1
|
Medina-Aedo M, Beltran J, Valli C, Canelo-Aybar C, Song Y, Ballester M, Bowman-Busato J, Christogiannis C, Grammatikopoulou MG, Groene O, Heijmans M, Hoogendorn M, Killeen SL, Kontouli KM, Mavridis D, Miñambres I, Mueller BS, Niño de Guzman E, Noordman J, Orrego C, Perestelo-Perez L, Saz-Parkinson Z, Seitidis G, Suñol R, Tsokani S, Alonso-Coello P. Recommendations on self-management interventions for adults living with obesity: COMPAR-EU project. Clin Obes 2024:e12667. [PMID: 38757917 DOI: 10.1111/cob.12667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
Self-management interventions (SMIs) may improve disease management in adults living with obesity. We formulated evidence-based recommendations for SMIs within the context of the COMPAR-EU project. The multidisciplinary panel selected critical outcomes based on the COMPAR-EU core outcome set and established decision thresholds for each outcome. Recommendations were informed by systematic reviews of effects, cost-effectiveness, and a contextual assessment. To assess the certainty of the evidence and formulate the recommendations, we used the GRADE approach guidance. Overall, SMIs were deemed to have a small impact, but the absence of harmful effects and potential cumulative benefits indicated a favourable balance of effects, despite low certainty. SMIs showed variations in structure, intensity, and resource utilisation, but overall are likely to be cost-effective. Adapting SMIs to local contexts would enhance equity, acceptability, and feasibility, considering patients' values, and availability of resources and teamwork. Consequently, the panel made conditional recommendations favouring SMIs over usual care. The rigorous and explicit recommendations demonstrated the effectiveness of SMIs for adults living with obesity. However, the gaps in the literature influenced the panel to make only conditional recommendations in favour of SMIs. Further research is needed to strengthen the evidence base and improve recommendations' certainty and applicability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melixa Medina-Aedo
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jessica Beltran
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Claudia Valli
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carlos Canelo-Aybar
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Yang Song
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Ballester
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Christos Christogiannis
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Maria G Grammatikopoulou
- Immunonutrition and Clinical Nutrition Unit, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medical School, University of Thessaly, Biopolis Campus, Larissa, Greece
| | | | - Monique Heijmans
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Martine Hoogendorn
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sarah Louise Killeen
- UCD Perinatal Research Centre, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Katerina-Maria Kontouli
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Dimitris Mavridis
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Inka Miñambres
- Endocrinology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas (CIBERDEM), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Beate Sigrid Mueller
- Institute of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ena Niño de Guzman
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Janneke Noordman
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Carola Orrego
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lilisbeth Perestelo-Perez
- Evaluation Unit (SESCS), Canary Islands Health Service (SCS), Canary Islands, Spain
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Tenerife, Spain
| | | | - Georgios Seitidis
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Rosa Suñol
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sofia Tsokani
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Pablo Alonso-Coello
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Beltran J, Valli C, Medina-Aedo M, Canelo-Aybar C, Niño de Guzmán E, Song Y, Orrego C, Ballester M, Suñol R, Noordman J, Heijmans M, Seitidis G, Tsokani S, Kontouli KM, Christogiannis C, Mavridis D, Graaf GD, Groene O, Grammatikopoulou MG, Camalleres-Guillem F, Perestelo-Perez L, McGloin H, Winkley K, Mueller BS, Saz-Parkinson Z, Corcoy R, Alonso-Coello P. COMPAR-EU Recommendations on Self-Management Interventions in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:483. [PMID: 38391858 PMCID: PMC10887949 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12040483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Self-management interventions (SMIs) offer a promising approach to actively engage patients in the management of their chronic diseases. Within the scope of the COMPAR-EU project, our goal is to provide evidence-based recommendations for the utilisation and implementation of SMIs in the care of adult individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A multidisciplinary panel of experts, utilising a core outcome set (COS), identified critical outcomes and established effect thresholds for each outcome. The panel formulated recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach, a transparent and rigorous framework for developing and presenting the best available evidence for the formulation of recommendations. All recommendations are based on systematic reviews (SR) of the effects and of values and preferences, a contextual analysis, and a cost-effectiveness analysis. The COMPAR-EU panel is in favour of using SMIs rather than usual care (UC) alone (conditional, very low certainty of the evidence). Furthermore, the panel specifically is in favour of using ten selected SMIs, rather than UC alone (conditional, low certainty of the evidence), mostly encompassing education, self-monitoring, and behavioural techniques. The panel acknowledges that, for most SMIs, moderate resource requirements exist, and cost-effectiveness analyses do not distinctly favour either the SMI or UC. Additionally, it recognises that SMIs are likely to enhance equity, deeming them acceptable and feasible for implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Beltran
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Sant Antoni Maria Claret, 167, 08025 Barcelona, Spain
- Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Sant Quintí 77-79, 08041 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Claudia Valli
- Avedis DonabedianResearch Institute (FAD), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 008037 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Melixa Medina-Aedo
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Sant Antoni Maria Claret, 167, 08025 Barcelona, Spain
- Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Sant Quintí 77-79, 08041 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carlos Canelo-Aybar
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Sant Antoni Maria Claret, 167, 08025 Barcelona, Spain
- Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Sant Quintí 77-79, 08041 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ena Niño de Guzmán
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Sant Antoni Maria Claret, 167, 08025 Barcelona, Spain
- Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Sant Quintí 77-79, 08041 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Yang Song
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Sant Antoni Maria Claret, 167, 08025 Barcelona, Spain
- Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Sant Quintí 77-79, 08041 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carola Orrego
- Avedis DonabedianResearch Institute (FAD), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 008037 Barcelona, Spain
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), 08007 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Ballester
- Avedis DonabedianResearch Institute (FAD), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 008037 Barcelona, Spain
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), 08007 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rosa Suñol
- Avedis DonabedianResearch Institute (FAD), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 008037 Barcelona, Spain
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), 08007 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Janneke Noordman
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 CR Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Monique Heijmans
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 CR Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Georgios Seitidis
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
| | - Sofia Tsokani
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
| | - Katerina-Maria Kontouli
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
| | - Christos Christogiannis
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
| | - Dimitris Mavridis
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
| | - Gimon de Graaf
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3062 PA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maria G Grammatikopoulou
- Immunonutrition and Clinical Nutrition Unit, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medical School, University of Thessaly, Biopolis Campus, 43100 Larissa, Greece
| | | | - Lilisbeth Perestelo-Perez
- Evaluation Unit (SESCS), Canary Islands Health Service (SCS), Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), 38109 Tenerife, Spain
| | - Helen McGloin
- School of Nursing, Health Science and Disability Studies, ATU St Angelas, F91 C643 Sligo, Ireland
| | - Kirsty Winkley
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London SE1 8WA, UK
| | - Beate Sigrid Mueller
- Institute of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Rosa Corcoy
- CIBER Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanotechnology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28220 Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Pablo Alonso-Coello
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Sant Antoni Maria Claret, 167, 08025 Barcelona, Spain
- Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Sant Quintí 77-79, 08041 Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ricci-Cabello I, Carvallo-Castañeda D, Vásquez-Mejía A, Alonso-Coello P, Saz-Parkinson Z, Parmelli E, Morgano GP, Rigau D, Solà I, Neamtiu L, Niño-de-Guzmán E. Characteristics and impact of interventions to support healthcare providers' compliance with guideline recommendations for breast cancer: a systematic literature review. Implement Sci 2023; 18:17. [PMID: 37217955 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-023-01267-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) offer evidence-based recommendations to improve quality of healthcare for patients. Suboptimal compliance with breast cancer guideline recommendations remains frequent, and has been associated with a decreased survival. The aim of this systematic review was to characterize and determine the impact of available interventions to support healthcare providers' compliance with CPGs recommendations in breast cancer healthcare. METHODS We searched for systematic reviews and primary studies in PubMed and Embase (from inception to May 2021). We included experimental and observational studies reporting on the use of interventions to support compliance with breast cancer CPGs. Eligibility assessment, data extraction and critical appraisal was conducted by one reviewer, and cross-checked by a second reviewer. Using the same approach, we synthesized the characteristics and the effects of the interventions by type of intervention (according to the EPOC taxonomy), and applied the GRADE framework to assess the certainty of evidence. RESULTS We identified 35 primary studies reporting on 24 different interventions. Most frequently described interventions consisted in computerized decision support systems (12 studies); educational interventions (seven), audit and feedback (two), and multifaceted interventions (nine). There is low quality evidence that educational interventions targeted to healthcare professionals may improve compliance with recommendations concerning breast cancer screening, diagnosis and treatment. There is moderate quality evidence that reminder systems for healthcare professionals improve compliance with recommendations concerning breast cancer screening. There is low quality evidence that multifaceted interventions may improve compliance with recommendations concerning breast cancer screening. The effectiveness of the remaining types of interventions identified have not been evaluated with appropriate study designs for such purpose. There is very limited data on the costs of implementing these interventions. CONCLUSIONS Different types of interventions to support compliance with breast cancer CPGs recommendations are available, and most of them show positive effects. More robust trials are needed to strengthen the available evidence base concerning their efficacy. Gathering data on the costs of implementing the proposed interventions is needed to inform decisions about their widespread implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION CRD42018092884 (PROSPERO).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ignacio Ricci-Cabello
- Balearic Islands Health Research Institute (IdISBa), Palma, Spain
- Primary Care Research Unit of Mallorca, Balearic Islands Health Service, Palma, Spain
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Adrián Vásquez-Mejía
- Facultad de Medicina Humana, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru
| | - Pablo Alonso-Coello
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre-Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | - Elena Parmelli
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
| | | | - David Rigau
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre-Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ivan Solà
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre-Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Luciana Neamtiu
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy
| | - Ena Niño-de-Guzmán
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre-Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
- Cancer Prevention and Control Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Piggott T, Langendam MW, Parmelli E, Adolfsson J, Akl EA, Armstrong D, Braithwaite J, Brignardello-Petersen R, Brozek J, Follmann M, Kopp I, Meerpohl JJ, Neamtiu L, Nothacker M, Qaseem A, Rossi PG, Saz-Parkinson Z, van der Wees PJ, Schünemann HJ. The GIN-McMaster guideline tool extension for the integration of quality improvement and quality assurance in guidelines: a description of the methods for its development. J Clin Epidemiol 2023; 154:197-203. [PMID: 35436527 PMCID: PMC10109085 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 04/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Our objective was to develop an extension of the widely used GIN-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist and Tool for the integration of quality assurance and improvement (QAI) schemes with guideline development. METHODS We used a mixed-methods approach incorporating evidence from a systematic review, an expert workshop and a survey of experts to iteratively create an extension of the checklist for QAI through three rounds of feedback. As a part of this process, we also refined criteria of a good guideline-based quality indicator. RESULTS We developed a 40-item checklist extension addressing steps for the integration of QAI into guideline development across the existing 18 topics and created one new topic specific to QAI. The steps span from 'organization, budget, planning and training', to updating of QAI and guideline implementation. CONCLUSION The tool supports integration of QAI schemes with guideline development initiatives and it will be used in the forthcoming integrated European Commission Initiative on Colorectal Cancer. Future work should evaluate this extension and QAI items requiring additional support for guideline developers and links to QAI schemes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Piggott
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Miranda W Langendam
- Department of Epidemiology, and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam of Public Health Research Instute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elena Parmelli
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
| | - Jan Adolfsson
- Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services, Sweden & The Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Elie A Akl
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - David Armstrong
- Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, Hamilton, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Level 6, 75 Talavera Rd, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia 2109
| | | | - Jan Brozek
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Ina Kopp
- Institute for Medical Knowledge Management, Association of the Scientific Medical Societies, (AWMF-IMWi), c/o Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany
| | - Joerg J Meerpohl
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Cochrane Germany, Cochrane Germany Foundation, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Luciana Neamtiu
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy
| | - Monika Nothacker
- Institute for Medical Knowledge Management, Association of the Scientific Medical Societies, (AWMF-IMWi), c/o Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany
| | - Amir Qaseem
- American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Paolo Giorgi Rossi
- Epidemiology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | | | - Philip J van der Wees
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ Healthcare and Department of Rehabilitation, The Netherlands
| | - Holger J Schünemann
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, Hamilton, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Institute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Department of Biomedical Sciences Humanitas University Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, Milano, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Karam S, Darzi AJ, Bognanni A, Morsi RZ, Tannous EE, Charide R, Choe SI, Stalteri R, Lee Y, Piggott T, Jewell L, Schünemann F, Langendam M, Parmelli E, Saz-Parkinson Z, Roi A, Vilahur N, Vali Y, Waffenschmidt S, Owens DK, Leontiadis GI, Moayyedi P, Brozek JL, Schünemann HJ. Analytical Frameworks in Colorectal Cancer Guidelines: Development of Methods for Systematic Reviews, their Application and Practical Guidance for their use. J Clin Epidemiol 2022; 149:206-216. [PMID: 35724863 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2021] [Revised: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Analytical frameworks are graphical representation of the key questions answered by a systematic review and can support the development of guideline recommendations. Our objectives were to a) conduct a systematic review to identify, describe and compare all analytical frameworks published as part of a systematic and guideline development process related to colorectal cancer (CRC); and b) to use this case study to develop guidance on how to conduct systematic reviews of analytical frameworks. METHODS We developed a search strategy to identify eligible studies in Medline and Embase from 1996 until December 2020. We also manually searched guideline databases and websites to identify all guidelines and systematic reviews in CRC that utilized an analytical framework. We assessed the quality of the guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II tool. The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO, registration CRD42020172117. RESULTS We screened 34,505 records and identified 1,166 guidelines and 3,127 systematic reviews on CRC of which 5 met our inclusion criteria. These 5 publications included 4 analytical frameworks in colorectal cancer (one update). We also describe our methodological approach to systematic reviews for analytical frameworks and underlying concepts for developing analytical framework using a bottom up or top-down approach. CONCLUSION Few guidelines and systematic reviews are utilizing analytical frameworks in the development of recommendations. Development of analytical frameworks should begin with a systematic search for existing analytical frameworks and follow a structured conceptual approach for their development to support guideline recommendations. Our methods may be helpful in achieving these objectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samer Karam
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West; Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada; Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and MacGRADE Centres, McMaster University, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
| | - Andrea J Darzi
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West; Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada; Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and MacGRADE Centres, McMaster University, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
| | - Antonio Bognanni
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West; Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada; Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and MacGRADE Centres, McMaster University, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
| | - Rami Z Morsi
- Department of Neurology, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Elie E Tannous
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA
| | - Rana Charide
- AUB GRADE Center, Clinical Research Institute, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon, Riad El Solh, Beirut, Lebanon 1107-2020
| | - Se-In Choe
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Rosa Stalteri
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West; Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada; Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and MacGRADE Centres, McMaster University, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
| | - Yung Lee
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Thomas Piggott
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West; Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada; Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and MacGRADE Centres, McMaster University, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
| | - Laura Jewell
- Memorial University of Newfoundland, Discipline of Family Medicine, Happy Valley-Goose Bay, Canada
| | - Finn Schünemann
- Institut für Evidenz in der Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Breisacher Str. 86, 79110 Freiburg
| | - Miranda Langendam
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Elena Parmelli
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy
| | | | - Annett Roi
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy
| | - Nadia Vilahur
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy
| | - Yasman Vali
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Siw Waffenschmidt
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West; Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada; Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care, Cologne, Germany
| | - Douglas K Owens
- Stanford Health Policy, Department of Medicine and Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Paul Moayyedi
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton (ON), Canada
| | - Jan L Brozek
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West; Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton (ON), Canada
| | - Holger J Schünemann
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West; Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada; Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and MacGRADE Centres, McMaster University, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton (ON), Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Canelo-Aybar C, Taype-Rondan A, Zafra-Tanaka JH, Rigau D, Graewingholt A, Lebeau A, Gómez EP, Rossi PG, Langendam M, Posso M, Parmelli E, Saz-Parkinson Z, Alonso-Coello P. Correction to: Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: a systematic review for the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC). Eur Radiol 2022; 32:4333. [PMID: 34994847 PMCID: PMC9123054 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08489-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Canelo-Aybar
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.,Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre - Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Sant Antonio María Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alvaro Taype-Rondan
- Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Unidad de Investigación para la Generación y Síntesis de Evidencias en Salud, Lima, Peru
| | | | - David Rigau
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre - Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Sant Antonio María Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Annette Lebeau
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Paolo Giorgi Rossi
- Epidemiology Unit, Azienda USL - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Miranda Langendam
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Margarita Posso
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre - Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Sant Antonio María Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Elena Parmelli
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via E. Fermi, 2749. TP127, I-21027, Ispra, VA, Italy.
