1
|
Zhou C, Srivastava MK, Xu H, Felip E, Wakelee H, Altorki N, Reck M, Liersch R, Kryzhanivska A, Oizumi S, Tanaka H, Hamm J, McCune SL, Bennett E, Gitlitz B, McNally V, Ballinger M, McCleland M, Zou W, Das Thakur M, Novello S. Comparison of SP263 and 22C3 immunohistochemistry PD-L1 assays for clinical efficacy of adjuvant atezolizumab in non-small cell lung cancer: results from the randomized phase III IMpower010 trial. J Immunother Cancer 2023; 11:e007047. [PMID: 37903590 PMCID: PMC10619123 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-007047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tumor samples from the phase III IMpower010 study were used to compare two programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry assays (VENTANA SP263 and Dako 22C3) for identification of PD-L1 patient subgroups (negative, positive, low, and high expression) and their predictive value for adjuvant atezolizumab compared with best supportive care (BSC) in resectable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS PD-L1 expression was assessed by the SP263 assay, which measured the percentage of tumor cells with any membranous PD-L1 staining, and the 22C3 assay, which scored the percentage of viable tumor cells showing partial or complete membranous PD-L1 staining. RESULTS When examining the concordance at the PD-L1-positive threshold (SP263: tumor cell (TC)≥1%; 22C3: tumor proportion score (TPS)≥1%), the results were concordant between assays for 83% of the samples. Similarly, at the PD-L1-high cut-off (SP263: TC≥50%; 22C3: TPS≥50%), the results were concordant between assays for 92% of samples. The disease-free survival benefit of atezolizumab over BSC was comparable between assays for PD-L1-positive (TC≥1% by SP263: HR, 0.58 (95% CI: 0.40 to 0.85) vs TPS≥1% by 22C3: HR, 0.65 (95% CI: 0.45 to 0.95)) and PD-L1-high (TC≥50% by SP263: HR, 0.27 (95% CI: 0.14 to 0.53) vs TPS≥50% by 22C3: HR, 0.31 (95% CI: 0.16 to 0.60)) subgroups. CONCLUSIONS The SP263 and 22C3 assays showed high concordance and a comparable clinical predictive value of atezolizumab at validated PD-L1 thresholds, suggesting that both assays can identify patients with early-stage NSCLC most likely to experience benefit from adjuvant atezolizumab. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02486718.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caicun Zhou
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Tongji University Affiliated Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Minu K Srivastava
- Oncology Biomarker Development, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Hao Xu
- F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| | - Enriqueta Felip
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Heather Wakelee
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Nasser Altorki
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Martin Reck
- Lung Clinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Research Center North, German Center of Lung Research, Grosshansdorf, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Liersch
- Practice for Hematology and Medical Oncology Clemenshospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Anna Kryzhanivska
- Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
| | - Satoshi Oizumi
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Tanaka
- Department of Internal Medicine, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan
| | - John Hamm
- Department of Medical Oncology, Norton Cancer Institute, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | | | - Elizabeth Bennett
- Product Development, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Barbara Gitlitz
- Product Development, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Marcus Ballinger
- Product Development, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Mark McCleland
- Oncology Biomarker Development, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
- Amunix, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Wei Zou
- Oncology Biomarker Development, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Meghna Das Thakur
- Oncology Biomarker Development, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
- Gilead Sciences, Foster City, CA, USA
| | - Silvia Novello
- University of Turin, AOU San Luigi Gonzaga, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
West HJ, McCleland M, Cappuzzo F, Reck M, Mok TS, Jotte RM, Nishio M, Kim E, Morris S, Zou W, Shames D, Das Thakur M, Shankar G, Socinski MA. Clinical efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and chemotherapy in KRAS-mutated non-small cell lung cancer with STK11, KEAP1, or TP53 comutations: subgroup results from the phase III IMpower150 trial. J Immunother Cancer 2022; 10:jitc-2021-003027. [PMID: 35190375 PMCID: PMC8862451 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-003027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The efficacy of atezolizumab (A) and/or bevacizumab (B) with carboplatin/paclitaxel (CP) chemotherapy was explored in the phase III, randomized IMpower150 study in patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) according to KRAS mutations (mKRAS) and co-occurring STK11, KEAP1, or TP53 mutations. Methods Mutation status was determined by circulating tumor DNA next-generation sequencing. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed in a mutation-evaluable intention-to-treat population (MEP; n=920) and SP263 (programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1)) biomarker-evaluable population (n=774). Results Within the mKRAS population (24.5% of MEP), ABCP showed numerical improvements vs BCP in median OS (19.8 vs 9.9 months; HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.72) and PFS (8.1 vs 5.8 months; HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.61)—greater than with ACP (OS: 11.7 vs 9.9 months; HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.91; PFS: 4.8 vs 5.8 months; HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.56 to 1.13) vs BCP. Across PD-L1 subgroups in mKRAS patients, OS and PFS were longer with ABCP vs BCP, but OS with ACP was similar to BCP in PD-L1-low and PD-L1-negative subgroups. Conversely, in KRAS-WT patients, OS was longer with ACP than with ABCP or BCP across PD-L1 subgroups. KRAS was frequently comutated with STK11, KEAP1, and TP53; these subgroups conferred different prognostic outcomes. Within the mKRAS population, STK11 and/or KEAP1 mutations were associated with inferior OS and PFS across treatments compared with STK11-WT and/or KEAP1-WT. In mKRAS patients with co-occurring mSTK11 and/or mKEAP1 (44.9%) or mTP53 (49.3%), survival was longer with ABCP than with ACP or BCP. Conclusions These analyses support previous findings of mutation of STK11 and/or KEAP1 as poor prognostic indicators. While clinical efficacy favored ABCP and ACP vs BCP in these mutational subgroups, survival benefits were greater in the mKRAS and KEAP1-WT and STK11-WT population vs mKRAS and mKEAP1 and mSTK11 population, suggesting both prognostic and predictive effects. Overall, these results suggest that atezolizumab combined with bevacizumab and chemotherapy is an efficacious first-line treatment in metastatic NSCLC subgroups with mKRAS and co-occurring STK11 and/or KEAP1 or TP53 mutations and/or high PD-L1 expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Howard Jack West
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | | | - Federico Cappuzzo
- Oncology Department, Istituto Nazionale Tumori "Regina Elena", Rome, Italy
| | - Martin Reck
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, LungenClinic Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research, Grosshansdorf, Germany
| | - Tony Sk Mok
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Department of Clinical Oncology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Robert M Jotte
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, Colorado, USA.,US Oncology, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Makoto Nishio
- Thoracic Medical Oncology Department, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eugene Kim
- Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Stefanie Morris
- Product Development Medical Affairs, F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Wei Zou
- Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - David Shames
- Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | | | - Mark A Socinski
- Thoracic Oncology, AdventHealth Cancer Institute, Orlando, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Roder H, Net L, Roder J, Campbell T, McCleland M, Zou W, Srivastava M, Shames D, Maguire L, Georgantas R. 831 Exact Shapley values for explaining complex machine learning based molecular tests of checkpoint inhibitors: potential utility for patients, physicians, and translational research. J Immunother Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-sitc2021.831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundModern machine learning (ML) models based on highly multivariate attribute sets (e.g. unbiased -omics data) can be very successful at generating clinically useful predictions, but at the price of less transparency in how individual attributes are used to make those predictions. In short, ML test algorithms tend to be ”black boxes”. Shapley values (SVs)1 describe the relative importance of the attributes used within a multivariate test to the generation of the test result for an individual patient.2 While typically the calculation of SVs is computationally prohibitive, our ML architecture permits the generation of SVs for large patient cohorts. In this study, we evaluate SVs for the Anti-PD-L1 Response Test (ART), that was shown in independent validation to predict outcomes for patients treated with atezolizumab,3 for the POPLAR Ph2 and OAK Ph3 studies of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients .4 5Abstract 831 Figure 1Radar plots illustrating the values of the 10 most important SVs for test classification generation for two samples classified as poor (A and B) and two samples classified as good (C and D). Positive SVs are shown in red and negative SVs are shown in blueAbstract 831 Figure 2Heatmaps of the SVs for samples classified as poor showing two subgroups (top and bottom, separated by horizontal line) with different patterns of SVs for (A) POPLAR and (B) OAKAbstract 831 Figure 3Heatmaps of the SVs for samples classified as good showing three subgroups, top, middle, and bottom, separated by horizontal lines) with different patterns of SVs for (A) POPLAR and (B) OAKMethodsART results, Good or Poor had been produced for 262 patients in POPLAR (NCT01903993) and 786 patients in OAK (NCT02008227). Exact SVs were generated for each pretreatment serum sample for each of the 93 attributes (proteomic features) used in the test. The distribution of SVs across the cohort was investigated to assess the relative importance of each feature to test classification. Subgroups of patients with similar patterns of SVs were identified using t-sne plots and ML methods in the POPLAR cohort and validated in the OAK cohort.ResultsThe SV distributions showed that the features influencing ART classification most were similar in both POPLAR and OAK. The relative importance of features to test classification differed between patients (figure 1), but subgroups of patients within test classification groups showed similar patterns of SVs (figures 2 and 3). Such patient subgroups, identified within POPLAR, were also found in the OAK cohort and were associated with differences in outcome and/or differences in patient characteristics.ConclusionsSVs can explain how complex ML-based tests combine molecular attributes to produce individual patient results. Exact SVs can be obtained for certain ML architectures used in molecular test development, revealing the overall relative importance of attributes used in such molecular tests. Subgrouping of patients with the same test classification by different patterns of SVs is possible. This may reveal different biologies contributing to a Good or Poor phenotype and inform translational studies.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrialsgov NCT01903993 and NCT02008227ReferencesShapley L. A value for n-person games. Contributions to the Theory of Games. 1953;2.28:307–317.Roder J, Maguire L, Georgantas R, Roder H. Explaining multivariate molecular diagnostic tests via Shapley values. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2021;21(1):211.Kowanetz M, Leng N, Roder J, et al. Evaluation of immune-related markers in the circulating proteomic and their association with atezolizumab efficacy in patients with 2L+ NSCLC. J Immunother Cancer 2018;6(Suppl1):114.Fehrenbacher L, Spira A, Ballinger M, et al. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel for patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (POPLAR): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016;387(10030):1837–1846.Rittmeyer A, Barlesi F, Waterkamp D, et al. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicenter randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2017;389(10066):255–265.Ethics ApprovalThe OAK study that was done in 194 academic medical centers and community oncology practices across 31 countries worldwide. The study was done in full accordance with the guidelines for Good Clinical Practice and the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients gave written informed consent.The POPLAR trial was done at 61 academic medical centers and community oncology practices across 13 countries in Europe and North America. The study was done in full accordance with the guidelines for Good Clinical Practice and the Declaration of Helsinki. Protocol (and modification) approval was obtained from anindependent ethics committee for each site. Patients gave written informed consent.
