1
|
Burger M. Re: First-in-human Evaluation of a Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-targeted Near-infrared Fluorescent Small Molecule for Fluorescence-based Identification of Prostate Cancer in Patients with High-risk Prostate Cancer Undergoing Robotic-assisted Prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2024; 85:588-589. [PMID: 38521614 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas-St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Müller MR, Prey EM, Spachmann PJ, Goßler C, Burger M, Schnabel MJ. Ureterorenoscopic stone removal without antibiotic prophylaxis. Urol Int 2024:000538856. [PMID: 38626728 DOI: 10.1159/000538856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/18/2024]
Abstract
Purpose To assess the feasibility of sparing routine antibiotic prophylaxis in patients without preoperative urinary tract infection (UTI) undergoing a ureterorenoscopy (URS) for stone removal. Patients and Methods A retrospective, monocentric study was conducted to evaluate the outcome of a modified perioperative antibiotic management strategy according to the principles of antibiotic stewardship (ABS). Patients with preoperative unremarkable urine culture received no antibiotic prophylaxis for ureterorenoscopic stone removal (NoPAP). The NoPAP group was compared to a historic URS cohort, when antibiotic prophylaxis was standard of care. Analysis focused on postoperative complications. Results Postoperative fever occurred in 1% of the NoPAP and 2% of the PAP patients (p= 0.589). Clavien 1-3 complications did not differ between groups with 9% in the NoPAP and 6.2% in the PAP (p= 0.159). No Clavien 4-5 complications were seen. We identified a residual stone (p=0.033) and an ASA-Score 3-4 (p=0.004) as significant risk factors for postoperative fever. By sparing routine antibiotic prophylaxis the overall antibiotic usage was reduced from 100% (PAP) to 8.3% (NoPAP). Conclusion Sparing a routine antibiotic prophylaxis during URS for stone removal seems feasible in patients with unremarkable preoperative urine culture for most of the patients. A prospective validation is warranted.
Collapse
|
3
|
Beijert IJ, Hentschel AE, Bründl J, Compérat EM, Plass K, Rodríguez O, Subiela Henríquez JD, Hernández V, de la Peña E, Alemany I, Turturica D, Pisano F, Soria F, Čapoun O, Bauerová L, Pešl M, Bruins HM, Runneboom W, Herdegen S, Breyer J, Brisuda A, Calatrava A, Rubio-Briones J, Seles M, Mannweiler S, Bosschieter J, Kusuma VRM, Ashabere D, Huebner N, Cotte J, Contieri R, Mertens LS, Claps F, Masson-Lecomte A, Liedberg F, Cohen D, Lunelli L, Cussenot O, El Sheikh S, Volanis D, Côté JF, Rouprêt M, Haitel A, Shariat SF, Mostafid AH, Nieuwenhuijzen JA, Zigeuner R, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Hacek J, Zlotta AR, Burger M, Evert M, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, van der Heijden AG, Kiemeney LALM, Soukup V, Molinaro L, Gontero P, Llorente C, Algaba F, Palou J, N'Dow J, Ribal MJ, van der Kwast TH, Babjuk M, Sylvester RJ, van Rhijn BWG. Second TURB, restaging TURB or repeat TURB in primary T1 non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: impact on prognosis? Int Urol Nephrol 2024; 56:1323-1333. [PMID: 37980689 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-023-03867-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A re-transurethral resection of the bladder (re-TURB) is a well-established approach in managing non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) for various reasons: repeat-TURB is recommended for a macroscopically incomplete initial resection, restaging-TURB is required if the first resection was macroscopically complete but contained no detrusor muscle (DM) and second-TURB is advised for all completely resected T1-tumors with DM in the resection specimen. This study assessed the long-term outcomes after repeat-, second-, and restaging-TURB in T1-NMIBC patients. METHODS Individual patient data with tumor characteristics of 1660 primary T1-patients (muscle-invasion at re-TURB omitted) diagnosed from 1990 to 2018 in 17 hospitals were analyzed. Time to recurrence, progression, death due to bladder cancer (BC), and all causes (OS) were visualized with cumulative incidence functions and analyzed by log-rank tests and multivariable Cox-regression models stratified by institution. RESULTS Median follow-up was 45.3 (IQR 22.7-81.1) months. There were no differences in time to recurrence, progression, or OS between patients undergoing restaging (135 patients), second (644 patients), or repeat-TURB (84 patients), nor between patients who did or who did not undergo second or restaging-TURB. However, patients who underwent repeat-TURB had a shorter time to BC death compared to those who had second- or restaging-TURB (multivariable HR 3.58, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION Prognosis did not significantly differ between patients who underwent restaging- or second-TURB. However, a worse prognosis in terms of death due to bladder cancer was found in patients who underwent repeat-TURB compared to second-TURB and restaging-TURB, highlighting the importance of separately evaluating different indications for re-TURB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene J Beijert
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anouk E Hentschel
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes Bründl
- Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Eva M Compérat
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Pathology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Karin Plass
- European Association of Urology, Guidelines Office Board, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Oscar Rodríguez
- Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Virginia Hernández
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Isabel Alemany
- Pathology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Diana Turturica
- Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesca Pisano
- Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Soria
- Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Otakar Čapoun
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Lenka Bauerová
- Pathology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Michael Pešl
- Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - H Maxim Bruins
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Urology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard/Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sonja Herdegen
- Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Breyer
- Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Antonin Brisuda
- Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ana Calatrava
- Pathology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (I.V.O.), Valencia, Spain
| | - José Rubio-Briones
- Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (I.V.O.), Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | - Judith Bosschieter
- Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Venkata R M Kusuma
- Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - David Ashabere
- Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Nicolai Huebner
- Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Juliette Cotte
- Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, GRC no 5, ONCOTYPE-URO, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Roberto Contieri
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Claps
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alexandra Masson-Lecomte
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Fredrik Liedberg
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Cohen
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, Royal Free London-NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Luca Lunelli
- Urology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Cussenot
- Urology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Soha El Sheikh
- Pathology, Royal Free London-NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Dimitrios Volanis
- Urology, Royal Free London-NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Jean-François Côté
- Pathology, Pierre et Marie Curie Medical School, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, GRC no 5, ONCOTYPE-URO, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Andrea Haitel
- Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
- Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - A Hugh Mostafid
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen
- Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard Zigeuner
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Jose L Dominguez-Escrig
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (I.V.O.), Valencia, Spain
| | - Jaromir Hacek
- Pathology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Alexandre R Zlotta
- Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Matthias Evert
- Pathology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Viktor Soukup
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Luca Molinaro
- Pathology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Carlos Llorente
- Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ferran Algaba
- Pathology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Palou
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - James N'Dow
- European Association of Urology, Guidelines Office Board, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Maria J Ribal
- European Association of Urology, Guidelines Office Board, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Theo H van der Kwast
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marko Babjuk
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
- Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Richard J Sylvester
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
- Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
May M, Körner-Riffard K, Kollitsch L, Burger M, Brookman-May SD, Rauchenwald M, Marszalek M, Eredics K. Evaluating the Efficacy of AI Chatbots as Tutors in Urology: A Comparative Analysis of Responses to the 2022 In-Service Assessment of the European Board of Urology. Urol Int 2024:000537854. [PMID: 38555637 DOI: 10.1159/000537854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study assessed the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) as educational tools by evaluating their accuracy in answering questions across urological subtopics. METHODS Three LLMs (ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, and Bing AI) were examined in two testing rounds, separated by 48-hours, using 100 Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQs) from the 2022 European Board of Urology (EBU) In-Service Assessment (ISA), covering five different subtopics. The correct answer was defined as "formal accuracy" (FA) representing the designated single best answer (SBA) among four options. Alternative answers selected from LLMs, which may not necessarily be the SBA but are still deemed correct, were labeled as "extended accuracy" (EA). Their capacity to enhance the overall accuracy rate when combined with FA was examined. RESULTS In two rounds of testing, the FAs scores were achieved as follows: ChatGPT-3.5: 58% and 62%, ChatGPT-4: 63% and 77%, and BING AI: 81% and 73%. The incorporation of EA did not yield a significant enhancement in overall performance. The achieved gains for ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, and BING AI were as a result 7% and 5%, 5% and 2%, and 3% and 1%, respectively (p>0.3). Within urological subtopics, LLMs showcased best performance in Pediatrics/Congenital and comparatively less effectiveness in Functional/BPS/Incontinence. CONCLUSION LLMs exhibit suboptimal urology knowledge and unsatisfactory proficiency for educational purposes. The overall accuracy did not significantly improve when combining EA to FA. The error rates remained high ranging from 16 to 35%. Proficiency levels vary substantially across subtopics. Further development of medicine specific LLMs is required before integration into urological training programs.
Collapse
|
5
|
Promm M, Otto W, Götz S, Burger M, Müller K, Rubenwolf P, Neuhuber WL, Rösch WH. Innervation pattern of the unclosed detrusor muscle in classic bladder exstrophy: a study of patients with urothelial overexpression of nerve growth factor. Pediatr Surg Int 2024; 40:69. [PMID: 38441774 PMCID: PMC10914852 DOI: 10.1007/s00383-024-05649-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE An overexpression of nerve growth factor (NGF) in the urothelium is discussed to lead to neuronal hyperinnervation of the bladder detrusor. The aim was to assess the sensory and sympathetic innervation of the detrusor in unclosed exstrophic bladders patients with known overexpression of NGF in the urothelium. METHODS Full-thickness bladder biopsies were prospectively obtained from 34 infants at delayed primary bladder closure between 01/2015 and 04/2020. The bladder biopsies were immunohistochemically stained with antibodies against S100, calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP), Neurofilament 200 (anti-NF200), and tyrosine-hydroxylase (anti-TH). Specimens from 6 children with congenital vesicoureterorenal reflux (VUR) served as controls. RESULTS There was no statistically significant difference in nerve fiber density in any of the immunohistochemical assessments (anti-S100 [p = 0.210], anti-CGRP [p = 0.897], anti-NF200 [p = 0.897]), and anti-TH [p = 0.956]) between patients with BE and patients with VUR. However, we observed a trend toward lower nerve fiber densities in exstrophic detrusor. CONCLUSION Overall our results showed an unharmed innervation pattern in this cohort but a lower density of nerve fibers in the detrusor compared to controls. Further studies in patients after successful primary closure are needed to clarify the potential impact of the urothelial overexpression of NGF modulating the innervation pattern in exstrophic bladders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Promm
- Department of Pediatric Urology, Clinic St. Hedwig, University Medical Center of Regensburg, Steinmetzstr. 1-3, 93049, Regensburg, Germany.
| | - Wolfgang Otto
- Department of Urology, University of Regensburg, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, Landshuter Str. 65, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Stefanie Götz
- Department of Urology, University of Regensburg, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, Landshuter Str. 65, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, University of Regensburg, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, Landshuter Str. 65, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Karolina Müller
- Center for Clinical Studies, University Medical Center Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Peter Rubenwolf
- Department of Pediatric Urology, Clinic St. Hedwig, University Medical Center of Regensburg, Steinmetzstr. 1-3, 93049, Regensburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Winfried L Neuhuber
- Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Universitaetsstr. 19, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang H Rösch
- Department of Pediatric Urology, Clinic St. Hedwig, University Medical Center of Regensburg, Steinmetzstr. 1-3, 93049, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Engelmann SU, Yang Y, Pickl C, Haas M, Goßler C, Kälble S, Hartmann V, Breyer J, Burger M, Mayr R. Ureteroplasty with buccal mucosa graft without omental wrap: an effective method to treat ureteral strictures. World J Urol 2024; 42:116. [PMID: 38436781 PMCID: PMC10912248 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04825-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Successful treatment options for ureteral strictures are limited. Surgical options such as ileal interposition and kidney autotransplantation are difficult and associated with morbidity and complications. Techniques such as Boari flap and psoas hitch are limited to distal strictures. Only limited case studies on the success of open buccal mucosa graft (BMG) ureteroplasty exist to this date. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the success of open BMG ureteroplasty without omental wrap. METHODS In this single-center retrospective study between July 2020 and January 2023, we included 14 consecutive patients with ureteric strictures who were treated with open BMG ureteroplasty without omental wrap. The primary outcome was the success of open BMG ureteroplasty. Further endpoints were complications and hospital readmission. Outcome variables were assessed by clinical examination, kidney sonography, and patient anamnesis. RESULTS Out of 14 patients, 13 were stricture and ectasia-free without a double-J stent at a median follow-up of 15 months (success rate 93%). No complications were observed at the donor site, and the complication rate overall was low with 3 out of 14 patients (21%) having mild-to-medium complications. CONCLUSIONS Open BMG ureteroplasty without omental wrap is a successful and feasible technique for ureteric stricture repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon U Engelmann
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuter Straße 65, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Yushan Yang
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuter Straße 65, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Pickl
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuter Straße 65, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Haas
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuter Straße 65, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Christopher Goßler
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuter Straße 65, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Kälble
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuter Straße 65, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Valerie Hartmann
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuter Straße 65, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Breyer
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuter Straße 65, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuter Straße 65, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Roman Mayr
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuter Straße 65, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Haas M, Engelmann SU, Mayr R, Gossler C, Pickl C, Kälble S, Yang Y, Otto W, Hartmann V, Burger M, Hartmann A, Breyer J, Eckstein M. A novel grading approach predicts worse outcomes in stage pT1 non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. BJU Int 2024. [PMID: 38409965 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop a prognostically relevant scoring system for stage pT1 non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) incorporating tumour budding, growth pattern and invasion pattern because the World Health Organisation grading system shows limited prognostic value in such patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS The tissue specimens and clinical data of 113 patients with stage pT1 NMIBC who underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumour were retrospectively investigated. Tumour budding, and growth and invasion patterns were evaluated and categorised into two grade groups (GGs). GGs and other clinical and histopathological variables were investigated regarding recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) using univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses. RESULTS The integration of two tumour budding groups, two growth patterns, and two invasion patterns yielded an unfavourable GG (n = 28; 24.7%) that had a high impact on oncological outcomes. The unfavourable GG was identified as an independent RFS and OS predictor (P = 0.004 and P = 0.046, respectively) and linked to worse PFS (P = 0.001) and CSS (P = 0.001), irrespective of the European Association of Urology risk group. The unfavourable GG was associated with higher rates of BCG-unresponsive tumours (P = 0.006). Study limitations include the retrospective, single-centre design, diverse therapies and small cohort. CONCLUSIONS We present a morphology-based grading system for stage pT1 NMIBC that correlates with disease aggressiveness and oncological patient outcomes. It therefore identifies a highest risk group of stage pT1 NMIBC patients, who should be followed up more intensively or receive immediate radical cystectomy. The grading incorporates objective variables assessable on haematoxylin and eosin slides and immunohistochemistry, enabling an easy-to-use low-cost approach that is applicable in daily routine. Further studies are needed to validate and confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Haas
