The Effect of Sodium Hyaluronate Eye Drops 2, 4 or 6 Times a Day on Signs and Symptoms of Dry Eye Disease

Purpose

A randomized clinical trial was run to evaluate the effectiveness of a preservative-free 0.4% sodium hyaluronate eye drop (LOF) in different dosage schemes to alleviate signs and symptoms of dry eye disease (DED).

Methods

A total of 116 subjects with mild-to-moderate DED were included, and 111 completed the study (from which 67.6% were female and 65.3% were users of oral contraceptives). Patients were randomly assigned to instill a drop of LOF either 2 (BID), 4 (QID) or 6 (6TD) times a day (at least 3 hours apart) for 30 days. The clinical parameters and symptom endpoints were Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), tear break-up time (TBUT), ocular surface staining, and conjunctival hyperemia. Other parameters evaluated were chemosis, best corrected visual acuity, and the incidence of adverse events (AE).

Results

There was a significant reduction in OSDI scores by day 30 in all groups. The recovery of the OSDI score back to normal values was observed in 51.4% of patients treated (50%, 48.6%, and 55.6% in BID, QID, and 6TD, respectively, p = 0.822). Similar improvement was observed for TBUT, 50.5% of patients increased this variable to >10 seconds (39.5%, 51.4%, and 61.1%, p = 0.175), and for ocular surface staining, ≥72% showed Grade 0. There were no significant differences among posology groups regarding ocular surface staining, conjunctival hyperemia, or any safety parameters. No overall improvement in OSDI and TBUT to normal values was noted for 31 patients (21 were female and 71.4% users of contraceptive drugs).

Conclusion

The ophthalmic use of preservative free LOF, 2, 4 or 6 times a day, may alleviate clinical parameters and symptoms in 50% of patients with mild-to-moderate DED after a one-month treatment. This improvement seemed to be less ubiquitous in patients within reproductive age and using oral contraceptives.

Trial Registration

This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT0704531).

Evaluation of the Relationship Between Diabetic Macular Edema and Renal Function in a Latino Population

INTRODUCTION

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is one of the leading causes of vision impairment. The relationship between DME and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) has not been clearly evaluated in Hispanic or Latino populations. The objective of this study was to evaluate the eGFR in a Latino population with DME.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, observational, and descriptive study was carried out on the basis of a multicenter phase III clinical trial.

RESULTS

A total of 82 subjects diagnosed with DME (36 women and 46 men) were included in the study. The mean age was 61.93 ± 6.71 years. Mean values of the blood chemistry parameters glycated hemoglobin and eGFR were 7.20 ± 0.95% and 74.42 ± 26.82 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. The time elapsed since diagnosis of diabetes mellitus was 15.30 ± 7.35 years, while the duration of DME was 1.41 ± 1.75 years. Mean values for central macular thickness (CMT) and total macular volume (TMV) were 440.99 ± 132.22 µm and 11.97 ± 2.11 mm3, respectively. DME duration had a negative correlation with TMV (Rho - 0.26, p < 0.05) and a positive correlation with mean arterial pressure (Rho 0.26, p < 0.05). CMT was correlated with TMV (Rho 0.43, p < 0.0001) and visual acuity (Rho 0.26, p < 0.05). No significant correlations were observed between eGFR and CMT, TMV, or any demographic variable (p > 0.05). Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was associated with hypertension (OR 9.32, p = 0.035), elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) (OR 0.03, p = 0.011), and advanced age (OR 0.45, p = 0.011). CMT was significantly associated with TMV (β = 27.69, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

We did not find a correlation between eGFR and DME. Our findings suggest that the presence of hypertension is associated with a decrease in the GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and CKD may be associated with advanced age and elevated IOP which may increase the risk for the development of glaucoma.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05217680 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Determinants of adherence to treatment in patients with ophthalmic conditions

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to identify and determine factors associated with patients' ophthalmic adherence in common ocular conditions from randomized clinical trials (RCT).

RESEARCH DESIGN METHODS

A univariate analysis with proportions, a bivariate analysis using polychoric correlations, and logistic regression (LR) models were used. The collected dataset was made up of records from RCT. Using three validated LR models, factors were identified and ranked based on their adjusted odds ratio and their statistical significance to adherence.

