1
|
Balmaceno-Criss M, Lafage R, Alsoof D, Daher M, Hamilton DK, Smith JS, Eastlack RK, Fessler RG, Gum JL, Gupta MC, Hostin R, Kebaish KM, Klineberg EO, Lewis SJ, Line BG, Nunley PD, Mundis GM, Passias PG, Protopsaltis TS, Buell T, Scheer JK, Mullin JP, Soroceanu A, Ames CP, Lenke LG, Bess S, Shaffrey CI, Schwab FJ, Lafage V, Burton DC, Diebo BG, Daniels AH. Impact of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis on Full Body Sagittal Alignment and Compensation for Sagittal Spinal Deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024; 49:743-751. [PMID: 38375611 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE To investigate the effect of lower extremity osteoarthritis on sagittal alignment and compensatory mechanisms in adult spinal deformity (ASD). BACKGROUND Spine, hip, and knee pathologies often overlap in ASD patients. Limited data exists on how lower extremity osteoarthritis impacts sagittal alignment and compensatory mechanisms in ASD. PATIENTS AND METHODS In total, 527 preoperative ASD patients with full body radiographs were included. Patients were grouped by Kellgren-Lawrence grade of bilateral hips and knees and stratified by quartile of T1-Pelvic Angle (T1PA) severity into low-, mid-, high-, and severe-T1PA. Full-body alignment and compensation were compared across quartiles. Regression analysis examined the incremental impact of hip and knee osteoarthritis severity on compensation. RESULTS The mean T1PA for low-, mid-, high-, and severe-T1PA groups was 7.3°, 19.5°, 27.8°, and 41.6°, respectively. Mid-T1PA patients with severe hip osteoarthritis had an increased sagittal vertical axis and global sagittal alignment ( P <0.001). Increasing hip osteoarthritis severity resulted in decreased pelvic tilt ( P =0.001) and sacrofemoral angle ( P <0.001), but increased knee flexion ( P =0.012). Regression analysis revealed that with increasing T1PA, pelvic tilt correlated inversely with hip osteoarthritis and positively with knee osteoarthritis ( r2 =0.812). Hip osteoarthritis decreased compensation through sacrofemoral angle (β-coefficient=-0.206). Knee and hip osteoarthritis contributed to greater knee flexion (β-coefficients=0.215, 0.101; respectively). For pelvic shift, only hip osteoarthritis significantly contributed to the model (β-coefficient=0.100). CONCLUSIONS For the same magnitude of spinal deformity, increased hip osteoarthritis severity was associated with worse truncal and full body alignment with posterior translation of the pelvis. Patients with severe hip and knee osteoarthritis exhibited decreased hip extension and pelvic tilt but increased knee flexion. This examines sagittal alignment and compensation in ASD patients with hip and knee arthritis and may help delineate whether hip and knee flexion is due to spinal deformity compensation or lower extremity osteoarthritis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariah Balmaceno-Criss
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Northwell, New York, NY
| | - Daniel Alsoof
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI
| | - Mohammad Daher
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI
| | - David Kojo Hamilton
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Justin S Smith
- University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA
| | | | - Richard G Fessler
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Rush University Medical School, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | - Richard Hostin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor Scoliosis Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | - Eric O Klineberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Health, Houston, TX
| | - Stephen J Lewis
- Division of Orthopaedics, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Peter G Passias
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY
| | | | - Thomas Buell
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Justin K Scheer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Alex Soroceanu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | | | - Lawrence G Lenke
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, The Spine Hospital at New York Presbyterian, New York, NY
| | - Shay Bess
- Denver International Spine Center, Denver, CO
| | | | - Frank J Schwab
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Northwell, New York, NY
| | | | - Douglas C Burton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
| | - Bassel G Diebo
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI
| | - Alan H Daniels
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mohanty S, Hassan FM, Lenke LG, Lewerenz E, Passias PG, Klineberg EO, Lafage V, Smith JS, Hamilton DK, Gum JL, Lafage R, Mullin J, Diebo B, Buell TJ, Kim HJ, Kebaish K, Eastlack R, Daniels AH, Mundis G, Hostin R, Protopsaltis TS, Hart RA, Gupta M, Schwab FJ, Shaffrey CI, Ames CP, Burton D, Bess S. Machine learning clustering of adult spinal deformity patients identifies four prognostic phenotypes: a multicenter prospective cohort analysis with single surgeon external validation. Spine J 2024; 24:1095-1108. [PMID: 38365004 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Among adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients, heterogeneity in patient pathology, surgical expectations, baseline impairments, and frailty complicates comparisons in clinical outcomes and research. This study aims to qualitatively segment ASD patients using machine learning-based clustering on a large, multicenter, prospectively gathered ASD cohort. PURPOSE To qualitatively segment adult spinal deformity patients using machine learning-based clustering on a large, multicenter, prospectively gathered cohort. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Machine learning algorithm using patients from a prospective multicenter study and a validation cohort from a retrospective single center, single surgeon cohort with complete 2-year follow up. PATIENT SAMPLE About 805 ASD patients; 563 patients from a prospective multicenter study and 242 from a single center to be used as a validation cohort. OUTCOME MEASURES To validate and extend the Ames-ISSG/ESSG classification using machine learning-based clustering analysis on a large, complex, multicenter, prospectively gathered ASD cohort. METHODS We analyzed a training cohort of 563 ASD patients from a prospective multicenter study and a validation cohort of 242 ASD patients from a retrospective single center/surgeon cohort with complete two-year patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and clinical/radiographic follow-up. Using k-means clustering, a machine learning algorithm, we clustered patients based on baseline PROs, Edmonton frailty, age, surgical history, and overall health. Baseline differences in clusters identified using the training cohort were assessed using Chi-Squared and ANOVA with pairwise comparisons. To evaluate the classification system's ability to discern postoperative trajectories, a second machine learning algorithm assigned the single-center/surgeon patients to the same 4 clusters, and we compared the clusters' two-year PROs and clinical outcomes. RESULTS K-means clustering revealed four distinct phenotypes from the multicenter training cohort based on age, frailty, and mental health: Old/Frail/Content (OFC, 27.7%), Old/Frail/Distressed (OFD, 33.2%), Old/Resilient/Content (ORC, 27.2%), and Young/Resilient/Content (YRC, 11.9%). OFC and OFD clusters had the highest frailty scores (OFC: 3.76, OFD: 4.72) and a higher proportion of patients with prior thoracolumbar fusion (OFC: 47.4%, OFD: 49.2%). ORC and YRC clusters exhibited lower frailty scores and fewest patients with prior thoracolumbar procedures (ORC: 2.10, 36.6%; YRC: 0.84, 19.4%). OFC had 69.9% of patients with global sagittal deformity and the highest T1PA (29.0), while YRC had 70.2% exhibiting coronal deformity, the highest mean coronal Cobb Angle (54.0), and the lowest T1PA (11.9). OFD and ORC had similar alignment phenotypes with intermediate values for Coronal Cobb Angle (OFD: 33.7; ORC: 40.0) and T1PA (OFD: 24.9; ORC: 24.6) between OFC (worst sagittal alignment) and YRC (worst coronal alignment). In the single surgeon validation cohort, the OFC cluster experienced the greatest increase in SRS Function scores (1.34 points, 95%CI 1.01-1.67) compared to OFD (0.5 points, 95%CI 0.245-0.755), ORC (0.7 points, 95%CI 0.415-0.985), and YRC (0.24 points, 95%CI -0.024-0.504) clusters. OFD cluster patients improved the least over 2 years. Multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated that the OFD cohort had significantly worse reoperation outcomes compared to other clusters (HR: 3.303, 95%CI: 1.085-8.390). CONCLUSION Machine-learning clustering found four different ASD patient qualitative phenotypes, defined by their age, frailty, physical functioning, and mental health upon presentation, which primarily determines their ability to improve their PROs following surgery. This reaffirms that these qualitative measures must be assessed in addition to the radiographic variables when counseling ASD patients regarding their expected surgical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarthak Mohanty
- Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Fthimnir M Hassan
- Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Lawrence G Lenke
- Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Erik Lewerenz
- Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter G Passias
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric O Klineberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwell Health Lenox Hill, New York, NY, USA
| | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - D Kojo Hamilton
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Gum
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwell Health Lenox Hill, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jeffrey Mullin
- Department of Neurosurgery, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Bassel Diebo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Orthopedics, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Thomas J Buell
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Han Jo Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Khalid Kebaish
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, John Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Robert Eastlack
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Alan H Daniels
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Orthopedics, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Gregory Mundis
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Richard Hostin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Southwest Scoliosis and Spine Institute, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Robert A Hart
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Munish Gupta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Frank J Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwell Health Lenox Hill, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Christopher P Ames
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco Spine Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Douglas Burton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Shay Bess
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Denver International Spine Center, Denver, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ani F, Sissman E, Woo D, Soroceanu A, Mundis G, Eastlack RK, Smith JS, Hamilton DK, Kim HJ, Daniels AH, Klineberg EO, Neuman B, Sciubba DM, Gupta MC, Kebaish KM, Passias PG, Hart RA, Bess S, Shaffrey CI, Schwab FJ, Lafage V, Ames CP, Protopsaltis TS. Are insufficient corrections a major factor in distal junctional kyphosis? A simulated analysis of cervical deformity correction using in-construct measurements. J Neurosurg Spine 2024; 40:622-629. [PMID: 38364226 DOI: 10.3171/2023.12.spine23481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The present study utilized recently developed in-construct measurements in simulations of cervical deformity surgery in order to assess undercorrection and predict distal junctional kyphosis (DJK). METHODS A retrospective review of a database of operative cervical deformity patients was analyzed for severe DJK and mild DJK. C2-lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) sagittal angle (SA) was measured postoperatively, and the correction was simulated in the preoperative radiograph in order to match the C2-LIV by using the planning software. Linear regression analysis that used C2 pelvic angle (CPA) and pelvic tilt (PT) determined the simulated PT that matched the virtual CPA. Linear regression analysis was used to determine the C2-T1 SA, C2-T4 SA, and C2-T10 SA that corresponded to DJK of 20° and cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) of 40 mm. RESULTS Sixty-nine cervical deformity patients were included. Severe and mild DJK occurred in 11 (16%) and 22 (32%) patients, respectively; 3 (4%) required DJK revision. Simulated corrections demonstrated that severe and mild DJK patients had worse alignment compared to non-DJK patients in terms of cSVA (42.5 mm vs 33.0 mm vs 23.4 mm, p < 0.001) and C2-LIV SVA (68.9 mm vs 57.3 mm vs 36.8 mm, p < 0.001). Linear regression revealed the relationships between in-construct measures (C2-T1 SA, C2-T4 SA, and C2-T10 SA), cSVA, and change in DJK (all R > 0.57, p < 0.001). A cSVA of 40 mm corresponded to C2-T4 SA of 10.4° and C2-T10 SA of 28.0°. A DJK angle change of 10° corresponded to C2-T4 SA of 5.8° and C2-T10 SA of 20.1°. CONCLUSIONS Simulated cervical deformity corrections demonstrated that severe DJK patients have insufficient corrections compared to patients without DJK. In-construct measures assess sagittal alignment within the fusion separate from DJK and subjacent compensation. They can be useful as intraoperative tools to gauge the adequacy of cervical deformity correction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fares Ani
- 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Ethan Sissman
- 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chaim Sheba Medical Center Hospital, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Dainn Woo
- 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Alex Soroceanu
- 4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Robert K Eastlack
- 6Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Spine Center, La Jolla, California
| | - Justin S Smith
- 7Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - D Kojo Hamilton
- 8The Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Han Jo Kim
- 9Department of Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Alan H Daniels
- 10Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | | | - Brian Neuman
- 12Department of Orthopaedics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Munish C Gupta
- 14Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Khaled M Kebaish
- 12Department of Orthopaedics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Peter G Passias
- 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Robert A Hart
- 15Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - Shay Bess
- 16Denver International Spine Center, Denver, Colorado
| | - Christopher I Shaffrey
- 17Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia; and
| | | | | | - Christopher P Ames
- 18Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Diebo BG, Alsoof D, Lafage R, Daher M, Balmaceno-Criss M, Passias PG, Ames CP, Shaffrey CI, Burton DC, Deviren V, Line BG, Soroceanu A, Hamilton DK, Klineberg EO, Mundis GM, Kim HJ, Gum JL, Smith JS, Uribe JS, Kebaish KM, Gupta MC, Nunley PD, Eastlack RK, Hostin R, Protopsaltis TS, Lenke LG, Hart RA, Schwab FJ, Bess S, Lafage V, Daniels AH. Impact of Self-Reported Loss of Balance and Gait Disturbance on Outcomes following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2202. [PMID: 38673475 PMCID: PMC11051140 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13082202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Revised: 04/06/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate if imbalance influences complication rates, radiological outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Methods: ASD patients with baseline and 2-year radiographic and PROMs were included. Patients were grouped according to whether they answered yes or no to a recent history of pre-operative loss of balance. The groups were propensity-matched by age, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), and surgical invasiveness score. Results: In total, 212 patients were examined (106 in each group). Patients with gait imbalance had worse baseline PROM measures, including Oswestry disability index (45.2 vs. 36.6), SF-36 mental component score (44 vs. 51.8), and SF-36 physical component score (p < 0.001 for all). After 2 years, patients with gait imbalance had less pelvic tilt correction (-1.2 vs. -3.6°, p = 0.039) for a comparable PI-LL correction (-11.9 vs. -15.1°, p = 0.144). Gait imbalance patients had higher rates of radiographic proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) (26.4% vs. 14.2%) and implant-related complications (47.2% vs. 34.0%). After controlling for age, baseline sagittal parameters, PI-LL correction, and comorbidities, patients with imbalance had 2.2-times-increased odds of PJK after 2 years. Conclusions: Patients with a self-reported loss of balance/unsteady gait have significantly worse PROMs and higher risk of PJK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bassel G. Diebo
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI 02914, USA; (B.G.D.); (D.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.-C.)
| | - Daniel Alsoof
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI 02914, USA; (B.G.D.); (D.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.-C.)
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Northwell, New York, NY 10075, USA; (R.L.); (F.J.S.); (V.L.)
| | - Mohammad Daher
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI 02914, USA; (B.G.D.); (D.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.-C.)
| | - Mariah Balmaceno-Criss
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI 02914, USA; (B.G.D.); (D.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.-C.)
| | - Peter G. Passias
- Department of Orthopedics, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY 10016, USA; (P.G.P.); (T.S.P.)
| | - Christopher P. Ames
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA; (C.P.A.); (V.D.)
| | | | - Douglas C. Burton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd., Kansas City, KS 66160, USA;
| | - Vedat Deviren
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA; (C.P.A.); (V.D.)
| | - Breton G. Line
- Denver International Spine Center, Denver, CO 80218, USA; (B.G.L.); (S.B.)
| | - Alex Soroceanu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada;
| | - David Kojo Hamilton
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA;
| | - Eric O. Klineberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, 1 Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616, USA;
| | | | - Han Jo Kim
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021, USA;
| | | | - Justin S. Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA;
| | - Juan S. Uribe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ 85013, USA;
| | - Khaled M. Kebaish
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA;
| | - Munish C. Gupta
- Department of Orthopedics, Washington University in St Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA;
| | | | | | - Richard Hostin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor Scoliosis Center, 4708 Alliance Blvd #800, Plano, TX 75093, USA;
| | | | - Lawrence G. Lenke
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, The Spine Hospital at New York Presbyterian, New York, NY 10032, USA;
| | | | - Frank J. Schwab
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Northwell, New York, NY 10075, USA; (R.L.); (F.J.S.); (V.L.)
| | - Shay Bess
- Denver International Spine Center, Denver, CO 80218, USA; (B.G.L.); (S.B.)
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Northwell, New York, NY 10075, USA; (R.L.); (F.J.S.); (V.L.)
