Definition, acronyms, nomenclature, and classification of angioedema (DANCE): AAAAI, ACAAI, ACARE, and APAAACI DANCE consensus

BACKGROUND

Angioedema (AE) manifests with intermittent, localized, self-limiting swelling of the subcutaneous and/or submucosal tissue. AE is heterogeneous, can be hereditary or acquired, may occur only once or be recurrent, may exhibit wheals or not, and may be due to mast cell mediators, bradykinin, or other mechanisms. Several different taxonomic systems are currently used, making it difficult to compare the results of studies, develop multicenter collaboration, and harmonize AE treatment.

OBJECTIVE

We developed a consensus on the definition, acronyms, nomenclature, and classification of AE (DANCE).

METHODS

The initiative involved 91 experts from 35 countries and was endorsed by 53 scientific and medical societies, and patient organizations. A consensus was reached by online discussion and voting using the Delphi process over a period of 16 months (June 2021 to November 2022).

RESULTS

The DANCE initiative resulted in an international consensus on the definition, classification, and terminology of AE. The new consensus classification features 5 types and endotypes of AE and a harmonized vocabulary of abbreviations/acronyms.

CONCLUSION

The DANCE classification complements current clinical guidelines and expert consensus recommendations on the diagnostic assessment and treatment of AE. DANCE does not replace current clinical guidelines, and expert consensus algorithms and should not be misconstrued in a way that affects reimbursement of medicines prescribed by physicians using sound clinical judgment. We anticipate that this new AE taxonomy and nomenclature will harmonize and facilitate AE research and clinical studies, thereby improving patient care.

A Core Outcome Set for Efficacy of Acute Treatment of Hereditary Angioedema

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials investigating drugs for the acute treatment of hereditary angioedema attacks have assessed many different outcomes. This heterogeneity limits the comparability of trial results and may lead to selective outcome reporting bias and a high burden on trial participants.

OBJECTIVE

To achieve consensus on a core outcome set composed of key outcomes that ideally should be used in all clinical efficacy trials involving the acute treatment of hereditary angioedema attacks.

METHODS

We conducted a Delphi consensus study involving all relevant parties: patients with hereditary angioedema, hereditary angioedema expert clinicians and clinical researchers, pharmaceutical companies, and regulatory bodies. Two Internet-based survey rounds were conducted. In round 1, panelists indicated the importance of individual outcomes used in clinical trials on a 9-point Likert scale. Based on these results, a core outcome set was developed and voted on by panelists in round 2.

RESULTS

A total of 58 worldwide panelists completed both rounds. The first round demonstrated high importance scores and substantial agreement among the panelists. In the second round, a consensus of 90% or greater was achieved on a core outcome set consisting of five key outcomes: change in overall symptom severity at one predetermined time point between 15 minutes and 4 hours after treatment, time to end of progression of all symptoms, the need for rescue medication during the entire attack, impairment of daily activities, and treatment satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

This international study obtained a high level of consensus on a core outcome set for the acute treatment of hereditary angioedema attacks, consisting of five key outcomes.

The 7-day recall period version of the Urticaria Control Test-UCT7

BACKGROUND

The Urticaria Control Test (UCT) is a well-established, very easy to use and calculate 4-item patient-reported outcome measure to assess chronic urticaria disease control during the previous 4 weeks. Clinical trials and practice may benefit from the use of a UCT version with a shorter recall period, but this does not exist.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to develop and validate a UCT version with a 7-day recall period, the UCT7.

METHODS

The UCT7 was developed, based on the UCT, and tested, in 152 patients with chronic urticaria (spontaneous: n = 101, inducible: n = 51) for its reliability, validity and screening accuracy, and clinimetric properties, in other words, the cutoff for well-controlled disease and the minimal clinically important difference.

RESULTS

The UCT7 showed excellent internal consistency reliability with a Cronbach αvalue of 0.91 and test-retest reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.83. Convergent validity was high and strongly correlated with anchors of disease control, wheal and angioedema frequency, and urticaria-related quality of life impairment. The UCT7 showed excellent sensitivity to change; however, changes in angioedema activity and impact did not correlate well with changes in UCT7. Based on receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, the proportion of correctly classified patients, and patients' assessment of treatment efficacy, we recommend a cutoff value of 12 points for identifying patients with well-controlled disease. The UCT7 minimal clinically important difference for improvement was estimated to be 2 points.

CONCLUSIONS

The UCT7 is a validated 7-day recall period version of the UCT. It is ideal for the assessment of disease control at short intervals in patients with chronic urticaria in clinical studies and practice.

Patients With Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Who Have Wheals, Angioedema, or Both, Differ Demographically, Clinically, and in Response to Treatment-Results From CURE

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) have spontaneous wheals (W), angioedema (AE), or both, for longer than 6 weeks. Clinical differences between patients with standalone W, standalone AE, and W and AE (W+AE) remain incompletely understood.

OBJECTIVE

To compare W, AE, and W+AE CSU patients regarding demographics, disease characteristics, comorbidities, disease burden, and treatment response.

METHODS

Baseline data from 3,698 CSU patients in the ongoing, prospective, international, multicenter, observational Chronic Urticaria REgistry (CURE) were analyzed (data cut: September 2022).

