, and disposition) and in a variety of clinical scenarios. SDM is perceived by most EPs to be medicolegally protective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc A Probst
- The Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Hemal K Kanzaria
- The Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA
| | - Dominick L Frosch
- The Patient Care Program, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Palo Alto, CA
- The Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Erik P Hess
- The Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Gary Winkel
- The Department of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Ka Ming Ngai
- The Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Lynne D Richardson
- The Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Probst MA, Dayan PS, Raja AS, Slovis BH, Yadav K, Lam SH, Shapiro JS, Farris C, Babcock CI, Griffey RT, Robey TE, Fortin EM, Johnson JO, Chong ST, Davenport M, Grigat DW, Lang EL. Knowledge Translation and Barriers to Imaging Optimization in the Emergency Department: A Research Agenda. Acad Emerg Med 2015; 22:1455-64. [PMID: 26568148 PMCID: PMC10548873 DOI: 10.1111/acem.12830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2015] [Accepted: 07/02/2015] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Researchers have attempted to optimize imaging utilization by describing which clinical variables are more predictive of acute disease and, conversely, what combination of variables can obviate the need for imaging. These results are then used to develop evidence-based clinical pathways, clinical decision instruments, and clinical practice guidelines. Despite the validation of these results in subsequent studies, with some demonstrating improved outcomes, their actual use is often limited. This article outlines a research agenda to promote the dissemination and implementation (also known as knowledge translation) of evidence-based interventions for emergency department (ED) imaging, i.e., clinical pathways, clinical decision instruments, and clinical practice guidelines. We convened a multidisciplinary group of stakeholders and held online and telephone discussions over a 6-month period culminating in an in-person meeting at the 2015 Academic Emergency Medicine consensus conference. We identified the following four overarching research questions: 1) what determinants (barriers and facilitators) influence emergency physicians' use of evidence-based interventions when ordering imaging in the ED; 2) what implementation strategies at the institutional level can improve the use of evidence-based interventions for ED imaging; 3) what interventions at the health care policy level can facilitate the adoption of evidence-based interventions for ED imaging; and 4) how can health information technology, including electronic health records, clinical decision support, and health information exchanges, be used to increase awareness, use, and adherence to evidence-based interventions for ED imaging? Advancing research that addresses these questions will provide valuable information as to how we can use evidence-based interventions to optimize imaging utilization and ultimately improve patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc A Probst
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Peter S Dayan
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY
| | - Ali S Raja
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Benjamin H Slovis
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Kabir Yadav
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Samuel H Lam
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Advocate Christ Medical Center, Oak Lawn, IL
| | - Jason S Shapiro
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Coreen Farris
- RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA
- Central Michigan University College of Medicine, Mount Pleasant, MI
| | - Charlene I Babcock
- Department of Emergency Medicine, St. John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, MI
| | - Richard T Griffey
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Thomas E Robey
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Waterbury Hospital, Yale University, New Haven, CT
| | - Emily M Fortin
- Central Michigan University College of Medicine, Mount Pleasant, MI
| | | | - Suzanne T Chong
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Moira Davenport
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Daniel W Grigat
- Alberta Health Services, Emergency Strategic Clinical Network, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Eddy L Lang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kanzaria HK, Probst MA, Hoffman JR. In Reply... Credat Emptor. Acad Emerg Med 2015; 22:1232. [PMID: 26357013 DOI: 10.1111/acem.12764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hemal K Kanzaria
- Department of Emergency Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
| | - Marc A Probst