| | - Alan H. Daniels
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI 02914, USA; (B.G.D.); (D.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.-C.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ani F, Ayres EW, Soroceanu A, Mundis GM, Smith JS, Gum JL, Daniels AH, Klineberg EO, Ames CP, Bess S, Shaffrey CI, Schwab FJ, Lafage V, Protopsaltis TS. Functional Alignment Within the Fusion in Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD) Improves Outcomes and Minimizes Mechanical Failures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024; 49:405-411. [PMID: 37698284 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of an adult deformity database. OBJECTIVE To identify pelvic incidence (PI) and age-appropriate physical function alignment targets using a component angle of T1-pelvic angle within the fusion to define correction and their relationship to proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and clinical outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA In preoperative planning, a patient's PI is often utilized to determine the alignment target. In a trend toward more patient-specific planning, age-specific alignment has been shown to reduce the risk of mechanical failures. PI and age have not been analyzed with respect to defining a functional alignment. METHODS A database of patients with operative adult spinal deformity was analyzed. Patients fused to the pelvis and upper-instrumented vertebrae above T11 were included. Alignment within the fusion correlated with clinical outcomes and PI. Short form 36-Physical Component Score (SF36-PCS) normative data and PI were used to compute functional alignment for each patient. Overcorrected, under-corrected, and functionally corrected groups were determined using T10-pelvic angle (T10PA). RESULTS In all, 1052 patients met the inclusion criteria. T10PA correlated with SF36-PCS and PI (R=0.601). At six weeks, 40.7% were functionally corrected, 39.4% were overcorrected, and 20.9% were under-corrected. The PJK incidence rate was 13.6%. Overcorrected patients had the highest PJK rate (18.1%) compared with functionally (11.3%) and under-corrected (9.5%) patients ( P <0.05). Overcorrected patients had a trend toward more PJK revisions. All groups improved in HRQL; however, under-corrected patients had the worst 1-year SF36-PCS offset relative to normative patients of equivalent age (-8.1) versus functional (-6.1) and overcorrected (-4.5), P <0.05. CONCLUSIONS T10PA was used to determine functional alignment, an alignment based on PI and age-appropriate physical function. Correcting patients to functional alignment produced improvements in clinical outcomes, with the lowest rates of PJK. This patient-specific approach to spinal alignment provides adult spinal deformity correction targets that can be used intraoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fares Ani
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Azad TD, Schwab FJ, Lafage V, Soroceanu A, Eastlack RK, Lafage R, Kebaish KM, Hart RA, Diebo B, Kelly MP, Smith JS, Daniels AH, Hamilton DK, Gupta M, Klineberg EO, Protopsaltis TS, Passias PG, Bess S, Gum JL, Hostin R, Lewis SJ, Shaffrey CI, Burton D, Lenke LG, Ames CP, Scheer JK. Stronger association of objective physical metrics with baseline patient-reported outcome measures than preoperative standing sagittal parameters for adult spinal deformity patients. J Neurosurg Spine 2024:1-8. [PMID: 38457811 DOI: 10.3171/2024.1.spine231030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Sagittal alignment measured on standing radiography remains a fundamental component of surgical planning for adult spinal deformity (ASD). However, the relationship between classic sagittal alignment parameters and objective metrics, such as walking time (WT) and grip strength (GS), remains unknown. The objective of this work was to determine if ASD patients with worse baseline sagittal malalignment have worse objective physical metrics and if those metrics have a stronger relationship to patient-reported outcome metrics (PROMs) than standing alignment. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective review of a multicenter ASD cohort. ASD patients underwent baseline testing with the timed up-and-go 6-m walk test (seconds) and for GS (pounds). Baseline PROMs were surveyed, including Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22r, and Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) scores. Standard spinopelvic measurements were obtained (sagittal vertical axis [SVA], pelvic tilt [PT], and mismatch between pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis [PI-LL], and SRS-Schwab ASD classification). Univariate and multivariable linear regression modeling was performed to interrogate associations between objective physical metrics, sagittal parameters, and PROMs. RESULTS In total, 494 patients were included, with mean ± SD age 61 ± 14 years, and 68% were female. Average WT was 11.2 ± 6.1 seconds and average GS was 56.6 ± 24.9 lbs. With increasing PT, PI-LL, and SVA quartiles, WT significantly increased (p < 0.05). SRS-Schwab type N patients demonstrated a significantly longer average WT (12.5 ± 6.2 seconds), and type T patients had a significantly shorter WT time (7.9 ± 2.7 seconds, p = 0.03). With increasing PT quartiles, GS significantly decreased (p < 0.05). SRS-Schwab type T patients had a significantly higher average GS (68.8 ± 27.8 lbs), and type L patients had a significantly lower average GS (51.6 ± 20.4 lbs, p = 0.03). In the frailty-adjusted multivariable linear regression analyses, WT was more strongly associated with PROMs than sagittal parameters. GS was more strongly associated with ODI and PROMIS Physical Function scores. CONCLUSIONS The authors observed that increasing baseline sagittal malalignment is associated with slower WT, and possibly weaker GS, in ASD patients. WT has a stronger relationship to PROMs than standing alignment parameters. Objective physical metrics likely offer added value to standard spinopelvic measurements in ASD evaluation and surgical planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tej D Azad
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Frank J Schwab
- 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lennox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Virginie Lafage
- 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lennox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Alex Soroceanu
- 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Robert K Eastlack
- 4Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, California
| | - Renaud Lafage
- 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lennox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Khaled M Kebaish
- 5Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Robert A Hart
- 6Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Bassel Diebo
- 7Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Michael P Kelly
- 8Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, California
| | - Justin S Smith
- 9Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Alan H Daniels
- 7Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - D Kojo Hamilton
- 10Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Munish Gupta
- 11Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Eric O Klineberg
- 12Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Texas Health Houston, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Peter G Passias
- 13Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York
| | - Shay Bess
- 14Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center, Denver, Colorado
| | | | - Richard Hostin
- 16Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Baylor Scoliosis Center, Plano, Texas
| | - Stephen J Lewis
- 17Department of Surgery, Division of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Toronto, and Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Douglas Burton
- 19Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Lawrence G Lenke
- 20Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York; and
| | - Christopher P Ames
- 21Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Justin K Scheer
- 21Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mullin JP, Soliman MAR, Smith JS, Kelly MP, Buell TJ, Diebo B, Scheer JK, Line B, Lafage V, Lafage R, Klineberg E, Kim HJ, Passias PG, Gum JL, Kebaish K, Eastlack RK, Daniels AH, Soroceanu A, Mundis G, Hostin R, Protopsaltis TS, Hamilton DK, Gupta MC, Lewis SJ, Schwab FJ, Lenke LG, Shaffrey CI, Bess S, Ames CP, Burton D. Analysis of tranexamic acid usage in adult spinal deformity patients with relative contraindications: does it increase the risk of complications? J Neurosurg Spine 2024:1-8. [PMID: 38457792 DOI: 10.3171/2024.1.spine231098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Complex spinal deformity surgeries may involve significant blood loss. The use of antifibrinolytic agents such as tranexamic acid (TXA) has been proven to reduce perioperative blood loss. However, for patients with a history of thromboembolic events, there is concern of increased risk when TXA is used during these surgeries. This study aimed to assess whether TXA use in patients undergoing complex spinal deformity correction surgeries increases the risk of thromboembolic complications based on preexisting thromboembolic risk factors. METHODS Data were analyzed for adult patients who received TXA during surgical correction for spinal deformity at 21 North American centers between August 2018 and October 2022. Patients with preexisting thromboembolic events and other risk factors (history of deep venous thrombosis [DVT], pulmonary embolism [PE], myocardial infarction [MI], stroke, peripheral vascular disease, or cancer) were identified. Thromboembolic complication rates were assessed during the postoperative 90 days. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess thromboembolic outcomes in high-risk and low-risk patients who received intravenous TXA. RESULTS Among 411 consecutive patients who underwent complex spinal deformity surgery and received TXA intraoperatively, 130 (31.6%) were considered high-risk patients. There was no significant difference in thromboembolic complications between patients with and those without preexisting thromboembolic risk factors in univariate analysis (high-risk group vs low-risk group: 8.5% vs 2.8%, p = 0.45). Specifically, there were no significant differences between groups regarding the 90-day postoperative rates of DVT (high-risk group vs low-risk group: 1.5% vs 1.4%, p = 0.98), PE (2.3% vs 1.8%, p = 0.71), acute MI (1.5% vs 0%, p = 0.19), or stroke (0.8% vs 1.1%, p > 0.99). On multivariate analysis, high-risk status was not a significant independent predictor for any of the thromboembolic complications. CONCLUSIONS Administration of intravenous TXA during the correction procedure did not change rates of thromboembolic events, acute MI, or stroke in this cohort of adult spinal deformity surgery patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey P Mullin
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences at University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Buffalo General Medical Center, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York
| | - Mohamed A R Soliman
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences at University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Justin S Smith
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Michael P Kelly
- 5Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, California
| | - Thomas J Buell
- 6Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Bassel Diebo
- 7Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Justin K Scheer
- 8Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Breton Line
- 9Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center, Denver, Colorado
| | - Virginie Lafage
- 10Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lennox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Renaud Lafage
- 10Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lennox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Eric Klineberg
- 11Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Texas Health Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Han Jo Kim
- 12Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Peter G Passias
- 13Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York
| | | | - Khaled Kebaish
- 15Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Robert K Eastlack
- 16Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, California
| | - Alan H Daniels
- 7Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Alex Soroceanu
- 17Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Gregory Mundis
- 16Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, California
| | - Richard Hostin
- 18Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor Scoliosis Center, Plano, Texas
| | | | - D Kojo Hamilton
- 6Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Munish C Gupta
- 19Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Stephen J Lewis
- 20Department of Surgery, Division of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Toronto and Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Frank J Schwab
- 10Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lennox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Lawrence G Lenke
- 21Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Christopher I Shaffrey
- 22Departments of Neurosurgery and Orthopedic Surgery, Spine Division, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; and
| | - Shay Bess
- 9Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center, Denver, Colorado
| | - Christopher P Ames
- 8Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Douglas Burton
- 23Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Daniels AH, Daher M, Singh M, Balmaceno-Criss M, Lafage R, Diebo BG, Hamilton DK, Smith JS, Eastlack RK, Fessler RG, Gum JL, Gupta MC, Hostin R, Kebaish KM, Klineberg EO, Lewis SJ, Line BG, Nunley PD, Mundis GM, Passias PG, Protopsaltis TS, Buell T, Scheer JK, Mullin JP, Soroceanu A, Ames CP, Lenke LG, Bess S, Shaffrey CI, Burton DC, Lafage V, Schwab FJ. The Case for Operative Efficiency in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Impact of Operative Time on Complications, Length of Stay, Alignment, Fusion Rates, and Patient-Reported Outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024; 49:313-320. [PMID: 37942794 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE To analyze the impact of operative room (OR) time in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery on patient outcomes. BACKGROUND It is currently unknown if OR time in ASD patients matched for deformity severity and surgical invasiveness is associated with patient outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS ASD patients with baseline and two-year postoperative radiographic and patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) data, undergoing a posterior-only approach for long fusion (>L1-Ilium) were included. Patients were grouped into short OR time (<40th percentile: <359 min) and long OR time (>60th percentile: >421 min). Groups were matched by age, baseline deformity severity, and surgical invasiveness. Demographics, radiographic, PROM data, fusion rate, and complications were compared between groups at baseline and two years follow-up. RESULTS In total, 270 patients were included for analysis: the mean OR time was 286 minutes in the short OR group versus 510 minutes in the long OR group ( P <0.001). Age, gender, percent of revision cases, surgical invasiveness, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis, sagittal vertical axis, and pelvic tilt were comparable between groups ( P >0.05). Short OR had a slightly lower body mass index than the short OR group ( P <0.001) and decompression was more prevalent in the long OR time ( P =0.042). Patients in the long group had greater hospital length of stay ( P =0.02); blood loss ( P <0.001); proportion requiring intensive care unit ( P =0.003); higher minor complication rate ( P =0.001); with no significant differences for major complications or revision procedures ( P >0.5). Both groups had comparable radiographic fusion rates ( P =0.152) and achieved improvement in sagittal alignment measures, Oswestry disability index, and Short Form-36 ( P <0.001). CONCLUSION Shorter OR time for ASD correction is associated with a lower minor complication rate, a lower estimated blood loss, fewer intensive care unit admissions, and a shorter hospital length of stay without sacrificing alignment correction or PROMs. Maximizing operative efficiency by minimizing OR time in ASD surgery has the potential to benefit patients, surgeons, and hospital systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan H Daniels
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI
| | - Mohammad Daher
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI
| | - Manjot Singh
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI
| | - Mariah Balmaceno-Criss
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Northwell, New York, NY
| | - Bassel G Diebo
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI
| | - David K Hamilton
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Justin S Smith
- University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA
| | | | - Richard G Fessler
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Rush University Medical School, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | - Richard Hostin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor Scoliosis Center, Plano, TX
| | | | - Eric O Klineberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, CA
| | - Stephen J Lewis
- Division of Orthopaedics, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Peter G Passias
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY
| | | | - Thomas Buell
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Justin K Scheer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Alex Soroceanu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | | | - Lawrence G Lenke
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, The Spine Hospital at New York Presbyterian, New York, NY
| | - Shay Bess
- Denver International Spine Center, Denver, CO
| | | | - Douglas C Burton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
| | | | - Frank J Schwab
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Northwell, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Williamson TK, Dave P, Mir JM, Smith JS, Lafage R, Line B, Diebo BG, Daniels AH, Gum JL, Protopsaltis TS, Hamilton DK, Soroceanu A, Scheer JK, Eastlack R, Kelly MP, Nunley P, Kebaish KM, Lewis S, Lenke LG, Hostin RA, Gupta MC, Kim HJ, Ames CP, Hart RA, Burton DC, Shaffrey CI, Klineberg EO, Schwab FJ, Lafage V, Chou D, Fu KM, Bess S, Passias PG. Persistent Lower Extremity Compensation for Sagittal Imbalance After Surgical Correction of Complex Adult Spinal Deformity: A Radiographic Analysis of Early Impact. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2024; 26:156-164. [PMID: 38227826 DOI: 10.1227/ons.0000000000000901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Achieving spinopelvic realignment during adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery does not always produce ideal outcomes. Little is known whether compensation in lower extremities (LEs) plays a role in this disassociation. The objective is to analyze lower extremity compensation after complex ASD surgery, its effect on outcomes, and whether correction can alleviate these mechanisms. METHODS We included patients with complex ASD with 6-week data. LE parameters were as follows: sacrofemoral angle, knee flexion angle, and ankle flexion angle. Each parameter was ranked, and upper tertile was deemed compensation. Patients compensating and not compensating postoperatively were propensity score matched for body mass index, frailty, and T1 pelvic angle. Linear regression assessed correlation between LE parameters and baseline deformity, demographics, and surgical details. Multivariate analysis controlling for baseline deformity and history of total knee/hip arthroplasty evaluated outcomes. RESULTS Two hundred and ten patients (age: 61.3 ± 14.1 years, body mass index: 27.4 ± 5.8 kg/m2, Charlson Comorbidity Index: 1.1 ± 1.6, 72% female, 22% previous total joint arthroplasty, 24% osteoporosis, levels fused: 13.1 ± 3.8) were included. At baseline, 59% were compensating in LE: 32% at hips, 39% knees, and 36% ankles. After correction, 61% were compensating at least one joint. Patients undercorrected postoperatively were less likely to relieve LE compensation (odds ratio: 0.2, P = .037). Patients compensating in LE were more often undercorrected in age-adjusted pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis, and T1 pelvic angle and disproportioned in Global Alignment and Proportion (P < .05). Patients matched in sagittal age-adjusted score at 6 weeks but compensating in LE were more likely to develop proximal junctional kyphosis (odds ratio: 4.1, P = .009) and proximal junctional failure (8% vs 0%, P = .035) than those sagittal age-adjusted score-matched and not compensating in LE. CONCLUSION Perioperative lower extremity compensation was a product of undercorrecting complex ASD. Even in age-adjusted realignment, compensation was associated with global undercorrection and junctional failure. Consideration of lower extremities during planning is vital to avoid adverse outcomes in perioperative course after complex ASD surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler K Williamson
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopaedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Pooja Dave
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopaedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jamshaid M Mir
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopaedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Breton Line
- Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Clinic, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Bassel G Diebo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Alan H Daniels
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Gum
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | | | - D Kojo Hamilton
- Departments of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alex Soroceanu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Justin K Scheer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Robert Eastlack
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Michael P Kelly
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Pierce Nunley
- Spine Institute of Louisiana, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
| | - Khaled M Kebaish
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Stephen Lewis
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lawrence G Lenke
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
| | - Richard A Hostin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor Scoliosis Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Munish C Gupta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University of St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Han Jo Kim
- Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Clinic, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Christopher P Ames
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Robert A Hart
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Douglas C Burton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Christopher I Shaffrey
- Spine Division, Departments of Neurosurgery and Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Eric O Klineberg
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Frank J Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dean Chou
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Kai-Ming Fu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine Brain and Spine Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Shay Bess
- Department of Orthopaedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Peter G Passias
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopaedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
