Abstract OT1-13-01: MammaPrint, BluePrint, and full-genome data linked with clinical data to evaluate new gene expression profiles (FLEX)

BACKGROUND: Genomic signatures are revolutionizing the definition, identification, and treatment of breast cancer subtypes. The ability of genomic signatures to enable fine grained stratification of breast cancers to the granular disease level is still generally untested because of the difficulties in aggregating large clinical data sets. In order to stratify breast cancers into actionable subtypes both the full genome data and clinical data must be collected for patients at scale.

DESIGN & METHODS: FLEX is designed as a novel, large-scale, population based, prospective registry. All patients with stage I-III breast cancer who receive MammaPrint (MP) or BluePrint (BP) testing on a primary breast tumor are eligible. FLEX utilizes an adaptive design which enables additional study arms at low incremental effort and cost by allowing targeted substudies to be added. Patients who are enrolled in the initial study will also be eligible for inclusion in any additional study arm where they meet all criteria. Additional study arms and substudies may be investigator-initiated.

SPECIFIC AIMS:

Primary: Create a big-data registry of full genome expression data and clinical data to investigate new gene associations with prognostic and/or predictive value.

Secondary: Generate hypotheses for targeted subset analyses and trials based on full genome data. To date the following substudies have been proposed:

DR. JENNIFER A. CROZIER, BAPTIST MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER

(1) MP and BP in male breast cancer TYPE: SUBSTUDY; NO ADDITIONAL CONSENT (ICF) REQUIRED. ARMS: ALL (2) MP BP evaluation in breast cancer patients ≥70. TYPE: SUBSTUDY; NO ADDITIONAL ICF REQUIRED. ARMS: ALL (3) FG evaluation in ILC. TYPE: SUBSTUDY; NO ADDITIONAL ICF REQUIRED. ARMS: ALL (4,5) MP BP relation to PR positivity, Ki67. TYPE: SUBSTUDY; NO ADDITIONAL ICF REQUIRED. ARMS: ALL (6) MP BP in metaplastic breast cancer. TYPE: SUBSTUDY; NO ADDITIONAL ICF REQUIRED. ARMS: ALL

DR. ADAM M. BRUFSKY, UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER MAGEE WOMENS HOSPITAL

(1) Response to standard chemotherapy regimens in clinically ER+/PR+/HER2+ (triple positive) patients according to BP molecular subtypes. (2) Expression signatures by response to bisphosphonates in ER+ patients receiving adjuvant therapy, or for osteoporosis after primary treatment. (3) Gene expression in breast cancer patients with obesity. TYPE: SUBSTUDY; DUAL ICF UTILIZED. ARMS: NEOADJUVANT AND ADJUVANT

DR. IAN GRADY, NORTH VALLEY BREAST CLINIC

Impact of genomic risk classification on travel time to receive breast cancer care. TYPE: SUBSTUDY; NO ADDITIONAL ICF REQUIRED. ARMS: ALL

DR. THOMAS LOMIS, VALLEY BREAST CARE

Complementary data collection for patients participating in the ODM-201 trial. FLEX provides gene expression for exploratory and signature discovery. TYPE: COMPLEMENTARY; DUAL ICF UTILIZED. ARM: NEOADJUVANT

DR. PAT WHITWORTH, NASHVILLE BREAST CENTER

Genomic reclassification of large tumors eligible to receive NCT therapy. TYPE: SUBSTUDY; NO ADDITIONAL ICF REQUIRED. ARM: NEOADJUVANT

ELIGIBILITY, ACCRUAL

FLEX will enroll a minimum of 10000 patients aged ≥18 with stage I-III breast cancer who sign ICF. Enrollment began April 2017 and 623 patients have been enrolled as of June 2018.

Citation Format: Brufsky AM, Crozier JA, Grady I, Lomis T, Whitworth P, Rehmus E, Srkalovic G, Lee L, Blumencranz P, Baron P, Mavromatis B, Untch S, Blumencranz L, Yoder EB, Audeh W, FLEX Investigators Group. MammaPrint, BluePrint, and full-genome data linked with clinical data to evaluate new gene expression profiles (FLEX) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-13-01.

Abstract P5-09-06: Underdiagnosis of HBOC in breast cancer patients: Are genetic testing guidelines a tool or an obstacle?

Background: Pathogenic genetic variants are estimated to occur in 10-15% of all breast cancer patients, with BRCA 1/2 accounting for 40-50% of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants. However, it is estimated that <30% of breast cancer patients harboring a BRCA 1/2 variant have been identified, with the percentage being much less for ˜20 other breast cancer associated genes. Reasons for this are multifactorial and include complicated and restrictive testing guidelines developed at a time when the cost of testing was high and guidelines for management were limited. Today, cost has plummeted and there are definitive management guidelines for a broader range of genes. We created a community based Registry to determine the incidence of P/LP variants in breast cancer patients who meet and who do not meet the NCCN 2017 genetic testing criteria.

Methods: An IRB-approved multicenter prospective registry was initiated with 20 community and academic sites experienced incancer genetic testing and counseling.

Eligibility criteria included patients with a breast cancer diagnosis who had not been previously tested. Consecutive patients aged 18-90 were consented and underwent an 80 gene panel test (Invitae –Multi-Cancer Panel). The non-inferiority study was powered to detect a difference in P/LP variant rate of 4 percentage points with statistical significance (p<0.05, Fisher's exact test).

HIPAA compliant electronic case report forms collected information on patient diagnosis, test results, and physician recommendations made after test results were received.

Results: Over 1000 patients were enrolled and data from 910 subjects analyzed to date. 50.4% met NCCN criteria and 49.5% did not. Median age for the enrolled patients is 60.5 and ranged from 22-93. 56.0% of patients were recently diagnosed with breast cancer. 10.9% of patients had a history of a prior non breast cancer. Overall, 8.9% of patients had a pathogenicvariant. 9.6% of patients who met NCCN criteria with test results had a P/LP variant. 8.2% of patients who did not meet criteria had a P/LP variant. The difference of positive cases among the two groups is not statistically significant (P = 0.49)

4.9% of patients had pathogenic variants if only an 11 gene standard breast cancer panel was considered.

The spectrum of mutated genes varied between the two groups, with some overlap.

Conclusions:

There was no statistically significant difference in the number of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants between those patients who met and those who did not meet NCCN guidelines. Expanded panel testing yields more medically actionable P/LP variants than testing BRCA 1/2 alone or breast cancer panels with 11 genes. This study demonstrates that there will be a significant number of patients with P/LP variants are missed if NCCN guidelines are required for genetic testing. Current NCCN guidelines for the genetic testing of breast cancer patients are an obstacle to identifying patients with P/LP variants and should be removed.

Universal BC Genetic Testing RegistryNCCN Criteria (910 patients analyzed)#/% who have P/LP variants#/% who do not have P/LP variantsPatients who meet guidelines44/459 (9.6%)415/459 (90.4%)Patients who do not meet guidelines37/451 (8.2%)414/451 (91.8%)

Citation Format: Beitsch P, Whitworth P, Baron P, Rosen B, Compagnoni G, Simmons R, Smith LA, Holmes D, Brown E, Gold L, Clark P, Coomer C, Grady I, Barbosa K, Riley L, Kinney M, Lyons S, MacDonald H, Kahn S, Ruiz A, Patel R, Curcio L, Esplin E, Yang S. Underdiagnosis of HBOC in breast cancer patients: Are genetic testing guidelines a tool or an obstacle? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-09-06.

