Italian S3-Guideline on the treatment of atopic eczema - First Update, adapted from EuroGuiDerm by the Italian Society of Dermatology and STD (SIDEMAST), the Italian Association of Hospital Dermatologists (ADOI) and the Italian Society of Allergological and Occupational Dermatology (SIDAPA)

The evidence- and consensus-based guideline on atopic eczema, published in JEADV on 18 August 2022 (part 1) and 3 September 2022 (part 2) was developed in accordance with the EuroGuiDerm Guideline and Consensus Statement Development Manual. Four consensus conferences were held between December 2020 and July 2021. Twenty-nine experts (including clinicians and patient representatives) from 12 European countries participated. To reflect the most recent evidence on novel systemic medications, an update was published in October 2022. According to the purpose of the Italian Society of Dermatology and STD (SIDEMAST), the Italian Association of Hospital Dermatologists (ADOI) and the Italian Society of Allergological and Environmental Dermatology (SIDAPA) to adapt the EuroGuiDerm guideline on the treatment of atopic eczema into the Italian Healthcare setting, the original update has been supplemented by inserting notes, well highlighted by the original text, to emphasize the laws, rules, procedures and suggestions of the Italian Ministry of Health and regional Health authorities.

Italian S3-Guideline on the treatment of Atopic Eczema - Part 1: Systemic therapy, adapted from EuroGuiDerm by the Italian Society of Dermatology and STD (SIDEMAST), the Italian Association of Hospital Dermatologists (ADOI) and the Italian Society of Allergological and Environmental Dermatology (SIDAPA)

SIDeMaST (Società Italiana di Dermatologia Medica, Chirurgica, Estetica e delle Malattie Sessualmente Trasmesse) contributed to the development of the present guideline on the systemic treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis. With the permission of EuroGuiDerm, SIDeMaST adapted the guideline to the Italian healthcare context to supply a reliable and affordable tool to Italian physicians who take care of patients affected by atopic dermatitis. The evidence- and consensus-based guideline on atopic eczema was developed in accordance with the EuroGuiDerm Guideline and Consensus Statement Development Manual. Four consensus conferences were held between December 2020 and July 2021. Twenty-nine experts (including clinicians and patient representatives) from 12 European countries participated. This first part of the guideline includes general information on its scope and purpose, the health questions covered, target users and a methods section. It also provides guidance on which patients should be treated with systemic therapies, as well as recommendations and detailed information on each systemic drug. The systemic treatment options discussed in the guideline comprise conventional immunosuppressive drugs (azathioprine, ciclosporin, glucocorticosteroids, methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil), biologics (dupilumab, lebrikizumab, nemolizumab, omalizumab and tralokinumab) and janus kinase inhibitors (abrocitinib, baricitinib and upadacitinib). Part two of the guideline will address avoidance of provocation factors, dietary interventions, immunotherapy, complementary medicine, educational interventions, occupational and psychodermatological aspects, patient perspective and considerations for pediatric, adolescent, pregnant and breastfeeding patients.

Italian S3-Guideline on the treatment of atopic eczema Part 2: non-systemic treatments and treatment recommendations for special AE patient populations, adapted from EuroGuiDerm by the Italian Society of Dermatology and STD (SIDEMAST), the Italian Association of Hospital Dermatologists (ADOI) and the Italian Society of Allergological and Occupational Dermatology (SIDAPA)

SIDeMaST (Società Italiana di Dermatologia Medica, Chirurgica, Estetica e delle Malattie Sessualmente Trasmesse) contributed to the development of the present guideline on the systemic treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis. With the permission of EuroGuiDerm, SIDeMaST adapted the guideline to the Italian healthcare context to supply a reliable and affordable tool to Italian physicians who take care of patients affected by atopic dermatitis. The evidence- and consensus-based guideline on atopic eczema was developed in accordance with the EuroGuiDerm Guideline and Consensus Statement Development Manual. Four consensus conferences were held between December 2020 and July 2021. Twenty-nine experts (including clinicians and patient representatives) from 12 European countries participated. This second part of the guideline includes recommendations and detailed information on basic therapy with emollients and moisturizers, topical anti-inflammatory treatment, antimicrobial and antipruritic treatment and UV phototherapy. Furthermore, this part of the guideline covers techniques for avoiding provocation factors, as well as dietary interventions, immunotherapy, complementary medicine and educational interventions for patients with atopic eczema and deals with occupational and psychodermatological aspects of the disease. It also contains guidance on treatment for pediatric and adolescent patients and pregnant or breastfeeding women, as well as considerations for patients who want to have a child. A chapter on the patient perspective is also provided. The first part of the guideline, published separately, contains recommendations and guidance on systemic treatment with conventional immunosuppressive drugs, biologics and janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, as well as information on the scope and purpose of the guideline, and a section on guideline methodology.

Biomarkers for phenotype-endotype relationship in atopic dermatitis: a critical review

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common form of chronic skin inflammation with diverse clinical variants. Historically, various AD phenotypes have been grouped together without considering their heterogeneity. This approach has resulted in a lack of phenotype- and endotype-adapted therapeutic strategies. Comprehensive insights into AD pathogenesis have enabled precise medicinal approach for AD. These efforts aimed to redefine the endophenotype of AD and develop various biomarkers for diverse purposes. Among these endeavours, efforts are underway to elucidate the mechanisms (and related biomarkers) that lead to the emergence and progression of atopic diseases originating from AD (e.g., atopic march). This review focuses on diverse AD phenotypes and calls for a definition of endophenotypes. While awaiting scientific validation, these biomarkers ensure predicting disease onset and trajectory and tailoring therapeutic strategies for the future.

Implementation of regulatory guidance for JAK inhibitors use in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: An international appropriateness study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) proposed measures to address severe side effects linked to Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID). Use of these medications in individuals aged 65 and older, those at high cardiovascular risk, active or former long-term smokers, and those with increased cancer risk should be considered only if no alternatives exist. Caution is advised when administering JAKi to patients at risk of venous thromboembolism. We aim to implement recommendations from regulatory guidelines based on areas of uncertainty identified.

METHODS

A two-round modified Research and Development/University of California Los Angeles appropriateness methodology study was conducted. A panel of 21 gastroenterologists, dermatologists and rheumatologists used a 9-point Likert scale to rate the appropriateness of administering a JAKi for each proposed clinical scenario. Scores for appropriateness were categorized as appropriate, uncertain, or inappropriate. Two rounds were performed, each with online surveys and a virtual meeting to enable discussion and rating of each best practice.

RESULTS

Round 1 involved participants rating JAKi appropriateness and suggesting descriptors to reduce uncertainty. Survey results were discussed in a virtual meeting, identifying areas of disagreement. In round 2, participants rated their agreement with descriptors from round 1, and the level of uncertainty and disagreement reduced. Age flexibility is recommended in the absence of other risk factors. Active counseling on modifiable risks (e.g., overweight, mild hyperlipidemia and hypertension) and smoking cessation is advised. Uncertainty persists regarding cancer risk due to various factors.

CONCLUSIONS

We outlined regulatory guidance without a personalized evaluation of the patient's risk profile might lead to uncertainty and become an arid technicality. Therefore, we identified gaps and implemented PRAC recommendations to help health professionals in clinical practice.