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Simon U Engelmann
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Roman Mayr
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Christopher Gossler
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Pickl
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Kälble
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Yushan Yang
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Otto
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Valerie Hartmann
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Johannes Breyer
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Markus Eckstein
- Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Benderska-Söder N, Ecke T, Kleinlein L, Roghmann F, Bismarck E, van Rhijn BWG, Stenzl A, Witjes JA, Todenhöfer T, Hakenberg OW, Grimm MO, Goebell PJ, Burger M, Jensen JB, Schmitz-Dräger BJ. Simulation of the effects of molecular urine markers in follow-up of patients with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 2024:S1078-1439(24)00041-3. [PMID: 38403529 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
A plethora of urine markers for the management of patients with bladder cancer has been developed and studied in the past. However, the clinical impact of urine testing on patient management remains obscure. The goal of this manuscript is to identify scenarios for the potential use of molecular urine markers in the follow-up of patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive BC (NMIBC) and estimate potential risks and benefits. Information on the course of disease of patients with high-risk NMIBC and performance data of a point-of-care test (UBC rapid™), an MCM-5 directed ELISA (ADXBLADDER™), and 2 additional novel assays targeting alterations of mRNA expression and DNA methylation (Xpert bladder cancer monitor™, Epicheck™) were retrieved from high-quality trials and/or meta-analyses. In addition, the sensitivity of white light cystoscopy (WLC) and the impact of a urine marker result on the performance of WLC were estimated based on fluorescence cystoscopy data and information from the CeFub trial. This information was applied to different scenarios in patient follow-up and sensitivity, estimated number of cystoscopies, and the numbers needed to diagnose were calculated. The sensitivity of guideline-based regular follow-up (SOC) at 1 year was calculated at 96%. For different marker-supported strategies sensitivities ranging from 77% to 97.9% were estimated. Calculations suggest that several strategies are effective for the SOC. While for the SOC 24.6 WLCs were required to diagnose 1 tumor recurrence (NND), this NND dropped below 5 in some marker-supported strategies. Based on the results of this simulation, a marker-supported follow-up of patients with HR NMIBC is safe and offers the option to significantly reduce the number of WLCs. Further research focusing on prospective randomized trials is needed to finally find a way to implement urine markers into clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thorsten Ecke
- Department of Urology, Helios Klinikum, Bad Saarow, Germany; Department of Urology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lisa Kleinlein
- Urologie 24, St. Theresienkrankenhaus, Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Florian Roghmann
- Department of Urology, Marienhospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany
| | | | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, University of Regensburg, Caritas-Hospital St. Josef, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Arnulf Stenzl
- Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls-University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Peter J Goebell
- Department of Urology, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, University of Regensburg, Caritas-Hospital St. Josef, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | - Bernd J Schmitz-Dräger
- Urologie 24, St. Theresienkrankenhaus, Nürnberg, Germany; Studienpraxis Urologie, Nürtingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kravchuk AP, Wolff I, Gilfrich C, Wirtz RM, Soares P, Braun KP, Brookman-May SD, Kollitsch L, Hauner K, Burchardt M, Bründl J, Burger M, May M. Urine-Based Biomarker Test Uromonitor ® in the Detection and Disease Monitoring of Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Performance. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:753. [PMID: 38398144 PMCID: PMC10886463 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2023] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Optimal urine-based diagnostic tests (UBDT) minimize unnecessary follow-up cystoscopies in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder-cancer (NMIBC), while accurately detecting high-grade bladder-cancer without false-negative results. Such UBDTs have not been comprehensively described upon a broad, validated dataset, resulting in cautious guideline recommendations. Uromonitor®, a urine-based DNA-assay detecting hotspot alterations in TERT, FGFR3, and KRAS, shows promising initial results. However, a systematic review merging all available data is lacking. Studies investigating the diagnostic performance of Uromonitor® in NMIBC until November 2023 were identified in PubMed, Embase, Web-of-Science, Cochrane, Scopus, and medRxiv databases. Within aggregated analyses, test performance and area under the curve/AUC were calculated. This project fully implemented the PRISMA statement. Four qualifying studies comprised a total of 1190 urinary tests (bladder-cancer prevalence: 14.9%). Based on comprehensive analyses, sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value/PPV, negative-predictive value/NPV, and test accuracy of Uromonitor® were 80.2%, 96.9%, 82.1%, 96.6%, and 94.5%, respectively, with an AUC of 0.886 (95%-CI: 0.851-0.921). In a meta-analysis of two studies comparing test performance with urinary cytology, Uromonitor® significantly outperformed urinary cytology in sensitivity, PPV, and test accuracy, while no significant differences were observed for specificity and NPV. This systematic review supports the use of Uromonitor® considering its favorable diagnostic performance. In a cohort of 1000 patients with a bladder-cancer prevalence of ~15%, this UBDT would avert 825 unnecessary cystoscopies (true-negatives) while missing 30 bladder-cancer cases (false-negatives). Due to currently limited aggregated data from only four studies with heterogeneous quality, confirmatory studies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anton P. Kravchuk
- Department of Urology, St. Elisabeth Hospital Straubing, 94315 Straubing, Germany
| | - Ingmar Wolff
- Department of Urology, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Christian Gilfrich
- Department of Urology, St. Elisabeth Hospital Straubing, 94315 Straubing, Germany
| | - Ralph M. Wirtz
- STRATIFYER Molecular Pathology GmbH, 50935 Cologne, Germany
| | - Paula Soares
- IPATIMUP-Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
- Department of Pathology and Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-139 Porto, Portugal
| | - Kay-Patrick Braun
- Institute of General Practice, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Sabine D. Brookman-May
- Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Johnson and Johnson Innovative Medicine, Research & Development, Spring House, PA 19477, USA
| | - Lisa Kollitsch
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Klinik Donaustadt, A1220 Vienna, Austria
| | - Katharina Hauner
- Department of Urology, University Hospital MRI-TUM (München rechts der Isar), 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Martin Burchardt
- Department of Urology, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Johannes Bründl
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Matthias May
- Department of Urology, St. Elisabeth Hospital Straubing, 94315 Straubing, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kollitsch L, Eredics K, Marszalek M, Rauchenwald M, Brookman-May SD, Burger M, Körner-Riffard K, May M. How does artificial intelligence master urological board examinations? A comparative analysis of different Large Language Models' accuracy and reliability in the 2022 In-Service Assessment of the European Board of Urology. World J Urol 2024; 42:20. [PMID: 38197996 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04749-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study is a comparative analysis of three Large Language Models (LLMs) evaluating their rate of correct answers (RoCA) and the reliability of generated answers on a set of urological knowledge-based questions spanning different levels of complexity. METHODS ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, and Bing AI underwent two testing rounds, with a 48-h gap in between, using the 100 multiple-choice questions from the 2022 European Board of Urology (EBU) In-Service Assessment (ISA). For conflicting responses, an additional consensus round was conducted to establish conclusive answers. RoCA was compared across various question complexities. Ten weeks after the consensus round, a subsequent testing round was conducted to assess potential knowledge gain and improvement in RoCA, respectively. RESULTS Over three testing rounds, ChatGPT-3.5 achieved RoCa scores of 58%, 62%, and 59%. In contrast, ChatGPT-4 achieved RoCA scores of 63%, 77%, and 77%, while Bing AI yielded scores of 81%, 73%, and 77%, respectively. Agreement rates between rounds 1 and 2 were 84% (κ = 0.67, p < 0.001) for ChatGPT-3.5, 74% (κ = 0.40, p < 0.001) for ChatGPT-4, and 76% (κ = 0.33, p < 0.001) for BING AI. In the consensus round, ChatGPT-4 and Bing AI significantly outperformed ChatGPT-3.5 (77% and 77% vs. 59%, both p = 0.010). All LLMs demonstrated decreasing RoCA scores with increasing question complexity (p < 0.001). In the fourth round, no significant improvement in RoCA was observed across all three LLMs. CONCLUSIONS The performance of the tested LLMs in addressing urological specialist inquiries warrants further refinement. Moreover, the deficiency in response reliability contributes to existing challenges related to their current utility for educational purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Kollitsch
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Klinik Donaustadt, Vienna, Austria
| | - Klaus Eredics
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Klinik Donaustadt, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Martin Marszalek
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Klinik Donaustadt, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Rauchenwald
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Klinik Donaustadt, Vienna, Austria
- European Board of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Sabine D Brookman-May
- Department of Urology, University of Munich, LMU, Munich, Germany
- Johnson and Johnson Innovative Medicine, Research and Development, Spring House, PA, USA
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Katharina Körner-Riffard
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Matthias May
- Department of Urology, St. Elisabeth Hospital Straubing, Brothers of Mercy Hospital, Straubing, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sarcan S, Wolff I, Lusuardi L, Kravchuk A, Wiegland J, Yakac A, Thomas C, Burger M, Gilfrich C, Lebentrau S, Ahyai S, Merseburger A, May M. The landscape of penile cancer research in Germany and Austria: a survey among professors in academic centers holding chair positions and results of a literature search. World J Urol 2024; 42:12. [PMID: 38189947 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04719-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research on penile cancer (PeCa) is predominantly conducted in countries with centralized treatment of PeCa-patients. In Germany and Austria (G + A), no state-regulated centralization is established, and no information is available on how PeCa-research is organized. METHODS Current research competence in PeCa was assessed by a 36-item questionnaire sent to all chairholders of urological academic centers in G + A. Based on PubMed records, all scientific PeCa-articles of 2012-2022 from G + A were identified. Current research trends were assessed by dividing the literature search into two periods (P1: 2012-2017, P2: 2018-2022). A bibliometric analysis was supplemented. RESULTS Response rate of the questionnaire was 75%, a median of 13 (IQR: 9-26) PeCa-patients/center was observed in 2021. Retrospective case series were conducted by 38.9% of participating clinics, while involvement in randomized-controlled trials was stated in 8.3% and in basic/fundamental research in 19.4%. 77.8% declared an interest in future multicenter projects. 205 PeCa-articles were identified [median impact factor: 2.77 (IQR: 0.90-4.37)]. Compared to P1, P2 showed a significant increase in the median annual publication count (29 (IQR: 13-17) vs. 15 (IQR: 19-29), p < 0.001), in multicenter studies (79.1% vs. 63.6%, p = 0.018), and in multinational studies (53% vs. 28.9%, p < 0.001); the proportion of basic/fundamental research articles significantly declined (16.5% vs. 28.9%, p = 0.041). Four of the top-5 institutions publishing PeCa-articles are academic centers. Bibliometric analyses revealed author networks, primary research areas in PeCa, and dominant journals for publications. CONCLUSIONS Given the lack of centralization in G + A, this analysis highlights the need for research coordination within multicenter PeCa-projects. The decline in basic/fundamental research should be effectively addressed by the allocation of funded research projects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Semih Sarcan
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Ingmar Wolff
- Department of Urology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Lukas Lusuardi
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Anton Kravchuk
- Department of Urology, St. Elisabeth Hospital Straubing, Brothers of Mercy Hospital, Straubing, Germany
| | - Jens Wiegland
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Abdulbaki Yakac
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christian Thomas
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, University of Regensburg, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Christian Gilfrich
- Department of Urology, St. Elisabeth Hospital Straubing, Brothers of Mercy Hospital, Straubing, Germany
| | - Steffen Lebentrau
- Department of Urology, Otto-Von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, Werner Forssmann Hospital, Eberswalde, Germany
| | - Sascha Ahyai
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Axel Merseburger
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Matthias May
- Department of Urology, St. Elisabeth Hospital Straubing, Brothers of Mercy Hospital, Straubing, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sikic D, Fiebig C, Wullich B, Wolff I, Hoschke B, Manseck A, Gillitzer R, Burger M, Steinestel J, Harke N, Löbig N, Distler FA, May M, Peter J, Gilfrich C. Patient Benefits of Radical Prostatectomy in Certified Prostate Cancer Centers: Comparative Results from the Multicenter IMPROVE Study. Urol Int 2023; 107:949-958. [PMID: 37931610 DOI: 10.1159/000534486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We investigated differences in treatment outcomes following radical prostatectomy (RP) between certified centers (CCs) and noncertified centers (nCCs) within the IMPROVE study group. METHODS A validated survey assessing various factors, including stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and decision regret (DR), was administered to 950 patients who underwent RP across 19 hospitals (12 CCs and 7 nCCs) at a median follow-up of 15 months after RP (interquartile range: 11-20). The response rate was 74%, with 703 patients participating, including 480 (68%) from CCs. Multivariate binary regression models were used to analyze differences between CCs and nCCs regarding the following binary endpoints: nerve-sparing (NS), positive surgical margins (PSM), SUI (defined as >1 safety pad), complications based on the Clavien-Dindo classification (grade ≥1, grade ≥3) and DR (>15 points indicating critical DR). RESULTS Considering the multivariate analysis, the rate of NS surgery was lower in CCs than in nCCs (OR = 0.52; p = 0.004). No significant differences were observed in the PSM rate (OR = 1.67; p = 0.051), SUI (OR = 1.03; p = 0.919), and DR (OR = 1.00; p = 0.990). SUI (OR 0.39; p < 0.001) and DR (OR 0.62; p = 0.026) were reported significantly less frequently by patients treated with robotic-assisted RP, which was significantly more often performed in CCs than in nCCs (68.3% vs. 18%; p < 0.001). The total complication rate was 45% lower in CCs (OR = 0.55; p = 0.004), although the number of complications requiring intervention (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥3) did not differ significantly between CCs and nCCs (OR = 2.52; p = 0.051). CONCLUSION Within the IMPROVE study group, similarly favorable outcomes after RP were found in both CCs and nCCs, which, however, cannot be transferred to the general treatment landscape of PCA in Germany. Of note, robotic-assisted RP was more often performed in CCs and associated with less SUI and DR, while open prostatectomy was the treatment of choice in low-volume nCCs. Future prospective and region wide studies should also investigate the surgeon caseload and experience as well as a spillover effect of the certification process on nCCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danijel Sikic
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christian Fiebig
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Bernd Wullich
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ingmar Wolff
- Department of Urology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Bernd Hoschke
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Carl-Thiem-Klinikum Cottbus, Cottbus, Germany
| | - Andreas Manseck
- Department of Urology, Klinikum Ingolstadt, Ingolstadt, Germany
| | - Rolf Gillitzer
- Department of Urology, Klinikum Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, St. Josef-Hospital Regensburg, Medical University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Julie Steinestel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Nina Harke
- Department of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Niklas Löbig
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Florian A Distler
- Department of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Matthias May
- Department of Urology, St. Elisabeth Hospital Straubing, Straubing, Germany
| | - Julia Peter
- Department of Urology, St. Elisabeth Hospital Straubing, Straubing, Germany
| | - Christian Gilfrich
- Department of Urology, St. Elisabeth Hospital Straubing, Straubing, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yakac A, Lebentrau S, Lusuardi L, Sarcan S, Burger M, Merseburger AS, Wiegland J, Gilfrich C, Wolff I, Ahyai S, May M, Thomas C. Centralizing Penile Cancer Care in Germany and Austria: Just a Dream or a Fast-Approaching Reality? Results of a Survey Study among Urological Department Chairs and Modeling of Real Treatment Numbers of Penile Cancer Patients. Urol Int 2023; 107:916-923. [PMID: 37918360 DOI: 10.1159/000534089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In countries characterized by a centralization of therapy management, patients with penile cancer (PeCa) have shown improvements in guideline adherence and ultimately, improved carcinoma-specific survival. Germany and Austria (G + A) have no state-regulated centralization of PeCa management, and the perspectives of urological university department chairs (UUDCs) in these countries, who act as drivers of professional and political developments, on this topic are currently unknown. METHODS Surveys containing 36 response options, including specific questions regarding perspectives on PeCa centralization, were sent to the 48 UUDC in G + A in January 2023. In addition to analyzing the responses, closely following the CROSS checklist, a modeling of the real healthcare situation of in-house PeCa patients in G + A was conducted. RESULTS The response rate was 75% (36/48). 94% and 89% of the UUDCs considered PeCa centralization meaningful and feasible in the medium term, respectively. Among the UUDCs, 72% estimated centralization within university hospitals as appropriate, while 28% favored a geographically oriented approach. Additionally, 97% of the UUDCs emphasized the importance of bridging the gap until implementation of centralization by establishing PeCa second-opinion portals. No country-specific differences were observed. The median number of in-house PeCa cases at the university hospitals in G + A was 13 (interquartile range: 9-26). A significant positive correlation was observed between the annual number of in-house PeCa cases at a given university hospital and the perspective of the UUDCs that centralization as meaningful by its UUDC (0.024). Under assumptions permissible for modeling, the average number of in-house PeCa cases in academic hospitals in G + A was approximately 30 times higher than in nonacademic hospitals. CONCLUSION This study provides the first data on the perspectives of UUDCs in G + A concerning centralization of PeCa therapy management. Even without state-regulated centralization in G + A, there is currently a clear focusing of PeCa treatments in university hospitals. Further necessary steps toward a structured PeCa centralization are discussed in this manuscript.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulbaki Yakac
