1
|
Bugge C, Hagen S, Elders A, Mason H, Goodman K, Dembinsky M, Melone L, Best C, Manoukian S, Dwyer L, Khunda A, Graham M, Agur W, Breeman S, Culverhouse J, Forrest A, Forrest M, Guerrero K, Hemming C, McClurg D, Norrie J, Thakar R, Kearney R. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of pessary self-management versus clinic-based care for pelvic organ prolapse in women: the TOPSY RCT with process evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2024; 28:1-121. [PMID: 38767959 DOI: 10.3310/nwtb5403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Pelvic organ prolapse is common, causes unpleasant symptoms and negatively affects women's quality of life. In the UK, most women with pelvic organ prolapse attend clinics for pessary care. Objectives To determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of vaginal pessary self-management on prolapse-specific quality of life for women with prolapse compared with clinic-based care; and to assess intervention acceptability and contextual influences on effectiveness, adherence and fidelity. Design A multicentre, parallel-group, superiority randomised controlled trial with a mixed-methods process evaluation. Participants Women attending UK NHS outpatient pessary services, aged ≥ 18 years, using a pessary of any type/material (except shelf, Gellhorn or Cube) for at least 2 weeks. Exclusions: women with limited manual dexterity, with cognitive deficit (prohibiting consent or self-management), pregnant or non-English-speaking. Intervention The self-management intervention involved a 30-minute teaching appointment, an information leaflet, a 2-week follow-up telephone call and a local clinic telephone helpline number. Clinic-based care involved routine appointments determined by centres' usual practice. Allocation Remote web-based application; minimisation was by age, pessary user type and centre. Blinding Participants, those delivering the intervention and researchers were not blinded to group allocation. Outcomes The patient-reported primary outcome (measured using the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7) was prolapse-specific quality of life, and the cost-effectiveness outcome was incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (a specifically developed health Resource Use Questionnaire was used) at 18 months post randomisation. Secondary outcome measures included self-efficacy and complications. Process evaluation data were collected by interview, audio-recording and checklist. Analysis was by intention to treat. Results Three hundred and forty women were randomised (self-management, n = 169; clinic-based care, n = 171). At 18 months post randomisation, 291 questionnaires with valid primary outcome data were available (self-management, n = 139; clinic-based care, n = 152). Baseline economic analysis was based on 264 participants (self-management, n = 125; clinic-based care, n = 139) with valid quality of life and resource use data. Self-management was an acceptable intervention. There was no group difference in prolapse-specific quality of life at 18 months (adjusted mean difference -0.03, 95% confidence interval -9.32 to 9.25). There was fidelity to intervention delivery. Self-management was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, with an estimated incremental net benefit of £564.32 and an 80.81% probability of cost-effectiveness. At 18 months, more pessary complications were reported in the clinic-based care group (adjusted mean difference 3.83, 95% confidence interval 0.81 to 6.86). There was no group difference in general self-efficacy, but self-managing women were more confident in pessary self-management activities. In both groups, contextual factors impacted on adherence and effectiveness. There were no reported serious unexpected serious adverse reactions. There were 32 serious adverse events (self-management, n = 17; clinic-based care, n = 14), all unrelated to the intervention. Skew in the baseline data for the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7, the influence of the global COVID-19 pandemic, the potential effects of crossover and the lack of ethnic diversity in the recruited sample were possible limitations. Conclusions Self-management was acceptable and cost-effective, led to fewer complications and did not improve or worsen quality of life for women with prolapse compared with clinic-based care. Future research is needed to develop a quality-of-life measure that is sensitive to the changes women desire from treatment. Study registration This study is registered as ISRCTN62510577. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 16/82/01) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 23. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol Bugge
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions (NMAHP) Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Andrew Elders
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions (NMAHP) Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Helen Mason
- Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Kirsteen Goodman
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions (NMAHP) Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Lynn Melone
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions (NMAHP) Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Catherine Best
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions (NMAHP) Research Unit, Stirling, UK
| | - Sarkis Manoukian
- Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Lucy Dwyer
- The Warrell Unit, Saint Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Aethele Khunda
- South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Margaret Graham
- Health Sciences & Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Wael Agur
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, NHS Ayrshire & Arran, University of Glasgow, Kilmarnock, UK
| | - Suzanne Breeman
- Health Services Research Unit (HSRU), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Angela Forrest
- Patient and public representative of the TOPSY trial, UK
| | - Mark Forrest
- Health Services Research Unit (HSRU), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Karen Guerrero
- Department of Urogynaecology, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Christine Hemming
- Grampian University Hospitals NHS Trust, Aberdeen Maternity Hospital and Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Doreen McClurg
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions (NMAHP) Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - John Norrie
- Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ranee Thakar
- Croydon Health Services NHS Trust, Croydon University Hospital, Croydon, UK
| | - Rohna Kearney
- The Warrell Unit, Saint Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Saul H, Deeney B, Swaithes L, Bugge C, Hagen S, Kearney R. Pelvic organ prolapse: self-management of pessaries can be a good option. BMJ 2024; 385:q866. [PMID: 38663924 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.q866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/15/2024]
Abstract
The studyHagen S, Kearney R, Goodman K, et al. Clinical effectiveness of vaginal pessary self-management vs clinic-based care for pelvic organ prolapse (TOPSY): a randomised controlled superiority trial. eClinicalMedicine 2023;66:102326.To read the full NIHR Alert, go to: https://evidence.nihr.ac.uk/alert/pelvic-organ-prolapse-self-management-of-pessaries-can-be-a-good-option/.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Rohna Kearney
- Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Manoukian S, Mason H, Hagen S, Kearney R, Goodman K, Best C, Elders A, Melone L, Dwyer L, Dembinsky M, Khunda A, Guerrero KL, McClurg D, Norrie J, Thakar R, Bugge C. Cost-effectiveness of 2 Models of Pessary Care for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Findings From the TOPSY Randomized Controlled Trial. Value Health 2024:S1098-3015(24)00118-9. [PMID: 38492924 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Pelvic organ prolapse is the descent of one or more reproductive organs from their normal position, causing associated negative symptoms. One conservative treatment option is pessary management. This study aimed to to investigate the cost-effectiveness of pessary self-management (SM) when compared with clinic-based care (CBC). A decision analytic model was developed to extend the economic evaluation. METHODS A randomized controlled trial with health economic evaluation. The SM group received a 30-minute SM teaching session, information leaflet, 2-week follow-up call, and a local helpline number. The CBC group received routine outpatient pessary appointments, determined by usual practice. The primary outcome for the cost-effectiveness analysis was incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), 18 months post-randomization. Uncertainty was handled using nonparametric bootstrap analysis. In addition, a simple decision analytic model was developed using the trial data to extend the analysis over a 5-year period. RESULTS There was no significant difference in the mean number of QALYs gained between SM and CBC (1.241 vs 1.221), but mean cost was lower for SM (£578 vs £728). The incremental net benefit estimated at a willingness to pay of £20 000 per QALY gained was £564, with an 80.8% probability of cost-effectiveness. The modeling results were consistent with the trial analysis: the incremental net benefit was estimated as £4221, and the probability of SM being cost-effective at 5 years was 69.7%. CONCLUSIONS Results suggest that pessary SM is likely to be cost-effective. The decision analytic model suggests that this result is likely to persist over longer durations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarkis Manoukian
- Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University.
| | - Helen Mason
- Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University
| | | | - Kirsteen Goodman
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University
| | - Catherine Best
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling
| | - Andrew Elders
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University
| | - Lynn Melone
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University
| | - Lucy Dwyer
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Melanie Dembinsky
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University
| | | | | | - Doreen McClurg
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University
| | - John Norrie
- Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh
| | | | - Carol Bugge
- Department of Nursing and Community Health, Glasgow Caledonian University
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Krishnaswamy PH, Middleton E, Hagen S, Guerrero KL, Booth J. Women's Experiences of Urinary Tract Infections and Impact on Life: An Exploratory Qualitative Study. Urogynecology (Phila) 2024; 30:80-86. [PMID: 37493246 DOI: 10.1097/spv.0000000000001386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Despite high incidences of urinary tract infections (UTIs), little is known about how bothersome symptoms are and the effects on women's life and sexual activity, leaving a gap in our understanding of the physical and emotional effects of UTIs on women. OBJECTIVES This initial exploratory and descriptive study analyzes women's experiences of UTI and their perceived impact on quality of life. STUDY DESIGN Qualitative interviews were undertaken with 23 women who had experienced at least 1 UTI, recruited from different settings-primary care, general gynecology clinics, urogynecology clinics, and online via social media. Data were analyzed thematically. RESULTS Three themes described women's experiences of UTI: Women in all groups reported a wide range of physical symptoms and described the financial and psychological effects of UTIs. These effects seemed worse in women recruited via social media who also reported experiencing strong emotions and worries about close family members. Urinary tract infection support groups were considered useful, with women being grateful for consultations with alternative health practitioners and presuming safety of natural products. CONCLUSIONS Having a UTI appeared to affect women in a variety of ways, ranging from having different physical symptoms to being psychologically affected by these symptoms, which affected their quality of life in different ways. This research contributes to the growing evidence on how UTIs affect women, specifically further expanding on the impact on women in a range of settings-in the community and different health care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Suzanne Hagen
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University
| | - Karen Lesley Guerrero
- Department of Urogynaecology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Jo Booth
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Todhunter-Brown A, Booth L, Campbell P, Cheer B, Cowie J, Elders A, Hagen S, Jankulak K, Mason H, Millington C, Ogden M, Paterson C, Richardson D, Smith D, Sutcliffe J, Thomson K, Torrens C, McClurg D. Strategies used for childhood chronic functional constipation: the SUCCESS evidence synthesis. Health Technol Assess 2024; 28:1-266. [PMID: 38343084 PMCID: PMC11017632 DOI: 10.3310/pltr9622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Up to 30% of children have constipation at some stage in their life. Although often short-lived, in one-third of children it progresses to chronic functional constipation, potentially with overflow incontinence. Optimal management strategies remain unclear. Objective To determine the most effective interventions, and combinations and sequences of interventions, for childhood chronic functional constipation, and understand how they can best be implemented. Methods Key stakeholders, comprising two parents of children with chronic functional constipation, two adults who experienced childhood chronic functional constipation and four health professional/continence experts, contributed throughout the research. We conducted pragmatic mixed-method reviews. For all reviews, included studies focused on any interventions/strategies, delivered in any setting, to improve any outcomes in children (0-18 years) with a clinical diagnosis of chronic functional constipation (excluding studies of diagnosis/assessment) included. Dual reviewers applied inclusion criteria and assessed risk of bias. One reviewer extracted data, checked by a second reviewer. Scoping review: We systematically searched electronic databases (including Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Excerpta Medica Database, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) (January 2011 to March 2020) and grey literature, including studies (any design) reporting any intervention/strategy. Data were coded, tabulated and mapped. Research quality was not evaluated. Systematic reviews of the evidence of effectiveness: For each different intervention, we included existing systematic reviews judged to be low risk of bias (using the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Systematic Reviews), updating any meta-analyses with new randomised controlled trials. Where there was no existing low risk of bias systematic reviews, we included randomised controlled trials and other primary studies. The risk of bias was judged using design-specific tools. Evidence was synthesised narratively, and a process of considered judgement was used to judge certainty in the evidence as high, moderate, low, very low or insufficient evidence. Economic synthesis: Included studies (any design, English-language) detailed intervention-related costs. Studies were categorised as cost-consequence, cost-effectiveness, cost-utility or cost-benefit, and reporting quality evaluated using the consensus health economic criteria checklist. Systematic review of implementation factors: Included studies reported data relating to implementation barriers or facilitators. Using a best-fit framework synthesis approach, factors were synthesised around the consolidated framework for implementation research domains. Results Stakeholders prioritised outcomes, developed a model which informed evidence synthesis and identified evidence gaps. Scoping review 651 studies, including 190 randomised controlled trials and 236 primary studies, conservatively reported 48 interventions/intervention combinations. Effectiveness systematic reviews studies explored service delivery models (n = 15); interventions delivered by families/carers (n = 32), wider children's workforce (n = 21), continence teams (n = 31) and specialist consultant-led teams (n = 42); complementary therapies (n = 15); and psychosocial interventions (n = 4). One intervention (probiotics) had moderate-quality evidence; all others had low to very-low-quality evidence. Thirty-one studies reported evidence relating to cost or resource use; data were insufficient to support generalisable conclusions. One hundred and six studies described implementation barriers and facilitators. Conclusions Management of childhood chronic functional constipation is complex. The available evidence remains limited, with small, poorly conducted and reported studies. Many evidence gaps were identified. Treatment recommendations within current clinical guidelines remain largely unchanged, but there is a need for research to move away from considering effectiveness of single interventions. Clinical care and future studies must consider the individual characteristics of children. Study registration This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42019159008. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 128470) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 5. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Todhunter-Brown
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions (NMAHP) Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Lorna Booth
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions (NMAHP) Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Pauline Campbell
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions (NMAHP) Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Brenda Cheer
- ERIC, The Children's Bowel and Bladder Charity, Bristol, UK
| | - Julie Cowie
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions (NMAHP) Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Andrew Elders
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions (NMAHP) Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions (NMAHP) Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Helen Mason
- Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | | | | | - Charlotte Paterson
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions (NMAHP) Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | | | | | | | - Katie Thomson
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions (NMAHP) Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Human Nutrition and Dietetics, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Claire Torrens
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions (NMAHP) Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Doreen McClurg
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions (NMAHP) Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nipa SI, Cooper D, Mostafa A, Hagen S, Abdel-Fattah M. Novel clinically meaningful scores for the ICIQ-UI-SF and ICIQ-FLUTS questionnaires in women with stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 2023; 34:3033-3040. [PMID: 37819367 PMCID: PMC10756866 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-023-05657-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
AIM To establish, for the first time, the clinically important differences for the ICIQ-UI-SF and ICIQ-FLUTS questionnaires following surgical and conservative treatments for stress-predominant urinary incontinence in women. METHODS Data from the SIMS and OPAL randomised controlled trials were analysed using an anchor-based method. Clinically important difference (CID; score change indicating a successful outcome) and minimal important difference (MID; score change indicating the smallest noticeable difference) were estimated using the PGI-I scale as the anchor. RESULTS For ICIQ-UI-SF, following surgical management, CIDs were 5.0 (95%CI 4.3, 5.6) at 1 year and 4.9 points (95%CI 4.2, 5.5) at 3 years, while following conservative management, CIDs were 4.0 (95%CI 3.4, 4.5) at 1 year and 4.6 points (95%CI 4.0, 5.2) at 2 years. For ICIQ-FLUTS, the CID was 3.4 points (95%CI 2.9, 4.0) at 1 year for both surgical and conservative management. MIDs for ICIQ-UI-SF, after surgical treatment, were 4.7 (95% CI 3.2, 6.1) at 1 year and 1.6 points (95%CI -0.2, 3.0) at 3 years, and after conservative treatment they were 1.7 (95% CI 1.0, 2.5) at 1 year and 1.9 points (95%CI 1.1, 2.7) at 2 years. For ICIQ-FLUTS, MIDs were 1.8 (95% CI 0.6, 3.1) at 1 year and 3.2 points (95%CI 2.0, 4.4) at 2 years after surgical treatment, and 1.3 (95%CI 0.6, 1.9) at 1 year and 1.9 points (95%CI 1.1, 2.6) at 2 years after conservative treatment. CONCLUSION Our study is the first to establish the CID for the ICIQ-UI-SF and ICIQ-FLUTS that women would associate with a successful outcome 3-years post-surgery and 2-years post-conservative treatment of stress-predominant urinary incontinence. The MID was lower following conservative compared to surgical treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shamima Islam Nipa
- Department of Rehabilitation Science, Bangladesh Health Professions Institute (BHPI), Savar, Bangladesh
| | - David Cooper
- Health Services Research Unit, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Alyaa Mostafa
- Aberdeen Centre for Women's Health Research, Institute of Applied Health Sciences School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Rd., Glasgow, UK
| | - Mohamed Abdel-Fattah
- Aberdeen Centre for Women's Health Research, School Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Youssef N, Shepherd A, Best C, Hagen S, Mackay W, Waddell D, El Sebaee H. The Quality of Life of Patients Living with a Urinary Catheter and Its Associated Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study in Egypt. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:2266. [PMID: 37628463 PMCID: PMC10454127 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11162266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Arabic countries, no research has focused on the experience of patients with indwelling urinary catheters. This cross-sectional study is the first to evaluate the catheter-specific quality of life (QoL) of patients living with a urinary catheter in Egypt. METHODS This study was conducted from April to September 2017, using a convenience sample of patients from a University Hospital. Data were collected using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Long-Term Catheter QoL (ICIQ-LTCQoL) instrument, along with a demographic datasheet. RESULTS 141 were enrolled, with 47.5% inpatients, 52.5% outpatients. A total of 70.9% reported problems with catheter function, and 92.2% reported that the catheter affected their daily lives. Place (inpatient or outpatient) was significantly associated with the total score of the ICIQ-LTCQoL (mean difference (MD) 6.34 (95% CI: 3.0 to 9.73)) and both subscales (catheter function subscale: MD = 4.92 (95% CI: 2.12 to 7.73) and lifestyle impact subscale: MD = 1.44 (95% CI: 0.3 to 2.63)), suggesting that outpatients have poorer QoL than inpatients. Moreover, catheter material was significantly related to the catheter function domain with Silicone Foley Catheter (100% Silicon) users experiencing poorer QoL related to catheter function than those with Latex Foley Catheter (Silicon-coated) (MD 4.43 (95% CI: 0.62 to 8.24). Workers/employees were found to have poorer QoL than those who were retired (MD = 4.94 (95% CI: 0.3 to 9.63)). CONCLUSION The results highlight the necessity of assessing function and concern regarding urinary catheter use and its impact on QoL, as well as its determinants. Evidence-based educational programs should be designed to enhance patients' self-care abilities to relieve their sense of distress and enhance their confidence in caring for their catheters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naglaa Youssef
- Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, College of Nursing, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ashley Shepherd
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK
| | - Catherine Best
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK
| | - William Mackay
- School of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley PA1 2BE, UK
| | - Debbie Waddell
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK
| | - Hanan El Sebaee
- Medical-Surgical Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Cairo University, Cairo 11562, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Reid FM, Aucott L, Glazener CMA, Elders A, Hemming C, Cooper KG, Freeman RM, Smith ARB, Hagen S, Kilonzo M, Boyers D, MacLennan G, Norrie J, Breeman S. PROSPECT: 4- and 6-year follow-up of a randomised trial of surgery for vaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2023; 34:67-78. [PMID: 36018353 PMCID: PMC9834125 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-022-05308-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS Our aim was to compare the mid-term results of native tissue, biological xenograft and polypropylene mesh surgery for women with vaginal wall prolapse. METHODS A total of 1348 women undergoing primary transvaginal repair of an anterior and/or posterior prolapse were recruited between January 2010 and August 2013 from 35 UK centres. They were randomised by remote allocation to native tissue surgery, biological xenograft or polypropylene mesh. We performed both 4- and 6-year follow-up using validated patient-reported outcome measures. RESULTS At 4 and 6 years post-operation, there was no clinically important difference in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score for any of the treatments. Using a strict composite outcome to assess functional cure at 6 years, we found no difference in cure among the three types of surgery. Half the women were cured at 6 years but only 10.3 to 12% of women had undergone further surgery for prolapse. However, 8.4% of women in the mesh group had undergone further surgery for mesh complications. There was no difference in the incidence of chronic pain or dyspareunia between groups. CONCLUSIONS At the mid-term outcome of 6 years, there is no benefit from augmenting primary prolapse repairs with polypropylene mesh inlays or biological xenografts. There was no evidence that polypropylene mesh inlays caused greater pain or dyspareunia than native tissue repairs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona M Reid
- Warrell Unit, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Oxford Road Campus, Manchester, M13 0JH, UK.
