'We just need to find space for them to practice so that we can help to make a stronger society': Perceived barriers and facilitators to employing health psychologists in UK public health and clinical health settings

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, health psychology has received significant attention within the health sector, due to its application to understanding influences on health and well-being and translation of health psychology into interventions to support behaviour change. The number of health psychologists in public health and healthcare settings is growing but remains limited, and is it unclear why. This study aimed to explore the views of potential and current employers of health psychologists, to elucidate barriers and facilitators of employing health psychologists in healthcare settings.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were carried out to explore the experiences of working with and/or employing health psychologists. Opportunities and barriers were explored for increasing access to health psychology expertise in the NHS and public health. Interviews were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Fifteen participants took part in interviews. Participants were mid-senior-level professionals working in varied healthcare settings and/or academic institutions. The majority had experience of health psychology/working with health psychologists, whilst others had limited experience but an interest in employing health psychologists. Three key themes were identified: (1) the organizational fit of health psychologists, (2) perception of competition for roles and (3) ideas for changing hearts, minds and processes.

CONCLUSION

Barriers exist to employing health psychologists in healthcare settings. These barriers include misunderstandings of the role of health psychologists and the need to preserve other disciplines due to perceived competition. Recommendations for change included showcasing the benefits and skills of health psychologists and having transparent conversations with employees and multi-disciplinary colleagues about roles.

Advancing Sexual Harassment Prevention and Elimination in the Sciences: "Every ... Health Organization Must Do Something Similar"

BACKGROUND

Sexual harassment is pervasive in science. A 2018 report found that the prevalence of sexual harassment in academia in the United States is 58%. An activity held at an international scientific congress was designed to advance sexual harassment prevention and elimination and empower binary and nonbinary persons at risk for harassment, discrimination, and violence. The objective is to describe the activity and outcomes to provide a promising model for other scientific communities.

METHODS

A description of the plenary and key components as well as the data collection and analysis of selected outcomes are provided.

RESULTS

Among 1338 congress participants from 61 countries, 526 (39%) attended the #MeToo plenary, and the majority engaged in some way during the plenary session. Engagement included standing for the pledge (~85%), participating in the question and answer session (n = 5), seeking counseling (n = 3), and/or providing written post-it comments (n = 96). Respondents to a postcongress survey (n = 388 [24% of all attendees]) ranked the plenary as number 1 among 14 congressional plenaries. In postanalysis, the written post-it comments were sorted into 14 themes within 6 domains, including: (1) emotional responses, (2) barriers to speaking out, (3) public health priorities, (4) reframing narratives about the issue, (5) allyship, and (6) moving the issue forward.

CONCLUSIONS

Scientific organizations, agencies, and institutions have an important role to play in setting norms and changing enabling policies toward a zero-tolerance culture of sexual harassment. The activity presented offers a promising model for scientific communities with similar goals. The outcomes suggest that the plenary successfully engaged participants and had a measurable impact on the participants.

Reduced Global Efficiency and Random Network Features in Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis with Cognitive Impairment

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Graph theory uses structural similarity to analyze cortical structural connectivity. We used a voxel-based definition of cortical covariance networks to quantify and assess the relationship of network characteristics to cognition in a cohort of patients with relapsing-remitting MS with and without cognitive impairment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We compared subject-specific structural gray matter network properties of 18 healthy controls, 25 patients with MS with cognitive impairment, and 55 patients with MS without cognitive impairment. Network parameters were compared, and predictive value for cognition was assessed, adjusting for confounders (sex, education, gray matter volume, network size and degree, and T1 and T2 lesion load). Backward stepwise multivariable regression quantified predictive factors for 5 neurocognitive domain test scores.

