1
|
Prowse SR, Brazzelli M, Treweek S. What factors influence the uptake of bowel, breast and cervical cancer screening? An overview of international research. Eur J Public Health 2024:ckae073. [PMID: 38702983 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For cancer screening programmes to be effective in early detection it is important that those invited can access screening services and understand the benefits of participation. A better understanding of the factors that matter to potential participants of cancer screening programmes can assist in developing strategies to increase current uptake. METHODS We conducted an overview of systematic reviews to answer the question: What factors influence the uptake of cancer screening services (breast, bowel and cervical) in high-income countries? A thematic approach supported by tabular summaries and qualitative heat maps was used to categorize factors, described as 'barriers' or 'facilitators'. RESULTS A total of 41 systematic reviews met the criteria for inclusion. The barrier with the greatest number of 'hot spots' across all three screening programmes was a fear of the unknown regarding a possible diagnosis of cancer or abnormal screening results, followed closely by a general lack of knowledge surrounding cancer screening programmes. The greatest collective facilitator to uptake was recommendation by a healthcare provider to attend screening. CONCLUSION Across all factors 'trust' and 'building trusted relationships' can be seen as integral to the success of cancer screening programmes and must be reflective of collaborative efforts to mitigate barriers and enhance facilitators to uptake. There is future scope to consider interventions that (i) increase demand for screening services, (ii) reduce barriers to uptake of services and/or (iii) are relevant to the healthcare system and those providing services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah R Prowse
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Shaun Treweek
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dewantoro D, Manson P, Brazzelli M, Ramsay G. Reversal of stoma with biosynthetic mesh fascial reinforcement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2024; 26:632-642. [PMID: 38374538 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2023] [Revised: 12/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
AIM Temporary stoma formation remains a common part of modern-day colorectal surgical operations. At the time of reversal, a second procedure is required when the bowel is anastomosed and the musculature is closed. The rate of incisional hernia at these sites is 30%-35% with conventional suture closure. Mesh placement at this site is therefore an attractive option to reduce hernia risk, particularly as new mesh types, such as biosynthetic meshes, are available. The aim of this work was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the use of mesh for prophylaxis of incisional hernia at stoma closure and to explore the outcome measures used by each of the included studies to establish whether they are genuinely patient-centred. METHOD This is a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the published literature regarding the use of mesh at stoma site closure operations. Comprehensive literature searches of major electronic databases were performed by an information specialist. Screening of search results was undertaken using standard systematic review principles. Data from selected studies were input into an Excel file. Meta-analysis of the results of included studies was conducted using RevMan software (v.5.4). Randomized controlled trial (RCT) and non-RCT data were analysed separately. RESULTS Eleven studies with a total of 2008 patients were selected for inclusion, with various mesh types used. Of the included studies, one was a RCT, seven were nonrandomized comparative studies and three were case series. The meta-analysis of nonrandomized studies shows that the rate of incisional hernia was lower in the mesh reinforcement group compared with the suture closure group (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.12-0.37) while rates of infection and haematoma/seroma were similar between groups (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.41-1.21 and OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.63-1.80, respectively). The results of the RCT were in line with those of the nonrandomized studies. CONCLUSION Current evidence indicates that mesh is safe and reduces incisional hernia. However, this is not commonly adopted into current clinical practice and the literature has minimal patient-reported outcome measures. Future work should explore the reasons for such slow adoption as well as the preferences of patients in terms of outcome measures that matter most to them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dickson Dewantoro
- Department of General Surgery, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Paul Manson
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - George Ramsay
- Department of General Surgery, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Treweek S, Brazzelli M, Crosse A, Daga S, Isaacs T, Sunga R. Using the GRADE evidence to decision framework to reach recommendations together with ethnic minority community organizations: the example of COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the United Kingdom. J Clin Epidemiol 2024; 168:111268. [PMID: 38307217 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To make recommendations regarding factors that affect COVID-19 vaccine uptake by ethnic minority individuals in the United Kingdom, together with strategies that could be used to increase uptake. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING The results of two rapid systematic reviews-one identifying factors that affect respiratory vaccine uptake in ethnic minority adults and the other identifying experimental evaluations of strategies to increase vaccine uptake in ethnic minority adults-were put into Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Evidence to Decision frameworks to support discussion with a panel of ethnic minority community organizations, community-focused small companies, and academics of the relevance of the review findings to the UK COVID context. Aided by the frameworks, the panel made recommendations for factors that need to be addressed to increase vaccine uptake, and for which strategies might be used to increase uptake. RESULTS Our two reviews contained 31 relevant research studies published in English between 2016 and 2021, all of which were from the United Kingdom (8/31), the United States (20), and Australia (3). We identified six factors-two linked to trust, three linked to information, and one on accessibility-that affected uptake. Strategies that had been evaluated fell into three categories: using trusted messengers, tailoring the message, and increasing convenience. These were put into GRADE Evidence to Decision frameworks and discussed over a series of meetings with individuals from nine ethnic minority community organizations and two community-focused small companies and academics. Community partners provided insight into why ethnic minority individuals in the United Kingdom had lower vaccine uptake, particularly with regard to the impact of nonhealth-related UK Government policy on individuals' heath decision-making. Recommendations included recognizing that trust will be low among some ethnic groups, thinking more broadly as to who messengers should be in a low-trust environment, ensuring that information is tailored to the information needs of specific ethnic groups and working to increase convenience. Our results are at https://www.collaborationforchange.co.uk. CONCLUSION GRADE Evidence to Decision frameworks could be used more widely to structure discussions of research evidence between researchers, community organizations, and other nonresearch partners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaun Treweek
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK
| | | | - Sunil Daga
- South Asian Health Action charity, Leicester, UK; Renal Department, St James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Talia Isaacs
- UCL Centre for Applied Linguistics, IOE, UCL's Faculty of Education and Society, University College London, WC1H 0AL, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cruickshank M, Brazzelli M, Manson P, Torrance N, Grant A. What is the impact of long-term COVID-19 on workers in healthcare settings? A rapid systematic review of current evidence. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0299743. [PMID: 38442116 PMCID: PMC10914278 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long COVID is a devastating, long-term, debilitating illness which disproportionately affects healthcare workers, due to the nature of their work. There is currently limited evidence specific to healthcare workers about the experience of living with Long COVID, or its prevalence, pattern of recovery or impact on healthcare. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to assess the effects of Long COVID among healthcare workers and its impact on health status, working lives, personal circumstances, and use of health service resources. METHODS We conducted a systematic rapid review according to current methodological standards and reported it in adherence to the PRISMA 2020 and ENTREQ statements. RESULTS We searched relevant electronic databases and identified 3770 articles of which two studies providing qualitative evidence and 28 survey studies providing quantitative evidence were eligible. Thematic analysis of the two qualitative studies identified five themes: uncertainty about symptoms, difficulty accessing services, importance of being listened to and supported, patient versus professional identity and suggestions to improve communication and services for people with Long COVID. Common long-term symptoms in the survey studies included fatigue, headache, loss of taste and/or smell, breathlessness, dyspnoea, difficulty concentrating, depression and anxiety. CONCLUSION Healthcare workers struggled with their dual identity (patient/doctor) and felt dismissed or not taken seriously by their doctors. Our findings are in line with those in the literature showing that there are barriers to healthcare professionals accessing healthcare and highlighting the challenges of receiving care due to their professional role. A more representative approach in Long COVID research is needed to reflect the diverse nature of healthcare staff and their occupations. This rapid review was conducted using robust methods with the codicil that the pace of research into Long COVID may mean relevant evidence was not identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moira Cruickshank
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Manson
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola Torrance
- School of Nursing, Midwifery & Paramedic Practice, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Aileen Grant
- School of Nursing, Midwifery & Paramedic Practice, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hernández R, de Silva NL, Hudson J, Cruickshank M, Quinton R, Manson P, Dhillo WS, Bhattacharya S, Brazzelli M, Jayasena CN. Cost-effectiveness of testosterone treatment utilising individual patient data from randomised controlled trials in men with low testosterone levels. Andrology 2024; 12:477-486. [PMID: 38233215 DOI: 10.1111/andr.13597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Testosterone is safe and highly effective in men with organic hypogonadism, but worldwide testosterone prescribing has recently shifted towards middle-aged and older men, mostly with low testosterone related to age, diabetes and obesity, for whom there is less established evidence of clinical safety and benefit. The value of testosterone treatment in middle-aged and older men with low testosterone is yet to be determined. We therefore evaluated the cost-effectiveness of testosterone treatment in such men with low testosterone compared with no treatment. METHODS A cost-utility analysis comparing testosterone with no treatment was conducted following best practices in decision modelling. A cohort Markov model incorporating relevant care pathways for individuals with hypogonadism was developed for a 10-year-time horizon. Clinical outcomes were obtained from an individual patient meta-analysis of placebo-controlled, double-blind randomised studies. Three starting age categories were defined: 40, 60 and 75 years. Cost utility (quality-adjusted life years) accrued and costs of testosterone treatment, monitoring and cardiovascular complications were compared to estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves for selected scenarios. RESULTS Ten-year excess treatment costs for testosterone compared with non-treatment ranged between £2306 and £3269 per patient. Quality-adjusted life years results depended on the instruments used to measure health utilities. Using Beck depression index-derived quality-adjusted life years data, testosterone was cost-effective (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio <£20,000) for men aged <75 years, regardless of morbidity and mortality sensitivity analyses. Testosterone was not cost-effective in men aged >75 years in models assuming increased morbidity and/or mortality. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE RESEARCH Our data suggest that testosterone is cost-effective in men <75 years when Beck depression index-derived quality-adjusted life years data are considered; cost-effectiveness in men >75 years is dependent on cardiovascular safety. However, more robust and longer-term cost-utility data are needed to verify our conclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodolfo Hernández
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Nipun Lakshitha de Silva
- Faculty of Medicine, General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University, Colombo, Sri Lanka
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Jemma Hudson
- Health Service Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Richard Quinton
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College, London, UK
- Translational & Clinical Research Institute, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
- Department of Endocrinology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Paul Manson
- Health Service Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Waljit S Dhillo
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Siladitya Bhattacharya
- School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Service Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Channa N Jayasena
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ahmed I, Hudson J, Innes K, Hernández R, Gillies K, Bruce R, Bell V, Avenell A, Blazeby J, Brazzelli M, Cotton S, Croal B, Forrest M, MacLennan G, Murchie P, Wileman S, Ramsay C. Effectiveness of conservative management versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the prevention of recurrent symptoms and complications in adults with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstone disease (C-GALL trial): pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2023; 383:e075383. [PMID: 38084426 PMCID: PMC10698555 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2023-075383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the clinical and cost effectiveness of conservative management compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the prevention of symptoms and complications in adults with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstone disease. DESIGN Parallel group, pragmatic randomised, superiority trial. SETTING 20 secondary care centres in the UK. PARTICIPANTS 434 adults (>18 years) with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstone disease referred to secondary care, assessed for eligibility between August 2016 and November 2019, and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive conservative management or laparoscopic cholecystectomy. INTERVENTIONS Conservative management or surgical removal of the gallbladder. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary patient outcome was quality of life, measured by area under the curve, over 18 months using the short form 36 (SF-36) bodily pain domain, with higher scores (range 0-100) indicating better quality of life. Other outcomes included costs to the NHS, quality adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost effectiveness ratio. RESULTS Of 2667 patients assessed for eligibility, 434 were randomised: 217 to the conservative management group and 217 to the laparoscopic cholecystectomy group. By 18 months, 54 (25%) participants in the conservative management arm and 146 (67%) in the cholecystectomy arm had received surgery. The mean SF-36 norm based bodily pain score was 49.4 (standard deviation 11.7) in the conservative management arm and 50.4 (11.6) in the cholecystectomy arm. The SF-36 bodily pain area under the curve up to 18 months did not differ (mean difference 0.0, 95% confidence interval -1.7 to 1.7; P=1.00). Conservative management was less costly (mean difference -£1033, (-$1334; -€1205), 95% credible interval -£1413 to -£632) and QALYs did not differ (mean difference -0.019, 95% credible interval -0.06 to 0.02). CONCLUSIONS In the short term (≤18 months), laparoscopic surgery is no more effective than conservative management for adults with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstone disease, and as such conservative management should be considered as an alternative to surgery. From an NHS perspective, conservative management may be cost effective for uncomplicated symptomatic gallstone disease. As costs, complications, and benefits will continue to be incurred in both groups beyond 18 months, future research should focus on longer term follow-up to establish effectiveness and lifetime cost effectiveness and to identify the cohort of patients who should be routinely offered surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN registry ISRCTN55215960.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irfan Ahmed
- Department of Surgery, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Jemma Hudson
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Karen Innes
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Rodolfo Hernández
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Katie Gillies
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Rebecca Bruce
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Victoria Bell
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Alison Avenell
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Jane Blazeby
- Centre for Surgical Research, NIHR Bristol and Western Biomedical Research Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Seonaidh Cotton
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Mark Forrest
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Graeme MacLennan
- The Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials,Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Peter Murchie
- Academic Primary Care, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Samantha Wileman
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Craig Ramsay
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Aljuwaiser S, Brazzelli M, Arain I, Poobalan A. Common mental health problems in medical students and junior doctors - an overview of systematic reviews. J Ment Health 2023:1-37. [PMID: 37933550 DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2023.2278095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Common mental health problems (CMHP) are prevalent among junior doctors and medical students, and the COVID-19 pandemic has brought challenging situations with education disruptions, early graduations, and front-line work. CMHPs can have detrimental consequences on clinical safety and healthcare colleagues; thus, it is vital to assess the overall prevalence and available interventions to provide institutional-level support. AIMS This overview summarises the prevalence of CMHPs from existing published systematic reviews and informs public health prevention and early intervention practice. METHODS Four electronic databases were searched from 2012 to identify systematic reviews on the prevalence of CMHPs and/or interventions to tackle them. RESULTS Thirty-six reviews were included: 25 assessing prevalence and 11 assessing interventions. Across systematic reviews, the prevalence of anxiety ranged from 7.04 to 88.30%, burnout from 7.0 to 86.0%, depression from 11.0 to 66.5%, stress from 29.6 to 49.9%, suicidal ideation from 3.0 to 53.9% and one obsessive-compulsive disorder review reported a prevalence of 3.8%. Mindfulness-based interventions were included in all reviews, with mixed findings for each CMHP. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of CMHPs is high among junior doctors and medical students, with anxiety remaining relatively stable and depression slightly increasing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Future research on mindfulness-based interventions is required for a resilient and healthy future workforce. PRISMA/PROSPERO the researchers have followed PRISMA guidance. This overview was not registered with PROSPERO as it was conducted as part of an MSc research project.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sameera Aljuwaiser
- School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Imran Arain
- School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Amudha Poobalan
- School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hudson J, Cruickshank M, Quinton R, Aucott L, Wu F, Grossmann M, Bhasin S, Snyder PJ, Ellenberg SS, Travison TG, Brock GB, Gianatti EJ, van der Schouw YT, Emmelot-Vonk MH, Giltay EJ, Hackett G, Ramachandran S, Svartberg J, Hildreth KL, Antonic KG, Tenover JL, Tan HM, Ho Chee Kong C, Tan WS, Marks LS, Ross RJ, Schwartz RS, Manson P, Roberts SA, Skovsager Andersen M, Velling Magnussen L, Aceves-Martins M, Gillies K, Hernández R, Oliver N, Dhillo WS, Bhattacharya S, Brazzelli M, Jayasena CN. Symptomatic benefits of testosterone treatment in patient subgroups: a systematic review, individual participant data meta-analysis, and aggregate data meta-analysis. Lancet Healthy Longev 2023; 4:e561-e572. [PMID: 37804846 DOI: 10.1016/s2666-7568(23)00169-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Testosterone replacement therapy is known to improve sexual function in men younger than 40 years with pathological hypogonadism. However, the extent to which testosterone alleviates sexual dysfunction in older men and men with obesity is unclear, despite the fact that testosterone is being increasingly prescribed to these patient populations. We aimed to evaluate whether subgroups of men with low testosterone derive any symptomatic benefit from testosterone treatment. METHODS We did a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate characteristics associated with symptomatic benefit of testosterone treatment versus placebo in men aged 18 years and older with a baseline serum total testosterone concentration of less than 12 nmol/L. We searched major electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and clinical trial registries for reports published in English between Jan 1, 1992, and Aug 27, 2018. Anonymised individual participant data were requested from the investigators of all identified trials. Primary (cardiovascular) outcomes from this analysis have been published previously. In this report, we present the secondary outcomes of sexual function, quality of life, and psychological outcomes at 12 months. We did a one-stage individual participant data meta-analysis with a random-effects linear regression model, and a two-stage meta-analysis integrating individual participant data with aggregated data from studies that did not provide individual participant data. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42018111005. FINDINGS 9871 citations were identified through database searches. After exclusion of duplicates and publications not meeting inclusion criteria, 225 full texts were assessed for inclusion, of which 109 publications reporting 35 primary studies (with a total 5601 participants) were included. Of these, 17 trials provided individual participant data (3431 participants; median age 67 years [IQR 60-72]; 3281 [97%] of 3380 aged ≥40 years) Compared with placebo, testosterone treatment increased 15-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15) total score (mean difference 5·52 [95% CI 3·95-7·10]; τ2=1·17; n=1412) and IIEF-15 erectile function subscore (2·14 [1·40-2·89]; τ2=0·64; n=1436), reaching the minimal clinically important difference for mild erectile dysfunction. These effects were not found to be dependent on participant age, obesity, presence of diabetes, or baseline serum total testosterone. However, absolute IIEF-15 scores reached during testosterone treatment were subject to thresholds in patient age and baseline serum total testosterone. Testosterone significantly improved Aging Males' Symptoms score, and some 12-item or 36-item Short Form Survey quality of life subscores compared with placebo, but it did not significantly improve psychological symptoms (measured by Beck Depression Inventory). INTERPRETATION In men aged 40 years or older with baseline serum testosterone of less than 12 nmol/L, short-to-medium-term testosterone treatment could provide clinically meaningful treatment for mild erectile dysfunction, irrespective of patient age, obesity, or degree of low testosterone. However, due to more severe baseline symptoms, the absolute level of sexual function reached during testosterone treatment might be lower in older men and men with obesity. FUNDING National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment Programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jemma Hudson
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Richard Quinton
- Translational & Clinical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Lorna Aucott
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Frederick Wu
