1
|
Clout M, Turner N, Clement C, Braude P, Benger J, Gagg J, Gendall E, Holloway S, Ingram J, Kandiyali R, Lewis A, Maskell NA, Shipway D, Smith JE, Taylor J, Darweish Medniuk A, Carlton E. The RELIEF feasibility trial: topical lidocaine patches in older adults with rib fractures. Emerg Med J 2024:emermed-2024-213905. [PMID: 38760021 DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2024-213905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lidocaine patches, applied over rib fractures, may reduce pulmonary complications in older patients. Known barriers to recruiting older patients in emergency settings necessitate a feasibility trial. We aimed to establish whether a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT) evaluating lidocaine patches in older patients with rib fracture(s) was feasible. METHODS This was a multicentre, parallel-group, open-label, feasibility RCT in seven hospitals in England and Scotland. Patients aged ≥65 years, presenting to ED with traumatic rib fracture(s) requiring hospital admission were randomised to receive up to 3×700 mg lidocaine patches (Ralvo), first applied in ED and then once daily for 72 hours in addition to standard care, or standard care alone. Feasibility outcomes were recruitment, retention and adherence. Clinical end points (pulmonary complications, pain and frailty-specific outcomes) and patient questionnaires were collected to determine feasibility of data collection and inform health economic scoping. Interviews and focus groups with trial participants and clinicians/research staff explored the understanding and acceptability of trial processes. RESULTS Between October 23, 2021 and October 7, 2022, 206 patients were eligible, of whom 100 (median age 83 years; IQR 74-88) were randomised; 48 to lidocaine patches and 52 to standard care. Pulmonary complications at 30 days were determined in 86% of participants and 83% of expected 30-day questionnaires were returned. Pulmonary complications occurred in 48% of the lidocaine group and 59% in standard care. Pain and some frailty-specific outcomes were not feasible to collect. Staff reported challenges in patient compliance, unfamiliarity with research measures and overwhelming the patients with research procedures. CONCLUSION Recruitment of older patients with rib fracture(s) in an emergency setting for the evaluation of lidocaine patches is feasible. Refinement of data collection, with a focus on the collection of pain, frailty-specific outcomes and intervention delivery are needed before progression to a definitive trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN14813929.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeleine Clout
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Nicholas Turner
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Philip Braude
- CLARITY (Collaborative Ageing Research), North Bristol NHS Trust, Westbury on Trym, UK
| | - Jonathan Benger
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - James Gagg
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton, UK
| | - Emma Gendall
- Research and Innovation, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Simon Holloway
- Pharmacy Clinical Trials and Research, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Jenny Ingram
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Amanda Lewis
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Nick A Maskell
- Academic Respiratory Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - David Shipway
- Department of Medicine for Older People, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Jason E Smith
- Emergency Department, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - Jodi Taylor
- Bristol Trials Centre, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Edward Carlton
- Emergency Department, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cramer H, Gaunt DM, Shallcross R, Bates L, Kandiyali R, Sardinha L, Rice CT, Man MS, Feder G, Peters TJ, Morgan K. Randomised pilot and feasibility trial of a group intervention for men who perpetrate intimate partner violence against women. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:1183. [PMID: 38678198 PMCID: PMC11055266 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18640-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a need for robust evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of domestic abuse perpetrator programmes in reducing abusive behaviour and improving wellbeing for victim/survivors. While any randomised controlled trial can present difficulties in terms of recruitment and retention, conducting such a trial with domestic abuse perpetrators is particularly challenging. This paper reports the pilot and feasibility trial of a voluntary domestic abuse perpetrator group programme in the United Kingdom. METHODS This was a pragmatic individually randomised pilot and feasibility trial with an integrated qualitative study in one site (covering three local-authority areas) in England. Male perpetrators were randomised to either the intervention or usual care. The intervention was a 23-week group programme for male perpetrators in heterosexual relationships, with an average of three one-to-one sessions, and one-to-one support for female current- or ex-partners delivered by third sector organisations. There was no active control treatment for men, and partners of control men were signposted towards domestic abuse support services. Data were collected at three-monthly intervals for nine months from male and female participants. The main objectives assessed were recruitment, randomisation, retention, data completeness, fidelity to the intervention model, and acceptability of the trial design. RESULTS This study recruited 36 men (22 randomly allocated to attend the intervention group programme, 14 to usual care), and 15 current- or ex-partners (39% of eligible partners). Retention and completeness of data were high: 67% of male (24/36), and 80% (12/15) of female participants completed the self-reported questionnaire at nine months. A framework for assessing fidelity to the intervention was developed. In interviews, men who completed all or most of the intervention gave positive feedback and reported changes in their own behaviour. Partners were also largely supportive of the trial and were positive about the intervention. Participants who were not allocated to the intervention group reported feeling disappointed but understood the rationale for the trial. CONCLUSIONS It was feasible to recruit, randomise and retain male perpetrators and female victim/survivors of abuse and collect self-reported outcome data. Participants were engaged in the intervention and reported positive benefits. The trial design was seen as acceptable. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN71797549, submitted 03/08/2017, retrospectively registered 27/05/2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Cramer
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| | - Daisy M Gaunt
- Bristol Trials Centre, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Rebekah Shallcross
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Lis Bates
- Connect Centre, University of Central Lancashire (UCLan), Preston, UK
| | - Rebecca Kandiyali
- Bristol Trials Centre, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Health Economics Bristol, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - LynnMarie Sardinha
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Caoimhe T Rice
- Bristol Trials Centre, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Health Economics Bristol, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Mei-See Man
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Gene Feder
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Tim J Peters
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Karen Morgan
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Akhtar K, Alkhaffaf B, Ariyarathenam A, Avery K, Barham P, Bateman A, Beard C, Berrisford R, Blazeby JM, Blencowe N, Boddy A, Bowrey D, Bracey T, Brierley RC, Briton K, Byrne J, Catton J, Chaparala R, Clark SK, Clarke T, Cooke J, Couper G, Culliford L, Dawson H, Deans C, Donovan JL, Ekblad C, Elliott J, Exon D, Falk S, Farooq N, Garfield K, Gaunt DM, Gill F, Goldin R, Gravani A, Hanna G, Hayes S, Heys R, Hindmarsh C, Hollinghurst S, Hollingworth W, Hollowood A, Houlihan R, Howes B, Howie L, Humphreys L, Hutton D, Jarvis R, Jepson M, Kandiyali R, Kaur S, Kaye P, Kelly J, King A, Kirwin J, Krysztopik R, Lamb P, Lang A, Lee V, Maitland S, Mapstone N, Melia G, Metcalfe C, Melhado R, Moure-Fernandez A, Nair B, Nicklin J, Noble F, Noble SM, O’Connell A, Palmer S, Parsons S, Pursnani K, Rea N, Reed F, Rice C, Richards C, Rogers C, Sanders G, Save V, Shaw C, Schiller M, Schranz R, Shetty V, Shirkey B, Singleton J, Skipworth R, Smith J, Streets C, Titcomb D, Turner P, Ubhi S, Underwood T, Vinod C, Vohra R, Ward EM, Warman R, Welch N, Wheatley T, White K, Wickens RA, Wilkerson P, Williams A, Williams R, Wilmshurst N, Wong NACS. Laparoscopic or open abdominal surgery with thoracotomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: ROMIO randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znae023. [PMID: 38525931 PMCID: PMC10961947 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study investigated if hybrid oesophagectomy with minimally invasive gastric mobilization and thoracotomy enabled faster recovery than open surgery. METHODS In eight UK centres, this pragmatic RCT recruited patients for oesophagectomy to treat localized cancer. Participants were randomly allocated to hybrid or open surgery, stratified by centre and receipt of neoadjuvant treatment. Large dressings aimed to mask patients to their allocation for six days post-surgery. The authors present the intention-to-treat analysis of outcome measures from the first 3 months post-randomization, including the primary outcome, the patient-reported physical function scale of the EORTC QLQ-C30, and cost-effectiveness. Current Controlled Trials registration: ISRCTN 59036820 (feasibility study), 10386621 (definitive study). FINDINGS There was no evidence of a difference between hybrid (n = 267) and open (n = 266) surgery in average physical function over 3 months post-randomization: difference in means 2.1, 95% c.i. -2.0 to 6.2, P = 0.3. Complication rates were similar; for example, 88 (34%) participants in the open and 82 (32%) participants in the hybrid surgery groups experienced a pulmonary infection within 30 days. There was no evidence that hybrid surgery was more cost-effective than open surgery at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS Patient-reported physical function in the 3 months post-randomization provided no evidence of a difference in recovery time between hybrid and open surgery, or a difference in cost-effectiveness. Both approaches to surgery were completed safely, with a similar risk of key complications, suggesting that surgeons who have a preference for one of the two approaches need not change their practice.
Collapse
|
4
|
Achten J, Appelbe D, Spoors L, Peckham N, Kandiyali R, Mason J, Ferguson D, Wright J, Wilson N, Preston J, Moscrop A, Costa M, Perry DC. Protocol for Surgery or Cast of the EpicoNdyle in Children's Elbows (SCIENCE). Bone Jt Open 2024; 5:69-77. [PMID: 38269598 PMCID: PMC10809059 DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.51.bjo-2023-0127.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Aims The management of fractures of the medial epicondyle is one of the greatest controversies in paediatric fracture care, with uncertainty concerning the need for surgery. The British Society of Children's Orthopaedic Surgery prioritized this as their most important research question in paediatric trauma. This is the protocol for a randomized controlled, multicentre, prospective superiority trial of operative fixation versus nonoperative treatment for displaced medial epicondyle fractures: the Surgery or Cast of the EpicoNdyle in Children's Elbows (SCIENCE) trial. Methods Children aged seven to 15 years old inclusive, who have sustained a displaced fracture of the medial epicondyle, are eligible to take part. Baseline function using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper limb score, pain measured using the Wong Baker FACES pain scale, and quality of life (QoL) assessed with the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire for younger patients (EQ-5D-Y) will be collected. Each patient will be randomly allocated (1:1, stratified using a minimization algorithm by centre and initial elbow dislocation status (i.e. dislocated or not-dislocated at presentation to the emergency department)) to either a regimen of the operative fixation or non-surgical treatment. Outcomes At six weeks, and three, six, and 12 months, data on function, pain, sports/music participation, QoL, immobilization, and analgesia will be collected. These will also be repeated annually until the child reaches the age of 16 years. Four weeks after injury, the main outcomes plus data on complications, resource use, and school absence will be collected. The primary outcome is the PROMIS upper limb score at 12 months post-randomization. All data will be obtained through electronic questionnaires completed by the participants and/or parents/guardians. The NHS number of participants will be stored to enable future data linkage to sources of routinely collected data (i.e. Hospital Episode Statistics).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juul Achten
- Oxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology & Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Duncan Appelbe
- Oxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology & Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Louise Spoors
- Oxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology & Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nicholas Peckham
- Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology & Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - James Mason
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick University, Coventry, UK
| | - David Ferguson
- South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
| | | | | | - Jennifer Preston
- University of Liverpool, Institute of Translational Medicine, Institute in the Park, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
- Alder Hey Children’s Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Matthew Costa
- Oxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology & Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Daniel C. Perry
- Oxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology & Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- University of Liverpool, Institute of Translational Medicine, Institute in the Park, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
- Alder Hey Children’s Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Morgan K, Man MS, Bloomer R, Cochrane M, Cole M, Dheensa S, Eisenstadt N, Feder G, Gaunt DM, Leach R, Kandiyali R, Noble S, Peters TJ, Shirkey BA, Cramer H. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a group domestic abuse perpetrator programme: protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2023; 24:617. [PMID: 37770906 PMCID: PMC10540403 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07612-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In contrast to evidence for interventions supporting victim/survivors of domestic violence and abuse (DVA), the effectiveness of perpetrator programmes for reduction of abuse is uncertain. This study aims to estimate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a perpetrator programme for men. METHODS Pragmatic two-group individually randomised controlled trial (RCT) with embedded process and economic evaluation. Five centres in southwest England and South Wales aim to recruit 316 (reduced from original target of 366) male domestic abuse perpetrators. These will be randomised 2:1 to a community-based domestic abuse perpetrator programme (DAPP) or usual care comparator with 12-month follow-up. Female partners/ex-partners will be invited to join the study. The intervention for men comprises 23 weekly sessions of a group programme delivered in voluntary sector domestic abuse services. The intervention for female partners/ex-partners is one-to-one support from a safety worker. Men allocated to usual care receive no intervention; however, they are free to access other services. Their partners/ex-partners will be signposted to support services. Data is collected at baseline, and 4, 8 and 12 months' follow-up. The primary outcome is men's self-reported abusive behaviour measured by the Abusive Behaviour Inventory (ABI-29) at 12 months. Secondary measures include physical and mental health status and resource use alongside the abuse measure ABI (ABI-R) for partners/ex-partners and criminal justice contact for men. A mixed methods process evaluation and qualitative study will explore mechanisms of effectiveness, judge fidelity to the intervention model using interviews and group observations. The economic evaluation, over a 1-year time horizon from three perspectives (health and social care, public sector and society), will employ a cost-consequences framework reporting costs alongside economic outcomes (Quality-Adjusted Life Years derived from EQ-5D-5L, SF-12 and CHU-9D, and ICECAP-A) as well as the primary and other secondary outcomes. DISCUSSION This trial will provide evidence of the (cost)effectiveness of a DAPP. The embedded process evaluation will further insights in the experiences and contexts of participants and their journey through a perpetrator programme, and the study will seek to address the omission in other studies of economic evaluations. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN15804282, April 1, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Morgan
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| | - Mei-See Man
- Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Rachael Bloomer
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Madeleine Cochrane
- Bristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Melissa Cole
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Sandi Dheensa