RESULTS

Across all CSU patients, 59%, 36%, and 5% had W+AE, W, and AE, respectively. The W+AE patients, compared with W and AE patients, showed the lowest male-to-female ratio (0.33), higher rates of concomitant psychiatric disease (17% vs 11% vs 6%, respectively), autoimmune disease (13% vs 7% vs 9%, respectively), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) hypersensitivity (9% vs 5% vs 2%, respectively) and the highest disease impact. The W patients, compared with W+AE and AE patients, showed the lowest rates of concomitant hypertension (15% vs 21% vs 40%, respectively) and obesity (11% vs 16% vs 17%, respectively), the highest rate of concomitant inducible urticaria (24% vs 22% vs 6%, respectively), and shorter W duration. The AE patients, compared with W+AE and W patients, were older at disease onset, showed longer AE duration, and the best response to increased doses of H1-antihistamines (58% vs 24% vs 31%, respectively) and omalizumab (92% vs 67% vs 60%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings provide a better understanding of CSU phenotypes and may guide patient care and research efforts that aim to link them to pathogenic drivers.

Patient-physician interactions in hereditary angioedema-Key learnings from the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease pandemic and its containing measures have caused concerns for patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE) and their treating physicians. Both faced challenges surrounding interaction, and communication had to adapt to facilitate appropriate management. Specifically, the pandemic resulted in reduced in-person contact in clinics. Where possible, telemedicine appointments were offered and treatment outside the hospital setting was encouraged. BODY: The pandemic markedly affected patient-physician communication, which is essential to maintain partnerships and optimize care. Although patients with HAE are often experts in their condition, guidance by their physicians is essential, especially with the recent shift toward patient-centered management for rare diseases and shared decision-making (SDM). SDM enables patients to take control of their disease and allows the risks and benefits of treatment to be discussed with their physicians. This review explores perspectives from patients and physicians in the HAE clinical setting, particularly regarding their experiences with communication throughout the pandemic. We discuss the importance of SDM in rare diseases such as HAE, factors that impact effective communication, and potential solutions.

CONCLUSION

Since patient-centered care and SDM have particular relevance in rare diseases in general, we believe our findings could be transferrable and applicable in the management of other rare diseases.

Sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference of the angioedema control test

BACKGROUND

The Angioedema Control Test (AECT) is a patient-reported outcome measure developed and validated for the assessment of disease control in patients with recurrent angioedema. Its sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) have hitherto not been established.

METHODS

Patients with recurrent angioedema due to chronic spontaneous urticaria, hereditary angioedema, or acquired C1-inhibitor deficiency were repeatedly asked to complete the AECT along with the Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire (AE-QoL), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and anchors for disease control and whether treatment was sufficient during routine care visits. The sensitivity to the change of the AECT was determined by correlating changes in its scores over time with changes in the applied anchors. The MCID was determined using anchor-based and distributional criterion-based approaches.

RESULTS

Eighty-six cases were used for this analysis. Changes in AECT scores correlated well with AE-QoL changes (but less with changes in the DLQI) as well as other applied anchors, demonstrating its sensitivity to change. The MCID was found to be three points for improvement of angioedema control. The available number of cases with meaningful deterioration in our dataset was too low to reach a definite conclusion on the MCID for deterioration of angioedema control.

CONCLUSION

The AECT is a valuable tool to assess changes in disease control in patients with recurrent angioedema over time. The lowest AECT score change that reflects a meaningful improvement of disease control to patients (MCID) is three points.

Case report: Recurrent angioedema: Diagnosing the rare and the frequent

Hereditary angiodema with normal C1 inhibitor and unknown mutation (HAE-nC1INH-UNK), an exceedingly rare subtype of HAE, appears to be often diagnosed in patients who do not have this condition, but have mast cell-mediated angioedema. Here, we report two patients diagnosed with HAE-nC1INH-UNK by their physicians, who referred them to our center for treatment continuation with costly kallikrein-kinin-system targeted therapies. We describe how we established the correct diagnosis of recurrent mast cell-mediated angioedema after thorough investigation of both patients and initiated effective treatment with omalizumab. Also, we present and discuss the consensus criteria for diagnosing the very rare condition HAE-nC1INH in light of recent research and based on our own clinical experience. In conclusion, HAE-nC1INH-UNK should only be considered after more common differential diagnoses, i.e., mast cell-mediated angioedema, have thoroughly been investigated and ruled out. This approach reduces both the patients’ disease burden and healthcare costs and contributes to meaningful research.

Idiopathic mast cell activation syndrome is more often suspected than diagnosed-A prospective real-life study

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) is characterized by three diagnostic criteria: (1) episodic mast cell (MC)-driven signs/symptoms of at least two organ systems in the absence of clonal MC expansion and definite triggers, (2) episodic increase in tryptase, and (3) response to MC-targeted treatment. Many patients believe they have MCAS, but how often this is the case remains unknown.

METHODS

We prospectively investigated patients with suspected MCAS (n = 100) for the diagnostic criteria including baseline tryptase, KIT D816V mutation, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) over the course of 12 weeks. Comorbid depression and anxiety were explored with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).

RESULTS

In 53% of our patients (80% females), suspicion of MCAS was based on self-evaluation. In total, patients reported 87 different symptoms, mostly fatigue (n = 57), musculoskeletal pain/weakness (n = 49), and abdominal pain (n = 43), with overall high disease activity and impact. Two of 79 patients had increased tryptase (by >20% +2 ng/ml) following an episode. Only 5%, with any of the PROMs used, showed complete response to MC-targeted treatment. Depression and anxiety disorders were frequent comorbidities (n = 23 each), and 65 patients had pathological HADS values, which were linked to high disease impact and poor symptom control.

CONCLUSION

Mast cell activation syndrome was confirmed in only 2% of patients, which implies that it is not MC activation that drives signs and symptoms in most patients with suspected MCAS. There is a high need for comprehensive research efforts aimed at the identification of the true underlying pathomechanism(s) in patients with suspected MCAS.