RESULTS

Greater path length (r = -0.28, P < .0057) and lower normalized path length (r = 0.36, P < .0004) demonstrated a correlation with average cognition when comparing healthy controls with patients with MS. Similarly, MS with cognitive impairment demonstrated a correlation between lower normalized path length (r = 0.40, P < .001) and reduced average cognition. Increased normalized path length was associated with better performance for processing (P < .001), learning (P < .001), and executive domain function (P = .0235), while reduced path length was associated with better executive (P = .0031) and visual domains. Normalized path length improved prediction for processing (R ² = 43.6%, G² = 20.9; P < .0001) and learning (R ² = 40.4%, G² = 26.1; P < .0001) over a null model comprising confounders. Similarly, higher normalized path length improved prediction of average z scores (G² = 21.3; P < .0001) and, combined with WM volume, explained 52% of average cognition variance.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with MS and cognitive impairment demonstrate more random network features and reduced global efficiency, impacting multiple cognitive domains. A model of normalized path length with normal-appearing white matter volume improved average cognitive z score prediction, explaining 52% of variance.

102 Process Evaluation Exploring the Delivery and Uptake of Posture and Mobility Training for Staff in Care Homes

Introduction

Provision of care for care home residents with complex needs is challenging. Physiotherapists can play a major role in enhancing the confidence, skills and abilities of care home staff. The Skilful Care Training Package (SCTP) aims to provide staff with an understanding of good posture and training in skilled facilitation of movement. This process evaluation explored barriers and facilitators to delivery and uptake of the SCTP within the context of a feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT) in 10 care homes.

Methods

A mixed methods process evaluation, incorporating non-participant observations and interviews, conducted in the five care homes receiving the SCTP intervention. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim; resident conversations were captured via a Dictaphone and/or field-notes. Data analysis used the Framework approach.

Results

Fourteen staff training sessions were observed. Interviews with 22 staff and four trainers, and 13 conversations with residents were completed. Five factors influenced delivery and uptake of the SCTP:Organisational factors: strategies to publicise and facilitate access to training improved attendance; a convenient training location and trainer flexibility encouraged attendance and staff engagement.Intervention delivery: a practical participatory element to the training was highly valued; adapting the training to meet the needs of the homes was well-received.Engagement and interaction: relating training to workplace and residents’ experiences engaged staff; high levels of engagement and positive interaction within the training sessions were reported; challenges relating to staff hierarchy affected training delivery in some homes.Intervention content: posture and mobility elements were seen as important; however, some repetition with prior training was highlighted.Training impact: there were indications that staff adopted SCTP techniques. Staff reported an increase in their wellbeing and confidence in movement facilitation; cascade training was reported in some homes.

Conclusions

Training was well-received, and feedback on its impact was largely positive. Practical elements were viewed favourably over classroom-based learning. Intervention content should be revised to optimise focus and avoid overlap with other training.

101 A Posture and Mobility Training Package for Care Home Staff: Results of A Cluster Randomised Controlled Feasibility Trial

Introduction

Provision of care for care home residents with complex needs is challenging. Physiotherapy and activity interventions can improve physical well-being but are often time-limited and resource intensive. A sustainable approach is to enhance the confidence, skills and abilities of care home staff. This trial assessed the feasibility of undertaking a definitive evaluation of the Skilful Care Training Package (SCTP) - a posture and mobility training programme developed by physiotherapists for care home staff.

Methods

A parallel-group, cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial was undertaken in ten care homes in Yorkshire. Five were randomised to receive SCTP, five to usual care. SCTP was delivered by specialist physiotherapists, with the intention of training all direct care staff. Following consent, data were collected from and about residents with restricted mobility (those fulfilling the eligibility criteria) at baseline, three and six months post-randomisation by blinded researchers. Outcome measurement included resident mobility, posture, pain and quality of life. The feasibility of recruitment, retention, data collection and intervention delivery was assessed.

Results

All residents (348) at participating homes were screened for eligibility. 250 were eligible and 146 took part. Follow-up was balanced between arms, with an overall loss-to-follow-up rate of 28.8% at six months. Where residents were available for six-month follow-up, proxy data provision was excellent (97.1% - 100% of expected data). Difficulty collecting data directly from residents was experienced (43.3% of expected data) due to high levels of cognitive impairment. Staff attendance at training met or was close to pre-specified criteria for acceptability in three homes, with 63.0%, 63.6% and 65.8% direct care staff attending all sessions, and &gt;85% attending at least one session across all three homes. However attendance fell short of acceptability in two homes, with only 21.4% and 12.5% staff attending all sessions.

