IMpassion132 double-blind randomised phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without atezolizumab for early relapsing unresectable locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors improve the efficacy of first-line chemotherapy for patients with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive unresectable locally advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (aTNBC), but randomised data in rapidly relapsing aTNBC are scarce.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

IMpassion132 (NCT03371017) enrolled patients with aTNBC relapsing <12 months after last chemotherapy dose (anthracycline and taxane required) or surgery for early TNBC. PD-L1 status was centrally assessed using SP142 before randomisation. Initially patients were enrolled irrespective of PD-L1 status. From August 2019, enrolment was restricted to PD-L1-positive (tumour immune cell ≥1%) aTNBC. Patients were randomised 1:1 to placebo or atezolizumab 1200 mg every 21 days with investigator-selected chemotherapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Stratification factors were chemotherapy regimen (carboplatin plus gemcitabine or capecitabine monotherapy), visceral (lung and/or liver) metastases and (initially) PD-L1 status. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), tested hierarchically in patients with PD-L1-positive tumours and then, if positive, in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population (all-comer patients randomised pre-August 2019). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and safety.

RESULTS

Among 354 patients with rapidly relapsing PD-L1-positive aTNBC, 68% had a disease-free interval of <6 months and 73% received carboplatin/gemcitabine. The OS hazard ratio was 0.93 (95% confidence interval 0.73-1.20, P = 0.59; median 11.2 months with placebo versus 12.1 months with atezolizumab). mITT and subgroup results were consistent. Median PFS was 4 months across treatment arms and populations. ORRs were 28% with placebo versus 40% with atezolizumab. Adverse events (predominantly haematological) were similar between arms and as expected with atezolizumab plus carboplatin/gemcitabine or capecitabine following recent chemotherapy exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

OS, which is dismal in patients with TNBC relapsing within <12 months, was not improved by adding atezolizumab to chemotherapy. A biology-based definition of intrinsic resistance to immunotherapy in aTNBC is urgently needed to develop novel therapies for these patients in next-generation clinical trials.

Event-free survival by residual cancer burden with pembrolizumab in early-stage TNBC: exploratory analysis from KEYNOTE-522

BACKGROUND

KEYNOTE-522 demonstrated statistically significant improvements in pathological complete response (pCR) with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and event-free survival (EFS) with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab in patients with high-risk, early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Prior studies have shown the prognostic value of the residual cancer burden (RCB) index to quantify the extent of residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In this preplanned exploratory analysis, we assessed RCB distribution and EFS within RCB categories by treatment group.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 1174 patients with stage T1c/N1-2 or T2-4/N0-2 TNBC were randomized 2 : 1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks given with four cycles of paclitaxel + carboplatin, followed by four cycles of doxorubicin or epirubicin + cyclophosphamide. After surgery, patients received pembrolizumab or placebo for nine cycles or until recurrence or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoints are pCR and EFS. RCB is a prespecified exploratory endpoint. The association between EFS and RCB was assessed using a Cox regression model.

RESULTS

Pembrolizumab shifted patients into lower RCB categories across the entire spectrum compared with placebo. There were more patients in the pembrolizumab group with RCB-0 (pCR), and fewer patients in the pembrolizumab group with RCB-1, RCB-2, and RCB-3. The corresponding hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for EFS were 0.70 (0.38-1.31), 0.92 (0.39-2.20), 0.52 (0.32-0.82), and 1.24 (0.69-2.23). The most common first EFS events were distant recurrences, with fewer in the pembrolizumab group across all RCB categories. Among patients with RCB-0/1, more than half [21/38 (55.3%)] of all events were central nervous system recurrences, with 13/22 (59.1%) in the pembrolizumab group and 8/16 (50.0%) in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy resulted in fewer EFS events in the RCB-0, RCB-1, and RCB-2 categories, with the greatest benefit in RCB-2. These findings demonstrate that pembrolizumab not only increased pCR rates, but also improved EFS among most patients who do not have a pCR.

Open questions, current challenges, and future perspectives in targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-low breast cancer

Approximately 60% of traditionally defined human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancers express low levels of HER2 [HER2-low; defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ or IHC 2+/in situ hybridization (ISH)-]. HER2-low breast cancers encompass a large percentage of both hormone receptor-positive (up to 85%) and triple-negative (up to 63%) breast cancers. The DESTINY-Breast04 trial established that HER2-low tumors are targetable, leading to the approval of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) as the first HER2-directed therapy for the treatment of HER2-low breast cancer in the United States and Europe. This change in the clinical landscape results in a number of questions and challenges-including those related to HER2 assessment and patient identification-and highlights the need for careful assessment of HER2 expression to identify patients eligible for T-DXd. This review provides context for understanding how to identify patients with HER2-low breast cancer with respect to sample types, scoring and reporting HER2 status, and testing methods and assays. It also discusses management of important T-DXd-related adverse events. Available evidence supports the efficacy of T-DXd in patients with any history of IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/ISH- scores; however, future research may further refine the population who could benefit from T-DXd or other HER2-directed therapies and identify novel methods for patient identification. Because HER2 expression can change with disease progression or treatment, and variability exists in scoring and interpretation of HER2 status, careful re-evaluation in certain scenarios may help to identify more patients who may benefit from T-DXd.

A285 CHANGE IN ALT DURING MODIFIED OPTIFAST WEIGHT LOSS PROGRAM IN INDIVIDUALS AT RISK FOR NON-ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE

Background

Obesity is linked to various health complications, including diabetes, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). NAFLD is the most frequent cause of abnormally high alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels. ALT is released at higher levels during hepatocellular injury and represents a simple, low cost and non-invasive method of assessing liver damage. There are conflicting data on ALT response to weight loss between men and women, with some evidence of transient increase in ALT levels in women.

Purpose

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a dietary weight loss intervention with Optifast on ALT in patients with obesity who have baseline elevated ALT levels.

