Pediatric de novo movement disorders and ataxia in the context of SARS-CoV-2

OBJECTIVE

In the fourth year of the COVID-19 pandemic, mortality rates decreased, but the risk of neuropsychiatric disorders remained the same, with a prevalence of 3.8% of pediatric cases, including movement disorders (MD) and ataxia.

METHODS

In this study, we report on a 10-year-old girl with hemichorea after SARS-CoV-2 infection and immunostained murine brain with patient CSF to identify intrathecal antibodies. Additionally, we conducted a scoping review of children with MD and ataxia after SARS-CoV-2 infection.

RESULTS

We detected antibodies in the patient's CSF binding unknown antigens in murine basal ganglia. The child received immunosuppression and recovered completely. In a scoping review, we identified further 32 children with de novo MD or ataxia after COVID-19. While in a minority of cases, MD or ataxia were a symptom of known clinical entities (e.g. ADEM, Sydenham's chorea), in most children, the etiology was suspected to be of autoimmune origin without further assigned diagnosis. (i) Children either presented with ataxia (79%), but different from the well-known postinfectious acute cerebellar ataxia (older age, less favorable outcome, or (ii) had hypo-/hyperkinetic MD (21%), which were choreatic in most cases. Besides 14% of spontaneous recovery, immunosuppression was necessary in 79%. Approximately one third of children only partially recovered.

CONCLUSIONS

Infection with SARS-CoV-2 can trigger de novo MD in children. Most patients showed COVID-19-associated-ataxia and fewer-chorea. Our data suggest that patients benefit from immunosuppression, especially steroids. Despite treatment, one third of patients recovered only partially, which makes up an increasing cohort with neurological sequelae.

Real-World Activity and Safety of Trifluridine-Tipiracil Plus Bevacizumab Therapy in Patients with Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

The combination of trifluridine-tipiracil and bevacizumab was compared with trifluridine-tipiracil monotherapy in a randomized, open-label, phase II trial, resulting in a statistically significant and clinically relevant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS), with tolerable toxicity in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC); however, evidence supporting the role of this combination in a real-world setting is limited.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our work was to provide further evidence on the activity and safety of this combination in a real-world series of Western mCRC patients refractory or intolerant to previous therapies.

PATIENT AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, observational study of patients with mCRC refractory or intolerant to standard therapies. Patients were treated with trifluridine-tipiracil and bevacizumab. Previous therapy with fluoropyrimidines, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, bevacizumab, aflibercept, regorafenib, and cetuximab or panitumumab (only RAS wild-type) was allowed, as was previous participation in clinical trials. Clinicopathological characteristics, overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), PFS, and safety data were retrospectively collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

We recorded 31 patients treated between 1 December 2017 and 30 June 2022. Median age was 69 years (range 38-82 years), 39% were male, 100% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0-1, tumor location was left-sided in 77% of cases, 54% had synchronous presentation, 35% were RAS mutant, 3% were BRAF mutant, and 71% underwent primary tumor resection; 64% of patients had liver metastases, 55% had lung metastases, and 23% had peritoneal carcinomatosis. The median number of previous treatment lines was 2 (range 0-5), and 84% of patients received at least one previous anti-angiogenic agent. The ORR and DCR were 3% and 71%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 8 months (range 2-39), median PFS was 6 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.1-8.9 months) and median OS was 14 months (95% CI 10.1-17.8 months). Adverse events of any grade were reported in 58% of patients. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (19%) and anemia (6%); 35% of patients required either dose delays or dose reductions due to toxicity. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis was administered either on first or subsequent cycles of treatment in 35% of patients. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Sixty percent of the patients who discontinued treatment eventually received one or more lines of subsequent therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our series provides further evidence on the activity and safety of the combination of trifluridine-tipiracil and bevacizumab in a real-world series of Western refractory mCRC patients.

Microsatellite Status Detection in Gastrointestinal Cancers: PCR/NGS Is Mandatory in Negative/Patchy MMR Immunohistochemistry

Simple Summary

Microsatellite instability (MSI) detection has a high impact on eligibility for immune checkpoint inhibitors in gastrointestinal cancers. The appropriate detection of MSI represents the major critical issue in clinical practice, thus a better understanding of the limits related to MSI testing is needed to avoid misinterpretations. This study addresses the discordance between IHC and PCR/NGS testing in a large retrospective series of colorectal and gastric cancers in order to improve diagnosis. Our findings show a disagreement between negative/patchy expression IHC and PCR/NGS results, suggesting that molecular testing is mandatory in this subset of tumors.