| | - Zuleika Saz-Parkinson
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via E. Fermi, 2749. TP127, I-21027, Ispra, VA, Italy
| | - Pablo Alonso-Coello
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.,Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre - Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Sant Antonio María Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Piggott T, Langendam MW, Parmelli E, Adolfsson J, Akl EA, Armstrong D, Braithwaite J, Brignardello-Petersen R, Brozek J, Follmann M, Kopp I, Meerpohl JJ, Neamtiu L, Nothacker M, Qaseem A, Rossi PG, Saz-Parkinson Z, van der Wees PJ, Schünemann HJ. Integrating Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement With Guidelines: Systematic Stakeholder-Driven Development of an Extension of the Guidelines International Network-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist. Ann Intern Med 2022; 175:735-739. [PMID: 35226517 DOI: 10.7326/m21-3977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Piggott
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (T.P., R.B., J.B.)
| | - Miranda W Langendam
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (M.W.L.)
| | - Elena Parmelli
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy (E.P., L.N., Z.S.)
| | - Jan Adolfsson
- Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services, and Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (J.A.)
| | - Elie A Akl
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, and American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon (E.A.A.)
| | - David Armstrong
- Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute and Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (D.A.)
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (J.B.)
| | - Romina Brignardello-Petersen
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (T.P., R.B., J.B.)
| | - Jan Brozek
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (T.P., R.B., J.B.)
| | | | - Ina Kopp
- Institute for Medical Knowledge Management, Association of the Scientific Medical Societies, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany (I.K., M.N.)
| | - Joerg J Meerpohl
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, and Cochrane Germany, Cochrane Germany Foundation, Freiburg, Germany (J.J.M.)
| | - Luciana Neamtiu
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy (E.P., L.N., Z.S.)
| | - Monika Nothacker
- Institute for Medical Knowledge Management, Association of the Scientific Medical Societies, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany (I.K., M.N.)
| | - Amir Qaseem
- American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (A.Q.)
| | - Paolo Giorgi Rossi
- Epidemiology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.)
| | | | - Philip J van der Wees
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of IQ Healthcare and Rehabilitation, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (P.J.V.)
| | - Holger J Schünemann
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact and Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, Institute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany, and Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy (H.J.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Morgano GP, Mbuagbaw L, Santesso N, Xie F, Brozek JL, Siebert U, Bognanni A, Wiercioch W, Piggott T, Darzi AJ, Akl EA, Verstijnen IM, Parmelli E, Saz-Parkinson Z, Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ. Defining decision thresholds for judgments on health benefits and harms using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a protocol for a randomised methodological study (GRADE-THRESHOLD). BMJ Open 2022; 12:e053246. [PMID: 35273045 PMCID: PMC8915269 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) and similar Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks require its users to judge how substantial the effects of interventions are on desirable and undesirable people-important health outcomes. However, decision thresholds (DTs) that could help understand the magnitude of intervention effects and serve as reference for interpretation of findings are not yet available.The objective of this study is an approach to derive and use DTs for EtD judgments about the magnitude of health benefits and harms. We hypothesise that approximate DTs could have the ability to discriminate between the existing four categories of EtD judgments (Trivial, Small, Moderate, Large), support panels of decision-makers in their work, and promote consistency and transparency in judgments. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will conduct a methodological randomised controlled trial to collect the data that allow deriving the DTs. We will invite clinicians, epidemiologists, decision scientists, health research methodologists, experts in Health Technology Assessment (HTA), members of guideline development groups and the public to participate in the trial. Then, we will investigate the validity of our DTs by measuring the agreement between judgments that were made in the past by guideline panels and the judgments that our DTs approach would suggest if applied on the same guideline data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board reviewed this study as a quality improvement study and determined that it requires no further consent. Survey participants will be required to read a consent statement in order to participate in this study at the beginning of the trial. This statement reads: You are being invited to participate in a research project which aims to identify indicative DTs that could assist users of the GRADE EtD frameworks in making judgments. Your input will be used in determining these indicative thresholds. By completing this survey, you provide consent that the anonymised data collected will be used for the research study and to be summarised in aggregate in publication and electronic tools. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT05237635.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gian Paolo Morgano
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada & McMaster GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lawrence Mbuagbaw
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nancy Santesso
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada & McMaster GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Feng Xie
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jan L Brozek
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada & McMaster GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Uwe Siebert
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria
- Division of Health Technology Assessment and Bioinformatics, ONCOTYROL - Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria
- Center for Health Decision Science/Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health and MGH-ITA/Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Antonio Bognanni
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wojtek Wiercioch
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada & McMaster GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Thomas Piggott
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada & McMaster GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrea J Darzi
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada & McMaster GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Elie A Akl
- Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | | | | | | | - Pablo Alonso-Coello
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre - Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Holger J Schünemann
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada & McMaster GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lotfi T, Hajizadeh A, Moja L, Akl EA, Piggott T, Kredo T, Langendam MW, Iorio A, Klugar M, Klugarová J, Neumann I, Wiercioch W, Leontiadis GI, Mbuagbaw L, Turgeon AF, Meerpohl J, Stevens A, Brozek J, Santesso N, Pottie K, Dewidar O, Flottorp SA, Karpusheff J, Saz-Parkinson Z, Rojas MX, Parmelli E, Chu DK, Tugwell P, Welch V, Avey MT, Brignardello-Petersen R, Mathew JL, Munn Z, Nieuwlaat R, Ford N, Qaseem A, Askie LM, Schünemann HJ. A taxonomy and framework for identifying and developing actionable statements in guidelines suggests avoiding informal recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol 2021; 141:161-171. [PMID: 34562579 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.09.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Revised: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To propose a taxonomy and framework that identifies and presents actionable statements in guidelines. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING We took an iterative approach reviewing case studies of guidelines produced by the World Health Organization and the American Society of Hematology to develop an initial conceptual framework. We then tested it using randomly selected recommendations from published guidelines addressing COVID-19 from different organizations, evaluated its results, and refined it before retesting. The urgency and availability of evidence for development of these recommendations varied. We consulted with experts in research methodology and guideline developers to improve the final framework. RESULTS The resulting taxonomy and framework distinguishes five types of actional statements: formal recommendations; research recommendations; good practice statements; implementation considerations, tools and tips; and informal recommendations. These statements should respond to a priori established criteria and require a clear structure and recognizable presentation in a guideline. Most importantly, this framework identifies informal recommendations that differ from formal recommendations by how they consider evidence and in their development process. CONCLUSION The identification, standardization and explicit labelling of actionable statements according to the framework may support guideline developers to create actionable statements with clear intent, avoid informal recommendations and improve their understanding and implementation by users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara Lotfi
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton ,ON, Canada; Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton , ON, Canada
| | - Anisa Hajizadeh
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton ,ON, Canada
| | - Lorenzo Moja
- Department of Health Product Policy and Standards, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Elie A Akl
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton ,ON, Canada; Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton , ON, Canada; Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Thomas Piggott
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton ,ON, Canada
| | - Tamara Kredo
- Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa; Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Miranda W Langendam
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alfonso Iorio
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton ,ON, Canada; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton ,ON, Canada
| | - Miloslav Klugar
- The Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation (Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech CEBHC: JBI Centre of Excellence, Masaryk University GRADE Centre); Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jitka Klugarová
- The Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation (Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech CEBHC: JBI Centre of Excellence, Masaryk University GRADE Centre); Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ignacio Neumann
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton ,ON, Canada; Department of Internal Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Wojtek Wiercioch
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton ,ON, Canada; Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton , ON, Canada
| | | | - Lawrence Mbuagbaw
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton ,ON, Canada; Biostatistics Unit/The Research Institute, St Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton ,ON, Canada
| | - Alexis F Turgeon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City ,QC, Canada; Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, CHU de Québec - Université Laval Research Center, Québec City ,QC, Canada
| | - Joerg Meerpohl
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center & Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Cochrane Germany, Cochrane Germany Foundation, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Adrienne Stevens
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton ,ON, Canada; Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton , ON, Canada
| | - Jan Brozek
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton ,ON, Canada; Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton , ON, Canada
| | - Nancy Santesso
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton ,ON, Canada; Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton , ON, Canada
| | - Kevin Pottie
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Canada; Departments of Family Medicine and Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa; Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada; Departments of Family Medicine and Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa
| | - Omar Dewidar
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Canada; Departments of Family Medicine and Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa; Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada; Departments of Family Medicine and Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa
| | - Signe A Flottorp
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Zuleika Saz-Parkinson
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias. Madrid, Spain
| | - María X Rojas
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau)
| | - Elena Parmelli
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy
| | - Derek K Chu
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton ,ON, Canada; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton ,ON, Canada
| | - Peter Tugwell
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Canada; Departments of Family Medicine and Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa; Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada; Departments of Family Medicine and Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa
| | - Vivian Welch
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Canada; Departments of Family Medicine and Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa; Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada; Departments of Family Medicine and Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa
| | | | | | - Joseph L Mathew
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Zachary Munn
- Joanna Briggs Institute Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences The University of Adelaide, Australia
| | - Robby Nieuwlaat
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton ,ON, Canada
| | - Nathan Ford
- Department of HIV, Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Amir Qaseem
- American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Lisa M Askie
- Quality Assurance of Norms and Standards Department, Science Division, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Holger J Schünemann
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton ,ON, Canada; Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton , ON, Canada; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton ,ON, Canada; Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Canelo-Aybar C, Taype-Rondan A, Zafra-Tanaka JH, Rigau D, Graewingholt A, Lebeau A, Pérez Gómez E, Rossi PG, Langedam M, Posso M, Parmelli E, Saz-Parkinson Z, Alonso-Coello P. Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: a systematic review for the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC). Eur Radiol 2021; 31:5880-5893. [PMID: 34052881 PMCID: PMC8270803 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07873-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Revised: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the impact of preoperative MRI in the management of Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Methods We searched the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases to identify randomised clinical trials (RCTs) or cohort studies assessing the impact of preoperative breast MRI in surgical outcomes, treatment change or loco-regional recurrence. We provided pooled estimates for odds ratios (OR), relative risks (RR) and proportions and assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. Results We included 3 RCTs and 23 observational cohorts, corresponding to 20,415 patients. For initial breast-conserving surgery (BCS), the RCTs showed that MRI may result in little to no difference (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.00) (low certainty); observational studies showed that MRI may have no difference in the odds of re-operation after BCS (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.36 to 2.61) (low certainty); and uncertain evidence from RCTs suggests little to no difference with respect to total mastectomy rate (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.65 to 1.27) (very low certainty). We also found that MRI may change the initial treatment plans in 17% (95% CI 12 to 24%) of cases, but with little to no effect on locoregional recurrence (aHR = 1.18; 95% CI 0.79 to 1.76) (very low certainty). Conclusion We found evidence of low to very low certainty which may suggest there is no improvement of surgical outcomes with pre-operative MRI assessment of women with DCIS lesions. There is a need for large rigorously conducted RCTs to evaluate the role of preoperative MRI in this population. Key Points • Evidence of low to very low certainty may suggest there is no improvement in surgical outcomes with pre-operative MRI. • There is a need for large rigorously conducted RCTs evaluating the role of preoperative MRI to improve treatment planning for DCIS. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-021-07873-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Canelo-Aybar
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain. .,Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre - Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Sant Antonio María Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Alvaro Taype-Rondan
- Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Unidad de Investigación para la Generación y Síntesis de Evidencias en Salud, Lima, Peru
| | | | - David Rigau
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre - Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Sant Antonio María Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Annette Lebeau
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Paolo Giorgi Rossi
- Epidemiology Unit, Azienda USL - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Miranda Langedam
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Margarita Posso
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre - Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Sant Antonio María Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Elena Parmelli
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via E. Fermi, 2749. TP127, I-21027, Ispra, VA, Italy.