- Rocky Mountain Scoliosis and Spine, Denver, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Passias PG, Pierce KE, Williamson TK, Lebovic J, Schoenfeld AJ, Lafage R, Lafage V, Gum JL, Eastlack R, Kim HJ, Klineberg EO, Daniels AH, Protopsaltis TS, Mundis GM, Scheer JK, Park P, Chou D, Line B, Hart RA, Burton DC, Bess S, Schwab FJ, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, Ames CP. Patient-specific Cervical Deformity Corrections With Consideration of Associated Risk: Establishment of Risk Benefit Thresholds for Invasiveness Based on Deformity and Frailty Severity. Clin Spine Surg 2024; 37:E43-E51. [PMID: 37798829 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING This was a retrospective cohort study. BACKGROUND Little is known of the intersection between surgical invasiveness, cervical deformity (CD) severity, and frailty. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of CD surgery by invasiveness, frailty status, and baseline magnitude of deformity. METHODS This study included CD patients with 1-year follow-up. Patients stratified in high deformity if severe in the following criteria: T1 slope minus cervical lordosis, McGregor's slope, C2-C7, C2-T3, and C2 slope. Frailty scores categorized patients into not frail and frail. Patients are categorized by frailty and deformity (not frail/low deformity; not frail/high deformity; frail/low deformity; frail/high deformity). Logistic regression assessed increasing invasiveness and outcomes [distal junctional failure (DJF), reoperation]. Within frailty/deformity groups, decision tree analysis assessed thresholds for an invasiveness cutoff above which experiencing a reoperation, DJF or not achieving Good Clinical Outcome was more likely. RESULTS A total of 115 patients were included. Frailty/deformity groups: 27% not frail/low deformity, 27% not frail/high deformity, 23.5% frail/low deformity, and 22.5% frail/high deformity. Logistic regression analysis found increasing invasiveness and occurrence of DJF [odds ratio (OR): 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05, P =0.002], and invasiveness increased with deformity severity ( P <0.05). Not frail/low deformity patients more often met Optimal Outcome with an invasiveness index <63 (OR: 27.2, 95% CI: 2.7-272.8, P =0.005). An invasiveness index <54 for the frail/low deformity group led to a higher likelihood of meeting the Optimal Outcome (OR: 9.6, 95% CI: 1.5-62.2, P =0.018). For the frail/high deformity group, patients with a score <63 had a higher likelihood of achieving Optimal Outcome (OR: 4.8, 95% CI: 1.1-25.8, P =0.033). There was no significant cutoff of invasiveness for the not frail/high deformity group. CONCLUSIONS Our study correlated increased invasiveness in CD surgery to the risk of DJF, reoperation, and poor clinical success. The thresholds derived for deformity severity and frailty may enable surgeons to individualize the invasiveness of their procedures during surgical planning to account for the heightened risk of adverse events and minimize unfavorable outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Passias
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Department of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center; NY Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Katherine E Pierce
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Department of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center; NY Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Tyler K Williamson
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Department of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center; NY Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Jordan Lebovic
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Department of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center; NY Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Jeffrey L Gum
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, KY
| | - Robert Eastlack
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, San Diego
| | - Han Jo Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery
| | - Eric O Klineberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA
| | - Alan H Daniels
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | - Justin K Scheer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Paul Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Dean Chou
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Breton Line
- Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Clinic, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, CO
| | - Robert A Hart
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Douglas C Burton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
| | - Shay Bess
- Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Clinic, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, CO
| | - Frank J Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | | | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Christopher P Ames
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Buckland AJ, Proctor DJ, Thomas JA, Protopsaltis TS, Ashayeri K, Braly BA. Single-Position Prone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Increases Operative Efficiency and Maintains Safety in Revision Lumbar Spinal Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024; 49:E19-E24. [PMID: 37134133 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Multi-centre retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the feasibility and safety of the single-position prone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) technique for revision lumbar fusion surgery. BACKGROUND CONTEXT Prone LLIF (P-LLIF) is a novel technique allowing for placement of a lateral interbody in the prone position and allowing posterior decompression and revision of posterior instrumentation without patient repositioning. This study examines perioperative outcomes and complications of single position P-LLIF against traditional Lateral LLIF (L-LLIF) technique with patient repositioning. METHOD A multi-centre retrospective cohort study involving patients undergoing 1 to 4 level LLIF surgery was performed at 4 institutions in the US and Australia. Patients were included if their surgery was performed via either: P-LLIF with revision posterior fusion; or L-LLIF with repositioning to prone. Demographics, perioperative outcomes, complications, and radiological outcomes were compared using independent samples t-tests and chi-squared analyses as appropriate with significance set at P <0.05. RESULTS 101 patients undergoing revision LLIF surgery were included, of which 43 had P-LLIF and 58 had L-LLIF. Age, BMI and CCI were similar between groups. The number of posterior levels fused (2.21 P-LLIF vs. 2.66 L-LLIF, P =0.469) and number of LLIF levels (1.35 vs. 1.39, P =0.668) was similar between groups.Operative time was significantly less in the P-LLIF group (151 vs. 206 min, P =0.004). EBL was similar between groups (150mL P-LLIF vs. 182mL L-LLIF, P =0.31) and there was a trend toward reduced length of stay in the P-LLIF group (2.7 vs. 3.3d, P =0.09). No significant difference was demonstrated in complications between groups. Radiographic analysis demonstrated no significant differences in preoperative or postoperative sagittal alignment measurements. CONCLUSION P-LLIF significantly improves operative efficiency when compared to L-LLIF for revision lumbar fusion. No increase in complications was demonstrated by P-LLIF or trade-offs in sagittal alignment restoration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level 4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron J Buckland
- Melbourne Orthopaedic Group, Melbourne, Vic Australia
- Spine and Scoliosis Research Associates Australia, Melbourne, Vic Australia
- NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| | | | - J Alex Thomas
- Atlantic Neurosurgical and Spine Specialists, Wilmington, NC
| | | | | | - Brett A Braly
- The Spine Clinic of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma City, OK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Diebo BG, Balmaceno-Criss M, Lafage R, Daher M, Singh M, Hamilton DK, Smith JS, Eastlack RK, Fessler R, Gum JL, Gupta MC, Hostin R, Kebaish KM, Lewis S, Line BG, Nunley PD, Mundis GM, Passias PG, Protopsaltis TS, Turner J, Buell T, Scheer JK, Mullin J, Soroceanu A, Ames CP, Bess S, Shaffrey CI, Lenke LG, Schwab FJ, Lafage V, Burton DC, Daniels AH. Lumbar Lordosis Redistribution and Segmental Correction in Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD): Does it Matter? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024:00007632-990000000-00569. [PMID: 38270393 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE Evaluate the impact of correcting to normative segmental lordosis values on post-operative outcomes. BACKGROUND Restoring lumbar lordosis magnitude is crucial in adult spinal deformity surgery, but the optimal location and segmental distribution remains unclear. METHODS Patients were grouped based on offset to normative segmental lordosis values, extracted from recent publications. Matched patients were within 10% of the cohort's mean offset, less than or over 10% were under- and over-corrected. Surgical technique, PROMs, and surgical complications were compared across groups at baseline and 2-year. RESULTS 510 patients with an average age of 64.6, mean CCI 2.08, and average follow-up of 25 months. L4-5 was least likely to be matched (19.1%), while L4-S1 was the most likely (24.3%). More patients were overcorrected at proximal levels (T10-L2; Undercorrected, U: 32.2% vs. Matched, M: 21.7% vs. Overcorrected, O: 46.1%) and undercorrected at distal levels (L4-S1: U: 39.0% vs. M: 24.3% vs. O: 36.8%). Postoperative ODI was comparable across correction groups at all spinal levels except at L4-S1 and T10-L2/L4-S1, where overcorrected patients and matched were better than undercorrected (U: 32.1 vs. M: 25.4 vs. O: 26.5, P=0.005; U: 36.2 vs. M: 24.2 vs. O: 26.8, P=0.001; respectively). Patients overcorrected at T10-L2 experienced higher rates of proximal junctional failure (PJF) (U: 16.0% vs. M: 15.6% vs. O: 32.8%, P<0.001) and had greater posterior inclination of the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) (U: -9.2±9.4° vs. M: -9.6±9.1° vs. O: -12.2±10.0°, P<0.001), whereas undercorrection at these levels led to higher rates of revision for implant failure (U: 14.2% vs. M: 7.3% vs. O: 6.4%, P=0.025). CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing fusion for adult spinal deformity suffer higher rates of PJF with overcorrection and increased rates of implant failure with undercorrection based on normative segmental lordosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bassel G Diebo
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Mariah Balmaceno-Criss
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York
| | - Mohammad Daher
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Manjot Singh
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - D Kojo Hamilton
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh
| | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Robert K Eastlack
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California
| | | | - Jeffrey L Gum
- Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Munish C Gupta
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Richard Hostin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Southwest Scoliosis Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Khaled M Kebaish
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Stephen Lewis
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Breton G Line
- Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Center, Denver, Colorado
| | | | - Gregory M Mundis
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California
| | - Peter G Passias
- Department of Orthopedics, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, New York
| | | | - Jay Turner
- Barrow Brain and Spine, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Thomas Buell
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh
| | - Justin K Scheer
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Jeffery Mullin
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Buffalo, Amherst, New York, New York
| | - Alex Soroceanu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Canada
| | - Christopher P Ames
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Shay Bess
- Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Center, Denver, Colorado
| | | | - Lawrence G Lenke
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Frank J Schwab
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York
| | - Douglas C Burton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Alan H Daniels
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Passias PG, Williamson TK, Pierce KE, Schoenfeld AJ, Krol O, Imbo B, Joujon-Roche R, Tretiakov P, Ahmad S, Bennett-Caso C, Mir J, Dave P, McFarland K, Owusu-Sarpong S, Lebovic JA, Janjua MB, de la Garza-Ramos R, Vira S, Diebo B, Koller H, Protopsaltis TS, Lafage R, Lafage V. The Importance of Incorporating Proportional Alignment in Adult Cervical Deformity Corrections Relative to Regional and Global Alignment: Steps Toward Development of a Cervical-Specific Score. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024; 49:116-127. [PMID: 37796161 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective single-center study. BACKGROUND The global alignment and proportion score is widely used in adult spinal deformity surgery. However, it is not specific to the parameters used in adult cervical deformity (ACD). PURPOSE Create a cervicothoracic alignment and proportion (CAP) score in patients with operative ACD. METHODS Patients with ACD with 2-year data were included. Parameters consisted of relative McGregor's Slope [RMGS = (MGS × 1.5)/0.9], relative cervical lordosis [RCL = CL - thoracic kyphosis (TK)], Cervical Lordosis Distribution Index (CLDI = C2 - Apex × 100/C2 - T2), relative pelvic version (RPV = sacral slope - pelvic incidence × 0.59 + 9), and a frailty factor (greater than 0.33). Cutoff points were chosen where the cross-tabulation of parameter subgroups reached a maximal rate of meeting the Optimal Outcome. The optimal outcome was defined as meeting Good Clinical Outcome criteria without the occurrence of distal junctional failure (DJF) or reoperation. CAP was scored between 0 and 13 and categorized accordingly: ≤3 (proportioned), 4-6 (moderately disproportioned), >6 (severely disproportioned). Multivariable logistic regression analysis determined the relationship between CAP categories, overall score, and development of distal junctional kyphosis (DJK), DJF, reoperation, and Optimal Outcome by 2 years. RESULTS One hundred five patients with operative ACD were included. Assessment of the 3-month CAP score found a mean of 5.2/13 possible points. 22.7% of patients were proportioned, 49.5% moderately disproportioned, and 27.8% severely disproportioned. DJK occurred in 34.5% and DJF in 8.7%, 20.0% underwent reoperation, and 55.7% achieved Optimal Outcome. Patients severely disproportioned in CAP had higher odds of DJK [OR: 6.0 (2.1-17.7); P =0.001], DJF [OR: 9.7 (1.8-51.8); P =0.008], reoperation [OR: 3.3 (1.9-10.6); P =0.011], and lower odds of meeting the optimal outcome [OR: 0.3 (0.1-0.7); P =0.007] by 2 years, while proportioned patients suffered zero occurrences of DJK or DJF. CONCLUSION The regional alignment and proportion score is a method of analyzing the cervical spine relative to global alignment and demonstrates the importance of maintaining horizontal gaze, while also matching overall cervical and thoracolumbar alignment to limit complications and maximize clinical improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Passias
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Tyler K Williamson
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Katherine E Pierce
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Center for Surgery and Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Oscar Krol
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Bailey Imbo
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Rachel Joujon-Roche
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Peter Tretiakov
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Salman Ahmad
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Claudia Bennett-Caso
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Jamshaid Mir
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Pooja Dave
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Kimberly McFarland
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | | | - Jordan A Lebovic
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
| | | | - Rafael de la Garza-Ramos
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | - Shaleen Vira
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Bassel Diebo
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY
| | - Heiko Koller
- International Center for Spinal Disorders and Deformity, Orthopedic Department II, Asklepios Clinics Bad Abbach, Bad Tölz, Germany
| | | | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ani F, Protopsaltis TS, Parekh Y, Odeh K, Lafage R, Smith JS, Eastlack RK, Lenke L, Schwab F, Mundis GM, Gupta MC, Klineberg EO, Lafage V, Hart R, Burton D, Ames CP, Shaffrey CI, Bess S. Determining the best vertebra for measuring pelvic incidence and spinopelvic parameters in adult spinal deformity patients with transitional anatomy. J Neurosurg Spine 2024; 40:92-98. [PMID: 37862715 DOI: 10.3171/2023.8.spine23432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine if spinal deformity patients with L5 sacralization should have pelvic incidence (PI) and other spinopelvic parameters measured from the L5 or S1 endplate. METHODS This study was a multicenter retrospective comparative cohort study comprising a large database of adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients and a database of asymptomatic individuals. Linear regression modeling was used to determine normative T1 pelvic angle (TPA) and PI - lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch (PI-LL) based on PI and age in a database of asymptomatic subjects. In an ASD database, patients with radiographic evidence of L5 sacralization had the PI, LL, and TPA measured from the superior endplate of S1 and then also from L5. The differences in TPA and PI-LL from normative were calculated in the sacralization cohort relative to L5 and S1 and correlated to the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Patients were grouped based on the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-Schwab PI-LL modifier (0, +, or ++) using the L5 PI-LL and S1 PI-LL. Baseline ODI and SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) scores were compared across and within groups. RESULTS Among 1179 ASD patients, 276 (23.4%) had transitional anatomy, 176 with sacralized L5 (14.9%) and 100 (8.48%) with lumbarization of S1. The 176 patients with sacralized L5 were analyzed. When measured using the L5 superior endplate, pelvic parameters were significantly smaller than those measured relative to S1 (PI: 24.5° ± 11.0° vs 55.7° ± 12.0°, p = 0.001;TPA: 11.2° ± 12.0° vs 20.3° ± 12.5°, p = 0.001; and PI-LL: 0.67° ± 21.1° vs 11.4° ± 20.8°, p = 0.001). When measured from S1, 76 (43%), 45 (25.6%), and 55 (31.3%) patients had SRS-Schwab PI-LL modifiers of 0, +, and ++, respectively, compared with 124 (70.5%), 22 (12.5%), and 30 (17.0%), respectively, when measured from L5. There were significant differences in ODI and PCS scores as the SRS-Schwab grade increased regardless of L5 or S1 measurement. The L5 group had lower PCS functional scores for SRS-Schwab modifiers 0 and ++ relative to same grades in the S1 group. Offset from normative TPA (0.5° ± 11.1° vs 9.6° ± 10.8°, p = 0.001) and PI-LL (4.5° ± 20.4° vs 15.2° ± 19.3°, p = 0.001) were smaller when measuring from L5. Moreover, S1 measurements were more correlated with health status by ODI (TPA offset from normative: S1, R = 0.326 vs L5, R = 0.285; PI-LL offset from normative: S1, R = 0.318 vs L5, R = 0.274). CONCLUSIONS Measuring the PI and spinopelvic parameters at L5 in sacralized anatomy results in underestimating spinal deformity and is less correlated with health-related quality of life. Surgeons may consider measuring PI and spinopelvic parameters relative to S1 rather than at L5 in patients with a sacralized L5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fares Ani
- 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
| | | | - Yesha Parekh
- 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Khalid Odeh
- 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Renaud Lafage
- 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill, Northwell Health, New York, New York
| | - Justin S Smith
- 4Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Robert K Eastlack
- 5Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Memorial Hospital, La Jolla, California
| | - Lawrence Lenke
- 6Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Frank Schwab
- 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill, Northwell Health, New York, New York
| | - Gregory M Mundis
- 5Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Memorial Hospital, La Jolla, California
| | - Munish C Gupta
- 7Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Eric O Klineberg
- 8Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, California
| | - Virginie Lafage
- 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill, Northwell Health, New York, New York
| | - Robert Hart
- 9Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Douglas Burton
- 10Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Christopher P Ames
- 11Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Shay Bess
- 13Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Center, Denver, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ye J, Gupta S, Farooqi AS, Yin T, Soroceanu A, Schwab FJ, Lafage V, Kelly MP, Kebaish K, Hostin R, Gum JL, Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Scheer JK, Protopsaltis TS, Passias PG, Klineberg EO, Kim HJ, Hart RA, Hamilton DK, Ames CP, Gupta MC. Predictive role of global spinopelvic alignment and upper instrumented vertebra level in symptomatic proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine 2023; 39:774-784. [PMID: 37542446 DOI: 10.3171/2023.6.spine23383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The authors of this study sought to evaluate the predictive role of global sagittal alignment and upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) level in symptomatic proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) among patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). METHODS Data on ASD patients who had undergone fusion of ≥ 5 vertebrae from 2008 to 2018 and with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were obtained from a prospectively collected multicenter database and evaluated (n = 1312). Radiographs were obtained preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years postoperatively. The 22-Item Scoliosis Research Society Patient Questionnaire Revised (SRS-22r) scores were collected preoperatively, 1 year postoperatively, and 2 years postoperatively. Symptomatic PJK was defined as a kyphotic increase > 20° in the Cobb angle from the UIV to the UIV+2. At 6 weeks postoperatively, sagittal parameters were evaluated and patients were categorized by global alignment and proportion (GAP) score/category and SRS-Schwab sagittal modifiers. Patients were stratified by UIV level: upper thoracic (UT) UIV ≥ T8 or lower thoracic (LT) UIV ≤ T9. RESULTS Patients who developed symptomatic PJK (n = 260) had worse 1-year postoperative SRS-22r mental health (3.70 vs 3.86) and total (3.56 vs 3.67) scores, as well as worse 2-year postoperative self-image (3.45 vs 3.65) and satisfaction (4.03 vs 4.22) scores (all p ≤ 0.04). In the whole study cohort, patients with PJK had less pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch (-0.24° vs 3.29°, p < 0.001) but no difference in their GAP score/category or SRS-Schwab sagittal modifiers compared with the patients without PJK. Regression showed a higher risk of PJK with a pelvic tilt (PT) grade ++ (OR 2.35) and less risk with a PI-LL grade ++ (OR 0.35; both p < 0.01). When specifically analyzing the LT UIV cohort, patients with PJK had a higher GAP score (5.66 vs 4.79), greater PT (23.02° vs 20.90°), and less PI-LL mismatch (1.61° vs 4.45°; all p ≤ 0.02). PJK patients were less likely to be proportioned postoperatively (17.6% vs 30.0%, p = 0.015), and regression demonstrated a greater PJK risk with severe disproportion (OR 1.98) and a PT grade ++ (OR 3.15) but less risk with a PI-LL grade ++ (OR 0.45; all p ≤ 0.01). When specifically evaluating the UT UIV cohort, the PJK patients had less PI-LL mismatch (-2.11° vs 1.45°) but no difference in their GAP score/category. Regression showed a greater PJK risk with a PT grade + (OR 1.58) and a decreased risk with a PI-LL grade ++ (OR 0.21; both p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Symptomatic PJK leads to worse patient-reported outcomes and is associated with less postoperative PI-LL mismatch and greater postoperative PT. A worse postoperative GAP score and disproportion are only predictive of symptomatic PJK in patients with an LT UIV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jichao Ye
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Sachin Gupta
- 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ali S Farooqi
- 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Tsung Yin
- 3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Alex Soroceanu
- 4University of Calgary Spine Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Frank J Schwab
- 5Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Virginie Lafage
- 5Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Michael P Kelly
- 7Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Khaled Kebaish
- 8Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Richard Hostin
- 9Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Southwest Scoliosis Institute, Dallas, Texas
| | - Jeffrey L Gum
- 10Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Justin S Smith
- 11Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | | | - Justin K Scheer
- 13Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Peter G Passias
- 14Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Eric O Klineberg
- 15Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California
| | - Han Jo Kim
- 6Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Robert A Hart
- 16Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington; and
| | - D Kojo Hamilton
- 17Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Christopher P Ames
- 13Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Munish C Gupta