Optimising both disease control and glucocorticoid dosing is essential for bone protection in patients with rheumatic disease

OBJECTIVES

Inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (iRMDs) are associated with increased systemic bone loss that is mediated by chronic inflammation, treatment with glucocorticoids (GCs) and other factors. Our objective was to analyse the impact of variables that influence osteoporosis (OP) in patients with iRMD treated with GC.

METHODS

Rh-GIOP (acronyme) is a prospective observational cohort study investigating bone health in consecutive patients with iRMD and current or prior GC treatment. We present an analysis of the patients' baseline data here. Bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry was the primary outcome. Multivariable linear regression models were performed to identify variables associated with BMD.

RESULTS

Data from 1066 patients with iRMD were analysed. GC doses of <5 mg prednisone equivalent per day, cumulative dose and duration of GC therapy were not associated with negative effects on BMD. Dosages of ≥5 mg/day lost their negative association with BMD after adjustment for confounders. When subanalysing patients with exactly 5 mg/day, no negative effect was seen. For patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), GC doses of >7.5 mg/day showed a negative association with BMD overall, but this effect seemed to be specific only to patients with moderate or high disease activity (Disease Activity Score 28-C reactive protein >3.2).

CONCLUSIONS

GCs of ≤5 mg/day did not seem to be associated with a reduction of BMD in patients with iRMD and current or prior exposure to GC. This is most likely due to the dampening of inflammation by GC, which exerts a mitigating effect on the risk of OP. In RA, current GC doses of >7.5 mg/day were negatively associated with BMD, but only in patients with moderate to high disease activity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02719314.

Age-related increase of mitochondrial content in human memory CD4+ T cells contributes to ROS-mediated increased expression of proinflammatory cytokines

Cellular metabolism modulates effector functions in human CD4⁺ T (Th) cells by providing energy and building blocks. Conversely, cellular metabolic responses are modulated by various influences, e.g., age. Thus, we hypothesized that metabolic reprogramming in human Th cells during aging modulates effector functions and contributes to “inflammaging”, an aging-related, chronic, sterile, low-grade inflammatory state characterized by specific proinflammatory cytokines. Analyzing the metabolic response of human naive and memory Th cells from young and aged individuals, we observed that memory Th cells exhibit higher glycolytic and mitochondrial fluxes than naive Th cells. In contrast, the metabolism of the latter was not affected by donor age. Memory Th cells from aged donors showed a higher respiratory capacity, mitochondrial content, and intracellular ROS production than those from young donors without altering glucose uptake and cellular ATP levels, which finally resulted in higher secreted amounts of proinflammatory cytokines, e.g., IFN-γ, IP-10 from memory Th cells taken from aged donors after TCR-stimulation which were sensitive to ROS inhibition. These findings suggest that metabolic reprogramming in human memory Th cells during aging results in an increased expression of proinflammatory cytokines through enhanced ROS production, which may contribute to the pathogenesis of inflammaging.

SIGLEC1 enables straightforward assessment of type I interferon activity in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

Objective

To evaluate sialic acid binding Ig-like lectin 1 (SIGLEC1) expression on monocytes by flow cytometry as a type I interferon biomarker in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM).

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of adult and paediatric patients with the diagnosis of IIM. SIGLEC1 expression was assessed by flow cytometry and was compared with Physician Global Assessment or Childhood Myositis Assessment Scale disease activity scores. Mann Whitney U test and receiver operating characteristic curves were used for cross-sectional data analysis (n=96), two-level mixed-effects linear regression model for longitudinal analyses (n=26, 110 visits). Response to treatment was analysed in 14 patients within 12 months, using Wilcoxon test. SIGLEC1 was compared with interferon-stimulated gene 15/MxA status by immunohistochemical staining of muscle biopsies (n=17).

Results

96 patients with adult (a) and juvenile (j) dermatomyositis (DM, n=38), antisynthetase syndrome (AS, n=19), immune-mediated necrotising myopathy (IMNM, n=8), inclusion body myositis (IBM, n=9) and overlap myositis (n=22) were included. SIGLEC1 distinguished significantly between active and inactive disease with an area under the curve of 0.92 (95% CI 0.83 to 1) in DM and correlated with disease activity longitudinally (aDM: standardised beta=0.54, p<0.001; jDM: standardised beta=−0.70, p<0.001). Response to treatment in DM was associated with a decreasing SIGLEC1 (p<0.01, Wilcoxon test). SIGLEC1 was found upregulated in 8 of 19 patients with AS, 2 of 9 patients with IBM but not in IMNM.

Conclusion

SIGLEC1 is a candidate biomarker to assess type I interferon activity in IIM and proved useful for monitoring disease activity and response to treatment in juvenile and adult DM.

Barriers and potential solutions in the recruitment and retention of older patients in clinical trials-lessons learned from six large multicentre randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

older people remain underrepresented in clinical trials, and evidence generated in younger populations cannot always be generalized to older patients.

OBJECTIVE

to identify key barriers and to discuss solutions to specific issues affecting recruitment and retention of older participants in clinical trials based on experience gained from six current European randomised controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on older people.

METHODS

a multidisciplinary group of experts including representatives of the six RCTs held two networking conferences and compiled lists of potential barriers and solutions. Every item was subsequently allocated points by each study team according to how important it was perceived to be for their RCTs.

RESULTS

the six RCTs enrolled 7,612 older patients. Key barriers to recruitment were impaired health status, comorbidities and diverse health beliefs including priorities within different cultural systems. All trials had to increase the number of recruitment sites. Other measures felt to be effective included the provision of extra time, communication training for the study staff and a re-design of patient information. Key barriers for retention included the presence of severe comorbidities and the occurrence of adverse events. Long study duration, frequent study visits and difficulties accessing the study site were also mentioned. Solutions felt to be effective included spending more time maintaining close contact with the participants, appropriate measures to show appreciation and reimbursement of travel arrangements.