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Syncope is a frequent emergency department (ED) presenting complaint and results in a disproportionate rate of hospitalization with variable management strategies. The objective was to estimate the annual national cost savings, reduction in inpatient hospitalizations, and reduction in hospital bed hours from implementation of protocolized care in an observation unit. METHODS We created a Monte Carlo simulation by building a model that reflects current clinical practice in the United States and uses inputs gathered from the most recent available peer-reviewed literature and national survey data. ED visit volume was adjusted to reflect observation unit availability and the portion of observation visits requiring subsequent inpatient care. A recent multicenter randomized controlled study informed the cost savings and length of stay reduction per observation unit visit model inputs. The study population included patients aged 50 years and older with syncope deemed at intermediate risk for serious 30-day cardiovascular outcomes. RESULTS The mean (±SD) annual cost savings was estimated to be $108 million (±$89 million) from avoiding 235,000 (±13,900) inpatient admissions, resulting in 4,297,000 (±1,242,000) fewer hospital bed hours. CONCLUSIONS The potential national cost savings for managing selected patients with syncope in a dedicated observation unit is substantial. Syncope is one of many conditions suitable for care in an observation unit as an alternative to an inpatient setting. As pressure to decrease hospital length of stay and bill short-stay hospitalizations as observation increases, syncope illustrates the value of observation unit care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Li-Jung Liang
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA; Los Angeles CA
| | - Marc A. Probst
- Department of Emergency Medicine; Ichan School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; New York NY
| | - Benjamin C. Sun
- Department of Emergency Medicine; Oregon Health & Science University; Portland OR
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Probst MA, Kanzaria HK, Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Moheimani RS, Sun BC, Quigley DD. Emergency Physicians' Perceptions and Decision-making Processes Regarding Patients Presenting with Palpitations. J Emerg Med 2015; 49:236-43.e2. [PMID: 25943288 DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2014] [Revised: 01/15/2015] [Accepted: 02/18/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Palpitations are a common emergency department (ED) complaint, yet relatively little research exists on this topic from an emergency care perspective. OBJECTIVES We sought to describe the perceptions and clinical decision-making processes of emergency physicians (EP) surrounding patients with palpitations. METHODS We conducted 21 semistructured interviews with a convenience sample of EPs. We recruited participants from academic and community practice settings from four regions of the United States. The transcribed interviews were analyzed using a combination of structural coding and grounded theory approaches with ATLAS.ti, a qualitative data analysis software program (version 7; Atlas.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH, Berlin, Germany). RESULTS EPs perceive palpitations to be a common but generally benign chief complaint. EPs' clinical approach to palpitations, with regards to testing, treatment, and ED management, can be classified as relating to one or more of the following themes: (1) risk stratification, (2) diagnostic categorization, (3) algorithmic management, and (4) case-specific gestalt. With regard to disposition decisions, four main themes emerged: (1) presence of a serious diagnosis, (2) perceived need for further cardiac testing/monitoring, (3) presence of key associated symptoms, (4) request of other physician or patient desire. The interrater reliability exercise yielded a Fleiss' kappa measure of 0.69, indicating substantial agreement between coders. CONCLUSION EPs perceive palpitations to be a common but generally benign chief complaint. EPs rely on one or more of four main clinical approaches to manage these patients. These findings could help guide future efforts at developing risk-stratification tools and clinical algorithms for patients with palpitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc A Probst
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Hemal K Kanzaria
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VA West Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jerome R Hoffman
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - William R Mower
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Roya S Moheimani
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Benjamin C Sun
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Center for Policy Research-Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Probst MA, Kanzaria HK, Gbedemah M, Richardson LD, Sun BC. National trends in resource utilization associated with ED visits for syncope. Am J Emerg Med 2015; 33:998-1001. [PMID: 25943042 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.04.