Abstract P5-09-03: Expanded panel testing superior to BRCA1/2 and breast cancer panel in patients with breast cancer

Background: The testing of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) patients for BRCA1/2 only was established years ago to identify patients with clinically actionable variants and limit the economic burden. However, the cost of genetic testing has plummeted, and the number of breast cancer-risk genes with management guidelines has expanded. We created a community-based registry to test all breast cancer patients. A primary objective of this registry included accruing and comparing patients who did and did not meet NCCN guidelines and determining if providing all breast cancer patients with comprehensive multi-gene panel testing yields additional clinical value than testing BRCA1/2 alone.

Methods: An IRB-approved multicenter prospective registry was initiated with 20 community-based and academic breast sites, selected to insure geographic and ethnic diversity. Consecutive patients ages 18-90 with current or prior breast cancer were offered testing with an 80-gene panel (Invitae, San Francisco, CA). HIPAA-compliant case report forms collected patient diagnosis, test results, and physician recommendations made after test results.

Results: Over 1,000 patients were enrolled and data on 911 have been analyzed to date. Median age of patients is 60.5 (range 22 to 93). 56.0% were recently diagnosed with breast cancer. Of these patients, 50.54% met NCCN criteria, and 49.5% did not. 10.9% had history of a prior non-breast cancer. The pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant rate for patients on a comprehensive 80-gene panel was 8.9%. When restricted to a guidelines-based 11-gene breast cancer panel (BRCA1/2, ATM, CDH1, CHEK2, NBN, NF1, PTEN, STK11, TP53, PALB2), 4.9% had P/LP variants; when limited to BRCA1/2, 1.6% had P/LP variants. Of all patients with P/LP findings, 93% had variants in cancer-risk genes with established management recommendations (Table 1) and 80% had germline variants conferring eligibility for precision medicine-based cancer treatments, such as PARP inhibitors, through actively enrolling clinical trials.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that comprehensive panel testing of breast cancer patients provides a higher yield of clinically actionable P/LP variants than BRCA1/2 testing alone. Limited panels may miss clinically relevant P/LP variants, leaving risk for preventable cancers undiscovered and unnecessarily restricting patients' treatment options. These results also suggest that variants in tumor suppressor genes, not previously thought related to breast cancer, may contribute to its etiology. A comprehensive panel strategy reveals untapped clinical utility and can impact breast cancer patient care by informing implementation of precision medicine treatment interventions and guiding long-term medical management and surveillance for patients and their family members.

 PatientsVariantsWith breast cancer management guidelines (including variants ATM*, BRCA1*, BRCA2*, CHEK2*, NBN*, NF1, PALB2*, TP53*)45 (56%)46 (55%)With cancer guidelines and clinical management implications (including variants BARD1*, FH, MITF, MSH6*, MUTYH*, PTCH1, RAD50*, RAD51C*, RAD51D*, RB1, RET, VHL)31 (38%)33 (39%)Evidence of actionability accruing (including variants BLM, DIS3L2, RECQL4)5 (6%)5 (6%)Totals8184*P/LP variants in these genes confer potential clinical trial eligibility, e.g. NCT02401347.

Citation Format: Beitsch P, Whitworth P, Baron P, Rosen B, Compagnoni G, Simmons R, Smith LA, Holmes D, Brown E, Gold L, Clark P, Coomer C, Grady I, Barbosa K, Riley L, Kinney M, Lyons S, MacDonald H, Kahn S, Ruiz A, Patel R, Curcio L, Esplin E, Yang S, Michalski S. Expanded panel testing superior to BRCA1/2 and breast cancer panel in patients with breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-09-03.

Abstract P4-08-10: MammaPrint identifies 46% of patients, age ≤50 years with oncotype RS 18-30, as low risk and safe to forgo chemotherapy

Background: The PROMIS trial (NCT01617954) previously showed that an OncotypeDx (ODx) Intermediate Recurrence Score (RS 18-30) led to uncertainty in prescribing chemotherapy (CT), especially in the middle of the intermediate range from RS 21-26 where an equal number of patients were recommended to receive and forego CT (Tsai, JAMA Oncology 2018). Forty-seven percent (3183/6711) of randomized TAILORx patients were classified as RS 18-25 and are well represented in PROMIS. These patients with RS 18-25 may still lack definitive CT recommendation following TAILORx, reflexing to age and menopausal status to make a decision. Here, we re-evaluate PROMIS using the subgroup analyses adopted by TAILORx. Methods: MammaPrint (MP) risk of recurrence was determined for ODx intermediate patients by standard diagnostic testing (Agendia, Irvine, CA). Clinical risk was assessed using the MINDACT, modified Adjuvant Online! algorithm (Cardoso, NEJM 2016). The MP high and low risk classification, and patient and tumor characteristics were re-evaluated and subdivided by RS 18-25 vs. RS 26-30. Results: The 840 eligible patients in PROMIS were classified as 61.3% (515/840) clinically low risk and 37.0% (311/840) clinically high risk (including 84 lymph node positive patients). Half (342/684) of all patients with an RS 18-25 and 20.5% (32/156) patients with RS 26-30 were MP low risk. There was no significant difference in the distribution of MP risk in women age ≤50 yrs vs. >50 years (Yates chi-square P=0.62); MP classified 46.4% (84/181) patients age ≤50 yrs and 44.0% (290/659) patients age >50 yrs as low risk. In the clinically-low risk subset of 515 patients, there was also no significant difference in the distribution of MP risk by age (Yates chi-square P=0.89); MP classified 48.3% (56/116) patients age ≤50 yrs and 49.6% (198/399) patients age >50 yrs as low risk. Conclusions: In light of TAILORx and uncertain CT benefit in women ≤50 yrs, MammaPrint provides a definitive high or low risk answer and identifies 46% of these women who may safely forego CT based on MINDACT data. An analysis of young patients in the MINDACT trial showed that MP low risk patients age <45 yrs and 45-55 yrs had very good 5-yr DMFS of 95-98%, in both clinically low and high risk groups (Alders, SABCS 2017).

MammaPrint Risk by RS and AgeMammaPrint RiskRS 18-25  RS 26-30  GrandClassification≤50 yrs>50 yrsAll Ages≤50 yrs>50 yrsAll AgesTotalHigh Risk7426834223101124466Low Risk8026234242832374All15453068427129156840

Citation Format: Soliman H, Lo S, Qamar R, Budway R, Levine E, Whitworth P, Mavromatis B, Zon R, Untch S, Treece T, Blumencranz L, Audeh W, Tsai M, PROMIS Investigators Group. MammaPrint identifies 46% of patients, age ≤50 years with oncotype RS 18-30, as low risk and safe to forgo chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-08-10.

Abstract P4-06-05: Not presented

This abstract was not presented at the symposium.

Abstract P3-14-08: The impact of a structured surveillance protocol using bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) on preventing breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL) in high-Risk patients

Background: We evaluated the impact of structured surveillance using bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) to prevent clinical BCRL in a group of high-risk (axillary lymph node dissection) patients.

Methods: From April 2010 through November 2016, 93 patients who were treated with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) were prospectively monitored with BIS using L-Dex (Impedimed). Patients received a pre-operative baseline L-Dex measurement followed by post-operative assessments at regular intervals. An elevated L-Dex score was defined as an increase of ≥10 points above baseline (considered subclinical BCRL). Intervention consisted of applying an over the counter (OTC) sleeve for 4 weeks followed by re-evaluation. The need for complete decongestive physiotherapy (CDP) represented a surrogate for the development of clinically significant, chronic BCRL.