CONCLUSION

recruitment and retention of older patients in trials requires special recognition and a targeted approach. Our results provide scientifically-based practical recommendations for optimizing future studies in this population.

Production of IL-6 and Phagocytosis Are the Most Resilient Immune Functions in Metabolically Compromised Human Monocytes

At sites of inflammation, monocytes carry out specific immune functions while facing challenging metabolic restrictions. Here, we investigated the potential of human monocytes to adapt to conditions of gradually inhibited oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) under glucose free conditions. We used myxothiazol, an inhibitor of mitochondrial respiration, to adjust two different levels of decreased mitochondrial ATP production. At these levels, and compared to uninhibited OXPHOS, we assessed phagocytosis, production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) through NADPH oxidase (NOX), expression of surface activation markers CD16, CD80, CD11b, HLA-DR, and production of the inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α in human monocytes. We found phagocytosis and the production of IL-6 to be least sensitive to metabolic restrictions while surface expression of CD11b, HLA-DR, production of TNF-α, IL-1β and production of ROS through NOX were most compromised by inhibition of OXPHOS in the absence of glucose. Our data demonstrate a short-term hierarchy of immune functions in human monocytes, which represents novel knowledge potentially leading to the development of new therapeutics in monocyte-mediated inflammatory diseases.

AB0031 METABOLIC ADAPTATION OF HUMAN NEUTROPHILS TO GLUCOSE DEPRIVATION IS IMPAIRED WITH INCREASING AGE

Background:

Age-related impairment of classical neutrophil functions is well described (Fortin, McDonald et al. 2008). However, experimental evidence for age-related alterations of neutrophil metabolic adaptation towards nutrient deprivation -a feature of neutrophil battlefields- remains elusive. Moreover, age-related differences in neutrophil metabolic adaptation may contribute to age-related pathologies such as atherosclerosis, cancer, and autoimmune diseases including rheumatoid arthritis.

Objectives:

Therefore, we hypothesized that metabolic adaptation of human neutrophils to glucose deprivation is impaired with increasing age.

Methods:

We isolated human peripheral CD15+ neutrophils from four healthy young donors (mean age: 23.4 ± 2.7) and four healthy donors with a mean age of 58.7 ± 2.4. First, we analyzed the survival of neutrophils either stimulated with PMA or left untreated and subsequently incubated for 0 h and 6 h under varying glucose concentrations (0, 0.5, 1, 5, and 10 mM). To address this, we used 7-AAD staining and flow cytometry. Using Seahorse™ technology, we determined basal respiration, ATP-bound respiration, and maximal and spare capacity.

Results:

We show that neutrophils (purity > 95%) survived for 6 hours in vitro, independent of treatment with PMA or concentrations of glucose in the culture medium. With negligible differences between the various concentrations of glucose used, the percentage of living cells after 6 h was 95% ± 2.5 without PMA and 75% ± 4.7 with PMA stimulation. No differences were uncovered in this respect between the two age groups. However, Seahorse™ technology revealed significant differences in basal, maximal, and spare respiratory capacity. Briefly, OCR (pmol/min/cell count) with respect to basal, maximal and reserve respiratory capacity was lower in the elderly donors compared to the young donors. For instance, with a concentration of 5 mM glucose, the basal respiration (OCR) was 17 ± 0.7 in elderly donors compared to 22.5 ± 1 in young donors, while the maximal respiration was 25 ± 0.8 in elderly and 41 ± 0.6 in the young donor group. Interestingly, these differences were independent of glucose concentration in the medium.

Conclusion:

Our data show that basal metabolic parameters differ between neutrophils from young and older donors. Further experiments are needed to understand in detail the mechanisms and effects of age-related differences in metabolism on neutrophil functions.

References:

[1]Fortin, C. F., P. P. McDonald, O. Lesur and T. Fülöp, Jr. (2008). “Aging and neutrophils: there is still much to do.” Rejuvenation Res11(5): 873-882.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

AB0029 THE METABOLIC HIERARCHY OF IMMUNE PROCESSES IN HUMAN MONOCYTES

Background:

At sites of inflammation, monocytes carry out specific immunological functions while facing challenging bioenergetic restrictions.

Objectives:

Here, we investigated the potential of human monocytes to adapt under conditions of reduced energy supply by gradually inhibiting oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) under glucose free conditions.

Methods:

We modelled this reduced energy supply with myxothiazol, an inhibitor of mitochondrial respiration, at 0, 2 and 4 pmol/106 cells to decrease mitochondrial ATP production for 0%, 25% and 66% under glucose free conditions. For the three energy levels, we assessed (i) phagocytosis of FITC-labelled E.coli using flow cytometry, (i) production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) through NADPH oxidase (NOX) as determined by VAS2870-sensitive OCR using a Clark-type electrode, (iii) ATP generation and steady state level using a Clark-type electrode and luminometric assessment (iv) expression of surface activation markers CD16, CD80, CD11b, HLA-DR and (v) production of the inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α using flow cytometry in peripheral blood-derived human monocytes with and without LPS-stimulation.

Results:

As a prerequisite for our study, we demonstrate that human monocytes survived strong inhibition of mitochondrial respiration without any sign of apoptosis as determined by flow cytometry. As a result of the inhibition of OXPHOS, we demonstrate a reduction of VAS2870-sensitive OCR (ROS production through NOX), ATPase-dependent OCR and ATP steady-state levels. Focusing on immune function, we observed that phagocytosis and the production of IL-6 were the least sensitive to reduced energy supply while surface expression of CD11b, HLA-DR, production of TNF-α and IL-1β were most affected by inhibition of OXPHOS.