- 7Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Protopsaltis TS, Ani F, Soroceanu A, Lafage R, Kim HJ, Balouch E, Norris Z, Smith JS, Daniels AH, Klineberg EO, Ames CP, Hart R, Bess S, Shaffrey CI, Schwab FJ, Lenke LG, Lafage V, Gupta MC. Clinical outcomes and proximal junctional failure in adult spinal deformity patients corrected to normative alignment versus functional alignment. J Neurosurg Spine 2023; 39:757-764. [PMID: 37503890 DOI: 10.3171/2023.5.spine221266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to explore the rate of proximal junctional failure (PJF) and functional outcomes of normative alignment goals compared with alignment targets based on age-appropriate physical function. METHODS Baseline relationships between age, pelvic incidence (PI), and a component of the T1 pelvic angle (TPA) within the fusion were analyzed in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients and compared with those of asymptomatic patients. Linear regression modeling was used to determine alignment based on PI and age in asymptomatic patients (normative alignment), and in ASD patients, alignment corresponding to age-appropriate functional status (functional alignment). A cohort of 288 ASD patients was split into two groups based on whether the patient was closer to their normative or functional alignment goal at their 6-week postoperative radiographic follow-up. The rates of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and PJF were determined for each cohort. RESULTS In the 288 ASD patients included in this pre- to postoperative analysis, there was no difference in baseline alignment or health-related quality of life (HRQOL) between the normative alignment and functional alignment groups. At 6 weeks, patients with normative alignment had a smaller TPA (4.45° vs 14.1°) and PI minus lumbar lordosis (-7.24° vs 7.4°) (both p < 0.0001) and higher PJK (40% vs 27.2%, p = 0.03) and PJF (17% vs 6.8%, p = 0.008) rates than patients with functional alignment. CONCLUSIONS Correction in ASD patients to normative alignment resulted in higher rates of PJK and PJF without improvements in HRQOL. Correction in ASD patients to functional alignment that mirrors the physical function of their age-matched asymptomatic peers is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fares Ani
- 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
| | | | - Renaud Lafage
- 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Northwell Health, New York, New York
| | - Han Jo Kim
- 4Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Eaman Balouch
- 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Zoe Norris
- 5Department of Orthopedic Surgery, George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | - Justin S Smith
- 6Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Alan H Daniels
- 7Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brown University, East Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Eric O Klineberg
- 8Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, California
| | - Christopher P Ames
- 9Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Robert Hart
- 10Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Shay Bess
- 11Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Center, Denver, Colorado
| | | | - Frank J Schwab
- 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Northwell Health, New York, New York
| | - Lawrence G Lenke
- 13Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University, New York, New York; and
| | - Virginie Lafage
- 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Northwell Health, New York, New York
| | - Munish C Gupta
- 14Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Smith JS, Kelly MP, Buell TJ, Ben-Israel D, Diebo B, Scheer JK, Line B, Lafage V, Lafage R, Klineberg E, Kim HJ, Passias P, Gum JL, Kebaish K, Mullin JP, Eastlack R, Daniels A, Soroceanu A, Mundis G, Hostin R, Protopsaltis TS, Hamilton DK, Gupta M, Lewis SJ, Schwab FJ, Lenke LG, Shaffrey CI, Burton D, Ames CP, Bess S. Adult Cervical Deformity Patients Have Higher Baseline Frailty, Disability, and Comorbidities Compared With Complex Adult Thoracolumbar Deformity Patients: A Comparative Cohort Study of 616 Patients. Global Spine J 2023:21925682231214059. [PMID: 37948666 DOI: 10.1177/21925682231214059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Multicenter comparative cohort. OBJECTIVE Studies have shown markedly higher rates of complications and all-cause mortality following surgery for adult cervical deformity (ACD) compared with adult thoracolumbar deformity (ATLD), though the reasons for these differences remain unclear. Our objectives were to compare baseline frailty, disability, and comorbidities between ACD and complex ATLD patients undergoing surgery. METHODS Two multicenter prospective adult spinal deformity registries were queried, one ATLD and one ACD. Baseline clinical and frailty measures were compared between the cohorts. RESULTS 616 patients were identified (107 ACD and 509 ATLD). These groups had similar mean age (64.6 vs 60.8 years, respectively, P = .07). ACD patients were less likely to be women (51.9% vs 69.5%, P < .001) and had greater Charlson Comorbidity Index (1.5 vs .9, P < .001) and ASA grade (2.7 vs 2.4, P < .001). ACD patients had worse VR-12 Physical Component Score (PCS, 25.7 vs 29.9, P < .001) and PROMIS Physical Function Score (33.3 vs 35.3, P = .031). All frailty measures were significantly worse for ACD patients, including hand dynamometer (44.6 vs 55.6 lbs, P < .001), CSHA Clinical Frailty Score (CFS, 4.0 vs 3.2, P < .001), and Edmonton Frailty Scale (EFS, 5.15 vs 3.21, P < .001). Greater proportions of ACD patients were frail (22.9% vs 5.7%) or vulnerable (15.6% vs 10.9%) based on EFS (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Compared with ATLD patients, ACD patients had worse baseline characteristics on all measures assessed (comorbidities/disability/frailty). These differences may help account for greater risk of complications and all-cause mortality previously observed in ACD patients and facilitate strategies for better preoperative optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Michael P Kelly
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Thomas J Buell
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David Ben-Israel
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Bassel Diebo
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Justin K Scheer
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Breton Line
- Presbyterian St Lukes Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lennox Hill Hospital, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lennox Hill Hospital, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Eric Klineberg
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Texas Health Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Han Jo Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Peter Passias
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Khal Kebaish
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jeffrey P Mullin
- Department of Neurosurgery, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Robert Eastlack
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, USA
| | - Alan Daniels
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Alex Soroceanu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Gregory Mundis
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, USA
| | - Richard Hostin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor Scoliosis Center, Plano, TX, USA
| | | | - D Kojo Hamilton
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Munish Gupta
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Stephen J Lewis
- Department of Surgery, Division of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Toronto and Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Frank J Schwab
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lennox Hill Hospital, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Lawrence G Lenke
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Douglas Burton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KA, USA
| | - Christopher P Ames
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Shay Bess
- Presbyterian St Lukes Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zabat MA, Mottole NA, Ashayeri K, Norris ZA, Patel H, Sissman E, Balouch E, Maglaras C, Protopsaltis TS, Buckland AJ, Fischer CR. Comparative Analysis of Inpatient Opioid Consumption Between Different Surgical Approaches Following Single Level Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery. Global Spine J 2023; 13:2508-2515. [PMID: 35379014 PMCID: PMC10538336 DOI: 10.1177/21925682221089244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Single-center retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES To evaluate inpatient MME administration associated with different lumbar spinal fusion surgeries. METHODS Patients ≥18 years of age with a diagnosis of Grade I or II spondylolisthesis, stenosis, degenerative disc disease or pars defect who underwent one-level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) or one-level Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) or Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF) through traditional MIS, anterior-posterior position or single position approaches between L2-S1. Outcome measures included patient demographics, surgical procedure and approach, perioperative clinical characteristics, incidence of ileus and inpatient MME. Statistical analysis included one-way ANOVA with a post-hoc Tukey Test and Kruskal-Wallis Test with post-hoc Mann-Whitney test. MME was calculated as per the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and previous literature. Significance set at P < .05. RESULTS Mean age differed significantly between MIS TLIF (55.6 ± 12.5 years) and all other groups (Open TLIF 57.1 ± 12.5, SP ALIF/LLIF 57.9 ± 9.9, TP ALIF/LLIF 50.9 ± 12.7, Open ALIF/LLIF 58.4 ± 15.5). MIS TLIF had the shortest LOS compared to all groups except SP ALIF/LLIF. Total MME was significantly different between MIS TLIF and Open ALIF/LLIF (172.5 MME vs 261.1 MME, P = .044) as well as MIS TLIF and TP ALIF/LLIF (172.5 MME vs 245.4 MME, P = .009). There were no significant differences in MME/hour and incidence of ileus between all groups. CONCLUSION Patients undergoing MIS TLIF had lower inpatient opioid intake compared to TP and SP ALIF/LLIF, as well as shorter LOS compared to all groups except SP ALIF/LLIF. Thus, it appears that the advantages of minimally invasive surgery are seen in minimally invasive TLIFs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle A. Zabat
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nicole A. Mottole
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kimberly Ashayeri
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zoe A. Norris
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hershil Patel
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ethan Sissman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eaman Balouch
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Constance Maglaras
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Aaron J. Buckland
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Charla R. Fischer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Diebo BG, Tataryn Z, Alsoof D, Lafage R, Hart RA, Passias PG, Ames CP, Scheer JK, Lewis SJ, Shaffrey CI, Burton DC, Deviren V, Line BG, Soroceanu A, Hamilton DK, Klineberg EO, Mundis GM, Kim HJ, Gum JL, Smith JS, Uribe JS, Kelly MP, Kebaish KM, Gupta MC, Nunley PD, Eastlack RK, Hostin R, Protopsaltis TS, Lenke LG, Schwab FJ, Bess S, Lafage V, Daniels AH. Height Gain Following Correction of Adult Spinal Deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2023; 105:1410-1419. [PMID: 37478308 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.23.00031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Height gain following a surgical procedure for patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) is incompletely understood, and it is unknown if height gain correlates with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing ASD surgery. Patients with baseline, 6-week, and subanalysis of 1-year postoperative full-body radiographic and PROM data were examined. Correlation analysis examined relationships between vertical height differences and PROMs. Regression analysis was utilized to preoperatively estimate T1-S1 and S1-ankle height changes. RESULTS This study included 198 patients (mean age, 57 years; 69% female); 147 patients (74%) gained height. Patients with height loss, compared with those who gained height, experienced greater increases in thoracolumbar kyphosis (2.81° compared with -7.37°; p < 0.001) and thoracic kyphosis (12.96° compared with 4.42°; p = 0.003). For patients with height gain, sagittal and coronal alignment improved from baseline to postoperatively: 25° to 21° for pelvic tilt (PT), 14° to 3° for pelvic incidence - lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), and 60 mm to 17 mm for sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (all p < 0.001). The full-body mean height gain was 7.6 cm, distributed as follows: sella turcica-C2, 2.9 mm; C2-T1, 2.8 mm; T1-S1 (trunk gain), 3.8 cm; and S1-ankle (lower-extremity gain), 3.3 cm (p < 0.001). T1-S1 height gain correlated with the thoracic Cobb angle correction and the maximum Cobb angle correction (p = 0.002). S1-ankle height gain correlated with the corrections in PT, PI-LL, and SVA (p < 0.001). T1-ankle height gain correlated with the corrections in PT (p < 0.001) and SVA (p = 0.03). Trunk height gain correlated with improved Scoliosis Research Society (SRS-22r) Appearance scores (r = 0.20; p = 0.02). Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression scores correlated with S1-ankle height gain (r = -0.19; p = 0.03) and C2-T1 height gain (r = -0.18; p = 0.04). A 1° correction in a thoracic scoliosis Cobb angle corresponded to a 0.2-mm height gain, and a 1° correction in a thoracolumbar scoliosis Cobb angle resulted in a 0.25-mm height gain. A 1° improvement in PI-LL resulted in a 0.2-mm height gain. CONCLUSIONS Most patients undergoing ASD surgery experienced height gain following deformity correction, with a mean full-body height gain of 7.6 cm. Height gain can be estimated preoperatively with predictive ratios, and height gain was correlated with improvements in reported SRS-22r appearance and PROMIS scores. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bassel G Diebo
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | | | - Daniel Alsoof
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Northwell, New York, NY
| | | | - Peter G Passias
- Department of Orthopedics, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
| | | | - Justin K Scheer
- University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Stephen J Lewis
- Division of Orthopaedics, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Douglas C Burton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Vedat Deviren
- University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Breton G Line
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Denver International Spine Center, Denver, Colorado
| | - Alex Soroceanu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - D Kojo Hamilton
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Eric O Klineberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-Davis, Davis, California
| | | | - Han Jo Kim
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Jeffrey L Gum
- Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Juan S Uribe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Michael P Kelly
- Division of Orthopedics & Scoliosis at Rady Children's Hospital-San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Khaled M Kebaish
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | | | | - Richard Hostin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Southwest Scoliosis Institute, Dallas, Texas
| | | | - Lawrence G Lenke
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Och Spine Hospital/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Frank J Schwab
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Northwell, New York, NY
| | - Shay Bess
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Denver International Spine Center, Denver, Colorado
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Northwell, New York, NY
| | - Alan H Daniels
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Galetta MS, Lorentz NA, Lan R, Chan C, Zabat MA, Raman T, Protopsaltis TS, Fischer CR. Reoperation Rates Due to Adjacent Segment Disease Following Primary 1 to 2-Level Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2023; 48:1295-1299. [PMID: 36972142 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE To investigate the effect of the approach of the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion [TLIF; open vs . minimally invasive (MIS)] on reoperation rates due to ASD at 2 to 4-year follow-up. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Adjacent segment degeneration is a complication of lumbar fusion surgery, which may progress to adjacent segment disease (ASD) and cause debilitating postoperative pain potentially requiring additional operative management for relief. MIS TLIF surgery has been introduced to minimize this complication but the impact on ASD incidence is unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS For a cohort of patients undergoing 1 or 2-level primary TLIF between 2013 and 2019, patient demographics and follow-up outcomes were collected and compared among patients who underwent open versus MIS TLIF using the Mann-Whitney U test, Fischer exact test, and binary logistic regression. RESULTS Two hundred thirty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria. There was a significant difference in revision rates due to ASD between MIS and open TLIFs at 2 (5.8% vs . 15.4%, P =0.021) and 3 (8% vs . 23.2%, P =0.03) year follow-up, with open TLIFs demonstrating significantly higher revision rates. The surgical approach was the only independent predictor of reoperation rates at both 2 and 3-year follow-ups (2 yr, P =0.009; 3 yr, P =0.011). CONCLUSIONS Open TLIF was found to have a significantly higher rate of reoperation due to ASD compared with the MIS approach. In addition, the surgical approach (MIS vs . open) seems to be an independent predictor of reoperation rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew S Galetta
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York City, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ye J, Gupta S, Farooqi AS, Yin TC, Soroceanu A, Schwab FJ, Lafage V, Kelly MP, Kebaish K, Hostin R, Gum JL, Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Scheer JK, Protopsaltis TS, Passias PG, Klineberg EO, Kim HJ, Hart RA, Hamilton DK, Ames CP, Gupta MC. Use of multiple rods and proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 2023; 39:320-328. [PMID: 37327142 DOI: 10.3171/2023.4.spine23209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Multiple rods are utilized in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery to increase construct stiffness. However, the impact of multiple rods on proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) is not well established. This study aimed to investigate the impact of multiple rods on PJK incidence in ASD patients. METHODS ASD patients from a prospective multicenter database with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical and radiographic data were collected preoperatively, at 6 weeks postoperatively, at 6 months postoperatively, at 1 year postoperatively, and at every subsequent year postoperatively. PJK was defined as a kyphotic increase of > 10° in the Cobb angle from the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) to UIV+2 as compared with preoperative values. Demographic data, radiographic parameters, and PJK incidence were compared between the multirod and dual-rod patient cohorts. PJK-free survival analysis was performed using Cox regression to control for demographic characteristics, comorbidities, level of fusion, and radiographic parameters. RESULTS Overall, 307/1300 (23.62%) cases utilized multiple rods. Cases with multiple rods were more likely to be revisions (68.4% vs 46.5%, p < 0.001), to be posterior only (80.7% vs 61.5%, p < 0.001), involve more levels of fusion (mean 11.73 vs 10.60, p < 0.001), and include 3-column osteotomy (42.9% vs 17.1%, p < 0.001). Patients with multiple rods also had greater preoperative pelvic retroversion (mean pelvic tilt 27.95° vs 23.58°, p < 0.001), greater thoracolumbar junction kyphosis (-15.9° vs -11.9°, p = 0.001), and more severe sagittal malalignment (C7-S1 sagittal vertical axis 99.76 mm vs 62.23 mm, p < 0.001), all of which corrected postoperatively. Patients with multiple rods had similar incidence rates of PJK (58.6% vs 58.1%) and revision surgery (13.0% vs 17.7%). The PJK-free survival analysis demonstrated equivalent PJK-free survival durations among the patients with multiple rods (HR 0.889, 95% CI 0.745-1.062, p = 0.195) after controlling for demographic and radiographic parameters. Further stratification based on implant metal type demonstrated noninferior PJK incidence rates with multiple rods in the titanium (57.1% vs 54.6%, p = 0.858), cobalt chrome (60.5% vs 58.7%, p = 0.646), and stainless steel (20% vs 63.7%, p = 0.008) cohorts. CONCLUSIONS Multirod constructs for ASD are most frequently utilized in revision, long-level reconstructions with 3-column osteotomy. The use of multiple rods in ASD surgery does not result in an increased incidence of PJK and is not affected by rod metal type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jichao Ye
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Sachin Gupta
- 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ali S Farooqi
- 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Tsung-Cheng Yin
- 3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Alex Soroceanu
- 4University of Calgary Spine Program, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Frank J Schwab
- 5Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Virginie Lafage
- 5Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Michael P Kelly
- 7Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Khaled Kebaish
- 8Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Richard Hostin
- 9Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Southwest Scoliosis Institute, Dallas, Texas
| | - Jeffrey L Gum
- 10Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Justin S Smith
- 11Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Christopher I Shaffrey
- 12Departments of Neurological Surgery and Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Spine Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Justin K Scheer
- 13Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Peter G Passias
- 14Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Eric O Klineberg
- 15Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California
| | - Han Jo Kim
- 6Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Robert A Hart
- 16Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington; and
| | - D Kojo Hamilton
- 17Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Christopher P Ames
- 13Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Munish C Gupta
- 7Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ye J, Rider SM, Lafage R, Gupta S, Farooqi AS, Protopsaltis TS, Passias PG, Smith JS, Lafage V, Kim HJ, Klineberg EO, Kebaish KM, Scheer JK, Mundis GM, Soroceanu A, Bess S, Ames CP, Shaffrey CI, Gupta MC. Spinopelvic sagittal compensation in adult cervical deformity. J Neurosurg Spine 2023; 39:1-10. [PMID: 36964727 DOI: 10.3171/2023.2.spine221295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to evaluate spinopelvic sagittal alignment and spinal compensatory changes in adult cervical kyphotic deformity. METHODS A database composed of 13 US spine centers was retrospectively reviewed for adult patients who underwent cervical reconstruction with radiographic evidence of cervical kyphotic deformity: C2-7 sagittal vertical axis > 4 cm, chin-brow vertical angle > 25°, or cervical kyphosis (T1 slope [T1S] cervical lordosis [CL] > 15°) (n = 129). Sagittal parameters were evaluated preoperatively and in the early postoperative window (6 weeks to 6 months postoperatively) and compared with asymptomatic control patients. Adult cervical deformity patients were further stratified by degree of cervical kyphosis (severe kyphosis, C2-T3 Cobb angle ≤ -30°; moderate kyphosis, ≤ 0°; and minimal kyphosis, > 0°) and severity of sagittal malalignment (severe malalignment, sagittal vertical axis T3-S1 ≤ -60 mm; moderate malalignment, ≤ 20 mm; and minimal malalignment > 20 mm). RESULTS Compared with asymptomatic control patients, cervical deformity was associated with increased C0-2 lordosis (32.9° vs 23.6°), T1S (33.5° vs 28.0°), thoracolumbar junction kyphosis (T10-L2 Cobb angle -7.0° vs -1.7°), and pelvic tilt (PT) (19.7° vs 15.9°) (p < 0.01). Cervicothoracic kyphosis was correlated with C0-2 lordosis (R = -0.57, p < 0.01) and lumbar lordosis (LL) (R = -0.20, p = 0.03). Cervical reconstruction resulted in decreased C0-2 lordosis, increased T1S, and increased thoracic and thoracolumbar junction kyphosis (p < 0.01). Patients with severe cervical kyphosis (n = 34) had greater C0-2 lordosis (p < 0.01) and postoperative reduction of C0-2 lordosis (p = 0.02) but no difference in PT. Severe cervical kyphosis was also associated with a greater increase in thoracic and thoracolumbar junction kyphosis postoperatively (p = 0.01). Patients with severe sagittal malalignment (n = 52) had decreased PT (p = 0.01) and increased LL (p < 0.01), as well as a greater postoperative reduction in LL (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Adult cervical deformity is associated with upper cervical hyperlordotic compensation and thoracic hypokyphosis. In the setting of increased kyphotic deformity and sagittal malalignment, thoracolumbar junction kyphosis and lumbar hyperlordosis develop to restore normal center of gravity. There was no consistent compensatory pelvic retroversion or anteversion among the adult cervical deformity patients in this cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jichao Ye