Results: Median follow-up was 24 months (range: 0.3-206.4 months). The median number of nodes removed was 19 (range: 5-41) and the median number of positive nodes was 3. Median age was 53 years old. Eighty five percent of patients underwent mastectomy and the remainder breast conserving therapy. 55% of patients received taxane based chemotherapy, 24% received some form of axillary RT (15% high tangents and 9% comprehensive regional nodal RT) and 74% had an elevated body mass index (BMI, > 25). Overall, 75% of these patients had at least one additional high-risk feature, 48% had at least two, and 6% had 3 (either taxane chemotherapy, axillary RT or elevated BMI). Thirty-three patients (35.4%) developed an elevated L-Dex score at some point during follow up. Overall, 10 patients (11%) required CDP at any point after treatment.

Conclusions: The results of this analysis support previously published data on the efficacy of prospective BCRL surveillance and early intervention using BIS. Of the 93 high-risk patients prospectively followed and managed in this structured BCRL protocol, 11% required CDP. These results compare favorably to all contemporary studies reporting BCRL rates in high-risk patients.

Citation Format: Whitworth P, Cooper A, Shah C, Vicini F. The impact of a structured surveillance protocol using bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) on preventing breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL) in high-Risk patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-14-08.

Abstract GS5-08: A validation of DCIS biological risk profile in a randomised study for radiation therapy with 20 year follow-up (SweDCIS)

Background: Women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and their physicians need tools that assess individualized risk and predict treatment benefit. A DCIS biologic signature was previously validated in an observational study at Kaiser Permanente NW. We evaluated the results of the signature for predictive utility in a national randomized clinical trial (SweDCIS) by assessing the 10-year benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) on ipsilateral breast event (IBE) and invasive breast cancer (IBC) risks.

Methods: The signature was validated in a prospective-retrospective study in women from the SweDCIS trial (n=1046) performed by the Swedish Breast Cancer Group. Women were treated with breast conserving surgery (BCS) between 1987-1999 and randomized to RT or no RT. A central pathology review of paraffin embedded tissue blocks (n=873) was performed at Uppsala University (UU). Freshly cut slides were provided to PreludeDx for biomarker testing. Extended follow-up of SweDCIS was published in 2014.

A panel of biomarkers (HER2, PR, Ki67, COX2, p16/INK4A, FOXA1 and SIAH2) were assayed and scored in PreludeDx's CLIA lab by board-certified pathologists. Continuous Decision Scores (DS) were calculated with the biologic signature using the biomarker and clinical factors (age, size, margin, and palpability) blinded to patient outcome. The DS results were provided to the Uppsala Regional Cancer Center for analysis. A predefined and co-developed statistical analysis plan was executed. Absolute 10-year RT benefit was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Hazard ratios (HR) were determined using Cox proportional hazards analysis and the interaction of the DS and RT benefit was assessed.

Results: Complete biomarker and clinical information was available in 584 women. In women with clear margins (n=506), 78 IBEs, including 31 IBCs, were recorded within 10 years of diagnosis. The multivariate analysis of DS (0-10 unit scale) and the RT interaction was significant for risk of IBC (p=0.048) and IBE (p<0.001) at 10 years. The DS defined an elevated risk group (>3) for which there was pronounced 10-year benefit of RT (p=0.01) with an absolute risk reduction of 9% for IBC (Table 1). The corresponding low risk group (≤3), which included 48% of all patients, demonstrated no significant RT benefit (p=0.70) with an absolute risk reduction of 1%. The continuous DS variable was correlated with IBE risk, HR 1.49/per 5 units 95%CI[1.02,2.18] (p=0.038), in addition to the RT benefit for IBE in low (p=0.04) and elevated (p<0.001) risk groups.

Table 1. 10-year RT benefit in women from the SweDCIS trial.DS Risk GroupsIBC eventsIn Situ or IBC eventsnAbsolute RT-benefitHR [95%CI] Absolute RT-benefit HR [95%CI]Low Risk Group (DS≤3)2431%0.83 [0.32, 2.16]9%0.48 [0.24-0.97]Elevated Risk Group (DS>3)2639%0.24 [0.08, 0.73]17%0.31 [0.17-0.59]

Discussion: Evaluation of the SweDCIS trial validated prognostic and RT predictive utility of the biologic signature. Women diagnosed with DCIS and treated with BCS±RT were stratified into clinically relevant low and elevated risk groups (≤3 vs >3). Women in the elevated risk group had twice the treatment benefit for IBC from RT compared to prior randomized trials, while the low risk group had no benefit from RT.

Citation Format: Wärnberg F, Garmo H, Folkvaljon Y, Holmberg L, Karlsson P, Sandelin K, Linke S, Lyle S, Simin K, Leesman G, Barry T, Savala J, Whitworth P, Bremer T. A validation of DCIS biological risk profile in a randomised study for radiation therapy with 20 year follow-up (SweDCIS) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS5-08.

Abstract S5-01: DCIS biological risk profile predicts risk of recurrence after breast conserving surgery in a Kaiser Permanente NW population

Background: Patients with DCIS and their physicians need tools that provide better information about the individual patient's biological risk profile to help make treatment decisions. Prelude and the Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research (KPCHR) validated a biological risk signature based test to assess ipsilateral breast event (IBE) risk after breast conserving surgery (BCS) with radiation (+RT) or without radiation therapy (-RT).

Methods: The Prelude DCIS test was independently validated in a retrospective cohort from the Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW) integrated healthcare system in patients diagnosed with DCIS from 1990- 2007 and treated with BCS±RT(n=608). KPCHR performed central pathology review to identify patients meeting study eligibility criteria with formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue samples (n=475); KPCHR also reviewed medical records to collect patient, treatment, and outcome data. FFPE patient samples were provided to Prelude for testing. REMARK guidelines were followed.

A panel of biomarkers (HER2, PR, Ki-67, COX2, p16/INK4A, FOXA1 and SIAH2) were assayed by the Prelude CLIA lab and scored by board-certified pathologists (n=455). Prelude's DCIS test was executed independently using biomarker and clinicopathologic data while blinded to patient outcome data. The risk results were provided to KPCHR under a Data Transfer Authority. KPCHR biostatisticians executed a predefined and co-developed statistical analysis plan. IBE rates were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Hazard ratios (HR) were determined using Cox proportional hazards analysis, with RT as a covariate.

Results: The Prelude DCIS test score was statistically associated with total IBE as a continuous linear variable (0-10 unit scale) on a per unit basis, HR of 1.12, 95% CI [1.03,1.23], p=0.01. The DCIS test score (0-10) corresponded to recurrence risks ranging from 10% to 42% (≤2, >7) for patients treated with BCS-RT and ranging from 4% to 11% (≤2, >7) for patients treated with BCS+RT. Patients treated with BCS ±RT with an elevated test score (≤3 vs >3) had a higher recurrence risk, n=455, HR=1.87 [1.03 - 3.38], p=0.04. In patients treated with BCS-RT in this sample, patients with a higher DCIS signature had an elevated recurrence risk, n=78, HR=2.37, 95% CI [0.82, 6.85], p=0.11. The 10-year contralateral breast event rate was 4%, 95% CI [2%, 6%]. Median follow-up time was 10.4 years.