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2015] [Revised: 04/09/2015] [Accepted: 04/10/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over the last 20 years, numerous research articles and clinical guidelines aimed at optimizing resource utilization for emergency department (ED) patients presenting with syncope have been published. HYPOTHESIS We hypothesized that there would be temporal trends in syncope-related ED visits and associated trends in imaging, hospital admissions, and diagnostic frequencies. METHODS The ED component of National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey was analyzed from 2001 through 2010, comprising more than 358000 visits (representing an estimated 1.18 billion visits nationally). We selected ED visits with a reason for visit of syncope or fainting and calculated nationally representative weighted estimates for prevalence of such visits and associated rates of advanced imaging utilization and admission. For admitted patients from 2005 to 2010, the most frequent hospital discharge diagnoses were tabulated. RESULTS During the study period, there were more than 3500 actual ED visits (representing 11.9 million visits nationally) related to syncope, representing roughly 1% of all ED visits. Admission rates for syncope patients ranged from 27% to 35% and showed no significant downward trend (P = .1). Advanced imaging rates increased from about 21% to 45% and showed a significant upward trend (P < .001). For admitted patients, the most common hospital discharge diagnosis was the symptomatic diagnosis of "syncope and collapse" (36.4%). CONCLUSIONS Despite substantial efforts by medical researchers and professional societies, resource utilization associated with ED visits for syncope appears to have actually increased. There have been no apparent improvements in diagnostic yield for admissions. Novel strategies may be needed to change practice patterns for such patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc A Probst
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 3 East 101st St, Second Floor, Room 209, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
| | - Hemal K Kanzaria
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholar, UCLA; US Department of Veterans Affairs, Emergency Medicine Center, School of Medicine, University of California, 924 Westwood Blvd, Suite 300, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
| | - Misato Gbedemah
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 3 East 101st St, Second Floor, Room 209, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
| | - Lynne D Richardson
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 3 East 101st St, Second Floor, Room 209, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
| | - Benjamin C Sun
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health Science University, CDW-EM, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kanzaria HK, Brook RH, Probst MA, Harris D, Berry SH, Hoffman JR. Emergency physician perceptions of shared decision-making. Acad Emerg Med 2015; 22:399-405. [PMID: 25807995 DOI: 10.1111/acem.12627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2014] [Revised: 10/10/2014] [Accepted: 10/22/2014] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Despite the potential benefits of shared decision-making (SDM), its integration into emergency care is challenging. Emergency physician (EP) perceptions about the frequency with which they use SDM, its potential to reduce medically unnecessary diagnostic testing, and the barriers to employing SDM in the emergency department (ED) were investigated. METHODS As part of a larger project examining beliefs on overtesting, questions were posed to EPs about SDM. Qualitative analysis of two multispecialty focus groups was done exploring decision-making around resource use to generate survey items. The survey was then pilot-tested and revised to focus on advanced diagnostic imaging and SDM. The final survey was administered to EPs recruited at four emergency medicine (EM) conferences and 15 ED group meetings. This report addresses responses regarding SDM. RESULTS A purposive sample of 478 EPs from 29 states were approached, of whom 435 (91%) completed the survey. EPs estimated that, on average, multiple reasonable management options exist in over 50% of their patients and reported employing SDM with 58% of such patients. Respondents perceived SDM as a promising solution to reduce overtesting. However, despite existing research to the contrary, respondents also commonly cited beliefs that 1) "many patients prefer that the physician decides," 2) "when offered a choice, many patients opt for more aggressive care than they need," and 3) "it is too complicated for patients to know how to choose." CONCLUSIONS Most surveyed EPs believe SDM is a potential high-yield solution to overtesting, but many perceive patient-related barriers to its successful implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hemal K. Kanzaria
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars program; University of California Los Angeles; Los Angeles CA
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs; University of California Los Angeles; Los Angeles CA
| | - Robert H. Brook
- David Geffen School of Medicine; University of California Los Angeles; Los Angeles CA
- Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health; University of California Los Angeles; Los Angeles CA
- RAND Corporation; Santa Monica CA
| | - Marc A. Probst
- The Department of Emergency Medicine; Mount Sinai Medical Center; New York NY
| | - Dustin Harris
- David Geffen School of Medicine; University of California Los Angeles; Los Angeles CA
| | | | - Jerome R. Hoffman