| | - Lorna Aucott
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Andrew Elders
- NMAHP Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Christine Hemming
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Kevin G Cooper
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Robert M Freeman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - Anthony R B Smith
- Warrell Unit, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Oxford Road Campus, Manchester, M13 0JH, UK
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- NMAHP Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Mary Kilonzo
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Dwayne Boyers
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Graeme MacLennan
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - John Norrie
- Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Suzanne Breeman
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fenocchi L, Best C, Mason H, Elders A, Hagen S, Maxwell M. Long-term effects and costs of pelvic floor muscle training for prolapse: trial follow-up record-linkage study. Int Urogynecol J 2023; 34:239-246. [PMID: 35763050 PMCID: PMC9834099 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-022-05272-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS Pelvic organ prolapse affects around 40% of women aged over 50 years. A multicentre parallel group randomised trial (the Pelvic Organ Prolapse PhysiotherapY (POPPY) trial) demonstrated that pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) was effective in reducing prolapse symptoms compared with no treatment. However, insight into the long-term impact of PFMT on health outcomes and health-service utilisation is scarce. METHODS This study utilised linkage of Scottish administrative health records to follow-up POPPY trial participants resident in Scotland over 11 years. Mixed effects logistic regression determined the likelihood of receiving further prolapse treatment for those in the PFMT and control groups. Analyses were adjusted for age group, prolapse stage, baseline symptom severity and attitude towards surgery. A cost assessment estimated longitudinal costs to the UK National Health Service (in Scotland) of accessing further prolapse treatment for each trial group. RESULTS Two hundred and ninety-three women, aged 25 to 79 years, were followed up. One hundred and forty-one women (48.1%) had received further prolapse treatment: 65 (of 149; 43.6%) in the PFMT group compared with 76 (of 144; 52.8%) in the control group. PFMT was associated with a reduction in the odds of any prolapse treatment during follow-up (AOR 0.61; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.99). Total cost of secondary care was £154,544 (GBP) in the PFMT group and £172,549 (GBP) in the control group. CONCLUSIONS Although PFMT did not lead to significant differences in total costs for further prolapse treatment over a post-intervention period of more than 10 years, it reduced the overall long-term risk of requiring hospital-based treatment for pelvic floor disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Fenocchi
- Yunus Centre for Social Business & Health, M201 George Moore Building, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 0BA, UK.
| | - Catherine Best
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Helen Mason
- Yunus Centre for Social Business & Health, M201 George Moore Building, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 0BA, UK
| | - Andrew Elders
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Margaret Maxwell
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Johnston W, Ware A, Kuiters WF, Delaney C, Brown JL, Hagen S, Corcoran D, Cummings M, Ramage G, Kean R. In vitro bacterial vaginosis biofilm community manipulation using endolysin therapy. Biofilm 2022; 5:100101. [PMID: 36655001 PMCID: PMC9841237 DOI: 10.1016/j.bioflm.2022.100101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) affects approximately 26% of women of childbearing age globally, presenting with 3-5 times increased risk of miscarriage and two-fold risk of pre-term birth. Antibiotics (metronidazole and clindamycin) are typically employed to treat BV; however the success rate is low due to the formation of recalcitrant polymicrobial biofilms. As a novel therapeutic, promising results have been obtained in vitro using Gardnerella endolysins, although to date their efficacy has only been demonstrated against simple biofilm models. In this study, a four-species biofilm was developed consisting of Gardnerella vaginalis, Fannyhessea vaginae, Prevotella bivia and Mobiluncus curtisii. Biofilms were grown in NYC III broth and treated using antibiotics and an anti-Gardnerella endolysin (CCB7.1) for 24 h. Biofilm composition, viability and structure were assessed using colony counts, live/dead qPCR and scanning electron microscopy. All species colonised biofilms to varying degrees, with G. vaginalis being the most abundant. Biofilm composition remained largely unchanged when challenged with escalated concentrations of conventional antibiotics. A Gardnerella-targeted endolysin candidate (CCB7.1) showed efficacy against several Gardnerella species planktonically, and significantly reduced viable G. vaginalis within polymicrobial biofilms at 1 to 4X pMIC (p < 0.05 vs. vehicle control). Collectively, this study highlights the resilience of biofilm-embedded pathogens against the currently used antibiotics and provides a polymicrobial model that allows for more effective pre-clinical screening of BV therapies. The Gardnerella-specific endolysin CCB7.1 demonstrated significant activity against G. vaginalis within polymicrobial biofilms, altering the overall community dynamic and composition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Johnston
- Department of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 0BA, United Kingdom,Glasgow Biofilm Research Network, United Kingdom
| | - Alicia Ware
- Department of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 0BA, United Kingdom,Glasgow Biofilm Research Network, United Kingdom
| | - Willemijn Frederique Kuiters
- Department of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 0BA, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Delaney
- Glasgow Biofilm Research Network, United Kingdom,Oral Sciences Research Group, University of Glasgow, 378 Sauchiehall Street, G2 3JZ, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Jason Lee Brown
- Glasgow Biofilm Research Network, United Kingdom,Oral Sciences Research Group, University of Glasgow, 378 Sauchiehall Street, G2 3JZ, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 0BA, United Kingdom
| | - David Corcoran
- CC Biotech Ltd, Imperial Translation and Innovation Hub, 84 Wood Lane, London, W12 0BZ, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Cummings
- CC Biotech Ltd, Imperial Translation and Innovation Hub, 84 Wood Lane, London, W12 0BZ, United Kingdom
| | - Gordon Ramage
- Glasgow Biofilm Research Network, United Kingdom,Oral Sciences Research Group, University of Glasgow, 378 Sauchiehall Street, G2 3JZ, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Ryan Kean
- Department of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 0BA, United Kingdom,Glasgow Biofilm Research Network, United Kingdom,Corresponding author. Department of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 0BA, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dwyer L, Bugge C, Hagen S, Goodman K, Agur W, Dembinsky M, Graham M, Guerrero K, Hemming C, Khunda A, McClurg D, Melone L, Thakar R, Kearney R. Theoretical and practical development of the TOPSY self-management intervention for women who use a vaginal pessary for pelvic organ prolapse. Trials 2022; 23:742. [PMID: 36064727 PMCID: PMC9446823 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06681-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition in women, where the downward descent of pelvic organs into the vagina causes symptoms which impacts quality of life. Vaginal pessaries offer an effective alternative to surgery for the management of POP. However, the need for regular follow-up can be burdensome for women and requires significant healthcare resources. The TOPSY study is a randomised controlled trial which aims to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of self-management of vaginal pessaries. This paper describes the theoretical and practical development of the self-management intervention. Methods The intervention was developed using the MRC complex intervention framework, normalisation process theory (NPT) and self-management theory. The intervention aims to boost perceived self-efficacy in accordance with Bandura’s social cognitive theory and is guided by the tasks and skills Lorig and Hollman describe as necessary to self-manage a health condition. Results The TOPSY intervention was designed to support women to undertake the medical management, role management and emotional management of their pessary. The six self-management skills described by Lorig and Hollman: problem-solving, decision-making, resource utilisation, formation of a patient-provider partnership role, action planning and self-tailoring, are discussed in detail, including how women were supported to achieve each task within the context of pessary self-management. The TOPSY intervention includes a self-management support session with a pessary practitioner trained in intervention delivery, a follow-up phone call 2 weeks later and ongoing telephone or face-to-face support as required by the woman initiated by contacting a member of the research team. Conclusions The TOPSY study intervention was developed utilising the findings from a prior service development project, intervention development and self-efficacy theory, relevant literature, clinician experience and feedback from pessary using women and members of the public. In 2022, the findings of the TOPSY study will provide further evidence to inform this important aspect of pessary management. Trial registration ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN62510577. Registered on June 10, 2017
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Dwyer
- The Warrell Unit, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
| | - Carol Bugge
- Health Sciences & Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery & Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Kirsteen Goodman
- Nursing, Midwifery & Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Wael Agur
- NHS Ayrshire & Arran, Crosshouse Hospital, Kilmarnock, UK.,School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | | | - Karen Guerrero
- Department of Urogynaecology, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Christine Hemming
- Aberdeen Maternity Hospital & Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Grampian University Hospitals NHS Trust, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Aethele Khunda
- South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Doreen McClurg
- Nursing, Midwifery & Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Lynn Melone
- Nursing, Midwifery & Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Ranee Thakar
- Croydon Health Services NHS Trust, Croydon University Hospital, Croydon, UK
| | - Rohna Kearney
- The Warrell Unit, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Todhunter-Brown A, Hazelton C, Campbell P, Elders A, Hagen S, McClurg D. Conservative interventions for treating urinary incontinence in women: an Overview of Cochrane systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 9:CD012337. [PMID: 36053030 PMCID: PMC9437962 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012337.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urinary incontinence (UI) is the involuntary loss of urine and can be caused by several different conditions. The common types of UI are stress (SUI), urgency (UUI) and mixed (MUI). A wide range of interventions can be delivered to reduce the symptoms of UI in women. Conservative interventions are generally recommended as the first line of treatment. OBJECTIVES To summarise Cochrane Reviews that assessed the effects of conservative interventions for treating UI in women. METHODS We searched the Cochrane Library to January 2021 (CDSR; 2021, Issue 1) and included any Cochrane Review that included studies with women aged 18 years or older with a clinical diagnosis of SUI, UUI or MUI, and investigating a conservative intervention aimed at improving or curing UI. We included reviews that compared a conservative intervention with 'control' (which included placebo, no treatment or usual care), another conservative intervention or another active, but non-conservative, intervention. A stakeholder group informed the selection and synthesis of evidence. Two overview authors independently applied the inclusion criteria, extracted data and judged review quality, resolving disagreements through discussion. Primary outcomes of interest were patient-reported cure or improvement and condition-specific quality of life. We judged the risk of bias in included reviews using the ROBIS tool. We judged the certainty of evidence within the reviews based on the GRADE approach. Evidence relating to SUI, UUI or all types of UI combined (AUI) were synthesised separately. The AUI group included evidence relating to participants with MUI, as well as from studies that combined women with different diagnoses (i.e. SUI, UUI and MUI) and studies in which the type of UI was unclear. MAIN RESULTS We included 29 relevant Cochrane Reviews. Seven focused on physical therapies; five on education, behavioural and lifestyle advice; one on mechanical devices; one on acupuncture and one on yoga. Fourteen focused on non-conservative interventions but had a comparison with a conservative intervention. No reviews synthesised evidence relating to psychological therapies. There were 112 unique trials (including 8975 women) that had primary outcome data included in at least one analysis. Stress urinary incontinence (14 reviews) Conservative intervention versus control: there was moderate or high certainty evidence that pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), PFMT plus biofeedback and cones were more beneficial than control for curing or improving UI. PFMT and intravaginal devices improved quality of life compared to control. One conservative intervention versus another conservative intervention: for cure and improvement of UI, there was moderate or high certainty evidence that: continence pessary plus PFMT was more beneficial than continence pessary alone; PFMT plus educational intervention was more beneficial than cones; more-intensive PFMT was more beneficial than less-intensive PFMT; and PFMT plus an adherence strategy was more beneficial than PFMT alone. There was no moderate or high certainty evidence for quality of life. Urgency urinary incontinence (five reviews) Conservative intervention versus control: there was moderate to high-certainty evidence demonstrating that PFMT plus feedback, PFMT plus biofeedback, electrical stimulation and bladder training were more beneficial than control for curing or improving UI. Women using electrical stimulation plus PFMT had higher quality of life than women in the control group. One conservative intervention versus another conservative intervention: for cure or improvement, there was moderate certainty evidence that electrical stimulation was more effective than laseropuncture. There was high or moderate certainty evidence that PFMT resulted in higher quality of life than electrical stimulation and electrical stimulation plus PFMT resulted in better cure or improvement and higher quality of life than PFMT alone. All types of urinary incontinence (13 reviews) Conservative intervention versus control: there was moderate to high certainty evidence of better cure or improvement with PFMT, electrical stimulation, weight loss and cones compared to control. There was moderate certainty evidence of improved quality of life with PFMT compared to control. One conservative intervention versus another conservative intervention: there was moderate or high certainty evidence of better cure or improvement for PFMT with bladder training than bladder training alone. Likewise, PFMT with more individual health professional supervision was more effective than less contact/supervision and more-intensive PFMT was more beneficial than less-intensive PFMT. There was moderate certainty evidence that PFMT plus bladder training resulted in higher quality of life than bladder training alone. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is high certainty that PFMT is more beneficial than control for all types of UI for outcomes of cure or improvement and quality of life. We are moderately certain that, if PFMT is more intense, more frequent, with individual supervision, with/without combined with behavioural interventions with/without an adherence strategy, effectiveness is improved. We are highly certain that, for cure or improvement, cones are more beneficial than control (but not PFMT) for women with SUI, electrical stimulation is beneficial for women with UUI, and weight loss results in more cure and improvement than control for women with AUI. Most evidence within the included Cochrane Reviews is of low certainty. It is important that future new and updated Cochrane Reviews develop questions that are more clinically useful, avoid multiple overlapping reviews and consult women with UI to further identify outcomes of importance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Todhunter-Brown
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Christine Hazelton
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Pauline Campbell
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Andrew Elders
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Doreen McClurg
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
McClurg D, Elders A, Hagen S, Mason H, Booth J, Cunnington AL, Walker R, Deane K, Harari D, Panicker J, Stratton S, McArthur J, Sellers C, Collins M. Stimulation of the tibial nerve-a randomised trial for urinary problems associated with Parkinson's-the STARTUP trial. Age Ageing 2022; 51:6608566. [PMID: 35704616 PMCID: PMC9200143 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afac114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background non-motor symptoms such as bladder dysfunction are common (80%) in people with Parkinson’s increasing the risk for falls with a negative impact on health-related costs and quality of life. We undertook STARTUP to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of using an adhesive electrode to stimulate the transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) to treat bladder dysfunction in people with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Study design, materials and methods: STARTUP was a parallel two-arm, multi-centre, pragmatic, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Each participant attended one clinic visit to complete consent, be randomised using a computer-generated system and to be shown how to use the device. The trial had two co-primary outcome measures: International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). These were completed at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks. A bladder frequency chart and resource questionnaire were also completed. Results two hundred forty two participants were randomised. About 59% of participants were male, the mean age was 69 years and mean time since diagnosis was 6 years. Questionnaire return rate was between 79 and 90%. There was a statistically significantly lower score in the active group at 6 weeks in the IPSS questionnaire (mean difference (Standard deviation, SD) 12.5 (6.5) vs 10.9 (5.5), effect size −1.49, 95% CI −2.72, −0.25). There was no statistically significant change in any other outcome. Conclusion TTNS was demonstrated to be safe with a high level of compliance. There was a significant change in one of the co-primary outcome measures at the end of the treatment period (i.e. 6 weeks), which could indicate a benefit. Further fully powered RCTs are required to determine effective treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doreen McClurg
- NMAHP RU, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK
| | - Andrew Elders
- NMAHP RU, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- NMAHP RU, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK
| | - Helen Mason
- Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK
| | - Jo Booth
- Scholl of Health & Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK
| | | | | | - Katherine Deane
- School of Nursing Sciences, University of East Anglia, NR4 7TJ, Norwich
| | - Danielle Harari
- Guy's & St Thomas Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, SE1 7EH, London
| | - Jalesh Panicker
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, WC1E 6BT, London
| | - Susan Stratton
- NMAHP RU, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK
| | - Jaclyn McArthur
- Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK
| | - Ceri Sellers
- NMAHP RU, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK
| | - Marissa Collins
- Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dembinsky M, Boodoosingh R, Fulu-Aiolupotea SM, Lima UL, Ekeroma A, Bugge C, Hagen S. Translating the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Score into Samoan using a modified back translation methodology. BMC Womens Health 2022; 22:93. [PMID: 35346163 PMCID: PMC8960078 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-022-01676-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although Samoan women have a high prevalence of obesity and multiple parity which are risk factors of pelvic organ prolapse, there is no prevalence data on this condition.
Aims Translate the Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Symptoms Score (POP-SS) from English into Samoan, Materials and methods Standardised methods for translating questionnaires, individual face to face audio-recorded interviews in which women completed the POP-SS using a Think Aloud method, analysis using a Framework approach. Results The POP-SS was successfully translated in to Samoan, an additional information leaflet was developed to support women’s understanding of what prolapse is, 14 Samoan women were recruited of which 13 were interviewed and completed the POP-SS, results of POP-SS (scores), results of think aloud, results in terms of research experience. Conclusions A Samoan version of the POP-SS is now available for further evaluation of its psychometric properties prior to wider use. The team continue to collaborate on their work on establishing the prevalence of prolapse whilst building local research capacity. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12905-022-01676-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Dembinsky
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Ramona Boodoosingh
- School of Nursing and Health Science, National University of Samoa, Apia, Samoa
| | | | - Uila Laifa Lima
- School of Nursing and Health Science, National University of Samoa, Apia, Samoa
| | - Alec Ekeroma
- School of Nursing and Health Science, National University of Samoa, Apia, Samoa
| | - Carol Bugge
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Boodoosingh R, Lima U, Fulu-Aiolupotea SM, Dembinsky M, Hagen S. Lessons learned from developing a Samoan health education video on pelvic organ prolapse. J Vis Commun Med 2022; 45:169-171. [DOI: 10.1080/17453054.2022.2043736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Uila Lima
- Doctor of Medicine in Progress, School of Nursing, National University of Samoa, To’omatagi, Samoa
| | | | | | - Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit (NMAHP RU), Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bugge C, Strachan H, Pringle S, Hagen S, Cheyne H, Wilson D. Should pregnant women know their individual risk of future pelvic floor dysfunction? A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022; 22:161. [PMID: 35220939 PMCID: PMC8883628 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04490-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The study aimed to explore: • pregnant women's and healthcare professionals' perspectives on provision of individual risk scores for future Pelvic Floor Dysfunction (PFD), • the feasibility of providing this during routine maternity care, • actions women might take as a result of knowing their PFD risk. METHODS Qualitative study. SETTING UK NHS Health Board. PARTICIPANTS Pregnant women (n = 14), obstetricians (n = 6), midwives (n = 8) and physiotherapists (n = 3). A purposive sample of pregnant women and obstetric healthcare professionals were introduced to the UR-CHOICE calculator, which estimates a woman's PFD risk, and were shown examples of low, medium and high-risk women. Data were collected in 2019 by semi-structured interview and focus group and analysed using the Framework Approach. RESULTS Women's PFD knowledge was limited, meaning they were unlikely to raise PFD risk with healthcare professionals. Women believed it was important to know their individual PFD risk and that knowledge would motivate them to undertake preventative activities. Healthcare professionals believed it was important to discuss PFD risk, however limited time and concerns over increased caesarean section rates prevented this in all but high-risk women or those that expressed concerns. CONCLUSION Women want to know their PFD risk. As part of an intervention based within a pregnant woman/ maternity healthcare professional consultation, the UR-CHOICE calculator could support discussion to consider preventative PFD activities and to enable women to be more prepared should PFD occur. A randomised controlled trial is needed to test the effectiveness of an intervention which includes the UR-CHOICE calculator in reducing PFD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol Bugge
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.
| | - Heather Strachan
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK
| | - Stewart Pringle
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Helen Cheyne
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Don Wilson
- University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Robinson D, Prodigalidad LT, Chan S, Serati M, Lozo S, Lowder J, Ghetti C, Hullfish K, Hagen S, Dumoulin C. International Urogynaecology Consultation chapter 1 committee 4: patients' perception of disease burden of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2022; 33:189-210. [PMID: 34977951 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-021-04997-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS This manuscript from Chapter 1 of the International Urogynecology Consultation (IUC) on Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) reports on the patients' perception of disease burden associated with pelvic organ prolapse. MATERIALS AND METHODS An international group containing a team of eight urogynaecologists, a physiotherapist and a statistician performed a search of the literature using pre-specified search terms in PubMed and Embase (January 2000 to August 2020). The division of sections within this report includes: (1) perception of POP and the relationship with body image and poor health; (2) a vaginal bulge as it impacts health and wellbeing in women; (3) the impact of POP on sexual life; (4) body image and pelvic floor disorders; (5) POP and mood; (6) appropriate use of treatment goals to better meet patients' expected benefits; (7) using health-related quality of life questionnaires to quantify patients' perception of POP; (8) The financial burden of POP to patients and society. Abstracts were reviewed and publications were eliminated if not relevant or did not include populations with POP or were not relevant to the subject areas as noted by the authors. The manuscripts were next reviewed for suitability using the Specialist Unit for Review Evidence (SURE) checklists for cohort, cross-sectional and case-control epidemiologic studies. RESULTS The original individual literature searches yielded 2312 references of which 190 were used in the final manuscript. The following perceptions were identified: (1) women were found to have varying perceptions of POP including shame and embarrassment. Some regard POP as consequence of aging and consider there is no effective therapy. (2) POP is perceived as a vaginal bulge and affects lifestyle and emotional wellbeing. The main driver for treatment is absence of bulge sensation. (3) POP is known to affect frequency of sexual intercourse but has less impact on satisfaction. (4) Prolapse-specific body image and genital self-image are important components of a women's emotional, physical and sexual wellbeing. (5) POP is commonly associated with depression and anxiety symptoms which impact HRQoL although are not correlated with objective anatomical findings. (6) Patient-centered treatment goals are useful in facilitating communication, shared decision-making and expectations before and after reconstructive surgery. (7) Disease-specific HRQoL questionnaires are important tools to assess bother and outcome following surgery, and there are now several tools with Level 1 evidence and a Grade A recommendation. (8) The cost of POP to the individual and to society is considerable in terms of productivity. In general, conservative measures tend to be more cost-effective than surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS Patients' perception of POP varies in different patients and has a far-reaching impact on their overall state of health and wellbeing. However, recognizing that it is a combination of body image and overall health (which affects mental health) allows clinicians to better tailor expectations for treatment to individual patients. There are HRQoL tools that can be used to quantify these impacts in clinical care and research. The costs to the individual patient (which affects their perception of POP) is an area that is poorly understood and needs more research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dudley Robinson
- Department of Urogynaecology, Kings College Hospital, London, UK.