Conclusion:

Our data demonstrate an energy-dependent hierarchy of immune functions in monocytes, which may represent a potential therapeutic target in monocyte-mediated inflammatory diseases.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

POS0183 SIGLEC1 AS A TYPE I INTERFERON BIOMARKER IN IDIOPATHIC INFLAMMATORY MYOPATHIES

Background:

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are autoimmune diseases that mainly affect skeletal muscle, lung, skin and joints. IIM can be separated into dermatomyositis (DM), inclusion body myositis (IBM), antisynthetase syndrome (AS) and immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM). Type I interferons (IFN) are known to play a crucial role in the etiopathogenesis of some of these entities such as DM.[1] Sialic acid binding Ig-like lectin 1 (SIGLEC1, CD169) is part of the type I IFN signature found in SLE and DM and is expressed on the cell surface of monocytes. Thus, analysis of SIGLEC1 expression by flow cytometry enables a straightforward assessment of the type I IFN signature. Its utility has been shown for juvenile and adult SLE and other rheumatic diseases but not in IIM.[2,3] The assessment of the type I IFN system in clinical practice is an unmet need and, in this context, SIGLEC1 might be useful.

Objectives:

To assess SIGLEC1 expression on monocytes by flow cytometry as a type I IFN biomarker in IIM

Methods:

Pediatric and adult patients with a clinical diagnosis of DM, AS, IMNM and IBM and at least one measurement of SIGLEC1 who have been treated at the Department of Rheumatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin between 2015 and 2020 were included in this retrospective study. Control groups of healthy individuals (n=19) and SLE patients (n=30) were included. Disease activity was assessed by Physician Global Assessment (PGA) and Childhood Myositis Assessment Scale (CMAS). SIGLEC1 expression on monocytes was analyzed by flow cytometry. Cross-sectional analyses (n=74) were performed using Mann Whitney-U test (MWU) and two-level mixed-effects linear regression model was used for longitudinal analyses (n=26, 110 visits). This study was approved by the local ethics committee of the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin.

Results:

74 patients (adult/juvenile DM: n=21/n=17; AS: n=19; IMNM: n=8; IBM: n=9) were included. In cross-sectional analysis, SIGLEC1 expression was significantly upregulated in adult and juvenile DM patients with moderate to severe disease activity (PGA≥5) compared with adult/juvenile DM patients with no to moderate disease activity (PGA<5) (both p<0.001). In longitudinal analyses, SIGLEC1 correlated with disease activity in juvenile DM (SIGLEC1 vs. CMAS: betaST=-0.65; p<0.001) and adult DM (SIGLEC1 vs. PGA: betaST=0.52; p<0.001), better than Creatine Kinase (CK) (juvenile DM, CK vs. CMAS: betaST=-0.50; p<0.001; adult DM, CK vs PGA: betaST=0.17; p=0.149). In AS 42,1% of the patients showed elevated SIGLEC1 expression, while it was not upregulated in IMNM and only in two patients with IBM, who were concurrently positive for autoantibodies that affect the type I IFN system (see Figure 1).

Conclusion:

SIGLEC1 is a useful biomarker to identify an activated type I IFN system in IIM. Flow cytometry is used widely in laboratory medicine, which could facilitate the implementation of SIGLEC1 into clinical routine.

References:

[1]Gallay L, Mouchiroud G, Chazaud B. Interferon-signature in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: Current Opinion in Rheumatology 2019;31:634–42. doi:10.1097/BOR.0000000000000653

[2]Rose T, Grutzkau A, Hirseland H, et al. IFNalpha and its response proteins, IP-10 and SIGLEC-1, are biomarkers of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:1639–45. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201586

[3]Stuckrad SL von, Klotsche J, Biesen R, et al. SIGLEC1 (CD169) is a sensitive biomarker for the deterioration of the clinical course in childhood systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2020;:961203320965699. doi:10.1177/0961203320965699

Figure 1.

SIGLEC1 expression on monocytes in IIM subgroups and control groups; in IIM subgroups, patients with low disease activity (PGA<5) are marked in blue, patients with high disease activity (PGA≥5) are marked in red; mAb/cell, monoclonal antibodies bound per cell

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

Lanadelumab Efficacy, Safety, and Injection Interval Extension in HAE: A Real-Life Study

BACKGROUND

Lanadelumab has been available in Germany for the prophylactic treatment of hereditary angioedema since February 2019.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate real-life treatment outcome of lanadelumab and gain practical experience in adapting the therapy to individual patients.

METHODS

The study included 34 patients. In 24 patients with hereditary angioedema and 4 patients with angioedema due to acquired C1-inhibitor deficiency, the previous treatment was switched to lanadelumab. In 6 patients with hereditary angioedema, lanadelumab from the open-label Hereditary Angioedema Long-term Prophylaxis study was continued in regular care. During the transition, patients were monitored using the angioedema control test and the angioedema quality of life questionnaire. At the time at which patients became symptom-free, the dosage interval was increased gradually (+3 days).

