Acute Abortive Therapies for Seizure Clusters in Long-Term Care

OBJECTIVES

To describe acute seizure treatment for the long-term care setting, emphasizing rescue (acute abortive) medications for on-site management of acute unexpected seizures and seizure clusters.

DESIGN

Narrative review.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

People with seizures in long-term care, including group residences.

METHODS

PubMed was searched using keywords that pertained to rescue medications, seizure emergencies/epilepsy, seizure action plans, and long-term care.

RESULTS

Seizure disorder, including epilepsy, is prevalent in long-term care residences, and rescue medications can be used for on-site treatment. Diazepam rectal gel, intranasal midazolam, and diazepam nasal spray are US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved seizure-cluster rescue medications, and intravenous diazepam and lorazepam are approved for status epilepticus. Benzodiazepines differ by formulation, route of administration, absorption, and metabolism. Intranasal formulations are easy and ideal for public use and when rectal treatment is challenging (eg, wheelchair). Intranasal, intrabuccal, and rectal formulations do not require specialized training to administer and are easier for staff at all levels of training compared with intravenous treatment. Off-label rescue medications may have anecdotal support; however, potential disadvantages include variable absorption and onset of action as well as potential risks to patients and caregivers/care partners. Delivery of intravenous-administered rescue medications is delayed by the time needed to set up and deliver the medication and is subject to dosing errors. Seizure action plans that include management of acute seizures can optimize the quality and timing of treatment, which may reduce emergency service needs and prevent progression to status epilepticus.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Seizure disorder is prevalent across all ages but is increased in older adults and in those with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Prompt intervention may reduce negative outcomes associated with acute unexpected seizures and seizure clusters. Seizure action plans that include acute seizures can improve the treatment response by detailing the necessary information for staff to provide immediate treatment.

Intravenous ganaxolone for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus: Results from an open-label, dose-finding, phase 2 trial

OBJECTIVE

Patients with refractory status epilepticus (RSE) have failed treatment with benzodiazepines and ≥1 second-line intravenous (IV) antiseizure medication (ASM). Guidelines recommend IV anesthesia when second-line ASMs have failed, but potential harms can outweigh the benefits. Novel treatments are needed to stop and durably control RSE without escalation to IV anesthetics. Ganaxolone is an investigational neuroactive steroid in development for RSE treatment. This study's objective was to determine the appropriate dosing for IV ganaxolone in RSE and obtain a preliminary assessment of efficacy and safety.

METHODS

This was an open-label, phase 2 trial conducted from February 19, 2018 to September 18, 2019, at three sites in the United States. Patients were aged ≥12 years, had convulsive or nonconvulsive SE, and failed to respond to ≥1 second-line IV ASM. Twenty-one patients were screened; 17 were enrolled. Patients received IV ganaxolone added to standard-of-care ASMs. Ganaxolone infusion was initiated as an IV bolus (over 3 min) with continuous infusion of decreasing infusion rates for 48-96 h followed by an 18-h taper. There were three ganaxolone dosing cohorts: low, 500 mg/day; medium, 650 mg/day; and high, 713 mg/day. The primary end point was the number of patients not requiring escalation to IV anesthetic treatment within 24 h of ganaxolone initiation.

RESULTS

Most of the 17 enrolled patients (65%) had nonconvulsive SE, and had failed a median of three prior ASMs, including first-line benzodiazepine and second-line IV ASM therapy. Median time to SE cessation following ganaxolone initiation was 5 min. No patient required escalation to third-line IV anesthetics during the 24-h period following ganaxolone initiation. Two treatment-related serious adverse events (sedation) were reported. Of the three deaths, none was considered related to ganaxolone; all occurred 9-22 days after completing ganaxolone.

SIGNIFICANCE

IV ganaxolone achieved rapid and durable seizure control in patients with RSE, and showed acceptable safety and tolerability.

Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of weight-based IV loading dose of lacosamide in the ICU

Among the newer antiseizure medications, lacosamide (LCM) has been increasingly used for acute seizures and status epilepticus in intensive care unit (ICU). We reviewed retrospectively weight-based dosing of IV LCM in patients admitted to ICU with acute seizures and status epilepticus. We have analyzed 354/382 patient treated with IV LCM in ICU during the years 2013-2016. Data collected were age, total body weight, body mass index (BMI), loading dose, post-IV infusion LCM blood level, duration of infusion, blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, mean arterial pressures, and documented initiation of pressor agents during or within in 30 min of infusion. Larger doses >8 mg/kg of IV LCM that can be safely administered in ICU patients produce effective plasma levels of 15-20 μg/ml with relatively constant volume of distribution.

Comparative analysis of the safety and tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate in older (≥60 years) and younger (18-59 years) adults

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety and tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL), a once-daily oral anti-seizure drug (ASD), in older and younger adult patient populations.

METHODS

Two post-hoc pooled data analyses were performed: one from three Phase III studies in patients with focal (partial-onset) seizures who were taking 1-3 concomitant ASDs; the other from five Phase II studies in patients from non-epilepsy populations not taking other ASDs chronically and/or at a clinically-effective anti-seizure dose. The frequencies of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were calculated for the older (≥60 years) and younger (18-59 years) adults separately.

RESULTS

In the focal seizures study pool, 4.1 % of patients (58/1431) were aged ≥60 years. The overall frequency of TEAEs was 77.5 % in older ESL-treated patients and 72.6 % in younger ESL-treated patients (p = 0.495). For patients who received placebo, the overall frequency of TEAEs was 50.0 % in the older adults and 57.5 % in the younger adults (p = 0.531). The overall placebo-adjusted frequency of TEAEs was 27.5 % in older adults and 15.1 % in younger adults. The placebo-adjusted frequencies of the TEAEs dizziness, somnolence, headache, nausea, diplopia, blurred vision, and ataxia were ≥5 % higher, and frequencies of vomiting and vertigo were ≥2 % higher in older than younger adults. The overall frequency of TEAEs leading to discontinuation was 15.0 % in older ESL-treated patients and 17.6 % in younger ESL-treated patients (p = 0.647); the frequency increased with increasing ESL dose. For patients who received placebo, the overall frequency of TEAEs leading to discontinuation was 5.6 % in older adults and 6.6 % in younger adults (p = 0.847). In the non-epilepsy study pool, 30.2 % of patients (515/1705) were aged ≥60 years. The overall frequency of TEAEs was 56.9 % in older ESL-treated patients and 58.8 % in younger ESL-treated patients. The placebo-adjusted frequencies were 14.9 % in older and 15.1 % in younger ESL-treated patients. The placebo-adjusted frequencies of the TEAEs nausea, vomiting, fatigue, and vertigo were ≥2 % higher in older adults, whereas somnolence was ≥2 % higher in younger adults. The overall frequency of TEAEs leading to discontinuation was 18.3 % in older ESL-treated patients and 12.1 % in younger ESL-treated patients (p = 0.003); frequencies were not related to ESL dose. For patients who received placebo, the overall frequency of TEAEs leading to discontinuation was 8.0 % in older adults and 5.6 % in younger adults (p = 0.407).