Abstract

Background: Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a predictive biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitors. The main goal was to investigate the discordance between IHC and PCR/NGS for MSI testing in gastrointestinal cancers. Methods: Two series were analyzed through IHC for mismatch-repair-system proteins (MMRP) and PCR, with one series of 444 colorectal cancers (CRC) and the other of 176 gastric cancers (GC). All cases with discordant results between IHC and PCR were analyzed by NGS. IHC staining was evaluated as follows: proficient MMR (pMMR), with all MMR positive; deficient MMR (dMMR), with the loss of one heterodimer; and cases with the loss/patchy expression of one MMR (lo-paMMR). Cases with instability in at least two markers by PCR were MSI-high (MSI-H) and with instability in one marker, MSI-low (MSI-L). Cases without instability were evaluated as microsatellite-stable (MSS). Results: In the CRC cohort, 15 out of 444 cases were dMMR and 46 lo-paMMR. Among the 15 dMMR, 13 were MSI-H and 2 MSS. Among the 46 lo-paMMR, 13 were MSI-H and 33 were MSS. In the GC cohort, 13 out of 176 cases were dMMR and 6 cases lo-paMMR. Among the 13 dMMR, 12 were MSI-H and only 1 was MSS. All six lo-paMMR cases were MSS. All NGS results were in agreement with PCR. Conclusions: In clinical practice, MMR–IHC could be used as a screening test and additional molecular analysis is mandatory exclusively in cases carrying loss/patchy MMR-IHC.

Exemestane and Everolimus combination treatment of hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer: A retrospective study of 9 cancer centers in the Campania Region (Southern Italy) focused on activity, efficacy and safety

Exemestane (Exe) in combination with Everolimus (Eve) represents an important treatment option for patients diagnosed with hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), which was previously treated with non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAI). Data from unselected populations may be useful for defining the optimal therapeutic algorithm within a clinical setting. Data from 264 HR+, HER2-MBC patients who received Exe-Eve treatment in combination, following the failure of NSAIs was retrospectively analyzed. Different lines of endocrine treatment (ET) were investigated to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the treatment within the ‘everyday clinical practice’ population. The disease control rate (DCR) was 73.1%, with no statistically significant difference among the different settings. At a median follow-up of 42 months, the median progression free survival (PFS) was 11.6, 9.7 and 7.5 months for patients treated with Exe-Eve as first, second or third line therapy, respectively. There was a statistically significant correlation with younger age, no previous adjuvant chemotherapy (CT), no previous adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET), HT duration ≥36 months, involvement of liver and/or lung, no prior CT for metastatic disease and PS=0 at the start of treatment. The median overall survival (OS) was 33.0 months; at a median follow-up of 67 months, the median OS was 43.1, 31.7 and 27.9 months in patients treated with Exe-Eve in first, second or third line therapy, respectively. On multivariate analysis, diabetes and previous CT for metastatic disease were revealed to correlate with a worse outcome. Conversely, the presence of mucositis was significantly associated with long-term survival. Overall, Exe-Eve was typically well tolerated and the majority toxicities were G1 or 2, while treatment discontinuation due to unacceptable toxicity was only required in 5.7% of patients. Despite the limitations due to the observational nature of this study, the findings suggest that treatment with Exe-Eve is an active and safe therapeutic option for endocrine-sensitive MBC patients in a real-world clinical setting, regardless of treatment lines.

Mitomycin C Etoposide and Vinorelbine (MEV II) in the Treatment of Metastatic Stage IV Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

Aims and Background

In a prior study with a new non-cisplatin-based regimen including mytomycin C, etoposide and vindesine (MEV I) we observed a 37% response rate and very low toxicity in stage IV non small cell lung cancer. In an attempt to improve the activity of MEV I we evaluated a new regimen, MEV II, a modification of MEV I in which vinorelbine replaced vindesine.

Methods

21 Patients with metastatic stage IV non small cell lung cancer entered the phase II trial and were treated with the MEV II regimen (mitomycin C 8 mg/m2, i.v., d 1, etoposide 100 mg/m2, i.v., d 1-3, vinorelbine 30 mg/m2, i.v., d 1, every 4 weeks.

Results

We observed a partial response rate of 30% (95% confidence limits 10-50) with a median survival of 6 months. The worst reported toxicity was leukopenia grade 4 in 10% of patients including one who died of sepsis and grade 3 in 20%.

Conclusions

The MEV II regimen showed a similar activity but greater toxicity than MEV I.