| | - Lisa T Prodigalidad
- Division of Urogynaecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of the Philippines - College of Medicine, Philippine General Hospital, Manila, Philippines
| | - Symphorosa Chan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, Hong Kong
| | | | - Svjetlana Lozo
- Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Columbia University Medical Centre, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jerry Lowder
- Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Chiara Ghetti
- Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Kathie Hullfish
- Departments of Obstetrics/Gynaecology and Urology, Division Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, UVA Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - Chantal Dumoulin
- Canadian Research Chair in Urogynaecological Health and Aging, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hagen S, Bugge C, Dean SG, Elders A, Hay-Smith J, Kilonzo M, McClurg D, Abdel-Fattah M, Agur W, Andreis F, Booth J, Dimitrova M, Gillespie N, Glazener C, Grant A, Guerrero KL, Henderson L, Kovandzic M, McDonald A, Norrie J, Sergenson N, Stratton S, Taylor A, Williams LR. Basic versus biofeedback-mediated intensive pelvic floor muscle training for women with urinary incontinence: the OPAL RCT. Health Technol Assess 2021; 24:1-144. [PMID: 33289476 DOI: 10.3310/hta24700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urinary incontinence affects one in three women worldwide. Pelvic floor muscle training is an effective treatment. Electromyography biofeedback (providing visual or auditory feedback of internal muscle movement) is an adjunct that may improve outcomes. OBJECTIVES To determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of biofeedback-mediated intensive pelvic floor muscle training (biofeedback pelvic floor muscle training) compared with basic pelvic floor muscle training for treating female stress urinary incontinence or mixed urinary incontinence. DESIGN A multicentre, parallel-group randomised controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of biofeedback pelvic floor muscle training compared with basic pelvic floor muscle training, with a mixed-methods process evaluation and a longitudinal qualitative case study. Group allocation was by web-based application, with minimisation by urinary incontinence type, centre, age and baseline urinary incontinence severity. Participants, therapy providers and researchers were not blinded to group allocation. Six-month pelvic floor muscle assessments were conducted by a blinded assessor. SETTING This trial was set in UK community and outpatient care settings. PARTICIPANTS Women aged ≥ 18 years, with new stress urinary incontinence or mixed urinary incontinence. The following women were excluded: those with urgency urinary incontinence alone, those who had received formal instruction in pelvic floor muscle training in the previous year, those unable to contract their pelvic floor muscles, those pregnant or < 6 months postnatal, those with prolapse greater than stage II, those currently having treatment for pelvic cancer, those with cognitive impairment affecting capacity to give informed consent, those with neurological disease, those with a known nickel allergy or sensitivity and those currently participating in other research relating to their urinary incontinence. INTERVENTIONS Both groups were offered six appointments over 16 weeks to receive biofeedback pelvic floor muscle training or basic pelvic floor muscle training. Home biofeedback units were provided to the biofeedback pelvic floor muscle training group. Behaviour change techniques were built in to both interventions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was urinary incontinence severity at 24 months (measured using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Urinary Incontinence Short Form score, range 0-21, with a higher score indicating greater severity). The secondary outcomes were urinary incontinence cure/improvement, other urinary and pelvic floor symptoms, urinary incontinence-specific quality of life, self-efficacy for pelvic floor muscle training, global impression of improvement in urinary incontinence, adherence to the exercise, uptake of other urinary incontinence treatment and pelvic floor muscle function. The primary health economic outcome was incremental cost per quality-adjusted-life-year gained at 24 months. RESULTS A total of 300 participants were randomised per group. The primary analysis included 225 and 235 participants (biofeedback and basic pelvic floor muscle training, respectively). The mean 24-month International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Urinary Incontinence Short Form score was 8.2 (standard deviation 5.1) for biofeedback pelvic floor muscle training and 8.5 (standard deviation 4.9) for basic pelvic floor muscle training (adjusted mean difference -0.09, 95% confidence interval -0.92 to 0.75; p = 0.84). A total of 48 participants had a non-serious adverse event (34 in the biofeedback pelvic floor muscle training group and 14 in the basic pelvic floor muscle training group), of whom 23 (21 in the biofeedback pelvic floor muscle training group and 2 in the basic pelvic floor muscle training group) had an event related/possibly related to the interventions. In addition, there were eight serious adverse events (six in the biofeedback pelvic floor muscle training group and two in the basic pelvic floor muscle training group), all unrelated to the interventions. At 24 months, biofeedback pelvic floor muscle training was not significantly more expensive than basic pelvic floor muscle training, but neither was it associated with significantly more quality-adjusted life-years. The probability that biofeedback pelvic floor muscle training would be cost-effective was 48% at a £20,000 willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life-year threshold. The process evaluation confirmed that the biofeedback pelvic floor muscle training group received an intensified intervention and both groups received basic pelvic floor muscle training core components. Women were positive about both interventions, adherence to both interventions was similar and both interventions were facilitated by desire to improve their urinary incontinence and hindered by lack of time. LIMITATIONS Women unable to contract their muscles were excluded, as biofeedback is recommended for these women. CONCLUSIONS There was no evidence of a difference between biofeedback pelvic floor muscle training and basic pelvic floor muscle training. FUTURE WORK Research should investigate other ways to intensify pelvic floor muscle training to improve continence outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trial ISRCTN57746448. FUNDING This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 70. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Carol Bugge
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | | | - Andrew Elders
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Jean Hay-Smith
- Rehabilitation Teaching and Research Unit, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Mary Kilonzo
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Doreen McClurg
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Wael Agur
- NHS Ayrshire and Arran, Kilmarnock, UK
| | - Federico Andreis
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Joanne Booth
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Maria Dimitrova
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Nicola Gillespie
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Cathryn Glazener
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Aileen Grant
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Karen L Guerrero
- Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Lorna Henderson
- Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT), Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Marija Kovandzic
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Alison McDonald
- Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT), Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - John Norrie
- Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Nicole Sergenson
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Susan Stratton
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Anne Taylor
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Louise R Williams
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hemming C, Constable L, Goulao B, Kilonzo M, Boyers D, Elders A, Cooper K, Smith A, Freeman R, Breeman S, McDonald A, Hagen S, Montgomery I, Norrie J, Glazener C. Surgical interventions for uterine prolapse and for vault prolapse: the two VUE RCTs. Health Technol Assess 2021; 24:1-220. [PMID: 32138809 DOI: 10.3310/hta24130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND New surgical approaches for apical prolapse have gradually been introduced, with few prospective randomised controlled trial data to evaluate their safety and efficacy compared with traditional methods. OBJECTIVE To compare surgical uterine preservation with vaginal hysterectomy in women with uterine prolapse and abdominal procedures with vaginal procedures in women with vault prolapse in terms of clinical effectiveness, adverse events, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. DESIGN Two parallel randomised controlled trials (i.e. Uterine and Vault). Allocation was by remote web-based randomisation (1 : 1 ratio), minimised on the need for concomitant anterior and/or posterior procedure, concomitant incontinence procedure, age and surgeon. SETTING UK hospitals. PARTICIPANTS Uterine trial - 563 out of 565 randomised women had uterine prolapse surgery. Vault trial - 208 out of 209 randomised women had vault prolapse surgery. INTERVENTIONS Uterine trial - uterine preservation or vaginal hysterectomy. Vault trial - abdominal or vaginal vault suspension. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome measures were women's prolapse symptoms (as measured using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score), prolapse-specific quality of life and cost-effectiveness (as assessed by incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year). RESULTS Uterine trial - adjusting for baseline and minimisation covariates, the mean Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score at 12 months for uterine preservation was 4.2 (standard deviation 4.9) versus vaginal hysterectomy with a Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score of 4.2 (standard deviation 5.3) (mean difference -0.05, 95% confidence interval -0.91 to 0.81). Serious adverse event rates were similar between the groups (uterine preservation 5.4% vs. vaginal hysterectomy 5.9%; risk ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.38 to 1.75). There was no difference in overall prolapse stage. Significantly more women would recommend vaginal hysterectomy to a friend (odds ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.18 to 0.83). Uterine preservation was £235 (95% confidence interval £6 to £464) more expensive than vaginal hysterectomy and generated non-significantly fewer quality-adjusted life-years (mean difference -0.004, 95% confidence interval -0.026 to 0.019). Vault trial - adjusting for baseline and minimisation covariates, the mean Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score at 12 months for an abdominal procedure was 5.6 (standard deviation 5.4) versus vaginal procedure with a Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score of 5.9 (standard deviation 5.4) (mean difference -0.61, 95% confidence interval -2.08 to 0.86). The serious adverse event rates were similar between the groups (abdominal 5.9% vs. vaginal 6.0%; risk ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.27 to 3.44). The objective anterior prolapse stage 2b or more was higher in the vaginal group than in the abdominal group (odds ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.18 to 0.79). There was no difference in the overall prolapse stage. An abdominal procedure was £570 (95% confidence interval £459 to £682) more expensive than a vaginal procedure and generated non-significantly more quality-adjusted life-years (mean difference 0.004, 95% confidence interval -0.031 to 0.041). CONCLUSIONS Uterine trial - in terms of efficacy, quality of life or adverse events in the short term, no difference was identified between uterine preservation and vaginal hysterectomy. Vault trial - in terms of efficacy, quality of life or adverse events in the short term, no difference was identified between an abdominal and a vaginal approach. FUTURE WORK Long-term follow-up for at least 6 years is ongoing to identify recurrence rates, need for further prolapse surgery, adverse events and cost-effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN86784244. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 13. See the National Institute for Health Research Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lynda Constable
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Beatriz Goulao
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Mary Kilonzo
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Dwayne Boyers
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Andrew Elders
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research Unit (NMAHP RU), Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Kevin Cooper
- Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Anthony Smith
- St Mary's Hospital, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Suzanne Breeman
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Alison McDonald
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research Unit (NMAHP RU), Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Isobel Montgomery
- Independent patient representative, c/o Health Services Research Unit, Aberdeen, UK
| | - John Norrie
- Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Edinburgh BioQuarter, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Cathryn Glazener
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Booth J, Aucott L, Cotton S, Davis B, Fenocchi L, Goodman C, Hagen S, Harari D, Lawrence M, Lowndes A, Macaulay L, MacLennan G, Mason H, McClurg D, Norrie J, Norton C, O'Dolan C, Skelton D, Surr C, Treweek S. Tibial nerve stimulation compared with sham to reduce incontinence in care home residents: ELECTRIC RCT. Health Technol Assess 2021; 25:1-110. [PMID: 34167637 PMCID: PMC8273680 DOI: 10.3310/hta25410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urinary incontinence is prevalent in nursing and residential care homes, and has a profound impact on residents' dignity and quality of life. Treatment options are limited in these care contexts and care homes predominantly use absorbent pads to contain incontinence, rather than actively treat it. Transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation is a non-invasive, safe, low-cost intervention that is effective in reducing urinary incontinence in adults. OBJECTIVE To determine the clinical effectiveness of transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation to treat urinary incontinence in care home residents and to determine the associated costs of the treatment. DESIGN A multicentre, pragmatic, participant and outcome assessor-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. SETTING A total of 37 UK residential and nursing care homes. PARTICIPANTS Care home residents with at least weekly urinary incontinence that is contained using absorbent pads and who are able to use a toilet/toilet aid with or without assistance. INTERVENTIONS Residents were randomised (1 : 1) to receive 12 30-minute sessions of transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation or sham stimulation over a 6-week period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome - change in volume of urine leaked over a 24-hour period at 6 weeks. Secondary outcomes - number of pads used, Perception of Bladder Condition, toileting skills, quality of life and resource use. RESULTS A total of 408 residents were randomised (transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation, n = 197; sham stimulation, n = 209); two exclusions occurred post randomisation. Primary outcome data were available for 345 (85%) residents (transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation, n = 167; sham stimulation, n = 178). Adherence to the intervention protocol was as follows: 78% of the transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation group and 71% of the sham group received the correct stimulation. Primary intention-to-treat adjusted analysis indicated a mean change of -5 ml (standard deviation 362 ml) urine leakage from baseline in the transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation group and -66 ml (standard deviation 394 ml) urine leakage in the sham group, which was a statistically significant, but not clinically important, between-group difference of 68-ml urine leakage (95% confidence interval 0 to 136 ml; p = 0.05) in favour of the sham group. Sensitivity analysis supported the primary analysis. No meaningful differences were detected in any of the secondary outcomes. No serious adverse events related to transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation were reported. Economic evaluation assessed the resources used. The training and support costs for the staff to deliver the intervention were estimated at £121.03 per staff member. Estimated costs for delivery of transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation during the trial were £81.20 per participant. No significant difference was found between participants' scores over time, or between transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation and sham groups at any time point, for resident or proxy quality-of-life measures. CONCLUSIONS The ELECTRIC (ELECtric Tibial nerve stimulation to Reduce Incontinence in Care homes) trial showed, in the care home context (with a high proportion of residents with poor cognitive capacity and limited independent mobility), that transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation was not effective in reducing urinary incontinence. No economic case for transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation was made by the cost-consequences analysis; however, the positive reception of learning about urinary incontinence for care home staff supports a case for routine education in this care context. LIMITATIONS Completing 24-hour pad collections was challenging for care home staff, resulting in some missing primary outcome data. FUTURE WORK Research should investigate transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation in residents with urgency urinary incontinence to determine whether or not targeted stimulation is effective. Research should evaluate the effects of continence training for staff on continence care in care homes. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN98415244 and ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03248362. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 41. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Booth
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Lorna Aucott
- Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Seonaidh Cotton
- Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Bridget Davis
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Linda Fenocchi
- Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Claire Goodman
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Danielle Harari
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Maggie Lawrence
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Lisa Macaulay
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Graeme MacLennan
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Helen Mason
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Doreen McClurg
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - John Norrie
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Christine Norton
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Catriona O'Dolan
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Dawn Skelton
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Claire Surr
- School of Health and Community Studies, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| | - Shaun Treweek
- Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hofmann P, Hagen S, Noack V, Noack V, Schanz G, Schumacher G, Sepold L. Essential experimental results of the CORA test program on severe core damage phenomena / Wesentliche experimentelle Ergebnisse des Versuchsprogramms CORA zu Phänomenen bei schwerer Corezerstörung. KERNTECHNIK 2021. [DOI: 10.1515/kern-1994-594-515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
22
|
Affiliation(s)
- Carol Bugge
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Melanie Dembinsky
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Rohna Kearney
- Warrell Unit, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Division of Developmental Biology and Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Maxwell M, Berry K, Wane S, Hagen S, McClurg D, Duncan E, Abhyankar P, Elders A, Best C, Wilkinson J, Mason H, Fenocchi L, Calveley E, Guerrero K, Tincello D. Pelvic floor muscle training for women with pelvic organ prolapse: the PROPEL realist evaluation. Health Serv Deliv Res 2020. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr08470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Pelvic organ prolapse is estimated to affect 41–50% of women aged > 40 years. A multicentre randomised controlled trial of individualised pelvic floor muscle training found that pelvic floor muscle training was effective in reducing symptoms of prolapse, improved quality of life and showed clear potential to be cost-effective. Provision of pelvic floor muscle training for prolapse has continued to vary across the UK, with limited availability of specialist physiotherapists to deliver it.
Objectives
This project aimed to study the implementation and outcomes of different models of delivery to increase the service provision of pelvic floor muscle training, and to follow up treatment outcomes for the original trial participants.
Design
A realist evaluation of pelvic floor muscle training implementation conducted within three full case study sites and two partial case study sites; an observational prospective cohort study comparing patient-reported outcomes pre and post intervention in all five sites; and a long-term follow-up study linking previous trial participants to routine NHS hospital data.
Setting
The setting for the realist evaluation was pelvic floor muscle training service delivery models in three NHS sites. The setting for the patient-reported outcome measures study was pelvic floor muscle training services in five NHS sites.
Methods
Realist evaluation qualitative data were collected at four time points in three case study sites to understand the implementation models, uptake, adherence and impact. Interviews involved service managers/leads, consultants, staff delivering pelvic floor muscle training and women receiving pelvic floor muscle training.
Main outcomes measures
Patient-reported outcomes were collected at baseline and at 6 and 12 months across five sites, including the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score, health-related quality of life (measured using the EuroQol-5 Dimensions, five-level version, questionnaire), prolapse severity (measured using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System), urinary incontinence (measured using International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire – Urinary Incontinence Short Form) and need for further treatment.
Results
A total of 102 women were recruited to the patient-reported outcome measures cohort study (target, n = 120), and 65 women had matched baseline and 6-month Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Scores. The mean Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score was 10.18 (standard deviation 5.63) at baseline and 6.98 (standard deviation 5.23) at 6 months, representing a statistically significant and clinically meaningful difference. There was no statistically significant difference between the outcomes obtained from delivery by specialist physiotherapists and the outcomes obtained from delivery by other health-care professionals (mean change in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score: –3.95 vs. –2.81, respectively). Services delivered using higher-band physiotherapists only were more costly than services delivered using other staff mixes. The effect of the original pelvic floor muscle training intervention, over a post-intervention period of > 10 years, was a reduction in the odds of any treatment during follow-up (odds ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.37 to 0.99). The realist evaluation revealed stark differences in implementation. The site with a specialist physiotherapy service resisted change because of perceived threats to the specialist role and concerns about care quality. Pelvic floor muscle training delivery by other health-care staff was easier when there was a lack of any existing specialist service; staff had prior training and interest in pelvic health; staff had support, autonomy, time and resources to deliver pelvic floor muscle training as part of their core role; and surrounding services supported a flow of pelvic floor muscle training referrals.
Limitations
The number of available matched pre and post outcomes for women and the lack of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System examinations were limitations of this study.
Conclusions
It is possible to train different staff to effectively deliver pelvic floor muscle training to women. Women’s self-reported outcomes significantly improved across all service models. Training should be adequately tailored to differential skill mix needs.
Future work
Future work should include further implementation of pelvic floor muscle training and should include pre- and post-outcome data collection using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score.