CONCLUSION

Analyses of adverse event data support the safety and tolerability of ESL in adults aged ≥60 years. In the limited number of older patients with focal seizures taking ESL plus concomitant ASDs (n = 40), the frequency of TEAEs was generally higher than in younger adults. However, in the non-epilepsy patient group (in which the number of older patients was ten times larger; 427 patients taking ESL without concomitant ASDs), no marked age-related TEAE differences were observed, suggesting that increased ASD load associated with adjunctive therapy may complicate treatment selection in older patients, due to risk of increased adverse events. As is common practice for all ASDs, balancing clinical response and tolerability is needed in this vulnerable group of patients.

Lamotrigine pharmacokinetics following oral and stable-labeled intravenous administration in young and elderly adult epilepsy patients: Effect of age

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were to investigate the effect of age on pharmacokinetic parameters of lamotrigine (LTG) and estimate parameter variability.

METHODS

Patients (>18 years old) who were already on a steady-state dose of LTG therapy with no interacting comedications were enrolled. Patients with significant cardiac disease, severe kidney dysfunction, or moderate-to-severe liver dysfunction were excluded. Fifty milligrams of a stable-labeled intravenous LTG formulation (SL-LTG) replaced 50 mg of a patient's normal daily oral LTG dose. Thirteen blood samples were collected in each person over 96 hours. SL-LTG and unlabeled LTG concentrations were measured simultaneously by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Concentration-time data were analyzed by nonlinear mixed-effects modeling (NONMEM version 7.3).

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients representing 16 young (18-48 years old) and 12 elderly (63-87 years old) patients were included, yielding 382 unlabeled and 351 SL-LTG concentrations. A two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination adequately described the plasma concentration-time data. Bioavailability of oral LTG was approximately 74% and did not differ by age. LTG clearance was 27.2% lower in elderly than in young patients (1.80 L/h for a 70-kg patient).

SIGNIFICANCE

Although LTG bioavailability was not affected by age, LTG clearance was 27.2% lower in elderly versus young patients of comparable body weight, possibly indicating lower dosages being needed in this population.

Factors in Variability of Serial Gabapentin Concentrations in Elderly Patients with Epilepsy

OBJECTIVES

To characterize and quantify the variability of serial gabapentin concentrations in elderly patients with epilepsy.

METHODS

This study included 83 patients (age ≥ 60 yrs) from an 18-center randomized double-blind double-dummy parallel study from the Veterans Affairs Cooperative 428 Study. All patients were taking 1500 mg/day gabapentin. Within-person coefficient of variation (CV) in gabapentin concentrations, measured weekly to bimonthly for up to 52 weeks, then quarterly, was computed. Impact of patient characteristics on gabapentin concentrations (linear mixed model) and CV (linear regression) were estimated.

RESULTS

A total of 482 gabapentin concentration measurements were available for analysis. Gabapentin concentrations and intrapatient CVs ranged from 0.5 to 22.6 μg/ml (mean 7.9 μg/ml, standard deviation [SD] 4.1 μg/ml) and 2% to 79% (mean 27.9%, SD 15.3%), respectively, across all visits. Intrapatient CV was higher by 7.3% for those with a body mass index of ≥ 30 kg/m² (coefficient = 7.3, p=0.04). CVs were on average 0.5% higher for each 1-unit higher CV in creatinine clearance (coefficient = 0.5, p=0.03) and 1.2% higher for each 1-hour longer mean time after dose (coefficient = 1.2, p=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial intrapatient variability in serial gabapentin concentration was noted in elderly patients with epilepsy. Creatinine clearance, time of sampling relative to dose, and obesity were found to be positively associated with variability.

Steady-state pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of immediate-release and extended-release formulations of lamotrigine in elderly epilepsy patients: Use of stable isotope methodology

A classic 2-period crossover bioavailability study was conducted to evaluate the relative and absolute bioavailability of immediate-release (IR) and extended-release (XR) lamotrigine formulations under steady-state conditions in elderly patients with epilepsy. On treatment days, each subject's morning dose (IR or XR lamotrigine) was replaced with an intravenous 50-mg dose of stable-labeled lamotrigine. Lamotrigine concentrations were measured at 13 points between 0 and 96 hours. XR and IR lamotrigine formulations were similar with respect to steady-state area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours (AUC0-24 h ss), average concentration (Cavg, ss), and trough concentration (Cτ, ss). A 33% lower fluctuation in concentrations with XR was observed relative to IR lamotrigine. The time to peak concentration (Tmax, ss) was delayed for XR lamotrigine (3.0 vs 1.3 hours) with lower peak concentration (15% lower). The absolute bioavailability for IR and XR formulations was 73% and 92%, respectively. The formulations were bioequivalent with respect to AUC0-24 h ss, Cτ, ss, and Cavg, ss indicating that it may be possible to switch directly from IR to XR lamotrigine without changes in the total daily dose.

Safety & pK of IV loading dose of lacosamide in the ICU

A restrospective review of patients treated in the ICU for refractory status epilepticus who had received an initial IV loading dose of lacosamide (LCS) was performed. A total of 142 patients were identified. The first 34 patients received 400mg which by weight-based measurement ranged from 2 to 11 mg/kg. Higher mg/kg dosing had been used subsequently with doses up to 13 mg/kg. No patient required reduction in rate or cessation of infusion. Initiation of pressor agents was not needed during the infusion of the loading dose. Postinfusion LCS blood levels were drawn, and dosing of 10-12 mg/kg and higher resulted in blood levels above 15 μg/ml while doses of 2-6 mg/kg resulted in levels below 10 μg/ml. We conclude that a weight-based loading dose of 10-12 mg/kg at an infusion rate of 0.4 mg/kg/min is safe and will produce levels of 15 μg/ml and higher. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Status Epilepticus".