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Steffen Lebentrau
- Department of Urology, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, Werner Forssmann Hospital, Eberswalde, Germany
| | - Lukas Lusuardi
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Semih Sarcan
- Department of Urology, University Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Axel S Merseburger
- Department of Urology, University Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Jens Wiegland
- St. Elisabeth Hospital Straubing, Brothers of Mercy Hospital, Straubing, Germany
| | - Christian Gilfrich
- St. Elisabeth Hospital Straubing, Brothers of Mercy Hospital, Straubing, Germany
| | - Ingmar Wolff
- Department of Urology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Sascha Ahyai
- Department of Urology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Matthias May
- St. Elisabeth Hospital Straubing, Brothers of Mercy Hospital, Straubing, Germany
| | - Christian Thomas
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bamias A, Stenzl A, Brown SL, Albiges L, Babjuk M, Birtle A, Briganti A, Burger M, Choudhury A, Colecchia M, De Santis M, Fanti S, Fonteyne V, Gallucci M, Rivas JG, Huddart R, Junker K, Kroeze S, Loriot Y, Merseburger A, Montironi R, Necchi A, Oing C, Oldenburg J, Ost P, Pinkawa M, Ribal MJ, Rouprêt M, Thoeny H, Zilli T, Hoskin P. Definition and Diagnosis of Oligometastatic Bladder Cancer: A Delphi Consensus Study Endorsed by the European Association of Urology, European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology, and European Society of Medical Oncology Genitourinary Faculty. Eur Urol 2023; 84:381-389. [PMID: 37217391 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 04/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In contrast to other cancers, the concept of oligometastatic disease (OMD) has not been investigated in bladder cancer (BC). OBJECTIVE To develop an acceptable definition, classification, and staging recommendations for oligometastatic BC (OMBC) spanning the issues of patient selection and the roles of systemic therapy and ablative local therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A European consensus group of 29 experts, led by the European Association of Urology (EAU), the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), and the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO), and including members from all other relevant European societies, was established. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS A modified Delphi method was used. A systematic review was used to build consensus questions. Consensus statements were extracted from two consecutive surveys. The statements were formulated during two consensus meetings. Agreement levels were measured to determine if consensus was achieved (≥75% agreement). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The first survey included 14 questions and the second survey had 12. Owing to a considerable lack of evidence, which was the major limitation, definition was limited in the context of de novo OMBC, which was further classified as synchronous OMD, oligorecurrence, and oligoprogression. A maximum of three metastatic sites, all resectable or amenable to stereotactic therapy, was proposed as the definition of OMBC. Pelvic lymph nodes represented the only "organ" not included in the definition of OMBC. For staging, no consensus on the role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography was reached. A favourable response to systemic treatment was proposed as the criterion for selection of patients for metastasis-directed therapy. CONCLUSIONS A consensus statement on the definition and staging of OMBC has been formulated. This statement will help to standardise inclusion criteria in future trials, potentiate research on aspects of OMBC for which consensus was not achieved, and hopefully will lead to the development of guidelines on optimal management of OMBC. PATIENT SUMMARY As an intermediate state between localised cancer and disease with extensive metastasis, oligometastatic bladder cancer (OMBC) might benefit from a combination of systemic treatment and local therapy. We report the first consensus statements on OMBC drawn up by an international expert group. These statements can provide a basis for standardisation of future research, which will lead to high-quality evidence in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aristotelis Bamias
- National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Chaidari, Greece.
| | - Arnulf Stenzl
- University of Tübingen Medical Center, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | | | - Marko Babjuk
- 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Motol, Charles University, Praha, Czechia
| | - Alison Birtle
- Rosemere Cancer Centre, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Maurizio Colecchia
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Valérie Fonteyne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Michele Gallucci
- Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Juan Gómez Rivas
- Department of Urology. Hospital Clinico San Carlos. Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Kerstin Junker
- Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Abteilung für Klinisch-Experimentelle Forschung, Homburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Axel Merseburger
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany
| | - Rodolfo Montironi
- Molecular Medicine and Cell Therapy Foundation, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona, Italy
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Christoph Oing
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Wilrijk, Belgium; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Michael Pinkawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MediClin Robert Janker Klinik, Bonn, Germany
| | - Maria J Ribal
- Uro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne University GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Harriet Thoeny
- Department of Radiology, HFR Fribourg-Hôpital Cantonal, University of Fribourg, Villars-sur-Glâne, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Clinica di Radio-Oncologia, Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Breyer J, Eckstein M, Sikic D, Wezel F, Roghmann F, Brehmer M, Wirtz RM, Jarczyk J, Erben P, Bahlinger V, Goldschmidt F, Fechner G, Chen J, Paxinos E, Bates M, Haas M, Zengerling F, Bolenz C, Burger M, Hartmann A, Kriegmair MC. Xpert bladder cancer monitor to predict the need for a second TURB (MoniTURB trial). Sci Rep 2023; 13:15437. [PMID: 37723173 PMCID: PMC10507065 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-42088-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023] Open
Abstract
To determine whether Xpert bladder cancer monitor, a noninvasive PCR-based biomarker test, can predict the need for 2nd transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB) better than clinical assessment. Patients scheduled for TURB were prospectively screened. After initial TURB, patients were assigned to 2nd TURB or follow-up cystoscopy at 3 months (FU) by clinicians' discretion. Central urine cytology and Xpert monitor tests were performed prior to the 1st TURB and 2nd TURB or FU, respectively. Statistical analysis to compare clinical assessment and Xpert monitor comprised sensitivity (SENS), specificity (SPEC), NPV and PPV. Of 756 screened patients, 171 were included (114 with 2nd TURB, 57 with FU). Residual tumors were detected in 34 patients who underwent 2nd TURB, and recurrent tumors were detected in 2 patients with FU. SENS and SPEC of Xpert monitor were 83.3% and 53.0%, respectively, PPV was 32.6% and NPV was 92.1%. Clinical risk assessment outperformed Xpert monitor. In patients with pTa disease at initial TURB, Xpert monitor revealed a NPV of 96%. Xpert monitor was not superior than clinical assessment in predicting the need for 2nd TURB. It might be an option to omit 2nd TURB for selected patients with pTa disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Breyer
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuter Str. 65, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
- BRIDGE (Bladder Cancer Research Initiative for Drug Targets Germany) Consortium E.V., Mannheim, Germany.
| | - Markus Eckstein
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
- BRIDGE (Bladder Cancer Research Initiative for Drug Targets Germany) Consortium E.V., Mannheim, Germany
| | - Danijel Sikic
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
- BRIDGE (Bladder Cancer Research Initiative for Drug Targets Germany) Consortium E.V., Mannheim, Germany
| | - Felix Wezel
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
- BRIDGE (Bladder Cancer Research Initiative for Drug Targets Germany) Consortium E.V., Mannheim, Germany
| | - Florian Roghmann
- Department of Urology, Marien Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
- BRIDGE (Bladder Cancer Research Initiative for Drug Targets Germany) Consortium E.V., Mannheim, Germany
| | - Mirco Brehmer
- Department of Urology, Marien Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Ralph M Wirtz
- Stratifyer Molecular Pathology GmbH, Cologne, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, St. Elisabeth Hospital Köln-Hohenlind, Cologne, Germany
- BRIDGE (Bladder Cancer Research Initiative for Drug Targets Germany) Consortium E.V., Mannheim, Germany
| | - Jonas Jarczyk
- Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Hospital Mannheim Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
- BRIDGE (Bladder Cancer Research Initiative for Drug Targets Germany) Consortium E.V., Mannheim, Germany
| | - Philipp Erben
- Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Hospital Mannheim Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
- BRIDGE (Bladder Cancer Research Initiative for Drug Targets Germany) Consortium E.V., Mannheim, Germany
| | - Veronika Bahlinger
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
- BRIDGE (Bladder Cancer Research Initiative for Drug Targets Germany) Consortium E.V., Mannheim, Germany
| | - Franziska Goldschmidt
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- BRIDGE (Bladder Cancer Research Initiative for Drug Targets Germany) Consortium E.V., Mannheim, Germany
| | - Guido Fechner
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- BRIDGE (Bladder Cancer Research Initiative for Drug Targets Germany) Consortium E.V., Mannheim, Germany
| | - Jack Chen
- Biostatistics, Cepheid Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA
| | - Ellen Paxinos
- Medical and Scientific Affairs, Cepheid Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA
| | - Michael Bates
- Medical and Scientific Affairs, Cepheid Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA
| | - Maximilian Haas
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuter Str. 65, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
- BRIDGE (Bladder Cancer Research Initiative for Drug Targets Germany) Consortium E.V., Mannheim, Germany
| | - Friedemann Zengerling
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
- BRIDGE (Bladder Cancer Research Initiative for Drug Targets Germany) Consortium E.V., Mannheim, Germany
| | - Christian Bolenz
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
- BRIDGE (Bladder Cancer Research Initiative for Drug Targets Germany) Consortium E.V., Mannheim, Germany
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuter Str. 65, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
- BRIDGE (Bladder Cancer Research Initiative for Drug Targets Germany) Consortium E.V., Mannheim, Germany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
- BRIDGE (Bladder Cancer Research Initiative for Drug Targets Germany) Consortium E.V., Mannheim, Germany
| | - Maximilian C Kriegmair
- Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Hospital Mannheim Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
- BRIDGE (Bladder Cancer Research Initiative for Drug Targets Germany) Consortium E.V., Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Claps F, van de Kamp MW, Mayr R, Bostrom PJ, Shariat SF, Hippe K, Bertz S, Neuzillet Y, Sanders J, Otto W, van der Heijden MS, Jewett MAS, Stöhr R, Zlotta AR, Trombetta C, Eckstein M, Mertens LS, Burger M, Soorojebally Y, Wullich B, Bartoletti R, Radvanyi F, Pavan N, Sirab N, Mir MC, Pouessel D, van der Kwast TH, Hartmann A, Lotan Y, Bussani R, Allory Y, van Rhijn BWG. Prognostic impact of variant histologies in urothelial bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy. BJU Int 2023; 132:170-180. [PMID: 36748180 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate variant histologies (VHs) for disease-specific survival (DSS) in patients with invasive urothelial bladder cancer (BCa) undergoing radical cystectomy (RC). MATERIALS AND METHODS We analysed a multi-institutional cohort of 1082 patients treated with upfront RC for cT1-4aN0M0 urothelial BCa at eight centres. Univariable and multivariable Cox' regression analyses were used to assess the effect of different VHs on DSS in overall cohort and three stage-based analyses. The stages were defined as 'organ-confined' (≤pT2N0), 'locally advanced' (pT3-4N0) and 'node-positive' (pTanyN1-3). RESULTS Overall, 784 patients (72.5%) had pure urothelial carcinoma (UC), while the remaining 298 (27.5%) harboured a VH. Squamous differentiation was the most common VH, observed in 166 patients (15.3%), followed by micropapillary (40 patients [3.7%]), sarcomatoid (29 patients [2.7%]), glandular (18 patients [1.7%]), lymphoepithelioma-like (14 patients [1.3%]), small-cell (13 patients [1.2%]), clear-cell (eight patients [0.7%]), nested (seven patients [0.6%]) and plasmacytoid VH (three patients [0.3%]). The median follow-up was 2.3 years. Overall, 534 (49.4%) disease-related deaths occurred. In uni- and multivariable analyses, plasmacytoid and small-cell VHs were associated with worse DSS in the overall cohort (both P = 0.04). In univariable analyses, sarcomatoid VH was significantly associated with worse DSS, while lymphoepithelioma-like VH had favourable DSS compared to pure UC. Clear-cell (P = 0.015) and small-cell (P = 0.011) VH were associated with worse DSS in the organ-confined and node-positive cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS More than 25% of patients harboured a VH at time of RC. Compared to pure UC, clear-cell, plasmacytoid, small-cell and sarcomatoid VHs were associated with worse DSS, while lymphoepithelioma-like VH was characterized by a DSS benefit. Accurate pathological diagnosis of VHs may ensure tailored counselling to identify patients who require more intensive management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Claps
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Maaike W van de Kamp
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roman Mayr
- Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Peter J Bostrom
- Department of Surgery (Urology) and Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Urology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Katrin Hippe
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center - Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Simone Bertz
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen/Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Yann Neuzillet
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobank, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology Team, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Joyce Sanders
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobank, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wolfgang Otto
- Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Michiel S van der Heijden
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael A S Jewett
- Department of Surgery (Urology) and Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robert Stöhr
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen/Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Alexandre R Zlotta
- Department of Surgery (Urology) and Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Carlo Trombetta
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Markus Eckstein
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen/Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Yanish Soorojebally
- Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology Team, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Bernd Wullich
- Department of Urology & Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen/Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Riccardo Bartoletti
- Unit of Urology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - François Radvanyi
- Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology Team, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Nicola Pavan
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Nanour Sirab
- Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology Team, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - M Carmen Mir
- Department of Urology, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Damien Pouessel
- Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology Team, PSL Research University, Paris, France
- Department of Medical Oncology, Claudius Regaud Institute, Toulouse University Cancer Center (IUCT) Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Theo H van der Kwast
- Department of Pathology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen/Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Rossana Bussani
- Department of Pathology, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Yves Allory
- Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology Team, PSL Research University, Paris, France
- Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
- Department of Surgery (Urology) and Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Latty KS, Burger M, Borrero J, Jovanovic I, Hartig KC. Emission characteristics of bulk aerosols excited by externally focused femtosecond filaments. Opt Express 2023; 31:24652-24666. [PMID: 37475286 DOI: 10.1364/oe.495456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
The bulk aerosol emissions excited by externally focused femtosecond laser filaments are characterized using time-resolved plasma imaging and spectroscopy. Images of N2 and N2+ plasma fluorescence are used to characterize the filament dimensions. Emission profiles from bulk Sr aerosols are studied, showing that several localized emission regions in the filament begin to develop for lower repetition rates and higher pulse energies. Plasma temperature and electron density profiles are determined using particle emissions along the length of short- and long-focused filaments, and results are compared for on-axis and side-collected spectra. The use of on-axis collection enables the sampling of light emitted over the entire length of the filament; however, the necessary back-propagation of light makes on-axis collection susceptible to self-absorption as the optical path is extended through the filament plasma column formed in bulk aerosols.