Study registration
This study is registered as Research Registry 4919.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 8, No. 47. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret Maxwell
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Karen Berry
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Sarah Wane
- Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, University of Northumbria, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Doreen McClurg
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Edward Duncan
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Purva Abhyankar
- Division of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Andrew Elders
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Catherine Best
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Joyce Wilkinson
- Division of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Helen Mason
- Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Linda Fenocchi
- Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Eileen Calveley
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Karen Guerrero
- Department of Urogynaecology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Douglas Tincello
- Department of Health Sciences, Centre for Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Pollock A, Campbell P, Cheyne J, Cowie J, Davis B, McCallum J, McGill K, Elders A, Hagen S, McClurg D, Torrens C, Maxwell M. Interventions to support the resilience and mental health of frontline health and social care professionals during and after a disease outbreak, epidemic or pandemic: a mixed methods systematic review. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 11:CD013779. [PMID: 33150970 PMCID: PMC8226433 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 192] [Impact Index Per Article: 48.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence from disease epidemics shows that healthcare workers are at risk of developing short- and long-term mental health problems. The World Health Organization (WHO) has warned about the potential negative impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the mental well-being of health and social care professionals. Symptoms of mental health problems commonly include depression, anxiety, stress, and additional cognitive and social problems; these can impact on function in the workplace. The mental health and resilience (ability to cope with the negative effects of stress) of frontline health and social care professionals ('frontline workers' in this review) could be supported during disease epidemics by workplace interventions, interventions to support basic daily needs, psychological support interventions, pharmacological interventions, or a combination of any or all of these. OBJECTIVES Objective 1: to assess the effects of interventions aimed at supporting the resilience and mental health of frontline health and social care professionals during and after a disease outbreak, epidemic or pandemic. Objective 2: to identify barriers and facilitators that may impact on the implementation of interventions aimed at supporting the resilience and mental health of frontline health and social care professionals during and after a disease outbreak, epidemic or pandemic. SEARCH METHODS On 28 May 2020 we searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Global Index Medicus databases and WHO Institutional Repository for Information Sharing. We also searched ongoing trials registers and Google Scholar. We ran all searches from the year 2002 onwards, with no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA We included studies in which participants were health and social care professionals working at the front line during infectious disease outbreaks, categorised as epidemics or pandemics by WHO, from 2002 onwards. For objective 1 we included quantitative evidence from randomised trials, non-randomised trials, controlled before-after studies and interrupted time series studies, which investigated the effect of any intervention to support mental health or resilience, compared to no intervention, standard care, placebo or attention control intervention, or other active interventions. For objective 2 we included qualitative evidence from studies that described barriers and facilitators to the implementation of interventions. Outcomes critical to this review were general mental health and resilience. Additional outcomes included psychological symptoms of anxiety, depression or stress; burnout; other mental health disorders; workplace staffing; and adverse events arising from interventions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Pairs of review authors independently applied selection criteria to abstracts and full papers, with disagreements resolved through discussion. One review author systematically extracted data, cross-checked by a second review author. For objective 1, we assessed risk of bias of studies of effectiveness using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool. For objective 2, we assessed methodological limitations using either the CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme) qualitative study tool, for qualitative studies, or WEIRD (Ways of Evaluating Important and Relevant Data) tool, for descriptive studies. We planned meta-analyses of pairwise comparisons for outcomes if direct evidence were available. Two review authors extracted evidence relating to barriers and facilitators to implementation, organised these around the domains of the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research, and used the GRADE-CERQual approach to assess confidence in each finding. We planned to produce an overarching synthesis, bringing quantitative and qualitative findings together. MAIN RESULTS We included 16 studies that reported implementation of an intervention aimed at supporting the resilience or mental health of frontline workers during disease outbreaks (severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS): 2; Ebola: 9; Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS): 1; COVID-19: 4). Interventions studied included workplace interventions, such as training, structure and communication (6 studies); psychological support interventions, such as counselling and psychology services (8 studies); and multifaceted interventions (2 studies). Objective 1: a mixed-methods study that incorporated a cluster-randomised trial, investigating the effect of a work-based intervention, provided very low-certainty evidence about the effect of training frontline healthcare workers to deliver psychological first aid on a measure of burnout. Objective 2: we included all 16 studies in our qualitative evidence synthesis; we classified seven as qualitative and nine as descriptive studies. We identified 17 key findings from multiple barriers and facilitators reported in studies. We did not have high confidence in any of the findings; we had moderate confidence in six findings and low to very low confidence in 11 findings. We are moderately confident that the following two factors were barriers to intervention implementation: frontline workers, or the organisations in which they worked, not being fully aware of what they needed to support their mental well-being; and a lack of equipment, staff time or skills needed for an intervention. We are moderately confident that the following three factors were facilitators of intervention implementation: interventions that could be adapted for local needs; having effective communication, both formally and socially; and having positive, safe and supportive learning environments for frontline workers. We are moderately confident that the knowledge or beliefs, or both, that people have about an intervention can act as either barriers or facilitators to implementation of the intervention. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is a lack of both quantitative and qualitative evidence from studies carried out during or after disease epidemics and pandemics that can inform the selection of interventions that are beneficial to the resilience and mental health of frontline workers. Alternative sources of evidence (e.g. from other healthcare crises, and general evidence about interventions that support mental well-being) could therefore be used to inform decision making. When selecting interventions aimed at supporting frontline workers' mental health, organisational, social, personal, and psychological factors may all be important. Research to determine the effectiveness of interventions is a high priority. The COVID-19 pandemic provides unique opportunities for robust evaluation of interventions. Future studies must be developed with appropriately rigorous planning, including development, peer review and transparent reporting of research protocols, following guidance and standards for best practice, and with appropriate length of follow-up. Factors that may act as barriers and facilitators to implementation of interventions should be considered during the planning of future research and when selecting interventions to deliver within local settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Pollock
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Pauline Campbell
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Joshua Cheyne
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences (CCBS), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Julie Cowie
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Bridget Davis
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Jacqueline McCallum
- Department of Nursing and Community Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Kris McGill
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Andrew Elders
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Doreen McClurg
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Claire Torrens
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Glasgow, UK
| | - Margaret Maxwell
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Hagen S, Elders A, Stratton S, Sergenson N, Bugge C, Dean S, Hay-Smith J, Kilonzo M, Dimitrova M, Abdel-Fattah M, Agur W, Booth J, Glazener C, Guerrero K, McDonald A, Norrie J, Williams LR, McClurg D. Effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training with and without electromyographic biofeedback for urinary incontinence in women: multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2020; 371:m3719. [PMID: 33055247 PMCID: PMC7555069 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m3719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) plus electromyographic biofeedback or PFMT alone for stress or mixed urinary incontinence in women. DESIGN Parallel group randomised controlled trial. SETTING 23 community and secondary care centres providing continence care in Scotland and England. PARTICIPANTS 600 women aged 18 and older, newly presenting with stress or mixed urinary incontinence between February 2014 and July 2016: 300 were randomised to PFMT plus electromyographic biofeedback and 300 to PFMT alone. INTERVENTIONS Participants in both groups were offered six appointments with a continence therapist over 16 weeks. Participants in the biofeedback PFMT group received supervised PFMT and a home PFMT programme, incorporating electromyographic biofeedback during clinic appointments and at home. The PFMT group received supervised PFMT and a home PFMT programme. PFMT programmes were progressed over the appointments. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was self-reported severity of urinary incontinence (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-urinary incontinence short form (ICIQ-UI SF), range 0 to 21, higher scores indicating greater severity) at 24 months. Secondary outcomes were cure or improvement, other pelvic floor symptoms, condition specific quality of life, women's perception of improvement, pelvic floor muscle function, uptake of other urinary incontinence treatment, PFMT self-efficacy, adherence, intervention costs, and quality adjusted life years. RESULTS Mean ICIQ-UI SF scores at 24 months were 8.2 (SD 5.1, n=225) in the biofeedback PFMT group and 8.5 (SD 4.9, n=235) in the PFMT group (mean difference -0.09, 95% confidence interval -0.92 to 0.75, P=0.84). Biofeedback PFMT had similar costs (mean difference £121 ($154; €133), -£409 to £651, P=0.64) and quality adjusted life years (-0.04, -0.12 to 0.04, P=0.28) to PFMT. 48 participants reported an adverse event: for 23 this was related or possibly related to the interventions. CONCLUSIONS At 24 months no evidence was found of any important difference in severity of urinary incontinence between PFMT plus electromyographic biofeedback and PFMT alone groups. Routine use of electromyographic biofeedback with PFMT should not be recommended. Other ways of maximising the effects of PFMT should be investigated. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN57756448.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK
| | - Andrew Elders
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK
| | - Susan Stratton
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK
| | - Nicole Sergenson
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK
| | - Carol Bugge
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Sarah Dean
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Jean Hay-Smith
- Rehabilitation Teaching and Research Unit, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Mary Kilonzo
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Maria Dimitrova
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Mohamed Abdel-Fattah
- Aberdeen Centre for Women's Health Research, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Wael Agur
- Crosshouse Hospital, NHS Ayrshire and Arran, Crosshouse, Kilmarnock, UK
| | - Jo Booth
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Cathryn Glazener
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Karen Guerrero
- Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Alison McDonald
- Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT), Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK
| | - John Norrie
- Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Louise R Williams
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK
| | - Doreen McClurg
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bugge C, Kearney R, Dembinsky M, Khunda A, Graham M, Agur W, Breeman S, Dwyer L, Elders A, Forrest M, Goodman K, Guerrero K, Hemming C, Mason H, McClurg D, Melone L, Norrie J, Thakar R, Hagen S. The TOPSY pessary self-management intervention for pelvic organ prolapse: a study protocol for the process evaluation. Trials 2020; 21:836. [PMID: 33032651 PMCID: PMC7542744 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04729-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Process evaluations have become a valued component, alongside clinical trials, of the wider evaluation of complex health interventions. They support understanding of implementation, and fidelity, related to the intervention and provide valuable insights into what is effective in a practical setting by examining the context in which interventions are implemented. The TOPSY study consists of a large multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of pessary self-management with clinic-based care in improving women's condition-specific quality of life, and a nested process evaluation. The process evaluation aims to examine and maximise recruitment to the trial, describe intervention fidelity and explore participants' and healthcare professionals' experiences. METHODS The trial will recruit 330 women from approximately 17 UK centres. The process evaluation uses a mixed-methods approach. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with randomised women (18 per randomised group/n = 36), women who declined trial participation but agreed to interview (non-randomised women) (n = 20) and healthcare professionals recruiting to the trial (n ~ 17) and delivering self-management and clinic-based care (n ~ 17). The six internal pilot centres will be asked to record two to three recruitment discussions each (total n = 12-18). All participating centres will be asked to record one or two self-management teaching appointments (n = 30) and self-management 2-week follow-up telephone calls (n = 30). Process data (quantitative and qualitative) will be gathered in participant completed trial questionnaires. Interviews will be analysed thematically and recordings using an analytic grid to identify fidelity to the intervention. Quantitative analysis will be predefined within the process evaluation analysis plan. DISCUSSION The wide variety of pessary care delivered across the UK for women with pelvic organ prolapse presents specific localised contexts in which the TOPSY interventions will be implemented. Understanding this contextual variance is central to understanding how and in what circumstances pessary self-management can be implemented (should it be effective). The inclusion of non-randomised women provides an innovative way of collecting indispensable information about eligible women who decline trial participation, allowing broader contextualisation and considerations of generalisability of trial findings. Methodological insights from examination of recruitment processes and mechanisms have the potential to inform recruitment mechanisms and future recruitment strategies and study designs. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN62510577 . Registered on 6 October 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol Bugge
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
| | - Rohna Kearney
- The Warrell Unit, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Melanie Dembinsky
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Aethele Khunda
- South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Margaret Graham
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Wael Agur
- NHS Ayrshire & Arran, Crosshouse Hospital, School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing, University of Glasgow, Kilmarnock, UK
| | - Suzanne Breeman
- Health Services Research Unit (HSRU), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Lucy Dwyer
- The Warrell Unit, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Andrew Elders
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Mark Forrest
- Health Services Research Unit (HSRU), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Kirsteen Goodman
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Karen Guerrero
- Department of Urogynaecology, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Christine Hemming
- Grampian University Hospitals NHS Trust, Aberdeen Maternity Hospital & Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Helen Mason
- Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Doreen McClurg
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Lynn Melone
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - John Norrie
- Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ranee Thakar
- Croydon Health Services NHS Trust, Croydon University Hospital, Croydon, UK
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hagen S, Kearney R, Goodman K, Melone L, Elders A, Manoukian S, Agur W, Best C, Breeman S, Dembinsky M, Dwyer L, Forrest M, Graham M, Guerrero K, Hemming C, Khunda A, Mason H, McClurg D, Norrie J, Karachalia-Sandri A, Thakar R, Bugge C. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of vaginal pessary self-management compared to clinic-based care for pelvic organ prolapse: protocol for the TOPSY randomised controlled trial. Trials 2020; 21:837. [PMID: 33032644 PMCID: PMC7542756 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04738-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2019] [Accepted: 03/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pelvic organ prolapse (or prolapse) is a common condition in women where the pelvic organs (bladder, bowel or womb) descend into the vagina and cause distressing symptoms that adversely affect quality of life. Many women will use a vaginal pessary to treat their prolapse symptoms. Clinic-based care usually consists of having a pessary fitted in a primary or secondary care setting, and returning approximately every 6 months for healthcare professional review and pessary change. However, it is possible that women could remove, clean and re-insert their pessary themselves; this is called self-management. This trial aims to assess if self-management of a vaginal pessary is associated with better quality of life for women with prolapse when compared to clinic-based care. Methods This is a multicentre randomised controlled trial in at least 17 UK centres. The intervention group will receive pessary self-management teaching, a self-management information leaflet, a follow-up phone call and access to a local telephone number for clinical support. The control group will receive the clinic-based pessary care which is standard at their centre. Demographic and medical history data will be collected from both groups at baseline. The primary outcome is condition-specific quality of life at 18 months’ post-randomisation. Several secondary outcomes will also be assessed using participant-completed questionnaires. Questionnaires will be administered at baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months’ post-randomisation. An economic evaluation will be carried out alongside the trial to evaluate cost-effectiveness. A process evaluation will run parallel to the trial, the protocol for which is reported in a companion paper. Discussion The results of the trial will provide robust evidence of the effectiveness of pessary self-management compared to clinic-based care in terms of improving women’s quality of life, and of its cost-effectiveness. Trial registration ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN62510577. Registered on June 10, 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne Hagen
- Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
| | - Rohna Kearney
- The Warrell Unit, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,University Institute of Human Development, Faculty of Medical Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Lynn Melone
- Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Andrew Elders
- Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Sarkis Manoukian
- Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Wael Agur
- NHS Ayrshire & Arran, Crosshouse Hospital, Kilmarnock, UK.,School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Catherine Best
- NMAHP Research Unit, unit 13 Scion House, University of Stirling Innovation Park, Stirling, UK
| | - Suzanne Breeman
- Health Services Research Unit (HSRU), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Lucy Dwyer
- The Warrell Unit, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,University Institute of Human Development, Faculty of Medical Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Mark Forrest
- Health Services Research Unit (HSRU), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Margaret Graham
- Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) representative, Dunlop, UK
| | - Karen Guerrero
- Department of Urogynaecology, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Christine Hemming
- Aberdeen Maternity Hospital & Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Grampian University Hospitals NHS Trust, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Aethele Khunda
- South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Helen Mason
- Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Doreen McClurg
- Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - John Norrie
- Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Ranee Thakar
- Croydon Health Services NHS Trust, Croydon University Hospital, Croydon, UK
| | - Carol Bugge
- Health Sciences & Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abhyankar P, Wilkinson J, Berry K, Wane S, Uny I, Aitchison P, Duncan E, Calveley E, Mason H, Guerrero K, Tincello D, McClurg D, Elders A, Hagen S, Maxwell M. Implementing pelvic floor muscle training for women with pelvic organ prolapse: a realist evaluation of different delivery models. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:910. [PMID: 32998714 PMCID: PMC7528592 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05748-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pelvic Floor Muscle Training (PFMT) has been shown to be effective for pelvic organ prolapse in women, but its implementation in routine practice is challenging due to lack of adequate specialist staff. It is important to know if PFMT can be delivered by different staff skill mixes, what barriers and facilitators operate in different contexts, what strategies enable successful implementation and what are the underlying mechanisms of their action. PROPEL intervention was designed to maximise the delivery of effective PFMT in the UK NHS using different staff skill mixes. We conducted a realist evaluation (RE) of this implementation to understand what works, for whom, in what circumstances and why. METHODS Informed by the Realist and RE-AIM frameworks, the study used a longitudinal, qualitative, multiple case study design. The study took place in five, purposively selected, diverse NHS sites across the UK and proceeded in three phases to identify, test and refine a theory of change. Data collection took place at 4 time points over an 18 month implementation period using focus groups and semi-structured interviews with a range of stakeholders including service leads/managers, senior practitioners, newly trained staff and women receiving care in the new service models. Data were analysed using thematic framework approach adapted to identify Context, Mechanism and Outcome (CMO) configurations of the RE. RESULTS A heightened awareness of the service need among staff and management was a mechanism for change, particularly in areas where there was a shortage of skilled staff. In contrast, the most established specialist physiotherapist-delivered PFMT service activated feelings of role protection and compromised quality, which restricted the reach of PFMT through alternative models. Staff with some level of prior knowledge in women's health and adequate organisational support were more comfortable and confident in new role. Implementation was seamless when PFMT delivery was incorporated in newly trained staff's role and core work. CONCLUSION Roll-out of PFMT delivery through different staff skill mixes is possible when it is undertaken by clinicians with an interest in women's health, and carefully implemented ensuring adequate levels of training and ongoing support from specialists, multi-disciplinary teams and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Purva Abhyankar
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.
