Significance of HIV status in cervical cancer patients receiving curative chemoradiation therapy, definitive radiation alone, or palliative radiation in Botswana

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer associated with human papillomavirus has the highest cancer incidence and mortality for women in Botswana because of a high HIV prevalence and limited screening. This study investigates the significance of HIV on the overall survival (OS) of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by various treatment categories (curative chemoradiation, definitive radiation [RT] alone, or palliative RT alone).

METHODS

This study included patients diagnosed with cervical cancer between 2013 and 2020, prospectively enrolled in the Botswana Prospective Cancer Cohort. OS based on HIV status and completion of planned treatment regimen was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparisons of 2-year OS by HIV status was performed by the log-rank test, univariate and multivariable Cox analyses adjusting for cancer stage, RT dose, number of chemotherapy cycles, and baseline hemoglobin levels.

RESULTS

Of 1131 patients diagnosed with stage IB-IVB cervical cancer, 69.8% were women living with HIV (n = 789). For patients receiving curative chemoradiation, HIV status was not significantly associated with OS in unadjusted (p = .987) and adjusted (p = .578) analyses. For RT only treatment and definitive (high-dose) RT alone, HIV status was significantly associated with OS in unadjusted analysis (HR = 1.77, p = .002; HR = 1.95, p = .014), but not in adjusted analysis (p = .227, p = .73). For patients receiving palliative (low-dose) RT, HIV status was not associated with OS in unadjusted (p = .835) or adjusted analysis (p = .359).

CONCLUSIONS

In Botswana, a resource-limited setting, HIV status had no significant effect on 2-year OS in patients with cervical cancer with well-managed HIV receiving chemoradiation, RT alone, or palliative RT. This demonstrates that patients living with HIV receiving antiretroviral treatment can receive clinically appropriate treatment with no evidence that HIV may lead to poorer outcomes.

Delays in Cervical Cancer Treatment Initiation for Patients Living With or Without HIV in Botswana: An Observational Cohort Analysis (2015-2019)

PURPOSE

To assess delays in treatment initiation of chemoradiation or radiation alone for patients with advanced stage cervical cancer in Botswana.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Females with locally advanced cervical cancer (stages IB2-IVB) were prospectively enrolled in an observational cohort study from 2015 to 2019. We evaluated delays at 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 or greater days between the date of diagnosis and treatment initiation. Factors associated with overall survival were modeled with multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression (aHR). Associations between delays in cervical cancer treatment initiation were evaluated via univariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among the 556 patients included (median age = 47.9 years), 386 (69.4%) were females living with HIV with a median CD4 count of 448.0 cells/μL (IQR, 283.0-647.5 cells/μL) at diagnosis. Most patients had stages 2 (38.1%) or 3 (34.5%) cervical cancer. Early-stage patients experienced longer delays in treatment initiation compared to late-stage patients (P = .033). Early-stage patients with delays ≥90 days and pathology diagnosis between 2016 and 2019 (aHR, 0.34; P < .001) versus <90 days had a decreased risk of mortality, and those with delays ≥90 days and pathology diagnosis before 2016 (aHR, 5.67; P = .022) versus <90 days had an increased risk of mortality. Late-stage patients with delays ≥120 days and pathology diagnosis between 2018 and 2019 (aHR, 1.98; P = .025) versus <120 days had an increased risk of mortality. Early-stage patients with pathology diagnosis between 2016 and 2019 (odds ratio, 2.32; P = .043) versus before 2016 were more likely to experience delays ≥90 days, and late-stage patients who traveled >100 km to the treatment facility (odds ratio, 2.83; P < .001) versus <100 km were more likely to experience delays ≥120 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Delays in care are common in Botswana, particularly for those living farther from the treatment clinic and at advanced stages. This paper is among the first to show an association between treatment delays and worsened overall survival at advanced stages of cervical cancer, highlighting the need for interventions to help patients receive timely care in global settings.

Paclitaxel plus Eftilagimod Alpha, a Soluble LAG-3 Protein, in Metastatic, HR+ Breast Cancer: Results from AIPAC, a Randomized, Placebo Controlled Phase IIb Trial

PURPOSE

Eftilagimod alpha (efti), a soluble lymphocyte activation gene (LAG-3) protein and MHC class II agonist, enhances innate and adaptive immunity. Active Immunotherapy PAClitaxel (AIPAC) evaluated safety and efficacy of efti plus paclitaxel in patients with predominantly endocrine-resistant, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (ET-resistant HR+ HER2- MBC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women with HR+ HER2- MBC were randomized 1:1 to weekly intravenous paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) and subcutaneous efti (30 mg) or placebo every 2 weeks for six 4-week cycles, then monthly subcutaneous efti (30 mg) or placebo maintenance. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), safety/tolerability, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, and quality of life. Exploratory endpoints included cellular biomarkers.

RESULTS

114 patients received efti and 112 patients received placebo. Median age was 60 years (91.6% visceral disease, 84.1% ET-resistant, 44.2% with previous CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment). Median PFS at 7.3 months was similar for efti and placebo. Median OS was not significantly improved for efti (20.4 vs. 17.5 months; HR, 0.88; P = 0.197) but became significant for predefined exploratory subgroups. EORTC QLQC30-B23 global health status was sustained for efti but deteriorated for placebo. Efti increased absolute lymphocyte, monocyte and secondary target cell (CD4, CD8) counts, plasma IFNγ and CXCL10 levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the primary endpoint, PFS, was not met, AIPAC confirmed expected pharmacodynamic effects and demonstrated excellent safety profile for efti. OS was not significantly improved globally (2.9-month difference), but was significantly improved in exploratory biomarker subgroups, warranting further studies to clarify efti's role in patients with ET-resistant HER2- MBC.

Surgery of the primary tumor in patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer: a nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study in Belgium

PURPOSE

We aimed to assess the impact of surgery of primary tumor in overall survival (OS) of women with de novo metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

Nationwide, population-based retrospective cohort study of women diagnosed with de novo metastatic breast cancer in Belgium, between Jan/2010-Dec/2014. Data was obtained from the Belgian Cancer Registry and administrative databases. "Surgery" group was defined by surgery of primary tumor up to nine months after diagnosis. We excluded women who did not receive systemic treatment or did not complete nine months follow-up after diagnosis. All the subsequent analyses reporting on overall survival and the stratified outcome analyses were performed based on this nine-month landmark cohort. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared using adjusted Cox proportional hazards models controlling for confounders with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We performed a stratified analysis according to surgery timing and a propensity score matching analysis.

RESULTS

1985 patients, 534 (26.9%) in the "Surgery" and 1451 (73.1%) in the "No Surgery" group. Patients undergoing surgery were younger (p < 0.001), had better performance status (PS) (p < 0.001), and higher proportion of HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer (p = 0.012). Median follow-up was 86.0 months (82.6-88.5). Median OS was 60.1 months (57.1-68.2) in the "Surgery" vs. 41.9 months (39.8-44.2) in the "No Surgery" group (adjusted HR 0.56; 0.49-0.64). OS was similar when surgery was performed upfront or after systemic treatment. Propensity score matching analysis confirmed the same findings.

CONCLUSION

Among patients receiving systemic treatment for de novo metastatic breast cancer and surviving nine months or more, those who received surgery of the primary tumor within nine months of diagnosis have longer subsequent survival than those who did not.

Breast cancer patient experiences in the Botswana health system: Is it time for patient navigators?

BACKGROUND

New models of care are required to support women with breast cancer due to rising incidence and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This study gives voice to the experiences of advanced-stage breast cancer patients in the Botswana healthcare system, to guide improved service provision and the potential utility of patient navigator (PN) programs.

METHODS

focus group discussions (FGD) were conducted with advanced-stage breast cancer patients recruited from the oncology ward of the public Princess Marina Hospital located in Gaborone, Botswana.

RESULTS

FGDs included 7 female breast cancer patients and their 7 caregivers (2 male and 5 females). Findings fell into the following themes: experiences with cancer diagnosis, experiences with treatment, roles of caregivers, information needs, views on cancer resources, and attitudes towards cancer research. The study identified several barriers across the cascade of care for breast cancer patients in the Botswana health system. These correspond to challenges with timely diagnosis and comprehensive management and highlight community level barriers to achieving the targets of the WHO Global Breast Cancer initiative (GBCI).

CONCLUSION

The study findings suggest PN programs have the potential to bridge barriers identified in the Botswana healthcare system by improving communication, meeting information needs, providing emotional or practical support, and by addressing logistical barriers to cancer diagnosis and treatment in Botswana.

Molecular Results and Potential Biomarkers Identified from the Phase 3 MILO/ENGOT-ov11 Study of Binimetinib versus Physician Choice of Chemotherapy in Recurrent Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer

PURPOSE

We present the results of a post hoc tumor tissue analysis from the phase 3 MILO/ENGOT-ov11 study (NCT01849874).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Mutation/copy-number analysis was performed on tissue obtained pre-randomization. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS). Unbiased univariate analysis, Cox regression, and binary logistic regression were used to test associations between mutation status and outcomes, including PFS and binary response by local RECIST 1.1.

RESULTS

MILO/ENGOT-ov11 enrolled 341 patients, ranging in age from 22 to 79, from June, 2013 to April, 2016. Patients were randomized 2:1 to binimetinib or physician's choice of chemotherapy (PCC). The most commonly altered gene was KRAS (33%). In 135 patients treated with binimetinib with response rate (RR) data, other detected MAPK pathway alterations included: NRAS (n = 11, 8.1%), BRAF V600E (n = 8, 5.9%), RAF1 (n = 2, 1.5%), and NF1 (n = 7, 5.2%). In those with and without MAPK pathway alterations, the RRs with binimetinib were 41% and 13%, respectively. PFS was significantly longer in patients with, compared with those without, MAPK pathway alterations treated with binimetinib [HR, 0.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-0.79]. There was a nonsignificant trend toward PFS improvement in PCC-treated patients with MAPK pathway alterations compared with those without (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.43-1.59).

CONCLUSIONS

Although this hypothesis-generating analysis is limited by multiple testing, higher RRs and longer PFS were seen in patients with low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) treated with binimetinib, and to a lesser extent in those treated with PCC, who harbored MAPK pathway alterations. Somatic tumor testing should be routinely considered in patients with LGSOC and used as a future stratification factor.

Trends in the Use of Hypofractionation in Treatment of Breast Cancer in Botswana

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Clinical trials have shown that moderate hypofractionation (HF) is clinically effective as adjuvant treatment to breast conserving surgery or following mastectomy with advanced disease. ASTRO issued updated guidelines in 2018, expanding the population eligible to receive HF to all patients, regardless of age and tumor stage. Use of HF can promote efficient resource utilization for over-burdened health care systems; however, global adoption of HF has been previously only reported via ESTRO survey of individual physicians. These data note that HF following lumpectomy is 40% in Africa vs. >90% in North America, with limited data on the uptake of HF within individual African countries. In this study, we characterize temporal trends and clinical, socio-demographic factors associated with the use of HF in breast cancer in Botswana.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of breast cancer patients receiving curative intent radiation between 2015 and 2022 at the only radiation clinic in Botswana. We compared patients' characteristics between those who received HF vs. standard fractionation (SF) and report chi-square statistics when appropriate. We fit a multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression model with a random intercept for district while adjusting for fixed effects such as HIV infection status, laterality, hormone receptor status, and marital status.