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology & Gastroenterology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Mathis Grossmann
- University of Melbourne Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Peter J Snyder
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Susan S Ellenberg
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Gerald B Brock
- Department of Surgery, Western University and Omega Fertility Center, London, ON, Canada
| | - Emily J Gianatti
- Department of Endocrinology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, WA, Australia
| | - Yvonne T van der Schouw
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Marielle H Emmelot-Vonk
- Department of Geriatrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Erik J Giltay
- Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Geoff Hackett
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Johan Svartberg
- Division of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway; Tromsø Endocrine Research Group, Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Kerry L Hildreth
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Kristina Groti Antonic
- Department of Endocrinology, University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Joyce Lisa Tenover
- Geriatric Medicine, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA; School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Hui Meng Tan
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Wei Shen Tan
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Leonard S Marks
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Richard J Ross
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Robert S Schwartz
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Paul Manson
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Katie Gillies
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Rodolfo Hernández
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Nick Oliver
- Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Siladitya Bhattacharya
- School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cecchini MA, Parra MA, Brazzelli M, Logie RH, Della Sala S. Short-term memory conjunctive binding in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychology 2023; 37:769-789. [PMID: 35617251 DOI: 10.1037/neu0000825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Short-term memory (STM) binding tests assess the ability to temporarily hold conjunctions between surface features, such as objects and their colors (i.e., feature binding condition), relative to the ability to hold the individual features (i.e., single feature condition). Impairments in performance of these tests have been considered cognitive markers of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The objective of the present study was to conduct a meta-analysis of results from STM binding tests used in the assessment of samples mapped along the AD clinical continuum. METHOD We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles that assessed patients with AD (from preclinical to dementia) using the STM binding tests and compared their results with those of controls. From each relevant article, we extracted the number of participants, the mean and standard deviations from single feature and of feature binding conditions. Results across studies were combined using standardized mean differences (effect sizes) to produce overall estimates of effect. RESULTS The feature binding condition of the STM binding showed large effects in all stages of AD. However, small sample sizes across studies, the presence of moderate to high heterogeneity and cross-sectional, case-controls designs decreased our confidence in the current evidence. CONCLUSIONS To be considered as a cognitive marker for AD, properly powered longitudinal designs and studies that clearly relate conjunctive memory tests with biomarkers (amyloid and tau) are still needed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mario A Parra
- School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Andersen M, Antonic K, Aucott L, Bhasin S, Bhattacharya S, Brazzelli M, Cruickshank M, Dhillo W, Ellenberg S, Emmelot-Vonk M, Gianatti E, Giltay E, Grossmann M, Hackett G, Hildreth K, Hudson J, Marks L, Quinton R, Snyder P, Svartberg J, Tan H, Tenover L, Travison T, Wu F, Jayasena C. OR25-5 Adverse Cardiovascular Events and Cause Mortality in Men During Testosterone Treatment: Individual Patient and Aggregate Data Meta-Analyses. J Endocr Soc 2022. [PMCID: PMC9627540 DOI: 10.1210/jendso/bvac150.1414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The cardiovascular safety of testosterone treatment in low testosterone is widely acknowledged to be unclear. Testosterone increases haematocrit, thereby potentially increasing venous thromboembolism risk. The FDA lists cardiovascular risk and stroke as adverse effects of testosterone. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of published data have limited ability to confirm source data quality and categorisation. Some published meta-analyses have included participants with distinct risk profiles (e.g. cancer, HIV), with serum testosterone atypical for hypogonadism (>12nmol/L), short durations of testosterone treatment, and studies without placebo treatment. Furthermore, subtypes of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events (e.g. stable angina) during testosterone treatment are seldom published, so have not been analysed previously. Objective Evaluate frequencies of all-cause mortality, and all cardiovascular or cerebrovascular event subtypes, and analyse efficacy of testosterone monotherapy compared to placebo for men with low testosterone, using individual patient data (IPD) and aggregate data meta-analyses. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, CENTRAL and clinical trial registries (PROSPERO CRD42018111005) were searched for placebo-controlled RCTs including men with serum testosterone <12nmol/L. One-stage meta-analyses were performed for studies providing IPD and two-stage meta-analyses were performed to integrate IPD and aggregated data. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and cardiovascular and/or cerebrovascular events at 12 months or nearest time point. Results IPD were obtained from 17 of 35 eligible RCTs (3431/5601 participants) in men with low testosterone. Most participants had functional hypogonadism. Risks of cardiovascular and/or cerebrovascular events were similar between the testosterone and placebo arms (testosterone 120/1601, 7.5%; placebo, 110/1519, 7.2% OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.81-1.42 p=0.62). Frequencies of all cardiovascular or cerebrovascular event subtypes were also similar between testosterone and placebo arms, but testosterone increased risks of oedema and erythrocytosis. No subgroups at higher cardiovascular and/or cerebrovascular event risk were identified. Fewer deaths were recorded in the testosterone arm, but this difference was non-significant (testosterone, 6/1621, 0.4%; placebo, 12/1537, 0.8% OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.17-1.24 p=0.13). Testosterone significantly reduced serum total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and triglycerides versus placebo. No significant differences in serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL), blood pressure, glycaemic parameters, diabetes incidence or prostate outcomes were observed between groups. Testosterone had positive, albeit varied, effects on quality of life and sexual function. Conclusions This is the most comprehensive study to date interrogating the safety of testosterone treatment in men with low testosterone. We were unable to find evidence from our IPD meta-analyses that testosterone increases risks of mortality or cardiovascular and/or cerebrovascular events in the short- to medium-term in men with low testosterone, most of whom have various forms of functional hypogonadism. These data provide some reassurance to men with low testosterone and their clinicians about the safety of testosterone in the short-to-medium term although more long-term data are required.Acknowledgement: NIHR TestES Consortium. Presentation: Monday, June 13, 2022 12:00 p.m. - 12:15 p.m.
Collapse
|
11
|
Jayasena CN, Aceves-Martins M, Quinton R, Brazzelli M, Aucott L, Cruickshank M, Manson P, Hudson J, Oliver N, Hernandez R, Wu F, Bhattacharya S, Dhillo WS, Gilles K. PMON258 Patient-Reported Outcomes for men with Hypogonadism and the Impact of Low Testosterone Levels: a review of measures. J Endocr Soc 2022. [PMCID: PMC9627248 DOI: 10.1210/jendso/bvac150.1445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
To better understand the impact of low testosterone treatments on men with hypogonadism, data on treatment efficacy and safety must be combined with patient-reported outcomes measurements (PROMs). Whether these objective tools conceptualise and measure the impacts of hypogonadism in the same way, is not known.
Aim
To appraise the evidence on the item content of validated patient-reported outcome measures for hypogonadism evaluations and identify core domains of potential importance in this context.
Methods
We systematically reviewed tools (e.g., questionnaires, surveys, scales) in published quantitative or qualitative data of men with low testosterone and/or those using (or who had considered treatment). PROMs data extraction forms and data tables were generated for each stage of the extraction process to standardise the information recorded and aid analysis. Data was synthesised by classifying the items identified into domains determined by the nomenclature reported in included studies and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (WHO-ICF). Finally, a narrative synthesis of the instruments and their inter-related domains and subdomains was conducted to identify areas of both convergence and divergence.
Results
A total of nine tools measuring PROMs of men with low testosterone were included in this review. The included studies were set within the US (n=5), Canada (n=1), UK (n=1), Germany (n=1), Italy (n=1). The tools identified were: Androgen Deficiency in Aging Males (ADAM) Questionnaire, The Aging Males’ Symptoms (AMS) scale, ANDROTEST ©, The Age-Related Hormone Deficiency Dependent Quality of Life Questionnaire (A-RHDQoL)©, Hypogonadism Energy Diary (HED), Hypogonadism Impact of Symptoms Questionnaire (HIS-Q), HIS-Q-Short Form (HIS-Q-SF), Massachusetts Male Ageing Study (MMAS) questionnaire, Sexual Arousal, Interest, and Drive Scale (SAID). Only HED, SAID, and HIS-Q reported including patients while developing the tool.
The number of items varied across instruments and ranged from 3 to 53 items (median=7) with a cumulative total of 98 individual items. The ten domains identified were: Cognition, Energy, General well-being, Mood, Pain, Physical-General, Role, Sexual, Sleep, Social. Across tools, the most frequently identified domain was the sexual domain. However, two of the PROMs, HED and MMAS, did not include any items that covered the sexual domain. Six of the nine tools were considered multi-dimensional, and three were considered unidimensional (i.e. only capturing one domain). The A-RHDQoL tool showed to be the most comprehensive tool across the PROMs included since this was the only one to include items that could be coded to all ten domains.
Conclusions
This study has demonstrated the considerable item concept variability across disease-specific PROMs for men with low testosterone regarding development and domain coverage. The dominant focus of these PROMs to date has centred around sexual function, but possibly to the detriment of other aspects that also matter to patients.
Presentation: Monday, June 13, 2022 12:30 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.
Collapse
|
12
|
Alabi A, Haladu N, Scott NW, Imamura M, Ahmed I, Ramsay G, Brazzelli M. Mesh fixation techniques for inguinal hernia repair: an overview of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials. Hernia 2022; 26:973-987. [PMID: 34905142 PMCID: PMC9334446 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-021-02546-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Inguinal hernia repair using surgical mesh is a very common surgical operation. Currently, there is no consensus on the best technique for mesh fixation. We conducted an overview of existing systematic reviews (SRs) of randomised controlled trials to compare the risk of chronic pain and recurrence following open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs using various mesh fixation techniques. METHODS We searched major electronic databases in April 2020 and assessed the methodological quality of identified reviews using the AMSTAR-2 tool. RESULTS We identified 20 SRs of variable quality assessing suture, self-gripping, glue, and mechanical fixation. Across reviews, the risk of chronic pain after open mesh repair was lower with glue fixation than with suture and comparable between self-gripping and suture. Incidence of chronic pain was lower with glue fixation than with mechanical fixation in laparoscopic repairs. There were no significant differences in recurrence rates between fixation techniques in open and laparoscopic mesh repairs, although fewer recurrences were reported with suture. Many reviews reported wide confidence intervals around summary estimates. Despite no clear evidence of differences among techniques, two network meta-analyses (one assessing open repairs and one laparoscopic repairs) ranked glue fixation as the best treatment for reducing pain and suture for reducing the risk of recurrence. CONCLUSION Glue fixation may be effective in reducing the incidence of chronic pain without increasing the risk of recurrence. Future research should consider both the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of fixation techniques alongside the type of mesh and the size and location of the hernia defect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Alabi
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.,Luton and Dunstable University Hospital, Luton, UK
| | - N Haladu
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.,Emergency Department, Southend University Teaching Hospital, Westcliff-on-Sea, UK
| | - N W Scott
- Medical Statistics Team, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - M Imamura
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - I Ahmed
- Department of Surgery, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
| | - G Ramsay
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.,Department of Surgery, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
| | - M Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Aceves‐Martins M, Quinton R, Brazzelli M, Cruickshank M, Manson P, Hudson J, Oliver N, Hernandez R, Aucott L, Wu F, Dhillo WS, Bhattacharya S, Gillies K, Jayasena CN. Identifying the outcomes important to men with hypogonadism: A qualitative evidence synthesis. Andrology 2022; 10:625-641. [PMID: 35064779 PMCID: PMC9487983 DOI: 10.1111/andr.13156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Men with male hypogonadism (MH) experience sexual dysfunction, which improves with testosterone replacement therapy (TRT). However, randomised controlled trials provide little consensus on functional and behavioural symptoms in hypogonadal men; these are often better captured by qualitative information from individual patient experience. METHODS We systematically searched major electronic databases to identify qualitative data from men with hypogonadism, with or without TRT. Two independent authors performed the selection, extraction, and thematic analysis of data. Quality of eligible studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisals Skills Programme and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research tools. RESULTS We analysed data from five studies published in nine reports that assessed a total of 284 participants. Published data were only available within North America, with no ethnic minority or other underserved groups included. In addition to sexual dysfunction, men with MH experienced adverse changes in physical strength, perceptions of masculinity, cognitive function, and quality of life. The experience of MH appeared dependent on the source(s) of educational material. DISCUSSION We propose a patient-centred approach to clinician interactions rather than focusing on discreet MH symptoms. Current evidence about the experience of MH is limited to North America and predominantly white ethnicity, which may not be broadly applicable to other geographic regions. Broadening our understanding of the MH experience may improve the targeting of information to patients. In addition, a multidisciplinary approach may better address symptoms neither attributable to MH nor alleviated by TRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Richard Quinton
- Translational & Clinical Research InstituteUniversity of Newcastle‐upon‐TyneNewcastle upon TyneUK,Department of EndocrinologyDiabetes & MetabolismNewcastle‐upon‐Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | | | | | - Paul Manson
- Health Services Research UnitUniversity of AberdeenAberdeenUK
| | - Jemma Hudson
- Health Services Research UnitUniversity of AberdeenAberdeenUK
| | - Nick Oliver
- Department of MetabolismDigestion and ReproductionFaculty of MedicineImperial College LondonLondonUK
| | | | - Lorna Aucott
- Health Services Research UnitUniversity of AberdeenAberdeenUK
| | - Frederick Wu
- Division of DiabetesEndocrinology & GastroenterologyManchester Institute for Collaborative Research on Ageing School of Social SciencesUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
| | - Waljit S. Dhillo
- Department of MetabolismDigestion and ReproductionFaculty of MedicineImperial College LondonLondonUK
| | | | - Katie Gillies
- Health Services Research UnitUniversity of AberdeenAberdeenUK
| | - Channa N. Jayasena
- Department of EndocrinologyDiabetes & MetabolismNewcastle‐upon‐Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Haladu N, Alabi A, Brazzelli M, Imamura M, Ahmed I, Ramsay G, Scott NW. Open versus laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia: an overview of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:4685-4700. [PMID: 35286471 PMCID: PMC9160137 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09161-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Background Inguinal hernia has a lifetime incidence of 27% in men and 3% in women. Surgery is the recommended treatment, but there is no consensus on the best method. Open repair is most popular, but there are concerns about the risk of chronic groin pain. Laparoscopic repair is increasingly accepted due to the lower risk of chronic pain, although its recurrence rate is still unclear. The aim of this overview is to compare the risk of recurrence and chronic groin pain in laparoscopic versus open repair for inguinal hernia. Methods We searched Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Only reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in adults published in English were included. Conference proceedings and editorials were excluded. The quality of the systematic reviews was assessed using the AMSTAR 2 checklist. Two outcomes were considered: hernia recurrence and chronic pain. Results Twenty-one systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included. Laparoscopic repair was associated with a lower risk of chronic groin pain compared with open repair. In the four systematic reviews assessing any laparoscopic versus any open repairs, laparoscopic repair was associated with a statistically significant (range: 26–46%) reduction in the odds or risk of chronic pain. Most reviews showed no difference in recurrence rates between laparoscopic and open repairs, regardless of the types of repair considered or the types of hernia that were studied, but most reviews had wide confidence intervals and we cannot rule out clinically important effects favouring either type of repair. Conclusion Meta-analyses suggest that laparoscopic repairs have a lower incidence of chronic groin pain than open repair, but there is no evidence of differences in recurrence rates between laparoscopic and open repairs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nafi'u Haladu
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
- Emergency Department, Southend University Teaching Hospital, Westcliff-on-Sea, UK
| | - Adegoke Alabi
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
- Luton and Dunstable University Hospital, Luton, UK
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Mari Imamura
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Irfan Ahmed
- Department of Surgery, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
| | - George Ramsay
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
- Department of Surgery, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Neil W Scott
- Medical Statistics Team, University of Aberdeen, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cruickshank M, Imamura M, Booth C, Aucott L, Counsell C, Manson P, Scotland G, Brazzelli M. Pre-hospital and emergency department treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in adults: an evidence synthesis. Health Technol Assess 2022; 26:1-76. [PMID: 35333156 PMCID: PMC8977974 DOI: 10.3310/rsvk2062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Convulsive status epilepticus is defined as ≥ 5 minutes of either continuous seizure activity or repetitive seizures without regaining consciousness. It is regarded as an emergency condition that requires prompt treatment to avoid hospitalisation and to reduce morbidity and mortality. Rapid pre-hospital first-line treatment of convulsive status epilepticus is currently benzodiazepines, administered either by trained caregivers in the community (e.g. buccal midazolam, rectal diazepam) or by trained health professionals via intramuscular or intravenous routes (e.g. midazolam, lorazepam). There is a lack of clarity about the optimal treatment for convulsive status epilepticus in the pre-hospital setting. OBJECTIVES To assess the current evidence on the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of treatments for adults with convulsive status epilepticus in the pre-hospital setting. DATA SOURCES We searched major electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo®, CINAHL, CENTRAL, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, Health Technology Assessment Database, Research Papers in Economics, and the ISPOR Scientific Presentations Database, with no restrictions on publication date or language of publication. Final searches were carried out on 21 July 2020. REVIEW METHODS Systematic review of randomised controlled trials assessing adults with convulsive status epilepticus who received treatment before or on arrival at the emergency department. Eligible treatments were any antiepileptic drugs offered as first-line treatments, regardless of their route of administration. Primary outcomes were seizure cessation, seizure recurrence and adverse events. Two reviewers independently screened all citations identified by the search strategy, retrieved full-text articles, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included trials. Results were described narratively. RESULTS Four trials (1345 randomised participants, of whom 1234 were adults) assessed the intravenous or intramuscular use of benzodiazepines or other antiepileptic drugs for the pre-hospital treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in adults. Three trials at a low risk of bias showed that benzodiazepines were effective in stopping seizures. In particular, intramuscular midazolam was non-inferior to intravenous lorazepam. The addition of levetiracetam to clonazepam did not show clear advantages over clonazepam alone. One trial at a high risk of bias showed that phenobarbital plus optional phenytoin was more effective in terminating seizures than diazepam plus phenytoin. The median time to seizure cessation from drug administration varied from 1.6 minutes to 15 minutes. The proportion of people with recurrence of seizures ranged from 10.4% to 19.1% in two trials reporting this outcome. Across trials, the rates of respiratory depression among participants receiving active treatments were generally low (from 6.4% to 10.6%). The mortality rate ranged from 2% to 7.6% in active treatment groups and from 6.2% to 15.5% in control groups. Only one study based on retrospective observational data met the criteria for economic evaluation; therefore, it was not possible to draw any robust conclusions on cost-effectiveness. LIMITATIONS The limited number of identified trials and their differences in terms of treatment comparisons and outcomes hindered any meaningful pooling of data. None of the included trials was conducted in the UK and none assessed the use of buccal midazolam or rectal diazepam. The review of economic evaluations was hampered by lack of suitable data. CONCLUSIONS Both intravenous lorazepam and intravenous diazepam administered by paramedics are more effective than a placebo in the treatments of adults with convulsive status epilepticus, and intramuscular midazolam is non-inferior to intravenous lorazepam. Large well-designed clinical trials are needed to establish which benzodiazepines are more effective and preferable in the pre-hospital setting. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42020201953. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Evidence Synthesis programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 26, No. 20. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mari Imamura
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Lorna Aucott
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Carl Counsell
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, UK
- NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Paul Manson
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Graham Scotland