Collapse
|
4
|
Roder H, Maguire L, Asmellash S, Rightmyer S, Norman P, McCleland M, Zou W, Srivastava M, Net L, Campbell T, Shames D, Georgantas R, Roder J. 26 Validation of the Primary Immune Response (PIR) test in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): blinded retrospective analyses from the POPLAR and OAK trials. J Immunother Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-sitc2021.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundBiomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) efficacy can be used for patient selection. PD-L1 expression in tumor tissue is used to determine eligibility for combination or monotherapy in 1st line NSCLC.1, 2 The liquid-biopsy mass spectrometry-based PIR test was developed to capture the role of patient biology on ICI outcomes.3 The test, stratifying patients into Resistant, Intermediate, and Sensitive groups, was associated with outcome on nivolumab treatment in 2nd line NSCLC patients.3 In this study, we blind validated PIR classifications in two large clinical studies (POPLAR4 and OAK5) of advanced NSCLC patients treated in the second or third line with atezolizumab.MethodsPretreatment serum samples from patients assigned to receive atezolizumab in the two studies (POPLAR (NCT01903993) and OAK (NCT02008227)) underwent PIR testing blinded to all clinical data. Association of test classification, as Sensitive vs Not Sensitive (Resistant+Intermediate) and Resistant vs Not Resistant (Sensitive+Intermediate), with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was investigated using Cox proportion hazards models in univariate and multivariate analysis.ResultsPIR classifications were generated for 133 (POPLAR) and 403 (OAK) samples; the remaining available samples failed test QC, mainly due to hemolysis. PIR classified the POPLAR samples as 53 (40%) Resistant, 25 (19%) Intermediate, 55 (41%) Sensitive and the OAK samples as 154 (38%) Resistant, 89 (22%) Intermediate, and 160 (40%) Sensitive. In both cohorts, OS and PFS were better in the Not Resistant vs Resistant group (figure 1). OS and PFS were superior in the Sensitive vs Not Sensitive group in the POPLAR cohort, while OS was better and PFS showed indications of superiority in the OAK cohort (figure 2). Multivariate analysis within the OAK cohort showed that test classification predicted OS when adjusted for baseline factors, including PD-L1 negative vs positive, with hazard ratio 0.51 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40–0.65) for Resistant vs Not Resistant and 0.65 (CI: 0.50–0.83) for Sensitive vs Not Sensitive.Abstract 23 Figure 1Kaplan-Meier plots of OS and PFS by test classification Resistant vs Not Resistant for the POPLAR and OAK cohortsAbstract 23 Figure 2Kaplan-Meier plots of OS and PFS by test classification Not Sensitive vs Sensitive for the POPLAR and OAK cohortsConclusionsThe PIR test stratified outcomes for patients treated with atezolizumab in second and third line NSCLC even when adjusted for PD-L1 expression. The combination of both tumor and host biomarkers appears to provide a more specific prognosis of NSCLC treated with ICIs.Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov NCT01903993 and NCT02008227ReferencesRoy S Herbst, Giuseppe Giaccone, Filippo de Marinis et al. Atezolizumab for first-line treatment of PD-L1-selected patients with NSCLC. N Engl J Med 2020 Oct 1;383(14):1328–1339Tony S K Mok, Yi-Long Wu, Iveta Kudaba et al. Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for previously untreated, PD-L1-expressing, locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-042): a randomised, open-label, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2019 May 4;393(10183):1819–1830.Muller M, Hummelink K, Hurkmans D, et al. A serum protein classifier identifying patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who derive clinical benefit from treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(19):5188–5197.Fehrenbacher L, Spira A, Ballinger M, et al. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel for patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (POPLAR): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016;387(10030):1837–1846.Rittmeyer A, Barlesi F, Waterkamp D, et al. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicenter randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2017;389(10066):255–265.Ethics ApprovalThe OAK study was done in 194 academic medical centers and community oncology practices across 31 countries worldwide. The study was done in full accordance with the guidelines for Good Clinical Practice and the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients gave written informed consent.The POPLAR trial was done at 61 academic medical centers and community oncology practices across 13 countries in Europe and North America. The study was done in full accordance with the guidelines for Good Clinical Practice and the Declaration of Helsinki. Protocol (and modification) approval was obtained from an independent ethics committee for each site. Patients gave written informed consent.
Collapse
|
5
|
Roder J, Campbell T, Asmellash S, Rightmyer S, Norman P, Georgantas R, McCleland M, Zou W, Srivastava M, Net L, Maguire L, Roder H, Shames D. 28 Predictions of outcomes and benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in NSCLC require information on both tumor and host biology. J Immunother Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-sitc2021.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundImmunotherapy has become a key element in the arsenal of treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The anti-PD-L1 Response Test (ART), based on mass spectrometry of pretreatment serum, captures the effect of host biology on outcomes after atezolizumab (A) therapy. It stratified outcomes on A and was predictive of benefit of A over docetaxel (D) in a blinded, retrospective study of 2nd and 3rd line NSCLC patients in the POPLAR Ph2 clinical study.1 Our current work applies the test to the larger OAK NSCLC Ph3 clinical study2 to investigate the interplay between tumor PD-L1 expression and ART classifications in predicting outcomes and benefit from A therapy.MethodsPretreatment serum samples from 823 of the 850 patients in the OAK study (NCT02008227) were analyzed with ART blinded to all clinical data. The ART assigns a result of Good or Poor corresponding to better or worse outcomes on A. Association of test classification with overall survival (OS) within and between treatment arms was investigated using Cox proportion hazards models overall and within PD-L1 subgroups defined by SP142 assay.3ResultsTest classifications were generated for 786 (96%) samples; the remaining samples failed test QC, mainly due to hemolysis. A Good classification was assigned to 359 (46%) samples and a Poor classification to 427 (54%) samples. Overall, OS was better for the Good subgroup than the Poor subgroup within both arms, arm A (hazard ratio (HR)=0.52 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.41–0.66)) and arm D (HR=0.54 (CI:0.43–0.68)). The test was not predictive of benefit of A over D, but was prognostic for both A and D. Patients classified as Good had better outcomes than those classified as Poor in both treatment arms for all PD-L1 subgroups investigated (figure 1). Benefit of A vs D was found in both test classification groups for PD-L1 positive patients (table 1).Abstract 28 Figure 1Kaplan-Meier plots of OS by test classification, Good and Poor, and treatment arm, A and D, within PD-L1 subgroupsAbstract 28 Table 1Hazard ratios between A and D by test classification group and PD-L1 subgroupConclusionsInformation on both tumor and host are essential to predict outcomes of immunotherapy and chemotherapy in NSCLC patients.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02008227ReferencesKowanetz M, Leng N, Roder J, et al. Evaluation of immune-related markers in the circulating proteomic and their association with atezolizumab efficacy in patients with 2L+ NSCLC. J Immunother Cancer 2018;6(Suppl1):114.Rittmeyer A, Barlesi F, Waterkamp D, et al. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicenter randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2017;389(10066):255–265.Herbst R, Giaccone G, de Marinis F, et al. Atezolizumab for first-line treatment of PD-L1-selected patients with NSCLC. N Engl J Med 2020;383:1328–1339.Ethics ApprovalThe OAK study (NCT02008227) was done in 194 academic medical centres and community oncology practices across 31 countries worldwide. The study was done in full accordance with the guidelines for Good Clinical Practice and the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients gave written informed consent.
Collapse
|
6
|
Felip E, Altorki N, Zhou C, Csőszi T, Vynnychenko I, Goloborodko O, Luft A, Akopov A, Martinez-Marti A, Kenmotsu H, Chen YM, Chella A, Sugawara S, Voong D, Wu F, Yi J, Deng Y, McCleland M, Bennett E, Gitlitz B, Wakelee H. Adjuvant atezolizumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in resected stage IB-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (IMpower010): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2021; 398:1344-1357. [PMID: 34555333 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02098-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 564] [Impact Index Per Article: 188.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Revised: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Novel adjuvant strategies are needed to optimise outcomes after complete surgical resection in patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to evaluate adjuvant atezolizumab versus best supportive care after adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy in these patients. METHODS IMpower010 was a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study done at 227 sites in 22 countries and regions. Eligible patients were 18 years or older with completely resected stage IB (tumours ≥4 cm) to IIIA NSCLC per the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer and American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system (7th edition). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by a permuted-block method (block size of four) to receive adjuvant atezolizumab (1200 mg every 21 days; for 16 cycles or 1 year) or best supportive care (observation and regular scans for disease recurrence) after adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy (one to four cycles). The primary endpoint, investigator-assessed disease-free survival, was tested hierarchically first in the stage II-IIIA population subgroup whose tumours expressed PD-L1 on 1% or more of tumour cells (SP263), then all patients in the stage II-IIIA population, and finally the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (stage IB-IIIA). Safety was evaluated in all patients who were randomly assigned and received atezolizumab or best supportive care. IMpower010 is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02486718 (active, not recruiting). FINDINGS Between Oct 7, 2015, and Sept 19, 2018, 1280 patients were enrolled after complete resection. 1269 received adjuvant chemotherapy, of whom 1005 patients were eligible for randomisation to atezolizumab (n=507) or best supportive care (n=498); 495 in each group received treatment. After a median follow-up of 32·2 months (IQR 27·4-38·3) in the stage II-IIIA population, atezolizumab treatment improved disease-free survival compared with best supportive care in patients in the stage II-IIIA population whose tumours expressed PD-L1 on 1% or more of tumour cells (HR 0·66; 95% CI 0·50-0·88; p=0·0039) and in all patients in the stage II-IIIA population (0·79; 0·64-0·96; p=0·020). In the ITT population, HR for disease-free survival was 0·81 (0·67-0·99; p=0·040). Atezolizumab-related grade 3 and 4 adverse events occurred in 53 (11%) of 495 patients and grade 5 events in four patients (1%). INTERPRETATION IMpower010 showed a disease-free survival benefit with atezolizumab versus best supportive care after adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resected stage II-IIIA NSCLC, with pronounced benefit in the subgroup whose tumours expressed PD-L1 on 1% or more of tumour cells, and no new safety signals. Atezolizumab after adjuvant chemotherapy offers a promising treatment option for patients with resected early-stage NSCLC. FUNDING F Hoffmann-La Roche and Genentech.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enriqueta Felip
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Nasser Altorki
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Caicun Zhou
- Department of Oncology, Tongji University Affiliated Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Tibor Csőszi
- Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok Megyei Hetényi Géza Kórház-Rendelőintézet, Szolnok, Hungary
| | - Ihor Vynnychenko
- Regional Municipal Institution Sumy Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine
| | - Oleksandr Goloborodko
- MI Zaporizhzhia Regional Clinical Oncological Dispensary Zaporizhzhia SMU Ch of Oncology, Zaporizhzhya, Ukraine
| | - Alexander Luft
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Leningrad Regional Clinical Hospital, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - Andrey Akopov
- Research Institute of Pulmonology, Pavlov State Medical University, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - Alex Martinez-Marti
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Yuh-Min Chen
- Department of Chest Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital and National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Antonio Chella
- Pneumology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Shunichi Sugawara
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Sendai Kousei Hospital, Miyagi, Japan
| | | | - Fan Wu
- Roche (China) Holding, Shanghai, China
| | - Jing Yi
- Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Yu Deng
- Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Heather Wakelee
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jassem J, de Marinis F, Giaccone G, Vergnenegre A, Barrios CH, Morise M, Felip E, Oprean C, Kim YC, Andric Z, Mocci S, Enquist I, Komatsubara K, McCleland M, Kuriki H, Villalobos M, Phan S, Spigel DR, Herbst RS. Updated Overall Survival Analysis From IMpower110: Atezolizumab Versus Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Treatment-Naive Programmed Death-Ligand 1-Selected NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol 2021; 16:1872-1882. [PMID: 34265434 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.06.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Revised: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION IMpower110 previously revealed significant overall survival (OS) benefit with atezolizumab versus chemotherapy in patients with treatment-naive EGFR- and ALK-negative (wild type [WT]) metastatic NSCLC with high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (≥50% on tumor cells [TCs] or ≥10% on tumor-infiltrating immune cells [ICs], per SP142 immunohistochemistry assay; p = 0.0106). We present primary OS analyses in lower PD-L1 expression groups and an updated, exploratory analysis in the high PD-L1 expression group. METHODS This open-label, phase 3 trial randomized patients with PD-L1 expression on greater than or equal to 1% of TC or IC to receive atezolizumab or platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary end point was OS, hierarchically tested in PD-L1 expression WT subgroups: first the high PD-L1 expression subgroup, then the high-or-intermediate PD-L1 expression subgroup (≥5% on TC or IC), and then the any PD-L1 expression subgroup (≥1% on TC or IC). RESULTS The any PD-L1 expression WT population included 554 patients (excluded 18 EGFR- or ALK-positive patients). With 17 months' additional follow-up, OS improvement in the atezolizumab versus chemotherapy arm was not statistically significant in high-or-intermediate PD-L1 expression WT patients (n = 328; hazard ratio = 0.87, 95% confidence interval: 0.66-1.14, p = 0.3091; median = 19.9 versus 16.1 mo), precluding formal OS testing in any PD-L1 expression WT patients. Exploratory analysis in high PD-L1 expression WT patients (n = 205) revealed maintained OS benefit in the atezolizumab arm (hazard ratio = 0.76, 95% confidence interval: 0.54-1.09; median = 20.2 versus 14.7 mo). Updated safety data continued to favor atezolizumab. CONCLUSIONS Statistical significance for OS was not revealed in the high-or-intermediate expression WT group, and, as a result, OS in the any PD-L1 expression WT group was not formally tested. No new safety signals were found. This updated analysis of IMpower110 supports using atezolizumab in treatment-naive, metastatic WT NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Filippo de Marinis