RESULTS

A total of 234 patients were prescribed curative intent radiation between 2015 and 2022 in Gaborone, Botswana. Median age at diagnosis was 51 years old, and the majority of patients presented with stage III disease (61.9%, 109/234). 26.9% of this population were women living with HIV (WLWH), and 71% lived >100km from the hospital. HF was utilized overall in 59.4% (139/234) of patients. Most common fractionation patterns included: 4005cGy/15fx and 4267cG/16fx. One patient received ultra-HF (2600cGy/5fx). In unadjusted chi-square analysis, a higher proportion of HF was seen in right vs left-sided breast cancer (65.8% vs. 50.9%, p = 0.02), increasing year of diagnosis from 2015 - 2022 (p<0.001), and among patients >/ = 40 years of age vs. those <40 years of age (62.8% vs 42.1%, p = 0.017). Temporal trends show a significant increase in the utilization of HF starting from 23.8% (5/21) in 2015, to 61.5% (32/52) in 2018, and finally 100% (11/11) of cases in 2022. Our regression analysis shows that there is no statistically significant between-district variance or patient-level factors that associate with the uptake of HF. The overall utilization rate for HF between 2015-2022 was 59.4% (95% CI: 53.0%-65.5%).

CONCLUSION

Based on recent survey results the uptake of HF among African countries is lower than that of North America. To our knowledge, this is the first quantitative analysis of the utilization of HF over 5 years in an African country. Further analysis on factors related to physician prescription of hypofractionation is warranted, including influence of breast laterality, age, and primary surgery type.

Patterns of care and outcomes for endometrial and ovarian cancers in botswana 2015-2021

Purpose

Endometrial and ovarian cancers are leading causes of cancer death among women. However, there is little data on these patients from low- and middle-income countries including Botswana, a country in sub-Saharan Africa. This study reports data on demographics, treatment, and outcomes for patients with endometrial and ovarian cancer in Botswana.

Methods

This prospective cohort study included all prospectively enrolled patients with endometrial or ovarian cancer who presented to Princess Marina or Gaborone Private Hospital between May 2015 and May 2021. Demographic, treatment, and survival data were analyzed.

Results

99 patients with endometrial and 38 patients with ovarian cancer were included. Median age at diagnosis was 64 for patients with endometrial cancer and 57 for patients with ovarian cancer. Just over half of patients with endometrial cancer (52.6%) presented with FIGO stages I and II, whereas most patients with ovarian cancer (65.8%) presented with stages III and IV. 24.2% of patients with endometrial cancer received chemotherapy, 32.3% received radiotherapy, 74.7% received surgical treatment, and 16.2% received no treatment; of patients with ovarian cancer, 42.1% received chemotherapy, 2.6% received radiotherapy, 52.6% received surgical treatment, and 31.6% of patients received no treatment. 1-and 2-year overall survival probabilities were 76.9% and 59.7% for patients with endometrial cancer and 62.8% and 43.7% for patients with ovarian cancer, respectively.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that a large proportion of patients with ovarian and endometrial cancer in Botswana are diagnosed at an advanced stage, and many do not receive standard-of-care treatment. Further inquiry is required to characterize challenges to diagnosis and treatment of ovarian and endometrial cancers in Botswana.

Cytoreductive surgery with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer (OVHIPEC-1): final survival analysis of a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

The OVHIPEC-1 trial previously showed that the addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to interval cytoreductive surgery resulted in improved progression-free and overall survival compared with cytoreductive surgery alone at 4·7 years of follow-up in patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer who were ineligible for primary cytoreduction. We report the final survival outcomes after 10 years of follow-up.

METHODS

In this open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial, patients with primary epithelial stage III ovarian cancer were recruited at eight HIPEC centres in the Netherlands and Belgium. Patients were eligible if they were aged 18-76 years, had not progressed during at least three cycles of neoadjuvant carboplatin plus paclitaxel, had a WHO performance status score of 0-2, normal blood counts, and adequate renal function. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to undergo interval cytoreductive surgery without HIPEC (surgery group) or with HIPEC (100 mg/m2 cisplatin; surgery-plus-HIPEC group). Randomisation was done centrally by minimisation with a masked web-based allocation procedure at the time of surgery when residual disease smaller than 10 mm diameter was anticipated, and was stratified by institution, previous suboptimal cytoreductive surgery, and number of abdominal regions involved. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival and a secondary endpoint was overall survival, analysed in the intention-to-treat population (ie, all randomly assigned patients). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00426257, and is closed.

FINDINGS

Between April 1, 2007, and April 30, 2016, 245 patients were enrolled and followed up for a median of 10·1 years (95% CI 8·4-12·9) in the surgery group (n=123) and 10·4 years (95% CI 9·5-13·3) in the surgery-plus-HIPEC group (n=122). Recurrence, progression, or death occurred in 114 (93%) patients in the surgery group (median progression-free survival 10·7 months [95% CI 9·6-12·0]) and 109 (89%) patients in the surgery-plus-HIPEC group (14·3 months [12·0-18·5]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·63 [95% CI 0·48-0·83], stratified log-rank p=0·0008). Death occurred in 108 (88%) patients in the surgery group (median overall survival 33·3 months [95% CI 29·0-39·1]) and 100 (82%) patients in the surgery-plus-HIPEC group (44·9 months [95% CI 38·6-55·1]; HR 0·70 [95% CI 0·53-0·92], stratified log-rank p=0·011).

INTERPRETATION

These updated survival results confirm the long-term survival benefit of HIPEC in patients with primary stage III epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing interval cytoreductive surgery.

FUNDING

Dutch Cancer Foundation (KWF Kankerbestrijding).

A Multi-Institutional Study of Barriers to Cervical Cancer Care in Sub-Saharan Africa

Purpose

The global rise in cancer incidence has been accompanied by disproportionately high morbidity and mortality rates in low- and middle-income countries. Many patients who are offered potentially curative treatment for cervical cancer in low- and middle-income countries never return to start treatment for reasons that are poorly documented and little understood. We investigated the interplay of sociodemographic, financial, and geographic factors as barriers to care among such patients in Botswana and Zimbabwe.

Methods and Materials

Patients seen in consultation between 2019 and 2021 who were >3 months late for an appointment to initiate definitive treatment were contacted via telephone and invited to complete a survey. Afterward, an intervention connected patients with resources and counseling to return for treatment. Follow-up data were collected 3 months later to ascertain the outcomes of the intervention. Fisher exact tests analyzed the relationship between the putative number and types of barriers and demographics.

Results

We recruited 40 women who initially presented for oncology care but did not return for treatment at [Princess Marina Hospital] in Botswana (n = 20) and [Parirenyatwa General Hospital] in Zimbabwe (n = 20) to complete the survey. Overall, married women experienced more barriers than unmarried women (P < .001), and unemployed women were 10 times more likely to report a financial barrier than employed women (P = .02). In Zimbabwe, financial barriers and belief-associated barriers (eg, fear of treatment) were reported. In Botswana, many patients noted scheduling obstacles associated with administrative delays and COVID-19. At follow-up, 16 Botswana patients and 4 Zimbabwe patients had returned for treatment.

Conclusions

Financial and belief barriers identified in Zimbabwe showcase the importance of targeting cost and health literacy to reduce apprehensions. In Botswana, administrative challenges could be addressed with patient navigation. Improving our understanding of the specific barriers to cancer care could enable us to help patients who might otherwise default.

Benchmarking of the Cervical Cancer Care Cascade and Survival Outcomes After Radiation Treatment in a Low- and Middle-Income Country Setting

PURPOSE

Timely radiation treatment (RT) is critical in cervical cancer treatment, but patients in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in sub-Saharan Africa often face barriers that delay care. Time to care was benchmarked in a multidisciplinary team (MDT) setting in Botswana.

METHODS

Time intervals between steps in care were recorded for 230 patients reviewed at MDT between January 2016 and July 2018. Associations between RT delay and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

For patients who received RT (n = 187; 81.3%), the median biopsy to pathology reporting interval was 25 (IQR, 19-36) days and was 57 (IQR, 28-68) days for patients who did not (P = .003). Intervals in care did not differ between patients who did and did not receive RT. Among treated patients, the uppermost quartile interval from pathology reporting to RT initiation was ≥111 days and that from RT simulation to initiation was ≥12 days. Among patients receiving a RT dose of ≥65 Gy (n = 100), the delay from RT simulation to initiation of >12 days was associated with worse median OS (2.0 v 4.6 years; P = .048); this association trended toward, although did not meet, statistical significance on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 2.35; 95% CI, 0.95 to 5.85; P = .07).

CONCLUSION

The MDT-coordinated care model allows for systematic benchmarking of the patient treatment cascade. Barriers to timely treatment exist for this cohort in Botswana, and RT delay may be associated with OS of patients receiving curative treatment. Interventions to accelerate the timing of the radiation oncology care cascade may improve clinical outcomes in this LMIC setting.

Advancing oncology drug therapies for sub-Saharan Africa

Cancer incidence is rising across sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), and is often characterized by late-stage presentation, early age of onset and poor survival. While a number of oncology drugs are now improving the length and quality of life for cancer patients in high-income countries, significant disparities in access to a range of oncology therapeutics exist for SSA. A number of challenges to drug access such as drug costs, lack of infrastructure and trained personnel must be urgently addressed to advance oncology therapies for SSA. We present a review of selected oncology drug therapies that are likely to benefit cancer patients with a focus on common malignancies in SSA. We collate available data from seminal clinical trials in high-income countries to highlight the potential for these therapeutics to improve cancer outcomes. In addition, we discuss the need to ensure access to drugs within the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines and highlight therapeutics that require consideration. Available and active oncology clinical trials in the region is tabulated, demonstrating the significant gaps in access to oncology drug trials across much of the region. We issue an urgent call to action to address drug access due to the predicted rise in cancer burden in the region in coming years.

Analysis of Cancer Research Projects in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Quantitative Perspective on Unmet Needs and Opportunities

PURPOSE

To evaluate the scope and types of cancer research projects in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) to identify research gaps and inform future efforts.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study summarized information on cancer research projects in SSA from the International Cancer Research Partnership (ICRP) between 2015 and 2020, alongside 2020 cancer incidence and mortality data from the Global Cancer Observatory. SSA cancer research projects were identified as led by investigators in SSA countries, or by investigators in non-SSA countries with collaborators in SSA, or in database keyword searches. Projects from the Coalition for Implementation Research in Global Oncology (CIRGO) were also summarized.

RESULTS

A total of 1,846 projects were identified from the ICRP database, funded by 34 organizations in seven countries (only one, Cancer Association of South Africa, based in SSA); only 156 (8%) were led by SSA-based investigators. Most projects focused on virally induced cancers (57%). Across all cancer types, projects were most frequently related to cervical cancer (24%), Kaposi sarcoma (15%), breast cancer (10%), or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (10%). Gaps were observed for several cancers with higher incidence/mortality burden in SSA; for example, prostate cancer accounted for only 4% of projects but 8% of cancer-related deaths and 10% of new cases. Approximately 26% were dedicated to etiology. Treatment-related research declined over the study period (14%-7% of all projects), while projects related to prevention (15%-20%) and diagnosis/prognosis (15%-29%) increased. Fifteen CIRGO projects were identified; seven were relevant across multiple cancer types, and 12 focused either wholly or partially on cancer control (representing 50% of the total research effort).

CONCLUSION

This analysis shows notable discrepancies between cancer burden and research projects and identifies opportunities for future strategic investments in cancer care in SSA.

Bibliometric analysis of cancer research outputs in Botswana between 2009 and 2021

INTRODUCTION

Cancer research is critical for cancer control policies; however, the state of cancer research activities in Botswana is largely unknown. The goal of this review was to describe trends and patterns of cancer research outputs in Botswana.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, African Journals Online, and African Index Medicus databases were systematically searched for peer-reviewed, primary cancer-related research articles published on the Botswana population or by Botswana institutions between January 2009 and June 2021.