Method

This was a retrospective cohort study of Ontario adults who participated in a 26 week weight loss program, including 6 or 12 weeks of low-calorie liquid diet meal replacement with Optifast 900^® (Nestlé, Canada), between 1992 and 2015. We included patients with elevated baseline ALT levels, defined by > 40 U/L, who had at least one follow-up ALT between week 15 and 26. We excluded patients with nonadherence to dietary intervention, established liver disease or using hepatotoxic drugs, excessive alcohol intake (>11U/wk for females and >14U/wk for males), and insufficient data to calculate FIB-4. The primary outcome was change in ALT levels, measured by normalization (post-intervention ALT < 40 U/L), percentage decrease and absolute decrease. Multiple linear regressions were obtained for the relationship between ALT changes and age, sex, body mass index (BMI) and FIB-4. All analyses were conducted in SPSS. P value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Result(s)

444 patients met study criteria. Mean age was 47.1 years +/- 10.9, 49 % of patients were female, and mean BMI was 43.5 kg/m² +/- 7.9. All patients lost weight, with mean weight loss 27.3 kg +/- 11.5 and a mean 20.7% decrease from baseline weight. Mean ALT at baseline was 58.9 U/L +/- 25.4 and mean ALT post intervention was 32.3 U/L +/- 28.1 (p <0.01). 85.1% of patients had normalization of ALT. Mean % decrease in ALT was 41.9% and mean absolute decrease in ALT was 26.6 U/L +/- 25.4. Younger age and higher baseline FIB-4 were significantly associated with a larger decrease in ALT levels, while sex and initial BMI were not significantly associated with changes in ALT.

Conclusion(s)

In patients with obesity and baseline elevated ALT, dietary weight loss intervention with Optifast leads to ALT normalization in most patients, regardless of sex. Younger age at baseline and higher baseline FIB-4 are significantly associated with greater decrease in ALT.

Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below

None

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Challenges in oncology career: are we closing the gender gap? Results of the new ESMO Women for Oncology Committee survey

BACKGROUND

Following a European Society for Medical Oncology Women for Oncology (ESMO W4O) survey in 2016 showing severe under-representation of female oncologists in leadership roles, ESMO launched a series of initiatives to address obstacles to gender equity. A follow-up survey in October 2021 investigated progress achieved.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The W4O questionnaire 2021 expanded on the 2016 survey, with additional questions on the impact of ethnicity, sexual orientation and religion on career development. Results were analysed according to respondent gender and age.

RESULTS

The survey sample was larger than in 2016 (n = 1473 versus 482), especially among men. Significantly fewer respondents had managerial or leadership roles than in 2016 (31.8% versus 51.7%). Lack of leadership development for women and unconscious bias were considered more important in 2021 than in 2016. In 2021, more people reported harassment in the workplace than in 2016 (50.3% versus 41.0%). In 2021, ethnicity, sexual orientation and religion were considered to have little or no impact on professional career opportunities, salary setting or related potential pay gap. However, gender had a significant or major impact on career development (25.5% of respondents), especially in respondents ≤40 years of age and women. As in 2016, highest ranked initiatives to foster workplace equity were promotion of work-life balance, development and leadership training and flexible working. Significantly more 2021 respondents (mainly women) supported the need for culture and gender equity education at work than in 2016.

CONCLUSIONS

Gender remains a major barrier to career progression in oncology and, although some obstacles may have been reduced since 2016, we are a long way from closing the gender gap. Increased reporting of discrimination and inappropriate behaviour in the workplace is a major, priority concern. The W4O 2021 survey findings provide new evidence and highlight the areas for future ESMO interventions to support equity and diversity in oncology career development.

Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with early breast cancer: a KSMO-ESMO initiative endorsed by CSCO, ISMPO, JSMO, MOS, SSO and TOS

In view of the planned new edition of the most recent version of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of primary breast cancer published in 2015, it was decided at the ESMO Asia Meeting in November 2018, by both the ESMO and the Korean Society of Medical Oncology (KSMO), to convene a special face-to-face guidelines meeting in 2019 in Seoul. The aim was to adapt the latest ESMO 2019 guidelines to take into account the ethnic and geographical differences associated with the treatment of early breast cancer in Asian patients. These guidelines represent the consensus opinions reached by experts in the treatment of patients with early breast cancer representing the oncology societies of Korea (KSMO), China (CSCO), India (ISMPO) Japan (JSMO), Malaysia (MOS), Singapore (SSO) and Taiwan (TOS). The voting was based on scientific evidence, and was independent of both the current treatment practices, and the drug availability and reimbursement situations, in the individual participating Asian countries.

Abstract P1-15-21: The molecular characterisation of early and advanced breast cancer in a Middle-Eastern breast cancer cohort treated with neo/adjuvant anthracycline+/-taxane-based chemotherapy

Neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer enables improved conservative operative approaches for breast cancer with similar survival. In addition, it may be used to define clinical as well as molecular systemic therapy sensitivity, aid molecular subtyping analysis of residual disease as well as incorporating potential mechanisms of resistance. Breast cancer in women in the Middle East is characterized by younger median age, more advanced stage at presentation and a higher proportion of patients with triple-negative disease. Recently, Symmans et al. published the results of neoadjuvant anthracycline+/-taxane-based chemotherapy demonstrating a strong association between residual cancer burden (RCB) and overall survival. In this and other cohorts e.g. TCGA, ICGC molecular data of pts from the Middle-East is under-represented.

Aim:

The aim of this project was to define the above parameters in a cohort of women treated with systemic therapy from June 2016 to October 2017 in a Middle Eastern breast cancer referral centre treated in the neo/adjuvant setting. In the neoadjuvant setting we are examining the association between primary biopsy and pathological response tissue (RCB criteria) integrating molecular pathology using massive parallel sequencing (MPS) analyses.

Methodology:

We designed a custom 1000 gene panel using Illumina IDT capture-based assay design and sequenced tumour samples to greater than 500X coverage. Sequencing analysis and variant calling were performed using Broad GAKT best practice; BWA, Mutect2, Oncotator pipeline.

Results:

We present a cohort of 57 pts with median age of 45(26-66), presenting with clinical stage I 2(4%), stageII 30(53%), stage III 25(44%) breast cancer for neoadjuvant (20) or adjuvant (37) anthracycline +/- taxane-based chemotherapy. Standard immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis revealed ER-pos PR-pos HER2-neg 38(67%) ER-pos PR-neg HER2-neg 2(4%) ER-neg PR-neg HER2-pos 3(5%), ER-pos PR-pos HER2-pos 5(9%), TNBC 9(16%). In the neoadjuvant cohort (20) pts, 7 were clinical stage II and 12 stage 3 at presentation. Anthracycline+/-taxane-based chemotherapy achieved pCR/RCB 0 7(35%), RCB I 3(15%), RBC II 4(20%), RCB III 6(30%). All Her2 positive patients received concurrent taxane-trastuzumab.