- European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Carlos H Barrios
- Centro de Pesquisa Clínica, Hospital São Lucas, PUCRS, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Masahiro Morise
- Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | | | - Cristina Oprean
- Oncomed SRL and Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania
| | - Young-Chul Kim
- Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, South Korea
| | - Zoran Andric
- Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa, Belgrade, Serbia
| | | | - Ida Enquist
- Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California
| | | | | | | | | | - See Phan
- Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California
| | - David R Spigel
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Roy S Herbst
- Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Banchereau R, Leng N, Zill O, Sokol E, Liu G, Pavlick D, Maund S, Liu LF, Kadel E, Baldwin N, Jhunjhunwala S, Nickles D, Assaf ZJ, Bower D, Patil N, McCleland M, Shames D, Molinero L, Huseni M, Sanjabi S, Cummings C, Mellman I, Mariathasan S, Hegde P, Powles T. Molecular determinants of response to PD-L1 blockade across tumor types. Nat Commun 2021; 12:3969. [PMID: 34172722 PMCID: PMC8233428 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-24112-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis lead to durable clinical responses in subsets of cancer patients across multiple indications, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), urothelial carcinoma (UC) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Herein, we complement PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and tumor mutation burden (TMB) with RNA-seq in 366 patients to identify unifying and indication-specific molecular profiles that can predict response to checkpoint blockade across these tumor types. Multiple machine learning approaches failed to identify a baseline transcriptional signature highly predictive of response across these indications. Signatures described previously for immune checkpoint inhibitors also failed to validate. At the pathway level, significant heterogeneity is observed between indications, in particular within the PD-L1+ tumors. mUC and NSCLC are molecularly aligned, with cell cycle and DNA damage repair genes associated with response in PD-L1- tumors. At the gene level, the CDK4/6 inhibitor CDKN2A is identified as a significant transcriptional correlate of response, highlighting the association of non-immune pathways to the outcome of checkpoint blockade. This cross-indication analysis reveals molecular heterogeneity between mUC, NSCLC and RCC tumors, suggesting that indication-specific molecular approaches should be prioritized to formulate treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ning Leng
- Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Nicole Baldwin
- Baylor Institute for Immunology Research, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Thomas Powles
- Barts Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gadgeel S, Hirsch FR, Kerr K, Barlesi F, Park K, Rittmeyer A, Zou W, Bhatia N, Koeppen H, Paul SM, Shames D, Yi J, Matheny C, Ballinger M, McCleland M, Gandara DR. Comparison of SP142 and 22C3 Immunohistochemistry PD-L1 Assays for Clinical Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results From the Randomized OAK Trial. Clin Lung Cancer 2021; 23:21-33. [PMID: 34226144 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2021.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This phase III OAK trial (NCT02008227) subgroup analysis (data cutoff, January 9, 2019) evaluated the predictive value of 2 PD-L1 IHC tests (VENTANA SP142 and Dako 22C3) for benefit from atezolizumab versus docetaxel by programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status in patients with previously treated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS PD-L1 expression was assessed prospectively with SP142 on tumor cells (TC) and tumor-infiltrating immune cells (IC) and retrospectively with 22C3 using a tumor proportion score (TPS) based on TC membrane staining. Efficacy was assessed in the 22C3 biomarker-evaluable population (22C3-BEP) (n = 577; 47.1% of SP142-intention-to-treat population) and non-22C3-BEP (n = 648) in PD-L1 subgroups (high, low, and negative) and according to selection by 1 or both assays. RESULTS In the 22C3-BEP, overall survival benefits with atezolizumab versus docetaxel were observed across PD-L1 subgroups; benefits were greatest in SP142-defined PD-L1-high (TC3 or IC3: hazard ratio [HR], 0.39 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.25-0.63]) and 22C3-defined PD-L1-high (TPS ≥ 50%: HR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.38-0.82]) and low (TPS, 1% to < 50%: HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.37-0.82]) groups. Progression-free survival improved with increasing PD-L1 expression for both assays. SP142 and 22C3 assays identified overlapping and unique patient populations in PD-L1-high, positive, and negative subgroups. Overall survival and progression-free survival benefits favored atezolizumab over docetaxel in double PD-L1-positive and negative groups; patients with both SP142- and 22C3-positive tumors derived the greatest benefit. CONCLUSIONS Despite different scoring algorithms and differing sensitivity levels, the SP142 and 22C3 assays similarly predicted atezolizumab benefit at validated PD-L1 thresholds in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shirish Gadgeel
- Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
| | | | - Keith Kerr
- Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen University Medical School, Aberdeen, Scotland
| | - Fabrice Barlesi
- Aix Marseille Universite, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Keunchil Park
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | - Wei Zou
- Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Jing Yi
- Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wakelee HA, Altorki NK, Zhou C, Csőszi T, Vynnychenko IO, Goloborodko O, Luft A, Akopov A, Martinez-Marti A, Kenmotsu H, Chen YM, Chella A, Sugawara S, Gitlitz BJ, Bennett E, Wu F, Yi J, Deng Y, McCleland M, Felip E. IMpower010: Primary results of a phase III global study of atezolizumab versus best supportive care after adjuvant chemotherapy in resected stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.8500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
8500 Background: Adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy (chemo) provides only a modest 5-year survival benefit in fully resected, high-risk early-stage NSCLC. We report the primary disease-free survival (DFS) results from the pre-planned interim analysis of IMpower010, a randomized phase 3 open-label trial of adjuvant atezolizumab (atezo; anti–PD-L1) vs best supportive care (BSC) after adjuvant chemo in patients (pts) with early-stage resected NSCLC. Methods: Eligible pts had completely resected (4-12 weeks prior to enrollment) Stage IB (≥4 cm)-IIIA NSCLC (AJCC/UICC v7) and ECOG PS 0-1. A total of 1280 pts were enrolled, and 1269 pts received up to four 21-day cycles of cisplatin-based chemo (plus pemetrexed, docetaxel, gemcitabine or vinorelbine). Of these pts (n=1269), 1005 were subsequently randomized 1:1 to 16 cycles of atezo 1200 mg Q3W or BSC. The primary endpoint of investigator-assessed DFS and secondary endpoint of overall survival (OS) were tested hierarchically: first DFS in the PD-L1 TC ≥1% (SP263) subgroup with Stage II-IIIA disease, then DFS in all randomized pts with Stage II-IIIA disease, then DFS in the ITT population (Stage IB-IIIA) and finally OS in the ITT population. Efficacy assessments were based on randomized pts. Safety was assessed in the safety-evaluable population, defined as pts who received ≥1 dose of atezo or who had ≥1 post-baseline safety assessment if randomized to the BSC arm. Results: At data cutoff (January 21, 2021), median follow-up was 32.2 months in the ITT population. Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between arms. Atezo showed statistically significant DFS benefit vs BSC in the PD-L1 TC ≥1% Stage II-IIIA and all randomized Stage II-IIIA populations; the significance boundary was not crossed for DFS in the ITT population (Table). OS data were immature and not formally tested. Pts in the atezo arm received a median of 16 (range, 1-16) atezo doses. Any-grade AEs occurred in 92.7% (atezo) and 70.7% (BSC); events were Grade 3/4 in 21.8% and 11.5%, respectively. Grade 5 treatment-related AEs occurred in 0.8% of pts in the atezo arm. AEs leading to atezo discontinuation occurred in 18.2% of atezo-treated pts. Conclusions: IMpower010 met its primary endpoint, showing DFS benefit with adjuvant atezo vs BSC after adjuvant chemo in pts with resected Stage II-IIIA NSCLC, with pronounced benefit in the PD-L1 TC ≥1% subgroup. The safety profile of atezo was consistent with prior experience of atezo monotherapy across indications and lines of therapy. Funding: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Clinical trial information: NCT02486718. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nasser K. Altorki
- New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Caicun Zhou
- Tongji University Affiliated Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Tibor Csőszi
- Jász-Nagykun Szolnok Megyei Hetényi Géza Kórház-Rendelointézet, Szolnok, Hungary
| | - Ihor O. Vynnychenko
- Regional Municipal Institution Sumy Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Sumy, Ukraine
| | | | - Alexander Luft
- Leningrad Regional Clinical Hospital, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - Andrey Akopov
- Pavlov State Medical University, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - Alex Martinez-Marti
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d´Hebron University Hospital/Vall d´Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Yuh-Min Chen
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, Department of Chest Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital and Department of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Antonio Chella
- Unit of Pneumology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Shunichi Sugawara
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Sendai Kousei Hospital, Sendai, Japan
| | | | | | - Fan Wu
- Roche China, Shanghai, China
| | - Jing Yi
- Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA
| | - Yu Deng
- Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Enriqueta Felip
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kockx MM, McCleland M, Koeppen H. Microenvironmental regulation of tumour immunity and response to immunotherapy. J Pathol 2021; 254:374-383. [PMID: 33846997 PMCID: PMC8252752 DOI: 10.1002/path.5681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The confluence of immunology and oncology has led to a lot of uncertainty and questions about relevant biomarkers. Despite the complexity of the tumour microenvironment, most clinical studies have relied on a single‐parameter immunohistochemical assay to prospectively select patients for checkpoint inhibitor therapy; the results of this strategy have been highly variable and often less than optimal. While great efforts have been made to identify additional or alternative biomarkers, pathologists, drug developers, and clinicians alike have faced technical, logistical, and regulatory challenges on how to implement them successfully. In this review, we will discuss these challenges; we will also highlight recent advances in dissecting the functional diversity of immune cell populations within the tumour microenvironment and their potential for improved, biomarker‐driven therapeutic strategies. The dynamic nature and cellular diversity of the tumour microenvironment may challenge past models of a single biomarker predicting patient response and clinical outcome. © 2021 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
|
12
|
Banchereau R, Chitre AS, Scherl A, Wu TD, Patil NS, de Almeida P, Kadel Iii EE, Madireddi S, Au-Yeung A, Takahashi C, Chen YJ, Modrusan Z, McBride J, Nersesian R, El-Gabry EA, Robida MD, Hung JC, Kowanetz M, Zou W, McCleland M, Caplazi P, Eshgi ST, Koeppen H, Hegde PS, Mellman I, Mathews WR, Powles T, Mariathasan S, Grogan J, O'Gorman WE. Intratumoral CD103+ CD8+ T cells predict response to PD-L1 blockade. J Immunother Cancer 2021; 9:jitc-2020-002231. [PMID: 33827905 PMCID: PMC8032254 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2020-002231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND CD8+ tissue-resident memory T (TRM) cells, marked by CD103 (ITGAE) expression, are thought to actively suppress cancer progression, leading to the hypothesis that their presence in tumors may predict response to immunotherapy. METHODS Here, we test this by combining high-dimensional single-cell modalities with bulk tumor transcriptomics from 1868 patients enrolled in lung and bladder cancer clinical trials of atezolizumab (anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1)). RESULTS ITGAE was identified as the most significantly upregulated gene in inflamed tumors. Tumor CD103+ CD8+ TRM cells exhibited a complex phenotype defined by the expression of checkpoint regulators, cytotoxic proteins, and increased clonal expansion. CONCLUSIONS Our analyses indeed demonstrate that the presence of CD103+ CD8+ TRM cells, quantified by tracking intratumoral CD103 expression, can predict treatment outcome, suggesting that patients who respond to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade are those who exhibit an ongoing antitumor T-cell response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romain Banchereau
- Department of Oncology Biomarker Development, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Avantika S Chitre
- Department of Cancer Immunology, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Alexis Scherl
- Department of Research Pathology, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Thomas D Wu
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Namrata S Patil
- Department of Oncology Biomarker Development, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Patricia de Almeida
- Department of Cancer Immunology, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA.,Adaptive Biotechnologies Corp South San Francisco, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Edward E Kadel Iii
- Department of Oncology Biomarker Development, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Shravan Madireddi
- Department of Cancer Immunology, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Amelia Au-Yeung
- Department of OMNI Biomarker Development, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Chikara Takahashi
- Department of OMNI Biomarker Development, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Ying-Jiun Chen