- Emergency Medicine Center; University of California Los Angeles; Los Angeles CA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Kanzaria HK, Hoffman JR, Probst MA, Caloyeras JP, Berry SH, Brook RH. Emergency physician perceptions of medically unnecessary advanced diagnostic imaging. Acad Emerg Med 2015; 22:390-8. [PMID: 25807868 DOI: 10.1111/acem.12625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 128] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2014] [Revised: 10/07/2014] [Accepted: 10/22/2014] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective was to determine emergency physician (EP) perceptions regarding 1) the extent to which they order medically unnecessary advanced diagnostic imaging, 2) factors that contribute to this behavior, and 3) proposed solutions for curbing this practice. METHODS As part of a larger study to engage physicians in the delivery of high-value health care, two multispecialty focus groups were conducted to explore the topic of decision-making around resource utilization, after which qualitative analysis was used to generate survey questions. The survey was extensively pilot-tested and refined for emergency medicine (EM) to focus on advanced diagnostic imaging (i.e., computed tomography [CT] or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]). The survey was then administered to a national, purposive sample of EPs and EM trainees. Simple descriptive statistics to summarize physician responses are presented. RESULTS In this study, 478 EPs were approached, of whom 435 (91%) completed the survey; 68% of respondents were board-certified, and roughly half worked in academic emergency departments (EDs). Over 85% of respondents believe too many diagnostic tests are ordered in their own EDs, and 97% said at least some (mean = 22%) of the advanced imaging studies they personally order are medically unnecessary. The main perceived contributors were fear of missing a low-probability diagnosis and fear of litigation. Solutions most commonly felt to be "extremely" or "very" helpful for reducing unnecessary imaging included malpractice reform (79%), increased patient involvement through education (70%) and shared decision-making (56%), feedback to physicians on test-ordering metrics (55%), and improved education of physicians on diagnostic testing (50%). CONCLUSIONS Overordering of advanced imaging may be a systemic problem, as many EPs believe a substantial proportion of such studies, including some they personally order, are medically unnecessary. Respondents cited multiple complex factors with several potential high-yield solutions that must be addressed simultaneously to curb overimaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hemal K. Kanzaria
- The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program; Los Angeles CA
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs; Los Angeles CA
- University of California Los Angeles; Los Angeles CA
| | - Jerome R. Hoffman
- The Emergency Medicine Center; Los Angeles CA
- University of California Los Angeles; Los Angeles CA
| | - Marc A. Probst
- The Department of Emergency Medicine; Mount Sinai Medical Center; New York NY
| | - John P. Caloyeras
- RAND Corporation; Santa Monica CA
- Pardee RAND Graduate School; Santa Monica CA
| | | | - Robert H. Brook
- RAND Corporation; Santa Monica CA
- The David Geffen School of Medicine; Los Angeles CA
- Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health; Los Angeles CA
- University of California Los Angeles; Los Angeles CA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Arora S, Probst MA, Andrews L, Camilion M, Grock A, Hayward G, Menchine M. A randomized, controlled trial of oral versus intravenous fluids for lowering blood glucose in emergency department patients with hyperglycemia. CAN J EMERG MED 2015; 16:214-9. [DOI: 10.2310/8000.2013.131082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Objectives:
Blood glucose can be lowered via insulin and/or fluid administration. Insulin, although efficacious, can cause hypoglycemia and hypokalemia. Fluids do not cause hypoglycemia or hypokalemia, but the most effective route of fluid administration has not been well described. This study compared the efficacy and safety of oral versus intravenous fluids for reducing blood glucose in patients with hyperglycemia.
Methods:
We conducted a prospective, nonblinded, randomized, controlled trial. Inclusion criteria were blood glucose > 13.9 mmol/L, age > 18 years, and ability to tolerate oral fluids. Subjects were excluded for critical illness, contraindication to fluids, and/or hyperglycemia therapy prior to enrolment. Subjects were randomized to receive oral bottled water or intravenous normal saline (maximum 2 L) over 2 hours. The primary outcome of interest was a change in blood glucose at 2 hours across treatment arms.
Results:
The 48 subjects were randomized. Baseline blood glucose levels and total amount of fluid received were similar between the two groups. The mean decrease in blood glucose at 2 hours was similar for both treatment arms: a mean decrease of 3.4 mmol/L (20.2 mmol/L to 16.8 mmol/L) in the oral fluid group versus a mean decrease of 4.0 mmol/L (19.7 mmol/L to 15.7 mmol/L) in the intravenous fluid group. The mean difference between groups was −0.6 mmol/L (95% confidence interval −2.3–1.2; p = 0.51). No adverse events were observed in either group.
Conclusion:
In this unblinded randomized trial, oral and intravenous fluids were equally efficacious in lowering blood glucose levels in stable hyperglycemic patients and no adverse events were noted. Physicians should be mindful that, although similar, the reduction in blood glucose was modest in both groups.
