Exposure-response relationship of cabozantinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated in routine care

BACKGROUND

Interindividual pharmacokinetic variability may influence the clinical benefit or toxicity of cabozantinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We aimed to investigate the exposure-toxicity and exposure-response relationship of cabozantinib in unselected mRCC patients treated in routine care.

METHODS

This ambispective multicenter study enrolled consecutive patients receiving cabozantinib in monotherapy. Steady-state trough concentration (Cmin,ss) within the first 3 months after treatment initiation was used for the PK/PD analysis with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and survival outcomes. Logistic regression and Cox proportional-hazards models were used to identify the risk factors of DLT and inefficacy in patients, respectively.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight mRCC patients were eligible for the statistical analysis. Fifty-two patients (67%) experienced DLT with a median onset of 2.1 months (95%CI 0.7-8.2). In multivariate analysis, Cmin,ss was identified as an independent risk factor of DLT (OR 1.46, 95%CI [1.04-2.04]; p = 0.029). PFS and OS were not statistically associated with the starting dose (p = 0.81 and p = 0.98, respectively). In the multivariate analysis of PFS, Cmin, ss > 336 ng/mL resulted in a hazard ratio of 0.28 (95%CI, 0.10-0.77, p = 0.014). By contrast, Cmin, ss > 336 ng/mL was not statistically associated with longer OS.

CONCLUSION

Early plasma drug monitoring may be useful to optimise cabozantinib treatment in mRCC patients treated in monotherapy, especially in frail patients starting at a lower than standard dose.

Silencing of genes by promoter hypermethylation shapes tumor microenvironment and resistance to immunotherapy in clear-cell renal cell carcinomas

The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors varies in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), with notable primary resistance among patients. Here, we integrate epigenetic (DNA methylation) and transcriptome data to identify a ccRCC subtype characterized by cancer-specific promoter hypermethylation and epigenetic silencing of Polycomb targets. We develop and validate an index of methylation-based epigenetic silencing (iMES) that predicts primary resistance to immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) in the BIONIKK trial. High iMES is associated with VEGF pathway silencing, endothelial cell depletion, immune activation/suppression, EZH2 activation, BAP1/SETD2 deficiency, and resistance to ICI. Combination therapy with hypomethylating agents or tyrosine kinase inhibitors may benefit patients with high iMES. Intriguingly, tumors with low iMES exhibit increased endothelial cells and improved ICI response, suggesting the importance of angiogenesis in ICI treatment. We also develop a transcriptome-based analogous system for extended applicability of iMES. Our study underscores the interplay between epigenetic alterations and tumor microenvironment in determining immunotherapy response.

Antitumor Activity and Safety of Dostarlimab Monotherapy in Patients With Mismatch Repair Deficient Solid Tumors: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

Importance

Mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) occurs in various cancers, and these tumors are attractive candidates for anti-programmed cell death 1 therapies, such as dostarlimab, a recently approved immune checkpoint inhibitor.

Objective

To assess the antitumor activity and safety of dostarlimab in patients with advanced or recurrent dMMR solid tumors.

Design, Setting, And Participants

The GARNET trial was a phase 1, open-label, single-group, multicenter study that began enrolling May 8, 2017. Participants had advanced or recurrent dMMR and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or polymerase epsilon (POLE)-altered solid tumors. The data cut for this interim analysis was from November 1, 2021, with median follow-up of 27.7 months.

Interventions

Patients received 500 mg of dostarlimab intravenously every 3 weeks for 4 doses, then 1000 mg every 6 weeks until disease progression, discontinuation, or withdrawal.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary objective was to evaluate objective response rate and duration of response in patients with dMMR solid tumors by blinded independent central review using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1.

Results

The efficacy population included 327 patients (median [range] age, 63 [24-85] years; 235 [71.9%] female; 7 [2.1%] Asian, 6 [1.8%] Black, and 206 [63.0%] White patients), with 141 patients (43.1%) with dMMR endometrial cancer, 105 patients (32.1%) with dMMR colorectal cancer, and 81 patients (24.8%) with other dMMR tumor types. All patients had at least 1 previous line of therapy. Objective response rate assessed per blinded independent central review for dMMR solid tumors was 44.0% (95% CI, 38.6% to 49.6%). Median duration of response was not reached (range, ≥1.18 to ≥47.21 months); 72.2% of responders (104 of 144) had a response lasting 12 or more months. Median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI, 4.2 to 13.6 months); probability of progression-free survival at 24 months was 40.6% (95% CI, 35.0% to 46.1%). Median overall survival was not reached (95% CI, 31.6 months to not reached). The most frequent immune-related adverse events were hypothyroidism (25 [6.9%]), alanine aminotransferase increase (21 [5.8%]), and arthralgia (17 [4.7%]). No new safety concerns were identified.

Conclusions And Relevance

In this nonrandomized controlled trial, dostarlimab was a well-tolerated treatment option with rapid, robust, and durable antitumor activity in patients with diverse dMMR solid tumors. These findings suggest that dostarlimab provides meaningful long-term benefit in a population with high unmet need.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02715284.

Preexisting autoantibodies as predictor of immune related adverse events (irAEs) for advanced solid tumors treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now standard of care in many cancers. They can generate immune-related adverse events (irAEs), but no biomarkers are available to identify patients who are more likely to develop irAEs. We assess the association between pre-existing autoantibodies and occurrence of irAEs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We prospectively collected data from consecutive patients receiving ICIs for advanced cancers, in a single center between May 2015 and July 2021. Autoantibodies testing was performed before ICIs initiation including AntiNeutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies, Antinuclear Antibodies, Rheumatoid Factor anti-Thyroid Peroxidase and anti-Thyroglobulin. We analyzed the associations of pre-existing autoantibodies with onset, severity, time to irAEs and with survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 221 patients included, most had renal cell carcinoma (n = 99; 45%) or lung carcinoma (n = 90; 41%). Grade ≥2 irAEs were more frequent among patients with pre-existing autoantibodies: 64 (50%) vs. 20 (22%) patients (Odds-Ratio= 3.5 [95% CI=1.8-6.8]; p < 0.001) in the positive vs negative group, respectively. irAEs occurred earlier in the positive group with a median time interval between ICI initiation and irAE of 13 weeks (IQR = 8.8-21.6) vs. 28.5 weeks (IQR=10.6-55.1) in the negative group (p = 0.01). Twelve patients (9.4%) experienced multiple (≥2) irAEs in the positive group vs. 2 (2%) in the negative group (OR = 4.5 [95% CI: 0.98-36], p = 0.04). After a median follow-up of 25 months, median PFS and OS were significantly longer among patients experiencing irAE (p = 0.00034 and p = 0.016, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The presence of pre-existing autoantibodies is significantly associated with the occurrence of grade ≥2 irAEs, with earlier and multiple irAEs in patients treated with ICIs.

