1
|
Hofman P, Calabrese F, Kern I, Adam J, Alarcão A, Alborelli I, Anton NT, Arndt A, Avdalyan A, Barberis M, Bégueret H, Bisig B, Blons H, Boström P, Brcic L, Bubanovic G, Buisson A, Caliò A, Cannone M, Carvalho L, Caumont C, Cayre A, Chalabreysse L, Chenard MP, Conde E, Copin MC, Côté JF, D'Haene N, Dai HY, de Leval L, Delongova P, Denčić-Fekete M, Fabre A, Ferenc F, Forest F, de Fraipont F, Garcia-Martos M, Gauchotte G, Geraghty R, Guerin E, Guerrero D, Hernandez S, Hurník P, Jean-Jacques B, Kashofer K, Kazdal D, Lantuejoul S, Leonce C, Lupo A, Malapelle U, Matej R, Merlin JL, Mertz KD, Morel A, Mutka A, Normanno N, Ovidiu P, Panizo A, Papotti MG, Parobkova E, Pasello G, Pauwels P, Pelosi G, Penault-Llorca F, Picot T, Piton N, Pittaro A, Planchard G, Poté N, Radonic T, Rapa I, Rappa A, Roma C, Rot M, Sabourin JC, Salmon I, Prince SS, Scarpa A, Schuuring E, Serre I, Siozopoulou V, Sizaret D, Smojver-Ježek S, Solassol J, Steinestel K, Stojšić J, Syrykh C, Timofeev S, Troncone G, Uguen A, Valmary-Degano S, Vigier A, Volante M, Wahl SGF, Stenzinger A, Ilié M. Real-world EGFR testing practices for non-small-cell lung cancer by thoracic pathology laboratories across Europe. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101628. [PMID: 37713929 PMCID: PMC10594022 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Testing for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations is an essential recommendation in guidelines for metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer, and is considered mandatory in European countries. However, in practice, challenges are often faced when carrying out routine biomarker testing, including access to testing, inadequate tissue samples and long turnaround times (TATs). MATERIALS AND METHODS To evaluate the real-world EGFR testing practices of European pathology laboratories, an online survey was set up and validated by the Pulmonary Pathology Working Group of the European Society of Pathology and distributed to 64 expert testing laboratories. The retrospective survey focussed on laboratory organisation and daily EGFR testing practice of pathologists and molecular biologists between 2018 and 2021. RESULTS TATs varied greatly both between and within countries. These discrepancies may be partly due to reflex testing practices, as 20.8% of laboratories carried out EGFR testing only at the request of the clinician. Many laboratories across Europe still favour single-test sequencing as a primary method of EGFR mutation identification; 32.7% indicated that they only used targeted techniques and 45.1% used single-gene testing followed by next-generation sequencing (NGS), depending on the case. Reported testing rates were consistent over time with no significant decrease in the number of EGFR tests carried out in 2020, despite the increased pressure faced by testing facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic. ISO 15189 accreditation was reported by 42.0% of molecular biology laboratories for single-test sequencing, and by 42.3% for NGS. 92.5% of laboratories indicated they regularly participate in an external quality assessment scheme. CONCLUSIONS These results highlight the strong heterogeneity of EGFR testing that still occurs within thoracic pathology and molecular biology laboratories across Europe. Even among expert testing facilities there is variability in testing capabilities, TAT, reflex testing practice and laboratory accreditation, stressing the need to harmonise reimbursement technologies and decision-making algorithms in Europe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Hofman
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, FHU OncoAge, Biobank Côte d'Azur BB-0033-00025, Louis Pasteur Hospital, IRCAN, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
| | - F Calabrese
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - I Kern
- Department of Pathology, University Clinic Golnik, Golnik, Slovenia
| | - J Adam
- Department of Pathology, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Paris, France
| | - A Alarcão
- IAP-PM, Institute of Anatomical and Molecular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3004-504 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - I Alborelli
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - N T Anton
- Department of Genetics, University Hospital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris University, Paris, France
| | - A Arndt
- Institute of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 40, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - A Avdalyan
- Multidisciplinary Clinical Center "Kommunarka" of the Moscow Health Department, Moscow, Russia
| | - M Barberis
- Oncogenomics Unit, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - H Bégueret
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Pessac, France
| | - B Bisig
- Institute of Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - H Blons
- Pharmacogenomics and Molecular Oncology Unit, Biochemistry Department, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - P Boström
- Department of Pathology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - L Brcic
- Diagnostic and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - G Bubanovic
- Laboratory for Molecular Pathology, Department of Pathology, University of Zagreb School of Medicine and University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - A Buisson
- Department of Biopathology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - A Caliò
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - M Cannone
- Inter-Hospital Pathology Division, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), MultiMedica, Milan, Italy
| | - L Carvalho
- IAP-PM, Institute of Anatomical and Molecular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3004-504 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - C Caumont
- Department of Tumor Biology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Hospital Haut-Lévêque, Pessac, France
| | - A Cayre
- Department of Biopathology, Jean Perrin Centre, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - L Chalabreysse
- Department of Pathology, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Bron, France
| | - M P Chenard
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 67098 Strasbourg, France
| | - E Conde
- Department of Pathology, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Research Institute 12 de Octubre University Hospital (i+12), CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | - M C Copin
- Department of Pathology, Université d'Angers, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, Angers, France
| | - J F Côté
- Department of Pathology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - N D'Haene
- Department of Pathology, Erasme Hospital, HUB ULB, Brussels, Belgium
| | - H Y Dai
- Department of Pathology, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - L de Leval
- Institute of Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - P Delongova
- Institute of Molecular and Clinical Pathology and Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | | | - A Fabre