Collapse
|
36
|
Probst MA, Sun BC. How can we improve management of syncope in the Emergency Department? Cardiol J 2014; 21:643-50. [PMID: 25299508 DOI: 10.5603/cj.a2014.0074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2014] [Accepted: 09/18/2014] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Syncope is a common and challenging presenting complaint to the Emergency Department (ED). Despite substantial research efforts, there is still considerable uncertainty about the optimal ED management of syncope. There is continued interest among clinicians and researchers in improving diagnostic algorithms and optimizing resource utilization. In this paper, we discuss 4 strategies to improve the emergency care of syncope patients: (1) Development of accurate and consistent risk-stratification, (2) Increased use of syncope observation protocols, (3) Evaluation of a discharge with ambulatory monitoring pathway, (4) Use of shared decision-making for disposition decisions. Since current risk-stratification tools have fallen short with regard to subsequent validation and implementation into clinical practice, we outline key factors for future risk-stratification research. We propose that observation units have the potential to safely decrease length-of-stay and hospital costs for hemodynamically stable, intermediate risk patients without adversely affecting clinical outcomes. For appropriate patients with a negative ED evaluation, we recommend consideration of direct discharge, with ambulatory monitoring and expedited follow-up, as a means of decreasing costs and reducing iatrogenic harms. Finally, we advocate for the use of shared decision-making regarding the ultimate disposition of select, intermediate risk patients who have not had a serious condition revealed in the ED. If properly implemented, these four strategies could significantly improve the care of ED syncope patients by helping clinicians identify truly high-risk patients, decreasing unnecessary hospitalizations, and increasing patient satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc A Probst
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Ichan School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kanzaria HK, Probst MA, Ponce NA, Hsia RY. The association between advanced diagnostic imaging and ED length of stay. Am J Emerg Med 2014; 32:1253-8. [PMID: 25176565 PMCID: PMC7199801 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.07.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2014] [Revised: 07/28/2014] [Accepted: 07/29/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There has been a rise in advanced diagnostic imaging (ADI) use in the emergency department (ED). Increased utilization may contribute to longer length of stay (LOS), but prior reports have not considered improved methods for modeling skewed LOS data. METHODS The 2010 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data were analyzed by 5 common ED chief complaints. Generalized linear model (GLM) was compared to quantile and ordinary least squares (OLS) regression to evaluate the association between ADI and ED LOS. Receipt of computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was the primary exposure. Emergency department LOS was the primary outcome. RESULTS Of the 33,685 ED visits analyzed, 17% involved ADI. The median LOS for patients without ADI was 138 minutes compared to 252 minutes for those who received ADI. Overall, GLM offered the most unbiased estimates, although it provided similar adjusted point estimates to OLS for the marginal change in LOS associated with ADI. The effect of imaging differed by LOS quantile, especially for patients with abdominal pain, fever, and back symptoms. CONCLUSIONS Generalized linear model offered an improved modeling approach compared to OLS and quantile regression. Consideration of such techniques may facilitate a more complete view of the effect of ADI on ED LOS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hemal K Kanzaria
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars program, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Emergency Medicine Center, University of California Los Angeles, 10940 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 710, Los Angeles, CA.
| | - Marc A Probst
- Emergency Medicine K12 Scholar, Department of Emergency Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center
| | - Ninez A Ponce
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of California Los Angeles, Fielding School of Public Health, UCLA Center for Health Policy Research
| | - Renee Y Hsia
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco General Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Probst MA, Mower WR, Kanzaria HK, Hoffman JR, Buch EF, Sun BC. Analysis of emergency department visits for palpitations (from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey). Am J Cardiol 2014; 113:1685-90. [PMID: 24698469 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.02.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2013] [Revised: 02/12/2014] [Accepted: 02/12/2014] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Palpitations is a common complaint in patients who visit the emergency department (ED), with causes ranging from benign to life threatening. We analyzed the ED component of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey for 2001 through 2010 for visits with a chief complaint of palpitations and calculated nationally representative weighted estimates for prevalence, demographic characteristics, and admission rates. ED and hospital discharge diagnoses were tabulated and categorized, and recursive partitioning was used to identify factors associated with admission. An estimated 684,000 visits had a primary reason for visit of "palpitations" representing a national prevalence of 5.8 per 1,000 ED visits (0.58%, 95% confidence interval 0.52 to 0.64). Women and non-Hispanic whites were responsible for most visits. A cardiac diagnosis made up 34% of all ED diagnoses. The overall admission rate was 24.6% (95% confidence interval 21.2 to 28.1), with higher rates seen in the Midwest and Northeast compared with the West. Survey-weighted recursive partitioning revealed several factors associated with admission including age >50 years, male gender, cardiac ED diagnosis, tachycardia, hypertension, and Medicare insurance. In conclusion, palpitations are responsible for a significant minority of ED visits and are associated with a cardiac diagnosis roughly 1/3 of the time. This was associated with a relatively high admission rate, although significant regional variation in these rates exists.