Implications:

Predictive molecular expression algorithms for response to systemic chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting have been published (Hatzis JAMA 2011; Masuda Clin Ca Res 2013).Molecular characterisation of RCB after neoadjuvant chemotherapy has looked at DNA mutations (Jiang PLOS Med 2016) and RNA expression (Lehmann J PLOS One 2016; Echavarria Clin Ca Res 2018). Integration of both provides insight into mechanisms of sensitivity and relapse using pathway analysis. We present genomic data on 20 of the neoadjuvant samples with sufficient quality DNA analysed using a custom designed 1000 gene panel using Illumina IDT capture-based assay design to greater than 500X coverage. The most commonly aberrant genes TP53, PIK3CA, GATA3, KMT2Dwere observed, with notable differences in PAX3, BRCA2, CHD2, FGFR4. Using integrated comprehensive tumour molecular comparisons pre- and post-treatment in the neoadjuvant patients and circulating tumour DNA analyses of the whole cohort will be presented.

Citation Format: Dawood S, Korbie D, Pheasant M, Kazim H, Al Hamadi A, Lloyd C, Dent R, Mainwaring PN. The molecular characterisation of early and advanced breast cancer in a Middle-Eastern breast cancer cohort treated with neo/adjuvant anthracycline+/-taxane-based chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-15-21.

Abstract P3-10-09: Relationship between tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and response to pembrolizumab (Pembro)+chemotherapy (Chemo) as neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): phase Ib KEYNOTE-173 trial

Background:Increasing quantities of stromal TILs (sTILs) are associated with higher pathologic complete response (pCR) rates with conventional chemo in early-stage TNBC. We evaluated the association between sTILs and PD-L1 expression with response to pembro+chemo as NAT for TNBC in the KEYNOTE-173 trial (NCT02622074).

Methods: sTILs were quantified using light microscopy of H&E-stained slides from pretreatment and on-treatment (during first 3 weeks of pembro monotherapy) tumor biopsies by a pathologist blind to response data. Pretreatment PD-L1 expression was assessed using the PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx assay and reported as combined positive score (CPS). Endpoints were pCR rate by ypT0 ypN0 and ypT0/Tis ypN0 and objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1) after the first 4 cycles of NAT (taxane±carboplatin+pembro) by MRI. sTILs and PD-L1 CPS were evaluated as continuous variables. Association between sTILs and PD-L1 CPS with response was assessed using logistic regression and area under the reciever operating curve (AUROC) analyses, with a 1-sided alpha level of 0.10. Correlation between PD-L1 and sTILs was assessed by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Multivariate analysis included sTILs (pretreatment and on-treatment) and PD-L1 CPS. Likelihood ratio tests were used to evaluate the added value of factors in predicting pCR rate.

Results: Of 60 total pts, 34 had tumors evaluated for pretreatment sTILs, 52 for PD-L1 CPS, and 33 for both sTILs and CPS. On-treatment sTILs were evaluated in 31 pts. Overall pCR rates were 56.7% and 60% by ypT0 ypN0 and ypT0/Tis ypN0, respectively; ORR was 78.3%. In pts evaluated for sTILs and CPS (individually), pCR rates and ORR were comparable with overall pCR rates and ORR. There was a significant correlation between pretreatment sTILs and PD-L1 CPS (ρ=0.65, P&lt;0.001).Higher pretreatment sTILs were significantly associated with response: ypT0 ypN0 P= 0.011; ypT0/Tis ypN0 P=0.006; ORR P=0.061. On-treatment sTILs were also significantly associated with response: ypT0 ypN0 P=0.061; ypT0/Tis ypN0 P=0.041; ORR P=0.031. Pretreatment PD-L1 CPS was significantly associated with response: ypT0 ypN0 P=0.073; ypT0/is ypN0 P=0.030; and ORR P=0.021. AUROC of pretreatment sTIL association with pCR was numerically higher than with on-treatment sTILs and PD-L1 CPS (0.69 vs 0.61 vs 0.56 for ypT0ypN0 and 0.72 vs 0.67 vs 0.62 for ypT0/Tis ypN0). Responders had higher median pretreatment sTIL levels vs nonresponders: 45% [10, 75] vs 10% [5, 20] for pCR rate by ypT0 ypN0 and 52.5% [10, 73.8] vs 10% [5, 20] for pCR rate by ypT0/Tis ypN0; 25% [5, 70] vs 10% [6.3, 27.5] for ORR. In multivariate analysis, only pretreatment sTILs were significant for both pCR endpoints (ypT0 ypN0 P=0.031; ypT0/Tis ypN0 P=0.034). Likelihood ratio tests demonstrated that for both pCR endpoints, PD-L1 CPS (P=0.683/P=0.422) and on-treatment sTILs (P=0.984/P=0.568) did not add significantly more value to pretreatment sTILs when predicting pCR.

Conclusions:Higher quantities of pretreatment sTILs and PD-L1 CPS and on-treatment sTILs were significantly associated with higher pCR rates and ORR in primary TNBC treated with pembro and NAT.

Citation Format: Loi S, Schmid P, Cortés J, Park YH, Muñoz-Couselo E, Kim S-B, Sohn J, Im S-A, Holgado E, Foukakis T, Kuemmel S, Dent R, Wang A, Aktan G, Karantza V, Salgado R. Relationship between tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and response to pembrolizumab (Pembro)+chemotherapy (Chemo) as neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): phase Ib KEYNOTE-173 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-10-09.