Discussion: Patients diagnosed with DCIS and treated with BCS ±RT, were stratified into clinically relevant low and elevated risk groups (≤3 vs >3) in an independent validation of the Prelude DCIS test. Patients in the elevated risk group had substantially higher likelihood of 10-year total IBE. The number of patients treated with BCS -RT was limited and while the stratification by risk group for BCS -RT was in the expected direction, it did not reach statistical significance. Two additional validation studies are scheduled to be completed in 2016.

10-YEAR IBE RISKBCS –RTBCS +RTRisk, [95% CI]PrevalenceNRisk, [95% CI]PrevalenceNBaseline Total Risk20%, [12%, 32%]100%788%, [5%, 11%]100%377Low Risk Group (≤3)10% [3%, 29%]53%415%, [2%, 10%]40%149Elevated Risk Group (>3)30%, [17%, 51%]47%3710%, [6%, 15%]60%228

Citation Format: Bremer T, Whitworth P, Leo M, Barry T, Goldstein N, Ganders C, Francisco M, Leesman G, Linke S, Patel R, Pellicane J, Weinmann S. DCIS biological risk profile predicts risk of recurrence after breast conserving surgery in a Kaiser Permanente NW population [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr S5-01.

Abstract P1-14-05: Three distinct HER2 subtypes identified by BluePrint 80-gene functional subtyping predict treatment-specific response in the prospective neo-adjuvant NBRST registry

Background

Ideally classification by subtype predicts treatment response and overall outcome. BluePrint 80-gene functional molecular subtype is based on mRNA expression (as is intrinsic subtype) associated with intact translation to protein (unlike intrinsic subtype). BluePrint (BP) classifies patients into Luminal, Her2 or Basal-type. Presently subtype is approximated using conventional immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) ("conventional subtype") or assigned by gene expression profiling. The main objective of the prospective neo-adjuvant NBRST study is to compare drug sensitivity as defined by pathological Complete Response (pCR), using 80-gene functional subtype vs. conventional IHC/FISH subtyping. NBRST enrolled over 1,000 US patients between June 2011 and December 2014. In this analysis we present the results for IHC/FISH Her2-positive patients.

Methods

Here we report findings in the 260 NBRST patients who had IHC/FISH Her2+ breast cancer, according to ASCO CAP guidelines at the time of diagnosis. Treatment, including chemotherapy and HER2-targeted agents, was at the discretion of the physician adhering to NCCN approved or other peer-reviewed, established regimens over the course of the study. pCR was defined as T0/isN0. Fisher's exact test was used to compare pCR rates among IHC/FISH and functional subtypes and treatment groups.

Results

The 260 IHC/FISH Her2+ patients had median age 53 (range 23-81) and included T1-4, N0-3 tumors. Of 169 ER+/Her2+ tumors 49% were re-classified as BP Luminal, 43% as BP HER2, and 8% as BP Basal. The median ER% of ER+/Her2+/BP Luminal tumors was 93% (range 3-100), compared to 79% in ER+/Her2+/BP HER2 (range 1-91) and 8% in ER+/Her2+/BP Basal-type (range 2-99).The overall pCR rate in ER+/Her2+/BP Luminal was 17% (4% with chemo/trastuzumab; 39% chemo/trastuzumab/pertuzumab, p<0.0001) and statistically inferior (p<0.0001) to the 59% pCR rate in ER+/Her2+/BP HER2. Of 91 ER-/Her2+ tumors 74% were classified as BP HER2, 25% were re-classified BP Basal and <1% was BP Luminal. NCT pCR rates for ER-/Her2+/BP HER2 was 67% (64% with chemo/trastuzumab; 77% chemo/trastuzumab/pertuzumab, p=0.40) and significantly superior (p=0.026) to the 39% pCR rate in ER-/Her2+/BP Basal (p=0.026).

Conclusions

In the NBRST study, BP 80-gene functional subtype (based on mRNA expression and translation): 1. Re-classifies over half of all IHC/FISH ER+/Her2+ patients; 2. Predicts treatment response or resistance in Her2+ patients not segregated by conventional IHC/FISH classification and 3. Identifies ER+/Her2+ tumors that are sensitive to chemo/trastuzumab/pertuzumab but resistant to chemo/trastuzumab.

Citation Format: Whitworth P, Beitsch P, Baron P, Beatty J, Pellicane JV, Murray MK, Dul CL, Mislowsky AM, Nash CH, Richards PD, Lee LA, Stork-Sloots L, de Snoo F, Untch S, Gittleman M, Akbari S, Rotkis MC. Three distinct HER2 subtypes identified by BluePrint 80-gene functional subtyping predict treatment-specific response in the prospective neo-adjuvant NBRST registry. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-14-05.

Abstract P3-13-08: A prospective, single-arm, multi-site, clinical evaluation of the SAVI SCOUT® surgical guidance system for the location of non-palpable breast lesions during excision

Background and Objectives: The standard preoperative technique for localizing non-palpable breast lesions is wire localization (WL). Radioactive seed localization (RSL) is an alternative approach that addresses a number of clear disadvantages associated with WL but, the adoption of RSL has been impacted by considerable regulatory requirements for the handling of radioactive materials. To advance the progress made with RSL and eliminate issues associated with radioactive components, the SAVI SCOUT® surgical guidance system was developed. SAVI SCOUT is an FDA-cleared medical device that utilizes non-radioactive electromagnetic wave technology to provide real-time guidance during excisional breast procedures. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of SAVI SCOUT in guiding the removal of non-palpable breast lesions.

Methods: Following a 50 patient pilot study that showed SAVI SCOUT to be safe and effective, IRB approval was granted for this prospective, single-arm, multi-site study for women with a non-palpable breast lesion. Pts underwent localization and excision with the SAVI SCOUT system, which consists of an electromagnetic wave reflective device (reflector), handpiece and console. Using mammographic or ultrasound guidance, the reflector was implanted into the target tissue. Before making an incision, the surgeon used the handpiece, which emits electromagnetic waves and infrared light, to detect the location of the reflector and subsequently plan the surgical incision. During the procedure, the surgeon used the handpiece to guide the localization and removal of the reflector along with the surrounding breast tissue. The console provides audible feedback of reflector proximity to the handpiece. Successful reflector placement, localization and retrieval were the primary endpoints.

Results: A total of 61 pts have participated in the study to date, along with 7 surgeons and 9 radiologists across 6 institutions. The reflectors were successfully placed in all pts, including 27 under mammographic guidance and 34 under ultrasound guidance. In 28 cases, the reflectors were placed on the same day as surgery. Otherwise, the reflectors were placed up to 7 days (average 2.9 days) before surgery. Thirteen pts underwent excisional biopsy and 48 pts had a lumpectomy. The intended lesion and reflector were successfully removed in all pts. Reflector migration did not occur and no adverse events occurred. Final pathology is currently available for 52 pts: 8/10 excisional biopsy pts had no invasive or in situ carcinoma identified. For pts with cancer and complete data, 39/39 had clear margins, but one patient was recommended for re-excision due to a close margin (1 mm) for DCIS.

Conclusions: The preliminary data from this prospective, multi-site study show that real-time surgical guidance with SAVI SCOUT is an accurate technique for directing the removal of non-palpable breast lesions and is reproducible at multiple clinical sites. At present, the study has yielded 100% surgical success with a re-excision rate of 3.0%. Ongoing accrual to this clinical evaluation study will validate these findings with planned enrollment of 150 pts at up to 15 total sites.

