1
|
Amaria RN, Reddy SM, Tawbi HA, Davies MA, Ross MI, Glitza IC, Cormier JN, Lewis C, Hwu WJ, Hanna E, Diab A, Wong MK, Royal R, Gross N, Weber R, Lai SY, Ehlers R, Blando J, Milton DR, Woodman S, Kageyama R, Wells DK, Hwu P, Patel SP, Lucci A, Hessel A, Lee JE, Gershenwald J, Simpson L, Burton EM, Posada L, Haydu L, Wang L, Zhang S, Lazar AJ, Hudgens CW, Gopalakrishnan V, Reuben A, Andrews MC, Spencer CN, Prieto V, Sharma P, Allison J, Tetzlaff MT, Wargo JA. Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in high-risk resectable melanoma. Nat Med 2018; 24:1649-1654. [PMID: 30297909 PMCID: PMC6481682 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0197-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 520] [Impact Index Per Article: 86.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2018] [Accepted: 08/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Preclinical studies suggest that treatment with neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade is associated with enhanced survival and antigen-specific T cell responses compared with adjuvant treatment1; however, optimal regimens have not been defined. Here we report results from a randomized phase 2 study of neoadjuvant nivolumab versus combined ipilimumab with nivolumab in 23 patients with high-risk resectable melanoma ( NCT02519322 ). RECIST overall response rates (ORR), pathologic complete response rates (pCR), treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) and immune correlates of response were assessed. Treatment with combined ipilimumab and nivolumab yielded high response rates (RECIST ORR 73%, pCR 45%) but substantial toxicity (73% grade 3 trAEs), whereas treatment with nivolumab monotherapy yielded modest responses (ORR 25%, pCR 25%) and low toxicity (8% grade 3 trAEs). Immune correlates of response were identified, demonstrating higher lymphoid infiltrates in responders to both therapies and a more clonal and diverse T cell infiltrate in responders to nivolumab monotherapy. These results describe the feasibility of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in melanoma and emphasize the need for additional studies to optimize treatment regimens and to validate putative biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodabe N Amaria
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sangeetha M Reddy
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hussein A Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Merrick I Ross
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Isabella C Glitza
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Janice N Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Carol Lewis
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wen-Jen Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ehab Hanna
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adi Diab
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael K Wong
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Richard Royal
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Neil Gross
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Randal Weber
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Stephen Y Lai
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Richard Ehlers
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jorge Blando
- Department of Immunology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Scott Woodman
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Robin Kageyama
- Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Daniel K Wells
- Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sapna P Patel
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anthony Lucci
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amy Hessel
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lauren Simpson
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elizabeth M Burton
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Liberty Posada
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lauren Haydu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Linghua Wang
- Department of Genomic Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shaojun Zhang
- Department of Genomic Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alexander J Lazar
- Department of Pathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Alexandre Reuben
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Miles C Andrews
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Victor Prieto
- Department of Pathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Padmanee Sharma
- Department of Immunology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Genitourinary Cancers, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - James Allison
- Department of Immunology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael T Tetzlaff
- Department of Pathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Translational and Molecular Pathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer A Wargo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. .,Department of Genomic Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Forget MA, Haymaker C, Hess KR, Meng YJ, Creasy C, Karpinets T, Fulbright OJ, Roszik J, Woodman SE, Kim YU, Sakellariou-Thompson D, Bhatta A, Wahl A, Flores E, Thorsen ST, Tavera RJ, Ramachandran R, Gonzalez AM, Toth CL, Wardell S, Mansaray R, Patel V, Carpio DJ, Vaughn C, Farinas CM, Velasquez PG, Hwu WJ, Patel SP, Davies MA, Diab A, Glitza IC, Tawbi H, Wong MK, Cain S, Ross MI, Lee JE, Gershenwald JE, Lucci A, Royal R, Cormier JN, Wargo JA, Radvanyi LG, Torres-Cabala CA, Beroukhim R, Hwu P, Amaria RN, Bernatchez C. Prospective Analysis of Adoptive TIL Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma: Response, Impact of Anti-CTLA4, and Biomarkers to Predict Clinical Outcome. Clin Cancer Res 2018; 24:4416-4428. [PMID: 29848573 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-3649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2017] [Revised: 04/11/2018] [Accepted: 05/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) using tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) has consistently demonstrated clinical efficacy in metastatic melanoma. Recent widespread use of checkpoint blockade has shifted the treatment landscape, raising questions regarding impact of these therapies on response to TIL and appropriate immunotherapy sequence.Patients and Methods: Seventy-four metastatic melanoma patients were treated with autologous TIL and evaluated for clinical response according to irRC, overall survival, and progression-free survival. Immunologic factors associated with response were also evaluated.Results: Best overall response for the entire cohort was 42%; 47% in 43 checkpoint-naïve patients, 38% when patients were exposed to anti-CTLA4 alone (21 patients) and 33% if also exposed to anti-PD1 (9 patients) prior to TIL ACT. Median overall survival was 17.3 months; 24.6 months in CTLA4-naïve patients and 8.6 months in patients with prior CTLA4 blockade. The latter patients were infused with fewer TIL and experienced a shorter duration of response. Infusion of higher numbers of TIL with CD8 predominance and expression of BTLA correlated with improved response in anti-CTLA4 naïve patients, but not in anti-CTLA4 refractory patients. Baseline serum levels of IL9 predicted response to TIL ACT, while TIL persistence, tumor recognition, and mutation burden did not correlate with outcome.Conclusions: This study demonstrates the deleterious effects of prior exposure to anti-CTLA4 on TIL ACT response and shows that baseline IL9 levels can potentially serve as a predictive tool to select the appropriate sequence of immunotherapies. Clin Cancer Res; 24(18); 4416-28. ©2018 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Andrée Forget
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Cara Haymaker
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Kenneth R Hess
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MDACC, Houston, Texas
| | - Yuzhong Jeff Meng
- Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Caitlin Creasy
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Tatiana Karpinets
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MDACC, Houston, Texas
| | - Orenthial J Fulbright
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Jason Roszik
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas.,Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MDACC, Houston, Texas
| | - Scott E Woodman
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Young Uk Kim
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | | | - Ankit Bhatta
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Arely Wahl
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Esteban Flores
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Shawne T Thorsen
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - René J Tavera
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Renjith Ramachandran
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Audrey M Gonzalez
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Christopher L Toth
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Seth Wardell
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Rahmatu Mansaray
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Vruti Patel
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Destiny Joy Carpio
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Carol Vaughn
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Chantell M Farinas
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Portia G Velasquez
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Wen-Jen Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Sapna P Patel
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Adi Diab
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Isabella C Glitza
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Hussein Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Michael K Wong
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Suzanne Cain
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Merrick I Ross
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MDACC, Houston, Texas
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MDACC, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Anthony Lucci
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MDACC, Houston, Texas
| | - Richard Royal
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MDACC, Houston, Texas
| | - Janice N Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MDACC, Houston, Texas
| | - Jennifer A Wargo
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MDACC, Houston, Texas.,Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MDACC, Houston, Texas
| | - Laszlo G Radvanyi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | | | - Rameen Beroukhim
- Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Rodabe N Amaria
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas.