Conclusions

It is feasible to recruit and follow-up residents in a randomised trial comparing SCTP and usual care. Proxy data collection is a successful method, but collection of data from residents is difficult. Intervention delivery success was variable, illustrating heterogeneity between care homes. Future research will be informed by learning from those homes with greater intervention compliance. Work should be undertaken to investigate how best to collect meaningful data from residents.

A randomized, double-blind phase II study evaluating cediranib versus cediranib and saracatinib in patients with relapsed metastatic clear-cell renal cancer (COSAK)

BACKGROUND

Preclinical work suggests SRC proteins have a role in the development of resistance to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) targeted therapy in metastatic clear-cell renal cancer (mRCC). This hypothesis was tested in this trial using the SRC inhibitor saracatinib and the VEGF inhibitor cediranib.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with disease progression after ≥1 VEGF-targeted therapy were eligible to participate in this double-blind, randomized (1:1) phase II study. The study compared the combination cediranib 30 mg once daily (o.d.) and saracatinib 175 mg o.d. (CS) (n = 69) or cediranib 45 mg o.d. and placebo o.d. (C) (n = 69). Archived tissue was used for biomarker analysis [SRC, focal adhesion kinase (FAK), von Hippel-Lindau, protein tyrosine phosphatase 1b and hypoxia-inducible factor 2α : n = 86]. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by RECIST v1.1.

RESULTS

Between 2010 and 2012, 138 patients were randomized across 16 UK sites. The characteristics of the two groups were well balanced. Partial responses were seen in 13.0% for C and 14.5% for CS (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in PFS [5.4 months (3.6-7.3 months) for C and 3.9 (2.4-5.3 months) for CS; hazard ratio (HR) 1.18 (0.94-1.48)] or overall survival (OS) [14.2 months (11.2-16.8 months) for C and 10.0 (6.7-13.2 months) for CS; HR 1.28 (1.00-1.63)]. There was no significant difference in the frequency of key adverse events, dose reductions or drug discontinuations. None of the biomarkers were prognostic for PFS or OS. FAK overexpression correlated with an OS benefit [HR 2.29 (1.09-4.82), P > 0.05], but not PFS, for CS.

CONCLUSIONS

Saracatinib did not increase the efficacy of a VEGF-targeted therapy (cediranib) in this setting. Biomarker analysis did not identify consistent predictive biomarkers.

CLINICALTRIALSGOV

NCT00942877.

Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with renal cell carcinoma in the UK: insights from the RECCORD registry

BACKGROUND

The aim of the RECCORD registry was to gather real-world UK data on the use of targeted therapies in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and assess clinical outcomes. Here, demographic and outcome data are presented with the treatment patterns and demographic profile of patients on the registry.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were retrospectively identified at seven UK hospitals with large cancer centres in England (5), Scotland (1) and Wales (1). Anonymised data were collected through an online registry covering demographics, treatments and outcomes. Five hundred and fourteen UK adult patients with metastatic RCC were included in the study for analysis. Patients were included if they were treated for metastatic RCC at one of the seven centres, and started systemic anti-cancer treatment from March 2009 to November 2012 inclusive. In addition to demographic factors, the principal outcome measures were overall survival (OS), time to disease progression and toxicity.

RESULTS

The majority of first-line treatment was with sunitinib; first-line use of pazopanib increased as the study progressed. 15.8% of patients received second-line treatment, half of whom were prescribed everolimus. Median OS (from initiation of first-line treatment) was 23.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 18.6-29.1 months), similar to that reported for clinical trials of targeted RCC therapies [Ljungberg B, Campbell SC, Choi HY et al. The epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2011; 60: 615-621; Abe H, Kamai T. Recent advances in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Int J Urol 2013; 20: 944-955; Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Tomczak P et al. Overall survival and updated results for sunitinib compared with interferon alfa in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 3584-3590]. OS was significantly longer for those who received second-line treatment after disease progression (33.0 months; 95% CI 30.8-35.2 months) than those who did not (20.9 months; 95% CI 16.4-25.3 months; P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

RECCORD is a large 'real-world' database assessing metastatic RCC treatment patterns and outcomes. Treatment patterns changed over time as targeted therapies were approved and became widely available; survival data in RECCORD are consistent with those reported for systemic treatments in clinical trials. Kaplan-Meier analysis of results demonstrated that receiving second-line therapy was a major prognostic factor for longer OS.