Collapse
|
18
|
Mikuteit M, Zschäbitz S, Stöhr C, Herrmann E, Polifka I, Agaimy A, Trojan L, Ströbel P, Becker F, Wülfing C, Barth P, Stöckle M, Staehler M, Stief C, Haferkamp A, Hohenfellner M, Duensing S, Macher-Göppinger S, Wullich B, Noldus J, Brenner W, Roos F, Walter B, Otto W, Burger M, Erlmeier M, Schrader AJ, Hartmann A, Erlmeier F, Steffens S. Evaluation of Gas 6 as a Prognostic Marker in Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma. Urol Int 2023; 107:713-722. [PMID: 37348477 PMCID: PMC10413799 DOI: 10.1159/000529898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Growth arrest-specific protein 6 (Gas 6) is a ligand that plays a role in proliferation and migration of cells. For several tumor entities, high levels of Gas 6 are associated with poorer survival. We examined the prognostic role of Gas 6 in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), especially in papillary RCC (pRCC), which is still unclear. METHODS The patients' sample collection is a joint collaboration of the PANZAR consortium. Patients' medical history and tumor specimens were collected from n = 240 and n = 128 patients with type 1 and 2 pRCC, respectively. Expression of Gas 6 was determined by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS In total, Gas 6 staining was evaluable in 180 of 240 type 1 and 110 of 128 type 2 pRCC cases. Kaplan-Meier analysis disclosed no significant difference in 5-year overall survival for all pRCC nor either subtype. Also, Gas+ and Gas- groups did not significantly differ in any tumor or patient characteristics. CONCLUSION Gas 6 was not found to be an independent prognostic marker in pRCC. Future studies are warranted to determine if Gas 6 plays a role as prognostic marker or therapeutic target in pRCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Mikuteit
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Dean’s Office, Curriculum Development, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Stefanie Zschäbitz
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center of Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Stöhr
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Edwin Herrmann
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Iris Polifka
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Abbas Agaimy
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lutz Trojan
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Philipp Ströbel
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Frank Becker
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University of Saarland (UKS), Homburg, Germany
| | - Christian Wülfing
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Peter Barth
- Department of Urology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Michael Stöckle
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University of Saarland (UKS), Homburg, Germany
| | - Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Axel Haferkamp
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Stefan Duensing
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Bernd Wullich
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Joachim Noldus
- Department of Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Walburgis Brenner
- Clinic for Obstretics and Woman's Health and Department of Urology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Urology, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Frederik Roos
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Bernhard Walter
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Otto
- Department of Urology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Franziska Erlmeier
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sandra Steffens
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Dean’s Office, Curriculum Development, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - German Network of Kidney Cancer
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Dean’s Office, Curriculum Development, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center of Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University of Saarland (UKS), Homburg, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
- Department of Urology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, Germany
- Clinic for Obstretics and Woman's Health and Department of Urology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Urology, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
- Department of Urology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, München Klinik Bogenhausen, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lebentrau S, Yakac A, Lusuardi L, Thomas C, Sarcan S, Burger M, Merseburger AS, Wiegland J, Gilfrich C, Wolff I, May M. [Are there any volume-related effects on treatment options for patients with penile cancer? Results of a survey among university hospitals in Germany and Austria]. Aktuelle Urol 2023. [PMID: 37339667 DOI: 10.1055/a-2090-5199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently, 959 men in Germany and 67 in Austria are diagnosed with penile cancer each year, with an increase of approximately 20% in the last decade [RKI 2021, Statcube.at 2023]. Despite the rising incidence, the number of cases per hospital remains low. The median annual number of penile cancer cases at university hospitals in the DACH region was 7 patients (IQR 5-10) in 2017 [E-PROPS group 2021]. The compromised institutional expertise due to low case numbers is compounded with inadequate adherence to penile cancer guidelines, as shown in several studies. The centralization, which is rigorously implemented in countries such as the UK, enabled a significant increase in organ-preserving primary tumor surgery and stage-adapted lymphadenectomies, as well as improved patient survival in cases of penile cancer, resulting in a claim for a similar centralization in Germany and Austria. The aim of this study was to determine the current effects of case volume on penile cancer related treatment options at university hospitals in Germany and Austria. MATERIALS AND METHODS In January 2023, a survey was sent to the heads of 48 urological university hospitals in Germany and Austria, including questions regarding case volume in 2021 (total number of inpatient and penile cancer cases), treatment options for primary tumors and inguinal lymphadenectomy (ILAE), the availability of a designated penile cancer surgeon, and the professional responsibility for systemic therapies in penile cancer. Correlations and differences related to case volume were statistically analyzed without adjustments. RESULTS The response rate was 75% (n=36/48). In total, 626 penile cancer patients were treated at the 36 responding university hospitals in 2021, representing approximately 60% of the expected incidence in Germany and Austria. The annual median total number of cases was 2807 (IQR 1937-3653), and for penile cancer, it was 13 (IQR 9-26). There was no significant correlation between the total inpatient and penile cancer caseloads (p=0.34). The number of organ-preserving therapy procedures for the primary tumor, the availability of modern ILAE procedures, the presence of a designated penile cancer surgeon, and the responsibility for systemic therapies were not significantly influenced by the total inpatient or penile cancer case volume of the treating hospitals, regardless of whether the case volumes were dichotomized at the median or upper quartile. No significant differences between Germany and Austria were observed. CONCLUSION Despite a significant increase in the annual number of penile cancer cases at university hospitals in Germany and Austria compared to 2017, we found no case volume-related effects on structural quality with respect to penile cancer therapy. In the light of the proven benefits of centralization, we interpret this result as an argument for the necessity of establishing nationally organized penile cancer centers with even higher case volumes compared to the status quo, in light of the proven benefits of centralization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steffen Lebentrau
- Klinik für Urologie, Uroonkologie, robotergestützte und fokale Therapie, Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
- Urologische Klinik, GLG Werner Forssmann Klinikum Eberswalde, Eberswalde, Germany
| | - Abdulbaki Yakac
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Lukas Lusuardi
- Urology, Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversitat, Salzburg, Austria
- Universitätsklinik für Urologie und Andrologie, Uniklinikum Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Christian Thomas
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Semih Sarcan
- Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Lubeck, Germany
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Klinik für Urologie, Universität Regensburg Fakultät für Medizin, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Axel S Merseburger
- Urology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Jens Wiegland
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christain Gilfrich
- Urologische Klinik, St. Elisabeth-Klinikums Straubing, Straubing, Germany
| | - Ingmar Wolff
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Matthias May
- Klinik für Urologie, St. Elisabeth Klinikum Straubing, Straubing, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Oppolzer IA, Riester J, Büttner R, Burger M, Schnabel MJ. Endocrine immune-related adverse events in patients with metastatic renal and urothelial cancer treated with immune checkpoint-inhibitors. Int Urol Nephrol 2023:10.1007/s11255-023-03635-9. [PMID: 37271776 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-023-03635-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the incidence, diagnosis and treatment of immune-related adverse events (e-irAE) of checkpoint inhibition (ICI) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). METHODS A retrospective, single-center study was conducted to identify a cohort that received ICI for mUC or mRCC. e-irAE were classified according to the CTCAE V.5.0. Patients received ICI for mUC or mCC between 01/2017 and 03/2021. A retrospective chart review was performed. T-Test, the chi-squared test, and Fisher's exact test were performed. RESULTS 102 Patients received ICI [mUC: 40 (39%), mRCC: 62 (61%)]. 64 (63%) received an ICI monotherapy, 27 (27%) a dual ICI therapy, 11 (11%) a combination with VEGFi. e-irAE occurred in 19 (19%) patients [grade 1-2: 17 (84%), grade 3: 3 (16%)]. The median time until e-irAE was 42 days (range 11-211 days). 14 Patients developed thyroidism (14%), 4 (4%) a hypophysitis, 1 (1%) an adrenal insufficiency (AI). 7 patients (7%) had to discontinue ICI therapy [hypophysitis (100%), AI (100%), thyroidism (14%)]. 6 (86%) received cortisone. After a median range of 34 days 5 patients (71%) restarted ICI therapy. All patients (n = 4) with hypophysitis continued ICI [4 (100%) prednisone, 3 (75%) levothyroxine]. 11 (79%) presented with hyperthyroidism. 4 (37%) needed therapy (1 (7%) prednisone, 3 (21%) thiamazole, 2 (14%) beta blocker). The 9 (64%) patients with hypothyroidism received levothyroxine. Hypophysitis appears only on dual ICI (CTLA-4/PD-1) inhibition (p 0.007). CONCLUSION This study shows the importance of adequate diagnosis and therapy of e-irAEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Josef Riester
- Department of Urology, University of Regensburg, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Roland Büttner
- Department of Internal Medicine Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, University of Regensburg, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Marco Julius Schnabel
- Department of Urology, University of Regensburg, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Beijert IJ, Cheng L, Liedberg F, Plass K, Williamson SR, Gontero P, Ribal MJ, Babjuk M, Black PC, Kamat AM, Algaba F, Berman DM, Hartmann A, Masson-Lecomte A, Rouprêt M, Lopez-Beltran A, Samaratunga H, Shariat SF, Mostafid AH, Varma M, Shen S, Burger M, Tsuzuki T, Palou J, Compérat EM, Sylvester RJ, van der Kwast TH, van Rhijn BW, Downes MR. International Opinions on Grading of Urothelial Carcinoma: A Survey Among European Association of Urology and International Society of Urological Pathology Members. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 52:154-165. [PMID: 37284047 PMCID: PMC10240524 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Grade of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is an important prognostic factor for progression. Currently, two World Health Organization (WHO) classification systems (WHO1973, categories: grade 1-3, and WHO2004 categories: papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential [PUNLMP], low-grade [LG], high-grade [HG] carcinoma) are used. Objective To ask the European Association of Urology (EAU) and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) members regarding their current practice and preferences of grading systems. Design setting and participants A web-based, anonymous questionnaire with ten questions on grading of NMIBC was created. The members of EAU and ISUP were invited to complete an online survey by the end of 2021. Thirteen experts had previously answered the same questions. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The submitted answers from 214 ISUP members, 191 EAU members, and 13 experts were analyzed. Results and limitations Currently, 53% use only the WHO2004 system and 40% use both systems. According to most respondents, PUNLMP is a rare diagnosis with management similar to Ta-LG carcinoma. The majority (72%) would consider reverting back to WHO1973 if grading criteria were more detailed. Separate reporting of WHO1973-G3 within WHO2004-HG would influence clinical decisions for Ta and/or T1 tumors according the majority (55%). Most respondents preferred a two-tier (41%) or a three-tier (41%) grading system. The current WHO2004 grading system is supported by a minority (20%), whereas nearly half (48%) supported a hybrid three- or four-tier grading system composed of both WHO1973 and WHO2004. The survey results of the experts were comparable with ISUP and EAU respondents. Conclusions Both the WHO1973 and the WHO2004 grading system are still widely used. Even though opinions on the future of bladder cancer grading were strongly divided, there was limited support for WHO1973 and WHO2004 in their current formats, while the hybrid (three-tier) grading system with LG, HG-G2, and HG-G3 as categories could be considered the most promising alternative. Patient summary Grading of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is a matter of ongoing debate and lacks international consensus. We surveyed urologists and pathologists of European Association of Urology and International Society of Urological Pathology on their preferences regarding NMIBC grading to generate a multidisciplinary dialogue. Both the "old" World Health Organization (WHO) 1973 and the "new" WHO2004 grading schemes are still used widely. However, continuation of both the WHO1973 and the WHO2004 system showed limited support, while a hybrid grading system composed of both the WHO1973 and the WHO2004 classification system may be considered a promising alternative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene J. Beijert
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Liang Cheng
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Lifespan Academic Medical Center and Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Fredrik Liedberg
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Karin Plass
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- European Association of Urology, Guidelines Office Board, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | | | - Paolo Gontero
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Maria J. Ribal
- European Association of Urology, Guidelines Office Board, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marko Babjuk
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter C. Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Ashish M. Kamat
- Department of Urology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ferran Algaba
- Department of Pathology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David M. Berman
- Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Alexandra Masson-Lecomte
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Université de Paris, APHP, Saint Louis Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Antonio Lopez-Beltran
- Department of Morphological Sciences, University of Cordoba Medical School, Cordoba, Spain
- Anatomic Pathology, Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Hemamali Samaratunga
- Department of Pathology, Aquesta Uropathology and University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - A. Hugh Mostafid
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Murali Varma
- Department of Cellular Pathology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Steven Shen
- Department of Pathology Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Maximilian Burger
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Toyonori Tsuzuki
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Aichi Medical University Hospital, Nagakute, Japan
| | - Joan Palou
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eva M. Compérat
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Richard J. Sylvester
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Theo H. van der Kwast
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Bas W.G. van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Michelle R. Downes
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Precision Diagnostics and Therapeutics Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wolff I, Burchardt M, Peter J, Thomas C, Sikic D, Fiebig C, Promnitz S, Hoschke B, Burger M, Schnabel MJ, Gilfrich C, Löbig N, Harke NN, Distler FA, May M. Patient's Desire and Real Availability Concerning Supportive Measures Accompanying Radical Prostatectomy: Differences between Certified Prostate Cancer Centers and Non-Certified Centers Based on Patient-Reported Outcomes within the Cross-Sectional Study Improve. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:2830. [PMID: 37345167 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15102830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2023] [Revised: 05/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Certification as a prostate cancer center requires the offer of several supportive measures to patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP). However, it remains unclear how patients estimate the relevance of these measures and whether the availability of these measures differs between certified prostate cancer centers (CERTs) and non-certified centers (NCERTs). In 20 German urologic centers, a survey comprising questions on the relevance of 15 supportive measures was sent to 1000 patients at a median of 15 months after RP. Additionally, patients were asked to rate the availability of these measures using a four-item Likert scale. The aim of this study was to compare these ratings between CERTs and NCERTs. The response rate was 75.0%. In total, 480 patients underwent surgery in CERTs, and 270 in NCERTs. Patients rated 6/15 supportive measures as very relevant: preoperative medical counselling concerning treatment options, a preoperative briefing answering last questions, preoperative pelvic floor exercises (PFEs), postoperative PFEs, postoperative social support, and postoperative rehabilitation addressing physical fitness recovery. These ratings showed no significant difference between CERTs and NCERTs (p = 0.133-0.676). In addition, 4/9 of the remaining criteria were rated as more detailed by patients in CERTs. IMPROVE represents the first study worldwide to evaluate a patient-reported assessment of the supportive measures accompanying RP. Pertinent offers vary marginally between CERTs and NCERTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingmar Wolff
- Department of Urology, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Martin Burchardt
- Department of Urology, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Julia Peter
- Department of Urology, St. Elisabeth Hospital Straubing, 94315 Straubing, Germany
| | - Christian Thomas
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Danijel Sikic
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christian Fiebig
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sören Promnitz
- Department of Urology, Klinikum Frankfurt (Oder), 15236 Frankfort (Oder), Germany
| | - Bernd Hoschke
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Carl-Thiem-Klinikum Cottbus, 03048 Cottbus, Germany
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas-St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Marco J Schnabel
- Department of Urology, Caritas-St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Christian Gilfrich
- Department of Urology, St. Elisabeth Hospital Straubing, 94315 Straubing, Germany
| | - Niklas Löbig
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Nina N Harke
- Department of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Hanover Medical School, 30625 Hanover, Germany
| | - Florian A Distler
- Department of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University Nuremberg, 90419 Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Matthias May
- Department of Urology, St. Elisabeth Hospital Straubing, 94315 Straubing, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kuckuck EC, Hennenlotter J, Todenhöfer T, Brünn LA, Rass GC, Stenzl A, Hakenberg OW, Roghmann F, Goebell PJ, Grimm MO, Pycha A, Bolenz C, Burger M, Benderska-Söder N, Schmitz-Dräger BJ. Discriminative capacity of guideline recommendations in the assessment of patients with asymptomatic microhematuria. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:254.e1-254.e8. [PMID: 36274029 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 08/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE Asymptomatic microhematuria (aMh) remains a diagnostic challenge in urological practice: while aMh is a risk factor of urothelial carcinoma (UC), prevalence of aMh is high. Guidelines were developed to permit risk stratification and reduce diagnostic workload. This study investigates the efficacy of several recommendations. MATERIAL & METHODS Sixty hundred eight patients with newly diagnosed aMh without previous UC from an academic referral center (A; n = 320) and a private outpatient clinic (B; n = 288) were included. All patients underwent clinical workup including medical history, urine cytology, upper tract imaging and cystoscopy. Eleven former and current guidelines were applied to each patient individually; every patient was classified as either low risk (no further workup recommended) or high risk. Furthermore, a recently developed nomogram for hematuria assessment was included. RESULTS The cohort comprised 142 females and 466 males (mean age 62 [range 18-92] years). Sixty-one patients (10.0%) were diagnosed with UC. Excluding the Swedish and recent NICE guideline generally advising against urologic workup, application of 9 other recommendations would have diagnosed all UCs and saved 1.6% to 16.1% of patients from workup. For the 2020 US guideline, solely applied to cohort B, 10.6% of patients were classified as low risk. The use of the nomogram would have saved 17.1% to 25% of patients from workup. CONCLUSIONS Practical relevance of current guidelines is limited as they do not sufficiently identify patients not requiring clinical work up. Thus, guideline adherence may trigger overdiagnosis and even overtreatment. New ways of risk stratification are needed to improve aMh assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Tilman Todenhöfer
- Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karl University, Tuebingen, Germany; Studienpraxis Urologie, Nürtingen, Germany
| | | | | | - Arnulf Stenzl
- Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karl University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Armin Pycha
- General Hospital of Bolzano, Department of Urology, Bolzano, Italy; Sigmund Freud University Vienna, Medical School Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, St. Josefs Hospital, University of Regensburg, Germany
| | | | - Bernd J Schmitz-Dräger
- Urologie 24, Nuremberg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Clinic, Erlangen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Goßler C, Pfänder F, Haas M, Mayr R, Gierth M, Burger M, Rosenhammer B, Breyer J. Risk factors for bladder neck contracture after transurethral resection of the prostate. Prostate 2023. [PMID: 37089004 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the most frequently used treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia with a prostate volume of <80 mL. A long-term complication is bladder neck contracture (BNC). The aim of the present study was to identify the risk factors for BNC formation after TURP. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of all TURP primary procedures which were performed at one academic institution between 2013 and 2018. All patients were analyzed and compared with regard to postoperative formation of a BNC requiring further therapy. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses (MVAs) were performed to identify possible risk factors for BNC development. RESULTS We included 1368 patients in this analysis. Out of these, 88 patients (6.4%) developed BNC requiring further surgical therapy. The following factors showed a statistically significant association with BNC development: smaller preoperative prostate volume (p = 0.001), lower resected prostate weight (p = 0.004), lower preoperative levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA, p < 0.001), shorter duration of the surgery (p = 0.027), secondary transurethral intervention (due to urinary retention or gross hematuria) during inpatient stay (p = 0.018), positive (≥100 CFU/mL) preoperative urine culture (p = 0.010), and urethral stricture (US) formation requiring direct visual internal urethrotomy (DVIU) postoperatively after TURP (p < 0.001), in particular membranous (p = 0.046) and bulbar (p < 0.001) strictures. Preoperative antibiotic treatment showed a protective effect (p = 0.042). Histopathological findings of prostate cancer (PCA) in the resected prostate tissue were more frequent among patients who did not develop BNC (p = 0.049). On MVA, smaller preoperative prostate volume (p = 0.046), positive preoperative urine culture (p = 0.021), and US requiring DVIU after TURP (p < 0.001) were identified as independent predictors for BNC development. CONCLUSION BNC is a relevant long-term complication after TURP. In particular, patients with a smaller prostate should be thoroughly informed about this complication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Goßler
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Franziska Pfänder
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Haas
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Roman Mayr
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Michael Gierth
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Bernd Rosenhammer
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Breyer
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Mertens LS, Claps F, Mayr R, Hodgson A, Shariat SF, Hippe K, Neuzillet Y, Sanders J, Burger M, Pouessel D, Otto W, van der Kwast TH, Lotan Y, Allory Y, Downes MR, van Rhijn BWG. The Search for the Optimal cut-off Value of p53-Immunohistochemistry to Predict Prognosis of Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Multi-Center, Multi-Laboratory Analysis. Int J Surg Pathol 2023; 31:157-166. [PMID: 35466737 DOI: 10.1177/10668969221095173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Mutations in the TP53 gene are indicative of worse outcome in bladder cancer and are usually assessed by immunohistochemistry. To define p53-overexpression, a threshold of >10% is most commonly used (cut-off1). Recently, a novel cut-off (aberrant = 0% or ≥50%) (cut-off2) showed better correlation to clinical outcome. In this study, we evaluate the association between p53-immunohistochemistry cut-offs, clinico-pathological variables and disease-specific survival (DSS). Methods: Seven-hundred-fifty chemotherapy-naïve patients who underwent radical cystectomy were included (92% muscle-invasive bladder cancer. In addition to cut-off1 and cut-off2, a third cut-off (cut-off3) was determined based on the highest Youden-index value. Cut-off values were associated with clinico-pathological variables and FGFR3 mutation status. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate DSS. Results: Aberrant p53-expression was found in 489 (65%) (cut-off1) and 466 (62%) (cut-off2) tumors. Cut-off3 was determined at 25% and aberrant p53-expression in 410 cases (55%) (cutoff3). p53-expression levels were significantly associated with higher pT-stage (cut-off1/2/3: P = 0.047, P = 0.006 and P = 0.0002, respectively), higher grade (all, P < 0.0001), and FGFR3 wild-type (cut-off1: P = 0.02, cut-offs2&3: P = 0.001). Median follow-up was 5.3 years (interquartile range, 4.0-6.0 years). p53-expression was not associated with DSS for any of the three cut-offs (cut-off1/2/3: P-log-rank = 0.566, 0.77 and 0.50, respectively). If we only considered locally advanced bladder cancer, results on DSS remained non-significant. Conclusion: This multi-center, multi-laboratory study showed that, regardless of the cut-off used, p53-immunohistochemistry did not enable selection of patients with worse outcome. Our results suggest that p53-immunohistochemistry alone is not suitable to guide clinical decision making after radical cystectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura S Mertens
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Claps
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roman Mayr
- Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, 9147University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Anjelica Hodgson
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, 7938University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Pathology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, 7938University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical center, Dallas, TX, USA.,Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Katrin Hippe
- Dept. Pathology, University Medical Center - Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Yann Neuzillet
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology team, PSL Research University, Paris, France.,Core Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobank, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Urology, Hôpital Foch, UVSQ-Paris-Saclay University, Suresnes, France
| | - Joyce Sanders
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobank, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, 9147University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Damien Pouessel
- Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology team, PSL Research University, Paris, France.,Department of Medical Oncology, Claudius Regaud Institute, Toulouse University Cancer Center (IUCT) Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Wolfgang Otto
- Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, 9147University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Theo H van der Kwast
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, 7938University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Pathology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, 7938University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Yves Allory
- Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology team, PSL Research University, Paris, France.,Department of Pathology, Institute Curie, Paris, France
| | - Michelle R Downes
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, 7938University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, 9147University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.,Department of Surgery (Urology) and Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kotlyar MJ, Krebs M, Solimando AG, Marquardt A, Burger M, Kübler H, Bargou R, Kneitz S, Otto W, Breyer J, Vergho DC, Kneitz B, Kalogirou C. Critical Evaluation of a microRNA-Based Risk Classifier Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Renal Cell Carcinoma with Tumor Thrombus of the Inferior Vena Cava. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15071981. [PMID: 37046643 PMCID: PMC10093292 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15071981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma extending into the inferior vena cava (ccRCCIVC) represents a clinical high-risk setting. However, there is substantial heterogeneity within this patient subgroup regarding survival outcomes. Previously, members of our group developed a microRNA(miR)-based risk classifier—containing miR-21-5p, miR-126-3p and miR-221-3p expression—which significantly predicted the cancer-specific survival (CSS) of ccRCCIVC patients. (2) Methods: Examining a single-center cohort of tumor tissue from n = 56 patients with ccRCCIVC, we measured the expression levels of miR-21, miR-126, and miR-221 using qRT-PCR. The prognostic impact of clinicopathological parameters and miR expression were investigated via single-variable and multivariable Cox regression. Referring to the previously established risk classifier, we performed Kaplan–Meier analyses for single miR expression levels and the combined risk classifier. Cut-off values and weights within the risk classifier were taken from the previous study. (3) Results: miR-21 and miR-126 expression were significantly associated with lymphonodal status at the time of surgery, the development of metastasis during follow-up, and cancer-related death. In Kaplan–Meier analyses, miR-21 and miR-126 significantly impacted CSS in our cohort. Moreover, applying the miR-based risk classifier significantly stratified ccRCCIVC according to CSS. (4) Conclusions: In our retrospective analysis, we successfully validated the miR-based risk classifier within an independent ccRCCIVC cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mischa J. Kotlyar
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Markus Krebs
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Antonio Giovanni Solimando
- Guido Baccelli Unit of Internal Medicine, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-(DiMePRe-J), School of Medicine, Aldo Moro University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy
- IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II” of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - André Marquardt
- Department of Pathology, Klinikum Stuttgart, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef, University of Regensburg Medical Center, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Hubert Kübler
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Ralf Bargou
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Susanne Kneitz
- Physiological Chemistry I, Theodor-Boveri-Institute, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, 97074 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Otto
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef, University of Regensburg Medical Center, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Breyer
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef, University of Regensburg Medical Center, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Daniel C. Vergho
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef, University of Regensburg Medical Center, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Burkhard Kneitz
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Charis Kalogirou
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-931-201-32001
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sylvester RJ, Rodríguez O, Hernández V, Turturica D, Bauerová L, Max Bruins H, Bründl J, van der Kwast TH, Brisuda A, Rubio-Briones J, Seles M, Hentschel AE, Kusuma VRM, Huebner N, Cotte J, Mertens LS, Volanis D, Cussenot O, Subiela Henríquez JD, de la Peña E, Pisano F, Pešl M, van der Heijden AG, Herdegen S, Zlotta AR, Hacek J, Calatrava A, Mannweiler S, Bosschieter J, Ashabere D, Haitel A, Côté JF, El Sheikh S, Lunelli L, Algaba F, Alemany I, Soria F, Runneboom W, Breyer J, Nieuwenhuijzen JA, Llorente C, Molinaro L, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, Evert M, Kiemeney LALM, N'Dow J, Plass K, Čapoun O, Soukup V, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Cohen D, Palou J, Gontero P, Burger M, Zigeuner R, Mostafid AH, Shariat SF, Rouprêt M, Compérat EM, Babjuk M, van Rhijn BWG. Erratum to "European Association of Urology (EAU) Prognostic Factor Risk Groups for Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Incorporating the WHO 2004/2016 and WHO 1973 Classification Systems for Grade: An Update from the EAU NMIBC Guidelines Panel" [Eur. Urol. 79(4) (2021) 480-488]. Eur Urol 2023; 83:e140-e141. [PMID: 36841687 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/27/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J Sylvester
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
| | - Oscar Rodríguez
- Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Virginia Hernández
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Diana Turturica
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Lenka Bauerová
- Department of Pathology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Harman Max Bruins
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes Bründl
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Theo H van der Kwast
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Antonin Brisuda
- Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - José Rubio-Briones
- Department of Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Maximilian Seles
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Anouk E Hentschel
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Venkata R M Kusuma
- Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Nicolai Huebner
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Juliette Cotte
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dimitrios Volanis
- Department of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Olivier Cussenot
- Department of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Enrique de la Peña
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francesca Pisano
- Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Michael Pešl
- Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Sonja Herdegen
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Alexandre R Zlotta
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jaromir Hacek
- Department of Pathology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ana Calatrava
- Department of Pathology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Judith Bosschieter
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David Ashabere
- Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Andrea Haitel
- Department of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jean-François Côté
- Department of Pathology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, Pierre et Marie Curie Medical School, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Soha El Sheikh
- Department of Pathology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Luca Lunelli
- Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Ferran Algaba
- Department of Pathology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Isabel Alemany
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francesco Soria
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Willemien Runneboom
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes Breyer
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carlos Llorente
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luca Molinaro
- Department of Pathology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | | | - Matthias Evert
- Department of Pathology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | - James N'Dow
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Karin Plass
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Otakar Čapoun
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Viktor Soukup
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jose L Dominguez-Escrig
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Daniel Cohen
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Joan Palou
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paolo Gontero
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Maximilian Burger
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Richard Zigeuner
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Amir Hugh Mostafid
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Eva M Compérat
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Marko Babjuk
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Blecha S, Hager A, Gross V, Seyfried T, Zeman F, Lubnow M, Burger M, Pawlik MT. Effects of Individualised High Positive End-Expiratory Pressure and Crystalloid Administration on Postoperative Pulmonary Function in Patients Undergoing Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective Randomised Single-Blinded Pilot Study. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12041460. [PMID: 36835995 PMCID: PMC9960679 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) is typically conducted in steep Trendelenburg position (STP). The aim of the study was to evaluate whether crystalloid administration and individual management of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) improve peri- and post-operative pulmonary function in patients undergoing RALP. DESIGN Prospective randomised single-centre single-blinded explorative study. SETTING Patients were either allocated to a standard PEEP (5 cmH2O) group or an individualised high PEEP group. Furthermore, each group was divided into a liberal and a restrictive crystalloid group (8 vs. 4 mL/kg/h predicted body weight). Individualised PEEP levels were determined by means of preoperative recruitment manoeuvre and PEEP titration in STP. PARTICIPANTS Informed consent was obtained from 98 patients scheduled for elective RALP. INTERVENTIONS The following intraoperative parameters were analysed in each of the four study groups: ventilation setting (peak inspiratory pressure [PIP], plateau pressure, driving pressure [Pdriv], lung compliance [LC] and mechanical power [MP]) and postoperative pulmonary function (bed-side spirometry). The spirometric parameters Tiffeneau index (FEV1/FVC ratio) and mean forced expiratory flow (FEF25-75) were measured pre- and post-operatively. Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and groups were compared with ANOVA. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS The two individualised high PEEP groups (mean PEEP 15.5 [±1.71 cmH2O]) showed intraoperative significantly higher PIP, plateau pressure and MP levels but significantly decreased Pdriv and increased LC. On the first and second postoperative day, patients with individualised high PEEP levels had a significantly higher mean Tiffeneau index and FEF25-75. Perioperative oxygenation and ventilation and postoperative spirometric parameters were not influenced by restrictive or liberal crystalloid infusion in either of the two respective PEEP groups. CONCLUSIONS Individualised high PEEP levels (≥14 cmH2O) during RALP improved intraoperative blood oxygenation and resulted in more lung-protective ventilation. Furthermore, postoperative pulmonary function was improved for up to 48 h after surgery in the sum of the two individualised high PEEP groups. Restrictive crystalloid infusion during RALP seemed to have no effect on peri- and post-operative oxygenation and pulmonary function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Blecha
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-941-944-7801; Fax: +49-941-944-7802
| | - Anna Hager
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University Medical Centre Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Verena Gross
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University Medical Centre Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Timo Seyfried
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Florian Zeman
- Centre for Clinical Studies, University Medical Centre Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Lubnow
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Medical Centre Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University Medical Centre Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Michael T. Pawlik
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University Medical Centre Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Engelmann S, Burger M, Mayr R. [Adrenal tumors: diagnostics, perioperative management and surgical treatment]. Urologie 2023; 62:187-195. [PMID: 36651952 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-023-02024-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Space-occupying lesions of the adrenal glands are one of the most frequent tumors; however, only a fraction of approximately 20% need further diagnostics and treatment. The diagnostic standard is native computed tomography (CT). For larger tumors and those that cannot be clearly classified as benign, the supplementary radiological modalities magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), contrast CT and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) should be used. Adrenal gland neoplasms can be hormone-active or hormone-inactive. The most important hormone-active adrenal gland neoplasms are those with autonomous cortisol secretion and autonomous aldosterone secretion as well as pheochromocytomas. Several laboratory tests are available each for the respective hormone activity. The indications for surgery are dependent on the dignity, size and hormone activity. Minimally invasive surgical techniques have become more important due to advantages such as lower blood loss; nevertheless, open surgery is still indispensable for large suspected tumors. Care must be taken preoperatively and postoperatively, particularly in cases of hormone-active tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Engelmann
- Lehrstuhl für Urologie, Universitätsklinik Regensburg am Caritas-Krankenhaus St. Josef, Landshuter Str. 65, 93053, Regensburg, Deutschland
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Lehrstuhl für Urologie, Universitätsklinik Regensburg am Caritas-Krankenhaus St. Josef, Landshuter Str. 65, 93053, Regensburg, Deutschland
| | - Roman Mayr
- Lehrstuhl für Urologie, Universitätsklinik Regensburg am Caritas-Krankenhaus St. Josef, Landshuter Str. 65, 93053, Regensburg, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Yirga L, Hadaschik B, Burger M, Püllen L. [Photodynamic TUR-B: it looks better than it is : Comment on the randomized study]. Urologie 2023; 62:181-183. [PMID: 36525031 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-022-02000-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Leubet Yirga
- Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland.