| | - Chantale Bernatchez
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hall CS, Ross M, Bowman Bauldry JB, Upshaw J, Karhade MG, Royal R, Patel S, Lucci A. Circulating Tumor Cells in Stage IV Melanoma Patients. J Am Coll Surg 2018; 227:116-124. [PMID: 29746918 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.04.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2018] [Revised: 04/16/2018] [Accepted: 04/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of stage IV melanoma patients remains a challenge. In spite of promising new therapies, many patients develop resistance and progression. The aim of this pilot study was to determine if circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are associated with shortened (180-day) progression-free survival (PFS) after a baseline CTC assessment in stage IV melanoma patients. STUDY DESIGN A baseline CTC assessment was performed in 93 stage IV melanoma patients using a commercially available immunomagnetic system. The presence of 1 or more CTC was considered a positive result. A Cox multivariable regression model was used to evaluate the association between presence of CTCs at baseline and PFS, after adjusting for covariables. Kaplan-Meier curves and a log-rank test were used to summarize and compare unadjusted PFS for patients stratified by CTC positivity. RESULTS Median follow-up was 17 months; mean age was 55 years. Thirteen of 93 (14%) patients had no evidence of disease (NED) at baseline CTC assessment. One or more CTC was detected in 39 of 93 (42%) of patients at baseline; CTCs were not associated with primary melanoma features or NED status. Twenty-eight of 93 (30%) patients progressed within 180 days of baseline draw, with 20 of 39 (51%) of the CTC-positive patients relapsing compared with 8 of 54 (15%) of the CTC-negative patients. In adjusted Cox models, a significant association was found suggesting worse PFS within 180 days for CTC-positive patients at baseline (vs CTC-negative) (hazard ratio 4.69, 95% CI 1.59 to 13.77, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS One or more CTCs at baseline were associated with progression within 180 days in stage IV melanoma patients. This information warrants further study of CTCs as a means of identifying patients at high-risk for disease progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn S Hall
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Merrick Ross
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jessica B Bowman Bauldry
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Joshua Upshaw
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Mandar G Karhade
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Richard Royal
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Sapna Patel
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Anthony Lucci
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ikoma N, Cormier JN, Feig B, Du XL, Yamal JM, Hofstetter W, Das P, Ajani JA, Roland CL, Fournier K, Royal R, Mansfield P, Badgwell BD. Racial disparities in preoperative chemotherapy use in gastric cancer patients in the United States: Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base, 2006-2014. Cancer 2018; 124:998-1007. [PMID: 29393964 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2017] [Revised: 10/03/2017] [Accepted: 10/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND No studies have investigated whether race/ethnicity is associated with the recommended use of preoperative chemotherapy or subsequent outcomes in gastric cancer. To determine whether there is such an association, analyses of patients with gastric cancer in the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) were performed. METHODS Patients with clinical T2-4bN0-1M0 gastric adenocarcinoma, as defined by the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual, who underwent gastrectomy from 2006 to 2014 were identified from the NCDB. Multiple logistic regression was conducted to examine factors associated with preoperative chemotherapy use. RESULTS This study identified 16,945 patients who met the criteria, and 8286 of these patients (49%) underwent preoperative chemotherapy. The use of preoperative chemotherapy remarkably increased over the study period, from 34% in 2006 to 65% in 2014. Preoperative chemotherapy was more commonly used for cardia tumors than noncardia tumors (83% vs 44% in 2014). In a multivariable analysis, races and ethnicities other than non-Hispanic (NH) white race were associated with less frequent use of preoperative chemotherapy in comparison with NH whites after adjustments for social, tumor, and hospital factors. The insurance status and the education level mediated an enhanced effect of racial/ethnic disparities in preoperative chemotherapy use. The use of preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy was associated with reduced racial/ethnic disparities in overall survival. CONCLUSIONS Racial/ethnic disparities in the use of preoperative chemotherapy and in outcomes exist among patients with gastric cancer in the United States. Efforts to improve the access to high-quality cancer care in minority groups may reduce racial disparities in gastric cancer in the United States. Cancer 2018;124:998-1007. © 2018 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Janice N Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Barry Feig
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Xianglin L Du
- Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Jose-Miguel Yamal
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Wayne Hofstetter
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Prajnan Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jaffer A Ajani
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Christina L Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Keith Fournier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Richard Royal
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Paul Mansfield
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Brian D Badgwell
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Amaria RN, Prieto PA, Tetzlaff MT, Reuben A, Andrews MC, Ross MI, Glitza IC, Cormier J, Hwu WJ, Tawbi HA, Patel SP, Lee JE, Gershenwald JE, Spencer CN, Gopalakrishnan V, Bassett R, Simpson L, Mouton R, Hudgens CW, Zhao L, Zhu H, Cooper ZA, Wani K, Lazar A, Hwu P, Diab A, Wong MK, McQuade JL, Royal R, Lucci A, Burton EM, Reddy S, Sharma P, Allison J, Futreal PA, Woodman SE, Davies MA, Wargo JA. Neoadjuvant plus adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib versus standard of care in patients with high-risk, surgically resectable melanoma: a single-centre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19:181-193. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30015-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 181] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2017] [Revised: 09/18/2017] [Accepted: 09/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
6
|
Fisher SB, Rafeeq S, Hess K, Grotz TE, Mansfield P, Royal R, Badgwell B, Fleming J, Fournier K, Mann GN. Elevated brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) is an early marker for patients at risk for complications after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC). J Surg Oncol 2017; 117:685-691. [PMID: 29193085 DOI: 10.1002/jso.24904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2017] [Accepted: 10/15/2017] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Elevated BNP is associated with adverse cardiac outcomes after noncardiac surgery. We assessed BNP values as markers of perioperative fluid status and their correlation with major/cardiopulmonary (CP) complications following CRS + HIPEC. METHODS Fluid balance, BNP levels, and morbidity data were collected for all patients undergoing CRS + HIPEC between 6/2014 and 2/2016. RESULTS One hundred and twenty-nine patients underwent CRS + HIPEC for appendiceal adenocarcinoma (n = 99), mesothelioma (n = 16), and colon cancer (n = 14). Less than 10% had CP comorbidities. The median PCI was 14 (range 4-39); 89% underwent CC0/1 resection (n = 115). Median blood loss (EBL) was 497 mL (50-2700). Major complications (Clavien III-V) occurred in 16 (12%), CP in 17 (13%), and major/CP in 24 (18%). Thirty-day mortality occurred in 2 (1.5%). Elevated BNP on POD1 correlated with increased risk of major/CP complications (OR 2.2, P = 0.052). This was most pronounced in the 25 patients receiving cisplatin: for each 100 unit increase in POD1 BNP the OR for major/CP complication was 7.4 versus 1.2 for the remaining patients, P = 0.083. Multivariate analysis identified increased EBL (OR 4.1 P = 0.011) and a trend toward increased BNP on POD1 (OR for each 100 unit increase 2.0, P = 0.10) as risk factors for major/CP complications. CONCLUSIONS Postoperative BNP measurement after CRS + HIPEC may guide postoperative fluid resuscitation and facilitate identification of patients at risk for major and/or cardiopulmonary complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah B Fisher
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Safia Rafeeq
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ken Hess
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Travis E Grotz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Paul Mansfield
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Richard Royal
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Brian Badgwell
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jason Fleming
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Keith Fournier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Gary N Mann
- Department of Surgery, Arnot Ogden Medical Center, Elmira, New York