[Inpatient care for psoriasis: quo vadis?-A retrospective study at the University Hospitals of Aachen, Bonn, and Essen from 2010 to 2019]

INTRODUCTION

A number of new, highly effective biologic drugs for psoriasis have been approved over the past few decades, which raises the question whether psoriasis is still a disease that requires inpatient treatment.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of inpatient data between 2010 and 2019 (the last 10 years prior to the coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19] pandemic) from three German dermatology departments at university hospitals (Aachen, Bonn, and Essen). The data collected included age, gender, the primary admission diagnosis, length of stay (LOS), and number of all comorbidities recorded during hospitalization.

RESULTS

A total of 59,500 patients were admitted to the three dermatological departments in the defined 10-year period. Of these patients, psoriasis (L40.-) was the main diagnosis for 4322 (7.3%). An almost continuous increase was observed in all inpatient dermatological cases, which was as high as 27% in 2016 compared to 2010. For psoriasis patients, the most substantial increase in the number of admissions was reached in 2016 compared to 2010 and was as high as 45%. While there was a statistically significant reduction of the mean LOS for all dermatological inpatient cases from 6.4 ± 6.6 days in 2010 to 5.1 ± 4.6 days in 2019 (p < 0.001), the decrease in 2019 compared to 2010 (from 12.2 ± 5.5 to 8.9 ± 3.3 days) was significantly greater for the inpatient psoriasis patients compared to the inpatient population overall (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show a stable need for inpatient psoriasis facilities in Germany. Further analysis of hospital admissions after the end of the COVID-19 pandemic is needed to understand the ongoing influence of modern systemic treatment options on inpatient psoriasis care in Germany.

Treatment of atopic dermatitis: Recently approved drugs and advanced clinical development programs

Atopic dermatitis (AD) represents the most common skin disease characterized by heterogeneous endophenotypes and a high disease burden. In Europe, six new systemic therapies for AD have been approved: the biologics dupilumab (anti-interleukin-4 receptor (IL-4R) α in 2017), tralokinumab (anti-IL-13 in 2021), lebrikizumab (anti-IL-13 in 2023), and the oral janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (JAKi) targeting JAK1/2 (baricitinib in 2020 in the EU) or JAK1 (upadacitinib in 2021 and abrocitinib in 2022). Herein, we give an update on new approvals, long-term safety, and efficacy. Upadacitinib and abrocitinib have the highest short-term efficacy among the approved systemic therapies. In responders, dupilumab and tralokinumab catch up regarding long-term efficacy and incremental clinical benefit within continuous use. Recently, the European Medicines Agency has released recommendations for the use of JAKi in patients at risk (cardiovascular and thromboembolic diseases, malignancies, (former) smoking, and age ≥65 years). Furthermore, we give an overview on emerging therapies currently in Phase III trials. Among the topical therapies, tapinarof (aryl hydrocarbon receptor), ruxolitinib (JAK1/2i), delgocitinib (pan-JAKi), asivatrep (anti-transient receptor potential vanilloid), and phosphodiesterase-4-inhibitors (roflumilast, difamilast) are discussed. Among systemic therapies, current data on cord-blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells, CM310 (anti IL-4Rα), nemolizumab (anti-IL-31RA), anti-OX40/OX40L-antibodies, neurokinin-receptor-1-antagonists, and difelikefalin (κ-opioid-R) are reported.

Development of a clinical algorithm to predict phenotypic switches between atopic dermatitis and psoriasis (the "Flip-Flop" phenomenon)

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) and psoriasis vulgaris (PV) are almost mutually exclusive diseases with different immune polarizations, mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Switches to the other disease ("Flip-Flop" [FF] phenomenon) can occur with or without systemic treatment and are often referred to as paradoxical reactions under biological therapy.

METHODS

The objective was to develop a diagnostic algorithm by combining clinical criteria of AD and PV to identify FF patients. The algorithm was prospectively validated in patients enrolled in the CK-CARE registry in Bonn, Germany. Afterward, algorithm refinements were implemented based on machine learning.

RESULTS

Three hundred adult Caucasian patients were included in the validation study (n = 238 with AD, n = 49 with PV, n = 13 with FF; mean age 41.2 years; n = 161 [53.7%] female). The total FF scores of the PV and AD groups differed significantly from the FF group in the validation data (p < .001). The predictive mean generalized Youden-Index of the initial model was 78.9% [95% confidence interval 72.0%-85.6%] and the accuracy was 89.7%. Disease group-specific sensitivity was 100% (FF), 95.0% (AD), and 61.2% (PV). The specificity was 89.2% (FF), 100% (AD), and 100% (PV), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The FF algorithm represents the first validated tool to identify FF patients.

Immunoglobulin E autoantibodies in atopic dermatitis associate with Type-2 comorbidities and the atopic march

BACKGROUND

Autoreactive immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies to self-peptides within the epidermis have been identified in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). Prevalence, concomitant diseases, patient characteristics, and risk factors of IgE autoantibody development remain elusive. We aimed to determine IgE autoantibodies in serum samples (n = 672) from well-characterized patients with AD and controls (1.2-88.9 years).

METHODS

Atopic dermatitis patients were sub-grouped in AD with comorbid Type-2 diseases ("AD + Type 2"; asthma, allergic rhinitis, food allergy, n = 431) or "solely AD" (n = 115). Also, subjects without AD but with Type-2 diseases ("atopic controls," n = 52) and non-atopic "healthy controls" (n = 74) were included. Total proteins from primary human keratinocytes were used for the immunoassay to detect IgE autoantibodies. Values were compared to already known positive and negative serum samples.

RESULTS

Immunoglobulin E autoantibodies were found in 15.0% (82/546) of all analyzed AD-patients. "AD + Type 2" showed a higher prevalence (16.4%) than "solely AD" (9.6%). "Atopic controls" (9.6%) were comparable with "solely AD" patients, while 2.7% of healthy controls showed IgE autoantibodies. Of those with high levels of IgE autoantibodies, 15 out of 16 were patients with "AD + Type 2". AD patients with IgE autoantibodies were younger than those without. Patients with IgE autoreactivity also displayed higher total serum IgE levels. Factors that affected IgE autoantibody development were as follows: birth between January and June, cesarean-section and diversity of domestic pets.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunoglobulin E autoantibodies in AD seem to associate with the presence of atopic comorbidities and environmental factors. The potential value of IgE autoantibodies as a predictive biomarker for the course of AD, including the atopic march, needs further exploration.

Baricitinib provides rapid and sustained improvements in absolute EASI and SCORAD outcomes in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Baricitinib is an oral selective Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitor approved for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in adults.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate absolute Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) and SCORing of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) outcomes over 16 weeks and to link disease severity categories to quality of life (QoL) improvements.

METHODS

This post-hoc analysis included patients enrolled in Phase3 monotherapy (BREEZE-AD1/AD2) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) combination therapy (BREEZE-AD7) trials and analyzed baricitinib 2 and 4 mg vs. placebo. Categorical outcomes were analyzed using Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Significantly more baricitinib-treated patients reached EASI ≤ 7 and SCORAD < 25 as early as week 1 in monotherapy and week 2 in TCS combination therapy, compared to placebo. Significant response vs. placebo was sustained until week 16 for EASI ≤ 7 (AD1/2 [p-value vs. placebo]: 2 mg = 19.9%, 4 mg = 25.4% [p = 0.001] and AD7: 2 mg = 40.4% [p = 0.087], 4 mg = 48.6% [p = 0.003]) and SCORAD < 25 (AD1/2: 2 mg = 12.2%, 4 mg = 19.4% [p = 0.001] and AD7: 2 mg = 30.3% [p = 0.025], 4 mg = 34.2% [p = 0.004]) severity categories. These effects were accompanied by rapid improvements in QoL.