Large-scale discovery of novel genetic causes of developmental disorders

Despite three decades of successful, predominantly phenotype-driven discovery of the genetic causes of monogenic disorders, up to half of children with severe developmental disorders of probable genetic origin remain without a genetic diagnosis. Particularly challenging are those disorders rare enough to have eluded recognition as a discrete clinical entity, those with highly variable clinical manifestations, and those that are difficult to distinguish from other, very similar, disorders. Here we demonstrate the power of using an unbiased genotype-driven approach to identify subsets of patients with similar disorders. By studying 1,133 children with severe, undiagnosed developmental disorders, and their parents, using a combination of exome sequencing and array-based detection of chromosomal rearrangements, we discovered 12 novel genes associated with developmental disorders. These newly implicated genes increase by 10% (from 28% to 31%) the proportion of children that could be diagnosed. Clustering of missense mutations in six of these newly implicated genes suggests that normal development is being perturbed by an activating or dominant-negative mechanism. Our findings demonstrate the value of adopting a comprehensive strategy, both genome-wide and nationwide, to elucidate the underlying causes of rare genetic disorders.

Introducing structured caregiver training in stroke care: findings from the TRACS process evaluation study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the process of implementation of the modified London Stroke Carers Training Course (LSCTC) in the Training Caregivers After Stroke (TRACS) cluster randomised trial and contribute to the interpretation of the TRACS trial results. The LSCTC was a structured competency-based training programme designed to help develop the knowledge and skills (eg, patient handling or transfer skills) essential for the day-to-day management of disabled survivors of stroke. The LSCTC comprised 14 components, 6 were mandatory (and delivered to all) and 8 non-mandatory, to be delivered based on individual assessment of caregiver need.

DESIGN

Process evaluation using non-participant observation, documentary analysis and semistructured interviews.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with stroke (n=38), caregivers (n=38), stroke unit staff (n=53).

SETTINGS

10 of the 36 stroke units participating in the TRACS trial in four English regions (Yorkshire, North West, South East and South West, Peninsula).

RESULTS

Preparatory cascade training on delivery of the LSCTC did not reach all staff and did not lead to multidisciplinary team (MDT) wide understanding of, engagement with or commitment to the LSCTC. Although senior therapists in most intervention units observed developed ownership of the LSCTC, MDT working led to separation rather than integration of delivery of LSCTC elements. Organisational features of stroke units and professionals' patient-focused practices limited the involvement of caregivers. Caregivers were often invited to observe therapy or care being provided by professionals but had few opportunities to make sense of, or to develop knowledge and stroke-specific skills provided by the LSCTC. Where provided, caregiver training came very late in the inpatient stay. Assessment and development of caregiver competence was not commonly observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Contextual factors including service improvement pressures and staff perceptions of the necessity for and work required in caregiver training impacted negatively on implementation of the caregiver training intervention. Structured caregiver training programmes such as the LSCTC are unlikely to be practical in settings with short inpatient stays. Stroke units where early supported discharge is in place potentially offer a more effective vehicle for introducing competency based caregiver training.

LINKED TRACS CLUSTER RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL NUMBER

ISRCTN49208824.

Proteinuria in metastatic pheochromocytoma is associated with an increased risk of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, spontaneously or after therapy with 131I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (131I-MIBG)

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) has been reported rarely in pheochromocytoma, occurring spontaneously or after therapy with 131I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (131I-MIBG). Our objective was to determine whether proteinuria is associated with an increased risk of ARDS. This was a retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort study of 64 patients with metastatic pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma treated with 131I-MIBG on institutional protocols. Proteinuria was defined as at least one urinalysis positive for at least trace protein within 1 month prior to 131I-MIBG or within 1 month prior to spontaneous ARDS. Proportions were compared using Fisher's exact test. Urinalyses within the defined time period were available for 48 patients, 8 of whom had proteinuria. Of the 8 patients with proteinuria, 5 developed ARDS: 3 within 10 days following 131I-MIBG, two 6 months following 131I-MIBG. Both patients who developed ARDS 6 months after 131I-MIBG had proteinuria within 1 month before apparently spontaneous ARDS. None of the 40 patients whose urinalyses were all negative for protein developed ARDS. None of the 16 patients with missing urinalyses developed ARDS. Patients with antecedent proteinuria were more likely to develop ARDS than those without proteinuria (63% vs. 0%; p<0.0001). The following variables were not significantly associated with ARDS: 131I-MIBG activities administered, number of 131I-MIBG administrations, age, hypertension, or secretion of catecholamines or metanephrines. In patients with metastatic pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma, proteinuria is associated with ARDS and urine protein should be examined prior to administering 131I-MIBG.