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Nathan Eisenstadt
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Gene Feder
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Daisy M Gaunt
- Bristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Rwth Leach
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Rebecca Kandiyali
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Sian Noble
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Tim J Peters
- Bristol Dental School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Beverly A Shirkey
- Bristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Helen Cramer
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lewis A, Clout M, Benger J, Braude P, Turner N, Gagg J, Gendall E, Holloway S, Ingram J, Kandiyali R, Maskell N, Shipway D, Smith JE, Taylor J, Darweish-Medniuk A, Carlton E. The Randomised Evaluation of early topical Lidocaine patches In Elderly patients admitted to hospital with rib Fractures (RELIEF): feasibility trial protocol. NIHR Open Res 2023; 3:38. [PMID: 37881461 PMCID: PMC10593328 DOI: 10.3310/nihropenres.13438.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
Background Topical lidocaine patches, applied over rib fractures, have been suggested as a non-invasive method of local anaesthetic delivery to improve respiratory function, reduce opioid consumption and consequently reduce pulmonary complications. Older patients may gain most benefit from improved analgesic regimens yet lidocaine patches are untested as an early intervention in the Emergency Department (ED). The aim of this trial is to investigate uncertainties around trial design and conduct, to establish whether a definitive randomised trial of topical lidocaine patches in older patients with rib fractures is feasible. Methods RELIEF is an open label, multicentre, parallel group, individually randomised, feasibility randomised controlled trial with economic scoping and nested qualitative study. Patients aged ≥ 65 years presenting to the ED with traumatic rib fracture(s) requiring admission will be randomised 1:1 to lidocaine patches (intervention), in addition to standard clinical management, or standard clinical management alone. Lidocaine patches will be applied immediately after diagnosis in ED and continued daily for 72 hours or until discharge. Feasibility outcomes will focus on recruitment, adherence and follow-up data with a total sample size of 100. Clinical outcomes, such as 30-day pulmonary complications, and resource use will be collected to understand feasibility of data collection. Qualitative interviews will explore details of the trial design, trial acceptability and recruitment processes. An evaluation of the feasibility of measuring health economics outcomes data will be completed. Discussion Interventions to improve outcomes in elderly patients with rib fractures are urgently required. This feasibility trial will test a novel early intervention which has the potential of fulfilling this unmet need. The Randomised Evaluation of early topical Lidocaine patches In Elderly patients admitted to hospital with rib Fractures (RELIEF) feasibility trial will determine whether a definitive trial is feasible. ISRCTN Registration ISRCTN14813929 (22/04/2021).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Lewis
- Bristol Trials Centre (BTC), Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England, UK
| | - Madeleine Clout
- Bristol Trials Centre (BTC), Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England, UK
| | - Jonathan Benger
- Emergency Care, Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, England, UK
| | - Philip Braude
- Department of Elderly Care Medicine, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, England, UK
| | - Nicholas Turner
- Bristol Trials Centre (BTC), Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England, UK
| | - James Gagg
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, England, UK
| | - Emma Gendall
- Research and Innovation, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, England, UK
| | - Simon Holloway
- Pharmacy Clinical Trials and Research, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, England, UK
| | - Jenny Ingram
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England, UK
| | - Rebecca Kandiyali
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick, England, UK
| | - Nick Maskell
- Academic Respiratory Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England, UK
| | - David Shipway
- Department of Elderly Care Medicine, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, England, UK
| | - Jason E Smith
- Emergency Department, Derriford Hospital, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - Jodi Taylor
- Bristol Trials Centre (BTC), Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England, UK
| | - Alia Darweish-Medniuk
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, England, UK
| | - Edward Carlton
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, England, UK
- Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kandiyali R, Taylor H, Thomas E, Cullen F, Hollingworth W, Ingram J, Kenward C, West N, McGregor D, Smith B, Hamilton-Shield J. Implementation of flash glucose monitoring in four pediatric diabetes clinics: controlled before and after study to produce real-world evidence of patient benefit. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2023; 11:e003561. [PMID: 37640505 PMCID: PMC10462967 DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS To assess the real-world evidence for flash glucose monitoring (Abbott FreeStyle Libre) for children with type 1 diabetes in terms of glucose control, secondary healthcare resources and costs. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We conducted a controlled before and after study (approximately 12 months before and after) using routinely collected health record data on children who start using flash monitors and a control population of children with self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). Our population-based sample of eligible individuals using flash monitoring (n=114) and controls (n=80) aged between 4 and 18 years was drawn from four paediatric diabetes clinics (secondary care) in the South West England. Outcome measures included: glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), frequency of BG tests; frequency of sensor scans; time in recommended glucose range; short-term complications (hypoglycemia, diabetic ketoacidosis and related illness resulting in investigation) and secondary care costs. RESULTS After adjustment for age, time since diagnosis, deprivation and the test modality (point of care or laboratory), the mean HbA1c reading for controls was 61.2 (mmol/mol) for the period before and 63.9 after. For individuals using flash monitoring, the adjusted mean HbA1c reading was 64.6 for the period before implementation and 63.8 after. Rates of short-term complications were low across all groups in the study. Whereas the 'after' flash monitoring group had substantially higher incremental costs (+£703 vs the flash monitoring 'before' comparison and +£841 vs contemporaneous SMBG controls), these cost differences were driven by primary care prescribing (sensor costs). CONCLUSIONS There was some indication that flash monitoring might help young people improve the control of their diabetes but for our sample, the difference between finger-prick testing and flash monitoring was not clinically significant (HbA1c improvement <5 mmol/mol). Given the pace of technological change within diabetes, research efforts should now facilitate the real-time analysis of long-term routine data on flash and continuous glucose monitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hazel Taylor
- Research and Development, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Elizabeth Thomas
- Bristol Paediatric Diabetes, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Freyja Cullen
- Bristol Paediatric Diabetes, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Jenny Ingram
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Charlie Kenward
- North Somerset and South Gloucestershire Integrated Care Board, Bristol, UK
| | - Nicol West
- Department of Paediatrics, Great Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Swindon, UK
| | - David McGregor
- Department of Paediatrics, Royal Devon and Exeter Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Becky Smith
- Department of Paediatrics, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - Julian Hamilton-Shield
- Bristol Paediatric Diabetes, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Davies A, Lenguerrand E, Scott E, Kandiyali R, Douek I, Norman J, Loose A, Sawyer L, Timlin L, Burden C. Protocol for a multi-site randomised controlled feasibility study investigating intermittently scanned blood continuous glucose monitoring use for gestational diabetes: the RECOGNISE study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2023; 9:120. [PMID: 37434220 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-023-01341-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is increasing and is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes including macrosomia, pre-eclampsia, and pre-term delivery. Optimum glycaemic control can reduce these adverse perinatal outcomes. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) informs users about interstitial glucose levels allowing early detection of glycaemic excursions and pharmacological or behavioural intervention. Few adequately powered RCTs to evaluate the impact of using CGM in women with GDM on perinatal outcomes have been undertaken. We aim to establish the feasibility of a multi-site RCT to evaluate the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of an intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitor (isCGM) compared with self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) in women with GDM for reducing fetal macrosomia and improving maternal and fetal outcomes. We will evaluate recruitment and retention rates, adherence to device requirements, adequacy of data capture and acceptability of trial design and isCGM devices. METHODS Open-label multicentre randomised controlled feasibility trial. INCLUSION CRITERIA pregnant women, singleton pregnancy, recent diagnosis of GDM (within 14 days of commencing medication, up to 34 weeks gestation) prescribed metformin and/or insulin. Women will be consecutively recruited and randomised to isCGM (FreestyleLibre2) or SMBG. At every antenatal visit, glucose measurements will be evaluated. The SMBG group will use blinded isCGM for 14 days at baseline (~ 12-32 weeks) and ~ 34-36 weeks. The primary outcome is the recruitment rate and absolute number of women participating. Clinical assessments of maternal and fetal/infant health will be undertaken at baseline, birth, up to ~ 13 weeks post-natal. Psychological, behavioural and health economic measures will be assessed at baseline and ~ 34-36 weeks gestation. Qualitative interviews will be undertaken with study decliners, participants, and professionals to explore trial acceptability, of using isCGM and SMBG. DISCUSSION GDM can be associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. isCGM could offer a timely, easy-to-engage-with intervention, to improve glycaemic control, potentially reducing adverse pregnancy, birth and long-term health outcomes for mother and child. This study will determine the feasibility of conducting a large-scale multisite RCT of isCGM in women with GDM. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study has been registered with the ISRCTN (reference: ISRCTN42125256 , Date registered: 07/11/2022).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Davies
- Academic Women's Health Unit, Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Erik Lenguerrand
- Academic Women's Health Unit, Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Eleanor Scott
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | - Jane Norman
- Academic Women's Health Unit, Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Abi Loose
- North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | | | | | - Christy Burden
- Academic Women's Health Unit, Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
- North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Beasant L, Cullen F, Thomas E, Kandiyali R, Shield JPH, Mcgregor D, West N, Ingram J. Flash glucose monitoring in young people with type 1 diabetes-a qualitative study of young people, parents and health professionals: ' It makes life much easier'. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e070477. [PMID: 37076165 PMCID: PMC10124239 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/21/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Flash glucose monitoring for patients with T1 diabetes avoids frequent painful finger-prick testing, thus potentially improving frequency of glucose self-monitoring. Our study aimed to explore experiences of young people using Freestyle Libre sensors and their parents, and to identify benefits and challenges to National Health Service (NHS) staff of its adoption in their care provision. PARTICIPANTS Young people with T1 diabetes, their parents and healthcare professionals were interviewed between February and December 2021. Participants were recruited via social media and through NHS diabetes clinic staff. DESIGN Semistructured interviews were conducted online and analysed using thematic methods. Staff themes were mapped onto normalisation process theory (NPT) constructs. RESULTS Thirty-four participants were interviewed: 10 young people, 14 parents and 10 healthcare professionals. Young people reported that life was much easier since changing to flash glucose monitoring, increasing confidence and independence to manage their condition. Parents' quality of life improved and they appreciated access to real-time data. Using the NPT concepts to understand how technology was integrated into routine care proved useful; health professionals were very enthusiastic about flash glucose monitoring and coped with the extra data load to facilitate more tailored patient support within and between clinic visits. CONCLUSION This technology empowers young people and their parents to understand their diabetes adherence more completely; to feel more confident about adjusting their own care between clinic appointments; and provides an improved interactive experience in clinic. Healthcare teams appear committed to delivering improving technologies, acknowledging the challenge for them to assimilate new information required to provide expert advice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Beasant
- Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Freyja Cullen
- Children's Diabetes Support, University Hospitals Bristol & Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Elizabeth Thomas
- Children's Diabetes Support, University Hospitals Bristol & Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Julian P H Shield
- Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Nicol West
- Great Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Swindon, UK
| | - Jenny Ingram
- Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Albers PN, Williams JG, El-Yousfi S, Marshman Z, Patel R, Kandiyali R, Breheny K, de Vocht F, Metcalfe C, Witton R, Kipping R. Study protocol for First Dental Steps Intervention: feasibility study of a health visitor led infant oral health improvement programme. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2022; 8:245. [PMID: 36463273 PMCID: PMC9719194 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-022-01195-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dental caries in childhood is a burden on the daily lives of children and their families, and associated with poor oral health in adulthood. In England, dental caries is the most common reason for young children to be admitted to hospital. It is believed that most tooth extractions (due to decay) for children aged 10 years and under, could be avoided with improved prevention and early management. National public health policy recommendations in England include specific oral health initiatives to tackle tooth decay. One of these initiatives is delivered as part of the Healthy Child Programme and includes providing workforce training in oral health, integrating oral health advice into home visits, and the timely provision of fluoride toothpaste. This protocol seeks to assess the delivery of the First Dental Steps intervention and uncertainties related to the acceptability, recruitment, and retention of participants. METHODS This study seeks to explore the feasibility and acceptability of the First Dental Steps intervention and research methods. First Dental Steps intervention will be delivered in local authority areas in South West England and includes oral health training for health visitors (or community nursery nurses) working with 0-5-year-olds and their families. Further, for vulnerable families, integrating oral health advice and the provision of an oral health pack (including a free flow cup, an age appropriate toothbrush, and 1450 ppm fluoride toothpaste) during a mandated check by a health visitor. In this study five local authority areas will receive the intervention. Interviews with parents receiving the intervention and health visitors delivering the intervention will be undertaken, along with a range of additional interviews with stakeholders from both intervention and comparison sites (four additional local authority areas). DISCUSSION This protocol was written after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, as a result, some of the original methods were adjusted specifically to account for disruptions caused by the pandemic. Results of this study will primarily provide evidence on the acceptability and feasibility of both the First Dental Steps intervention and the research methods from the perspective of both families and stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia N. Albers
- grid.5337.20000 0004 1936 7603Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England
| | - Joanna G. Williams
- grid.5337.20000 0004 1936 7603Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England