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Badgwell B, Blum M, Das P, Estrella J, Wang X, Ho L, Fournier K, Royal R, Mansfield P, Ajani J. Phase II Trial of Laparoscopic Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemoperfusion for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis or Positive Peritoneal Cytology in Patients with Gastric Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2017; 24:3338-3344. [PMID: 28799004 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-6047-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this phase II study was to perform neoadjuvant hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (HIPEC) via a minimally invasive approach without cytoreduction for patients with gastric cancer and positive peritoneal cytology or low-volume peritoneal carcinomatosis. METHODS Patients with gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma and positive peritoneal cytology or radiologically occult peritoneal carcinomatosis after systemic chemotherapy received laparoscopic HIPEC with mitomycin C 30 mg and cisplatin 200 mg. Patients whose peritoneal disease resolved were offered gastrectomy. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), with secondary endpoints of HIPEC complications and gastrectomy rate. RESULTS We enrolled 19 patients (6 with positive peritoneal cytology only and 13 with peritoneal carcinomatosis) and treated them with 38 laparoscopic HIPEC procedures. Patients had received a median of 8 cycles (range 3-12) of systemic chemotherapy prior to enrollment. Fourteen patients were also treated with chemoradiotherapy before or between cycles of HIPEC. The complication rate for HIPEC was 11% (4 of 38 procedures), the 30-day mortality rate was 0%, and the median length of hospital stay after HIPEC was 3 days (range 2-6). Five patients went on to receive gastrectomy. The median follow-up was 18.9 months, the median OS from the date of diagnosis of metastatic disease was 30.2 months, and the median OS from the first laparoscopic HIPEC was 20.3 months. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic HIPEC was well tolerated, and an encouraging number of patients demonstrated an absence of peritoneal disease after HIPEC and were able to undergo gastrectomy. Comparative studies will be required to clarify survival benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Badgwell
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Mariela Blum
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Prajnan Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeannelyn Estrella
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xuemei Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Linus Ho
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Keith Fournier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Richard Royal
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Paul Mansfield
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jaffer Ajani
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Woodman SE, Prieto P, Andrews MC, Amaria RN, Tetzlaff M, Diab A, Patel SP, Wen-Jen H, Glitza I, Tawbi H, Hwu P, Cormier J, Lucci A, Royal R, Lee J, Bassett R, Simpson L, Burton E, Zhao L, Grimm E, Reuben A, Spencer C, Oba J, Ross M, Gershenwald J, Davies M, Wargo JA. Abstract CT156: Novel neoadjuvant targeted therapy trial yields insight into molecular mechanisms of response. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-ct156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Major advances have been made in the treatment of metastatic melanoma through the use of molecularly targeted therapy and immunotherapy, and trials incorporating these agents are now being extended to patients with earlier-stage disease. The current standard of care (SOC) therapy for high-risk resectable melanoma (stage IIIB/IIIC) is upfront surgery and SOC adjuvant therapy; however, relapse rates are high (~70%). We hypothesized that treatment with neoadjuvant + adjuvant targeted therapy (dabrafenib + trametinib) in this patient population would result in lower relapse rates and prolonged survival over SOC therapy.
Methods: To test this hypothesis, we designed a randomized clinical trial (NCT02231775) in patients with resectable Stage IIIB/C or oligometastatic stage IV BRAF-mutant melanoma. Patients were randomized 1:2 to SOC (Arm A) versus neoadjuvant + adjuvant D+T (Arm B, 8 wks neoadjuvant + 44 wks adjuvant). The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS) with additional secondary endpoints. Importantly longitudinal sampling of tumor tissue was obtained (at baseline, week 3, and surgery) and molecular profiling was performed to gain insights into mechanisms of therapeutic response.
Results: 21 of 84 patients were enrolled (arm A=7, arm B=14). Arms were well matched, and toxicity to targeted therapy was limited. RECIST response rate to 8 wks D+T was 77%, with a pathologic complete response rate (pCR) of 58%. Interim analysis revealed a significantly higher RFS in the D+T arm over SOC (p<0.0001), substantiating early stoppage of the trial. Notably, achievement of a pCR correlated with durable clinical benefit. Tumor mutational load was similar in those achieving a pCR versus those who did not, however known recurrent gene alterations in melanoma were noted to be more abundant in those who failed to achieve a pCR. Transcriptomic profiling in longitudinal tumor samples revealed differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that were highly correlated with achieving a pCR. Initial functional analysis of DEGs implicate multiple cancer cell-intrinsic (differentiation, MAPK pathway and metabolic) features and immune microenvironmental factors to be associated with response to neoadjuvant targeted therapy.
Conclusion: Neoadjuvant + adjuvant D+T is associated with a high pCR rate and improved RFS over SOC in patients with high-risk resectable metastatic melanoma. Pathological and molecular correlative analysis revealed both pre- and on-treatment tumor features to be highly associated with the high pCR rate.
Citation Format: Scott E. Woodman, Peter Prieto, Miles C. Andrews, Rodabe N. Amaria, Michael Tetzlaff, Adi Diab, Sapna P. Patel, Hwu Wen-Jen, Isabella Glitza, Hussein Tawbi, Patrick Hwu, Janice Cormier, Anthony Lucci, Richard Royal, Jeffrey Lee, Roland Bassett, Lauren Simpson, Elizabeth Burton, Li Zhao, Elizabeth Grimm, Alexandre Reuben, Christine Spencer, Junna Oba, Merrick Ross, Jeffrey Gershenwald, Michael Davies, Jennifer A. Wargo. Novel neoadjuvant targeted therapy trial yields insight into molecular mechanisms of response [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT156. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-CT156
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Adi Diab
- UT MD Anderson Cancer Ctr., Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Li Zhao
- UT MD Anderson Cancer Ctr., Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | - Junna Oba
- UT MD Anderson Cancer Ctr., Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fournier K, Rafeeq S, Taggart M, Kanaby P, Ning J, Chen HC, Overman M, Raghav K, Eng C, Mansfield P, Royal R. Low-grade Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasm of Uncertain Malignant Potential (LAMN-UMP): Prognostic Factors and Implications for Treatment and Follow-up. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 24:187-193. [PMID: 27660258 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5588-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2016] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential are poorly understood lesions characterized by extraluminal mucin or fibrosis with neoplastic cells confined to the appendiceal lumen. The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical and pathologic parameters of these lesions to optimize our understanding and management of these tumors. METHODS Subjects with these tumors were identified from the appendiceal tumor databases at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses assessed relationships between clinicopathologic variables [including age, gender, margin status and serum levels of the tumor markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen (CA)-125, and CA19-9] disease-free survival, postrecurrence survival and overall survival. RESULTS Ninety-eight subjects with this disease were identified. Most patients did not experience disease recurrence after initial appendectomy. At last follow-up, 25 (26 %) had disease recurrence or died. Of the 20 patients who had disease recurrence, 5 (25 %) died, and 15 (75 %) were alive. Disease-free survival was significantly reduced with positive margin status (p = 0.02) and elevated serum levels of CEA (p < 0.001), CA19-9 (p = 0.01), or CA-125 (p = 0.002) at the time of appendectomy. The median postrecurrence survival time was 4.7 years and the 5-year postrecurrence survival rate was 41 % (standard error = 18 %). CONCLUSIONS Patients with Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential who have negative margins and normal tumor marker levels have a lower risk for recurrence. In these patients, expectant management is sufficient. Elevated tumor marker levels at the time of appendectomy marks an increased risk of recurrence or death and signals the need for closer monitoring or intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith Fournier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Safia Rafeeq
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Melissa Taggart
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Paul Kanaby
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jing Ning
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hsiang-Chun Chen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael Overman
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kanwal Raghav