| | - Boris Hadaschik
- Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Klinik für Urologie, Caritas-St. Josef Krankenhaus, Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland
| | - Lukas Püllen
- Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Beijert I, Cheng L, Liedberg F, Plass K, Gontero P, Ribal M, Babjuk M, Black P, Kamat A, Algaba F, Berman D, Hartmann A, Masson-Lecomte A, Rouprêt M, Lopez-Beltran A, Shariat S, Mostafid H, Burger M, Palou J, Compérat E, Sylvester R, Van Rhijn B, Downes M. International opinions on grading of urothelial carcinoma: A survey among European Association of Urology and International Society of Urological Pathology members. Eur Urol 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(23)01044-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
|
32
|
Gontero P, Soria F, Babjuk M, Burger M, Comperat E, Mostafid H, Palou Redorta J, Roupret M, Van Rhijn B, Zigeuner R, Shariat S, Cohen D, Masson-Lecomte A, Hernandez V, Xylinas E, Capoun O, Thalmann G, Pradere B, Linares E, Soukup V, Seisen T, Dominguez-Escrig J, Liedberg F, Sylvester R. Do current definitions of BCG failure/ BCG unresponsive NMIBCs correlate with disease progression? Results of an individual patient data validation international multi-center retrospective study. Eur Urol 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(23)01043-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
|
33
|
Beijert IJ, Hentschel AE, Bründl J, Compérat EM, Plass K, Rodríguez O, Subiela Henríquez JD, Hernández V, de la Peña E, Alemany I, Turturica D, Pisano F, Soria F, Čapoun O, Bauerová L, Pešl M, Bruins HM, Runneboom W, Herdegen S, Breyer J, Brisuda A, Calatrava A, Rubio-Briones J, Seles M, Mannweiler S, Bosschieter J, Kusuma VRM, Ashabere D, Huebner N, Cotte J, Mertens LS, Claps F, Masson-Lecomte A, Liedberg F, Cohen D, Lunelli L, Cussenot O, El Sheikh S, Volanis D, Côté JF, Rouprêt M, Haitel A, Shariat SF, Mostafid AH, Nieuwenhuijzen JA, Zigeuner R, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Hacek J, Zlotta AR, Burger M, Evert M, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, van der Heijden AG, Kiemeney LALM, Soukup V, Molinaro L, Gontero P, Llorente C, Algaba F, Palou J, N'Dow J, Ribal MJ, van der Kwast TH, Babjuk M, Sylvester RJ, van Rhijn BWG. Prognosis of Primary Papillary Ta Grade 3 Bladder Cancer in the Non-muscle-invasive Spectrum. Eur Urol Oncol 2023; 6:214-221. [PMID: 36670042 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ta grade 3 (G3) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is a relatively rare diagnosis with an ambiguous character owing to the presence of an aggressive G3 component together with the lower malignant potential of the Ta component. The European Association of Urology (EAU) NMIBC guidelines recently changed the risk stratification for Ta G3 from high risk to intermediate, high, or very high risk. However, prognostic studies on Ta G3 carcinomas are limited and inconclusive. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the prognostic value of categorizing Ta G3 compared to Ta G2 and T1 G3 carcinomas. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Individual patient data for 5170 primary Ta-T1 bladder tumors from 17 hospitals were analyzed. Transurethral resection of the tumor was performed between 1990 and 2018. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Time to recurrence and time to progression were analyzed using cumulative incidence functions, log-rank tests, and multivariable Cox-regression models with interaction terms stratified by institution. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Ta G3 represented 7.5% (387/5170) of Ta-T1 carcinomas of which 42% were classified as intermediate risk. Time to recurrence did not differ between Ta G3 and Ta G2 (p = 0.9) or T1 G3 (p = 0.4). Progression at 5 yr occurred for 3.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.7-4.8%) of Ta G2, 13% (95% CI 9.3-17%) of Ta G3, and 20% (95% CI 17-23%) of T1 G3 carcinomas. Time to progression for Ta G3 was shorter than for Ta G2 (p < 0.001) and longer than for T1 G3 (p = 0.002). Patients with Ta G3 NMIBC with concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS) had worse prognosis and a similar time to progression as for patients with T1 G3 NMIBC with CIS (p = 0.5). Multivariable analyses for recurrence and progression showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS The prognosis of Ta G3 tumors in terms of progression appears to be in between that of Ta G2 and T1 G3. However, patients with Ta G3 NMIBC with concomitant CIS have worse prognosis that is comparable to that of T1 G3 with CIS. Our results support the recent EAU NMIBC guideline changes for more refined risk stratification of Ta G3 tumors because many of these patients have better prognosis than previously thought. PATIENT SUMMARY We used data from 17 centers in Europe and Canada to assess the prognosis for patients with stage Ta grade 3 (G3) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Time to cancer progression for Ta G3 cancer differed from both Ta G2 and T1 G3 tumors. Our results support the recent change in the European Association of Urology guidelines for more refined risk stratification of Ta G3 NMIBC because many patients with this tumor have better prognosis than previously thought.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene J Beijert
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anouk E Hentschel
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes Bründl
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Eva M Compérat
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Karin Plass
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Oscar Rodríguez
- Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Virginia Hernández
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Enrique de la Peña
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Isabel Alemany
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Diana Turturica
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Francesca Pisano
- Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Francesco Soria
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Otakar Čapoun
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia
| | - Lenka Bauerová
- Department of Pathology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia
| | - Michael Pešl
- Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia
| | - H Maxim Bruins
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Willemien Runneboom
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Sonja Herdegen
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Breyer
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Antonin Brisuda
- Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia
| | - Ana Calatrava
- Department of Pathology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - José Rubio-Briones
- Department of Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Maximilian Seles
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Judith Bosschieter
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Venkata R M Kusuma
- Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - David Ashabere
- Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Nicolai Huebner
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Juliette Cotte
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Claps
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alexandra Masson-Lecomte
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Fredrik Liedberg
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Cohen
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Luca Lunelli
- Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Cussenot
- Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Soha El Sheikh
- Department of Pathology, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Dimitrios Volanis
- Department of Urology, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jean-François Côté
- Department of Pathology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, Pierre et Marie Curie Medical School, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Andrea Haitel
- Department of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - A Hugh Mostafid
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard Zigeuner
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Jose L Dominguez-Escrig
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Jaromir Hacek
- Department of Pathology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia
| | - Alexandre R Zlotta
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Matthias Evert
- Department of Pathology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Lambertus A L M Kiemeney
- Department of Health Evidence and Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Viktor Soukup
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia
| | - Luca Molinaro
- Department of Pathology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Carlos Llorente
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ferran Algaba
- Deaprtment of Pathology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Palou
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - James N'Dow
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Maria J Ribal
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Theo H van der Kwast
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marko Babjuk
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Richard J Sylvester
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ali Reza SB, Burger M, Bassène P, Nutting T, Jovanovic I, N'Gom M. Generation of multiple obstruction-free channels for free space optical communication. Opt Express 2023; 31:3168-3178. [PMID: 36785314 DOI: 10.1364/oe.477204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Multi-filament structures produced by vortical high-power femtosecond pulses propagating through clouds and fog can simultaneously clear two channels with cylindrical and annular profile. We present a method to achieve Free Space Optical (FSO) communications through such highly scattering media by propagating appropriately shaped laser modes through these channels. As a proof of concept, we implemented a Laguerre-Gaussian beam as information signal carrier to demonstrate transmission of 543-nm CW laser beam through a 1-m long cloud chamber using both channels. The low power of the information signal in this experiment allows considering applications in Earth-satellite FSO communication.
Collapse
|
35
|
Pickl C, Engelmann S, Girtner F, Gužvić M, van Rhijn BWG, Hartmann V, Holbach S, Kälble S, Haas M, Rosenhammer B, Breyer J, Burger M, Mayr R. Body Composition as a Comorbidity-Independent Predictor of Survival following Nephroureterectomy for Urothelial Cancer of the Upper Urinary Tract. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15020450. [PMID: 36672398 PMCID: PMC9857333 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 01/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Radical nephroureterectomy (NUE) is the gold standard treatment for high-risk urothelial cancer of the upper urinary tract (UTUC). Besides sarcopenia and frailty, fat distribution is moving increasingly into focus. Components of body composition were assessed in patients undergoing NUE due to UTUC. The study cohort included 142 patients. By using CT-based measurements, the skeletal muscle index (SMI), subcutaneous adipose tissue index (SATI), and visceral adipose tissue index (VATI) were measured at the height of the third lumbar vertebra. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated using univariable und multivariable Cox regression models. The prevalence of sarcopenia in the study population (n = 142) was 37%. OS and CSS were significantly reduced in sarcopenic patients. In the multivariable cox regression analysis, including age, ACE-27, T-stage, R-stage, LVI and necrosis, sarcopenia remained a significant risk factor of OS (HR, 1.77; 95% CI 1.02-3.07; p = 0.042) and CSS (HR, 2.17; 95% CI 1.18-3.99; p = 0.012). High visceral adipose tissue seems to be protective, although not statistically significant. Sarcopenia is a comorbidity-independent risk factor in patients who underwent NUE due to UTUC. Visceral fat represents a potentially protective factor. These results suggest that specific factors of body composition can be used for better risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Pickl
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuterstr. 65, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Simon Engelmann
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuterstr. 65, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Florian Girtner
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuterstr. 65, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Miodrag Gužvić
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuterstr. 65, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Bas W. G. van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuterstr. 65, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Valerie Hartmann
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuterstr. 65, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Sonja Holbach
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuterstr. 65, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Kälble
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuterstr. 65, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Haas
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuterstr. 65, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Bernd Rosenhammer
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuterstr. 65, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Breyer
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuterstr. 65, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuterstr. 65, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Roman Mayr
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuterstr. 65, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Haas M, Knobloch C, Mayr R, Gierth M, Pickl C, Engelmann S, Denzinger S, Burger M, Breyer J, Holbach S. Short-Term and Long-Term Morbidity after Radical Cystectomy in Patients with NMIBC and Comparison with MIBC: Identifying Risk Factors for Severe Short-Term Complications. Urol Int 2023; 107:246-256. [PMID: 36693329 DOI: 10.1159/000528579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION RC represents a viable treatment option for certain NMIBC patients. However, studies investigating morbidity in the context of RC for NMIBC are scarce. The goal of the current study was to assess and compare morbidity after RC performed in patients with NMIBC and patients with MIBC and to identify risk factors for severe short-term complications. METHODS Medical records of 521 patients who underwent RC for bladder cancer were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into patients with NMIBC and patients with MIBC. The groups were compared and risk factors for severe complications were identified. RESULTS RC for NMIBC was performed in 123 patients (23.6%). Histological upstaging was seen in 47 NMIBC patients (38.2%) and in 231 MIBC patients (58%, p < 0.001). OS was 29.8% and CSS was 15.5%. Both endpoints were higher for RC for MIBC (p < 0.001). More complications affecting the urinary diversion were seen with RC for NMIBC (p = 0.033) and more continent urinary diversions (p = 0.040) were performed in those patients. Obesity (p = 0.008), a higher ASA score (p = 0.004), and preoperative medical drug anticoagulation (p = 0.025) were risk factors for severe short-term morbidity after both, RC for NMIBC and for MIBC. CONCLUSION Patients who underwent RC for NMIBC are exposed to a comparably high perioperative risk than patients with MIBC. RC seems to be a viable treatment option for certain NMIBC patients with a significant histological upstaging in both groups. In patients with obesity, a high ASA score, and with medical drug anticoagulation, the indication for surgery should be confirmed especially strict and possible treatment alternatives should be considered particularly thorough.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Haas
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Hospital, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Charlotte Knobloch
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Hospital, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Roman Mayr
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Hospital, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Michael Gierth
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Hospital, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Pickl
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Hospital, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Simon Engelmann
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Hospital, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Denzinger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Hospital, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Hospital, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Breyer
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Hospital, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Sonja Holbach
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Hospital, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Wick W, Gamelas Magalhaes J, Dos Santos Leite A, IdBaih A, Vieito Villar M, Tabatabai G, Stradella A, Ghiringhelli F, Burger M, Mildenberger I, Herrlinger U, Touat M, Wen P, Wick A, Toussaint H, Gouttefangeas C, Bonny C, Paillarse JM, Reardon D. 185P Interim analysis of the EOGBM1-18 study: Strong immune response to therapeutic vaccination with EO2401 microbiome derived therapeutic vaccine + nivolumab. Immuno-Oncology and Technology 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.iotech.2022.100297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
38
|
Wick W, IdBaih A, Vieito Villar M, Tabatabai G, Stradella A, Ghiringhelli F, Burger M, Mildenberger I, Herrlinger U, Touat M, Wen P, Wick A, Gouttefangeas C, Maia A, Bonny C, Paillarse JM, Fagerberg J, Reardon D. 170P EO2401 microbiome derived therapeutic vaccine + nivolumab +/- bevacizumab, in neoadjuvant, adjuvant and non-surgery linked treatment of recurrent glioblastoma: Phase I-II EOGBM1-18/ROSALIE study. Immuno-Oncology and Technology 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.iotech.2022.100282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
39
|