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Sean M Rider
- 13Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri; and
| | - Renaud Lafage
- 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Sachin Gupta
- 14Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ali S Farooqi
- 14Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Peter G Passias
- 3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Justin S Smith
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Virginie Lafage
- 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Han-Jo Kim
- 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Eric O Klineberg
- 5Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California
| | - Khaled M Kebaish
- 6Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Justin K Scheer
- 7Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Gregory M Mundis
- 8Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic Torrey Pines, La Jolla, California
| | - Alex Soroceanu
- 9University of Calgary Spine Program, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Shay Bess
- 10Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Presbyterian/St. Luke's Medical Center, Denver, Colorado
| | - Christopher P Ames
- 7Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Christopher I Shaffrey
- Departments of11Neurological Surgery and
- 12Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Munish C Gupta
- 13Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri; and
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Passias PG, Williamson TK, Krol O, Tretiakov PS, Joujon-Roche R, Imbo B, Ahmad S, Bennett-Caso C, Owusu-Sarpong S, Lebovic JB, Robertson D, Vira S, Dhillon E, Schoenfeld AJ, Janjua MB, Raman T, Protopsaltis TS, Maglaras C, O'Connell B, Daniels AH, Paulino C, Diebo BG, Smith JS, Schwab FJ, Lafage R, Lafage V. Should Global Realignment Be Tailored to Frailty Status for Patients Undergoing Surgical Intervention for Adult Spinal Deformity? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2023; 48:930-936. [PMID: 36191091 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE Assess whether modifying spinal alignment goals to accommodate frailty considerations will decrease mechanical complications and maximize clinical outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score was developed to assist in reducing mechanical complications, but has had less success predicting such events in external validation. Higher frailty and many of its components have been linked to the development of implant failure. Therefore, modifying the GAP score with frailty may strengthen its ability to predict mechanical complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS We included 412 surgical ASD patients with two-year follow-up. Frailty was quantified using the modified Adult Spinal Deformity Frailty Index (mASD-FI). Outcomes: proximal junctional kyphosis and proximal junctional failure (PJF), major mechanical complications, and "Best Clinical Outcome" (BCO), defined as Oswestry Disability Index<15 and Scoliosis Research Society 22-item Questionnaire Total>4.5. Logistic regression analysis established a six-week score based on GAP score, frailty, and Oswestry Disability Index US Norms. Logistic regression followed by conditional inference tree analysis generated categorical thresholds. Multivariable logistic regression analysis controlling for confounders was used to assess the performance of the frailty-modified GAP score. RESULTS Baseline frailty categories: 57% not frail, 30% frail, 14% severely frail. Overall, 39 of patients developed proximal junctional kyphosis, 8% PJF, 21% mechanical complications, 22% underwent reoperation, and 15% met BCO. The mASD-FI demonstrated a correlation with developing PJF, mechanical complications, undergoing reoperation, and meeting BCO at two years (all P <0.05). Regression analysis generated the following equation: Frailty-Adjusted Realignment Score (FAR Score)=0.49×mASD-FI+0.38×GAP Score. Thresholds for the FAR score (0-13): proportioned: <3.5, moderately disproportioned: 3.5-7.5, severely disproportioned: >7.5. Multivariable logistic regression assessing FAR score demonstrated associations with mechanical complications, reoperation, and meeting BCO by two years (all P <0.05), whereas the original GAP score was only significant for reoperation. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated adjusting alignment goals in adult spinal deformity surgery for a patient's baseline frailty status and disability may be useful in minimizing the risk of complications and adverse events, outperforming the original GAP score in terms of prognostic capacity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Passias
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Department of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Tyler K Williamson
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Department of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Oscar Krol
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Department of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Peter S Tretiakov
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Department of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Rachel Joujon-Roche
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Department of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Bailey Imbo
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Department of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Salman Ahmad
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Department of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Claudia Bennett-Caso
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Department of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | | | - Jordan B Lebovic
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Djani Robertson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Shaleen Vira
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Ekamjeet Dhillon
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Muhammad B Janjua
- Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University of St Louis, St Louis, MO
| | - Tina Raman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Constance Maglaras
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Brooke O'Connell
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Alan H Daniels
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine/Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Carl Paulino
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Bassel G Diebo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Frank J Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Norris ZA, Zabat MA, Patel H, Mottole NA, Ashayeri K, Balouch E, Maglaras C, Protopsaltis TS, Buckland AJ, Fischer CR. Multidisciplinary conference for complex surgery leads to improved quality and safety. Spine Deform 2023; 11:1001-1008. [PMID: 36813882 DOI: 10.1007/s43390-023-00667-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Complex surgery for adult spinal deformity has high rates of complications, reoperations, and readmissions. Preoperative discussions of high-risk operative spine patients at a multidisciplinary conference may contribute to decreased rates of these adverse outcomes through appropriate patient selection and surgical plan optimization. With this goal, we implemented a high-risk case conference involving orthopedic and neurosurgery spine, anesthesia, intraoperative monitoring neurology, and neurological intensive care. METHODS Included in this retrospective review were patients ≥ 18 years old meeting one of the following high-risk criteria: 8 + levels fused, osteoporosis with 4 + levels fused, three column osteotomy, anterior revision of the same lumbar level, or planned significant correction for severe myelopathy, scoliosis (> 75˚), or kyphosis (> 75˚). Patients were categorized as Before Conference (BC): surgery before 2/19/2019 or After Conference (AC): surgery after 2/19/2019. Outcome measures include intraoperative and postoperative complications, readmissions, and reoperations. RESULTS 263 patients were included (96 AC, 167 BC). AC was older than BC (60.0 vs 54.6, p = 0.025) and had lower BMI (27.1 vs 28.9, p = 0.047), but had similar CCI (3.2 vs 2.9 p = 0.312), and ASA Classification (2.5 vs 2.5, p = 0.790). Surgical characteristics, including levels fused (10.6 vs 10.7, p = 0.839), levels decompressed (1.29 vs 1.25, p = 0.863), 3 column osteotomies (10.4% vs 18.6%, p = 0.080), anterior column release (9.4% vs 12.6%, p = 0.432), and revision cases (53.1% vs 52.4%, p = 0.911) were similar between AC and BC. AC had lower EBL (1.1 vs 1.9L, p < 0.001) and fewer total intraoperative complications (16.7% vs 34.1%, p = 0.002), including fewer dural tears (4.2% vs 12.6%, p = 0.025), delayed extubations (8.3% vs 22.8%%, p = 0.003), and massive blood loss (4.2% vs 13.2%, p = 0.018). Length of stay (LOS) was similar between groups (7.2 vs 8.2 days, 0.251). AC had a lower incidence of deep surgical site infections (SSI, 1.0% vs 6.6%, p = 0.038), but a higher rate of hypotension requiring vasopressor therapy (18.8% vs 4.8%, p < 0.001). Other postoperative complications were similar between groups. AC had lower rates of reoperation at 30 (2.1% vs 8.4%, p = 0.040) and 90 days (3.1 vs 12.0%, p = 0.014) and lower readmission rates at 30 (3.1% vs 10.2%, p = 0.038) and 90 days (6.3 vs 15.0%, p = 0.035). On logistic regression, AC patients had higher odds of hypotension requiring vasopressor therapy and lower odds of delayed extubation, intraoperative RBC, and intraoperative salvage blood. CONCLUSIONS Following implementation of a multidisciplinary high-risk case conference, 30- and 90-day reoperation and readmission rates, intraoperative complications, and postoperative deep SSIs decreased. Hypotensive events requiring vasopressors increased, but did not result in longer LOS or greater readmissions. These associations suggest a multidisciplinary conference may help improve quality and safety for high-risk spine patients. particularly through minimizing complications and optimizing outcomes in complex spine surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoe A Norris
- Spine Research Center, NYU Langone Health Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 306 E. 15th St., New York City, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Michelle A Zabat
- Spine Research Center, NYU Langone Health Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 306 E. 15th St., New York City, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Hershil Patel
- Spine Research Center, NYU Langone Health Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 306 E. 15th St., New York City, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Nicole A Mottole
- Spine Research Center, NYU Langone Health Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 306 E. 15th St., New York City, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Kimberly Ashayeri
- Spine Research Center, NYU Langone Health Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 306 E. 15th St., New York City, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Eaman Balouch
- Spine Research Center, NYU Langone Health Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 306 E. 15th St., New York City, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Constance Maglaras
- Spine Research Center, NYU Langone Health Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 306 E. 15th St., New York City, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Themistocles S Protopsaltis
- Spine Research Center, NYU Langone Health Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 306 E. 15th St., New York City, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Aaron J Buckland
- Spine Research Center, NYU Langone Health Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 306 E. 15th St., New York City, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Charla R Fischer
- Spine Research Center, NYU Langone Health Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 306 E. 15th St., New York City, NY, 10003, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lorentz NA, Galetta MS, Zabat MA, Raman T, Protopsaltis TS, Fischer C. Post-Operative Physical Therapy Following Cervical Spine Surgery: Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes. Cureus 2023; 15:e40559. [PMID: 37465791 PMCID: PMC10351333 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.40559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Post-operative physical therapy (PT) following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery is often performed to improve a patient's functional ability and reduce neck pain. However, current literature evaluating the benefits of post-operative PT using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is limited and remains inconclusive. Here we compare post-operative improvement between patients who did and did not undergo formal PT after ACDF using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores. Methods A retrospective observational study examining patients who underwent one- or two-level primary ACDF or cervical disc replacement (CDR) at an academic orthopedic hospital and who had PROMIS scores recorded pre-operatively and through two-year follow-up. Patients were stratified according to whether or not they attended formal postoperative PT. PROMIS scores and patient demographics were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test, Fisher's exact test, chi-square test of independence, and Student's t-test within and between cohorts. Results Two hundred and twenty patients were identified. Demographic differences between PT and no PT groups include age (PT 54.1 vs. no PT 49.5, p=0.005) and BMI (PT 28.1 vs. no PT 29.8, p=0.028). The only significant difference in post-operative PROMIS scores was in physical health scores at three months post-operatively (no PT 43.9 vs. PT 39.1, p=0.008). Physical health scores improved from baseline to one-year follow-up in both cohorts (PT +3.5, p=0.025; no PT +6.6, p=0.008). There were no significant differences when comparing improvements in physical health scores between groups at six months and one year. Conclusion In conclusion, there was no significance to support the benefits of post-operative PT as measured by PROMIS scores. No significant differences in PROMIS were observed between groups from pre-operative baseline scores to six-month and one-year follow-ups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan A Lorentz
- Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University (NYU) Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA
| | - Matthew S Galetta
- Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University (NYU) Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA
| | - Michelle A Zabat
- Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University (NYU) Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA
| | - Tina Raman
- Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University (NYU) Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA
| | | | - Charla Fischer
- Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University (NYU) Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ye J, Rider SM, Lafage R, Gupta S, Farooqi AS, Protopsaltis TS, Passias PG, Smith JS, Lafage V, Kim HJ, Klineberg EO, Kebaish KM, Scheer JK, Mundis GM, Soroceanu A, Bess S, Ames CP, Shaffrey CI, Gupta MC. Distal junctional kyphosis in adult cervical deformity patients: where does it occur? Eur Spine J 2023; 32:1598-1606. [PMID: 36928488 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07631-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the impact of the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) on Distal Junctional kyphosis (DJK) incidence in adult cervical deformity (ACD) surgery. METHODS Prospectively collected data from ACD patients undergoing posterior or anterior-posterior reconstruction at 13 US sites was reviewed up to 2-years postoperatively (n = 140). Data was stratified into five groups by level of LIV: C6-C7, T1-T2, T3-Apex, Apex-T10, and T11-L2. DJK was defined as a kyphotic increase > 10° in Cobb angle from LIV to LIV-1. Analysis included DJK-free survival, covariate-controlled cox regression, and DJK incidence at 1-year follow-up. RESULTS 25/27 cases of DJK developed within 1-year post-op. In patients with a minimum follow-up of 1-year (n = 102), the incidence of DJK by level of LIV was: C6-7 (3/12, 25.00%), T1-T2 (3/29, 10.34%), T3-Apex (7/41, 17.07%), Apex-T10 (8/11, 72.73%), and T11-L2 (4/8, 50.00%) (p < 0.001). DJK incidence was significantly lower in the T1-T2 LIV group (adjusted residual = -2.13), and significantly higher in the Apex-T10 LIV group (adjusted residual = 3.91). In covariate-controlled regression using the T11-L2 LIV group as reference, LIV selected at the T1-T2 level (HR = 0.054, p = 0.008) or T3-Apex level (HR = 0.081, p = 0.010) was associated with significantly lower risk of DJK. However, there was no difference in DJK risk when LIV was selected at the C6-C7 level (HR = 0.239, p = 0.214). CONCLUSION DJK risk is lower when the LIV is at the upper thoracic segment than the lower cervical segment. DJK incidence is highest with LIV level in the lower thoracic or thoracolumbar junction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jichao Ye
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Sean M Rider
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid, Campus, Box 8233, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sachin Gupta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ali S Farooqi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Peter G Passias
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Han-Jo Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric O Klineberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Khaled M Kebaish
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Justin K Scheer
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Gregory M Mundis
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic Torrey Pines, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Alex Soroceanu
- University of Calgary Spine Program, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Shay Bess
- Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Presbyterian/St Luke's Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Christopher P Ames
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Christopher I Shaffrey
- Departments of Neurological Surgery and Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Munish C Gupta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid, Campus, Box 8233, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ani F, Bono J, Walia A, Van Perrier G, O'Connell B, Maglaras C, Protopsaltis TS, Raman T. The Effect of Inpatient Step Count on Complications in the Elderly Patient After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery. Int J Spine Surg 2023; 17:318-323. [PMID: 37028802 PMCID: PMC10165633 DOI: 10.14444/8425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of elderly patients undergoing adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery has increased with the advent of new techniques and more nuanced understanding of global malalignment as patients age. The relationship between inpatient physical activity after ASD surgery and postoperative complications in elderly patients has not been reported; thus, we sought to investigate this relationship. METHODS We performed a medical record review of 185 ASD patients older than 65 years (age: 71.5 ± 4.7; body mass index: 30.0 ± 6.1, American Society of Anesthesiologists: 2.7 ± 0.5, and levels fused: 10.5 ± 3.4). We derived the number of feet walked over the first 3 days after surgery from physical therapy documentation and evaluated for association with 90-day perioperative complications. Patients who sustained an incidental durotomy were excluded from the study. RESULTS The 185 patients were divided into groups based on whether they were among the 50th percentile for number of feet walked (62 ft). Walking less than 62 ft after ASD surgery was associated with higher incidence of postoperative complications (54.3%, P = 0.05), cardiac complications (34.8%, P = 0.03), pulmonary complications (21.7%, P = 0.01), and ileus (15.2%, P = 0.03). Patients who developed any postoperative complication (106 ± 172 vs 211 ± 279 ft, P = 0.001), ileus (26 ± 49 vs 174 ± 248 ft, P = 0.001), deep venous thrombosis (23 ± 30 vs 171 ± 247 ft, P = 0.001), and cardiac complications (58 ± 94 vs 192 ± 261 ft) walked less than patients who did not. CONCLUSION Elderly patients who walked less than 62 ft in the first 3 days after ASD surgery have a higher rate of postoperative complications, specifically pulmonary and ileus compared with those patients who walked more. Steps walked after ASD surgery may be a helpful and practical addition to the surgeon's armamentarium for monitoring the recovery of their patients. CLINICAL RELEVENCE Monitoring the steps walked by patients after ASD surgery can be a practical and useful tool for surgeons to track and improve their patients' recovery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fares Ani
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Juliana Bono
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Arnaav Walia
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gregory Van Perrier
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Brooke O'Connell
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Constance Maglaras
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Tina Raman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Zabat MA, Elboghdady I, Mottole NA, Mojica E, Maglaras C, Jazrawi LM, Virk MS, Campbell KA, Buckland AJ, Protopsaltis TS, Fischer CR. Evaluation of Health-related Quality of Life Improvement in Patients Undergoing Cervical Versus Shoulder Surgery. Clin Spine Surg 2023; 36:E80-E85. [PMID: 35969677 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective analysis of outcomes in cervical spine and shoulder arthroscopy patients. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to assess differential improvements in health-related quality of life for cervical spine surgery compared with shoulder surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA An understanding of outcome differences between different types of orthopedic surgeries is helpful in counseling patients about expected postoperative recovery. This study compares outcomes in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery with arthroscopic shoulder surgery using computer-adaptive Patient-reported Outcome Information System scores. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients undergoing cervical spine surgery (1-level or 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, cervical disc replacement) or arthroscopic shoulder surgery (rotator cuff repair±biceps tenodesis) were grouped. Patient-reported Outcome Information System scores of physical function, pain interference, and pain intensity at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months were compared using paired t tests. RESULTS Cervical spine (n=127) and shoulder (n=91) groups were similar in sex (25.8% vs. 41.8% female, P =0.731) but differed in age (51.6±11.6 vs. 58.60±11.2, P <0.05), operative time (148.3±68.6 vs. 75.9±26.9 min, P <0.05), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASAs) (2.3±0.6 vs. 2.0±0.5, P =0.001), smoking status (15.7% vs. 4.4%, P =0.008), and length of stay (1.1±1.0 vs. 0.3±0.1, P =0.000). Spine patients had worse physical function (36.9 ±12.6 vs. 49.4±8.6, P <0.05) and greater pain interference (67.0±13.6 vs. 61.7±4.8, P =0.001) at baseline. Significant improvements were seen in all domains by 3 months for both groups, except for physical function after shoulder surgery. Spine patients had greater physical function improvements at all timepoints (3.33 vs. -0.43, P =0.003; 4.81 vs. 0.08, P =0.001; 6.5 vs. -5.24, P =<0.05). Conversely, shoulder surgery patients showed better 6-month improvement in pain intensity over spine patients (-8.86 vs. -4.46, P =0.001), but this difference resolved by 12 months. CONCLUSIONS Cervical spine patients had greater relative early improvement in physical function compared with shoulder patients, whereas pain interference and intensity did not significantly differ between the 2 groups after surgery. This will help in counseling patients about relative difference in recovery and improvement between the 2 surgery types. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle A Zabat
