Frailty according to the 2019 HFA-ESC definition in patients at risk for advanced heart failure: Insights from the HELP-HF registry

AIMS

Frailty is highly prevalent in patients with heart failure (HF), but a concordant definition of this condition is lacking. The Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology (HFA-ESC) proposed in 2019 a new multi-domain definition of frailty, but it has never been validated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients from the HELP-HF registry were stratified according to the number of HFA-ESC frailty domains fulfilled and to the cumulative deficits frailty index (FI) quintiles. Prevalence of frailty and of each domain was reported, as well as the rate of the composite of all-cause death and HF hospitalization, its single components, and cardiovascular death in each group and quintile. Among 854 included patients, 37 (4.3%), 206 (24.1%), 365 (42.8%), 217 (25.4%), and 29 (3.4%) patients fulfilled zero, one, two, three, or four domains, respectively, while 179 patients had a FI < 0.21 and were considered not frail. The 1-year risk of adverse events increased proportionally to the number of domains fulfilled (for each criterion increase, all-cause death or HF hospitalization: hazard ratio [HR] 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27-1.62; all-cause death: HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.46-2.02, HF hospitalizations: subHR 1.21, 95% CI 1.04-1.31; cardiovascular death: HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.45-2.15). Consistent results were found stratifying the cohort for FI quintiles. The FI as a continuous variable demonstrated higher discriminative ability than the number of domains fulfilled (area under the curve = 0.68 vs. 0.64, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Frailty in patients at risk for advanced HF, assessed via a multi-domain approach and the FI, is highly prevalent and identifies those at increased risk of adverse events. The FI was found to be slightly more effective in identifying patients at increased risk of mortality.

Functional Mitral Regurgitation and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Clinical Implications and Management

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is highly prevalent and associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes. The pathophysiology of HFpEF mostly relies on the development of elevated left ventricle filling pressure, diastolic dysfunction, and atrial dilatation and impairment. This dynamic process may eventually lead to the development of functional mitral regurgitation (MR), characterized by mitral annular dilatation and consequent leaflet remodeling, in the context of preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. These observations highlight the possible common pathophysiology of MR and HFpEF. However, less is known about the prevalence and the clinical value of MR in the context of HFpEF. This review aims to provide an overview of the association and interplay between functional MR and HFpEF, discuss the underlying mechanisms that are common to these diseases, and summarize potential targeted pharmacological treatments.

Ion channel dysfunction and fibrosis in atrial fibrillation: Two sides of the same coin

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common heart rhythm disorder that is associated with an increased risk of stroke and heart failure (HF). Initially, an association between AF and ion channel dysfunction was identified, classifying the pathology as a predominantly electrical disease. More recently it has been recognized that fibrosis and structural atrial remodeling play a driving role in the development of this arrhythmia also in these cases.

PURPOSE

Understanding the role of fibrosis in genetic determined AF could be important to better comprise the pathophysiology of this arrhythmia and to refine its management also in nongenetic forms. In this review we analyze genetic and epigenetic mechanisms responsible for AF and their link with atrial fibrosis, then we will consider analogies with the pathophysiological mechanism in nongenetic AF, and discuss consequent therapeutic options.

Characteristics and outcomes of patients with tricuspid regurgitation and advanced heart failure

AIMS

To evaluate the role of tricuspid regurgitation in advanced heart failure.

METHODS

The multicenter observational HELP-HF registry enrolled consecutive patients with heart failure and at least one 'I NEED HELP' criterion evaluated at four Italian centers between January 2020 and November 2021. Patients with no data on tricuspid regurgitation and/or receiving tricuspid valve intervention during follow-up were excluded. The population was stratified by no/mild tricuspid regurgitation vs. moderate tricuspid regurgitation vs. severe tricuspid regurgitation. Variables independently associated with tricuspid regurgitation, as well as the association between tricuspid regurgitation and clinical outcomes were investigated. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Among the 1085 patients included in this study, 508 (46.8%) had no/mild tricuspid regurgitation, 373 (34.4%) had moderate tricuspid regurgitation and 204 (18.8%) had severe tricuspid regurgitation. History of atrial fibrillation, any prior valve surgery, high dose of furosemide, preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, moderate/severe mitral regurgitation and pulmonary hypertension were found to be independently associated with an increased likelihood of severe tricuspid regurgitation. Estimated rates of 1-year all-cause death were of 21.4, 24.5 and 37.1% in no/mild tricuspid regurgitation, moderate tricuspid regurgitation and severe tricuspid regurgitation, respectively (log-rank P  < 0.001). As compared with nonsevere tricuspid regurgitation, severe tricuspid regurgitation was independently associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.38, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.88, P  = 0.042), whereas moderate tricuspid regurgitation did not.

CONCLUSION

In a contemporary, real-world cohort of patients with advanced heart failure, several clinical and echocardiographic characteristics are associated with an increased likelihood of severe tricuspid regurgitation. Patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation have an increased risk of mortality.

Guideline-directed medical therapy in severe heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: An analysis from the HELP-HF registry

AIM

Persistent symptoms despite guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and poor tolerance of GDMT are hallmarks of patients with advanced heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, real-world data on GDMT use, dose, and prognostic implications are lacking.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We included 699 consecutive patients with HFrEF and at least one 'I NEED HELP' marker for advanced HF enrolled in a multicentre registry. Beta-blockers (BB) were administered to 574 (82%) patients, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ACEi/ARB/ARNI) were administered to 381 (55%) patients and 416 (60%) received mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA). Overall, ≥50% of target doses were reached in 41%, 22%, and 56% of the patients on BB, ACEi/ARB/ARNI and MRA, respectively. Hypotension, bradycardia, kidney dysfunction and hyperkalaemia were the main causes of underprescription and/or underdosing, but up to a half of the patients did not receive target doses for unknown causes (51%, 41%, and 55% for BB, ACEi/ARB/ARNI and MRA, respectively). The proportions of patients receiving BB and ACEi/ARB/ARNI were lower among those fulfilling the 2018 HFA-ESC criteria for advanced HF. Treatment with BB and ACEi/ARB/ARNI were associated with a lower risk of death or HF hospitalizations (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-0.84, and HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58-0.95, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large, real-world, contemporary cohort of patients with severe HFrEF, with at least one marker for advanced HF, prescription and uptitration of GDMT remained limited. A significant proportion of patients were undertreated due to unknown reasons suggesting a potential role of clinical inertia either by the prescribing healthcare professional or by the patient. Treatment with BB and ACEi/ARB/ARNI was associated with lower mortality/morbidity.