| | - Sarab El-Yousfi
- grid.11835.3e0000 0004 1936 9262School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England
| | - Zoe Marshman
- grid.11835.3e0000 0004 1936 9262School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England
| | - Reena Patel
- Healthcare Public Health Directorate, NHS England and NHS Improvement South West, Bristol, England
| | - Rebecca Kandiyali
- grid.7372.10000 0000 8809 1613Centre for Health Economics (CHEW), Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, England
| | - Katie Breheny
- grid.5337.20000 0004 1936 7603Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England
| | - Frank de Vocht
- grid.5337.20000 0004 1936 7603Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England ,NIHR ARC West, Bristol, England
| | - Chris Metcalfe
- grid.5337.20000 0004 1936 7603Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England
| | - Robert Witton
- grid.11201.330000 0001 2219 0747Faculty of Health: Medicine, Dentistry and Human Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, England
| | - Ruth Kipping
- grid.5337.20000 0004 1936 7603Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Moran P, Bick D, Biddle L, Borries B, Kandiyali R, Rigby J, Seume P, Sadhnani V, Smith N, Swales M, Turner N. A feasibility randomised controlled trial with an embedded qualitative evaluation of perinatal emotional skills groups for women with borderline personality disorder: protocol for the EASE study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2022; 8:215. [PMID: 36151584 PMCID: PMC9503265 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-022-01177-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a severe mental disorder characterised by emotional instability, impaired interpersonal functioning and an increased risk of suicide. There is no clear evidence about how best to help women with BPD during the perinatal period. Perinatal Emotional Skills Groups (ESGs) consist of 12 group sessions, focussing on core skills in emotion regulation, interpersonal effectiveness, distress tolerance and mindfulness and how these skills can best be utilised during the perinatal period. Prior observational research has shown that perinatal ESGs may help women with BPD. We set out to test the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial to investigate the clinical effectiveness of perinatal ESGs. Methods A two-arm, parallel-group, feasibility randomised controlled trial of Perinatal ESGs in addition to Treatment as Usual (TAU) versus TAU for women aged over 18 years, who are likely to have a diagnosis of BPD and are either pregnant or are within 12 months of having a live birth. We will exclude women who have a co-existing organic, psychotic mental disorder or substance use dependence syndrome; those with cognitive or language difficulties that would preclude them from consenting or participating in study procedures; those judged to pose an acute risk to their baby and those requiring admission to a mother and baby unit. After consenting to participation and completing screening assessments, eligible individuals will be randomly allocated, on a 1:1 ratio, to either ESGs + TAU or to TAU. Randomisation will be stratified according to recruitment centre. Feasibility outcomes will be the proportion of participants: (1) consenting; (2) completing baseline measures and randomised; (3) completing the intervention and (4) completing follow-up assessments. All study participants will complete a battery of self-report measures at 2 and 4 months post-randomisation. A nested qualitative study will examine participants’ and therapists’ experiences of the trial and the intervention. Discussion Evidence is lacking about how to help women with BPD during the perinatal period. Perinatal ESGs are a promising intervention and if they prove to be an effective adjunct to usual care, a large population of vulnerable women and their children could experience substantial health gains. Trial registration ISRCTN80470632.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Moran
- Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences Department, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| | - Debra Bick
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Lucy Biddle
- Population Health Sciences Department, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Belinda Borries
- Specialist Community Perinatal Mental Health Service, Avon & Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Rebecca Kandiyali
- Centre for Health Economics, Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Janice Rigby
- Channi Kumar Mother and Baby Unit, Bethlem Royal Hospital, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Penny Seume
- Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences Department, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Vaneeta Sadhnani
- Specialist Community Perinatal Mental Health Service, Avon & Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Nadine Smith
- Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement Lead, London, UK
| | - Michaela Swales
- North Wales Clinical psychology Programme, Bangor University, Bath, UK
| | - Nicholas Turner
- Population Health Sciences Department, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jago R, Tibbitts B, Willis K, Sanderson E, Kandiyali R, Reid T, MacNeill S, Kipping R, Campbell R, Sebire SJ, Hollingworth W. Peer-led physical activity intervention for girls aged 13 to 14 years: PLAN-A cluster RCT. Public Health Res 2022. [DOI: 10.3310/zjqw2587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Increasing physical activity among girls is a public health priority. Peers play a central role in influencing adolescent behaviour. Peer-led interventions may increase physical activity in adolescent girls, and a feasibility trial had shown that PLAN-A (Peer-led physical Activity iNtervention for Adolescent girls) had evidence of promise to increase physical activity in adolescent girls.
Objective
The objective was to test whether or not PLAN-A can increase adolescent girls’ physical activity, relative to usual practice, and be cost-effective.
Design
This was a two-arm, cluster-randomised controlled trial, including an economic evaluation and a process evaluation.
Participants
State-funded secondary schools in the UK with girls in Year 9 (aged 13–14 years) participated in the trial. All Year 9 girls in participating schools were eligible.
Randomisation
Schools were the unit of allocation. They were randomised by an independent statistician, who was blinded to school identities, to the control or intervention arm, stratified by region and the England Index of Multiple Deprivation score.
Intervention
The intervention comprised peer nomination (i.e. identification of influential girls), train the trainers (i.e. training the instructors who delivered the intervention), peer supporter training (i.e. training the peer-nominated girls in techniques and strategies underpinned by motivational theory to support peer physical activity increases) and a 10-week diffusion period.
Outcomes
The primary outcome was accelerometer-assessed mean weekday minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity among Year 9 girls. The follow-up measures were conducted 5–6 months after the 10-week intervention, when the girls were in Year 10 (which was also 12 months after the baseline measures). Analysis used a multivariable, mixed-effects, linear regression model on an intention-to-treat basis. Secondary outcomes included weekend moderate to vigorous physical activity, and weekday and weekend sedentary time. Intervention delivery costs were calculated for the economic evaluation.
Results
A total of 33 schools were approached; 20 schools and 1558 pupils consented. Pupils in the intervention arm had higher Index of Multiple Deprivation scores than pupils in the control arm. The numbers randomised were as follows: 10 schools (n = 758 pupils) were randomised to the intervention arm and 10 schools (n = 800 pupils) were randomised to the control arm. For analysis, a total of 1219 pupils provided valid weekday accelerometer data at both time points (intervention, n = 602; control, n = 617). The mean weekday moderate to vigorous physical activity was similar between groups at follow-up. The central estimate of time spent engaging in moderate to vigorous physical activity was 2.84 minutes lower in the intervention arm than in the control arm, after adjustment for baseline mean weekday moderate to vigorous physical activity, the number of valid days of data and the stratification variables; however, this difference was not statistically significant (95% confidence interval –5.94 to 0.25; p = 0.071). There were no between-arm differences in the secondary outcomes. The intervention costs ranged from £20.85 to £48.86 per pupil, with an average cost of £31.16.
Harms
None.
Limitations
The trial was limited to south-west England.
Conclusions
There was no evidence that PLAN-A increased physical activity in Year 9 girls compared with usual practice and, consequently, it was not cost-effective.
Future work
Future work should evaluate the utility of whole-school approaches to promote physical activity in schools.
Trial registration
This trial is registered as ISRCTN14539759.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme and will be published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 10, No. 6. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. This trial was designed and delivered in collaboration with the Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration (BRTC), a United Kingdom Clinical Research Commission (UKCRC)-registered Clinical Trials Unit that, as part of the Bristol Trials Centre, is in receipt of NIHR Clinical Trials Unit support funding. The sponsor of this trial was University of Bristol, Research and Enterprise Development www.bristol.ac.uk/red/. The costs of delivering the intervention were funded by Sport England.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Russell Jago
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West at University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Byron Tibbitts
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Kathryn Willis
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Emily Sanderson
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Rebecca Kandiyali
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Tom Reid
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Stephanie MacNeill
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Ruth Kipping
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Rona Campbell
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Simon J Sebire
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jones MD, Franklin BD, Raynor DK, Thom H, Watson MC, Kandiyali R. Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of User-Testing of Health Professionals' Guidelines to Reduce the Frequency of Intravenous Medicines Administration Errors by Nurses in the United Kingdom: A Probabilistic Model Based on Voriconazole Administration. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2022; 20:91-104. [PMID: 34403128 PMCID: PMC8752547 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-021-00675-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
AIM In the UK, injectable medicines are often prepared and administered by nurses following the Injectable Medicines Guide (IMG). Our earlier study confirmed a higher frequency of correct administration with user-tested versus standard IMG guidelines. This current study aimed to model the cost-effectiveness of user-testing. METHODS The costs and cost-effectiveness of user-testing were explored by modifying an existing probabilistic decision-analytic model. The adapted model considered administration of intravenous voriconazole to hospital inpatients by nurses. It included 11 error types, their probability of detection and level of harm. Model inputs (including costs) were derived from our previous study and other published data. Monte Carlo simulation using 20,000 samples (sufficient for convergence) was performed with a 5-year time horizon from the perspective of the 121 NHS trusts and health boards that use the IMG. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken for the risk of a medication error and other sources of uncertainty. RESULTS The net monetary benefit at £20,000/quality-adjusted life year was £3,190,064 (95% credible interval (CrI): -346,709 to 8,480,665), favouring user-testing with a 96% chance of cost-effectiveness. Incremental cost-savings were £240,943 (95% CrI 43,527-491,576), also favouring user-tested guidelines with a 99% chance of cost-saving. The total user testing cost was £6317 (95% CrI 6012-6627). These findings were robust to assumptions about a range of input parameters, but greater uncertainty was seen with a lower medication error risk. CONCLUSIONS User-testing of injectable medicines guidelines is a low-cost intervention that is highly likely to be cost-effective, especially for high-risk medicines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew D Jones
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
| | - Bryony Dean Franklin
- UCL School of Pharmacy, London, UK
- Pharmacy Department, Centre for Medication Safety and Service Quality, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - D K Raynor
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Luto Research, Leeds, UK
| | - Howard Thom
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Margaret C Watson
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hiller RM, Davis RS, Devaney J, Halligan SL, Meiser-Stedman R, Smith P, Stallard P, Kandiyali R, MacNeill S. Protocol for the RELATE trial: a feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial of a low-intensity group intervention for young people in care with elevated posttraumatic stress symptoms. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2021; 7:204. [PMID: 34774093 PMCID: PMC8590138 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-021-00936-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Young people in out-of-home care have often experienced trauma, such as direct maltreatment or witnessing violence. There is good evidence that rates of mental health difficulties are high in this group, including posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), a trauma-specific mental health outcome. There remains less evidence to guide how to effectively address elevated PTSD symptoms (PTSS) in these young people, particularly in ways that are feasible and scalable for stretched social-care and mental health services. Methods and analysis This protocol describes a feasibility study comprising a pilot two-arm randomised controlled trial (RCT). Participants (N = 50) will be randomised to either (a) a group-based trauma-focused programme (Teaching Recovery Techniques), delivered by mental health practitioners both online and in-person, or (b) care-as-usual. Primarily, the trial aims to explore the key feasibility and protocol acceptability questions, including rates of recruitment and retention, as well as the acceptability of the intervention (particularly the online delivery format) to participants and services. In addition, outcomes including PTSS (primary clinical outcome), depression and functioning will be assessed at baseline (pre-randomisation), post-intervention and at a 3-month follow-up. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval has been received from the Health Research Authority (Wales REC1 Ref 20/WA/0100) and University, with further approval from the host trust and social care site. The results will inform the design of a definitive RCT. Dissemination will include peer-reviewed journal articles reporting the qualitative and quantitative results, as well as presentations at conferences and lay summaries. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04467320. Registered on 13 July 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - John Devaney
- School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Richard Meiser-Stedman
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychological Therapies, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Patrick Smith
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Rebecca Kandiyali
- Centre for Health Economics, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.,Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Stephanie MacNeill
- Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bradbury CA, Pell J, Hill Q, Bagot C, Cooper N, Ingram J, Breheny K, Kandiyali R, Rayment R, Evans G, Talks K, Thomas I, Greenwood R. Mycophenolate Mofetil for First-Line Treatment of Immune Thrombocytopenia. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:885-895. [PMID: 34469646 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2100596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune thrombocytopenia is a rare autoimmune disorder with associated bleeding risk and fatigue. Recommended first-line treatment for immune thrombocytopenia is high-dose glucocorticoids, but side effects, variable responses, and high relapse rates are serious drawbacks. METHODS In this multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial conducted in the United Kingdom, we assigned adult patients with immune thrombocytopenia, in a 1:1 ratio, to first-line treatment with a glucocorticoid only (standard care) or combined glucocorticoid and mycophenolate mofetil. The primary efficacy outcome was treatment failure, defined as a platelet count of less than 30×109 per liter and initiation of a second-line treatment, assessed in a time-to-event analysis. Secondary outcomes were response rates, side effects, occurrence of bleeding, patient-reported quality-of-life measures, and serious adverse events. RESULTS A total of 120 patients with immune thrombocytopenia underwent randomization (52.4% male; mean age, 54 years [range 17 to 87]; mean platelet level, 7×109 per liter) and were followed for up to 2 years after beginning trial treatment. The mycophenolate mofetil group had fewer treatment failures than the glucocorticoid-only group (22% [13 of 59 patients] vs. 44% [27 of 61 patients]; hazard ratio, 0.41; range, 0.21 to 0.80; P = 0.008) and greater response (91.5% of patients having platelet counts greater than 100×109 per liter vs. 63.9%; P<0.001). We found no evidence of a difference between the groups in the occurrence of bleeding, rescue treatments, or treatment side effects, including infection. However, patients in the mycophenolate mofetil group reported worse quality-of-life outcomes regarding physical function and fatigue than those in the glucocorticoid-only group. CONCLUSIONS The addition of mycophenolate mofetil to a glucocorticoid for first-line treatment of immune thrombocytopenia resulted in greater response and a lower risk of refractory or relapsed immune thrombocytopenia, but with somewhat decreased quality of life. (Funded by the U.K. National Institute for Health Research; FLIGHT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03156452; EudraCT number, 2017-001171-23.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte A Bradbury