RESULTS

Of the 86 publications included, 39 (45 %) were about cervical cancer, followed by breast cancer (10 %) and Kaposi sarcoma (7 %). The remainder (27 %) were not focused on any specific cancer type. The research activities were skewed towards three main areas of scientific interest: early detection, diagnosis, and prognosis; cancer control, survivorship, and outcomes; and treatment. Botswana was represented by authors in the first (54 %), last (53 %), and any authorship (53 %) positions. The United States of America had the strongest collaborative partnerships with Botswana, followed by the United Kingdom and South Africa. The majority of funding institutions were American (76 %) and the National Institutes of Health was the most mentioned funding organization, accounting for 33 % of all financial acknowledgments. Only 9 % of the funding acknowledgments came from Botswana.

CONCLUSION AND POLICY SUMMARY

Although cancer research in Botswana is expanding because of substantial foreign assistance, it is also hampered by a lack of local funding, minimal participation by Botswana-affiliated researchers, and research that is not aligned with disease burden. Our study highlights the need to strengthen local research capacity in Botswana.

Abstract P4-01-29: Ribociclib plus letrozole alters the immune subset composition in older (≥70 yrs.) patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer

Background The combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors and endocrine therapy is the current standard first-line therapy for patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Preliminary data suggest that CDK4/6 inhibitors not only induce tumor response by blocking CDK-dependent cell growth but that they can also alter the host immune function and stimulate tumor cell-directed immunity. However, clinical data are scarce, and no data exist about the impact of age and frailty, which are known to impact host immunity (immunosenescence). Materials and methods This prospective ongoing study is evaluating the efficacy and toxicity of the CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib and letrozole in older (≥ 70 years) patients with HR+/HER2- mBC (RIBOB, NCT03956654). In the associated blood biomarker sub-study, we investigate the impact of ribociclib and letrozole on the immune subset composition. Immune cell subsets were analyzed using flowcytometry (BD FACSVerse™) of peripheral blood mononuclear cells isolated at baseline (before ribociclib administration) and after three months of ribociclib treatment. In total, six multicolor flow cytometry staining panels were set up to investigate the changes in the immune cell subsets (CD4+ T-cell subsets, CD8+ T-cell subsets, general immune cell subsets, T-regulatory cell subsets, T-cell activation status subsets, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells subsets). Frailty status was assessed at baseline using the G8 screening tool (range score: 0-17) as a proxy. The paired t-test and matched-pairs Wilcoxon signed-rank test are used to evaluate changes in immune subset composition between baseline and after three months. The unpaired t-test and Mann-Whitney U test are used to evaluate differences in immune subset composition between frail and fit patients. Results Immune cell subset distribution and evolution were available for 15 older patients (median age: 77 yrs.; IQR 74-83), 4 considered fit (G8-score &gt;14), and 11 frail (G8-score ≤14). Firstly, we analyzed the difference in immune subset composition between baseline and three months for the whole cohort. There was a significant increase of naïve T-regulatory cells (p=0.0012) and a significant increase in CD8+ T-cell activation indicated by an upregulation of HLA-DR+ (p=0.0055) and CD38+ (p=0.0203). Secondly, the difference in immune subset composition between fit and frail persons was assessed showing a lower activation status of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell subsets in frail persons at baseline, as assessed by several activation markers: CD4+PD1+ (p=0.0051), CD4+PD1+CD69+ (p=0.0013), CD8+PD1+ (p=0.0073), and CD8+PD1+CD69+ (p=0.0339). These significant differences between fit and frail disappeared after three months, largely because of increased T-cell activation in the frail subset. Conclusion Ribociclib plus letrozole treatment for three months results in an upregulation of the T-regulatory cells’ naïve subset, suggesting an expansion of the T-cell repertoire, which is compatible with immune cell activation. Furthermore, the activation status of the CD8+ T-cells was upregulated. These observations confirm recent findings reported by Scirocchi F. et al. (Lancet, 2022). In addition, frail older patients show a lower baseline T-cell activation status compared to fit older patients but seem to have increased T-cell activation after treatment exposure. In the future, correlations with treatment response will be evaluated when follow-up data matures. Our data encourage the further assessment of immune cell modulation in combination with CDK4/6 inhibitors in the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Citation Format: Yentl Lambrechts, Sigrid Hatse, Cindy Kenis, Lore Decoster, Evandro de Azambuja, Guy Jerusalem, Patrick Neven, Lissandra Dal Lago, Hannelore Denys, Peter Vuylsteke, Frank Cornelis, Kevin Punie, Giuseppe Floris, Christine Desmedt, Annouschka Laenen, Noam Pondé, Hans Wildiers. Ribociclib plus letrozole alters the immune subset composition in older (≥70 yrs.) patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-01-29.

Pembrolizumab, radiotherapy, and an immunomodulatory five-drug cocktail in pretreated patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical or endometrial carcinoma: Results of the phase II PRIMMO study

A phase II study (PRIMMO) of patients with pretreated persistent/recurrent/metastatic cervical or endometrial cancer is presented. Patients received an immunomodulatory five-drug cocktail (IDC) consisting of low-dose cyclophosphamide, aspirin, lansoprazole, vitamin D, and curcumin starting 2 weeks before radioimmunotherapy. Pembrolizumab was administered three-weekly from day 15 onwards; one of the tumor lesions was irradiated (8Gyx3) on days 15, 17, and 19. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate per immune-related response criteria (irORR) at week 26 (a lower bound of the 90% confidence interval [CI] of > 10% was considered efficacious). The prespecified 43 patients (cervical, n = 18; endometrial, n = 25) were enrolled. The irORR was 11.1% (90% CI 2.0-31.0) in cervical cancer and 12.0% (90% CI 3.4-28.2) in endometrial cancer. Median duration of response was not reached in both cohorts. Median interval-censored progression-free survival was 4.1 weeks (95% CI 4.1-25.7) in cervical cancer and 3.6 weeks (95% CI 3.6-15.4) in endometrial cancer; median overall survival was 39.6 weeks (95% CI 15.0-67.0) and 37.4 weeks (95% CI 19.0-50.3), respectively. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 10 (55.6%) cervical cancer patients and 9 (36.0%) endometrial cancer patients. Health-related quality of life was generally stable over time. Responders had a significantly higher proportion of peripheral T cells when compared to nonresponders (p = 0.013). In conclusion, PRIMMO did not meet its primary objective in both cohorts; pembrolizumab, radiotherapy, and an IDC had modest but durable antitumor activity with acceptable but not negligible toxicity.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT03192059) and EudraCT Registry (number 2016-001569-97).

Cervical cancer screening in HIV-endemic countries: An urgent call for guideline change

Women living with HIV (WLWH) are at an increased risk of developing HPV-related high grade cervical dysplasia and cervical cancer. Prior World Health Organization (WHO) screening guidelines recommended starting screening at age 30. We assessed characteristics of women diagnosed with cervical cancer to further inform and refine screening guidelines. We prospectively enrolled women diagnosed with cervical cancer from January 2015 to March 2020 at two tertiary hospitals in Gaborone, Botswana. We performed chi-square and ANOVA analyses to evaluate the association between age upon diagnosis and HIV status, CD4 count, viral load, and other sociodemographic and clinical factors. Data were available for 1130 women who were diagnosed with cervical cancer and 69.3% were WLWH. The median age overall was 47.9 (IQR 41.2-59.1), 44.6 IQR: 39.8 - 50.9) among WLWH, and 61.2 (IQR 48.6-69.3) among women living without HIV. There were 1.3% of women aged <30 years old, 19.1% were 30-39 and 37.2% were 40-49. Overall, 20.4% (n = 231) of cancers were in women <40 years. Age of cervical cancer diagnosis is younger in countries with higher HIV prevalence, like Botswana. Approximately 20% of the patients presented with cancer at <40 years of age and would have likely benefited from screening 10 years prior to cancer diagnosis to provide an opportunity for detection and treatment of pre-invasive disease.

Distance to Multidisciplinary Team Clinic in Gaborone, Botswana, and Stage at Cervical Cancer Presentation for Women Living With and Without HIV

PURPOSE

Cervical cancer is the leading cause of cancer death for women in Botswana. Barriers in access to cancer care can lead to later stages at diagnosis and increased mortality. This study evaluated access, defined as travel time from a patient's residential village to a multidisciplinary team clinic in Gaborone, with stage of cervical cancer at presentation. In addition, because of the high HIV prevalence in Botswana, we explored the association between travel time and HIV status.

METHODS

Eligible patients with cervical cancer presenting to the multidisciplinary team between 2015 and 2020 were included. Data were abstracted from questionnaires and hospital records. Google Maps was used to calculate travel time. Multinomial regression was used to examine travel time and cancer stage, and multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate travel time and HIV status.

RESULTS

We identified 959 patients with cervical cancer of which 70.1% were women living with HIV. The median travel time was approximately 2 hours. Using a reference group of stage I disease and a travel time of < 1 hour, the odds of presenting with stage II increased for patients traveling 3-5 hours (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.00; 95% CI, 1.14 to 3.52) and > 5 hours (OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.15 to 4.19). There were no significant associations for stage III. For stage IV disease, the odds were increased for patients traveling 3-5 hours (OR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.26 to 6.79) and > 5 hours (adjusted OR, 4.05; 95% CI, 1.62 to 10.10). In addition, the odds of patients presenting living with HIV increased with increasing travel time (trend test = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

This study identified two potential factors, travel time and HIV status, that influence access to comprehensive cervical cancer care in Botswana.

Dynamic alterations of immunosenescence-related genes in older women with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy: A prospective study

BACKGROUND

The exact impact of chemotherapy on the immune system of older patients with breast cancer is not well known. A longitudinal study was performed investigating the evolution of the blood immune profile during and after chemotherapy in this population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included 39 patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (chemotherapy group, CTG) and 32 patients receiving only hormone therapy (control group, CG). A 10-gene panel associated with immunosenescence was measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) before (T1), at 3 months (T2) and at 12 months (T3) after initiation of adjuvant therapy. Nutrition status was assessed by using a mini nutritional assessment scale. Linear mixed model analyses were performed for trajectory evolution, with or without adjusting for age, tumor stage, breast cancer phenotype, and/or corresponding baseline gene levels.

RESULTS

Six genes relating to T cell activation (CD28, CD27, CD86, LCK, GRAP, LRRN3), and two genes relating to oxidative stress (PRDX6, HMOX1) exhibited a significant group-by-time effect, even after adjusting covariates(p≤ 0.01). In CTG, the T cell activation genes substantially declined from T1 to T2 and bounced back to a level higher than baseline at T3 (p<0.03), which was not observed in CG (p>0.26). Patients with malnutrition detected at T1 experienced more pronounced perturbation regarding CD27, LCK, CD69, VAMP5, and LRRN3 (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Chemotherapy leads to transient perturbation of immune-related gene expression and potentially stimulates immunity in the long term. Well-nourished patients experience less impact of chemotherapy on immune-related gene expression profiles.

Long term outcome data from the EORTC 75111-10114 ETF/BCG randomized phase II study: Pertuzumab and trastuzumab with or without metronomic chemotherapy for older patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, followed by T-DM1 after progression

INTRODUCTION

Older patients are at higher risk of chemotherapy-induced toxicity, raising interest in less toxic anti-HER2 regimens for older persons with HER2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phase II study randomized (1:1) patients with HER2+ MBC, aged 70+ or frail 60+, to first line chemotherapy with metronomic oral cyclophosphamide (M) + Trastuzumab (T) and Pertuzumab (P) or TP alone. T-DM1 was offered in case of progression.