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Cathy Eng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Paul Mansfield
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Richard Royal
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Beasley GM, Speicher P, Augustine CK, Dolber PC, Peterson BL, Sharma K, Mosca PJ, Royal R, Ross M, Zager JS, Tyler DS. A multicenter phase I dose escalation trial to evaluate safety and tolerability of intra-arterial temozolomide for patients with advanced extremity melanoma using normothermic isolated limb infusion. Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 22:287-94. [PMID: 25145500 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3887-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2014] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND L-phenylalanine mustard (LPAM) has been the standard for use in regional chemotherapy (RC) for unresectable in-transit melanoma. Preclinical data demonstrated that regional temozolomide (TMZ) may be more effective. METHODS Patients with AJCC Stage IIIB or IIIC extremity melanoma who failed previous LPAM-based RC were treated with TMZ via isolated limb infusion (ILI) according to a modified accelerated titration design. Drug pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis, tumor gene expression, methylation status of the O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter, and MGMT expression were evaluated. Primary objectives were to (1) determine dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of TMZ via ILI and (2) explore biomarker correlates of response. RESULTS 28 patients completed treatment over 2.5 years at 3 institutions. 19 patients were treated at the MTD defined as 3,200 mg/m(2) [multiplied by 0.09 (arm), 0.18 (leg)]. Two of five patients had DLTs at the 3,600 mg/m(2) level while only grade 1 (n = 15) and grade 2 (n = 4) clinical toxicities occurred at the MTD. At 3-month post-ILI, 10.5 % (2/19) had CR, 5.3 % (1/19) had PR, 15.8 % (3/19) had SD, and 68.4 % (13/19) had PD. Neither PK parameters of TMZ nor MGMT levels were associated with response or toxicity. CONCLUSION In this first ever use of intra-arterial TMZ in ILI for melanoma, the MTD was determined. While we could not define a marker for TMZ response, the minimal toxicity of TMZ ILI may allow for repeated treatments to increase the response rate as well as clarify the role of MGMT expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgia M Beasley
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Raghav KP, Shetty AV, Kazmi SM, Zhang N, Morris J, Taggart M, Fournier K, Royal R, Mansfield P, Eng C, Wolff RA, Overman MJ. Impact of molecular alterations and targeted therapy in appendiceal adenocarcinomas. Oncologist 2013; 18:1270-7. [PMID: 24149137 PMCID: PMC3868421 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2013] [Accepted: 08/28/2013] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED Appendiceal adenocarcinomas (AAs) are rare and this has limited their molecular understanding. The purpose of our study was to characterize the molecular profile of AA and explore the role of targeted therapy against cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective review of 607 patients with AA at a single institution. A total of 149 patients underwent molecular testing for at least one of the following: activating mutations in KRAS, BRAF, cKIT, EGFR, or PI3K; protein expression of c-KIT or COX-2; or microsatellite instability (MSI) status by immunohistochemistry. Kaplan-Meier product limit method and log-rank test were used to estimate overall survival (OS) and to determine associations among OS, COX-2 expression, KRAS mutations, and other characteristics. RESULTS Age, grade, stage, signet ring cells, mucinous histology, and completeness of cytoreduction score correlated with survival outcomes. COX-2 expression, KRAS, PI3K, and BRAF mutations were seen in 61%, 55%, 17%, and 4% of patients, respectively. High MSI was seen in 6% of patients. KRAS mutation was strongly associated with well differentiated or moderately differentiated AA (p < .01). COX-2 expression (p = .33) and the presence of KRAS mutation (p = .91) had no impact on OS. The use of celecoxib in patients whose tumors expressed COX-2 (p = .84) and the use of cetuximab or panitumumab in patients with KRAS wild-type tumors (p = .83) also had no impact on OS. CONCLUSION In this cohort, we demonstrated that COX-2 expression and KRAS mutations were frequently seen in AA, although neither exhibited any prognostic significance. MSI was infrequent in AA. Targeted therapy against COX-2 and EGFR appeared to provide no clinical benefit. Well and moderately differentiated AA were molecularly distinct from poorly differentiated AA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Aditya V. Shetty
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Keith Fournier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston Texas, USA
| | - Richard Royal
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston Texas, USA
| | - Paul Mansfield
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston Texas, USA
| | - Cathy Eng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Overman MJ, Fournier K, Hu CY, Eng C, Taggart M, Royal R, Mansfield P, Chang GJ. Improving the AJCC/TNM staging for adenocarcinomas of the appendix: the prognostic impact of histological grade. Ann Surg 2013; 257:1072-8. [PMID: 23001080 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e318269d680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Though histological grade is known to have a major prognostic impact in metastatic mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinomas, the prognostic impact of grade in localized disease, and the validity of the American Joint Committee on Cancer AJCC Staging Manual 7th edition's decision to combine moderately and poorly differentiated mucinous adenocarcinomas into a single mucinous high-grade category, is not known. METHODS Patients with adenocarcinoma of the appendix diagnosed between 1988 and 2007 were identified from the SEER database. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) stratified by histological subtype, stage, and grade was calculated, and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed. RESULTS We analyzed a total of 2469 appendiceal adenocarcinomas, of which 1375 had mucinous histology and 860 had nonmucinous histology. Though overall CSS was similar for mucinous and nonmucinous subtypes, differences in stage distribution and stage-stratified CSS were seen. Female sex, stage IV disease, and well-differentiated histology were more common for mucinous adenocarcinomas. Histological grade had a strong prognostic impact, especially in patients with stage IV mucinous adenocarcinoma. The adjusted hazard ratios for stage IV moderately and poorly differentiated histological grade were 1.63 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14-2.34] and 4.94 (95% CI: 3.32-7.35) for mucinous histology, in comparison with 1.44 (95% CI: 0.82-2.52) and 1.90 (95% CI: 0.95-3.80) for nonmucinous histology, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The strong prognostic impact of histological grade for mucinous adenocarcinomas is primarily restricted to stage IV disease. Stage IV moderately and poorly differentiated mucinous adenocarcinomas have distinctly different CSS and these data do not support the combination of these 2 histological grades in the recent AJCC Staging Manual 7th edition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Overman
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Turaga K, Levine E, Barone R, Sticca R, Petrelli N, Lambert L, Nash G, Morse M, Adbel-Misih R, Alexander HR, Attiyeh F, Bartlett D, Bastidas A, Blazer T, Chu Q, Chung K, Dominguez-Parra L, Espat NJ, Foster J, Fournier K, Garcia R, Goodman M, Hanna N, Harrison L, Hoefer R, Holtzman M, Kane J, Labow D, Li B, Lowy A, Mansfield P, Ong E, Pameijer C, Pingpank J, Quinones M, Royal R, Salti G, Sardi A, Shen P, Skitzki J, Spellman J, Stewart J, Esquivel J. Consensus guidelines from The American Society of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies on standardizing the delivery of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in colorectal cancer patients in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 21:1501-5. [PMID: 23793364 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3061-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 133] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2012] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The American Society of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies (ASPSM) is a consortium of cancer centers performing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). This is a position paper from the ASPSM on the standardization of the delivery of HIPEC. METHODS A survey was conducted of all cancer centers performing HIPEC in the United States. We attempted to obtain consensus by the modified method of Delphi on seven key HIPEC parameters: (1) method, (2) inflow temperature, (3) perfusate volume, (4) drug, (5) dosage, (6) timing of drug delivery, and (7) total perfusion time. Statistical analysis was performed using nonparametric tests. RESULTS Response rates for ASPSM members (n = 45) and non-ASPSM members (n = 24) were 89 and 33 %, respectively. Of the responders from ASPSM members, 95 % agreed with implementing the proposal. Majority of the surgical oncologists favored the closed method of delivery with a standardized dual dose of mitomycin for a 90-min chemoperfusion for patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin. CONCLUSIONS This recommendation on a standardized delivery of HIPEC in patients with colorectal cancer represents an important first step in enhancing research in this field. Studies directed at maximizing the efficacy of each of the seven key elements will need to follow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Turaga