CONCLUSION

Baricitinib-treated patients rapidly achieved recommended absolute EASI and SCORAD treatment outcomes which were sustained until week 16. Improvements in QoL were greater than EASI severity categories reflected, indicating that physician-assessed scores do not necessarily correlate with patients' impression of AD severity.

Safety of baricitinib for the treatment of atopic dermatitis over a median of 1.6 years and up to 3.9 years of treatment: an updated integrated analysis of eight clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Baricitinib, a selective Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 inhibitor, is approved for treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in adults.

OBJECTIVES

We report integrated baricitinib safety data in patients with up to 3.9-years exposure.

METHODS

Three datasets from the integrated AD clinical trial program were analyzed: placebo-controlled, 2-mg-4-mg extended, and All-bari. Data cutoffs were up to 21-December-2021 for long-term extension studies. Proportions of patients with events and incidence rates (IR)/100 patient years (PY) at risk were calculated.

RESULTS

2636 patients received baricitinib for 4628.4 PY. Discontinuation due to adverse events was low (IR = 3.4). IRs in All-bari were: serious adverse events, 5.2; infection, 67.2 (any infection), 6.7 (herpes simplex), 2.8 (herpes zoster), and 0.3 (opportunistic infections). Adverse events of special interest in All-bari included seven patients with positively adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (IR = 0.15), three pulmonary emboli (PE) (IR = 0.06), 14 malignancies excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer (IR = 0.3), one gastrointestinal perforation (IR = 0.02), and four deaths (IR = 0.1). No deep vein thromboses (DVT) or tuberculosis were reported.

CONCLUSION

In this analysis, baricitinib maintained a similar safety profile to earlier analyses with no new safety signals. Rates of MACE, DVT/PE, malignancies, and serious infections were within ranges of background rates in patients with AD.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV

NCT02576938 (JAHG), NCT03334396 (JAHL; BREEZE-AD1), NCT03334422 (JAHM; BREEZE-AD2), NCT03334435 (JAHN; BREEZE-AD3), NCT03428100 (JAIN; BREEZE-AD4), NCT03435081 (JAIW; BREEZE-AD5), NCT03559270 (JAIX; BREEZE-AD6), NCT03733301 (JAIY; BREEZE-AD7).

Tralokinumab therapy for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Clinical outcomes with targeted IL-13 inhibition

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, inflammatory, intensely pruritic skin disorder associated with significant patient burden. Interleukin (IL)-13 is a cytokine that acts as a driver of immune dysregulation, skin-barrier dysfunction, and microbiome dysbiosis that characterizes AD, and is consistently overexpressed in AD skin. Tralokinumab is a fully human immunoglobulin (Ig) G4 monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to IL-13 with high affinity, thereby inhibiting subsequent downstream IL-13 signaling. Three pivotal phase 3 clinical trials demonstrated that tralokinumab 300 mg every other week, as monotherapy or in combination with topical corticosteroids as needed, provides significant improvements in signs and symptoms of moderate-to-severe AD, as measured by Investigator's Global Assessment 0/1 (clear/almost clear) and Eczema Area and Severity Index-75 at Week 16. Improvements were observed soon after tralokinumab initiation and were maintained over 52 weeks of therapy. Tralokinumab significantly improved patient-reported outcomes such as itch and sleep, and demonstrated a safety profile comparable with placebo; conjunctivitis during tralokinumab therapy was generally mild. Similar results were observed in a phase 3 adolescent trial. The role of IL-13 in the pathophysiology of AD justifies a targeted approach and a wealth of clinical data supports tralokinumab as a new therapeutic option for people with moderate-to-severe AD.

Efficacy and Safety of Methotrexate in Psoriasis Vulgaris Long-Term Treatment: A Real-World Observation Study

Background

Methotrexate (MTX) in the therapy of psoriasis vulgaris (PV) is a well and long-established treatment option.

Aims

To assess the long-term experience of individual patients in the real world with regard to the efficacy and safety of MTX in PV therapy.

Patients and Methods

In a retrospective study, MTX as a weekly used monotherapy in PV was examined. Clinical data including the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI), prevalence of psoriatic-arthritis (PsA), Investigator Global Assessment (IGA), laboratory parameters, occurrence of adverse events (AEs), dosing of MTX and characteristics of patients treated for at least 24 months were collected.

Results

A total of 55 patients with 247 patient-years under MTX therapy were included. The mean PASI reduction was 51.2% with a significant (P < 0.001) improvement in the skin condition in the first 6 months of treatment, remaining stable thereafter. The mean MTX dose increased from 11.8 ± 3.7 mg to 12.9 ± 3.8 mg in the first year of therapy, with a constant mean dose in the following years. In 247 patient-years, no serious AE was documented. Gastrointestinal side effects or fatigue were commonly detected. The liver parameter alanine aminotransferase/ glutamate-pyruvate transaminase (ALT/GPT) (baseline 35.8 ± 22.0 U/L) increased after 3 years of therapy (42.0 ± 22.4 U/L; P = 0.013) without clinical significance.

Conclusion

In this patient collective, MTX in low doses was effective and safe in long-term therapy. The improved skin condition was steady and reached by an unvarying dose. New data showed a better efficacy of MTX in higher doses; however, additional data must be collected on the long-term efficacy and safety of MTX with a higher dose regime.

Safety and efficacy of amlitelimab, a fully human nondepleting, noncytotoxic anti-OX40 ligand monoclonal antibody, in atopic dermatitis: results of a phase IIa randomized placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory skin disease with significant unmet need. Blockade of the OX40-OX40 ligand (OX40L) costimulation pathway by targeting OX40L on antigen-presenting cells (APCs) with a fully human noncytotoxic, nondepleting anti-OX40L monoclonal antibody (amlitelimab; SAR445229; KY1005) is a novel way to modulate persistent inflammation.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety and efficacy of amlitelimab over 16 weeks in adults with AD in a phase IIa double-blind placebo-controlled study.

METHODS

The study was conducted at 19 hospitals in Germany, Poland, Spain and the UK. Eligible patients with moderate-to-severe AD were randomized (1 : 1 : 1) to low-dose intravenous (IV) amlitelimab (200 mg), high-dose IV amlitelimab (500 mg) or placebo, followed by three maintenance doses (50% of loading dose) at 4, 8 and 12 weeks, with safety follow-up to week 36. The co-primary endpoints were the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (all patients who received ≥ 1 dose of the study drug) and mean percentage change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) to week 16 (full analysis set).

RESULTS

Between 13 December 2018 and 12 May 2020, 89 patients were randomly assigned to low- (n = 29) or high-dose amlitelimab (n = 30) or placebo (n = 29), of whom 88 proceeded to treatment [37 women (42%), 51 (58%) men; mean (SD) age 33.6 (11.9) years]. Amlitelimab was generally well tolerated with an unremarkable safety profile; no hypersensitivity events were reported. For the primary endpoint, the least square mean percentage change in EASI from baseline to week 16 was -80.12% [95% confidence interval (CI) -95.55 to -64.68; P = 0.009 vs. placebo] and -69.97% (95% CI -85.04 to -54.60; P = 0.07 vs. placebo) for the low- (n = 27) and high-dose (n = 27) amlitelimab groups, respectively, vs. -49.37% (95% CI -66.02 to -32.72) for placebo (n = 24). Numerically greater reductions in EASI were observed for amlitelimab vs. placebo from weeks 2 to 16.

CONCLUSIONS

Novel targeting of OX40L-expressing APCs with amlitelimab was well tolerated and resulted in clinically meaningful improvements in AD.