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York City, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Moses MJ, Protopsaltis TS. What's Important (Arts & Humanities): The Gothic and the Grotesque-Romanticizing Deformity in Verdi's Rigoletto. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2023; 105:413-416. [PMID: 36367949 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.22.00820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Rigoletto, composed by Giuseppe Verdi, is one of the most commonly performed operas around the world. At the time of its 1851 premiere in Venice, the work was remarkable for its portrayal of a main character with a spinal deformity. Through the music of Rigoletto, Verdi explored the societal tensions surrounding physical deformity in the 19th century, providing valuable lessons about the importance of approaching patient care with compassion and empathy in the present day.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Moses
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Smith JS, Elias E, Sursal T, Line B, Lafage V, Lafage R, Klineberg E, Kim HJ, Passias P, Nasser Z, Gum JL, Eastlack R, Daniels A, Mundis G, Hostin R, Protopsaltis TS, Soroceanu A, Hamilton DK, Kelly MP, Lewis SJ, Gupta M, Schwab FJ, Burton D, Ames CP, Lenke LG, Shaffrey CI, Bess S. How Good Are Surgeons at Achieving Their Preoperative Goal Sagittal Alignment Following Adult Deformity Surgery? Global Spine J 2023:21925682231161304. [PMID: 36821516 DOI: 10.1177/21925682231161304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Multicenter, prospective cohort. OBJECTIVES Malalignment following adult spine deformity (ASD) surgery can impact outcomes and increase mechanical complications. We assess whether preoperative goals for sagittal alignment following ASD surgery are achieved. METHODS ASD patients were prospectively enrolled based on 3 criteria: deformity severity (PI-LL ≥25°, TPA ≥30°, SVA ≥15 cm, TCobb≥70° or TLCobb≥50°), procedure complexity (≥12 levels fused, 3-CO or ACR) and/or age (>65 and ≥7 levels fused). The surgeon documented sagittal alignment goals prior to surgery. Goals were compared with achieved alignment on first follow-up standing radiographs. RESULTS The 266 enrolled patients had a mean age of 61.0 years (SD = 14.6) and 68% were women. Mean instrumented levels was 13.6 (SD = 3.8), and 23.2% had a 3-CO. Mean (SD) offsets (achieved-goal) were: SVA = -8.5 mm (45.6 mm), PI-LL = -4.6° (14.6°), TK = 7.2° (14.7°), reflecting tendencies to undercorrect SVA and PI-LL and increase TK. Goals were achieved for SVA, PI-LL, and TK in 74.4%, 71.4%, and 68.8% of patients, respectively, and was achieved for all 3 parameters in 37.2% of patients. Three factors were independently associated with achievement of all 3 alignment goals: use of PACs/equivalent for surgical planning (P < .001), lower baseline GCA (P = .009), and surgery not including a 3-CO (P = .037). CONCLUSIONS Surgeons failed to achieve goal alignment of each sagittal parameter in ∼25-30% of ASD patients. Goal alignment for all 3 parameters was only achieved in 37.2% of patients. Those at greatest risk were patients with more severe deformity. Advancements are needed to enable more consistent translation of preoperative alignment goals to the operating room.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Elias Elias
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Tolga Sursal
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Breton Line
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Presbyterian St Lukes Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lennox Hill Hospital, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Eric Klineberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Han Jo Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Peter Passias
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zeina Nasser
- Neuroscience Research Center, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Hadath, Lebanon
| | - Jeffrey L Gum
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Robert Eastlack
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Alan Daniels
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Gregory Mundis
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Richard Hostin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor Scoliosis Center, Plano, TX, USA
| | | | - Alex Soroceanu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | - Michael P Kelly
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Stephen J Lewis
- Department of Surgery, Division of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Toronto and Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Munish Gupta
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Frank J Schwab
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lennox Hill Hospital, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Douglas Burton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KA, USA
| | - Christopher P Ames
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lawrence G Lenke
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Shay Bess
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Presbyterian St Lukes Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Lafage R, Fourman MS, Smith JS, Bess S, Shaffrey CI, Kim HJ, Kebaish KM, Burton DC, Hostin R, Passias PG, Protopsaltis TS, Daniels AH, Klineberg EO, Gupta MC, Kelly MP, Lenke LG, Schwab FJ, Lafage V. Can unsupervised cluster analysis identify patterns of complex adult spinal deformity with distinct perioperative outcomes? J Neurosurg Spine 2023; 38:547-557. [PMID: 36806173 DOI: 10.3171/2023.1.spine221095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to use an unsupervised cluster approach to identify patterns of operative adult spinal deformity (ASD) and compare the perioperative outcomes of these groups. METHODS A multicenter data set included patients with complex surgical ASD, including those with severe deformities, significant surgical complexity, or advanced age who underwent a multilevel fusion. An unsupervised cluster analysis allowing for 10% outliers was used to identify different deformity patterns. The perioperative outcomes of these clusters were then compared using ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, and chi-square tests, with p values < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS Two hundred eighty-six patients were classified into four clusters of deformity patterns: hyper-thoracic kyphosis (hyper-TK), severe coronal, severe sagittal, and moderate sagittal. Hyper-TK patients had the lowest disability (mean Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] 32.9 ± 17.1) and pain scores (median numeric rating scale [NRS] back score 6, leg score 1). The severe coronal cluster had moderate functional impairment (mean physical component score 34.4 ± 12.3) and pain (median NRS back score 7, leg score 4) scores. The severe sagittal cluster had the highest levels of disability (mean ODI 49.3 ± 15.6) and low appearance scores (mean 2.3 ± 0.7). The moderate cluster (mean 68.8 ± 7.8 years) had the highest pain interference subscores on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (mean 65.2 ± 5.8). Overall 30-day adverse events were equivalent among the four groups. Fusion to the pelvis was most common in the moderate sagittal (89.4%) and severe sagittal (97.5%) clusters. The severe coronal cluster had more osteotomies per case (median 11, IQR 6.5-14) and a higher rate of 30-day implant-related complications (5.5%). The severe sagittal and hyper-TK clusters had more three-column osteotomies (43% and 32.3%, respectively). Hyper-TK patients had shorter hospital stays. CONCLUSIONS This cohort of patients with complex ASD surgeries contained four natural clusters of deformity, each with distinct perioperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renaud Lafage
- 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Mitchell S Fourman
- 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Justin S Smith
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, UVA Health, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Shay Bess
- 4Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Han Jo Kim
- 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Khaled M Kebaish
- 6Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Douglas C Burton
- 7Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Richard Hostin
- 8Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Medical City Scoliosis & Advanced Spine Center, Plano, Texas
| | - Peter G Passias
- 4Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Alan H Daniels
- 9Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Eric O Klineberg
- 10Department of Orthopedic Surgery, UC Davis Health, Sacramento, California
| | - Munish C Gupta
- 11Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University Orthopedics, St. Louis, Missouri; and
| | - Michael P Kelly
- 11Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University Orthopedics, St. Louis, Missouri; and
| | - Lawrence G Lenke
- 12Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia Orthopedic Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Frank J Schwab
- 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Virginie Lafage
- 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Buckland AJ, Braly BA, O'Malley NA, Ashayeri K, Protopsaltis TS, Kwon B, Cheng I, Thomas JA. Lateral decubitus single position anterior posterior surgery improves operative efficiency, improves perioperative outcomes, and maintains radiological outcomes comparable with traditional anterior posterior fusion at minimum 2-year follow-up. Spine J 2023; 23:685-694. [PMID: 36641035 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT The advantages of Lateral Single Position surgery (LSPS) in the perioperative period has previously been demonstrated, however 2-year postoperative outcomes of this novel technique have not yet been compared to circumferential anterior-posterior fusion (FLIP) at 2-years postoperatively. PURPOSE Evaluate the safety and efficacy of LSPS versus gold-standard FLIP STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Multi-center retrospective cohort review. PATIENT SAMPLE Four hundred forty- two patients undergoing lumbar fusion via LSPS or FLIP OUTCOME MEASURES: Levels fused, operative time, estimated blood loss, perioperative complications, and reasons for reoperation at 30-days, 90-days, 1-year, and 2-years. Radiographic outcomes included lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), PI-LL mismatch, and segmental lumbar lordosis. METHODS Patients were grouped as LSPS if anterior and posterior portions of the procedure were performed in the lateral decubitus position, and FLIP if patients were repositioned from supine or lateral to prone position for the posterior portion of the procedure under the same anesthetic. Groups were compared in terms of demographics, intraoperative, perioperative and radiological outcomes, complications and reoperations up to 2-years follow-up. Measures were compared using independent samples or paired t-tests and chi-squared analyses with significance set at p<.05. RESULTS Four hundred forty- two pts met inclusion, including 352 LSPS and 90 FLIP pts. Significant differences were noted in age (62.4 vs 56.9; p≤.001) and smoking status (7% vs 16%; p=.023) between the LSPS and FLIP groups. LSPS demonstrated significantly lower Op time (97.7min vs 297.0 min; p<.001), fluoro dose (36.5mGy vs 78.8mGy; p<.001), EBL (88.8mL vs 270.0mL; p<.001), and LOS (1.91 days vs 3.61 days; p<.001) compared to FLIP. LSPS also demonstrated significantly fewer post-op complications than FLIP (21.9%vs 34.4%; p=.013), specifically regarding rates of ileus (0.0% vs 5.6%; p<.001). No differences in reoperation were noted at 30-day (1.7%LSPS vs 4.4%FLIP, p=.125), 90-day (5.1%LSPS vs 5.6%FLIP, p=.795) or 2-year follow-up (9.7%LSPS vs 12.2% FLIP; p=.441). LSPS group had a significantly lower preoperative PI-LL (4.1° LSPS vs 8.6°FLIP, p=.018), and a significantly greater postoperative LL (56.6° vs 51.8°, p = .006). No significant differences were noted in rates of fusion (94.3% LSPS vs 97.8% FLIP; p=.266) or subsidence (6.9% LSPS vs 12.2% FLIP; p=.260). CONCLUSIONS LSPS and circumferential fusions have similar outcomes at 2-years post-operatively, while reducing perioperative complications, improving perioperative efficiency and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron J Buckland
- Melbourne Orthopaedic Group, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Spine and Scoliosis Research Associates Australia, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Spine Research Center, Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
| | | | - Nicholas A O'Malley
- Spine Research Center, Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kimberly Ashayeri
- Spine Research Center, Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Brian Kwon
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Passias PG, Ahmad W, Oh C, Imbo B, Naessig S, Pierce K, Lafage V, Lafage R, Hamilton DK, Protopsaltis TS, Klineberg EO, Gum J, Schoenfeld AJ, Line B, Hart RA, Burton DC, Bess S, Schwab FJ, Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Ames CP. Development of Risk Stratification Predictive Models for Cervical Deformity Surgery. Neurosurgery 2022; 91:928-935. [PMID: 36250700 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As corrective surgery for cervical deformity (CD) increases, so does the rate of complications and reoperations. To minimize suboptimal postoperative outcomes, it is important to develop a tool that allows for proper preoperative risk stratification. OBJECTIVE To develop a prognostic utility for identification of risk factors that lead to the development of major complications and unplanned reoperations. METHODS CD patients age 18 years or older were stratified into 2 groups based on the postoperative occurrence of a revision and/or major complication. Multivariable logistic regressions identified characteristics that were associated with revision or major complication. Decision tree analysis established cutoffs for predictive variables. Models predicting both outcomes were quantified using area under the curve (AUC) and receiver operating curve characteristics. RESULTS A total of 109 patients with CD were included in this study. By 1 year postoperatively, 26 patients experienced a major complication and 17 patients underwent a revision. Predictive modeling incorporating preoperative and surgical factors identified development of a revision to include upper instrumented vertebrae > C5, lowermost instrumented vertebrae > T7, number of unfused lordotic cervical vertebrae > 1, baseline T1 slope > 25.3°, and number of vertebral levels in maximal kyphosis > 12 (AUC: 0.82). For developing a major complication, a model included a current smoking history, osteoporosis, upper instrumented vertebrae inclination angle < 0° or > 40°, anterior diskectomies > 3, and a posterior Smith Peterson osteotomy (AUC: 0.81). CONCLUSION Revisions were predicted using a predominance of radiographic parameters while the occurrence of major complications relied on baseline bone health, radiographic, and surgical characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Passias
- Department of Orthopedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Waleed Ahmad
- Department of Orthopedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Cheongeun Oh
- Department of Orthopedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Bailey Imbo
- Department of Orthopedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sara Naessig
- Department of Orthopedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Katherine Pierce
- Department of Orthopedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - D Kojo Hamilton
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Themistocles S Protopsaltis
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopaedic Hospital, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Eric O Klineberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA
| | - Jeffrey Gum
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Breton Line
- Denver International Spine Center, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Robert A Hart
- Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Douglas C Burton
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Shay Bess
- Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Frank J Schwab
- Department of Orthopedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | | | - Christopher P Ames
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Elias E, Bess S, Line BG, Lafage V, Lafage R, Klineberg E, Kim HJ, Passias P, Nasser Z, Gum JL, Kebaish K, Eastlack R, Daniels AH, Mundis G, Hostin R, Protopsaltis TS, Soroceanu A, Hamilton DK, Kelly MP, Gupta M, Hart R, Schwab FJ, Burton D, Ames CP, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS. Operative treatment outcomes for adult cervical deformity: a prospective multicenter assessment with mean 3-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 2022; 37:855-864. [PMID: 35901674 DOI: 10.3171/2022.6.spine22422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Adult cervical deformity (ACD) has high complication rates due to surgical complexity and patient frailty. Very few studies have focused on longer-term outcomes of operative ACD treatment. The objective of this study was to assess minimum 2-year outcomes and complications of ACD surgery. METHODS A multicenter, prospective observational study was performed at 13 centers across the United States to evaluate surgical outcomes for ACD. Demographics, complications, radiographic parameters, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs; Neck Disability Index, modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association, EuroQol-5D [EQ-5D], and numeric rating scale [NRS] for neck and back pain) were evaluated, and analyses focused on patients with ≥ 2-year follow-up. RESULTS Of 169 patients with ACD who were eligible for the study, 102 (60.4%) had a minimum 2-year follow-up (mean 3.4 years, range 2-8.1 years). The mean age at surgery was 62 years (SD 11 years). Surgical approaches included anterior-only (22.8%), posterior-only (39.6%), and combined (37.6%). PROMs significantly improved from baseline to last follow-up, including Neck Disability Index (from 47.3 to 33.0) and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (from 12.0 to 12.8; for patients with baseline score ≤ 14), neck pain NRS (from 6.8 to 3.8), back pain NRS (from 5.5 to 4.8), EQ-5D score (from 0.74 to 0.78), and EQ-5D visual analog scale score (from 59.5 to 66.6) (all p ≤ 0.04). More than half of the patients (n = 58, 56.9%) had at least one complication, with the most common complications including dysphagia, distal junctional kyphosis, instrumentation failure, and cardiopulmonary events. The patients who did not achieve 2-year follow-up (n = 67) were similar to study patients based on baseline demographics, comorbidities, and PROMs. Over the course of follow-up, 23 of the total 169 enrolled patients were reported to have died. Notably, these represent all-cause mortalities during the course of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS This multicenter, prospective analysis demonstrates that operative treatment for ACD provides significant improvement of health-related quality of life at a mean 3.4-year follow-up, despite high complication rates and a high rate of all-cause mortality that is reflective of the overall frailty of this patient population. To the authors' knowledge, this study represents the largest and most comprehensive prospective effort to date designed to assess the intermediate-term outcomes and complications of operative treatment for ACD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias Elias
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Shay Bess
- 2Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center, Denver, Colorado
| | - Breton G Line
- 2Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center, Denver, Colorado
| | - Virginie Lafage
- 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lennox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Renaud Lafage
- 4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Eric Klineberg
- 5Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California
| | - Han Jo Kim
- 4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Peter Passias
- 6Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York
| | - Zeina Nasser
- 7Neuroscience Research Center, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Hadath, Lebanon
| | | | - Khaled Kebaish
- 9Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Alan H Daniels
- 11Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | | | - Richard Hostin
- 12Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor Scoliosis Center, Plano, Texas
| | | | - Alex Soroceanu
- 13Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - D Kojo Hamilton
- 14Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael P Kelly
- 15Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, California
| | - Munish Gupta
- 16Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Robert Hart
- 17Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Frank J Schwab
- 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lennox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Douglas Burton
- 18Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Christopher P Ames
- 19Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California; and
| | - Christopher I Shaffrey
- 20Departments of Neurosurgery and Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Justin S Smith
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Elias E, Bess S, Line B, Lafage V, Lafage R, Klineberg E, Kim HJ, Passias PG, Nasser Z, Gum JL, Kebaish K, Eastlack R, Daniels AH, Mundis G, Hostin R, Protopsaltis TS, Soroceanu A, Hamilton DK, Kelly MP, Gupta M, Hart R, Schwab FJ, Burton D, Ames CP, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS. Outcomes of operative treatment for adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter assessment with mean 4-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 2022; 37:607-616. [PMID: 35535835 DOI: 10.3171/2022.3.spine2295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The current literature has primarily focused on the 2-year outcomes of operative adult spinal deformity (ASD) treatment. Longer term durability is important given the invasiveness, complications, and costs of these procedures. The aim of this study was to assess minimum 3-year outcomes and complications of ASD surgery. METHODS Operatively treated ASD patients were assessed at baseline, follow-up, and through mailings. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) included scores on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Scoliosis Research Society-22r (SRS-22r) questionnaire, mental component summary (MCS) and physical component summary (PCS) of the SF-36, and numeric rating scale (NRS) for back and leg pain. Complications were classified as perioperative (≤ 90 days), delayed (90 days to 2 years), and long term (≥ 2 years). Analyses focused on patients with minimum 3-year follow-up. RESULTS Of 569 patients, 427 (75%) with minimum 3-year follow-up (mean ± SD [range] 4.1 ± 1.1 [3.0-9.6] years) had a mean age of 60.8 years and 75% were women. Operative treatment included a posterior approach for 426 patients (99%), with a mean ± SD 12 ± 4 fusion levels. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion was performed in 35 (8%) patients, and 89 (21%) underwent 3-column osteotomy. All PROMs improved significantly from baseline to last follow-up, including scores on ODI (45.4 to 30.5), PCS (31.0 to 38.5), MCS (45.3 to 50.6), SRS-22r total (2.7 to 3.6), SRS-22r activity (2.8 to 3.5), SRS-22r pain (2.3 to 3.4), SRS-22r appearance (2.4 to 3.5), SRS-22r mental (3.4 to 3.7), SRS-22r satisfaction (2.7 to 4.1), NRS for back pain (7.1 to 3.8), and NRS for leg pain (4.8 to 3.0) (all p < 0.001). Degradations in some outcome measures were observed between the 2-year and last follow-up evaluations, but the magnitudes of these degradations were modest and arguably not clinically significant. Overall, 277 (65%) patients had at least 1 complication, including 185 (43%) perioperative, 118 (27%) delayed, and 56 (13%) long term. Notably, the 142 patients who did not achieve 3-year follow-up were similar to the study patients in terms of demographic characteristics, deformities, and baseline PROMs and had similar rates and types of complications. CONCLUSIONS This prospective multicenter analysis demonstrated that operative ASD treatment provided significant improvement of health-related quality of life at minimum 3-year follow-up (mean 4.1 years), suggesting that the benefits of surgery for ASD remain durable at longer follow-up. These findings should prove useful for counseling, cost-effectiveness assessments, and efforts to improve the safety of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias Elias
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Shay Bess
- 2Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center, Denver, Colorado
| | - Breton Line
- 2Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center, Denver, Colorado
| | - Virginie Lafage
- 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Renaud Lafage
- 4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Eric Klineberg
- 5Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California
| | - Han Jo Kim
- 4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Peter G Passias
- 6Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York
| | - Zeina Nasser