- Department of Microchemistry, Proteomics, Lipidomics, and Next Generation Sequencing, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA.,Analytical Biosciences Limited, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Zora Modrusan
- Department of Microchemistry, Proteomics, Lipidomics, and Next Generation Sequencing, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jacqueline McBride
- Department of OMNI Biomarker Development, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Rhea Nersesian
- Department of Oncology Biomarker Development, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | | | - Jeffrey C Hung
- Department of Research Pathology, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Marcin Kowanetz
- Department of Oncology Biomarker Development, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA.,Bolt Biotherapeutics, Redwood City, California, USA
| | - Wei Zou
- Department of Biostatistics Oncology, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Mark McCleland
- Department of Oncology Biomarker Development, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Patrick Caplazi
- Department of Research Pathology, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Shadi Toghi Eshgi
- Department of OMNI Biomarker Development, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Hartmut Koeppen
- Department of Research Pathology, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Ira Mellman
- Department of Cancer Immunology, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - W Rodney Mathews
- Department of OMNI Biomarker Development, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Thomas Powles
- Barts Cancer Center, Queen Mary University, London, UK
| | - Sanjeev Mariathasan
- Department of Oncology Biomarker Development, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jane Grogan
- Department of Cancer Immunology, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - William E O'Gorman
- Department of OMNI Biomarker Development, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Singh A, Daemen A, Nickles D, Jeon SM, Foreman O, Sudini K, Gnad F, Lajoie S, Gour N, Mitzner W, Chatterjee S, Choi EJ, Ravishankar B, Rappaport A, Patil N, McCleland M, Johnson L, Acquaah-Mensah G, Gabrielson E, Biswal S, Hatzivassiliou G. NRF2 Activation Promotes Aggressive Lung Cancer and Associates with Poor Clinical Outcomes. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:877-888. [PMID: 33077574 PMCID: PMC10867786 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-1985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Revised: 07/25/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stabilization of the transcription factor NRF2 through genomic alterations in KEAP1 and NFE2L2 occurs in a quarter of patients with lung adenocarcinoma and a third of patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma. In lung adenocarcinoma, KEAP1 loss often co-occurs with STK11 loss and KRAS-activating alterations. Despite its prevalence, the impact of NRF2 activation on tumor progression and patient outcomes is not fully defined. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We model NRF2 activation, STK11 loss, and KRAS activation in vivo using novel genetically engineered mouse models. Furthermore, we derive a NRF2 activation signature from human non-small cell lung tumors that we use to dissect how these genomic events impact outcomes and immune contexture of participants in the OAK and IMpower131 immunotherapy trials. RESULTS Our in vivo data reveal roles for NRF2 activation in (i) promoting rapid-onset, multifocal intrabronchiolar carcinomas, leading to lethal pulmonary dysfunction, and (ii) decreasing elevated redox stress in KRAS-mutant, STK11-null tumors. In patients with nonsquamous tumors, the NRF2 signature is negatively prognostic independently of STK11 loss. Patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma with low NRF2 signature survive longer when receiving anti-PD-L1 treatment. CONCLUSIONS Our in vivo modeling establishes NRF2 activation as a critical oncogenic driver, cooperating with STK11 loss and KRAS activation to promote aggressive lung adenocarcinoma. In patients, oncogenic events alter the tumor immune contexture, possibly having an impact on treatment responses. Importantly, patients with NRF2-activated nonsquamous or squamous tumors have poor prognosis and show limited response to anti-PD-L1 treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anju Singh
- Department of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Anneleen Daemen
- Oncology Bioinformatics, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California.
| | - Dorothee Nickles
- Oncology Bioinformatics, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California.
| | - Sang-Min Jeon
- Translational Oncology, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California
- College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Ajou University, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Oded Foreman
- Pathology, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California
| | - Kuladeep Sudini
- Department of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Florian Gnad
- Oncology Bioinformatics, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California
| | - Stephane Lajoie
- Department of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Naina Gour
- Department of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Wayne Mitzner
- Department of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Samit Chatterjee
- Department of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Eun-Ji Choi
- College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Ajou University, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Amy Rappaport
- Discovery Oncology, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California
| | - Namrata Patil
- Oncology Biomarker Development, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California
| | - Mark McCleland
- Oncology Biomarker Development, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California
| | - Leisa Johnson
- Discovery Oncology, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California
| | - George Acquaah-Mensah
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Edward Gabrielson
- Department of Pathology and Oncology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Shyam Biswal
- Department of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Liu SV, Reck M, Mansfield AS, Mok T, Scherpereel A, Reinmuth N, Garassino MC, De Castro Carpeno J, Califano R, Nishio M, Orlandi F, Alatorre-Alexander J, Leal T, Cheng Y, Lee JS, Lam S, McCleland M, Deng Y, Phan S, Horn L. Updated Overall Survival and PD-L1 Subgroup Analysis of Patients With Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide (IMpower133). J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:619-630. [PMID: 33439693 PMCID: PMC8078320 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.01055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 278] [Impact Index Per Article: 92.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
IMpower133 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02763579), a randomized, double-blind, phase I/III study, demonstrated that adding atezolizumab (anti-programmed death-ligand 1 [PD-L1]) to carboplatin plus etoposide (CP/ET) for first-line (1L) treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) resulted in significant improvement in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo plus CP/ET. Updated OS, disease progression patterns, safety, and exploratory biomarkers (PD-L1, blood-based tumor mutational burden [bTMB]) are reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen V Liu
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Martin Reck
- Lung Clinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Research Center North, German Center of Lung Research, Grosshansdorf, Germany
| | | | - Tony Mok
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, PR China
| | | | - Niels Reinmuth
- Thoracic Oncology, Asklepios Clinics Munich-Gauting, Gauting, Germany
| | | | | | - Raffaele Califano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Makoto Nishio
- The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | - Ticiana Leal
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI
| | | | - Jong-Seok Lee
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | | | | | - Yu Deng
- Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA
| | - See Phan
- Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA
| | - Leora Horn
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Nishio M, Barlesi F, West H, Ball S, Bordoni R, Cobo M, Longeras PD, Goldschmidt J, Novello S, Orlandi F, Sanborn RE, Szalai Z, Ursol G, Mendus D, Wang L, Wen X, McCleland M, Hoang T, Phan S, Socinski MA. Atezolizumab Plus Chemotherapy for First-Line Treatment of Nonsquamous NSCLC: Results From the Randomized Phase 3 IMpower132 Trial. J Thorac Oncol 2020; 16:653-664. [PMID: 33333328 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.11.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 221] [Impact Index Per Article: 55.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Revised: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We report the final results of the phase 3 IMpower132 study evaluating atezolizumab plus carboplatin or cisplatin plus pemetrexed (APP) in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC. METHODS Chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IV nonsquamous NSCLC without sensitizing EGFR or ALK genetic alterations were randomized in a one-to-one ratio to receive four or six cycles of carboplatin or cisplatin plus pemetrexed (PP) or APP every 3 weeks, followed by maintenance therapy with atezolizumab plus pemetrexed or pemetrexed alone. Co-primary end points were overall survival (OS) and investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS The intention-to-treat population included 578 patients (APP, n = 292; PP, n = 286). At the primary PFS analysis (May 22, 2018; median follow-up, 14.8 mo), APP exhibited significant PFS improvement versus PP (median = 7.6 versus 5.2 mo, stratified hazard ratio [HR] = 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49-0.72, p < 0.0001). OS for the APP group was numerically better but not statistically significant at the interim (May 22, 2018; median = 18.1 versus 13.6 mo, stratified HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.64-1.03, p = 0.0797) and final analyses (July 18, 2019; median = 17.5 versus 13.6 mo; stratified HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.71-1.06, p = 0.1546). The OS and PFS results favored APP versus PP across subgroups. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 54.6% (APP) and 40.1% (PP) of patients; grade 5 treatment-related events occurred in 3.8% and 2.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS IMpower132 met its co-primary PFS end point but not its co-primary OS end point, with numerical improvement for OS in the APP arm. APP had a manageable safety profile, with no new or unexpected safety signals identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Makoto Nishio
- The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Fabrice Barlesi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Research Center of Marseille, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Marseille, Campus Timone, Centres Hospitaliers et Universitaires Nord, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France; Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - Howard West
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | - Simon Ball
- Department of Oncology, Queen's Hospital, Rom Valley Way, Romford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Manuel Cobo
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica Intercentros de Oncología Médica. Hospitales Universitarios Regional y Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain
| | | | | | - Silvia Novello
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Francisco Orlandi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Instituto Nacional del Tόrax, Santiago, Chile
| | - Rachel E Sanborn
- Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon
| | - Zsuzsanna Szalai
- Department of Pulmonology, Petz Aladár County Teaching Hospital, Vasvári Pál, Hungary
| | | | - Diana Mendus
- Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California
| | - Lijia Wang
- Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California
| | - Xiaohui Wen
- Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California
| | | | - Tien Hoang
- Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California
| | - See Phan
- Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California
| | - Mark A Socinski
- Department of Medical Oncology, AdventHealth Cancer Institute, Orlando, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Herbst RS, Giaccone G, de Marinis F, Reinmuth N, Vergnenegre A, Barrios CH, Morise M, Felip E, Andric Z, Geater S, Özgüroğlu M, Zou W, Sandler A, Enquist I, Komatsubara K, Deng Y, Kuriki H, Wen X, McCleland M, Mocci S, Jassem J, Spigel DR. Atezolizumab for First-Line Treatment of PD-L1-Selected Patients with NSCLC. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:1328-1339. [PMID: 32997907 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1917346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 841] [Impact Index Per Article: 210.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy and safety of the anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) monoclonal antibody atezolizumab, as compared with those of platinum-based chemotherapy, as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with PD-L1 expression are not known. METHODS We conducted a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial involving patients with metastatic nonsquamous or squamous NSCLC who had not previously received chemotherapy and who had PD-L1 expression on at least 1% of tumor cells or at least 1% of tumor-infiltrating immune cells as assessed by the SP142 immunohistochemical assay. Patients were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive atezolizumab or chemotherapy. Overall survival (primary end point) was tested hierarchically according to PD-L1 expression status among patients in the intention-to-treat population whose tumors were wild-type with respect to EGFR mutations or ALK translocations. Within the population with EGFR and ALK wild-type tumors, overall survival and progression-free survival were also prospectively assessed in subgroups defined according to findings on two PD-L1 assays as well as by blood-based tumor mutational burden. RESULTS Overall, 572 patients were enrolled. In the subgroup of patients with EGFR and ALK wild-type tumors who had the highest expression of PD-L1 (205 patients), the median overall survival was longer by 7.1 months in the atezolizumab group than in the chemotherapy group (20.2 months vs. 13.1 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.59; P = 0.01). Among all the patients who could be evaluated for safety, adverse events occurred in 90.2% of the patients in the atezolizumab group and in 94.7% of those in the chemotherapy group; grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 30.1% and 52.5% of the patients in the respective groups. Overall and progression-free survival favored atezolizumab in the subgroups with a high blood-based tumor mutational burden. CONCLUSIONS Atezolizumab treatment resulted in significantly longer overall survival than platinum-based chemotherapy among patients with NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression, regardless of histologic type. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech; IMpower110 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02409342.).