A detailed look at the European Medicines Agency's recommendations for use of Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Oral Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have been approved for the treatment of several chronic inflammatory conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and atopic dermatitis (AD). Prompted by new evidence, the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) recently reassessed the benefit-risk balance of oral JAKi. The PRAC recommended that oral JAKi should be used only if no suitable alternatives are available in patients ≥65 years of age, or who have a history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular (CV) disease, other CV risk factors (e.g. history of long-term smoking) or have malignancy risk factors, and used with caution in patients at risk of pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis. The European Commission's final decision was issued in March 2023.

OBJECTIVES

Our goal was to highlight the PRAC recommendations, especially in the context of oral JAKi use in AD.

METHODS

Authors summarized the PRAC recommendations, the new clinical evidence on oral JAKi safety and key differences between patients with RA and AD.

RESULTS

Risk of developing adverse events of special interest (e.g. cardiovascular events, malignancy) is higher in patients with RA than in patients with AD, because of the higher prevalence of the underlying risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The benefit-risk profile of JAKi approved for AD remains favourable, including use as first-line systemic therapy for patients with AD <65 years of age and without CV or malignancy risk factors.

Upadacitinib for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Stratified analysis from three randomized phase 3 trials by key baseline characteristics

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a heterogeneous inflammatory skin disease with different clinical phenotypes based on factors such as age, race, comorbidities, and clinical signs and symptoms. The effect of these factors on therapeutic responses in AD has only been scarcely studied and not for upadacitinib. Currently, there is no biomarker predicting response to upadacitinib.

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the efficacy of the oral Janus kinase inhibitor upadacitinib across patient subgroups (baseline demographics, disease characteristics and prior treatment) in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.

METHODS

Data from phase 3 studies (Measure Up 1, Measure Up 2 and AD Up) were utilized for this post hoc analysis. Adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD were randomized to receive once daily oral upadacitinib 15 mg, upadacitinib 30 mg or placebo; patients enrolled in the AD Up study received concomitant topical corticosteroids. Data from the Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2 studies were integrated.

RESULTS

A total of 2584 patients were randomized. A consistently greater proportion of patients achieved at least 75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index, a 0 or 1 on the validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis, and improvement in itch (including an achievement of a reduction of ≥4; and score of 0/1 in Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale) with upadacitinib compared with placebo at Week 16, regardless of age, sex, race, body mass index, AD severity, body surface area involvement, history of atopic comorbidities or asthma, or previous exposure to systemic therapy or cyclosporin.

CONCLUSIONS

Upadacitinib had consistently high skin clearance rates and itch efficacy across subgroups of patients with moderate-to-severe AD through Week 16. These results support upadacitinib as a suitable treatment option in a variety of patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT03569293 (Measure Up 1), NCT03607422 (Measure Up 2) and NCT03568318 (AD Up).

A concept for integrated care pathways for atopic dermatitis-A GA2 LEN ADCARE initiative

INTRODUCTION

The integrated care pathways for atopic dermatitis (AD-ICPs) aim to bridge the gap between existing AD treatment evidence-based guidelines and expert opinion based on daily practice by offering a structured multidisciplinary plan for patient management of AD. ICPs have the potential to enhance guideline recommendations by combining interventions and aspects from different guidelines, integrating quality assurance, and describing co-ordination of care. Most importantly, patients can enter the ICPs at any level depending on AD severity, resources available in their country, and economic factors such as differences in insurance reimbursement systems.

METHODS

The GA2 LEN ADCARE network and partners as well as all stakeholders, abbreviated as the AD-ICPs working group, were involved in the discussion and preparation of the AD ICPs during a series of subgroup workshops and meetings in years 2020 and 2021, after which the document was circulated within all GAL2 EN ADCARE centres.

RESULTS

The AD-ICPs outline the diagnostic procedures, possible co-morbidities, different available treatment options including differential approaches for the pediatric population, and the role of the pharmacists and other stakeholders, as well as remaining unmet needs in the management of AD.

CONCLUSION

The AD-ICPs provide a multidisciplinary plan for improved diagnosis, treatment, and patient feedback in AD management, as well as addressing critical unmet needs, including improved access to care, training specialists, implementation of educational programs, assessment on the impact of climate change, and fostering a personalised treatment approach. By focusing on these key areas, the initiative aims to pave the way for a brighter future in the management of AD.

Lebrikizumab for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common, heterogeneous, inflammatory skin disorder characterized by chronic or relapsing eczematous lesions with intense pruritus and discomfort. Affected patients often experience significant impairment in their quality of life, and the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD forms remains challenging. In the past few decades, increasing knowledge on the AD pathogenesis has driven the development of novel targeted therapies. Interleukin (IL)-13 plays a central and pleiotropic role in AD pathogenesis, contributing directly or indirectly to epidermal barrier disfunction, type-2 inflammation, dysbiosis, fibrosis, and itch response. For this reason, agents selectively targeting IL-13, such as lebrikizumab, emerged as a potential therapy for AD. This article reviews the current evidence about lebrikizumab in the management of AD. The phase II and phase III trials seem to corroborate efficacy of lebrikizumab in the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD, as shown by significant improvement of Eczema Area and Severity Index, body surface area, and pruritus scores. Also, lebrikizumab demonstrated favorable safety and tolerability profiles, with the majority of patients experiencing no significant adverse events. Lebrikizumab seems to be a promising emerging targeted biological agent for patients with moderate-to-severe AD. More data on the long-term efficacy and safety, head-to-head comparisons with other agents, and real-world evidence will help to clarify its place in therapy in AD.

Type 2 chronic inflammatory diseases: targets, therapies and unmet needs

Over the past two decades, significant progress in understanding of the pathogenesis of type 2 chronic inflammatory diseases has enabled the identification of compounds for more than 20 novel targets, which are approved or at various stages of development, finally facilitating a more targeted approach for the treatment of these disorders. Most of these newly identified pathogenic drivers of type 2 inflammation and their corresponding treatments are related to mast cells, eosinophils, T cells, B cells, epithelial cells and sensory nerves. Epithelial barrier defects and dysbiotic microbiomes represent exciting future drug targets for chronic type 2 inflammatory conditions. Here, we review common targets, current treatments and emerging therapies for the treatment of five major type 2 chronic inflammatory diseases - atopic dermatitis, chronic prurigo, chronic urticaria, asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps - with a high need for targeted therapies. Unmet needs and future directions in the field are discussed.

Disease modification in inflammatory skin disorders: opportunities and challenges

Progress in understanding of the mechanisms underlying chronic inflammatory skin disorders, such as atopic dermatitis and psoriasis vulgaris, has led to new treatment options with the primary goal of alleviating symptoms. In addition, this knowledge has the potential to inform on new strategies aimed at inducing deep and therapy-free remission, that is, disease modification, potentially impacting on associated comorbidities. However, to reach this goal, key areas require further exploration, including the definitions of disease modification and disease activity index, further understanding of disease mechanisms and systemic spillover effects, potential windows of opportunity, biomarkers for patient stratification and successful intervention, as well as appropriate study design. This Perspective article assesses the opportunities and challenges in the discovery and development of disease-modifying therapies for chronic inflammatory skin disorders.

Baseline Body Surface Area and Itch Severity Define Response to Baricitinib in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis at Week 16

INTRODUCTION

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease characterized by heterogeneous clinical phenotypes and high symptom burden, especially through itch. Baricitinib (BARI), an oral Janus Kinase 1/2 inhibitor, is approved in Europe, Japan, and other countries, for treatment of adults with moderate-to-severe AD who are candidates for systemic therapy. This post hoc analysis of a Phase 3 topical corticosteroid (TCS) combination therapy trial (BREEZE-AD7) aims to characterize patients who might benefit most from BARI.