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Alexander HR, Bartlett DL, Pingpank JF, Libutti SK, Royal R, Hughes MS, Holtzman M, Hanna N, Turner K, Beresneva T, Zhu Y. Treatment factors associated with long-term survival after cytoreductive surgery and regional chemotherapy for patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma. Surgery 2013; 153:779-86. [PMID: 23489943 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2012] [Accepted: 01/04/2013] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is a primary cancer that arises diffusely from the mesothelial cells lining the peritoneum. Morbidity and mortality are almost invariably owing to locoregional progression. Cytoreduction surgery (CRS) with intraoperative or perioperative high-dose regional chemotherapy has been established as the preferred approach in selected patients. This study was performed to identify factors associated with long-term outcome. METHODS Between January 1992 and 2010, 211 patients with MPM treated at 3 major referral centers with operative CRS and hyperthermic intraoperative peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) were analyzed. RESULTS The median, actuarial overall survival was 38.4 months; the actuarial 5- and 10-year survivals were 41% and 26%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, factors independently associated with favorable outcome were younger age <60 years (P < .01), complete or near complete (R0-1) versus incomplete (R2-3) resection (P < .02), low versus high histologic grade (P < .01), and the use of cisplatin versus mitomycin-C during HIPEC (P < .01). There was a trend toward female sex and improved survival (male hazard ratio, 1.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-2.41; P = .13). CONCLUSION Operative CRS with HIPEC is associated with prolonged survival in patients with MPM. Factors associated with survival include age, complete or near complete gross tumor resection, histologic tumor grade, and HIPEC with cisplatin. Cisplatin (versus mitomycin-C) was independently associated with improved survival and demonstrates a salutary effect for HIPEC with cisplatin in the management of patients with MPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Richard Alexander
- Divisions of General and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Radvanyi LG, Bernatchez C, Zhang M, Fox PS, Miller P, Chacon J, Wu R, Lizee G, Mahoney S, Alvarado G, Glass M, Johnson VE, McMannis JD, Shpall E, Prieto V, Papadopoulos N, Kim K, Homsi J, Bedikian A, Hwu WJ, Patel S, Ross MI, Lee JE, Gershenwald JE, Lucci A, Royal R, Cormier JN, Davies MA, Mansaray R, Fulbright OJ, Toth C, Ramachandran R, Wardell S, Gonzalez A, Hwu P. Specific lymphocyte subsets predict response to adoptive cell therapy using expanded autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in metastatic melanoma patients. Clin Cancer Res 2012; 18:6758-70. [PMID: 23032743 PMCID: PMC3525747 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-12-1177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 298] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) using autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) is a promising treatment for metastatic melanoma unresponsive to conventional therapies. We report here on the results of an ongoing phase II clinical trial testing the efficacy of ACT using TIL in patients with metastatic melanoma and the association of specific patient clinical characteristics and the phenotypic attributes of the infused TIL with clinical response. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Altogether, 31 transiently lymphodepleted patients were treated with their expanded TIL, followed by two cycles of high-dose interleukin (IL)-2 therapy. The effects of patient clinical features and the phenotypes of the T cells infused on the clinical response were determined. RESULTS Overall, 15 of 31 (48.4%) patients had an objective clinical response using immune-related response criteria (irRC) with 2 patients (6.5%) having a complete response. Progression-free survival of more than 12 months was observed for 9 of 15 (60%) of the responding patients. Factors significantly associated with the objective tumor regression included a higher number of TIL infused, a higher proportion of CD8(+) T cells in the infusion product, a more differentiated effector phenotype of the CD8(+) population, and a higher frequency of CD8(+) T cells coexpressing the negative costimulation molecule "B- and T-lymphocyte attenuator" (BTLA). No significant difference in the telomere lengths of TIL between responders and nonresponders was identified. CONCLUSION These results indicate that the immunotherapy with expanded autologous TIL is capable of achieving durable clinical responses in patients with metastatic melanoma and that CD8(+) T cells in the infused TIL, particularly differentiated effectors cells and cells expressing BTLA, are associated with tumor regression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laszlo G. Radvanyi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Chantale Bernatchez
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Minying Zhang
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Patricia S. Fox
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Priscilla Miller
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Jessica Chacon
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Richard Wu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Gregory Lizee
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Sandy Mahoney
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Gladys Alvarado
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Michelle Glass
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Valen E. Johnson
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - John D. McMannis
- Department of Stem Cell Transplant and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Elizabeth Shpall
- Department of Stem Cell Transplant and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Victor Prieto
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Nicholas Papadopoulos
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Kevin Kim
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Jade Homsi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Agop Bedikian
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Wen-Jen Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Sapna Patel
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Merrick I. Ross
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Jeffrey E. Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Jeffrey E. Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Anthony Lucci
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Richard Royal
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Janice N. Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Michael A. Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Rahmatu Mansaray
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
- Department of Stem Cell Transplant and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Orenthial J. Fulbright
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
- Department of Stem Cell Transplant and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Christopher Toth
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
- Department of Stem Cell Transplant and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Renjith Ramachandran
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
- Department of Stem Cell Transplant and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Seth Wardell
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
- Department of Stem Cell Transplant and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Audrey Gonzalez
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
- Department of Stem Cell Transplant and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lieu CH, Lambert LA, Wolff RA, Eng C, Zhang N, Wen S, Rafeeq S, Taggart M, Fournier K, Royal R, Mansfield P, Overman MJ. Systemic chemotherapy and surgical cytoreduction for poorly differentiated and signet ring cell adenocarcinomas of the appendix. Ann Oncol 2012; 23:652-658. [PMID: 21653683 PMCID: PMC3331734 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdr279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2011] [Revised: 04/06/2011] [Accepted: 04/07/2011] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Poorly differentiated and signet ring cell adenocarcinomas of the appendix represent a subset with aggressive tumor biology and poor outcomes with few studies evaluating the impact of systemic chemotherapy and cytoreductive surgery (CRS). PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective chart review of patients with either poorly differentiated and signet ring cell appendiceal adenocarcinomas was completed from 1992 to 2010. RESULTS One hundred forty-two patients were identified. Seventy-eight patients with metastatic disease received chemotherapy. Radiographic response was 44%, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.9 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 1.7 years. In multivariate analysis, response to chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) 0.5; P = 0.02] predicted improved PFS, and complete CRS (HR 0.3; P = 0.004) predicted improved OS. Patients who underwent complete CRS (n = 26) had a median relapse-free survival (RFS) of 1.2 years and a median OS of 4.2 years. In multivariate analysis for this subset, complete cytoreduction score of 0 was significantly correlated with improved RFS (HR 0.07; P = 0.01) and OS (HR 0.02; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Systemic chemotherapy appears to be a viable treatment option for patients with metastatic poorly differentiated and signet ring cell appendiceal adenocarcinomas. Complete CRS is associated with improved RFS and OS, though part of this benefit likely reflects the selection of good tumor biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C H Lieu