- Department of Histopathology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, University College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin, Ireland
| | - F Ferenc
- Department of Pathology, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania
| | - F Forest
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - F de Fraipont
- Medical Unit of Molecular Genetic (Hereditary Diseases and Oncology), Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - M Garcia-Martos
- Department of Pathology, Gregorio Marañón General University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - G Gauchotte
- Department of Biopathology, CHRU-ICL, CHRU Nancy, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - R Geraghty
- Department of Histopathology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, University College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin, Ireland
| | - E Guerin
- Department of Molecular Cancer Genetics, Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - D Guerrero
- Biomedical Research Centre, Navarra Health Service, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - S Hernandez
- Department of Pathology, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Research Institute 12 de Octubre University Hospital (i+12), CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | - P Hurník
- Institute of Molecular and Clinical Pathology and Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - B Jean-Jacques
- Department of Pathology, CHU de Caen Côte de Nacre, Caen, France
| | - K Kashofer
- Diagnostic and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - D Kazdal
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - S Lantuejoul
- Department of Biopathology, Centre Leon Berard Unicancer and Pathology Research Platform, Cancer Research Center of Lyon (CRCL), Lyon, France
| | - C Leonce
- Department of Pathology, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Bron, France
| | - A Lupo
- Department of Pathology, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - U Malapelle
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - R Matej
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Thomayer University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - J L Merlin
- Department of Biopathology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, University of Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy, France
| | - K D Mertz
- Institute of Pathology, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland
| | - A Morel
- Department of Innate Immunity and Immunotherapy, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Centre Paul Papin, Angers, France
| | - A Mutka
- HUSLAB, Department of Pathology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - N Normanno
- Cell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, INT-Fondazione Pascale, Via M. Semmola, Naples, Italy
| | - P Ovidiu
- Department of Pathology, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania
| | - A Panizo
- Department of Pathology, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - M G Papotti
- Division of Pathology, University Hospital Città Della Salute, Turin, Italy
| | - E Parobkova
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Thomayer University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - G Pasello
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - P Pauwels
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Antwerp and University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - G Pelosi
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - F Penault-Llorca
- Department of Pathology, Clermont Auvergne University, "Molecular Imaging and Theranostic Strategies", Center Jean Perrin, Montalembert, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - T Picot
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - N Piton
- Department of Pathology, Rouen University Hospital, France and Normandie University, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, Rouen, France
| | - A Pittaro
- Division of Pathology, University Hospital Città Della Salute, Turin, Italy
| | - G Planchard
- Department of Pathology, CHU de Caen Côte de Nacre, Caen, France
| | - N Poté
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Bichat Bichat, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris; Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - T Radonic
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VUMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - I Rapa
- Pathology Unit, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano Turin, Italy
| | - A Rappa
- Oncogenomics Unit, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - C Roma
- Cell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, INT-Fondazione Pascale, Via M. Semmola, Naples, Italy
| | - M Rot
- Department of Pathology, University Clinic Golnik, Golnik, Slovenia
| | - J C Sabourin
- Department of Pathology, Rouen University Hospital, France and Normandie University, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, Rouen, France
| | - I Salmon
- Department of Pathology, Erasme Hospital, HUB ULB, Brussels, Belgium; CurePath, Jumet, Belgium
| | - S Savic Prince
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - A Scarpa
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - E Schuuring
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - I Serre
- Department of Pathology, Gui de Chauliac Hospital, Montpellier University Medical Center, University of Montpellier, 80 Avenue Augustin Fliche, Montpellier, France
| | - V Siozopoulou
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Antwerp and University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - D Sizaret
- Department of Pathology, CHRU Tours - Hôpital Trousseau, Chambray-lès-Tours, France
| | - S Smojver-Ježek
- Division for Pulmonary Cytology, Department of Pathology and Cytology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - J Solassol
- Solid Tumour Laboratory, Pathology and Oncobiology Department, CHU Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - K Steinestel
- Institute of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 40, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - J Stojšić
- Department of Thoracic Pathology, Section of Pathology, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - C Syrykh
- Department of Pathology, IUC-T-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - S Timofeev
- Multidisciplinary Clinical Center "Kommunarka" of the Moscow Health Department, Moscow, Russia
| | - G Troncone
- Department of Pathology, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania
| | - A Uguen
- Department of Pathological Anatomy and Cytology, CHRU de Brest, Brest, France; LBAI, UMR1227, INSERM, University of Brest, CHU de Brest, Brest, France
| | - S Valmary-Degano
- Department of Pathology, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - A Vigier
- Department of Pathology, IUC-T-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - M Volante
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - S G F Wahl