Role of ejection fraction in patients at risk for advanced heart failure: insights from the HELP-HF registry

AIMS

Patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (EF) (HFrEF), mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF), and preserved EF (HFpEF) may all progress to advanced HF, but the impact of EF in the advanced setting is not well established. Our aim was to assess the prognostic impact of EF in patients with at least one 'I NEED HELP' marker for advanced HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with HF and at least one high-risk 'I NEED HELP' criterion from four centres were included in this analysis. Outcomes were assessed in patients with HFrEF (EF ≤ 40%), HFmrEF (EF 41-49%), and HFpEF (EF ≥ 50%) and with EF analysed as a continuous variable. The prognostic impact of medical therapy for HF in patients with EF < 50% and EF > 50% was also evaluated. All-cause death was the primary endpoint, and cardiovascular death was a secondary endpoint. Among 1149 patients enrolled [mean age 75.1 ± 11.5 years, 67.3% males, 67.6% hospitalized, median follow-up 260 days (inter-quartile range 105-390 days)], HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF were observed in 699 (60.8%), 122 (10.6%), and 328 (28.6%) patients, and 1 year mortality was 28.3%, 26.2%, and 20.1, respectively (log-rank P = 0.036). As compared with HFrEF patients, HFpEF patients had a lower risk of all-cause death [adjusted hazard ratio (HRadj ) 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48-0.94, P = 0.022], whereas no difference was noted for HFmrEF patients. After multivariable adjustment, a lower risk of all-cause death (HRadj for 5% increase 0.94, 95% CI 0.89-0.99, P = 0.017) and cardiovascular death (HRadj for 5% increase 0.94, 95% CI 0.88-1.00, P = 0.049) was observed at higher EF values. Beta-blockers and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors or sacubitril/valsartan were associated with lower mortality in both EF < 50% and EF ≥ 50% groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with HF and at least one 'I NEED HELP' marker for advanced HF, left ventricular EF is still of prognostic value.

Clinical and prognostic implications of heart failure hospitalization in patients with advanced heart failure

BACKGROUND

Hospitalization is associated with poor outcomes in patients with heart failure, but its prognostic role in advanced heart failure is still unsettled. We evaluated the prognostic role of heart failure hospitalization in patients with advanced heart failure.

METHODS

The multicenter HELP-HF registry enrolled consecutive patients with heart failure and at least one high-risk 'I NEED HELP' marker. Characteristics and outcomes were compared between patients who were hospitalized for decompensated heart failure (inpatients) or not (outpatients) at the time of enrolment. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality or first heart failure hospitalization.

RESULTS

Among the 1149 patients included [mean age 75.1 ± 11.5 years, 67.3% men, median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 35% (IQR 25-50%)], 777 (67.6%) were inpatients at the time of enrolment. As compared with outpatients, inpatients had lower LVEF, higher natriuretic peptides and a worse clinical profile. The 1-year rate of the primary endpoint was 50.9% in inpatients versus 36.8% in outpatients [crude hazard ratio 1.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.39-2.07, P < 0.001]. At multivariable analysis, inpatient status was independently associated with a higher risk of the primary endpoint (adjusted hazard ratio 1.54, 95% CI 1.23-1.93, P < 0.001). Among inpatients, the independent predictors of the primary endpoint were older age, lower SBP, heart failure association criteria for advanced heart failure and glomerular filtration rate 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 or less.

CONCLUSION

Hospitalization for heart failure in patients with at least one high-risk 'I NEED HELP' marker is associated with an extremely poor prognosis supporting the need for specific interventions, such as mechanical circulatory support or heart transplantation.

Right ventricle assessment before tricuspid valve interventions

In the latest ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the Management of Valvular Heart Disease, right ventricular dilatation and dysfunction, severe pulmonary hypertension and tricuspid annulus dilatation were reported to be the most important parameters to consider in patient selection for tricuspid valve interventions. Indeed, comprehensive right ventricular assessment is crucial in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation who may benefit from transcatheter or surgical procedures. However, the only guideline parameter considered for intervention has been tricuspid annular dilatation in the presence of at least mild to moderate tricuspid regurgitation, with no other right ventricular markers used in the decision-making process for invasive treatment. Notably, challenges in the assessment of right ventricular function may limit establishing thresholds for defining right ventricular dysfunction. The aim of this review is to summarize current evidence on the prognostic significance of right ventricular function in patients with tricuspid regurgitation undergoing percutaneous or surgical interventions.

Detailed Assessment of the "I Need Help" Criteria in Patients With Heart Failure: Insights From the HELP-HF Registry

BACKGROUND

The "I Need Help" markers have been proposed to identify patients with advanced heart failure (HF). We evaluated the prognostic impact of these markers on clinical outcomes in a real-world, contemporary, multicenter HF population.

METHODS

We included consecutive patients with HF and at least 1 high-risk "I Need Help" marker from 4 centers. The impact of the cumulative number of "I Need Help" criteria and that of each individual "I Need Help" criterion was evaluated. The primary end point was the composite of all-cause mortality or first HF hospitalization.

RESULTS

Among 1149 patients enrolled, the majority had 2 (30.9%) or 3 (22.6%) "I Need Help" criteria. A higher cumulative number of "I Need Help" criteria was independently associated with a higher risk of the primary end point (adjusted hazard ratio for each criterion increase, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.11-1.27]; P<0.001), and patients with >5 criteria had the worst prognosis. Need of inotropes, persistently high New York Heart Association classes III and IV or natriuretic peptides, end-organ dysfunction, >1 HF hospitalization in the last year, persisting fluid overload or escalating diuretics, and low blood pressure were the individual criteria independently associated with a higher risk of the primary end point.

CONCLUSIONS

In our HF population, a higher number of "I Need Help" criteria was associated with a worse prognosis. The individual criteria with an independent impact on mortality or HF hospitalization were need of inotropes, New York Heart Association class or natriuretic peptides, end-organ dysfunction, multiple HF hospitalizations, persisting edema or escalating diuretics, and low blood pressure.

Prognostic value of right ventricular longitudinal strain in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair

AIMS

To evaluate the prognostic impact of pre-procedural right ventricular longitudinal strain (RVLS) in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) in comparison with conventional echocardiographic parameters of RV function.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This is a retrospective study including 142 patients with SMR undergoing TEER at two Italian centres. At 1-year follow-up 45 patients reached the composite endpoint of all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization. The best cut-off value of RV free-wall longitudinal strain (RVFWLS) to predict outcome was -18% [sensitivity 72%, specificity of 71%, area under curve (AUC) 0.78, P < 0.001], whereas the best cut-off value of RV global longitudinal strain (RVGLS) was -15% (sensitivity 56%, specificity 76%, AUC 0.69, P < 0.001). Prognostic performance was suboptimal for tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, Doppler tissue imaging-derived tricuspid lateral annular systolic velocity and fractional area change (FAC). Cumulative survival free from events was lower in patients with RVFWLS ≥ -18% vs. RVFWLS < -18% (44.0% vs. 85.4%; < 0.001) as well as in patients with RVGLS ≥ -15% vs. RVGLS < -15% (54.9% vs. 81.7%; P < 0.001). At multivariable analysis FAC, RVGLS and RVFWLS were independent predictors of events. The identified cut-off of RVFWLS and RVGLS both resulted independently associated with outcomes.