- Health Services Research Unit and Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cruickshank M, Imamura M, Counsell C, Aucott L, Manson P, Booth C, Scotland G, Brazzelli M. Management of the first stage of convulsive status epilepticus in adults: a systematic review of current randomised evidence. J Neurol 2022; 269:3420-3429. [PMID: 35094154 PMCID: PMC9217864 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-10979-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Revised: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Background Convulsive status epilepticus is the most severe form of epilepsy and requires urgent treatment. We synthesised the current evidence on first-line treatments for controlling seizures in adults with convulsive status epilepticus before, or at, arrival at hospital. Methods We conducted a systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing antiepileptic drugs offered to adults as first-line treatments. Major electronic databases were searched. Results Four RCTs (1234 adults) were included. None were conducted in the UK and none assessed the use of buccal or intranasal midazolam. Both intravenous lorazepam and intravenous diazepam administered by paramedics were more effective than placebo and, notably, intramuscular midazolam was non-inferior to intravenous lorazepam. Overall, median time to seizure cessation from drug administration varied from 2 to 15 min. Rates of respiratory depression among participants receiving active treatments ranged from 6.4 to 10.6%. Mortality ranged from 2 to 7.6% in active treatment groups and 6.2 to 15.5% in control groups. Conclusions Intravenous and intramuscular benzodiazepines are safe and effective in this clinical context. Further research is needed to establish the most clinically and cost-effective first-line treatment and preferable mode of administration. Head-to-head trials comparing buccal versus intranasal midazolam versus rectal diazepam would provide useful information to inform the management of the first stage of convulsive status epilepticus in adults, especially when intravenous or intramuscular access is not feasible. Approaches to improve adherence to clinical guidelines on the use of currently available benzodiazepines for the first-line treatment of convulsive status epilepticus should also be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mari Imamura
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Carl Counsell
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
- NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Lorna Aucott
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Paul Manson
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Corinne Booth
- Independent Consultant, Health Economist, Glasgow, UK
| | - Graham Scotland
- Health Services Research Unit and Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, 3rd Floor, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sala SD, Belin C, Boccardi M, Brazzelli M, Garrard P, Pomati S, Cappa S. Distance assessment of cognitive deficits in older immigrants. Alzheimers Dement 2022. [PMID: 34971218 DOI: 10.1002/alz.049315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In European memory clinics, requests for assessing people with cognitive complaints in a foreign language are becoming frequent. Currently, over one million people living in EU are older migrants presenting with possible cognitive deterioration. The assessments of cognitive functions is the gateway to diagnosis, and the main tool for monitoring progression of neurocognitive disorders. However, the limitations of older migrants in the language of the host country add hurdles to the diagnostic process. This represents an emerging problem for the EU healthcare systems. In several EU countries, the current best approach is to involve a translator, who assists the healthcare personnel with the assessment. This practice is far from perfect. METHODS We convened a multidisciplinary and international team, including experts in neurocognitive disorders and in digital tools, to develop a user-friendly process aimed at connecting clinicians dealing with the diagnosis of people affected by cognitive deficits in different languages or countries. The initial network included countries with great prevalence of immigrants (DE, F, I, UK) and referents from partner specialists from the main immigrant nationalities. This network is planned to expand. RESULTS This preliminary network convened on a reference procedure to be supported with digital tools. The procedure includes referral of migrants with cognitive complaints to a colleague from the established network, for remote assessment in their mother-tongue using tools appropriate for their cultural background. The outcome of the referral is sent to the clinicians in the adopted country who could take a better informed decision on the diagnosis and handling of the symptoms presented by the migrant. DISCUSSION The proposed procedure overcomes several limitations of the current assessment of migrants via a translator, relative to time, languages availability, linguistic and cultural specificity of materials and norms used for the assessment. Assessment would improve thank to greater empathy allowed through the process, and the specific medical background will allow to detect issues that could emerge during the interview or the formal testing. The proposed process solves several problems identified within the current practice, with considerable benefit on detection of neurocognitive disorders in a heterogeneous population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Marina Boccardi
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) - Rostock/Greifswald, Rostock, Germany
| | | | - Peter Garrard
- St Georges University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Brazzelli M, Aucott L, Aceves-Martins M, Robertson C, Jacobsen E, Imamura M, Poobalan A, Manson P, Scotland G, Kaye C, Sawhney S, Boyers D. Biomarkers for assessing acute kidney injury for people who are being considered for admission to critical care: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess 2022; 26:1-286. [PMID: 35115079 PMCID: PMC8859769 DOI: 10.3310/ugez4120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute kidney injury is a serious complication that occurs in the context of an acute critical illness or during a postoperative period. Earlier detection of acute kidney injury may facilitate strategies to preserve renal function, prevent further disease progression and reduce mortality. Acute kidney injury diagnosis relies on a rise in serum creatinine levels and/or fall in urine output; however, creatinine is an imperfect marker of kidney function. There is interest in the performance of novel biomarkers used in conjunction with existing clinical assessment, such as NephroCheck® (Astute Medical, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), ARCHITECT® urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA), and urine and plasma BioPorto NGAL (BioPorto Diagnostics A/S, Hellerup, Denmark) immunoassays. If reliable, these biomarkers may enable earlier identification of acute kidney injury and enhance management of those with a modifiable disease course. OBJECTIVE The objective was to evaluate the role of biomarkers for assessing acute kidney injury in critically ill patients who are considered for admission to critical care. DATA SOURCES Major electronic databases, conference abstracts and ongoing studies were searched up to June 2019, with no date restrictions. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Health Technology Assessment Database, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, World Health Organization Global Index Medicus, EU Clinical Trials Register, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched. REVIEW METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the performance of novel biomarkers for the detection of acute kidney injury and prediction of other relevant clinical outcomes. Random-effects models were adopted to combine evidence. A decision tree was developed to evaluate costs and quality-adjusted life-years accrued as a result of changes in short-term outcomes (up to 90 days), and a Markov model was used to extrapolate results over a lifetime time horizon. RESULTS A total of 56 studies (17,967 participants), mainly prospective cohort studies, were selected for inclusion. No studies addressing the clinical impact of the use of biomarkers on patient outcomes, compared with standard care, were identified. The main sources of bias across studies were a lack of information on blinding and the optimal threshold for NGAL. For prediction studies, the reporting of statistical details was limited. Although the meta-analyses results showed the potential ability of these biomarkers to detect and predict acute kidney injury, there were limited data to establish any causal link with longer-term health outcomes and there were considerable clinical differences across studies. Cost-effectiveness results were highly uncertain, largely speculative and should be interpreted with caution in the light of the limited evidence base. To illustrate the current uncertainty, 15 scenario analyses were undertaken. Incremental quality-adjusted life-years were very low across all scenarios, ranging from positive to negative increments. Incremental costs were also small, in general, with some scenarios generating cost savings with tests dominant over standard care (cost savings with quality-adjusted life-year gains). However, other scenarios generated results whereby the candidate tests were more costly with fewer quality-adjusted life-years, and were thus dominated by standard care. Therefore, it was not possible to determine a plausible base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the tests, compared with standard care. LIMITATIONS Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness results were hampered by the considerable heterogeneity across identified studies. Economic model predictions should also be interpreted cautiously because of the unknown impact of NGAL-guided treatment, and uncertain causal links between changes in acute kidney injury status and changes in health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Current evidence is insufficient to make a full appraisal of the role and economic value of these biomarkers and to determine whether or not they provide cost-effective improvements in the clinical outcomes of acute kidney injury patients. FUTURE WORK Future studies should evaluate the targeted use of biomarkers among specific patient populations and the clinical impact of their routine use on patient outcomes and management. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42019147039. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Evidence Synthesis programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 26, No. 7. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Lorna Aucott
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Clare Robertson
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Elisabet Jacobsen
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Mari Imamura
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Amudha Poobalan
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Paul Manson
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Graham Scotland
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Callum Kaye
- Anaesthetics and Intensive Care Medicine, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Simon Sawhney
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Dwayne Boyers
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Jacobsen E, Sawhney S, Brazzelli M, Aucott L, Scotland G, Aceves-Martins M, Robertson C, Imamura M, Poobalan A, Manson P, Kaye C, Boyers D. Cost-effectiveness and value of information analysis of NephroCheck and NGAL tests compared to standard care for the diagnosis of acute kidney injury. BMC Nephrol 2021; 22:399. [PMID: 34852765 PMCID: PMC8638090 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-021-02610-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early and accurate acute kidney injury (AKI) detection may improve patient outcomes and reduce health service costs. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of NephroCheck and NGAL (urine and plasma) biomarker tests used alongside standard care, compared with standard care to detect AKI in hospitalised UK adults. METHODS A 90-day decision tree and lifetime Markov cohort model predicted costs, quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) from a UK NHS perspective. Test accuracy was informed by a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. Clinical trial and observational data informed the link between AKI and health outcomes, health state probabilities, costs and utilities. Value of information (VOI) analysis informed future research priorities. RESULTS Under base case assumptions, the biomarker tests were not cost-effective with ICERs of £105,965 (NephroCheck), £539,041 (NGAL urine BioPorto), £633,846 (NGAL plasma BioPorto) and £725,061 (NGAL urine ARCHITECT) per QALY gained compared to standard care. Results were uncertain, due to limited trial data, with probabilities of cost-effectiveness at £20,000 per QALY ranging from 0 to 99% and 0 to 56% for NephroCheck and NGAL tests respectively. The expected value of perfect information (EVPI) was £66 M, which demonstrated that additional research to resolve decision uncertainty is worthwhile. CONCLUSIONS Current evidence is inadequate to support the cost-effectiveness of general use of biomarker tests. Future research evaluating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of test guided implementation of protective care bundles is necessary. Improving the evidence base around the impact of tests on AKI staging, and of AKI staging on clinical outcomes would have the greatest impact on reducing decision uncertainty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabet Jacobsen
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
| | - Simon Sawhney
- Aberdeen Centre for Health Data Science, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Lorna Aucott
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Graham Scotland
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Clare Robertson
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Mari Imamura
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Amudha Poobalan
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Paul Manson
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Callum Kaye
- NHS Grampian, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Dwayne Boyers
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Cruickshank M, Newlands R, Blazeby J, Ahmed I, Bekheit M, Brazzelli M, Croal B, Innes K, Ramsay C, Gillies K. Identification and categorisation of relevant outcomes for symptomatic uncomplicated gallstone disease: in-depth analysis to inform the development of a core outcome set. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e045568. [PMID: 34168025 PMCID: PMC8231013 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many completed trials of interventions for uncomplicated gallstone disease are not as helpful as they could be due to lack of standardisation across studies, outcome definition, collection and reporting. This heterogeneity of outcomes across studies hampers useful synthesis of primary studies and ultimately negatively impacts on decision making by all stakeholders. Core outcome sets offer a potential solution to this problem of heterogeneity and concerns over whether the 'right' outcomes are being measured. One of the first steps in core outcome set generation is to identify the range of outcomes reported (in the literature or by patients directly) that are considered important. OBJECTIVES To develop a systematic map that examines the variation in outcome reporting of interventions for uncomplicated symptomatic gallstone disease, and to identify other outcomes of importance to patients with gallstones not previously measured or reported in interventional studies. RESULTS The literature search identified 794 potentially relevant titles and abstracts of which 137 were deemed eligible for inclusion. A total of 129 randomised controlled trials, 4 gallstone disease specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and 8 qualitative studies were included. This was supplemented with data from 6 individual interviews, 1 focus group (n=5 participants) and analysis of 20 consultations. A total of 386 individual recorded outcomes were identified across the combined evidence: 330 outcomes (which were reported 1147 times) from trials evaluating interventions, 22 outcomes from PROMs, 17 outcomes from existing qualitative studies and 17 outcomes from primary qualitative research. Areas of overlap between the evidence sources existed but also the primary research contributed new, unreported in this context, outcomes. CONCLUSIONS This study took a rigorous approach to catalogue and map the outcomes of importance in gallstone disease to enhance the development of the COS 'long' list. A COS for uncomplicated gallstone disease that considers the views of all relevant stakeholders is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moira Cruickshank
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Rumana Newlands
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Jane Blazeby
- Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol Department of Social Medicine, Bristol, UK
| | - Irfan Ahmed
- Department of Surgery, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Mohamed Bekheit
- Department of Surgery, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
- Department of Surgery, ElKabbary Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Bernard Croal
- Clinical Biochemistry, Grampian University Hospitals NHS Trust, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Karen Innes
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Craig Ramsay
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Katie Gillies
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Jacobsen E, Cruickshank M, Cooper D, Marks A, Brazzelli M, Scotland G. Cost-effectiveness and value of information analysis of multiple frequency bioimpedance devices for fluid management in people with chronic kidney disease having dialysis. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 2021; 19:24. [PMID: 33902602 PMCID: PMC8077940 DOI: 10.1186/s12962-021-00276-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Among people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on dialysis, sub-optimal fluid management has been linked with hospitalisation, cardiovascular complications and death. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness using multiple-frequency bioimpedance guided fluid management versus standard fluid management based on clinical judgment. Methods A Markov model was developed to compare expected costs, outcomes and quality adjusted life years of the alternative management strategies. The relative effectiveness of the bioimpedance guided approach was informed by a systematic review of clinical trials, and focussed reviews were conducted to identify baseline event rates, costs and health state utility values for application in the model. The model was analysed probabilistically and a value of information (VOI) analysis was conducted to inform the value of conducting further research to reduce current uncertainties in the evidence base. Results For the base-case analysis, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for bioimpedance guided fluid management versus standard management was £16,536 per QALY gained. There was a 59% chance of the ICER being below £20,000 per QALY. Form the VOI analysis, the theoretical upper bound on the value of further research was £53 million. The value of further research was highest for parameters relating to the relative effectiveness of bioimpedance guided management on final health outcomes. Conclusions Multiple frequency bioimpedance testing may offer a cost-effective approach to improve fluid management in patients with CKD on dialysis, but further research would be of value to reduce the current uncertainties. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12962-021-00276-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabet Jacobsen
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
| | | | - David Cooper
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Angharad Marks
- Chronic Disease Research Group, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Graham Scotland
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.,Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ahmed I, Innes K, Brazzelli M, Gillies K, Newlands R, Avenell A, Hernández R, Blazeby J, Croal B, Hudson J, MacLennan G, McCormack K, McDonald A, Murchie P, Ramsay C. Protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with observation/conservative management for preventing recurrent symptoms and complications in adults with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones (C-Gall trial). BMJ Open 2021; 11:e039781. [PMID: 33766835 PMCID: PMC7996370 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gallstone disease (cholelithiasis) is common. In most people it is asymptomatic and does not require treatment, but in about 20% it can become symptomatic, causing pain and other complications requiring medical attention and/or surgery. A proportion of symptomatic people with uncomplicated gallstone disease do not experience further episodes of pain and, therefore, could be treated conservatively. Moreover, surgery carries risks of perioperative and postoperative complications. METHODS AND ANALYSIS C-Gall is a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation to assess whether cholecystectomy is cost-effective compared with observation/ conservative management (here after referred to as medical management) at 18 months post-randomisation (with internal pilot). PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE Patient-reported quality of life (QoL) (36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) bodily pain domain) up to 18 months after randomisation.The primary economic outcome is incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained at 18 months. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Secondary outcome measures include condition-specific QoL, SF-36 domains, complications, further treatment, persistent symptoms, healthcare resource use, and costs assessed at 18 and 24 months after randomisation. The bodily pain domain of the SF-36 will also be assessed at 24 months after randomisation.A sample size of 430 participants was calculated. Computer-generated 1:1 randomisation was used.The C-Gall Study is currently in follow-up in 20 UK research centres. The first patient was randomised on 1 August 2016, with follow-up to be completed by 30 November 2021. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Statistical analysis of the primary outcome will be intention-to-treat and a per-protocol analysis. The primary outcome, area under the curve (AUC) for the SF-36 bodily pain up to 18 months, will be generated using the Trapezium rule and analysed using linear regression with adjustment for the minimisation variables (recruitment site, sex and age). For the secondary outcome, SF-36 bodily pain, AUC up to 24 months will be analysed in a similar way. Other secondary outcomes will be analysed using generalised linear models with adjustment for minimisation and baseline variables, as appropriate. Statistical significance will be at the two-sided 5% level with corresponding CIs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The North of Scotland Research Ethics Committee approved this study (16/NS/0053). The dissemination plans include Health Technology Assessment monograph, international scientific meetings and publications in high-impact, open-access journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN55215960; pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irfan Ahmed
- Department of Surgery, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Health Services Research Unit, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Karen Innes
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Health Services Research Unit, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Health Services Research Unit, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Katie Gillies
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Health Services Research Unit, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Rumana Newlands
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen College of Life Sciences and Medicine, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Alison Avenell
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Health Services Research Unit, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Rodolfo Hernández
- Health Economics Research Unit (HERU), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Jane Blazeby
- Centre for Surgical Research and NIHR Bristol and Weston Biomedical Research Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Jemma Hudson
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Health Services Research Unit, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Graeme MacLennan
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Health Services Research Unit, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Kirsty McCormack
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Health Services Research Unit, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Alison McDonald
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Health Services Research Unit, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Peter Murchie
- Academic Primary Care, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Craig Ramsay
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Health Services Research Unit, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Saunders DH, Sanderson M, Hayes S, Johnson L, Kramer S, Carter D, Jarvis H, Brazzelli M, Mead GE. Physical Fitness Training for Patients With Stroke. Stroke 2020; 51:e299-e300. [PMID: 33104465 DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.120.030826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David H Saunders
- Physical Activity for Health Research Centre (PAHRC) (D.H.S.), University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Sanderson
- Institute of Clinical Exercise and Health Science, University of the West of Scotland, Hamilton, United Kingdom (M.S.)