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use
- Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects
- Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
- B7-H1 Antigen/metabolism
- Carboplatin/administration & dosage
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/metabolism
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/mortality
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy
- Cisplatin/administration & dosage
- Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage
- Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives
- Female
- Humans
- Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Lung Neoplasms/genetics
- Lung Neoplasms/metabolism
- Lung Neoplasms/mortality
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Mutation
- Survival Analysis
- Gemcitabine
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roy S Herbst
- From the Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.S.H.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York (G.G.); the European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan (F.M.); Asklepios Lung Clinic, Munich-Gauting, Germany (N.R.); University Hospital Limoges, Limoges, France (A.V.); Centro de Pesquisa Clínica, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.H.B.); Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan (M. Morise); Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona (E.F.); Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa, Belgrade, Serbia (Z.A.); Prince of Songkla University-Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand (S.G.); Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (M.O.); Genentech, South San Francisco, CA (W.Z., A.S., I.E., K.K., Y.D., H.K., X.W., M. McCleland, S.M.); the Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdansk, Poland (J.J.); and the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.R.S.)
| | - Giuseppe Giaccone
- From the Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.S.H.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York (G.G.); the European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan (F.M.); Asklepios Lung Clinic, Munich-Gauting, Germany (N.R.); University Hospital Limoges, Limoges, France (A.V.); Centro de Pesquisa Clínica, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.H.B.); Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan (M. Morise); Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona (E.F.); Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa, Belgrade, Serbia (Z.A.); Prince of Songkla University-Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand (S.G.); Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (M.O.); Genentech, South San Francisco, CA (W.Z., A.S., I.E., K.K., Y.D., H.K., X.W., M. McCleland, S.M.); the Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdansk, Poland (J.J.); and the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.R.S.)
| | - Filippo de Marinis
- From the Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.S.H.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York (G.G.); the European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan (F.M.); Asklepios Lung Clinic, Munich-Gauting, Germany (N.R.); University Hospital Limoges, Limoges, France (A.V.); Centro de Pesquisa Clínica, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.H.B.); Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan (M. Morise); Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona (E.F.); Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa, Belgrade, Serbia (Z.A.); Prince of Songkla University-Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand (S.G.); Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (M.O.); Genentech, South San Francisco, CA (W.Z., A.S., I.E., K.K., Y.D., H.K., X.W., M. McCleland, S.M.); the Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdansk, Poland (J.J.); and the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.R.S.)
| | - Niels Reinmuth
- From the Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.S.H.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York (G.G.); the European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan (F.M.); Asklepios Lung Clinic, Munich-Gauting, Germany (N.R.); University Hospital Limoges, Limoges, France (A.V.); Centro de Pesquisa Clínica, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.H.B.); Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan (M. Morise); Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona (E.F.); Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa, Belgrade, Serbia (Z.A.); Prince of Songkla University-Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand (S.G.); Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (M.O.); Genentech, South San Francisco, CA (W.Z., A.S., I.E., K.K., Y.D., H.K., X.W., M. McCleland, S.M.); the Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdansk, Poland (J.J.); and the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.R.S.)
| | - Alain Vergnenegre
- From the Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.S.H.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York (G.G.); the European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan (F.M.); Asklepios Lung Clinic, Munich-Gauting, Germany (N.R.); University Hospital Limoges, Limoges, France (A.V.); Centro de Pesquisa Clínica, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.H.B.); Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan (M. Morise); Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona (E.F.); Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa, Belgrade, Serbia (Z.A.); Prince of Songkla University-Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand (S.G.); Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (M.O.); Genentech, South San Francisco, CA (W.Z., A.S., I.E., K.K., Y.D., H.K., X.W., M. McCleland, S.M.); the Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdansk, Poland (J.J.); and the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.R.S.)
| | - Carlos H Barrios
- From the Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.S.H.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York (G.G.); the European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan (F.M.); Asklepios Lung Clinic, Munich-Gauting, Germany (N.R.); University Hospital Limoges, Limoges, France (A.V.); Centro de Pesquisa Clínica, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.H.B.); Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan (M. Morise); Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona (E.F.); Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa, Belgrade, Serbia (Z.A.); Prince of Songkla University-Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand (S.G.); Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (M.O.); Genentech, South San Francisco, CA (W.Z., A.S., I.E., K.K., Y.D., H.K., X.W., M. McCleland, S.M.); the Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdansk, Poland (J.J.); and the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.R.S.)
| | - Masahiro Morise
- From the Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.S.H.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York (G.G.); the European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan (F.M.); Asklepios Lung Clinic, Munich-Gauting, Germany (N.R.); University Hospital Limoges, Limoges, France (A.V.); Centro de Pesquisa Clínica, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.H.B.); Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan (M. Morise); Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona (E.F.); Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa, Belgrade, Serbia (Z.A.); Prince of Songkla University-Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand (S.G.); Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (M.O.); Genentech, South San Francisco, CA (W.Z., A.S., I.E., K.K., Y.D., H.K., X.W., M. McCleland, S.M.); the Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdansk, Poland (J.J.); and the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.R.S.)
| | - Enriqueta Felip
- From the Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.S.H.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York (G.G.); the European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan (F.M.); Asklepios Lung Clinic, Munich-Gauting, Germany (N.R.); University Hospital Limoges, Limoges, France (A.V.); Centro de Pesquisa Clínica, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.H.B.); Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan (M. Morise); Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona (E.F.); Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa, Belgrade, Serbia (Z.A.); Prince of Songkla University-Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand (S.G.); Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (M.O.); Genentech, South San Francisco, CA (W.Z., A.S., I.E., K.K., Y.D., H.K., X.W., M. McCleland, S.M.); the Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdansk, Poland (J.J.); and the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.R.S.)
| | - Zoran Andric
- From the Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.S.H.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York (G.G.); the European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan (F.M.); Asklepios Lung Clinic, Munich-Gauting, Germany (N.R.); University Hospital Limoges, Limoges, France (A.V.); Centro de Pesquisa Clínica, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.H.B.); Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan (M. Morise); Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona (E.F.); Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa, Belgrade, Serbia (Z.A.); Prince of Songkla University-Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand (S.G.); Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (M.O.); Genentech, South San Francisco, CA (W.Z., A.S., I.E., K.K., Y.D., H.K., X.W., M. McCleland, S.M.); the Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdansk, Poland (J.J.); and the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.R.S.)
| | - Sarayut Geater
- From the Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.S.H.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York (G.G.); the European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan (F.M.); Asklepios Lung Clinic, Munich-Gauting, Germany (N.R.); University Hospital Limoges, Limoges, France (A.V.); Centro de Pesquisa Clínica, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.H.B.); Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan (M. Morise); Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona (E.F.); Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa, Belgrade, Serbia (Z.A.); Prince of Songkla University-Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand (S.G.); Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (M.O.); Genentech, South San Francisco, CA (W.Z., A.S., I.E., K.K., Y.D., H.K., X.W., M. McCleland, S.M.); the Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdansk, Poland (J.J.); and the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.R.S.)
| | - Mustafa Özgüroğlu
- From the Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.S.H.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York (G.G.); the European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan (F.M.); Asklepios Lung Clinic, Munich-Gauting, Germany (N.R.); University Hospital Limoges, Limoges, France (A.V.); Centro de Pesquisa Clínica, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.H.B.); Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan (M. Morise); Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona (E.F.); Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa, Belgrade, Serbia (Z.A.); Prince of Songkla University-Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand (S.G.); Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (M.O.); Genentech, South San Francisco, CA (W.Z., A.S., I.E., K.K., Y.D., H.K., X.W., M. McCleland, S.M.); the Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdansk, Poland (J.J.); and the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.R.S.)
| | - Wei Zou
- From the Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.S.H.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York (G.G.); the European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan (F.M.); Asklepios Lung Clinic, Munich-Gauting, Germany (N.R.); University Hospital Limoges, Limoges, France (A.V.); Centro de Pesquisa Clínica, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.H.B.); Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan (M. Morise); Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona (E.F.); Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa, Belgrade, Serbia (Z.A.); Prince of Songkla University-Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand (S.G.); Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (M.O.); Genentech, South San Francisco, CA (W.Z., A.S., I.E., K.K., Y.D., H.K., X.W., M. McCleland, S.M.); the Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdansk, Poland (J.J.); and the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.R.S.)
| | - Alan Sandler
- From the Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.S.H.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York (G.G.); the European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan (F.M.); Asklepios Lung Clinic, Munich-Gauting, Germany (N.R.); University Hospital Limoges, Limoges, France (A.V.); Centro de Pesquisa Clínica, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.H.B.); Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan (M. Morise); Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona (E.F.); Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa, Belgrade, Serbia (Z.A.); Prince of Songkla University-Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand (S.G.); Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (M.O.); Genentech, South San Francisco, CA (W.Z., A.S., I.E., K.K., Y.D., H.K., X.W., M. McCleland, S.M.); the Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdansk, Poland (J.J.); and the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.R.S.)
| | - Ida Enquist
- From the Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.S.H.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York (G.G.); the European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan (F.M.); Asklepios Lung Clinic, Munich-Gauting, Germany (N.R.); University Hospital Limoges, Limoges, France (A.V.); Centro de Pesquisa Clínica, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.H.B.); Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan (M. Morise); Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona (E.F.); Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa, Belgrade, Serbia (Z.A.); Prince of Songkla University-Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand (S.G.); Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (M.O.); Genentech, South San Francisco, CA (W.Z., A.S., I.E., K.K., Y.D., H.K., X.W., M. McCleland, S.M.); the Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdansk, Poland (J.J.); and the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.R.S.)
| | - Kimberly Komatsubara
- From the Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.S.H.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York (G.G.); the European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan (F.M.); Asklepios Lung Clinic, Munich-Gauting, Germany (N.R.); University Hospital Limoges, Limoges, France (A.V.); Centro de Pesquisa Clínica, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.H.B.); Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan (M. Morise); Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona (E.F.); Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa, Belgrade, Serbia (Z.A.); Prince of Songkla University-Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand (S.G.); Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (M.O.); Genentech, South San Francisco, CA (W.Z., A.S., I.E., K.K., Y.D., H.K., X.W., M. McCleland, S.M.); the Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdansk, Poland (J.J.); and the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.R.S.)