Willingness to be Reinitiated on a Statin (from the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke Study)

Guidelines recommend attempting to reinitiate statins in patients who discontinue treatment. Previous experiences while taking a statin, including side effects, may reduce a patient's willingness to reinitiate treatment. We determined the percentage of adults who are willing to reinitiate statin therapy after treatment discontinuation. Factors associated with willingness to reinitiate a statin were also examined. A statin questionnaire was administered and study examination conducted in black and white US adults enrolled in the nationwide REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke study from 2013 to 2017. In participants who self-reported ever having taken a statin (n = 7,216, mean age 72 years, 53% women, 34% black), 1,081 (15%) reported having discontinued treatment. Among those who discontinued treatment, statin side effects, perceived lack of need for a statin, and cost were reported by 66%, 31%, and 3% of participants, respectively. Overall, 37% of participants who had discontinued treatment were willing to reinitiate statin therapy. Participants who discontinued treatment due to cost (prevalence ratio [PR] 1.61; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01, 2.57) were more likely to report a willingness to reinitiate therapy. Participants with a low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol ≥130 mg/dl versus <100 mg/dl (PR 0.69; 95% CI 0.53, 0. 88) and who discontinued treatment due to side effects (PR 0.51; 95% CI 0.41, 0.64) were less likely to report willingness to reinitiate statin therapy. In conclusion, a substantial proportion of participants who discontinued statin therapy were willing to reinitiate treatment. Healthcare providers should discuss reinitiation of statin therapy with their patients who have discontinued treatment.

Primary Care Physician Perspectives on Barriers to Statin Treatment

PURPOSE

Discontinuation of statin therapy represents a major challenge for effective cardiovascular disease prevention. It is unclear how often primary care physicians (PCPs) re-initiate statins and what barriers they encounter. We aimed to identify PCP perspectives on factors influencing statin re-initiation.

METHODS

We conducted six nominal group discussions with 23 PCPs from the Deep South Continuing Medical Education network. PCPs answered questions about statin side effects, reasons their patients reported for discontinuing statins, how they respond when discontinuation is reported, and barriers they encounter in getting their patients to re-initiate statin therapy. Each group generated a list of responses in round-robin fashion. Then, each PCP independently ranked their top three responses to each question. For each PCP, the most important reason was given a weight of 3 votes, and the second and third most important reasons were given weights of 2 and 1, respectively. We categorized the individual responses into themes and determined the relative importance of each theme using a "percent of available votes" metric.

RESULTS

PCPs reported that side effects, especially muscle/joint-related symptoms, were the most common reason patients reported for statin discontinuation (47% of available votes). PCPs reported statin re-challenge as their most common response when a patient discontinues statin use (31% of available votes). Patients' fear of side effects was ranked as the biggest challenge PCPs encounter in getting their patients to re-initiate statin therapy (70% of available votes).

CONCLUSION

PCPs face challenges getting their patients to re-initiate statins, particularly after a patient reports side effects.

Statin Discontinuation, Reinitiation, and Persistence Patterns Among Medicare Beneficiaries After Myocardial Infarction: A Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Although the benefits of statins accrue over time, treatment discontinuation is common. Examining the patterns of statin discontinuation, reinitiation, and persistence after reinitiation among Medicare beneficiaries after hospital discharge for a myocardial infarction may help increase statin use in high-risk patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Medicare beneficiaries with a statin fill claim within 30 days after hospital discharge for myocardial infarction in 2007 to 2012 (n=158 795) were followed for 182 days post-discharge to identify discontinuation, defined as 60 continuous days without statins available. Reinitiation, defined by a statin fill, was identified in the 365 days post-discontinuation. High persistence was defined as proportion of days covered ≥80% with ≥1 day of statin supply 182 days after reinitiation. Follow-up ended on December 31, 2014. In the 182 days after myocardial infarction hospital discharge, 15.4% of beneficiaries discontinued statins. Of this group, 53.7% reinitiated statins. On reinitiation, 27.1% changed statin type, 6.9% up-titrated intensity, 14.4% down-titrated intensity, and 66.0% had the same statin and intensity. In the 182 days after reinitiation, 45.8% had high persistence. Moderate- and high- versus low-intensity statins were associated with a lower risk for statin discontinuation (moderate intensity: relative risk [RR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-0.96; high-intensity: RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.91-0.99). High persistence was less common after reinitiating high- versus low-intensity statins (RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.75-0.86), but no association was present for those reinitiating a moderate- versus low-intensity statin (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.90-1.01). Down-titrating versus reinitiating the same statin intensity (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.05-1.16) and reinitiating a different versus the same statin (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.06-1.14) were associated with high persistence after treatment reinitiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Although many people who discontinue a statin reinitiate treatment, statin persistence after reinitiation was low. Reinitiating therapy with moderate-intensity statins, down-titration, and using a different statin may promote persistence.

Healthcare Utilization and Statin Re-Initiation Among Medicare Beneficiaries With a History of Myocardial Infarction

Background

Contact with the healthcare system represents an opportunity for individuals who discontinue statins to re‐initiate treatment. To help identify opportunities for healthcare providers to emphasize the risk‐lowering benefits accrued through restarting statins, we determined the types of healthcare utilization associated with statin re‐initiation among patients with history of a myocardial infarction.

Methods and Results

Medicare beneficiaries with a statin pharmacy fill claim within 30 days of hospital discharge for a myocardial infarction in 2007 to 2012 (n=158 795) were followed for 182 days postdischarge to identify treatment discontinuation, defined as 60 continuous days without statins (n=24 461). Re‐initiation was defined as a statin fill within 365 days of the discontinuation date (n=13 136). Using a case‐crossover study design and each beneficiary as their own control, healthcare utilization during 0 to 14 days before statin re‐initiation (case period) was compared with healthcare utilization 30 to 44 days before statin re‐initiation (control period). The mean age of beneficiaries was 75.4 years; 52.8% were women and 81.9% were white. For routine healthcare utilization, the odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for statin re‐initiation associated with lipid panel testing was 2.65 (1.93–3.65), outpatient primary care was 1.31 (1.23–1.40), and outpatient cardiologist care was 1.38 (1.28–1.50). For acute healthcare utilization, the odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for statin re‐initiation associated with emergency department visits was 1.77 (1.31–2.40), coronary heart disease (CHD) hospitalizations was 3.16 (2.41–4.14) and non–coronary heart disease hospitalizations was 1.73 (1.49–2.01).

Conclusions

The weaker association of routine versus acute healthcare utilization with statin re‐initiation suggests missed opportunities to reinforce the importance of statin therapy for secondary prevention.