RESULTS

In total, 39 and 41 patients were randomized to TP and TPM arm respectively. Median follow-up is 54.0 months. 24-month PFS was 18.7% (95% CI 8.2-32.4) and 28.7% (95% CI 15.8-43.0), respectively. A total of 49 (61.3%) patients died of whom 37 (75.5%) from disease progression; number of deaths per arm was 27 (69.2%) for TP and 22 (53.7%) for TPM. There was no significant difference in OS between the two arms (median OS TP vs TPM: 32.1 vs 37.5 months, p 0.25). Among the 40 patients who have started T-DM1 after disease progression on TP/TPM, PFS rate at 6 months after start of T-DM1 was 43.6% (95% CI: 27.7-58.5) and grade 3 or higher AE occurred in 18 pts (45%).

CONCLUSIONS

Metronomic chemotherapy-based dual blockade (TPM), followed by T-DM1 after progression, provides an active and relatively well tolerated treatment option in an older/frail HER2+ MBC population, with a median survival of over 3 years. Nevertheless, the majority of this older/frail population died from breast cancer, highlighting the need for well tolerated and efficacious treatments in these patients.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cervical cancer diagnosis and treatment in Botswana

e17518

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic rapidly altered cancer care delivery globally, providing a compelling opportunity to empirically study how these changes impacted persistent disparities in care. Cervical cancer is one of the most common female cancers worldwide, with approximately 90% of cases and deaths occurring in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In Botswana, a LMIC with a particularly high prevalence of HIV and cervical cancer, delays in cervical cancer diagnosis and treatment have been documented but is unknown how these delays may have been mitigated or exacerbated since the pandemic. Methods: The objective of this analysis is to evaluate patterns of cervical cancer diagnosis and treatment initiation before (January 2015-March 2020) and during the pandemic (April 2020-July 2021) using longitudinal clinical and patient-reported data from a cohort of over 1,000 patients receiving care for gynecologic cancers in Botswana. The primary outcome is timeliness of treatment defined by the number of days between first clinical visit and initiation of first-line treatment and categorized dichotomously (> 30 days classified as delay). Primary exposure is the time period (pre-pandemic and pandemic) defined by the month of first visit. We calculated unadjusted proportion of delays and covariates stratified by time period and used bivariate analysis to examine factors associated with each time period. We used multivariable logistic regression models to examine the association between delay and time period, adjusting for all covariates (age, stage, HIV status, rurality, screening history, and partner status). Results are presented as unadjusted proportions, adjusted odds ratios (AOR), and 95% confidence intervals. Results: Of the 1,200 patients treated for cervical cancer at the multidisciplinary clinic, 990 (82.5%) were diagnosed pre-pandemic and 210 (17.5%) during the pandemic. Among all patients with gynecologic cancers (n = 1,568), the proportion of patients with cervical cancer significantly decreased from 78.6% pre-pandemic to 68.0% during the pandemic (p < 0.001). In comparison to pre-pandemic, patients with cervical cancer during the pandemic were significantly less likely to have attended a screening clinic prior to their treatment (57.6% vs 15.3%; p < 0.001) and significantly more likely to experience treatment delays (61.6% vs 92.9%; p < 0.001). In the multivariable model, patients diagnosed during the pandemic had a 7-fold higher likelihood of treatment delays than those patients diagnosed pre-pandemic (AOR: 7.95; 95% CI: 4.45-14.19). Conclusions: The pandemic significantly increased delays in treatment for nearly all patients with cervical cancer in Botswana. Given persistent global disparities in cervical cancer, there is a great need to implement evidence-based strategies for improving screening and timeliness of care in Botswana and other LMICs.

Quality of life in patients with advanced high-grade ovarian cancer (HGOC) receiving maintenance therapies after first-line (1L) chemotherapy in the randomized phase III PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial (NCT02477644)

5560

Background: In the Phase III PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial, maintenance olaparib + bevacizumab (bev) provided a significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit vs placebo (pbo) + bev in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer in response to platinum-based chemotherapy. Subgroup analyses revealed a substantial PFS benefit in homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-positive (including BRCA1/2 mutation) pts, leading to US/EU labels for this combination. Preliminary analyses reported that olaparib did not alter global health-related quality of life (G-HQoL; Ray-Coquard I et al. NEJM 2019). We analyzed HQoL by domains and molecular subgroups and explored the impact of disease progression (DP) on HQoL in the 1L setting. Methods: Eligible pts with newly diagnosed advanced (FIGO stage III–IV) HGOC were randomized 2:1 to maintenance olaparib + bev or pbo + bev. Pts completed European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OV28 HQoL questionnaires at baseline and every 12 weeks for 2 years’ follow-up, irrespective of DP. The minimal important difference for clinically relevant change was fixed at 10 points. Longitudinal data were analyzed by mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) and time until definitive deterioration (TUDD). Analyses were in the intent-to-treat population and HRD-positive subgroup. HQoL analyses at DP (± 60 days) were explored. Results: 806 pts were randomized to olaparib + bev (n=537) or pbo + bev (n=269). 465 pts had DP over 2 years’ follow-up. Compliance to HQoL questionnaires was high at baseline (95%) and over time (>70%). MMRM models by HQoL domain did not reveal a clinically relevant difference between treatment arms over time. TUDD of G-HQoL did not differ between arms (hazard ratio [HR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72–1.07). In the HRD-positive subgroup (n=372), we observed no difference by HQoL domain between treatment arms. Interestingly, TUDD of G-HQoL was statistically significantly in favor of olaparib + bev compared with pbo + bev (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52–0.93). We also observed a clinically significant deterioration in emotional (mean change −12.30 points, 95% CI −16.46 to −8.13) and social (−11.17 points, 95% CI −16.21 to −6.12) functioning in both treatment arms at DP, among 103 pts with HQoL questionnaires at DP. Conclusions: The substantial PFS benefit provided by maintenance olaparib + bev in the newly diagnosed setting was achieved without detrimental effect on HQoL domains, even with longer TUDD of G-HQoL in the HRD-positive subgroup. Use of an effective maintenance therapy (ie one with a significant PFS benefit) in HGOC patients in the 1L setting is likely to delay the clinically significant deterioration in emotional and social functioning we identified in patients at DP across PAOLA-1 treatments arms. Clinical trial information: NCT02477644.

Patient perspectives on delays in cervical cancer screening and follow-up care in Botswana: a mixed methods study

Background

Delays in screening and timely diagnosis contribute significantly to global disparities in cervical cancer mortality in Botswana and other low- and middle-income countries, particularly those with high rates of HIV. Little is known about the modifiable factors shaping these delays from the perspectives of women themselves and how these perspectives may differ between those living with and without HIV.

Methods

From March–May 2019, we conducted a concurrent, mixed methods study of women receiving treatment for cervical cancer at a multidisciplinary oncology clinic in Botswana. Enrolled participants completed a one-time, concurrent semi-structured interview and structured questionnaire assessing patient characteristics, screening and HIV-related beliefs and knowledge, and barriers and facilitators to screening and follow-up care. Qualitative data were analyzed using directed content analysis guided by the Model of Pathways to Treatment and triangulated with quantitative questionnaire data to identify areas of convergence and divergence. Fisher’s exact tests were used to explore associations between questionnaire data (e.g., screening knowledge) and HIV status.

Results

Forty-two women enrolled in the study, 64% of whom were living with HIV and 26% were diagnosed with stage III cervical cancer. Median age was 45 years (IQR 54–67) in those living with HIV and 64 years (IQR 42–53) in those living without. Overall screening rates before symptomatic disease were low (24%). Median time from most proximal screen to diagnosis was 52 median days (IQR 15–176), with no significant differences by HIV status. General screening knowledge was higher among those living with HIV versus those without (100% vs 73%; p < 0.05), but knowledge about HPV and other risk factors was low in both groups. Similar to questionnaire results, qualitative results indicate limited awareness of the need to be screened prior to symptoms as a central barrier to timely screening. Some participants also noted that delays in the receipt of screening results and fear also contributed to treatment delays. However, many participants also described myriad sources of social and tangible support that helped them to overcome some of these challenges.

Conclusion

Interventions focused on increasing routine screening and supporting timely awareness and access to care are needed to reduce global disparities in cervical cancer.

Effect of HIPEC according to HRD/BRCAwt genomic profile in stage III ovarian cancer - results from the phase III OVHIPEC trial

The addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with cisplatin to interval cytoreductive surgery improves recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with stage III ovarian cancer. Homologous recombination deficient (HRD) ovarian tumors are usually more platinum sensitive. Since hyperthermia impairs BRCA1/2 protein function, we hypothesized that HRD tumors respond best to treatment with HIPEC. We analyzed the effect of HIPEC in patients in the OVHIPEC trial, stratified by HRD status and BRCAm status. Clinical data and tissue samples were collected from patients included in the randomized, phase III OVHIPEC-1 trial. DNA copy number variation (CNV) profiles, HRD-related pathogenic mutations, and BRCA1 promotor hypermethylation were determined. CNV-profiles were categorized as HRD or non-HRD, based on a previously validated algorithm-based BRCA1-like classifier. Hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 99% confidence intervals (CI) for the effect of RFS and OS of HIPEC in the BRCAm, the HRD/BRCAwt and the non-HRD group were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models. DNA was available from 200/245 (82%) patients. Seventeen (9%) tumors carried a pathogenic mutation in BRCA1 and 14 (7%) in BRCA2. Ninety-one (46%) tumors classified as BRCA1-like. The effect of HIPEC on RFS and OS was absent in BRCAm tumors (HR 1.25; 99%CI 0.48-3.29), and most present in HRD/BRCAwt (HR 0.44; 99%CI 0.21-0.91), and non-HRD/BRCAwt tumors (HR 0.82; 99%CI 0.48-1.42), interaction p-value: 0.024. Patients with HRD tumors without pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutation appear to benefit most from treatment with HIPEC, while benefit in patients with BRCA1/2 pathogenic mutations and patients without HRD seems less evident.

Findings of a Nationwide Mixed-Methods Assessment of Cancer Care and Prevention Needs in Botswana

PURPOSE

High-level investment in cancer prevention and control in low- and middle-income countries is urgently needed to address the predicted surge in cancer incidence, yet few assessments of health systems have systematically identified gaps in infrastructure, training, and patient care in sub-Saharan Africa. In Botswana, we evaluated the current state of cancer care and prevention, to understand the strengths, weaknesses, and needs regarding the provision of comprehensive cancer services.

METHODS

The study evaluated four regional hospitals designated as cancer sites by the Botswana Ministry of Health and Wellness to decentralize cancer services. A multi-site, cross-sectional evaluation using qualitative and quantitative methods was conducted. Focus Group Discussions with cancer patients, cancer survivors, caregivers, the general population, and healthcare workers were analyzed for emergent themes. Quantitative surveys assessed knowledge, attitudes and practices of health workers and hospital management staff, and cancer service gaps at health facilities.

RESULTS

Knowledge gaps included low awareness of cancer signs and symptoms among the general population, poor knowledge of early detection and treatment among health workers, and caregivers lacked skills to support cancer patients. Cancer screening services, other than cervical screening, were limited in all sites. Diagnosis and treatment barriers included lack of specialized personnel, equipment, timely pathology services, and drug stockouts. There were low levels of confidence in cancer management, including chemotherapy, without support from oncologists. Providers reported low patient screening uptake due lack of access and patients reported fear of diagnosis. Health facilities did not routinely notify cancers to the national registry. Radiotherapy was limited to one private hospital in the capital.

CONCLUSION

Decentralization of cancer services to regions will require substantial capacity building at district hospitals to strengthen fragmented screening, early diagnosis and treatment services. Health provider training needs and infrastructure gaps were substantial, with low public awareness of cancer signs, symptoms and causes.