- Department of Pathology, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - A Stenzinger
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M Ilié
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, FHU OncoAge, Biobank Côte d'Azur BB-0033-00025, Louis Pasteur Hospital, IRCAN, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nummi A, Nurminen P, Kesti O, Högerman M, Ettala O, Kaipia A, Boström P, Sairanen J, Järvinen R. Asymptomatic bacteriuria does not increase the risk of infective complications in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer undergoing intravesical bacillus calmette-guérin immunotherapy. Eur Urol 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(23)00326-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
|
3
|
Ettala O, Anttinen M, Tommila T, Malaspina S, Kemppainen J, Seppänen M, Boström P. How should lesions without anatomical correspondence in 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT be interpreted - a PROSTAGE follow-up study. Eur Urol 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(23)00164-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
|
4
|
Dai Z, Jambor I, Taimen P, Pantelic M, Elshaikh M, Dabaja A, Rogers C, Ettala O, Boström P, Aronen H, Merisaari H, Wen N. Accurate Prostate Cancer Detection and Segmentation Using Non-Local Mask R-CNN With Histopathological Ground Truth. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
5
|
Madekivi V, Boström P, Vahlberg T, Aaltonen R, Salminen E. Characteristics of clinically node negative breast cancer patients needing preoperative MRI. Surg Oncol 2021; 38:101552. [PMID: 33865184 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND International guidelines do not recommend magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for all breast cancer patients at primary diagnostics. This study aimed to understand which patient or tumor characteristics are associated with the use of MRI. The role of MRI among other preoperative imaging methods in clinically node negative breast cancer was studied. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patient and tumor characteristics were analyzed in association with the use of MRI by multivariable logistic regression analysis in 461 patients. Primary tumor size was compared between MRI, mammography (MGR), ultrasound (US) and histopathology by Spearman correlation. The delays in surgery and diagnosis were analyzed among patients with or without MRI, and axillary reoperations were evaluated. RESULTS Age (p < 0.0001), primary operation method (p < 0.0001), tumor histology (p < 0.0001) and HER2 status (p = 0.0064) were associated with the use of MRI. Spearman correlations between tumor size in histopathology and the difference in tumor size between histopathology and imaging methods were 0.52 in MGR, 0.66 in US and 0.36 in MRI (p < 0.0001 for all). A seven-day delay in surgical treatment was observed among patients with MRI compared to patients without MRI (p < 0.0001). Axillary reoperation rates were similar in patients with or without MRI (p = 0.57). CONCLUSION Patient selection through prearranged characterization is important in deciding on optimal candidates for preoperative MRI among breast cancer patients. MRI causes moderate delays in primary breast cancer surgery. Preoperative MRI is useful in the evaluation of tumor size but might be insufficient in detecting lymph node metastases.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Breast Neoplasms/surgery
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/diagnostic imaging
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/surgery
- Carcinoma, Lobular/diagnostic imaging
- Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology
- Carcinoma, Lobular/surgery
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging
- Lymph Nodes/pathology
- Lymph Nodes/surgery
- Lymphatic Metastasis/diagnostic imaging
- Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods
- Mammography/methods
- Middle Aged
- Preoperative Care
- Prognosis
- Ultrasonography/methods
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Madekivi
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital, Finland; University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
| | - P Boström
- University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Department of Pathology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - T Vahlberg
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Biostatistics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - R Aaltonen
- University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Department of Surgery, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - E Salminen
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital, Finland; University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Finnish Nuclear and Radiation Safety, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hofman P, Ilié M, Chamorey E, Brest P, Schiappa R, Nakache V, Antoine M, Barberis M, Begueret H, Bibeau F, Bonnetaud C, Boström P, Brousset P, Bubendorf L, Carvalho L, Cathomas G, Cazes A, Chalabreysse L, Chenard MP, Copin MC, Côté JF, Damotte D, de Leval L, Delongova P, Thomas de Montpreville V, de Muret A, Dema A, Dietmaier W, Evert M, Fabre A, Forest F, Foulet A, Garcia S, Garcia-Martos M, Gibault L, Gorkiewicz G, Jonigk D, Gosney J, Hofman A, Kern I, Kerr K, Kossai M, Kriegsmann M, Lassalle S, Long-Mira E, Lupo A, Mamilos A, Matěj R, Meilleroux J, Ortiz-Villalón C, Panico L, Panizo A, Papotti M, Pauwels P, Pelosi G, Penault-Llorca F, Pop O, Poté N, Cajal SRY, Sabourin JC, Salmon I, Sajin M, Savic-Prince S, Schildhaus HU, Schirmacher P, Serre I, Shaw E, Sizaret D, Stenzinger A, Stojsic J, Thunnissen E, Timens W, Troncone G, Werlein C, Wolff H, Berthet JP, Benzaquen J, Marquette CH, Hofman V, Calabrese F. Clinical and molecular practice of European thoracic pathology laboratories during the COVID-19 pandemic. The past and the near future. ESMO Open 2020; 6:100024. [PMID: 33399086 PMCID: PMC7780004 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2020.100024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Revised: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study evaluated the consequences in Europe of the COVID-19 outbreak on pathology laboratories orientated toward the diagnosis of thoracic diseases. Materials and methods A survey was sent to 71 pathology laboratories from 21 European countries. The questionnaire requested information concerning the organization of biosafety, the clinical and molecular pathology, the biobanking, the workload, the associated research into COVID-19, and the organization of education and training during the COVID-19 crisis, from 15 March to 31 May 2020, compared with the same period in 2019. Results Questionnaires were returned from 53/71 (75%) laboratories from 18 European countries. The biosafety procedures were heterogeneous. The workload in clinical and molecular pathology decreased dramatically by 31% (range, 3%-55%) and 26% (range, 7%-62%), respectively. According to the professional category, between 28% and 41% of the staff members were not present in the laboratories but did teleworking. A total of 70% of the laboratories developed virtual meetings for the training of residents and junior pathologists. During the period of study, none of the staff members with confirmed COVID-19 became infected as a result of handling samples. Conclusions The COVID-19 pandemic has had a strong impact on most of the European pathology laboratories included in this study. Urgent implementation of several changes to the organization of most of these laboratories, notably to better harmonize biosafety procedures, was noted at the onset of the pandemic and maintained in the event of a new wave of infection occurring in Europe. Biosafety measures used in the first wave of the COVID-19 crisis were heterogeneous in 53 European pathology laboratories. A dramatic decrease of the workload in pathology laboratories was noted. No case of healthcare workers contaminated with SARS-CoV-2 associated with samples handling was identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Hofman