| | - Zuleika Saz-Parkinson
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via E. Fermi, 2749. TP127, I-21027, Ispra, VA, Italy
| | - Pablo Alonso-Coello
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.,Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre - Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Sant Antonio María Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Canelo-Aybar C, Carrera L, Beltrán J, Posso M, Rigau D, Lebeau A, Gräwingholt A, Castells X, Langendam M, Pérez E, Giorgi Rossi P, Van Engen R, Parmelli E, Saz-Parkinson Z, Alonso-Coello P. Digital breast tomosynthesis compared to diagnostic mammographic projections (including magnification) among women recalled at screening mammography: a systematic review for the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC). Cancer Med 2021; 10:2191-2204. [PMID: 33675147 PMCID: PMC7982617 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2020] [Revised: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Diagnostic mammography projections (DxMM) have been traditionally used in the assessment of women recalled after a suspicious screening mammogram. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) reduces the tissue overlap effect, thus improving image assessment. Some studies have suggested DBT might replace DxMM with at least equivalent performance. Objective To evaluate the replacement of DxMM with DBT in women recalled at screening. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases to identify diagnostic paired cohort studies or RCTs comparing DBT vs DxMM, published in English that: reported accuracy outcomes, recruited women recalled for assessment at mammography screening, and included a reference standard. Subgroup analysis was performed over lesion characteristics. We provided pooled accuracy estimates and differences between tests using a quadrivariate model. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. Results We included ten studies that reported specificity and sensitivity. One study included 7060 women while the remaining included between 52 and 738 women. DBT compared with DxMM showed a pooled difference for the sensitivity of 2% (95% CI 1%–3%) and a pooled difference for the specificity of 6% (95%CI 2%–11%). Restricting the analysis to the six studies that included women with microcalcification lesions gave similar results. In the context of a prevalence of 21% of breast cancer (BC) in recalled women, DBT probably detects 4 (95% CI 2–6) more BC cases and has 47 (95%CI 16–87) fewer false‐positive results per 1000 assessments. The certainty of the evidence was moderate due to risk of bias. Conclusion The evidence in the assessment of screen‐recalled findings with DBT is sparse and of moderate certainty. DBT probably has higher sensitivity and specificity than DxMM. Women, health care providers and policymakers might value as relevant the reduction of false‐positive results and related fewer invasive diagnostic procedures with DBT, without missing BC cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Canelo-Aybar
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.,Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Jessica Beltrán
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Margarita Posso
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Rigau
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Annette Lebeau
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Xavier Castells
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miranda Langendam
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elsa Pérez
- University Hospital Dr. Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | - Paolo Giorgi Rossi
- Epidemiology Unit, Azienda USL - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Ruben Van Engen
- LRCB, Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Elena Parmelli
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy
| | | | - Pablo Alonso-Coello
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.,Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Canelo-Aybar C, Ferreira DS, Ballesteros M, Posso M, Montero N, Solà I, Saz-Parkinson Z, Lerda D, Rossi PG, Duffy SW, Follmann M, Gräwingholt A, Alonso-Coello P. Benefits and harms of breast cancer mammography screening for women at average risk of breast cancer: A systematic review for the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer. J Med Screen 2021; 28:389-404. [PMID: 33632023 DOI: 10.1177/0969141321993866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Mammography screening is generally accepted in women aged 50-69, but the balance between benefits and harms remains controversial in other age groups. This study systematically reviews these effects to inform the European Breast Cancer Guidelines. METHODS We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library for randomised clinical trials (RCTs) or systematic reviews of observational studies in the absence of RCTs comparing invitation to mammography screening to no invitation in women at average breast cancer (BC) risk. We extracted data for mortality, BC stage, mastectomy rate, chemotherapy provision, overdiagnosis and false-positive-related adverse effects. We performed a pooled analysis of relative risks, applying an inverse-variance random-effects model for three age groups (<50, 50-69 and 70-74). GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) was used to assess the certainty of evidence. RESULTS We identified 10 RCTs including 616,641 women aged 38-75. Mammography reduced BC mortality in women aged 50-69 (relative risk (RR) 0.77, 95%CI (confidence interval) 0.66-0.90, high certainty) and 70-74 (RR 0.77, 95%CI 0.54-1.09, high certainty), with smaller reductions in under 50s (RR 0.88, 95%CI 0.76-1.02, moderate certainty). Mammography reduced stage IIA+ in women 50-69 (RR 0.80, 95%CI 0.64-1.00, very low certainty) but resulted in an overdiagnosis probability of 23% (95%CI 18-27%) and 17% (95%CI 15-20%) in under 50s and 50-69, respectively (moderate certainty). Mammography was associated with 2.9% increased risk of invasive procedures with benign outcomes (low certainty). CONCLUSIONS For women 50-69, high certainty evidence that mammography screening reduces BC mortality risk would support policymakers formulating strong recommendations. In other age groups, where the net balance of effects is less clear, conditional recommendations will be more likely, together with shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Canelo-Aybar
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.,Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Diogenes S Ferreira
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mónica Ballesteros
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Margarita Posso
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nadia Montero
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ivan Solà
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Donata Lerda
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, VA, Italy
| | - Paolo G Rossi
- Epidemiology Unit, AUSL - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, RE, Italy
| | - Stephen W Duffy
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | | | | - Pablo Alonso-Coello
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.,Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Parmelli E, Langendam M, Piggott T, Adolfsson J, Akl EA, Armstrong D, Braithwaite J, Brignardello-Petersen R, Follmann M, Leś Z, Meerpohl JJ, Neamtiu L, Qaseem A, Rossi PG, Saz-Parkinson Z, van der Wees PJ, Schünemann HJ. Guideline-based quality assurance: a conceptual framework for the definition of key elements. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:173. [PMID: 33627092 PMCID: PMC7903784 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06148-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2017, the European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC) started developing a methodological framework for a guideline-based quality assurance (QA) scheme to improve cancer quality of care. During the first phase of the work, inconsistency emerged about the use of terminology for the definition, the conceptual underpinnings and the way QA relates to health questions that are answered in guidelines. The objective of this final of three articles is to propose a conceptual framework for an integrated approach to guideline and QA development and clarify terms and definitions for key elements. This work will inform the upcoming European Commission Initiative on Colorectal Cancer (ECICC). METHODS A multidisciplinary group of 23 experts from key organizations in the fields of guideline development, performance measurement and quality assurance participated in a mixed method approach including face-to-face dialogue and several rounds of virtual meetings. Informed by results of a systematic literature review that indicated absence of an existing framework and practical examples, we first identified the relations of key elements in guideline-based QA and then developed appropriate concepts and terminology to provide guidance. RESULTS Our framework connects the three key concepts of quality indicators, performance measures and performance indicators integrated with guideline development. Quality indicators are constructs used as a guide to monitor, evaluate, and improve the quality of the structure, process and outcomes of healthcare services; performance measures are tools that quantify or describe measurable elements of practice performance; and performance indicators are quantifiable and measurable units or scores of practice, which should be guided by guideline recommendations. CONCLUSIONS The inconsistency in the way key terms of QA are used and defined has confused the field. Our conceptual framework defines the role, meaning and interactions of the key elements for improving quality in healthcare. It directly builds on the questions asked in guidelines and answered through recommendations. These findings will be applied in the forthcoming ECICC and for the future updates of ECIBC. These are large-scale integrated projects aimed at improving healthcare quality across Europe through the development of guideline-based QA schemes; this will help in implementing and improving our approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Parmelli
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via E. Fermi 2749 - TP 127, I-21027, Ispra, Italy.
| | - Miranda Langendam
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Thomas Piggott
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact McMaster University Health Sciences Centre, Room 2C16, 1280 Main Street, West Hamilton, ON, L8N 4K1, Canada
| | - Jan Adolfsson
- Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services, Sweden & The Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Elie A Akl
- American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - David Armstrong
- Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Romina Brignardello-Petersen
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact McMaster University Health Sciences Centre, Room 2C16, 1280 Main Street, West Hamilton, ON, L8N 4K1, Canada
| | | | | | - Joerg J Meerpohl
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Cochrane Germany, Cochrane Germany Foundation, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Luciana Neamtiu
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via E. Fermi 2749 - TP 127, I-21027, Ispra, Italy
| | - Amir Qaseem
- American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Paolo Giorgi Rossi
- Epidemiology Unit, Azienda USL - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Zuleika Saz-Parkinson
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via E. Fermi 2749 - TP 127, I-21027, Ispra, Italy
| | - Philip J van der Wees
- Department of Rehabilitation and IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Holger J Schünemann
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact McMaster University Health Sciences Centre, Room 2C16, 1280 Main Street, West Hamilton, ON, L8N 4K1, Canada.
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Piggott T, Langendam M, Parmelli E, Adolfsson J, Akl EA, Armstrong D, Braithwaite J, Brignardello-Petersen R, Brozek J, Gore-Booth J, Follmann M, Leś Z, Meerpohl JJ, Neamţiu L, Nothacker M, Qaseem A, Giorgi Rossi P, Saz-Parkinson Z, van der Wees P, Schünemann HJ. Bringing two worlds closer together: a critical analysis of an integrated approach to guideline development and quality assurance schemes. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:172. [PMID: 33627104 PMCID: PMC7903641 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05819-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although quality indicators are frequently derived from guidelines, there is a substantial gap in collaboration between the corresponding parties. To optimise workflow, guideline recommendations and quality assurance should be aligned methodologically and practically. Learning from the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC), our objective was to bring the key knowledge and most important considerations from both worlds together to inform European Commission future initiatives. METHODS We undertook several steps to address the problem. First, we conducted a feasibility study that included a survey, interviews and a review of manuals for an integrated guideline and quality assurance (QA) scheme that would support the European Commission. The feasibility study drew from an assessment of the ECIBC experience that followed commonly applied strategies leading to separation of the guideline and QA development processes. Secondly, we used results of a systematic review to inform our understanding of methodologies for integrating guideline and QA development. We then, in a third step, used the findings to prepare an evidence brief and identify key aspects of a methodological framework for integrating guidelines QA through meetings with key informants. RESULTS Seven key themes emerged to be taken into account for integrating guidelines and QA schemes: (1) evidence-based integrated guideline and QA frameworks are possible, (2) transparency is key in clearly documenting the source and rationale for quality indicators, (3) intellectual and financial interests should be declared and managed appropriately, (4) selection processes and criteria for quality indicators need further refinement, (5) clear guidance on retirement of quality indicators should be included, (6) risks of an integrated guideline and QA Group can be mitigated, and (7) an extension of the GIN-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist should incorporate QA considerations. DISCUSSION We concluded that the work of guideline and QA developers can be integrated under a common methodological framework and we provided key findings and recommendations. These two worlds, that are fundamental to improving health, can both benefit from integration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Piggott
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University Health Sciences Centre, Room 2C16, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4K1, Canada
| | - Miranda Langendam
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Elena Parmelli
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Via E. Fermi 2749 - TP 127, I-21027, Ispra, VA, Italy.