Abstract P2-09-20: Biomarker analysis of the LOTUS trial of first-line ipatasertib (IPAT) + paclitaxel (PAC) in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)

Background: The oral Akt inhibitor IPAT is being evaluated in cancers with a high prevalence of PI3K/Akt pathway activation. In the placebo-controlled randomized phase II LOTUS trial (NCT02162719), adding IPAT to PAC as first-line therapy for metastatic TNBC improved progression-free survival (PFS) in unselected patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.60 [95% CI: 0.37–0.98]), with a more pronounced effect in patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors (HR: 0.44 [95% CI: 0.20–0.99]) [Kim, Lancet Oncol in press]. An exploratory analysis was performed to understand better the potential associations between PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN alterations and other biomarkers relevant to TNBC, as well as IPAT efficacy.

Methods: Pretreatment tumor samples (76 primary, 27 metastatic) were evaluated for genetic alterations using the FoundationOne® (Foundation Medicine) assay (n=103) and gene expression by RNA sequencing (n=73). Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were quantified using the Salgado method [Salgado, Ann Oncol 2015] (n=118). Samples were classified into subtypes by gene expression based on the method developed by Lehmann and Pietenpol [Lehmann, J Clin Invest 2011].

Results: Of 42 patients (41%) with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors, 26 had an activating mutation in PIK3CA or AKT1 and 16 had an alteration in PTEN. Patients with PIK3CA- and AKT1-mutant tumors were enriched in the BL2 and LAR TNBC subtypes, whereas those with PTEN-altered tumors were enriched in the BL1 subtype. An internal analysis of the publicly available METABRIC dataset yielded similar results. PTEN alterations were also associated with reduced levels of stromal TILs compared with PIK3CA/AKT1-mutant and PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN non-altered tumors. In an exploratory analysis of the 26 patients with PIK3CA/AKT1-mutant tumors, the effect of adding IPAT was particularly pronounced (PFS HR: 0.24 [95% CI: 0.06–0.83]; median PFS 12.9 months in the IPAT + PAC arm vs 5.0 months for placebo + PAC); interpretation of efficacy in patients with PTEN-altered tumors was limited by the size of the subgroup.

There was no enrichment of PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN alterations in metastatic vs primary samples, nor in samples collected after (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy vs from chemotherapy-naïve patients. Additionally, there was no association between PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN alterations and BRCA1/2 alterations. BRCA1/2 alterations were not associated with any differences in IPAT efficacy outcomes (PFS, objective response rate).

No association was observed between PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered status and gene signatures of immune cell infiltration/activation or tumor mutational burden. High (≥10%) vs low levels of stromal TILs showed a trend toward longer PFS in patients treated with placebo + PAC (HR: 0.74 [95% CI: 0.39–1.48]), but no difference was apparent in those treated with IPAT + PAC (HR: 1.14 [95% CI: 0.57–2.40]).

Conclusions: This retrospective exploratory biomarker analysis of the phase II LOTUS trial of IPAT in TNBC provides insight into the potential heterogeneity of disease biologies underlying PI3K/Akt pathway activation.

Citation Format: Wongchenko MJ, Dent R, Kim S-B, Saura C, Oliveira M, Baselga J, Kapp AV, Chan WY, Singel SM, Maslyar DJ, Gendreau S. Biomarker analysis of the LOTUS trial of first-line ipatasertib (IPAT) + paclitaxel (PAC) in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-09-20.

Abstract OT3-04-02: The DORA trial: A non-comparator randomised phase II multi-center maintenance study of olaparib alone or olaparib in combination with durvalumab in platinum treated advanced triple negative breast cancer (TNBC)

Background: Recent data from the OlympiaD study revealed an improvement in response rate and progression-free survival (PFS) with the PARP inhibitor (PARPi) olaparib vs. standard of care chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer who harbor germline BRCA (gBRCA) mutations. Maintenance PARPi has improved median PFS in relapsed ovarian cancer regardless of gBRCA mutation status or HRD status. The similarities between the molecular aberration profiles of high-grade serous ovarian cancer and TNBC invites exploration of maintenance PARPi in mTNBC. Furthermore, because durable responses have been reported in subsets of patients with metastatic TNBC (mTNBC) with checkpoint blockade and because high mutational load is associated with both gBRCA and TNBC, these patients may be particularly susceptible to immunotherapy with PARPi. Thus, we hypothesize that olaparib either alone or in combination with the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab will be active in TNBC subjects who have responded to platinum-based chemotherapy.

Trial design: DORA is a non-comparator randomized, international, multicenter phase II study designed to explore the efficacy of olaparib with or without durvalumab as maintenance therapy in platinum-treated mTNBC. Subjects will be enrolled following four cycles of treatment with a platinum-based (cisplatin or carboplatin) chemotherapy as single agent or combination therapy. Subjects deriving clinical benefit (CR / PR / SD) with platinum-based therapy as determined by the treating physician will be eligible and randomized in a 1:1 ratio. Patients in arm 1 will receive olaparib orally 300mg BID continuously and in arm 2 will receive olaparib orally 300mg BID continuously in combination with durvalumab 1500mg IV every 4 wks. Tumor responses will be assessed every 8 wks.

Eligibility criteria: Subjects with mTNBC who are receiving platinum-based chemotherapy and who have had no more than 2 lines of chemotherapy in the metastatic or advanced setting, with one of those being a platinum, will be included in this trial. Eligible patients must have been assessed by their treating physicians to have derived clinical benefit with platinum based therapy. Archival tissue or fresh biopsy samples are mandated for biomarker analyses.

Aims:The primary endpoint is PFS; the key secondary endpoint is overall survival.

Statistical methods: The sample size is calculated based upon data derived from contemporary trials of chemotherapy in mTNBC. In both arms of the study, it is proposed to test a null hypothesis of a median PFS of 2 months against an alternative hypothesis of a median PFS of 4 months; there is no intention to make a formal statistical comparison between the two treatment arms. To test this hypothesis, assuming an exponential PFS distribution, use of an exponential MLE test, a two-sided significance level of 5% and a power of 90%, 25 subjects are required per arm.