- 7Neuroscience Research Center, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Hadath, Lebanon
| | | | - Khal Kebaish
- 9Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Alan H Daniels
- 11Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | | | - Richard Hostin
- 12Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor Scoliosis Center, Plano, Texas
| | | | - Alex Soroceanu
- 13Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - D Kojo Hamilton
- 14Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael P Kelly
- 15Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, California
| | - Munish Gupta
- 16Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Robert Hart
- 17Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Frank J Schwab
- 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Douglas Burton
- 18Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Christopher P Ames
- 19Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California; and
| | - Christopher I Shaffrey
- 20Departments of Neurosurgery and Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Justin S Smith
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Passias PG, Pierce KE, Williamson TK, Krol O, Lafage R, Lafage V, Schoenfeld AJ, Protopsaltis TS, Vira S, Line B, Diebo BG, Ames CP, Kim HJ, Smith JS, Chou D, Daniels AH, Gum JL, Shaffrey CI, Burton DC, Kelly MP, Klineberg EO, Hart RA, Bess S, Schwab FJ, Gupta MC. Pelvic Non-Response Following Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity: Influence of Realignment Strategies on Occurrence. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2022; 48:645-652. [PMID: 36102572 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite adequate correction, the pelvis may fail to readjust, deemed pelvic non-response. To assess alignment outcomes(pelvic non-response[PNR], PJK, postoperative cervical deformity[CD]) following ASD surgery utilizing different realignment strategies. METHODS ASD patients with 2-year(2Y) data were included. PNR defined as undercorrected in age-adjusted pelvic tilt(PT) at 6W and maintained at 2Y. Patients classified by alignment utilities: [a] Improvement in SRS-Schwab SVA,[b] Matching in age-adjusted PI-LL,[c] Matching in Roussouly,[d] aligning Global Alignment and Proportionality(GAP) score. Multivariable regression analyses, controlling for age, baseline deformity, and surgical factors, assessed rates of PNR, PJK, and CD development following realignment. RESULTS 686 patients met inclusion criteria. Rates of postop PJK and CD were not significant in the PNR group(both P>0.15). PNR patients less often met substantial clinical benefit in ODI by 2Y(OR: 0.6,[0.4-0.98]). Patients overcorrected in age-adjusted PI-LL, matching Roussouly, or proportioned in GAP at 6W had lower rates of PNR(all P<0.001). Incremental addition of classifications led to 0% occurrence of PNR, PJK and CD. Stratifying by baseline PT severity, Low and Moderate deformity demonstrated the least incidence of PNR(7.7%) when proportioning in GAP at 6W, while severe PT benefited most from matching in Roussouly(all P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Following ASD corrective surgery, 24.9% of patients showed residual pelvic malalignment. This occurrence was often accompanied by undercorrection of lumbopelvic mismatch and less improvement of pain. However, overcorrection in any strategy incurred higher rates of PJK. We recommend surgeons identify a middle ground using one, or more, of the available classifications to inform correction goals in this regard. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Passias
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Katherine E Pierce
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Tyler K Williamson
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Oscar Krol
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Themistocles S Protopsaltis
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Shaleen Vira
- Department of Spine Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Breton Line
- Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Clinic, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Bassel G Diebo
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, SUNY Downstate, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christopher P Ames
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Han Jo Kim
- Department of Orthopaedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Dean Chou
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Alan H Daniels
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Gum
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Christopher I Shaffrey
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Douglas C Burton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Michael P Kelly
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University of St Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Eric O Klineberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Robert A Hart
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Shay Bess
- Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Clinic, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Frank J Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Munish C Gupta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University of St Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Passias PG, Kummer N, Williamson TK, Moattari K, Lafage V, Lafage R, Kim HJ, Daniels AH, Gum JL, Diebo BG, Protopsaltis TS, Mundis GM, Eastlack RK, Soroceanu A, Scheer JK, Hamilton DK, Klineberg EO, Line B, Hart RA, Burton DC, Mummaneni P, Chou D, Park P, Schwab FJ, Shaffrey CI, Bess S, Ames CP, Smith JS. Highest Achievable Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Cervical Deformity Corrective Surgery by Frailty. Neurosurgery 2022; 91:693-700. [PMID: 36084195 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Frailty is influential in determining operative outcomes, including complications, in patients with cervical deformity (CD). OBJECTIVE To assess whether frailty status limits the highest achievable outcomes of patients with CD. METHODS Adult patients with CD with 2-year (2Y) data included. Frailty stratification: not frail (NF) <0.2, frail (F) 0.2 to 0.4, and severely frail (SF) >0.4. Analysis of covariance established estimated marginal means based on age, invasiveness, and baseline deformity, for improvement, deterioration, or maintenance in Neck Disability Index (NDI), Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA), and Numerical Rating Scale Neck Pain. RESULTS One hundred twenty-six patients with CD included 29 NF, 83 F, and 14 SF. The NF group had the highest rates of deterioration and lowest rates of improvement in cervical Sagittal Vertical Axis and horizontal gaze modifiers. Two-year improvements in NDI by frailty: NF: -11.2, F: -16.9, and SF: -14.6 (P = .524). The top quartile of NF patients also had the lowest 1-year (1Y) NDI (7.0) compared with F (11.0) and SF (40.5). Between 1Y and 2Y, 7.9% of patients deteriorated in NDI, 71.1% maintained, and 21.1% improved. Between 1Y and 2Y, SF had the highest rate of improvement (42%), while NF had the highest rate of deterioration (18.5%). CONCLUSION Although frail patients improved more often by 1Y, SF patients achieve most of their clinical improvement between 1 and 2Y. Frailty is associated with factors such as osteoporosis, poor alignment, neurological status, sarcopenia, and other medical comorbidities. Similarly, clinical outcomes can be affected by many factors (fusion status, number of pain generators within treated levels, integrity of soft tissues and bone, and deformity correction). Although accounting for such factors will ultimately determine whether frailty alone is an independent risk factor, these preliminary findings may suggest that frailty status affects the clinical outcomes and improvement after CD surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Passias
- Department of Orthopedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nicholas Kummer
- Department of Orthopedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Tyler K Williamson
- Department of Orthopedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kevin Moattari
- Department of Orthopedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Han Jo Kim
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alan H Daniels
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University/Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Gum
- Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | - Bassel G Diebo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Themistocles S Protopsaltis
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopaedic Hospital, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Gregory M Mundis
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic Medical Group, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Robert K Eastlack
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Alexandra Soroceanu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Justin K Scheer
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - D Kojo Hamilton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Eric O Klineberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UC Davis Health System, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Breton Line
- Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Center, Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Robert A Hart
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Douglas C Burton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Praveen Mummaneni
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Dean Chou
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Paul Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Frank J Schwab
- Department of Orthopedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Christopher I Shaffrey
- Division of Spine, Departments of Neurosurgery and Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Shay Bess
- Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Center, Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Christopher P Ames
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Balouch E, Burapachaisri A, Woo D, Norris Z, Segar A, Ayres EW, Vasquez-Montes D, Buckland AJ, Razi A, Smith ML, Protopsaltis TS, Kim YH. Assessing Postoperative Pseudarthrosis in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) on Dynamic Radiographs Using Novel Angular Measurements. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2022; 47:1151-1156. [PMID: 35853174 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A retrospective review of operative patients at a single institution. OBJECTIVE The aim was to validate a novel method of detecting pseudarthrosis on dynamic radiographs. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA A common complication after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is pseudarthrosis. A previously published method for detecting pseudarthrosis identifies a 1 mm difference in interspinous motion (ISM), which requires calibration of images and relies on anatomic landmarks difficult to visualize. An alternative is to use angles between spinous processes, which does not require calibration and relies on more visible landmarks. MATERIALS AND METHODS ISM was measured on dynamic radiographs using the previously published linear method and new angular method. Angles were defined by lines from screw heads to dorsal points of spinous processes. Angular cutoff for fusion was calculated using a regression equation correlating linear and angular measures, based on the 1 mm linear cutoff. Pseudarthrosis was assessed with both cutoffs. Sensitivity, specificity, inter-reliability and intrareliability of angular and linear measures used postoperative computed tomography (CT) as the reference. RESULTS A total of 242 fused levels (81 allograft, 84 polyetheretherketone, 40 titanium, 37 standalone cages) were measured in 143 patients (mean age 52.0±11.5, 42%F). 36 patients (66 levels) had 1-year postoperative CTs; 13 patients (13 levels) had confirmed pseudarthrosis. Linear and angular measurements closely correlated ( R =0.872), with 2.3° corresponding to 1 mm linear ISM. Potential pseudarthroses was found in 28.0% and 18.5% levels using linear and angular cutoffs, respectively. Linear cutoff had 85% sensitivity, 87% specificity; angular cutoff had 85% sensitivity, 96% specificity for detecting CT-validated pseudarthrosis. Interclass correlation coefficients were 0.974 and 0.986 (both P <0.001); intrarater reliability averaged 0.953 and 0.974 ( P <0.001 for all) for linear and angular methods, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The angular measure for assessing potential pseudarthrosis is as sensitive as and more specific than published linear methods, has high interobserver reliability, and can be used without image calibration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eaman Balouch
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
| | | | - Dainn Woo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Zoe Norris
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Anand Segar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Ethan W Ayres
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
| | | | - Aaron J Buckland
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- Melbourne Orthopaedic Group, Melbourne Australia
- Spine and Scoliosis Research Associates, Melbourne Australia
| | | | | | | | - Yong H Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kim HJ, Yao YC, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, Kelly MP, Gupta M, Albert TJ, Protopsaltis TS, Mundis GM, Passias P, Klineberg E, Bess S, Lafage V, Ames CP. Neurological Complications and Recovery Rates of Patients With Adult Cervical Deformity Surgeries. Global Spine J 2022; 12:1091-1097. [PMID: 33222533 PMCID: PMC9210226 DOI: 10.1177/2192568220975735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE This study aims to report the incidence, risk factors, and recovery rate of neurological complications (NC) in patients with adult cervical deformity (ACD) who underwent corrective surgery. METHODS ACD patients undergoing surgery from 2013 to 2015 were enrolled in a prospective, multicenter database. Patients were separated into 2 groups according to the presence of neurological complications (NC vs no-NC groups). The types, timing, recovery patterns, and interventions for NC were recorded. Patients' demographics, surgical details, radiographic parameters, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores were compared. RESULTS 106 patients were prospectively included. Average age was 60.8 years with a mean of 18.2 months follow-up. The overall incidence of NC was 18.9%; of these, 68.1% were major complications. Nerve root motor deficit was the most common complication, followed by radiculopathy, sensory deficit, and spinal cord injury. The proportion of complications occurring within 30 days of surgery was 54.5%. The recovery rate from neurological complication was high (90.9%), with most of the recoveries occurring within 6 months and continuing even after 12 months. Only 2 patients (1.9%) had continuous neurological complication. No demographic or preoperative radiographic risk factors could be identified, and anterior corpectomy and posterior foraminotomy were found to be performed less in the NC group. The final HRQOL outcome was not significantly different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS Our data is valuable to surgeons and patients to better understand the neurological complications before performing or undergoing complex cervical deformity surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han Jo Kim
- Spine Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA,Han Jo Kim, Spine Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA.
| | - Yu-Cheng Yao
- Spine Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA,Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Beitou District, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | - Justin S. Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Michael P. Kelly
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Munish Gupta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Todd J. Albert
- Spine Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Peter Passias
- Department of Orthopaedics, NYU Langone Medical Center-Orthopaedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric Klineberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Shay Bess
- Paediatric and Adult Spine Surgery, Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Presbyterian St Luke’s Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Spine Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christopher P. Ames
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Passias PG, Pierce KE, Horn SR, Segar A, Passfall L, Kummer N, Krol O, Bortz C, Brown AE, Alas H, Segreto FA, Ahmad W, Naessig S, Buckland AJ, Protopsaltis TS, Gerling M, Lafage R, Schwab FJ, Lafage V. Cervical Deformity Correction Fails to Achieve Age-Adjusted Spinopelvic Alignment Targets. Int J Spine Surg 2022; 16:450-457. [PMID: 35772976 DOI: 10.14444/8260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess whether surgical cervical deformity (CD) patients meet spinopelvic age-adjusted alignment targets, reciprocal, and lower limb compensation changes. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review. METHODS CD was defined as C2-C7 lordosis >10°, cervical sagittal vertical angle (cSVA) >4 cm, or T1 slope minus cervical lordosis (TS-CL) >20°. Inclusion criteria were age >18 years and undergoing surgical correction with complete baseline and postoperative imaging. Published formulas were used to create age-adjusted alignment target for pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), sagittal vertical angle (SVA), and lumbar lordosis and thoracic kyphosis (LL-TK). Actual alignment was compared with age-adjusted ideal values. Patients who matched ±10-year thresholds for age-adjusted targets were compared with unmatched cases (under- or overcorrected). RESULTS A total of 120 CD patients were included (mean age, 55.1 years; 48.4% women; body mass index, 28.8 kg/m2). For PT, only 24.4% of patients matched age-adjusted alignment, 51.1% overcorrected for PT, and 24.4% undercorrected. For PI-LL, only 27.6% of CD patients matched age-adjusted targets, with 49.4% overcorrected and 23% undercorrected postoperatively. Forty percent of patients matched age-adjusted target for SVA, 41.3% overcorrected, and 18.8% undercorrected. CD patients who had worsened in TS-CL or cSVA postoperatively displayed increased TK (-41.1° to -45.3°, P = 1.06). With lower extremity compensation, CD patients decreased in ankle flexion angle postoperatively (6.1°-5.5°, P = 0.036) and trended toward smaller sacrofemoral angle (199.6-195.6 mm, P = 0.286) and knee flexion (2.6° to -1.1°, P = 0.269). CONCLUSIONS In response to worsening CD postoperatively, patients increased in TK and recruited less lower limb compensation. Almost 75% of CD patients did not meet previously established spinopelvic alignment goals, of whom a subset of patients were actually made worse off in these parameters following surgery. This finding raises the question of whether we should be looking at the entire spine when treating CD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Passias
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Katherine E Pierce
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Samantha R Horn
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anand Segar
- Department of Orthopaedics, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lara Passfall
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nicholas Kummer
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Oscar Krol
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Cole Bortz
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Avery E Brown
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Haddy Alas
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Frank A Segreto
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Waleed Ahmad
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sara Naessig
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Aaron J Buckland
- Department of Orthopaedics, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Michael Gerling
- Department of Orthopaedics, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Frank J Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Owusu-Sarpong S, Iweala U, Bloom D, Buckland AJ, Protopsaltis TS, Fischer CR. Characterizing the Effect of Perioperative Narcotic Consumption and Narcotic Prescription Dosing at Discharge on Satisfaction With Pain Control for Patients Undergoing Single-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Clin Spine Surg 2022; 35:E478-E482. [PMID: 34907928 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A single-center, retrospective review of prospectively collected data on patients who underwent single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusions (ACDFs) between October 2014 and October 2019. OBJECTIVE To investigate the effect of perioperative narcotic consumption and amount of narcotic prescribed at discharge on patient satisfaction with pain control after single-level ACDF. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Prior research has demonstrated that opioid prescription habits may be related to physician desire to produce superior patient satisfaction with pain control. METHODS Patients with complete Press-Ganey Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey information were analyzed. Inpatient opioid prescriptions were recorded and converted to milligram morphine equivalents (MME) and tablets of 5 mg oxycodone. HCAHPS scores were converted to a Likert-type 5-point scale. RESULTS A total of 47 patients met inclusion criteria for this study. Average age was 48.1±10.9 y. Average inpatient opioids prescribed was 102±106 MME. Average opioids prescribed at discharge was 437±342 MME. No statistically significant correlation was found between satisfaction with pain control and opioid consumption while in the hospital [r=-0.106, P=0.483]. Similarly, there was no statistically significant correlation between satisfaction with pain control and opioids prescribed upon discharge [r=-0.185, P=0.219]. No statistically significant correlation was found between date of surgery and inpatient MME consumption [r=-0.113, P=0.450]. Interestingly, more opioids were prescribed at discharge the earlier the date of surgery [r=-0.426, P=0.003]. For every additional month further along in the study period, the odds of a patient reporting a top box score for satisfaction with pain control increased by 5.5% [P=0.025]. CONCLUSION Our study found no correlation between patient satisfaction with pain control and inpatient opioid dosage or outpatient prescription dosage after single-level ACDF. Moreover, satisfaction with pain control increased over time despite a decrease in MME prescribed at discharge. This suggests that factors other than narcotic consumption play a more important role in patient satisfaction with pain control. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
|
42
|
Ashayeri K, Alex Thomas J, Braly B, O'Malley N, Leon C, Cheng I, Kwon B, Medley M, Eisen L, Protopsaltis TS, Buckland AJ. Lateral decubitus single position anterior-posterior (AP) fusion shows equivalent results to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at one-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 2022; 31:2227-2238. [PMID: 35551483 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07226-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Revised: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study compares perioperative and 1-year outcomes of lateral decubitus single position circumferential fusion (L-SPS) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) for degenerative pathologies. METHODS Multicenter retrospective chart review of patients undergoing AP fusion with L-SPS or MIS TLIF. Demographics and clinical and radiographic outcomes were compared using independent samples t tests and chi-squared analyses with significance set at p < 0.05. RESULTS A total of 445 patients were included: 353 L-SPS, 92 MIS TLIF. The L-SPS cohort was significantly older with fewer diabetics and more levels fused. The L-SPS cohort had significantly shorter operative time, blood loss, radiation dosage, and length of stay compared to MIS TLIF. 1-year follow-up showed that the L-SPS cohort had higher rates of fusion (97.87% vs. 81.11%; p = 0.006) and lower rates of subsidence (6.38% vs. 38.46%; p < 0.001) compared with MIS TLIF. There were significantly fewer returns to the OR within 1 year for early mechanical failures with L-SPS (0.0% vs. 5.4%; p < 0.001). 1-year radiographic outcomes revealed that the L-SPS cohort had a greater LL (56.6 ± 12.5 vs. 51.1 ± 15.9; p = 0.004), smaller PI-LL mismatch (0.2 ± 13.0 vs. 5.5 ± 10.5; p = 0.004). There were no significant differences in amount of change in VAS scores between cohorts. Similar results were seen after propensity-matched analysis and sub-analysis of cases including L5-S1. CONCLUSIONS L-SPS improves perioperative outcomes and does not compromise clinical or radiographic results at 1-year follow-up compared with MIS TLIF. There may be decreased rates of early mechanical failure with L-SPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly Ashayeri
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, 462 1st Avenue, Suite 7S4, New York, NY, USA.