RESULTS

A total of 1,087 valid patients were included in this analysis, of which 88.96% presented adherence. All models were calibrated, had a good performance, were well specified and cost-effective using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, metrics for class imbalance, link test approach and Akaike's criteriums, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We identified as determinants for encouraging good ophthalmic adherence the adverse events presented, duration of the study, female sex, and older age; other determinants such as medical condition, protocol treatment, type of treatment and disease are all risk factors for adherence. Improvements in ophthalmic adherence may be achieved by focused attention to young male patients with chronic degenerative diseases such as glaucoma or ocular hypertension (especially those who need combination therapy) and developing medications with reduced side effects.

Efficacy and Safety of an Ophthalmic DMPC-Based Nanoemulsion in Patients with Dry Eye Disease: A Phase I/II Randomized Clinical Trial

Purpose

The goals of this study were to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an ophthalmic 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DMPC)-based nanoemulsion (Nanodrop®) in patients with dry eye disease (DED).

Methods

This was a randomized phase I/II multicentric, prospective, double-blind clinical trial. Patients (phase I: n = 25 and phase II: n = 101) were assigned to receive either PRO-176 (Nanodrop®) or Systane Balance® (control) for 29 days. Once the visits of the first 25 subjects were completed, if there were less than 20% of unexpected adverse events (AEs), related to PRO-176, recruitment was continued until the sample was completed for noninferiority (efficacy) analysis (phase II, n = 126). Efficacy endpoints were the ocular surface disease index (OSDI), tear break-up time (TBUT), epithelial defects, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and the incidence of expected AE.

Results

For the phase I portion of the study, there were no differences between groups regarding the incidence of AE. All related-AE symptoms in both groups were mild and expected. For the phase II subset, there was a significant reduction in OSDI scores at day 29 and noninferiority between treatments was confirmed (p=0.650, CI 95% [-8.7, 5.5]). Similar improvement was observed for TBUT although no significant intergroup differences were found (p=0.518, CI 95% [-0.08, 1.6]). There were no significant differences between treatments for epithelial staining or safety parameters.

Conclusions

Topical application of PRO-176 is as safe and effective as the controls. Both groups were clinically similar in terms of efficacy and safety. The results support the hypothesis that ophthalmic DMPC-based nanoemulsion may improve clinical parameters and symptoms in patients with DED. This trial is registered with NCT04111965.

Evaluation of the Rheological Properties, Preclinical Safety, and Clinical Effectiveness of a New Dispersive Ophthalmic Viscoelastic Device for Cataract Surgery

Purpose

To evaluate the rheological properties of the ophthalmic viscoelastic device (OVD) PRO-149, its preclinical safety, and its effectiveness when used during cataract surgery in patients with age-related cataract.

Material and Methods

Control (HEC) and test (PRO-149) OVDs were compared through rheological measures, by two preclinical safety studies in rabbits, and under normal-use conditions during cataract removal and lens implantation in a parallel randomized clinical trial.

Results

Rheological properties were determined. Preclinical studies did not find any evidence of safety issues or toxicity. In the clinical trial, 36 subjects were included. After 29 days, there were no statistically significant differences in mean percentage of endothelial cell count change or in the postoperative intraocular pressure between groups. There were no significant differences between OVDs for any safety parameter studied. Finally, PRO-149 showed a statistically significant improvement in surgeon rating for ease of use during extraction (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

PRO-149 is a dispersive OVD. The rabbit models did not find evidence of clinical alterations or toxicity. The results of the clinical study support that the two studied OVDs were clinically similar in terms of safety and effectiveness for cataract surgery.

Trial Registration

The trial is registered at Clinical Trials.gov at NCT04702802 (21–01-11).

Validation of a preclinical dry eye model in New Zealand white rabbits during and following topical instillation of 1% ophthalmic atropine sulfate

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to validate an animal model for dry eye during and after the administration of 1% ophthalmic atropine sulfate (OAS) in New Zealand white (NZW) rabbits.