[Collecting duct carcinoma and renal medullary carcinoma in the age of new therapies]

Collecting duct carcinoma (also known as Bellini tumour) and renal medullary carcinoma are two extremely rare and aggressive renal cancers. They are both less responsive to conventional treatments used in clear cell renal carcinoma. There are very few studies evaluating their optimal management and currently, at the metastatic stage, polychemotherapy based on platinum salts remains the most widely used. The emergence of new treatments such as anti-angiogenic TKIs, immunotherapy or treatments targeting specific genetic abnormalities, opens up a new field of possibilities in the management of these cancers. The evaluation of the response to these treatments is therefore essential. In this article, we will review the status of their management and the various studies that have evaluated recent treatments in these two cancers.

Baseline circulating soluble factors as predictors of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients (pts) with metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma (mRCC) treated with nivolumab: A translational NIVOREN GETUG-AFU 26 study

724

Background: The NIVOREN GETUG-AFU 26 study launched a translational research program to quantify baseline circulating soluble factors levels and correlate them with outcomes and irAEs in mRCC pts treated with nivolumab. We previously identified (training-set = 80 pts, validation-set= 233 pts) several soluble factors associated with overall survival (IL-6, IL-8, VEGF, BAFF, and CXCL13) (Carril-Ajuria et al. ASCO. 2022). Our aim was to evaluate the association between baseline levels of circulating soluble factors and the presence of all grade and severe irAEs. Methods: 720 patients treated with nivolumab within the NIVOREN study and with available safety data were included in the study. The association between baseline levels of seven different circulating soluble factors (VEGF, VCAM-1, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, BAFF, CXCL13) and the development of all grade and severe irAEs was evaluated in those pts who had previously undergone soluble factors quantification within the translational program. The association between other systemic inflammatory markers (the lung immune prognostic index (LIPI), LDH and the derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (dNLR)) and irAEs was also evaluated. Results: Out of 720 pts, 456 (63%) and 143 (20%) pts presented all grade and severe irAEs respectively. Soluble factors quantification at baseline was available for 353 pts. Baseline characteristics were similar to the overall trial population. Lower levels of circulating IL-6 (cut-off: 8.7 pg/ml) at baseline were significantly associated with a higher risk of all grade irAEs (p=0.025). Lower dNLR levels (<3, p=0.003) at baseline and a good LIPI score (p=0.014) were also associated with a higher risk of all grade AEs. No other significant associations were found between circulating soluble factors and all grade irAEs. No significant associations were found between circulating solubles factors/systemic inflammatory markers and the presence of severe irAEs Conclusions: Using the cut-off values previously identified, we observed that lower baseline levels of circulating IL-6 were associated with an increased risk of all grade irAEs. Good LIPI patients and those with a lower dNLR also presented a higher risk of all grade irAEs. Baseline circulating soluble factors and systemic inflammatory markers failed to demonstrate a significant association with the development of severe irAEs.

Exposure toxicity and response relationship of cabozantinib (CABO) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)

676

Background: At the recommended dose of 60mg/day in mRCC, CABO is associated with frequent and/or severe toxicities in mRCC, which may be modified, along with clinical benefit, by interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics (PK). The objective of this multicentre ambispective study was to determine whether the PK of CABO could help to better predict efficacy and early dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) in mRCC. Methods: We collected plasma and determined the concentration of CABO in the first 3 months of initiation in all consecutive mRCC patients (pts) treated in 3 French oncology departments from Dec. 2016 to Mar. 2022. Correlation of plasma trough concentration (Cmin) with objective response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and DLT (any discontinuation or dose reduction in the first 3 months) was explored. An optimal therapeutic range was defined using ROC curves to predict efficacy and DLT. Cox proportional-hazards models were used to identify risk factors of DLT, progression and death. Results: 80 pts were included, 80% clear cell RCC, mean age 62.1 years (+/-13.3) and sex ratio (male/female) 3.2. CABO was administered as second-line, or third-or later-line in 36% and 55% of pts, respectively. Thirty-six (45 %) and 32 (40%) pts initiated CABO at 60mg and 40mg, respectively. After a median follow-up of 17.9 months (9.4-27.9), 24 (30%) were alive, 16 (20%) were still on CABO, and 46 (50%) had experienced DLT with a median to onset of 2 months (CI95%: 0.7-6.2). In the whole cohort, median Cmin was 614 ng/mL [IQR 439-827], with an interindividual variability in dose-normalized exposure of 47.5%. DLT was not associated with the starting dose (p=0.18) but was associated with higher baseline albumin (p=0.03) and higher Cmin (p=0.003). In multivariate analysis, only Cmin was associated with DLT (HR per 100-unit increase: 1.35 [1.03-1.77]; p=0.03). ORR was achieved in 25/79 (32%) evaluable pts, including 16/35 (46%) pts starting CABO at 60mg vs 9/44 (20%) in pts starting at 20/40mg (p=0.03). No difference was found in PFS and OS according to the starting dose (p=0.72 and p=0.49, respectively), nor with previously reported Cmin≥750ng/mL (vs <750, p=0.77 for PFS and p=0.59 for OS). According to the ROC curves, Cmin<350ng/mL tended to be associated with shorter PFS (p=0.0748) and OS (p=0.264), and that Cmin>800ng/mL was significantly associated with DLT (HR 1.56 [1.13-2.15]; p=0.009), although it was not associated with an increase in PFS (p=0.94) or OS (p=0.33). Conclusions: We show that Cmin of CABO is more robustly associated with DLT and PFS/OS than the starting dose, probably due to a high interindividual variability in exposure. Early plasma drug monitoring associated with a target Cmin of 350-800 ng/mL may be useful to optimize CABO in mRCC pts. Future studies should focus on validating this therapeutic range in external validation cohorts.

Overall survival (OS) and efficacy results of second-line treatment in patients (pts) with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated in the randomized phase II BIONIKK trial

607

Background: To date, no biomarker of efficacy of nivolumab+/-ipilimumab (N+/-I) or anti-VEGFR TKI has been prospectively validated in mRCC. The BIONIKK trial showed promising objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) with these treatments in first line (L1) after selection by tumour molecular group. We report OS and efficacy results of the second-line (L2) treatment. Methods: BIONIKK is a French multicentre non-comparative phase II trial, randomising 199 mRCC pts to receive N (58), NI (101) or TKI (40) in L1 according to four molecular groups (ccrcc1-4). ORR and PFS were already reported. With an additional follow-up of ≥20 months, we report OS from randomization and from the start of L2, as well as ORR and PFS with a TKI in L2 by molecular group. Results: With a median follow-up of 42.1 months (40.5-45.2), 86 (43%) patients died: 27/58 (46.5%), 39/101 (39%) and 20/40 (50%) in the N, NI, and TKI arm, respectively. Median OS were 43.4 months (95%CI=31.4-NR) with N, 52.7 months (95%CI=46-NR) with NI and 38.1 months (95%CI=33.2-NR) with TKI (table). 175 (88%) patients discontinued first-line treatment, including 20 deaths, and 129 (74%) received a L2, 38/58 (65.5%), 64/101 (63%), and 27/40 (67.5%) after N, NI and TKI, respectively. The most frequent L2 received after N+/-I was a TKI in 96/102 (94%) pts, including cabozantinib in 49, sunitinib/pazopanib in 32, axitinib in 13, and lenvatinib in 2. N was the most frequent L2 after TKI, 20/27 (74%). ORR with TKI in L2 was 28.5% (10/35) after N, 39% (24/61) after NI and 80% (4/5) after TKI, with marked benefit in ccrcc2 pts (table). The mPFS with TKI in L2 was 8.2 (95%CI=6.9-19.3) after N, 11.4 (95%CI= 8.9-16.8) after NI, and 12.1 (95%CI =11.4-NR) months after TKI, with a higher benefit in ccrcc2 pts (vs. ccrcc1+4, p=0.04). Conversely, ORR and mPFS with N after TKI in ccrcc2-pts were 12.5% (2/16) and 5.4 (2.6-NR) months, respectively. Median OS L2 was reported in the table. The updated ORR and PFS in L1 will presented at the Meeting, as well as PFS2 and efficacy by TKI type in L2. Conclusions: We report for the first-time OS and L2 efficacy results by molecular group in a randomized trial. Molecular selection also has an impact on treatment efficacy in L2. These results, together with those reported in L1, can inform clinicians on the best treatment sequence in L1-2. Clinical trial information: NCT02960906 . [Table: see text]