- From the Faculty of Translational Health Sciences (C.A.B.), University of Bristol (J.I., K.B., R.K.), and the Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre (C.A.B.) and the Research Design Service (R.G.), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, the Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University (J.P., I.T.), and the Department of Haematology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (R.R.), Cardiff, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (Q.H.), Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow (C.B.), the Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London (N.C.), East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury (G.E.), and Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne (K.T.) - all in the United Kingdom
| | - Julie Pell
- From the Faculty of Translational Health Sciences (C.A.B.), University of Bristol (J.I., K.B., R.K.), and the Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre (C.A.B.) and the Research Design Service (R.G.), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, the Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University (J.P., I.T.), and the Department of Haematology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (R.R.), Cardiff, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (Q.H.), Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow (C.B.), the Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London (N.C.), East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury (G.E.), and Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne (K.T.) - all in the United Kingdom
| | - Quentin Hill
- From the Faculty of Translational Health Sciences (C.A.B.), University of Bristol (J.I., K.B., R.K.), and the Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre (C.A.B.) and the Research Design Service (R.G.), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, the Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University (J.P., I.T.), and the Department of Haematology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (R.R.), Cardiff, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (Q.H.), Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow (C.B.), the Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London (N.C.), East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury (G.E.), and Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne (K.T.) - all in the United Kingdom
| | - Catherine Bagot
- From the Faculty of Translational Health Sciences (C.A.B.), University of Bristol (J.I., K.B., R.K.), and the Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre (C.A.B.) and the Research Design Service (R.G.), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, the Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University (J.P., I.T.), and the Department of Haematology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (R.R.), Cardiff, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (Q.H.), Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow (C.B.), the Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London (N.C.), East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury (G.E.), and Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne (K.T.) - all in the United Kingdom
| | - Nichola Cooper
- From the Faculty of Translational Health Sciences (C.A.B.), University of Bristol (J.I., K.B., R.K.), and the Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre (C.A.B.) and the Research Design Service (R.G.), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, the Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University (J.P., I.T.), and the Department of Haematology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (R.R.), Cardiff, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (Q.H.), Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow (C.B.), the Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London (N.C.), East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury (G.E.), and Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne (K.T.) - all in the United Kingdom
| | - Jenny Ingram
- From the Faculty of Translational Health Sciences (C.A.B.), University of Bristol (J.I., K.B., R.K.), and the Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre (C.A.B.) and the Research Design Service (R.G.), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, the Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University (J.P., I.T.), and the Department of Haematology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (R.R.), Cardiff, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (Q.H.), Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow (C.B.), the Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London (N.C.), East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury (G.E.), and Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne (K.T.) - all in the United Kingdom
| | - Katie Breheny
- From the Faculty of Translational Health Sciences (C.A.B.), University of Bristol (J.I., K.B., R.K.), and the Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre (C.A.B.) and the Research Design Service (R.G.), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, the Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University (J.P., I.T.), and the Department of Haematology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (R.R.), Cardiff, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (Q.H.), Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow (C.B.), the Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London (N.C.), East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury (G.E.), and Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne (K.T.) - all in the United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca Kandiyali
- From the Faculty of Translational Health Sciences (C.A.B.), University of Bristol (J.I., K.B., R.K.), and the Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre (C.A.B.) and the Research Design Service (R.G.), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, the Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University (J.P., I.T.), and the Department of Haematology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (R.R.), Cardiff, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (Q.H.), Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow (C.B.), the Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London (N.C.), East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury (G.E.), and Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne (K.T.) - all in the United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Rayment
- From the Faculty of Translational Health Sciences (C.A.B.), University of Bristol (J.I., K.B., R.K.), and the Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre (C.A.B.) and the Research Design Service (R.G.), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, the Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University (J.P., I.T.), and the Department of Haematology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (R.R.), Cardiff, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (Q.H.), Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow (C.B.), the Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London (N.C.), East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury (G.E.), and Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne (K.T.) - all in the United Kingdom
| | - Gillian Evans
- From the Faculty of Translational Health Sciences (C.A.B.), University of Bristol (J.I., K.B., R.K.), and the Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre (C.A.B.) and the Research Design Service (R.G.), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, the Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University (J.P., I.T.), and the Department of Haematology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (R.R.), Cardiff, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (Q.H.), Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow (C.B.), the Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London (N.C.), East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury (G.E.), and Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne (K.T.) - all in the United Kingdom
| | - Kate Talks
- From the Faculty of Translational Health Sciences (C.A.B.), University of Bristol (J.I., K.B., R.K.), and the Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre (C.A.B.) and the Research Design Service (R.G.), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, the Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University (J.P., I.T.), and the Department of Haematology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (R.R.), Cardiff, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (Q.H.), Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow (C.B.), the Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London (N.C.), East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury (G.E.), and Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne (K.T.) - all in the United Kingdom
| | - Ian Thomas
- From the Faculty of Translational Health Sciences (C.A.B.), University of Bristol (J.I., K.B., R.K.), and the Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre (C.A.B.) and the Research Design Service (R.G.), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, the Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University (J.P., I.T.), and the Department of Haematology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (R.R.), Cardiff, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (Q.H.), Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow (C.B.), the Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London (N.C.), East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury (G.E.), and Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne (K.T.) - all in the United Kingdom
| | - Rosemary Greenwood
- From the Faculty of Translational Health Sciences (C.A.B.), University of Bristol (J.I., K.B., R.K.), and the Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre (C.A.B.) and the Research Design Service (R.G.), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, the Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University (J.P., I.T.), and the Department of Haematology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (R.R.), Cardiff, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (Q.H.), Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow (C.B.), the Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London (N.C.), East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury (G.E.), and Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne (K.T.) - all in the United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jago R, Tibbitts B, Willis K, Sanderson E, Kandiyali R, Reid T, Kipping RR, Campbell R, MacNeill SJ, Hollingworth W, Sebire SJ. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the PLAN-A intervention, a peer led physical activity program for adolescent girls: results of a cluster randomised controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2021; 18:63. [PMID: 33985532 PMCID: PMC8117648 DOI: 10.1186/s12966-021-01133-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 05/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Physical activity is associated with improved health. Girls are less active than boys. Pilot work showed that a peer-led physical activity intervention called PLAN-A was a promising method of increasing physical activity in secondary school age girls. This study examined the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the PLAN-A intervention. METHODS We conducted a cluster randomised controlled trial with Year 9 (13-14 year old) girls recruited from 20 secondary schools. Schools were randomly assigned to the PLAN-A intervention or a non-intervention control group after baseline data collection. Girls nominated students to be peer leaders. The top 18 % of girls nominated by their peers in intervention schools received three days of training designed to prepare them to support physical activity. Data were collected at two time points, baseline (T0) and 5-6 months post-intervention (T1). Participants wore an accelerometer for seven days to assess the primary outcome of mean weekday minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Multivariable mixed effects linear regression was used to estimate differences in the primary outcome between the two arms on an Intention-to-Treat (ITT) basis. Resource use and quality of life were measured and a within trial economic evaluation from a public sector perspective was conducted. RESULTS A total of 1558 girls were recruited to the study. At T0, girls in both arms engaged in an average of 51 min of MVPA per weekday. The adjusted mean difference in weekday MVPA at T1 was - 2.84 min per day (95 % CI = -5.94 to 0.25) indicating a slightly larger decline in weekday MVPA in the intervention group. Results were broadly consistent when repeated using a multiple imputation approach and for pre-specified secondary outcomes and sub-groups. The mean cost of the PLAN-A intervention was £2817 per school, equivalent to £31 per girl. Economic analyses indicated that PLAN-A did not lead to demonstrable cost-effectiveness in terms of cost per unit change in QALY. CONCLUSIONS This study has shown that the PLAN-A intervention did not result in higher levels of weekday MVPA or associated secondary outcomes among Year 9 girls. The PLAN-A intervention should not be disseminated as a public health strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN14539759 -31 May, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Russell Jago
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, 8 Priory Road, BS8 1TZ, Bristol, UK. .,The National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West) at University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
| | - Byron Tibbitts
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, 8 Priory Road, BS8 1TZ, Bristol, UK
| | - Kathryn Willis
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, 8 Priory Road, BS8 1TZ, Bristol, UK
| | - Emily Sanderson
- Bristol Trials Centre, Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Rebecca Kandiyali
- Bristol Trials Centre, Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Tom Reid
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, 8 Priory Road, BS8 1TZ, Bristol, UK
| | - Ruth R Kipping
- Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Rona Campbell
- Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Stephanie J MacNeill
- Bristol Trials Centre, Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - William Hollingworth
- Bristol Trials Centre, Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Simon J Sebire
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, 8 Priory Road, BS8 1TZ, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hawton A, Boddy K, Kandiyali R, Tatnell L, Gibson A, Goodwin E. Involving Patients in Health Economics Research: "The PACTS Principles". Patient 2020; 14:429-434. [PMID: 33043427 PMCID: PMC7548133 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-020-00461-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Discussion of public and patient involvement (PPI) in health economics (HE) research is growing. There is much literature on PPI principles and standards, but little specifically regarding involving patients in HE research. Here, we outline “PACTS”, a set of principles, developed with a PPI group, for considering patient involvement in HE research. Planning: Involvement is best built in to research plans from the outset. This includes setting specific goals for involvement activities, and clearly communicating the background and purpose of involvement. Approach selection: We describe two main approaches to involvement—discussion-based and task-based. Discussion-based approaches are useful for generating broad insights and revealing “unknown unknowns”. Task-based approaches offer a more focused means of shedding light on “known unknowns”. Continuous involvement: Involving patients throughout the research process and across a range of projects helps build expertise for patients and insight for HE researchers. Team building: Meaningful involvement creates a shared sense of ownership of the research and, over time, helps to develop a team ethos, enhancing the positive impacts of involvement. Sensitivity: HE research can be perceived as technical and impersonal. Addressing this requires sensitivity, clarity, and an honest and open approach. There is increased recognition that patient contributors are experts at providing a “lived experience” perspective, in the way that clinicians are experts at providing an overview of conditions and HEs are experts in the methodology of their discipline. We hope these “PACTS Principles” complement existing PPI approaches and provide a useful foundation for health economists considering patient involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annie Hawton
- Health Economics Group, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK. .,NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) South West Peninsula, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK.