Beijert IJ, Hentschel AE, Bründl J, Compérat EM, Plass K, Rodríguez O, Subiela Henríquez JD, Hernández V, de la Peña E, Alemany I, Turturica D, Pisano F, Soria F, Čapoun O, Bauerová L, Pešl M, Maxim Bruins H, Runneboom W, Herdegen S, Breyer J, Brisuda A, Calatrava A, Rubio-Briones J, Seles M, Mannweiler S, Bosschieter J, Kusuma VRM, Ashabere D, Huebner N, Cotte J, Mertens LS, Masson-Lecomte A, Liedberg F, Cohen D, Lunelli L, Cussenot O, El Sheikh S, Volanis D, Côté JF, Rouprêt M, Haitel A, Shariat SF, Mostafid AH, Nieuwenhuijzen JA, Zigeuner R, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Hacek J, Zlotta AR, Burger M, Evert M, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, van der Heijden AG, A L M Kiemeney L, Soukup V, Molinaro L, Gontero P, Llorente C, Algaba F, Palou J, N'Dow J, Ribal MJ, van der Kwast TH, Babjuk M, Sylvester RJ, van Rhijn BWG. T1G1 Bladder Cancer: Prognosis for this Rare Pathological Diagnosis Within the Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Spectrum. Eur Urol Focus 2022; 8:1627-1634. [PMID: 35577750 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The pathological existence and clinical consequence of stage T1 grade 1 (T1G1) bladder cancer are the subject of debate. Even though the diagnosis of T1G1 is controversial, several reports have consistently found a prevalence of 2-6% G1 in their T1 series. However, it remains unclear if T1G1 carcinomas have added value as a separate category to predict prognosis within the non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) spectrum. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the prognostic value of T1G1 carcinomas compared to TaG1 and T1G2 carcinomas within the NMIBC spectrum. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Individual patient data for 5170 primary Ta and T1 bladder tumors from 17 hospitals in Europe and Canada were analyzed. Transurethral resection (TUR) was performed between 1990 and 2018. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Time to recurrence and progression were analyzed using cumulative incidence functions, log-rank tests, and multivariable Cox regression models stratified by institution. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS T1G1 represented 1.9% (99/5170) of all carcinomas and 5.3% (99/1859) of T1 carcinomas. According to primary TUR dates, the proportion of T1G1 varied between 0.9% and 3.5% per year, with similar percentages in the early and later calendar years. We found no difference in time to recurrence between T1G1 and TaG1 (p = 0.91) or between T1G1 and T1G2 (p = 0.30). Time to progression significantly differed between TaG1 and T1G1 (p < 0.001) but not between T1G1 and T1G2 (p = 0.30). Multivariable analyses for recurrence and progression showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS The relative prevalence of T1G1 diagnosis was low and remained constant over the past three decades. Time to recurrence of T1G1 NMIBC was comparable to that for other stage/grade NMIBC combinations. Time to progression of T1G1 NMIBC was comparable to that for T1G2 but not for TaG1, suggesting that treatment and surveillance of T1G1 carcinomas should be more like the approaches for T1G2 NMIBC in accordance with the intermediate and/or high risk categories of the European Association of Urology NMIBC guidelines. PATIENT SUMMARY Although rare, stage T1 grade 1 (T1G1) bladder cancer is still diagnosed in daily clinical practice. Using individual patient data from 17 centers in Europe and Canada, we found that time to progression of T1G1 cancer was comparable to that for T1G2 but not TaG1 cancer. Therefore, our results suggest that primary T1G1 bladder cancers should be managed with more aggressive treatment and more frequent follow-up than for low-risk bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene J Beijert
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anouk E Hentschel
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes Bründl
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Eva M Compérat
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Karin Plass
- European Association of Urology, Guidelines Office Board, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Oscar Rodríguez
- Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Virginia Hernández
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Enrique de la Peña
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Isabel Alemany
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Diana Turturica
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Francesca Pisano
- Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Francesco Soria
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Otakar Čapoun
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Lenka Bauerová
- Department of Pathology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Michael Pešl
- Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - H Maxim Bruins
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Willemien Runneboom
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Sonja Herdegen
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Breyer
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Antonin Brisuda
- Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ana Calatrava
- Department of Pathology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - José Rubio-Briones
- Department of Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Maximilian Seles
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Judith Bosschieter
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Venkata R M Kusuma
- Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - David Ashabere
- Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Nicolai Huebner
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Juliette Cotte
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, GRC no. 5, Oncotype-Uro, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alexandra Masson-Lecomte
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Fredrik Liedberg
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Cohen
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Luca Lunelli
- Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Cussenot
- Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Soha El Sheikh
- Department of Pathology, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Dimitrios Volanis
- Department of Urology, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jean-François Côté
- Department of Pathology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, Pierre et Marie Curie Medical School, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, GRC no. 5, Oncotype-Uro, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Andrea Haitel
- Department of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - A Hugh Mostafid
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard Zigeuner
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Jose L Dominguez-Escrig
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Jaromir Hacek
- Department of Pathology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Alexandre R Zlotta
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Matthias Evert
- Department of Pathology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Lambertus A L M Kiemeney
- Department of Health Evidence and Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Viktor Soukup
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Luca Molinaro
- Department of Pathology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Carlos Llorente
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ferran Algaba
- Department of Pathology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Palou
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - James N'Dow
- European Association of Urology, Guidelines Office Board, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Maria J Ribal
- European Association of Urology, Guidelines Office Board, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Theo H van der Kwast
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marko Babjuk
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Richard J Sylvester
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Wolff I, Burchardt M, Gilfrich C, Peter J, Baunacke M, Thomas C, Huber J, Gillitzer R, Sikic D, Fiebig C, Steinestel J, Schifano P, Löbig N, Bolenz C, Distler FA, Huettenbrink C, Janssen M, Schilling D, Barakat B, Harke NN, Fuhrmann C, Manseck A, Wagenhoffer R, Geist E, Blair L, Pfitzenmaier J, Reinhardt B, Hoschke B, Burger M, Bründl J, Schnabel MJ, May M. Patients Regret Their Choice of Therapy Significantly Less Frequently after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy as Opposed to Open Radical Prostatectomy: Patient-Reported Results of the Multicenter Cross-Sectional IMPROVE Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14215356. [PMID: 36358775 PMCID: PMC9654391 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14215356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Revised: 10/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Patient’s regret (PatR) concerning the choice of therapy represents a crucial endpoint for treatment evaluation after radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCA). This study aims to compare PatR following robot-assisted (RARP) and open surgical approach (ORP). A survey comprising perioperative-functional criteria was sent to 1000 patients in 20 German centers at a median of 15 months after RP. Surgery-related items were collected from participating centers. To calculate PatR differences between approaches, a multivariate regressive base model (MVBM) was established incorporating surgical approach and demographic, center-specific, and tumor-specific criteria not primarily affected by surgical approach. An extended model (MVEM) was further adjusted by variables potentially affected by surgical approach. PatR was based on five validated questions ranging 0−100 (cutoff >15 defined as critical PatR). The response rate was 75.0%. After exclusion of patients with laparoscopic RP or stage M1b/c, the study cohort comprised 277/365 ORP/RARP patients. ORP/RARP patients had a median PatR of 15/10 (p < 0.001) and 46.2%/28.1% had a PatR >15, respectively (p < 0.001). Based on the MVBM, RARP patients showed PatR >15 relative 46.8% less frequently (p < 0.001). Consensual decision making regarding surgical approach independently reduced PatR. With the MVEM, the independent impact of both surgical approach and of consensual decision making was confirmed. This study involving centers of different care levels showed significantly lower PatR following RARP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingmar Wolff
- Department of Urology, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Martin Burchardt
- Department of Urology, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Christian Gilfrich
- Department of Urology, St. Elisabeth Hospital Straubing, 94315 Straubing, Germany
| | - Julia Peter
- Department of Urology, St. Elisabeth Hospital Straubing, 94315 Straubing, Germany
| | - Martin Baunacke
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Christian Thomas
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Johannes Huber
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- Department of Urology, Philipps-University Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany
| | - Rolf Gillitzer
- Department of Urology, Klinikum Darmstadt, 64283 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Danijel Sikic
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christian Fiebig
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Julie Steinestel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Paola Schifano
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Niklas Löbig
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Christian Bolenz
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Florian A. Distler
- Department of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University, 90419 Nuremberg, Germany
| | | | - Maximilian Janssen
- Department of Urology, Isarklinikum Hospital Munich, 80331 Munich, Germany
| | - David Schilling
- Department of Urology, Isarklinikum Hospital Munich, 80331 Munich, Germany
| | - Bara Barakat
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Hospital Viersen, 41747 Viersen, Germany
| | - Nina N. Harke
- Department of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Hanover Medical School, 30625 Hanover, Germany
| | - Christian Fuhrmann
- Department of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Hanover Medical School, 30625 Hanover, Germany
| | - Andreas Manseck
- Department of Urology, Klinikum Ingolstadt, 85049 Ingolstadt, Germany
| | | | - Ekkehard Geist
- Department of Urology, Klinikum Neumarkt, 92318 Neumarkt Oberpfalz, Germany
| | - Lisa Blair
- Department of Urology, Klinikum Neumarkt, 92318 Neumarkt Oberpfalz, Germany
| | - Jesco Pfitzenmaier
- Department of Urology, Evangelical Hospital Bethel, University Hospital Ostwestfalen-Lippe of the University Bielefeld, 33611 Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Bettina Reinhardt
- Department of Urology, Evangelical Hospital Bethel, University Hospital Ostwestfalen-Lippe of the University Bielefeld, 33611 Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Bernd Hoschke
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Carl-Thiem-Klinikum Cottbus, 03048 Cottbus, Germany
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas - St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Bründl
- Department of Urology, Caritas - St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Marco J. Schnabel
- Department of Urology, Caritas - St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Matthias May
- Department of Urology, St. Elisabeth Hospital Straubing, 94315 Straubing, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Zschäbitz S, Mikuteit M, Stöhr C, Herrmann E, Polifka I, Agaimy A, Trojan L, Ströbel P, Becker F, Wülfing C, Barth P, Stöckle M, Staehler M, Stief C, Haferkamp A, Hohenfellner M, Duensing S, Macher-Göppinger S, Wullich B, Noldus J, Brenner W, Roos FC, Walter B, Otto W, Burger M, Schrader AJ, Hartmann A, Erlmeier F, Steffens S. Expression of nectin-4 in papillary renal cell carcinoma. Discov Oncol 2022; 13:90. [PMID: 36136143 PMCID: PMC9500133 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-022-00558-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nectin-4 contributes to tumor proliferation, lymphangiogenesis and angiogenesis in malignant tumors and is an emerging target in tumor therapy. In renal cell carcinoma (RCC) VEGF-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitors and checkpoint inhibitors are currently treatments of choice. Enfortumab vedotin-ejf (EV) is an antibody drug conjugate that targets Nectin-4. The aim of our study was to investigate the expression of Nectin-4 in a large cohort of papillary RCC specimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS Specimens were derived from the PANZAR consortium (Erlangen, Heidelberg, Herne, Homburg, Mainz, Mannheim, Marburg, Muenster, LMU Munich, TU Munich, and Regensburg). Clinical data and tissue samples from n = 190 and n = 107 patients with type 1 and 2 pRCC, respectively, were available. Expression of Nectin-4 was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC). RESULTS In total, Nectin-4 staining was moderately or strongly positive in of 92 (48.4%) of type 1 and 39 (36.4%) type 2 of pRCC cases. No associations between Nectin-4 expression and age at diagnosis, gender, grading, and TNM stage was found. 5 year overall survival rate was not statistically different in patients with Nectin-4 negative versus Nectin-4 positive tumors for the overall cohort and the pRCC type 2 subgroup, but higher in patient with Nectin-4 positive pRCC type 1 tumors compared to Nectin-4 negative tumors (81.3% vs. 67.8%, p = 0.042). CONCLUSION Nectin-4 could not be confirmed as a prognostic marker in pRCC in general. Due to its high abundance on pRCC specimens Nectin-4 is an interesting target for therapeutical approaches e.g. with EV. Clinical trials are warranted to elucidate its role in the pRCC treatment landscape.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Zschäbitz
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, National Center of Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marie Mikuteit
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hanover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
- Dean’s Office – Curriculum Development, Hanover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Christine Stöhr
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Edwin Herrmann
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
- Present Address: Institute of Urology, Prosper-Hospital GmbH, 45659 Recklinghausen, Germany
| | - Iris Polifka
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Abbas Agaimy
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lutz Trojan
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Philipp Ströbel
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Frank Becker
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University of Saarland (UKS), 66421 Homburg, Germany
- Present Address: Urological Group and Clinic Derouet/Pönicke/Becker, Boxberg Centre, 66538 Neunkirchen, Germany
| | - Christian Wülfing
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
- Present Address: Department of Urology, Asklepios Clinics Altona, 22763 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Peter Barth
- Department of Urology, University of Marburg, 35037 Marburg, Germany
- Present Address: Institute of Pathology/Gerhard-Domagk Institute, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Michael Stöckle
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University of Saarland (UKS), 66421 Homburg, Germany
| | - Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich, 81337 Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich, 81337 Munich, Germany
| | - Axel Haferkamp
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
- Present Address: Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Markus Hohenfellner
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Duensing
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Bernd Wullich
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Joachim Noldus
- Department of Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr University Bochum, 44625 Herne, Germany
| | - Walburgis Brenner
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
- Present Address: Department of Gynecology, University of Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Frederik C. Roos
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Bernhard Walter
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Present Address: Department of Urology, Kreiskliniken Altötting-Burghausen, 84489 Burghausen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Otto
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef and University, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef and University, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Andres Jan Schrader
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
- Present Address: Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Medical School Hannover, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Franziska Erlmeier
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sandra Steffens
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hanover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
- Dean’s Office – Curriculum Development, Hanover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
- Present Address: Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hanover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Idbaih A, Vieito M, Tabatabai G, Stradella A, Ghiringhelli F, Burger M, Mildenberger I, Fagerberg J, Reardon D, Wick W. PL02.1.A EO2401, a novel microbiome-derived therapeutic vaccine for patients with recurrent glioblastoma: ROSALIE study. Neuro Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac174.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
EO2401 (EO) was designed to activate existing commensal memory T-cells cross-reacting with tumor associated antigens (TAAs). EO includes microbial-derived, synthetically produced peptides corresponding to HLA-A2 restricted epitopes with molecular mimicry to three TAAs upregulated in glioblastoma (GB), IL13Rα2, BIRC5 and FOXM1, with the CD4 helper peptide UCP2 and the adjuvant Montanide. Pre-clinically EO generated strong immune responses and cross-reactive CD8 cells recognizing the targeted TAAs.