| | - Sara Hayes
- Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute (S.H.), School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Ireland
| | - Liam Johnson
- The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Australia (L.J., S.K.)
| | - Sharon Kramer
- The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Australia (L.J., S.K.)
| | - Daniel Carter
- Faculty of Education and Health Sciences (D.C.), School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Ireland
| | - Hannah Jarvis
- Research Centre for Musculoskeletal Science and Sports Medicine, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, United Kingdom (H.J.)
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom (M.B.)
| | - Gillian E Mead
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences (G.E.M.), University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Brazzelli M, Javanbakht M, Imamura M, Hudson J, Moloney E, Becker F, Wallace S, Omar MI, Shimonovich M, MacLennan G, Ternent L, Vale L, Montgomery I, Mackie P, Saraswat L, Monga A, Craig D. Surgical treatments for women with stress urinary incontinence: the ESTER systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2020; 23:1-306. [PMID: 30929658 DOI: 10.3310/hta23140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urinary incontinence in women is a distressing condition that restricts quality of life and results in a large economic burden to both the NHS and women themselves. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the clinical effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women and explore women's preferences. DESIGN An evidence synthesis, a discrete choice experiment (DCE) and an economic decision model, with a value-of-information (VOI) analysis. Nine surgical interventions were compared. Previous Cochrane reviews for each were identified and updated to include additional studies. Systematic review methods were applied. The outcomes of interest were 'cure' and 'improvement'. Both a pairwise and a network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted for all available surgical comparisons. A DCE was undertaken to assess the preferences of women for treatment outcomes. An economic model assessed the cost-effectiveness of alternative surgeries and a VOI analysis was undertaken. RESULTS Data from 175 studies were included in the effectiveness review. The majority of included studies were rated as being at high or unclear risk of bias across all risk-of-bias domains. The NMA, which included 120 studies that reported data on 'cure' or 'improvement', showed that retropubic mid-urethral sling (MUS), transobturator MUS, traditional sling and open colposuspension were more effective than other surgical procedures for both primary outcomes. The results for other interventions were variable. In general, rate of tape and mesh exposure was higher after transobturator MUS than after retropubic MUS or single-incision sling, whereas the rate of tape or mesh erosion/extrusion was similar between transobturator MUS and retropubic MUS. The results of the DCE, in which 789 women completed an anonymous online questionnaire, indicate that women tend to prefer surgical treatments associated with no pain or mild chronic pain and shorter length of hospital stay as well as those treatments that have a smaller risk for urinary symptoms to reoccur after surgery. The cost-effectiveness results suggest that, over a lifetime, retropubic MUS is, on average, the least costly and most effective surgery. However, the high level of uncertainty makes robust estimates difficult to ascertain. The VOI analysis highlighted that further research around the incidence rates of complications would be of most value. LIMITATIONS Overall, the quality of the clinical evidence was low, with limited data available for the assessment of complications. Furthermore, there is a lack of robust evidence and significant uncertainty around some parameters in the economic modelling. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive assessment of published evidence for the treatment of SUI. There is some evidence that retropubic MUS, transobturator MUS and traditional sling are effective in the short to medium term and that retropubic MUS is cost-effective in the medium to long term. The VOI analysis highlights the value of further research to reduce the uncertainty around the incidence rates of complications. There is a need to obtain robust clinical data in future work, particularly around long-term complication rates. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016049339. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Mehdi Javanbakht
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Mari Imamura
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Jemma Hudson
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Eoin Moloney
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Frauke Becker
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sheila Wallace
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | | | - Graeme MacLennan
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Laura Ternent
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Luke Vale
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Phil Mackie
- Scottish Public Health Network, NHS Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Ash Monga
- University Hospital Southampton Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Dawn Craig
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Imamura M, Scott NW, Wallace SA, Ogah JA, Ford AA, Dubos YA, Brazzelli M. Interventions for treating people with symptoms of bladder pain syndrome: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 7:CD013325. [PMID: 32734597 PMCID: PMC8094454 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013325.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bladder pain syndrome (BPS), which includes the condition of interstitial cystitis, is a poorly understood clinical condition for which patients present with varying symptoms. Management of BPS is challenging for both patients and practitioners. At present, there is no universally accepted diagnosis and diverse causes have been proposed. This is reflected in wide-ranging treatment options, used alone or in combination, with limited evidence. A network meta-analysis (NMA) simultaneously comparing multiple treatments may help to determine the best treatment options for patients with BPS. OBJECTIVES To conduct a network meta-analysis to assess the effects of interventions for treating people with symptoms of bladder pain syndrome (BPS). SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Specialised Register, which contains trials identified from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, in the Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) and handsearched journals and conference proceedings (searched 11 May 2018) and the reference lists of relevant articles. We conducted a further search on 5 June 2019, which yielded four small studies that were screened for eligibility but were not incorporated into the review. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs of interventions for treating adults with BPS. All types of interventions (including conservative, pharmacological and surgical) were eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We assessed the risk of bias of included studies using Cochrane's 'Risk of bias' tool. Primary outcomes were the number of people cured or improved, pain, frequency and nocturia. For each outcome, random-effects NMA models were fitted using WinBUGS 1.4. We monitored median odds ratios (ORs) for binary outcomes and mean differences (MDs) for continuous outcomes with 95% credible intervals (Crls). We compared results of the NMA with direct evidence from pairwise meta-analysis of head-to-head trials. We used the CINeMA tool to assess the certainty of evidence for selected treatment categories. MAIN RESULTS We included 81 RCTs involving 4674 people with a median of 38 participants (range 10 to 369) per RCT. Most trials compared treatment against control; few trials compared two active treatments. There were 65 different active treatments, and some comparisons were informed by direct evidence from only one trial. To simplify, treatments were grouped into 31 treatment categories by mode of action. Most studies were judged to have unclear or high risk of bias for most domains, particularly for selection and detection bias. Overall, the NMA suggested that six (proportion cured/improved), one (pain), one (frequency) and zero (nocturia) treatment categories were effective compared with control, but there was great uncertainty around estimates of effect. Due to the large number of intervention comparisons in this review, we focus on three interventions: antidepressants, pentosan polysulfate (PPS) and neuromuscular blockade. We selected these interventions on the basis that they are given 'strong recommendations' in the EAU Guidelines for management of BPS (EAU Guidelines 2019). We found very low-certainty evidence suggesting that antidepressants were associated with greater likelihood of cure or improvement compared with control (OR 5.91, 95% CrI 1.12 to 37.56), but it was uncertain whether they reduced pain (MD -1.27, 95% CrI -3.25 to 0.71; low-certainty evidence), daytime frequency (MD -2.41, 95% CrI -6.85 to 2.05; very low-certainty evidence) or nocturia (MD 0.01, 95% CrI -2.53 to 2.50; very low-certainty evidence). There was no evidence that PPS had improved cure/improvement rates (OR 0.14, 95% CrI 0.40 to 3.35; very low-certainty evidence) or reduced pain (MD 0.42, 95% CrI -1.04 to 1.91; low-certainty evidence), frequency (MD -0.37, 95% CrI -5.00 to 3.44; very low-certainty evidence) or nocturia (MD -1.20, 95% CrI -3.62 to 1.28; very low-certainty evidence). There was evidence that neuromuscular blockade resulted in greater cure or improvement (OR 5.80, 95% CrI 2.08 to 18.30) but no evidence that it improved pain (MD -0.33, 95% CrI -1.71 to 1.03), frequency (MD -0.91, 95% CrI -3.24, 1.29) or nocturia (MD -0.04, 95% CrI -1.35 to 1.27). The certainty of this evidence was always very low. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We are uncertain whether some treatments may be effective in treating patients with BPS because the certainty of evidence was generally low or very low. Data were available for a relatively large number of trials, but most had small sample sizes and effects of treatments often could not be estimated with precision. An NMA was successfully conducted, but limited numbers of small trials for each treatment category hampered our ability to fully exploit the advantages of this analysis. Larger, more focused trials are needed to improve the current evidence base.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mari Imamura
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Neil W Scott
- Medical Statistics Team, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Sheila A Wallace
- Evidence Synthesis Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Joseph A Ogah
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust, Barrow in Furness, UK
| | - Abigail A Ford
- Department of Urogynaecology, Imperial Healthcare Trust, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Yann A Dubos
- c/o Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Javanbakht M, Moloney E, Brazzelli M, Wallace S, Ternent L, Omar MI, Monga A, Saraswat L, Mackie P, Becker F, Imamura M, Hudson J, Shimonovich M, MacLennan G, Vale L, Craig D. Economic evaluation of surgical treatments for women with stress urinary incontinence: a cost-utility and value of information analysis. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e035555. [PMID: 32532771 PMCID: PMC7295417 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2019] [Revised: 02/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) are common conditions that can have a negative impact on the quality of life of patients and serious cost implications for healthcare providers. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of nine different surgical interventions for treatment of SUI and stress-predominant MUI from a National Health Service and personal social services perspective in the UK. METHODS A Markov microsimulation model was developed to compare the costs and effectiveness of nine surgical interventions. The model was informed by undertaking a systematic review of clinical effectiveness and network meta-analysis. The main clinical parameters in the model were the cure and incidence rates of complications after different interventions. The outcomes from the model were expressed in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. In addition, expected value of perfect information (EVPI) analyses were conducted to quantify the main uncertainties facing decision-makers. RESULTS The base-case results suggest that retropubic mid-urethral sling (retro-MUS) is the most cost-effective surgical intervention over a 10-year and lifetime time horizon. The probabilistic results show that retro-MUS and traditional sling are the interventions with the highest probability of being cost-effective across all willingness-to-pay thresholds over a lifetime time horizon. The value of information analysis results suggest that the largest value appears to be in removing uncertainty around the incidence rates of complications, the relative treatment effectiveness and health utility values. CONCLUSIONS Although retro-MUS appears, at this stage, to be a cost-effective intervention, research is needed on possible long-term complications of all surgical treatments to provide reassurance of safety, or earlier warning of unanticipated adverse effects. The value of information analysis supports the need, as a first step, for further research to improve our knowledge of the actual incidence of complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehdi Javanbakht
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Eoin Moloney
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Sheila Wallace
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Laura Ternent
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Muhammad Imran Omar
- Academic Urology Unit/Cochrane Incontinence Group, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Ash Monga
- Gynaecology, University Hospitals Southampton Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Lucky Saraswat
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Phil Mackie
- Scottish Public Health Network, NHS Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK
| | - Frauke Becker
- Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mari Imamura
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Jemma Hudson
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Graeme MacLennan
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Luke Vale
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Dawn Craig
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Javanbakht M, Moloney E, Brazzelli M, Wallace S, Omar MI, Monga A, Saraswat L, Mackie P, Imamura M, Hudson J, Shimonovich M, MacLennan G, Vale L, Craig D. Surgical treatments for women with stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review of economic evidence. Syst Rev 2020; 9:85. [PMID: 32312310 PMCID: PMC7169003 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-020-01352-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2019] [Accepted: 04/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical interventions for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women are commonly employed following the failure of minimally invasive therapies. Due to the limited information available on the relative cost-effectiveness of available surgeries for treating SUI, a de novo economic analysis was conducted to assess costs and effects of all relevant surgeries. To inform the economic analysis, the objective of this review was to identify and assess the quality of existing economic evaluation studies on different surgical interventions for the treatment of SUI in women. METHODS The following databases were searched during the review process: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), MEDLINE In-Process, Excerpta Medica Database (Embase), National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED), and Health Management Information Consortium and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry (CEA registry). The key criteria for inclusion were that the study population included women with SUI and that the surgical interventions considered were utilised as either a primary or a follow-up surgery. The review included only full economic evaluations. Studies were quality assessed using the Drummond checklist for economic evaluations. No quantitative synthesis of the results by meta-analysis was conducted due to the high methodological heterogeneity. RESULTS Twenty-six economic evaluations were included, of which 13 were model-based analyses. Surgical treatments assessed most frequently were mid-urethral slings and open and laparoscopic colposuspension. There were some differences in the methodological approaches taken, including differences in type of economic analysis, perspective, time horizon, types of resource use, and costs and outcomes that were included in the analysis. The majority of studies conducted a cost-utility analysis from a health system perspective and applied a time horizon of between 1 and 5 years. The cost-effectiveness results suggest that single-incision mini-sling and mid-urethral slings are among the most cost-effective options. CONCLUSIONS The review has shown that methods used for the economic evaluation of surgical treatments for SUI vary widely in terms of study design, analysis type, compared alternatives, time horizon, costing methodologies and effect outcomes. Future economic evaluation studies on surgical treatments for SUI may be improved by the application of available guidelines. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION Registered in PROSPERO in 2016, CRD42016049339.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehdi Javanbakht
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK
| | - Eoin Moloney
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK.