| | - Kate Boddy
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) South West Peninsula, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK
| | - Rebecca Kandiyali
- Health Economics at Bristol, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Lynn Tatnell
- Patient and Public Involvement Group (PenPIG), University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK
| | - Andy Gibson
- Department of Health and Social Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - Elizabeth Goodwin
- Health Economics Group, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Thompson TP, Horrell J, Taylor AH, Wanner A, Husk K, Wei Y, Creanor S, Kandiyali R, Neale J, Sinclair J, Nasser M, Wallace G. Physical activity and the prevention, reduction, and treatment of alcohol and other drug use across the lifespan (The PHASE review): A systematic review. Ment Health Phys Act 2020; 19:100360. [PMID: 33020704 PMCID: PMC7527800 DOI: 10.1016/j.mhpa.2020.100360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Revised: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this review is to systematically describe and quantify the effects of PA interventions on alcohol and other drug use outcomes, and to identify any apparent effect of PA dose and type, possible mechanisms of effect, and any other aspect of intervention delivery (e.g. key behaviour change processes), within a framework to inform the design and evaluation of future interventions. Systematic searches were designed to identify published and grey literature on the role of PA for reducing the risk of progression to alcohol and other drug use (PREVENTION), supporting individuals to reduce alcohol and other drug use for harm reduction (REDUCTION), and promote abstinence and relapse prevention during and after treatment of alcohol and other drug use (TREATMENT). Searches identified 49,518 records, with 49,342 excluded on title and abstract. We screened 176 full text articles from which we included 32 studies in 32 papers with quantitative results of relevance to this review. Meta-analysis of two studies showed a significant effect of PA on prevention of alcohol initiation (risk ratio [RR]: 0.72, 95%CI: 0.61 to 0.85). Meta-analysis of four studies showed no clear evidence for an effect of PA on alcohol consumption (Standardised Mean Difference [SMD]: 0.19, 95%, Confidence Interval -0.57 to 0.18). We were unable to quantitatively examine the effects of PA interventions on other drug use alone, or in combination with alcohol use, for prevention, reduction or treatment. Among the 19 treatment studies with an alcohol and other drug use outcome, there was a trend for promising short-term effect but with limited information about intervention fidelity and exercise dose, there was a moderate to high risk of bias. We identified no studies reporting the cost-effectiveness of interventions. More rigorous and well-designed research is needed. Our novel approach to the review provides a clearer guide to achieve this in future research questions addressed to inform policy and practice for different populations and settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T P Thompson
- Faculty of Health, Medicine, Dentistry & Human Sciences University of Plymouth, Plymouth Science Park Derriford, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK
| | - J Horrell
- Faculty of Health, Medicine, Dentistry & Human Sciences University of Plymouth, Plymouth Science Park Derriford, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK
| | - A H Taylor
- Faculty of Health, Medicine, Dentistry & Human Sciences University of Plymouth, Plymouth Science Park Derriford, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK
| | - A Wanner
- Faculty of Health, Medicine, Dentistry & Human Sciences University of Plymouth, Plymouth Science Park Derriford, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK
| | - K Husk
- Faculty of Health, Medicine, Dentistry & Human Sciences University of Plymouth, Plymouth Science Park Derriford, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK
| | - Y Wei
- University of Plymouth, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, School of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK
| | - S Creanor
- Faculty of Health, Medicine, Dentistry & Human Sciences University of Plymouth, Plymouth Science Park Derriford, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK
| | - R Kandiyali
- Bristol University, School of Social and Community Medicine, Oakfield Grove, Clifton, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK
| | - J Neale
- King's College London Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8BB, UK
| | - J Sinclair
- University of Southampton, Faculty of Medicine, 4-12 Terminus Terrace, Southampton, SO14 3DT, UK
| | - M Nasser
- Faculty of Health, Medicine, Dentistry & Human Sciences University of Plymouth, Plymouth Science Park Derriford, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK
| | - G Wallace
- Plymouth City Council, Public Dispensary, Catherine Street, Plymouth, PL1 2AA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Carlton EW, Ingram J, Taylor H, Glynn J, Kandiyali R, Campbell S, Beasant L, Aziz S, Beresford P, Kendall J, Reuben A, Smith JE, Chapman R, Creanor S, Benger JR. Limit of detection of troponin discharge strategy versus usual care: randomised controlled trial. Heart 2020; 106:1586-1594. [PMID: 32371401 PMCID: PMC7525793 DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2020] [Revised: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The clinical effectiveness of a ‘rule-out’ acute coronary syndrome (ACS) strategy for emergency department patients with chest pain, incorporating a single undetectable high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) taken at presentation, together with a non-ischaemic ECG, remains unknown. Methods A randomised controlled trial, across eight hospitals in the UK, aimed to establish the clinical effectiveness of an undetectable hs-cTn and ECG (limit of detection and ECG discharge (LoDED)) discharge strategy. Eligible adult patients presented with chest pain; the treating clinician intended to perform investigations to rule out an ACS; the initial ECG was non-ischaemic; and peak symptoms occurred <6 hours previously. Participants were randomised 1:1 to either the LoDED strategy or the usual rule-out strategy. The primary outcome was discharge from the hospital within 4 hours of arrival, without a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) within 30 days. Results Between June 2018 and March 2019, 632 patients were randomised; 3 were later withdrawn. Of 629 patients (age 53.8 (SD 16.1) years, 41% women), 7% had a MACE within 30 days. For the LoDED strategy, 141 of 309 (46%) patients were discharged within 4 hours, without MACE within 30 days, and for usual care, 114 of 311 (37%); pooled adjusted OR 1.58 (95% CI 0.84 to 2.98). No patient with an initial undetectable hs-cTn had a MACE within 30 days. Conclusion The LoDED strategy facilitates safe early discharge in >40% of patients with chest pain. Clinical effectiveness is variable when compared with existing rule-out strategies and influenced by wider system factors. Trial registration number ISRCTN86184521.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jenny Ingram
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Hazel Taylor
- Research Design Service South West, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Joel Glynn
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Rebecca Kandiyali
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah Campbell
- Peninsula Clinical Trials Unit, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Lucy Beasant
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Shahid Aziz
- Cardiology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Westbury on Trym, UK
| | | | - Jason Kendall
- Emergency Department, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Adam Reuben
- Emergency Department, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Jason E Smith
- Emergency Department, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK.,Academic Department of Military Emergency Medicine, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine (Research and Academia), Birmingham, UK
| | - Rebecca Chapman
- Peninsula Clinical Trials Unit, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Siobhan Creanor
- Centre for Medical Statistics, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK
| | - Jonathan Richard Benger
- Academic Department of Emergency care, The University Hospitals NHS Foundation trust, Bristol, UK.,Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, The University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Breheny K, Hollingworth W, Kandiyali R, Dixon P, Loose A, Craggs P, Grzeda M, Sparrow J. Assessing the construct validity and responsiveness of Preference-Based Measures (PBMs) in cataract surgery patients. Qual Life Res 2020; 29:1935-1946. [PMID: 32080789 PMCID: PMC7295830 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-020-02443-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L in visual conditions has been questioned, inspiring development of a vision 'bolt-on' domain (EQ-5D-3L + VIS). Developments in preference-based measures (PBM) also includes the EQ-5D-5L and the ICECAP-O capability wellbeing measure. This study aimed to examine the construct validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, EQ-5D-3L + VIS and ICECAP-O in cataract surgery patients for the first time, to inform choice of PBM for economic evaluation in this population. METHODS The analyses used data from the UK Predict-CAT cataract surgery cohort study. PBMs and the Cat-PROM5 [a validated measure of cataract quality of life (QOL)] were completed before surgery and 4-8 weeks after. Construct validity was assessed using correlations and known-group differences evaluated using regression. Responsiveness was evaluated using effect sizes and analysis of variance to compare change scores between groups, defined by patient-reported and clinical outcomes. RESULTS The sample comprised 1315 patients at baseline. No PBMs were associated with visual acuity and only the ICECAP-O (Spearman's rs = - 0.35), EQ-5D-3L + VIS (rs = - 0.42) and EQ-5D-5L (Value Set for England rs = - 0.31) correlated at least moderately with the Cat-PROM5. Effect sizes of change were consistently largest for the EQ-5D-3L + VIS (range 0.34-0.41), followed by the ICECAP-O (range 0.20-0.34). Results indicated no improvement in responsiveness using the EQ-5D-5L (range 0.13-0.16) compared to the EQ-5D-3L (range 0.17-0.20). CONCLUSIONS Whilst no PBMs comprehensively demonstrated evidence of construct validity and responsiveness in cataract surgery patients, the ICECAP-O was the most responsive generic PBM to improvements in QOL. Surprisingly the EQ-5D-5L was not more responsive than the EQ-5D-3L in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Breheny
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| | - William Hollingworth
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Rebecca Kandiyali
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Padraig Dixon
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Abi Loose
- Department of Ophthalmology, Bristol Eye Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Pippa Craggs
- Department of Ophthalmology, Bristol Eye Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Mariusz Grzeda
- Department of Ophthalmology, Bristol Eye Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - John Sparrow
- Department of Ophthalmology, Bristol Eye Hospital, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Barnfield S, Ingram J, Halliday R, Griffin X, Greenwood R, Kandiyali R, Thompson J, Glynn J, Beasant L, McArthur J, Bates P, Acharya M. TULIP: a randomised controlled trial of surgical versus non-surgical treatment of lateral compression injuries of the pelvis with complete sacral fractures (LC1) in the non-fragility fracture patient-a feasibility study protocol. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e036588. [PMID: 32047021 PMCID: PMC7044852 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic fractures are the most common type of pelvic fracture. The majority of LC1 fractures are considered stable. Fractures where a complete sacral fracture is present increases the degree of potential instability and have the potential to displace over time. Non-operative management of these unstable fractures may involve restricted weight bearing and significant rehabilitation. Frequent monitoring with X-rays is also necessary for displacement of the fracture. Operative stabilisation of these fractures may be appropriate to prevent displacement of the fracture. This may allow patients to mobilise pain-free, quicker. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The study is a feasibility study to inform the design of a full definitive randomised controlled trial to guide the most appropriate management of these injuries. Participants will be recruited from major trauma centres and randomly allocated to either operative or non-operative management of their injuries. A variety of outcome instruments, measuring health-related quality of life, functional outcome and pain, will be completed at several time points up to 12 months post injury. Qualitative interviews will be undertaken with participants to explore their views of the treatments under investigation and trial processes.Eligibility and recruitment to the study will be analysed to inform the feasibility of a definitive trial. Completion rates of the measurement instruments will be assessed, as well as their sensitivity to change and the presence of floor or ceiling effects in this population, to inform the choice of the primary outcome for a definitive trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval for the study was given by the South West-Central Bristol NHS Research Ethics Committee on 2nd July 2018 (Ref; 18/SW/0135). The study will be reported in relevant specialist journals and through presentation at specialist conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN10649958.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Barnfield
- Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Jenny Ingram
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Ruth Halliday
- Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Xavier Griffin
- Nuffield Dept of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), Kadoorie Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Rosemary Greenwood
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Level 3 Education Centre, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Julian Thompson
- Department of Anaesthetics, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Joel Glynn
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Lucy Beasant
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - John McArthur
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Peter Bates
- Department of Orthopaedics, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Mehool Acharya
- Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kandiyali R, Thom H, Young AE, Greenwood R, Welton NJ. Cost-effectiveness and value of information analysis of a low-friction environment following skin graft in patients with burn injury. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2020; 6:8. [PMID: 32021697 PMCID: PMC6995137 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-019-0543-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with burn injuries may receive a skin graft to achieve healing in a timely manner. However, in around 7% of cases, the skin graft is lost (fails to attach to the wound site) and a re-grafting procedure is necessary. It has been hypothesised that low-friction (smooth, more slippery) bedding may reduce the risk of skin-graft loss. A before and after feasibility study comparing low-friction with standard bedding in skin-grafted patients was conducted in order to collect proof of concept data. The resulting relative risk on the primary outcome (number of patients with skin graft failure) for the non-randomised study provided no evidence of effect but had a large standard error. The aim of this study is to see if an appropriately powered randomised control trial would be worthwhile. Methods A probabilistic decision-analytic model was constructed to compare low-friction bedding to standard care in a population of burn patients who have undergone skin grafting. Results from the before and after study were used as model inputs. The sensitivity of results to bias in the relative risk of graft loss was conducted. Low-friction bedding is considered optimal if expected incremental net benefit (INB) is positive. Uncertainty is assessed using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Expected Value of Perfect Partial Information (EVPPI) provides an upper bound for the potential net health benefits of new research for given model input. Results At a willingness to pay threshold of £20,000 per QALY, INB = £151 (95% Credible Interval (CrI) −142 to 814), marginally favouring low-friction bedding but with high uncertainty (probability of being cost-effective 70.5%). Expected value of perfect information (EVPI) per patient was £20.29, which results in a population EVPI of £174,765 over a 10-year lifetime for the technology (based on 1000 patients per year who would benefit from the intervention). The parameter contributing most to the uncertainty was the inpatient care cost, i.e. information that could be obtained from the audit of practice and without an expensive trial. These findings were robust to a wide-range of assumptions about the potential bias due to the observational nature of the comparative evidence. Conclusions Our study results suggest that an RCT (randomised controlled trial) is unlikely to be worthwhile, but there may be value in a study to estimate the re-graft rates and associated costs in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Kandiyali