METHOD

Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was used to identify baseline predictors for patients treated with BARI 4-mg, who achieved ≥ 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75), or EASI75 or Itch Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ≥ 4-point improvement at week 16 (responders), versus non-responders. Subgroup efficacy analyses were performed based on identified predictor variables, combined with Itch NRS < 7/ ≥ 7. Missing data were imputed as non-responder.

RESULTS

Baseline body surface area (BSA) was identified by CART as strongest variable predicting response to BARI at week 16, with a cut-off around 40% (BSA ≤ 40%). When combining BSA with itch severity, highest response rates were achieved by BARI patients with BSA ≤ 40%/Itch NRS ≥ 7 at baseline. In this subgroup, 69% and 58% of patients treated with BARI 4-mg achieved EASI75 and Itch NRS ≥ 4-point response at week 16, respectively. While these response rates were 65% and 50% for BARI 4-mg patients with baseline BSA ≤ 40%/Itch NRS < 7, they were 33% and 11% in BSA > 40%/Itch NRS < 7, and 32% and 49% in BSA > 40%/Itch NRS ≥ 7 subgroups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Using a machine learning approach, patients with moderate-to-severe AD and a BSA affecting 10-40% and Itch NRS ≥ 7 were characterized as likely to benefit most from BARI 4-mg TCS combination therapy. This was confirmed by subgroup analyses, which showed that these patients are most likely to show favorable response rates in improving AD signs and symptoms, specifically itch, after 16 weeks of treatment.

Atopic dermatitis: Correlation of distinct risk factors with age of onset in adulthood compared to childhood

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) has long been regarded as a primarily pediatric disease. However, there is growing evidence for a high rate of adult-onset AD. We aimed to characterize factors associated with adult-onset versus childhood-onset AD and controls.

METHODS

We analyzed cross-sectional data of the CK-CARE-ProRaD cohorts Bonn, Augsburg, Davos, Zürich of 736 adult patients stratified by age of AD onset (childhood-onset <18 years: 76.4% (subsets: 0 to 2; ≥2 to 6; ≥7 to 11; ≥12 to 18); adult-onset ≥18 years: 23.6% (subsets: ≥18 to 40; ≥41 to 60; ≥61) and 167 controls (91 atopic, 76 non-atopic)).

RESULTS

We identified active smoking to be associated with adult-onset AD versus controls (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) = 5.54 [95% Confidence Interval: 1.06-29.01] vs. controlsnon-atopic , aOR = 4.03 [1.20-13.45] vs. controlsatopic ). Conjunctivitis showed a negative association versus controlsatopic (aOR = 0.36 [0.14-0.91]). Food allergy (aOR = 2.93 [1.44-5.96]), maternal food allergy (aOR = 9.43 [1.10-80.95]), palmar hyperlinearity (aOR = 2.11 [1.05-4.25]), and academic background (aOR = 2.14 [1.00-4.54]) increased the odds of childhood-onset AD versus controlsatopic . Shared AD-associated factors were maternal AD (4-34x), increased IgE (2-20x), atopic stigmata (2-3x) with varying effect sizes depending on AD onset and control group. Patients with adult-compared to childhood-onset had doubled odds of allergic rhinitis (aOR = 2.15 [1.12-4.13]), but reduced odds to feature multiple (3-4) atopic comorbidities (aOR = 0.34 [0.14-0.84]). Adult-onset AD, particularly onset ≥61 years, grouped mainly in clusters with low contributions of personal and familial atopy and high frequencies of physical inactivity, childhood-onset AD, particularly infant-onset, mainly in "high-atopic"-clusters.

CONCLUSIONS

The identified associated factors suggest partly varying endo- and exogeneous mechanisms underlying adult-onset versus childhood-onset AD. Our findings might contribute to better assessment of the individual risk to develop AD throughout life and encourage prevention by non-smoking and physical activity as modifiable lifestyle factors.

Biologic Versus Small Molecule Therapy for Treating Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Clinical Considerations

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of dupilumab for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis shifted the paradigm from use of broad, systemic immunosuppressants to a safer, targeted treatment and led to the emergence of newer interleukin (IL)-4/IL-13 directed biologics and small molecule therapies, namely Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (JAKi). Tralokinumab and emerging (not yet approved) lebrikizumab, which both target IL-13, are alternative biologics to dupilumab. The emerging anti-IL-31 receptor nemolizumab is likely to be used second-line to other biologics, primarily for pruritus. Three JAKi are currently in use for treating atopic dermatitis, 2 of which, abrocitinib and upadacitinib, are U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved. This review provides an in-depth, practical discussion on use of these biologics and JAKi that are approved or have completed phase 3 clinical trials in pediatric patients and adults, comparing the groups of medications based on available efficacy and safety data.

Early improvements in signs and symptoms predict clinical response to baricitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Early prediction of therapeutic response can optimise treatment strategies in atopic dermatitis (AD). Baricitinib is approved for moderate-to-severe AD in Europe, Japan and other countries.

AIM

To identify early clinical improvements that reliably predict a later clinical response to baricitinib in adults with moderate-to-severe AD.

METHODS

Using data from one topical corticosteroid combination study and from two monotherapy studies (pooled), we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (NPV) of predefined changes in single and combined clinical scores at weeks 2, 4 and 8 to predict clinical response at week 16. Clinical response was defined as Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) ≥75% improvement (EASI75), Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ≥4-point improvement (Itch NRS≥4), or a combination of both.

RESULTS

Composite predictors had higher predictive accuracy than single parameters. Sensitivities and NPVs for ≥50% EASI improvement (EASI50) or Itch NRS ≥3-point improvement (Itch NRS≥3), validated Investigator's Global Assessment of AD (vIGA-AD) score ≤2 or Itch NRS≥3 ranged from 87% to 97% and 68% to 100%, respectively, at week 4. The predictive accuracy for composite clinical outcomes at week 16 was highest at week 8 (sensitivity: 93%-100%; NPV: 80%-100%). At both weeks 4 and 8, EASI50 or Itch NRS≥3 had higher sensitivity and NPV than vIGA-AD score ≤2 or Itch NRS≥3.

CONCLUSION

Improvement in signs and symptoms early during treatment with baricitinib 4 mg once daily predicts clinical response at week 16, providing a tool for dermatologists when choosing treatment strategies with patients with moderate-to-severe AD.BREEZE-AD1 (NCT03334396); BREEZE-AD2 (NCT03334422); BREEZE-AD7 (NCT03733301).

Baricitinib Safety for Events of Special Interest in Populations at Risk: Analysis from Randomised Trial Data Across Rheumatologic and Dermatologic Indications

INTRODUCTION

Baricitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor, is an approved treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), atopic dermatitis (AD), and alopecia areata (AA). Further characterisation of adverse events of special interest (AESI) for JAK inhibitors in at-risk populations will improve benefit-risk assessment for individual patients and diseases.

METHODS

Data were pooled from clinical trials and long-term extensions in moderate-to-severe active RA, moderate-to-severe AD, and severe AA. Incidence rates (IR) per 100 patient-years of major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), malignancy, venous thromboembolism (VTE), serious infection, and mortality were calculated for patients with low risk (younger than 65 years with no specified risk factors), and patients at risk (≥ 1 of: aged 65 years or older, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, current smoking, HDL cholesterol < 40 mg/dL, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, poor mobility on EQ-5D, or history of malignancy).