METHODS

OAS (1%) was applied three times per day to 30 eyes of 15 healthy NZW rabbits. Sacrifice, enucleation, and lacrimal gland removal took place on days 15, 21, and 30 (OAS group). A second group (n = 5) was used as control. Clinical evaluations took place on days 3, 10, 15, 18, 21, 24 and 30. The primary endpoints were: Schirmer I test, tear break-up time (TBUT), and corneal fluorescein staining. As secondary endpoints, clinical changes including intraocular pressure, and histopathology were evaluated.

RESULTS

While OAS was administered, the Schirmer I test showed a statistically significant reduction for OAS group versus control (p < 0.001), and versus basal production (p < 0.001). TBUT showed statistically significant differences between groups (days 3 and 10; p = 0.001) and versus basal values (day 3; p < 0.001). Fluorescein staining showed a statistically significant difference (day 3; p = 0.001). The most frequent clinical finding was conjunctival hyperemia (76.9% OAS vs. 20% control). For histopathology, all OAS subjects presented some degree of inflammation (86.7% minimal; 13.3% mild) whereas the control presented only 30% minimal inflammation. Goblet cell density showed no difference.

CONCLUSIONS

The effectiveness of the OAS dry eye model in NZW rabbits as reported in previous studies was confirmed, provided that the application of the drug is maintained throughout the intervention; it is not a viable model after OAS administration is suspended.

Reexamining Ophthalmic Drugs, Safety and Tolerability in Phase 1 Clinical Trials

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability profile of drugs used for treating common eye disorders when applied to normal healthy volunteers (NHVs) as explored in phase 1 trials.

Subjects and Methods

A total of 166 NHVs were identified in six phase 1 trials, examined in a retrospective analysis. The primary endpoints were visual comfort (by ocular comfort index, OCI) and safety (laboratory evaluations, vital signs (VS), visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP), lissamine green and fluorescein staining, conjunctival hyperemia, chemosis, and adverse events’ incidence (AE)).

Results

Compared to baseline, 75.9%, 40.4% and 73.7% of NHV (for lubricant, hypotensive and antibiotic treatments, respectively) improved their OCI score by their final visit. Laboratory evaluations and VS were within normal ranges in 88% of NHV. Similar results were found for VA, corneal and conjunctival staining, and chemosis. IOP decreased significantly in the hypotensive agents’ group, trace to mild hyperemia was reported in 32.1%, 27.1%, and 6.8%, respectively. Additionally, lubricant and hypotensive investigational drugs (ID) had a lower risk of incidence of AE than approved drugs (OR 0.856, 95% CI [0.365, 1.999] and 0.636, 95% CI [0.096, 4.197], respectively). Meanwhile, on antibiotic drugs, the risk for ID-related AE was higher (OR 1.313, 95% CI [0.309, 5.583]).

Conclusion

Phase 1 trials are important in order to ensure the safety and tolerability of ophthalmic medications. This study demonstrates that NHVs do not face a significant risk of harm in these studies, since 98% of the reported AE were mild, and all AE were resolved by the end of the study in which they appeared.

Trial Registration

This is a retrospective study of six previously conducted clinical trials, registered on clinicaltrials.gov with the following registration IDs: NCT04081610, NCT03524157, NCT03520348, NCT03966365, NCT03965052 and, NCT03519516.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of an Intravitreal Humanized Anti-VEGF-A Monoclonal Antibody (PRO-169), a Biosimilar Candidate to Bevacizumab

Background

PRO-169 is a biosimilar candidate to bevacizumab (BEV), a monoclonal antibody (mAb) that inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) developed for intravitreal use. The current study demonstrates the intraocular pharmacokinetics (PK) of PRO-169 and its safety using New Zealand white (NZW) rabbits.

Methods

Intraocular concentration was evaluated in thirty-six rabbits at 1h, 1, 2, 5, 14 and 30 days after a single bilateral injection of PRO-169 or BEV (1.25 mg/0.05 mL). In a secondary experiment, safety was evaluated after three consecutive unilateral injections at 30-day intervals in twenty-four rabbits (PRO-169: 1.25 mg/0.05 mL or ranibizumab [RZB]: 0.5 mg/0.05 mL), by liver-associated enzymes (LAE), ophthalmological examination and adverse event (AE) incidence. Primary endpoints were vitreous maximum concentration (C_max), time to attain maximum concentration (t_max), area under curve (AUC_0-t), half-life (t_1/2) and LAE. Secondary endpoints included aqueous humor (AH) and plasma pharmacokinetics, clinical examination and AEs.