- 1Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Howard Thom
- 1Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Amber E Young
- 1Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,2University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Nicky J Welton
- 1Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Band R, Ewings S, Cheetham-Blake T, Ellis J, Breheny K, Vassilev I, Portillo MC, Yardley L, Blickem C, Kandiyali R, Culliford D, Rogers A. Study protocol for 'The Project About Loneliness and Social networks (PALS)': a pragmatic, randomised trial comparing a facilitated social network intervention (Genie) with a wait-list control for lonely and socially isolated people. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e028718. [PMID: 31427326 PMCID: PMC6701612 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Revised: 03/13/2019] [Accepted: 06/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Loneliness and social isolation have been identified as significant public health concerns, but improving relationships and increasing social participation may improve health outcomes and quality of life. The aim of the Project About Loneliness and Social networks (PALS) study is to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a guided social network intervention within a community setting among individuals experiencing loneliness and isolation and to understand implementation of Generating Engagement in Network Involvement (Genie) in the context of different organisations. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The PALS trial will be a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial comparing participants receiving the Genie intervention to a wait-list control group. Eligible participants will be recruited from organisations working within a community setting: any adult identified as socially isolated or at-risk of loneliness and living in the community will be eligible. Genie will be delivered by trained facilitators recruited from community organisations. The primary outcome will be the difference in the SF-12 Mental Health composite scale score at 6-month follow-up between the intervention and control group using a mixed effects model (accounting for clustering within facilitators and organisation). Secondary outcomes will be loneliness, social isolation, well-being, physical health and engagement with new activities. The economic evaluation will use a cost-utility approach, and adopt a public sector perspective to include health-related resource use and costs incurred by other public services. Exploratory analysis will use a societal perspective, and explore broader measures of benefit (capability well-being). A qualitative process evaluation will explore organisational and environmental arrangements, as well as stakeholder and participant experiences of the study to understand the factors likely to influence future sustainability, implementation and scalability of using a social network intervention within this context. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study has received NHS ethical approval (REC reference: 18/SC/0245). The findings from PALS will be disseminated widely through peer-reviewed publications, conferences and workshops in collaboration with our community partners. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN19193075.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Band
- Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Wessex, NIHR, Wessex, UK
| | - Sean Ewings
- Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Tara Cheetham-Blake
- Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Wessex, NIHR, Wessex, UK
| | - Jaimie Ellis
- Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Wessex, NIHR, Wessex, UK
| | - Katie Breheny
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Ivaylo Vassilev
- Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Wessex, NIHR, Wessex, UK
| | - Mari Carmen Portillo
- Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Wessex, NIHR, Wessex, UK
| | - Lucy Yardley
- Academic Unit of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Rebecca Kandiyali
- Centre for Child and Adolescent Health, University of Bristol School of Social and Community Medicine, Bristol, UK
| | - David Culliford
- NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Wessex, NIHR, Wessex, UK
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Anne Rogers
- Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Wessex, NIHR, Wessex, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kandiyali R, Hawton A, Cabral C, Mytton J, Shilling V, Morris C, Ingram J. Working with Patients and Members of the Public: Informing Health Economics in Child Health Research. Pharmacoecon Open 2019; 3:133-141. [PMID: 30324567 PMCID: PMC6533327 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-018-0099-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
This paper considers patient and public involvement (PPI) in health economics research and how this might be facilitated. PPI refers to research carried out 'with' or 'by' members of the public and is now an important aspect of health research policies internationally. Patients and members of the public can be involved in all stages of the research cycle, from establishing whether the topic is important to influencing details of study design, wording of patient-facing documentation and interpretation and dissemination of findings. PPI has become commonplace in health services research. In the context of clinical trials, it has become imperative, with, for example, patients and members of the public informing the selection of outcome measures and recruitment methods, and qualitative research is frequently steered by PPI input regarding the content of interview topic guides and the interpretation of study findings. It is less common for PPI to be explicitly reported in the economic components of health services research. However, we argue that involvement is no less important in this area. The fundamental rationale for involving people in research is that it promotes democratic principles, research quality and relevance to service users. These arguments equally apply to health economics as to other health research disciplines. Our overarching aim in this paper is to show how health economic research might be informed by PPI. We report our experiences of PPI via case studies in child health, reflect on our learnings, and make suggestions for future research practice. Plain Language Summary This paper considers how to involve patients and members of the public in health economics research.Health economists often carry out research into the value for money (sometimes called 'cost effectiveness') of new ways of treating people. This can help in decisions about which treatments are publically funded. In an economic evaluation, the economist identifies and values the key things used to treat someone who is unwell. They also have to measure how unwell that person is and whether their health changes with treatment. They do this by asking them questions about how they rate specific aspects of their health. Economists compare costs and health outcomes of different treatments. Patient and public involvement in health research is really important because the public fund health systems (through taxation in the UK) and benefit from healthcare. This paper shares our ideas on and experiences involving the public in health economic research studies. All our examples come from the involvement of children and/or parents. We think our approaches would also apply to adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Kandiyali
- Health Economics at Bristol, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
- Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| | - Annie Hawton
- Health Economics Group, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Christie Cabral
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Julie Mytton
- Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - Valerie Shilling
- University of Sussex, Sussex Health Outcomes Research and Education in Cancer (SHORE-C), Brighton, Brighton and Hove, UK
| | - Christopher Morris
- PenCRU, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Jenny Ingram
- Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Willis K, Tibbitts B, Sebire SJ, Reid T, MacNeill SJ, Sanderson E, Hollingworth W, Kandiyali R, Campbell R, Kipping RR, Jago R. Protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of a Peer-Led physical Activity iNtervention for Adolescent girls (PLAN-A). BMC Public Health 2019; 19:644. [PMID: 31138171 PMCID: PMC6537278 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7012-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2019] [Accepted: 05/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Adolescent girls are less physically active than recommended for health, and levels decline further as they approach adulthood. Peers can influence adolescent girls’ physical activity. Interventions capitalising on peer support could positively impact physical activity behaviour in this group. Building on promising feasibility work, the purpose of this cluster randomised controlled trial is to assess whether the Peer-Led physical Activity iNtervention for Adolescent girls (PLAN-A) increases adolescent girls’ physical activity and is cost effective. Methods PLAN-A is a two-arm secondary school-based cluster randomised controlled trial, conducted with girls aged 13–14 years from twenty schools in the south west of England. The intervention requires participants to nominate influential girls within their year group to become peer supporters. The top 15% of girls nominated in each school receive three days of training designed to prepare them to support their peers to be more physically active during a ten-week intervention period. Data will be collected at two time points, at baseline (T0) and 5–6 months post-intervention (T1). Schools will be randomly allocated to the intervention (n = 10) or control (n = 10) arm after T0. At each time point, all consenting participants will wear an accelerometer for seven days to assess the primary outcome of mean weekday minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Multivariable mixed effects linear regression will be used to estimate differences in the primary outcome between the two arms and will be examined on an Intention-to-Treat (ITT) basis. A self-report psychosocial questionnaire will be completed by participants to assess self-esteem and physical activity motivation. Resource use and quality of life will be measured for the purposes of an economic evaluation. A mixed-methods process evaluation will be conducted to explore intervention fidelity, acceptability and sustainability. Analysis of quantitative process evaluation data will be descriptive, and the framework method will be used to analyse qualitative data. Discussion This paper describes the protocol for the PLAN-A cluster randomised controlled trial, a novel approach to increasing adolescent girls’ physical activity levels through peer support. Trial registration ISRCTN14539759–31 May, 2018. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-7012-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn Willis
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, 8 Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TZ, UK.
| | - Byron Tibbitts
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, 8 Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TZ, UK
| | - Simon J Sebire
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, 8 Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TZ, UK
| | - Tom Reid
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, 8 Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TZ, UK
| | - Stephanie J MacNeill
- Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Emily Sanderson
- Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - William Hollingworth
- Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Rebecca Kandiyali
- Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Rona Campbell
- Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Ruth R Kipping
- Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Russell Jago
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, 8 Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TZ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Winters Z, Roberts N, McCartan N, Potyka I, Brunt M, Maxwell A, Greenwood R, Ingram J, Kandiyali R, Schmid P, Williams N. 16. Can patients with multiple breast cancers in the same breast avoid mastectomy by having multiple lumpectomies to achieve equivalent rates of local breast cancer recurrence? A randomized controlled feasibility trial called MIAMI UK (NCT03514654). Eur J Surg Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.01.202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
27
|
Pell J, Greenwood R, Ingram J, Wale K, Thomas I, Kandiyali R, Mumford A, Dick A, Bagot C, Cooper N, Hill Q, Bradbury CA. Trial protocol: a multicentre randomised trial of first-line treatment pathways for newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia: standard steroid treatment versus combined steroid and mycophenolate. The FLIGHT trial. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e024427. [PMID: 30341143 PMCID: PMC6196935 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune condition that may cause thrombocytopenia-related bleeding. Current first-line ITP treatment is with high-dose corticosteroids but frequent side effects, heterogeneous responses and high relapse rates are significant problems with only 20% remaining in sustained remission with this approach. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is often used as the next treatment with efficacy in 50%-80% of patients and good tolerability but can take up to 2 months to work. OBJECTIVE To test the hypothesis that MMF combined with corticosteroid is a more effective first-line treatment for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) than current standard of corticosteroid alone. METHODS AND ANALYSIS DesignMulticentre, UK-based, open-label, randomised controlled trial. SETTING Haematology departments in secondary care. PARTICIPANTS We plan to recruit 120 patients >16 years old with a diagnosis of ITP and a platelet count <30x109/L who require first-line treatment. Patients will be followed up for a minimum of 12 months following randomisation. PRIMARY OUTCOME Time from randomisation to treatment failure defined as platelets <30x109/L and a need for second-line treatment. SECONDARY OUTCOMES Side effects, bleeding events, remission rates, time to relapse, time to next therapy, cumulative corticosteroid dose, rescue therapy, splenectomy, socioeconomic costs, patient-reported outcomes (quality of life, fatigue, impact of bleeding, care costs). ANALYSIS The sample size of 120 achieves a 91.5% power to detect a doubling of the median time to treatment failure from 5 to 10 months. This will be expressed as an HR with 95% CI, median time to event if more than 50% have had an event and illustrated with Kaplan-Meier curves. Cost-effectiveness will be based on the first 12 months from diagnosis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval from NRES Committee South West (IRAS number 225959). EudraCT Number: 2017-001171-23. Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03156452.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Pell
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| | - Rosemary Greenwood
- Research and Design Service, South West, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jenny Ingram