Target accrual: To allow for a drop-out rate of approximately 20%, the sample size per arm will be inflated to 30 subjects. We plan to enroll approximately 60 subjects with mTNBC from 6 centers.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03167619

Citation Format: Dent R, Tan T, Kim S-B, Traina T, McArthur H, Im Y-H, Creel T, Blackwell K. The DORA trial: A non-comparator randomised phase II multi-center maintenance study of olaparib alone or olaparib in combination with durvalumab in platinum treated advanced triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-04-02.

Abstract PD6-12: Withdrawn

This abstract was withdrawn by the authors.

Identification and Management of Statin-Associated Symptoms in Clinical Practice: Extension of a Clinician Survey to 12 Further Countries

PURPOSE

Statins are the first-choice pharmacological treatment for patients with hypercholesterolemia and at risk for cardiovascular disease; however, a minority of patients experience statin-associated symptoms (SAS) and are considered to have reduced statin tolerance. The objective of this study was to establish how patients with SAS are identified and managed in clinical practice in Austria, Belgium, Colombia, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Portugal, Switzerland, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted (2015-2016) among clinicians (n = 60 per country; Croatia: n = 30) who are specialized/experienced in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. Participants were asked about their experience of patients presenting with potential SAS and how such patients were identified and treated.

RESULTS

Muscle-related symptoms were the most common presentation of potential SAS (average: 51%; range across countries [RAC] 17-74%); other signs/symptoms included persistent elevation in transaminases. To establish whether symptoms are due to statins, clinicians required rechallenge after discontinuation of statin treatment (average: 77%; RAC 40-90%); other requirements included trying at least one alternative statin. Clinicians reported that half of high-risk patients with confirmed SAS receive a lower-dose statin (average: 53%; RAC 43-72%), and that most receive another non-statin lipid-lowering therapy with or without a concomitant statin (average: 65%; RAC 52-83%).

CONCLUSIONS

The specialists and GPs surveyed use stringent criteria to establish causality between statin use and signs or symptoms, and persevere with statin treatment where possible.

Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy of Evolocumab and Other Therapies for the Management of Lipid Levels in Hyperlipidemia

Background

The proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors evolocumab and alirocumab substantially reduce low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) when added to statin therapy in patients who need additional LDL‐C reduction.

Methods and Results

We conducted a systematic review and network meta‐analysis of randomized trials of lipid‐lowering therapies from database inception through August 2016 (45 058 records retrieved). We found 69 trials of lipid‐lowering therapies that enrolled patients requiring further LDL‐C reduction while on maximally tolerated medium‐ or high‐intensity statin, of which 15 could be relevant for inclusion in LDL‐C reduction networks with evolocumab, alirocumab, ezetimibe, and placebo as treatment arms. PCSK9 inhibitors significantly reduced LDL‐C by 54% to 74% versus placebo and 26% to 46% versus ezetimibe. There were significant treatment differences for evolocumab 140 mg every 2 weeks at the mean of weeks 10 and 12 versus placebo (−74.1%; 95% credible interval −79.81% to −68.58%), alirocumab 75 mg (−20.03%; 95% credible interval −27.32% to −12.96%), and alirocumab 150 mg (−13.63%; 95% credible interval −22.43% to −5.33%) at ≥12 weeks. Treatment differences were similar in direction and magnitude for PCSK9 inhibitor monthly dosing. Adverse events were similar between PCSK9 inhibitors and control. Rates of adverse events were similar between PCSK9 inhibitors versus placebo or ezetimibe.

Conclusions

PCSK9 inhibitors added to medium‐ to high‐intensity statin therapy significantly reduce LDL‐C in patients requiring further LDL‐C reduction. The network meta‐analysis showed a significant treatment difference in LDL‐C reduction for evolocumab versus alirocumab.

Practical Considerations for the Use of Subcutaneous Treatment in the Management of Dyslipidaemia

Suboptimal drug adherence represents a major challenge to effective primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. While adherence is influenced by multiple considerations, polypharmacy and dosing frequency appear to be rate-limiting factors in patient satisfaction and subsequent adherence. The cardiovascular and metabolic therapeutic areas have recently benefited from a number of advances in drug therapy, in particular protease proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors and incretin-based therapies, respectively. These drugs are administered subcutaneously and offer efficacious treatment options with reduced dosing frequency. Whilst patients with diabetes and diabetologists are well initiated to injectable therapies, the cardiovascular therapeutic arena has traditionally been dominated by oral agents. It is therefore important to examine the practical aspects of treating patients with these new lipid-lowering agents, to ensure they are optimally deployed in everyday clinical practice.

Anti-PCSK9 antibodies for hypercholesterolaemia: Overview of clinical data and implications for primary care

OBJECTIVES

To put data from our recent systematic review of phase 3 studies of anti-proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) antibodies into the context of clinical practice.

METHODS

Data from studies previously identified by a systematic review of phase 3 studies of alirocumab and evolocumab and additional references from non-systematic literature searches were used. We evaluated the hypothetical cardiovascular (CV) benefit in cases of typical patients in whom anti-PCSK9 antibodies may be recommended, using preliminary major CV event (CVE) rates from long-term clinical trials of anti-PCSK9 antibodies and from extrapolations derived from correlation between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction and CV benefit with other lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs).

RESULTS

Rapid (within 1-2 weeks) and persistent (8-74 weeks) reductions in LDL-C levels were achieved with anti-PCSK9 antibodies. When combined with statins (± ezetimibe), high rates of LDL-C goal achievement were observed (41%-87% with alirocumab and 63%-100% with evolocumab). In long-term alirocumab and evolocumab studies, reductions in major CVEs of 48% and 53%, respectively, were observed. For every 38.7 mg/dL (1 mmol/L) reduction in LDL-C, a 22% reduction in relative CVE risk is predicted. Applying these assumptions to typical patients who have high-very high risk (15%-60% absolute 10-year CVE risk) and elevated LDL-C despite maximally tolerated statins, the 10-year number needed to treat with an anti-PCSK9 antibody to prevent one additional CVE varies from 4 to 26, depending on baseline LDL-C levels and residual absolute CVE risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-PCSK9 antibodies effectively lower LDL-C levels in a broad patient population. While awaiting comprehensive data from CV outcome trials, these agents should be considered in very high risk patients, such as those in secondary prevention and those with familial hypercholesterolaemia who are already receiving maximally tolerated LLTs, have not achieved their LDL-C goal and require substantial reductions in LDL-C.