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Sheila Wallace
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK
| | - Muhammad Imran Omar
- Guidelines Office Methodology Supervisor, European Association of Urology, Arnhem, Netherlands
| | - Ash Monga
- University Hospitals Southampton Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Phil Mackie
- Scottish Public Health Network, NHS Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK
| | - Mari Imamura
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Jemma Hudson
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Graeme MacLennan
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Luke Vale
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK
| | - Dawn Craig
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Levels of physical activity and physical fitness are low after stroke. Interventions to increase physical fitness could reduce mortality and reduce disability through increased function. OBJECTIVES The primary objectives of this updated review were to determine whether fitness training after stroke reduces death, death or dependence, and disability. The secondary objectives were to determine the effects of training on adverse events, risk factors, physical fitness, mobility, physical function, health status and quality of life, mood, and cognitive function. SEARCH METHODS In July 2018 we searched the Cochrane Stroke Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO, and four additional databases. We also searched ongoing trials registers and conference proceedings, screened reference lists, and contacted experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised trials comparing either cardiorespiratory training or resistance training, or both (mixed training), with usual care, no intervention, or a non-exercise intervention in stroke survivors. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently selected studies, assessed quality and risk of bias, and extracted data. We analysed data using random-effects meta-analyses and assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach. Diverse outcome measures limited the intended analyses. MAIN RESULTS We included 75 studies, involving 3017 mostly ambulatory participants, which comprised cardiorespiratory (32 studies, 1631 participants), resistance (20 studies, 779 participants), and mixed training interventions (23 studies, 1207 participants). Death was not influenced by any intervention; risk differences were all 0.00 (low-certainty evidence). There were few deaths overall (19/3017 at end of intervention and 19/1469 at end of follow-up). None of the studies assessed death or dependence as a composite outcome. Disability scores were improved at end of intervention by cardiorespiratory training (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.52, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.84; 8 studies, 462 participants; P = 0.002; moderate-certainty evidence) and mixed training (SMD 0.23, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.42; 9 studies, 604 participants; P = 0.02; low-certainty evidence). There were too few data to assess the effects of resistance training on disability. Secondary outcomes showed multiple benefits for physical fitness (VO2 peak and strength), mobility (walking speed) and physical function (balance). These physical effects tended to be intervention-specific with the evidence mostly low or moderate certainty. Risk factor data were limited or showed no effects apart from cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2 peak), which increased after cardiorespiratory training (mean difference (MD) 3.40 mL/kg/min, 95% CI 2.98 to 3.83; 9 studies, 438 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There was no evidence of any serious adverse events. Lack of data prevents conclusions about effects of training on mood, quality of life, and cognition. Lack of data also meant benefits at follow-up (i.e. after training had stopped) were unclear but some mobility benefits did persist. Risk of bias varied across studies but imbalanced amounts of exposure in control and intervention groups was a common issue affecting many comparisons. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Few deaths overall suggest exercise is a safe intervention but means we cannot determine whether exercise reduces mortality or the chance of death or dependency. Cardiorespiratory training and, to a lesser extent mixed training, reduce disability during or after usual stroke care; this could be mediated by improved mobility and balance. There is sufficient evidence to incorporate cardiorespiratory and mixed training, involving walking, within post-stroke rehabilitation programmes to improve fitness, balance and the speed and capacity of walking. The magnitude of VO2 peak increase after cardiorespiratory training has been suggested to reduce risk of stroke hospitalisation by ˜7%. Cognitive function is under-investigated despite being a key outcome of interest for patients. Further well-designed randomised trials are needed to determine the optimal exercise prescription, the range of benefits and any long-term benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David H Saunders
- University of EdinburghPhysical Activity for Health Research Centre (PAHRC)St Leonards LandHolyrood RoadEdinburghMidlothianUKEH8 8AQ
| | - Mark Sanderson
- University of the West of ScotlandInstitute of Clinical Exercise and Health ScienceRoom A071A, Almada BuildingHamiltonUKML3 0JB
| | - Sara Hayes
- University of LimerickSchool of Allied Health, Ageing Research Centre, Health Research InstituteLimerickIreland
| | - Liam Johnson
- University of MelbourneThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental HealthHeidelbergAustralia3084
| | - Sharon Kramer
- University of MelbourneThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental HealthHeidelbergAustralia3084
| | - Daniel D Carter
- University of LimerickSchool of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health SciencesLimerickIreland
| | - Hannah Jarvis
- Manchester Metropolitan UniversityResearch Centre for Musculoskeletal Science and Sports Medicine, Faculty of Science and EngineeringJohn Dalton BuildingChester StreetManchesterUKM1 5GD
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- University of AberdeenHealth Services Research UnitHealth Sciences BuildingForesterhillAberdeenUKAB25 2ZD
| | - Gillian E Mead
- University of EdinburghCentre for Clinical Brain SciencesRoom S1642, Royal InfirmaryLittle France CrescentEdinburghUKEH16 4SA
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Mattioni A, Cenciarelli S, Eusebi P, Brazzelli M, Mazzoli T, Del Sette M, Gandolfo C, Marinoni M, Finocchi C, Saia V, Ricci S. Transcranial Doppler sonography for detecting stenosis or occlusion of intracranial arteries in people with acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 2:CD010722. [PMID: 32072609 PMCID: PMC7029193 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010722.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An occlusion or stenosis of intracranial large arteries can be detected in the acute phase of ischaemic stroke in about 42% of patients. The approved therapies for acute ischaemic stroke are thrombolysis with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA), and mechanical thrombectomy; both aim to recanalise an occluded intracranial artery. The reference standard for the diagnosis of intracranial stenosis and occlusion is intra-arterial angiography (IA) and, recently, computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), or contrast-enhanced MRA. Transcranial Doppler (TCD) and transcranial colour Doppler (TCCD) are useful, rapid, noninvasive tools for the assessment of intracranial large arteries pathology. Due to the current lack of consensus regarding the use of TCD and TCCD in clinical practice, we systematically reviewed the literature for studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of these techniques compared with intra-arterial IA, CTA, and MRA for the detection of intracranial stenosis and occlusion in people presenting with symptoms of ischaemic stroke. OBJECTIVES To assess the diagnostic accuracy of TCD and TCCD for detecting stenosis and occlusion of intracranial large arteries in people with acute ischaemic stroke. SEARCH METHODS We limited our searches from January 1982 onwards as the transcranial Doppler technique was only introduced into clinical practice in the 1980s. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid) (from 1982 to 2018); Embase (Ovid) (from 1982 to 2018); Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE); and Health Technology Assessment Database (HTA) (from 1982 to 2018). Moreover, we perused the reference lists of all retrieved articles and of previously published relevant review articles, handsearched relevant conference proceedings, searched relevant websites, and contacted experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA We included all studies comparing TCD or TCCD (index tests) with IA, CTA, MRA, or contrast-enhanced MRA (reference standards) in people with acute ischaemic stroke, where all participants underwent both the index test and the reference standard within 24 hours of symptom onset. We included prospective cohort studies and randomised studies of test comparisons. We also considered retrospective studies eligible for inclusion where the original population sample was recruited prospectively but the results were analysed retrospectively. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS At least two review authors independently screened the titles and abstracts identified by the search strategies, applied the inclusion criteria, extracted data, assessed methodological quality (using QUADAS-2), and investigated heterogeneity. We contacted study authors for missing data. MAIN RESULTS A comprehensive search of major relevant electronic databases (MEDLINE and Embase) from 1982 to 13 March 2018 yielded 13,534 articles, of which nine were deemed eligible for inclusion. The studies included a total of 493 participants. The mean age of included participants was 64.2 years (range 55.8 to 69.9 years). The proportion of men and women was similar across studies. Six studies recruited participants in Europe, one in south America, one in China, and one in Egypt. Risk of bias was high for participant selection but low for flow, timing, index and reference standard. The summary sensitivity and specificity estimates for TCD and TCCD were 95% (95% CI = 0.83 to 0.99) and 95% (95% CI = 0.90 to 0.98), respectively. Considering a prevalence of stenosis or occlusion of 42% (as reported in the literature), for every 1000 people who receive a TCD or TCCD test, stenosis or occlusion will be missed in 21 people (95% CI = 4 to 71) and 29 (95% CI = 12 to 58) will be wrongly diagnosed as harbouring an intracranial occlusion. However, there was substantial heterogeneity between studies, which was no longer evident when only occlusion of the MCA was considered, or when the analysis was limited to participants investigated within six hours. The performance of either TCD or TCCD in ruling in and ruling out a MCA occlusion was good. Limitations of this review were the small number of identified studies and the lack of data on the use of ultrasound contrast medium. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This review provides evidence that TCD or TCCD, administered by professionals with adequate experience and skills, can provide useful diagnostic information for detecting stenosis or occlusion of intracranial vessels in people with acute ischaemic stroke, or guide the request for more invasive vascular neuroimaging, especially where CT or MR-based vascular imaging are not immediately available. More studies are needed to confirm or refute the results of this review in a larger sample of stroke patients, to verify the role of contrast medium and to evaluate the clinical advantage of the use of ultrasound.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Mattioni
- USL Umbria 1UO NeurologiaVia Luigi Angelini 10Città di CastelloPerugiaItaly06012
| | - Silvia Cenciarelli
- USL Umbria 1UO NeurologiaVia Luigi Angelini 10Città di CastelloPerugiaItaly06012
| | - Paolo Eusebi
- Regional Health Authority of UmbriaEpidemiology DepartmentVia Mario Angeloni 61PerugiaUmbriaItaly06124
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- University of AberdeenHealth Services Research UnitHealth Sciences BuildingForesterhillAberdeenUKAB25 2ZD
| | - Tatiana Mazzoli
- USL Umbria 1UO NeurologiaVia Luigi Angelini 10Città di CastelloPerugiaItaly06012
| | | | - Carlo Gandolfo
- Università di Genova e Ospedale Policlinico San MartiniDipartimento di Neuroscienze, Oftalmologia, Genetica e Scienze Materno‐InfantiliGenovaItaly16132
| | | | - Cinzia Finocchi
- Università di Genova e Ospedale Policlinico San MartiniDipartimento di Neuroscienze, Oftalmologia, Genetica e Scienze Materno‐InfantiliGenovaItaly16132
| | - Valentina Saia
- Ospedale di Pietra LigureUO NeurologiaPietra LigureItaly
| | - Stefano Ricci
- USL Umbria 1UO NeurologiaVia Luigi Angelini 10Città di CastelloPerugiaItaly06012
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Service Research Unit, 3rd floor Health Sciences Building, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZU
| | - Alison Avenell
- Health Service Research Unit, 3rd floor Health Sciences Building, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZU
| | - Katie Gillies
- Health Service Research Unit, 3rd floor Health Sciences Building, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZU
| | - Craig Ramsay
- Health Service Research Unit, 3rd floor Health Sciences Building, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZU
| | - Irfan Ahmed
- Health Service Research Unit, 3rd floor Health Sciences Building, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZU
- Department of Surgery, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZN
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Imamura M, Hudson J, Wallace SA, MacLennan G, Shimonovich M, Omar MI, Javanbakht M, Moloney E, Becker F, Ternent L, Montgomery I, Mackie P, Saraswat L, Monga A, Vale L, Craig D, Brazzelli M. Surgical interventions for women with stress urinary incontinence: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2019; 365:l1842. [PMID: 31167796 PMCID: PMC6549286 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l1842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the effectiveness and safety of surgical interventions for women with stress urinary incontinence. DESIGN Systematic review and network meta-analysis. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES Randomised controlled trials evaluating surgical interventions for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. METHODS Identification of relevant randomised controlled trials from Cochrane reviews and the Cochrane Incontinence Specialised Register (searched May 2017), which contains trials identified from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medline, Medline In-Process, Medline Epub Ahead of Print, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP. The reference lists of relevant articles were also searched. Primary outcomes were "cure" and "improvement" at 12 months, analysed by means of network meta-analyses, with results presented as the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Adverse events were analysed using pairwise meta-analyses. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The quality of evidence for network meta-analysis was assessed using the GRADE approach. RESULTS 175 randomised controlled trials assessing a total of 21 598 women were included. Most studies had high or unclear risk across all risk of bias domains. Network meta-analyses were based on data from 105 trials that reported cure and 120 trials that reported improvement of incontinence symptoms. Results showed that the interventions with highest cure rates were traditional sling, retropubic midurethral sling (MUS), open colposuspension, and transobturator MUS, with rankings of 89.4%, 89.1%, 76.7%, and 64.1%, respectively. Compared with retropubic MUS, the odds ratio of cure for traditional sling was 1.06 (95% credible interval 0.62 to 1.85), for open colposuspension was 0.85 (0.54 to 1.33), and for transobtrurator MUS was 0.74 (0.59 to 0.92). Women were also more likely to experience an improvement in their incontinence symptoms after receiving retropubic MUS or transobturator MUS compared with other surgical procedures. In particular, compared with retropubic MUS, the odds ratio of improvement for transobturator MUS was 0.76 (95% credible interval 0.59 to 0.98), for traditional sling was 0.69 (0.39 to 1.26), and for open colposuspension was 0.65 (0.41 to 1.02). Quality of evidence was moderate for retropubic MUS versus transobturator MUS and low or very low for retropubic MUS versus the other two interventions. Data on adverse events were available mainly for mesh procedures, indicating a higher rate of repeat surgery and groin pain but a lower rate of suprapubic pain, vascular complications, bladder or urethral perforation, and voiding difficulties after transobturator MUS compared with retropubic MUS. Data on adverse events for non-MUS procedures were sparse and showed wide confidence intervals. Long term data were limited. CONCLUSIONS Retropubic MUS, transobturator MUS, traditional sling, and open colposuspension are more effective than other procedures for stress urinary incontinence in the short to medium term. Data on long term effectiveness and adverse events are, however, limited, especially around the comparative adverse events profiles of MUS and non-MUS procedures. A better understanding of complications after surgery for stress urinary incontinence is imperative. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42016049339.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mari Imamura
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Jemma Hudson
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Sheila A Wallace
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Graeme MacLennan
- Centre for Health Care Randomised Trials, Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | | | - Mehdi Javanbakht
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Eoin Moloney
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Frauke Becker
- Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Laura Ternent
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | | | | | - Ash Monga
- University Hospitals Southampton Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Luke Vale
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Dawn Craig
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Brazzelli M, Hernández R, Sharma P, Robertson C, Shimonovich M, MacLennan G, Fraser C, Jamieson R, Vallabhaneni SR. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and/or colour duplex ultrasound for surveillance after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2019; 22:1-220. [PMID: 30543179 DOI: 10.3310/hta22720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is less invasive than open surgery, but may be associated with important complications. Patients receiving EVAR require long-term surveillance to detect abnormalities and direct treatments. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) has been the most common imaging modality adopted for EVAR surveillance, but it is associated with repeated radiation exposure and the risk of contrast-related nephropathy. Colour duplex ultrasound (CDU) and, more recently, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEU) have been suggested as possible, safer, alternatives to CTA. OBJECTIVES To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of imaging strategies, using either CDU or CEU alone or in conjunction with plain radiography, compared with CTA for EVAR surveillance. DATA SOURCES Major electronic databases were searched, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, Scopus' Articles-in-Press, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) and NHS Economic Evaluation Database from 1996 onwards. We also searched for relevant ongoing studies and conference proceedings. The final searches were undertaken in September 2016. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies of patients with AAAs who were receiving surveillance using CTA, CDU and CEU with or without plain radiography. Three reviewers were involved in the study selection, data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment. We developed a Markov model based on five surveillance strategies: (1) annual CTA; (2) annual CDU; (3) annual CEU; (4) CDU together with CTA at 1 year, followed by CDU on an annual basis; and (5) CEU together with CTA at 1 year, followed by CEU on an annual basis. All of these strategies also considered plain radiography on an annual basis. RESULTS We identified two non-randomised comparative studies and 25 cohort studies of interventions, and nine systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy. Overall, the proportion of patients who required reintervention ranged from 1.1% (mean follow-up of 24 months) to 23.8% (mean follow-up of 32 months). Reintervention was mainly required for patients with thrombosis and types I-III endoleaks. All-cause mortality ranged from 2.7% (mean follow-up of 24 months) to 42% (mean follow-up of 54.8 months). Aneurysm-related mortality occurred in < 1% of the participants. Strategies based on early and mid-term CTA and/or CDU and long-term CDU surveillance were broadly comparable with those based on a combination of CTA and CDU throughout the follow-up period in terms of clinical complications, reinterventions and mortality. The economic evaluation showed that a CDU-based strategy generated lower expected costs and higher quality-adjusted life-year (QALYs) than a CTA-based strategy and has a 63% probability of being cost-effective at a £30,000 willingness-to-pay-per-QALY threshold. A CEU-based strategy generated more QALYs, but at higher costs, and became cost-effective only for high-risk patient groups. LIMITATIONS Most studies were rated as being at a high or moderate risk of bias. No studies compared CDU with CEU. Substantial clinical heterogeneity precluded a formal synthesis of results. The economic model was hindered by a lack of suitable data. CONCLUSIONS Current surveillance practice is very heterogeneous. CDU may be a safe and cost-effective alternative to CTA, with CTA being reserved for abnormal/inconclusive CDU cases. FUTURE WORK Research is needed to validate the safety of modified, more-targeted surveillance protocols based on the use of CDU and CEU. The role of radiography for surveillance after EVAR requires clarification. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016036475. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Rodolfo Hernández
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Pawana Sharma
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Clare Robertson
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Graeme MacLennan
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Cynthia Fraser
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Imamura M, Scott NW, Ogah JA, Ford AA, Wallace SA, Dubos YA, Brazzelli M. Interventions for treating people with symptoms of bladder pain syndrome: a network meta-analysis. Hippokratia 2019. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mari Imamura
- University of Aberdeen; Health Services Research Unit; Health Sciences Building Foresterhill Aberdeen UK AB25 2ZD
| | - Neil W Scott
- University of Aberdeen; Medical Statistics Team; Polwarth Building Foresterhill Aberdeen Scotland UK AB 25 2 ZD
| | - Joseph A Ogah
- University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust; Obstetrics and Gynaecology; Dalton Road Barrow in Furness Cumbria UK LA14 4LF
| | - Abigail A Ford
- Imperial Healthcare Trust, St Mary's Hospital; Department of Urogynaecology; Praed Street Paddington London UK W2 1NY
| | - Sheila A Wallace
- Newcastle University; Institute of Health & Society; Baddiley-Clarke Building Richardson Road Newcastle Upon Tyne Tyne and Wear UK NE2 4AX
| | - Yann A Dubos
- University of Aberdeen; c/o Health Services Research Unit; Health Sciences Building Foresterhill Aberdeen UK AB25 2ZD
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- University of Aberdeen; Health Services Research Unit; Health Sciences Building Foresterhill Aberdeen UK AB25 2ZD
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
BackgroundFood insecurity (FI) is a multifaceted, socioeconomic problem involving difficulties accessing sufficient, safe and nutritious food to meet people’s dietary requirements and preferences for a healthy life. For children experiencing FI, there are some potentially negative developmental consequences and it is, therefore, important to understand the links between FI and children’s health and well-being as well as any strategies undertaken to address FI. The overall objective of this assessment was to determine the nature, extent and consequences of FI affecting children (aged ≤ 18 years) in the UK.ObjectiveTo determine the nature, extent and consequences of FI affecting children (aged ≤ 18 years) in the UK.Data sourcesThe databases searched on 4 December 2017 included MEDLINE (including In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and E-pub ahead of print files), EMBASE, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), the Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux (CAB) abstracts, The Cochrane Library, Education Resources Information Centre (ERIC), PsycINFO, the Social Science Citation Index and the Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA).MethodsA rapid review of the current published and unpublished literature was conducted, including all study designs from specified high-income countries in children aged ≤ 18 years. Searches were conducted of major health-care, nutrition, education and social science databases from 1995 onwards, and websites of relevant UK and international organisations. Final searches were undertaken in December 2017.ResultsIn total, 109 studies were selected. Only five studies were conducted in the UK, four of which provided qualitative data. Possible factors associated with child FI were identified, for example socioeconomic status, material deprivation, living in public housing and having unemployed or poorly educated parents. Children’s health, well-being and academic outcomes were all negatively affected by FI. The mediating effects of family stressors and parenting practices in the relationship between FI and children’s health and well-being outcomes were not clear. Food assistance programmes were generally effective in mitigating FI and improving nutritional outcomes (including hunger) in the short term, but did not eradicate FI, eliminate its effects on children’s health or have an impact on academic outcomes. No reports assessing the prevalence of child FI in the UK or the cost-effectiveness and sustainability of interventions to tackle FI were identified.LimitationsThere was a lack of consistency in how FI was defined and measured across studies. Most of the studies used indirect measurements of child FI through parental reports. The majority of studies were conducted in North America. Only five studies were conducted in the UK. Thirty potentially relevant studies were not included in the review as a result of time and resource constraints. Most studies were observational and caution is advised in interpreting their results.ConclusionsA number of factors that were related to child FI were identified, as were negative associations between child FI and physical, mental and social outcomes. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution because of the correlational nature of the analyses and the fact that it is difficult to determine if some factors are predictors or consequences of FI.Future researchThere is an urgent requirement for the development of a reliable instrument to measure and monitor child FI in the UK and for well-designed interventions or programmes to tackle child FI.Study registrationThis study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42017084818.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Public Health Research programme. The Health Services Research Unit is core-funded by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Cynthia Fraser
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Dickson R, Boland A, Duarte R, Kotas E, Woolacott N, Hodgson R, Riemsma R, Grimm S, Ramaekers B, Joore M, Büyükkaramikli N, Kaltenthaler E, Stevenson M, Pandor A, Edwards S, Hoyle M, Shepherd J, Armoiry X, Brazzelli M. EMA and NICE Appraisal Processes for Cancer Drugs: Current Status and Uncertainties. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2018; 16:429-432. [PMID: 29808296 PMCID: PMC6028888 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-018-0393-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Rumona Dickson
- Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building, Liverpool, L69 3GB, UK.