Population pharmacokinetics of unbound and total drug concentrations following intravenously administered carbamazepine in elderly and younger adult patients with epilepsy

The objective of the study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of unbound and total plasma carbamazepine (CBZ) concentrations following simultaneous administration of intravenous and oral formulations. We tested the hypothesis that age-related alterations in physiology and patient characteristics influence CBZ disposition and protein binding. Patients (n = 113) on maintenance therapy received a 100 mg dose of a novel, intravenous, stable-labeled (SL) CBZ formulation as partial replacement of their morning CBZ dose. A two-compartment model described unbound and total SL-CBZ data. The stable-labeled intravenous dosing methodology enabled the estimation of the CBZ clearance (CL) and volumes of distribution. The CL of CBZ was dependent on race through the model equation unbound CL (L/hour) = 11.2 × (1.30)(Race); where Race = 1 for Caucasian, 0 for African American. Total body weight explained 57% and 70% of the interindividual variability in the central and peripheral volumes of distribution, respectively. Age, sex, smoking, plasma albumin, and alpha 1-acid glycoprotein concentrations had no effect on CL, binding or volumes of distribution. The model was evaluated via bootstrap and predictive check. Results may support race specific dosing for CBZ where an average African-American individual would receive 70% of the standard dose prescribed for the Caucasian person.

Steady-state carbamazepine pharmacokinetics following oral and stable-labeled intravenous administration in epilepsy patients: effects of race and sex

Carbamazepine is a widely prescribed antiepileptic drug. Owing to the lack of an intravenous formulation, its absolute bioavailability, absolute clearance, and half-life in patients at steady state have not been determined. We developed an intravenous, stable-labeled (SL) formulation in order to characterize carbamazepine pharmacokinetics in patients. Ninety-two patients received a 100-mg infusion of SL-carbamazepine as part of their morning dose. Blood samples were collected up to 96 hours after drug administration. Plasma drug concentrations were measured with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, and concentration-time data were analyzed using a noncompartmental approach. Absolute clearance (l/hr/kg) was significantly lower in men (0.039 ± 0.017) than in women (0.049 ± 0.018; P = 0.007) and in African Americans (0.039 ± 0.017) when compared with Caucasians (0.048 ± 0.018; P = 0.019). Half-life was significantly longer in men than in women as well as in African Americans as compared with Caucasians. The absolute bioavailability was 0.78. Sex and racial differences in clearance may contribute to variable dosing requirements and clinical response.

Characterization of the time course of carbamazepine deinduction by an enzyme turnover model

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Carbamazepine is a potent inducer of drug metabolizing enzymes, which results in a number of clinically significant drug-drug interactions. Deinduction occurs when long-term carbamazepine therapy is discontinued. The goal of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model to describe the time course of carbamazepine deinduction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Stable-labelled carbamazepine was administered intravenously on three occasions during the deinduction period to 15 patients with epilepsy for whom carbamazepine therapy was being discontinued. Data were analysed using a nonlinear mixed-effects model (NONMEM). An enzyme turnover model consisting of a one-compartment model linked with a hypothetical enzyme compartment was applied to characterize the time course of carbamazepine deinduction. Model evaluation was performed using the bootstrap approach and a visual predictive check.

RESULTS

In the final model, the deinduction process was accomplished by decreasing the rate of enzyme synthesis, resulting in a decrease in the relative amount of enzymes. The estimated rate constant for enzyme degradation was 0.00805 h-1, corresponding to a half-life of the combined enzymes of 86.1 hours (3.6 days).

CONCLUSION

An enzyme turnover model adequately characterized the experimental data. Based on the predicted enzyme half-life from the final model, the deinduction process should be completed within 2 weeks after carbamazepine therapy is terminated.

Application of volumetric MR spectroscopic imaging for localization of neocortical epilepsy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate volumetric proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) for localization of epileptogenic foci in neocortical epilepsy.

METHODS

Twenty-five subjects reporting seizures considered to be of neocortical origin were recruited to take part in a 3-T MR study that included high-resolution structural MRI and a whole-brain MRSI acquisition. Using a fully automated MRSI processing protocol, maps for signal intensity normalized N-acetylaspartate (NAA), creatine, and choline were created, together with the relative volume fraction of grey-matter, white-matter, and CSF within each MRSI voxel. Analyses were performed using visual observation of the metabolite and metabolite ratio maps; voxel-based calculation of differences in these metabolite maps relative to normal controls; comparison of average grey-matter and white-matter metabolite values over each lobar volume; and examination of relative left-right asymmetry factors by brain region.

RESULTS

Data from 14 subjects were suitable for inclusion in the analysis. Eight subjects had MRI-visible pathologies that were associated with decreases in NAA/creatine, which extended beyond the volume indicated by the MRI. Five subjects demonstrated no significant metabolic alterations using any of the analysis methods, and one subject had no findings on MRI or MRSI.

CONCLUSIONS

This proof of principle study supports previous evidence that alterations of MR-detected brain metabolites can be detected in tissue areas affected by neocortical seizure activity, while additionally demonstrating advantages of the volumetric MRSI approach.

Managing epilepsy: issues in the elderly

OBJECTIVES

To describe key factors that can affect treatment of epilepsy in the elderly. To outline steps to reduce or discontinue antiepileptic drug therapy in those who have been seizure-free. To design a care plan for a resident with a diagnosis of epilepsy.

DATA SOURCES

Live symposium presentation based on clinical practice and research.

CONCLUSIONS

Treating and managing epilepsy in the elderly may be complicated by confounding factors, including comorbidities and polypharmacy. Special attention must be paid to reduce drug interactions and monitor for effectiveness and toxicity. Consultant pharmacists play a key role in managing patients with epilepsy, and nursing facilities should strive to integrate consultant pharmacists into all stages of care plan development and revision.

Epilepsy in the elderly: medications and pharmacokinetics

OBJECTIVES

To describe the pharmacokinetics of the different antiepileptic drugs. To discuss optimal pharmacologic use of antiepileptic therapy as it relates to elderly individuals taking multiple medications. To understand the controversy over generic versus brand-name antiepileptic drugs.

DATA SOURCES

Live symposium presentation based on clinical practice and research.

CONCLUSIONS

While the goal of antiepileptic drug therapy is to have patients be seizure-free without experiencing side effects, this ideal may be difficult to achieve. Classical and newer antiepileptic drugs have varying mechanisms of action and pharmacokinetics that consultant pharmacists must understand. Because of the potential of drug interactions, selecting an appropriate antiepileptic drug requires a thorough assessment of patient health history to determine which therapy will be most effective and safe. Generic options are available and are effective for some, but concerns about bioequivalence make their use controversial.