Mitomycin C and Vindesine: An Ineffective Combination Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

Twelve patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma were subjected to mitomycin C (MMC) and vindesine (VDS) chemotherapy (MMC 10 mg/m2, i.v., d 1; VDS, 3 mg/m2, i.v., d 1–8, every 4 weeks). No objective response was obtained; 3 (25%) patients had stable disease and 9 (75%) progression of disease. We conclude that MMC plus VDS is an ineffective combination chemotherapy in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Complete Regression of Laryngeal Involvement by Classic Kaposi's Sarcoma with Low-Dose Alpha-2b Interferon

We report the case of an 82-year old Italian female with laryngeal involvement of classic Kaposi's sarcoma. We obtained a complete regression of laryngeal lesion with low-dose alpha-2b interferon.

Adjuvant anastrozole versus exemestane versus letrozole, upfront or after 2 years of tamoxifen, in endocrine-sensitive breast cancer (FATA-GIM3): a randomised, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Uncertainty exists about the optimal schedule of adjuvant treatment of breast cancer with aromatase inhibitors and, to our knowledge, no trial has directly compared the three aromatase inhibitors anastrozole, exemestane, and letrozole. We investigated the schedule and type of aromatase inhibitors to be used as adjuvant treatment for hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer.

METHODS

FATA-GIM3 is a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial of six different treatments in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed invasive hormone receptor-positive breast cancer that had been completely removed by surgery, any pathological tumour size, and axillary nodal status. Key exclusion criteria were hormone replacement therapy, recurrent or metastatic disease, previous treatment with tamoxifen, and another malignancy in the previous 10 years. Patients were randomly assigned in an equal ratio to one of six treatment groups: oral anastrozole (1 mg per day), exemestane (25 mg per day), or letrozole (2·5 mg per day) tablets upfront for 5 years (upfront strategy) or oral tamoxifen (20 mg per day) for 2 years followed by oral administration of one of the three aromatase inhibitors for 3 years (switch strategy). Randomisation was done by a computerised minimisation procedure stratified for oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 status; previous chemotherapy; and pathological nodal status. Neither the patients nor the physicians were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival. The minimum cutoff to declare superiority of the upfront strategy over the switch strategy was assumed to be a 2% difference in disease-free survival at 5 years. Primary efficacy analyses were done by intention to treat; safety analyses included all patients for whom at least one safety case report form had been completed. Follow-up is ongoing. This trial is registered with the European Clinical Trials Database, number 2006-004018-42, and ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00541086.

FINDINGS

Between March 9, 2007, and July 31, 2012, 3697 patients were enrolled into the study. After a median follow-up of 60 months (IQR 46-72), 401 disease-free survival events were reported, including 211 (11%) of 1850 patients allocated to the switch strategy and 190 (10%) of 1847 patients allocated to upfront treatment. 5-year disease-free survival was 88·5% (95% CI 86·7-90·0) with the switch strategy and 89·8% (88·2-91·2) with upfront treatment (hazard ratio 0·89, 95% CI 0·73-1·08; p=0·23). 5-year disease-free survival was 90·0% (95% CI 87·9-91·7) with anastrozole (124 events), 88·0% (85·8-89·9) with exemestane (148 events), and 89·4% (87·3 to 91·1) with letrozole (129 events; p=0·24). No unexpected serious adverse reactions or treatment-related deaths occurred. Musculoskeletal side-effects were the most frequent grade 3-4 events, reported in 130 (7%) of 1761 patients who received the switch strategy and 128 (7%) of 1766 patients who received upfront treatment. Grade 1 musculoskeletal events were more frequent with the upfront schedule than with the switch schedule (924 [52%] of 1766 patients vs 745 [42%] of 1761 patients). All other grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in less than 2% of patients in either group.

INTERPRETATION

5 years of treatment with aromatase inhibitors was not superior to 2 years of tamoxifen followed by 3 years of aromatase inhibitors. None of the three aromatase inhibitors was superior to the others in terms of efficacy. Therefore, patient preference, tolerability, and financial constraints should be considered when deciding the optimal treatment approach in this setting.

FUNDING

Italian Drug Agency.

Eribulin for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treatment: a retrospective, multicenter study based in Campania, south Italy (Eri-001 trial)

BACKGROUND

On the basis of the results of two pivotal phase III clinical trials, eribulin mesylate is currently approved in EU for the treatment of advanced breast cancer (aBC) in patients who have previously received an anthracycline and a taxane in either the adjuvant or the metastatic setting, and at least one chemotherapeutic regimen for metastatic disease.

METHODS

In our study, we investigated the efficacy and tolerability of eribulin as second or further line chemotherapy in 137 women affected by aBC.