| | - Jan Adolfsson
- Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services, Sweden & The Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Elie A Akl
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University Health Sciences Centre, Room 2C16, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4K1, Canada.,Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - David Armstrong
- Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.,Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 6, 75 Talavera Rd, Sydney, 2109, Australia
| | - Romina Brignardello-Petersen
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University Health Sciences Centre, Room 2C16, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4K1, Canada
| | - Jan Brozek
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University Health Sciences Centre, Room 2C16, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4K1, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Joerg J Meerpohl
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Luciana Neamţiu
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Via E. Fermi 2749 - TP 127, I-21027, Ispra, VA, Italy
| | - Monika Nothacker
- Institute of Medical Knowledge Management, Association of the Scientific Medical Societies, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Amir Qaseem
- American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Paolo Giorgi Rossi
- Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Zuleika Saz-Parkinson
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Via E. Fermi 2749 - TP 127, I-21027, Ispra, VA, Italy
| | - Philip van der Wees
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of IQ healthcare and Rehabilitation, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,The George Washington University, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Research & Leadership, Washington, D.C., USA
| | - Holger J Schünemann
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University Health Sciences Centre, Room 2C16, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4K1, Canada. .,Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. .,Institute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Giorgi Rossi P, Lebeau A, Canelo-Aybar C, Saz-Parkinson Z, Quinn C, Langendam M, Mcgarrigle H, Warman S, Rigau D, Alonso-Coello P, Broeders M, Graewingholt A, Posso M, Duffy S, Schünemann HJ. Recommendations from the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer for multigene testing to guide the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer, hormone receptor positive, HER-2 negative. Br J Cancer 2021; 124:1503-1512. [PMID: 33597715 PMCID: PMC8076250 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-01247-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Predicting the risk of recurrence and response to chemotherapy in women with early breast cancer is crucial to optimise adjuvant treatment. Despite the common practice of using multigene tests to predict recurrence, existing recommendations are inconsistent. Our aim was to formulate healthcare recommendations for the question “Should multigene tests be used in women who have early invasive breast cancer, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, to guide the use of adjuvant chemotherapy?” Methods The European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC) Guidelines Development Group (GDG), a multidisciplinary guideline panel including experts and three patients, developed recommendations informed by systematic reviews of the evidence. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Evidence to Decision frameworks were used. Four multigene tests were evaluated: the 21-gene recurrence score (21-RS), the 70-gene signature (70-GS), the PAM50 risk of recurrence score (PAM50-RORS), and the 12-gene molecular score (12-MS). Results Five studies (2 marker-based design RCTs, two treatment interaction design RCTs and 1 pooled individual data analysis from observational studies) were included; no eligible studies on PAM50-RORS or 12-MS were identified and the GDG did not formulate recommendations for these tests. Conclusions The ECIBC GDG suggests the use of the 21-RS for lymph node-negative women (conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence), recognising that benefits are probably larger in women at high risk of recurrence based on clinical characteristics. The ECIBC GDG suggests the use of the 70-GS for women at high clinical risk (conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence), and recommends not using 70-GS in women at low clinical risk (strong recommendation, low certainty of evidence).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Giorgi Rossi
- Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Annette Lebeau
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Carlos Canelo-Aybar
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Center, Biomedical Research Institute (IIB Sant Pau-CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Paediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Preventive Medicine, and Public Health, PhD Programme in Methodology of Biomedical Research and Public Health, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Zuleika Saz-Parkinson
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy. .,Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Health Technology Assessment Agency, Avenida Monforte de Lemos 5, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Cecily Quinn
- St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Miranda Langendam
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sue Warman
- Havyatt Lodge, Havyatt Road, Langford, North Somerset, UK
| | - David Rigau
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Center, Biomedical Research Institute (IIB Sant Pau-CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pablo Alonso-Coello
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Center, Biomedical Research Institute (IIB Sant Pau-CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mireille Broeders
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Margarita Posso
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Center, Biomedical Research Institute (IIB Sant Pau-CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Stephen Duffy
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, UK
| | - Holger J Schünemann
- Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and McGRADE Centres; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University Health Sciences Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hilton Boon M, Thomson H, Shaw B, Akl EA, Lhachimi SK, López-Alcalde J, Klugar M, Choi L, Saz-Parkinson Z, Mustafa RA, Langendam MW, Crane O, Morgan RL, Rehfuess E, Johnston BC, Chong LY, Guyatt GH, Schünemann HJ, Katikireddi SV. Challenges in applying the GRADE approach in public health guidelines and systematic reviews: a concept article from the GRADE Public Health Group. J Clin Epidemiol 2021; 135:42-53. [PMID: 33476768 PMCID: PMC8352629 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2020] [Revised: 12/29/2020] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE This article explores the need for conceptual advances and practical guidance in the application of the GRADE approach within public health contexts. METHODS We convened an expert workshop and conducted a scoping review to identify challenges experienced by GRADE users in public health contexts. We developed this concept article through thematic analysis and an iterative process of consultation and discussion conducted with members electronically and at three GRADE Working Group meetings. RESULTS Five priority issues can pose challenges for public health guideline developers and systematic reviewers when applying GRADE: (1) incorporating the perspectives of diverse stakeholders; (2) selecting and prioritizing health and "nonhealth" outcomes; (3) interpreting outcomes and identifying a threshold for decision-making; (4) assessing certainty of evidence from diverse sources, including nonrandomized studies; and (5) addressing implications for decision makers, including concerns about conditional recommendations. We illustrate these challenges with examples from public health guidelines and systematic reviews, identifying gaps where conceptual advances may facilitate the consistent application or further development of the methodology and provide solutions. CONCLUSION The GRADE Public Health Group will respond to these challenges with solutions that are coherent with existing guidance and can be consistently implemented across public health decision-making contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Hilton Boon
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Berkeley Square, 99 Berkeley Street, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G3 7HR, UK.
| | - Hilary Thomson
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Berkeley Square, 99 Berkeley Street, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G3 7HR, UK
| | - Beth Shaw
- Center for Evidence-based Policy, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201 USA
| | - Elie A Akl
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street W, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada; Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Stefan K Lhachimi
- Department for Health Services Research, Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Grazer Straße 4, 28359 Bremen, Germany; Health Sciences Bremen, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany
| | - Jesús López-Alcalde
- Department of Paediatrics, Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Preventative Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria (UFV)-Madrid; Clinical Biostatistics Unit, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (IRYCIS); CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health; Cochrane Associate Centre of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miloslav Klugar
- Faculty of Medicine, Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation (Cochrane Czech Republic, The Czech Republic Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare; JBI Centre of Excellence, Masaryk University GRADE Centre), Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University, 625 00 Brno, Czechia
| | - Leslie Choi
- The Department of Vector Biology, Partnership for Increasing the Impact of Vector Control, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Reem A Mustafa
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street W, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada; Departments of Medicine and Biomedical & Health Informatics, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO 66160 USA
| | - Miranda W Langendam
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Olivia Crane
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Level 1A, City Tower, Piccadilly Plaza, Manchester M1 4BT, UK
| | - Rebecca L Morgan
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street W, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada
| | - Eva Rehfuess
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Pettenkofer School of Public Health, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Lee Yee Chong
- Cochrane Public Health and Health Systems Network, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Gordon H Guyatt
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street W, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada
| | - Holger J Schünemann
- Department of Health Research Methods, Michael G DeGroote Cochrane Canada and McMaster GRADE Centres, and WHO Collaborating Centre for Infectious Diseases, Research Methods and Recommendations, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Berkeley Square, 99 Berkeley Street, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G3 7HR, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Saz-Parkinson Z, Monteagudo-Piqueras O, Granados Ortega J, Martínez Mondéjar E, Labrador Cañadas MV. ["European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer": Selected Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations from the European Guidelines.]. Rev Esp Salud Publica 2020; 94:e202012179. [PMID: 33323925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC) has developed new recommendations on breast cancer screening and diagnosis. The objective of this work was to adapt these recommendations to Spanish in order to implement and guarantee the quality and success of breast cancer screening programmes (PCCM) throughout the Spanish territory. METHODS The new European Guidelines on Screening and Diagnosis of Breast Cancer have been prepared by a multidisciplinary panel of experts and patients (Guidelines Development Group, GDG). The recommendations inclu-ded are supported by systematic reviews of the evidence conducted by a team of researchers from the Ibero-American Cochrane Center. For its preparation, the European Commission's conflict of interest management rules were applied and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology was used. The GRADE evidence-to-decision (EtD) frameworks were used to minimize potential influence of interests on the recommendations. RESULTS As a result of the systematic reviews carried out, the GDG published on the ECIBC website a list of recommendations as part of the guidelines for the screening and diagnosis of breast cancer, which were translated into Spanish in this work. CONCLUSIONS The adaptation to Spanish of the new recommendations helps their implementation and the creation of a uniform PCCM throughout the Spanish territory. All of this improves informed decision making and the success of PCCM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Olga Monteagudo-Piqueras
- Servicio de Promoción y Educación para la Salud. Consejería de Salud. Comunidad Autónoma de la Región de Murcia. Murcia. España
| | - Joaquin Granados Ortega
- Servicio de Promoción y Educación para la Salud. Consejería de Salud. Comunidad Autónoma de la Región de Murcia. Murcia. España
| | - Encarnación Martínez Mondéjar
- Servicio de Promoción y Educación para la Salud. Consejería de Salud. Comunidad Autónoma de la Región de Murcia. Murcia. España
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Piggott T, Brozek J, Nowak A, Dietl H, Dietl B, Saz-Parkinson Z, Mirzayev F, González-Angulo L, Yepes-Nuñez JJ, Mustafa RA, Leontiadis GI, Brignardello-Petersen R, Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ. Using GRADE evidence to decision frameworks to choose from multiple interventions. J Clin Epidemiol 2020; 130:117-124. [PMID: 33127374 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Revised: 09/29/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Guideline development groups or other health care decision makers frequently encounter situations that require a simultaneous comparison of multiple interventions. This sometimes becomes apparent either when they identify questions of interest, before they formulate recommendations, or it may surface only when recommendations have already been formulated based on pairwise comparisons. METHODS Using examples from the World Health Organization, the European Commission, and a professional society, we developed a flexible approach to developing recommendations when a multiple-intervention comparison (MC) is needed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) evidence to decision (EtD) frameworks. We iteratively refined this approach through user testing and then included a module in GRADE's official software GRADEpro to test the approach in two real and one theoretical guideline recommendations. RESULTS We found the approach feasible and that all EtD criteria should be considered in an MC approach. We judged that guideline development groups and other decision makers will benefit from the availability of a network meta-analyses (NMA) of intervention effects to support decisions; however, NMA supports only one of many criteria, that is, the balance of health benefits and harms, and is therefore helpful, but not essential to the approach we propose. When similar but not identical comparators are used to address MC, challenges may arise with intransitivity and the relative rankings of interventions. CONCLUSION We successfully applied the MC approach and software module in generating recommendations across different scenarios and identified challenges. The MC approach allows guideline groups and other decision makers to transparently and critically assess multiple options for a given health question. Application of the approach by others may lead to refinement and allow for better understanding of its impact in developing recommendations and making choices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Piggott
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Jan Brozek
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Artur Nowak
- Evidence Prime, Hamilton, Canada and Krakow, Poland
| | - Helena Dietl
- Evidence Prime, Hamilton, Canada and Krakow, Poland
| | - Bart Dietl
- Evidence Prime, Hamilton, Canada and Krakow, Poland
| | | | - Fuad Mirzayev
- Global TB Program, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Juan José Yepes-Nuñez
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; School of Medicine, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Reem A Mustafa
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, USA
| | | | | | - Pablo Alonso-Coello
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Center-Servicio de Epidemiología Clínica y Salud Pública, Biomedical Research Institute (IIB-Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain; CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Holger J Schünemann
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Institut für Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center & Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rossi P, Lebeau A, Canelo-Aybar C, Rivera MP, Comas D, Quinn C, Coello P, McGarrigle H, Warman S, Broeders M, Duffy S, Langendam M, Gräwingholt A, Follmann M, Saz-Parkinson Z, Schünemann H. Recommendations from the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer on multigene tests to guide the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients who have hormone receptor positive, HER-2 negative, lymph node negative or up to 3 lymph nodes positive invasive breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(20)30555-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
20
|
Saz-Parkinson Z, Duffy SW, Canelo-Aybar C, Gräwingholt A, Quinn C, Follmann M, Schünemann HJ. Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis. Ann Intern Med 2020; 172:840-841. [PMID: 32539513 DOI: 10.7326/l20-0254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stephen W Duffy
- Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (S.W.D.)
