Improving shared decision-making about cancer treatment through design-based data-driven decision-support tools and redesigning care paths: an overview of the 4D PICTURE project

Background

Patients with cancer often have to make complex decisions about treatment, with the options varying in risk profiles and effects on survival and quality of life. Moreover, inefficient care paths make it hard for patients to participate in shared decision-making. Data-driven decision-support tools have the potential to empower patients, support personalized care, improve health outcomes and promote health equity. However, decision-support tools currently seldom consider quality of life or individual preferences, and their use in clinical practice remains limited, partly because they are not well integrated in patients' care paths.

Aim and objectives

The central aim of the 4D PICTURE project is to redesign patients' care paths and develop and integrate evidence-based decision-support tools to improve decision-making processes in cancer care delivery. This article presents an overview of this international, interdisciplinary project.

Design methods and analysis

In co-creation with patients and other stakeholders, we will develop data-driven decision-support tools for patients with breast cancer, prostate cancer and melanoma. We will support treatment decisions by using large, high-quality datasets with state-of-the-art prognostic algorithms. We will further develop a conversation tool, the Metaphor Menu, using text mining combined with citizen science techniques and linguistics, incorporating large datasets of patient experiences, values and preferences. We will further develop a promising methodology, MetroMapping, to redesign care paths. We will evaluate MetroMapping and these integrated decision-support tools, and ensure their sustainability using the Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) framework. We will explore the generalizability of MetroMapping and the decision-support tools for other types of cancer and across other EU member states.

Ethics

Through an embedded ethics approach, we will address social and ethical issues.

Discussion

Improved care paths integrating comprehensive decision-support tools have the potential to empower patients, their significant others and healthcare providers in decision-making and improve outcomes. This project will strengthen health care at the system level by improving its resilience and efficiency.

Risk-adjusted benchmarking of long-term overall survival in patients with HER2-positive early-stage Breast cancer: A Swedish retrospective cohort study

AIM

The main objective of the current study was to explore the value of risk-adjustment when comparing (i.e. benchmarking) long-term overall survival (OS) in breast cancer (BC) between Swedish regions. We performed risk-adjusted benchmarking of 5- and 10-year OS after HER2-positive early BC diagnosis between Sweden's two largest healthcare regions, constituting approximately a third of the total population in Sweden.

METHODS

All patients diagnosed with HER2-positive early-stage BC between 01-01-2009 and 31-12-2016 in healthcare regions Stockholm-Gotland and Skane were included in the study. Cox proportional hazards model was used for risk-adjustment. Unadjusted (i.e. crude) and adjusted 5- and 10-year OS was benchmarked between the two regions.

RESULTS

The crude 5-year OS was 90.3% in the Stockholm-Gotland region and 87.8% in the Skane region. The crude 10-year OS was 81.7% in the Stockholm-Gotland region and 77.3% in the Skane region. However, when adjusted for age, menopausal status and tumour biology, there was no significant OS disparity between the regions, neither at the 5-year nor 10-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that risk-adjustment is relevant when benchmarking OS in BC, even when comparing regions from the same country that share the same national treatment guidelines. This is, to our knowledge, the first published risk-adjusted benchmarking of OS in HER2-positive BC.

International development of a patient-centered core outcome set for assessing health-related quality of life in metastatic breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

For patients living with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), achieving best possible health-related quality of life, along with maximizing survival, is vital. Yet, we have no systemic way to determine if we achieve these goals. A Core Outcome Set (COS) that allows standardized measurement of outcomes important to patients, but also promotes discussing these outcomes during clinical encounters, is long overdue.

METHODS

An international expert group (EG) of patient advocates, researchers, medical specialists, nurse specialists, and pharmaceutical industry representatives (n = 17) reviewed a list of relevant outcomes retrieved from the literature. A broader group (n = 141: patients/patient advocates (n = 45), health care professionals/researchers (n = 64), pharmaceutical industry representatives (n = 28), and health authority representatives (n = 4)) participated in a modified Delphi procedure, scoring the relevance of outcomes in two survey rounds. The EG finalized the COS in a consensus meeting.

RESULTS

The final MBC COS includes 101 variables about: (1) health-related quality of life (HRQoL, n = 26) and adverse events (n = 24); (2) baseline patient characteristics (n = 9); and (3) clinical variables (n = 42). Many outcome that cover aspects of HRQoL relevant to MBC patients are included, e.g. daily functioning (including ability to work), psychosocial/emotional functioning, sexual functioning, and relationship with the medical team.

