130 Individual Differences in Skin Temperature Responses to Cold Pressor Stress During Sleep Restriction and Circadian Misalignment

Introduction

Individual differences in cognition during sleep restriction and circadian misalignment have been shown to be trait-like. Here we explored the consistency of individual differences in cardiovascular responses to the cold pressor test (CPT) measured by changes in the distal-proximal skin temperature gradient (DPG) using the contralateral hand to that immersed in the ice water bath, which reflects a reflex cutaneous vasoconstriction.

Methods

Eighteen healthy participants (8 females) mean (±SD) age 25.28 (±4.3), underwent two identical in-laboratory combined sleep restriction and circadian misalignment protocols preceded by an 8h baseline in-laboratory sleep opportunity. The participants were given a 3h sleep opportunity on night 2 and a 3h sleep opportunity on days 3 and 4 followed by recovery sleep. The CPT occurred the morning after the baseline sleep opportunity and the morning before recovery sleep. Participants maintained a seated posture beginning 30 min prior to the CPT and skin temperature was assessed starting 15 min before until 45 min after the CPT. DPG (proximal=subclavicular; distal=hand palmar) data were averaged into 3 min bins. Changes in DPG from pre-CPT and 5 min post-CPT were assessed as the primary outcome using mixed-model ANOVAs. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to measure consistency of individual differences for DPG responses.

Results

Mixed-model ANOVA revealed significant effects of time and combined sleep restriction and circadian misalignment on DPG during the CPT (both p<0.05), such that the DPG was wider (i.e., more negative) post-CPT and during sleep restriction and circadian misalignment. Participants showed moderately consistent DPG responses across visits 1 and 2 at baseline (ICC=0.59) and substantially consistent DPG responses during sleep restriction and circadian misalignment (ICC=0.67). Further, participants showed moderately consistent DPG responses when comparing changes between baseline and sleep restriction and circadian misalignment across visits (ICC=0.58).

Conclusion

Findings support that combined sleep restriction and circadian misalignment is associated with sympathetic activation and that individual differences in the DPG response to cold pressor stress are consistent.

Support (if any)

Office of Naval Research MURI grant N00014-15-1-2809, NIH/NCATS Colorado CTSA Grant UL1TR002535

114 Stability of Gut Microbiome Alpha Diversity During Combined Sleep Restriction and Circadian Misalignment

Introduction

Disturbed gut microbiome diversity has been associated with poor health outcomes and various disease states. We investigated the impact of combined sleep restriction (3h time in bed [TIB] sleep opportunities per day) and circadian misalignment (daytime sleep and nighttime wakefulness) on gut microbiome alpha diversity in healthy young individuals in a controlled laboratory setting.

Methods

Twenty healthy adults (8 female), mean age (±SD) 25.65(±4.2) completed a 39-day protocol consisting of two laboratory visits lasting 4 days each. Two weeks of ambulatory monitoring prior to laboratory visits confirmed ~8h habitual sleep duration per night. Participants consumed energy-balanced diets, identical within participants, 2 days before and during the laboratory visits. The laboratory visits consisted of sleep opportunities as follows: night 1 (8h TIB), night 2 (3h TIB), day 3 (3h TIB) and day 4 (3h TIB). Fecal microbiome samples were obtained at baseline between day 1 and 2, and during sleep and circadian disruption (between day 3 and 4). Alpha diversity measures were calculated using Pielou’s evenness, Faith’s phylogenetic diversity and number of observed OTUs.

Results

Linear mixed models with subject as a random factor and visit as a fixed factor were performed to assess whether any alpha diversity measures changed during sleep and circadian disruption compared to baseline. Alpha diversity did not change significantly between baseline and sleep and circadian disruption (all p > 0.57). Additionally, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated at baseline and during sleep and circadian disruption to determine if alpha diversity measures showed trait-like stability at both time points. ICCs were substantial to almost perfect (ICC 0.64–0.84) at baseline and substantial (ICC 0.70–0.80) during sleep and circadian disruption.

Conclusion

Four days of combined sleep restriction and circadian misalignment does not appear to alter alpha diversity of gut microbiota species in healthy adults. Further, substantial to almost perfect intraclass correlation coefficients suggest alpha diversity of the human microbiome is stable during combined sleep and circadian perturbation and that examination at the level of microbiota community composition and functional outcomes are needed.

Support (if any)

Office of Naval Research MURI (N00014- 15-1-2809), NIH/NCATS (UL1TR002535), NIH T32 HL149646, CU Undergraduate Research Opportunities.

Regulation of dopaminergic transmission and cocaine reward by the Clock gene

Although there are clear interactions between circadian rhythms and drug addiction, mechanisms for such interactions remain unknown. Here we establish a role for the Clock gene in regulating the brain's reward circuit. Mice lacking a functional Clock gene display an increase in cocaine reward and in the excitability of dopamine neurons in the midbrain ventral tegmental area, a key brain reward region. These phenotypes are associated with increased expression and phosphorylation of tyrosine hydroxylase (the rate-limiting enzyme in dopamine synthesis), as well as changes in several genes known to regulate dopamine activity in the ventral tegmental area. These findings demonstrate the involvement of a circadian-associated gene, Clock, in regulating dopamine function and cocaine reward.

Measurement of hypocretin/orexin content in the mouse brain using an enzyme immunoassay: the effect of circadian time, age and genetic background

The hypocretins (1 and 2) have emerged as key regulators of sleep and wakefulness. We developed a high-throughput enzyme immunoassay (EIA) to measure total brain hypocretin levels from large numbers of mice. Hypocretin levels were not altered by circadian time or age. However, significant differences in one or both hypocretin peptides were observed between different mouse strains. We studied hypocretin levels in knockout and transgenic mouse models with obesity, circadian gene mutations or monoaminergic defects. Compared to controls, only histamine receptor knockouts had lower hypocretin levels. This was most pronounced in H1 receptor knockouts suggesting the existence of a positive feedback loop between hypocretin and histaminergic neurons.