Results

The C_max in the vitreous was 593.75 ± 45.63 (PRO-169) vs 644.79 ± 62.65 µg/mL (BEV) (p= 0.136). T_max was 0.53 ± 0.82 vs 0.85 ± 0.73 days (p= 0.330). The AUC_0-t was 3837.72 ± 465.91 vs 4247.31 ± 93.99 days*µg/mL (p= 0.052) and the half-life was 4.99 ± 0.89 vs 5.18 ± 0.88 days (p= 0.711). LAEs were normal in 92% of NZW rabbits; no differences between groups were observed (p>0.05). The AH and plasma PKs were also similar. Finally, clinical examinations found no alterations. AEs were observed in 25% of PRO-169 rabbits, without differences vs RZB (p=0.399).

Conclusion

PRO-169 can be efficiently diffused and distributed in ocular compartments, showing vitreous pharmacokinetics analogous to BEV. The safety experiment did not find evidence of clinical alterations from a repeated injection of PRO-169. These results provide scientific justification supporting that PRO-169 should be evaluated in future clinical trials to confirm its safety and efficacy.

Efficacy and Safety of Sodium Hyaluronate/chondroitin Sulfate Preservative-free Ophthalmic Solution in the Treatment of Dry Eye: A Clinical Trial

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of a preservative free sodium hyaluronate/chondroitin sulfate ophthalmic solution (SH/CS-PF) in patients with dry eye disease (DED).Methods: This was a randomized phase IV, multicentric, prospective, double-blind clinical trial. Intent-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses were performed. Patients were assigned to receive either SH/CS-PF, Systane® Ultra (PEG/PG) or Systane® Ultra PF (PEG/PG-PF) for 90 days. A total of 326 patients were included in the ITT, and 217 in the PP analysis. Efficacy endpoints were goblet cell density, Nelson's grades (conjunctival impression cytology), tear break-up time (TBUT), Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), and Schirmer's test. Other parameters included were tolerability, measured by the ocular symptomatology; and safety, measured through corneal staining, intraocular pressure, visual acuity and adverse events.Results: In the ITT, there was a significant increase in mean goblet cell density in all treatments compared with their baseline (28.4% vs 21.4% and 30.8%), without difference between arms (p = .159). Eyes exposed to SH/CS-PF, PEG/PG and PEG/PG-PF showed Grade 0-I squamous metaplasia (85.5%, 87.9% and 93.2%, respectively). Similar improvements were observed for TBUT (1.24 ± 2.3s vs 1.27 ± 2.4s and 1.39 ± 2.3s) and OSDI scores at day 90 (-8.81 ± 8.6 vs -7.95 ± 9.2 and -8.78 ± 9.8), although no significant intergroup difference was found. Schirmer's test also presented improvement compared to baseline (1.38 ± 4.9 vs 1.50 ± 4.7 and 2.63 ± 5.9), with a significantly higher variation for PEG/PG-PF. There were no significant differences between treatments for any tolerability and safety parameter, nor between ITT and PP analyses for any outcome.Conclusions: The topical application of SH/CS-PF is as effective, safe and well tolerated as that of PEG/PG or PEG/PG-PF. The results suggest that SH/CS-PF may lead to normalization of clinical parameters and symptom alleviation in patients treated for DED.

Safety and tolerability evaluation after repeated intravitreal injections of a humanized anti-VEGF-A monoclonal antibody (PRO-169) versus ranibizumab in New Zealand white rabbits

Background

To evaluate the retinal toxicity after repeated intravitreal injections of a humanized anti-VEGF-A monoclonal antibody (PRO-169) versus ranibizumab in New Zealand white (NZW) rabbit eyes.