CONCLUSION

RVLS is a useful and reliable tool to identify patients with SMR undergoing TEER at high risk of mortality and HF hospitalization, on top of other clinical and echocardiographic parameters, with RVFWLS offering the best prognostic performance.

Telemedicine for the treatment of heart failure: new opportunities after COVID-19

ABSTRACT

During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the epidemiology of heart failure significantly changed with reduced access to health system resources and a worsening of patients' outcome. Understanding the causes of these phenomena could be important to refine the management of heart failure during and after the pandemic. Telemedicine was associated with an improvement in heart failure outcomes in several studies; therefore, it may help in refining the out-of-hospital care of heart failure. In this review, the authors describe the changes in heart failure epidemiology during the COVID-19 pandemic; analyse available evidence on use and benefit of telemedicine during the pandemic and prepandemic periods; and discuss approaches to optimize the home-based or outpatient heart failure management in the future, beyond the pandemic.

Ischemic Etiology in Advanced Heart Failure: Insight from the HELP-HF Registry

In patients with advanced heart failure (HF), defined according to the presence of at least one I-NEED-HELP criterium, the updated 2018 Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology (HFA-ESC) criteria for advanced HF identify a subgroup of patients with HF with worse prognosis, but whether ischemic etiology has a relevant prognostic impact in this very high-risk cohort is unknown. Patients from the HELP-HF registry were stratified according to ischemic etiology and presence of advanced HF based on 2018 HFA-ESC criteria. The primary end point was a composite of all-cause death and HF hospitalization at 1 year. Secondary end points were all-cause death, HF hospitalization, and cardiovascular death at 1 year. Ischemic etiology was a leading cause of HF, in both patients with advanced and nonadvanced HF (46.1% and 42.4%, respectively, p = 0.337). The risk of the primary end point (hazard ratio [HR] 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09 to 1.58) and all-cause mortality (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.76) was increased in ischemic as compared with nonischemic patients. The risk of the primary end point was consistently higher in ischemic patients in both patients with advanced and nonadvanced HF (advanced HF, HR 1.50 95% CI 1.04 to 2.16; nonadvanced HF, HR 1.25 95% CI 1.01 to 1.56, pinteraction = 0.333), driven by an increased risk of mortality, mainly because of cardiovascular causes. In conclusion, ischemic etiology is the most common cause of HF in patients with at least one I-NEED-HELP marker and with or without advanced HF as defined by the 2018 HFA-ESC definition. In both patients with advanced and not-advanced HF, ischemic etiology carried an increased risk of worse prognosis.

Right ventricular to pulmonary artery coupling and outcome in patients with cardiac amyloidosis

AIMS

To investigate the prognostic value of the right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery (RV-PA) coupling in patients with either transthyretin (ATTR) or immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) cardiac amyloidosis (CA).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Overall, 283 patients with CA from 3 Italian high-volume centres were included (median age 76 years; 63% males; 53% with ATTR-CA, 47% with AL-CA). The RV-PA coupling was evaluated by using the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion/pulmonary artery systolic pressure (TAPSE/PASP) ratio. The median value of TAPSE/PASP was 0.45 (0.33-0.63) mm/mmHg. Patients with a TAPSE/PASP ratio <0.45 were older, had lower systolic blood pressure, more severe symptoms, higher cardiac troponin and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels, greater left ventricular (LV) thickness, and worse LV systolic and diastolic function. A TAPSE/PASP ratio <0.45 was independently associated with a higher risk of all-cause death or heart failure (HF) hospitalization [hazard ratio (HR) 1.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.32-2.96; P = 0.001] and all-cause death (HR 2.18, 95% CI 1.31-3.62; P = 0.003). The TAPSE/PASP ratio reclassified the risk of both endpoints [net reclassification index 0.46 (95% CI 0.18-0.74) P = 0.001 and 0.49 (0.22-0.77) P < 0.001, respectively], while TAPSE or PASP alone did not (all P > 0.05). The prognostic impact of the TAPSE/PASP ratio was significant both in AL-CA patients (HR for the composite endpoint 2.47, 95% CI 1.58-3.85; P < 0.001) and in ATTR-CA (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.11-2.95; P = 0.017). The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the optimal cut-off for predicting prognosis was 0.47 mm/mmHg.

CONCLUSION

In patients with CA, RV-PA coupling predicted the risk of mortality or HF hospitalization. The TAPSE/PASP ratio was more effective than TAPSE or PASP in predicting prognosis.

Prognostic role of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion/pulmonary artery systolic pressure ratio in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure

BACKGROUND

The role of TAPSE/PASP, a measurement of right ventricular to pulmonary artery coupling, in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure (AHF) is poorly described.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the prognostic impact of TAPSE/PASP in AHF.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study included patients hospitalized for AHF between January 2004 and May 2017. TAPSE/PASP was evaluated as a continuous variable and as tertiles according to its value on admission. The main outcome was the composite of 1-year all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization.

RESULTS

A total of 340 patients were included [mean age 68.8 ± 11.8 years; 76.2% men, mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 30.4 ± 13.3%]. Patients with lower TAPSE/PASP had more comorbidities and a more advanced clinical profile, and received higher doses of intravenous furosemide in the first 24 h. There was a significant, linear, inverse relationship between TAPSE/PASP values and the incidence of the main outcome (P = 0.003). In two multivariable analyses including clinical (model 1), biochemical and imaging parameters (model 2) TAPSE/PASP ratio was independently associated with the primary end point [model 1: hazard ratio 0.813, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.708-0.932, P = 0.003; model 2: hazard ratio 0.879, 95% CI 0.775-0.996, P = 0.043]. Patients with TAPSE/PASP greater than 0.47 mm/mmHg had a significantly lower risk of the primary end point (model 1: hazard ratio 0.473, 95% CI 0.277-0.808, P = 0.006; model 2: hazard ratio 0.582, 95% CI 0.355-0.955, P = 0.032; both compared with TAPSE/PASP <0.34 mm/mmHg). Similar findings were observed for 1-year all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSION

TAPSE/PASP on admission demonstrated a prognostic value among patients with AHF.

226 ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC AND INVASIVE EVALUATION OF LEFT ATRIAL PRESSURE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CATHETER ABLATION FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

Aims

Estimation of left ventricle (LV) filling pressure is one of the most important parameters to provide information in clinical practice. However, the challenging in investigating this parameter through invasive methods makes it difficult to be used. The study aims to investigate the association between cardiac structure and function derived by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and left atrial (LA) invasive pressure (LAP).

Methods

The study was a multi-center prospective study enrolling 73 patients (mean age 65 ± 8, 27% female) undergoing primary catheter ablation for AF. Patients were evaluated and enrolled from June 2021 to April 2022. Complete TTE assessing measures of LV, LA and right ventricle (RV) structure and function including speckle tracking echocardiography, was performed at baseline.

Echocardiographic data have been assessed the same day of the invasive measurement of the LAP during AF ablative procedure. Linear regression analysis has been performed to assess the relationship between measures of cardiac structure and function and LAP. Logistic regression analysis assessed the parameters associated with elevated LAP (≥ 15mmHg).