Citation Format: Cox CE, Prati R, Blumencranz P, Allen K, Banull C, Cline M, Howard T, Portillo M, Whitworth P, Funk K, Police A, Lin E, Combs F, Anglin B, King J, Shivers SC. A prospective, single-arm, multi-site, clinical evaluation of the SAVI SCOUT® surgical guidance system for the location of non-palpable breast lesions during excision. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-13-08.

Abstract P4-14-29: One-third of HER2 positive patients have 80-gene luminal subtype that is resistant to chemo-trastuzumab but sensitive to chemo-trastuzumab-pertuzumab: Critical implications for the adjuvant setting from the NBRST phase 4 neoadjuvant study

Background

The phase 4 Neo-adjuvant Breast Registry Symphony Trial (NBRST) enrolled over 1,000 US patients between June 2011 and December 2014. The aim of NBRST study is to compare chemo-sensitivity as defined by pathological Complete Response (pCR) using the 80-gene BluePrint (BP) functional subtype profile vs. conventional IHC/FISH subtyping. Treatment was at the discretion of the physician utilizing standard NCCN regimens. Pertuzumab, a monoclonal antibody, inhibits the dimerization of HER2 with other HER receptors. Pertuzumab received US FDA approval for the neo-adjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer in September 2013. Essentially all patients with HER2 positive cancers were treated with chemotherapy + trastuzumab and after this date pertuzumab was added, creating 2 distinct groups of Her2-treated patients.

The aim of the current analysis is to compare the pCR rate of chemo-trastuzumab (c-t) vs chemo-trastuzumab plus pertuzumab (c-t-p) by conventional and 80-gene BP functional subtype. 80-gene BP functional subtype was derived by supervised cluster analysis for concordant mRNA and protein expression.

Methods

The current analysis includes women from the NBRST study, with histologically proven breast cancer, who received neo-adjuvant treatment, had 80-gene subtyping and provided written informed consent. Pathological assessment of HER2 was performed according to ASCO CAP guidelines at the time of diagnosis. 80-gene BluePrint (BP) classifies patients into Luminal, HER2 or Basal-type. pCR is defined as T0/isN0. All pCRs were verified with a de-identified copy of the surgical pathology report. Fisher's exact test was used to compare pCR rates within different subgroups.

Results

286 IHC/FISH HER2+ patients received c-t (175) or c-t-p (111). Of these 80-gene BP subtype classified 53% as HER2-type, 33% as Luminal-type and 14% as Basal-type. 64% were ER positive.

The pCR rates and p-values within different subgroups of clinical HER2+ patients are provided in the table below.

 c-tc-t-p (n)pCR ratep-valueTotal (n=286)41%57%0.01BP HER2 (153)58%73%0.06 BP Luminal (93) 6% 39% 0.0002BP Basal (40)45%1.0IHC/FISH HER2+/ER+ (183)31%53%0.003IHC/FISH HER2+/ER- (103)59%64%0.68

Conclusions

One-third of ASCO/CAP Her2+ patients had 80-gene BP Luminal subtype and demonstrated resistance to c-t (pCR 6%). Addition of Pertuzumab overcame resistance in this group (pCR 39%). This finding in the neoadjuvant setting suggests a substantial potential benefit in the adjuvant setting and thus an urgent need to consider treatment in at-risk patients as well as confirmatory tissue analysis from independently reported trials.

Citation Format: Beitsch P, Whitworth P, Baron P, Beatty J, Pellicane JV, Murray MK, Dul C, Mislowsky AM, Nash CH, Richards PD, Lee LA, Stork-Sloots L, de Snoo F, Untch S, Gittleman M, Akbari S, Rotkis MC. One-third of HER2 positive patients have 80-gene luminal subtype that is resistant to chemo-trastuzumab but sensitive to chemo-trastuzumab-pertuzumab: Critical implications for the adjuvant setting from the NBRST phase 4 neoadjuvant study. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-14-29.

Abstract P1-02-02: Concordance of microarray based determination of ER, PR and HER2 receptor status and local IHC/FISH assessment in the prospective neo-adjuvant breast registry symphony trial (NBRST)

Background

The level of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2 expression is predictive for prognosis and/or treatment response in breast cancer patients. However, differences in fixation and IHC and subjective interpretation can substantially affect the accuracy and reproducibility of the results. The commercially available TargetPrint test measures the mRNA expression level of ER, PR and HER2. Previously TargetPrint was shown to be strongly correlated with high quality IHC/FISH assessment, especially for ER and HER2. Concordance rates were 98% (k = 0.90) for ER; 85% (k = 0.62) for PR and 96% for HER2 (k = 0.78) in 619 patients (Viale et al., SABCS 2011).

This study compares results from the microarray-based TargetPrint with IHC and FISH conducted according to local standard procedures in the prospective NBRST study.

Methods

The NBRST study includes women aged 18–90 with histologically proven breast cancer, who are scheduled to start neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) or neo-adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET), and who provide written informed consent. The mRNA level of ER, PR and HER2 (TargetPrint) was assessed at the Agendia laboratory (Agendia Inc, Irvine, CA) in fresh and formalin fixed paraffin embedded tumor samples submitted from 40 institutes in the US. The results of the IHC/FISH assessments conducted according to local standard procedures were compared to the quantitative gene expression readouts.

Results

There were 355 eligible patients enrolled. 67% of patients are IHC ER positive and 25% Her2 IHC/FISH positive. 11 patients were IHC/FISH HER2 equivocal (all TargetPrint HER2 negative). Comparison of IHC and gene expression read out by TargetPrint showed a concordance of 88% (k = 0.75)for ER; 83% (k = 0.66) for PR and 89% (k = 0.70) for HER2. The discordance range for institutes who submitted more than 10 samples was 0-30% for ER, 0-47% for PR and 0-28% for HER2. 16% of all IHC ER+ samples were classified negative by microarray. In contrast, 4% of IHC ER- samples were classified positive by microarray. However for HER2, as many as 33% of IHC/FISH HER2+ samples were classified negative by microarray; 3% of IHC/FISH HER2- samples were classified positive by microarray.

Conclusions

Microarray based readout of ER, PR and HER2 status using TargetPrint is comparable to local IHC and FISH analysis in 355 analyzed samples from 40 US institutes but the discordance range for individual institutes was up to 30% for ER and 28% for Her2.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P1-02-02.

Abstract P3-06-28: Use of the MiCK drug-induced apoptosis assay improves clinical outcomes in recurrent breast cancer (BRCA)

Background: The microculture kinetic (MiCK) assay (Correct Chemo™) correlates with outcomes in acute myelocytic leukemia and ovarian cancer (Cancer Research, in press). A prior trial suggested that its use in breast cancer could improve clinical outcomes (Cancer, in press). This study was designed to correlate MiCK assay results with clinical outcomes in recurrent or metastatic BRCA.

Methods: 30 patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer in 4 different institutions were evaluated. Each patient (pt) had a BRCA biopsy sent to a central laboratory, tumor cells were purified to over 90% homogeneity, and were then cultured with individual drugs or drug combinations. The induction of apoptosis was measured every five minutes continuously for 48 hours. The amount of apoptosis was expressed in kinetic units (KU), and results were sent to the attending oncologist within 72 hours of submission. Physicians were free to choose any treatment plan for the pts, and were free to add hormonal therapy or biotherapy. Clinical results were evaluated by oncologists using clinical criteria and the results of the MiCK assay were correlated with outcomes of complete (CR) or partial (PR) response, time-to-relapse (TTR), and overall survival (OS).