Methods

NZW rabbits were injected intravitreally with PRO-169 (n = 12), 1.25 mg/0.05 ml or ranibizumab (n = 12), 0.5 mg/0.05 ml into the right eye (OD), whereas the left eye (OS) of each rabbit was used as control. Three consecutive injections were administered at 30-days intervals. An electroretinogram (ERG) was recorded 30 days after each injection. Clinical examination was conducted before and after injections, including intraocular pressure determination and eye fundus exploration. Eyes were enucleated and retina, cornea, conjunctiva, ciliary body and optic nerve were prepared for histopathology assessment.

Results

ERG of the experimental and control eyes in PRO-169 and ranibizumab groups were similar in amplitude and pattern throughout the follow-up period. Clinical examination found no alterations of intraocular pressure (IOP). No retinal damage was observed in both, the experimental and control eyes, of all the rabbits. The histopathologic studies showed similar results in both groups, showing no signs of structural damage.

Conclusions

Our study did not find evidence of retinal toxicity from a repeated intravitreal injection of PRO-169 or ranibizumab (Lucentis^®) in NZW rabbits. These findings support intravitreal PRO-169 as a safe candidate to develop as a future alternative for the treatment of retinal neovascularization diseases.

Difluprednate 0.05% versus Prednisolone Acetate Post-Phacoemulsification for Inflammation and Pain: An Efficacy and Safety Clinical Trial

Background

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of difluprednate 0.05% (PRO-145) versus prednisolone acetate 1% (Prednefrin^® SF), for management of postoperative inflammation and pain, after cataract surgery.

Methods

This was a Phase III, multicenter, prospective, double-blind, clinical trial. Intent-to-treat population included 178 post-phacoemulsification patients that were assigned to receive either PRO-145, or prednisolone. One day after unilateral eye surgery, patients instilled a drop 4 times a day for 14 days (then tapering the dose downward for 14 days). The primary efficacy endpoints were anterior chamber (AC) cell grade and flare. Other parameters measured included: retinal central thickness (measured via OCT), conjunctival hyperemia, edema, pain and photophobia. Tolerability and safety were assessed through burning, itching, foreign body sensation, visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP) and incidence of adverse events (AE).

Results

A total of 171 subjects were randomized (1:1) and completed the study. Compared to day 1, there was a significant improvement in the AC cell count and flare in both groups by the final visit (80.2% vs 88.4%, p=1.000). Conjunctival hyperemia improved in a similar fashion (81.2% vs 79%, p=0.234) in both PRO-145 and prednisolone groups, without differences between them. This was also observed for edema (82.4% vs 82.5%, p=0.246), pain (15.3% vs 7%, p=0.497) and photophobia (16.4% vs 15.1%, p=0.246), respectively. There was no significant difference between treatments for any tolerability parameter studied. Finally, at the 4-week postoperative visit, there were no significant differences between treatments for VA, IOP and AE results (p-values; 0.095, 0.053 and 0.099, respectively).

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that PRO-145 is as effective and safe as prednisolone acetate in treating postoperative inflammation and pain in patients undergoing phacoemulsification. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03693989.

Comparing The Efficacy Of An Anti-Human VEGF-A Neutralizing Antibody Versus Bevacizumab On A Laser-Induced Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Rhesus Monkey Model

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of a therapy on improving characteristics of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization (CNV) via single intravitreal injection of a humanized anti-human VEGF monoclonal antibody (PRO-169) versus bevacizumab in a rhesus monkey model.

Methods

To induce experimental CNV, small high-energy laser spots were used to treat several areas, around the macula in the retinas of monkeys at Day −21. Eighteen rhesus monkeys were used for CNV induction. The efficacy endpoints were fluorescein leakage by FFA and retinal thickness by OCT. FFA examinations were performed 19 days after induction. Appropriate animals were enrolled for treatment and randomly divided into 3 groups: bevacizumab (n=5, 7 eyes), PRO-169 (n=5, 7 eyes), and vehicle controls (n=4, 7 eyes).