Defining and diagnosing epilepsy in the elderly

OBJECTIVES

To distinguish between nonepileptic and epileptic seizures and further categorize epileptic seizures. To describe the prevalence and risk factors related to epilepsy in the elderly, including seizure triggers. To explain how to evaluate elderly patients who present with seizure symptoms.

DATA SOURCES

Live symposium presentation based on clinical practice and research. Current clinical research and guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

Seizures and epilepsy are prevalent in the elderly (> or =65 years of age). It is important to recognize that seizures in the elderly may present differently and can mimic other conditions common in the aged. Consultant pharmacists should understand these differences and be able to classify seizure types to allow for more appropriate treatment and management recommendations.

Safety of an IV formulation of carbamazepine

An intravenous formulation of carbamazepine (CBZ) was administered to 113 (60 male; 53 female) persons with epilepsy aged 19-87 years. Subjects received 100mg of study drug as replacement for 100mg of their usual morning dose of CBZ. There were no significant changes in blood pressure or heart rate suggesting that this formulation can be developed as replacement therapy for persons unable to take oral CBZ.

Topiramate in older patients with partial-onset seizures: a pilot double-blind, dose-comparison study

PURPOSE

Pharmacokinetics of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) can be altered by age-related changes in physiology, thereby altering clinical effects, especially tolerability, in older adults. We compared two dosages of topiramate (TPM) in a pilot study of patients >or=60 years of age with partial-onset seizures.

METHODS

In this 24-week, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study, patients with one or more seizures in previous 6 months were randomized to treatment with 50 or 200 mg/day TPM. TPM was initiated as monotherapy or added to one AED and titrated by 25 mg/day per week to target or maximum tolerated dose as the concomitant AED, if any, was withdrawn.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were randomized to the 50 mg/day TPM (mean age, 68 years) and 39-200 mg/day TPM (69 years). Seizure control was similar with the two dosages when TPM could be used as monotherapy, whereas 200 mg TPM was more effective than 50 mg in patients requiring adjunctive therapy. The overall incidence of adverse events was similar for the two dosages--66% with 50 mg and 62% with 200 mg TPM. Most common adverse events were somnolence (TPM 50, 13%; TPM 200, 8%), dizziness (13% vs. 8%), and headache (13% vs. 5%). Of 10 (13%) patients reporting a cognitive-related adverse event, six patients were assigned to the 50-mg group. A total of 14 patients (18%; seven in each group) discontinued TPM due to adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study supports the practice of using low-to-moderate dosages of AEDs in older adults.

Trends in antiepileptic drug prescribing for older patients with new-onset epilepsy: 2000-2004

BACKGROUND

Newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been shown to be equally efficacious as older seizure medications but with fewer neurotoxic and systemic side effects in the elderly. A growing body of clinical recommendations based on systematic literature review and expert opinion advocate the use of the newer agents and avoidance of phenobarbital and phenytoin. This study sought to determine if changes in practice occurred between 2000 and 2004--a time during which evidence and recommendations became increasingly available.

METHODS

National data from the Veterans Health Administration (VA; inpatient, outpatient, pharmacy) from 1998 to 2004 and Medicare data (1999-2004) were used to identify patients 66 years and older with new-onset epilepsy. Initial AED was the first AED received from the VA. AEDs were categorized into four groups: phenobarbital, phenytoin, standard (carbamazepine, valproate), and new (gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, topiramate).

RESULTS

We found a small reduction in use of phenytoin (70.6% to 66.1%) and phenobarbital (3.2% to 1.9%). Use of new AEDs increased significantly from 12.9% to 19.8%, due primarily to use of lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and topiramate.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a growing list of clinical recommendations and guidelines, phenytoin was the most commonly used antiepileptic drug, and there was little change in its use for elderly patients over 5 years. Research further exploring physician and health care system factors associated with change (or lack thereof) will provide better insight into the impact of clinical recommendations on practice.

Recruitment and retention in clinical trials of the elderly

The recruitment and retention of elderly patients in clinical trials provide many challenges. Factors affecting recruitment, retention, and cost of recruitment are discussed in this chapter. Various methods are described that were used in recruiting and retaining elderly patients in a Veterans Affairs (VA) Administration clinical trial that compared two newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), gabapentin and lamotrigine, to the established standard AED, carbamazepine. Various strategies were utilized in the VA study to improve recruitment, and each strategy's overall effectiveness was monitored. Modification of the patient inclusion criteria, by lowering the age of eligibility from 65 to 60 years, added approximately 100 patients to the study. Replacing five trial sites that had poor recruiting records, extending the patient recruitment period by 3 months, and conducting site visits also improved patient recruitment rates, such that 82.4% of target enrollment (720 patients) was achieved. The main reasons that screened patients were excluded from the study included: lack of seizures during the prior 3 months, unstable medical condition, adequate treatment with an AED, satisfaction with current treatment, and the inability to give informed consent. Retaining patients for 1 year was the primary outcome measure of this trial, with 46.8% of patients completing the year. The most common reasons for early termination were study drug-related adverse events (43.0%) and lack of seizure control (10.8%). Comorbidities and polypharmacy occurred more frequently in the elderly, and both had a negative influence on recruitment and retention.

Special issues in the management of young children, older adults, and the developmentally disabled

The very young, the very old, and those with developmental disability have an increased risk of both epilepsy and prolonged and repetitive seizures. The special issues that affect their management are reviewed. Polypharmacy that occurs because of comorbid illnesses requiring chronic medication can result in dangerous drug-drug interactions. The antiepileptic drug's pharmacokinetic profile must be factored when treating young children and older adults. Patients who have taken an older enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drug for years may have a markedly induced hepatic enzyme system that may alter drug metabolism. Overdose or toxicity may occur in older adults who may metabolize and clear antiepileptic drugs more slowly than younger patients. Benzodiazepines are the most rapidly effective acute therapy for repetitive or prolonged seizures. It is important to have a plan for management of prolonged and repetitive seizures. Long-term therapy should be managed in a manner that will eliminate the need for rescue therapies and visits to the emergency department.