Results: Median age was 57 years, and number of lines of prior therapy was a median of 2 (range 1–8). Median ECOG performance status was 1. The total number of drugs tested in the assay was a median of 12 (range 3–31). The MiCK assay was used to help select therapy in 22 pts (73%). There was change between drugs originally planned before MiCK assay and drugs used after MiCK in 15 pts (50%). The best therapy from the MiCK assay was used for treatment in 16 pts (53%). In five pts (17%), a single drug was used in place of a combination. Generic drugs were used in place of proprietary drugs in nine pts (30%). Hormonal therapy was added to drugs selected based on the MiCK assay in seven pts (23%), and bio-therapy drugs were added to chemotherapy drugs in eight pts (27%). If the MiCK results were used to help select therapy, eight pts had a CR or PR (27%), compared to 0 pts with CR or PR if MiCK was not used (p = 0.04). If the MiCK assay was used to determine therapy, 17 pts (59%) had a CR, PR or stable disease compared to only 2 pts (6.9%) in whom the MiCK assay was not used (p < 0.01). The TTR was significantly longer if the MiCK assay was used to select chemotherapy, 7.4 months, compared to only 2.2 months if the MiCK assay was not used (p < 0.01). There was a trend toward longer survival if the MiCK assay was used, 16.8 months, compared to 13.1 months if the MiCK assay was not used, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.3). If the best chemotherapy from the MiCK assay was used, there were trends for increased TTR (7.3 vs 3.9 mo if best not used p = 0.13) and increased rate of CR or PR or stable (54% vs 17% p = 0.11).

Conclusions: Use of the MiCK assay to determine chemotherapy was associated with a higher response rate and a longer time to relapse in pts with recurrent or metastatic BRCA. It is possible that OS is also improved, but longer follow up is needed. There was a trend for improved outcomes if the best chemotherapy based on the MiCK assay was used.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-06-28.

OT2-03-02: Prospective Neo-Adjuvant Registry Trial Linking MammaPrint, Subtyping and Treatment Response: Neoadjuvant Breast Registry – Symphony Trial (NBRST)

Background MammaPrint is performed on a diagnostic multi-gene array featuring >4,500 genes. This platform enables additional gene expression profiles to be analyzed simultaneously on one tumor specimen. BluePrint, an eighty gene Molecular Subtyping Profile, discriminates between three distinctive subtypes; Basal-type, Luminal-type, and ERBB2 (HER2)-type. Studies have shown marked differences in response to neo-adjuvant treatment in groups stratified by MammaPrint and BluePrint.

Trial design A prospective observational, case-only study linking MammaPrint, BluePrint, TargetPrint, TheraPrint (together referred to as the Symphony suite) and possible additional profiles of interest to neoadjuvant treatment response and Distant Metastases Free Survival (DMFS) and Relapse Free Survival (RFS).

20-30 institutions in the US will be invited to contribute clinical patient data from enrolled patients after a MammaPrint, TargetPrint, BluePrint and TheraPrint (Symphony suite) has been successfully performed and the patient has started neo-adjuvant therapy. Treatment is at the discretion of the physician, adhering to NCCN approved regimens or a recognized alternative.

Eligibility criteria

Women with histologically proven breast cancer, who have started or are scheduled to start neo-adjuvant chemotherapy therapy or neo-adjuvant hormone therapy, after successful Symphony suite assessment Age 18–90 Written informed consent No excisional biopsy or axillary dissection No confirmed distant metastatic disease No prior therapy for the treatment of breast cancer

Scope

The scope of this registry study is to measure chemosensitivity as defined by pCR (primary endpoint), or endocrine sensitivity as defined by partial response, (a primary endpoint for neo-adjuvant endocrine therapy and a secondary endpoint for neoadjuvant chemotherapy), metastasis-free survival and relapse-free survival (secondary endpoints) in molecular subgroups, determined by the MammaPrint and BluePrint; as well as correlation to Targetprint and Theraprint read outs in addition to investigating novel response profiles.

Statistical methods

The response rate and corresponding confidence intervals will be presented as a proportion of all patients enrolled. The confidence intervals will be calculated using the normal approximation to the binomial distribution. Comparison of response rates between different molecular subgroups will be conducted using Pearson Chi-square test. Correlation of chemosensitivity and endocrine sensitivity (as defined by pCR) to TheraPrint will be determined using Pearson correlation and linear fit models.

Kaplan-Meier curves for RFS and DMFS will be calculated for different molecular subgroups.

Present accrual and target accrual

The target accrual is to enroll approximately 500 patients in 4 years.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-03-02.

Factors influencing accrual to ACOSOG Z0011, a randomized phase III trial of axillary dissection vs. observation for sentinel node positive breast cancer

601

Background: The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group opened a phase III randomized trial to assess the value of axillary node dissection (ALND) after positive sentinel node biopsy (SNB). After 5.5 years, the trial closed due to poor accrual with only 891 patients of the planned 1900 accrued. The purpose of the current analysis is to assess factors impacting accrual to Z0011. Methods: Women having SNB for T1 or T2 breast cancer were eligible for participation in the Z0010 trial to assess the significance of micrometastases identified by immunohistochemistry. If the SN was positive for metastasis by H&E, the patient was eligible for randomization on Z0011 trial. Intraoperative (IOR) and postoperative randomization were allowed. Patients having SNB outside of the Z0010 trial were eligible. Results: 1003 patients from the Z0010 trial were eligible for randomization on Z0011. Of these, only 37% were entered in Z0011. Z0010 participants accounted for 42% of patients in Z0011. 16% of patients not randomized refused ALND. 69% of those not randomized had ALND. 67% of these had no additional positive nodes. Only 14% had ≥ 4 positive nodes. Enrollment of eligible Z0010 patients varied by type of institution: 25% at academic sites, 42% at teaching affiliated and 53% at community (p < 0.0001). By geographic region, sites in the South entered 42% of eligible patients compared with 24–36% in other geographic regions (p=0.0027). Only 32% of patients were consented for IOR based on frozen section of the SN. Sites in the South and West were less likely to use IOR (25% and 28%) compared to Northeast and Midwest (45% and 46%) (p < 0.0001). 110 sites participated in Z0011, yet 48% of patients were enrolled by 10% of sites. Conclusions: Failure of this important trial to accrue as planned is likely related to the clinical bias of physicians and patients to standard ALND. Yet, 2/3 of patients had no additional positive nodes and extensive nodal disease was infrequent. While it was thought that IOR might improve accrual to Z0011, the most successful sites were less likely to use this approach. Community surgeons were most successful in randomizing patients.

[Table: see text]

Descriptions and outcomes of insertion techniques of a breast brachytherapy balloon catheter in 1403 patients enrolled in the American Society of Breast Surgeons MammoSite breast brachytherapy registry trial

BACKGROUND

The use of the MammoSite brachytherapy balloon catheter is 1 option for the delivery of accelerated partial breast irradiation during breast cancer therapy. The device can be inserted into the breast using 3 different techniques. This report describes these methods of insertion and correlates the technique with outcome data collected in a multi-institutional registry trial.

METHODS

In the registry trial, MammoSite catheters were inserted either (1) at the time of lumpectomy into an open cavity, (2) after surgery with ultrasound guidance through a separate small lateral incision into a closed cavity, or (3) after surgery by entering directly through the lumpectomy wound (the scar entry technique). Device placement techniques in 1403 patients with early stage breast cancer treated at 87 institutions by 223 different investigators were documented in the registry. Data collected included number of cases of each technique, age of patient, tumor size, skin spacing, catheter pull rates and reasons, infection, radiation recall, cosmesis, and recurrence.