| | - Yu Deng
- From the Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.S.H.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York (G.G.); the European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan (F.M.); Asklepios Lung Clinic, Munich-Gauting, Germany (N.R.); University Hospital Limoges, Limoges, France (A.V.); Centro de Pesquisa Clínica, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.H.B.); Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan (M. Morise); Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona (E.F.); Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa, Belgrade, Serbia (Z.A.); Prince of Songkla University-Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand (S.G.); Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (M.O.); Genentech, South San Francisco, CA (W.Z., A.S., I.E., K.K., Y.D., H.K., X.W., M. McCleland, S.M.); the Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdansk, Poland (J.J.); and the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.R.S.)
| | - Hiroshi Kuriki
- From the Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.S.H.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York (G.G.); the European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan (F.M.); Asklepios Lung Clinic, Munich-Gauting, Germany (N.R.); University Hospital Limoges, Limoges, France (A.V.); Centro de Pesquisa Clínica, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.H.B.); Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan (M. Morise); Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona (E.F.); Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa, Belgrade, Serbia (Z.A.); Prince of Songkla University-Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand (S.G.); Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (M.O.); Genentech, South San Francisco, CA (W.Z., A.S., I.E., K.K., Y.D., H.K., X.W., M. McCleland, S.M.); the Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdansk, Poland (J.J.); and the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.R.S.)
| | - Xiaohui Wen
- From the Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.S.H.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York (G.G.); the European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan (F.M.); Asklepios Lung Clinic, Munich-Gauting, Germany (N.R.); University Hospital Limoges, Limoges, France (A.V.); Centro de Pesquisa Clínica, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.H.B.); Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan (M. Morise); Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona (E.F.); Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa, Belgrade, Serbia (Z.A.); Prince of Songkla University-Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand (S.G.); Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (M.O.); Genentech, South San Francisco, CA (W.Z., A.S., I.E., K.K., Y.D., H.K., X.W., M. McCleland, S.M.); the Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdansk, Poland (J.J.); and the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.R.S.)
| | - Mark McCleland
- From the Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.S.H.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York (G.G.); the European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan (F.M.); Asklepios Lung Clinic, Munich-Gauting, Germany (N.R.); University Hospital Limoges, Limoges, France (A.V.); Centro de Pesquisa Clínica, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.H.B.); Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan (M. Morise); Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona (E.F.); Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa, Belgrade, Serbia (Z.A.); Prince of Songkla University-Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand (S.G.); Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (M.O.); Genentech, South San Francisco, CA (W.Z., A.S., I.E., K.K., Y.D., H.K., X.W., M. McCleland, S.M.); the Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdansk, Poland (J.J.); and the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.R.S.)
| | - Simonetta Mocci
- From the Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.S.H.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York (G.G.); the European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan (F.M.); Asklepios Lung Clinic, Munich-Gauting, Germany (N.R.); University Hospital Limoges, Limoges, France (A.V.); Centro de Pesquisa Clínica, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.H.B.); Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan (M. Morise); Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona (E.F.); Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa, Belgrade, Serbia (Z.A.); Prince of Songkla University-Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand (S.G.); Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (M.O.); Genentech, South San Francisco, CA (W.Z., A.S., I.E., K.K., Y.D., H.K., X.W., M. McCleland, S.M.); the Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdansk, Poland (J.J.); and the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.R.S.)
| | - Jacek Jassem
- From the Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.S.H.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York (G.G.); the European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan (F.M.); Asklepios Lung Clinic, Munich-Gauting, Germany (N.R.); University Hospital Limoges, Limoges, France (A.V.); Centro de Pesquisa Clínica, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.H.B.); Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan (M. Morise); Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona (E.F.); Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa, Belgrade, Serbia (Z.A.); Prince of Songkla University-Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand (S.G.); Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (M.O.); Genentech, South San Francisco, CA (W.Z., A.S., I.E., K.K., Y.D., H.K., X.W., M. McCleland, S.M.); the Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdansk, Poland (J.J.); and the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.R.S.)
| | - David R Spigel
- From the Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.S.H.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York (G.G.); the European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan (F.M.); Asklepios Lung Clinic, Munich-Gauting, Germany (N.R.); University Hospital Limoges, Limoges, France (A.V.); Centro de Pesquisa Clínica, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.H.B.); Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan (M. Morise); Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona (E.F.); Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa, Belgrade, Serbia (Z.A.); Prince of Songkla University-Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand (S.G.); Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (M.O.); Genentech, South San Francisco, CA (W.Z., A.S., I.E., K.K., Y.D., H.K., X.W., M. McCleland, S.M.); the Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdansk, Poland (J.J.); and the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.R.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Liu S, Horn L, Mok T, Mansfield A, De Boer R, Losonczy G, Sugawara S, Dziadziuszko R, Krzakowski M, Smolin A, Hochmair M, Garassino M, Lam S, McCleland M, Cardona A, Morris S, Reck M. 1781MO IMpower133: Characterisation of long-term survivors treated first-line with chemotherapy ± atezolizumab in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.1543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
18
|
Horn L, Liu SV, Mansfield AS, Mok T, Scherpereel A, Reinmuth N, Garassino MC, Carpeno JDC, Califano R, Nishio M, Orlandi F, Alexander JAA, Leal T, Cheng Y, Lee JS, Lam S, McCleland M, Deng Y, Phan S, Reck M. Abstract CT220: IMpower133: Updated OS and exploratory analyses of first-line (1L) atezolizumab (atezo) + carboplatin (C) + etoposide (E) in extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC). Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2020-ct220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: IMpower133 (NCT02763579), a global Phase I/III, randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled trial, showed that the addition of atezo (anti-PD-L1) to CE for 1L ES-SCLC led to statistically and clinically significant OS and PFS improvement vs CE alone. Here we report updated OS and exploratory analyses. Methods: Pts with untreated ES-SCLC were randomized 1:1 to receive four 21-day cycles of E (100 mg/m2 IV, days 1-3) + C (AUC 5 mg/mL/min IV, day 1) with atezo (1200 mg IV, day 1) or PBO, followed by maintenance therapy with atezo or PBO until intolerable toxicity, progression or loss of clinical benefit. PD-L1 testing was not required for enrollment. Coprimary endpoints were investigator-assessed PFS (RECIST 1.1) and OS. Interim and final OS analyses were planned for ≈240 and ≈306 events, respectively. OS was significant at the interim analysis. Updated OS, exploratory biomarkers and patterns of disease progression were analyzed. Results: 201 and 202 pts were randomized to receive atezo+CE and PBO+CE, respectively. The median follow-up was 22.9 mo and 302 deaths had occurred. Median OS for the atezo and PBO arms was 12.3 and 10.3 mo, respectively (HR, 0.76 [95% CI: 0.60, 0.95]; descriptive P = 0.0154). At the 18-mo landmark, the OS rate was 13% higher with atezo+CE than with PBO+CE (Table). Exploratory analyses showed treatment benefit with atezo+CE regardless of biomarker status. 181 (90.0%) And 194 (96.0%) pts in the atezo+CE and PBO+CE arms, respectively, had RECIST-defined disease progression. Progression at existing, new or existing and new lesions was numerically lower with atezo+CE than with PBO+CE. Common sites of new lesions included the CNS, lung, lymph node and liver, with similar incidences between arms. Conclusion: Adding atezo to CE continued to provide OS improvement for 1L ES-SCLC in an all-comer population. The updated results of IMpower133 further support this regimen for untreated ES-SCLC.
Landmark OSAtezo + CE, n = 201PBO + CE, n = 20212 Mo, n (%)93 (51.9)74 (39.0)18 Mo, n (%)61 (34.0)39(21.0)Median OS in biomarker subgroupsAtezo + CEPBO + CEITT (N = 403), mo12.310.3HR (95% CI)0.76 (0.61, 0.96)aITT-BEP (n = 137), mo9.98.9HR (95% CI)0.70 (0.48, 1.02)Non-BEP (n = 266), mo14.611.2HR (95% CI)0.81 (0.61, 1.08)PD-L1 expression, 1% TC or IC< 1% (n = 65), mo10.28.3HR (95% CI)0.51 (0.30, 0.89)≥ 1% (n = 72), mo9.710.6HR (95% CI)0.87 (0.51, 1.49)PD-L1 expression, 5% TC or IC< 5% (n = 108), mo9.28.9HR (95% CI)0.77 (0.51, 1.17)≥ 5% (n = 29), mo21.69.2HR (95% CI)0.60 (0.25, 1.46)Disease progression at sites, n (%)Atezo + CEPBO + CEExisting116 (57.7)131 (64.9)New86 (42.8)99 (49.0)Existing and new42 (20.9)57 (28.2)BEP, biomarker-evaluable population; ITT, intention-to-treat population.a Stratified HR. BEP included pts evaluable by PD-L1 IHC using the VENTANA SP263 assay.
