Dose Distribution of High Dose-Rate and Low Dose-Rate Prostate Brachytherapy at Different Intervals-Impact of a Hydrogel Spacer and Prostate Volume

The study aimed to compare the dose distribution in permanent low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT), specifically focusing on the impact of a spacer and prostate volume. The relative dose distribution of 102 LDR-BT patients (prescription dose 145 Gy) at different intervals was compared with the dose distribution of 105 HDR-BT patients (232 HDR-BT fractions with prescription doses of 9 Gy, n = 151, or 11.5 Gy, n = 81). A hydrogel spacer (10 mL) was only injected before HDR-BT. For the analysis of dose coverage outside the prostate, a 5 mm margin was added to the prostate volume (PV+). Prostate V100 and D90 of HDR-BT and LDR-BT at different intervals were comparable. HDR-BT was characterized by a considerably more homogenous dose distribution and lower doses to the urethra. The minimum dose in 90% of PV+ was higher for larger prostates. As a consequence of the hydrogel spacer in HDR-BT patients, the intraoperative dose at the rectum was considerably lower, especially in smaller prostates. However, prostate volume dose coverage was not improved. The dosimetric results well explain clinical differences between these techniques reported in the literature review, specifically comparable tumor control, higher acute urinary toxicity rates in LDR-BT in comparison to HDR-BT, decreased rectal toxicity after spacer placement, and improved tumor control after HDR-BT in larger prostate volumes.

Radiobiological and dosimetric comparison of 60Co versus 192Ir high-dose-rate intracavitary-interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer

BACKGROUND

High-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary-interstitial brachytherapy (IC-ISBT) is an effective treatment for bulky, middle, and advanced cervical cancer. In this study, we compared the differences between 60Co and 192Ir HDR IC-ISBT plans in terms of radiobiological and dosimetric parameters, providing a reference for clinical workers in brachytherapy.

METHODS

A total of 30 patients with cervical cancer receiving HDR IC-ISBT were included in this study, and IC-ISBT plans for each individual were designed with both 60Co and 192Ir at a prescribed dose of CTV D90 = 6 Gy while keeping the dose to OARs as low as possible. Physical dose and dose-volume parameters of CTV and OARs were extracted from TPS. The EQD2, EUBED, EUD, TCP, and NTCP were calculated using corresponding formulas. The differences between the 60Co and 192Ir IC-ISBT plans were compared using the paired t-test.

RESULTS

In each patient's 60Co and 192Ir IC-ISBT plan, the average physical dose and EQD2 of 60Co were lower than those of 192Ir, and there were statistically significant differences in D2cc and D1cc for the OARs (p < 0.05); there were statistically significant differences in D0.1 cc for the bladder (p < 0.05) and no significant differences in D0.1 cc for the rectum or intestines (p > 0.05). The EUBED ratio (60Co/192Ir) at the CTV was mostly close to 1 when neither 60Co or 192Ir passed their half-lives or when both passed two half-lives, and the difference between them was not significant; at the OARs, the mean value of 60Co was lower than that of 192Ir. There was no statistical difference between 60Co and 192Ir in the EUD (93.93 versus 93.92 Gy, p > 0.05) and TCP (97.07% versus 97.08%, p > 0.05) of the tumors. The mean NTCP value of 60Co was lower than that of 192Ir.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the CTV and OARs, the dosimetric parameters of 60Co and 192Ir are comparable. Compared with 192Ir, the use of 60Co for HDR IC-ISBT can ensure a similar tumor control probability while providing better protection to the OARs. In addition, 60Co has obvious economic advantages and can be promoted as a good alternative to 192Ir.

Rapid HPGe well detector gamma bioassay of 137Cs, 60Co, and 192Ir method

CDC designed a rapid HPGe Bioassay Method for ¹³⁷Cs, ⁶⁰Co, and ¹⁹²Ir that is suitable for a public health response to a radiological incident where people may ingest or inhale radionuclides. The method uses a short count time, small sample volume, and a large volume detector and well size. It measures a patient's urine sample collected post-incident. The levels of concern are directly related to the Clinical Decision Guide levels recommended in the National Council of Radiation Protection 161.