Results

Baseline clinical characteristics of the study population did not differ according to elevated LAP vs. non-elevated LAP. Patients with elevated LAP showed instead abnormal measures of LV global longitudinal strain, measures of LA structure and function, except for LA maximal volume, and RV structure and function. After multivariable adjustment, including demographic factors and comorbidities, E/e`(p = 0,024), LA minimal volume (p = 0,009), LA emptying fraction (LAEF) (p = 0,012), LA Reservoir (p = 0,039), TAPSE (p = 0,010) and RV free wall strain (p = 0,028), but not LA maximal volume (p = 0,11), were significantly associated with LAP. Similarly, these measures, but nor LA maximal volume, were significant determinants of elevated LAP. Overall, LA minimal volume and LAEF showed the best diagnostic accuracy to predict elevated LAP (AUC 0.72 and 0.73, respectively).

Conclusions

Novel measures of LA structure and function, but not standard assessment by LA maximal volume, were significantly associated with LAP in patients affected by AF. These measures, along with measures of LV and RV function may be used in the diagnostic assessment of filling pressure in ambulatory settings.

771 THE SERUM ACE2 MOLECULE IN SARS-COV2 / COVID-19 INFECTION AND ITS POTENTIAL PROGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC ROLE (ACCEPT STUDY)

Background

It is well known that the entry of the SARS- CoV-2 virus into cells is mediated by the binding between the virus Spike-glycoprotein (S) and the membrane ACE2-receptor (ACE2R). When SARS-CoV-2 binds to ACE2R, with subsequent membrane fusion and virus entry into the cell, a down-regulation of these receptors occurs. ACE2R downregulation plays a crucial role in the pulmonary and systemic inflammatory response. Also ACE2 deficiency is thought to play an important role in the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The down-regulation of ACE2 induced by viral infection could be particularly harmful in subjects with pre-existing ACE2 deficiency, for example due to advanced age, the presence of DM, arterial hypertension or pre-existing heart disease, including HF. Literature data suggest an association between the patient's age and comorbidities and a greater risk of severe clinical course and with a worse prognosis. However, serious clinical pictures requiring hospitalization or leading to death have also been observed in young subjects or subjects without comorbidities.

Aim of the Study

we aimed to identify predicting factors of a higher risk in terms of severity of the clinical course and worse prognosis in the population of the Brescia area, affected by a large number of cases in the first period of COVID-19 outbreak. In particular, we aimed to verify whether there is correlation between levels of serum ACE2 (sACE2) and the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, as well as between sACE2 and the different severity of the clinical manifestations of COVID-19 in patients with and without CV diseases.

Methods

we consecutively enrolled subjects with previous documented SARS-CoV-2 infection and divided our sample into three groups: pts with asymptomatic course; pts with symptomatic course but without the need for hospitalization for COVID-19; pts with severe symptomatic course requiring hospitalization in intensive care unit. Blood samples were taken for sACE2 dosage. We compared the concentrations of sACE2 in these groups in relation to the age, clinical course, comorbidities, and ongoing therapies.

Results

at March 2022, we enrolled 178 pts, 51 (28%) were hospitalized for COVID-19, whereas 78 (44%) had symptomatic course without hospitalization and 49 (28%) were completely pauci-asymptomatic. Only 6 pts (4%) had myocarditis or pericarditis SARS-CoV-2-related. Between hospitalized pts, male sex (67%), older age and higher BMI were most frequent. Moreover, chronic heart failure (20%), a diagnosis of cardiopathy (29%) and AF or atrial flutter (22%) were most frequent (Table 1). Plasma concentrations of sACE2 will be dosed and analyzed in relation to the clinical characteristics of each patient.

Perspectives

ACCEPT study will help to clarify the relationship between ACE2 molecule, the risk of SARS-CoV2 infection and the severity of clinical presentation of COVID-19 in pts with or without CV diseases.

774 THE PROGNOSTIC ROLE OF GENOTYPIC VARIANTS OF ACE2 AND TMPRSS2 POLYMORPHISMS IN SARS-COV2 / COVID-19 INFECTION

Background

to date, more than 243 million COVID-19 cases have been diagnosed globally, with 4.94 million deaths, 489.000 new cases and 8.474 deaths per day. In Italy there are currently 4.73 million cases and 132.000 deaths. It is well known that the entry of the SARS- CoV-2 virus into cells is mediated by the binding between the virus Spike-glycoprotein (S) and the membrane ACE2-receptor (ACE2-R). When SARS-CoV-2 binds to ACE2-R, with subsequent membrane fusion and virus entry into the cell, a down-regulation of these receptors occurs. ACE2 –R downregulation plays a crucial role in the pulmonary and systemic inflammatory response. A serious clinical course appears to be associated with some factors such as age, previous pathologies and comorbidities. However, also a dysregulation of the RAA system linked to a different expression of ACE-2 R and TMPRSS2 gene polymorphisms and different serum levels of soluble ACE2 (sACE2), could be associated with abnormal inflammatory and immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Aim of the Study

we aimed to verify whether there is an association between the clinical course of COVID-19 patients (pts) and the presence of more frequent ACE2 and TMPRSS2 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and if sACE2 levels are related to specific ACE2 and TMPRSS2 polymorphic variants.

Methods

we consecutively enrolled subjects with previous documented SARS-CoV-2 infection and divided our sample into three groups: pts with asymptomatic course; pts with symptomatic course but without the need for hospitalization for COVID-19; pts with severe symptomatic course requiring hospitalization in intensive care unit. Data about age, clinical course, comorbidities, and therapies were collected. Blood samples were taken for the genetic analysis of the most frequent SNPs of the ACE2-R and TMPRSS2 detected in Italian population, in particular genotypic variants TT and CC of ACE2 SNPs 1 and 5 (rate of 5% and 14% respectively) and genotypic variants TT and CC of TMPRSS2 SNPs 2 and 3 (rate of 50% and 30% respective).

Results

among 178 pts enrolled up to March 2022, we have so far analyzed the genetic polymorphisms of 74 pts.; 21 (28%) were hospitalized for COVID-19, 38 (51%) had symptomatic course without hospitalization and 15 (21%) were completely pauci-asymptomatics. Serum concentrations of sACE2 and distribution of polymorphic variants in the three groups are summarized in Table 1. We found that sACE2 levels were higher in genotypic variant CC of SNP 1 of TMPRSS2 gene (Table 2). Considering that a high concentration of sACE2 outlines a proinflammatory condition, it could be hypothesized that the CC genotype may be a predisposing condition to the cytokine storm of COVID-19.

Perspectives: Genetic analysis of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 SNPs will help to clarify the relationship between these polymorphic variant, sACE2 levels, risk of SARS-CoV2 infection and severity of clinical presentation of COVID-19 in patients with or without CV diseases.