RESULTS

Catheter placement at the time of lumpectomy was performed in 619 patients (44%), after surgery with ultrasound guidance in 576 patients (41%), and the scar entry technique technique in 197 patients (14%). The type of technique was not associated with age of patient, tumor size, bra size, catheter size, skin spacing, infection, radiation recall, cosmesis, or recurrence. There was a statistically significant increased incidence of premature catheter removals for pathologically related reasons with the open-cavity technique compared with the 2 postoperative methods secondary to final histology reports disqualifying the patient after MammoSite placement.

CONCLUSIONS

These registry data show that the MammoSite catheter can be inserted with any 1 of 3 different techniques. A postoperative placement, after the final pathology report is issued, decreases the incidence of premature removal of the catheter because of disqualifying pathology.

Use of methotrexate in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Methotrexate (MTX) has transformed the outlook for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Most of the evidence from uncontrolled clinical trials suggests that MTX is an effective agent for treating active JIA. Data from controlled clinical trials suggests that MTX has statistically significant effects on patient centred disability measures in JIA patients with active arthritis. Although we would like a much larger study directed evidence base for our use of the drug, the studies that have been done are sound and have been followed by a change in clinical expectations and advice that speak of qualitative evidence from clinical practice, confirming the scientifically acquired data. Randomised controlled multicentre trials using sufficient numbers of patients, including functional assessment and quality of life measures, are needed to confirm the long term efficacy and safety of MTX in JIA.

A prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a new lesion localization device

BACKGROUND

The objective was to compare the safety and effectiveness of a new localization device to traditional flexible wires. Safety variables included blood loss, procedure time, pain and complications. Effectiveness variables included placement accuracy, lesion retrieval, histological diagnosis, procedural enhancements, and margin status.

METHODS

Twelve sites enrolled 120 patients between June 2000 and June 2001, with 58 randomized to treatment and 62 to control.

RESULTS

The two groups were equivalent in device placement accuracy, lesion retrieval, histological diagnosis, blood loss, pain, and complications. There was a significant difference favoring the treatment group for procedural enhancements, (ie, use as a palpable guide and retractor) and operating time. There were significantly fewer positive margins in the treatment group.

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter trial demonstrated equivalent safety and improved effectiveness for the treatment group. The new device demonstrated greater surgeon utility, reduced operative time, and fewer positive margins than the current wires.

Improved lymphatic mapping technique for breast cancer

Breast sentinel lymph node biopsy is becoming more common. However, the best injection technique is not well established. Currently the gold standard is peritumoral injection. However, for upper outer quadrant tumors there is considerable axillary "shine through" which makes the identification of the radioactive sentinel lymph node difficult. We undertook a study to compare an injection in Sappey's subareolar plexus to the gold standard of peritumoral injection. Between December 1997 and March 1998, 85 patients with breast cancer were enrolled in the study. All patients were injected with 2 cc of normal saline containing 1.0 mCi of unfiltered technetium sulfur colloid in Sappey's subareolar plexus in the clock position of the breast cancer. In the operating room the patients underwent a peritumoral injection of 5 cc of 1% isosulfan blue. All blue and radioactive lymph nodes were identified and removed. The majority of the tumors were in the upper outer quadrant and were diagnosed by core biopsy. Only half of the patients had palpable tumors and approximately 25% had previous upper outer quadrant biopsy incisions. Peritumoral blue dye injection yielded an identification rate of 94%, with 99% of these being blue and radioactive. Three patients had radioactive lymph nodes with no blue lymph nodes identified. One of these patients had a micrometastasis. Injection in Sappey's subareolar plexus in the clock position of the tumor drained to the same sentinel lymph node as peritumoral injection. This injection technique solved the two major problems confronting the wide adoption of sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer staging. First, it eliminates axillary "shine through" which will allow nonspecialist surgeons to more easily identify the radioactive axillary sentinel lymph node. Second, it allows for easier isotope injection by the technician or nuclear medicine physician, by eliminating the need for three-dimensional localization. This new technique should allow the majority of breast cancer patients who are treated by nonspecialist surgeons to be offered this less morbid, more accurate procedure.

Gamma probe guided biopsy of the sentinel node in malignant melanoma: a multicentre study

Sentinel lymph node biopsy was attempted in 336 patients with clinically node-negative cutaneous melanoma. All patients were injected with technetium-99m labelled radiocolloid, with 108 patients simultaneously receiving vital blue dye for sentinel node identification. Sentinel lymph nodes were identified in 329 patients, giving a technical success rate of 97.9%. Metastatic disease was identified in 39 (11.9%) of the patients in whom sentinel nodes were found. Patients with negative sentinel nodes were observed and patients with positive sentinel nodes underwent comprehensive lymph node dissection. The presence of metastatic disease in the sentinel nodes and primary tumour depth by Breslow or Clark levels were joint predictors of survival based on Cox proportional hazards modelling. Disease recurrences occurred in 26 (8.8%) patients with negative sentinel lymph nodes, with isolated regional recurrences as the first site in 10 (3.4%). No patients with Clark level II primary tumours were found to have positive sentinel nodes or disease recurrences. One patient with a thin (<0.75 mm) Clark level III primary had metastatic disease in a sentinel node. Patients with metastases confined to the sentinel nodes had similar survival rates regardless of the number of nodes involved.

State-of-the-art lymph node staging for breast cancer in the year 2000

Axillary staging for breast cancer is vitally important for determining appropriate adjuvant hormone and chemotherapy. In the absence of distant metastases, axillary lymph node status remains the most accurate predictor of clinical outcome. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is a minimally invasive approach with enhanced accuracy and less morbidity than conventional axillary dissection. The stage is now set for the sentinel lymphadenectomy staging to move from state-of-the-art care to the standard care in coming years.

Credentialing issues with sentinel lymph node staging for breast cancer

Sentinel lymphadenectomy (SL) is a minimally invasive approach for staging patients with breast cancer. SL, when performed in lieu of axillary dissection, is associated with less morbidity and is potentially more cost effective and more accurate than the historical axillary dissection in the detection of regional nodal metastases. The credentialing and privileging of SL, as with any surgical procedure, is by the policies of the local hospital or institution. The suggested credentialing criteria for local hospitals has been an area of controversy. Herein the authors outline the credentialing controversy and suggest criteria for the implementation of sentinel lymph node staging for breast cancer.

The details of successful sentinel lymph node staging for breast cancer

Sentinel lymphadenectomy is an effective and accurate tool for staging breast cancer. In recent years the details of a successful program have become better defined. The authors outline practical considerations for the performance of successful sentinel lymph node staging from a multidisciplinary perspective.

Cognitive behavior therapy, relaxation training, and tricyclic antidepressant medication in the treatment of depression

Outcomes of seven treatment trials comparing cognitive behavioral therapy to treatment with tricyclic antidepressant medication in major depressive disorder have been quite similar to one another. This led us to question whether treatment outcome in time-limited studies reflected a unique effect of cognitive behavioral therapy. To test the uniqueness hypothesis, relaxation training, a nonpharmacologic, noncognitive treatment, was chosen as a comparison for cognitive behavioral therapy as well as drug therapy. Treatment duration was 16 weeks. The sample of 37 patients treated for major depressive disorder was less depressed than those previously studied. For both cognitive behavioral therapy and relaxation training, outcome of depression was superior to that of tricyclic antidepressant medication by endpoint analysis. The posttreatment scores on the Beck Depression Inventory of 82% of the group receiving cognitive behavioral therapy improved to a Beck Depression Inventory score < or = 9 which was not significantly greater than that for the group receiving relaxation training (73%), so a unique effect was not demonstrated for cognitive behavioral therapy. The outcome for tricyclic antidepressant medication (29% improved to criteria) was significantly worse than that for cognitive behavioral therapy. The patient's pretreatment initial expectancy was not predictive.