| | | | | | - Cecily Quinn
- St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland (C.Q.)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Baldeh T, Saz-Parkinson Z, Muti P, Santesso N, Morgano GP, Wiercioch W, Nieuwlaat R, Gräwingholt A, Broeders M, Duffy S, Hofvind S, Nystrom L, Ioannidou-Mouzaka L, Warman S, McGarrigle H, Knox S, Fitzpatrick P, Rossi PG, Quinn C, Borisch B, Lebeau A, de Wolf C, Langendam M, Piggott T, Giordano L, van Landsveld-Verhoeven C, Bernier J, Rabe P, Schünemann HJ. Development and use of health outcome descriptors: a guideline development case study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2020; 18:167. [PMID: 32503619 PMCID: PMC7275587 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-020-01338-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2019] [Accepted: 03/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND During healthcare guideline development, panel members often have implicit, different definitions of health outcomes that can lead to misunderstandings about how important these outcomes are and how to balance benefits and harms. McMaster GRADE Centre researchers developed 'health outcome descriptors' for standardizing descriptions of health outcomes and overcoming these problems to support the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC) Guideline Development Group (GDG). We aimed to determine which aspects of the development, content, and use of health outcome descriptors were valuable to guideline developers. METHODS We developed 24 health outcome descriptors related to breast cancer screening and diagnosis for the European Commission Breast Guideline Development Group (GDG). Eighteen GDG members provided feedback in written format or in interviews. We then evaluated the process and conducted two health utility rating surveys. RESULTS Feedback from GDG members revealed that health outcome descriptors are probably useful for developing recommendations and improving transparency of guideline methods. Time commitment, methodology training, and need for multidisciplinary expertise throughout development were considered important determinants of the process. Comparison of the two health utility surveys showed a decrease in standard deviation in the second survey across 21 (88%) of the outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Health outcome descriptors are feasible and should be developed prior to the outcome prioritization step in the guideline development process. Guideline developers should involve a subgroup of multidisciplinary experts in all stages of development and ensure all guideline panel members are trained in guideline methodology that includes understanding the importance of defining and understanding the outcomes of interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tejan Baldeh
- Department of Health Research Methodology, Evidence and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4K1, Canada.,Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and MacGRADE Centres, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada
| | - Zuleika Saz-Parkinson
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via E. Fermi 2749 - TP 127, I-21027, Ispra, VA, Italy
| | - Paola Muti
- Department of Health Research Methodology, Evidence and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4K1, Canada.,Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Nancy Santesso
- Department of Health Research Methodology, Evidence and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4K1, Canada.,Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and MacGRADE Centres, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada.,Cochrane GRADEing Methods Group, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada
| | - Gian Paolo Morgano
- Department of Health Research Methodology, Evidence and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4K1, Canada.,Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and MacGRADE Centres, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada
| | - Wojtek Wiercioch
- Department of Health Research Methodology, Evidence and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4K1, Canada.,Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and MacGRADE Centres, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada
| | - Robby Nieuwlaat
- Department of Health Research Methodology, Evidence and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4K1, Canada.,Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and MacGRADE Centres, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada
| | - Axel Gräwingholt
- European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer Guidelines Development Group, European Commission, JRC, Ispra, Italy.,Private Group Practice for Radiology, Radiologie am Theater, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Mireille Broeders
- European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer Guidelines Development Group, European Commission, JRC, Ispra, Italy.,Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6525 EZ, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, PO Box 6873, 6503, GJ, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Stephen Duffy
- European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer Guidelines Development Group, European Commission, JRC, Ispra, Italy.,Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, United Kingdom
| | - Solveig Hofvind
- European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer Guidelines Development Group, European Commission, JRC, Ispra, Italy.,Cancer Registry of Norway, PO 5313, Majorstua, 0304, Oslo, Norway.,Oslo Metropolitan University, Pilestredet 48, 0167, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lennarth Nystrom
- European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer Guidelines Development Group, European Commission, JRC, Ispra, Italy.,Umeå University, 90187, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Lydia Ioannidou-Mouzaka
- European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer Guidelines Development Group, European Commission, JRC, Ispra, Italy.,Leto Gynecological-Surgical and Obstetrical Clinic, 18, Avenue Kifissias, 11526, Athens, Greece
| | - Sue Warman
- European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer Guidelines Development Group, European Commission, JRC, Ispra, Italy
| | - Helen McGarrigle
- European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer Guidelines Development Group, European Commission, JRC, Ispra, Italy.,Cardiff and Vale Breast Centre, University Hospital Llandough, Llandough, United Kingdom
| | - Susan Knox
- European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer Guidelines Development Group, European Commission, JRC, Ispra, Italy.,EUROPA DONNA - The European Breast Cancer Coalition, Piazza Amendola 3, 20149, Milan, Italy
| | - Patricia Fitzpatrick
- European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer Guidelines Development Group, European Commission, JRC, Ispra, Italy.,National Screening Service, Kings Inns House, 200 Parnell Street, Dublin, D01 A3Y8, Ireland
| | - Paolo Giorgi Rossi
- European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer Guidelines Development Group, European Commission, JRC, Ispra, Italy.,Epidemiology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Via Amendola 2, 42122, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Cecily Quinn
- European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer Guidelines Development Group, European Commission, JRC, Ispra, Italy.,School of Medicine, University College Dublin, BreastCheck, Irish National Breast Screening Programme, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Bettina Borisch
- European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer Guidelines Development Group, European Commission, JRC, Ispra, Italy.,Insitute of Global Health, University of Geneva, chemin des Mines 9, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Annette Lebeau
- European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer Guidelines Development Group, European Commission, JRC, Ispra, Italy.,Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Chris de Wolf
- European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer Guidelines Development Group, European Commission, JRC, Ispra, Italy
| | - Miranda Langendam
- Cochrane GRADEing Methods Group, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada.,European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer Guidelines Development Group, European Commission, JRC, Ispra, Italy.,Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Piggott
- Department of Health Research Methodology, Evidence and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4K1, Canada
| | - Livia Giordano
- European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer Guidelines Development Group, European Commission, JRC, Ispra, Italy.,CPO Piedmont-AOU Citta della Salute e della Scienza, via Cavour 31, 10131, Turin, Italy
| | - Cary van Landsveld-Verhoeven
- European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer Guidelines Development Group, European Commission, JRC, Ispra, Italy.,Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, PO Box 6873, 6503, GJ, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jacques Bernier
- European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer Guidelines Development Group, European Commission, JRC, Ispra, Italy
| | - Peter Rabe
- European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer Guidelines Development Group, European Commission, JRC, Ispra, Italy
| | - Holger J Schünemann
- Department of Health Research Methodology, Evidence and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4K1, Canada. .,Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and MacGRADE Centres, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada. .,Cochrane GRADEing Methods Group, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada. .,European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer Guidelines Development Group, European Commission, JRC, Ispra, Italy. .,Department of Medicine, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Schünemann HJ, Alonso-Coello P, Gräwingholt A, Quinn C, Follmann M, Langendam M, Saz-Parkinson Z. Development of the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer Guidelines. Ann Intern Med 2020; 172:72-73. [PMID: 31905388 DOI: 10.7326/l19-0621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Holger J Schünemann
- McMaster University Health Sciences Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (H.J.S.)
| | | | | | - Cecily Quinn
- St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland (C.Q.)
| | | | - Miranda Langendam
- University of Amsterdam Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (M.L.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Schünemann HJ, Lerda D, Quinn C, Follmann M, Alonso-Coello P, Rossi PG, Lebeau A, Nyström L, Broeders M, Ioannidou-Mouzaka L, Duffy SW, Borisch B, Fitzpatrick P, Hofvind S, Castells X, Giordano L, Canelo-Aybar C, Warman S, Mansel R, Sardanelli F, Parmelli E, Gräwingholt A, Saz-Parkinson Z. Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis: A Synopsis of the European Breast Guidelines. Ann Intern Med 2020; 172:46-56. [PMID: 31766052 DOI: 10.7326/m19-2125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 131] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
DESCRIPTION The European Commission Initiative for Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis guidelines (European Breast Guidelines) are coordinated by the European Commission's Joint Research Centre. The target audience for the guidelines includes women, health professionals, and policymakers. METHODS An international guideline panel of 28 multidisciplinary members, including patients, developed questions and corresponding recommendations that were informed by systematic reviews of the evidence conducted between March 2016 and December 2018. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) Evidence to Decision frameworks were used to structure the process and minimize the influence of competing interests by enhancing transparency. Questions and recommendations, expressed as strong or conditional, focused on outcomes that matter to women and provided a rating of the certainty of evidence. RECOMMENDATIONS This synopsis of the European Breast Guidelines provides recommendations regarding organized screening programs for women aged 40 to 75 years who are at average risk. The recommendations address digital mammography screening and the addition of hand-held ultrasonography, automated breast ultrasonography, or magnetic resonance imaging compared with mammography alone. The recommendations also discuss the frequency of screening and inform decision making for women at average risk who are recalled for suspicious lesions or who have high breast density.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Donata Lerda
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy (D.L., E.P., Z.S.)
| | - Cecily Quinn
- St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland (C.Q.)
| | | | | | - Paolo Giorgi Rossi
- Azienda Unitá Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggia Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.)
| | - Annette Lebeau
- Private Group Practice for Pathology, Lübeck, Germany (A.L.)
| | | | | | | | - Stephen W Duffy
- Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (S.W.D.)
| | | | | | | | - Xavier Castells
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain (X.C.)
| | - Livia Giordano
- CPO-Piedmont - AOU Cittá della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy (L.G.)
| | | | - Sue Warman
- Langford, North Somerset, United Kingdom (S.W.)
| | | | | | - Elena Parmelli
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy (D.L., E.P., Z.S.)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Schünemann HJ, Lerda D, Dimitrova N, Alonso-Coello P, Gräwingholt A, Quinn C, Follmann M, Mansel R, Sardanelli F, Rossi PG, Lebeau A, Nyström L, Broeders M, Ioannidou-Mouzaka L, Duffy SW, Borisch B, Fitzpatrick P, Hofvind S, Castells X, Giordano L, Warman S, Saz-Parkinson Z. Methods for Development of the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer Guidelines: Recommendations in the Era of Guideline Transparency. Ann Intern Med 2019; 171:273-280. [PMID: 31330534 DOI: 10.7326/m18-3445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Neither breast cancer prevention and early-detection programs, nor their outcomes, are uniform across Europe. This article describes the rationale, methods, and process for development of the European Commission (EC) Initiative on Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Guidelines. To be consistent with standards set by the Institute of Medicine and others, the EC followed 6 general principles. First, the EC selected, via an open call, a panel with broad representation of areas of expertise. Second, it ensured that all recommendations were supported by systematic reviews. Third, the EC separately considered important subgroups of women, included patient advocates in the guidelines development group, and focused on good communication to inform women's decisions. Fourth, EC rules on conflicts of interest were followed and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) Evidence to Decision frameworks were used to structure the process and minimize the influence of competing interests. Fifth, it focused its recommendations on outcomes that matter to women, and certainty of the evidence is rated for each. Sixth, the EC elicited stakeholder feedback to ensure that the recommendations remain up to date and relevant to practice. This article describes the approach and highlights ways of disseminating and adapting the recommendations both within and outside Europe, using innovative information technology tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holger J Schünemann
- McMaster University Health Sciences Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (H.J.S.)
| | - Donata Lerda
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy (D.L., N.D., Z.S.)
| | - Nadya Dimitrova
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy (D.L., N.D., Z.S.)
| | | | | | - Cecily Quinn
- St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland (C.Q.)
| | | | | | | | - Paolo Giorgi Rossi
- Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.)
| | - Annette Lebeau
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, and Private Group Practice for Pathology, Lübeck, Germany (A.L.)
| | | | | | | | - Stephen W Duffy
- Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (S.W.D.)
| | - Bettina Borisch
- Institute of Global Health. University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland (B.B.)
| | | | | | - Xavier Castells
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain (X.C.)
| | - Livia Giordano
- CPO-Piedmont - AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy (L.G.)