Immune Checkpoint Therapy Combinations in Adult Advanced MiT Family Translocation Renal Cell Carcinomas

BACKGROUND

There remains a paucity of data regarding the efficacy of immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) combinations ± vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) targeted therapy (TT) in translocation renal cell carcinoma (tRCC).

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of patients with advanced tRCC treated with ICT combinations at 11 centers in the US, France, and Belgium. Only cases with confirmed fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were included. Objective response rates (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed by RECIST, and overall survival (OS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods.

RESULTS

There were 29 patients identified with median age of 38 (21-70) years, and F:M ratio 0.9:1. FISH revealed TFE3 and TFEB translocations in 22 and 7 patients, respectively. Dual ICT and ICT + VEGF TT were used in 18 and 11 patients, respectively. Seventeen (59%) patients received ICT combinations as first-line therapy. ORR was 1/18 (5.5%) for dual ICT and 4/11 (36%) for ICT + VEGF TT. At a median follow-up of 12.9 months, median PFS was 2.8 and 5.4 months in the dual ICT and ICT + VEGF TT groups, respectively. Median OS from metastatic disease was 17.8 and 30.7 months in the dual ICT and ICT + VEGF TT groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective study of advanced tRCC, limited response and survival were seen after frontline dual ICT combination therapy, while ICT + VEGF TT therapy offered some efficacy. Due to the heterogeneity of tRCC, insights into the biological underpinnings are necessary to develop more effective therapies.

MiTF/TFE Translocation Renal Cell Carcinomas: From Clinical Entities to Molecular Insights

MiTF/TFE translocation renal cell carcinoma (tRCC) is a rare and aggressive subtype of RCC representing the most prevalent RCC in the pediatric population (up to 40%) and making up 4% of all RCCs in adults. It is characterized by translocations involving either TFE3 (TFE3-tRCC), TFEB (TFEB-tRCC) or MITF, all members of the MIT family (microphthalmia-associated transcriptional factor). TFE3-tRCC was first recognized in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of kidney cancers in 2004. In contrast to TFEB-tRCC, TFE3-tRCC is associated with many partners that can be detected by RNA or exome sequencing. Both diagnoses of TFE3 and TFEB-tRCC are performed on morphological and immunohistochemical features, but, to date, TFE break-apart fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) remains the gold standard for diagnosis. The clinical behavior of tRCC is heterogeneous and more aggressive in adults. Management of metastatic tRCC is challenging, especially in the younger population, and data are scarce. Efficacy of the standard of care-targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors remains low. Recent integrative exome and RNA sequencing analyses have provided a better understanding of the biological heterogeneity, which can contribute to a better therapeutic approach. We describe the clinico-pathological entities, the response to systemic therapy and the molecular features and techniques used to diagnose tRCC.

Preexisting autoantibodies as predictor of immune-related adverse events for advanced solid tumors treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

2523

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), used alone or as a combination are standard of care in many cancers. Generally well tolerated, they can generate immune-related adverse events (irAEs). No biomarkers are available to identify patients who are more likely to develop irAEs. The aim of this study was to assess the association between preexisting autoantibodies, occurrence of irAEs and survival outcomes. Methods: We performed a prospective study including 221 patients receiving ICIs for advanced solid tumors between May 2015 and July 2021. Autoantibodies testing (anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic, anti-nuclear, thyroid peroxidase and thyroglobulin) was performed before ICIs initiation. The associations among preexisting autoantibodies, the occurrence, the severity, the delay of irAEs and the survival outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Statistical analyses were performed with T-test, Cox regression models, univariate and multivariate analyses and Kaplan-Meier’s method. Results: Of the 221 patients, 151 (68%) were men, the median age was 66,5 (range 21-90) years and 103 (81%) had an ECOG-PS of 0 or 1. Seventy-three percent (n=162) received an anti-PD-(L)1 in monotherapy, 27% (n=59) an anti-PD-(L)1 in combination, for a renal cell carcinoma in 45% (n=99) and a lung carcinoma in 41% (n=90). In total, 129 (58%) patients had preexisting antibodies. IrAEs were significantly more frequent in patients with preexisting autoantibodies: 64 patients (50%) in the positive group vs. 20 patients (22%) in the negative group, OR = 3.5 (95%CI=1.8 - 6.8), p=0.00002. Median time interval between ICI initiation and irAE was shorter in the positive group vs. the negative group, 13 weeks (IQR=43weeks) vs. 28.5 weeks (IQR=12weeks) respectively (p=0.01). Twelve patients (9.4%) experienced multi toxicities in the positive group vs. two (2%) in the negative group, OR=4.5 (95%CI0.98-36), p=0.04. ICIs exposure was identical in preexisting and non-preexisting autoantibodies groups. After a median follow-up of 25 months (95%CI=19-31), median PFS and OS were significantly longer among patients experiencing irAE: 12.6 months (95%CI=11-22.7) vs 5 months (95%CI=4.2-7.0), p= 0.0003 and 30 months (95%CI= 22.7-NR) vs 21 months (95%CI=15-34.6), p= 0.016. In multivariate analyses irAEs remain statistically associated with survival outcomes. Preexisting autoantibodies were not associated with survival outcomes. Conclusions: The presence of preexisting autoantibodies is significantly associated with the occurrence of irAE in patients treated with ICIs. Earlier and multiple irAEs were observed in the presence of preexisting autoantibodies. Thus, these biomarkers could help to identify patients at risk of irAEs and would prompt us to closely monitor them.