| | - Angela Boland
- Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building, Liverpool, L69 3GB, UK
| | - Rui Duarte
- Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building, Liverpool, L69 3GB, UK
| | - Eleanor Kotas
- Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building, Liverpool, L69 3GB, UK
| | - Nerys Woolacott
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| | - Robert Hodgson
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Sabine Grimm
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bram Ramaekers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Nasuh Büyükkaramikli
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eva Kaltenthaler
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Matt Stevenson
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Abdullah Pandor
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Martin Hoyle
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Jonathan Shepherd
- Southampton Health Technology Assessments Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Scotland G, Cruickshank M, Jacobsen E, Cooper D, Fraser C, Shimonovich M, Marks A, Brazzelli M. Multiple-frequency bioimpedance devices for fluid management in people with chronic kidney disease receiving dialysis: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2018; 22:1-138. [PMID: 29298736 PMCID: PMC5776406 DOI: 10.3310/hta22010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a long-term condition requiring treatment such as conservative management, kidney transplantation or dialysis. To optimise the volume of fluid removed during dialysis (to avoid underhydration or overhydration), people are assigned a 'target weight', which is commonly assessed using clinical methods, such as weight gain between dialysis sessions, pre- and post-dialysis blood pressure and patient-reported symptoms. However, these methods are not precise, and measurement devices based on bioimpedance technology are increasingly used in dialysis centres. Current evidence on the role of bioimpedance devices for fluid management in people with CKD receiving dialysis is limited. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multiple-frequency bioimpedance devices versus standard clinical assessment for fluid management in people with CKD receiving dialysis. DATA SOURCES We searched major electronic databases [e.g. MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, EMBASE, Science Citation Index and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL)] conference abstracts and ongoing studies. There were no date restrictions. Searches were undertaken between June and October 2016. REVIEW METHODS Evidence was considered from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing fluid management by multiple-frequency bioimpedance devices and standard clinical assessment in people receiving dialysis, and non-randomised studies evaluating the use of the devices for fluid management in people receiving dialysis. One reviewer extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. A second reviewer cross-checked the extracted data. Standard meta-analyses techniques were used to combine results from included studies. A Markov model was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of the interventions. RESULTS Five RCTs (with 904 adult participants) and eight non-randomised studies (with 4915 adult participants) assessing the use of the Body Composition Monitor [(BCM) Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg vor der Höhe, Germany] were included. Both absolute overhydration and relative overhydration were significantly lower in patients evaluated using BCM measurements than for those evaluated using standard clinical methods [weighted mean difference -0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.72 to -0.15, p = 0.003, I2 = 49%; and weighted mean difference -1.84, 95% CI -3.65 to -0.03; p = 0.05, I2 = 52%, respectively]. Pooled effects of bioimpedance monitoring on systolic blood pressure (SBP) (mean difference -2.46 mmHg, 95% CI -5.07 to 0.15 mmHg; p = 0.06, I2 = 0%), arterial stiffness (mean difference -1.18, 95% CI -3.14 to 0.78; p = 0.24, I2 = 92%) and mortality (hazard ratio = 0.689, 95% CI 0.23 to 2.08; p = 0.51) were not statistically significant. The economic evaluation showed that, when dialysis costs were included in the model, the probability of bioimpedance monitoring being cost-effective ranged from 13% to 26% at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. With dialysis costs excluded, the corresponding probabilities of cost-effectiveness ranged from 61% to 67%. LIMITATIONS Lack of evidence on clinically relevant outcomes, children receiving dialysis, and any multifrequency bioimpedance devices, other than the BCM. CONCLUSIONS BCM used in addition to clinical assessment may lower overhydration and potentially improve intermediate outcomes, such as SBP, but effects on mortality have not been demonstrated. If dialysis costs are not considered, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio falls below £20,000, with modest effects on mortality and/or hospitalisation rates. The current findings are not generalisable to paediatric populations nor across other multifrequency bioimpedance devices. FUTURE WORK Services that routinely use the BCM should report clinically relevant intermediate and long-term outcomes before and after introduction of the device to extend the current evidence base. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016041785. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graham Scotland
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Elisabet Jacobsen
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - David Cooper
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Cynthia Fraser
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | | | - Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Cruickshank M, Henderson L, MacLennan G, Fraser C, Campbell M, Blackwood B, Gordon A, Brazzelli M. Alpha-2 agonists for sedation of mechanically ventilated adults in intensive care units: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2017; 20:v-xx, 1-117. [PMID: 27035758 DOI: 10.3310/hta20250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Care of critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs) often requires potentially invasive or uncomfortable procedures, such as mechanical ventilation (MV). Sedation can alleviate pain and discomfort, provide protection from stressful or harmful events, prevent anxiety and promote sleep. Various sedative agents are available for use in ICUs. In the UK, the most commonly used sedatives are propofol (Diprivan(®), AstraZeneca), benzodiazepines [e.g. midazolam (Hypnovel(®), Roche) and lorazepam (Ativan(®), Pfizer)] and alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonists [e.g. dexmedetomidine (Dexdor(®), Orion Corporation) and clonidine (Catapres(®), Boehringer Ingelheim)]. Sedative agents vary in onset/duration of effects and in their side effects. The pattern of sedation of alpha-2 agonists is quite different from that of other sedatives in that patients can be aroused readily and their cognitive performance on psychometric tests is usually preserved. Moreover, respiratory depression is less frequent after alpha-2 agonists than after other sedative agents. OBJECTIVES To conduct a systematic review to evaluate the comparative effects of alpha-2 agonists (dexmedetomidine and clonidine) and propofol or benzodiazepines (midazolam and lorazepam) in mechanically ventilated adults admitted to ICUs. DATA SOURCES We searched major electronic databases (e.g. MEDLINE without revisions, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) from 1999 to 2014. METHODS Evidence was considered from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing dexmedetomidine with clonidine or dexmedetomidine or clonidine with propofol or benzodiazepines such as midazolam, lorazepam and diazepam (Diazemuls(®), Actavis UK Limited). Primary outcomes included mortality, duration of MV, length of ICU stay and adverse events. One reviewer extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included trials. A second reviewer cross-checked all the data extracted. Random-effects meta-analyses were used for data synthesis. RESULTS Eighteen RCTs (2489 adult patients) were included. One trial at unclear risk of bias compared dexmedetomidine with clonidine and found that target sedation was achieved in a higher number of patients treated with dexmedetomidine with lesser need for additional sedation. The remaining 17 trials compared dexmedetomidine with propofol or benzodiazepines (midazolam or lorazepam). Trials varied considerably with regard to clinical population, type of comparators, dose of sedative agents, outcome measures and length of follow-up. Overall, risk of bias was generally high or unclear. In particular, few trials blinded outcome assessors. Compared with propofol or benzodiazepines (midazolam or lorazepam), dexmedetomidine had no significant effects on mortality [risk ratio (RR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85 to 1.24, I (2) = 0%; p = 0.78]. Length of ICU stay (mean difference -1.26 days, 95% CI -1.96 to -0.55 days, I (2) = 31%; p = 0.0004) and time to extubation (mean difference -1.85 days, 95% CI -2.61 to -1.09 days, I (2) = 0%; p < 0.00001) were significantly shorter among patients who received dexmedetomidine. No difference in time to target sedation range was observed between sedative interventions (I (2) = 0%; p = 0.14). Dexmedetomidine was associated with a higher risk of bradycardia (RR 1.88, 95% CI 1.28 to 2.77, I (2) = 46%; p = 0.001). LIMITATIONS Trials varied considerably with regard to participants, type of comparators, dose of sedative agents, outcome measures and length of follow-up. Overall, risk of bias was generally high or unclear. In particular, few trials blinded assessors. CONCLUSIONS Evidence on the use of clonidine in ICUs is very limited. Dexmedetomidine may be effective in reducing ICU length of stay and time to extubation in critically ill ICU patients. Risk of bradycardia but not of overall mortality is higher among patients treated with dexmedetomidine. Well-designed RCTs are needed to assess the use of clonidine in ICUs and identify subgroups of patients that are more likely to benefit from the use of dexmedetomidine. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42014014101. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme. The Health Services Research Unit is core funded by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lorna Henderson
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Graeme MacLennan
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Cynthia Fraser
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Marion Campbell
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Centre for Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Anthony Gordon
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Affiliation(s)
- David H. Saunders
- From the Institute for Sport, Physical Education, and Health Sciences (SPEHS), Moray House School of Education, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom (D.H.S.); Institute of Clinical Exercise and Health Science, University of the West of Scotland, Hamilton, United Kingdom (M.S.); Department of Clinical Therapies, Faculty of Education and Health Science, Health Research Institute (HRI), University of Limerick, Ireland (S.H.); Institute of Sport Exercise and Health, University College
| | - Mark Sanderson
- From the Institute for Sport, Physical Education, and Health Sciences (SPEHS), Moray House School of Education, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom (D.H.S.); Institute of Clinical Exercise and Health Science, University of the West of Scotland, Hamilton, United Kingdom (M.S.); Department of Clinical Therapies, Faculty of Education and Health Science, Health Research Institute (HRI), University of Limerick, Ireland (S.H.); Institute of Sport Exercise and Health, University College
| | - Sara Hayes
- From the Institute for Sport, Physical Education, and Health Sciences (SPEHS), Moray House School of Education, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom (D.H.S.); Institute of Clinical Exercise and Health Science, University of the West of Scotland, Hamilton, United Kingdom (M.S.); Department of Clinical Therapies, Faculty of Education and Health Science, Health Research Institute (HRI), University of Limerick, Ireland (S.H.); Institute of Sport Exercise and Health, University College
| | - Maeve Kilrane
- From the Institute for Sport, Physical Education, and Health Sciences (SPEHS), Moray House School of Education, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom (D.H.S.); Institute of Clinical Exercise and Health Science, University of the West of Scotland, Hamilton, United Kingdom (M.S.); Department of Clinical Therapies, Faculty of Education and Health Science, Health Research Institute (HRI), University of Limerick, Ireland (S.H.); Institute of Sport Exercise and Health, University College
| | - Carolyn A. Greig
- From the Institute for Sport, Physical Education, and Health Sciences (SPEHS), Moray House School of Education, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom (D.H.S.); Institute of Clinical Exercise and Health Science, University of the West of Scotland, Hamilton, United Kingdom (M.S.); Department of Clinical Therapies, Faculty of Education and Health Science, Health Research Institute (HRI), University of Limerick, Ireland (S.H.); Institute of Sport Exercise and Health, University College
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- From the Institute for Sport, Physical Education, and Health Sciences (SPEHS), Moray House School of Education, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom (D.H.S.); Institute of Clinical Exercise and Health Science, University of the West of Scotland, Hamilton, United Kingdom (M.S.); Department of Clinical Therapies, Faculty of Education and Health Science, Health Research Institute (HRI), University of Limerick, Ireland (S.H.); Institute of Sport Exercise and Health, University College
| | - Gillian E. Mead
- From the Institute for Sport, Physical Education, and Health Sciences (SPEHS), Moray House School of Education, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom (D.H.S.); Institute of Clinical Exercise and Health Science, University of the West of Scotland, Hamilton, United Kingdom (M.S.); Department of Clinical Therapies, Faculty of Education and Health Science, Health Research Institute (HRI), University of Limerick, Ireland (S.H.); Institute of Sport Exercise and Health, University College
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Sharma P, Boyers D, Scott N, Hernández R, Fraser C, Cruickshank M, Ahmed I, Ramsay C, Brazzelli M. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of open mesh repairs in adults presenting with a clinically diagnosed primary unilateral inguinal hernia who are operated in an elective setting: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2016; 19:1-142. [PMID: 26556776 DOI: 10.3310/hta19920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS Current open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair have shown similar recurrence rates. However, chronic pain has been associated with Lichtenstein mesh repair, the most common surgical procedure for inguinal hernia in the UK. The position of the mesh is probably an important factor. The Lichtenstein method requires dissection of the inguinal wall and fixation of the mesh. In contrast, in the open preperitoneal approach the mesh is placed in the preperitoneal space and held in place with intra-abdominal pressure. Currently, there is no consensus regarding the best open approach for repair of inguinal hernia. OBJECTIVES To determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of open preperitoneal mesh repair compared with Lichtenstein mesh repair in adults presenting with a clinically diagnosed primary unilateral inguinal hernia. DATA SOURCES We searched major electronic databases (e.g. MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register) from inception to November 2014 and contacted experts in the field. REVIEW METHODS Evidence was considered from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared open preperitoneal mesh repair with Lichtenstein mesh repair for the treatment of inguinal hernia. Two reviewers independently selected studies for inclusion. One reviewer completed data extraction and assessed risk of bias for included studies, and two reviewers independently cross-checked the details extracted. Meta-analyses techniques were used to combine results from included studies. A Markov model was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of open mesh procedures from a NHS health services perspective over a 25-year time horizon. RESULTS Twelve RCTs involving 1568 participants were included. Participants who underwent open preperitoneal mesh repair returned to work and normal activities significantly earlier than those who underwent Lichtenstein mesh repair [mean difference -1.49 days, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.78 to -0.20 days]. Although no significant differences were observed between the two open approaches for incidence of pain [risk ratio (RR) 0.50, 95% CI 0.20 to 1.27], numbness (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.56), recurrences (Peto odds ratio 0.76, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.52) or postoperative complications, fewer events were generally reported after open preperitoneal mesh repair. The results of the economic evaluation indicate that the open preperitoneal mesh repair was £256 less costly and improved health outcomes by 0.041 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) compared with Lichtenstein mesh repair. The open preperitoneal procedure was the most efficient and dominant treatment strategy with a high (> 98%) probability of being cost-effectiveness for the NHS at a willingness to pay of £20,000 for a QALY. Results were robust to a range of sensitivity analyses. However, the magnitude of cost saving or QALY gain was sensitive to some model assumptions. LIMITATIONS Overall, the included trials were of small sample size (mean 130.7 participants) and at high or unclear risk of bias. Meta-analyses results demonstrated significant statistical heterogeneity for most of the assessed outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Open preperitoneal mesh repair appears to be a safe and efficacious alternative to Lichtenstein mesh repair. Further research is required to determine the long-term effects of these surgical procedures as well as the most effective open preperitoneal repair technique in terms of both clinical efficacy and costs. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42014013510. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pawana Sharma
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Dwayne Boyers
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.,Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Neil Scott
- Medical Statistics Team, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Rodolfo Hernández
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Cynthia Fraser
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Irfan Ahmed
- NHS Grampian, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Craig Ramsay
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Brazzelli M, Cruickshank M, Tassie E, McNamee P, Robertson C, Elders A, Fraser C, Hernandez R, Lawrie D, Ramsay C. Collagenase clostridium histolyticum for the treatment of Dupuytren's contracture: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2016; 19:1-202. [PMID: 26524616 DOI: 10.3310/hta19900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dupuytren's disease is a slowly progressive condition of the hand, characterised by the formation of nodules in the palm that gradually develop into fibrotic cords. Contracture of the cords produces deformities of the fingers. Surgery is recommended for moderate and severe contractures, but complications and/or recurrences are frequent. Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) has been developed as a minimally invasive alternative to surgery for some patients. OBJECTIVES To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of collagenase as an alternative to surgery for adults with Dupuytren's contracture with a palpable cord. DATA SOURCES We searched all major electronic databases from 1990 to February 2014. REVIEW METHODS Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised comparative studies and observational studies involving collagenase and/or surgical interventions were considered. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies. A de novo Markov model was developed to assess cost-effectiveness of collagenase, percutaneous needle fasciotomy (PNF) and limited fasciectomy (LF). Results were reported as incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were undertaken to investigate model and parameter uncertainty. RESULTS Five RCTs comparing collagenase with placebo (493 participants), three RCTs comparing surgical techniques (334 participants), two non-randomised studies comparing collagenase and surgery (105 participants), five non-randomised comparative studies assessing various surgical procedures (3571 participants) and 15 collagenase case series (3154 participants) were included. Meta-analyses of RCTs assessing CCH versus placebo were performed. Joints randomised to collagenase were more likely to achieve clinical success. Collagenase-treated participants experienced significant reduction in contracture and an increased range of motion compared with placebo-treated participants. Participants treated with collagenase also experienced significantly more adverse events, most of which were mild or moderate. Four serious adverse events were observed in the collagenase group: two tendon ruptures, one pulley rupture and one complex regional pain syndrome. Two tendon ruptures were also reported in two collagenase case series. Non-randomised studies comparing collagenase with surgery produced variable results and were at high risk of bias. Serious adverse events across surgery studies were low. Recurrence rates ranged from 0% (at 90 days) to 100% (at 8 years) for collagenase and from 0% (at 2.7 years for fasciectomy) to 85% (at 5 years for PNF) for surgery. The results of the de novo economic analysis show that PNF was the cheapest treatment option, whereas LF generated the greatest QALY gains. Collagenase was more costly and generated fewer QALYs compared with LF. LF was £1199 more costly and generated an additional 0.11 QALYs in comparison with PNF. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was £10,871 per QALY gained. Two subgroup analyses were conducted for a population of patients with moderate and severe disease and up to two joints affected. In both subgroup analyses, collagenase remained dominated. LIMITATIONS The main limitation of the review was the lack of head-to-head RCTs comparing collagenase with surgery and the limited evidence base for estimating the effects of specific surgical procedures (fasciectomy and PNF). Substantial differences across studies further limited the comparability of available evidence. The economic model was derived from a naive indirect comparison and was hindered by a lack of suitable data. In addition, there was considerable uncertainty about the appropriateness of many assumptions and parameters used in the model. CONCLUSIONS Collagenase was significantly better than placebo. There was no evidence that collagenase was clinically better or worse than surgical treatments. LF was the most cost-effective choice to treat moderate to severe contractures, whereas collagenase was not. However, the results of the cost-utility analysis are based on a naive indirect comparison of clinical effectiveness, and a RCT is required to confirm or refute these findings. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42013006248. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Emma Tassie