- Research and Design Service, South West, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Katherine Wale
- Research & Innovation, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Ian Thomas
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| | - Rebecca Kandiyali
- Research & Innovation, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Andrew Mumford
- Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Department of Haematology, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Andrew Dick
- Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- UCL-Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK
| | - Catherine Bagot
- Department of Haematology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | - Nichola Cooper
- Department of Haematology, Imperial College London and Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Quentin Hill
- Department of Haematology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Charlotte Ann Bradbury
- Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Department of Haematology, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Carlton E, Campbell S, Ingram J, Kandiyali R, Taylor H, Aziz S, Beresford P, Kendall J, Reuben A, Smith J, Vickery PJ, Benger JR. Randomised controlled trial of the Limit of Detection of Troponin and ECG Discharge (LoDED) strategy versus usual care in adult patients with chest pain attending the emergency department: study protocol. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e025339. [PMID: 30282688 PMCID: PMC6169748 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Observational data suggest a single high-sensitivity troponin blood test taken at emergency department (ED) presentation could be used to rule out major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in 10%-60% of ED patients with chest pain. This is done using an 'undetectable' cut-off (the Limit of Detection: LoD). We combined the LoD cut-off with ECG findings to create the LoDED strategy. We aim to establish whether the LoDED strategy works under real-life conditions, when compared with existing strategies, in a way that is cost-effective and acceptable to patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a parallel-group pragmatic randomised controlled trial across UK EDs. Adults presenting to ED with suspected cardiac chest pain will be randomised 1:1. Existing rule-out strategies in current use across study centres, using serial high-sensitivity troponin testing, will be compared with the LoDED strategy. The primary outcome is successful early discharge (discharge from hospital within 4 hours of arrival) without MACE occurring within 30 days. Secondary outcomes include initial length of hospital stay; comparative costs; patient satisfaction and acceptability to patients. To detect a 9% difference between the early discharge rates (assuming an 8% rate in the standard care group) with 90% power, 594 patients need to be recruited, assuming a 95% follow-up rate. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has been approved by the Frenchay Research Ethics Committee (reference 18/SW/0038). Results will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal. Lay summaries will be made available to patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN86184521; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Carlton
- Emergency Department, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah Campbell
- Peninsula Clinical Trials Unit, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK
| | - Jenny Ingram
- Bristol Medical School (Population Health), University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Rebecca Kandiyali
- Bristol Medical School (Population Health), University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Hazel Taylor
- Research Design Service South West, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Shahid Aziz
- Department of Cardiology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Peter Beresford
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Jason Kendall
- Emergency Department, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Adam Reuben
- Emergency Department, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Jason Smith
- Emergency Department, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hollén L, Greenwood R, Kandiyali R, Ingram J, Foy C, George S, Mulligan S, Spickett-Jones F, Booth S, Sack A, Emond A, Dunn K, Young A. The SILKIE (Skin graftIng Low friKtIon Environment) study: a non-randomised proof-of-concept and feasibility study on the impact of low-friction nursing environment on skin grafting success rates in adult and paediatric burns. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e021886. [PMID: 29903799 PMCID: PMC6009614 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the impact of low-friction (LF) bedding on graft loss in an acute burn care setting, and to examine the feasibility and costs of using LF bedding compared with standard care. DESIGN Proof of concept before and after study with feasibility of delivering the intervention. SETTING Three burns services within two UK hospital trusts. PARTICIPANTS Inclusion criteria were patients older than 4 weeks, who received a skin graft after burn injury and were admitted overnight. The comparator cohort were eligible patients admitted in a 12-month period before the intervention. INTERVENTION Introduction of LF sheets and pillowcases during a 15-month period. OUTCOME MEASURES For proof of concept, the LF and comparator cohorts were compared in terms of number of regrafting operations (primary), percentage graft loss, hospital length of stay (LoS) and LoS cost (secondary). Feasibility outcomes were practicality and safety of using LF bedding. RESULTS 131 patients were eligible for the LF cohort and 90 patients for the comparator cohort. Although the primary outcome of the proportion needing regrafting was halved in the LF cohort, the confidence interval (CI) crossed 1 (OR (95% CI): 0.56 (0.16 to 1.88)). Partial graft loss (any loss) was significantly reduced in the LF cohort (OR (95% CI): 0.27 (0.14, 0.51)). Inpatient LoS was no different between the two cohorts (difference in median days (95% CI): 0 (-2 to 1)), and the estimated difference in LoS cost was £-1139 (-4829 to 2551). Practical issues were easily resolved, and no safety incidents occurred while patients were nursed on LF bedding. CONCLUSIONS LF bedding is safe to use in burned patients with skin grafts and we have shown proof of concept for the intervention. Further economic modelling is required to see if an appropriately powered randomised control trial would be worthwhile or if roll out across the National Health Service is justified. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN82599687.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Hollén
- The Scar Free Foundation Centre for Children’s Burn Research, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
- Centre for Child and Adolescent Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Rosemary Greenwood
- Department of Research and Innovation, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Rebecca Kandiyali
- The Scar Free Foundation Centre for Children’s Burn Research, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
- Centre for Child and Adolescent Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jenny Ingram
- Centre for Child and Adolescent Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Chris Foy
- Gloucestershire Research Support Service, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, UK
| | - Susan George
- The Scar Free Foundation Centre for Children’s Burn Research, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Sandra Mulligan
- The Scar Free Foundation Centre for Children’s Burn Research, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Francesca Spickett-Jones
- The Scar Free Foundation Centre for Children’s Burn Research, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Simon Booth
- McIndoe Burn Centre, Queen Victoria Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, East Grinstead, UK
| | - Anthony Sack
- Adult Burns Unit, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Alan Emond
- The Scar Free Foundation Centre for Children’s Burn Research, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
- Centre for Child and Adolescent Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Ken Dunn
- Department of Burns and Plastic surgery, The Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Amber Young
- The Scar Free Foundation Centre for Children’s Burn Research, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Clarke CE, Patel S, Ives N, Rick CE, Woolley R, Wheatley K, Walker MF, Zhu S, Kandiyali R, Yao G, Sackley CM. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of physiotherapy and occupational therapy versus no therapy in mild to moderate Parkinson's disease: a large pragmatic randomised controlled trial (PD REHAB). Health Technol Assess 2018; 20:1-96. [PMID: 27580669 DOI: 10.3310/hta20630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cochrane reviews of physiotherapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT) for Parkinson's disease found insufficient evidence of effectiveness, but previous trials were methodologically flawed with small sample size and short-term follow-up. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of individualised PT and OT in Parkinson's disease. DESIGN Large pragmatic randomised controlled trial. SETTING Thirty-eight neurology and geriatric medicine outpatient clinics in the UK. PARTICIPANTS Seven hundred and sixty-two patients with mild to moderate Parkinson's disease reporting limitations in activities of daily living (ADL). INTERVENTION Patients were randomised online to either both PT and OT NHS services (n = 381) or no therapy (n = 381). Therapy incorporated a patient-centred approach with individual assessment and goal setting. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was instrumental ADL measured by the patient-completed Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living (NEADL) scale at 3 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life [Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39); European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)], adverse events, resource use and carer quality of life (Short Form questionnaire-12 items). Outcomes were assessed before randomisation and at 3, 9 and 15 months after randomisation. RESULTS Data from 92% of the participants in each group were available at the primary time point of 3 months, but there was no difference in NEADL total score [difference 0.5 points, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.7 to 1.7; p = 0.4] or PDQ-39 summary index (0.007 points, 95% CI -1.5 to 1.5; p = 1.0) between groups. The EQ-5D quotient was of borderline significance in favour of therapy (-0.03, 95% CI -0.07 to -0.002; p = 0.04). Contact time with therapists was for a median of four visits of 58 minutes each over 8 weeks (mean dose 232 minutes). Repeated measures analysis including all time points showed no difference in NEADL total score, but PDQ-39 summary index (curves diverging at 1.6 points per annum, 95% CI 0.47 to 2.62; p = 0.005) and EQ-5D quotient (0.02, 95% CI 0.00007 to 0.03; p = 0.04) showed significant but small differences in favour of the therapy arm. Cost-effective analysis showed that therapy was associated with a slight but not significant gain in quality-adjusted life-years (0.027, 95% CI -0.010 to 0.065) at a small incremental cost (£164, 95% CI -£141 to £468), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of under £4000 (£3493, 95% -£169,371 to £176,358). There was no difference in adverse events or serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS NHS PT and OT did not produce immediate or long-term clinically meaningful improvements in ADL or quality of life in patients with mild to moderate Parkinson's disease. This evidence does not support the use of low-dose, patient-centred, goal-directed PT and OT in patients in the early stages of Parkinson's disease. Future research should include the development and testing of more structured and intensive PT and OT programmes in patients with all stages of Parkinson's disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN17452402. FUNDING This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 20, No. 63. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. The Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, received support from the UK Department of Health up to March 2012. Catherine Sackley was supported by a NIHR senior investigator award, Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care East of England and West Midlands Strategic Health Authority Clinical Academic Training award.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl E Clarke
- Institute for Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Department of Neurology, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Smitaa Patel
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Natalie Ives
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Caroline E Rick
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Rebecca Woolley
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Keith Wheatley
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Marion F Walker
- Rehabilitation and Ageing, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Shihua Zhu
- Primary Care Clinical Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Rebecca Kandiyali
- Primary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Guiqing Yao
- Primary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Catherine M Sackley
- University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.,Academic Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Thompson TP, Taylor AH, Wanner A, Husk K, Wei Y, Creanor S, Kandiyali R, Neale J, Sinclair J, Nasser M, Wallace G. Physical activity and the prevention, reduction, and treatment of alcohol and/or substance use across the lifespan (The PHASE review): protocol for a systematic review. Syst Rev 2018; 7:9. [PMID: 29357931 PMCID: PMC5778642 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-018-0674-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2017] [Accepted: 01/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alcohol and substance use results in significant human and economic cost globally and is associated with economic costs of £21 billion and £15billion within the UK, respectively, and trends for use are not improving. Pharmacological interventions are well researched, but relapse rates across interventions for substance and alcohol use disorders are as high as 60-90%. Physical activity may offer an alternative or adjunct approach to reducing rates of alcohol and substance use that is associated with few adverse side effects, is easily accessible, and is potentially cost-effective. Through psychological, behavioural, and physiological mechanisms, physical activity may offer benefits in the prevention, reduction, and treatment of alcohol and substance use across the lifespan. Whilst physical activity is widely advocated as offering benefit, no systematic review exists of physical activity (in all forms) and its effects on all levels of alcohol and substance use across all ages to help inform policymakers, service providers, and commissioners. METHODS The objectives of this mixed methods systematic review are to describe and evaluate the quantitative and qualitative research obtained by a diverse search strategy on the impact of physical activity and its potential to: 1. Reduce the risk of progression to alcohol and/or substance use (PREVENTION) 2. Support individuals to reduce alcohol and/or substance use for harm reduction (REDUCTION), and 3. Promote abstinence and relapse prevention during and after treatment for an alcohol and/or substance use disorder (TREATMENT). With the input of key stakeholders, we aim to assess how what we know can be translated into policy and practice. Quantitative, qualitative, service evaluations, and economic analyses will be brought together in a final narrative synthesis that will describe the potential benefits of physical activity for whom, in what conditions, and in what form. DISCUSSION This review will provide details of what is known about physical activity and the prevention, reduction, and treatment of alcohol and/or substance use. The synthesised findings will be disseminated to policymakers, service providers, and commissioners in the UK. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO number: CRD42017079322 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom P Thompson
- Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth Science Park, Derriford, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK.