High resolution small-scale inorganic scintillator detector: HDR brachytherapy application

PURPOSE

Brachytherapy (BT) deals with high gradient internal dose irradiation made up of a complex system where the source is placed nearby the tumor to destroy cancerous cells. A primary concern of clinical safety in BT is quality assurance to ensure the best matches between the delivered and prescribed doses targeting small volume tumors and sparing surrounding healthy tissues. Hence, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of a point size inorganic scintillator detector (ISD) in terms of high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) treatment.

METHODS

A prototype of the dose verification system has been developed based on scintillating dosimetry to measure a high dose rate while using an ¹⁹² Ir BT source. The associated dose rate is measured in photons/s employing a highly sensitive photon counter (design data: 20 photons/s). Dose measurement was performed as a function of source-to-detector distance according to TG43U1 recommendations. Overall measurements were carried out inside water phantoms keeping the ISD along the BT needle; a minimum of 0.1 cm distance was maintained between each measurement point. The planned dwell times were measured accurately from the difference of two adjacent times of transit. The ISD system performances were also evaluated in terms of dose linearity, energy dependency, scintillation stability, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and signal-to-background ratio (SBR). Finally, a comparison was presented between the ISD measurements and results obtained from TG43 reference dataset.

RESULTS

The detection efficiency of the ISD was verified by measuring the planned dwell times at different dwell positions. Measurements demonstrated that the ISD has a perfectly linear behavior with dose rate (R²  = 1) and shows high SNR (>35) and SBR (>36) values even at the lowest dose rate investigated at around 10 cm from the source. Standard deviation (1σ) remains within 0.03% of signal magnitude, and less than 0.01% STEM signal was monitored at 0.1 cm source-to-detector distance. Stability of 0.54% is achieved, and afterglow stays less than 1% of the total signal in all the irradiations. Excellent symmetrical behavior of the dose rate regarding source position was observed at different radiation planes. Finally, a comparison with TG-43 reference dataset shows that corrected measurements agreed with simulation data within 1.2% and 1.3%, and valid for the source-to-detector distance greater than 0.25 cm.

CONCLUSION

The proposed ISD in this study anticipated that the system could be promoted to validate with further clinical investigations. It allows an appropriate dose verification with dwell time estimation during source tracking and suitable dose measurement with a high spatial resolution both nearby (high dose gradient) and far (low dose gradient) from the source position.

Estimation and comparison of integral dose to target and organs at risk in three-dimensional computed tomography image-based treatment planning of carcinoma uterine cervix with two high-dose-rate brachytherapy sources: 60Co and 192Ir

Background

Iridium-192 (¹⁹²Ir) has been a widely accepted radioisotope for high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy. Recently, Cobalt-60 (⁶⁰Co) radioisotope with a longer half-life (5.26 years) has been gaining popularity due to economic and logistical reasons as compared with the traditional ¹⁹²Ir.

Aim

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the integral dose (ID) to the target and organs at risk (OARs) with two HDR brachytherapy sources in brachytherapy treatment of carcinoma uterine cervix to find appropriate HDR radioisotopes for clinical benefit.

Materials and Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of 52 computed tomography image-based brachytherapy plans of 52 patients who have received intracavitary treatment with ¹⁹²Ir HDR source. For each patient plan, one additional set of plan was created using ⁶⁰Co source in place of ¹⁹²Ir source keeping the same dwell position, and again dose was optimized. The volume and mean dose for target, OARs, and volume structures of 400%, 200%, 150%, 100%, and 50% were recorded for the estimation and comparison of ID.