Baseline circulating soluble factors as predictors of response to nivolumab in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): A validation study within the NIVOREN GETUG-AFU 26 translational study

4552

Background: The NIVOREN GETUG-AFU 26 study launched a translational research program to quantify baseline circulating soluble factors levels and correlate them with outcomes to nivolumab in mRCC pts. We previously identified on a training set (n = 80, 40 responders/40 progressors) several soluble factors significantly associated with worse overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and response (IL-8 and VEGF), or with worse OS only (IL-6, IL-7) (Carril-Ajuria et al. ASCO GU. 2022). Our aim was to confirm these findings using an independent validation set. Methods: The remaining pts (n = 233) included in the translational-program of the NIVOREN study were included in this validation set. Based on previous results (training set), a panel of 7 different soluble factors (VEGF, VCAM-1, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, BAFF, CXCL13) were quantified for each plasma sample using the MSD electrochemiluminescence assay. The association between baseline soluble-factors levels and response, PFS and OS was evaluated using previously identified cut-off values. Results: Two hundred thirty-three pts were included in the validation set. Baseline characteristics were similar to the overall trial population. The IMDC risk score breakdown was 17.7% good, 57.3% intermediate and 25.0% poor. With a median follow-up of 21.8 months (mo), the OS rate was 69.6% at 12 mo and median PFS was 3.0 mo. IL-8 (cut-off: 17.9 pg/ml) and IL-6 (cut-off: 8.7 pg/ml), involved in inflammation, confirmed an association with worse OS (IL8: HR = 2.57, p < 0.0001, IL-6: HR = 3.28,p < 0.0001) and worse PFS (IL-8: HR = 1.61,p = 0.0008, IL-6: HR = 1.68, p = 0.0021). VEGF (cut-off: 48.3 pg/ml) confirmed the association with worse OS (HR = 1.56, p = 0.0176), but not with PFS (p = 0.2068). IL-7, involved in T and B cells development, did not show a significant association with OS or PFS when using 8.6 pg/ml (training set) as cut-off (p = 0.0675 and p = 0.7818, respectively). IL-7 was the only cytokine to show an association with response (p = 0.044). Interestingly, circulating CXCL13 (cut-off: 106.4 pg/ml) and BAFF (cut-off: 1122.6 pg/ml), involved in B cell differentiation/survival, were significantly associated with worse OS (HR = 2.09, p = 0.0001 and HR = 2.34, p = 0.0001, respectively); BAFF showed a trend for worse PFS (HR = 1.29, p = 0.0920). Conclusions: Using the cut-off values previously identified in the training set, we confirmed a significant association between baseline blood concentration of IL-6/IL-8 and worse OS/PFS, and of VEGF with worse OS. Non-responders presented lower baseline circulating IL-7 concentrations. CXCL13 and BAFF were significantly associated with worse OS. Multivariate analyses are ongoing.

Cabozantinib-nivolumab sequence in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: the CABIR study

Nivolumab and cabozantinib are approved agents in mRCC patients after sunitinib/pazopanib (TKI) failure. However, the optimal sequence, cabozantinib then nivolumab (CN) or nivolumab then cabozantinib (NC), is still unknown. The CABIR study aimed to identify the optimal sequence between CN and NC after frontline VEGFR‐TKI. In this multicenter retrospective study, we collected data from mRCC pts receiving CN or NC, after frontline VEGFR‐TKI. A propensity score (PrS) was calculated to manage bias selection, and sequence comparisons were carried out with a cox model on a matched sample 1:1. The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS) from the start of second line to progression in third line (PFS_2‐3). Key secondary endpoints included overall survival from second line (OS₂). Out of 139 included mRCC patients, 38 (27%) and 101 (73%) received CN and NC, respectively. Overlap in PrS allowed 1:1 matching for each CN pts, with characteristics well balanced. For both PFS_2‐3 and OS₂, NC sequence was superior to CN (PFS_2‐3: HR = 0.58 [0.34‐0.98], P = .043; OS₂: 0.66 [0.42‐1.05], P = .080). Superior PFS_2‐3 was in patients treated between 6 and 18 months with prior VEGFR‐TKI (P = .019) and was driven by a higher PFS_L3 with cabozantinib when given after nivolumab (P < .001). The CABIR study shows a prolonged PFS of the NC sequence compared to CN in mRCC after first line VEGFR‐TKI failure. The data suggest that cabozantinib may be more effective than nivolumab in the third‐line setting, possibly related to an ability of cabozantinib to overcome resistance to PD‐1 blockade.

Biomarker analysis from CheckMate 214: nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The phase 3 CheckMate 214 trial demonstrated higher response rates and improved overall survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in first-line therapy for advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). An unmet need exists to identify patients with RCC who are most likely to benefit from treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab.

METHODS

In exploratory analyses, pretreatment levels of programmed death ligand 1 were assessed by immunohistochemistry. Genomic and transcriptomic biomarkers (including tumor mutational burden and gene expression signatures) were also investigated.

RESULTS

Biomarkers previously associated with benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor-containing regimens in RCC were not predictive for survival in patients with RCC treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Analysis of gene expression identified an association between an inflammatory response and progression-free survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab.

CONCLUSIONS

The exploratory analyses reveal relationships between molecular biomarkers and provide supportive data on how the inflammation status of the tumor microenvironment may be important for identifying predictive biomarkers of response and survival with combination immunotherapy in patients with RCC. Further validation may help to provide biomarker-driven precision treatment for patients with RCC.

Tertiary lymphoid structures generate and propagate anti-tumor antibody-producing plasma cells in renal cell cancer

The presence of intratumoral tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) is associated with positive clinical outcomes and responses to immunotherapy in cancer. Here, we used spatial transcriptomics to examine the nature of B cell responses within TLS in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). B cells were enriched in TLS, and therein, we could identify all B cell maturation stages toward plasma cell (PC) formation. B cell repertoire analysis revealed clonal diversification, selection, expansion in TLS, and the presence of fully mature clonotypes at distance. In TLS+ tumors, IgG- and IgA-producing PCs disseminated into the tumor beds along fibroblastic tracks. TLS+ tumors exhibited high frequencies of IgG-producing PCs and IgG-stained and apoptotic malignant cells, suggestive of anti-tumor effector activity. Therapeutic responses and progression-free survival correlated with IgG-stained tumor cells in RCC patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Thus, intratumoral TLS sustains B cell maturation and antibody production that is associated with response to immunotherapy, potentially via direct anti-tumor effects.