247 HEPATIC T1-TIME, CARDIAC STRUCTURE, FUNCTION AND CARDIOVASCULAR OTUCOMES IN PATIENTS WITH HEART FAILURE WITH REDUCED EJECTION FRACTION UNDERGOING CARDIAC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING

Aim

Liver damage is frequently encountered in patients with cardiovascular (CV) disease, due to congestion or metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). It has been shown that liver disease is associated with worse outcomes in patients with CV disease. Nevertheless, the association of liver disease with cardiac structure and function and CV events in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is poorly known.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled consecutive patients with HFrEF undergoing Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) Imaging. In addition to standard cardiac T1-mapping, 3 regions of interest were also defined at the liver parenchyma. Patients were stratified according to hepatic T1 mapping. Linear regression analysis adjusted for demographics and clinical characteristics was performed to cross-sectionally examine the association between hepatic T1-time on CMR and measures of cardiac structure and function. The Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression analyses were performed to prospectively investigate the association between hepatic T1-time and the composite adverse outcome of hospitalization for HF or all-cause death.

Results

Overall, 106 HFrEF patients were included in the study (mean age 56 ± 14 years, 75% male). Mean hepatic T1-time was 558 ± 70 ms. In logistic regression analysis, left-ventricle (LV) end-diastolic volume (EDV) (p = 0.027), left atrial volume (LAV) (p = 0.015), right-ventricle (RV) EDV (p &lt; 0.001) and RVEF (p = 0.035) were positively associated with hepatic T1-time. Over a mean follow-up of 5 ± 2 years, 32 patients (30%) experienced the composite outcome at a rate of 6.7 per 100 person-year. In Cox regression analysis, higher hepatic T1-time was independently associated with an increased risk of developing the composite outcome (adjusted-hazard ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval: 1.01–1.12, p = 0.011). In particular, patients with a hepatic T1-time ≥558 ms had a higher risk of adverse outcomes compared to those with a hepatic T1-time &lt;558 ms (log-rank p = 0.02).

Conclusion

Among HFrEF patients undergoing CMR, higher hepatic T1-time was significantly associated with poorer measures of cardiac size and function. Hepatic T1-time was also significantly associated with higher rates of hospitalization for HF or all-cause-mortality. This parameter may be useful to stratify HFrEF patients at risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes.

Changes in Right Ventricular-to-Pulmonary Artery Coupling After Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair in Secondary Mitral Regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Preprocedural right ventricular-to-pulmonary artery (RV-PA) coupling is a major predictor of outcome in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (M-TEER). However, clinical significance of changes in RV-PA coupling after M-TEER is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in RV-PA coupling after M-TEER, their prognostic value, and predictors of improvement.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study, including patients undergoing successful M-TEER (residual mitral regurgitation ≤2+ at discharge) for SMR at 13 European centers and with complete echocardiographic data at baseline and short-term follow-up (30-180 days). RV-PA coupling was assessed with the use of echocardiography as the ratio of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion to pulmonary artery systolic pressure (TAPSE/PASP). All-cause death was assessed at the longest available follow-up starting from the time of the echocardiographic reassessment.

RESULTS

Among 501 patients included, 331 (66%) improved their TAPSE/PASP after M-TEER (responders) at short-term follow-up (median: 89 days; IQR: 43-159 days), whereas 170 (34%) did not (nonresponders). Lack of previous cardiac surgery, low postprocedural mitral mean gradient, low baseline TAPSE, high baseline PASP, and baseline tricuspid regurgitation were independently associated with TAPSE/PASP improvement after M-TEER. Compared with nonresponders, responders had lower New York Heart Association functional class and less heart failure hospitalizations at short-term follow-up. Improvement in TAPSE/PASP was independently associated with reduced risk of mortality at long-term follow-up (584 days; IQR: 191-1,243 days) (HR: 0.65 [95% CI: 0.42-0.92]; P = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with SMR, improvement in TAPSE/PASP after successful M-TEER is predicted by baseline clinical and echocardiographic variables and postprocedural mitral gradient, and is associated with a better outcome.

Left atrial function may mitigate the effect of mitral regurgitation on right chambers in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis

Introduction

Left atrial (LA) function has been associated to right chambers hemodynamics in the context of mitral valve regurgitation (MR). However, this physiological interplay between left atrial function, mitral regurgitation and right ventricular (RV) parameters has not yet been clarified in patients with aortic valve stenosis (AS).

Aim of the study

To assess the combination of LA function and different MR grades with right chambers performance and pulmonary non-invasive hemodynamics status in patients with severe AS using an advanced automated echocardiographic approach.

Methods

Consecutive patients with severe AS referred to our institution were analyzed. Mitral regurgitation was classified according to integrative guideline-based criteria. 2D advanced speckle tracking echocardiography analysis was conducted to measure the LA peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) and right ventricular free wall strain, (RVFWS) using Tomtec Arena, version TTA2 41.00, with dedicated LV/LA/RV analysis option (Tomtec, Unterschlei heim, Germany). All conventional right chambers performance indexes were also measured: TAPSE, S'- TDI, fractional area change, systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP). We featured 3 patients groups based on MR grade and LA function: (a) no/mild MR and preserved PALS (above the median); (c) &gt;mild MR and reduced PALS; (b) the remaining patients with &gt;mild MR and low PALS or &gt;mild MR and high PALS.

Results

A total of 102 patients with severe aortic stenosis formed the study cohort: age was 82±9, 47% were female, mean left-ventricular-ejection-fraction 56%±12, more than mild MR was present in 24% of patients, mean PALS was 19±10%, sPAP 38±12 mmHg, RVFW strain 21±6%, and RVFW/sPAP 0.62±0.25. The 3 subgroups presented similar age and sex distribution. Right ventricular function significantly worsened moving from group (a) to (c); RVFW strain decreased from 25±5 (a) to 19±7 (b) and 17±5% (c), p&lt;0.001; sPAP increased from 34±9 (a) to 39±12 (b) and 47±13 mmhg (c), p&lt;0.001; and RVFW/sPAP decreased from 0.76±0.21 (a) to 0.54±0.23 (b) and 0.39±0.11 (c), p&lt;0.001. Patients in the group (c) were more symptomatic (NYHA class III/IV increase from 40% in group a and 63% in group (b) to 80% in group c, p=0.006). When added to MR grade, in a logistic regression analysis, PALS provided incremental prediction of all right ventricular parameters (p&lt;0.01).