Results

The mean ID to high-risk clinical target volume was significantly higher by 5.84% in ⁶⁰Co plan than that in ¹⁹²Ir plan. For OARs, the mean ID to the rectum was significantly higher by 2.60% in ⁶⁰Co plan as compared to ¹⁹²Ir plan, whereas for bladder and sigmoid colon, it was lower in ⁶⁰Co plan than that in ¹⁹²Ir plan. The mean ID of central dose volume structures of 400%, 200%, 150%, 100%, and 50% was higher by 12.97%, 9.77%, 8.16%, 6.10%, and 3.22%, respectively, in ⁶⁰Co plan than that of ¹⁹²Ir plan.

Conclusion

The results of our study concluded that ¹⁹²Ir HDR radioisotope should be preferred for intracavitary brachytherapy due to its ideal physical characteristics for better clinical outcomes.

Evaluation of a collapsed-cone convolution algorithm for esophagus and surface mold 192Ir brachytherapy treatment planning

PURPOSE

TG43 does not account for a lack of scatter and tissue and applicator heterogeneities. The advanced collapsed-cone engine (ACE) algorithm available for use in the Oncentra Brachy treatment planning system (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) can model these conditions more accurately and is evaluated for esophageal and surface mold brachytherapy treatments.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

ACE was commissioned for use then compared against TG43 for five esophageal and five surface mold treatment plans. Dosimetric differences between each algorithm were assessed using superimposed comparisons and dose-volume histogram statistics.

RESULTS

Esophagus (6 Gy per fraction): Compared with TG43, ACE demonstrated up to a 0.63% and 0.05 Gy reduction in planning target volume (PTV) V100% and PTV D98, respectively. Lung D2cc and bone D2cc deviated by up to 0.09 Gy and 0.03 Gy, respectively. Lung D0.1 cc and bone D0.1 cc both deviated by up to 0.12 Gy. Surface mold (4.5 Gy per fraction): Compared with TG43, ACE demonstrated up to a 12.5% and 0.18 Gy reduction in PTV V80% and PTV D98, respectively. Bone D2cc and D0.1 cc both reduced by up to 0.2 Gy when modeled with ACE. Increasing mold size laterally increased the dosimetric differences between TG43 and ACE.

CONCLUSIONS

TG43 generally overestimated dose delivered to the target volume and organs at risk for the sites investigated. Dosimetric differences observed for esophageal treatments were minimal; however, surface mold treatments would benefit from the increased dosimetric accuracy offered by ACE. Implementation should be considered for surface mold ¹⁹²Ir treatment planning, but increased calculation time, additional contouring, and mass density assignment requirements should be scrutinized with regard to their potentially negative impact on current clinical practice.

A comparative assessment of inhomogeneity and finite patient dimension effects in 60Co and 192Ir high-dose-rate brachytherapy

Purpose

To perform a comparative study of heterogeneities and finite patient dimension effects in ⁶⁰Co and ¹⁹²Ir high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy.

Material and methods

Clinically equivalent plans were prepared for 19 cases (8 breast, 5 esophagus, 6 gynecologic) using the Ir2.A85-2 and the Co0.A86 HDR sources, with a TG-43 based treatment planning system (TPS). Phase space files were obtained for the two source designs using MCNP6, and validated through comparison to a single source dosimetry results in the literature. Dose to water, taking into account the patient specific anatomy and materials (D_w,m), was calculated for all plans using MCNP6, with input files prepared using the BrachyGuide software tool to analyze information from DICOM RT plan exports.

Results

A general TG-43 dose overestimation was observed, except for the lungs, with a greater magnitude for ¹⁹²Ir. The distribution of percentage differences between TG-43 and Monte Carlo (MC) in dose volume histogram (DVH) indices for the planning target volume (PTV) presented small median values (about 2%) for both ⁶⁰Co and ¹⁹²Ir, with a greater dispersion for ¹⁹²Ir. Regarding the organs at risk (OARs), median percentage differences for breast V_50% were 3% (5%) for ⁶⁰Co (¹⁹²Ir). Differences in median skin D_2cc were found comparable, with a larger dispersion for ¹⁹²Ir, and the same applied to the lung D_10cc and the aorta D_2cc. TG-43 overestimates D_2cc for the rectum and the sigmoid, with median differences from MC within 2% and a greater dispersion for ¹⁹²Ir. For the bladder, the median of the difference is greater for ⁶⁰Co (~2%) than for ¹⁹²Ir (~0.75%), demonstrating however a greater dispersion again for ¹⁹²Ir.