RESULTS

Datasets included baricitinib exposure up to 9.3 years with 14,744 person-years of exposure (PYE) (RA), 3.9 years with 4628 PYE (AD), and 3.1 years with 1868 PYE (AA). In patients with low risk (RA: 31%, AD: 48%, AA: 49%), IRs for MACE (0.05, 0.04, 0), malignancies (0.20, 0.13, 0), VTE (0.09, 0.04, 0), serious infection (1.73, 1.18, 0.6), and mortality (0.04, 0, 0) in the RA, AD, and AA datasets, respectively, were low. In patients at risk (RA: 69%, AD: 52%, AA: 51%), IRs were for MACE (0.70, 0.25, 0.10), malignancies (1.23, 0.45, 0.31), VTE (0.66, 0.12, 0.10), serious infection (2.95, 2.30, 1.05), and mortality (0.78, 0.16, 0) for RA, AD, and AA datasets, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Populations with low risk have low incidence of the examined JAK inhibitor-related AESI. In the dermatologic indications, incidence is also low for patients at risk. Considering individual disease burden, risk factors, and response to treatment is relevant to make informed decisions for individual patients treated with baricitinib.

Tralokinumab treatment improves the skin microbiota by increasing the microbial diversity in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Analysis of microbial diversity in ECZTRA 1, a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is characterized by microbial dysbiosis, immune dysregulation, and an impaired skin barrier. Microbial dysbiosis in AD involves a reduction in diversity primarily driven by an increased abundance of Staphylococcus aureus. Tralokinumab, an approved treatment for adults with moderate-to-severe AD, improves the skin barrier and immune abnormalities by specifically targeting the interleukin 13 cytokine, but its impact on the skin microbiome is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate how tralokinumab affects the skin microbiome by examining the lesional skin of adults with moderate-to-severe AD from the phase 3 ECZTRA 1 trial (NCT03131648).

METHODS

Microbiome profiling, S aureus abundance, and biomarker data were assessed in a subset of ECZTRA 1 participants (S aureus abundance at baseline and week 16; microbiome profiling at baseline, and week 8/16; and serum sampling before dose and week 4/8/16/28/52).

RESULTS

Tralokinumab treatment led to increased microbial diversity, reduced S aureus abundance, and increased abundance of the commensal coagulase-negative Staphylococci.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations include a lack of S aureus abundance data at week 8, sampling site variation between participants, and possible influence from concomitant systemic antiinfectives.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate specific targeting of the interleukin 13 cytokine with tralokinumab can directly and/or indirectly improve microbial dysbiosis seen in AD skin.

Dermatomyositis autoantigen CHD4 forms immune stimulatory complexes with endogenous DNA

Dermatomyositis (DM) is an idiopathic inflammatory myopathy belonging to the spectrum of autoimmune connective tissue diseases. DM patients present with antinuclear antibodies against Mi-2, also known as Chromodomain-helicase-DNA-binding protein 4 (CHD4). CHD4 is upregulated in DM skin biopsies and could potentially affect DM pathophysiology as it binds endogenous DNA with a high affinity (KD = 0.2 nM ± 0.076 nM) and forms CHD4-DNA complexes. The complexes are localized in the cytoplasm of UV-radiated and transfected HaCaTs and amplify the expression of interferon (IFN) regulated genes and the amount of functional CXCL10 protein stronger than DNA alone. The enhancement of the type I IFN pathway activation in HaCaTs through CHD4-DNA signalling suggests a possible mechanism for the sustainment of the pro-inflammatory vicious cycle in DM skin lesions.

Efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: 52-week results of two randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled phase III trials

BACKGROUND

Lebrikizumab is a novel, high-affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to interleukin (IL)-13.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab monotherapy in adolescent and adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) over 52 weeks of treatment in ADvocate1 (NCT04146363) and ADvocate2 (NCT04178967).

METHODS

Patients who responded to lebrikizumab 250 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) at the end of the 16-week induction period were re-randomized 2 : 2 : 1 to receive lebrikizumab Q2W, lebrikizumab 250 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) or placebo Q2W (lebrikizumab withdrawal) for 36 additional weeks. Response at week 16 was defined as achieving a 75% reduction in Eczema Area Severity Index (EASI 75) or an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of 0 or 1, with a ≥ 2-point improvement and no rescue medication use. Multiple imputation was used to handle missing data. Intermittent use of topical therapy was permitted during the maintenance period.

RESULTS

After 52 weeks, an IGA of 0 or 1 with a ≥ 2 point improvement was maintained by 71.2% of patients treated with lebrikizumab Q2W, 76.9% of patients treated with lebrikizumab Q4W and 47.9% of patients in the lebrikizumab withdrawal arm. EASI 75 was maintained by 78.4% of patients treated with lebrikizumab Q2W, 81.7% of patients treated with lebrikizumab Q4W and 66.4% of patients in the lebrikizumab withdrawal arm at week 52. Across treatment arms, proportions of patients using any rescue therapy were 14.0% (ADvocate1) and 16.4% (ADvocate2). During the combined induction and maintenance periods of ADvocate1 and ADvocate2, 63.0% of lebrikizumab-treated patients reported any treatment emergent adverse event, with most events (93.1%) being mild or moderate in severity.

CONCLUSIONS

After a 16-week induction period with lebrikizumab Q2W, lebrikizumab Q2W and Q4W maintained similar improvement of the signs and symptoms of moderate-to-severe AD, with a safety profile consistent with previously published data.

Spesolimab, an anti-interleukin-36 receptor antibody, in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Results from a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase IIa study

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic relapsing inflammatory skin disease, and there is increasing evidence that the interleukin (IL)-36 pathway may play a role in the pathogenesis of AD.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of spesolimab, a novel anti-IL-36 receptor antibody, in adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD.

METHODS

In this phase IIa study, 51 eligible patients were randomized 2:1 to receive intravenous doses of spesolimab 600 mg or placebo every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the percentage change from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score at Week 16.

RESULTS

The decrease in EASI score from baseline to Week 16 was -37.9% for spesolimab versus -12.3% for placebo (adjusted mean difference -25.6%, p = 0.149). A predefined sensitivity analysis, excluding data from patients who used restricted corticosteroids, resulted in an adjusted mean difference of -48.3% (nominal p = 0.024). Spesolimab was well tolerated, with no clinically relevant safety signals.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to evaluate the IL-36 pathway inhibition in AD. Although not statistically significant, numerical improvements were observed in the primary endpoint of change from baseline in the EASI score. Spesolimab had an acceptable safety profile, with no unexcepted safety concerns.

353 Amlitelimab reduces serum IL-13 in a phase 2a clinical trial in atopic dermatitis without impacting T-cell expansion in a T-cell recall assay

Amlitelimab (SAR445229), a fully human non-depleting, non-cytotoxic, monoclonal antibody, binds to OX40Ligand (OX40L) on antigen-presenting cells (APC) to block OX40-OX40L interactions. In a 16-week, double-blind, Phase 2a trial (NCT03754309), amlitelimab induced clinically meaningful disease activity improvement in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). To assess the effects of amlitelimab on interleukin (IL)-13 and T-cell recall responses. In the trial, 89 patients were randomized to amlitelimab low dose (LD; 200 mg loading/100 mg maintenance every 4 weeks [Q4W]), high dose (HD; 500 mg loading/250 mg maintenance Q4W), or placebo. Serum IL-13 levels were assessed by single molecule immunoassay (259 samples). Using human peripheral blood mononuclear cells from five healthy donors, a T-cell recall assay was performed. At baseline in the trial, IL-13 levels significantly correlated with disease severity (Eczema Area and Severity Index; r = 0.4784, P &lt; 0.0001). Week 16 IL-13 levels were significantly reduced with amlitelimab vs. baseline but not placebo (median fold change [95% confidence interval, CI] from baseline to week 16 with P-values based on two-way Analysis of Variance [ANOVA] of log10-transformed fold change for patients with a complete dataset at week 16: LD 0.345 [0.23–0.44], P &lt; 0.0001; HD 0.390 [0.30–0.63], P = 0.0002; placebo 0.835 [0.34–1.12], P = 0.1544). In a T-cell recall assay, amlitelimab significantly reduced IL-13 protein levels at days 3 and 6 without negatively impacting T-cell expansion, based on the percentage of proliferating CD4+ T-cells vs. isotype control. Amlitelimab decreased IL-13 levels in patients with AD and in a T-cell recall assay without negative effects on T-cell expansion, thus reducing inflammation without blocking T-cell proliferation during recall responses.