Citation Format: Leora Horn, Stephen V. Liu, Aaron S. Mansfield, Tony Mok, Arnaud Scherpereel, Niels Reinmuth, Marina Chiara Garassino, Javier De Castro Carpeno, Raffaele Califano, Makoto Nishio, Francisco Orlandi, Jorge Arturo Alatorre Alexander, Ticiana Leal, Ying Cheng, Jong-Seok Lee, Sivuonthanh Lam, Mark McCleland, Yu Deng, See Phan, Martin Reck. IMpower133: Updated OS and exploratory analyses of first-line (1L) atezolizumab (atezo) + carboplatin (C) + etoposide (E) in extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT220.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stephen V. Liu
- 2Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington DC, DC
| | | | - Tony Mok
- 4State Key Laboratory of South China, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Arnaud Scherpereel
- 5Department of Pulmonary and Thoracic Oncology, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Niels Reinmuth
- 6Thoracic Oncology, Asklepios Clinics Munich-Gauting, Gauting, Germany
| | | | | | - Raffaele Califano
- 9Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Makoto Nishio
- 10The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | - Ticiana Leal
- 13University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI
| | - Ying Cheng
- 14Jilin Province Cancer Hospital, Jilin, China
| | - Jong-Seok Lee
- 15Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Democratic People's Republic of Korea
| | | | | | - Yu Deng
- 16Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA
| | - See Phan
- 16Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA
| | - Martin Reck
- 17LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Clinical Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research, Grosshansdorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Taylor-Weiner A, Beck A, Cowan JD, Elliott H, Fridlyand J, Glass B, Guardino E, Hegde P, Kerner JK, Khosla A, Lee M, Liu Y, McCleland M, Montalto M, Schulze K, Shames DS, Srinivasan R, Zou W, Wapinski I, Giltnane JM. Machine learning-based identification of predictive features of the tumor micro-environment and vasculature in NSCLC patients using the IMpower150 study. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.3130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
3130 Background: IMpower150 is a phase 3 study measuring the effect of carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) combined with atezolizumab (A) and/or bevacizumab (B) in patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC, testing the hypothesis that anti-PD-L1 therapy may be enhanced by the blockade of VEGF. Here, we apply a machine-learning based approach to quantify the tumor micro-environment (TME) and vasculature and identify associations with clinical outcome in IMpower150. Methods: Digitized H&E images were registered onto the PathAI research platform (n=1027). Over 200K annotations from 90 pathologists were used to train convolutional neural networks (CNNs) that classify human-interpretable features (HIFs) of cells and tissue structures from images. Blood vessel compression (BVC) indices were calculated using the long versus short axes for each predicted blood vessel. HIFs were clustered to reduce redundancy, and selected features were associated with progression free survival (PFS) within each arm (ABCP, ACP, and BCP) using Cox proportional hazard models. Results: We used the trained CNNs to generate 4,534 features summarizing each patient’s histopathology and TME. After association with survival and correction for multiple comparisons we identified clusters that were significantly associated with survival in at least one arm. Among patients receiving treatments that target PD-L1 (ABCP and ACP), high lymphocyte to fibroblast ratio (LFR) was associated with improved PFS (HR=0.64 (0.51, 0.81), p < 0.001) and showed no significant association with PFS among patients treated with BCP alone (HR=1.13 (0.85, 1.51), p=0.4). Among BCP treated patients, a higher average BVC within the tumor tissue was associated with improved PFS (HR=0.67 (0.50,0.90), p=0.01) and worse PFS among patients treated with ACP (HR=1.50 (1.10,2.06), p=0.009). Conclusions: We developed a deep learning-based assay for quantifying pathology features of the TME and vasculature from H&E images. Application of this system to Impower150 identified an association between high LFR and improved PFS among patients receiving PD-L1 targeting therapy, and between low BVC and improved PFS among patients receiving BCP. These findings support the importance of the TME and vasculature in determining response to PD-L1 and VEGF-targeting therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mark Lee
- Genentech, Roche, Menlo Park, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Wei Zou
- Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Herbst R, Marinis FD, Giaccone G, Reinmuth N, Vergnenegre A, Barrios C, Morise M, Font E, Andric Z, Geater S, Ozguroglu M, Mocci S, McCleland M, Enquist I, Komatsubara K, Deng Y, Kuriki H, Wen X, Jassem J, Spigel D. O81 IMpower110: interim overall survival (OS) analysis of a phase III study of atezolizumab (ATEZO) monotherapy vs platinum-based chemotherapy (CHEMO) as first-line (1L) treatment in PD-L1–selected NSCLC. J Immunother Cancer 2020. [DOI: 10.1136/lba2019.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundPD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors (CPI) as monotherapy or in combination with platinum-based doublet chemo (± bevacizumab) are 1L treatment options in metastatic NSCLC, with choice of agent(s) determined by PD-L1 expression. For patients (pts) who may be ineligible for combination therapy, CPI monotherapy remains an attractive treatment choice. IMpower110 evaluated atezo as 1L treatment in PD-L1–selected pts independent of tumor histology.MethodsIMpower110 enrolled 572 chemo-naive pts with stage IV nonsquamous (nsq) or squamous (sq) NSCLC, PD-L1 expression ≥ 1% on TC or IC, measurable disease by RECIST 1.1 and ECOG PS 0-1. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive atezo 1200 mg IV q3w (Arm A) or platinum-based chemo (Arm B; 4 or 6 21-day cycles). Arm B nsq pts received cisplatin (cis) 75 mg/m2 or carboplatin (carbo) AUC 6 + pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 IV q3w; Arm B sq pts received cis 75 mg/m2 + gemcitabine (gem) 1250 mg/m2 or carbo AUC 5 + gem 1000 mg/m2 IV q3w. Stratification factors were sex, ECOG PS, histology and tumor PD-L1 status (TC1/2/3 and any IC vs TC0 and IC1/2/3). The primary endpoint of OS is tested hierarchically in the wild-type (WT; EGFR/ALK-negative) population (TC3 or IC3 then TC2/3 or IC2/3 then TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3).ResultsThe 3 primary efficacy populations included 554 TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 WT pts, 328 TC2/3 or IC2/3 WT pts and 205 TC3 or IC3 WT pts. Median follow-up was 15.7 months (range, 0-35) in TC3 or IC3 WT pts. In the TC3 or IC3 WT population, atezo monotherapy improved median OS by 7.1 months (HR, 0.595; P = 0.0106) compared with chemo (table 1). The safety population comprised 286 pts in Arm A and 263 in Arm B. Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) and Grade 3-4 TRAEs occurred in 60.5% (Arm A) and 85.2% (Arm B), and 12.9% (Arm A) and 44.1% (Arm B), respectively.Abstract 081 Table 1ConclusionsAt this interim analysis, IMpower110 met the primary endpoint of OS with statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in the TC3 or IC3 WT population. The safety profile favored Arm A, with no new or unexpected safety signals identified.Trial RegistrationNCT02409342Ethics ApprovalThe trial was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients provided written informed consent. Protocol approval was obtained from independent review boards or ethics committees at each site.
Collapse
|
21
|
Reck M, Shankar G, Lee A, Coleman S, McCleland M, Papadimitrakopoulou VA, Socinski MA, Sandler A. Atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab, paclitaxel and carboplatin for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer, including patients with EGFR mutations. Expert Rev Respir Med 2019; 14:125-136. [PMID: 31829747 DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2020.1701439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Cancer immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, specific patient groups (e.g. patients with activating epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR] mutations) do not appear to derive benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy. Combining ICIs, such as atezolizumab, with chemotherapy and/or targeted therapies may help to address this unmet need.Areas covered: Atezolizumab is an anti-programmed death-ligand 1 therapy for several tumor types. We review its clinical efficacy and safety in the treatment of advanced or metastatic NSCLC, with a specific focus on the combination of atezolizumab with bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (ABCP). Data from IMpower150 show that the ABCP regimen provided clinical benefit to patients with non-squamous NSCLC, including those with EGFR mutations.Expert opinion: Combining ICIs with chemotherapy has proven to be superior to chemotherapy alone. However, tumor resistance to ICIs will likely increase as these drugs enter earlier lines of therapy, underscoring a need for effective treatments when immunotherapy fails. Data suggest that the ABCP regimen may circumvent ICI resistance mechanisms. Continued investigation into the regimen's mechanisms, improved patient profiling/selection, and treatment personalization will drive further development/discoveries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Reck
- Lung Clinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research, Grosshansdorf, Germany
| | - Geetha Shankar
- Product Development Oncology, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Anthony Lee
- Product Development Oncology, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Shelley Coleman
- Product Development Oncology, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mark McCleland
- Product Development Oncology, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Mark A Socinski
- Thoracic Oncology Program, AdventHealth Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Alan Sandler
- Product Development Oncology, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Herbst R, de Marinis F, Giaccone G, Reinmuth N, Vergnenegre A, Barrios C, Morise M, Felip E, Andric Z, Geater S, Ozguroglu M, Mocci S, McCleland M, Zou W, Enquist I, Komatsubara K, Deng Y, Kuriki H, Spigel D, Jassem J. LBA1 Clinical efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo) in biomarker subgroups by SP142, SP263 and 22C3 PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays and by blood tumour mutational burden (bTMB): Results from the IMpower110 study. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
23
|
Spigel D, de Marinis F, Giaccone G, Reinmuth N, Vergnenegre A, Barrios C, Morise M, Felip E, Andric Z, Geater S, Özgüroğlu M, Mocci S, McCleland M, Enquist I, Komatsubara K, Deng Y, Kuriki H, Wen X, Jassem J, Herbst R. IMpower110: Interim overall survival (OS) analysis of a phase III study of atezolizumab (atezo) vs platinum-based chemotherapy (chemo) as first-line (1L) treatment (tx) in PD-L1–selected NSCLC. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
24
|
Reck M, Liu S, Mansfield A, Mok T, Scherpereel A, Reinmuth N, Garassino M, De Carpeno JC, Califano R, Nishio M, Orlandi F, Alexander JAA, Leal T, Cheng Y, Lee JS, Lam S, McCleland M, Deng Y, Phan S, Horn L. IMpower133: Updated overall survival (OS) analysis of first-line (1L) atezolizumab (atezo) + carboplatin + etoposide in extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC). Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
|
25
|
Wertz I, Kategaya L, Lello PD, Rouge L, Pastor R, Clark KR, Drummond J, Kleinheinz T, Lin E, Upton JP, Prakash S, Heideker J, McCleland M, Ritorto MS, Alessi DR, Trost M, Bainbridge TW, Kwok MC, Ma TP, Stiffler Z, Brasher B, Tang Y, Jaishanker P, Hearn B, Renslo AR, Arkin MR, Cohen F, Yu K, Peale F, Gnad F, Chang MT, Klijn C, Blackwood E, Martin SE, Forrest WF, Ernst JA, Ndubaku C, Wang X, Beresini MH, Tsui V, Schwerdtfeger C, Blake RA, Murray J, Maurer T. Abstract SY23-03: Development and mechanistic characterization of USP7 deubiquitinase inhibitors. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2018-sy23-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
The ubiquitin system regulates the majority of cellular processes in eukaryotes. Ubiquitin is ligated to substrate proteins as monomers or chains, and the topology of ubiquitin modifications regulates substrate interactions with specific proteins. Thus ubiquitination directs a variety of substrate fates, including proteasomal degradation. Deubiquitinase enzymes cleave ubiquitin from substrates and are implicated in disease; for example ubiquitin-specific protease-7 (USP7) regulates stability of the p53 tumor suppressor and other proteins critical for tumor cell survival. However, developing selective deubiquitinase inhibitors has been challenging and no co-crystal structures have been solved with small-molecule inhibitors. Here, using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-based screening and structure-based design, we describe the development of selective USP7 inhibitors GNE-6640 and GNE-6776. These compounds induce tumor cell death and enhance cytotoxicity with chemotherapeutics and targeted compounds, including PIM kinase inhibitors. Structural studies reveal that GNE-6640 and GNE-6776 noncovalently target USP7 12Å distant from the catalytic cysteine. The compounds attenuate ubiquitin binding and thus inhibit USP7 deubiquitinase activity. GNE-6640 and GNE-6776 interact with acidic residues that mediate H-bond interactions with the ubiquitin Lys-48 side-chain, suggesting that USP7 preferentially interacts with and cleaves ubiquitin moieties having free Lys-48 side-chains. We investigated this idea by engineering di-ubiquitin chains containing differential proximal and distal isotopic labels and measuring USP7 binding via NMR, a study that substantiated our hypothesis. This preferential binding significantly protracted the depolymerization kinetics of Lys-48-linked ubiquitin chains relative to Lys-63-linked chains. In summary, engineering compounds that inhibit USP7 activity by attenuating ubiquitin binding suggests opportunities for developing other deubiquitinase inhibitors and may be a strategy more broadly applicable to inhibiting proteins that require ubiquitin binding for full functional activity.
[LK, PDL, and LR contributed equally to this work.]