Duty of care and autonomy: how support workers managed the tension between protecting service users from risk and promoting their independence in a specialist group home

BACKGROUND

In the UK those paid to support adults with intellectual disabilities must manage two potentially conflicting duties that are set out in policy documents as being vital to their role: protecting service users (their duty of care) and recognising service users' autonomy. This study focuses specifically on the support of people with the genetically determined condition, Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS). Due to the behaviours associated with PWS, the support of this group of people vividly illustrates the tension between respect for autonomy and duty of care. This article explores how support workers working in a residential group home managed their competing duties of managing risk and promoting independence in practice.

METHODS

An ethnographic study, comprising of qualitative observations, semi-structured interviews and documentary analysis, was undertaken to investigate the work of support workers in a UK residential group home specialising in the support of adults diagnosed with PWS. The study focused on how support workers attempted to reconcile the tension between protecting service users from the risks associated with the syndrome and acknowledging service users' autonomy by enabling independence.

RESULTS

Findings demonstrate that risk was central to the structure of care delivery at the group home and support workers often adhered to standardised risk management procedures. The organisation also required support workers to promote service users' independence and many thought acknowledging service users' autonomy through the promotion of their independence was important. To manage tensions between their differing duties, some support workers deviated from standardised risk management procedures to allow service users a degree of independence.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a tension between the duty of care and the duty to recognise autonomy at the level of service delivery in residential homes. Support workers attempt to manage this tension; however, further work needs to be done by both residential services and policy makers to facilitate the reconciliation of the duty of care with the duty to recognise service users' autonomy in practice.

Oblique double layers: a comparison between terrestrial and auroral measurements

The S3-3, POLAR, and FAST satellite auroral observations of parallel and perpendicular electric field structures have been identified as belonging to a large "U"-shaped potential structure that supports oblique electric double layers. This interpretation is verified by terrestrial laboratory measurements of a self-consistently supported three-dimensional oblique current-free double layer. Its width is a few tens of Debye lengths, its oblicity (with respect to the magnetic field) varies from 0 up to 30 degrees, and its strength is a few times the electron temperature.

A randomized, double-blind phase III study of pazopanib in treatment-naive and cytokine-pretreated patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC)

5021^

Background: Pazopanib, an oral multikinase angiogenesis inhibitor, has shown clinical efficacy in patients (pts) with advanced RCC. In this study (VEG105192), the efficacy and safety of pazopanib was compared with placebo in advanced RCC. Methods: Pts (N = 400 planned) with clear cell advanced RCC and measurable disease with no prior treatment or 1 prior cytokine-based treatment, were stratified and randomized (2:1) to pazopanib 800 mg QD or placebo. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), and safety. The study had ≥ 90% power to detect an 80% improvement in PFS and a 50% improvement in OS, by stratified log-rank tests with α = 0.025 one-sided. Pts received continuous treatment until disease progression (PD), death or unacceptable toxicity. Upon PD, placebo pts could receive pazopanib via an extension study. Final PFS, RR and safety results are reported here. Results: A total of 233 treatment-naïve and 202 cytokine-pretreated pts were enrolled (290 pazopanib; 145 placebo). Pt characteristics were balanced between the 2 arms. ECOG 0/1 was 42%/58% and 41%/59% for pazopanib and placebo pts, respectively. PFS was significantly prolonged with pazopanib in the overall study population (9.2 vs 4.2 mos; HR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.34, 0.62; p < 0.0000001), in treatment naïve pts (11.1 vs 2.8 mos; HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.27, 0.60; p < 0.0000001), and in cytokine-pretreated pts (7.4 vs 4.2 mos; HR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.35, 0.84; p < 0.001). RR was 30% with pazopanib (vs 3% with placebo) and median duration of response was 58.7 wks. Median duration of exposure was 7.4 mos (pazopanib) and 3.8 mos (placebo). The majority of adverse events (AEs) were grade 1 or 2. Most common AEs in pazopanib-treated pts were diarrhea (52%; 4% Gr 3/4), hypertension (40%; 4% Gr 3/4), hair color change (38%; <1% Gr 3/4), nausea (26%; <1% Gr 3/4), anorexia (22%; 2% Gr 3/4), and vomiting (21%; 2% Gr 3/4). The most common laboratory abnormality was ALT elevation (53%; 10% Gr 3; 2% Gr 4). Conclusions: Pazopanib monotherapy was well tolerated and demonstrated a significant improvement in PFS and RR compared to placebo. Final OS results are awaited.