Collapse
|
39
|
Probst MA, Kanzaria HK, Schriger DL. A conceptual model of emergency physician decision making for head computed tomography in mild head injury. Am J Emerg Med 2014; 32:645-50. [PMID: 24560384 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2013] [Accepted: 01/08/2014] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of computed tomographic scanning in blunt head trauma has increased dramatically in recent years without an accompanying rise in the prevalence of injury or hospital admission for serious conditions. Because computed tomography is neither harmless nor inexpensive, researchers have attempted to optimize utilization, largely through research that describes which clinical variables predict intracranial injury, and use this information to develop clinical decision instruments. Although such techniques may be useful when the benefits and harms of each strategy (neuroimaging vs observation) are quantifiable and amenable to comparison, the exact magnitude of these benefits and harms remains unknown in this clinical scenario. We believe that most clinical decision instrument development efforts are misguided insofar as they ignore critical, nonclinical factors influencing the decision to image. In this article, we propose a conceptual model to illustrate how clinical and nonclinical factors influence emergency physicians making this decision. We posit that elements unrelated to standard clinical factors, such as personality of the physician, fear of litigation and of missed diagnoses, patient expectations, and compensation method, may have equal or greater impact on actual decision making than traditional clinical factors. We believe that 3 particular factors deserve special consideration for further research: fear of error/malpractice, financial incentives, and patient engagement. Acknowledgement and study of these factors will be essential if we are to understand how emergency physicians truly make these decisions and how test-ordering behavior can be modified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc A Probst
- UCLA Emergency Medicine Center School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Hemal K Kanzaria
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program UCLA Emergency Medicine Center School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - David L Schriger
- UCLA Emergency Medicine Center School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
|
41
|
Arora S, Probst MA, Agy C, Menchine M. Point-of-care beta-hydroxybutyrate testing for assessing diabetic ketoacidosis severity prior to treatment in the emergency department. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2011; 94:e86-8. [PMID: 21955959 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2011] [Accepted: 09/05/2011] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
We prospectively evaluated the correlation between point-of-care β-OHB values and DKA severity at time of initial diagnosis in 54 patients. The correlation coefficients between β-OHB and pH, bicarbonate and anion gap were 0.33, 0.25 and 0.16, respectively. We conclude that point-of-care β-OHB absolute values cannot reliably assess DKA severity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjay Arora
- Clinical Emergency Medicine, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Menchine M, Probst MA, Agy C, Bach D, Arora S. Diagnostic accuracy of venous blood gas electrolytes for identifying diabetic ketoacidosis in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2011; 18:1105-8. [PMID: 21951652 DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01158.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Diagnosing diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) has traditionally required a venous blood gas (VBG) to obtain serum pH and a serum chemistry panel to obtain electrolyte values. Because newer blood gas analyzers have the ability to report electrolyte values and glucose in addition to pH, this diagnostic process could theoretically be condensed. However, neither the diagnostic accuracy of the VBG for DKA nor the agreement between the VBG electrolytes and the serum chemistry electrolytes, including sodium, chloride, and bicarbonate, has been evaluated in the context of acute hyperglycemia. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of VBG electrolytes for diagnosing DKA using serum chemistry electrolytes measures as the criterion standard and to describe the correlation between VBG and serum chemistry electrolytes in a sample of hyperglycemic patients seen in the emergency department (ED). METHODS The authors prospectively identified a convenience sample of ED patients with serum blood glucose ≥ 250 mg/dL and examined their paired VBG and serum chemistry electrolytes. The diagnosis of DKA was made by using American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria including serum glucose ≥ 250 mg/dL, serum anion gap > 10 mEq/L, bicarbonate ≤ 18 mEq/L, serum pH ≤ 7.30, and presence of ketosis. Serum chemistry electrolyte values were considered to be the criterion standard. Diagnostic test characteristics of VBG electrolytes including sensitivity and specificity were compared against this standard. In addition, correlation coefficients for individual electrolytes and anion gap between VBG and chemistry electrolytes were calculated. RESULTS Paired VBG and serum chemistry panels were available for 342 patients, of whom 46 (13.5%) had DKA. The sensitivity and specificity of the VBG electrolytes for diagnosing DKA was 97.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 88.5% to 99.9%) and 100% (95% CI = 98.8% to 100%), respectively. One case of DKA was missed by the VBG. Correlation coefficients between VBG and serum chemistry were 0.90, 0.73, 0.94, and 0.81 for sodium, chloride, bicarbonate, and anion gap, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The VBG electrolytes were 97.8% sensitive and 100% specific for the diagnosis of DKA in hyperglycemic patients. These preliminary findings support the use of VBG electrolytes in lieu of VBG along with serum chemistry analysis to rule in or rule out DKA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Menchine