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, FHU OncoAge, BB-0033-00025, Louis Pasteur Hospital, IRCAN, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
| | - M Ilié
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, FHU OncoAge, BB-0033-00025, Louis Pasteur Hospital, IRCAN, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - E Chamorey
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - P Brest
- Team 4, IRCAN, INSERM, CNRS, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - R Schiappa
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - V Nakache
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, FHU OncoAge, BB-0033-00025, Louis Pasteur Hospital, IRCAN, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - M Antoine
- Department of Pathology, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - M Barberis
- Unit of Histopathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - H Begueret
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - F Bibeau
- Department of Pathology, CHU de Caen, Université de Caen Normandie, Caen, France
| | - C Bonnetaud
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, FHU OncoAge, BB-0033-00025, Louis Pasteur Hospital, IRCAN, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - P Boström
- Department of Pathology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - P Brousset
- Department of Pathology, IUC-T-Oncopole, Inserm U1037 CRCT, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - L Bubendorf
- Institute of Pathology, Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - L Carvalho
- Institute of Anatomical and Molecular Pathology and University Hospital, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - G Cathomas
- Institute of Pathology, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland
| | - A Cazes
- Department of Pathology, Bichat Hospital, AP-HP, Inserm UMR 1152, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - L Chalabreysse
- Department of Pathology, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - M-P Chenard
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - M-C Copin
- Institut de Pathologie, CHU Lille, Université de Lille, Lille, France
| | - J-F Côté
- Department of Pathology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - D Damotte
- Department of Pathology, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Centre, Hôpital Cochin, Inserm U1138, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - L de Leval
- Institute of Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - P Delongova
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | | | - A de Muret
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
| | - A Dema
- Department of Pathology, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania
| | - W Dietmaier
- Institute of Pathology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - M Evert
- Institute of Pathology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - A Fabre
- Department of Histopathology, St Vincent's University Hospital, University College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin, Ireland
| | - F Forest
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - A Foulet
- Department of Pathology, Centre Hospitalier, Le Mans, France
| | - S Garcia
- Department of Pathology, Hôpital Nord, AP-HM, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - M Garcia-Martos
- Pulmonary Pathology Department, Gregorio Marañon University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - L Gibault
- Department of Pathology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - G Gorkiewicz
- Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - D Jonigk
- Institute of Pathology, German Center for Lung Research, Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hannover, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - J Gosney
- Liverpool University Hospitals, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - A Hofman
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, FHU OncoAge, BB-0033-00025, Louis Pasteur Hospital, IRCAN, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - I Kern
- Department of Pathology, University Clinic Golnik, Golnik, Slovenia
| | - K Kerr
- Department of Pathology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - M Kossai
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - M Kriegsmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, and German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Germany
| | - S Lassalle
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, FHU OncoAge, BB-0033-00025, Louis Pasteur Hospital, IRCAN, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - E Long-Mira
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, FHU OncoAge, BB-0033-00025, Louis Pasteur Hospital, IRCAN, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - A Lupo
- Department of Pathology, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Centre, Hôpital Cochin, Inserm U1138, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - A Mamilos
- Institute of Pathology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - R Matěj
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Thomayer Hospital and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - J Meilleroux
- Department of Pathology, IUC-T-Oncopole, Inserm U1037 CRCT, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - C Ortiz-Villalón
- Department of Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - L Panico
- Unit of Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliera dei Colli, Monaldi-Cotugno-CTO, Naples, Italy
| | - A Panizo
- Department of Pathology, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - M Papotti
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - P Pauwels
- Centre for Oncological Research (CORE), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - G Pelosi
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, and IRCCS MultiMedica, Milan, Italy
| | - F Penault-Llorca
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - O Pop
- Department of Pathology, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania
| | - N Poté
- Department of Pathology, Bichat Hospital, AP-HP, Inserm UMR 1152, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - S R Y Cajal
- Department of Pathology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J-C Sabourin
- Department of Pathology, Inserm 1245, Rouen University Hospital Normandy University, Rouen, France
| | - I Salmon
- Department of Pathology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - M Sajin
- Department of Pathology, Emergency University Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - S Savic-Prince
- Institute of Pathology, Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - H-U Schildhaus
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - P Schirmacher
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, and German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Germany
| | - I Serre
- Department of Biopathology, Gui de Chauliac Hospital, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - E Shaw
- Department of Cellular Pathology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - D Sizaret
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
| | - A Stenzinger
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, and German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Germany
| | - J Stojsic
- Department of Thoracic Pathology, Service of Pathology, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - E Thunnissen
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W Timens
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - G Troncone
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Frederico II, Naples, Italy
| | - C Werlein
- Institute of Pathology, German Center for Lung Research, Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hannover, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - H Wolff
- Laboratory of Pathology, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland
| | - J-P Berthet
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, FHU OnoAge, Louis Pasteur Hospital, University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - J Benzaquen
- Department of Pneumology, FHU OncoAge, Louis Pasteur Hospital, IRCAN, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - C-H Marquette
- Department of Pneumology, FHU OncoAge, Louis Pasteur Hospital, IRCAN, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - V Hofman
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, FHU OncoAge, BB-0033-00025, Louis Pasteur Hospital, IRCAN, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - F Calabrese
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Pathological Anatomy Section, University of Padova Medical School, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kähkönen TE, Toriseva M, Petruk N, Virta AR, Maher A, Eigéliené N, Kaivola J, Boström P, Koskivuo I, Nees M, Tuomela JM, Ivaska KK, Härkönen PL. Effects of FGFR inhibitors TKI258, BGJ398 and AZD4547 on breast cancer cells in 2D, 3D and tissue explant cultures. Cell Oncol (Dordr) 2020; 44:205-218. [PMID: 33119860 PMCID: PMC7907049 DOI: 10.1007/s13402-020-00562-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFR) and pathways are important players in breast cancer (BC) development. They are commonly altered, and BCs exhibiting FGFR gene amplification are currently being studied for drug development. Here, we aimed to compare the effects of three FGFR inhibitors (FGFRis), i.e., non-selective TKI258 and selective BGJ398 and AZD4547, on different BC-derived cell lines (BCCs) and primary tissues. Methods The human BCCs MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231(SA) (wild-type FGFR) and MFM223 (amplified FGFR1 and FGFR2) were analyzed for FGFR expression using qRT-PCR, and the effects of FGFRis on FGFR signaling by Western blotting. The effects of FGFRis on proliferation, viability, migration and invasion of BCCs were assessed in 2D cultures using live-cell imaging, and in 3D cultures using phenotypic analysis of organoids. To study radio-sensitization, FGFRi treatment was combined with irradiation. Patient-derived BC samples were treated with FGFRis in explant cultures and immunostained for Ki67 and cleaved caspase 3. Results We found that all FGFRis tested decreased the growth and viability of BC cells in 2D and 3D cultures. BGJ398 and AZD4547 were found to be potent at low concentrations in FGFR-amplified MFM233 cells, whereas higher concentrations were required in non-amplified MCF7 and MDA-MB-231(SA) cells. TKI258 inhibited the migration and invasion, whereas BGJ398 and AZD4547 only inhibited the invasion of MDA-MB-231(SA) cells. FGFRi treatment of MCF7 and MFM223 cells enhanced the inhibitory effect of radiotherapy, but this effect was not observed in MDA-MB-231(SA) cells. FGFRi-treated primary BC explants with moderate FGFR levels showed a tendency towards decreased proliferation and increased apoptosis. Conclusions Our results indicate that, besides targeting FGFR-amplified BCs with selective FGFRis, also BCs without FGFR amplification/activation may benefit from FGFRi-treatment. Combination with other treatment modalities, such as radiotherapy, may allow the use of FGFRis at relatively low concentrations and, thereby, contribute to better BC treatment outcomes. Supplementary Information The online version of this article (10.1007/s13402-020-00562-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T E Kähkönen
- University of Turku, Institute of Biomedicine, 20520, Turku, Finland
| | - M Toriseva
- University of Turku, Institute of Biomedicine, 20520, Turku, Finland.,FICAN West Cancer Centre, 20520, Turku, Finland
| | - N Petruk
- University of Turku, Institute of Biomedicine, 20520, Turku, Finland.,FICAN West Cancer Centre, 20520, Turku, Finland
| | - A-R Virta
- University of Turku, Institute of Biomedicine, 20520, Turku, Finland
| | - A Maher
- University of Turku, Institute of Biomedicine, 20520, Turku, Finland
| | - N Eigéliené
- University of Turku, Institute of Biomedicine, 20520, Turku, Finland
| | - J Kaivola
- University of Turku, Institute of Biomedicine, 20520, Turku, Finland
| | - P Boström
- Department of Pathology, Turku University Hospital, 20520, Turku, Finland
| | - I Koskivuo
- Department of Plastic and General Surgery, Turku University Hospital, 20520, Turku, Finland
| | - M Nees
- University of Turku, Institute of Biomedicine, 20520, Turku, Finland.,Department of Biomedicine and Molecular Biology II, Uniwersytet Medyczny w Lublinie, 20-095, Lublin, Poland
| | - J M Tuomela
- University of Turku, Institute of Biomedicine, 20520, Turku, Finland.,FICAN West Cancer Centre, 20520, Turku, Finland
| | - K K Ivaska
- University of Turku, Institute of Biomedicine, 20520, Turku, Finland
| | - P L Härkönen
- University of Turku, Institute of Biomedicine, 20520, Turku, Finland. .,FICAN West Cancer Centre, 20520, Turku, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Viitala A, Anttinen M, Mäkelä P, Suomi V, Sainio T, Taimen P, Boström P, Sequeiros R. Transurethral ultrasound therapy for benign prostatic obstruction in humans. EUR UROL SUPPL 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s2666-1683(20)33249-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