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Paul McNamee
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Clare Robertson
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Andrew Elders
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Cynthia Fraser
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Rodolfo Hernandez
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - David Lawrie
- NHS Grampian, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Craig Ramsay
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Ramsay CR, Adewuyi TE, Gray J, Hislop J, Shirley MDF, Jayakody S, MacLennan G, Fraser C, MacLennan S, Brazzelli M, N'Dow J, Pickard R, Robertson C, Rothnie K, Rushton SP, Vale L, Lam TB. Ablative therapy for people with localised prostate cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2016; 19:1-490. [PMID: 26140518 DOI: 10.3310/hta19490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For people with localised prostate cancer, active treatments are effective but have significant side effects. Minimally invasive treatments that destroy (or ablate) either the entire gland or the part of the prostate with cancer may be as effective and cause less side effects at an acceptable cost. Such therapies include cryotherapy, high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and brachytherapy, among others. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to determine the relative clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ablative therapies compared with radical prostatectomy (RP), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and active surveillance (AS) for primary treatment of localised prostate cancer, and compared with RP for salvage treatment of localised prostate cancer which has recurred after initial treatment with EBRT. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE (1946 to March week 3, 2013), MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations (29 March 2013), EMBASE (1974 to week 13, 2013), Bioscience Information Service (BIOSIS) (1956 to 1 April 2013), Science Citation Index (1970 to 1 April 2013), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (issue 3, 2013), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) (issue 3, 2013), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) (inception to March 2013) and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) (inception to March 2013) databases were searched. Costs were obtained from NHS sources. REVIEW METHODS Evidence was drawn from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs, and from case series for the ablative procedures only, in people with localised prostate cancer. For primary therapy, the ablative therapies were cryotherapy, HIFU, brachytherapy and other ablative therapies. The comparators were AS, RP and EBRT. For salvage therapy, the ablative therapies were cryotherapy and HIFU. The comparator was RP. Outcomes were cancer related, adverse effects (functional and procedural) and quality of life. Two reviewers extracted data and carried out quality assessment. Meta-analysis used a Bayesian indirect mixed-treatment comparison. Data were incorporated into an individual simulation Markov model to estimate cost-effectiveness. RESULTS The searches identified 121 studies for inclusion in the review of patients undergoing primary treatment and nine studies for the review of salvage treatment. Cryotherapy [3995 patients; 14 case series, 1 RCT and 4 non-randomised comparative studies (NRCSs)], HIFU (4000 patients; 20 case series, 1 NRCS) and brachytherapy (26,129 patients; 2 RCTs, 38 NRCSs) studies provided limited data for meta-analyses. All studies were considered at high risk of bias. There was no robust evidence that mortality (4-year survival 93% for cryotherapy, 99% for HIFU, 91% for EBRT) or other cancer-specific outcomes differed between treatments. For functional and quality-of-life outcomes, the paucity of data prevented any definitive conclusions from being made, although data on incontinence rates and erectile dysfunction for all ablative procedures were generally numerically lower than for non-ablative procedures. The safety profiles were comparable with existing treatments. Studies reporting the use of focal cryotherapy suggested that incontinence rates may be better than for whole-gland treatment. Data on AS, salvage treatment and other ablative therapies were too limited. The cost-effectiveness analysis confirmed the uncertainty from the clinical review and that there is no technology which appears superior, on the basis of current evidence, in terms of average cost-effectiveness. The probabilistic sensitivity analyses suggest that a number of ablative techniques are worthy of further research. LIMITATIONS The main limitations were the quantity and quality of the data available on cancer-related outcomes and dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS The findings indicate that there is insufficient evidence to form any clear recommendations on the use of ablative therapies in order to influence current clinical practice. Research efforts in the use of ablative therapies in the management of prostate cancer should now be concentrated on the performance of RCTs and the generation of standardised outcomes. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42012002461. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Craig R Ramsay
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Joanne Gray
- Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jenni Hislop
- Health Economics Group, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Mark D F Shirley
- School of Biology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Graeme MacLennan
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Cynthia Fraser
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Sara MacLennan
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - James N'Dow
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Robert Pickard
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Clare Robertson
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Kieran Rothnie
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Luke Vale
- Health Economics Group, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Thomas B Lam
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Sharma P, Scotland G, Cruickshank M, Tassie E, Fraser C, Burton C, Croal B, Ramsay CR, Brazzelli M. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of point-of-care tests (CoaguChek system, INRatio2 PT/INR monitor and ProTime Microcoagulation system) for the self-monitoring of the coagulation status of people receiving long-term vitamin K antagonist therapy, compared with standard UK practice: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2016; 19:1-172. [PMID: 26138549 DOI: 10.3310/hta19480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Self-monitoring (self-testing and self-management) could be a valid option for oral anticoagulation therapy monitoring in the NHS, but current evidence on its clinical effectiveness or cost-effectiveness is limited. OBJECTIVES We investigated the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of point-of-care coagulometers for the self-monitoring of coagulation status in people receiving long-term vitamin K antagonist therapy, compared with standard clinic monitoring. DATA SOURCES We searched major electronic databases (e.g. MEDLINE, MEDLINE In Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, EMBASE, Bioscience Information Service, Science Citation Index and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) from 2007 to May 2013. Reports published before 2007 were identified from the existing Cochrane review (major databases searched from inception to 2007). The economic model parameters were derived from the clinical effectiveness review, other relevant reviews, routine sources of cost data and clinical experts' advice. REVIEW METHODS We assessed randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating self-monitoring in people with atrial fibrillation or heart valve disease requiring long-term anticoagulation therapy. CoaguChek(®) XS and S models (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland), INRatio2(®) PT/INR monitor (Alere Inc., San Diego, CA USA), and ProTime Microcoagulation system(®) (International Technidyne Corporation, Nexus Dx, Edison, NJ, USA) coagulometers were compared with standard monitoring. Where possible, we combined data from included trials using standard inverse variance methods. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. A de novo economic model was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness over a 10-year period. RESULTS We identified 26 RCTs (published in 45 papers) with a total of 8763 participants. CoaguChek was used in 85% of the trials. Primary analyses were based on data from 21 out of 26 trials. Only four trials were at low risk of bias. Major clinical events: self-monitoring was significantly better than standard monitoring in preventing thromboembolic events [relative risk (RR) 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40 to 0.84; p = 0.004]. In people with artificial heart valves (AHVs), self-monitoring almost halved the risk of thromboembolic events (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.82; p = 0.003) and all-cause mortality (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.92; p = 0.02). There was greater reduction in thromboembolic events and all-cause mortality through self-management but not through self-testing. Intermediate outcomes: self-testing, but not self-management, showed a modest but significantly higher percentage of time in therapeutic range, compared with standard care (weighted mean difference 4.44, 95% CI 1.71 to 7.18; p = 0.02). Patient-reported outcomes: improvements in patients' quality of life related to self-monitoring were observed in six out of nine trials. High preference rates were reported for self-monitoring (77% to 98% in four trials). Net health and social care costs over 10 years were £7295 (self-monitoring with INRatio2); £7324 (standard care monitoring); £7333 (self-monitoring with CoaguChek XS) and £8609 (self-monitoring with ProTime). The estimated quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gain associated with self-monitoring was 0.03. Self-monitoring with INRatio2 or CoaguChek XS was found to have ≈ 80% chance of being cost-effective, compared with standard monitoring at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000 per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS Compared with standard monitoring, self-monitoring appears to be safe and effective, especially for people with AHVs. Self-monitoring, and in particular self-management, of anticoagulation status appeared cost-effective when pooled estimates of clinical effectiveness were applied. However, if self-monitoring does not result in significant reductions in thromboembolic events, it is unlikely to be cost-effective, based on a comparison of annual monitoring costs alone. Trials investigating the longer-term outcomes of self-management are needed, as well as direct comparisons of the various point-of-care coagulometers. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42013004944. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pawana Sharma
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Graham Scotland
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.,Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Emma Tassie
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Cynthia Fraser
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Chris Burton
- Centre of Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Bernard Croal
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Craig R Ramsay
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Levels of physical fitness are low after stroke. It is unknown whether improving physical fitness after stroke reduces disability. OBJECTIVES To determine whether fitness training after stroke reduces death, dependence, and disability and to assess the effects of training with regard to adverse events, risk factors, physical fitness, mobility, physical function, quality of life, mood, and cognitive function. Interventions to improve cognitive function have attracted increased attention after being identified as the highest rated research priority for life after stroke. Therefore we have added this class of outcomes to this updated review. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched February 2015), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2015, Issue 1: searched February 2015), MEDLINE (1966 to February 2015), EMBASE (1980 to February 2015), CINAHL (1982 to February 2015), SPORTDiscus (1949 to February 2015), and five additional databases (February 2015). We also searched ongoing trials registers, handsearched relevant journals and conference proceedings, screened reference lists, and contacted experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised trials comparing either cardiorespiratory training or resistance training, or both (mixed training), with usual care, no intervention, or a non-exercise intervention in stroke survivors. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently selected trials, assessed quality and risk of bias, and extracted data. We analysed data using random-effects meta-analyses. Diverse outcome measures limited the intended analyses. MAIN RESULTS We included 58 trials, involving 2797 participants, which comprised cardiorespiratory interventions (28 trials, 1408 participants), resistance interventions (13 trials, 432 participants), and mixed training interventions (17 trials, 957 participants). Thirteen deaths occurred before the end of the intervention and a further nine before the end of follow-up. No dependence data were reported. Diverse outcome measures restricted pooling of data. Global indices of disability show moderate improvement after cardiorespiratory training (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19 to 0.84; P value = 0.002) and by a small amount after mixed training (SMD 0.26, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.49; P value = 0.02); benefits at follow-up (i.e. after training had stopped) were unclear. There were too few data to assess the effects of resistance training.Cardiorespiratory training involving walking improved maximum walking speed (mean difference (MD) 6.71 metres per minute, 95% CI 2.73 to 10.69), preferred gait speed (MD 4.28 metres per minute, 95% CI 1.71 to 6.84), and walking capacity (MD 30.29 metres in six minutes, 95% CI 16.19 to 44.39) at the end of the intervention. Mixed training, involving walking, increased preferred walking speed (MD 4.54 metres per minute, 95% CI 0.95 to 8.14), and walking capacity (MD 41.60 metres per six minutes, 95% CI 25.25 to 57.95). Balance scores improved slightly after mixed training (SMD 0.27, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.47). Some mobility benefits also persisted at the end of follow-up. The variability, quality of the included trials, and lack of data prevents conclusions about other outcomes and limits generalisability of the observed results. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Cardiorespiratory training and, to a lesser extent, mixed training reduce disability during or after usual stroke care; this could be mediated by improved mobility and balance. There is sufficient evidence to incorporate cardiorespiratory and mixed training, involving walking, within post-stroke rehabilitation programmes to improve the speed and tolerance of walking; some improvement in balance could also occur. There is insufficient evidence to support the use of resistance training. The effects of training on death and dependence after stroke are still unclear but these outcomes are rarely observed in physical fitness training trials. Cognitive function is under-investigated despite being a key outcome of interest for patients. Further well-designed randomised trials are needed to determine the optimal exercise prescription and identify long-term benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David H Saunders
- Institute for Sport, Physical Education and Health Sciences (SPEHS), University of EdinburghMoray House School of EducationSt Leonards LandHolyrood RoadEdinburghUKEH8 2AZ
| | - Mark Sanderson
- University of the West of ScotlandInstitute of Clinical Exercise and Health ScienceRoom A071A, Almada BuildingHamiltonUKML3 0JB
| | - Sara Hayes
- University of LimerickDepartment of Clinical TherapiesLimerickIreland
| | - Maeve Kilrane
- Royal Infirmary of EdinburghDepartment of Stroke MedicineWard 201 ‐ Stroke UnitLittle FranceEdinburghUKEH16 4SA
| | - Carolyn A Greig
- University of BirminghamSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, MRC‐ARUK Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing ResearchEdgbastonBirminghamUKB15 2TT
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- University of AberdeenHealth Services Research UnitHealth Sciences BuildingForesterhillAberdeenUKAB25 2ZD
| | - Gillian E Mead
- University of EdinburghCentre for Clinical Brain SciencesRoom S1642, Royal InfirmaryLittle France CrescentEdinburghUKEH16 4SA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Wardlaw JM, Brazzelli M, Chappell F, Dennis MS, Sandercock PAG. Author Response. Neurology 2016; 86:697. [PMID: 27303783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023] Open
|
45
|
Wardlaw J, Brazzelli M, Miranda H, Chappell F, McNamee P, Scotland G, Quayyum Z, Martin D, Shuler K, Sandercock P, Dennis M. Erratum: An assessment of the cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance, including diffusion-weighted imaging, in patients with transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke: a systematic review, meta-analysis and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2015; 18:369-70. [PMID: 26420656 DOI: 10.3310/hta18270-c201509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractCorrections to thex-axis title of the right-hand side forest plot in Figures 10–12
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Wardlaw
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Hector Miranda
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Francesca Chappell
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Paul McNamee
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Graham Scotland
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Zahid Quayyum
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Duncan Martin
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Kirsten Shuler
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Peter Sandercock
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Martin Dennis