Efficacy and Safety of the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab in Patients with Mixed Hyperlipidemia

PURPOSE

Evolocumab significantly reduces low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C); we investigated its effects on LDL-C lowering in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia.

METHODS

We compared the efficacy and safety of evolocumab in hypercholesterolemic patients selected from the phase 2 and 3 trials who had fasting triglyceride levels ≥1.7 mmol/L (150 mg/dL elevated triglycerides) and <1.7 mmol/L (without elevated triglycerides). Fasting triglyceride level ≥ 4.5 mmol/L at screening was an exclusion criterion for these studies, but post-enrollment triglyceride levels may have exceeded 4.5 mmol/L (400 mg/dL). Efficacy was evaluated in four phase 3 randomized studies (n = 1148) and safety from the phase 2 and 3 studies (n = 2246) and their open-label extension studies (n = 1698). Efficacy analyses were based on 12-week studies, while safety analyses included data from all available studies. Treatment differences were calculated vs. placebo and ezetimibe after pooling dose frequencies.

RESULTS

Mean treatment difference in percentage change from baseline in LDL-C for participants with elevated triglycerides and those without elevated triglycerides (mean of weeks 10 and 12) with evolocumab was approximately -67 % vs. placebo and -42 % vs. ezetimibe (all P < 0.001) compared to −65 % vs. placebo and −39 % vs. ezetimibe, [corrected] respectively. Treatment differences for evolocumab vs. placebo and ezetimibe followed a similar pattern for non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C) and apolipoprotein B. Evolocumab was well tolerated, with balanced rates of adverse events leading to discontinuation of evolocumab vs. comparator (placebo and/or ezetimibe).

CONCLUSION

The significant reductions of atherogenic lipids including LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and apolipoprotein B seen with evolocumab are similar in patients with and without mixed hyperlipidemia.

Prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia: The role of PCSK9 inhibitors

Familial hypercholesterolaemia is an autosomal dominant inherited disorder characterised by elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and consequently an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Familial hypercholesterolaemia is relatively common, but is often underdiagnosed and undertreated. Cardiologists are likely to encounter many individuals with familial hypercholesterolaemia; however, patients presenting with premature ASCVD are rarely screened for familial hypercholesterolaemia and fasting lipid levels are infrequently documented. Given that individuals with familial hypercholesterolaemia and ASCVD are at a particularly high risk of subsequent cardiac events, this is a missed opportunity for preventive therapy. Furthermore, because there is a 50% chance that first-degree relatives of individuals with familial hypercholesterolaemia will also be affected by the disorder, the underdiagnosis of familial hypercholesterolaemia among patients with ASCVD is a barrier to cascade screening and the prevention of ASCVD in affected relatives. Targeted screening of patients with ASCVD is an effective strategy to identify new familial hypercholesterolaemia index cases. Statins are the standard treatment for individuals with familial hypercholesterolaemia; however, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets are not achieved in a large proportion of patients despite treatment. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors have been shown to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels considerably in individuals with familial hypercholesterolaemia who are concurrently receiving the maximal tolerated statin dose. The clinical benefit of PCSK9 inhibitors must, however, also be considered in terms of their cost-effectiveness. Increased awareness of familial hypercholesterolaemia is required among healthcare professionals, particularly cardiologists and primary care physicians, in order to start early preventive measures and to reduce the mortality and morbidity associated with familial hypercholesterolaemia and ASCVD.

Pooled Safety Analysis of Evolocumab in Over 6000 Patients From Double-Blind and Open-Label Extension Studies

Background:

Evolocumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody to PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9), markedly reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol across diverse patient populations. The objective of this study was to assess the safety and tolerability of evolocumab in a pooled safety analysis from phase 2 or 3 randomized and placebo or comparator-controlled trials (integrated parent trials) and the first year of open-label extension (OLE) trials that included a standard-of-care control group.

Methods:

This analysis included adverse event (AE) data from 6026 patients in 12 phase 2 and 3 parent trials, with a median exposure of 2.8 months, and, of those patients, from 4465 patients who continued with a median follow-up of 11.1 months in 2 OLE trials. AEs were analyzed separately for the parent and OLE trials. Overall AE rates, serious AEs, laboratory assessments, and AEs of interest were evaluated.

Results:

Overall AE rates were similar between evolocumab and control in the parent trials (51.1% versus 49.6%) and in year 1 of OLE trials (70.0% versus 66.0%), as were those for serious AEs. Elevations of serum transaminases, bilirubin, and creatine kinase were infrequent and similar between groups. Muscle-related AEs were similar between evolocumab and control. Neurocognitive AEs were infrequent and balanced during the double-blind parent studies (5 events [0.1%], evolocumab groups versus 6 events [0.3%], control groups). In the OLE trials, 27 patients (0.9%) in the evolocumab groups and 5 patients (0.3%) in the control groups reported neurocognitive AEs. No neutralizing antievolocumab antibodies were detected.

Conclusions:

Overall, this integrated safety analysis of 6026 patients pooled across phase 2/3 trials and 4465 patients who continued in OLE trials for 1 year supports a favorable benefit-risk profile for evolocumab.

Final efficacy and updated safety results of the randomized phase III BEATRICE trial evaluating adjuvant bevacizumab-containing therapy in triple-negative early breast cancer

Background

The purpose of this analysis was to assess the long-term impact of adding bevacizumab to adjuvant chemotherapy for early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

Methods

Patients eligible for the open-label randomized phase III BEATRICE trial had centrally confirmed triple-negative operable primary invasive breast cancer (pT1a-pT3). Investigators selected anthracycline- and/or taxane-based chemotherapy for each patient. After definitive surgery, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive ≥4 cycles of chemotherapy alone or with 1 year of bevacizumab (5 mg/kg/week equivalent). Stratification factors were nodal status, selected chemotherapy, hormone receptor status, and type of surgery. The primary end point was invasive disease-free survival (IDFS; previously reported). Secondary outcome measures included overall survival (OS) and safety.