Results

In 25 of 36 (69.4%) eyes, CNV lesions were identified. The average percent change of retinal thickness in the eyes of bevacizumab group was −159.3±62.2% and −154.0±45.1% (p<0.01 vs Vehicle) at Day 14 and Day 28, respectively; in the eyes of PRO-169 group it was −131.6±68.7% and −131.5±63.8% (p<0.01 vs Vehicle), respectively. The average percent change of leakage area in the eyes of bevacizumab group was −75.3±49.4% and −78.0±42.6% (p<0.01 vs Vehicle) at Day 14 and Day 28, respectively; in the eyes of PRO-169 group it was −82.0±19.3% and −81.4±21.0% (p<0.01 vs Vehicle), respectively. There were no abnormalities found in behavior, skin and hair, excretion and overall eye appearance before and after treatment in all groups.

Conclusion

After photocoagulation, the eyes enrolled in this studio showed CNV related characteristics including increased retinal thickness, and fluorescein leakage at laser spots. PRO-169 (1.25 mg per eye) can reduce the retinal thickness and fluorescein leakage area after treatment for 14 and 28 days in this rhesus monkeys model, without toxic effect or adverse events. These findings suggested that PRO-169 can inhibit CNV.

Efficacy and safety of bromfenac 0.09% and sodium hyaluronate 0.4% combination therapy, versus placebo in patients with pterygium I-III for clinical signs on ocular inflammation

Purpose: This study evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of bromfenac 0.09%, sodium hyaluronate 0.4% (SH) combination therapy, versus placebo and SH in a clinical model of pterygium I–III.

Methods: A total of 166 eyes (99 patients) with pterygium grade I–III were randomized to bromfenac 0.09% ophthalmic solution+SH 0.4% or placebo+SH 0.4%. This was a Phase IV, prospective, parallel, double-masked, multicenter clinical trial. One drop of bromfenac or placebo was instilled two times a day (BID) for 20 days, both groups accompanied treatments with one drop of SH three times a day (TID). The primary efficacy endpoints were the conjunctival hyperemia and the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score. Other results measured included burning, foreign body sensation, and photophobia. The safety was assessed by the tear break-up time (TBUT), visual acuity (VA), IOP, lissamine green, fluorescein stains, and the incidence of adverse events (AEs).

Results: Compared with baseline, there was a significant reduction in the conjunctival hyperemia (p=0.0001) and OSDI score in both groups (p=0.0001). There was a significant improvement in ocular symptomatology for both, placebo/SH and bromfenac/SH groups (p=0.0001), the decrement in the ocular burning was 41.1% vs 24.6%, the foreign body sensation was 31.5% vs 36.2% and, for photophobia was 23.3% vs 30.5%, respectively. A statistically significant difference was observed in TBUT for bromfenac/SH (p=0.045), at day 20. There were no significant alterations in IOP (p=0.068) or VA (p=0.632). Similar improvements were observed in the fluorescein and green lissamine staining. Finally, the incidence of AE was similar between groups.

Conclusion: The treatment with bromfenac 0.09% ophthalmic solution and SH 0.4% combination therapy for 3 weeks reduced clinical signs, in patients with pterygium I–III. The results suggest that bromfenac 0.09% can improve the symptomatology, reduce the presentation of clinical signs associated with superficial ocular inflammation.

A Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial of a 0.5% Timolol + 0.2% Brimonidine + 2.0% Dorzolamide Fixed Combination, Preservative-Free Ophthalmic Solution vs. 0.5% Timolol + 0.2% Brimonidine + 2.0% Dorzolamide Fixed Combination in Patients with Controlled Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma

Introduction

The aim of this prospective crossover study was to evaluate the non-inferiority of PRO-122 (a preservative-free fixed combination) compared with 0.5% timolol + 0.2% brimonidine + 2.0% dorzolamide fixed combination (KOF) by evaluating its efficacy, tolerability and safety in subjects with controlled primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) previously treated with KOF for at least 2 months.

Methods

In a prospective, crossover, randomized, double-masked multicenter study, patients previously treated with KOF were randomly assigned to receive either PRO-122 or KOF for 30 days. On day 31, the A sequence changed to KOF, while the B sequence received PRO-122. All patients remained in the protocol for 30 additional days for a total of 60 days. The main efficacy endpoint was maintaining the controlled intraocular pressure (IOP). The safety and tolerability of both products were assessed by the presence of adverse events (AEs), ocular findings, a questionnaire on ocular comfort and the VF-14 index.