Conclusion

This study highlights that the combination of MR and reduced LA function is associated with symptoms and RV impairment in patients with severe AS. These preliminary results suggest that preserved LA function may modulate the adverse effects of the AS-MR combination by preventing/delaying the development of pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular dysfunction.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Prognostic impact of the updated 2018 HFA-ESC definition of advanced heart failure: results from the HELP-HF registry

AIMS

The Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology (HFA-ESC) proposed a definition of advanced heart failure (HF) that has not been validated, yet. We assessed its prognostic impact in a consecutive series of patients with high-risk HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The HELP-HF registry enrolled consecutive patients with HF and at least one high-risk 'I NEED HELP' marker, evaluated at four Italian centres between 1^st January 2020 and 30^th November 2021. Patients meeting the HFA-ESC advanced HF definition were compared to patients not meeting this definition. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality or first HF hospitalization. Out of 4753 patients with HF screened, 1149 (24.3%) patients with at least one high-risk 'I NEED HELP' marker were included (mean age 75.1 ± 11.5 years, 67.3% male, median left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 35% [interquartile range 25%-50%]). Among them, 193 (16.8%) patients met the HFA-ESC advanced HF definition. As compared to others, these patients were younger, had lower LVEF, higher natriuretic peptides and a worse clinical profile. The 1-year rate of the primary endpoint was 69.3% in patients with advanced HF according to the HFA-ESC definition versus 41.8% in the others (hazard ratio [HR] 2.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.82-2.74, p < 0.001). The prognostic impact of the HFA-ESC advanced HF definition was confirmed after multivariable adjustment for relevant covariates (adjusted HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.57-2.50, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The HFA-ESC advanced HF definition had a strong prognostic impact in a contemporary, real-world, multicentre high-risk cohort of patients with HF.

Machine learning for prediction of in-hospital mortality in coronavirus disease 2019 patients: results from an Italian multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Several risk factors have been identified to predict worse outcomes in patients affected by SARS-CoV-2 infection. Machine learning algorithms represent a novel approach to identifying a prediction model with a good discriminatory capacity to be easily used in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to obtain a risk score for in-hospital mortality in patients with coronavirus disease infection (COVID-19) based on a limited number of features collected at hospital admission.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied an Italian cohort of consecutive adult Caucasian patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 who were hospitalized in 13 cardiology units during Spring 2020. The Lasso procedure was used to select the most relevant covariates. The dataset was randomly divided into a training set containing 80% of the data, used for estimating the model, and a test set with the remaining 20%. A Random Forest modeled in-hospital mortality with the selected set of covariates: its accuracy was measured by means of the ROC curve, obtaining AUC, sensitivity, specificity and related 95% confidence interval (CI). This model was then compared with the one obtained by the Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) and with logistic regression. Finally, to understand if each model has the same performance in the training and test set, the two AUCs were compared using the DeLong's test. Among 701 patients enrolled (mean age 67.2 ± 13.2 years, 69.5% male individuals), 165 (23.5%) died during a median hospitalization of 15 (IQR, 9-24) days. Variables selected by the Lasso procedure were: age, oxygen saturation, PaO2/FiO2, creatinine clearance and elevated troponin. Compared with those who survived, deceased patients were older, had a lower blood oxygenation, lower creatinine clearance levels and higher prevalence of elevated troponin (all P < 0.001). The best performance out of the samples was provided by Random Forest with an AUC of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.68-0.88) and a sensitivity of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.58-1.00). Moreover, Random Forest was the unique model that provided similar performance in sample and out of sample (DeLong test P = 0.78).

CONCLUSION

In a large COVID-19 population, we showed that a customizable machine learning-based score derived from clinical variables is feasible and effective for the prediction of in-hospital mortality.

Cardiac biomarkers and mortality in COVID-19 infection: A review

Lots of meta-analysis emphasize that a great number of hospitalized patients with moderate and severe forms of COVID-19 developed acute myocardial damage, defined as an increase of cardiac biomarkers, such N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP), creatine kinase-myocardial band (CK-MB) and of all type of troponins. The highest mortality rate is related with progressively increasing biomarkers levels and with a history of cardiovascular disease. In fact, the biomarkers dosage should be considered as a prognostic marker in all patients with COVID-19 disease at admission, during hospitalization and in the case of clinical deterioration. The purpose of this review is to evaluate cardiovascular prognostic factors in COVID-19 disease throughout the analysis of cardiac biomarkers to early identify the most serious patients and to optimize their outcomes.

Prognostic significance of serum potassium in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure

Aim

We investigated the prognostic significance of serum potassium abnormalities at discharge in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure (AHF).

Methods and results

In a retrospective analysis, we included 926 patients hospitalized for AHF, stratified by serum potassium levels at discharge as hypokalaemia (<3.5 mEq/L), normokalaemia (3.5–5.0 mEq/L), and hyperkalaemia (>5.0 mEq/L). The primary endpoint was all‐cause death at 1 year since hospital discharge. At discharge, 40 patients had hypokalaemia (4.3%), 840 normokalaemia (90.7%), and 46 hyperkalaemia (5.0%). Patients with hyperkalaemia at discharge were more frequently men, had more signs of congestion, and lower LVEF while patients with hypokalaemia were more likely to be women with HFpEF. Treatment with ACEi/ARBs and MRAs ≥50% of target dose at discharge was similar across groups. One year all‐cause death occurred in 10% of the patients with hypokalaemia, 13.9% of those with normokalaemia, and 30.4% of those with hyperkalaemia (P = 0.006). After adjustment for covariates, including renal function, background treatment, and baseline potassium level, hyperkalaemia resulted an independent predictor of the primary endpoint (HR 1.96, 95% IC [1.01–3.82]; P = 0.048).

Conclusions

In patients with AHF, the presence of hyperkalaemia at discharge is an independent predictor of 1 year all‐cause death.

Sex-related differences in patients with coronavirus disease 2019: results of the Cardio-COVID-Italy multicentre study

INTRODUCTION

The role of sex compared to comorbidities and other prognostic variables in patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is unclear.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study on patients with COVID-19 infection, referred to 13 cardiology units. The primary objective was to assess the difference in risk of death between the sexes. The secondary objective was to explore sex-based heterogeneity in the association between demographic, clinical and laboratory variables, and patients' risk of death.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and one patients were included: 214 (30.5%) women and 487 (69.5%) men. During a median follow-up of 15 days, deaths occurred in 39 (18.2%) women and 126 (25.9%) men. In a multivariable Cox regression model, men had a nonsignificantly higher risk of death vs. women (P = 0.07).The risk of death was more than double in men with a low lymphocytes count as compared with men with a high lymphocytes count [overall survival hazard ratio (OS-HR) 2.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.72-3.81]. In contrast, lymphocytes count was not related to death in women (P = 0.03).Platelets count was associated with better outcome in men (OS-HR for increase of 50 × 103 units: 0.88 95% CI 0.78-1.00) but not in women. The strength of association between higher PaO2/FiO2 ratio and lower risk of death was larger in women (OS-HR for increase of 50 mmHg/%: 0.72, 95% CI 0.59-0.89) vs. men (OS-HR: 0.88, 95% CI 0.80-0.98; P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients' sex is a relevant variable that should be taken into account when evaluating risk of death from COVID-19. There is a sex-based heterogeneity in the association between baseline variables and patients' risk of death.