- Departments of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology
| | | | - R A Wolff
- Departments of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology
| | - C Eng
- Departments of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology
| | - N Zhang
- Departments of Biostatistics
| | - S Wen
- Departments of Biostatistics
| | - S Rafeeq
- Departments of Surgical Oncology
| | - M Taggart
- Departments of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | | | - R Royal
- Departments of Surgical Oncology
| | | | - M J Overman
- Departments of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Beasley GM, Riboh JC, Augustine CK, Zager JS, Hochwald SN, Grobmyer SR, Peterson B, Royal R, Ross MI, Tyler DS. Prospective multicenter phase II trial of systemic ADH-1 in combination with melphalan via isolated limb infusion in patients with advanced extremity melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29:1210-5. [PMID: 21343562 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.32.1224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Isolated limb infusion (ILI) with melphalan (M-ILI) dosing corrected for ideal body weight (IBW) is a well-tolerated treatment for patients with in-transit melanoma with a 29% complete response rate. ADH-1 is a cyclic pentapeptide that disrupts N-cadherin adhesion complexes. In a preclinical animal model, systemic ADH-1 given with regional melphalan demonstrated synergistic antitumor activity, and in a phase I trial with M-ILI it had minimal toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage IIIB or IIIC extremity melanoma were treated with 4,000 mg of ADH-1, administered systemically on days 1 and 8, and with M-ILI corrected for IBW on day 1. Drug pharmacokinetics and N-cadherin immunohistochemical staining were performed on pretreatment tumor. The primary end point was response at 12 weeks determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. RESULTS In all, 45 patients were enrolled over 15 months at four institutions. In-field responses included 17 patients with complete responses (CRs; 38%), 10 with partial responses (22%), six with stable disease (13%), eight with progressive disease (18%), and four (9%) who were not evaluable. Median duration of in-field response among the 17 CRs was 5 months, and median time to in-field progression among 41 evaluable patients was 4.6 months (95% CI, 4.0 to 7.1 months). N-cadherin was detected in 20 (69%) of 29 tumor samples. Grade 4 toxicities included creatinine phosphokinase increase (four patients), arterial injury (one), neutropenia (one), and pneumonitis (one). CONCLUSION To the best of our knowledge, this phase II trial is the first prospective multicenter ILI trial and the first to incorporate a targeted agent in an attempt to augment antitumor responses to regional chemotherapy. Although targeting N-cadherin may improve melanoma sensitivity to chemotherapy, no difference in response to treatment was seen in this study.
Collapse
|
18
|
Fournier KF, Royal R, Lambert LA, Taggart M, Rafeeq S, Mansfield PF. Mucinous appendiceal tumors of uncertain malignant potential (UMP): Prognostic factors and implications for treatment and follow-up. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.4_suppl.372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
372 Background: The diagnosis of UMP is used for dysplastic mucinous tumors that are difficult to classify as clearly benign or malignant. Given the rarity of this tumor, management of these patients is unclear. Methods: All patients with a pathologic diagnosis of an appendiceal mucinous UMP who underwent evaluation at a single institution between September 1993 and July 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, operative findings, pathology, tumor markers, procedures performed, recurrence, overall survival, and disease-free survival were determined. Results: Of 688 patients with appendiceal neoplasms, 62 (9%) patients (pts) were identified as having UMP. Initial procedures included: appendectomy - 45, colectomy - 11, cytoreduction - 2, and other - 4. Median follow-up was 43.2 months (range 2-184 mos). Median overall survival (OS) was 11.5 years (range 2-184 mos). Median disease-free survival (DFS) has not been reached. There was a trend towards improved DFS in patients who are: female, < 65 years of age, or have mucin confined to the appendix or its serosal surface. Clinicopathologic factors associated with a significantly worse overall DFS included elevated serum CEA (3.6 years, p = 0.0129) and CA-125 (4.16 years, p = 0.0288). DFS at 8 years follow-up in patients with a normal CEA was as follows: 100% if mucin confined to lumen of the appendix, 90% if mucin confined to serosa, and 69% if mucin was in an extra-appendiceal location. 15 patients developed recurrent disease and had an OS of 4.6 years after recurrence. Conclusions: Mucinous UMP tumors of the appendix have an overall favorable prognosis. In patients with a negative margin and mucin confined to the appendix or serosa, expectant management may be sufficient. Elevation of CEA or CA-125 may warrant closer monitoring or intervention. If confirmed in a larger cohort, these findings may have substantial implications for management of these patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K. F. Fournier
- University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, MA
| | - R. Royal
- University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, MA
| | - L. A. Lambert
- University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, MA
| | - M. Taggart
- University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, MA
| | - S. Rafeeq
- University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, MA
| | - P. F. Mansfield
- University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, MA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Xing Y, Bronstein Y, Ross MI, Askew RL, Lee JE, Gershenwald JE, Royal R, Cormier JN. Contemporary diagnostic imaging modalities for the staging and surveillance of melanoma patients: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010; 103:129-42. [PMID: 21081714 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djq455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 210] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Meta-analyses were performed to examine the utility of ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), and a combination of both (PET-CT) for the staging and surveillance of melanoma patients. METHOD Patient-level data from 74 studies containing 10,528 patients (between January 1, 1990, and June, 30, 2009) were used to derive characteristics of the diagnostic tests used. Meta-analyses were conducted by use of Bayesian bivariate binomial models to estimate sensitivity and specificity. Diagnostic odds ratios [ie, true-positive results/false-negative results)/(false-positive results/true-negative results)] and their 95% credible intervals (CrIs) and positive predictive values were used as indicators of test performance. RESULTS Among the four imaging methods examined for the staging of regional lymph nodes, ultrasonography had the highest sensitivity (60%, 95% CrI = 33% to 83%), specificity (97%, 95% CrI = 88% to 99%), and diagnostic odds ratio (42, 95% CrI = 8.08 to 249.8). For staging of distant metastases, PET-CT had the highest sensitivity (80%, 95% CrI = 53% to 93%), specificity (87%, 95% CrI = 54% to 97%), and diagnostic odds ratio (25, 95% CrI = 3.58 to 198.7). Similar trends were observed for melanoma surveillance of lymph node involvement, with ultrasonography having the highest sensitivity (96%, 95% CrI = 85% to 99%), specificity (99%, 95% CrI = 95% to 100%), and diagnostic odds ratio (1675, 95% CrI = 226.6 to 15,920). For distant metastases, PET-CT had the highest sensitivity (86%, 95% CrI = 76% to 93%), specificity (91%, 95% CrI = 79% to 97%), and diagnostic odds ratio (67, 95% CrI = 20.42 to 229.7). Positive predictive values were likewise highest for ultrasonography in lymph node staging and for PET-CT in detecting distant metastases. CONCLUSION Among the compared modalities, ultrasonography was superior for detecting lymph node metastases, and PET-CT was superior for the detection of distant metastases in both the staging and surveillance of melanoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Xing
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030-4009, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pingpank JF, Hughes MS, Alexander HR, Faries MB, Zager JS, Royal R, Whitman ED, Nutting CW, Siskin GP, Agarwala SS. A phase III random assignment trial comparing percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan (PHP-mel) to standard of care for patients with hepatic metastases from metastatic ocular or cutaneous melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2010. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.28.18_suppl.lba8512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