Abstract GS2-02: Elacestrant, an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), vs investigator’s choice of endocrine monotherapy for ER+/HER2- advanced/metastatic breast cancer (mBC) following progression on prior endocrine and CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy: Results of EMERALD phase 3 trial

Background: Endocrine therapy(ET) plus CDK4/6 inhibitor (i) is the mainstay for the management of estrogenreceptor-positive (ER+)/HER2- mBC. However, most patients (pts) with ER+ mBCeventually experience disease progression, including development of ESR1mutations (mESR1). Elacestrant, an oral SERD, demonstrated preclinical activity,and clinical activity in a phase 1 trial in ER+ mBC, including responses in ptswith prior fulvestrant, CDK4/6i, and mESR1tumors (Bardia JCO 2021).. Methods: EMERALD(NCT03778931), a multicenter, international, randomized, open-label, controlledphase 3 trial, enrolled postmenopausal pts with ER+/HER2- mBC who had received 1-2prior lines of ET and ≤1 line of chemotherapy in the mBC setting and had prior progressionon a ET plus CDK4/6i. Pts were randomized 1:1 to elacestrant (400 mg orallydaily) or standard of care (SOC; investigator’s choice of fulvestrant or anaromatase inhibitor). Stratification factors included mESR1 status (by central lab), priorfulvestrant exposure, and presence of visceral disease. The study had 2 primary endpoints of progression-free survival (PFS), by blindedindependent review committee, in pts withtumors harboring mESR1 and in all pts (mESR1 or mESR1 notdetected). Secondary endpoints included: overall survival (OS), safety, tolerability,and quality of life. An alpha-value of 0.0475 was used to determine statisticalsignificance (2-sided using the truncated Hochberg procedure).. Results: EMERALD enrolled 477 pts(228 with mESR1) between Feb 2019 - Oct 2020, with 239 pts randomized toreceive elacestrant vs 238 pts to SOC. Demographics and disease characteristicswere well-balanced across treatment arms [median age: 63 yrs vs 63.5 yrs; 2prior lines: 46% vs 40.8%; prior CDK4/6i: 100% in both arms]. The study met bothprimary endpoints. There was a 30% reduction in the risk of progression ordeath in the elacestrant arm in all pts (HR=0.697 [95% CI: 0.552, 0.88]; P=0.0018),and a 45% (HR=0.546 [95% CI: 0.387, 0.768]; P=0.0005) reduction in therisk of progression or death in pts with mESR1.For both endpoints, results in key prespecified subgroups, including visceral metastases,number of prior lines of therapy, pretreatment with fulvestrant, and geographicalregion, were consistent with the overall outcome. The PFS rate at 12 months was 22.32% (95% CI: 15.24%, 29.40%)with elacestrant vs 9.42% (95% CI: 4.02%, 14.81%) with SOC in all pts, and26.76% (95% CI: 16.17%, 37.36%) vs 8.19% (95% CI: 1.26%, 15.12%) in the mESR1 subgroup. The prespecified interim OS analysis plannedat the time of the final PFS analysis (allocated2-sided alpha level of 0.0001) demonstrated a trend in favor of elacestrant inall pts (HR=0.751 [95% CI: 0.542, 1.038]; P=0.0821) and in pts with mESR1(HR=0.592 [95% CI: 0.361, 0.958]; P=0.0325). The final OS analysisis expected next year. Common (&gt;10%) treatment-related adverse events (AEs) withelacestrant vs SOC included: nausea (25.3% vs 8.7%), vomiting (11% vs 2.6%), and fatigue (11% vs 7.9%), mostlygrade 1/2. Treatment-emergent AEs leading to discontinuation of elacestrant orSOC were infrequent in both arms (6.3% and 4.4%). Grade ≥3 treatment-relatedAEs in the elacestrant arm vs SOC were 7.2% vs 3.1%, mainly driven by nausea(2.1% vs 0.9%). There were no treatment-related deaths in either group.. Conclusions:Elacestrant is the first oral SERD to demonstrate a statistically significantand clinically meaningful improvement of PFS vs SOC in a randomized phase 3study in pts with ER+/HER2- mBC in the 2nd/3rd-linesetting, including those whose tumors harbor mESR1. Elacestrant was well tolerated and hasthe potential to become the new standard of care for pts with ER+/HER2- mBC.

Citation Format: Aditya Bardia, Patrick Neven, Guillermo Streich, Alberto J. Montero, Frédéric Forget, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Joo Hyuk Sohn, Peter Vuylsteke, Kathleen K. Harnden, Hung Khong, Judit Kocsis, Florence Dalenc, Virginia Kaklamani, Patrick Dillon, Sunil Babu, Simon Waters, Ines Deleu, José García-Sáenz, Emilio Bria, Marina Cazzaniga, Janice Lu, Philippe Aftimos, Javier Cortes, Shubin Liu, Dirk Laurent, Maureen G. Conlan, Francois-Clement Bidard. Elacestrant, an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), vs investigator’s choice of endocrine monotherapy for ER+/HER2- advanced/metastatic breast cancer (mBC) following progression on prior endocrine and CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy: Results of EMERALD phase 3 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS2-02.

Abstract P1-18-06: Long term outcome data from the EORTC 75111-10114 ETF/BCG randomized phase II study: Pertuzumab and trastuzumab with or without metronomic chemotherapy for older patients with HER2- positive metastatic breast cancer, followed by T-DM1 after progression

Introduction: Pertuzumab (P) is approved as first line therapy for HER2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) combined with trastuzumab (T) and docetaxel. However older patients are at high risk of chemotherapy-induced toxicity ,raising interest in less toxic anti-HER2 therapy regimens.Patients and Methods: This phase II selection study randomized (1:1) patients with HER2+ MBC, aged 70+ or frail 60+, to first line chemotherapy with metronomic oral cyclophosphamide 50 mg/day + TP (TPM) or TP alone. Prior endocrine therapy and up to 1 line of anti-HER2 therapy (without chemotherapy) for MBC were allowed. T-DM1 was offered in case of progression. Randomization was stratified according to hormonal receptors, previous anti-HER2 treatment and geriatric assessment. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6months, already reported (Lancet Oncol 2018, Wildiers et al). We now present data on long term outcome (including cause of death), and on response and tolerance of T-DM1 given after progression on TP(M).Results: Between July 2013 and May 2016, 39 and 41 patients were randomized to TP and TPM arm respectively: median age 76.7 years, hormone receptor positivity 69%, prior (neo)adjuvant T 11%, prior metastatic T (with endocrine therapy) 3%, visceral involvement 93.7%, potential frailty profile according to geriatric screening G8 (≤14) 70% and/or to short physical performance battery (&lt;10) 81%, Charlson comorbidity score &gt; 0 in 41%. With 54.0 months of median follow-up, 6-month PFS was 43.1% (95% CI 27.1-58.1) versus 73.0% (95% CI 55.8-84.3) for TP and TPM, respectively. 12-month PFS was 33.7% and 51.9%, and 24-month PFS 18.7% and 28.7%, respectively. A total of 49 (61.3%) patients died, 27 (69.2%) in the TP arm and 22 (53.7%) in the TPM arm. There was no significant difference in OS between the two arms (TPM vs TP: HR=0.72, 95% CI 0.41-1.26) with median OS 32.1 months for TP, and 37.5 months for TPM. The causes of death were progressive disease (N=37, 75.5%), toxicity (cardiac failure, N=1, 2.0%), and other causes not due to PD/toxicity (N=9, 22.5%). Among the 40 patients who have started T-DM1 (22 in TPM arm and 18 in TP arm), median follow-up was 33.7 months from T-DM1 start. PFS rate at 6 months after start of T-DM1 was 43.6% (95% CI: 27.7-58.5). Grade 3 or higher AE occurred in 18 pts (45%). Most relevant reported grade III or higher toxicities on T-DM1 were fatigue (N=3), anorexia (N=2), anemia (N=1), febrile neutropenia (N=1), diarrhoea (N=1), hepatic failure (N=1), lung infection (N=1), increased GGT (N=1), thrombocytopenia (N=1), weight loss (N=1), hypophosphatemia (N=1), dyspnoea (N=1), epistaxis (N=1), hematoma (N=1). Two patients (5%) experienced grade 5 toxicity: one death was considered as related to cachexia and tumor progression; the other death was considered to be related to acute pneumonia and renal failure. The prognostic impact of geriatric assessment on PFS and OS, and frailty evolution during therapy will be presented at the meeting.Conclusions: Metronomic chemotherapy-based dual blockade (TPM), followed by T-DM1 after progression, provides an active and well tolerated treatment option in an older/frail HER2+ MBC population, with a median survival of over 3 years despite the associated frailty in the majority of the study population. T-DM1 provides a PFS rate at 6 months of 43.6% (95% CI: 27.7-58.5) with a wide range of possibly related toxicities in this generally frail population.

Citation Format: Hans Wildiers, Sandrine Marreaud, Lissandra Dal Lago, Peter Vuylsteke, Giuseppe Curigliano, Simon Waters, Barbara Brouwers, Bart Meulemans, Berta Sousa, Coralie Poncet, Etienne Brain. Long term outcome data from the EORTC 75111-10114 ETF/BCG randomized phase II study: Pertuzumab and trastuzumab with or without metronomic chemotherapy for older patients with HER2- positive metastatic breast cancer, followed by T-DM1 after progression [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-18-06.

Prospective non-interventional BELOVA/BGOG-ov16 study on safety of frontline bevacizumab in elderly patients with FIGO stage IV ovarian cancer: a study of the Belgian and Luxembourg Gynaecological Oncology Group

Objective

Because elderly patients with ovarian cancer are underrepresented in randomized studies, this study aimed to expand our knowledge on the safety and effectiveness of frontline treatment with bevacizumab in combination with standard carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy in patients aged 70 years and older with a diagnosis of Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IV ovarian cancer in routine clinical practice in Belgium.

Methods

Patients aged 70 years and older with FIGO stage IV ovarian cancer were included in a multicenter, non-interventional prospective study

to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of treatment with bevacizumab in combination with frontline carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy. Comprehensive geriatric assessments were performed at baseline and during treatment.

Results

The most frequently reported adverse events for bevacizumab were hypertension (55%), epistaxis (32%) and proteinuria (21%). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of progression-free survival was 14.5 months. The results of the comprehensive geriatric assessments during treatment indicated a slight improvement in the geriatric eight health status screening tool score for general health status and the mini-nutritional assessment score for nutritional status. The median change from baseline score was close to zero for the instruments measuring independency, activity of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living, and for the mobility-tiredness test measuring self-perceived fatigue.

Conclusions

No new safety signals were registered in this study in patients aged 70 years and older treated with bevacizumab and frontline carboplatin and paclitaxel for FIGO stage IV ovarian cancer. Elderly patients should not be excluded from treatment for advanced ovarian cancer based on age alone.

EU PAS register

ENCEPP/SDPP/13849.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier

NCT02393898.

948 Final results from AIPAC: A phase IIb comparing eftilagimod alpha (a soluble LAG-3 protein) vs. placebo in combination with weekly paclitaxel in HR+ HER2- MBC

Background

Eftilagimod alpha (efti; IMP321) is a soluble LAG-3 protein (LAG-3Ig) that binds to a subset of MHC class II molecules and mediates activation of antigen-presenting cells followed by CD8 T-cells. Weekly paclitaxel is a standard of care chemo-regimen after failure of endocrine-based therapy for metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC). AIPAC (Active Immunotherapy PAClitaxel) investigated the addition of efti to weekly paclitaxel in these patients (pts).