Methods
This ongoing Ph 1/2 trial (NCT04116658) investigates the safety and tolerability (primary) of EO (300 µg/peptide, SC Q2W X 4, then Q4W), EO with nivolumab (3 mg/kg Q2W; EN), and EN with bevacizumab (10 mg/kg Q2W; ENB) among four Cohorts (Cs) of pts with GB at first progression/recurrence after radiotherapy/temozolomide. Treatment was delivered until progression, or 24 months. After the Ph 1 of EO followed by EN (C1), C2 investigated EN without (C2a) or with (C2b) surgery while C3 investigated ENB (population as C2a).
Results
Among 40 treated pts (C1 n=3, C2a n=23, C2b n=3, C3 n=11), median age was 60 years, 53% were male, 40% had KPS 90-100%, 35% had O6-methylguanine DNA-methyltransferase promotor hypermethylated tumors, and 5% isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutated tumors. All evaluable pts demonstrated strong CD8 T-cell ELISPOT responses against the 3 vaccine peptides; response was shown with tetramer staining of specific CD8 in 24/25 investigated pts after in vitro stimulation and in 19/20 pts directly ex vivo. Cross-reactivity against targeted TAAs was confirmed in 20/21 pts. Majority of response were detected by week 4 after 1st dose and as early as 2 weeks in some pts. EO, EN, and ENB were well tolerated (max exposure EN 86 wks, ENB 47 wks) with EO associated toxicity limited to local administration site reactions (48%; all grade 1-2). The frequency and severity of nivolumab- or bevacizumab-associated AEs was consistent with historical single-agent profiles. With a median follow-up of 13.6 months, median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median survival for EN (C1+C2a+C2b) were 1.8 months (2 ongoing at 7.3, and 18.5 months), and 11.0 months (survival at 12 months 42%), respectively. With a median follow-up of 7.3 months (range, 3.0-10.5), pts on ENB (C3) have mPFS and survival at 6 months of 5.5 months (3 ongoing at 5.6, 7.3 and 9.1 months), and 82% (9/11 alive), respectively. ORR/DCR (ORR+SD) for EN and ENB were 10%/34% and 55%/82%, respectively.
Conclusion
EO2401 generated strong systemic immune responses and was well tolerated in combination with nivolumab ± bevacizumab. Preliminary ORR/DCR and mPFS for ENB, and survival for EN seem encouraging. Updated results from the current 40 patients and results from additional 35 patients who already started treatment with EN with the option for low-dose bevacizumab edema treatment at neurological symptoms will be presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Idbaih
- Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, ICM, Hôpital Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière , Paris , France
| | - M Vieito
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO) , Barcelona , Spain
| | | | - A Stradella
- Institut Catala d'Oncologia Hospital Duran i Reynals, , Barcelona , Spain
| | | | - M Burger
- Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt Goethe-Universität , Frankfurt , Germany
| | | | | | - D Reardon
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA , United States
| | - W Wick
- Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg and German Cancer Research Center , Heidelberg , Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
May M, Wolff I, Brookman-May SD, Burger M. Bladder cancer with secondary muscle invasion - a prognostic dilemma. Scand J Urol 2022; 56:334-335. [PMID: 35924319 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2022.2107068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias May
- Department of Urology, St. Elisabeth-Hospital Straubing, Brothers of Mercy Hospital, Straubing, Germany
| | - Ingmar Wolff
- Department of Urology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Sabine D Brookman-May
- Department of Urology, Campus Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany.,Janssen Pharma Research and Development, Spring House, PA, USA
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Burger M, Murphy JM, Finney LA, Peskosky N, Nees JA, Krushelnick K, Jovanovic I. Iterative wavefront optimization of ultrafast laser beams carrying orbital angular momentum. Opt Express 2022; 30:26315-26323. [PMID: 36236826 DOI: 10.1364/oe.464063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/19/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Structured intense laser beams offer degrees of freedom that are highly attractive for high-field science applications. However, the performance of high-power laser beams in these applications is often hindered by deviations from the desired spatiotemporal profile. This study reports the wavefront optimization of ultrafast Laguerre-Gaussian beams through the synergy of adaptive optics and genetic algorithm-guided feedback. The results indicate that the intensity fluctuations along the perimeter of the target ring-shaped profile can be reduced up to ∼15%. Furthermore, the radius of the ring beam profile can be tailored to a certain extent by establishing threshold fitting criteria. The versatility of this approach is experimentally demonstrated in conjunction with different focusing geometries.
Collapse
|
45
|
Becker C, Burger M, Haferkamp A. [Research management and promoting young academics in the DGU]. Urologie 2022; 61:715-721. [PMID: 35925242 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-022-01853-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Becker
- Forschungskoordination, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie (DGU) e. V., Uerdinger Str. 64, 40474, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
- Forschungskoordination, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie, Berlin, Deutschland.
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Klinik für Urologie, Caritas-Krankenhaus St. Josef, Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland
| | - Axel Haferkamp
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland
- Ressort Forschungsförderung, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
- Ressort Forschungsförderung, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie, Berlin, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Huang H, Xiao X, Burger M, Nees J, Jovanovic I. Ultra-broadband long-wave-infrared pulse production using a chirped-pulse difference-frequency generation. Opt Lett 2022; 47:3159-3162. [PMID: 35776575 DOI: 10.1364/ol.458405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
We present a broadband light source based on near-infrared chirped-pulse difference-frequency mixing that is suitable for seeding long-wave-infrared (LWIR) optical parametric chirped-pulse amplification (OPCPA). A nitrocellulose pellicle is used in a Ti:sapphire regenerative amplifier to generate dual-frequency output pulses, which are subsequently mixed in a 0.4-mm thick AgGaS2 crystal. LWIR pulses with ∼1 µm full width at half maximum (FWHM) bandwidth centered at 10.5 µm are generated by mixing transform-limited pulses. Assisted by genetic algorithm optimization, the bandwidth is broadened to ∼3 µm FWHM within the 8-12 µm atmospheric transmission window. The seed source paves the path towards tabletop ultrafast terawatt-class passively carrier-envelope-phase stabilized OPCPA in the LWIR region.
Collapse
|
47
|
Kunath F, Burger M, Becker C. [Research is an indispensable component of urology]. Urologie 2022; 61:713-714. [PMID: 35925252 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-022-01855-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- F Kunath
- Urologische und Kinderurologische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Krankenhausstr. 12, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
| | - M Burger
- Klinik für Urologie, Caritas-Krankenhaus St. Josef, Universität Regensburg, Landshuter Str. 65, 93053, Regensburg, Deutschland.
| | - C Becker
- Forschungskoordination, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie e. V., Geschäftsstelle Düsseldorf, Uerdinger Str. 64, 40474, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Gužvić M, Engelmann S, Burger M, Mayr R. [Disseminated tumour cells in bladder cancer]. Urologie 2022; 61:728-733. [PMID: 35925248 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-022-01849-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Molecular analysis of disseminated tumour cells (DTC) may aid in predicting the course of the disease and response to therapies in individual patients. It has been shown in bladder cancer and many other cancer types that the presence of disseminated tumour cells or occult micrometastases in bone marrow or lymph nodes is associated with shorter survival. This type of analysis is particularly important for patients who have been declared disease-free after postsurgery histopathological and clinical imaging analysis. However, comprehensive molecular analysis of disseminated tumour cells is challenging due to the low amount of material and great heterogeneity of the disease. Therefore, currently the routine molecular analysis of these cells is hardly possible in daily clinical practice. Nevertheless, we see daily advances in clinical utility of analysis of cellular or cell-free liquid biopsy analytes taken before, during or after surgery. These advances will enable an integration of translational research workflows into clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miodrag Gužvić
- Lehrstuhl für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland
| | - Simon Engelmann
- Klinik für Urologie, Universität Regensburg, Caritas-Krankenhaus St. Josef, Landshuter Str. 65, 93053, Regensburg, Deutschland
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Lehrstuhl für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland
- Klinik für Urologie, Universität Regensburg, Caritas-Krankenhaus St. Josef, Landshuter Str. 65, 93053, Regensburg, Deutschland
| | - Roman Mayr
- Lehrstuhl für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland.
- Klinik für Urologie, Universität Regensburg, Caritas-Krankenhaus St. Josef, Landshuter Str. 65, 93053, Regensburg, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Riedel F, Münker M, Roghmann F, Breyer J, Schnabel MJ, Burger M, Sikic D, Büttner T, Ritter M, Hiller K, Wezel F, Bolenz C, Zengerling F. Efficacy of Vinflunine for Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Cancer after Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Pretreatment-A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14122850. [PMID: 35740516 PMCID: PMC9220857 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14122850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2022] [Revised: 04/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary With the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in recent years, the treatment landscape of metastatic urothelial cancer has undergone a substantial transformation. Nevertheless, disease progression after prior platinum-based chemotherapy and ICI pretreatment remains a challenging clinical situation with little evidence for following therapeutic options. The aim of this multicenter analysis was to examine the efficacy of the vinca alkaloid vinflunine after previous ICI therapy. In our cohort, post-ICI patients showed an overall response rate (ORR) of 22.4% compared to 15.6% within ICI-naïve patients (p = 0.451), and the clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 51.0% vs. 25.0% (p = 0.020), respectively. Post-ICI patients showed longer OS (8.78 vs. 5.72 months; p = 0.467) and longer PFS (3.09 vs. 2.14 months; p = 0.105). Our analysis demonstrates the clinical activity of vinflunine in a third- or later-line post-ICI setting, and the therapeutic benefit may be considerably higher than demonstrated in previous studies. Abstract Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are standard of care in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) ineligible for cisplatin, and as second-line therapy after platinum-based chemotherapy. To date, few data exist about the efficacy of the former second-line chemotherapeutic agent vinflunine after the failure of sequential platinum-based chemotherapy and ICI treatment. The aim of this analysis was to examine the efficacy of vinflunine in a post-ICI third- or later-line setting. Methods: In this retrospective German multicenter study, data of mUC patients treated with vinflunine were reviewed in six centers between February 2010 and December 2021. All of the 105 included patients had radiologic progression after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. The objective was to describe the efficacy of vinflunine in terms of overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) for post-ICI and ICI-naïve patients, respectively. Results: In our cohort, 61 patients (58.1%) had preceding immunotherapy before vinflunine administration, and 44 patients (41.9%) were ICI-naïve. Patients with ICI pretreatment showed an ORR of 22.4% compared to 15.6% within ICI-naïve patients (p = 0.451), and CBR was 51.0% vs. 25.0% (p = 0.020), respectively. Post-ICI patients showed longer OS (8.78 vs. 5.72 months; p = 0.467) and longer PFS (3.09 vs. 2.14 months; p = 0.105). Conclusion: This analysis supports the sequential use of vinflunine in post-ICI patients since the vinca-alkaloid retains a measurable clinical activity in these heavily pretreated patients. The therapeutic benefit may be higher than demonstrated in previous studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Riedel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany; (F.W.); (C.B.); (F.Z.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-175-1505482
| | - Mara Münker
- Department of Urology, Marien Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44625 Herne, Germany; (M.M.); (F.R.)
| | - Florian Roghmann
- Department of Urology, Marien Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44625 Herne, Germany; (M.M.); (F.R.)
| | - Johannes Breyer
- Department of Urology, Caritas Hospital St. Josef, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (J.B.); (M.J.S.); (M.B.)
| | - Marco J. Schnabel
- Department of Urology, Caritas Hospital St. Josef, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (J.B.); (M.J.S.); (M.B.)
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas Hospital St. Josef, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (J.B.); (M.J.S.); (M.B.)
| | - Danijel Sikic
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany;
| | - Thomas Büttner
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Bonn (UKB), 53127 Bonn, Germany; (T.B.); (M.R.)
| | - Manuel Ritter
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Bonn (UKB), 53127 Bonn, Germany; (T.B.); (M.R.)
| | - Kiriaki Hiller
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
| | - Felix Wezel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany; (F.W.); (C.B.); (F.Z.)
| | - Christian Bolenz
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany; (F.W.); (C.B.); (F.Z.)
| | - Friedemann Zengerling
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany; (F.W.); (C.B.); (F.Z.)
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Mondorf Y, Mikuteit M, Ivanyi P, Stöhr C, Herrmann E, Polifka I, Agaimy A, Trojan L, Ströbel P, Becker F, Wülfing C, Barth P, Stöckle M, Staehler M, Stief CG, Haferkamp A, Hohenfellner M, Macher-Göppinger S, Wullich B, Noldus J, Brenner W, Roos FC, Walter B, Otto W, Burger M, Schrader AJ, Hartmann A, Steffens S, Erlmeier F. The Prognostic Impact of PD-L2 in Papillary Renal-Cell Carcinoma. Urol Int 2022; 106:1168-1176. [PMID: 35654002 DOI: 10.1159/000525016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Programmed death-1 ligand (PD-L1) has been often studied in different types of renal-cell carcinoma (RCC). For example, in clear-cell renal carcinoma it is well established that programmed death-1 receptor and PD-L1 are important prognostic markers. In contrast, the role of programmed death-2 ligand (PD-L2) as prognostic marker remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate if PD-L2 expression could play a role as a prognostic marker for papillary RCC (pRCC). METHODS The patients' sample collection was a joint collaboration of the PANZAR consortium. Patients' medical history and tumor specimens were collected from n = 240 and n = 128 patients with type 1 and 2 pRCC, respectively. Expression of PD-L2 was determined by immunohistochemistry. In total, PD-L2 staining was evaluable in 185 of 240 type 1 and 99 of 128 type 2 pRCC cases. RESULTS PD-L2 staining was positive in 67 (36.2%) of type 1 and in 31 (31.3%) of type 2 pRCC specimens. The prevalence of PD-L2+ cells was significantly higher in high-grade type 1 tumors (p = 0.019) and in type 2 patients with metastasis (p = 0.002). Kaplan-Meier analysis disclosed significant differences in 5-year overall survival (OS) for patients with PD-L2- compared to PD-L2+ in pRCC type 1 of 88.4% compared to 73.6% (p = 0.039) and type 2 of 78.8% compared to 39.1% % (p < 0.001). However, multivariate analysis did not identify the presence of PD-L2+ cells neither in type 1 nor type 2 pRCC as an independent predictor of poor OS. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION PD-L2 expression did not qualify as an independent prognostic marker in pRCC. Future studies will have to determine whether anti-PD-L2-targeted treatment may play a role in pRCC and expression can potentially serve as a predictive marker for these therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne Mondorf
- Department of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, BDH Hospital Hessisch Oldendorf, Hessisch Oldendorf, Germany
| | - Marie Mikuteit
- Department for Rheumatology and Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Philipp Ivanyi
- Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Christine Stöhr
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Edwin Herrmann
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Iris Polifka
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Abbas Agaimy
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lutz Trojan
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Philipp Ströbel
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Frank Becker
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Saarland (UKS), Homburg, Germany
| | - Christian Wülfing
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Peter Barth
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Michael Stöckle
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Saarland (UKS), Homburg, Germany
| | - Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Axel Haferkamp
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Bernd Wullich
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Joachim Noldus
- Department of Urology, Marien-Hospital Herne, Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | | | - Frederik C Roos
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Bernhard Walter
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Otto
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sandra Steffens
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.,Department for Rheumatology and Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Franziska Erlmeier
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|