Vigabatrin

Refractory epilepsies such as infantile spasms (IS) and complex partial seizures (CPS) can have a severe negative impact on the neurological integrity and quality of life of affected patients, in addition to drastically increasing their risk of premature mortality. Early identification of potentially effective pharmacotherapy agents is important. Vigabatrin has been shown to be a generally well tolerated and effective antiepileptic drug (AED) in a wide variety of seizure types affecting both children and adults, particularly those with IS and CPS. A bilateral, concentric constriction of the peripheral visual field characterizes the visual field defect (VFD) associated with vigabatrin, well characterized by numerous studies. This peripheral VFD presents in 30-50% of patients with exposure of several years; however, most of these patients are asymptomatic. In well-controlled studies, the earliest onset in patients with CPS is 11 months and at 5 months in infants, with average onsets being more than 5 years and 1 year, respectively. Patients with a peripheral VFD retain an average 65 degrees of lateral vision (normal, 90 degrees). The fact that many patients never develop the vigabatrin-related peripheral VFD, despite long-term exposure at high doses, may support the hypothesis that the injury is an idiosyncratic adverse drug reaction (as opposed to a strict dose- or duration-dependent toxicity). Effective testing methods are available to aid in the early detection and management of the peripheral VFD. This article discusses issues of importance to clinical decision-making in the use of vigabatrin to assist the physician and patient in assessing the benefits of vigabatrin therapy and understanding the potential risks of the VFD and uncontrolled seizures.

Diagnosing Epilepsy in the Elderly

Elderly individuals represent the fastest-growing segment of the US population. Seizures are common among elderly persons, and the etiology, clinical presentation, and prognosis of seizure disorders can often differ between elderly patients and younger individuals. However, published information regarding the diagnosis and management of epilepsy in elderly patients is scarce. Because a number of conditions that are common in elderly patients may resemble epilepsy, diagnosis can be challenging. Cardiovascular conditions, migraines, drug effects, infections, metabolic disturbances, sleep disorders, and psychiatric disorders are all associated with signs and symptoms that may often mimic epilepsy. New paradigms must be put into practice to establish an accurate diagnosis in the elderly patient; besides an initial evaluation, the patient history and an electroencephalogram should be obtained. Proper diagnosis is essential for proper treatment in the elderly patient.

Elders with epilepsy

Why is it important to learn about epilepsy in the elderly? The answers are many. As this article has highlighted, compared with younger individuals epilepsy is more common and the causes are more structural and symptomatic than in younger patients (particularly stroke). The clinical presentation is different in the elderly. The diagnosis is more difficult and often delayed. The most common seizures are simple partial and complex partial seizures, which are more often extratemporal in location. Confusion and memory problems are common presenting symptoms and postictal deficits often are prolonged. The prognosis for epilepsy in the elderly generally is favorable for seizure control, but if untreated, depression and quality of life suffer and seizures frequently recur. Seizures respond well at lower serum concentrations of antiepileptic drugs but these patients are also more sensitive (less tolerant) to side effects at lower doses than younger adults.

Rapid infusion with valproate sodium is well tolerated in patients with epilepsy

Many IV antiepileptic drugs administered in emergency situations to patients with prolonged seizures have serious adverse effects. For this reason, the authors conducted a multicenter, open-label, prospective, dose-escalation study of IV valproate sodium administered to patients with epilepsy at rates of infusion of up to 6 mg/kg/minute and doses of up to 30 mg/kg. Valproate sodium had no clinically significant negative effects on blood pressure and pulse rate and caused only mild-to-moderate, reversible adverse events.

Outcomes research: clinical trials in the elderly

Very few clinical trials have been done in the elderly. This report reviews results of two completed studies and describes one in progress. The largest published study was a United States Veterans Affairs Administration study in newly diagnosed patients with epilepsy. It compared carbamazepine to gabapentin and lamotrigine, and found that, although equivalent in efficacy, the newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were better tolerated. This study also highlighted many of the difficulties in recruiting and retaining elderly patients in studies, the large number of comorbidities, and the problems of distinguishing seizures in the elderly from other symptoms. Another study of new-onset epilepsy suggested that a large percentage of elderly patients respond to initial AED therapy, but side effect profiles differ. More studies are needed to better define the risk/benefit relationships in elderly patients.

New onset geriatric epilepsy: a randomized study of gabapentin, lamotrigine, and carbamazepine

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relative tolerability and efficacy of two newer antiepileptic drugs, lamotrigine (LTG) and gabapentin (GBP), as compared to carbamazepine (CBZ) in older patients with epilepsy.

METHODS

This was an 18-center, randomized, double-blind, double dummy, parallel study of 593 elderly subjects with newly diagnosed seizures. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: GBP 1,500 mg/day, LTG 150 mg/day, CBZ 600 mg/day. The primary outcome measure was retention in trial for 12 months.

RESULTS

Mean age was 72 years. The most common etiology was cerebral infarction. Patients had multiple medical conditions and took an average of seven comedications. Mean plasma levels at 6 weeks were as follows: GBP 8.67 +/- 4.83 microg/mL, LTG 2.87 +/- 1.60 microg/mL, CBZ 6.79 +/- 2.92 microg/mL. They remained stable throughout the trial. Early terminations: LTG 44.2%, GBP 51%, CBZ 64.5% (p = 0.0002). Significant paired comparisons: LTG vs CBZ: p < 0.0001; GBP vs CBZ: p = 0.008. Terminations for adverse events: LTG 12.1%, GBP 21.6%, CBZ 31% (p = 0.001). Significant paired comparisons: LTG vs CBZ: p < 0.0001; LTG vs GBP: p = 0.015. There were no significant differences in seizure free rate at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The main limiting factor in patient retention was adverse drug reactions. Patients taking lamotrigine (LTG) or gabapentin (GBP) did better than those taking carbamazepine. Seizure control was similar among groups. LTG and GBP should be considered as initial therapy for older patients with newly diagnosed seizures.

Advances in antiepileptic drug treatments. A rational basis for selecting drugs for older patients with epilepsy

Incidence of epilepsy increases rapidly after age 65; recent studies indicate that approximately 10% of nursing home residents are being treated with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Almost all are being treated with first generation AEDs. The average nursing home patient receives six medications, has age-related changes in protein binding, decreases in hepatic and renal clearance, and may have alterations in gastrointestinal absorption. AEDs that do not have drug-drug interactions, are not metabolized by the liver, and are readily absorbed may offer benefits in this population. New studies are demonstrating that the first generation AEDs have a number of shortcomings for treating older patients, whereas some of the newer AEDs may overcome these limitations. This paper reviews the present knowledge base and compares properties of the first generation AEDs with newer agents to develop a more rational approach for drug selection in older adults.

Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial of Zonisamide as Adjunctive Treatment for Refractory Partial Seizures

PURPOSE

This study was designed to evaluate efficacy and safety of zonisamide (ZNS) as adjunctive treatment for patients with refractory partial seizures.