9
|
Madekivi V, Boström P, Karlsson A, Aaltonen R, Salminen E. Can a machine-learning model improve the prediction of nodal stage after a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer? Acta Oncol 2020; 59:689-695. [PMID: 32148141 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1736332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Background: The current standard for evaluating axillary nodal burden in clinically node negative breast cancer is sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). However, the accuracy of SLNB to detect nodal stage N2-3 remains debatable. Nomograms can help the decision-making process between axillary treatment options. The aim of this study was to create a new model to predict the nodal stage N2-3 after a positive SLNB using machine learning methods that are rarely seen in nomogram development.Material and methods: Primary breast cancer patients who underwent SLNB and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) between 2012 and 2017 formed cohorts for nomogram development (training cohort, N = 460) and for nomogram validation (validation cohort, N = 70). A machine learning method known as the gradient boosted trees model (XGBoost) was used to determine the variables associated with nodal stage N2-3 and to create a predictive model. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used for comparison.Results: The best combination of variables associated with nodal stage N2-3 in XGBoost modeling included tumor size, histological type, multifocality, lymphovascular invasion, percentage of ER positive cells, number of positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) and number of positive SLNs multiplied by tumor size. Indicating discrimination, AUC values for the training cohort and the validation cohort were 0.80 (95%CI 0.71-0.89) and 0.80 (95%CI 0.65-0.92) in the XGBoost model and 0.85 (95%CI 0.77-0.93) and 0.75 (95%CI 0.58-0.89) in the logistic regression model, respectively.Conclusions: This machine learning model was able to maintain its discrimination in the validation cohort better than the logistic regression model. This indicates advantages in employing modern artificial intelligence techniques into nomogram development. The nomogram could be used to help identify nodal stage N2-3 in early breast cancer and to select appropriate treatments for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V. Madekivi
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - P. Boström
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Department of Pathology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - A. Karlsson
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Auria Clinical Informatics, Turku, Finland
| | - R. Aaltonen
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Department of Surgery, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - E. Salminen
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Finnish Nuclear and Radiation Safety, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Syed P, Kekki H, Terävä J, Gidwani K, Lamminmäki U, Boström P, Pettersson K. Potential role of glycovariants of urinary MUC1 and CEA in sensitive detection of urothelial bladder cancer. Clin Chim Acta 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.03.296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
11
|
Boström P, Haapamäki MM, Rutegård J, Matthiessen P, Rutegård M. Population-based cohort study of the impact on postoperative mortality of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. BJS Open 2018; 3:106-111. [PMID: 30734021 PMCID: PMC6354192 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2018] [Accepted: 08/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Anastomotic leakage following anterior resection for rectal cancer may result in death. The aim of this study was to yield an updated, population‐based estimate of postoperative mortality and evaluate possible interacting factors. Methods This was a retrospective national cohort study of patients who underwent anterior resection between 2007 and 2016. Data were retrieved from a prospectively developed database. Anastomotic leakage constituted exposure, whereas outcome was defined as death within 90 days of surgery. Logistic regression analyses, using directed acyclic graphs to evaluate possible confounders, were performed, including interaction analyses. Results Of 6948 patients, 693 (10·0 per cent) experienced anastomotic leakage and 294 (4·2 per cent) underwent reintervention due to leakage. The mortality rate was 1·5 per cent in patients without leakage and 3·9 per cent in those with leakage. In multivariable analysis, leakage was associated with increased mortality only when a reintervention was performed (odds ratio (OR) 5·57, 95 per cent c.i. 3·29 to 9·44). Leaks not necessitating reintervention did not result in increased mortality (OR 0·70, 0·25 to 1·96). There was evidence of interaction between leakage and age on a multiplicative scale (P = 0·007), leading to a substantial mortality increase in elderly patients with leakage. Conclusion Anastomotic leakage, in particular severe leakage, led to a significant increase in 90‐day mortality, with a more pronounced risk of death in the elderly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Boström
- Surgery Unit, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences Umeå University Umeå Sweden
| | - M M Haapamäki
- Surgery Unit, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences Umeå University Umeå Sweden
| | - J Rutegård
- Surgery Unit, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences Umeå University Umeå Sweden
| | - P Matthiessen
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health and Medical Sciences Örebro University Örebro Sweden
| | - M Rutegård
- Surgery Unit, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences Umeå University Umeå Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Boström P, Åsberg Johnels J, Broberg M. Self-reported psychological wellbeing in adolescents: the role of intellectual/developmental disability and gender. J Intellect Disabil Res 2018; 62:83-93. [PMID: 28984004 DOI: 10.1111/jir.12432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2017] [Revised: 08/15/2017] [Accepted: 09/19/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Wellbeing in Special Education Questionnaire was developed to assess subjective wellbeing in young persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities (ID/DD) as this perspective is rarely included in research. The present study explored how ID/DD and gender are related to self-reported wellbeing among adolescents. METHOD Students with (n = 110) or without (n = 110) ID/DD, aged 12-16 years, completed the Wellbeing in Special Education Questionnaire. Analyses of the effects of gender and disability status on peer relations and conflict, mental health, mental ill-health, school environment and family relations were carried out. RESULTS The experiences of the school environment and of positive mental health aspects did not differ between students with and without ID/DD, but those with ID/DD reported more mental health problems and less positive experiences of peer relations and family. Generally, boys reported more positive experiences of school and less mental health problems than girls. CONCLUSIONS Including the subjective perspective of young persons with ID/DD through self-reports can provide essential information about wellbeing that cannot be gained from proxy ratings. The results suggest both differences and similarities in self-reported wellbeing between boys and girls with and without ID/DD and potentially also in how they perceived the concepts measured.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Boström
- Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - J Åsberg Johnels
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - M Broberg
- Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Brück N, Koskivuo I, Boström P, Saunavaara J, Aaltonen R, Parkkola R. Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Stage I Invasive Ductal Breast Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Study. Scand J Surg 2017; 107:14-22. [PMID: 28401771 DOI: 10.1177/1457496917701669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging has become an important complementary imaging technique in patients with breast cancer, providing additional information for preoperative local staging. Magnetic resonance imaging is recommended selectively in lobular breast cancer and in patients with dense breast tissue in the case when mammography and ultrasound fail to fully evaluate the lesion, but the routine use of magnetic resonance imaging in all patients with invasive ductal carcinoma is controversial. The purpose of this randomized study was to investigate the diagnostic value of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and its impact on short-term surgical outcome in newly diagnosed unifocal stage I invasive ductal carcinoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 100 patients were randomized to either receive preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging or to be scheduled directly to operation without magnetic resonance imaging on a 1:1 basis. There were 50 patients in both study arms. RESULTS In 14 patients (28%), breast magnetic resonance imaging detected an additional finding and seven of them were found to be malignant. Six additional cancer foci were found in the ipsilateral breast and one in the contralateral breast. Magnetic resonance imaging findings caused a change in planned surgical management in 10 patients (20%). Mastectomy was performed in six patients (12%) in the magnetic resonance imaging group and in two patients (4%) in the control group ( p = 0.140). The breast reoperation rate was 14% in the magnetic resonance imaging group and 24% in the control group ( p = 0.202). The mean interval between referral and first surgical procedure was 34 days in the magnetic resonance imaging group and 21 days in the control group ( p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging may be beneficial for some patients with early-stage invasive ductal carcinoma, but its routine use is not recommended without specific indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Brück
- 1 Department of Plastic and General Surgery, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - I Koskivuo
- 1 Department of Plastic and General Surgery, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - P Boström
- 2 Department of Pathology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - J Saunavaara
- 3 Medical Imaging Centre of Southwest Finland, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.,4 Department of Medical Physics, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - R Aaltonen
- 1 Department of Plastic and General Surgery, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - R Parkkola
- 3 Medical Imaging Centre of Southwest Finland, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Boström P, Haapamäki MM, Matthiessen P, Ljung R, Rutegård J, Rutegård M. High arterial ligation and risk of anastomotic leakage in anterior resection for rectal cancer in patients with increased cardiovascular risk. Colorectal Dis 2015; 17:1018-27. [PMID: 25851151 DOI: 10.1111/codi.12971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2014] [Accepted: 03/04/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
AIM Controversy still exists as to whether division of the inferior mesenteric artery close to the aorta influences the risk of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. This population-based study was carried out to evaluate the independent association between high arterial ligation and anastomotic leakage in patients with increased cardiovascular risk. METHOD All 2673 cases of registered anterior resection for rectal cancer from 2007 to 2010 were identified from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry and cross-referenced with the Prescribed Drugs Registry, rendering a cohort of all patients with increased cardiovascular risk. Operative charts and registered data were reviewed for 722 patients. The association between high tie and anastomotic leakage, as quantified by ORs and 95% CIs, was evaluated in a logistic regression model, with adjustment for confounding, including assessment of interaction. RESULTS Symptomatic anastomotic leakage occurred in 12.3% (41/334) of patients in the high tie group and in 10.6% (41/388) in the low tie group. The use of high tie was not independently associated with a higher risk of anastomotic leakage (OR = 1.05; 95% CI: 0.61-1.84). In a post-hoc analysis, patients with a history of manifest cardiovascular disease and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score III-IV seemed to be at greater risk (OR = 3.66; 95% CI: 1.04-12.85). CONCLUSION In the present population-based, observational setting, high tie was not independently associated with an increased risk of symptomatic anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. However, this conclusion may not hold for patients with severe cardiovascular disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Boström
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - M M Haapamäki
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - P Matthiessen
- Department of Surgery, Örebro University Hospital and Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - R Ljung
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Rutegård
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - M Rutegård
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Yu L, Kähkönen T, Taimen P, Boström P, Tuomela J, Härkönen P. 225: Patient-derived tissue culture and xenograft models for studying prostate tumor responses to therapy. Eur J Cancer 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(14)50196-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
16
|
Boström P, Wickström Y, Hultén LM, Perkins R, Ståhlman M, Wiklund O, Olofsson SO, Borén J. 146 LIPID DROPLETS IN HUMAN MACROPHAGES RECRUIT CYTOSOLIC PHOSPHOLIPASE A2 AND PROMOTE SECRETION OF INFLAMMATORY MEDIATORS. ATHEROSCLEROSIS SUPP 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/s1567-5688(11)70147-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