| | - Sue Warman
- Langford, North Somerset, United Kingdom (S.W.)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Mathioudakis AG, Salakari M, Pylkkanen L, Saz-Parkinson Z, Bramesfeld A, Deandrea S, Lerda D, Neamtiu L, Pardo-Hernandez H, Solà I, Alonso-Coello P. Systematic review on women's values and preferences concerning breast cancer screening and diagnostic services. Psychooncology 2019; 28:939-947. [PMID: 30812068 PMCID: PMC6594004 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2018] [Revised: 02/21/2019] [Accepted: 02/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is still lack of consensus on the benefit-harm balance of breast cancer screening. In this scenario, women's values and preferences are crucial for developing health-related recommendations. In the context of the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer, we conducted a systematic review to inform the European Breast Guidelines. METHODS We searched Medline and included primary studies assessing women's values and preferences regarding breast cancer screening and diagnosis decision making. We used a thematic approach to synthesise relevant data. The quality of evidence was determined with GRADE, including GRADE CERQual for qualitative research. RESULTS We included 22 individual studies. Women were willing to accept the psychological and physical burden of breast cancer screening and a significant risk of overdiagnosis and false-positive mammography findings, in return for the benefit of earlier diagnosis. The anxiety engendered by the delay in getting results of diagnostic tests was highlighted as a significant burden, emphasising the need for rapid and efficient screening services, and clear and efficient communication. The confidence in the findings was low to moderate for screening and moderate for diagnosis, predominantly because of methodological limitations, lack of adequate understanding of the outcomes by participants, and indirectness. CONCLUSIONS Women value more the possibility of an earlier diagnosis over the risks of a false-positive result or overdiagnosis. Concerns remain that women may not understand the concept of overdiagnosis. Women highly value time efficient screening processes and rapid result delivery and will accept some discomfort for the peace of mind screening may provide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander G Mathioudakis
- Biomedical Research Institute (IIB Sant Pau), Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Barcelona, Spain.,Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Minna Salakari
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Liisa Pylkkanen
- Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Ispra, Italy.,Clinico-Pharmacological Unit, Finnish Medicines Agency Fimea, Turku, Finland
| | | | - Anke Bramesfeld
- Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Ispra, Italy.,Institute for Epidemiology Social Medicine and Health System Research, Hanover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Silvia Deandrea
- Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Ispra, Italy.,Health Protection Agency, Metropolitan city of Milan, Italy
| | - Donata Lerda
- Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Ispra, Italy
| | | | - Hector Pardo-Hernandez
- Biomedical Research Institute (IIB Sant Pau), Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Barcelona, Spain.,CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ivan Solà
- Biomedical Research Institute (IIB Sant Pau), Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Barcelona, Spain.,CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pablo Alonso-Coello
- Biomedical Research Institute (IIB Sant Pau), Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Barcelona, Spain.,CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Saz-Parkinson Z, Parmelli E, Neamtiu L, Uluturk A, Dimitrova N. Enhancing knowledge translation: ECIBC European Guidelines for breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Eur J Public Health 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/cky212.755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Z Saz-Parkinson
- Healthcare Quality / ECIBC Team, DG JRC, European Commission, Ispra, Italy
| | - E Parmelli
- Healthcare Quality / ECIBC Team, DG JRC, European Commission, Ispra, Italy
| | - L Neamtiu
- Healthcare Quality / ECIBC Team, DG JRC, European Commission, Ispra, Italy
| | - A Uluturk
- Healthcare Quality / ECIBC Team, DG JRC, European Commission, Ispra, Italy
| | - N Dimitrova
- Healthcare Quality / ECIBC Team, DG JRC, European Commission, Ispra, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lafranconi A, Pylkkänen L, Deandrea S, Bramesfeld A, Lerda D, Neamțiu L, Saz-Parkinson Z, Posso M, Rigau D, Sola I, Alonso-Coello P, Martinez-Zapata MJ. Intensive follow-up for women with breast cancer: review of clinical, economic and patient's preference domains through evidence to decision framework. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2017; 15:206. [PMID: 29052503 PMCID: PMC5649085 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-017-0779-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2016] [Accepted: 10/05/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women treated for breast cancer are followed-up for monitoring of treatment effectiveness and for detecting recurrences at an early stage. The type of follow-up received may affect women's reassurance and impact on their quality of life. Anxiety and depression among women with breast cancer has been described, but little is known about how the intensity of the follow-up can affect women's psychological status. This study was undertaken to evaluate the effects of intensive vs. less-intensive follow-up on different health outcomes, to determine what are women's preferences and values regarding the follow-up received, and also assess the costs of these different types of follow-up. METHODS A systematic review following standard Cochrane Collaboration methods was carried out to assess the efficacy of intensive follow-up versus non-intensive follow-up in breast cancer patients. Two additional reviews on women's preferences and economic evidence were also carried out. The search was performed up to January 2016 in: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PDQ, McMaster Health Systems Evidence, CENTRAL, and NHS EED (through The Cochrane Library). The quality of evidence was assessed by GRADE (for quantitative studies) and CerQUAL (for qualitative studies). Several outcomes including mortality, breast cancer recurrences, quality of life, and patient satisfaction were evaluated. RESULTS Six randomised trials (corresponding to 3534 women) were included for the evaluation of health outcomes; three studies were included for women's values and preferences and four for an economic assessment. There is moderate certainty of evidence showing that intensive follow-up, including more frequent diagnostic tests or visits, does not have effects on 5- or 10-year overall mortality and recurrences in women with breast cancer, compared with less intensive follow-up. Regarding women's preferences and values, there was important variability among studies and within studies (low confidence due to risk of bias and inconsistency). Furthermore, intensive follow-up, as opposed to less intensive follow-up, is not likely to be cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS Less intensive follow-up appears to be justified and can be recommended over intensive follow-up. Resources could thus be mobilised to other aspects of breast cancer care, or other areas of healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Lafranconi
- CESP, School of Medicine, Università degli Studi Milano Bicocca, Monza, MB Italy
- Department of International Health, FHML, CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
- European Commission, Directorate General Joint Research Centre (JRC), Directorate F - Health, Consumers and Reference Materials, Ispra, VA Italy
| | - Liisa Pylkkänen
- Cancer Society of Finland, Helsinki, Finland
- European Commission, Directorate General Joint Research Centre (JRC), Directorate F - Health, Consumers and Reference Materials, Ispra, VA Italy
| | - Silvia Deandrea
- European Commission, Directorate General Joint Research Centre (JRC), Directorate F - Health, Consumers and Reference Materials, Ispra, VA Italy
| | - Anke Bramesfeld
- European Commission, Directorate General Joint Research Centre (JRC), Directorate F - Health, Consumers and Reference Materials, Ispra, VA Italy
| | - Donata Lerda
- European Commission, Directorate General Joint Research Centre (JRC), Directorate F - Health, Consumers and Reference Materials, Ispra, VA Italy
| | - Luciana Neamțiu
- European Commission, Directorate General Joint Research Centre (JRC), Directorate F - Health, Consumers and Reference Materials, Ispra, VA Italy
| | - Zuleika Saz-Parkinson
- European Commission, Directorate General Joint Research Centre (JRC), Directorate F - Health, Consumers and Reference Materials, Ispra, VA Italy
| | - Margarita Posso
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre - Service of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Rigau
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre - Service of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ivan Sola
- CESP, School of Medicine, Università degli Studi Milano Bicocca, Monza, MB Italy
- Department of International Health, FHML, CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Cancer Society of Finland, Helsinki, Finland
- European Commission, Directorate General Joint Research Centre (JRC), Directorate F - Health, Consumers and Reference Materials, Ispra, VA Italy
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre - Service of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pablo Alonso-Coello
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre - Service of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria José Martinez-Zapata
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre - Service of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Neamtiu L, Saz-Parkinson Z, Pylkkanen L, Bramesfeld A, Deandrea S, Ambrosio M, Lerda D. Use of cancer registries data for measuring adherence to breast cancer guidelines in Europe. Eur J Public Health 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw171.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
29
|
Neamtiu L, Pylkkanen L, Salakari M, Deandrea S, Bramesfeld A, Saz-Parkinson Z, Ambrosio M, Lerda D. Systematic review on users’ values and preferences concerning breast cancer screening services. Eur J Public Health 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw169.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
30
|
Ruíz-López Del Prado G, Blaya-Nováková V, Saz-Parkinson Z, Álvarez-Montero ÓL, Ayala A, Muñoz-Moreno MF, Forjaz MJ. [Design and validation of an oral health questionnaire for preoperative anaesthetic evaluation]. Rev Bras Anestesiol 2016; 67:6-14. [PMID: 27692805 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjan.2016.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2015] [Accepted: 08/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Dental injuries incurred during endotracheal intubation are more frequent in patients with previous oral pathology. The study objectives were to develop an oral health questionnaire for preanaesthesia evaluation, easy to apply for personnel without special dental training; and establish a cut-off value for detecting persons with poor oral health. METHODS Validation study of a self-administered questionnaire, designed according to a literature review and an expert group's recommendations. The questionnaire was applied to a sample of patients evaluated in a preanaesthesia consultation. Rasch analysis of the questionnaire psychometric properties included viability, acceptability, content validity and reliability of the scale. RESULTS The sample included 115 individuals, 50.4% of men, with a median age of 58 years (range: 38-71). The final analysis of 11 items presented a Person Separation Index of 0.861 and good adjustment of data to the Rasch model. The scale was unidimensional and its items were not biased by sex, age or nationality. The oral health linear measure presented good construct validity. The cut-off value was set at 52 points. CONCLUSIONS The questionnaire showed sufficient psychometric properties to be considered a reliable tool, valid for measuring the state of oral health in preoperative anaesthetic evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gema Ruíz-López Del Prado
- Hospital Clínico Universitario, Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Valladolid, Espanha
| | - Vendula Blaya-Nováková
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Servicio de Medicina Preventiva y Gestión de Calidad, Madri, Espanha; Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias, Madri, Espanha
| | - Zuleika Saz-Parkinson
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias, Madri, Espanha; Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria, Madri, Espanha
| | - Óscar Luis Álvarez-Montero
- Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Departamento de Otorrinolaringología, Madrid, Espanha; Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Departamento de Otorrinolaringología, Madri, Espanha
| | - Alba Ayala
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Escuela Nacional de Sanidad, Madri, Espanha
| | - Maria Fe Muñoz-Moreno
- Hospital Clínico Universitario, Unidad de Investigación Biomédica, Valladolid, Espanha
| | - Maria João Forjaz
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Escuela Nacional de Sanidad, Madri, Espanha.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Deandrea S, Pylkkanen L, Ambrosio M, Neamtiu L, Saz-Parkinson Z, Bramesfeld A, Uluturk A, Lerda D. 91. Efficacy of multidisciplinary meetings on breast cancer outcomes. A systematic review and pooled analysis. European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer, Quality Assurance Scheme Development Group, and Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre contributed. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.06.097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
32
|
Neamţiu L, Deandrea S, Pylkkänen L, Freeman C, López Alcalde J, Bramesfeld A, Saz-Parkinson Z, Ulutürk A, Lerda D. Psycho-oncological support for breast cancer patients: A brief overview of breast cancer services certification schemes and national health policies in Europe. Breast 2016; 29:178-80. [PMID: 27526300 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2016] [Revised: 06/29/2016] [Accepted: 07/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Psycho-oncology addresses the psychological, social, behavioural, and ethical aspects of cancer. Identification and proper management of the patients' psychosocial needs, as well as the needs of their caregivers and family are essential for a person-centred concept of breast cancer care. The aim of this overview is to describe how psychosocial support in breast cancer is incorporated in cancer-related policy documents, such as national cancer plans and breast cancer care certification schemes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Neamţiu
- European Commission, Directorate General Joint Research Centre, Directorate F - Health, Consumers and Reference Materials, Unit F1 "Health in Society", Via E. Fermi 2749, TP 127, I-21027 Ispra, VA, Italy.
| | - S Deandrea
- European Commission, Directorate General Joint Research Centre, Directorate F - Health, Consumers and Reference Materials, Unit F1 "Health in Society", Via E. Fermi 2749, TP 127, I-21027 Ispra, VA, Italy
| | - L Pylkkänen
- European Commission, Directorate General Joint Research Centre, Directorate F - Health, Consumers and Reference Materials, Unit F1 "Health in Society", Via E. Fermi 2749, TP 127, I-21027 Ispra, VA, Italy
| | - C Freeman
- Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, 08908 L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J López Alcalde
- Unidad de Bioestadistica Clinica, Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal (IRYCIS), CIBER Epidemiologia y Salud Publica (CIBERESP), Ctra. Colmenar Km. 9,100, 28034 Madrid, Spain; Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Ctra. Pozuelo-Majadahonda Km. 1,800, Madrid, Spain
| | - A Bramesfeld
- European Commission, Directorate General Joint Research Centre, Directorate F - Health, Consumers and Reference Materials, Unit F1 "Health in Society", Via E. Fermi 2749, TP 127, I-21027 Ispra, VA, Italy
| | - Z Saz-Parkinson
- European Commission, Directorate General Joint Research Centre, Directorate F - Health, Consumers and Reference Materials, Unit F1 "Health in Society", Via E. Fermi 2749, TP 127, I-21027 Ispra, VA, Italy
| | - A Ulutürk
- European Commission, Directorate General Joint Research Centre, Directorate F - Health, Consumers and Reference Materials, Unit F1 "Health in Society", Via E. Fermi 2749, TP 127, I-21027 Ispra, VA, Italy
| | - D Lerda
- European Commission, Directorate General Joint Research Centre, Directorate F - Health, Consumers and Reference Materials, Unit F1 "Health in Society", Via E. Fermi 2749, TP 127, I-21027 Ispra, VA, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ruíz-López Del Prado G, Blaya-Nováková V, Saz-Parkinson Z, Álvarez-Montero ÓL, Ayala A, Muñoz-Moreno MF, Forjaz MJ. Design and validation of an oral health questionnaire for preoperative anaesthetic evaluation. Braz J Anesthesiol 2016; 67:6-14. [PMID: 28017172 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2015.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2015] [Accepted: 08/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Dental injuries incurred during endotracheal intubation are more frequent in patients with previous oral pathology. The study objectives were to develop an oral health questionnaire for preanaesthesia evaluation, easy to apply for personnel without special dental training; and establish a cut-off value for detecting persons with poor oral health. METHODS Validation study of a self-administered questionnaire, designed according to a literature review and an expert group's recommendations. The questionnaire was applied to a sample of patients evaluated in a preanaesthesia consultation. Rasch analysis of the questionnaire psychometric properties included viability, acceptability, content validity and reliability of the scale. RESULTS The sample included 115 individuals, 50.4% of men, with a median age of 58 years (range: 38-71). The final analysis of 11 items presented a Person Separation Index of 0.861 and good adjustment of data to the Rasch model. The scale was unidimensional and its items were not biased by sex, age or nationality. The oral health linear measure presented good construct validity. The cut-off value was set at 52 points. CONCLUSIONS The questionnaire showed sufficient psychometric properties to be considered a reliable tool, valid for measuring the state of oral health in preoperative anaesthetic evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gema Ruíz-López Del Prado
- Hospital Clínico Universitario, Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Vendula Blaya-Nováková
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Servicio de Medicina Preventiva y Gestión de Calidad, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias, Madrid, Spain
| | - Zuleika Saz-Parkinson
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria, Madrid, Spain
| | - Óscar Luis Álvarez-Montero
- Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Departamento de Otorrinolaringología, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Departamento de Otorrinolaringología, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alba Ayala
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Escuela Nacional de Sanidad, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria Fe Muñoz-Moreno
- Hospital Clínico Universitario, Unidad de Investigación Biomédica, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Maria João Forjaz
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Escuela Nacional de Sanidad, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Medel-Herrero A, Gómez-Beneyto M, Saz-Parkinson Z, Bravo-Ortiz MF, Amate JM. Discordance between two national health statistics sources (EMH and EESCRI, 1990-2009). Analysis of psychiatric morbidity. Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment 2016; 9:22-30. [PMID: 24998168 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpsm.2014.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2013] [Revised: 05/02/2014] [Accepted: 05/06/2014] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Two statistical sources provide data on hospital stays and discharges for all Spanish hospitals: Hospital Morbidity Survey (acronym in Spanish: EMH) and Statistics of Health Establishments providing Inpatient Care (acronym in Spanish: EESCRI). Our aim is to contrast these two statistical sources to define their accuracy and relevance in psychiatric epidemiology studies. MATERIAL AND METHODOLOGY The analysis is based on two aspects: 1.- Compare the number of psychiatric stays and hospital discharges from 1990-2009, 2.- Analyze and compare how the average stay is provided. RESULTS The differences between the two statistical sources are significant and increase over time. In 2005-2009 the EMH records 121% of hospitalizations (577,078 vs. 475,414) and 46% (14,239,527 vs. 30,821,412) of psychiatric stays, compared with EESCRI. Moreover, the average stay estimated by EESCRI shows serious methodological problems, particularly in settings of prolonged hospitalization (psychiatric hospitals); the estimations are potentially below the real value. CONCLUSIONS Surprisingly, the questionnaires completed by hospitals to develop the EESCRI provide data on assisted morbidity quite different from that provided by the EMH, despite both statistical sources having the same inpatient records for data processing. It is difficult to attribute these differences to sampling error, as the EMH has a very high sampling fraction, which minimizes the sampling error. Given the mismatch between sources, we recommend using the EMH, as it offers more reliable data and allows an accurate determination of the length of stays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alvaro Medel-Herrero
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas, CIBERNED, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, España.