Randomized phase II study to assess the efficacy and tolerability of sunitinib by dose administration regimen in anti-angiogenic naïve patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): Final analysis of SURF study

344

Background: SUN is approved in mRCC setting at the dose of 50mg daily for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks rest (4/2 schedule). The 4/2 schedule often requires dose modifications for toxicity. Current recommendation is to reduce the dose to 37.5mg per day. Alternative schedules (2 weeks of treatment followed by one-week rest (2/1 schedule) have shown promising results. SURF trial evaluated prospectively schedule 2/1 when toxicity occurs. Methods: SURF [NCT02689167] is a prospective, non-comparative randomized study. Patients (pts) with mRCC (clear cell) were included at SUN initiation. When a dose adjustment of SUN was required, patients were randomized between 4/2 schedule at 37.5mg daily and experimental 2/1 schedule at 50mg daily. Primary objective was to assess duration of SUN treatment among the 73 first evaluable pts. Overall 226 pts were enrolled with 133 randomized. All other analyses are shown for the 133 randomized patients. Results: Pts were 75.2% males, with a median age 63.7 years for 94% with a Karnofsky ≥ 80%. Of them, 54.9% had partial/total nephrectomy. IMDC risk score was favourable (45.1%), intermediate (46.6%) or poor (8.3%). Pts characteristics were well balanced between 2 arms. Metastatic sites were lungs (60.5%), bones (16.3%), lymph nodes (15.5%). At 6 months, 48 patients (65.8%) of the 2/1 schedule were still on treatment (above predefined threshold for positivity). Other data are listed on the table. No new safety signal was identified. Permanent SUN discontinuation due to toxicity was 22.2% in control arm vs 12.3% in experimental arm. Conclusions: SURF is the largest prospective randomised trial evaluating two different SUN schedules modifications in mRCC in case of toxicity. This positive trial confirms the role of adapting SUN to a 2/1 schedule rather than reducing SUN dose to the classical 4/2 schedule. Clinical trial information: NCT02689167. [Table: see text]

Immuno-oncology (IO) combinations +/- VEGF targeted therapy (VEGF TT) in patients (pts) with advanced mit family translocation renal cell carcinomas (tRCC): Results from an international multicenter study

343

Background: IO combinations are standard of care for first-line therapy of clear-cell RCC; however, non-clear cell histologies including tRCC were not included in the registrational trials. We previously reported a modest efficacy (objective response rate [ORR] <20%) with IO monotherapy (PD-1 blockade) in tRCC (Boilève et al, JITC. 2018). The efficacy of IO combinations +/- VEGF TT has not been reported. Methods: This is a retrospective, international, multicenter study of pts with tRCC treated with IO-IO or IO+VEGF TT at 11 centers in the US, France, and Belgium. Only pts with confirmed TFE3 or TFEB translocation by fluorescent-in-situ hybridization (FISH) were included. ORR and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed by RECIST. Overall survival (OS) was assessed by Kaplan-Meier methods. OS was measured from initiation of therapy till death or last follow up. We also assessed the association between OS and baseline prognostic variables. Results: 29 patients with metastatic tRCC were included in this analysis. Median age at starting therapy was 38 (IQR 27, 53) years. Female:Male ratio was 0.9:1. FISH revealed a translocation involving TFE3 and TFEB in 22 and 7 patients, respectively. Most frequent metastatic sites at diagnosis were lungs (76%), liver (52%), retroperitoneal adenopathy (48%), and bone (38%). IMDC risk at diagnosis was favorable (31%), intermediate (45%) and poor (24%). Combinations of IO+VEGF TT and anti-PD1 (L1) + anti-CTLA-4 (IO+IO) were used in 11 and 18 pts, respectively. 17 (59%) pts received IO combinations as 1L, 7 (24%) pts as 2L and 5 (17%) pts as ≥3L. ORR in the IO+IO group was 1/18 (5.5%), while in IO+VEGF TT group was 4/11 (36%). For 20 (69%) pts, progressive disease was the best overall response. At a median follow-up of 12.9 months (mo), median PFS was 3.2 mo and median OS was 13.5 mo for all 29 pts (Table). Median PFS in the IO+IO group was 2.8 mo, and 5.4 mo in IO+VEGF TT group (HR=0.81, 95% CI: 0.35-1.84). Conclusions: In this small retrospective study of tRCC, IO+IO therapy produced modest activity based on low ORR and short PFS while IO+VEGF TT produced numerically higher ORR and longer PFS. Insights into the biological basis of tRCC are necessary to develop more effective therapies for this rare and aggressive RCC variant.[Table: see text]

The impact of baseline peripheral cytokines on survival in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with nivolumab: NIVOREN GETUG-AFU 26 Translational study

379

Background: The NIVOREN GETUG-AFU 26 study reported safety and efficacy of nivolumab in patients with RCC in a “real world setting”. A translational research program was launched to quantify baseline cytokine levels and correlate them with outcomes to nivolumab. Methods: Extreme responder patients (pts) treated with nivolumab as part of the phase II NIVOREN GETUG-AFU 26 were included in this TRAINING cohort. A panel of 14 different plasma cytokines and proteins (VEGF, VCAM-1, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, APRIL, BAFF, 4-1BB, BCA, SDF-1, MDC, IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha) were quantified for each plasma sample using the Elisa-based Meso Scale Discovery electrochemiluminescence assay. The association between baseline cytokine levels and objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated. Results: Overall, 80 pts, 40 responders and 40 progressors, were included for cytokine analysis. Baseline characteristics were similar to the overall trial population. The IMDC risk score breakdown was 11.3% good, 56.3% intermediate and 32.5% poor. With a median follow-up of 21.2 months, mOS data was immature at data cut-off. Overall survival rate was 67.3% at 12 months and median PFS was 3.8 months. Increased levels of IL-6 (75th percentile=P75), IL-7 (P75), IL-8 (P50) and VEGF (P50) were significantly negatively associated with survival (IL-6: HR=2.44, p=0.0112; IL-7: HR=2.38, p=0.0123; IL-8: HR=2.80, p=0.0045, and VEGF: HR=2.43, p=0.0133). 4-1BB (P50) was associated with improved OS (HR=0.39, p=0.0375). Higher levels of IL-8 (P50) and VEGF (P50) were associated with worse PFS (IL-8: HR=2.50, p=0.0133, and VEGF: HR=1.96, p=0.0132) and worse ORR (IL-8: p=0.013, and VEGF: p=0.044). Except for IL-8 and VEGF, no other associations with response were observed. Conclusions: Higher baseline plasma levels of IL-6, IL-7, IL-8 and VEGF were significantly associated with worse survival outcomes in mRCC pts treated with nivolumab within TRAINING cohort of the NIVOREN trial. In contrast, 4-1BB was significantly associated with improved OS. IL-8 and VEGF were also associated with worse PFS and ORR. VALIDATION cohort within the entire NIVOREN study is ongoing.

First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: What Are the Most Appropriate Combination Therapies?

The development of antiangiogenic treatments, followed by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), has significantly changed the management of metastatic clear cell renal cell cancer. Several phase III trials show the superiority of combination therapy, dual immunotherapy (ICI-ICI) or ICI plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) of the vascular endothelium growth factor (VEGF) over sunitinib monotherapy. The question is therefore what is the best combination for a given patient? A strategy based on the International Metastatic Database Consortium (IMDC) classification is currently recommended with pembrolizumab + axitinib, cabozantinib + nivolumab, and lenvatinib + pembrolizumab (for all patients) or nivolumab + ipilimumab (for patients with intermediate or poor risk), which are the first-line treatment standards of care. However, several issues remain unresolved and require further investigation, such as the PD-L1 status, the relevance of possible options based on the patient's profile, and consideration of second-line and subsequent treatments.