345 Treatment with amlitelimab—a novel non-depleting, non-cytotoxic anti-OX40Ligand monoclonal antibody—reduces IL-22 serum levels in a phase 2a randomized, placebo-controlled trial in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis

OX40Ligand (OX40L) upregulation on antigen-presenting cells (APCs) following antigen presentation contributes to the survival and functional activation of T helper (Th) 2 and Th1/17/22 cells, which are central to the inflammation and pathological outcomes in atopic dermatitis (AD). In a Phase 2a trial (NCT03754309), amlitelimab, a fully human, non-depleting, non-cytotoxic anti-OX40L monoclonal antibody, was effective in treating patients with moderate-to-severe AD. To assess the effects of amlitelimab on interleukin (IL)-22, an important Th22-associated disease mediator of AD. 89 patients with moderate-to-severe AD were enrolled in a Phase 2a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial and randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to intravenous amlitelimab low dose (200 mg loading/100 mg maintenance every 4 weeks [Q4W]; n = 29), high dose (500 mg/250 mg Q4W; n = 30) or placebo (Q4W; n = 29) until week 12. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) from baseline to week 16. Other disease severity measurements included SCORing of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) and validated Investigator Global Assessment (vIGA). Serum was collected at baseline, week 4 and week 16, and further collected at week 24 and week 36 in responders, defined as patients who reached vIGA 0/1 at week 16. IL-22 levels were determined by ultrasensitive single-molecule immunoassay (Simoa). Of 88 subjects who received study treatment, 59 were evaluable at week 16. Amlitelimab was well tolerated with an unremarkable safety profile. The mean percentage change in EASI from baseline at week 16 was −80.12% for amlitelimab low dose and −69.97% for amlitelimab high dose vs. −49.37% for placebo (nominal P-values: 0.009 [amlitelimab low dose vs. placebo] and 0.072 [amlitelimab high dose vs. placebo]). Amlitelimab-treated patients who achieved vIGA 0/1 at week 16 had sustained clinical responses up to week 36. No difference in IL-22 serum levels was found between groups at baseline. IL-22 levels correlated with disease severity at baseline, as measured by EASI and SCORAD (r = 0.53, P &lt; 0.0001; and r = 0.36, P = 0.001; respectively). A significant reduction in IL-22 levels was observed at week 16 in amlitelimab-treated patients (low dose P &lt; 0.0001; high dose P = 0.001), but not in the placebo group (P = 0.381). The amlitelimab-induced decrease in IL-22 levels was maintained until week 36 in those defined as vIGA 0/1 responders at week 16. OX40L blockade on APCs represents a promising novel approach in the treatment of AD by effectively targeting underlying T-cell immune dysregulation. Amlitelimab monotherapy not only provided a sustained and clinically meaningful improvement in disease activity compared with placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe AD, but also significantly decreased serum levels of IL-22, a Th22 cell-associated cytokine involved in the underlying immunopathogenesis of AD.

322 Efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: 52-week results of two randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials (ADvocate1 and ADvocate2)

Lebrikizumab (LEB) is a novel, high-affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to interleukin (IL)-13. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of LEB monotherapy in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in two identical phase 3 trials ADvocate1 (ADv1) and ADvocate2 (ADv2). Patients who responded to LEB 250 mg every 2 weeks (LEB Q2W) at the end of the 16-week induction period were re-randomized in a 2 : 2 : 1 ratio to receive LEB Q2W, LEB 250 mg every 4 weeks (LEB Q4W) or placebo (LEB withdrawal) for an additional 36 weeks. Response, at week 16, was defined as achieving an IGA (0, 1) with a ≥2-point improvement or EASI75 and no use of rescue medication. Efficacy outcomes reported at week 52 included IGA (0, 1), EASI 75, ≥4-point reduction in Pruritis Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), EASI 90 and DLQI ≥4-point. Safety analysis was conducted on all patients who received ≥1 dose of LEB. Patients maintained IGA (0, 1) in LEB Q2W (ADv1, 75.8%; ADv2, 64.6%), LEB Q4W (ADv1, 74.2%; ADv2, 80.6%) and LEB withdrawal (ADv1, 46.5%; ADv2, 49.8%). Maintenance of EASI75 was, in LEB Q2W (ADv1, 79.2%; ADv2, 77.4%), LEB Q4W (ADv1, 79.2%; ADv2, 84.7%) and LEB withdrawal (ADv1, 61.3%; ADv2, 72.0%). For Pruritus NRS ≥4-point improvement from baseline, patients-maintained improvement in the LEB Q2W (ADv1, 81.2%; ADv2, 90.3%), LEB Q4W (ADv1, 80.4%; ADv2, 88.1%) and LEB withdrawal (ADv1, 65.4%; ADv2, 67.6%). Maintenance of EASI90 was, in LEB Q2W (ADv1, 66.1%; ADv2, 61.5%), LEB Q4W (ADv1, 66.6%; ADv2, 67.4%) and LEB withdrawal (ADv1, 45.5%; ADv2, 36.9%). DLQI ≥4-point improvement from baseline was LEB Q2W (ADv1, 64.0%; ADv2, 59.0%), LEB Q4W (ADv1, 62.7%; ADv2, 73.0%) and LEB withdrawal (ADv1, 57.7%; ADv2, 45.5%). TEAEs were reported by 58.1% (ADv1) and 67.8% (ADv2) LEB-treated patients at week 52. Serious adverse events were reported by 3.3% of ADv1 patients and 2.7% of ADv2 patients. In ADv1 and ADv2, 2.3% and 3.9% of patients reported an adverse event leading to treatment discontinuation, respectively. Both LEB Q2W and LEB Q4W maintained improvement in all reported outcomes for the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD through 52 weeks. The safety profile was consistent with previously published data.

IL-13, periostin and dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 reveal endotype-phenotype associations in atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

The heterogeneous (endo)phenotypes of atopic dermatitis (AD) require precision medicine. Currently, systemic therapy is recommended to patients with an Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI)≥16. Previous studies have demonstrated an improved treatment response to the anti-interleukin (IL)-13 antibody tralokinumab in AD subgroups with elevated levels of the IL-13-related biomarkers dipeptidyl-peptidase (DPP)-4 and periostin.

METHODS

Herein, 373 AD patients aged≥12 years were stratified by IL-13high , periostinhigh and DPP-4high endotypes using cross-sectional data from the ProRaD cohort Bonn. "High" was defined as >80th quantile of 47 non-atopic controls. We analyzed endotype-phenotype associations using machine-learning gradient boosting compared to logistic regression.