Methods

This placebo-controlled, double-blinded, 1:1 randomized phase IIb trial enrolled pts with measurable disease, HR+ HER2- MBC after endocrine-based therapy. Pts received paclitaxel (80 mg/m² IV on D1, D8, D15) + efti (30 mg) or placebo on D2, D16 (every 2 weeks) for up to 24 weeks following efti/placebo for up to 52 weeks. The primary endpoint (EP) was progression-free survival (RECIST1.1) by BICR. Secondary EPs included overall survival (OS), PFS (local read), overall response rate (ORR), biomarker, quality of life. Exploratory EPs included univariate/multivariate analyses.

Results

227 pts were randomized (Jan2017-Jul2019). All except 1 received ≥1 treatment and were included in the full analysis set [efti (n=114); placebo (n=112)]. Data cut-off was 14May2021 (min. follow-up= 22 months). Median age was 60 yrs with ECOG 0 in 61.5%. 91.6% had visceral disease. Pts were mostly endocrine resistant (84%) and partially pre-treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors (44.2%). Post-study treatment was similar. Median OS was 20.4 (95% CI: 14.3-25.1) months in the efti group vs. 17.5 (95% CI: 12.9-21.9) in the placebo group. HR was 0.88 (95%CI: 0.64-1.19; p=0.197). In predefined univariate analyses, younger pts, low baseline monocytes and luminal B showed significant/clinically meaningful improvement in OS (table 1).

Efti increased PBMC/T cell (CD4/CD8) count vs. placebo, correlating with improved OS (Spearman Rho=0.6, p=0.02 for CD8 T cells). In a whole population multivariate cox regression model, increasing BMI and prior treatment with CDK4/6 were independent significant poor prognostic markers for PFS and OS.

TEAEs leading to discontinuation were similar at 5.3%(efti) & 6.3%(placebo). PFS (Primary EP) and safety were reported at SABCS 2020 (Abstract#132).

Abstract 948 Table 1

Overall survival by subgroups at final analysis

Conclusions

Efti added to paclitaxel led to a non-significant 2.9 months median OS increase in HR+ HER2- MBC pts after endocrine-based therapy. Effects were significant in pts <65yrs, with low monocytes and more aggressive disease (luminal B). Efti increased circulating CD4/CD8 T cells, which significantly correlated to improved OS. Weekly paclitaxel + efti should be further investigated in MBC.

Trial Registration

The trial identifiers are IMP321-P011 (code for sponsor), 2015-002541-63 (EudraCT) and NCT02614833 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Ethics Approval

The study was approved by relevant ethic committees and institutional review boards.

Niraparib for Advanced Breast Cancer with Germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations: the EORTC 1307-BCG/BIG5-13/TESARO PR-30-50-10-C BRAVO Study

PURPOSE

To investigate the activity of niraparib in patients with germline-mutated BRCA1/2 (gBRCAm) advanced breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

BRAVO was a randomized, open-label phase III trial. Eligible patients had gBRCAm and HER2-negative advanced breast cancer previously treated with ≤2 prior lines of chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer or had relapsed within 12 months of adjuvant chemotherapy, and were randomized 2:1 between niraparib and physician's choice chemotherapy (PC; monotherapy with eribulin, capecitabine, vinorelbine, or gemcitabine). Patients with hormone receptor-positive tumors had to have received ≥1 line of endocrine therapy and progressed during this treatment in the metastatic setting or relapsed within 1 year of (neo)adjuvant treatment. The primary endpoint was centrally assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), PFS by local assessment (local-PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety.

RESULTS

After the pre-planned interim analysis, recruitment was halted on the basis of futility, noting a high degree of discordance between local and central PFS assessment in the PC arm that resulted in informative censoring. At the final analysis (median follow-up, 19.9 months), median centrally assessed PFS was 4.1 months in the niraparib arm (n = 141) versus 3.1 months in the PC arm [n = 74; hazard ratio (HR), 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.65-1.44; P = 0.86]. HRs for OS and local-PFS were 0.95 (95% CI, 0.63-1.42) and 0.65 (95% CI, 0.46-0.93), respectively. ORR was 35% (95% CI, 26-45) with niraparib and 31% (95% CI, 19-46) in the PC arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Informative censoring in the control arm prevented accurate assessment of the trial hypothesis, although there was clear evidence of niraparib's activity in this patient population.

Assessment of potential process quality indicators for systemic treatment of breast cancer in Belgium: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Quality indicators (QIs) for the management of breast cancer (BC) have been published in Europe and internationally. In Belgium, a task force was established to select measurable process indicators of systemic treatment for BC, focusing on appropriateness of delivered care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the results of the selected QIs, both nationally and among individual centres.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Female Belgian residents with unilateral primary invasive BC diagnosed between 2010 and 2014 were selected from the Belgian Cancer Registry database. The national number enabled linkage with the national reimbursement database, which contains information on all reimbursed medical procedures. A total of 12 process indicators were measured on the population and hospital level. Intercentre variability was assessed by median results and interquartile ranges.

RESULTS

A total of 48  872 patients were included in the study. QIs concerning specific BC subtypes only applied to patients diagnosed in 2014 (n = 9855). Clinical stage (cStage) I patients (n = 17 116) were staged with positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Among patients who were pT1aN0 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive (n = 47), 25.5% (n = 12) received adjuvant trastuzumab. Among patients with de novo metastatic luminal A/B-like HER2-negative BC (n = 295), 17.3% (n = 51) received upfront chemotherapy. (Neo)adjuvant chemotherapy was administered in 52.4% (n = 12 592) of operated women with cStage I-III, in 37.0% (n = 1270) of operated women with cStage I-III luminal A/B-like HER2-negative BC, and in 19.1% of operated women with cStage I luminal A/B-like HER2-negative BC. In the population of operated patients with cStage I-III, of those younger than 70 years that started adjuvant endocrine therapy (n = 3591), 81.7% (n = 2932) continued treatment for ≥4.5 years. Among patients in cStage I-III older than 70 years (n = 8544), 19.0% (n = 1622) received (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, whereas among patients with cStage I-III luminal A/B-like HER2-negative BC (n = 1388), 13.0% (n = 181) received (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. In patients with cStage I-II luminal A/B-like HER2-negative BC older than 70 years (n = 1477), 11.6% (n = 171) were not operated and received upfront endocrine treatment.

CONCLUSION

Well-considered QIs using population-based data can evaluate quality of care and expose disparities among treatment centres. Their use in daily practice should be implemented in all centres treating BC.

Abstract 84: Development and Implementation of a Case-based Virtual Training Program for Oncologic Emergencies in Botswana

Purpose: Oncologic emergencies contribute to a large proportion of morbidity and mortality for oncology patients, who present unique medical challenges due to disease and treatment complexities. Emergencies training of medical staff is important, particularly if there is high turnover. We describe the development and implementation of a program to enhance timely recognition and treatment of oncologic emergencies. Due to the COVID19 pandemic, sessions were conducted virtually.

Methods: Healthcare workers who normally care for oncology patients at Princess Marina Hospital (PMH) were invited to participate in a series of weekly virtual case-based lectures. Didactic content was developed between Botswana and Rutgers faculty and fellows to reflect specific management and resources available at PMH. Participation was through live chat case reviews and pre- and post- session questions. Feedback was elicited through Likert-scale surveys.

Results: An average of 19 participants (range 13-29) attended the training sessions. Average make-up per session were as follows: 16% physicians, 26% Medical Officers, 4% Internal Medicine Residents, 32% nurses, 21% other. Healthcare workers from Botswana were invited to participate in content preparation and presentation to their peers; 3 of 8 presentations were by Botswana personnel. Average pre-session test score was 70% (range 40-89%); post-session score was 82% (range 55-97%). In post sessions surveys, average confidence in diagnosis and recognition across emergencies was 84% (range 71-100%); average confidence in management was 81% (range 57-100%).

Conclusions: We describe the successful piloting of a case-based virtual training program in oncologic emergencies, which to our knowledge is the first of its kind. The program was adapted to the Botswana health care setting. Overall, confidence in diagnosis, recognition and management of oncologic emergencies appeared to increase after sessions. Plans are in place to expand the series to more sites within the country, most of which do not have dedicated oncology trained staff.

Citation Format: Sharon Li, Sadaf Qureshi, Reena Antony, Kara Wilson, Robert Moumakwa, Refeletswe Lebelonyane, Tendani Gaolathe, Mansi Shah, Pallvi Popli, Ashwin Chandar, Sukhdeep Kaur, Richard Marlink, Tina Mayer, Peter Vuylsteke, Tlotlo Ralefala. Development and Implementation of a Case-based Virtual Training Program for Oncologic Emergencies in Botswana [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 9th Annual Symposium on Global Cancer Research; Global Cancer Research and Control: Looking Back and Charting a Path Forward; 2021 Mar 10-11. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2021;30(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 84.

70-gene signature as an aid for treatment decisions in early breast cancer: updated results of the phase 3 randomised MINDACT trial with an exploratory analysis by age

BACKGROUND

The MINDACT trial showed excellent 5-year distant metastasis-free survival of 94·7% (95% CI 92·5-96·2) in patients with breast cancer of high clinical and low genomic risk who did not receive chemotherapy. We present long-term follow-up results together with an exploratory analysis by age.

METHODS

MINDACT was a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial done in 112 academic and community hospitals in nine European countries. Patients aged 18-70 years, with histologically confirmed primary invasive breast cancer (stage T1, T2, or operable T3) with up to three positive lymph nodes, no distant metastases, and a WHO performance status of 0-1 were enrolled and their genomic risk (using the MammaPrint 70-gene signature) and clinical risk (using a modified version of Adjuvant! Online) were determined. Patients with low clinical and low genomic risk results did not receive chemotherapy, and patients with high clinical and high genomic risk did receive chemotherapy (mostly anthracycline-based or taxane-based, or a combination thereof). Patients with discordant risk results (ie, patients with high clinical risk but low genomic risk, and those with low clinical risk but high genomic risk) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive chemotherapy or not based on either the clinical risk or the genomic risk. Randomisation was done centrally and used a minimisation technique that was stratified by institution, risk group, and clinical-pathological characteristics. Treatment allocation was not masked. The primary endpoint was to test whether the distant metastasis-free survival rate at 5 years in patients with high clinical risk and low genomic risk not receiving chemotherapy had a lower boundary of the 95% CI above the predefined non-inferiority boundary of 92%. In the primary test population of patients with high clinical risk and low genomic risk who adhered to the treatment allocation of no chemotherapy and had no change in risk post-enrolment. Here, we present updated follow-up as well as an exploratory analysis of a potential age effect (≤50 years vs >50 years) and an analysis by nodal status for patients with hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative disease. These analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00433589, and the European Clinical Trials database, EudraCT2005-002625-31. Recruitment is complete and further long-term follow-up is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 8, 2007, and July 11, 2011, 6693 patients were enrolled. On Feb 26, 2020, median follow-up was 8·7 years (IQR 7·8-9·7). The updated 5-year distant metastasis-free survival rate for patients with high clinical risk and low genomic risk receiving no chemotherapy (primary test population, n=644) was 95·1% (95% CI 93·1-96·6), which is above the predefined non-inferiority boundary of 92%, supporting the previous analysis and proving MINDACT as a positive de-escalation trial. Patients with high clinical risk and low genomic risk were randomly assigned to receive chemotherapy (n=749) or not (n=748); this was the intention-to-treat population. The 8-year estimates for distant metastasis-free survival in the intention-to-treat population were 92·0% (95% CI 89·6-93·8) for chemotherapy versus 89·4% (86·8-91·5) for no chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0·66; 95% CI 0·48-0·92). An exploratory analysis confined to the subset of patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative disease (1358 [90.7%] of 1497 randomly assigned patients, of whom 676 received chemotherapy and 682 did not) shows different effects of chemotherapy administration on 8-year distant metastasis-free survival according to age: 93·6% (95% CI 89·3-96·3) with chemotherapy versus 88·6% (83·5-92·3) without chemotherapy in 464 women aged 50 years or younger (absolute difference 5·0 percentage points [SE 2·8, 95% CI -0·5 to 10·4]) and 90·2% (86·8-92·7) versus 90·0% (86·6-92·6) in 894 women older than 50 years (absolute difference 0·2 percentage points [2·1, -4·0 to 4·4]). The 8-year distant metastasis-free survival in the exploratory analysis by nodal status in these patients was 91·7% (95% CI 88·1-94·3) with chemotherapy and 89·2% (85·2-92·2) without chemotherapy in 699 node-negative patients (absolute difference 2·5 percentage points [SE 2·3, 95% CI -2·1 to 7·2]) and 91·2% (87·2-94·0) versus 89·9% (85·8-92·8) for 658 patients with one to three positive nodes (absolute difference 1·3 percentage points [2·4, -3·5 to 6·1]).