Combined Role of Troponin and Natriuretic Peptides Measurements in Patients With Covid-19 (from the Cardio-COVID-Italy Multicenter Study)

Data concerning the combined prognostic role of natriuretic peptide (NP) and troponin in patients with COVID-19 are lacking. The aim of the study is to evaluate the combined prognostic value of NPs and troponin in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. From March 1, 2020 to April 9, 2020, consecutive patients with COVID-19 and available data on cardiac biomarkers at admission were recruited. Patients admitted for acute coronary syndrome were excluded. Troponin levels were defined as elevated when greater than the 99^th percentile of normal values. NPs were considered elevated if above the limit for ruling in acute heart failure (HF). A total of 341 patients were included in this study, mean age 68 ± 13 years, 72% were men. During a median follow-up period of 14 days, 81 patients (24%) died. In the Cox regression analysis, patients with elevated both NPs and troponin levels had higher risk of death compared with those with normal levels of both (hazard ratio 2.94; 95% confidence interval 1.31 to 6.64; p = 0.009), and this remained significant after adjustment for age, gender, oxygen saturation, HF history, and chronic kidney disease. Interestingly, NPs provided risk stratification also in patients with normal troponin values (hazard ratio 2.86; 95% confidence interval 1.21 to 6.72; p = 0.016 with high NPs levels). These data show the combined prognostic role of troponin and NPs in COVID-19 patients. NPs value may be helpful in identifying patients with a worse prognosis among those with normal troponin values. Further, NPs’ cut-point used for diagnosis of acute HF has a predictive role in patients with COVID-19.

554 Machine learning for prediction of in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients: results from an Italian multicentre study

Aims

Several risk factors have been identified to predict worse outcomes in patients affected by SARS-CoV-2 infection. Prediction models are needed to optimize clinical management and to early stratify patients at a higher mortality risk. Machine learning (ML) algorithms represent a novel approach to identify a prediction model with a good discriminatory capacity to be easily used in clinical practice.

Methods and results

The Cardio-COVID is a multicentre observational study that involved a cohort of consecutive adult Caucasian patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 [by real time reverse transcriptase—polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)] who were hospitalized in 13 Italian cardiology units from 1 March to 9 April 2020. Patients were followed-up after the COVID-19 diagnosis and all causes in-hospital mortality or discharge were ascertained until 23 April 2020. Variables with more than 20% of missing values were excluded. The Lasso procedure was used with a λ = 0.07 for reducing the covariates number. Mortality was estimated by means of a Random Forest (RF). The dataset was randomly divided in two subsamples with the same percentage of death/alive people of the entire sample: training set contained 80% of the data and test set the remaining 20%. The training set was used in the calibration procedure where a RF models in-hospital mortality with the covariates selected by Lasso. Its accuracy was measured by means of the ROC curve, obtaining AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and related 95% confidence interval (CI) computed with 10 000 stratified bootstrap replicates. From the RF the relative Variable Importance Measure (relVIM) was extracted to understand which of the selected variables had the greatest impact on outcome, providing a ranking from the most (relVIM = 100) to the less important variable. The model obtained was compared with the Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) and with the logistic regression, where the predictions were cross validated. Finally, to understand if each model has the same performance in sample (training) and out of sample (test), the two AUCs were compared by means of the DeLong’s test. Among 701 patients enrolled (mean age 67.2 ± 13.2 years, 69.5% males), 165 (23.5%) died during a median hospitalization of 15 (IQR, 9–24) days. Variables selected by the Lasso were: age, Oxygen saturation, PaO2/FiO2, Creatinine Clearance and elevated Troponin. Compared with those who survived, deceased patients were older, had a lower blood oxygenation, a lower creatinine clearance levels and higher prevalence of elevated Troponin (all P &lt; 0.001). Training set included 561 patients and test set 140 patients. The best performance out of sample was provided by the RF with an AUC of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.68–0.88) and a sensitivity of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.58–1.00). Moreover, RF is the unique methodology that provided similar performance in sample and out of sample (DeLong test P = 0.78). On the contrary, prediction model was less accurate by using GBM and logistic regression. The relVIM ranked the variables from the most to the less important in predicting the outcome as follows: clearance creatinine, PaO2/FiO2, age, oxygen saturation, and elevated Troponin.

Conclusions

In a large COVID-19 population, we showed that a customizable ML-based score derived from clinical variables, is feasible and effective for the prediction of in-hospital mortality.

267 Cardiac biomarkers and mortality in COVID-19 infection

Aims

The SARS-CoV-2 infection is mostly characterized by acute lung injury. Yet, some COVID-19 patients showed also neurological signs, acute myocardial injury, heart failure, myocarditis, and hypercoagulability, such as pulmonary embolism. Cardiac biomarkers can play an essential role in the diagnosis, management, and prognosis of COVID-19. In fact, during hospitalization, these patients develop biochemical abnormalities, with increasing of all Troponins (TnT), B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) and creatine kinase-myocardial band (CK-MB) levels. This situation helps us to predict adverse outcomes, especially in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities or risk factors. Data emerged demonstrated a myocardial involvement which determines a high risk of adverse events and increasing of mortality.

Methods and results

Lots of meta-analysis emphasize that a great number of hospitalized patients with moderate and severe forms of COVID-19 developed acute myocardial damage, defined as an increase of cardiac biomarkers, such NT-pro-BNP, CK-MB, and of all type of troponins. The highest mortality rate is related with progressively increasing biomarkers levels and with a history of cardiovascular disease. In fact, the biomarkers dosage should be considered as a prognostic marker in all patients with COVID-19 disease at admission, during hospitalization and in the case of clinical deterioration. Our purpose is to evaluate cardiovascular prognostic factors in COVID-19 disease throughout the analysis of cardiac biomarkers to early identify the most serious patients and to optimize their outcomes. Results of aforementioned studies underline how cardiac biomarkers are associated with severe form of COVID-19 infection. Above all, higher levels of these biomarkers are significantly associated with an increased risk of the mortality in COVID-19 infected patients. Therefore, has been demonstrated COVID-19 infection is more severe in those patients with a previous history of arterial hypertension, cardiovascular diseases. In addition to classical laboratory parameters evaluated in COVID-19 infection, such as C Reactive Protein (CRP), d-dimer, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), which are currently used in clinical practice, others biomarkers could potentially be useful for screening, clinical management, and prevention of serious complications. Therefore, it is clinically significant that fluctuating levels of myocardial biomarkers are closely monitored and patients with high levels of myocardial biomarkers are treated promptly to improve prognosis. At the end, on basis of symptoms and cardiac biomarkers patients could be divided in mild, severe and critical.

Conclusions

Biomarkers of acute myocardial injury play an important role in predicting worsening prognosis for COVID-19 patients with and without myocardial injury. They are not only predictive of disease severity, but are also helpful for therapeutic management, based on drugs preventing the activation of coagulation processes. It’s important, above all, to identify a laboratory score, made by haematological, inflammatory, biochemical, and immunological parameters, may help to stratify COVID-19 positive patients into risk categories for deciding therapeutic management, thus avoiding cardiac compromise which, as we have previously analysed, is an indication of a poor prognosis.