RESULTS

On average, the angioedema control test values improved from 7.5 (poorly controlled disease) to 14.9 (well-controlled disease), and all patients showed adequate disease control. All treated patients, except 1 outlier, scored angioedema quality of life questionnaire values representing only a slight reduction in quality of life (mean, 14 points). At the time point of data collection, 9 patients used an average fixed injection interval of 30 days. Twenty-two patients were symptom-free from the beginning of the treatment phase and intended to extend their injection interval from 30 to 32.5 days (median). We recommended reducing the initial dosing interval from 24 to 21 days (median) to 3 patients because of intermediately occurring symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Gradual extension of injection intervals of lanadelumab presented in this study can minimize the burden of therapy without losing efficacy.

The Diagnostic Workup in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria-What to Test and Why

BACKGROUND

In chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), the guidelines recommend very limited diagnostic procedures during the routine workup, although additional investigations might be indicated in some patients with CSU. For physicians treating patients with CSU, it is often difficult to decide which diagnostic tests are useful.

OBJECTIVE

To provide recommendations on what diagnostic tests should be performed on which patients with CSU.

METHODS

We performed an extensive literature search on the respective topics and identified relevant questions that should prompt diagnostic procedures based on the published evidence and expert consensus among all authors.

RESULTS

We provide questions, diagnostic testing, where appropriate, and recommendation that should be included when assessing the history of a patient with CSU, to explore and rule out differential diagnoses, to assess patients for underlying causes and modifying conditions, to explore patients for comorbid diseases and consequences of having CSU, and to assess patients for CSU components that can help to predict their disease course and response to treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Here, we provide physicians treating patients with CSU with information about which clues should lead to which tests and why.

AB0767 PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS HAVE A LOWER BONE DENSITY THAN PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS

Background:

Osteoporosis is a skeletal disease characterized by the loss of bone density resulting in an increased fracture risk. Female sex, advanced age, Caucasian ancestry, previous history of fractures, menopause and certain genetic factors predispose for osteoporosis. In addition, recent studies could prove that chronic inflammatory diseases such as Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and long-term treatment with higher doses of glucocorticoids (GCs) represent independent risk factors for the development of osteoporosis. On the other hand, the intake of vitamin D, a calcium-rich diet and physical exercise can be protective. Data describing the prevalence of osteoporosis in patients with other rheumatic diseases like psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are lacking.

Objectives:

We compared the prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in patients with RA and PsA, respectively, based on data obtained from our ongoing prospective monocentric study Rh-GIOP investigating glucocorticoid (GC)-induced osteoporosis in patients with different rheumatic diseases (NCT02719314).

Methods:

Bone mineral density data measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in patients with PsA (n=92) were compared with data measured in 92 age- and gender-matched patients with RA. The results were analysed with respect to clinical and laboratory parameters such as data on GC treatment (frequency, duration defined as start of treatment until timepoint of measurement, actual and cumulative dose), csDMARD and bDMARD (including as well tsDMARDs) therapy, serological parameters (Vitamin D, alkaline phosphatase, calcium, inflammatory markers and rheumatoid factor) and functional status (e.g. Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), sporting activities). Statistical analyses were performed descriptively using mean and standard deviation, t-tests for metric variables, and chi-square tests for nominal variables. For subgroup analyses with less than 30 patients per group, tests for non-normally distributed data were used due to the lower test power.

Results:

RA patients showed significantly lower means of bone density values (minimal T-score, p=0.03) than PsA patients leading to a higher frequency of osteopenic bone densities (p<0.005). However, no differences in the frequency of osteoporotic bone densities could be detected. PsA patients reported a significantly longer disease duration and a higher current GC dosage. In contrast, the frequency of current GC intake was higher in RA patients. Although the calcium intake was higher in the RA group, neither blood levels of calcium and vitamin D, nor the cumulative GC dose (GCCD) or duration of GC therapy could indicate a causal relationship for the differences observed in bone density values between the two groups. The frequency of csDMARD therapy did not differ significantly between PsA and RA patients while the frequency of bDMARD therapy was higher in the PsA group (p=0.04).

Conclusion:

The lower bone density in RA patients seems not to be fully explained by higher GCCD, disease duration or higher levels of inflammation. However, RA patients had a higher frequency of current GC intake. Additionally, differences in bone density between the two groups could be related to the higher number of bDMARD therapies in PsA patients, but further investigations like multivariate analyses with higher numbers of patients are necessary. Furthermore there is more need for research on possible molecular and genetic factors in PsA, which are protecting from low bone density.

Disclosure of Interests:

Desiree Freier: None declared, Edgar Wiebe: None declared, Robert Biesen: None declared, Thomas Buttgereit: None declared, Sandra Hermann: None declared, Timo Gaber: None declared, Frank Buttgereit Grant/research support from: Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Generic Assays, GSK, Hexal, Horizon, Lilly, medac, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi.

SAT0372 PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS SHOW HIGHER BONE DENSITY COMPARED TO AGE AND GENDER MATCHED PATIENTS WITH ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS

Background:

The prevalence of osteoporosis in inflammatory rheumatic diseases such as psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has not been sufficiently clarified yet, and the data in the literature are heterogeneous. In addition, it is still unclear to what extent patients with PsA differ in terms of bone density from patients with other forms of spondyloarthritis such as ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

Objectives:

In an interim analysis of the Rh-GIOP Study (ClinicalTrials.gov IdentifierNCT02719314), we observed that PsA patients demonstrated more frequently normal bone density than any other patient group analyzed (suffering from e.g. rheumatoid arthritis or systemic sclerosis). The main objective of this investigation was to compare bone density data from patients with PsA and AS, as both diseases belong to the spondyloarthritis group. 1100 patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases provided the basis of Rh-GIOP, a prospective study monitoring glucocorticoid (GC)-induced osteoporosis in patients with rheumatic diseases. Rh-GIOP was established in 2015 at the Charité University Hospital. Bone mineral density data were measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Methods:

92 patients with PsA (65% female) were compared with 51 patients suffering from AS (35% female). Potential risk and protective factors (e.g. data on GC treatment, anti-rheumatic therapy), laboratory parameters (e.g. Vitamin D, alkaline phosphatase, calcium and inflammatory markers) and functional status (e.g. Health Assessment Questionnaire, sporting activities, back pain) were compared between these groups. Statistical analysis was performed descriptively using mean and standard deviation, t-tests for metric variables, and chi-square tests for nominal variables. Due to the heterogeneous gender distribution, an additional statistical matching was performed to compare patients matched by age and gender.