Conclusions

The magnitude of differences observed between TG-43 based and MC dosimetry and their smaller dispersion relative to ¹⁹²Ir, suggest that ⁶⁰Co HDR sources are more amenable to the TG-43 assumptions in clinical treatment planning dosimetry.

Experience of using MOSFET detectors for dose verification measurements in an end-to-end 192Ir brachytherapy quality assurance system

PURPOSE

Establishment of an end-to-end system for the brachytherapy (BT) dosimetric chain could be valuable in clinical quality assurance. Here, the development of such a system using MOSFET (metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor) detectors and experience gained during 2 years of use are reported with focus on the performance of the MOSFET detectors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A bolus phantom was constructed with two implants, mimicking prostate and head & neck treatments, using steel needles and plastic catheters to guide the ¹⁹²Ir source and house the MOSFET detectors. The phantom was taken through the BT treatment chain from image acquisition to dose evaluation. During the 2-year evaluation-period, delivered doses were verified a total of 56 times using MOSFET detectors which had been calibrated in an external ⁶⁰Co beam. An initial experimental investigation on beam quality differences between ¹⁹²Ir and ⁶⁰Co is reported.

RESULTS

The standard deviation in repeated MOSFET measurements was below 3% in the six measurement points with dose levels above 2 Gy. MOSFET measurements overestimated treatment planning system doses by 2-7%. Distance-dependent experimental beam quality correction factors derived in a phantom of similar size as that used for end-to-end tests applied on a time-resolved measurement improved the agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

MOSFET detectors provide values stable over time and function well for use as detectors for end-to-end quality assurance purposes in ¹⁹²Ir BT. Beam quality correction factors should address not only distance from source but also phantom dimensions.

Direction modulated brachytherapy (DMBT) for treatment of cervical cancer: A planning study with 192 Ir, 60 Co, and 169 Yb HDR sources

PURPOSE

To evaluate plan quality of a novel MRI-compatible direction modulated brachytherapy (DMBT) tandem applicator using ¹⁹² Ir, ⁶⁰ Co, and ¹⁶⁹ Yb HDR brachytherapy sources, for various cervical cancer high-risk clinical target volumes (CTV_HR ).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The novel DMBT tandem applicator has six peripheral grooves of 1.3-mm diameter along a 5.4-mm thick nonmagnetic tungsten alloy rod. Monte Carlo (MC) simulations were used to benchmark the dosimetric parameters of the ¹⁹² Ir, ⁶⁰ Co, and ¹⁶⁹ Yb HDR sources in a water phantom against the literature data. 45 clinical cases that were treated using conventional tandem-and-ring applicators with ¹⁹² Ir source (¹⁹² Ir-T&R) were selected consecutively from intErnational MRI-guided BRAchytherapy in CErvical cancer (EMBRACE) trial. Then, for each clinical case, 3D dose distribution of each source inside the DMBT and conventional applicators were calculated and imported onto an in-house developed inverse planning optimization code to generate optimal plans. All plans generated by the DMBT tandem-and-ring (DMBT T&R) from all three sources were compared to the respective ¹⁹² Ir-T&R plans. For consistency, all plans were normalized to the same CTV_HR D90 achieved in clinical plans. The D_2 cm3 for organs at risk (OAR) such as bladder, rectum, and sigmoid, and D90, D98, D10, V100, and V200 for CTV_HR were calculated.