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Michelessi M, Lucenteforte E, Oddone F, Brazzelli M, Parravano M, Franchi S, Ng SM, Virgili G. Optic nerve head and fibre layer imaging for diagnosing glaucoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2015:CD008803. [PMID: 26618332 PMCID: PMC4732281 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008803.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The diagnosis of glaucoma is traditionally based on the finding of optic nerve head (ONH) damage assessed subjectively by ophthalmoscopy or photography or by corresponding damage to the visual field assessed by automated perimetry, or both. Diagnostic assessments are usually required when ophthalmologists or primary eye care professionals find elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) or a suspect appearance of the ONH. Imaging tests such as confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (HRT), optical coherence tomography (OCT) and scanning laser polarimetry (SLP, as used by the GDx instrument), provide an objective measure of the structural changes of retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness and ONH parameters occurring in glaucoma. OBJECTIVES To determine the diagnostic accuracy of HRT, OCT and GDx for diagnosing manifest glaucoma by detecting ONH and RNFL damage. SEARCH METHODS We searched several databases for this review. The most recent searches were on 19 February 2015. SELECTION CRITERIA We included prospective and retrospective cohort studies and case-control studies that evaluated the accuracy of OCT, HRT or the GDx for diagnosing glaucoma. We excluded population-based screening studies, since we planned to consider studies on self-referred people or participants in whom a risk factor for glaucoma had already been identified in primary care, such as elevated IOP or a family history of glaucoma. We only considered recent commercial versions of the tests: spectral domain OCT, HRT III and GDx VCC or ECC. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We adopted standard Cochrane methods. We fitted a hierarchical summary ROC (HSROC) model using the METADAS macro in SAS software. After studies were selected, we decided to use 2 x 2 data at 0.95 specificity or closer in meta-analyses, since this was the most commonly-reported level. MAIN RESULTS We included 106 studies in this review, which analysed 16,260 eyes (8353 cases, 7907 controls) in total. Forty studies (5574 participants) assessed GDx, 18 studies (3550 participants) HRT, and 63 (9390 participants) OCT, with 12 of these studies comparing two or three tests. Regarding study quality, a case-control design in 103 studies raised concerns as it can overestimate accuracy and reduce the applicability of the results to daily practice. Twenty-four studies were sponsored by the manufacturer, and in 15 the potential conflict of interest was unclear.Comparisons made within each test were more reliable than those between tests, as they were mostly based on direct comparisons within each study.The Nerve Fibre Indicator yielded the highest accuracy (estimate, 95% confidence interval (CI)) among GDx parameters (sensitivity: 0.67, 0.55 to 0.77; specificity: 0.94, 0.92 to 0.95). For HRT measures, the Vertical Cup/Disc (C/D) ratio (sensitivity: 0.72, 0.60 to 0.68; specificity: 0.94, 0.92 to 0.95) was no different from other parameters. With OCT, the accuracy of average RNFL retinal thickness was similar to the inferior sector (0.72, 0.65 to 0.77; specificity: 0.93, 0.92 to 0.95) and, in different studies, to the vertical C/D ratio.Comparing the parameters with the highest diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) for each device in a single HSROC model, the performance of GDx, HRT and OCT was remarkably similar. At a sensitivity of 0.70 and a high specificity close to 0.95 as in most of these studies, in 1000 people referred by primary eye care, of whom 200 have manifest glaucoma, such as in those who have already undergone some functional or anatomic testing by optometrists, the best measures of GDx, HRT and OCT would miss about 60 cases out of the 200 patients with glaucoma, and would incorrectly refer 50 out of 800 patients without glaucoma. If prevalence were 5%, e.g. such as in people referred only because of family history of glaucoma, the corresponding figures would be 15 patients missed out of 50 with manifest glaucoma, avoiding referral of about 890 out of 950 non-glaucomatous people.Heterogeneity investigations found that sensitivity estimate was higher for studies with more severe glaucoma, expressed as worse average mean deviation (MD): 0.79 (0.74 to 0.83) for MD < -6 db versus 0.64 (0.60 to 0.69) for MD ≥ -6 db, at a similar summary specificity (0.93, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.94 and, respectively, 0.94; 95% CI 0.93 to 0.95; P < 0.0001 for the difference in relative DOR). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The accuracy of imaging tests for detecting manifest glaucoma was variable across studies, but overall similar for different devices. Accuracy may have been overestimated due to the case-control design, which is a serious limitation of the current evidence base.We recommend that further diagnostic accuracy studies are carried out on patients selected consecutively at a defined step of the clinical pathway, providing a description of risk factors leading to referral and bearing in mind the consequences of false positives and false negatives in the setting in which the diagnostic question is made. Future research should report accuracy for each threshold of these continuous measures, or publish raw data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuele Michelessi
- Ophthalmology, Fondazione G.B. Bietti per lo studio e la ricerca in Oftalmolologia-IRCCS, Via Livenza n 3, Rome, Italy, 00198
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Wardlaw JM, Brazzelli M, Chappell FM, Miranda H, Shuler K, Sandercock PAG, Dennis MS. ABCD2 score and secondary stroke prevention: meta-analysis and effect per 1,000 patients triaged. Neurology 2015; 85:373-80. [PMID: 26136519 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000001780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2014] [Accepted: 02/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with TIA have high risk of recurrent stroke and require rapid assessment and treatment. The ABCD2 clinical risk prediction score is recommended for patient triage by stroke risk, but its ability to stratify by known risk factors and effect on clinic workload are unknown. METHODS We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all studies published between January 2005 and September 2014 that reported proportions of true TIA/minor stroke or mimics, risk factors, and recurrent stroke rates, dichotomized to ABCD2 score </≥4. We calculated the effect per 1,000 patients triaged on stroke prevention services. RESULTS Twenty-nine studies, 13,766 TIA patients (range 69-1,679), were relevant: 48% calculated the ABCD2 score retrospectively; few reported on the ABCD2 score's ability to identify TIA mimics or use by nonspecialists. Meta-analysis showed that ABCD2 ≥4 was sensitive (86.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 81.4%-90.7%) but not specific (35.4%, 95% CI 33.3%-37.6%) for recurrent stroke within 7 days. Additionally, 20% of patients with ABCD2 <4 had >50% carotid stenosis or atrial fibrillation (AF); 35%-41% of TIA mimics, and 66% of true TIAs, had ABCD2 score ≥4. Among 1,000 patients attending stroke prevention services, including the 45% with mimics, 52% of patients would have an ABCD2 score ≥4. CONCLUSION The ABCD2 score does not reliably discriminate those at low and high risk of early recurrent stroke, identify patients with carotid stenosis or AF needing urgent intervention, or streamline clinic workload. Stroke prevention services need adequate capacity for prompt specialist clinical assessment of all suspected TIA patients for correct patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna M Wardlaw
- From the Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences (J.M.W., F.M.C., K.S., P.A.G.S., M.S.D.), University of Edinburgh; the Health Services Research Unit (M.B.), University of Aberdeen, UK; the Department of Neurology (H.M.), Santiago, Chile; and the Scottish Imaging Network (J.M.W., F.M.C., K.S., P.A.G.S.), A Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE), Inverness, Scotland.
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- From the Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences (J.M.W., F.M.C., K.S., P.A.G.S., M.S.D.), University of Edinburgh; the Health Services Research Unit (M.B.), University of Aberdeen, UK; the Department of Neurology (H.M.), Santiago, Chile; and the Scottish Imaging Network (J.M.W., F.M.C., K.S., P.A.G.S.), A Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE), Inverness, Scotland
| | - Francesca M Chappell
- From the Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences (J.M.W., F.M.C., K.S., P.A.G.S., M.S.D.), University of Edinburgh; the Health Services Research Unit (M.B.), University of Aberdeen, UK; the Department of Neurology (H.M.), Santiago, Chile; and the Scottish Imaging Network (J.M.W., F.M.C., K.S., P.A.G.S.), A Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE), Inverness, Scotland
| | - Hector Miranda
- From the Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences (J.M.W., F.M.C., K.S., P.A.G.S., M.S.D.), University of Edinburgh; the Health Services Research Unit (M.B.), University of Aberdeen, UK; the Department of Neurology (H.M.), Santiago, Chile; and the Scottish Imaging Network (J.M.W., F.M.C., K.S., P.A.G.S.), A Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE), Inverness, Scotland
| | - Kirsten Shuler
- From the Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences (J.M.W., F.M.C., K.S., P.A.G.S., M.S.D.), University of Edinburgh; the Health Services Research Unit (M.B.), University of Aberdeen, UK; the Department of Neurology (H.M.), Santiago, Chile; and the Scottish Imaging Network (J.M.W., F.M.C., K.S., P.A.G.S.), A Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE), Inverness, Scotland
| | - Peter A G Sandercock
- From the Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences (J.M.W., F.M.C., K.S., P.A.G.S., M.S.D.), University of Edinburgh; the Health Services Research Unit (M.B.), University of Aberdeen, UK; the Department of Neurology (H.M.), Santiago, Chile; and the Scottish Imaging Network (J.M.W., F.M.C., K.S., P.A.G.S.), A Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE), Inverness, Scotland
| | - Martin S Dennis
- From the Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences (J.M.W., F.M.C., K.S., P.A.G.S., M.S.D.), University of Edinburgh; the Health Services Research Unit (M.B.), University of Aberdeen, UK; the Department of Neurology (H.M.), Santiago, Chile; and the Scottish Imaging Network (J.M.W., F.M.C., K.S., P.A.G.S.), A Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE), Inverness, Scotland
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Sharma P, Scotland G, Cruickshank M, Tassie E, Fraser C, Burton C, Croal B, Ramsay CR, Brazzelli M. Is self-monitoring an effective option for people receiving long-term vitamin K antagonist therapy? A systematic review and economic evaluation. BMJ Open 2015; 5:e007758. [PMID: 26112222 PMCID: PMC4486963 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2015] [Revised: 05/01/2015] [Accepted: 05/07/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of self-monitoring of coagulation status in people receiving long-term vitamin K antagonist therapy compared with standard clinic care. DESIGN Systematic review of current evidence and economic modelling. DATA SOURCES Major electronic databases were searched up to May 2013. The economic model parameters were derived from the clinical effectiveness review, routine sources of cost data and advice from clinical experts. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing self-monitoring versus standard clinical care in people with different clinical conditions. Self-monitoring included both self-management (patients conducted the tests and adjusted their treatment according to an algorithm) and self-testing (patients conducted the tests, but received treatment recommendations from a clinician). Various point-of-care coagulometers were considered. RESULTS 26 RCTs (8763 participants) were included. Both self-management and self-testing were as safe as standard care in terms of major bleeding events (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.45, p=0.690, and RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.23, p=0.92, respectively). Self-management was associated with fewer thromboembolic events (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.69, p ≤ 0.001) and with a borderline significant reduction in all-cause mortality (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.01, p=0.06) than standard care. Self-testing resulted in a modest increase in time in therapeutic range compared with standard care (weighted mean difference, WMD 4.4%, 95% CI 1.71 to 7.18, p=0.02). Total health and social care costs over 10 years were £7324 with standard care and £7326 with self-monitoring (estimated quality adjusted life year, QALY gain was 0.028). Self-monitoring was found to have ∼ 80% probability of being cost-effective compared with standard care applying a ceiling willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000 per QALY gained. Within the base case model, applying the pooled relative effect of thromboembolic events, self-management alone was highly cost-effective while self-testing was not. CONCLUSIONS Self-monitoring appears to be a safe and cost-effective option. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER PROSPERO CRD42013004944.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pawana Sharma
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Graham Scotland
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Emma Tassie
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Cynthia Fraser
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Christopher Burton
- Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Bernard Croal
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Craig R Ramsay
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Brazzelli M, Cruickshank M, Kilonzo M, Ahmed I, Stewart F, McNamee P, Elders A, Fraser C, Avenell A, Ramsay C. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cholecystectomy compared with observation/conservative management for preventing recurrent symptoms and complications in adults presenting with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones or cholecystitis: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2015; 18:1-101, v-vi. [PMID: 25164349 DOI: 10.3310/hta18550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 10-15% of the adult population suffer from gallstone disease, cholelithiasis, with more women than men being affected. Cholecystectomy is the treatment of choice for people who present with biliary pain or acute cholecystitis and evidence of gallstones. However, some people do not experience a recurrence after an initial episode of biliary pain or cholecystitis. As most of the current research focuses on the surgical management of the disease, less attention has been dedicated to the consequences of conservative management. OBJECTIVES To determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cholecystectomy compared with observation/conservative management in people presenting with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones (biliary pain) or cholecystitis. DATA SOURCES We searched all major electronic databases (e.g. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, Bioscience Information Service, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) from 1980 to September 2012 and we contacted experts in the field. REVIEW METHODS Evidence was considered from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised comparative studies that enrolled people with symptomatic gallstone disease (pain attacks only and/or acute cholecystitis). Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Standard meta-analysis techniques were used to combine results from included studies. A de novo Markov model was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of the interventions. RESULTS Two Norwegian RCTs involving 201 participants were included. Eighty-eight per cent of people randomised to surgery and 45% of people randomised to observation underwent cholecystectomy during the 14-year follow-up period. Participants randomised to observation were significantly more likely to experience gallstone-related complications [risk ratio = 6.69; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.57 to 28.51; p = 0.01], in particular acute cholecystitis (risk ratio = 9.55; 95% CI 1.25 to 73.27; p = 0.03), and less likely to undergo surgery (risk ratio = 0.50; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.73; p = 0.0004), experience surgery-related complications (risk ratio = 0.36; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.81; p = 0.01) or, more specifically, minor surgery-related complications (risk ratio = 0.11; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.56; p = 0.008) than those randomised to surgery. Fifty-five per cent of people randomised to observation did not require an operation during the 14-year follow-up period and 12% of people randomised to cholecystectomy did not undergo the scheduled operation. The results of the economic evaluation suggest that, on average, the surgery strategy costs £1236 more per patient than the conservative management strategy but was, on average, more effective. An increase in the number of people requiring surgery while treated conservatively corresponded to a reduction in the cost-effectiveness of the conservative strategy. There was uncertainty around some of the parameters used in the economic model. CONCLUSIONS The results of this assessment indicate that cholecystectomy is still the treatment of choice for many symptomatic people. However, approximately half of the people in the observation group did not require surgery or suffer complications in the long term indicating that a conservative therapeutic approach may represent a valid alternative to surgery in this group of people. Owing to the dearth of current evidence in the UK setting a large, well-designed, multicentre trial is needed. STUDY REGISTRATION The study was registered as PROSPERO CRD42012002817. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Mary Kilonzo
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Irfan Ahmed
- NHS Grampian, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Fiona Stewart
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Paul McNamee
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Andrew Elders
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Cynthia Fraser
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Alison Avenell
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Craig Ramsay
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Wardlaw J, Brazzelli M, Miranda H, Chappell F, McNamee P, Scotland G, Quayyum Z, Martin D, Shuler K, Sandercock P, Dennis M. An assessment of the cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance, including diffusion-weighted imaging, in patients with transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke: a systematic review, meta-analysis and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2014; 18:1-368, v-vi. [PMID: 24791949 DOI: 10.3310/hta18270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke need rapid treatment of risk factors to prevent recurrent stroke. ABCD2 score or magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted brain imaging (MR DWI) may help assessment and treatment. OBJECTIVES Is MR with DWI cost-effective in stroke prevention compared with computed tomography (CT) brain scanning in all patients, in specific subgroups or as 'one-stop' brain-carotid imaging? What is the current UK availability of services for stroke prevention? DATA SOURCES Published literature; stroke registries, audit and randomised clinical trials; national databases; survey of UK clinical and imaging services for stroke; expert opinion. REVIEW METHODS Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of published/unpublished data. Decision-analytic model of stroke prevention including on a 20-year time horizon including nine representative imaging scenarios. RESULTS The pooled recurrent stroke rate after TIA (53 studies, 30,558 patients) is 5.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.9% to 5.9%] by 7 days, and 6.7% (5.2% to 8.7%) at 90 days. ABCD2 score does not identify patients with key stroke causes or identify mimics: 66% of specialist-diagnosed true TIAs and 35-41% of mimics had an ABCD2 score of ≥ 4; 20% of true TIAs with ABCD2 score of < 4 had key risk factors. MR DWI (45 studies, 9078 patients) showed an acute ischaemic lesion in 34.3% (95% CI 30.5% to 38.4%) of TIA, 69% of minor stroke patients, i.e. two-thirds of TIA patients are DWI negative. TIA mimics (16 studies, 14,542 patients) make up 40-45% of patients attending clinics. UK survey (45% response) showed most secondary prevention started prior to clinic, 85% of primary brain imaging was same-day CT; 51-54% of patients had MR, mostly additional to CT, on average 1 week later; 55% omitted blood-sensitive MR sequences. Compared with 'CT scan all patients' MR was more expensive and no more cost-effective, except for patients presenting at > 1 week after symptoms to diagnose haemorrhage; strategies that triaged patients with low ABCD2 scores for slow investigation or treated DWI-negative patients as non-TIA/minor stroke prevented fewer strokes and increased costs. 'One-stop' CT/MR angiographic-plus-brain imaging was not cost-effective. LIMITATIONS Data on sensitivity/specificity of MR in TIA/minor stroke, stroke costs, prognosis of TIA mimics and accuracy of ABCD2 score by non-specialists are sparse or absent; all analysis had substantial heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS Magnetic resonance with DWI is not cost-effective for secondary stroke prevention. MR was most helpful in patients presenting at > 1 week after symptoms if blood-sensitive sequences were used. ABCD2 score is unlikely to facilitate patient triage by non-stroke specialists. Rapid specialist assessment, CT brain scanning and identification of serious underlying stroke causes is the most cost-effective stroke prevention strategy. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Wardlaw
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Hector Miranda
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Francesca Chappell
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Paul McNamee
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Graham Scotland
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Zahid Quayyum
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Duncan Martin
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Kirsten Shuler
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Peter Sandercock
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Martin Dennis
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|