| | - Manuel Gómez-Beneyto
- Departamento de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Valencia, CIBERSAM, Valencia, España
| | - Zuleika Saz-Parkinson
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Fundación Investigación Biomédica-HCSC, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, España
| | - Maria Fe Bravo-Ortiz
- Servicio de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPaz, Madrid, España; Departamento de Psiquiatría, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | - Jose Maria Amate
- Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Saz-Parkinson Z, Granados Alonso MDS, Bouza C, Poveda Andrés JL, Amate JM. Self-administration of Recombinant Human Growth Hormone with an Electronic Device: Clinical, Economic and Management Benefits of Objective Adherence Monitoring. J Health Econ Outcomes Res 2015; 1:296-307. [PMID: 37662880 PMCID: PMC10471364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
Purpose: The aim was to identify factors affecting treatment adherence and to assess the clinical, economic and management impact of growth hormone deficiency treatment using an electronic auto-injector for recombinant human growth hormone (r-hGH) administration in children. Patients and Methods: A literature review was conducted in PubMed up to 31JUL2013, including the following search terms: "growth hormone deficiency", "human-recombinant growth hormone" and "treatment adherence". An economic model was developed to estimate the economic benefits of using an electronic injection device. In order to quantify this benefit, potential savings due to growth hormone cartridge optimization were analyzed. Results: From the literature review, the following key factors were found to affect treatment adherence: type of device used, discomfort, complexity of treatment regimens, long-term treatment, age and patient or family understanding of treatment benefits were assessed. A better adjustment to prescribed daily dose (accuracy up to 0.01 mg) with the electronic device results in a better optimization of vials and could save an average of 5% of total treatment costs in terms of doses not wasted, amounting to €245 of potential savings per patient and year of treatment. Conclusion: The use of an electronic device for r-hGH administration and monitoring may provide a better identification of responder and adherent patients. It may also generate savings in annual r-hGH consumption by hospitals and regional healthcare services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zuleika Saz-Parkinson
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Carmen Bouza
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - José María Amate
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Neamtiu L, Lopez-Alcalde J, Deandrea S, Uluturk A, Saz-Parkinson Z, Lerda D. Requirements for breast cancer data collection: systematic review of European funded projects. Eur J Public Health 2015. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv176.183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
37
|
Rossi EG, Rossi E, Di Stefano M, Cervino C, Baccetti S, Saz-Parkinson Z, Deandrea S, Utulurk A, Lerda D. Updating the EPAAC/JRC survey on integrative oncology centres in Europe. Eur J Integr Med 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eujim.2015.09.117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
38
|
Amate JM, Lopez-Cuadrado T, Almendro N, Bouza C, Saz-Parkinson Z, Rivas-Ruiz R, Gonzalez-Canudas J. Effectiveness and safety of glimepiride and iDPP4, associated with metformin in second line pharmacotherapy of type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Clin Pract 2015; 69:292-304. [PMID: 25683794 PMCID: PMC5024024 DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.12605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2014] [Accepted: 12/02/2014] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Our review analyses the studies that have specifically compared the association iDPP4/metformin with glimepiride/metformin, both in second line pharmacotherapy of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2). METHODS Systematic literature review with a meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing glimepiride with any iDPP4, both used together with metformin as a second line treatment of DM2. The effectiveness variables used were as follows: %HbA1c variation, fasting plasma glucose variation, patients achieving the therapeutic objective of HbA1c <7%, treatment dropouts due to lack of effectiveness and rescue treatments needed. The safety variables included were as follows: weight variation at the end of treatment; presentation of any type of adverse event; presentation of serious adverse events; patients who experienced any type of hypoglycaemia; patients who experienced severe hypoglycaemia; treatments suspended due to adverse effects; and deaths for any reason. RESULTS Four studies met the inclusion criteria. The group treated with glimepiride showed better results in all effectiveness variables. Regarding safety variables, the main differences observed were in the greater number of cases with hypoglycaemia in the group treated with glimepiride, and the serious adverse events or treatment discontinuations due to these which occurred in slightly over 2% more cases in this group compared to the iDPP4 group. The remaining adverse events, including mortality, did not show any differences between both groups. The variation in the weight difference between groups (2.1 kg) is not considered clinically relevant. CONCLUSIONS A greater effectiveness is seen in the glimepiride/metformin association, which should not be diminished by slight differences in adverse effects, with absence of severe hypoglycaemia in over 98% of patients under treatment. The association of glimepiride/metformin, both due to cost as well as effectiveness and safety, may be the preferential treatment for most DM2 patients, and it offers a potential advantage in refractory hyperglycemic populations, tolerant to treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Amate
- Institute of Health "Carlos III", Healthcare Technologies Assessment Agency, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Bouza C, López-Cuadrado T, Saz-Parkinson Z, Amate-Blanco JM. Epidemiology and recent trends of severe sepsis in Spain: a nationwide population-based analysis (2006-2011). BMC Infect Dis 2014; 14:3863. [PMID: 25528662 PMCID: PMC4327809 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-014-0717-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2014] [Accepted: 12/15/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although severe sepsis constitutes an important burden for healthcare systems, there is limited nationwide data on its epidemiology in European countries. Our objective was to examine the most recent epidemiological characteristics and trends of severe sepsis in Spain, from a population perspective. Methods Analysis of the 2006-2011 National Hospital Discharge Registry. Cases were identified by combining specific ICD-9CM codes. We estimated demographics, clinical characteristics and outcomes and calculated age- and sex- adjusted estimations of incidence and mortality rates. Trends were assessed in terms of annual percent change (APC) in rates using joinpoint regression analysis. Results Over the 6-year period we identified 240939 cases of severe sepsis nationwide representing 1.1% of all hospitalisations and 54% of hospitalisations with sepsis. Incidence was 87 cases per 100,000 population. Overall 58% of cases were men, 66% were over the age of 65 and about 67% had associated comorbidities. Bacteremia was coded in 16% of records. Almost 54% of cases had one organ dysfunction, 26% two and around 20% three or more dysfunctions. In-hospital case-fatality was 43% and associated with age, gender, comorbidities and organ dysfunctions, among others. We found significant demographic and clinical changes over time with an increase in the mean age of cases, comorbidities, number of organ dysfunctions and in the number of cases with gram-negative pathogens. Furthermore, even with gender disparities, standardised incidence and mortality rates increased with an overall APC of 8.6% (95% CI 5.1, 12.1) and 6% (95% CI 1.9, 10.3), respectively. Conversely, we detect a significant decrease in case-fatality rates with an overall APC of -3.24% (95% CI: -4.2, -2.2). Conclusions This nationwide population-based study shows that hospitalizations with severe sepsis are frequent and associated with substantial in-hospital mortality in Spain. Furthermore it indicates that the incidence and mortality rates of severe sepsis have notably increased in recent years, showing also a significant increase in the age and severity of the affected population. Despite this, there has been a significant decreasing trend in case-fatality rates over time. This information has significant implications for health-care system planning and may prove useful to estimate future care requirements. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-014-0717-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Bouza
- Health-Care Technology Assessment Agency, National Center of Epidemiology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Teresa López-Cuadrado
- Health-Care Technology Assessment Agency, National Center of Epidemiology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Zuleika Saz-Parkinson
- Health-Care Technology Assessment Agency, National Center of Epidemiology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
| | - José María Amate-Blanco
- Health-Care Technology Assessment Agency, National Center of Epidemiology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Elissen A, Nolte E, Hinrichs S, Conklin A, Adams J, Cadier B, Chevreul K, Durand-Zaleski I, Erler A, Flamm M, Frølich A, Fullerton B, Jacobsen R, Knai C, Saz-Parkinson Z, Sarria-Santamera A, Sönnichsen A, Vrijhoef HJ. Evaluating chronic disease management in real-world settings in six European countries: Lessons from the collaborative DISMEVAL project. International Journal of Care Coordination 2014. [DOI: 10.1177/2053435414541644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Objective To describe the interventions, research methods and main findings of the international DISMEVAL project, in which the “real-world” impact of exemplary European disease management approaches was investigated in six countries using advanced analytic techniques. Design Across countries, the project captured a wide range of disease management strategies and settings; approaches to evaluation varied per country, but included, among others, difference-in-differences analysis and regression discontinuity analysis. Setting Austria, Denmark, France, Germany, The Netherlands, and Spain. Participants Health care providers and/or statutory insurance funds providing routine data from their disease management interventions, mostly retrospectively. Intervention(s) This study did not carry out an intervention but evaluated the impact of existing disease management interventions implemented in European care settings. Main outcome measure(s) Outcome measures were largely dependent on available routine data, but could concern health care structures, processes, and outcomes. Results Data covering 10 to 36 months were gathered concerning more than 154,000 patients with three conditions. The analyses demonstrated considerable positive effects of disease management on process quality (Austria, Germany), but no more than moderate improvements in intermediate health outcomes (Austria, France, Netherlands, Spain) or disease progression (Denmark) in intervention patients, where possible compared with a matched control group. Conclusions Assessing the “real-world” impact of chronic disease management remains a challenge. In settings where randomization is not possible and/or desirable, routine health care performance data can provide a valuable resource for practice-based evaluations using advanced analytic techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arianne Elissen
- 1Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen Nolte
- Health and Healthcare Research Programme, RAND Europe, Cambridge, UK
| | - Saba Hinrichs
- Health and Healthcare Research Programme, RAND Europe, Cambridge, UK
| | - Annalijn Conklin
- Health and Healthcare Research Programme, RAND Europe, Cambridge, UK
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - John Adams
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Center for Effectiveness and Safety Research, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Benjamin Cadier
- URC Eco Ile-de-France, Université Paris Est Créteil, Paris, France
| | - Karine Chevreul
- URC Eco Ile-de-France, Université Paris Est Créteil, Paris, France
- AP-HP Recherche Clinique Santé Publique, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
| | - Isabelle Durand-Zaleski
- URC Eco Ile-de-France, Université Paris Est Créteil, Paris, France
- AP-HP Recherche Clinique Santé Publique, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
| | - Antje Erler
- Institute of General Practice, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Maria Flamm
- Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Danube University Krems, Krems, Austria
| | - Anne Frølich
- Department of Health Services Research, Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Birgit Fullerton
- Institute of General Practice, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Ramune Jacobsen
- Institute of Preventive Medicine, Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - Cécile Knai
- Faculty of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Zuleika Saz-Parkinson
- Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Andreas Sönnichsen
- Institute of General and Family Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
| | - Hubertus J.M. Vrijhoef
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Elissen AMJ, Nolte E, Knai C, Brunn M, Chevreul K, Conklin A, Durand-Zaleski I, Erler A, Flamm M, Frølich A, Fullerton B, Jacobsen R, Saz-Parkinson Z, Sarria-Santamera A, Sönnichsen A, Vrijhoef HJM. Is Europe putting theory into practice? A study of the level of self-management support in coordinated care approaches for chronically ill. Eur J Public Health 2013. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckt126.234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
42
|
Elissen A, Nolte E, Knai C, Brunn M, Chevreul K, Conklin A, Durand-Zaleski I, Erler A, Flamm M, Frølich A, Fullerton B, Jacobsen R, Saz-Parkinson Z, Sarria-Santamera A, Sönnichsen A, Vrijhoef H. Is Europe putting theory into practice? A qualitative study of the level of self-management support in chronic care management approaches. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13:117. [PMID: 23530744 PMCID: PMC3621080 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2012] [Accepted: 03/20/2013] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Self-management support is a key component of effective chronic care management, yet in practice appears to be the least implemented and most challenging. This study explores whether and how self-management support is integrated into chronic care approaches in 13 European countries. In addition, it investigates the level of and barriers to implementation of support strategies in health care practice. Methods We conducted a review among the 13 participating countries, based on a common data template informed by the Chronic Care Model. Key informants presented a sample of representative chronic care approaches and related self-management support strategies. The cross-country review was complemented by a Dutch case study of health professionals’ views on the implementation of self-management support in practice. Results Self-management support for chronically ill patients remains relatively underdeveloped in Europe. Similarities between countries exist mostly in involved providers (nurses) and settings (primary care). Differences prevail in mode and format of support, and materials used. Support activities focus primarily on patients’ medical and behavioral management, and less on emotional management. According to Dutch providers, self-management support is not (yet) an integral part of daily practice; implementation is hampered by barriers related to, among others, funding, IT and medical culture. Conclusions Although collaborative care for chronic conditions is becoming more important in European health systems, adequate self-management support for patients with chronic disease is far from accomplished in most countries. There is a need for better understanding of how we can encourage both patients and health care providers to engage in productive interactions in daily chronic care practice, which can improve health and social outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arianne Elissen