Enhance the Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Efficacy with Radiotherapy Induced Immunogenic Cell Death: A Comprehensive Review and Latest Developments

The immunogenic cell death (ICD) is defined as a regulated cell death able to induce an adaptive immunity. It depends on different parameters including sufficient antigenicity, adjuvanticity and favorable microenvironment conditions. Radiation therapy (RT), a pillar of modern cancer treatment, is being used in many tumor types in curative, (neo) adjuvant, as well as metastatic settings. The anti-tumor effects of RT have been traditionally attributed to the mitotic cell death resulting from the DNA damages triggered by the release of reactive oxygen species. Recent evidence suggests that RT may also exert its anti-tumor effect by recruiting tumor-specific immunity. RT is able to induce the release of tumor antigens, to act as an immune adjuvant and thus to synergize with the anti-tumor immunity. The advent of new efficient immunotherapeutic agents, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), in multiple tumor types sheds new light on the opportunity of combining RT and ICI. Here, we will describe the biological and radiobiological rationale of the RT-induced ICD. We will then focus on the interest to combine RT and ICI, from bench to bedside, and summarize the clinical data existing with this combination. Finally, RT technical adaptations to optimize the ICD induction will be discussed.

Cabazitaxel schedules in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a review

Cabazitaxel (25 mg/m² every 3 weeks) is the standard second-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel. It is associated with a risk of neutropenic complications, which may be a barrier to its use in daily clinical practice, particularly in frail elderly patients. Here the authors reviewed key studies conducted with cabazitaxel (TROPIC, PROSELICA, AFFINITY, CARD and the European compassionate use program) and pilot studies with adapted schedules. Based on this review, the use of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor from cycle 1 appears crucial to maximize the benefit-risk ratio of cabazitaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Preliminary data with alternative schedules look promising, especially for frail patients. Results of the ongoing Phase III CABASTY trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02961257) are awaited.

Tumor Microenvironment Features as Predictive Biomarkers of Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) in Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (mccRCC)

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the seventh most frequently diagnosed malignancy with an increasing incidence in developed countries. Despite a greater understanding of the cancer biology, which has led to an increase of therapeutic options, metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) still have a poor prognosis with a median five-years survival rate lower than 10%. The standard of care for mccRCC has changed dramatically over the past decades with the emergence of new treatments: anti-VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mTOR Inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) such as anti-Programmed cell-Death 1 (PD-1) and anti-anti-Programmed Death Ligand-1 (PD-L1) used as monotherapy or as a combination with anti CTLA-4 or anti angiogenic therapies. In the face of these rising therapeutic options, the question of the therapeutic sequences is crucial. Predictive biomarkers are urgently required to provide a personalized treatment for each patient. Disappointingly, the usual ICI biomarkers, PD-L1 expression and Tumor Mutational Burden, approved in melanoma or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have failed to distinguish good and poor mccRCC responders to ICI. The tumor microenvironment is known to be involved in ICI response. Innovative technologies can be used to explore the immune contexture of tumors and to find predictive and prognostic biomarkers. Recent comprehensive molecular characterization of RCC has led to the development of robust genomic signatures, which could be used as predictive biomarkers. This review will provide an overview of the components of the RCC tumor microenvironment and discuss their role in disease progression and resistance to ICI. We will then highlight the current and future ICI predictive biomarkers assessed in mccRCC with a major focus on immunohistochemistry markers and genomic signatures.

Update on the most promising biomarkers of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

In the last few years, the standard of care for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) has changed dramatically with the emergence of the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI): anti-PD(L)-1 used as a monotherapy or as in combination either with an anti CTLA-4 or with an anti-angiogenic molecule (VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)). These combinations are now recommended in first line setting for mccRCC, according to the last European recommendations. In the face of these new therapeutic options, the question of selecting the best treatment arises as well as the optimal sequence. Predictive biomarkers are required to guide the therapeutic choice and provide a personalized treatment for each patient. This narrative review will provide an overview of the main predictive biomarkers assessed in mccRCC treatment, with a particular focus on mRNA panel signatures.

BIONIKK: A phase 2 biomarker driven trial with nivolumab and ipilimumab or VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in naïve metastatic kidney cancer

BACKGROUND

The nivolumab-ipilimumab combination provides an overall response rate of 42% in first-line metastatic treatment of clear cell renal carcinoma (mccRCC). To date, there is no robust predictive biomarker of response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). In addition, severe autoimmune disorders occur more frequently with ICI combination than with ICI alone. The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of ICI alone or in combination in patients according to tumor molecular characteristics.

METHODS

Using a 35-gene expression mRNA signature, patients were divided into 4 molecular groups (1 to 4). Patients in groups 1 and 4 were randomized to receive nivolumab alone (arms 1A and 4A) or nivolumab plus ipilimumab for 4 injections followed by nivolumab alone (arms 1B and 4B). Patients in groups 2 and 3 were randomized to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab followed by nivolumab alone (arms 2B and 3B) or a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (sunitinib or pazopanib at the investigator's choice (arms 2C and 3C)). The main objective is the overall response rate by treatment and molecular group.

DISCUSSION

BIONIKK is the first trial in mccRCC to study the personalization of treatment with ICI or TKI according to tumor molecular characteristics in mccRCC. This trial is the most appropriate to prospectively identify biomarkers of response to nivolumab used alone or in combination or TKI monotherapy in patients with mccRCC. NCT02960906.

Open-label phase II to evaluate the efficacy of NEoadjuvant dose-dense MVAC In cOmbination with durvalumab and tremelimumab in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma: NEMIO

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (NAC) is the standard of care in localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, 60-70% of patients have residual tumor after NAC. Based on the overall response rate observed in the metastatic setting, ddMVAC is the most commonly used NAC regimen in Europe. The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in the metastatic setting raises the question if the combination of chemo plus ICI could increase the pCR rate.

METHODS/DESIGN

NEMIO is a French open-label randomized phase I/II trial assessing in the neoadjuvant setting the combination of ddMVAC plus durvalumab alone or with tremelimumab: 4 cycles of ddMVAC/2 weeks + 2 cycles of Durvalumab +/- Tremelimumab/4 weeks. Cystectomy is performed 4-8 weeks after the last dose of ddMVAC. Six pts will be included in each arm in a safety run-in cohort to evaluate the toxicity rate. Each arm will be expanded to a maximum of 60 pts. The primary endpoint of the safety run-in phase will be the rate of grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events G3/4 TRAE. The primary endpoint of the phase II will be the pathological response rate and G 3/4 TRAE. Exploratory endpoints will include biomarkers of response and resistance to the combo. A total of 120 patients will be included in 15 French centers and we expect the recruitment to be completed in 2021.

DISCUSSION

NEMIO trial will assess for the first time the tolerance and the efficacy of ddMVAC regimen associated with checkpoints inhibitors as neoadjuvant treatment in localized MIBC. NCT number: NCT03549715. Registered on June 8, 2018.