CONCLUSION

The COS developed in this study contains important administrative data, clinical records, and clinician-reported measures that captures the impact of cancer. The COS is important for standardization of clinical research and implementation in daily practice and has received accreditation by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM).

Hotspot ESR1 Mutations Are Multimodal and Contextual Modulators of Breast Cancer Metastasis

Constitutively active estrogen receptor α (ER/ESR1) mutations have been identified in approximately one-third of ER+ metastatic breast cancers. Although these mutations are known as mediators of endocrine resistance, their potential role in promoting metastatic disease has not yet been mechanistically addressed. In this study, we show the presence of ESR1 mutations exclusively in distant but not local recurrences in five independent breast cancer cohorts. In concordance with transcriptomic profiling of ESR1-mutant tumors, genome-edited ESR1 Y537S and D538G-mutant cell models exhibited a reprogrammed cell adhesive gene network via alterations in desmosome/gap junction genes and the TIMP3/MMP axis, which functionally conferred enhanced cell-cell contacts while decreasing cell-extracellular matrix adhesion. In vivo studies showed ESR1-mutant cells were associated with larger multicellular circulating tumor cell (CTC) clusters with increased compactness compared with ESR1 wild-type CTCs. These preclinical findings translated to clinical observations, where CTC clusters were enriched in patients with ESR1-mutated metastatic breast cancer. Conversely, context-dependent migratory phenotypes revealed cotargeting of Wnt and ER as a vulnerability in a D538G cell model. Mechanistically, mutant ESR1 exhibited noncanonical regulation of several metastatic pathways, including secondary transcriptional regulation and de novo FOXA1-driven chromatin remodeling. Collectively, these data provide evidence for ESR1 mutation-modulated metastasis and suggest future therapeutic strategies for targeting ESR1-mutant breast cancer.

SIGNIFICANCE

Context- and allele-dependent transcriptome and cistrome reprogramming in mutant ESR1 cell models elicit diverse metastatic phenotypes related to cell adhesion and migration, which can be pharmacologically targeted in metastatic breast cancer.

Measuring Quality of Life Using Patient-Reported Outcomes in Real-World Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: The Need for a Standardized Approach

Simple Summary

Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains incurable despite treatment improvements. The health-related quality of life is a multidimensional entity which covers physical, psychological and social dimensions. It is an important outcome particularly in patients with metastatic disease, as the primary goal of therapy is no longer curation, but to provide the best possible quality of life weighted against treatment risks and adverse symptoms. Patient-reported outcomes reflecting the quality of life are usually measured with validated questionnaires to evaluate treatment strategies based on symptom burden and to improve care delivery. This review shares insights into the role of patient-reported outcome measurements in MBC patients and describes the heterogeneity of current questionnaires. We conclude that an up-to-date and standardized outcome set is needed, containing relevant domains referring to individual needs to improve the quality of life assessment among MBC patients. This is a prerequisite to learn about how they could impact the clinical care pathway.

Abstract

Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients are almost always treated to minimize the symptom burden, and to prolong life without a curative intent. Although the prognosis of MBC patients has improved in recent years, the median survival after diagnosis is still only 3 years. Therefore, the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) should play a leading role in making treatment decisions. Heterogeneity in questionnaires used to evaluate the HRQoL in MBC patients complicates the interpretability and comparability of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) globally. In this review, we aimed to provide an overview of PRO instruments used in real-world MBC patients and to discuss important issues in measuring HRQoL. Routinely collecting symptom information using PROs could enhance treatment evaluation and shared decision-making. Standardizing these measures might help to improve the implementation of PROs, and facilitates collecting and sharing data to establish valid comparisons in research. This is a prerequisite to learn about how they could impact the clinical care pathway. In addition, the prognostic value of intensified PRO collection throughout therapy on survival and disease progression is promising. Future perspectives in the field of PROs and MBC are described.

FGFR4 overexpression and hotspot mutations in metastatic ER+ breast cancer are enriched in the lobular subtype

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is an understudied subtype of breast cancer that requires novel therapies in the advanced setting. To study acquired resistance to endocrine therapy in ILC, we have recently performed RNA-Sequencing on long-term estrogen deprived cell lines and identified FGFR4 overexpression as a top druggable target. Here, we show that FGFR4 expression also increases dramatically in endocrine-treated distant metastases, with an average fold change of 4.8 relative to the paired primary breast tumor for ILC, and 2.4-fold for invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). In addition, we now report that FGFR4 hotspot mutations are enriched in metastatic breast cancer, with an additional enrichment for ILC, suggesting a multimodal selection of FGFR4 activation. These data collectively support the notion that FGFR4 is an important mediator of endocrine resistance in ILC, warranting future mechanistic studies on downstream signaling of overexpressed wild-type and mutant FGFR4.