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Guderian B, Borreson LA, Sletten LE, Cable K, Stecker TP, Probst MA, Dalleck LC. The cardiovascular and metabolic responses to Wii Fit video game playing in middle-aged and older adults. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2010; 50:436-442. [PMID: 21178930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
AIM The purpose of this study was (a) to assess the cardiovascular and metabolic responses to Wii Fit video games and (b) to determine if Wii Fit video games meet the American College of Sports Medicine guidelines for improving and maintaining cardiorespiratory fitness. METHODS Twenty men and women (mean±SD age, height, and weight: = 58.1±8.8 years, 172.1±10.5 cm, 87.1±22.8 kg, respectively) completed a 20-min Wii Fit testing session consisting of six separate aerobic and balance games. Cardiovascular and metabolic data were collected via a portable calorimetric measurement system. RESULTS Mean relative exercise intensity was 43.4±16.7% of heart rate reserve. Absolute exercise intensity in metabolic equivalents (METS) was 3.5±0.96. Total net energy expenditure for the Wii Fit video game playing session was 116.2±40.9 kcal/session. CONCLUSION Results indicate that playing Wii Fit video games is a feasible alternative to more traditional aerobic exercise modalities for middle-aged and older adults that fulfills the American College of Sports Medicine guidelines for improving and maintaining cardiorespiratory fitness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Guderian
- University of Wisconsin at Eau Claire, Wisconsin, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Baraff LJ, Byyny RL, Probst MA, Salamon N, Linetsky M, Mower WR. Prevalence of herniation and intracranial shift on cranial tomography in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage and a normal neurologic examination. Acad Emerg Med 2010; 17:423-8. [PMID: 20370782 DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00704.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients frequently present to the emergency department (ED) with headache. Those with sudden severe headache are often evaluated for spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) with noncontrast cranial computed tomography (CT) followed by lumbar puncture (LP). The authors postulated that in patients without neurologic symptoms or signs, physicians could forgo noncontrast cranial CT and proceed directly to LP. The authors sought to define the safety of this option by having senior neuroradiologists rereview all cranial CTs in a group of such patients for evidence of brain herniation or midline shift. METHODS This was a retrospective study that included all patients with a normal neurologic examination and nontraumatic SAH diagnosed by CT presenting to a tertiary care medical center from August 1, 2001, to December 31, 2004. Two neuroradiologists, blinded to clinical information and outcomes, rereviewed the initial ED head CT for evidence of herniation or midline shift. RESULTS Of the 172 patients who presented to the ED with spontaneous SAH diagnoses by cranial CT, 78 had normal neurologic examinations. Of these, 73 had initial ED CTs available for review. Four of the 73 (5%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2% to 13%) had evidence of brain herniation or midline shift, including three (4%; 95% CI = 1% to 12%) with herniation. In only one of these patients was herniation or shift noted on the initial radiology report. CONCLUSIONS Awake and alert patients with a normal neurologic examination and SAH may have brain herniation and/or midline shift. Therefore, cranial CT should be obtained before LP in all patients with suspected SAH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Larry J Baraff
- University of California Los Angeles Emergency Medicine Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Probst MA, Baraff LJ, Hoffman JR, Wolfson AB, Ourian AJ, Mower WR. Can patients with brain herniation on cranial computed tomography have a normal neurologic exam? Acad Emerg Med 2009; 16:145-50. [PMID: 19076104 DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00312.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Herniation of the brain outside of its normal intracranial spaces is assumed to be accompanied by clinically apparent neurologic dysfunction. The authors sought to determine if some patients with brain herniation or significant brain shift diagnosed by cranial computed tomography (CT) might have a normal neurologic examination. METHODS This is a secondary analysis of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) II cranial CT database compiled from a multicenter, prospective, observational study of all patients for whom cranial CT scanning was ordered in the emergency department (ED). Clinical information including neurologic examination was prospectively collected on all patients prior to CT scanning. Using the final cranial CT radiology reports from participating centers, all CT scans were classified into three categories: frank herniation, significant shift without frank herniation, and minimal or no shift, based on predetermined explicit criteria. These reports were concatenated with clinical information to form the final study database. RESULTS A total of 161 patients had CT-diagnosed frank herniation; 3 (1.9%) had no neurologic deficit. Of 91 patients with significant brain shift but no herniation, 4 (4.4%) had no neurologic deficit. CONCLUSIONS A small number of patients may have normal neurologic status while harboring significant brain shift or brain herniation on cranial CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc A Probst
- University of California, Los Angeles Emergency Medicine Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|