[Impact of molecular signatures on the choice of systemic treatment for metastatic kidney cancer]

The standard of care for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) has changed dramatically over the past decades thanks to the increasing number of treatments: anti-VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), mTOR inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI): anti PD(L)-1 used as monotherapy or in combination with anti CTLA-4 or anti angiogenic therapies. In the face of rising therapeutic options, the question of the therapeutic sequences arises: which treatment for which patient? Actually, there is a lack of predictive biomarkers. A greater understanding of the cancer biology and its interaction with the microenvironment has allowed the development of genomic signatures which could perhaps be used as predictive biomarker. This review will give an insight on some robust genomic signatures assessed in mccRCC and will have a closer look at BIONIKK phase II trial, which is the first trial to adapt treatments according to the molecular characteristics of the tumor in the context of mccRCC.

Resistance to cancer immunotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

The prognosis of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) has changed dramatically over the years with the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) used alone, or in combination with another ICI, or with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Although major response rates have been observed with ICI, many patients do not respond, reflecting primary resistance, and durable responses remain exceptional, reflecting secondary resistance. Factors contributing to primary and acquired resistance are manifold, including patient-intrinsic factors, tumor cell-intrinsic factors and factors associated with the tumoral microenvironment (TME). While some mechanisms of resistance are common to several tumor types, others are specific to mccRCC. Predictive biomarkers and alternative strategies are needed to overcome this resistance. This review provides an overview of the major ICI resistance mechanisms, highlights the potential of the TME to induce resistance to ICI, and discusses the predictive biomarkers available to guide therapeutic choice.

Variation in neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as predictor of outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) patients treated with nivolumab

BACKGROUND

An elevated pre-treatment neutrophil to lymphocytes ratio (NLR) is associated with poor prognosis in various malignancies. Optimal cut-off is highly variable across studies and could not be determined individually for a patient to inform his prognosis. We hypothesize that NLR variations could be more useful than baseline NLR to predict progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) receiving anti-PD1 treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All pts with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) who received anti-PD1 nivolumab monotherapy in second-line setting or later were included in this French multicentric retrospective study. NLR values were prospectively collected prior to each nivolumab administration. Clinical characteristics were recorded. Associations between baseline NLR, NLR variations and survival outcomes were determined using Kaplan-Meier's method and multivariable Cox regression models.

RESULTS

161 pts (86 mRCC and 75 mNSCLC) were included with a median follow-up of 18 months. On the whole cohort, any NLR increase at week 6 was significantly associated with worse outcomes compared to NLR decrease, with a median PFS of 11 months vs 3.7 months (p < 0.0001), and a median OS of 28.5 months vs. 18 months (p = 0.013), respectively. In multivariate analysis, NLR increase was significantly associated with worse PFS (HR 2.2; p = 6.10^-5) and OS (HR 2.1; p = 0.005). Consistent results were observed in each cohort when analyzed separately.

CONCLUSION

Any NLR increase at week 6 was associated with worse PFS and OS outcomes. NLR variation is an inexpensive and dynamic marker easily obtained to monitor anti-PD1 efficacy.

Does escalation results from phase Ib/II Norse study of erdafitinib (ERDA) + PD-1 inhibitor JNJ-63723283 (Cetrelimab [CET]) in patients (pts) with metastatic or locally advanced urothelial carcinoma (mUC) and selected fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) gene alterations

511

Background: ERDA, an oral pan-FGFR inhibitor, is approved by the US FDA for pts with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) with susceptible FGFR3/2 gene alterations and progressed after ≥1 line of prior platinum-containing chemotherapy (PCC).1 CET, an IgG4, binds to anti-programmed cell death proteins (PD-1) and has shown activity in solid tumors.2 ERDA+CET may demonstrate complementary mechanisms as neoantigen release by ERDA may prime the tumor microenvironment for response. NORSE is a phase 1b/2 study to evaluate ERDA+CET in pts with mUC. Methods: Adult mUC pts with specific FGFR alterations who have progressed after ≥1 prior systemic therapy and no prior FGFR or PD-1/PD(L)-1 inhibitors enrolled in 3 dose levels (DL) of ERDA (DL1: 6 mg, DL2A: 8 mg, DL2: 8 mg with uptitration [UPT] to 9 mg) + CET (IV, 240 mg). Cohorts enrolled until dose limiting toxicity (DLT) or RP2D was identified. Primary endpoints: DLT and adverse events (AEs). Results: Of 15 pts (DL1: 4, DL2A: 3, DL2: 8), 11 continued on treatment at the time of the data cut. 14/15 pts experienced AEs; 3 experienced serious unrelated AEs (urinary tract infection, urosepsis, and large intestinal obstruction) all in DL1, 2 led to death; 10 experienced Grade >3 AEs and 2 experienced AEs of special interest, considered related to ERDA (Table). No DLTs were observed in any cohorts, 8 mg with UPT + CET was established as the RP2D. At data cut-off, investigator-assessed best overall response rate (CR+PR+uCR+uPR) in pts treated with the RP2D was 71% and disease control rate was 100% for RECIST 1.1 evaluable pts (n=7). Conclusions: 8 mg ERDA with UPT+240 mg CET was well tolerated and established as the RP2D. The combination of ERDA+CET is being further explored in the ongoing randomized phase 2 study in first-line cisplatin-ineligible mUC pts (NCT03473743). Clinical trial information: 2017-001980-19. [Table: see text]

Optimal sequence strategy with nivolumab and targeted therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)

700

Background: Nivolumab is an approved standard tretatment for pts with mRCC after one VEGFR-TKI failure. Some reports suggest that Nibolumab provides similar response rate across treatment line. Nevetheless, no comparative data has been reported on the sequence of 2nd line Nivolumab followed by TKI vs TKI followed by Nivolumab in 3rd or later line. Objective: To determine the optimal sequence of Nivolumab monotherapy and anti-VEGFR-TKI in mRCC beginning from the 2nd line. Methods: We included in a French expert center all patients with mRCC who received real-life experienced of anti-PD1 nivolumab monotherapy in 2nd line setting or later were included in a French expert center. Clinical characteristics were prospectively recorded including IDMC prognostic factors. Patients who did not receive TKI on the 1st line were excluded. Survival outcomes and subgroups analysis were performed using log rank test and univariate cox regression analysis. Results: 91 patients with mRCC received Nivolumab between January 2006 and May 2018, 58 pts received nivolumab in 2nde line (63%) and 33 in 3rd line and more. Median follow-up was 18.9 [0.1;143] months starting from the beginning of the 2nd line. All received first line anti-VEGFR TKI, 83%/11% sunitinib/pazopanib. At the beginning of 2nd line, IMDC prognostic groups were Fav 19%/Int 56%/ Poor 24%, with similar repartition (p=0,8) between pts treated with Nivolumab vs others. PFS at 6 months for 2nd line was in favor of patients treated by targeted treatments with respectively 63% (IC95% [46%;80%]) and 34% (IC95% [23%;49%]), p=0,06. OS at 24 months for 2nd line was significatively higher for patients treated by targeted treatments with 72% (IC95% [56;87%]) and 46% (IC95% [31%;61%]), p=0,007. Conclusions: We report for the first time the optimal timing to sequence Nivolumab – targeted therapy in patients with mRCC. We found better PFS and OS when Nivolumab is given after the 2nde line of treatment. Subgroups analysis including IMDC prognostic groups and duration of fist line TKI will be presented at the meeting.