Abstract P4-12-05: First implementation of the International Consortium of Health Outcomes Measurement standard for breast cancer at a major German university hospital using a web-based tool to measure patient reported outcomes

Purpose:

Collecting patient reported outcome (PRO) data in a systematic way enables an objective evaluation of treatments and its related outcomes. By using the disease specific questionnaires developed by the International Consortium of Health Outcome Measurement (ICHOM) this allows for comparison between physicians, hospitals and even different countries.

Methods

In November 2016 we implemented a web-based system to collect PRO data at the breast center at Charité University hospital using the ICHOM data set. All new patients who are seen at the breast center are enrolled and are answering a predefined set of questions using a tablet computer. Once they start their treatment at Charité automated emails are sent to the patient at predefined treatment points. Those emails contain a web-based link through which they can access their questionnaires.

Results

Until now we have enrolled 834 patients and initiated 2470 questionnaires. 9.44% of patients were under 40 years of age, 49.7% between 40 and 60, 39.6% between 60-80 and 1.3% over the age of 80 years. The average return rate of questionnaires is 72% without any additional intervention. When asked about preference regarding paper versus online 7.9% of the patients 50 to 60 years of age would prefer paper, 18% in the 60-70 years of age group and 21.2 % in the age group over 70 years.

Conclusion

Measuring PRO in breast cancer patients in an automated electronic version is possible across all age ranges while simultaneously achieving a high return rate.

Citation Format: Karsten MM, Speiser D, Hartmann C, Lippold K, Kirchberger V, Blohmer J-U. First implementation of the International Consortium of Health Outcomes Measurement standard for breast cancer at a major German university hospital using a web-based tool to measure patient reported outcomes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-12-05.

Frequent ESR1 and CDK Pathway Copy-Number Alterations in Metastatic Breast Cancer

DNA sequencing has identified a limited number of driver mutations in metastatic breast cancer beyond single base-pair mutations in the estrogen receptor (ESR1). However, our previous studies and others have observed that structural variants, such as ESR1 fusions, may also play a role. Therefore, we expanded upon these observations by performing a comprehensive and highly sensitive characterization of copy-number (CN) alterations in a large clinical cohort of metastatic specimens. NanoString DNA hybridization was utilized to measure CN gains, amplifications, and deletions of 67 genes in 108 breast cancer metastases, and in 26 cases, the patient-matched primary tumor. For ESR1, a copyshift algorithm was applied to identify CN imbalances at exon-specific resolution and queried large data sets (>15,000 tumors) that had previously undergone next-generation sequencing (NGS). Interestingly, a subset of ER+ tumors showed increased ESR1 CN (11/82, 13%); three had CN amplifications (4%) and eight had gains (10%). Increased ESR1 CN was enriched in metastatic specimens versus primary tumors, and this was orthogonally confirmed in a large NGS data set. ESR1-amplified tumors showed a site-specific enrichment for bone metastases and worse outcomes than nonamplified tumors. No ESR1 CN amplifications and only one gain was identified in ER- tumors. ESR1 copyshift was present in 5 of the 11 ESR1-amplified tumors. Other frequent amplifications included ERBB2, GRB7, and cell-cycle pathway members CCND1 and CDK4/6, which showed mutually exclusivity with deletions of CDKN2A, CDKN2B, and CDKN1B. IMPLICATIONS: Copy-number alterations of ESR1 and key CDK pathway genes are frequent in metastatic breast cancers, and their clinical relevance should be tested further.

Web-Based Patient-Reported Outcomes Using the International Consortium for Health Outcome Measurement Dataset in a Major German University Hospital: Observational Study

Background

Collecting patient-reported outcome (PRO) data systematically enables objective evaluation of treatment and its related outcomes. Using disease-specific questionnaires developed by the International Consortium for Health Outcome Measurement (ICHOM) allows for comparison between physicians, hospitals, and even different countries.

Objective

This pilot project aimed to establish a digital system to measure PROs for new patients with breast cancer who attended the Charité Breast Center This approach should serve as a blueprint to further expand the PRO measurement to other disease entities and departments.