| | - Joyce Wilkinson
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK
| | - Karen Berry
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling Innovation Park, Stirling, FK9 4NF, UK
| | - Sarah Wane
- Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, University of Northumbria, Sutherland Building, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK
| | - Isabelle Uny
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling Innovation Park, Stirling, FK9 4NF, UK
| | - Patricia Aitchison
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling Innovation Park, Stirling, FK9 4NF, UK
| | - Edward Duncan
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling Innovation Park, Stirling, FK9 4NF, UK
| | - Eileen Calveley
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling Innovation Park, Stirling, FK9 4NF, UK
| | - Helen Mason
- Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 0BA, UK
| | - Karen Guerrero
- Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, 1345 Govan Road, Glasgow, G51 4TF, UK
| | - Douglas Tincello
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Centre for Medicine, University Road, Leicester, LE1 RRH, UK
| | - Doreen McClurg
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Govan Mbeki Building, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 0BA, UK
| | - Andrew Elders
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Govan Mbeki Building, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 0BA, UK
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Govan Mbeki Building, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 0BA, UK
| | - Margaret Maxwell
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling Innovation Park, Stirling, FK9 4NF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Daly CME, Mathew J, Aloyscious J, Hagen S, Tyagi V, Guerrero KL. Urethral bulking agents: a retrospective review of primary versus salvage procedure outcomes. World J Urol 2020; 39:2107-2112. [PMID: 32816136 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03413-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Urethral bulking agents (UBA) have traditionally been offered as salvage procedures for recurrent stress urinary incontinence (SUI). We compare the success of UBA in patients that had undergone a previous procedure for SUI (Salvage-UBA) to the SUI surgery naïve (Primary-UBA). We hypothesised a positive effect in both Primary and Salvage-UBA with potentially poorer rates of response in the salvage group. METHODS Retrospective case series of patients having their first UBA (2010-2018). Primary outcome was to assess any difference in patient reported success between groups. Patient-reported improvement was assessed on a 4-point scale: 'cured, improved, no change, worse' and treatment 'success' defined as 'cured' or 'improved'. A multivariate analysis, adjusting for plausible differences between groups, was undertaken in IBM SPSS Statistics (2016). RESULTS 135 Primary-UBA and 38 Salvage-UBA were performed. Complete follow-up was obtained for 114 patients (66%): 86 Primary and 28 Salvage. Median follow-up time: 33 months. In 2012, 47% (8/17) of all UBA were Salvage-UBA, whilst in 2018, the majority were Primary-UBA (92%, 46/50). Success was not significantly different between Salvage-UBA 75% (21/28) versus Primary-UBA 67% (58/86) (Wald χ2 = 0.687, df = 1, p = 0.407). Top-up rates were similar: 14% (n = 4/28, Salvage-UBA) versus 15% (n = 13/86, Primary-UBA) (χ2 = 0.011, df = 1, p = 0.914). CONCLUSION The number of women opting for UBA has increased substantially. No significant differences were noted for success with Salvage-UBA compared to Primary-UBA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ciara M E Daly
- Department of Urogynaecology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland.
| | - Jini Mathew
- Department of Urogynaecology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - Judey Aloyscious
- Department of Urogynaecology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- Department of Urogynaecology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - Veenu Tyagi
- Department of Urogynaecology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - Karen L Guerrero
- Department of Urogynaecology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Glazener CM, Breeman S, Hagen S, Elders A, Aucott L, Cooper K, Reid FM. Authors' reply re: Mesh inlay, mesh kit or native tissue repair for women having repeat anterior or posterior prolapse surgery: randomised controlled trial (PROSPECT). BJOG 2020; 127:1170-1171. [PMID: 32488988 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Suzanne Breeman
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- NMAHP Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Andrew Elders
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Kevin Cooper
- Gynaecology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Fiona M Reid
- St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Glazener C, Breeman S, Elders A, Hemming C, Cooper KG, Freeman RM, Smith A, Hagen S, Montgomery I, Kilonzo M, Boyers D, McDonald A, McPherson G, MacLennan G, Norrie J, Reid FM. Mesh inlay, mesh kit or native tissue repair for women having repeat anterior or posterior prolapse surgery: randomised controlled trial (PROSPECT). BJOG 2020; 127:1002-1013. [PMID: 32141709 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare standard (native tissue) repair with synthetic mesh inlays or mesh kits. DESIGN Randomised controlled trial. SETTING Thirty-three UK hospitals. POPULATION Women having surgery for recurrent prolapse. METHODS Women recruited using remote randomisation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Prolapse symptoms, condition-specific quality-of-life and serious adverse effects. RESULTS A Mean Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score at 1 year was similar for each comparison (standard 6.6 versus mesh inlay 6.1, mean difference [MD] -0.41, 95% CI -2.92 to 2.11: standard 6.6 versus mesh kit 5.9, MD -1.21 , 95% CI -4.13 to 1.72) but the confidence intervals did not exclude a minimally important clinical difference. There was no evidence of difference in any other outcome measure at 1 or 2 years. Serious adverse events, excluding mesh exposure, were similar at 1 year (standard 7/55 [13%] versus mesh inlay 5/52 [10%], risk ratio [RR] 1.05 [0.66-1.68]: standard 3/25 [12%] versus mesh kit 3/46 [7%], RR 0.49 [0.11-2.16]). Cumulative mesh exposure rates over 2 years were 7/52 (13%) in the mesh inlay arm, of whom four women required surgical revision; and 4/46 in the mesh kit arm (9%), of whom two required surgical revision. CONCLUSIONS We did not find evidence of a difference in terms of prolapse symptoms from the use of mesh inlays or mesh kits in women undergoing repeat prolapse surgery. Although the sample size was too small to be conclusive, the results provide a substantive contribution to future meta-analysis. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT There is not enough evidence to support use of synthetic mesh inlay or mesh kits for repeat prolapse surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cma Glazener
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - S Breeman
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - A Elders
- NMAHP Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - C Hemming
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - K G Cooper
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - R M Freeman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - Arb Smith
- St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - S Hagen
- NMAHP Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - I Montgomery
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - M Kilonzo
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - D Boyers
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - A McDonald
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - G McPherson
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - G MacLennan
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - J Norrie
- Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences & Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - F M Reid
- St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
McClurg D, Panicker J, Walker RW, Cunnington A, Deane KHO, Harari D, Elders A, Booth J, Hagen S, Mason H, Stratton S. Stimulation of the tibial nerve: a protocol for a multicentred randomised controlled trial for urinary problems associated with Parkinson's disease-STARTUP. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e034887. [PMID: 32071190 PMCID: PMC7044833 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Parkinson's disease is the second most common chronic neurodegenerative condition with bladder dysfunction affecting up to 71%. Symptoms affect quality of life and include urgency, frequency, hesitancy, nocturia and incontinence. Addressing urinary dysfunction is one of the top 10 priority research areas identified by the James Lind Alliance and Parkinson's UK. OBJECTIVES Conduct a randomised controlled trial (RCT) targeting people with Parkinson's disease (PwP) who have self-reported problematic lower urinary tract symptoms, investigating the effectiveness of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) compared with sham TTNS. Implement a standardised training approach and package for the correct application of TTNS. Conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of TTNS compared with sham TTNS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS An RCT of 6 weeks with twice weekly TTNS or sham TTNS. Participants will be recruited in 12 National Health Service neurology/movement disorder services, using a web-based randomisation system, and will be shown how to apply TTNS or sham TTNS. Participants will receive a weekly telephone call from the researchers during the intervention period. The trial has two coprimary outcome measures: International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form and the International Prostate Symptom Score. Secondary outcomes include a 3-day bladder diary, quality of life, acceptability and fidelity and health economic evaluation. Outcomes will be measured at 0, 6 and 12 weeks.A sample size of 208 randomised in equal numbers to the two arms will provide 90% power to detect a clinically important difference of 2.52 points on the Internatioanl Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF) and of 3 points in the International Prostate Symptom Score total score at 12 weeks at 5% significance level, based on an SD of 4.7 in each arm and 20% attrition at 6 weeks. Analysis will be by intention to treat and pre defined in a statistical analysis plan ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: East of Scotland Research Ethics Service (EoSRES), 18/ES00042, obtained on 10 May 2018. The trial will allow us to determine effectiveness, safety, cost and acceptability of TTNS for bladder dysfunction in PWP. Results will be published in open access journals; lay reports will be posted to all participants and presented at conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN12437878; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doreen McClurg
- Nursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Jalesh Panicker
- Department of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Richard W Walker
- Department of Medicine, North Tyneside General Hospital, North Shields, UK
| | - AnneLouise Cunnington
- Neurology Department, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Clyde Division, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Danielle Harari
- Department of Ageing and Health, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - Andrew Elders
- Nursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Jo Booth
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Helen Mason
- Yunus Centre, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Susan Stratton
- Nursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Jerez-Roig J, Booth J, Skelton DA, Giné-Garriga M, Chastin SFM, Hagen S. Is urinary incontinence associated with sedentary behaviour in older women? Analysis of data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0227195. [PMID: 32017767 PMCID: PMC6999862 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2019] [Accepted: 12/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urinary incontinence (UI) is a common geriatric syndrome associated with physical and cognitive impairments. The association between type of UI and sedentary behaviour (SB) has not been explored. AIM To determine association between moderate-severe UI, or any stress UI (SUI) or any urgency UI (UUI) and SB in community-dwelling older women. METHODS Women aged 60 and over from the 2005-2006 cycle of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) with objectively measured (accelerometer) and self-reported SB and UI data were selected. Multivariate models exploring association between moderate-severe UI and SB, or SUI and SB, or UUI and SB were analysed using logistic regression adjusted for factors associated with UI. RESULTS In the overall sample of 459 older women, 23.5% reported moderate-severe UI, 50.5% reported any SUI and 41.4% reported any UUI. In bivariate analysis objectively measured proportion of time in SB was associated with moderate-severe UI and UUI (p = 0.014 and p = 0.047) but not SUI. Average duration of SB bouts in those with moderate-severe UI or any SUI was no longer than older women reporting no continence issues, but it was significantly (19%) longer in older women with any UUI (mean difference 3.2 minutes; p = 0.001). Self-reported SB variables were not associated with any type of UI. Multivariate analysis showed an association between UUI and a longer average duration of SB bouts (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.01-1.09, p = 0.006) but no association with moderate-severe UI or SUI. CONCLUSION UUI was significantly associated with increased average duration of SB bouts in community-dwelling older women. The importance of objective measurement of SB is highlighted and suggests that decreasing time in prolonged sitting may be a target intervention to reduce UUI. Future studies are required to further explore the association between SB and incontinence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Jerez-Roig
- Research group on Methodology, Methods, Models and Outcomes of Health and Social Sciences (M3O). Faculty of Health Sciences and Welfare. Centre for Health and Social Care Research (CESS), University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia (UVic-UCC), Vic, Spain
| | - Joanne Booth
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Dawn A. Skelton
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Maria Giné-Garriga
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom
- Blanquerna Faculty of Psychology, Education and Sport Sciences, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sebastien F. M. Chastin
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom
- Department of Sport and Movement Science, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Youssef N, Best C, Mackay WG, Hagen S, Shepherd A. Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire on Long-Term Catheter Quality of Life. Int J Nurs Pract 2019; 26:e12807. [PMID: 31854071 DOI: 10.1111/ijn.12807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2019] [Revised: 10/25/2019] [Accepted: 11/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIM To translate the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ) Long-Term Catheter Quality of Life (LTCqol) questionnaire (ICIQ-LTCqol) from English to Arabic and evaluate its psychometric properties. BACKGROUND Currently, no tool for Arabic-speaking patients is available to measure the quality of life in patients using long-term urinary catheters. DESIGN Translation and psychometric assessment of questionnaire. METHODS The internal consistency and construct validity of the translated Arabic version of the ICIQ-LTCqol were evaluated in a convenience sample of 141 participants recruited from a hospital in Egypt from April to September 2017. Test-retest reliability was assessed for a sample of 15 participants who completed this version at two time points. Construct validity was assessed by factor analysis. RESULTS The translated Arabic version of the ICIQ-LTCqol showed satisfactory test-retest reliability and internal consistency, with the Cronbach α = .75. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the same two factors ("catheter function" and "lifestyle") structure as found in the English version of the tool supporting the construct validity of the translated questionnaire. CONCLUSION This original and significant study allows, for the first time, researchers and clinicians working with Arabic-speaking patients, the opportunity to evaluate the quality of life in long-term urinary catheter users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naglaa Youssef
- College of Nursing, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.,Faculty of Nursing, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
| | - Catherine Best
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - William Gordon Mackay
- Institute of Healthcare Policy and Practice, School of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley, UK
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Ashley Shepherd
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Booth J, Aucott L, Cotton S, Goodman C, Hagen S, Harari D, Lawrence M, Lowndes A, Macaulay L, MacLennan G, Mason H, McClurg D, Norrie J, Norton C, O’Dolan C, Skelton DA, Surr C, Treweek S. ELECtric Tibial nerve stimulation to Reduce Incontinence in Care homes: protocol for the ELECTRIC randomised trial. Trials 2019; 20:723. [PMID: 31843002 PMCID: PMC6915984 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3723-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2019] [Accepted: 09/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urinary incontinence (UI) is highly prevalent in nursing and residential care homes (CHs) and profoundly impacts on residents' dignity and quality of life. CHs predominantly use absorbent pads to contain UI rather than actively treat the condition. Transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (TPTNS) is a non-invasive, safe and low-cost intervention with demonstrated effectiveness for reducing UI in adults. However, the effectiveness of TPTNS to treat UI in older adults living in CHs is not known. The ELECTRIC trial aims to establish if a programme of TPTNS is a clinically effective treatment for UI in CH residents and investigate the associated costs and consequences. METHODS This is a pragmatic, multicentre, placebo-controlled, randomised parallel-group trial comparing the effectiveness of TPTNS (target n = 250) with sham stimulation (target n = 250) in reducing volume of UI in CH residents. CH residents (men and women) with self- or staff-reported UI of more than once per week are eligible to take part, including those with cognitive impairment. Outcomes will be measured at 6, 12 and 18 weeks post randomisation using the following measures: 24-h Pad Weight Tests, post void residual urine (bladder scans), Patient Perception of Bladder Condition, Minnesota Toileting Skills Questionnaire and Dementia Quality of Life. Economic evaluation based on a bespoke Resource Use Questionnaire will assess the costs of providing a programme of TPTNS. A concurrent process evaluation will investigate fidelity to the intervention and influencing factors, and qualitative interviews will explore the experiences of TPTNS from the perspective of CH residents, family members, CH staff and managers. DISCUSSION TPTNS is a non-invasive intervention that has demonstrated effectiveness in reducing UI in adults. The ELECTRIC trial will involve CH staff delivering TPTNS to residents and establish whether TPTNS is more effective than sham stimulation for reducing the volume of UI in CH residents. Should TPTNS be shown to be an effective and acceptable treatment for UI in older adults in CHs, it will provide a safe, low-cost and dignified alternative to the current standard approach of containment and medication. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03248362. Registered on 14 August 2017. ISRCTN, ISRCTN98415244. Registered on 25 April 2018. https://www.isrctn.com/.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Booth
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Govan Mbeki Building, Glasgow, G4 0BA UK
| | - L. Aucott
- Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - S. Cotton
- Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - C. Goodman
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - S. Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit (NMAHP RU), Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - D. Harari
- Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M. Lawrence
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Govan Mbeki Building, Glasgow, G4 0BA UK