Citation Format: Ingrid Wertz, Lorna Kategaya, Paola Di Lello, Lionel Rouge, Richard Pastor, Kevin R. Clark, Jason Drummond, Tracy Kleinheinz, Eva Lin, John-Paul Upton, Sumit Prakash, Johanna Heideker, Mark McCleland, Maria Stella Ritorto, Dario R. Alessi, Matthias Trost, Travis W. Bainbridge, Michael C. Kwok, Taylur P. Ma, Zachary Stiffler, Bradley Brasher, Yinyan Tang, Priya Jaishanker, Brian Hearn, Adam R. Renslo, Michelle R. Arkin, Frederick Cohen, Kebing Yu, Frank Peale, Florian Gnad, Matthew T. Chang, Christiaan Klijn, Elizabeth Blackwood, Scott E. Martin, William F. Forrest, James A. Ernst, Chudi Ndubaku, Xiaojing Wang, Maureen H. Beresini, Vickie Tsui, Carsten Schwerdtfeger, Robert A. Blake, Jeremy Murray, Till Maurer. Development and mechanistic characterization of USP7 deubiquitinase inhibitors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr SY23-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Eva Lin
- 1Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Matthias Trost
- 3Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Yinyan Tang
- 5University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Brian Hearn
- 5University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Adam R. Renslo
- 5University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | - Kebing Yu
- 1Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Rittmeyer A, Gadgeel S, Kowanetz M, Zou W, Hirsch FR, Kerr KM, Gandara D, Barlesi F, Park K, McCleland M, Koeppen H, Ballinger M, Sandler A, Hegde PS. Clinical Efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo) in PD-L1 subgroups defined by SP142 and 22C3 IHC assays in 2L+ NSCLC: Results from the randomized OAK study. Pneumologie 2018. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1619252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - S Gadgeel
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| | | | - W Zou
- Genentech Inc., South San Francisco
| | - FR Hirsch
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
| | - KM Kerr
- Department of Pathology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary/Aberdeen University Medical School
| | - D Gandara
- UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA,
| | - F Barlesi
- Aix Marseille University; Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille
| | - K Park
- Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | | | | | | | - PS Hegde
- Genentech Inc., South San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Viotti M, Wilson C, McCleland M, Koeppen H, Haley B, Jhunjhunwala S, Klijn C, Modrusan Z, Arnott D, Classon M, Stephan JP, Mellman I. SUV420H2 is an epigenetic regulator of epithelial/mesenchymal states in pancreatic cancer. J Cell Biol 2017; 217:763-777. [PMID: 29229751 PMCID: PMC5800801 DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201705031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2017] [Revised: 10/13/2017] [Accepted: 11/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition is implicated in metastasis. Viotti et al. show that the histone methyltransferase SUV420H2 favors the mesenchymal identity in pancreatic tumor cells by silencing key drivers of the epithelial state. High levels of SUV420H2 also correlate with a loss of epithelial characteristics in invasive cancer. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition is implicated in metastasis, where carcinoma cells lose sessile epithelial traits and acquire mesenchymal migratory potential. The mesenchymal state is also associated with cancer stem cells and resistance to chemotherapy. It might therefore be therapeutically beneficial to promote epithelial identity in cancer. Because large-scale cell identity shifts are often orchestrated on an epigenetic level, we screened for candidate epigenetic factors and identified the histone methyltransferase SUV420H2 (KMT5C) as favoring the mesenchymal identity in pancreatic cancer cell lines. Through its repressive mark H4K20me3, SUV420H2 silences several key drivers of the epithelial state. Its knockdown elicited mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition on a molecular and functional level, and cells displayed decreased stemness and increased drug sensitivity. An analysis of human pancreatic cancer biopsies was concordant with these findings, because high levels of SUV420H2 correlated with a loss of epithelial characteristics in progressively invasive cancer. Together, these data indicate that SUV420H2 is an upstream epigenetic regulator of epithelial/mesenchymal state control.
Collapse
|
28
|
Gadgeel S, Kowanetz M, Zou W, Hirsch F, Kerr K, Gandara D, Barlesi F, Park K, McCleland M, Koeppen H, Ballinger M, Sandler A, Hegde P, Rittmeyer A. Clinical efficacy of atezolizumab (Atezo) in PD-L1 subgroups defined by SP142 and 22C3 IHC assays in 2L+ NSCLC: Results from the randomized OAK study. Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx380.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
29
|
Kategaya L, Cuellar T, Haley B, Liu J, Tran A, Cao Y, Stokoe D, McCleland M, Blackwood B, Yee S, Drobnick J, Drummond J, Ernst J, Kwok M, Ly C, Pastor R, Lello PD, Ndubaku C, Blake R, Tsui V, Murray J, Maurer T, Wertz I. Abstract B23: Crucial deubiquitinases in cancer cell survival. Clin Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.pmccavuln16-b23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Deubiquitinases (DUBs) are enzymes that proteolytically cleave ubiquitin from substrates. Substrates include oncogenes, tumor suppressors and polyubiquitinated proteins marked for degradation by the proteasome. Ubiquitin specific peptidase-7 (USP7) deubiquitinates MDM2 (an oncogene). MDM2 is a ligase that ubiquitinates p53 (a tumor suppressor protein), targeting it for proteosomal degradation. As such, USP7 is a promising cancer target because its inhibition stabilizes p53 and thereby promotes apoptosis and cell cycle arrest, processes that are often deregulated in tumors (Nicholson and Suresh Kumar, 2011). We found that USP7 was selectively druggable following a fragment-based lead discovery effort to obtain USP7 antagonists. Cellular and xenograft studies confirm that inhibiting USP7 activity stabilized p53 levels and p53-downstream target, p21. Additionally, normal primary and p53-null cells were less sensitive than the corresponding p53-WT cancer cells to USP7 inhibition.
To investigate whether other DUBs are involved in cancer cell survival, we carried out a drop-out CRISPR screen using a pooled DUB library in HCT116 and A549 cells. Out of the approximately 100 DUBs targeted, nine, including USP7, were found to affect cell viability. These hits were validated using siRNA-mediated knockdown in cancer cell lines (A549, HCT116, MCF7). Three DUBs that robustly decreased cell proliferation were further tested in normal cells (Human Mammary Epithelial Cells and Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells). DUB protein expression levels and activity were also determined. In general, DUB expression levels, activity and knockdown efficiency were higher in cancer cells compared to normal cells. Collectively, our studies support the hypothesis that USP7 inhibition may be an efficacious strategy to promote cancer cell death. Furthermore, there are other DUBs that should be considered as novel cancer targets.
Citation Format: Lorna Kategaya, Trinna Cuellar, Ben Haley, Jinfeng Liu, Andy Tran, Yi Cao, David Stokoe, Mark McCleland, Beth Blackwood, Sharon Yee, Joy Drobnick, Jake Drummond, James Ernst, Michael Kwok, Cuong Ly, Richard Pastor, Paola Di Lello, Chudi Ndubaku, Robert Blake, Vickie Tsui, Jeremy Murray, Till Maurer, Ingrid Wertz. Crucial deubiquitinases in cancer cell survival. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Precision Medicine Series: Targeting the Vulnerabilities of Cancer; May 16-19, 2016; Miami, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2017;23(1_Suppl):Abstract nr B23.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Yi Cao
- Genentech, South San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Cuong Ly
- Genentech, South San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Williams J, Kowanetz M, Koeppen H, Boyd Z, Kadel E, Smith D, McCleland M, Zou W, Hegde P. The SP142 PD-L1 IHC assay for atezolizumab (atezo) reflects pre-existing immune status in NSCLC and correlates with PD-L1 mRNA. Ann Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw380.13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
31
|
Firestein R, McCleland M, Mesh K, Gnad F. Abstract 406: Enhancer templated RNAs as predictors of therapeutic response to epigenetic therapy. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2016-406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Colon tumors arise in a stepwise fashion from either discrete genetic perturbations or epigenetic dysregulation. To uncover the key epigenetic regulators that drive colon cancer growth, we utilized a CRISPR loss of function screen and identified a number of essential genes, including the Bromodomain and Extraterminal (BET) protein, BRD4. We find BRD4 is critical for colon cancer proliferation and its loss leads to differentiation effects in vivo. JQ1, a BET inhibitor, preferentially reduced growth in a subset of epigenetically dysregulated colon cancers, characterized by the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP). Integrated transcriptomic and genomic analyses defined a distinct super-enhancer in CIMP(+) colon cancers that regulates cMYC transcription. We find that the CCAT1 long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) is transcribed from this super-enhancer and is exquisitely sensitive to BET inhibition. Concordantly, cMYC transcription and cell growth were tightly correlated with the presence of CCAT1 RNA in a variety of tumor types. Taken together, we propose CCAT1 as a clinically tractable biomarker for identifying patients likely to benefit from BET inhibitors.
Citation Format: Ron Firestein, Mark McCleland, Kathryn Mesh, Florian Gnad. Enhancer templated RNAs as predictors of therapeutic response to epigenetic therapy. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 406.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ron Firestein
- 1Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Australia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Firestein R, Adler A, McCleland M, Yaylaoglu M, Zhang Z, Liu J, Jiang Z. 553 PRPF6, a tri-snRNP spliceosome protein, regulates the alternative splicing of a distinct oncogenic ZAK variant and promotes colon tumor growth. Eur J Cancer 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(14)70679-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
33
|
Adler A, Jiang Z, McCleland M, Blackwood E, Yee S, Haley B, Stephan JP, Hussain S, Chopra V, Firestein R. Abstract 3203: The tri-snRNP spliceosome complex is required for MYC-dependent cancer growth. Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2013-3203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Spliceosome coordinated RNA splicing is an essential cellular process that can generate an immensely diverse repertoire of RNA. While cancer cells have been known to hijack this process to generate splice forms with oncogenic function, the specific role of spliceosome components in this process is not well understood. In this study, we use an integrative genomic approach to identify PRPF6, a member of the tri-snRNP spliceosome complex as essential for colon cancer growth. We show that, in addition to PRPF6, other tri-snRNP components are coordinately overexpressed or amplified in cancer cells. Inhibition of the tri-snRNP complex, but not other spliceosome components, abrogated cancer cell growth only in dependent cancer cell lines in vitro and in vivo. High resolution transcriptome analysis reveals that the tri-snRNP complex binds and regulates the splicing of a relatively small number of genes, many of which are transcriptional targets of the c-MYC oncogene. Intriguingly, many components of the tri-snRNP complex are mutated in a genetic form of Retinitis Pigmentosa. This genetic corollary suggests that the tri-snRNP complex is necessary in specific cellular contexts that may depend on the proper transcription and splicing of a tri-snRNP regulated set of genes.
Citation Format: Adam Adler, Zhaoshi Jiang, Mark McCleland, Elizabeth Blackwood, Sharon Yee, Benjamin Haley, Jean-Philippe Stephan, Sofia Hussain, Vivek Chopra, Ron Firestein. The tri-snRNP spliceosome complex is required for MYC-dependent cancer growth. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3203. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-3203
Note: This abstract was not presented at the AACR Annual Meeting 2013 because the presenter was unable to attend.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Adler
- Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | - Sharon Yee
- Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
McCleland M, Adler A, Firestein R. Abstract 5191: Dual roles for CDK8 in cancer and stem cell maintenance. Cancer Res 2011. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2011-5191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Cyclin Dependent Kinase 8 (CDK8) is a highly conserved member of the Mediator complex that is required for animal development and growth. Several groups have recently identified CDK8 as a colorectal oncogene (Firestein R., et al Nature 2008; Starr T. Science 2009). While, loss of CDK8 expression inhibits colon cancer cell line proliferation in vitro, the mechanism through which this occurs is unkown. In order to examine the role of CDK8 on tumor growth in vivo, we generated inducible knockdown cell lines in two colon cancer cell line models. We find that CDK8 is necessary for tumor progression in vivo and loss of CDK8 imparts a differentiated phenotype in xenografted colon cancer tumors. FACS analysis of these tumors shows that loss of CDK8 leads to a specific depletion of the tumor initating stem cell compartment. These observations were extended to mouse and human intestine, where CDK8 protein levels were found to be increased both in tumors and in the basal portion of the crypt where the intestinal stem cells reside To further explore the mechanism by which CDK8 leads to this depletion, we performed both microarray gene expression analysis and whole genome ChIP to identify CDK8 transcriptional targets. We find that many of CDK8 regulated targets overlap with gene signatures known to be upregulated in stem cells (p<1×10−45). To determine the relevance of these transcriptional targets to colon cancer, we assessed their level of expression in colon tumors and performed a loss of function screen in a panel of 12 cell lines to determine which genes are required for colon cancer proliferation. Using this approach we identify a subset of CDK8 downstream genes with dual roles in cancer and embryonic maintenance. These data show that modulation of CDK8 induces differentiation in cancer cells by potentially targeting the stem cell properties of cancer.
Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 5191. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-5191
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Adam Adler
- 1Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, MA
| | | |
Collapse
|