RESULTS

Eribulin as monotherapy provided benefit in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR) and disease control rate (DCR) independently of its use as second or late-line therapy. The overall RR and DCR were 17.5% and 64%, respectively. In particular, DCR and overall RR were 50% and 13.6%, 65.4% and 21.1%, 70.4% and 14.8% and 66.7% and 16.7% in second, third, fourth and further lines of treatment, respectively. Median PFS (mPFS) according to the line of therapy was 5.7, 6.3, 4.5 and 4.0 months in patients treated with eribulin in second, third, fourth and over the fourth line, respectively. No significant difference in terms of mPFS was found between the various BC subtypes. Overall, eribulin resulted safe and most adverse events were of grade 1 or 2 and easily manageable. Grades 3-4 toxicities were neutropaenia and neurotoxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

With the limitations due to the observational nature of our findings, eribulin was shown to be an effective and safe therapeutic option in heavily pretreated patients with aBC.

Phase II study of sequential hormonal therapy with anastrozole/exemestane in advanced and metastatic breast cancer

Hormonal therapy is the preferred systemic treatment for recurrent or metastatic, post-menopausal hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer. Previous studies have shown that there is no cross-resistance between exemestane and reversible aromatase inhibitors. Exposure to hormonal therapy does not hamper later response to chemotherapy. Patients with locally advanced or metastatic, hormonal receptor positive or unknown, breast cancer were treated with oral anastrozole, until disease progression, followed by oral exemestane until new evidence of disease progression. The primary end point of the study was clinical benefit, defined as the sum of complete responses (CR), partial responses (PR) and > 24 weeks stable disease (SD). In all, 100 patients were enrolled in the study. Anastrozole produced eight CR and 19 PR for an overall response rate of 27% (95% CI: 18.6-36.8%). An additional 46 patients had long-term (> 24 weeks) SD for an overall clinical benefit of 73% (95% CI: 63.2-81.4). Median time to progression (TTP) was 11 months (95% CI: 10-12). A total of 50 patients were evaluated for the second-line treatment: exemestane produced one CR and three PR; 25 patients had SD which lasted > or = 6 months in 18 patients. Median TTP was 5 months. Toxicity of treatment was low. Our study confirms that treatment with sequential hormonal agents can extend the period of time during which endocrine therapy can be used, thereby deferring the decision to use chemotherapy.

Cisplatin-gemcitabine combination in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study

PURPOSE

The nucleoside analog, gemcitabine, has shown activity as a single agent in the treatment of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Its combination with cisplatin in preclinical models suggested synergy between the two drugs. The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and toxicity of the cisplatin-gemcitabine combination in advanced NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-eight consecutive previously untreated NSCLC patients entered the trial from January to June 1994. The median age was 60 years (range, 37 to 70) and performance status (PS) was 0 or 1; 22 patients had unresectable stage III disease (21 stage IIIB and one stage IIIA) and 26 had stage IV disease. Gemcitabine 1 g/m2 was administered weekly (days 1, 8, and 15) followed by a 1-week rest and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 2 of each 28-day cycle. Survival and response were determined in accordance with the intention-to-treat principle in all enrolled patients.

RESULTS

Of 48 assessable patients, one (stage IV) had a complete response (CR) and 25 achieved a partial response (PR). The overall response rate was 54% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40% to 68%). Thrombocytopenia was the main side effect, with 52% of patients experiencing grade III to IV toxicity, which was usually short-lived and responsible for the omission of gemcitabine administration on day 15 in 50% of chemotherapy courses. The median survival time was 61.5 weeks (95% CI, 40 to 71).

CONCLUSION

The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin induced a high response rate in both stage IIIB and IV NSCLC, with modest side effects. The regimen deserves further careful evaluation in a phase III prospective randomized trial.

Mitomycin C plus vindesine plus etoposide (MEV) versus mitomycin C plus vindesine plus cisplatin (MVP) in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: A phase III multicentre randomised trial. The "Gruppo Oncologico Centro-Sud-Isole' (G.O.C.S.I.)

PURPOSE

To compare mitomycin C plus vindesine plus etoposide (MEV) vs. mitomycin C plus vindesine plus cisplatin (MVP) in the treatment of stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

204 patients were entered in a phase III multicentre randomised trial from June 1990 to December 1994 and stratified according to the ECOG performance status (0-1 vs. 2). MVP was given in the following dosages: mitomycin C 8 mg/m2+vindesine 3 mg/m2+cisplatin 100 mg/m2 i.v. day 1 and vindesine 3 mg/m2 i.v. day 8 with cycles repeated every 4 weeks. MEV was given in the following dosages: mitomycin C 8 mg/m2+vindesine 3 mg/ m2 i.v. day 1 and etoposide 100 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 to 3 with cycles repeated every 3 weeks. For both treatments a maximum of 6 cycles was planned. Response and toxicity were evaluated according to WHO. Subjective responses were assessed by numerical scales. Analyses were made on the basis of intent to treat.