METHODS

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted at four epilepsy treatment centers. It included a baseline phase (8 to 12 weeks) and a double-blind treatment phase (12 weeks). Initially, patients randomized to ZNS treatment were given a 7-mg/kg/d dosage. When investigators found that adverse effects could be reduced by gradually introducing ZNS, patients were allowed to begin treatment at lower doses (100 mg or approximately 1.5 mg/kg/d) titrated over several weeks to a maximum of 400 to 600 mg/d. Primary and secondary efficacy measures were the median percentage reduction from baseline in seizure frequency and the proportion of patients achieving a > or =50% reduction from baseline (responder rate). Patient and physician global assessments also served as indicators of efficacy. Safety was assessed primarily by treatment-emergent adverse events.

RESULTS

ZNS-treated patients had a 28.9% reduction in seizure frequency, which differed significantly from the 4.7% increase in placebo-treated patients. The responder rate for ZNS-treated patients was 26.9%, compared with 16.2% for placebo-treated patients. At study's end, 66.2% of ZNS-treated patients and 12.3% of placebo-treated patients considered their condition improved; similarly, physicians assessed 63.6% of ZNS-treated patients and 10.8% of placebo-treated patients as improved. The most frequently reported adverse events with ZNS treatment included somnolence, irritability, dizziness, nausea, and fatigue.

CONCLUSIONS

As adjunctive treatment, ZNS was generally well tolerated and significantly improved seizure control among patients with refractory partial seizures.

Special considerations in treating the elderly patient with epilepsy

Epilepsy in elderly patients, compared with the younger adult population, differs in etiology, clinical presentation, and prognosis. Challenges in the pharmacologic treatment of epilepsy in the elderly include the following: the physiologic changes associated with aging; adverse events to which the elderly are especially vulnerable; the increased risk for these patients, who are often taking multiple medications; and toxicity from drug-drug interactions. This article presents data on efficacy and safety from clinical trials of newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in elderly patients compared with older AEDs. We discuss the implications of the findings using newer-generation AEDs in the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study (VACS) #428 in order to educate physicians involved in choosing appropriate AEDs for older patients. In the elderly patient population, an optimal treatment outcome of seizure control with minimal or no adverse events is dependent on the well-informed choice of an AED by a physician.

Safety and tolerance of rapidly infused Depacon. A randomized trial in subjects with epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Valproate sodium injection (Depacon(R)) is an intravenous form of valproate for use in absence and complex partial seizures when circumstances preclude oral administration. Certain situations may warrant larger and more rapid infusions than permitted by the original labeling. This study evaluated the safety of more rapid infusions.

METHODS

Subjects with epilepsy were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive up to 15 mg/kg of valproate sodium infused at 3.0 or 1.5 mg/kg/min. Up to four infusions were allowed within 24 h to achieve target plasma valproate concentrations of 50-100 mcg/ml. Primary safety endpoints were the changes in the 5-min and minimum post-first infusion blood pressures (BPs).

RESULTS

One hundred twelve subjects were treated, (3.0 mg/kg/min group: n=72, 1.5 mg/kg/min group: n=40). No significant treatment differences were detected for changes in the primary BP endpoints. Two subjects in the 3.0 mg/kg/min group had potentially clinically significant low systolic BP values during the study. Similar proportions of subjects in the two groups reported adverse events during or within 6 h following the first infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Valproate sodium injection dosages up to 15 mg/kg and rates of 1.5 and 3.0 mg/kg/min were well tolerated in this population.

Fosphenytoin: pharmacokinetics and tolerance of intramuscular loading doses

PURPOSE

Fosphenytoin (FPHT; Cerebyx) is well absorbed when given intramuscularly (IM). All prior pharmacokinetic studies had the first plasma sample obtained 30 min after IM administration. The objectives of this study were to determine the rate and extent of FPHT absorption and to evaluate the tolerability of IM FPHT compared with IM saline.

METHODS

This was an open-label, double-blinded study in which patients received 10 mg/kg dose of IM FPHT in one gluteus and IM saline in the other gluteus. Half the patients received saline injection of equal volume to FPHT (up to 19.5 mL); the other half received 2 mL of saline. Neurologic examination, vital signs, PHT blood samples, injection site examination, and subjective pain scores at injection site were obtained before and at timed intervals for 6 h.

RESULTS

Total PHT serum concentrations 10 microg/mL were obtained in 5 min in 14.3% of patients and in 26.3% after 10 min. More than half the patients had therapeutic serum concentrations at 30 min; 45.8% of patients reported no pain at either the FPHT or saline injection site. No significant difference in pain was noted between FPHT and saline injection sites at 60 min and thereafter. Early decrease in blood pressure occurred but was not clinically significant. Classic PHT-induced central nervous system (CNS) side effects were evident in one third of patients within 1 h after injection.

CONCLUSIONS

(a) IM FPHT is rapidly absorbed (therapeutic levels achieved as early as 5-20 min). (b) IM FPHT is well tolerated by most patients irrespective of injection volume.

Increased seizures after discontinuing carbamazepine: results from the gabapentin monotherapy trial

Studies in patients with epilepsy undergoing telemetry evaluation for surgery have suggested that discontinuation of carbamazepine (CBZ) is associated with increased seizures. The period of observation in that setting, however, was limited to a few days. The authors reviewed the occurrence of seizures in patients with epilepsy who had all their antiepileptic medications discontinued during an 8-week period, converted to gabapentin monotherapy, and observed for 26 weeks as part of the gabapentin trial #945-082. Two hundred and seventy-five patients were enrolled. Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to exit for all patients showed that 18% of patients previously treated with CBZ completed the study as compared with 30% of the patients receiving other antiepileptic medications. Increase in the frequency of seizures was maximal in the 2 weeks following CBZ discontinuation. Seizures increased both in frequency and severity but no new seizure types were observed. The findings in this study show that removal of CBZ is associated with increased frequency of seizures in patients with a previous history of epilepsy with incompletely controlled seizures. The period of maximal increase was the first 2 weeks after CBZ discontinuation.

Epilepsy in the elderly

The incidence of epilepsy is high in the elderly. Increasing awareness of this phenomenon has led to a better understanding of the predominant seizure types, their clinical manifestations, and the most appropriate treatment regimens. Carbamazepine, phenytoin, and valproic acid are considered to be first-line antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). However, the newer AEDs gabapentin, lamotrigine, and tiagabine also warrant consideration as first-line agents because of their efficacy and favorable side-effect profiles. This is particularly important because aging produces physical changes in the patient that can increase the likelihood of adverse effects. To select the appropriate drug and dosage for each individual, a variety of issues must be considered. These include age-related changes in body composition and physiology, as well as the pharmacokinetics, routes of administration, drug interactions, adverse-effect profiles, and cost of available agents.