LBA8512 Background: Patients with hepatic metastases from primary melanoma have a median survival between 6 and 9 months. Few treatment strategies provide a meaningful impact on outcome. This report examines the efficacy of a minimally invasive regional therapy with melphalan (MEL) in patients with hepatic metastases from malignant melanoma. Methods: Between February 2006 and October 2009, 93 patients (M:F; 45:48) were accrued to a phase III, random-assignment trial comparing percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP-mel) (n=44) to standard of care (BAC) (n=49). This represents 100% of a planned 92 patient accrual. The primary endpoint was hepatic progression-free survival (H-PFS). Crossover to PHP-mel therapy was permitted at hepatic progression. Secondary endpoints included assessment of response rate (RR), duration of response (RES), and overall survival (OS) after PHP. A planned PHP treatment regimen included 4 to 6 PHP procedures at 28 to 35 day intervals. MEL (3.0 mg/kg) was delivered via the hepatic artery in a 30-minute hepatic artery infusion via a percutaneously placed catheter with hepatic venous hemofiltration using a retrohepatic, double balloon catheter (Delcath Systems, Inc.) and paired hemofiltration cartridges. Patients randomized to BAC were offered treatment considered to be the best alternative regimen by the treating physician. Staging evaluations were performed at baseline and then at 6 to 8 week intervals post baseline. All responses represent investigator-based results and were evaluated via standard RECIST criteria. Intent to treat based survival analysis was via the Kaplan-Meier method, with a 2-sided p< 0.05 defining significance. Results: Median H-PFS was 245 days (CI:136, 267) for PHP-mel vs. 49 days (CI:43, 68) for BAC (p<0.001). Overall response rate was 34.1 % (15/44) (CI: 20.5, 49.9) for PHP (15/44) vs. 2.0 % (1/49) (CI: 0.1, 10.9) for BAC (p<0.001). Upon hepatic progression, crossover to PHP occurred in 27 patients (55%) randomized to BAC. Conclusions: For patients with metastatic melanoma to the liver, H-PFS is significantly improved with PHP-mel versus best available care. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. F. Pingpank
- University of Pittsburgh, Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Surgery Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Atlantic Melanoma Center, Morristown, NJ; Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO; Albany Medical Center Hospital, Albany, NY; St. Luke's Hospital and
| | - M. S. Hughes
- University of Pittsburgh, Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Surgery Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Atlantic Melanoma Center, Morristown, NJ; Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO; Albany Medical Center Hospital, Albany, NY; St. Luke's Hospital and
| | - H. R. Alexander
- University of Pittsburgh, Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Surgery Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Atlantic Melanoma Center, Morristown, NJ; Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO; Albany Medical Center Hospital, Albany, NY; St. Luke's Hospital and
| | - M. B. Faries
- University of Pittsburgh, Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Surgery Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Atlantic Melanoma Center, Morristown, NJ; Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO; Albany Medical Center Hospital, Albany, NY; St. Luke's Hospital and
| | - J. S. Zager
- University of Pittsburgh, Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Surgery Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Atlantic Melanoma Center, Morristown, NJ; Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO; Albany Medical Center Hospital, Albany, NY; St. Luke's Hospital and
| | - R. Royal
- University of Pittsburgh, Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Surgery Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Atlantic Melanoma Center, Morristown, NJ; Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO; Albany Medical Center Hospital, Albany, NY; St. Luke's Hospital and
| | - E. D. Whitman
- University of Pittsburgh, Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Surgery Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Atlantic Melanoma Center, Morristown, NJ; Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO; Albany Medical Center Hospital, Albany, NY; St. Luke's Hospital and
| | - C. W. Nutting
- University of Pittsburgh, Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Surgery Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Atlantic Melanoma Center, Morristown, NJ; Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO; Albany Medical Center Hospital, Albany, NY; St. Luke's Hospital and
| | - G. P. Siskin
- University of Pittsburgh, Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Surgery Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Atlantic Melanoma Center, Morristown, NJ; Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO; Albany Medical Center Hospital, Albany, NY; St. Luke's Hospital and
| | - S. S. Agarwala
- University of Pittsburgh, Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Surgery Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Atlantic Melanoma Center, Morristown, NJ; Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO; Albany Medical Center Hospital, Albany, NY; St. Luke's Hospital and
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Xing Y, Bronstein Y, Ross MI, Askew RL, Lee JE, Gershenwald JE, Royal R, Cormier JN. Diagnostic imaging modalities for the surveillance of melanoma patients: A meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 2010. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.28.15_suppl.8581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
22
|
Cormier JN, Shih YT, Xu Y, Pan I, Askew RL, Ross MI, Gershenwald JE, Lee JE, Royal R, Xing Y. The impact of physician specialty on quality of melanoma care. J Clin Oncol 2010. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.28.15_suppl.8563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
23
|
Chang SB, Askew RL, Xing Y, Weaver S, Gershenwald JE, Lee JE, Royal R, Lucci A, Ross MI, Cormier JN. Prospective assessment of postoperative complications and associated costs following inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) in melanoma patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2010; 17:2764-72. [PMID: 20336388 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1026-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2009] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We prospectively assessed the incidence, risk factors, and costs associated with wound complications and lymphedema in melanoma patients undergoing inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND). MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 53 melanoma patients were accrued to 2 trials (June 2005 to July 2008) that included prospective evaluations of postoperative complications; 30-day wound complications included infection, seroma, and/or dehiscence. There were 20 patients who underwent limb volume measurement and completed a 19-item lymphedema symptom assessment questionnaire preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. A multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate potential risk factors for complications. A microcosting analysis was also performed to evaluate the direct costs associated with wound complications. RESULTS The 30-day wound complications were noted in 77.4% of patients. A BMI ≥ 30 (n = 28) increased the risk for wound complications (odds ratio [OR] = 11.4, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.6-78.5, P = .01), while advanced nodal disease approached significance (OR = 9.0, 95%CI: 0.79-103.1, P = .08). Other risk factors, including diabetes, smoking, and the addition of a deep pelvic (iliac/obturator) dissection to ILND, were not significant. Of 20 patients, 9 (45%) developed limb volume change (LVC) ≥5% at 3 months, with associated mean symptom scores of 6.1 versus 4.6 for those without LVC. Costs for patients with wound complications were significantly higher than for those without wound complications. CONCLUSIONS Postoperative wound complications and early onset lymphedema occur frequently following ILND for melanoma. Obesity is an adverse risk factor for 30-day wound complications that can significantly increase postoperative costs, as is likely the case for advanced disease. Risk reduction practices and novel treatment approaches are needed to reduce postoperative morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon B Chang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Levy E, Chang R, Neeman Z, Abi-Jaoudeh N, Hughes M, Kammula U, Avital I, Royal R, Libutti S, Alexander H, Pingpank J, Wood B. Abstract No. 114: Percutaneous hepatic perfusion: Single institution review of technical considerations. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.12.266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
25
|
Alexander HR, Bartlett DL, Libutti SK, Pingpank JF, Fraker DL, Royal R, Steinberg SM, Helsabeck CB, Beresneva TH. Analysis of factors associated with outcome in patients undergoing isolated hepatic perfusion for unresectable liver metastases from colorectal center. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16:1852-9. [PMID: 19434456 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-009-0482-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2008] [Revised: 02/05/2009] [Accepted: 02/06/2009] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