RESULTS

The objective response rate was 21.4% (1 CR + 21 PR among 103 patients) in the MEV and 28.7% (1 CR + 28 PR among 101 patients) in the MVP arm (P = 0.48). Symptoms were similar in the two arms. 196 patients progressed and 182 died. The median times to progression were 10 weeks (95% CI 9-12) and 12 weeks (95% CI 10-15) and median survivals were 29 weeks (95% CI 25-36) and 28 weeks (95% CI 25-35) in the MEV and MVP arms, respectively. The relative risks of progressing and of dying were 0.89 (95% CL 0.66-1.20) and 0.96 (95% CL 0.71-1.30), respectively, for patients receiving MVP as compared with those receiving MEV at multivariate analysis adjusted by sex, age, histologic type, number of metastatic sites, performance status at entry, and centre.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, no significant differences were observed in response rate, survival or palliation of symptoms between the MEV and MVP regimens, while toxicity was significantly more frequent and severe with MVP. Thus, MEV should be considered a reasonable alternative to the MVP regimen in the treatment of stage IV NSCLC.

Phase I study of ifosfamide plus high-dose epirubicin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

The present phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of epirubicin given in combination with ifosfamide at a dose of 3 g/m2, recycled every 4 weeks, in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A total of 18 patients entered the study; they received the following four dose levels of epirubicin (i.v., day 1): 75 (6 patients), 90 (3 patients), 105 (3 patients, and 120 mg/m2 (6 patients). The MTD of epirubicin was 120 mg/m2, neutropenia being the dose-limiting toxicity. We observed 1/6, 1/3 1/3, and 2/6 partial responses (PRs) at epirubicin dose levels of 75, 90, 104, and 120 mg/m2, respectively. A phase II study of epirubicin given at a dose of 120 mg/m2, in association with conventional-dose ifosfamide in advanced NSCLC is in order.

Phase I study of epirubicin plus vinorelbine with or without G-CSF in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The present phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of epirubicin, administered every 3 weeks to patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and combined with a conventional dose of vinorelbine [25 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) days 1 and 8] with or without the support of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). 18 patients entered the study. The patients received the following four dose levels of epirubicin (i.v., day 1): 50 mg/m2 (3 patients) and 60 mg/m2 (6 patients) without G-CSF, 75 mg/m2 (3 patients) and 90 mg/m2 (6 patients) with G-CSF (5 micrograms/kg days 4-6 and 9-15). In the patients treated without G-CSF the MTD of epirubicin was 60 mg/m2 and leukopenia was the dose-limiting toxicity. In the patients treated with G-CSF the MTD was 90 mg/m2, myelotoxicity being the dose-limiting toxicity. We observed 1/3 partial response (PR) with epirubicin at the dose of 75 mg/m2 and 2/6 PR at 90 mg/m2. These results would indicate the usefulness of a phase II study with epirubicin at the dose of 90 mg/m2 in association with conventional dose of vinorelbine with the support of G-CSF in advanced NSCLC.

Mitomycin C plus vindesine or cisplatin plus epirubicin in previously treated patients with symptomatic advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

A total of 40 previously treated patients with symptomatic advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were subjected to second-line chemotherapy with mitomycin C plus vindesine (MV) or cisplatin plus epirubicin (PE). The 12 patients treated with the MV regimen showed no objective response (OR) or symptom palliation. In the 28 patients who received the PE regimen, we obtained a 25% partial response rate, with amelioration of tumor-related symptoms occurring in 35.7% of cases and improvement in the performance status being noted in 25% of subjects. Both regimens were well tolerated. These data show that the administration of cisplatin-based second-line chemotherapy to patients with symptomatic advanced NSCLC may be useful.

Second-line chemotherapy of advanced colorectal cancer with sequential high-dose methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil

Twenty-five patients with pretreated advanced colorectal carcinoma were subjected to second-line chemotherapy with sequential high-dose methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil. In 20 evaluable patients 2 (10%) partial responses, 12 (60%) stable disease and 6 (30%) progressions were observed. Partial responses were maintained for 3 and 4 months respectively; stable disease had a median duration of 4 months. The overall median survival after progression was 7 months. From our results sequential high-dose methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil cannot be recommended as second-line chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer.

Clinical trial with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin

Many clinical trials with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin have been reported. This combination therapy seems to play an important role in untreated advanced colorectal cancer. In other neoplasms (gastric, head and neck, breast cancer) further studies are required.