Results:

Patients with PsA displayed significantly higher minimal T-scores than patients with AS (p=0.003) even though patients with AS were younger and more often male (p<0.001). AS patients showed a higher frequency of osteopenic bone densities (p<0.05), however, no differences in the frequency of osteoporotic bone densities were found. Body-mass-index (BMI) was significantly higher (p<0.001) in PsA patients. PsA patients demonstrated a higher frequency of csDMARD use (p<0.001). Additional analyses among PsA patients with and without csDMARDs revealed also significantly higher minimal T-scores in PsA patients taking csDMARDs (90% Methotrexate), and both groups showed the same average of age and gender distribution. Furthermore, AS patients complained significantly more often of back pain (96 % vs. 74%, p=0.001) than PsA patients. No differences in GC use or cumulative GC dose were found. All results could be confirmed when groups were matched by age and gender.

Conclusion:

Our results demonstrate that patients with PsA display higher bone density compared to age and gender matched patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Possible influencing factors could be the higher frequency of csDMARD use, higher BMI or the lower frequency of back pain in PsA patients. Multivariate tests and additional biomarker investigations in larger cohorts are necessary to corroborate these findings and to identify underlying pathogenic differences which could serve for an explanation.

Disclosure of Interests:

Desiree Freier: None declared, Edgar Wiebe: None declared, Robert Biesen: None declared, Thomas Buttgereit: None declared, Sandra Hermann: None declared, Timo Gaber: None declared, Frank Buttgereit Grant/research support from: Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Generic Assays, GSK, Hexal, Horizon, Lilly, medac, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi.

AB1223 RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS INCLUDED IN GLUCOCORTICOID TRIALS MOSTLY RESEMBLE THOSE SEEN IN OBSERVATIONAL COHORTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Background:

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard in clinical research. Their results, however, may not be generalizable to patients in routine care.1Together with methotrexate, glucocorticoids (GCs) constitute the mainstay of therapy for many patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but it is unclear whether trial evidence is actually generalizable to real-world patients.

Objectives:

This review assesses to what extent RA patients participating in GC-RCTs differ from RA patients taking GCs in routine care.

Methods:

This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019134675). MEDLINE was searched for RCTs and, as comparators, cohort studies in RA evaluating systemic GC therapy. Cohorts were not allowed to exhibit apparent selection mechanisms concerning gender or age. Random-effects meta-analyses combined descriptive baseline characteristics that may modify the benefit-risk-ratio of various RA therapeutics. Meta-analyses were stratified by study type (RCT and CS). Stratified estimates were subsequently compared.

Results:

55 RCTs and ten cohort studies (21,657 participants overall) were included. Twelve characteristics (related to general demographics and disease activity) were reported frequently enough to allow for comparative analysis. Compared to cohorts, RCT participants were younger (-4.7 [-7.2 to -2.1] years) and had somewhat higher erythrocyte sedimentation rates (12 [6 to 18] mm/h) (Table 1). In the other ten characteristics, estimates did not differ significantly. Numerically, cohort patients had more longstanding disease and slightly more favourable disease levels in core set variables. Comorbidities could not be assessed.

Table 1.

Pooled estimates

OutcomeRCTkCohortkContrast(95% CI)pGeneral demographics Age (years)54.25058.910–4.7(–7.2 to –2.1)<0.001 Female (proportion)0.70520.73100.89(0.68 to 1.16)0.38 Current or previous smokers (proportion)0.5930.5121.38(0.61 to 3.14)0.44 BMI (kg/m2)25.9525.930.0(–1.9 to 1.9)0.98 Disease duration (months)56.54385.17–28.6(–85.6 to 28.4)0.33Disease activity ESR (mm/h)40.13128.2311.8(5.7 to 18.0)<0.001 DAS5.3244.950.4(–0.1 to 0.9)0.12 RF+, (proportion)0.67320.6361.19(0.80 to 1.78)0.39 ACPA+, (proportion)0.6470.5631.38(0.64 to 3.00)0.41 HAQ1.3311.140.2(–0.1 to 0.5)0.15 Pain (0-10)5.2264.820.4(–0.8 to 1.6)0.52 Patient global assessment (0-10)5.2174.930.3(–0.9 to 1.5)0.58

Conclusion:

The results of our study suggest that evidence from RA GC-RCTs can be generalized to most patients in routine practice. We note that comorbidities – a frequent exclusion criterion for trial participation – could not be evaluated due to insufficient reporting. Our findings contrast with a similar study on RCTs investigating biologics in RA: There, trial participants were found to differ significantly in 4 out of 8 investigated baseline characteristics.2

References:

1]Palmowski A et al. Applicability of trials in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of trial populations showing adequate proportion of women, but underrepresentation of elderly people.Semin Arthritis Rheum2018 doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.10.017 and

[2]Kilcher G et al. Rheumatoid arthritis patients treated in trial and real world settings: comparison of randomized trials with registries.Rheumatology (Oxford) 2017 doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex394

Acknowledgments:

Part of the GLORIA project and trial, funded by the EU (Horizon 2020, Grant No 634886)

Disclosure of Interests:

Andriko Palmowski: None declared, Sabrina Mai Nielsen: None declared, Thomas Buttgereit: None declared, Yannick Palmowski: None declared, Maarten Boers: None declared, Robin Christensen: None declared, Frank Buttgereit Grant/research support from: Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Generic Assays, GSK, Hexal, Horizon, Lilly, medac, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi.