AIM To define the indications for hyperthermic isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) in patients with unresectable liver metastases (LM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) with particular focus on IHP's utility as a second-line option for patients whose tumors have progressed following combination systemic chemotherapy treatment. METHODS From June 1994 through July 2005, 120 patients with unresectable CRC LM underwent IHP with melphalan (n = 69), tumor necrosis factor (TNF) (n = 10) or both (n = 41). Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) with floxuridine started 6-8 weeks post IHP in 46 (38%). Patients were followed for toxicity, radiographic response, and overall survival (OS). Wilcoxon rank-sum and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare parameters by response category; survival and hepatic progression-free survival were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Of 79 males and 41 females, 96 (80%) received prior chemotherapy. There were five (4%) operative/treatment mortalities. There were 69 responses in 114 evaluable patients (61%). Total melphalan dose and combination melphalan/TNF were each associated with response; age, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), prior chemotherapy for established LM, tumor burden, and post-IHP HAI therapy were not. Median overall survival was 17.4 months and 2-year survival was 34%. Factors found to be independently related to survival were preoperative CEA <30 ng/mL and use of post-IHP HAI (P < 0.015). CONCLUSIONS IHP results in marked tumor regression and prolonged survival in patients with CRC LM. Continued development of IHP in this clinical setting is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Richard Alexander
- Department of Surgery, Greenebaum Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Miao N, Pingpank JF, Alexander HR, Royal R, Steinberg SM, Quezado MM, Beresnev T, Quezado ZMN. Cytoreductive surgery and continuous hyperthermic peritoneal perfusion in patients with mesothelioma and peritoneal carcinomatosis: hemodynamic, metabolic, and anesthetic considerations. Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 16:334-44. [PMID: 19050961 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-008-0253-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2008] [Revised: 10/01/2008] [Accepted: 10/02/2008] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery and continuous hyperthermic peritoneal perfusion (CHPP) involve the conduct of a complex surgical procedure and delivery of high-dose hyperthermic chemotherapy to the peritoneum. This therapeutic modality has been shown to benefit patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis resulting from gastrointestinal and ovarian tumors and mesothelioma. However, it is unknown whether the primary disease (mesothelioma versus peritoneal carcinomatosis) affects hemodynamic and metabolic perturbations during the course of CHPP with cisplatin. We examined the perioperative course of patients undergoing CHPP with cisplatin and evaluated the effect of primary diagnosis (mesothelioma versus peritoneal carcinomatosis) on hemodynamic and metabolic parameters in response to peritoneal perfusion. Sixty-nine mesothelioma and 100 peritoneal carcinomatosis patients underwent 169 consecutive cytoreduction and CHPP procedures with general anesthesia. During CHPP, patients from both groups developed significant increases in central venous pressure, and heart rate, decreases in mean arterial pressure (all P < 0.0001), metabolic acidosis with significant decreases in pH and bicarbonate (P < 0.0001), deterioration of gas exchange with significant increases in PaCO(2) and oxygen alveolar-arterial gradient (P < 0.0001), and significant increases in activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and prothrombin time (PT) and decreases in hematocrit and platelet counts (all P < 0.0001). However, patients with mesothelioma had lesser increases in temperature (P < 0.01) and heart rate (P < 0.0001) and lesser decreases in hematocrit (P = 0.0013) during CHPP and greater decreases in sodium bicarbonate (P = 0.0082) after completion of CHPP compared with patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. We conclude that the transient hemodynamic and metabolic perturbations associated with cytoreductive surgery and CHPP with cisplatin can vary according to the primary diagnosis (mesothelioma versus peritoneal carcinomatosis) warranting this therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Miao
- Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Services, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, MSC-1512, Building 10, Room 2C624, Bethesda, MD 20892-1512, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Dudley ME, Yang JC, Sherry R, Hughes MS, Royal R, Kammula U, Robbins PF, Huang J, Citrin DE, Leitman SF, Wunderlich J, Restifo NP, Thomasian A, Downey SG, Smith FO, Klapper J, Morton K, Laurencot C, White DE, Rosenberg SA. Adoptive cell therapy for patients with metastatic melanoma: evaluation of intensive myeloablative chemoradiation preparative regimens. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26:5233-9. [PMID: 18809613 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.16.5449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1015] [Impact Index Per Article: 63.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The two approved treatments for patients with metastatic melanoma, interleukin (IL)-2 and dacarbazine, mediate objective response rates of 12% to 15%. We previously reported that adoptive cell therapy (ACT) with autologous antitumor lymphocytes in lymphodepleted hosts mediated objective responses in 51% of 35 patients. Here, we update that study and evaluate the safety and efficacy of two increased-intensity myeloablative lymphodepleting regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed two additional sequential trials of ACT with autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) in patients with metastatic melanoma. Increasing intensity of host preparative lymphodepletion consisting of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine with either 2 (25 patients) or 12 Gy (25 patients) of total-body irradiation (TBI) was administered before cell transfer. Objective response rates by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and survival were evaluated. Immunologic correlates of effective treatment were studied. RESULTS Although nonmyeloablative chemotherapy alone showed an objective response rate of 49%, when 2 or 12 Gy of TBI was added, the response rates were 52% and 72% respectively. Responses were seen in all visceral sites including brain. There was one treatment-related death in the 93 patients. Host lymphodepletion was associated with increased serum levels of the lymphocyte homeostatic cytokines IL-7 and IL-15. Objective responses were correlated with the telomere length of the transferred cells. CONCLUSION Host lymphodepletion followed by autologous TIL transfer and IL-2 results in objective response rates of 50% to 70% in patients with metastatic melanoma refractory to standard therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark E Dudley
- Surgery Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-1201, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Evans KC, Evans RG, Royal R, Esterman AJ, James SL. Effect of caesarean section on breast milk transfer to the normal term newborn over the first week of life. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003; 88:F380-2. [PMID: 12937041 PMCID: PMC1721616 DOI: 10.1136/fn.88.5.f380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 105] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of caesarean section on breast milk transfer (BMT) to the normal term infant over the first week of life. METHOD A sample of 88 healthy nursing mothers who had a normal vaginal delivery, and 97 mothers who had a caesarean section were recruited from a teaching hospital. Mothers and midwives were instructed to weigh the infants before and after each feed throughout the study period using calibrated portable electronic scales. RESULTS The volume of milk transferred to infants born by caesarean section was significantly less than that transferred to infants born by normal vaginal delivery on days 2 to 5 (p < 0.05), but by day 6 there was no difference between the two groups (p = 0.08). The difference could not be explained by any of the maternal and infant variables measured. Birth weight was regained by day 6 in 40% of infants born vaginally compared with 20% in those born by caesarean section. CONCLUSION There is a lag in the profile of the daily volume of breast milk transferred to infants delivered by caesarean section compared with those born by normal vaginal delivery. This study also challenges the widely followed schedules of milk volumes considered to be suitable for the term infant, which appear to be excessive, at least for the first four to five days post partum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K C Evans
- Women and Children at Flinders, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Affiliation(s)
- T Monet
- East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Barclay L, Harrington A, Conroy R, Royal R, LaForgia J. A comparative study of neonates' umbilical cord management . AUST J ADV NURS 1994; 11:34-40. [PMID: 7980882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to establish the effect of treating neonates' umbilical cords with chlorhexidine 0.5% in alcohol 70% on cord separation time and to observe the clinical and microbiological consequences of not treating the cords of healthy neonates. The treated group contained 466 babies whose cords were treated with chlorhexidine, 424 babies were not treated. Microbiological colonisation patterns of the cords of babies in both groups were monitored both for purposes of this investigation and to ensure that no untoward consequences resulted from non-treatment. The research showed that treatment prolonged separation time by 1.7 days, which was significant at the level of p = 0.000, and that normal colonisation was delayed in the treated group.
Collapse
|