INTERPRETATION

With a more mature follow-up approaching 9 years, the 70-gene signature shows an intact ability of identifying among women with high clinical risk, a subgroup, namely patients with a low genomic risk, with an excellent distant metastasis-free survival when treated with endocrine therapy alone. For these women the magnitude of the benefit from adding chemotherapy to endocrine therapy remains small (2·6 percentage points) and is not enhanced by nodal positivity. However, in an underpowered exploratory analysis this benefit appears to be age-dependent, as it is only seen in women younger than 50 years where it reaches a clinically relevant threshold of 5 percentage points. Although, possibly due to chemotherapy-induced ovarian function suppression, it should be part of informed, shared decision making. Further study is needed in younger women, who might need reinforced endocrine therapy to forego chemotherapy.

FUNDING

European Commission Sixth Framework Programme.

Abstract GS4-11: How low is low risk: MINDACT updated outcome and treatment benefit in patients considered clinical low risk and stratified by genomic signature, age and nodal status

Background With 8.7 years follow-up, the prospective phase III randomized MINDACT trial (EORTC 10041/BIG3-04) continues to meet its primary objective, i.e. 95.1% (95%CI 93.1-96.6), 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in clinical high (C-High)/genomic low (G-Low) risk patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) (Cardoso et al., ASCO 2020). In addition, about half of the MINDACT patients had a low clinical risk (C-Low) defined by pre-specified clinical-pathological characteristics. Here, we evaluated the outcome of this C-Low population stratified by the 70-gene signature (MammaPrint®) (G-Low or G-High) for outcome considering age, and present data on the total G-low population (C-Low and C-High combined). Methods Of 6693 patients enrolled in the MINDACT trial between 2007 and 2011, 3337 were C-Low, characterized as mainly T1, grade 1 or 2, and node negative. We evaluated the pre-specified DMFS, distant metastasis free interval (DMFI), and overall survival (OS) rates at 5 and 8 years in the C-Low population: i) in patients with genomic low risk (C-Low/G-Low, n=2744) who were recommended to receive endocrine therapy only (for 99% HR+), and ii) in C-Low/G-High who received ACT or not following randomization (ITT, n=690, 81% HR+). Exploratory analyses by age, ≤50 and &gt;50, were conducted for ACT vs no ACT received in C-Low/G-High. In parallel we estimated survival rates for all G-low patients if all would have followed the genomic low risk assignment and received no ACT (C-Low/G-Low, and C-High/G-Low randomized to no ACT double weighted, n=4130). We used Kaplan-Meier estimates for time to event endpoints and hazard ratios with 95%CI from Cox-regression models adjusted for stratification factors used for the randomization. Results C-low/G-low patients who were recommended endocrine therapy only (compliance &gt; 79%, based on local guidelines) have excellent 5 and 8 year survival rates for all endpoints (Table 1). The estimated survival rates for all G-Low patients, if all would have followed the genomic low risk assignment and received no ACT, is excellent as well (Table 1), albeit this population includes both C-Low and C-High patients. The survival estimates for C-Low/G-High patients are for all endpoints a few percentage points lower than for the C-Low/G-Low group (Table 1). At 8 years of follow-up, in the relatively small subset of 690 patients with C-Low/G-High tumors assigned to ACT or not by randomization (ITT), a 1.5% (SE ±2.3%) higher DMFS is seen in the ACT group, and a 2.9% (SE ±2.0%) higher DMFI. This suggested benefit is mostly seen in patients under 50 years of age (absolute Δ in DMFS for ACT vs no ACT at 8 years: 5.4% for age ≤50 vs -0.3% for age &gt;50). Conclusion Patients with a 70-gene G-Low risk tumor have an excellent 8 year outcome in the context of C-Low characteristics when recommended for endocrine therapy only, very close to the outcome in the larger group of all G-Low patients regardless of clinical risk. Stratification of C-Low patients in to G-Low and G-high provides meaningful information. The benefit of ACT in C-Low patients with a 70-gene G-High risk tumor needs further confirmation, especially relevant in younger women.

Table 1All Patients PopulationPatientsObserved events% at 5 years (95% CI)% at 8 years (95% CI)DMFSC-Low / G-Low274417097.3 (96.6-97.9)94.7 (93.8-95.6)C-Low / G-High5936194.2 (92.0-95.9)91.1 (88.4-93.3)DMFIC-Low / G-Low274410398.5 (97.9-98.9)96.7 (95.9-97.3)C-Low / G-High5934695.8 (93.8-97.2)93.5 (91.0-95.3)OSC-Low / G-Low274412298.2 (97.6-98.7)96.5 (95.7-97.2)C-Low / G-High5934496.8 (94.9-98.0)93.1 (90.5-95.0)Patients G-low (C-Low & C-High)PatientsEstimated events% at 5 years% at 8 yearsDMFSAll G-Low - no ACT413033996.492.8DMFIAll G-Low - no ACT413024497.494.6OSAll G-Low - no ACT413022397.995.7

Citation Format: Laura J van 't Veer, Fatima Cardoso, Coralie Poncet, Josephine Lopes Cardozo, Suzette Delaloge, Jean-Yves Pierga, Peter Vuylsteke, Etienne Brain, Giuseppe Viale, Sherko Kümmel, Isabel T Rubio, Gabriele Zoppoli, Alistair Thompson, Erika Matos, Khalil Zaman, Susan Knox, Florentine Hilbers, Aleksandra Peric, Bart Meulemans, Martine Picccart, Emiel J Th Rutgers. How low is low risk: MINDACT updated outcome and treatment benefit in patients considered clinical low risk and stratified by genomic signature, age and nodal status [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-11.

Abstract PS6-01: How low is low risk: MINDACT updated outcome and treatment benefit in patients considered clinical low risk and stratified by genomic signature, age and nodal status

Background With 8.7 years follow-up, the prospective phase III randomized MINDACT trial (EORTC 10041/BIG3-04) continues to meet its primary objective, i.e. 95.1% (95%CI 93.1-96.6), 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in clinical high (C-High)/genomic low (G-Low) risk patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) (Cardoso et al., ASCO 2020). In addition, about half of the MINDACT patients had a low clinical risk (C-Low) defined by pre-specified clinical-pathological characteristics. Here, we evaluated the outcome of this C-Low population stratified by the 70-gene signature (MammaPrint®) (G-Low or G-High) for outcome considering age, and present data on the total G-low population (C-Low and C-High combined). Methods Of 6693 patients enrolled in the MINDACT trial between 2007 and 2011, 3337 were C-Low, characterized as mainly T1, grade 1 or 2, and node negative. We evaluated the pre-specified DMFS, distant metastasis free interval (DMFI), and overall survival (OS) rates at 5 and 8 years in the C-Low population: i) in patients with genomic low risk (C-Low/G-Low, n=2744) who were recommended to receive endocrine therapy only (for 99% HR+), and ii) in C-Low/G-High who received ACT or not following randomization (ITT, n=690, 81% HR+). Exploratory analyses by age, ≤50 and &gt;50, were conducted for ACT vs no ACT received in C-Low/G-High. In parallel we estimated survival rates for all G-low patients if all would have followed the genomic low risk assignment and received no ACT (C-Low/G-Low, and C-High/G-Low randomized to no ACT double weighted, n=4130). We used Kaplan-Meier estimates for time to event endpoints and hazard ratios with 95%CI from Cox-regression models adjusted for stratification factors used for the randomization. Results C-low/G-low patients who were recommended endocrine therapy only (compliance &gt; 79%, based on local guidelines) have excellent 5 and 8 year survival rates for all endpoints (Table 1). The estimated survival rates for all G-Low patients, if all would have followed the genomic low risk assignment and received no ACT, is excellent as well (Table 1), albeit this population includes both C-Low and C-High patients. The survival estimates for C-Low/G-High patients are for all endpoints a few percentage points lower than for the C-Low/G-Low group (Table 1). At 8 years of follow-up, in the relatively small subset of 690 patients with C-Low/G-High tumors assigned to ACT or not by randomization (ITT), a 1.5% (SE ±2.3%) higher DMFS is seen in the ACT group, and a 2.9% (SE ±2.0%) higher DMFI. This suggested benefit is mostly seen in patients under 50 years of age (absolute Δ in DMFS for ACT vs no ACT at 8 years: 5.4% for age ≤50 vs -0.3% for age &gt;50). Conclusion Patients with a 70-gene G-Low risk tumor have an excellent 8 year outcome in the context of C-Low characteristics when recommended for endocrine therapy only, very close to the outcome in the larger group of all G-Low patients regardless of clinical risk. Stratification of C-Low patients in to G-Low and G-high provides meaningful information. The benefit of ACT in C-Low patients with a 70-gene G-High risk tumor needs further confirmation, especially relevant in younger women.

Table 1All Patients PopulationPatientsObserved events% at 5 years (95% CI)% at 8 years (95% CI)DMFSC-Low / G-Low274417097.3 (96.6-97.9)94.7 (93.8-95.6)C-Low / G-High5936194.2 (92.0-95.9)91.1 (88.4-93.3)DMFIC-Low / G-Low274410398.5 (97.9-98.9)96.7 (95.9-97.3)C-Low / G-High5934695.8 (93.8-97.2)93.5 (91.0-95.3)OSC-Low / G-Low274412298.2 (97.6-98.7)96.5 (95.7-97.2)C-Low / G-High5934496.8 (94.9-98.0)93.1 (90.5-95.0)Patients G-low (C-Low & C-High)PatientsEstimated events% at 5 years% at 8 yearsDMFSAll G-Low - no ACT413033996.492.8DMFIAll G-Low - no ACT413024497.494.6OSAll G-Low - no ACT413022397.995.7

Citation Format: Laura J van 't Veer, Fatima Cardoso, Coralie Poncet, Josephine Lopes Cardozo, Suzette Delaloge, Jean-Yves Pierga, Peter Vuylsteke, Etienne Brain, Giuseppe Viale, Sherko Kümmel, Isabel T Rubio, Gabriele Zoppoli, Alistair Thompson, Erika Matos, Khalil Zaman, Susan Knox, Florentine Hilbers, Aleksandra Peric, Bart Meulemans, Martine Picccart, Emiel J Th Rutgers. How low is low risk: MINDACT updated outcome and treatment benefit in patients considered clinical low risk and stratified by genomic signature, age and nodal status [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS6-01.