[Table: see text]

ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy and Exceptions

In compliance with the guidelines established by the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy (J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24[3]:519–521) and the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), ASCO strives to promote balance, independence, objectivity, and scientific rigor through disclosure of financial and other interests, and identification and management of potential conflicts. According to the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy, the following financial and other relationships must be disclosed: employment or leadership position, consultant or advisory role, stock ownership, honoraria, research funding, expert testimony, and other remuneration (J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24[3]:520). The ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy disclosure requirements apply to all authors who submit abstracts to the Annual Meeting.

For clinical trials that began accrual on or after April 29, 2004, ASCO's Policy places some restrictions on the financial relationships of principal investigators (J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24[3]:521). If a principal investigator holds any restricted relationships, his or her abstract will be ineligible for placement in the 2009 Annual Meeting unless the ASCO Ethics Committee grants an exception. Among the circumstances that might justify an exception are that the principal investigator (1) is a widely acknowledged expert in a particular therapeutic area; (2) is the inventor of a unique technology or treatment being evaluated in the clinical trial; or (3) is involved in international clinical oncology research and has acted consistently with recognized international standards of ethics in the conduct of clinical research. NIH-sponsored trials are exempt from the Policy restrictions. Abstracts for which authors requested and have been granted an exception in accordance with ASCO's Policy are designated with a caret symbol (^) in the Annual Meeting Proceedings.

For more information about the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy and the exceptions process, please visit www.asco.org/conflictofinterest .

The impact of primary tumour origins in patients with advanced oesophageal, oesophago-gastric junction and gastric adenocarcinoma--individual patient data from 1775 patients in four randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

It is unclear if differential chemotherapy effects exist on overall survival (OS), response rate (RR) and toxicity depending on primary tumour origin [oesophageal versus oesophago-gastric junction (OGJ) versus gastric adenocarcinoma].

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 2110 patients were enrolled in four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing fluoropyrimidine +/- platinum-based chemotherapy. This analysis used individual patient data and restricted to patients with adenocarcinoma who received one or more dose of chemotherapy. Gastric origin was the control in comparisons of tumour origin.

RESULTS

Of the 2110 patients randomised, 1775 (84%) patients had adenocarcinoma with oesophageal (n = 485), OGJ (n = 457) and gastric (n = 833) origins. The median OS was 9.5 months in oesophageal, 9.3 months in OGJ and 8.7 months in gastric cancer (P = 0.68). RR was 44.1% in oesophageal, 41.1% in OGJ and 35.6% in gastric cancers (P = 0.11 and 0.27, respectively, compared with gastric cancer on multivariate analysis). Toxicity composite end point occurred in 46%, 47% and 45% in oesophageal, OGJ and gastric cancers, respectively (P = 0.85 and 0.62 compared with gastric).