| | - J Alex Thomas
- Atlantic Neurosurgical and Spine Specialists, Wilmington, NC, USA
| | - Brett Braly
- Oklahoma Sports, Science and Orthopaedics, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | | | - Carlos Leon
- Oklahoma Sports, Science and Orthopaedics, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | | | - Brian Kwon
- Division of Spine Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mark Medley
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, 462 1st Avenue, Suite 7S4, New York, NY, USA
| | - Leon Eisen
- Oklahoma Sports, Science and Orthopaedics, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Wick JB, Le HV, Lafage R, Gupta MC, Hart RA, Mundis GM, Bess S, Burton DC, Ames CP, Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Schwab FJ, Passias PG, Protopsaltis TS, Lafage V, Klineberg EO. Assessment of Adult Spinal Deformity Complication Timing and Impact on 2-Year Outcomes Using a Comprehensive Adult Spinal Deformity Classification System. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2022; 47:445-454. [PMID: 34812199 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of prospectively collected multicenter registry data. OBJECTIVE To identify rates and timing of postoperative complications in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients, the impact of complication type and timing on health related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes, and the impact of complication timing on readmission and reoperation rates. Better understanding of complication timing and impact on HRQoL may improve patient selection, preoperative counseling, and postoperative complication surveillance. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA ASD is common and associated with significant disability. Surgical correction is often pursued, but is associated with high complication rates. The International Spine Study Group, AO Spinal Deformity Forum, and European Spine Study Group have developed a new complication classification system for ASD (ISSG-AO spine complications classification system). METHODS The ISSG-AO spine complications classification system was utilized to assess complications occurring over the 2-year postoperative time period amongst a multicenter, prospectively enrolled cohort of patients who underwent surgery for ASD. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were established for each complication type. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for baseline disability and comorbidities. Associations between each complication type and HRQoL, and reoperation/readmission and complication timing, were assessed. RESULTS Of 584 patients meeting inclusion criteria, cardiopulmonary, gastrointestinal, infection, early adverse events, and operative complications contributed to a rapid initial decrease in complication-free survival. Implant-related, radiographic, and neurologic complications substantially decreased long-term complication-free survival. Only radiographic and implant-related complications were significantly associated with worse 2-year HRQoL outcomes. Need for readmission and/or reoperation was most frequent among those experiencing complications after postoperative day 90. CONCLUSION Surgeons should recognize that long-term complications have a substantial negative impact on HRQoL, and should carefully monitor for implant-related and radiographic complications over long-term follow-up.Level of Evidence: 4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph B Wick
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA
| | - Hai V Le
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA
| | | | - Munish C Gupta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Robert A Hart
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Gregory M Mundis
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS
| | - Shay Bess
- Denver International Spine Center, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, CO
| | - Douglas C Burton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS
| | | | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA
| | | | | | - Peter G Passias
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University, Langone Health, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Eric O Klineberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Durand WM, DiSilvestro KJ, Kim HJ, Hamilton DK, Lafage R, Passias PG, Protopsaltis TS, Lafage V, Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Gupta MC, Klineberg EO, Schwab FJ, Gum JL, Mundis GM, Eastlack RK, Kebaish KM, Soroceanu A, Hostin RA, Burton DC, Bess S, Ames CP, Hart RA, Daniels AH. Low-Density Pedicle Screw Constructs Are Associated with Lower Incidence of Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2022; 47:463-469. [PMID: 35019881 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE Determine whether screws per level and rod material/diameter are associated with incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA PJF is a common and particularly adverse complication of adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. There is evidence that the rigidity of posterior spinal constructs may impact risk of PJF. METHODS Patients with ASD and 2-year minimum follow-up were included. Only patients undergoing primary fusion of more than or equal to five levels with lower instrumented vertebrae (LIV) at the sacro-pelvis were included. Screws per level fused was analyzed with a cutoff of 1.8 (determined by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis). Multivariable logistic regression was utilized, controlling for age, body mass index (BMI), 6-week postoperative change from baseline in lumbar lordosis, number of posterior levels fused, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, approach, osteotomy, upper instrumented vertebra (UIV), osteoporosis, preoperative TPA, and pedicle screw at the UIV (as opposed to hook, wire, etc.). RESULTS In total, 504 patients were included. PJF occurred in 12.7%. The mean screws per level was 1.7, and 56.8% of patients had less than 1.8 screws per level. No differences were observed between low versus high screw density groups for T1-pelvic angle or magnitude of lordosis correction (both P > 0.15). PJF occurred in 17.0% versus 9.4% of patients with more than or equal to 1.8 versus less than 1.8 screws per level, respectively (P < 0.05). In multivariable analysis, patients with less than 1.8 screws per level exhibited lower odds of PJF (odds ratio (OR) 0.48, P < 0.05), and a continuous variable for screw density was significantly associated with PJF (OR 3.87 per 0.5 screws per level, P < 0.05). Rod material and diameter were not significantly associated with PJF (both P > 0.1). CONCLUSION Among ASD patients undergoing long-segment primary fusion to the pelvis, the risk of PJF was lower among patients with less than 1.8 screws per level. This finding may be related to construct rigidity. Residual confounding by other patient and surgeon-specific characteristics may exist. Further biomechanical and clinical studies exploring this relationship are warranted.Level of Evidence: 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Han Jo Kim
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Peter G Passias
- Langone Medical Center, New York University, New York City, NY
| | | | | | - Justin S Smith
- University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA
| | | | | | - Eric O Klineberg
- University of California Davis Medical Center, University of California, Sacramento, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Shay Bess
- Denver International Spine Center, Denver, CO
| | | | - Robert A Hart
- Swedish Medical Center, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ashayeri K, Leon C, Tigchelaar S, Fatemi P, Follett M, Cheng I, Thomas JA, Medley M, Braly B, Kwon B, Eisen L, Protopsaltis TS, Buckland AJ. Single position lateral decubitus anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and posterior fusion reduces complications and improves perioperative outcomes compared with traditional anterior-posterior lumbar fusion. Spine J 2022; 22:419-428. [PMID: 34600110 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Lateral decubitus single position anterior-posterior (AP) fusion utilizing anterior lumbar interbody fusion and percutaneous posterior fixation is a novel, minimally invasive surgical technique. Single position lumbar surgery (SPLS) with anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) or lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) has been shown to be a safe, effective technique. This study directly compares perioperative outcomes of SPLS with lateral ALIF vs. traditional supine ALIF with repositioning (FLIP) for degenerative pathologies. PURPOSE To determine if SPLS with lateral ALIF improves perioperative outcomes compared to FLIP with supine ALIF. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Multicenter retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients undergoing primary AP fusions with ALIF at 5 institutions from 2015 to 2020. OUTCOME MEASURES Levels fused, inclusion of L4-L5, L5-S1, radiation dosage, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), perioperative complications. Radiographic analysis included lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), and PI-LL mismatch. METHODS Retrospective analysis of primary ALIFs with bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation between L4-S1 over 5 years at 5 institutions. Patients were grouped as FLIP or SPLS. Demographic, procedural, perioperative, and radiographic outcome measures were compared using independent samples t-tests and chi-squared analyses with significance set at p <.05. Cohorts were propensity-matched for demographic or procedural differences. RESULTS A total of 321 patients were included; 124 SPS and 197 Flip patients. Propensity-matching yielded 248 patients: 124 SPLS and 124 FLIP. The SPLS cohort demonstrated significantly reduced operative time (132.95±77.45 vs. 261.79±91.65 min; p <0.001), EBL (120.44±217.08 vs. 224.29±243.99 mL; p <.001), LOS (2.07±1.26 vs. 3.47±1.40 days; p <.001), and rate of perioperative ileus (0.00% vs. 6.45%; p =.005). Radiation dose (39.79±31.66 vs. 37.54±35.85 mGy; p =.719) and perioperative complications including vascular injury (1.61% vs. 1.61%; p =.000), retrograde ejaculation (0.00% vs. 0.81%, p =.328), abdominal wall (0.81% vs. 2.42%; p =.338), neuropraxia (1.61% vs. 0.81%; p =.532), persistent motor deficit (0.00% vs. 1.61%; p =.166), wound complications (1.61% vs. 1.61%; p =.000), or VTE (0.81% vs. 0.81%; p =.972) were similar. No difference was seen in 90-day return to OR. Similar results were noted in sub-analyses of single-level L4-L5 or L5-S1 fusions. On radiographic analysis, the SPLS cohort had greater changes in LL (4.23±11.14 vs. 0.43±8.07 deg; p =.005) and PI-LL mismatch (-4.78±8.77 vs. -0.39±7.51 deg; p =.002). CONCLUSIONS Single position lateral ALIF with percutaneous posterior fixation improves operative time, EBL, LOS, rate of ileus, and maintains safety compared to supine ALIF with prone percutaneous pedicle screws between L4-S1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly Ashayeri
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, 462 1st Avenue, Suite 7S4, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
| | - Carlos Leon
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, 333 East 38th Street, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10016
| | - Seth Tigchelaar
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, 430 Broadway Street, MC: 6342, Pavilion C, 4th Floor, Redwood City, CA 94063-3132 CA, USA
| | - Parastou Fatemi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, 430 Broadway Street, MC: 6342, Pavilion C, 4th Floor, Redwood City, CA 94063-3132 CA, USA
| | - Matt Follett
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, 430 Broadway Street, MC: 6342, Pavilion C, 4th Floor, Redwood City, CA 94063-3132 CA, USA
| | - Ivan Cheng
- St. David's Medical Center, Austin Spine Surgery, Austin, Austin Spine - Central Austin Office 3000 N IH 35, Suite 708 Austin, TX 78705 TX, USA
| | - J Alex Thomas
- New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Atlantic Neurosurgical and Spine Specialists, 2208 South 17th St. Wilmington, NC 28401, Wilmington, NC, USA
| | - Mark Medley
- New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Atlantic Neurosurgical and Spine Specialists, 2208 South 17th St. Wilmington, NC 28401, Wilmington, NC, USA
| | - Brett Braly
- Healthcare Partners Investments, Inc, Oklahoma Sports, Science and Orthopaedics, 9800 Broadway Ext., Ste. 203OKC, OK 73114, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Brian Kwon
- Division of Spine Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, 125 Parker Hill Avenue, Converse 4, Suite 1 Boston, MA 02120, Boston, MA
| | - Leon Eisen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, 333 East 38th Street, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10016
| | - Themistocles S Protopsaltis
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, 333 East 38th Street, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10016
| | - Aaron J Buckland
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, 333 East 38th Street, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10016
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Zabat MA, Mottole NA, Patel H, Norris ZA, Ashayeri K, Sissman E, Balouch E, Maglaras C, Protopsaltis TS, Buckland AJ, Roberts T, Fischer CR. Incidence of dysphagia following posterior cervical spine surgery. J Clin Neurosci 2022; 99:44-48. [PMID: 35240474 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.02.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Abundant literature exists describing the incidence of dysphagia following anterior cervical surgery; however, there is a paucity of literature detailing the incidence of dysphagia following posterior cervical procedures. Further characterization of this complication is important for guiding clinical prevention and management. Patients ≥ 18 years of age underwent posterior cervical fusion with laminectomy or laminoplasty between C1-T1. Pre- and post-operative dysphagia was assessed by a speech language pathologist. The patient cohort was categorized by approach: Laminectomy + Fusion (LF) and Laminoplasty (LP). Patients were excluded from radiographic analyses if they did not have both baseline and follow-up imaging. The study included 147 LF and 47 LP cases. There were no differences in baseline demographics. There were three patients with new-onset dysphagia in the LF group (1.5% incidence) and no new cases in the LP group (p = 1.000). LF patients had significantly higher rates of post-op complications (27.9% LF vs. 8.5% LP, p = 0.005) but not intra-op complications (6.1% LF vs. 2.1% LP, p = 0.456). Radiographic analysis of the entire cohort showed no significant changes in cervical lordosis, cSVA, or T1 slope. Both group comparisons showed no differences in incidence of dysphagia pre and post operatively. Based on this study, the likelihood of developing dysphagia after LF or LP are similarly low with a new onset dysphagia rate of 1.5%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle A Zabat
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nicole A Mottole
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hershil Patel
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zoe A Norris
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kimberly Ashayeri
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ethan Sissman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eaman Balouch
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Constance Maglaras
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Aaron J Buckland
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Timothy Roberts
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Charla R Fischer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Le HV, Wick JB, Lafage R, Kelly MP, Kim HJ, Gupta MC, Bess S, Burton DC, Ames CP, Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Schwab FJ, Passias PG, Protopsaltis TS, Lafage V, Klineberg EO. Surgical Factors and Treatment Severity for Perioperative Complications Predict Hospital Length of Stay in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2022; 47:136-143. [PMID: 34889884 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of prospectively collected multicenter registry data. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine whether surgical variables and complications as graded by treatment severity impact postoperative hospital length of stay (LOS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Surgical treatment can substantially improve quality of life for patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). However, surgical treatment is associated with high complication rates, which may impact hospital LOS. Classifying complications by severity of subsequent treatment may allow surgeons to better understand complications and predict their impact on important outcome metrics, including LOS. METHODS Patients enrolled in a multicenter, prospectively enrolled database for ASD were assessed for study inclusion. Complications were graded based on intervention severity. Associations between LOS, complication intervention severity, and surgical variables (fusion length, use of interbody fusion, use of major osteotomy, primary versus revision surgery, same day vs. staged surgery, and surgical approach), were assessed. Two multivariate regression models were constructed to assess for independent associations with LOS. RESULTS Of 1183 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 708 did not and 475 did experience a perioperative complication during their index hospitalization, with 660 and 436 included in the final cohorts, respectively. Among those with complications, intervention severities included 14.9% with no intervention, 68.6% with minor, 8.9% with moderate, and 7.6% with severe interventions. Multivariate regression modeling demonstrated that length of posterior fusion, use of major osteotomy, staged surgery, and severity of intervention for complications were significantly associated with LOS. CONCLUSION Careful selection of surgical factors may help reduce hospital LOS following surgery for ASD. Classification of complications by treatment severity can help surgeons better understand and predict the implications of complications, in turn assisting with surgical planning and patient counseling.Level of Evidence: 4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hai V Le
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA
| | - Joseph B Wick
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA
| | | | - Michael P Kelly
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Han Jo Kim
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Munish C Gupta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Shay Bess
- Denver International Spine Center, Presbyterian St. Luke's/ Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, CO
| | - Douglas C Burton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS
| | | | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA
| | | | | | - Peter G Passias
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Eric O Klineberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Bloom DA, Manjunath AK, Dinizo M, Fried JW, Jazrawi LM, Protopsaltis TS, Fischer CR. Reducing Postoperative Opioid-prescribing Following Posterior Lumbar Fusion Does Not Significantly Change Patient Satisfaction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2022; 47:34-41. [PMID: 34091561 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective comparative; LOE-3. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to investigate what effect, if any, an institutional opioid reduction prescribing policy following one- or two-level lumbar fusion has on Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey results. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Previous research has demonstrated that high levels of opioid-prescribing may be related, in part, to a desire to produce superior patient satisfaction. METHODS A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was conducted on patients who underwent one- or two-level lumbar fusions L3-S1 between October 2014 and October 2019 at a single institution. Patients with complete survey information were included in the analysis. Patients with a history of trauma, fracture, spinal deformity, fusions more than two levels, or prior lumbar fusion surgery L3-S1 were excluded. Cohorts were based on date of surgery relative to implementation of an institutional opioid reduction policy, which commenced in October 1, 2018. To better compare groups, opioid prescriptions were converted into milligram morphine equivalents (MME). RESULTS A total of 330 patients met inclusion criteria: 259 pre-protocol, 71 post-protocol. There were 256 one-level fusions and 74 two-level fusions included. There were few statistically significant differences between groups with respect to patient demographics (P > 0.05) with the exception of number of patients who saw the pain management service, which increased from 36.7% (95) pre-protocol to 59.2% (42) post-protocol; P < 0.001. Estimated blood loss (EBL) decreased from 533 ± 571 mL to 346 ± 328 mL (P = 0.003). Percentage of patients who underwent concomitant laminectomy decreased from 71.8% to 49.3% (P < 0.001). Average opioids prescribed on discharge in the pre-protocol period was 534 ± 425 MME, compared to after initiation of the protocol, that is 320 ± 174 MME (P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference with respect to satisfaction with pain control, 4.49 ± 0.85 pre-protocol versus 4.51 ± 0.82 post-protocol (P = 0.986). CONCLUSION A reduction in opioids prescribed at discharge after one- or two-level lumbar fusion is not associated with any statistically significant change in patient satisfaction with pain management, as measured by the HCAHPS survey.Level of Evidence: 3.
Collapse
|
49
|
Theodore N, Chambless LB, Hartl R, Zygourakis CC, Jiang B, Protopsaltis TS. Introduction. The neurosurgeon as roboticist. Neurosurg Focus 2022; 52:E1. [DOI: 10.3171/2021.10.focus21634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Theodore
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Lola B. Chambless
- Department of Neurosurgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Roger Hartl
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cornell University, New York, New York
| | | | - Bowen Jiang
- St. Jude Neuroscience Institute, Fullerton, California; and
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Norris ZA, Sissman E, O'Connell BK, Mottole NA, Patel H, Balouch E, Ashayeri K, Maglaras C, Protopsaltis TS, Buckland AJ, Fischer CR. COVID-19 pandemic and elective spinal surgery cancelations - what happens to the patients? Spine J 2021; 21:2003-2009. [PMID: 34339887 PMCID: PMC8321964 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.07.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Revised: 07/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT The COVID-19 pandemic caused nationwide suspensions of elective surgeries due to reallocation of resources to the care of COVID-19 patients. Following resumption of elective cases, a significant proportion of patients continued to delay surgery, with many yet to reschedule, potentially prolonging their pain and impairment of function and causing detrimental long-term effects. PURPOSE The aim of this study was to examine differences between patients who have and have not rescheduled their spine surgery procedures originally cancelled due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and to evaluate the reasons for continued deferment of spine surgeries even after the lifting of the mandated suspension of elective surgeries. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective case series at a single institution PATIENT SAMPLE: Included were 133 patients seen at a single institution where spine surgery was canceled due to a state-mandated suspension of elective surgeries from March to June, 2020. OUTCOME MEASURES The measures assessed included preoperative diagnoses and neurological dysfunction, surgical characteristics, reasons for surgery deferment, and PROMIS scores of pain intensity, pain interference, and physical function. METHODS Patient electronic medical records were reviewed. Patients who had not rescheduled their canceled surgery as of January 31, 2021, and did not have a reason noted in their charts were called to determine the reason for continued surgery deferment. Patients were divided into three groups: early rescheduled (ER), late rescheduled (LR), and not rescheduled (NR). ER patients had a date of surgery (DOS) prior to the city's Phase 4 reopening on July 20, 2020; LR patients had a DOS on or after that date. Statistical analysis of the group findings included analysis of variance with Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) post-hoc test, independent samples T-test, and chi-square analysis with significance set at p≤.05. RESULTS Out of 133 patients, 47.4% (63) were in the ER, 15.8% (21) in the LR, and 36.8% (49) in the NR groups. Demographics and baseline PROMIS scores were similar between groups. LR had more levels fused (3.6) than ER (1.6), p= .018 on Tukey HSD. NR (2.1) did not have different mean levels fused than LR or ER, both p= >.05 on Tukey HSD. LR had more three column osteotomies (14.3%) than ER and (1.6%) and NR (2.0%) p=.022, and fewer lumbar microdiscectomies (0%) compared to ER (20.6%) and NR (10.2%), p=.039. Other surgical characteristics were similar between groups. LR had a longer length of stay than ER (4.2 vs 2.4, p=.036). No patients in ER or LR had a nosocomial COVID-19 infection. Of NR, 2.0% have a future surgery date scheduled and 8.2% (4) are acquiring updated exams before rescheduling. 40.8% (20; 15.0% total cohort) continue to defer surgery over concern for COVID-19 exposure and 16.3% (8) for medical comorbidities. 6.1% (3) permanently canceled for symptom improvement. 8.2% (4) had follow-up recommendations for non-surgical management. 4.1% (2) are since deceased. CONCLUSION Over 1/3 of elective spine surgeries canceled due to COVID-19 have not been performed in the 8 months from when elective surgeries resumed in our institution to the end of the study. ER patients had less complex surgeries planned than LR. NR patients continue to defer surgery primarily over concern for COVID-19 exposure. The toll on the health of these patients as a result of the delay in treatment and on their lives due to their inability to return to normal function remains to be seen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Charla R. Fischer
- Corresponding author. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Spine Research Center, NYU Langone Health, 306 E 15th St, Ground Floor, New York, NY 10003. Tel: 646-7948643; fax: 929-4559241
| |
Collapse
|