| | - A. Lowndes
- Playlist for Life, Unit 1/14, Govanhill Workspace, Glasgow,, UK
| | - L. Macaulay
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Govan Mbeki Building, Glasgow, G4 0BA UK
| | - G. MacLennan
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - H. Mason
- Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - D. McClurg
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit (NMAHP RU), Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - J. Norrie
- Usher Institute, Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - C. O’Dolan
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Govan Mbeki Building, Glasgow, G4 0BA UK
| | - D. A. Skelton
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Govan Mbeki Building, Glasgow, G4 0BA UK
| | - C. Surr
- School of Health and Community Studies, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| | - S. Treweek
- Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Shepherd A, Steel E, Taylor A, Mackay WG, Hagen S. Patient and community nurse perspectives on recruitment to a randomized controlled trial of urinary catheter washout solutions. Nurs Open 2019; 6:907-914. [PMID: 31367414 PMCID: PMC6650662 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2018] [Revised: 02/26/2019] [Accepted: 03/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To give evidence around the acceptability of a proposed randomized controlled trial (RCT) of catheter washout solutions. DESIGN A sample of senior community nursing staff (N = 7) were interviewed, and four focus groups with a sample of community nurses were conducted. Eleven semi-structured face-to-face interviews were undertaken with patients using a long-term catheter. METHODS An in-depth qualitative study using a phenomenological approach was employed. This approach was suitable to explore the lived experiences of patients and gain their viewpoints and experiences. RESULTS Nurse participants raised concerns about the removal of washout treatment or increased risk of infection in relation to which arm of the trial patients were randomized to. There was concern that patients could get used to the increased contact with nursing staff. Six patients who agreed to participate cited personal benefit, benefiting others and a sense of indifference. Four patients were unsure about taking part and one declined. All cited concerns about negative implications for themselves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Shepherd
- Faculty of Health Sciences and SportUniversity of StirlingStirlingUK
| | - Emma Steel
- Faculty of Health Sciences and SportUniversity of StirlingStirlingUK
| | - Anne Taylor
- Faculty of Health Sciences and SportUniversity of StirlingStirlingUK
| | - William Gordon Mackay
- Institute of Healthcare Policy and Practice, Health, Nursing and MidwiferyUniversity of the West of ScotlandPaisleyUK
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research UnitGlasgow Caledonian UniversityGlasgowUK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
France E, Hoskins G, Hoddinott P, Hagen S, Williams B, Main E, Treweek S, Glasscoe C, Dhouieb E, Cunningham S, Semple K. P357 A before-and-after feasibility study of an intervention to increase chest physiotherapy adherence among young children with cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/s1569-1993(19)30649-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
38
|
McClurg D, Harris F, Goodman K, Doran S, Hagen S, Treweek S, Norton C, Coggrave M, Norrie J, Rauchhaus P, Donnan P, Emmanuel A, Manoukian S, Mason H. Abdominal massage plus advice, compared with advice only, for neurogenic bowel dysfunction in MS: a RCT. Health Technol Assess 2019; 22:1-134. [PMID: 30375324 DOI: 10.3310/hta22580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Between 50% and 80% of people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) experience neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD) (i.e. constipation and faecal incontinence) that affects quality of life and can lead to hospitalisation. OBJECTIVES To determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of abdominal massage plus advice on bowel symptoms on PwMS compared with advice only. A process evaluation investigated the factors that affected the clinical effectiveness and possible implementation of the different treatments. DESIGN A randomised controlled trial with process evaluation and health economic components. Outcome analysis was undertaken blind. SETTING The trial took place in 12 UK hospitals. PARTICIPANTS PwMS who had 'bothersome' NBD. INTERVENTION Following individualised training, abdominal massage was undertaken daily for 6 weeks (intervention group). Advice on good bowel management as per the Multiple Sclerosis Society advice booklet was provided to both groups. All participants received weekly telephone calls from the research nurse. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the difference between the intervention and control groups in change in the NBD score from baseline to week 24. Secondary outcomes were measured via a bowel diary, adherence diary, the Constipation Scoring System, patient resource questionnaire and the EuroQol-5 Dimensions, five-level version (EQ-5D-5L). RESULTS A total of 191 participants were finalised, 189 of whom were randomised (two participants were finalised in error) (control group, n = 99; intervention group, n = 90) and an intention-to-treat analysis was performed. The mean age was 52 years (standard deviation 10.83 years), 81% (n = 154) were female and 11% (n = 21) were wheelchair dependent. Fifteen participants from the intervention group and five from the control group were lost to follow-up. The change in NBD score by week 24 demonstrated no significant difference between groups [mean difference total score -1.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) -3.32 to 0.04; p = 0.0558]; there was a significant difference between groups in the change in the frequency of stool evacuation per week (mean difference 0.62, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.21; p = 0.039) and in the number of times per week that participants felt that they emptied their bowels completely (mean difference 1.08, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.76; p = 0.002), in favour of the intervention group. Of participant interviewees, 75% reported benefits, for example less difficulty passing stool, more complete evacuations, less bloated, improved appetite, and 85% continued with the massage. A cost-utility analysis conducted from a NHS and patient cost perspective found in the imputed sample with bootstrapping a mean incremental outcome effect of the intervention relative to usual care of -0.002 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) (95% CI -0.029 to 0.027 QALYs). In the same imputed sample with bootstrapping, the mean incremental cost effect of the intervention relative to usual care was £56.50 (95% CI -£372.62 to £415.68). No adverse events were reported. Limitations include unequal randomisation, dropout and the possibility of ineffective massage technique. CONCLUSION The increment in the primary outcome favoured the intervention group, but it was small and not statistically significant. The economic analysis identified that the intervention was dominated by the control group. Given the small improvement in the primary outcome, but not in terms of QALYs, a low-cost version of the intervention might be considered worthwhile by some patients. FUTURE WORK Research is required to establish possible mechanisms of action and modes of massage delivery. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN85007023 and NCT03166007. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 22, No. 58. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doreen McClurg
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Fiona Harris
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Kirsteen Goodman
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Selina Doran
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Shaun Treweek
- Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT), Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | | | - John Norrie
- Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Petra Rauchhaus
- Tayside Clinical Trials Unit, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Peter Donnan
- Tayside Clinical Trials Unit, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Anton Emmanuel
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sarkis Manoukian
- Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Helen Mason
- Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abhyankar P, Uny I, Semple K, Wane S, Hagen S, Wilkinson J, Guerrero K, Tincello D, Duncan E, Calveley E, Elders A, McClurg D, Maxwell M. Women's experiences of receiving care for pelvic organ prolapse: a qualitative study. BMC Womens Health 2019; 19:45. [PMID: 30876415 PMCID: PMC6419797 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-019-0741-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2018] [Accepted: 03/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pelvic organ prolapse is a common urogenital condition affecting 41-50% of women over the age of 40. To achieve early diagnosis and appropriate treatment, it is important that care is sensitive to and meets women's needs, throughout their patient journey. This study explored women's experiences of seeking diagnosis and treatment for prolapse and their needs and priorities for improving person-centred care. METHODS Twenty-two women receiving prolapse care through urogynaecology services across three purposefully selected NHS UK sites took part in three focus groups and four telephone interviews. A topic guide facilitated discussions about women's experiences of prolapse, diagnosis, treatment, follow-up, interactions with healthcare professionals, overall service delivery, and ideals for future services to meet their needs. Data were analysed thematically. RESULTS Three themes emerged relating to women's experiences of a) Evaluating what is normal b) Hobson's choice of treatment decisions, and c) The trial and error of treatment and technique. Women often delayed seeking help for their symptoms due to lack of awareness, embarrassment and stigma. When presented to GPs, their symptoms were often dismissed and unaddressed until they became more severe. Women reported receiving little or no choice in treatment decisions. Choices were often influenced by health professionals' preferences which were subtly reflected through the framing of the offer. Women's embodied knowledge of their condition and treatment was largely unheeded, resulting in decisions that were inconsistent with women's preferences and needs. Physiotherapy based interventions were reported as helping women regain control over their symptoms and life. A need for greater awareness of prolapse and physiotherapy interventions among women, GPs and consultants was identified alongside greater focus on prevention, early diagnosis and regular follow-up. Greater choice and involvement in treatment decision making was desired. CONCLUSIONS As prolapse treatment options expand to include more conservative choices, greater awareness and education is needed among women and professionals about these as a first line treatment and preventive measure, alongside a multi-professional team approach to treatment decision making. Women presenting with prolapse symptoms need to be listened to by the health care team, offered better information about treatment choices, and supported to make a decision that is right for them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Karen Semple
- Nursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | | | - Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | | | | | | | - Edward Duncan
- Nursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Eileen Calveley
- Nursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Andrew Elders
- Nursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Doreen McClurg
- Nursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Margaret Maxwell
- Nursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Grant A, Dean S, Hay-Smith J, Hagen S, McClurg D, Taylor A, Kovandzic M, Bugge C. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness randomised controlled trial of basic versus biofeedback-mediated intensive pelvic floor muscle training for female stress or mixed urinary incontinence: protocol for the OPAL (optimising pelvic floor exercises to achieve long-term benefits) trial mixed methods longitudinal qualitative case study and process evaluation. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e024152. [PMID: 30782894 PMCID: PMC6411251 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2018] [Revised: 11/22/2018] [Accepted: 11/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Female urinary incontinence (UI) is common affecting up to 45% of women. Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is the first-line treatment but there is uncertainty whether intensive PFMT is better than basic PFMT for long-term symptomatic improvement. It is also unclear which factors influence women's ability to perform PFMT long term and whether this has impacts on long-term outcomes. OPAL (optimising PFMT to achieve long-term benefits) trial examines the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of basic PFMT versus biofeedback-mediated PFMT and this evaluation explores women's experiences of treatment and the factors which influence effectiveness. This will provide data aiding interpretation of the trial findings; make recommendations for optimising the treatment protocol; support implementation in practice; and address gaps in the literature around long-term adherence to PFMT for women with stress or mixed UI. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This evaluation comprises a longitudinal qualitative case study and process evaluation (PE). The case study aims to explore women's experiences of treatment and adherence and the PE will explore factors influencing intervention effectiveness. The case study has a two-tailed design and will recruit 40 women, 20 from each trial group; they will be interviewed four times over 2 years. Process data will be collected from women through questionnaires at four time-points, from health professionals through checklists and interviews and by sampling 100 audio recordings of appointments. Qualitative analysis will use case study methodology (qualitative study) and the framework technique (PE) and will interrogate for similarities and differences between the trial groups regarding barriers and facilitators to adherence. Process data analyses will examine fidelity, engagement and mediating factors using descriptive and interpretative statistics. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Approval from West of Scotland Research Ethics Committee 4 (16/LO/0990). Findings will be published in journals, disseminated at conferences and through the final report. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN57746448.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aileen Grant
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Sarah Dean
- South West Peninsula Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Research in Health Care (PenCLAHRC), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Jean Hay-Smith
- Rehabilitation Teaching and Research Unit, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Doreen McClurg
- Nursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Anne Taylor
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Marija Kovandzic
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Carol Bugge
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Hagen S, McClurg D, Bugge C, Hay-Smith J, Dean SG, Elders A, Glazener C, Abdel-fattah M, Agur WI, Booth J, Guerrero K, Norrie J, Kilonzo M, McPherson G, McDonald A, Stratton S, Sergenson N, Grant A, Wilson L. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of basic versus biofeedback-mediated intensive pelvic floor muscle training for female stress or mixed urinary incontinence: protocol for the OPAL randomised trial. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e024153. [PMID: 30782895 PMCID: PMC6411252 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2018] [Revised: 09/19/2018] [Accepted: 11/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Accidental urine leakage is a distressing problem that affects around one in three women. The main types of urinary incontinence (UI) are stress, urgency and mixed, with stress being most common. Current UK guidelines recommend that women with UI are offered at least 3 months of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT). There is evidence that PFMT is effective in treating UI, however it is not clear how intensively women have to exercise to give the maximum sustained improvement in symptoms, and how we enable women to achieve this. Biofeedback is an adjunct to PFMT that may help women exercise more intensively for longer, and thus may improve continence outcomes when compared with PFMT alone. A Cochrane review was inconclusive about the benefit of biofeedback, indicating the need for further evidence. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This multicentre randomised controlled trial will compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of PFMT versus biofeedback-mediated PFMT for women with stress UI or mixed UI. The primary outcome is UI severity at 24 months after randomisation. The primary economic outcome measure is incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year at 24 months. Six hundred women from UK community, outpatient and primary care settings will be randomised and followed up via questionnaires, diaries and pelvic floor assessment. All participants are offered six PFMT appointments over 16 weeks. The use of clinic and home biofeedback is added to PFMT for participants in the biofeedback group. Group allocation could not be masked from participants and healthcare staff. An intention-to-treat analysis of the primary outcome will estimate the mean difference between the trial groups at 24 months using a general linear mixed model adjusting for minimisation covariates and other important prognostic covariates, including the baseline score. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Approval granted by the West of Scotland Research Ethics Committee 4 (16/LO/0990). Written informed consent will be obtained from participants by the local research team. Serious adverse events will be reported to the data monitoring and ethics committee, the ethics committee and trial centres as required. A Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials checklist and figure are available for this protocol. The results will be published in international journals and included in the relevant Cochrane review. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN57746448; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Doreen McClurg
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Carol Bugge
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Jean Hay-Smith
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | | | - Andrew Elders
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Cathryn Glazener
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Wael Ibrahim Agur
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, NHS Ayrshire and Arran University Hospital Crosshouse, Kilmarnock, UK
| | - Jo Booth
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Karen Guerrero
- Department of Gynaecology, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - John Norrie
- Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Mary Kilonzo
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Gladys McPherson
- The Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Alison McDonald
- The Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Susan Stratton
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Nicole Sergenson
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Aileen Grant
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