Methods

In November 2016, we implemented a Web-based system to collect PRO data at Charité Breast Center using the ICHOM dataset. All new patients at the Breast Center were enrolled and answered a predefined set of questions using a tablet computer. Once they started their treatment at Charité, automated emails were sent to the patients at predefined treatment points. Those emails contained a Web-based link through which they could access and answer questionnaires.

Results

By now, 541 patients have been enrolled and 2470 questionnaires initiated. Overall, 9.4% (51/541) of the patients were under the age of 40 years, 49.7% (269/541) between 40 and 60 years, 39.6% (214/541) between 60 and 80 years, and 1.3% (7/541) over the age of 80 years. The average return rate of questionnaires was 67.0%. When asked about the preference regarding paper versus Web-based questionnaires, 6.0% (8/134) of the patients between 50 and 60 years, 6.0% (9/150) between 60 and 70 years, and 12.7% (9/71) over the age of 70 years preferred paper versions.

Conclusions

Measuring PRO in patients with breast cancer in an automated electronic version is possible across all age ranges while simultaneously achieving a high return rate.

Abstract P1-01-07: Clinical and histological characteristics of peritoneal metastases of invasive lobular breast cancer

Introduction: In previously reported autopsy series, peritoneal metastases have been detected in up to 40% of patients with invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC). Despite modern diagnostic techniques such as high-resolution ultrasound, it remains a challenge to differentiate ovarian cancer from metastatic breast cancer with peritoneal manifestation before or during surgery. The goal of this analysis was to determine typical clinical and immunohistological features of peritoneal metastasis of ILC. Specifically, we asked the question whether there are predictive factors in primary breast cancer associated with subsequent development of peritoneal metastasis. Patients and methods: We identified 58 patients with ovarian metastases in the Charité cancer register (4,792 breast cancer patients from 2003 to 2015). We looked for clinical and pathological differences between breast cancer patients with (N=58) and without (N=4734) peritoneal metastases and between ILC and non-ILC breast cancer subtypes. Imaging and surgical reports of these 58 patients with ILC intraperitoneal metastases were reviewed. Results: The majority (84.7%) of primary breast cancers consisted of subtypes other than ILC and only 15.3% were histologically characterized as ILC. In contrast, 63.6% of patients with peritoneal metastases had histologically proven ILC in the metastatic tissue. Other subtypes where found in the 36.4% of the metastatic tissue (p<0.001). The Odds ratio for peritoneal metastases for ILC was 2.35 (95% CI 1.655-3.332) and for Non-ILC 0.23 (0.185-0.284). There were no significant differences in receptor status between primary and peritoneal metastatic ILC. Comparing ER/PR expressions levels on primary tumor versus metastasis, while statistically not significant (p= 0.805), showed a rise in ER expression in 42.95% in the metastatic tissue while PR expression remained stable with no difference in 53.3% and a rise in the metastatic site in only 26.7% (p= 0.715). Median age of all patients with primary breast cancer was 60 years (10%-90%: 41-75). There was a significant difference in age at diagnosis of metastasis between patients with (50.5 years) and without peritoneal metastases (59 years) (p= 0.002). Median time to development of peritoneal metastases for all patients was 48.5 months (10%-90%: 0-191.7), for ILC 44 months (0-198.2) and for Non-ILC 56.5 months (6.7-206.4) (p= 0.487). Median survival time for patients with ILC and peritoneal metastases was 56 months, for Non-ILC 53 months (p=0.759). 33 of 58 patients had radiologic evidence of disease, 26 with ILC and 7 with Non-ILC. An ovarian mass was detected by imaging in 15/26 patients with ILC and 4/7 patients with non-ILC. Ascites and diffuse peritoneal metastases were seen in 18/26 patients with detectable ILC and in 4/7 patients with Non-ILC.

Conclusion: This is the first comprehensive analysis of clinical and pathological characteristics of peritoneal metastases showing ILC is more frequent than other histologic subtypes. Patients with peritoneal metastasis are significantly younger (median 50.5y.) than patients without. The clinical signs are similar to those of ovarian cancer except and therefore the diagnosis of metastatic ILC must be taken into consideration as a differential diagnosis.

Citation Format: Karsten MM, Ingold-Heppner B, Oesterreich S, Sander S, Machleidt A, von Waldenfels G, Denkert C, Blohmer JU. Clinical and histological characteristics of peritoneal metastases of invasive lobular breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-01-07.