Results

After 56 months' median follow-up, 293 of 2591 randomized patients had died. There was no statistically significant difference in OS between treatment arms in either the total population (hazard ratio 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-1.17; P = 0.52) or pre-specified subgroups. The 5-year OS rate was 88% (95% CI 86-90%) in both treatment arms. Updated IDFS results were consistent with the primary IDFS analysis. Five-year IDFS rates were 77% (95% CI 75-79%) with chemotherapy alone versus 80% (95% CI 77-82%) with bevacizumab. From 18 months after first study dose to study end, new grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 4.6% and 4.5% of patients in the two arms, respectively.

Conclusion

Final OS results showed no significant benefit from bevacizumab therapy for early TNBC. Late-onset toxicities were rare in both groups. Five-year OS and IDFS rates suggest that the prognosis for patients with TNBC is better than previously thought.

ClinicalTrials.gov

NCT00528567.

Evidence-based goals in LDL-C reduction

The evidence from trials of statin therapy suggests that benefits in cardiovascular disease (CVD) event reduction are proportional to the magnitude of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering. The lack of a threshold at which LDL-C lowering is not beneficial, in terms of CVD prevention observed in these trials, is supported by epidemiological and genetic studies reporting the cardio-protective effects of lifelong low exposure to atherogenic cholesterol in a graded fashion. Providing that intensive LDL-C lowering is safe, these observations suggest that many individuals even at current LDL-C treatment targets could benefit. Here, we review recent safety and efficacy data from trials of adjunctive therapy, with LDL-C lowering beyond that achieved by statin therapy, and their potential implications for current guideline targets. Finally, the application of current guidance in the context of pre-treatment LDL-C concentration and deployment of statin therapy is also discussed. The number of patients requiring treatment to prevent a CVD event with statin treatment has been shown to differ markedly according to the pre-treatment LDL-C concentration even when absolute CVD risk is similar. It produces more likelihood of benefit when absolute LDL-C reduction is greater which is largely dependent on pre-treatment LDL-C concentration. This also has to be taken in consideration when deploying new agents like proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 monoclonal antibodies. Patients with highest LDL-C concentration despite maximum statin and ezetimibe therapy will attain most absolute LDL-C reduction when treated with proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 monoclonal antibodies, hence benefit most in term of CVD risk reduction.

Systematic review of published Phase 3 data on anti-PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies in patients with hypercholesterolaemia

AIMS

Two anti-proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) monoclonal antibodies, alirocumab and evolocumab, have been approved for the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia in certain patients. We reviewed data from Phase 3 studies to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these antibodies.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed Phase 3 English-language studies in patients with hypercholesterolaemia, published between 1 January 2005 and 20 October 2015. Congress proceedings from 16 November 2012 to 16 November 2015 were also reviewed.

RESULTS

We identified 12 studies of alirocumab and nine of evolocumab, including over 10 000 patients overall. Most studies enrolled patients with hypercholesterolaemia and used anti-PCSK9 antibodies with statins. The ODYSSEY FH I, FH II and HIGH FH alirocumab studies and the RUTHERFORD-2 evolocumab study exclusively recruited patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. Two evolocumab studies focused mainly on homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH): TESLA Part B and TAUSSIG (a TESLA sub-study); only those data for HoFH are reported here. All comparator studies demonstrated a reduction in LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) with the anti-PCSK9 antibodies. No head-to-head studies were conducted between alirocumab and evolocumab. Up to 87% of patients receiving alirocumab and up to 98% receiving evolocumab reached LDL-C goals. Both antibodies were effective and well tolerated across a broad population of patients and in specific subgroups, such as those with type 2 diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

Using anti-PCSK9 antibodies as add-on therapy to other lipid-lowering treatments or as monotherapy for patients unable to tolerate statins may help patients with high cardiovascular risk to achieve their LDL-C goals.

Very low LDL-C levels may safely provide additional clinical cardiovascular benefit: the evidence to date

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in Europe and increased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a major contributor to CVD risk. Extensive evidence from clinical studies of statins has demonstrated a linear relationship between LDL-C levels and CVD risk. It has been proposed that lower LDL-C levels than those currently recommended may provide additional clinical benefit to patients.

AIM

This review summarises the genetic and clinical evidence on the efficacy and safety of achieving very low LDL-C levels.

METHODS

Relevant epidemiological and clinical studies were identified using PubMed and by searching abstracts published at major congresses.

RESULTS

Genetic evidence demonstrates that individuals with naturally very low LDL-C levels are healthy and have a low risk of CVD. Clinical evidence has shown that those patients who achieve very low LDL-C levels through using lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs), such as statins, have reduced CVD risk compared with patients who only just achieve recommended target LDL-C levels. These data show that the incidence of adverse events in patients achieving very low LDL-C levels using LLT is comparable to those reaching the recommended LDL-C targets.

CONCLUSIONS

Genetic and clinical evidence supports the concept that reduction in LDL-C levels below current recommended targets may provide additional clinical benefit to patients without adversely impacting patient safety. Statin add-on therapies, such as ezetimibe and the recently approved proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors alirocumab and evolocumab, allow patients to achieve very low LDL-C levels and are likely to impact on future treatment paradigms.

Statin non-adherence and residual cardiovascular risk: There is need for substantial improvement

Although statin therapy has proven to be the cornerstone for prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease (CVD), there are many patients for whom long-term therapy remains suboptimal. The aims of this article are to review the current complex issues associated with statin use and to explore when novel treatment approaches should be considered. Statin discontinuation as well as adherence to statin therapy remain two of the greatest challenges for lipidologists. Evidence suggests that between 40 and 75% of patients discontinue their statin therapy within one year after initiation. Furthermore, whilst the reasons for persistence with statin therapy are complex, evidence shows that low-adherence to statins negatively impacts clinical outcomes and residual CV risk remains a major concern. Non-adherence or lack of persistence with long-term statin therapy in real-life may be the main cause of inadequate low density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering with statins. There is a large need for the improvement of the use of statins, which have good safety profiles and are inexpensive. On the other hand, in a non-cost-constrained environment, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors should arguably be used more often in those patients in whom treatment with statins remains unsatisfactory.