CONCLUSIONS

In our large multicentre RCT dataset, no significant differences were demonstrated on multivariate analyses in OS, RR and toxic effects among patients with advanced oesophageal, OGJ and gastric adenocarcinoma. Future RCTs should not exclude oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Does histology influence outcome in advanced oesophagogastric (OG) cancer? Individual patient data from 1,680 patients on three randomised controlled trials (RCT)

15001

Background: In advanced OG cancer, it is unclear whether squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) differs from adenocarcinoma (Ad) in its response to chemotherapy, as most phase III studies do not include both histology. The aim of this pooled analysis was to evaluate whether there is a differential chemotherapy effect on overall survival (OS), response rate (RR) and toxicity depending on tumour histology (SCC vs. Ad) using individual patient (pt) data. Methods: From 1994 to 2005, 3 RCTs were conducted assessing fluoropyrimidine ± platinum-based chemotherapy. This analysis was restricted to eligible pts with SCC or Ad histology who received =1 dose chemotherapy. Apart from OS and RR, a toxicity composite endpoint (TCE) was constructed - defined as occurrence of grades =3 diarrhoea, (febrile) neutropenia, infection, nausea & vomiting, grades =2 renal and neurotoxicity. Ad was used as the control group. Two-sided p values of <0.05 were considered significant. Results: Of the 1,836 pts randomised, 1,680 were included for this analysis of whom 1,536 (91%) had Ad and 144 (9%) had SCC. Locally advanced disease was present in 17% and 20% of Ad and SCC patients respectively. The median survival was 9.4 months with Ad and 7.7 months with SCC and one year survival rates were 38% and 29% respectively (log rank p= 0.115) and this remained non- significant on multivariate analysis (p=0.206). The RR was 40.4% (95% CI: 38–42.9%) in Ad and 33.3% in SCC (95% CI: 26.1–41.4%; p=0.109). TCE occurred in 45% and 44% of patients with Ad and SCC respectively (p=1.0). Time to TCE was not significantly different (log rank p=0.829). Conclusions: Although there was a trend towards worse survival with SCC, no significant differences in chemotherapy outcome were demonstrated, despite our large dataset. Molecular therapeutics targeting distinct biological pathways between the two histology subtypes may influence outcome more than cytotoxic combinations in the future.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Open label phase II studies of modified vaccinia ankara expressing the tumor antigen 5T4 given in conjunction with IFL and FOLFOX chemotherapy regimens: Final analysis of safety and immunogenicity of MVA 5T4 given before, during and after chemotherapy

2527

Background: 5T4 is a tumour associated antigen that is widely expressed on the surface of most human adenocarcinomas, including colorectal, but rarely in normal cells. Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) has been employed as a vaccine vector to deliver 5T4. Previously, MVA-5T4 has been evaluated in a phase I/II clinical trial in stage IV colorectal cancer patients. MVA-5T4 was shown to be safe and well tolerated and induced 5T4 specific immune responses in most patients. Furthermore, 5T4 specific antibody titres correlated with clinical benefit. Methods: Two open label phase II clinical trials were initiated in which patients with advanced colorectal cancer received MVA-5T4 in conjunction with either 5-FU/leukovorin and irinotecan (TV2-IFL; n=19 patients) or 5-FU/leukovorin and oxaliplatin (TV2-FOLFOX; n=17 patients). MVA-5T4 was administered up to 6 times, 2 prior to, 2 during and 2 post-chemotherapy. The primary objectives were to assess the safety and immunogenicity of MVA-5T4 given in combination with chemotherapy. Results: Recruitment to both trials is complete and MVA-5T4 was well tolerated in all ITT patients, with no serious adverse events being associated with MVA-5T4. 5T4-specific cellular and humoral immune responses were monitored before, during and after chemotherapy in all 23 per protocol patients (n=12 for TV2-IFL and n=11 for TV2-FOLFOX). Following vaccination, all 23 patients mounted 5T4 cellular and/or humoral responses. Immune responses were detectable during chemotherapy in the majority of patients. IFNγ ELISPOT responses to 5T4 peptides revealed precursor frequencies as high as 1 in 1000 PBMCs. Assessment of clinical responses in all PP patients demonstrated an overall response rate of 65% across both trials. Conclusions: MVA-5T4 is safe and well tolerated when administered in conjunction with IFL and FOLFOX chemotherapy regimens. Furthermore, 5T4 specific immune responses are induced in all per protocol patients and can be boosted or maintained during chemotherapy. Encouraging clinical responses have been observed and 5T4 immune responses shown to correlate with clinical benefit.