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Knai C, Nolte E, Brunn M, Elissen A, Conklin A, Pedersen JP, Brereton L, Erler A, Frølich A, Flamm M, Fullerton B, Jacobsen R, Krohn R, Saz-Parkinson Z, Vrijhoef B, Chevreul K, Durand-Zaleski I, Farsi F, Sarría-Santamera A, Soennichsen A. Reported barriers to evaluation in chronic care: experiences in six European countries. Health Policy 2013; 110:220-8. [PMID: 23453595 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2012] [Revised: 11/07/2012] [Accepted: 01/17/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The growing movement of innovative approaches to chronic disease management in Europe has not been matched by a corresponding effort to evaluate them. This paper discusses challenges to evaluation of chronic disease management as reported by experts in six European countries. METHODS We conducted 42 semi-structured interviews with key informants from Austria, Denmark, France, Germany, The Netherlands and Spain involved in decision-making and implementation of chronic disease management approaches. Interviews were complemented by a survey on approaches to chronic disease management in each country. Finally two project teams (France and the Netherlands) conducted in-depth case studies on various aspects of chronic care evaluation. RESULTS We identified three common challenges to evaluation of chronic disease management approaches: (1) a lack of evaluation culture and related shortage of capacity; (2) reluctance of payers or providers to engage in evaluation and (3) practical challenges around data and the heterogeity of IT infrastructure. The ability to evaluate chronic disease management interventions is influenced by contextual and cultural factors. CONCLUSIONS This study contributes to our understanding of some of the most common underlying barriers to chronic care evaluation by highlighting the views and experiences of stakeholders and experts in six European countries. Overcoming the cultural, political and structural barriers to evaluation should be driven by payers and providers, for example by building in incentives such as feedback on performance, aligning financial incentives with programme objectives, collectively participating in designing an appropriate framework for evaluation, and making data use and accessibility consistent with data protection policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cécile Knai
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H9SH, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Bouza C, López-Cuadrado T, Cediel P, Saz-Parkinson Z, Amate JM. Balloon kyphoplasty in malignant spinal fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Palliat Care 2009; 8:12. [PMID: 19740423 PMCID: PMC2746801 DOI: 10.1186/1472-684x-8-12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2009] [Accepted: 09/09/2009] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spinal fractures are a common source of morbidity in cancer patients. Balloon Kyphoplasty (BKP) is a minimally invasive procedure designed to stabilize fractures and correct vertebral deformities. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of BKP for spinal fractures in cancer patients. METHODS We searched several electronic databases up to September 2008 and the reference lists of relevant publications for studies reporting on BKP in patients with spinal fractures secondary to osteolytic metastasis and multiple myeloma. Outcomes sought included pain relief, functional capacity, quality of life, vertebral height, kyphotic angle and adverse events. Studies were assessed for methodological bias, and estimates of effect were calculated using a random-effects model. Potential reasons for heterogeneity were explored. RESULTS The literature search revealed seven relevant studies published from 2003 to 2008, none of which were randomized trials. Analysis of those studies indicated that BKP resulted in less pain and better functional outcomes, and that these effects were maintained up to 2 years post-procedure. While BKP also improved early vertebral height loss and spinal deformity, these effects were not long-term. No serious procedure-related complications were described. Clinically asymptomatic cement leakage occurred in 6% of all treated levels, and new vertebral fractures in 10% of patients. While there is a lack of studies comparing BKP to other interventions, some data suggested that BKP provided similar pain relief as vertebroplasty and a lower cement leakage rate. CONCLUSION It appears that there is level III evidence showing BKP is a well-tolerated, relatively safe and effective technique that provides early pain relief and improved functional outcomes in patients with painful neoplastic spinal fractures. BKP also provided long-term benefits in terms of pain and disability. However, the methodological quality of the original studies prevents definitive conclusions being drawn. Further investigation into the use of BKP for spinal fractures in cancer patients is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Bouza
- Health-Care Technology Assessment Agency, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Teresa López-Cuadrado
- Health-Care Technology Assessment Agency, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Patricia Cediel
- Health-Care Technology Assessment Agency, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Zuleika Saz-Parkinson
- Health-Care Technology Assessment Agency, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - José María Amate
- Health-Care Technology Assessment Agency, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Saz-Parkinson Z, López-Cuadrado T, Bouza C, Amate JM. Outcomes of new quality standards of follitropin alfa on ovarian stimulation: meta-analysis of previous studies. BioDrugs 2009; 23:37-42. [PMID: 19344190 DOI: 10.2165/00063030-200923010-00004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Human follicle-stimulating hormone (hFSH; follitropin alfa) can be employed therapeutically to induce ovarian follicular development in assisted reproduction treatments. Current recombinant hFSH (r-hFSH) preparations available for clinical use are labeled either in terms of the bioactivity expressed in international units (IU) or in mass (microg). Several clinical trials have tried to assess the clinical implications of the physicochemical improvements in the dosing of follitropin alfa filled by mass (FbM). The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of previous studies in order to assess the efficacy and safety of ovarian stimulation using follitropin alfa FbM compared with follitropin alfa filled by international units (FbIU). METHODS A literature search was carried out in scientific databases to find published articles and abstracts comparing both hormone preparations. A fixed effects model meta-analysis was performed. The variables studied include the average dose (IU), days of treatment, estradiol peak, follicles >14 mm, number of extracted oocytes, number of embryos obtained, number of cases of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), and clinical pregnancies. RESULTS A total of six studies met the stated criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. In these studies, the average r-hFSH dose per patient was 230.29 IU less with administration of follitropin alfa FbM compared with FbIU, and the number of days of treatment was reduced by 0.48. In addition, a significantly greater number of oocytes (0.84) were extracted, more embryos (0.88) were obtained, and a higher peak level of estradiol (613.08 pmol/L) was achieved in the patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with follitropin alfa FbM. However, no statistically significant differences were observed in the number of follicles >14 mm, clinical pregnancies, or OHSS cases. CONCLUSION Follitropin alfa FbM, a technologically modified formulation of r-hFSH, is as safe as follitropin alfa FbIU but requires a smaller dose over a shorter period to produce more oocytes and final embryos.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zuleika Saz-Parkinson
- Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, Madrid, Spain.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Polo-De Santos M, Luengo-Matos S, Muñoz-Navarro B, Saz-Parkinson Z. Results from the monitoring use programme for endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in Spain. INT ANGIOL 2009; 28:181-191. [PMID: 19169205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this study was to present the results from the Monitoring Use Programme (MUP) for endovascular repair (ER) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) using stent grafts in Spain, carried out to determine the procedure's effectiveness and safety. METHODS This was a follow-up study carried out through a multicentric-case registry between 2001-2003. Variables were grouped into: 1) general information, 2) postoperative period and 3) follow-up period. RESULTS The study enrolled 740 cases (97% males), from 32 hospitals. Mean age of patients was 72.7+/-7.3 years. Mean AAA diameter was 59.5+/-13.7 mm. Forty-seven percent of patients required additional intervention procedures; 19% patients presented intervention complications (53% were endoleaks). The endovascular intervention could not be completed in 6 patients, and in 2 patients the operation was changed to conventional surgery; 24% patients suffered, mostly minor, postoperative complications. Between 4-24 months, follow-up was normal in 81-85% cases with the most common complication being endoleaks (7%). After 24 months, and especially after 37, reinterventions and complications, in particular angulation and stent migration, increased, mainly associated to the Vanguard device. After 37 months, an increase in AAA size was observed. Among patients with preoperative AAA<50 mm, there was a greater proportion of individuals requiring additional procedures (60% vs 41%, P<0.01), suffering postoperative complications (26% vs 24%), and presenting more leaks (71% vs 52%), than among patients with AAA >or= 50 mm. CONCLUSIONS ER of AAA shows favourable results in the short/medium term with regards to procedure safety and effectiveness. The appearance of some complications and increase in AAA size 2-3 years after ER raises the need for caution. Care should be taken when considering ER of small AAA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Polo-De Santos
- Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Bouza C, López-Cuadrado T, Alcázar R, Saz-Parkinson Z, Amate JM. Meta-analysis of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation versus ethanol injection in hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Gastroenterol 2009; 9:31. [PMID: 19432967 PMCID: PMC3224700 DOI: 10.1186/1471-230x-9-31] [Citation(s) in RCA: 114] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2008] [Accepted: 05/11/2009] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has gained popularity in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, its role versus other conventional minimally invasive therapies is still a matter of debate. The purpose of this work is to analyse the efficacy and safety of RFA versus that of ethanol injection (PEI), the percutaneous standard approach to treat nonsurgical HCC. METHODS Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials published up to August 2008 in PubMed, ISI Web of Science and The Cochrane Library. Overall survival, local recurrence rate and adverse effects were considered as primary outcomes. Studies were critically appraised and estimates of effect were calculated according to the random-effects model. Inconsistency across studies was evaluated using the I2 statistic. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore statistical heterogeneity. RESULTS Six studies were eligible. The studies reported data on 396 patients treated by RFA and 391 treated by PEI. In general, subjects were in Child-Pugh class A (74%) and had unresectable HCC (mean size 2.5 cm). Mean follow-up was 25 +/- 11 months. The survival rate showed a significant benefit for RFA over PEI at one, two, three and four years. The advantage in survival increased with time with Relative Risk values of: 1.28 (95%CI:1.12-1.45) and 1.24 (95%CI:1.05-1.48) for RFA versus PEI at 3- and 4-years respectively. Likewise, RFA achieved significantly lower rates of local recurrence (RR: 0.37, 95%CI: 0.23-0.59). The overall rate of adverse events was higher with RFA (RR:2.55, 95%CI: 1.8-3.6) yet no significant differences were found concerning major complications (RR:1.85, 95%CI: 0.68-5.01). There was not enough evidence supporting a better cost-effectiveness ratio for RFA compared to PEI. CONCLUSION Available evidence from adequate quality controlled studies support the superiority of RFA versus PEI, in terms of better survival and local control of the disease, for the treatment of patients with relatively preserved liver function and early-stage non-surgical HCC. However, the higher rate of adverse events displayed is something that will have to be tested with appropriate weighting of the possible benefits in each individual case. Overall cost-effectiveness of RFA needs further evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Bouza
- Healthcare Technology Assessment Agency, Carlos III Health Institute, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Raimundo Alcázar
- Healthcare Technology Assessment Agency, Carlos III Health Institute, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - José María Amate
- Healthcare Technology Assessment Agency, Carlos III Health Institute, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Luengo-Matos S, Polo-Santos M, Saz-Parkinson Z. Mammography use and factors associated with its use after the introduction of breast cancer screening programmes in Spain. Eur J Cancer Prev 2006; 15:242-8. [PMID: 16679867 DOI: 10.1097/01.cej.0000199503.30818.e6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to measure the use of mammography and the factors associated with testing among Spanish women, after the introduction of screening programmes in Spain. We conducted a cross-sectional population survey of a representative sample of women aged 40-70 (2409 women). Data collection took place in October 2000, using a questionnaire addressing the dependent variable (mammography use) and the independent variables (socio-demographic and socio-health factors, and women's knowledge and attitudes). Mammography use was defined as having received at least one screening test in the previous 2 years. Data analysis consisted of univariate and multivariate analyses. 48.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 46.0-50.2) of women had received screening mammography. The main factors associated with testing were: mammography invitation from the screening programme (odds ratio (OR) 4.81; 95% CI 3.85-6.01); gynaecologist visit (OR 4.32; 95% CI 3.45-5.41); and intention to have a mammogram (OR 2.94; 95% CI 2.00-4.32). Other test-related factors were: not rejecting test for discomfort or fear of cancer; mammography perceived as necessary; age 56-65; upper/upper-middle socio-economic status. In conclusion, after the introduction of screening programmes, almost half of Spanish women aged 40-70 had received mammography. Invitation to screening, gynaecologist visit and women's attitudes are the main reasons for undergoing testing. Women over 65 years of age and/or those in a lower socio-economic level warrant special attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Setefilla Luengo-Matos
- Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias (Health Technology Assessment Agency). Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Institute of Health Carlos III), Madrid, Spain.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|