A Data Visualization and Dissemination Resource to Support HIV Prevention and Care at the Local Level: Analysis and Uses of the AIDSVu Public Data Resource

BACKGROUND

AIDSVu is a public resource for visualizing HIV surveillance data and other population-based information relevant to HIV prevention, care, policy, and impact assessment.

OBJECTIVE

The site, AIDSVu.org, aims to make data about the US HIV epidemic widely available, easily accessible, and locally relevant to inform public health decision making.

METHODS

AIDSVu develops visualizations, maps, and downloadable datasets using results from HIV surveillance systems, other population-based sources of information (eg, US Census and national probability surveys), and other data developed specifically for display and dissemination through the website (eg, pre-exposure prophylaxis [PrEP] prescriptions). Other types of content are developed to translate surveillance data into summarized content for diverse audiences using infographic panels, interactive maps, local and state fact sheets, and narrative blog posts.

RESULTS

Over 10 years, AIDSVu.org has used an expanded number of data sources and has progressively provided HIV surveillance and related data at finer geographic levels, with current data resources providing HIV prevalence data down to the census tract level in many of the largest US cities. Data are available at the county level in 48 US states and at the ZIP Code level in more than 50 US cities. In 2019, over 500,000 unique users consumed AIDSVu data and resources, and HIV-related data and insights were disseminated through nearly 4,000,000 social media posts. Since AIDSVu's inception, at least 249 peer-reviewed publications have used AIDSVu data for analyses or referenced AIDSVu resources. Data uses have included targeting of HIV testing programs, identifying areas with inequitable PrEP uptake, including maps and data in academic and community grant applications, and strategically selecting locations for new HIV treatment and care facilities to serve high-need areas.

CONCLUSIONS

Surveillance data should be actively used to guide and evaluate public health programs; AIDSVu translates high-quality, population-based data about the US HIV epidemic and makes that information available in formats that are not consistently available in surveillance reports. Bringing public health surveillance data to an online resource is a democratization of data, and presenting information about the HIV epidemic in more visual formats allows diverse stakeholders to engage with, understand, and use these important public health data to inform public health decision making.

Small-area spatial-temporal changes in pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use in the general population and among men who have sex with men in the United States between 2012 and 2018

PURPOSE

Oral emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate was approved for use as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2012. We used national pharmacy data to examine trends of PrEP use in U.S. counties from 2012 to 2018.

METHODS

Using multi-level small-area spatio-temporal modeling, we calculated the estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) in prevalence of PrEP use in the general population from 2012 to 2018. We also used a proxy measure for prevalence of PrEP use among men who have sex with men (MSM) to evaluate trends of use among MSM, the PrEP use-to-MSM ratio (PmR) or number of male PrEP users per 1000 MSM population.

RESULTS

The prevalence of PrEP use and PmR increased (EAPC range: (+26.9%, +71.0%) and (+28.4%, +158.7%), respectively) in all counties with varying magnitude of increase. Counties of the Midwest and the upper South and upper West had the slowest increase in prevalence of PrEP use (EAPC range: (+26.9%; +52.9%)). Counties of the northern part of the South had the lowest PmR (EAPC range: (+28.4%; +76.0%)). Counties of the most populous core-based statistical areas had a relatively faster increase in population prevalence of PrEP use but slower increase in PmR.

CONCLUSIONS

All counties in the U.S. have witnessed an increase in PrEP use with important geographic variabilities. Identifying areas with slow improvement in PrEP use, as well as "model counties" with the fastest pace of progress in PrEP coverage, is critical to inform local and state-level policies and program evaluation for PrEP scale up, particularly among MSM at higher risk for HIV.

Policy- and county-level associations with HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis use, the United States, 2018

PURPOSE

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly efficacious, and yet most individuals indicated for it are not currently using it. To provide guidance for health policymakers, researchers, and community advocates, we developed county-level PrEP use estimates and assessed locality and policy associations.

METHODS

Using data from a national aggregator, we applied a validated crosswalk procedure to generate county-level estimates of PrEP users in 2018. A multilevel Poisson regression explored associations between PrEP use and (1) state policy variables of Medicaid expansion and state Drug Assistance Programs (PrEP-DAPs) and (2) county-level characteristics from the U.S. Census Bureau. Outcomes were PrEP per population (prevalence) and PrEP-to-need ratio (PnR), defined as the ratio of PrEP users per new HIV diagnosis. Higher levels of PrEP prevalence or PnR indicate more PrEP users relative to the total population or estimated need, respectively.

RESULTS

Our 2018 county-level data set included a total of 188,546 PrEP users in the United States. Nationally, PrEP prevalence was 70.3/100,000 population and PnR was 4.9. In an adjusted model, counties with a 5% higher proportion of black residents had 5% lower PnR (rate ratio (RR): 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.93, 0.96). Similarly, counties with higher concentration of residents uninsured or living in poverty had lower PnR. Relative to states without Medicaid expansion or PrEP-DAPs, states with only one of those programs had 25% higher PrEP prevalence (RR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.45), and states with both programs had 99% higher PrEP prevalence (RR: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.60, 2.48). There was a significant linear trend across the three policy groups, and similar findings for the relation between PnR and the policy groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In a data set comprising approximately 80% of PrEP users in the United States, we found that Medicaid expansion and PrEP-DAPs were associated with higher PrEP use in states that adopted those policies, after controlling for potential confounders. Future research should identify which components of PrEP support programs have the most success and how to best promote PrEP among groups most impacted by the epidemic. States should support the admirable health decisions of their residents to get on PrEP by implementing policies that facilitate access.

Methods for county-level estimation of pre-exposure prophylaxis coverage and application to the U.S. Ending the HIV Epidemic jurisdictions

PURPOSE

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a pillar of the US Department of Health and Human Services "Ending the HIV Epidemic" (EHE) initiative in 50 EHE jurisdictions (48 U.S. counties and two U.S. cities) and seven U.S. states with high numbers of HIV diagnoses rates in rural areas. Current data systems do not provide data on PrEP uptake in counties or cities.

METHODS

We report on PrEP users at the county level. Data from a large, commercial pharmacy database were used; we applied the U.S. Census Bureau's method to allocate PrEP users within a ZIP3 into counties and validated the results. We report counts and rates of PrEP users in 2018 for all EHE jurisdictions. We used joinpoint regression to model the estimated annual percent change in PrEP use for each jurisdiction and state.

RESULTS

93,156 people in the 50 EHE jurisdictions used PrEP in 2018; 94% were men and 39% were aged 25-34 years. There was more than an 80-fold difference in the range of rates of PrEP use per 100,000 population among the EHE jurisdictions (range: 8-644 per 100,000 population; median 93 per 100,000 population). PrEP use increased from 2012 to 2018 in all EHE counties and states. At current rates of growth of PrEP use, 94% of EHE counties and jurisdictions will reach their National HIV/AIDS Strategy goals of a 500% increase in PrEP use in 2020. EHE states had less variation in rates of PrEP use (range: 29-51/100,000 population; median 32/100,000 population).

CONCLUSIONS

At the outset of a major U.S. government program to reduce HIV infections, rates of PrEP use are highly variable among the 50 EHE jurisdictions. Data from commercial prescription databases will be a useful public resource to understand progress in promoting use of PrEP as part of the EHE initiative and evaluating progress in PrEP use across health jurisdictions.