[Table: see text]

A vaccinia-based vaccine (TroVax) targeting the oncofetal antigen 5T4 administered before and after surgical resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases: Phase II trial

2574

Background: Oncofetal antigen 5T4 is expressed by most colorectal cancers. Administration of a vaccine combining a Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) vector with 5T4 elicits immune responses in late-stage colorectal cancer patients. This trial seeks to investigate the immunological effects of the vaccine both in peripheral blood and locally in tumour tissue resected during potentially curative surgery for colorectal liver metastases. Some patients may have micrometastatic disease, a potential target for immunotherapy. Methods: Colorectal cancer patients selected for resection of liver metastases were eligible. Recruitment of up to 20 patients was planned. Following screening they received 2 vaccinations prior to, and 2 after, surgery. Primary endpoint was assessment of the immune response at time of surgery. Blood was taken for analysis at screening and 2 weeks after each vaccination. A tumour biopsy was obtained at surgery. T-cell responses were assessed using proliferation and gamma-interferon ELISPOT assays; ELISA used to assess serological response. Immunohistochemical analysis was used to confirm tumour antigen expression and the nature of T-cell infiltration into the liver. If 5T4-specific immune responses were demonstrated patients were offered further vaccinations at 20 and 28 weeks post surgery. Results: Of 20 patients recruited, 16 were eligible for assessment, 4 excluded, 1 due to hepatocellular carcinoma, 3 with inoperable disease. There was no grade III/IV toxicity related to vaccination. Tumour expression of 5T4 was confirmed in all cases, local T-cell infiltration consisted predominantly of CD4 cells. According to proliferation assays, 8 of 16 patients had T-cell responses at time of surgery and 12 of 16 in total to date. 14 patients have developed 5T4-specific antibody responses. At median follow up of 8.4 months 7 of 16 patients have disease recurrence. Conclusions: The MVA-5T4 vaccine (TroVax) was safe and well tolerated in all patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases. 5T4 specific cellular and/or humoral immune responses were induced in the majority of patients following vaccination with TroVax.

[Table: see text]

Efficacy of lapatinib in patients with high tumor EGFR expression: Results of a phase III trial in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC)

4502

Background: Lapatinib is an orally-active, reversible inhibitor of EGFR/ErbB2 tyrosine kinases. In Phase I/II trials, lapatinib has demonstrated activity in patients (pts) with advanced breast cancer. We report the first results of a randomized open-label Phase III trial ( EGF20001 ) of lapatinib vs. hormone therapy (HT) in pts with advanced RCC that express EGFR and/or ErbB2 by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The main endpoints were time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). Methods: Pts with advanced RCC of any histology who had failed first-line cytokine therapy were stratified by Karnofsky performance score (KPS) and number of metastatic sites. Pts were randomized to receive oral lapatinib 1250 mg OD or HT. The primary efficacy endpoint was TTP, with 90% power to detect a 50% increase (i.e. 4 vs. 6 months) at a two-sided 5% significance level. All pt scans were interpreted by independent radiologic review. Results: At the time of the TTP analysis, 417 pts were randomized and 298 TTP events were reported. Demographic and baseline characteristics were similar between both arms; pooled results were: median age: 61 yrs; Stage IV disease: 97%, KPS 90–100: 59%, metastatic sites >2: 49%, prior nephrectomy: 94%, prior interferon therapy: 64%. No unexpected toxicities were observed, and drug-related AE (all grades) for lapatinib vs. HT included rash (44%:3%), diarrhoea (40%:3%). When results from all pts were analysed, median TTP was 15.3 weeks for lapatinib vs. 15.4 weeks for HT (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.94; p = 0.60), and median OS was 46.9 weeks for lapatinib vs. 43.1 weeks for HT (HR=0.88; p=0.29). In the major subgroup of 241 pts with EGFR overexpressed disease (3+ by IHC), median TTP was 15.1 weeks for lapatinib vs. 10.9 weeks for HT (HR = 0.76; p = 0.06), and median OS was 46.0 weeks for lapatinib vs. 37.9 weeks for HT (HR = 0.69; p = 0.02). These results were confirmed by Cox Regression analysis, and additional biomarker evaluation, including FISH, is underway. Conclusions: The EGFR/ErbB2 dual targeted inhibitor, lapatinib, appears to prolong overall survival compared to hormone therapy in advanced RCC pts with overexpressed EGFR who failed prior therapy.

[Table: see text]