RESULTS

AD severity and eosinophils correlated with IL-13 and periostin levels. Correlations of IL-13 with EASI were stronger in patients with increased (rs=0.482) than with normal (rs=0.342) periostin levels. We identified eosinophilia>6% and an EASI range of 5.5-17 dependent on the biomarker combination to be associated with increasing probabilities of biomarkerhigh endotypes. Also patients with mild-to-low-moderate severity (EASI<16) featured increased biomarkers (IL-13high : 41%, periostinhigh : 48.4%, DPP-4high : 22.3%). Herthoge sign (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR)=1.89, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) [1.14-3.14]) and maternal allergic rhinitis (aOR=2.79-4.47) increased the probability of an IL-13high -endotype, "dirty neck" (aOR=2.83 [1.32-6.07]), orbital darkening (aOR=2.43 [1.08-5.50]), keratosis pilaris (aOR=2.21 [1.1-4.42]) and perleche (aOR=3.44 [1.72-6.86]) of a DPP-4high -endotype.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial proportion of patients with EASI<16 featured high biomarker levels suggesting systemic impact of skin inflammation already below the current cut-off for systemic therapy. Our findings facilitate the identification of patients with distinct endotypes potentially linked to response to IL-13-targeted therapy.

Characterization of B cells in lupus erythematosus skin biopsies in the context of different immune cell infiltration patterns

Cutaneous lesions in lupus erythematosus (LE) subtypes are heterogenous. In line with the heterogeneity of the clinical presentation, the underlying lesional inflammation in LE skin samples is defined by different immune cell infiltrates. Pathophysiologically, lesional inflammation is driven by autoreactive cytotoxic T cells, targeting keratinocytes; plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs), producing large amounts of interferon (IFN); and B cells, whose function in cutaneous LE is still unclear. This study aims to (a) classify inflammatory patterns with regard to the dominating cell type or cytokine expression and (b) investigating the specific role of B cells in LE skin lesions. Therefore, the immunohistological expression of inflammatory surrogates (CD20, CD123, MXA) in skin samples of n = 119 LE (subtypes: subacute cutaneous LE, chronic discoid LE, chilblain LE, LE tumidus, other LE) and n = 17 patients with inflammatory skin diseases (atopic dermatitis, psoriasis) were assessed. Samples were classified with regard to inflammatory groups. In addition multiplex-immunohistochemical analyses of n = 17 LE skin samples focusing on lesional B cells were conducted. In this study, we show that cutaneous lesions present with eight different inflammatory groups dominated by B cells, pDCs, a strong IFN expression, or overlapping patterns. Altogether, LE subtypes show heterogenous infiltration regardless of LE subtype, certain subtypes display a preference for infiltration groups. Furthermore, lesional B cells either form diffuse infiltrates or pseudofollicular structures, wherein they show antigen-presenting and T cell-activating properties. Altogether, in the light of emerging targeted therapeutic options, we suggest histological assessment in regard to B-cell or pDC preponderance to allow tailored treatment decisions.

European guideline (EuroGuiDerm) on atopic eczema - part II: non-systemic treatments and treatment recommendations for special AE patient populations

The evidence- and consensus-based guideline on atopic eczema was developed in accordance with the EuroGuiDerm Guideline and Consensus Statement Development Manual. Four consensus conferences were held between December 2020 and July 2021. Twenty-nine experts (including clinicians and patient representatives) from 12 European countries participated. This second part of the guideline includes recommendations and detailed information on basic therapy with emollients and moisturizers, topical anti-inflammatory treatment, antimicrobial and antipruritic treatment and UV phototherapy. Furthermore, this part of the guideline covers techniques for avoiding provocation factors, as well as dietary interventions, immunotherapy, complementary medicine and educational interventions for patients with atopic eczema and deals with occupational and psychodermatological aspects of the disease. It also contains guidance on treatment for paediatric and adolescent patients and pregnant or breastfeeding women, as well as considerations for patients who want to have a child. A chapter on the patient perspective is also provided. The first part of the guideline, published separately, contains recommendations and guidance on systemic treatment with conventional immunosuppressive drugs, biologics and janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, as well as information on the scope and purpose of the guideline, and a section on guideline methodology.

European guideline (EuroGuiDerm) on atopic eczema: part I - systemic therapy

The evidence- and consensus-based guideline on atopic eczema was developed in accordance with the EuroGuiDerm Guideline and Consensus Statement Development Manual. Four consensus conferences were held between December 2020 and July 2021. Twenty-nine experts (including clinicians and patient representatives) from 12 European countries participated. This first part of the guideline includes general information on its scope and purpose, the health questions covered, target users and a methods section. It also provides guidance on which patients should be treated with systemic therapies, as well as recommendations and detailed information on each systemic drug. The systemic treatment options discussed in the guideline comprise conventional immunosuppressive drugs (azathioprine, ciclosporin, glucocorticosteroids, methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil), biologics (dupilumab, lebrikizumab, nemolizumab, omalizumab and tralokinumab) and janus kinase inhibitors (abrocitinib, baricitinib and upadacitinib). Part two of the guideline will address avoidance of provocation factors, dietary interventions, immunotherapy, complementary medicine, educational interventions, occupational and psychodermatological aspects, patient perspective and considerations for paediatric, adolescent, pregnant and breastfeeding patients.

From Skin Barrier Dysfunction to Systemic Impact of Atopic Dermatitis: Implications for a Precision Approach in Dermocosmetics and Medicine

: Atopic dermatitis (AD) affects up to 20% of children and is considered the starting point of the atopic march with the development of food allergy, asthma, and allergic rhinitis. The heterogeneous phenotype reflects distinct and/or overlapping pathogenetic mechanisms with varying degrees of epidermal barrier disruption, activation of different T cell subsets and dysbiosis of the skin microbiome. Here, we review current evidence suggesting a systemic impact of the cutaneous inflammation in AD together with a higher risk of asthma and other comorbidities, especially in severe and persistent AD. Thus, early therapy of AD to restore the impaired skin barrier, modified microbiome, and target type 2 inflammation, depending on the (endo)phenotype, in a tailored approach is crucial. We discuss what we can learn from the comorbidities and the implications for preventive and therapeutic interventions from precision dermocosmetics to precision medicine. The stratification of AD patients into biomarker-based endotypes for a precision medicine approach offers opportunities for better long-term control of AD with the potential to reduce the systemic impact of a chronic skin inflammation and even prevent or modify the course, not only of AD, but possibly also the comorbidities, depending on the patient’s age and disease stage.

Atopic dermatitis: pathomechanisms and lessons learned from novel systemic therapeutic options

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, heterogenous, inflammatory skin disorder associated with a high skin-related health burden, typically starting in childhood and often persisting into adulthood. AD is characterized by a wide range of clinical phenotypes, reflecting multiple underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and interactions between genetics, immune system dysregulation, and environmental factors. In this review, we describe the diverse cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in AD, including the critical role of T cell-driven inflammation, primarily via T helper (Th) 2- and Th17-derived cytokines, many of which are mediated by the Janus kinase (JAK) signaling pathway. These local inflammatory processes interact with sensory neuronal pathways, contributing to the clinical manifestations of AD, including itch, pain, and sleep disturbance. The recent elucidation of the molecular pathways involved in AD has allowed treatment strategies to evolve from broad-acting systemic immunosuppressive therapies to more targeted agents, including JAK inhibitors and cytokine-specific biologic agents. Evidence from the clinical development of these targeted therapies has reinforced and expanded our understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying AD and holds promise for individualized treatment strategies tailored to specific AD subtypes.