Effect of lipegfilgrastim administration as prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia on dose modification and incidence of neutropenic events: real-world evidence from a non-interventional study in Belgium and Luxembourg

Objectives: This study evaluated the effect of lipegfilgrastim, a glycopegylated granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, used as primary (PP) or secondary prophylaxis (SP) on chemotherapy (CT) treatment modifications, as well as the incidence of CT-induced neutropenic events in adult patients receiving cytotoxic CT with or without biological therapy (BT) for solid and hematological tumors, in routine clinical practice. Other objectives were to characterize the population of lipegfilgrastim-treated cancer patients and safety assessment. Methods: This phase 4, prospective, observational study was conducted at 15 centers from Belgium and Luxembourg, between 2015 and 2017. Results: Of 139 patients, 82.7% had breast cancer and 54.7% were treated with dose-dense regimens. Most received lipegfilgrastim as PP (82.0%) and were at high-risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) (68.3%). FN and grade III/IV neutropenia were reported for 7.9% and 22.3% patients. Among 123 evaluated patients, CT/BT dose modifications were recorded for 33.3% (PP) and 52.4% (SP) of patients receiving lipegfilgrastim; dose reductions, followed by dose delays, were more frequent than omissions. Among 45 patients with dose modifications, FN was reported for 8.8% and 9.1% patients and grade IV neutropenia for 17.6% and 18.2% of patients when lipegfilgrastim was applied for PP and SP, respectively. Adverse events related to lipegfilgrastim occurred for 55 (39.6%) patients; bone pain and back pain were more frequent. Lipegfilgrastim-related serious adverse events were reported for 9 (6.5%) patients. Conclusion: Use of lipegfilgrastim in real-world settings resulted in limited CT dose modifications and low incidences of neutropenic events, with no new safety concerns arising.

Inhibition of RANK signaling in breast cancer induces an anti-tumor immune response orchestrated by CD8+ T cells

Most breast cancers exhibit low immune infiltration and are unresponsive to immunotherapy. We hypothesized that inhibition of the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB (RANK) signaling pathway may enhance immune activation. Here we report that loss of RANK signaling in mouse tumor cells increases leukocytes, lymphocytes, and CD8⁺ T cells, and reduces macrophage and neutrophil infiltration. CD8⁺ T cells mediate the attenuated tumor phenotype observed upon RANK loss, whereas neutrophils, supported by RANK-expressing tumor cells, induce immunosuppression. RANKL inhibition increases the anti-tumor effect of immunotherapies in breast cancer through a tumor cell mediated effect. Comparably, pre-operative single-agent denosumab in premenopausal early-stage breast cancer patients from the Phase-II D-BEYOND clinical trial (NCT01864798) is well tolerated, inhibits RANK pathway and increases tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and CD8⁺ T cells. Higher RANK signaling activation in tumors and serum RANKL levels at baseline predict these immune-modulatory effects. No changes in tumor cell proliferation (primary endpoint) or other secondary endpoints are observed. Overall, our preclinical and clinical findings reveal that tumor cells exploit RANK pathway as a mechanism to evade immune surveillance and support the use of RANK pathway inhibitors to prime luminal breast cancer for immunotherapy.

Receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB (RANK)/RANK-ligand (RANKL) signaling regulates the tumor-immune crosstalk. Here the authors show that systemic RANKL inhibition promotes CD8 + T cell infiltration in patients with early breast cancer and that loss of RANK signaling in tumor cells drives a T cell-dependent anti-tumor response in preclinical models.

Central radiology assessment of the randomized phase III open-label OVHIPEC-1 trial in ovarian cancer

Introduction

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) improved investigator-assessed recurrence-free survival and overall survival in patients with stage III ovarian cancer in the phase III OVHIPEC-1 trial. We analyzed whether an open-label design affected the results of the trial by central blinded assessment of recurrence-free survival, and tested whether HIPEC specifically targets the peritoneal surface by analyzing the site of disease recurrence.

Methods

OVHIPEC-1 was an open-label, multicenter, phase III trial that randomized 245 patients after three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to interval cytoreduction with or without HIPEC using cisplatin (100 mg/m2). Patients received three additional cycles of chemotherapy after surgery. Computed tomography (CT) scans and serum cancer antigen 125 (CA125) measurements were performed during chemotherapy, and during follow-up. Two expert radiologists reviewed all available CT scans. They were blinded for treatment allocation and clinical outcome. Central revision included Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 measurements and peritoneal cancer index scorings at baseline, during treatment, and during follow-up. Time to centrally-revised recurrence was compared between study arms using Cox proportional hazard models. Subdistribution models compared time to peritoneal recurrence between arms, accounting for competing risks.

Results

CT scans for central revision were available for 231 patients (94%) during neoadjuvant treatment and 212 patients (87%) during follow-up. Centrally-assessed median recurrence-free survival was 9.9 months in the surgery group and 13.2 months in the surgery+HIPEC group (HR for disease recurrence or death 0.72, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.94; p=0.015). The improved recurrence-free survival and overall survival associated with HIPEC were irrespective of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and baseline peritoneal cancer index. Cumulative incidence of peritoneal recurrence was lower after surgery+HIPEC, but there was no difference in extraperitoneal recurrences.

Conclusion

Centrally-assessed recurrence-free survival analysis confirms the benefit of adding HIPEC to interval cytoreductive surgery in patients with stage III ovarian cancer, with fewer peritoneal recurrences. These results rule out radiological bias caused by the open-label nature of the study.

Treatment algorithm in patients with ovarian cancer

Most ovarian cancer patients are diagnosed only at advanced stages when survival outcomes are worse, andwhen therapeutic decisions might prove challenging. The fundamental treatment for women with ovarian cancerincludes debulking surgery whenever possible and appropriate systemic therapy (chemotherapy, targeted andantiangiogenic agents). In the last few years, knowledge about histological and molecular characteristics of ovariancancer subtypes and stages has increased considerably. This has enabled the development and improvement ofseveral options for the diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer in a patient-tailored approach. Accordingly,therapeutic decisions are guided by the characteristics of the patient and the tumour, especially the molecularfeatures of the cancer subtype and disease stage. Particularly relevant are the advances in early genetic testing ofgermline and somatic mutations involved in DNA repair, and the clinical development of targeted agents. In orderto implement the best individual medical strategies, in this article, we present an algorithm of treatment options,including recently developed targeted agents, for primary and recurrent ovarian cancer patients in Belgium.

Impact of solid cancer on in-hospital mortality overall and among different subgroups of patients with COVID-19: a nationwide, population-based analysis

BACKGROUND

Cancer seems to have an independent adverse prognostic effect on COVID-19-related mortality, but uncertainty exists regarding its effect across different patient subgroups. We report a population-based analysis of patients hospitalised with COVID-19 with prior or current solid cancer versus those without cancer.

METHODS

We analysed data of adult patients registered until 24 May 2020 in the Belgian nationwide database of Sciensano. The primary objective was in-hospital mortality within 30 days of COVID-19 diagnosis among patients with solid cancer versus patients without cancer. Severe event occurrence, a composite of intensive care unit admission, invasive ventilation and/or death, was a secondary objective. These endpoints were analysed across different patient subgroups. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to analyse the association between cancer and clinical characteristics (baseline analysis) and the effect of cancer on in-hospital mortality and on severe event occurrence, adjusting for clinical characteristics (in-hospital analysis).

RESULTS

A total of 13 594 patients (of whom 1187 with solid cancer (8.7%)) were evaluable for the baseline analysis and 10 486 (892 with solid cancer (8.5%)) for the in-hospital analysis. Patients with cancer were older and presented with less symptoms/signs and lung imaging alterations. The 30-day in-hospital mortality was higher in patients with solid cancer compared with patients without cancer (31.7% vs 20.0%, respectively; adjusted OR (aOR) 1.34; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.58). The aOR was 3.84 (95% CI 1.94 to 7.59) among younger patients (<60 years) and 2.27 (95% CI 1.41 to 3.64) among patients without other comorbidities. Severe event occurrence was similar in both groups (36.7% vs 28.8%; aOR 1.10; 95% CI 0.95 to 1.29).

CONCLUSIONS

This population-based analysis demonstrates that solid cancer is an independent adverse prognostic factor for in-hospital mortality among patients with COVID-19. This adverse effect was more pronounced among younger patients and those without other comorbidities. Patients with solid cancer should be prioritised in vaccination campaigns and in tailored containment measurements.

MILO/ENGOT-ov11: Binimetinib Versus Physician's Choice Chemotherapy in Recurrent or Persistent Low-Grade Serous Carcinomas of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneum

PURPOSE

Low-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (LGSOCs) have historically low chemotherapy responses. Alterations affecting the MAPK pathway, most commonly KRAS/BRAF, are present in 30%-60% of LGSOCs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate binimetinib, a potent MEK1/2 inhibitor with demonstrated activity across multiple cancers, in LGSOC.

METHODS

This was a 2:1 randomized study of binimetinib (45 mg twice daily) versus physician's choice chemotherapy (PCC). Eligible patients had recurrent measurable LGSOC after ≥ 1 prior platinum-based chemotherapy but ≤ 3 prior chemotherapy lines. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR); additional assessments included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), clinical-benefit rate, biomarkers, and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 303 patients were randomly assigned to an arm of the study at the time of interim analysis (January 20, 2016). Median PFS by BICR was 9.1 months (95% CI, 7.3 to 11.3) for binimetinib and 10.6 months (95% CI, 9.2 to 14.5) for PCC (hazard ratio,1.21; 95%CI, 0.79 to 1.86), resulting in early study closure according to a prespecified futility boundary after 341 patients had enrolled. Secondary efficacy end points were similar in the two groups: ORR 16% (complete response [CR]/partial responses[PRs], 32) versus 13% (CR/PRs, 13); median DOR, 8.1 months (range, 0.03 to ≥ 12.0 months) versus 6.7 months (0.03 to ≥ 9.7 months); and median OS, 25.3 versus 20.8 months for binimetinib and PCC, respectively. Safety results were consistent with the known safety profile of binimetinib; the most common grade ≥ 3 event was increased blood creatine kinase level (26%). Post hoc analysis suggests a possible association between KRAS mutation and response to binimetinib. Results from an updated analysis (n = 341; January 2019) were consistent.

CONCLUSION

Although the MEK Inhibitor in Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Study did not meet its primary end point, binimetinib showed activity in LGSOC across the efficacy end points evaluated. A higher response to chemotherapy than expected was observed and KRAS mutation might predict response to binimetinib.

The added value of geriatric assessment in evaluating a patient's Health-Related Quality-of-Life: A study in ≥70-year-old early-stage invasive breast cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between geriatric assessment (GA) and health-related Quality-of-Life (HRQOL) in older patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

Patients were assigned either to adjuvant chemotherapy (CTG) or to a control group (CG). Spearman rank coefficients (ρ) calculated correlations between HRQOL and GA at baseline, 3 months and 1 year. Multivariate regressions modelled the prognostic value of GA in evaluating of a patient's HRQOL and the accuracy of baseline GA in predicting HRQOL decline (change of ≥10 points).

RESULTS

The analysis included 57 patients in the CTG and 52 in the CG. Strong correlations (ρ ≥ 0.5) were reported between the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Scale and Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Instrumental ADL (iADL) and Leuven Oncogeriatric Frailty Score Scale (LOFS). Multivariate models demonstrated that poor iADL, ADL and LOFS (CG) and ADL and iADL (CTG) contributed to a statistically (all p < .05) worse HRQOL. The relative gain in predicting 3-month and 1-year HRQOL decline was 24.1% and 4.7% (CG) and 6.1% and 18.3% (CTG).

CONCLUSION

Our results show that the functional measures in the GA are strongly correlated with patient self-reported functioning. Poor baseline GA has a modest probability of predicting HRQOL deterioration.