Fosphenytoin and phenytoin in patients with status epilepticus: improved tolerability versus increased costs

Tonic-clonic status epilepticus (TCSE) is the most common neurological emergency and affects approximately 60000 patients each year in the US. The risk of complications increases substantially as TCSE lasts longer than 60 minutes. Ideally, drugs used to treat this condition should be well tolerated when administered as rapid intravenous infusions and should not interfere with patients' state of consciousness or cardiovascular and respiratory functions. Because of its efficacy, absence of sedation or respiratory suppression, intravenous phenytoin has largely replaced phenobarbital (phenobarbitone) as the second agent of choice (following the administration of a benzodiazepine) in the treatment of TCSE. While the efficacy of phenytoin in the treatment of acute seizures and TCSE is well established, the parenteral formulation of phenytoin has several inherent shortcomings which compromise its tolerability and limit the rate of administration. Intravenous phenytoin has been associated with fatal haemodynamic complications and serious reactions at the injection site including skin necrosis and amputation of extremities. Fosphenytoin, a phenytoin prodrug, has the same pharmacological properties as phenytoin but none of the injection site and cardiac rhythm complications of intravenous infusions of phenytoin. While fosphenytoin costs more than intravenous phenytoin, treating the acute and chronic complications of TCSE itself, and the complications of intravenous phenytoin can also be costly. All other factors being equal, there is no doubt that fosphenytoin is better tolerated and can be delivered faster than intravenous phenytoin; 2 measures that clearly improve outcome in patients with TCSE. The tolerability of intramuscular fosphenytoin also extends its use to clinical situations where prompt administration of a nondepressing anticonvulsant is indicated but secure intravenous access and cardiac monitoring are not available, such as treatment of seizures by rescue squads in the field and serial seizures in the institutionalised, elderly and other patients with intractable epilepsy.

Guidelines for nonemergency use of parenteral phenytoin products: proceedings of an expert panel consensus process. Panel on Nonemergency Use of Parenteral Phenytoin Products

This document summarizes the proceedings of an expert panel consensus process addressing the nonemergency use of parenteral phenytoin products for management of seizures in pediatric and adult patients. The algorithm and consensus statements developed by the expert panel emphasize strategies for lowering the probability of adverse events associated with the use of parenteral phenytoin products. Specific patient characteristics are defined to guide administration and monitoring of parenteral phenytoin therapy. The algorithm provides a decision pathway for the selection of the product and the route of administration of phenytoin sodium or fosphenytoin sodium after it has been determined that a parenteral phenytoin product is appropriate. Key factors covered in the algorithm include a list of patient characteristics and considerations necessary to prevent parenteral phenytoin adverse effects during selection of administration route and recommendations for monitoring of parenteral phenytoin therapy once it has been initiated. Situations requiring rapid attainment of high phenytoin concentrations, such as in the management of acute seizures, are not addressed in these guidelines.

Restraining patients and shoulder dislocations during seizures

We describe 3 patients whose shoulders dislocated as the movements of the arm were restricted during a generalized tonic clonic seizure over an 18-month period. The first patient had both shoulders dislocated when observers sat on his arms during the convulsion. The second patient had a convulsion while in a forced lateral decubitus position and dislocated the shoulder on that side. The third patient dislocated the shoulder and fractured the acromion as she was held by her arms in a chair during a convulsion. Despite the large number of patients with refractory epilepsy under our care, no cases of spontaneous shoulder dislocation occurred during that period of time.

Skin eruption with gabapentin in a patient with repeated AED-induced Stevens-Johnson's syndrome

Skin eruptions have been reported with the use of all antiepileptic drugs and there is a significant risk of cross-reactivity between these agents in causing serious eruptions such as Stevens-Johnson's syndrome. Gabepentin is usually considered a safe agent for patients with a previous history of drug allergies and there have been no cases of skin eruption reported to the gabapentin post marketing surveillance. We report a patient who had severe Stevens-Johnson's syndrome induced by phenytoin and later by carbamazepine. Subsequent use of gabapentin also resulted in a skin eruption which was limited to the lower extremities but without systemic or mucosal involvement. This case suggests that patients with a strong history of drug-induced idiosyncratic reactions may experience such reactions to gabapentin as well.

A comparison of four treatments for generalized convulsive status epilepticus. Veterans Affairs Status Epilepticus Cooperative Study Group

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

Although generalized convulsive status epilepticus is a life-threatening emergency, the best initial drug treatment is uncertain. We conducted a five-year randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial of four intravenous regimens: diazepam (0.15 mg per kilogram of body weight) followed by phenytoin (18 mg per kilogram), lorazepam (0.1 mg per kilogram), phenobarbital (15 mg per kilogram), and phenytoin (18 mg per kilogram). Patients were classified as having either overt generalized status epilepticus (defined as easily visible generalized convulsions) or subtle status epilepticus (indicated by coma and ictal discharges on the electroencephalogram, with or without subtle convulsive movements such as rhythmic muscle twitches or tonic eye deviation). Treatment was considered successful when all motor and electroencephalographic seizure activity ceased within 20 minutes after the beginning of the drug infusion and there was no return of seizure activity during the next 40 minutes. Analyses were performed with data on only the 518 patients with verified generalized convulsive status epilepticus as well as with data on all 570 patients who were enrolled.

RESULTS

Three hundred eighty-four patients had a verified diagnosis of overt generalized convulsive status epilepticus. In this group, lorazepam was successful in 64.9 percent of those assigned to receive it, phenobarbital in 58.2 percent, diazepam plus phenytoin in 55.8 percent, and phenytoin in 43.6 percent (P=0.02 for the overall comparison among the four groups). Lorazepam was significantly superior to phenytoin in a pairwise comparison (P=0.002). Among the 134 patients with a verified diagnosis of subtle generalized convulsive status epilepticus, no significant differences among the treatments were detected (range of success rates, 7.7 to 24.2 percent). In an intention-to-treat analysis, the differences among treatment groups were not significant, either among the patients with overt status epilepticus (P=0.12) or among those with subtle status epilepticus (P=0.91). There were no differences among the treatments with respect to recurrence during the 12-hour study period, the incidence of adverse reactions, or the outcome at 30 days.

CONCLUSIONS

As initial intravenous treatment for overt generalized convulsive status epilepticus, lorazepam is more effective than phenytoin. Although lorazepam is no more efficacious than phenobarbital or diazepam plus phenytoin, it is easier to use.