The immunogenic properties of drug-resistant murine tumor cells do not correlate with expression of the MDR phenotype

Alterations in the immunogenic properties of tumor cells frequently accompany selection for multiple-drug-resistant (MDR) variants. Therefore, studies were performed to examine the hypothesis that overexpression of membrane P-glycoprotein, commonly observed in MDR tumor cells, is associated with enhanced immunogenic properties. Immunogenicity was determined by (a) the ability of drug-sensitive parental UV2237M fibrosarcoma cells and drug-resistant UV2237M variant cells to immunize normal mice against rechallenge with parental tumor cells and (b) the ability of normal syngeneic mice to reject cell inocula that caused progressive tumor growth in immunocompromised mice. Variant UV2237M cell lines included subpopulations selected for a six- to ten-fold increase in mRNA for P-glycoprotein and expression of the MDR phenotype (resistance to doxorubicin) and cells sensitive to doxorubicin (and no expression of MDR properties) but resistant to ouabain. All UV2237M drug-resistant cells were highly immunogenic in immunocompetent mice, regardless of their MDR phenotype. Additional studies showed that CT-26 murine adenocarcinoma cells, sensitive or resistant to doxorubicin (expressing high levels of P-glycoprotein), injected into normal syngeneic Balb/c mice produced rapidly growing tumors. The data do not demonstrate a correlation between the immunogenic properties of drug-resistant tumor cells and the expression of P-glycoprotein.

Prescribing therapy for depression: the role of learned resourcefulness, a failure to replicate

Work in 1985 by Simons, Lustman, Wetzel, and Murphy showed that a patient's score on Rosenbaum's self-control scale predicted differential response to treatments for depression, with a high score predicting a good outcome with talking therapy and a low score a good outcome with drug therapy. This study of 37 patients did not replicate those findings. Using the same paradigm, we predicted response correctly 7 times and incorrectly 16 times, a clear failure. A valid method for choosing the best treatment for a patient with major depression remains to be found.

The effects of acute and chronic lithium treatment on pilocarpine-stimulated phosphoinositide hydrolysis in mouse brain in vivo

1. Measurements were made of the in vivo formation of inositol phosphates in the brains of C57/B1/601a mice treated acutely or chronically with lithium chloride (LiCl). 2. A single injection of LiCl (10 mEquiv kg-1, s.c.) 18 h before death increased the accumulation of [3H]-inositol phosphates ([3H]-Ins P's) in the brains of mice injected i.c.v. with [3H]-myo-inositol 24 h previously. 3. Pilocarpine (200 mg kg-1, i.p.) injected 15 min before death further enhanced the formation of [3H]-Ins P's in the brains of LiCl-treated, but not saline-treated, mice. The enhancement due to pilocarpine was abolished by injection of atropine sulphate (10 mg kg-1, i.p.) 10 min earlier. 4. Chronic (14 days) LiCl feeding produced an accumulation of [3H]-Ins P's significantly less than that due to a single injection of LiCl, but the response to pilocarpine was markedly greater in mice chronically fed with LiCl when compared with mice acutely injected with LiCl. 5. Mass measurements of endogenous inositol 1,4,5 triphosphate revealed increases due to pilocarpine and chronic LiCl feeding alone. A combination of the two treatments produced levels greater than either alone. 6. These results demonstrate that LiCl treatment enhances both basal and pilocarpine-stimulated inositol phospholipid hydrolysis in vivo and this might be relevant to its therapeutic effects.

Lithium amplifies inhibitions of inositol phospholipid hydrolysis in mammalian brain slices

1. We have examined the effects of lithium chloride (LiCl) on inhibitions of inositol phospholipid hydrolysis in guinea-pig and rat brain slices by assessing the accumulation of [3H]-inositol phosphates ([3H]-InsP), in vitro. 2. In guinea-pig and rat cerebral cortex slices the accumulation of total [3H]-inositol phosphates due to the cholinoceptor agonist carbachol was inhibited by the excitatory amino acid L-glutamate, but only when LiCl was present. 3. The effects of LiCl were time and concentration-dependent. Significant inhibitions of the carbachol response by glutamate (in the presence of LiCl) being evident only after 20-30 min of stimulation at LiCl concentrations above 1.2 mM. 4. N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), in the absence of LiCl, enhanced the response to carbachol at low concentrations of the amino acid and inhibited the response at higher concentrations. In the presence of 5 mM LiCl, only the inhibitory phase was observed. 5. In rat cerebral cortex slices, aluminium fluoride inhibited [3H]-InsP accumulation in the presence of carbachol, noradrenaline and a depolarising concentration of KCl and these inhibitions were more marked when LiCl was present. The response to histamine was unaffected. 6. The data presented provide evidence that LiCl amplifies inhibitions of inositol phospholipid hydrolysis due to receptor and non-receptor mediated stimuli, although the mechanism underlying the effect is, as yet, obscure.

Effects of lithium on inositol phospholipid hydrolysis and inhibition of dopamine D1 receptor-mediated cyclic AMP formation by carbachol in rat brain slices

The in vitro and ex vivo effects of lithium on muscarinic cholinergic inositol phospholipid hydrolysis and muscarinic cholinergic inhibition of dopamine D1-receptor-stimulated cyclic AMP formation were examined in rat brain slices. Following chronic lithium feeding, carbachol-stimulated inositol phosphate accumulation was reduced ex vivo in slices of cerebral cortex but not in striatal slices. Lithium (1 mM) in vitro had no direct effect on dopamine D1-receptor-stimulated cyclic AMP formation, but enhanced the inhibitory effect of carbachol on the D1 response, in striatal slices, and this was not significantly altered by prior lithium feeding. Lithium therefore has effects on two discrete muscarinic responses in rat brain which are apparently maintained after chronic exposure to the ion and might be relevant to its antimanic actions.

Lithium selectively inhibits muscarinic receptor-stimulated inositol tetrakisphosphate accumulation in mouse cerebral cortex slices

The in vitro effects of Li on agonist- and depolarization-stimulated accumulation of inositol phosphates were determined in mouse cerebral cortex slices. Of the agents examined, only the cholinergic agonist carbachol produced a significant accumulation of inositol tetrakisphosphate (InsP4) in the absence of Li. Lithium at 5 mM enhanced the accumulation of inositol monophosphate (InsP1) and inositol bisphosphate (InsP2) due to all the stimuli used and potentiated inositol trisphosphate (InsP3) accumulation due to histamine and noradrenaline, although at lower Li concentrations, carbachol-stimulated InsP3 accumulation was reduced. Li also enhanced InsP4 accumulation in the presence of noradrenaline, histamine, and elevated KCl level but, in marked contrast, reduced carbachol-stimulated InsP4 accumulation with an IC50 of 100 microM. There was a significant time delay between the initiation of carbachol stimulation and the beginning of the InsP4 inhibition due to Li. The phorbol ester 4 beta-phorbol 12 beta-myristate 13 alpha-acetate did not mimic the effects of Li. The results suggest that muscarinic receptor-mediated InsP4 production might be one of the targets for the therapeutic action of Li.