Purpose: Lower urinary tract symptoms are common in advancing age and a major cause of disability through avoidance of activity and social engagement. This systematic review aimed to identify the most valid and reliable brief screening tool for these symptoms or bladder problems, to incorporate into a health promotion programme for older adults to facilitate discussion about self-management.Method: Review eligibility criteria included studies published between 1990 and November 2018, reporting the validity, reliability and/or acceptability of bladder health screening tools. Six electronic databases were searched.Results: Twenty-two studies were included. Three screening tools met the criteria: International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS); International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Urinary Incontinence Short-Form; Bladder Control Self-Assessment Questionnaire (B-SAQ). Test-retest reliability for total scores of the IPSS and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Urinary Incontinence Short-Form was acceptable. All three questionnaires showed evidence of acceptable levels of internal consistency and of convergent validity.Conclusion: Having favourable psychometric scores compared to the B-SAQ and for ease of use and trustworthiness of a simple questionnaire, the IPSS and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Urinary Incontinence Short-Form met the criteria for recommendation for raising awareness and bladder health promoting interventions to reduce associated disability.Implications for RehabilitationLower urinary tract symptoms are common in advancing age and a major cause of disability through avoidance of activity and social engagement.Lower urinary tract symptoms can be prevented or improved through self-management strategies.Help-seeking levels for lower urinary tract symptoms is low but could be improved through continence promotion interventions.The International Prostate Symptom Score and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Urinary Incontinence Short Form are bladder health screening questionnaires which would be appropriate to use as part of a continence promotion intervention to help prompt discussions and raise awareness and subsequently improve symptoms and associated disability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorna Booth
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Dawn A Skelton
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Joanne Booth
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Booth L, Skelton DA, Hagen S, Booth J. Age and gender stratified normative values for the International Prostate Symptom Score for adults aged 60 years and over. Neurourol Urodyn 2018; 37:2732-2739. [PMID: 29926963 DOI: 10.1002/nau.23735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2018] [Accepted: 05/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To identify age and gender stratified normative values for the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) for older community-living adults. METHODS Secondary analysis of data from a large cohort study produced norms presented as means, standard deviations, medians, ranges, and percentile scores. Non-parametric analyses were conducted to investigate the effect that demographic variables, smoking status and comorbidity had on the severity of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) as measured by the IPSS. RESULTS Data from a total of 1103 survey respondents of community-living men and women aged between 60 and 99 years in the UK were analyzed. Normal ranges for the IPSS (as indicated by the median and 25th to 75th percentiles) were within the mild and low moderate LUTS categories of the IPSS, irrespective of age or gender. Age, gender, co-habitant status, and comorbidity had an effect on LUTS severity with comorbidity being the best predictor of IPSS scores. CONCLUSION This study has provided IPSS normative values for an older UK adult population aged 60-99 years. These normative values can be used by researchers and practitioners for peer comparison making the individual's IPSS score more meaningful. Presenting the normative values suggests that some mild symptoms may be described as "normal." It may also help to combat the perception that poor bladder health is an inevitable part of aging, as all norms in the current study fell into either mild or low moderate symptom categories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorna Booth
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Dawn A Skelton
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Joanne Booth
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify the shared priorities for future research of women affected by and clinicians involved with pessary use for the management of prolapse. DESIGN A priority setting project using a consensus method. SETTING A James Lind Alliance Pessary use for prolapse Priority Setting Partnership (JLA Pessary PSP) conducted from May 2016 to September 2017 in the UK. PARTICIPANTS The PSP was run by a Steering Group of three women with experience of pessary use, three experienced clinicians involved with management of prolapse, two researchers with relevant experience, a JLA adviser and a PSP leader. Two surveys were conducted in 2016 and 2017. The first gathered questions about pessaries, and the second asked respondents to prioritise a list of questions. A final workshop was held on 8 September 2017 involving 10 women and 13 clinician representatives with prolapse and pessary experience. RESULTS A top 10 list of priorities for future research in pessary use for prolapse was agreed by consensus. CONCLUSIONS Women with experience of pessary use and clinicians involved with prolapse management have worked together to determine shared priorities for future research. Aligning the top 10 results with existing research findings will highlight the gaps in current evidence and signpost future research to areas of priority. Effective dissemination of the results will enable research funding bodies to focus on gathering the evidence to answer the questions that matter most to those who will be affected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Lough
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Doreen McClurg
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Alex Pollock
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
McClurg D, Bugge C, Elders A, Irshad T, Hagen S, Moore KN, Buckley B, Fader M. Factors affecting continuation of clean intermittent catheterisation in people with multiple sclerosis: Results of the COSMOS mixed-methods study. Mult Scler 2018; 25:727-739. [PMID: 29683042 DOI: 10.1177/1352458518768722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clean intermittent catheterisation (CIC) is often recommended for people with multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVE To determine the variables that affect continuation or discontinuation of the use of CIC. METHODS A three-part mixed-method study (prospective longitudinal cohort ( n = 56), longitudinal qualitative interviews ( n = 20) and retrospective survey ( n = 456)) was undertaken, which identified the variables that influenced CIC continuation/discontinuation. The potential explanatory variables investigated in each study were the individual's age, gender, social circumstances, number of urinary tract infections, bladder symptoms, presence of co-morbidity, stage of multiple sclerosis and years since diagnosis, as well as CIC teaching method and intensity. RESULTS For some people with MS the prospect of undertaking CIC is difficult and may take a period of time to accept before beginning the process of using CIC. Ongoing support from clinicians, support at home and a perceived improvement in symptoms such as nocturia were positive predictors of continuation. In many cases, the development of a urinary tract infection during the early stages of CIC use had a significant detrimental impact on continuation. CONCLUSION Procedures for reducing the incidence of urinary tract infection during the learning period (i.e. when being taught and becoming competent) should be considered, as well as the development of a tool to aid identification of a person's readiness to try CIC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carol Bugge
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Andrew Elders
- NMAHP RU, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Suzanne Hagen
- NMAHP RU, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Brian Buckley
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Philippine General Hospital, Manila, Philippines
| | - Mandy Fader
- Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK/Continence and Skin Technology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
AIMS The gradient in health inequalities reflects a relationship between health and social circumstance, demonstrating that health worsens as you move down the socio-economic scale. For more than a decade, the Norwegian National government has developed policies to reduce social inequalities in health by levelling the social gradient. The adoption of the Public Health Act in 2012 was a further movement towards a comprehensive policy. The main aim of the act is to reduce social health inequalities by adopting a Health in All Policies approach. The municipalities are regarded key in the implementation of the act. The SODEMIFA project aimed to study the development of the new public health policy, with a particular emphasis on its implementation in municipalities. METHODS In the SODEMIFA project, a mixed-methods approach was applied, and the data consisted of surveys as well as qualitative interviews. The informants were policymakers at the national and local level. RESULTS Our findings indicate that the municipalities had a rather vague understanding of the concept of health inequalities, and even more so, the concept of the social gradient in health. The most common understanding was that policy to reduce social inequalities concerned disadvantaged groups. Accordingly, policies and measures would be directed at these groups, rather than addressing the social gradient. CONCLUSIONS A movement towards an increased understanding and adoption of the new, comprehensive public health policy was observed. However, to continue this process, both local and national levels must stay committed to the principles of the act.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Fosse
- 1 Department of Health Promotion and Development, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- 2 Department of Health, Social and Welfare Studies, University College of Southeast Norway, Notodden, Norway
| | - M K Helgesen
- 3 Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research, (NIBR)Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences Oslo, Norway
| | - S Hagen
- 2 Department of Health, Social and Welfare Studies, University College of Southeast Norway, Notodden, Norway
| | - S Torp
- 2 Department of Health, Social and Welfare Studies, University College of Southeast Norway, Notodden, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Affiliation(s)
| | - William Gordon Mackay
- Institute of Healthcare Policy and Practice, University of the West of Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Glazener C, Breeman S, Elders A, Hemming C, Cooper K, Freeman R, Smith A, Hagen S, Montgomery I, Kilonzo M, Boyers D, McDonald A, McPherson G, MacLennan G, Norrie J. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surgical options for the management of anterior and/or posterior vaginal wall prolapse: two randomised controlled trials within a comprehensive cohort study - results from the PROSPECT Study. Health Technol Assess 2018; 20:1-452. [PMID: 28052810 DOI: 10.3310/hta20950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of mesh in prolapse surgery is controversial, leading to a number of enquiries into its safety and efficacy. OBJECTIVE To compare synthetic non-absorbable mesh inlay, biological graft and mesh kit with a standard repair in terms of clinical effectiveness, adverse effects, quality of life (QoL), costs and cost-effectiveness. DESIGN Two randomised controlled trials within a comprehensive cohort (CC) study. Allocation was by a remote web-based randomisation system in a 1 :1 : 1 ratio (Primary trial) or 1 : 1 : 2 ratio (Secondary trial), and was minimised on age, type of prolapse repair planned, need for a concomitant continence procedure, need for a concomitant upper vaginal prolapse procedure and surgeon. Participants and outcome assessors were blinded to randomisation; participants were unblinded if they requested the information. Surgeons were not blinded to allocated procedure. SETTING Thirty-five UK hospitals. PARTICIPANTS Primary study: 2474 women in the analysis (including 1348 randomised) having primary anterior or posterior prolapse surgery. Secondary study: 398 in the analysis (including 154 randomised) having repeat anterior or posterior prolapse surgery. CC3: 215 women having either uterine or vault prolapse repair. INTERVENTIONS Anterior or posterior repair alone, or with mesh inlay, biological graft or mesh kit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Prolapse symptoms [Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score (POP-SS)]; prolapse-specific QoL; cost-effectiveness [incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY)]. RESULTS Primary trials: adjusting for baseline and minimisation covariates, mean POP-SS was similar for each comparison {standard 5.4 [standard deviation (SD) 5.5] vs. mesh 5.5 (SD 5.1), mean difference (MD) 0.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.70 to 0.71; standard 5.5 (SD 5.6) vs. graft 5.6 (SD 5.6), MD -0.15, 95% CI -0.93 to 0.63}. Serious non-mesh adverse effects rates were similar between the groups in year 1 [standard 7.2% vs. mesh 7.8%, risk ratio (RR) 1.08, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.72; standard 6.3% vs. graft 9.8%, RR 1.57, 95% CI 0.95 to 2.59]. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in any other outcome measure. The cumulative mesh complication rates over 2 years were 2 of 430 (0.5%) for standard repair (trial 1), 46 of 435 (10.6%) for mesh inlay and 2 of 368 (0.5%) for biological graft. The CC findings were comparable. Incremental costs were £363 (95% CI -£32 to £758) and £565 (95% CI £180 to £950) for mesh and graft vs. standard, respectively. Incremental QALYs were 0.071 (95% CI -0.004 to 0.145) and 0.039 (95% CI -0.041 to 0.120) for mesh and graft vs. standard, respectively. A Markov decision model extrapolating trial results over 5 years showed standard repair had the highest probability of cost-effectiveness, but results were surrounded by considerable uncertainty. Secondary trials: there were no statistically significant differences between the randomised groups in any outcome measure, but the sample size was too small to be conclusive. The cumulative mesh complication rates over 2 years were 7 of 52 (13.5%) for mesh inlay and 4 of 46 (8.7%) for mesh kit, with no mesh exposures for standard repair. CONCLUSIONS In women who were having primary repairs, there was evidence of no benefit from the use of mesh inlay or biological graft compared with standard repair in terms of efficacy, QoL or adverse effects (other than mesh complications) in the short term. The Secondary trials were too small to provide conclusive results. LIMITATIONS Women in the Primary trials included some with a previous repair in another compartment. Follow-up is vital to identify any long-term potential benefits and serious adverse effects. FUTURE WORK Long-term follow-up to at least 6 years after surgery is ongoing to identify recurrence rates, need for further prolapse surgery, adverse effects and cost-effectiveness. TRIAI REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN60695184. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 20, No. 95. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathryn Glazener
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Suzanne Breeman
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Andrew Elders
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Mary Kilonzo
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Dwayne Boyers
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.,Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Alison McDonald
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Gladys McPherson
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Graeme MacLennan
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - John Norrie
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Mackay WG, MacIntosh T, Kydd A, Fleming A, O'Kane C, Shepherd A, Hagen S, Williams C, Mundie J, Russell C, Rodgers F, MacLachlan M, Galbraith R, Rankin J, McIver V. Living with an indwelling urethral catheter in a community setting: Exploring triggers for unscheduled community nurse “out‐of‐hours” visits. J Clin Nurs 2017; 27:866-875. [PMID: 29052353 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- William G Mackay
- Institute of Healthcare Policy and Practice School of Health Nursing and Midwifery University of the West of Scotland Paisley UK
| | - Teresa MacIntosh
- Institute of Healthcare Policy and Practice School of Health Nursing and Midwifery University of the West of Scotland Paisley UK
| | - Angela Kydd
- School of Health and Social Care Edinburgh Napier University Edinburgh UK
| | - Anne Fleming
- Institute of Healthcare Policy and Practice School of Health Nursing and Midwifery University of the West of Scotland Paisley UK
| | - Cate O'Kane
- Institute of Healthcare Policy and Practice School of Health Nursing and Midwifery University of the West of Scotland Paisley UK
| | - Ashley Shepherd
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport University of Stirling Stirling UK
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit Glasgow Caledonian University Glasgow UK
| | - Craig Williams
- Institute of Healthcare Policy and Practice School of Health Nursing and Midwifery University of the West of Scotland Paisley UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jean Rankin
- Institute of Healthcare Policy and Practice School of Health Nursing and Midwifery University of the West of Scotland Paisley UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Maxwell M, Semple K, Wane S, Elders A, Duncan E, Abhyankar P, Wilkinson J, Tincello D, Calveley E, MacFarlane M, McClurg D, Guerrero K, Mason H, Hagen S. PROPEL: implementation of an evidence based pelvic floor muscle training intervention for women with pelvic organ prolapse: a realist evaluation and outcomes study protocol. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17:843. [PMID: 29273048 PMCID: PMC5741940 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2795-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2017] [Accepted: 12/13/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) is estimated to affect 41%–50% of women aged over 40. Findings from the multi-centre randomised controlled “Pelvic Organ Prolapse PhysiotherapY” (POPPY) trial showed that individualised pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) was effective in reducing symptoms of prolapse, improved quality of life and showed clear potential to be cost-effective. However, provision of PFMT for prolapse continues to vary across the UK, with limited numbers of women’s health physiotherapists specialising in its delivery. Implementation of this robust evidence from the POPPY trial will require attention to different models of delivery (e.g. staff skill mix) to fit with differing care environments. Methods A Realist Evaluation (RE) of implementation and outcomes of PFMT delivery in contrasting NHS settings will be conducted using multiple case study sites. Involving substantial local stakeholder engagement will permit a detailed exploration of how local sites make decisions on how to deliver PFMT and how these lead to service change. The RE will track how implementation is working; identify what influences outcomes; and, guided by the RE-AIM framework, will collect robust outcomes data. This will require mixed methods data collection and analysis. Qualitative data will be collected at four time-points across each site to understand local contexts and decisions regarding options for intervention delivery and to monitor implementation, uptake, adherence and outcomes. Patient outcome data will be collected at baseline, six months and one year follow-up for 120 women. Primary outcome will be the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score (POP-SS). An economic evaluation will assess the costs and benefits associated with different delivery models taking account of further health care resource use by the women. Cost data will be combined with the primary outcome in a cost effectiveness analysis, and the EQ-5D-5L data in a cost utility analysis for each of the different models of delivery. Discussion Study of the implementation of varying models of service delivery of PFMT across contrasting sites combined with outcomes data and a cost effectiveness analysis will provide insight into the implementation and value of different models of PFMT service delivery and the cost benefits to the NHS in the longer term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret Maxwell
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Karen Semple
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Sarah Wane
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
| | | | - Edward Duncan
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Purva Abhyankar
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Joyce Wilkinson
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | | | - Eileen Calveley
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Mary MacFarlane
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|