| | - Adrian H Taylor
- Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth Science Park, Derriford, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK
| | - Amanda Wanner
- Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth Science Park, Derriford, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK
| | - Kerryn Husk
- Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth Science Park, Derriford, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK
| | - Yinghui Wei
- Centre for Mathematical Sciences, School of Computing, Electronics and Mathematics, Plymouth University, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK
| | - Siobhan Creanor
- Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth Science Park, Derriford, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK
| | - Rebecca Kandiyali
- Bristol Medical School, Bristol University, Oakfield grove, Clifton, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK
| | - Jo Neale
- King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8BB, UK
| | - Julia Sinclair
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, 4-12 Terminus Terrace, Southampton, SO14 3DT, UK
| | - Mona Nasser
- Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth Science Park, Derriford, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK
| | - Gary Wallace
- Plymouth City Council, Public Dispensary, Catherine Street, Plymouth, PL1 2AA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Atkinson C, Penfold CM, Ness AR, Longman RJ, Thomas SJ, Hollingworth W, Kandiyali R, Leary SD, Lewis SJ. Randomized clinical trial of postoperative chewing gum versus standard care after colorectal resection. Br J Surg 2016; 103:962-70. [PMID: 27146793 PMCID: PMC5084762 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2015] [Revised: 03/08/2016] [Accepted: 03/10/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Background Chewing gum may stimulate gastrointestinal motility, with beneficial effects on postoperative ileus suggested in small studies. The primary aim of this trial was to determine whether chewing gum reduces length of hospital stay (LOS) after colorectal resection. Secondary aims included examining bowel habit symptoms, complications and healthcare costs. Methods This clinical trial allocated patients randomly to standard postoperative care with or without chewing gum (sugar‐free gum for at least 10 min, four times per day on days 1–5) in five UK hospitals. The primary outcome was LOS. Cox regression was used to calculate hazard ratios for LOS. Results Data from 402 of 412 patients, of whom 199 (49·5 per cent) were allocated to chewing gum, were available for analysis. Some 40 per cent of patients in both groups had laparoscopic surgery, and all study sites used enhanced recovery programmes. Median (i.q.r.) LOS was 7 (5–11) days in both groups (P = 0·962); the hazard ratio for use of gum was 0·94 (95 per cent c.i. 0·77 to 1·15; P = 0·557). Participants allocated to gum had worse quality of life, measured using the EuroQoL 5D‐3L, than controls at 6 and 12 weeks after operation (but not on day 4). They also had more complications graded III or above according to the Dindo–Demartines–Clavien classification (16 versus 6 in the group that received standard care) and deaths (11 versus 0), but none was classed as related to gum. No other differences were observed. Conclusion Chewing gum did not alter the return of bowel function or LOS after colorectal resection. Registration number: ISRCTN55784442 (http://www.controlled-trials.com). No advantage observed
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Atkinson
- Schools of Oral and Dental Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Unit in Nutrition, Diet and Lifestyle, University Hospitals Bristol Education Centre, Bristol, UK
| | - C M Penfold
- Schools of Oral and Dental Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Unit in Nutrition, Diet and Lifestyle, University Hospitals Bristol Education Centre, Bristol, UK
| | - A R Ness
- Schools of Oral and Dental Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Unit in Nutrition, Diet and Lifestyle, University Hospitals Bristol Education Centre, Bristol, UK
| | - R J Longman
- Department of Coloproctology, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - S J Thomas
- Schools of Oral and Dental Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Unit in Nutrition, Diet and Lifestyle, University Hospitals Bristol Education Centre, Bristol, UK
| | - W Hollingworth
- Schools of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - R Kandiyali
- Schools of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - S D Leary
- Schools of Oral and Dental Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Unit in Nutrition, Diet and Lifestyle, University Hospitals Bristol Education Centre, Bristol, UK
| | - S J Lewis
- National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Unit in Nutrition, Diet and Lifestyle, University Hospitals Bristol Education Centre, Bristol, UK.,Department of Gastroenterology, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Campbell JL, Fletcher E, Britten N, Green C, Holt T, Lattimer V, Richards DA, Richards SH, Salisbury C, Taylor RS, Calitri R, Bowyer V, Chaplin K, Kandiyali R, Murdoch J, Price L, Roscoe J, Varley A, Warren FC. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telephone triage for managing same-day consultation requests in general practice: a cluster randomised controlled trial comparing general practitioner-led and nurse-led management systems with usual care (the ESTEEM trial). Health Technol Assess 2015; 19:1-212, vii-viii. [PMID: 25690266 DOI: 10.3310/hta19130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Telephone triage is proposed as a method of managing increasing demand for primary care. Previous studies have involved small samples in limited settings, and focused on nurse roles. Evidence is limited regarding the impact on primary care workload, costs, and patient safety and experience when triage is used to manage patients requesting same-day consultations in general practice. OBJECTIVES In comparison with usual care (UC), to assess the impact of GP-led telephone triage (GPT) and nurse-led computer-supported telephone triage (NT) on primary care workload and cost, patient experience of care, and patient safety and health status for patients requesting same-day consultations in general practice. DESIGN Pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial, incorporating economic evaluation and qualitative process evaluation. SETTING General practices (n = 42) in four regions of England, UK (Devon, Bristol/Somerset, Warwickshire/Coventry, Norfolk/Suffolk). PARTICIPANTS Patients requesting same-day consultations. INTERVENTIONS Practices were randomised to GPT, NT or UC. Data collection was not blinded; however, analysis was conducted by a statistician blinded to practice allocation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary - primary care contacts [general practice, out-of-hours primary care, accident and emergency (A&E) and walk-in centre attendances] in the 28 days following the index consultation request. Secondary - resource use and costs, patient safety (deaths and emergency hospital admissions within 7 days of index request, and A&E attendance within 28 days), health status and experience of care. RESULTS Of 20,990 eligible randomised patients (UC n = 7283; GPT n = 6695; NT n = 7012), primary outcome data were analysed for 16,211 patients (UC n = 5572; GPT n = 5171; NT n = 5468). Compared with UC, GPT and NT increased primary outcome contacts (over 28-day follow-up) by 33% [rate ratio (RR) 1.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.30 to 1.36] and 48% (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.44 to 1.52), respectively. Compared with GPT, NT was associated with a marginal increase in primary outcome contacts by 4% (RR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.08). Triage was associated with a redistribution of primary care contacts. Although GPT, compared with UC, increased the rate of overall GP contacts (face to face and telephone) over the 28 days by 38% (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.50), GP face-to-face contacts were reduced by 39% (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.69). NT reduced the rate of overall GP contacts by 16% (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.91) and GP face-to-face contacts by 20% (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.90), whereas nurse contacts increased. The increased rate of primary care contacts in triage arms is largely attributable to increased telephone contacts. Estimated overall patient-clinician contact time on the index day increased in triage (GPT = 10.3 minutes; NT = 14.8 minutes; UC = 9.6 minutes), although patterns of clinician use varied between arms. Taking account of both the pattern and duration of primary outcome contacts, overall costs over the 28-day follow-up were similar in all three arms (approximately £75 per patient). Triage appeared safe, and no differences in patient health status were observed. NT was somewhat less acceptable to patients than GPT or UC. The process evaluation identified the complexity associated with introducing triage but found no consistency across practices about what works and what does not work when implementing it. CONCLUSIONS Introducing GPT or NT was associated with a redistribution of primary care workload for patients requesting same-day consultations, and at similar cost to UC. Although triage seemed to be safe, investigation of the circumstances of a larger number of deaths or admissions after triage might be warranted, and monitoring of these events is necessary as triage is implemented. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN20687662. FUNDING This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 19, No. 13. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John L Campbell
- Primary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Emily Fletcher
- Primary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Nicky Britten
- Institute of Health Service Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Colin Green
- Institute of Health Service Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Tim Holt
- Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Valerie Lattimer
- School of Nursing Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - David A Richards
- Institute of Health Service Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Suzanne H Richards
- Primary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Chris Salisbury
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Rod S Taylor
- Primary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Raff Calitri
- Primary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Vicky Bowyer
- Department of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Katherine Chaplin
- Institute of Health Service Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Rebecca Kandiyali
- Primary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Jamie Murdoch
- School of Nursing Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Linnie Price
- Primary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Julia Roscoe
- Department of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Anna Varley
- School of Nursing Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Fiona C Warren
- Primary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Campbell JL, Fletcher E, Britten N, Green C, Holt TA, Lattimer V, Richards DA, Richards SH, Salisbury C, Calitri R, Bowyer V, Chaplin K, Kandiyali R, Murdoch J, Roscoe J, Varley A, Warren FC, Taylor RS. Telephone triage for management of same-day consultation requests in general practice (the ESTEEM trial): a cluster-randomised controlled trial and cost-consequence analysis. Lancet 2014; 384:1859-1868. [PMID: 25098487 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61058-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 124] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Telephone triage is increasingly used to manage workload in primary care; however, supporting evidence for this approach is scarce. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and cost consequences of general practitioner-(GP)-led and nurse-led telephone triage compared with usual care for patients seeking same-day consultations in primary care. METHODS We did a pragmatic, cluster-randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation between March 1, 2011, and March 31, 2013, at 42 practices in four centres in the UK. Practices were randomly assigned (1:1:1), via a computer-generated randomisation sequence minimised for geographical location, practice deprivation, and practice list size, to either GP-led triage, nurse-led computer-supported triage, or usual care. We included patients who telephoned the practice seeking a same-day face-to-face consultation with a GP. Allocations were concealed from practices until after they had agreed to participate and a stochastic element was included within the minimisation algorithm to maintain concealment. Patients, clinicians, and researchers were not masked to allocation, but practice assignment was concealed from the trial statistician. The primary outcome was primary care workload (patient contacts, including those attending accident and emergency departments) in the 28 days after the first same-day request. Analyses were by intention to treat and per protocol. This trial was registered with the ISRCTN register, number ISRCTN20687662. FINDINGS We randomly assigned 42 practices to GP triage (n=13), nurse triage (n=15), or usual care (n=14), and 20,990 patients (n=6695 vs 7012 vs 7283) were randomly assigned, of whom 16,211 (77%) patients provided primary outcome data (n=5171 vs 5468 vs 5572). GP triage was associated with a 33% increase in the mean number of contacts per person over 28 days compared with usual care (2·65 [SD 1·74] vs 1·91 [1·43]; rate ratio [RR] 1·33, 95% CI 1·30-1·36), and nurse triage with a 48% increase (2·81 [SD 1·68]; RR 1·48, 95% CI 1·44-1·52). Eight patients died within 7 days of the index request: five in the GP-triage group, two in the nurse-triage group, and one in the usual-care group; however, these deaths were not associated with the trial group or procedures. Although triage interventions were associated with increased contacts, estimated costs over 28 days were similar between all three groups (roughly £75 per patient). INTERPRETATION Introduction of telephone triage delivered by a GP or nurse was associated with an increase in the number of primary care contacts in the 28 days after a patient's request for a same-day GP consultation, with similar costs to those of usual care. Telephone triage might be useful in aiding the delivery of primary care. The whole-system implications should be assessed when introduction of such a system is considered. FUNDING Health Technology Assessment Programme UK National Institute for Health Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John L Campbell
- Primary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
| | - Emily Fletcher
- Primary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Nicky Britten
- Institute of Health Service Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Colin Green
- Institute of Health Service Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Tim A Holt
- Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Valerie Lattimer
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - David A Richards
- Institute of Health Service Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Suzanne H Richards
- Primary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Chris Salisbury
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Raff Calitri
- Primary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Vicky Bowyer
- Department of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Katherine Chaplin
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Rebecca Kandiyali
- Institute of Health Service Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Jamie Murdoch
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Julia Roscoe
- Department of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Anna Varley
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Fiona C Warren
- Primary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Rod S Taylor
- Primary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Taylor AH, Thompson TP, Greaves CJ, Taylor RS, Green C, Warren FC, Kandiyali R, Aveyard P, Ayres R, Byng R, Campbell JL, Ussher MH, Michie S, West R. A pilot randomised trial to assess the methods and procedures for evaluating the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Exercise Assisted Reduction then Stop (EARS) among disadvantaged smokers. Health Technol Assess 2014; 18:1-324. [PMID: 24433837 DOI: 10.3310/hta18040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There have been few rigorous studies on the effects of behavioural support for helping smokers to reduce who do not immediately wish to quit. While reduction may not have the health benefits of quitting, it may lead smokers to want to quit. Physical activity (PA) helps to reduce cravings and withdrawal symptoms, and also reduces weight gain after quitting, but smokers may be less inclined to exercise. There is scope to develop and determine the effectiveness of interventions to support smoking reduction and increase physical activity, for those not ready to quit. OBJECTIVE To conduct a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) [Exercise Assisted Reduction then Stop (EARS) smoking study] to (1) design and evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a PA and smoking-reduction counselling intervention [for disadvantaged smokers who do not wish to quit but do want to reduce their smoking (to increase the likelihood of quitting)], and (2) to inform the design of a large RCT to determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the intervention. DESIGN A single-centre, pragmatic, pilot trial with follow-up up to 16 weeks. A mixed methods approach assessed the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention and trial methods. Smokers were individually randomised to intervention or control arms. SETTING General practices, NHS buildings, community venues, and the Stop Smoking Service (SSS) within Plymouth, UK. PARTICIPANTS Aged > 18 years, smoking ≥ 10 cigarettes per day (for ≥ 2 years) who wished to cut down. We excluded individuals who were contraindicated for moderate PA, posed a safety risk to the research team, wished to quit immediately or use Nicotine Replacement Therapy, not registered with a general practitioner, or did not converse in English. INTERVENTION We designed a client-centred, counselling-based intervention designed to support smoking reduction and increases in PA. Support sessions were delivered by trained counsellors either face to face or by telephone. Both intervention and control arms were given information at baseline on specialist SSS support available should they have wished to quit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was 4-week post-quit expired air carbon monoxide (CO)-confirmed abstinence from smoking. Secondary outcomes included validated behavioural, cognitive and emotional/affective and health-related quality of life measures and treatment costs. RESULTS The study randomised 99 participants, 49 to the intervention arm and 50 to the control arm, with a 62% follow-up rate at 16 weeks. In the intervention and control arms, 14% versus 4%, respectively [relative risk = 3.57; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78 to 16.35], had expired CO-confirmed abstinence at least 4 and up to 8 weeks after quit day; 22% versus 6% (relative risk = 3.74; 95% CI 1.11 to 12.60) made a quit attempt; 10% versus 4% (relative risk = 92.55; 95% CI 0.52 to 12.53) achieved point-prevalent abstinence at 16 weeks; and 39% versus 20% (relative risk = 1.94; 95% CI 1.01 to 3.74) achieved at least a 50% reduction in the number of cigarettes smoked daily. The percentage reporting using PA for controlling smoking in the intervention versus control arms was 55% versus 22%, respectively at 8 weeks and 37% versus 16%, respectively, at 16 weeks. The counsellors generally delivered the intervention as planned and participants responded with a variety of smoking reduction strategies, sometimes supported by changes in PA. The intervention costs were approximately £192 per participant. Exploratory cost-effectiveness modelling indicates that the intervention may be cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS The study provided valuable information on the resources needed to improve study recruitment and retention. Offering support for smoking reduction and PA appears to have value in promoting reduction and cessation in disadvantaged smokers not currently motivated to quit. A large RCT is needed to assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the intervention in this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN 13837944. FUNDING This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment, Vol. 18, No. 4. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian H Taylor
- Plymouth University Peninsula School of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, UK
| | - Tom P Thompson
- Sport and Health Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Colin J Greaves
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Rod S Taylor
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Colin Green
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Fiona C Warren
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Rebecca Kandiyali
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Paul Aveyard
- Department of Primary Care Health Services, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Richard Ayres
- Plymouth University Peninsula School of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, UK
| | - Richard Byng
- Plymouth University Peninsula School of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, UK
| | - John L Campbell
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Michael H Ussher
- Division of Population Health Sciences and Education, St George's University of London, London, UK
| | - Susan Michie
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Robert West
- Health Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|