Gabapentin bioavailability: effect of dose and frequency of administration in adult patients with epilepsy

Gabapentin (GBP) is a non-metabolized antiepileptic drug that is eliminated by renal excretion and displays saturable, dose dependent absorption. The recommended dosing schedule for GBP is t.i.d. At large daily doses, oral bioavailability (F) may be improved by giving the daily dose more frequently.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether switching GBP dosage regimen from t.i.d. to q.i.d. results in increased oral bioavailability.

METHODS

This study consisted of two parts; a computer simulated pharmacokinetic model and a clinical pharmacokinetic study in nine adult epileptic patients receiving 3600 mg/day and 11 receiving 4800 mg/day. All patients were evaluated during both t.i.d. and q.i.d. regimens. F were determined by calculation of percent of dose excreted unchanged using steady-state 24-h urine collections and were compared using a paired t-test.

RESULTS

At 3600 mg/day, mean F following t.i.d. and q.i.d. dosing were 38.7+/-22.1% and 40.0+/-18.9%, respectively (P=0.738). At 4800 mg/day, mean F following t.i.d. and q.i.d. dosing were 29.2+/-16.2% and 35.6+/-17.6%, respectively (P=0.006).

DISCUSSION

Good agreement was observed between values from this study and predicted values based on the pharmacokinetic model. Improved GBP F at doses of 3600 mg/day was not achieved with more frequent drug administration, and thus is not warranted. At 4800 mg/day, a 22% increase in F was observed with more frequent drug dosing.

CONCLUSION

GBP F may be significantly increased by q.i.d. versus t.i.d. dosing, depending upon dose level. This increase in F however must be balanced against the inconvenience of more frequent dosing. Therapeutic drug level monitoring may aid in the evaluation of such pharmacokinetic maneuvers.

Surgical correction of scoliosis in patients with generalized seizures. Risk of vertebral body fracture

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective evaluation of the outcome of surgical management of progressive scoliosis in institutionalized patients with frequent, uncontrolled, generalized tonic clonic seizures.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the safety and stability of internal fixation devices in patients with progressive scoliosis and intractable seizures.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Progressive scoliosis is a common problem in severely disabled patients. It has been the belief among some spine physicians that the coexistence of intractable seizures with progressive scoliosis is a contraindication for surgery, because most of the thoracic and lumbar spine is fixed and "unyielding" after internal fixations, increasing the risk of vertebral fractures. There have been reports of fracture of fixation devices, particularly Harrington rods, under conditions of massive trauma or mechanical stress, such as seizures.

METHODS

The authors reviewed the outcome of six profoundly retarded institutionalized patients with a history of intractable seizures who underwent internal fixation of the spine between 1984 and 1987 because of progressive scoliosis. Seizure types and frequency of convulsion were obtained from the institutional charts. Follow-up radiographs of the spine obtained at 1, 3, and 6 months after the surgery and once a year thereafter were reviewed by the radiologist and orthopedic surgeon with special attention paid to fractures, stability of the fusion, and integrity of the instrumentation.

RESULTS

Six patients underwent spinal fusion with internal spinal fixation, four patients with Harrington rods and two with Luque rods. All patients had refractory tonic clonic seizures ranging from 11 to 80 generalized tonic clonic convulsions per year for the 10-year follow-up period after surgery. There were no fractures, subluxation, or pseudoarthrosis of the fused vertebrae or the vertebral bodies adjacent to the fusion. There were no fractures of the instrumentation.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' findings suggest that when appropriate fusion is attained, the use of internal fixation devices is not contraindicated in the management of progressive scoliosis in patients with intractable seizures.

Intramuscular fosphenytoin (Cerebyx) in patients requiring a loading dose of phenytoin

Fosphenytoin (Cerebyx), is a water soluble prodrug that is rapidly and completely converted to phenytoin. This study reports the injection-site tolerance and safety of intramuscular fosphenytoin (> 10 mg/kg doses) in 60 patients requiring a phenytoin loading dose. Patients received injections at single or multiple sites with volumes ranging from 4 to 30 ml per injection site. The majority of patients had no irritation (erythema, swelling, tenderness, bruising) or complaints of discomfort related to fosphenytoin injection either after injection (95%) or at follow-up (88%). Irritation, when reported, was mild in all cases. Forty of 60 patients (67%) reported transient side effects, primarily involving the central nervous system, such as nystagmus, dizziness or ataxia, which are commonly associated with phenytoin therapy. All patients received prescribed doses; no patient had an injection(s) stopped due to intolerance or side effects. No serious adverse events occurred with intramuscular fosphenytoin. In this study, intramuscular fosphenytoin was demonstrated to be a safe and well tolerated, and in many instances, a preferable alternative to other means of phenytoin loading.

Gabapentin monotherapy: II. A 26-week, double-blind, dose-controlled, multicenter study of conversion from polytherapy in outpatients with refractory complex partial or secondarily generalized seizures. The US Gabapentin Study Group 82/83

This study evaluated gabapentin monotherapy in 275 patients with medically refractory complex partial or secondarily generalized seizures who were taking one or two antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Following an 8-week baseline, patients received randomized dosages of gabapentin (600, 1,200, or 2,400 mg/d) during a 26-week double-blind phase comprising 2 weeks gabapentin add-on therapy, an 8-week AED taper, and a 16-week gabapentin monotherapy period. Patients exited the study if they experienced a protocol-defined exit event. Results of outcome measures, including time to exit, completion rate, and mean time on monotherapy, showed no significant differences among dosage groups. Possible reasons for this lack of a dose-response relationship include withdrawal seizures and the limited range of gabapentin dosages studied. Overall, 20% of patients completed the study. Completion rates were higher among patients who had discontinued one AED (23%) than two AEDs (14%), and higher among patients who were not withdrawn from carbamazepine (27%) than among those who were (16%).

Changes in body weight with chronic, high-dose gabapentin therapy

The authors reviewed changes in body weight in 44 patients treated with Gabapentin (GPN) for a period of 12 or more months. All patients had a seizure disorder and the dose of GPN was increased aiming at complete seizure control or until side effects limited further increase. Twenty-eight patients were receiving GPN dosages of > 3000 mg/day. Observed changes in body weight were as follows 10 patients gained more than 10% of their baseline weight, 15 patients gained 5% to 10% of baseline, 16 patients had no change, and 3 patients lost 5% to 10% of their initial weight. Weight increase started between the second and the third months of GPN treatment in most patients and tended to stabilize after 6 to 9 months of treatment, although the doses of GPN remained unchanged. Weight gain occurred in patients taking GPN in combination with each of the major antiepileptic drugs including Felbatol and also occurred with GPN monotherapy.