Results

A total of 51 patients participated. After application of PRO-122 twice a day, its efficacy was demonstrated through maintenance of the controlled IOP in patients previously controlled with KOF. The crossover between PRO-122 and KOF and vice versa, after 30 days of use, did not affect IOP control. PRO-122 was shown not to be inferior to KOF in maintaining IOP at control levels. The safety of both drugs is similar, as neither presented drug-related AEs or differences regarding safety issues. The tolerability of the two medications—evaluated by ocular findings, the questionnaire on ocular comfort and the VF-14 index—was also determined to be similar.

Conclusions

The controlled IOP in patients with controlled POAG treated with PRO-122 was maintained both in relation to the initial controlled IOP of the study and when compared with KOF in the B sequence. Finally, the treatment with PRO-122 demonstrated similar safety and tolerability to KOF.

Funding

Laboratorios Sophia, S.A. de C.V. (Zapopan, Jalisco, México).

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03257813 (registered retrospectively).

Efficacy and Safety of 0.6% Pazufloxacin Ophthalmic Solution Versus Moxifloxacin 0.5% and Gatifloxacin 0.5% in Subjects with Bacterial Conjunctivitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of a novel ophthalmic solution of pazufloxacin on the ocular surface of patients with bacterial conjunctivitis after 7 days of intervention.

METHODS

This is a phase 2, double-blind, controlled, multicenter, clinical trial of 300 subjects, randomized to either a 3 dosing regimen of pazufloxacin 0.6% ophthalmic solution (twice a day [BID], n = 90; 3 times a day [TID], n = 76; 4 times a day [QID], n = 68), moxifloxacin 0.3% TID (n = 82), or gatifloxacin 0.5% TID (n = 72). Follow-up was set on days 0, 3, and 7. Assessments of ocular signs were performed, both anterior and posterior segments. The primary outcome measures included conjunctival culture and clinical signs. Safety variables included adverse events (AEs), lisamine green, fluorescein ocular surface stains, and clinical signs of tolerability.

RESULTS

After intervention, bacterial eradication was reported in all groups: pazufloxacin BID 79%, pazufloxacin TID 84%, pazufloxacin QID 84%, moxifloxacin 80%, and gatifloxacin 82%. There were no significant differences between treatments. Similar results were reported in clinical remission: pazufloxacin BID 89%, pazufloxacin TID 98%, pazufloxacin QID 92%, moxifloxacin 91%, and gatifloxacin 92% (P = 0.03 comparing pazufloxacin BID vs. TID). There were no differences between female and male responses. The AEs were not related to the interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

A simplified dosing regimen was selected to follow the development of ophthalmic pazufloxacin based on its efficacy and safety profile. Pazufloxacin, 1 drop 3 times daily, showed similar rates of bacterial eradication and clinical remission compared with other fluoroquinolones.

Bioavailability of generic 0.05% difluprednate emulsion in the aqueous humor, cornea, and conjunctiva of New Zealand rabbits after a single dose compared with commercial difluprednate

BACKGROUND

To determine the concentration after a single dose of generic 0.05% difluprednate and commercial difluprednate in the aqueous humor, cornea, and conjunctiva of New Zealand rabbits, a preclinical study in 72 male New Zealand white rabbits was performed. A single dose (50 μL) of two 0.05% difluprednate ophthalmic formulations was instilled in both eyes. Conjunctiva, cornea, and aqueous humor samples were collected at nine time points over 8 h (four animals per time point). The active metabolite of difluprednate, 17-difluoroprednisolone-butyrate (DFB), concentrations was quantified using HPLC.

RESULTS

Measurable levels of DFB were quantified in all three ocular tissues. After a single instillation, the highest concentration of difluprednate was found between 30 and 60 min in the conjunctiva, cornea, and aqueous humor, respectively. There was no significant difference between both formulations in any tissue at any time point. After 3 h, no metabolites of either emulsion were found in any tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

Difluprednate penetrates into different ocular tissues. Generic difluprednate has a similar pharmacokinetic profile compared with commercial difluprednate.