Congestion in Patients with Advanced Heart Failure: Assessment and Treatment

Heart failure (HF) is characterized by frequent hospital admissions due to acute decompensation and shortened life span with a progressive clinical course leading to an advanced stage where traditional therapies become ineffective. Due to aging of the population and improved therapies, only a small of proportion of patients with advanced HF are candidates for surgical treatments, such as mechanical circulatory support or heart transplantation. In most cases, prompt identification and management of congestion is paramount to improving symptoms and quality of life and avoiding progression to severe multiorgan dysfunction and death.

The prognostic value of serial troponin measurements in patients admitted for COVID-19

Aims

Myocardial injury (MI) in coronavirus disease‐19 (COVID‐19) is quite prevalent at admission and affects prognosis. Little is known about troponin trajectories and their prognostic role. We aimed to describe the early in‐hospital evolution of MI and its prognostic impact.

Methods and results

We performed an analysis from an Italian multicentre study enrolling COVID‐19 patients, hospitalized from 1 March to 9 April 2020. MI was defined as increased troponin level. The first troponin was tested within 24 h from admission, the second one between 24 and 48 h. Elevated troponin was defined as values above the 99th percentile of normal values. Patients were divided in four groups: normal, normal then elevated, elevated then normal, and elevated. The outcome was in‐hospital death. The study population included 197 patients; 41% had normal troponin at both evaluations, 44% had elevated troponin at both assessments, 8% had normal then elevated troponin, and 7% had elevated then normal troponin. During hospitalization, 49 (25%) patients died. Patients with incident MI, with persistent MI, and with MI only at admission had a higher risk of death compared with those with normal troponin at both evaluations (P < 0.001). At multivariable analysis, patients with normal troponin at admission and MI injury on Day 2 had the highest mortality risk (hazard ratio 3.78, 95% confidence interval 1.10–13.09, P = 0.035).

Conclusions

In patients admitted for COVID‐19, re‐test MI on Day 2 provides a prognostic value. A non‐negligible proportion of patients with incident MI on Day 2 is identified at high risk of death only by the second measurement.

Mitral regurgitation and dyspnoea: the expanding role of mitral effective regurgitant orifice among un-selected patients

AIMS

Mitral regurgitation is frequent in the general population and among suspected heart failure patients; however, to what extent it contributes to dyspnoea is unclear. We hypothesized mitral regurgitation to have a role in determining dyspnoea in unselected ambulatory patients.

METHODS

Consecutive outpatients referred for echocardiography were retrospectively screened and included. We excluded patients with mitral stenosis or prosthesis, congenital heart disease, cardiac surgery (previous 6 months) and atrial fibrillation. Patients were classified into four dyspnoea grades based on how they perceived their disability. We assessed mitral regurgitation severity through the effective regurgitant orifice area (ERO).

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-four patients (58% men; age 67 ± 14 years; mean ejection fraction 54 ± 12%) formed the study population; 76 (49%) classified asymptomatic (grade I), 63 (41%) dyspnoea grade II and 15 (10%) grade III; none was in grade IV. Mitral regurgitation was present in 102 patients (66%): primary in 14 (14%) and secondary in 88 (86%); among grades I, II and III patients, mitral regurgitation was present in 35 (46%; ERO 0.05 ± 0.10 cm), 52 (82%; ERO 0.10 ± 0.13 cm) and 15 (100%; ERO 0.20 ± 0.11 cm) patients, respectively (P < 0.0001). After adjusting for clinical (age, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, chronic kidney injury, chronic pulmonary disease) and echocardiographic confounders (ejection fraction, E/e'), ERO remained associated with symptoms presence (grade I versus II - III; P = 0.01 and P = 0.03, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Among unselected heterogeneous ambulatory patients, mitral ERO was associated with the presence of dyspnoea and could therefore help in identifying symptomatic patients and in clinical characterization of patients with perceived dyspnoea.

P3526Heart Failure hospitalization and mortality in non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation: The ENGAGE-AF TIMI 48 Trial

Introduction

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality. Heart Failure (HF) represents the most common CV complication, more common than thromboembolic events.

Purpose

We aimed to determine clinical factors associated with HF hospitalization and mortality in a contemporary cohort of patients with AF without previous history of HF.

Methods

The Effective Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Next Generation in AF–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48 (ENGAGE-AF TIMI 48) study tested the oral factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban in comparison with warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism, in 21,105 patients with AF. We assessed the composite endpoint of HF hospitalization, death due to HF or sudden cardiac death in 8981 patients without a history of HF. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the significant clinical predictors associated with the endpoint of interest.

Results

Over a median follow-up of 2.8 years, 589 patients (6.5%) experienced the composite endpoint. Older patients, cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, heart valve disease), history of stroke and coronary artery disease, impaired renal function (ClCr ≤50 ml/min), heart rate at baseline and diuretic use were associated with increased risk of the composite endpoint (model c-statistic 0.66) (Figure 1). Outcomes were not affected by randomization to edoxaban or warfarin. In patients with available cardiac-derived biomarkers, elevated levels of both NT-proBNP and Troponin I were significantly associated with the endpoint after adjustment for the clinical predictors (Figure 1). The addition of the biomarkers to clinical predictors enhanced risk estimation (c-statistics 0.69, NRI 0.40, IDI 0.01, all p<0.001 for NT-proBNP and c-statistics 0.70, NRI 0.43, IDI 0.03, all p<0.001 for Troponin I).

Figure 1

Conclusions

HF hospitalization and mortality are important complications in AF patients without a history of HF. The addition of cardiac biomarkers to clinical characteristics enhances risk estimation. These findings may improve risk stratification.

Anatomical features and clinical correlations in Caucasian patients with definite arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy

AIM

Arrhythmogenic right ventrticular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) is an inherited cardiomyopathy characterized by fibrofatty replacement and a high risk of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and sudden cardiac death (SCD). The aim of the present investigation is to examine the pathological profile and the clinical correlations in a group of ARVD/C patients.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter study evaluating 47 patients (31 men; mean age 37±14 years) with definite ARVD/C. Diagnosis was established according to the actual clinicomorphologic criteria at autopsy or clinically. We divided the study population in 2 different groups. First group included 28 alive patients and the second 19 patients dead suddenly.

RESULTS

Age at presentation was different in the two groups (P=0.0015). We observed an important association regarding the risk of sudden death and the history of physical exercise (P=0.0017). Moreover patients with negative outcome (i.e., SCD, cardiac transplantation, congestive heart failure) had a significantly association with biventricular form of ARVD/C (P=0.0034) and age presentation (P=0.003). Left ventricular (LV) involvement was frequently observed in the two groups (17% and 32% respectively). Post-mortem examination revealed frequent inflammatory infiltrates (26%) indicating active myocarditis, which probably justify the fatal arrhythmic events occurred in these patients.

CONCLUSION

Frequent LV involvement justifies the recent adoption of the broad term Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy. Early age presentation, sport activity and the biventricular form of ARVD/C represent important predictors of adverse outcome that can be useful to early identify patients at high risk.