17
|
Boström P, Broberg M, Hwang CP. Different, difficult or distinct? Mothers' and fathers' perceptions of temperament in children with and without intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res 2010; 54:806-819. [PMID: 20663013 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01309.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Can ratings of temperament be a way of identifying young children with intellectual disabilities (ID) who are at risk for being experienced as difficult? We aimed to explore parents' reports of temperament in their young children with or without ID, as well as positive and negative impact of the child on parents. METHOD Mothers and fathers of 55 children recently diagnosed with ID and 183 age-matched typically developing (TD) children completed the EASI Temperamental Survey and two scales of the Family Impact Questionnaire measuring positive and negative impact of the child on parents. RESULTS Parents rated children with mixed ID/DD (developmental delay) as shyer and more impulsive, and less active and sociable when compared with TD children. Children with mixed ID/DD were also reported to have more negative and less positive impact on the family compared with the TD group. In subgroup analyses, children with Down syndrome and cerebral palsy/motor impairment were described as having less negative impact on parents and were described as low in negative emotionality. Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), ID/DD nos and other less common diagnoses had a similar pattern of temperament with high emotionality, shyness and impulsivity, and low activity and sociability. Parents of children with ASD and ID/DD reported the highest level of negative impact. CONCLUSIONS Temperamental characteristics such as high negative emotionality and impulsivity, which can be identified earlier than behavioural problems, could be indicators of negative impact on parents of young children with ID. Despite great variability in temperament among children with mixed ID/DD, results indicated common temperamental characteristics among children with ASD, ID/DD and other diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Boström
- Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Laihia J, Pylkkänen L, Laato M, Boström P, Leino L. 4508 POSTER Protodynamic therapy–anovel anti-cancer concept for treatment of urinary bladder carcinoma. EJC Suppl 2007. [DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6349(07)71139-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
19
|
Abstract
Salicylic acid (SA) and urea are widely used in topical preparations. Using a simple tape stripping technique the effect on the binding forces within the stratum corneum and the skin absorption of SA and urea were studied. The degree of stratum corneum removal was recorded by measuring the transmission through the tape with a digital light-measuring instrument. With successive stripping of the skin the amount of tissue adhering to the tape decreased. Exposure of the upper arm to 2% SA for 6 h increased the skin material on the tape strips significantly. No significant increase was recorded after 3-hour exposure, or after exposure to 0.5% SA. Neither did the exposure to 10% urea for 3 or 6 h influence the amount of skin adhering to the tape significantly. Radiochemical analyses showed that the amount of SA and urea in each of the first 6 tape strips was about 5-15 micrograms/cm2. This technique provides a useful tool to evaluate the binding forces within the stratum corneum in relation to absorption of topically applied substances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Lodén
- Apoteksbolaget Central Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Makkonen TA, Boström P, Vilja P, Joensuu H. Sucralfate mouth washing in the prevention of radiation-induced mucositis: a placebo-controlled double-blind randomized study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1994; 30:177-82. [PMID: 8083112 DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)90533-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the value of sucralfate mouth washings in prevention of radiation-induced mucositis. METHODS AND MATERIALS Forty patients with head and neck cancer were randomized to use either sucralfate mouth washing 1 g six times daily during irradiation (n = 20) or to placebo washing (n = 20). Mouth washing was started at the beginning of radiation therapy and continued to the end of the therapy (7-10 weeks). Assessment of the degree of radiation mucositis and collection of stimulated saliva samples were done weekly during the therapy. Salivary lactoferrin and albumin, suggested markers for the degree of mucositis, were analyzed from stimulated whole saliva samples. RESULTS All patients developed radiation-induced mucositis of varying degree after irradiation of about 30 Gy. No difference in the visually assessed degree of mucositis or oral pain reported by the patients was found between the study and the control groups. However, the patients treated with sucralfate used less anesthetic mouth washing and their salivary lactoferrin and albumin levels were lower. CONCLUSION Although the trial produced no direct clinical evidence indicating that sucralfate mouth rinses prevent radiation-induced mucositis, the decrease in the salivary lactoferrin and albumin levels suggests that sucralfate has a slight protective effect on the oral mucosa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T A Makkonen
- University of Turku, Department of Oral Surgery, Finland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
Twenty-four patients with radiation-related xerostomia were treated with oral pilocarpine solution 6 mg t.i.d., and after a 4-week drug-free period 16 of these patients were treated with carbacholine 2 mg tablets t.i.d. Basal and stimulated whole saliva flow rates were measured before commencing the drug treatment, and after 1 and 12 weeks on treatment. On a subjective linear scale both pilocarpine (p = 0.01) and carbacholine (p = 0.02) improved mouth moistness. Only 2 of the 8 patients with no basal or stimulated saliva flow reported some subjective benefit from the drug treatment, whereas all 8 patients with less severe xerostomia improved (p = 0.007). However, the salivary flow rates measured 12 h after the last drug dose did not improve with either drug. Both drugs were generally well tolerated. It is concluded that both drugs may be useful in the treatment of radiation-induced xerostomia among patients with residual salivary function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Joensuu
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Turku University Central Hospital, Finland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Boström P. [Dental care for patients undergoing radiation therapy of the head and neck area using a tongue depression to reduce the radiation area]. Suom Hammaslaakarilehti 1990; 37:228-32. [PMID: 2144658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|