NIVOREN GETUG-AFU 26 translational study: Association of PD-1, AXL, and PBRM-1 with outcomes in patients (pts) with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) treated with nivolumab (N)

618

Background: The NIVOREN GETUG-AFU 26 study reported safety and efficacy of N in mccRCC pts in a “real world setting”. A translationnal research program was launched to characterize immune cell populations in the tumor by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and correlate them with outcome on N. Methods: All pts treated with N in the GETUG AFU 26 NIVOREN trial who consented for translational program and with available archived paraffin- embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue samples were eligible. Tumor were centrally reviewed. Using IHC we quantified main immune populations (B-cells, CD8 T-cells, macrophages), and immune checkpoints receptors (TIM-3, LAG-3, PD-1) at the invasive margin (IM) and at the core of the tumor (CT). We also identified AXL and PBRM1/BAP1 expression. Results: Overall 324 pts were included. Pts had similar baseline characteristics (IMDC Good, Intermediate, Poor in 18%, 60% and 22%, respectively) and comparable outcomes than overall trial population (PFS/OS = 4.5 / 25.4 months). PD-1 (IM) expression was associated with better PFS whereas AXL expression by tumor cells (TC) was associated with worse PFS (table). LAG-3 expression tend to be associated with worse OS. PBRM-1 loss (15%) was associated with better OS and PFS and with a higher density of CD8 T-cells (p = 0.001) and CD163-macrophages (p = 0.01) (CT) and a higher expression of LAG-3 (CT) (p = 0.01) and PD-1 (CT) (p = 0.02). BAP-1 loss was not associated with PFS (p = 0.6) nor OS (p = 0.9) in this cohort. Conclusions: We report the largest translational analysis supporting that PD-1 and AXL expression are associated with PFS in pts with mccRCC receiving N. We further confirm that PBRM-1 loss is a strong prognostic factor in this setting.[Table: see text]

Immunothérapie des cancers du rein

IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR RENAL CELL CARCINOMA

Clear cell kidney cancer is a tumour type whose development and progression is driven by the HIF/VEGF angiogenesis pathway. Anti-angiogenic (AA) agents, particularly anti-VEGFR tyrosine kinase (TKI) inhibitors, have profoundly modified the prognosis of patients in the metastatic setting (mRCC) since their registration in 2006. At the same time, mTOR inhibitors have also brought significant benefit to patients. More recently, treatments restoring adaptive anti-tumor immunity, anti-program death 1 (anti-PD-1) checkpoint inhibitors (ICP), have in turn revolutionized the management of patients with mRCC. The multi-tumor efficacy of these ICPs proves the crucial role of anti-tumor immunity in tumor development and progression in a number of tumors including clear cell kidney tumours (ccRCC). The tumor immune microenvironment (TME) of ccRCC is known to be highly immunosuppressive. Thus ccRCCs are characterized by a strong infiltration of CD8+ T lymphocytes, frequently expressing immunological checkpoint molecules on their surface, giving them a poor prognostic feature. These characteristics partly explain the effectiveness of ICP in ccRCC and constitute a strong rationale for their further development, either at an earlier stage or in combination, particularly with AA or TKI. In this review are compiled the main clinical results of immunological checkpoint molecules alone or in combination in 1^stline or after TKI failure.

Optimal cut-off for neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: Fact or Fantasy? A prospective cohort study in metastatic cancer patients

This study assessed the prognostic value of pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with metastatic solid tumors. Clinical and biological data for patients with metastatic solid tumors treated in an oncology outpatient department and prospectively followed by a call center (PROCHE program) between January 2008 and December 2011 were analyzed. All patients with an NLR value within 28 days before the first cycle of first-line of chemotherapy were included (cohort 1). To assess influence of chemotherapy line on NLR prognostic value, data from patients treated with later chemotherapy lines were also analyzed (cohort 2). Adjusted multivariate Cox regressions with or without non-linear and time-dependent effects were performed. Optimal NLR cut-off was investigated by time-dependent sensitivity analysis using several indices. There were 317 and 134 patients in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. Elevated NLR was associated with worse survival (hazard ratio [HR] for death, 1.35 [95% confidence interval 1.19-1.54]; p<0.0001). The optimal NLR cut-off in cohort 1 was dependent on index used and time of assessment: HR values were non-significant at a cut-off of 3.0 (1.34 [0.99-1.32], but significant when the cut-off was 4.0 (1.53 [1.11-2.10]). NLR was linearly related to mortality risk; in subgroup analysis, no significant interaction was found with co-variables or tumor localization overall (cohorts 1+2). Pre-treatment NLR is a useful prognostic tool in patients with metastatic solid tumors, irrespective of primary tumor site, chemotherapy line, age, gender and performance status. However, using an NLR cut-off value for clinical decision-making requires extreme caution.

Molecular Classification of Renal Cell Carcinoma and Its Implication in Future Clinical Practice

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) encompasses a wide spectrum of morphologically and molecularly distinct (>10) cancer subtypes originated from the kidney epithelium. Metastatic RCC (mRCC) is lethal and refractory to conventional chemotherapeutic agents. The incorporation of targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors into the current practice of mRCC has markedly improved the median overall survival of clear cell RCC (ccRCC) patients, the most common subtype, but not rare kidney cancer (RKC or non-ccRCC, nccRCC). Varied treatment response in mRCC patients is observed, which presents clinical challenges/opportunities at the modern mRCC therapeutic landscape consisting of 12 approved drugs representing 6 different effective mechanisms. Key contributing factors include inter- and intra-RCC heterogeneity. With the advances in pan-omics technologies, we now have a better understanding of the molecular pathobiology of individual RCC subtype. Here, we attempt to classify ccRCC based on contemporary molecular features with emphasis on their respective potential significance in clinical practice.

[French national survey on incoming phone calls in oncology departments]

INTRODUCTION

Oral therapies have shifted the follow-up of patients with cancer from hospital to home. As a consequence, the number of incoming calls has increased. To understand the source, reasons, management and burden of calls, we underwent a French national survey. The objective was to describe the way calls are managed in oncology departments.

METHODS

The study was a prospective survey in a representative sample of French oncology specialists using oral therapies.

RESULTS

Among 51 participating onco/radiotherapy departments, 86 % of specialists were oncologists or hematologists and 14 % radiation oncologists. Eighty percent were from public centers and 20 % from private ones. The median number of calls/week was 110. Sixty-six percent of calls were from patients and families and 23 % from general practitioners. Upon calls reception by the secretaries, half of them corresponded to a medical question. Sixty-five percent of centers did not have an established specific procedure and 70 % of responders did not specifically train their teams to address the management of calls. Sixty-five percent of the specialists spent more than 30min/day. Most of them considered it disturbing medical activities. Sixty-six percent of patients calls were related to adverse effects of treatments. Twenty-two percent of specialists declared at least one severe adverse effect linked to misinterpretation of a call.

DISCUSSION

With the increase of oral therapies, incoming phone calls represent an important burden of work. To improve calls management, adaptations of organizations are needed.