Glucocorticoid-trials in rheumatoid arthritis mostly study representative real-world patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard in clinical research due to credible causality. Their results, however, may not be generalizable to real-world populations. While glucocorticoids (GCs) remain a mainstay of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment, it is unclear whether the results of GC-RCTs are generalizable to current real-world RA patients.

METHODS

MEDLINE was searched for RCTs and, as comparators, cohort studies (CSs) in RA evaluating systemic GCs. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed for descriptive baseline characteristics (including general demographics, comorbidities, and disease activity) that have been shown to be able to modify the benefit-risk-ratio of various RA therapeutics. These meta-analyses were stratified by study type (RCT and CS). Stratified estimates were subsequently compared. Further sensitivity analyses were performed stratifying by disease duration.

RESULTS

56 RCTs (7053 participants) and 10 CSs (14,688 participants) were included. 12 characteristics were reported frequently enough to allow for comparative analysis. In 10/12 characteristics (83%), RCT estimates did not appear to differ from CS estimates. However, RCT participants were younger (-4.7 years [95% CI -7.2 to -2.1]; p < 0.001) and had higher erythrocyte sedimentation rates (11.8 mm/h [5.7 to 17.8]; p < 0.001) than CS participants. Comorbidities could not be assessed due to insufficient reporting.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that evidence from GC trials in RA is of acceptable generalizability to current real-world patients - especially compared to findings from biologic agents in RA. However, RCT participants were younger than real-world patients, potentially limiting the generalizability of trial results to elderly patients.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42019134675).

Association Between Participant Retention and the Proportion of Included Elderly People in Rheumatology Trials: Results From a Series of Exploratory Meta-Regression Analyses

OBJECTIVE

The elderly, a population defined by an age of ≥65 years, are underrepresented in rheumatology trials, possibly due to investigators' concerns of increased premature discontinuations in higher age groups. The present study was undertaken to evaluate whether the proportion of included elderly individuals (PE) is independently associated with participant retention in rheumatology trials.

METHODS

Medline was searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis (OA) of any intervention (years 2016 and 2017). PE was either extracted from the research manuscript or estimated from an assumed (truncated) normal distribution. We used mixed-effects meta-regression models including several covariates to assess whether there is an independent association between PE and participant retention. Using sensitivity analyses, we evaluated whether associations were connected to attrition due to lack of efficacy (LoE) or adverse events (AE).

RESULTS

In total, 243 RCTs comprising >48,000 participants were included. Pooled participant retention was 88%. PE was not associated with retention in the unadjusted (P = 0.97) or adjusted (all: P ≥ 0.14) models. Of all covariates, only study duration and type of intervention were associated with retention (both: P < 0.001). Post hoc analyses allowing for interaction revealed a small but statistically significant positive association between PE and retention in pharmacologic interventions and a negative association in physical/physiotherapeutic interventions (overall P for interaction = 0.05). No associations were found for PE and attrition due to LoE or AE.

CONCLUSION

Participant retention in RA and OA trials is high and not associated with PE. These findings should motivate investigators to include more elderly participants in rheumatology trials.

The 70th anniversary of glucocorticoids in rheumatic diseases: the second youth of an old friend

Seventy years ago, the first administration of cortisone in a patient with RA marked a milestone in the treatment of inflammatory diseases. However, the initial enthusiasm rapidly vanished as the administration of high doses for lengthy periods revealed worrisome adverse effects. It has taken several decades to overcome the (sometimes excessive) mistrust and to achieve a more differentiated evaluation of the benefit–risk profile and the adequate usage of glucocorticoids (GCs). Today, GCs remain indispensable for the treatment of many inflammatory conditions and their usefulness in RA as a disease-modifying low-dose co-medication is widely acknowledged. Recent studies show promising results concerning both traditional GCs and new formulations. Still, decades of relatively little scientific attention have resulted in a continuing lack of detailed evidence. Hence there is an ongoing need for further research regarding mechanisms of GC actions, the further optimization of treatment parameters for traditional GCs and new formulations.

"Official View" on Glucocorticoids in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review of International Guidelines and Consensus Statements

OBJECTIVE

To describe the perception of the current role of systemic glucocorticoids in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by examining their importance and the current level of evidence in recent guidelines, and to identify open questions to be addressed in future guidelines and research projects.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review using the databases Ovid Embase, PubMed Medline, and Cochrane Library for guidelines on the pharmacologic treatment of RA. Retrieved articles were evaluated regarding their quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II tool and scrutinized for all relevant information concerning the use of glucocorticoids.

RESULTS

All guidelines agree that glucocorticoids, especially if given at low doses and for a short duration, are an appropriate option in the treatment of RA. However, many recommendations remain vague, as reliable and detailed evidence is scarce. Important aspects of glucocorticoid therapy are partially or completely neglected, and the existing nomenclature is not used uniformly. Quality evaluation revealed flaws in many articles, concerning not only glucocorticoid-specific recommendations but also guideline quality in general.

CONCLUSION

Current recommendations for use of glucocorticoids in the management of RA are suboptimal. More rigorous evaluation of doses, timing, and duration of their use is needed. Existing nomenclature on glucocorticoid therapy should be used uniformly.