RESULTS

In general, plan quality significantly improved when a conventional tandem (Con.T) is replaced with the DMBT tandem. The target coverage metrics were similar across ¹⁹² Ir-T&R and DMBT T&R plans with all three sources (P > 0.093). ⁶⁰ Co-DMBT T&R generated greater hot spots and less dose homogeneity in the target volumes compared with the ¹⁹² Ir- and ¹⁶⁹ Yb-DMBT T&R plans. Mean OAR doses in the DMBT T&R plans were significantly smaller (P < 0.0084) than the ¹⁹² Ir-T&R plans. Mean bladder D_2 cm3 was reduced by 4.07%, 4.15%, and 5.13%, for the ¹⁹² Ir-, ⁶⁰ Co-, and ¹⁶⁹ Yb-DMBT T&R plans respectively. Mean rectum (sigmoid) D_2 cm3 was reduced by 3.17% (3.63%), 2.57% (3.96%), and 4.65% (4.34%) for the ¹⁹² Ir-, ⁶⁰ Co-, and ¹⁶⁹ Yb-DMBT T&R plans respectively. The DMBT T&R plans with the ¹⁶⁹ Yb source generally resulted in the greatest OAR sparing when the CTV_HR were larger and irregular in shape, while for smaller and regularly shaped CTV_HR (<30 cm³ ), OAR sparing between the sources were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

The DMBT tandem provides a promising alternative to the Con.T design with significant improvement in the plan quality for various target volumes. The DMBT T&R plans generated with the three sources of varying energies generated superior plans compared to the conventional T&R applicators. Plans generated with the ¹⁶⁹ Yb-DMBT T&R produced best results for larger and irregularly shaped CTV_HR in terms of OAR sparing. Thus, this study suggests that the combination of the DMBT tandem applicator with varying energy sources can work synergistically to generate improved plans for cervical cancer brachytherapy.

Commissioning and quality assurance procedures for the HDR Valencia skin applicators

The Valencia applicators (Nucletron, an Elekta company, Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) are cup-shaped tungsten applicators with a flattening filter used to collimate the radiation produced by a high-dose-rate (HDR) ¹⁹²Ir source, and provide a homogeneous absorbed dose at a given depth. This beam quality provides a good option for the treatment of skin lesions at shallow depth (3-4 mm). The user must perform commissioning and periodic testing of these applicators to guarantee the proper and safe delivery of the intended absorbed dose, as recommended in the standards in radiation oncology.

In this study, based on AAPM and GEC-ESTRO guidelines for brachytherapy units and our experience, a set of tests for the commissioning and periodic testing of the Valencia applicators is proposed. These include general considerations, verification of the manufacturer documentation and physical integrity, evaluation of the source-to-indexer distance and reproducibility, setting the library plan in the treatment planning system, evaluation of flatness and symmetry, absolute output and percentage depth dose verification, independent calculation of the treatment time, and visual inspection of the applicator before each treatment. For each test, the proposed methodology, equipment, frequency, expected results, and tolerance levels (when applicable) are provided.

Investigation of the gold nanoparticles effects on the prostate dose distribution in brachytherapy: gel dosimetry and Monte Carlo method

Purpose

In this work, gold nanoparticles (GNPs) were embedded in the MAGIC-f polymer gel irradiated with the ¹⁹²Ir brachytherapy sources.

Material and methods

At the first plexiglas phantom was made as the human pelvis. The GNPs were synthesized with 15 nm in diameter and 0.1 mM (0.0197 mg/ml) in concentration by using a chemical reduction method. Then, the MAGIC-f gel was synthesized. The fabricated gel was poured into the tubes located at the prostate (with and without the GNPs) locations of the phantom. The phantom was irradiated with ¹⁹²Ir brachytherapy sources for prostate cancer. After 24 hours, the irradiated gels was read by using Siemens 1.5 Tesla MRI scanner. Following the brachytherapy practices, the absolute doses at the reference points and isodose curves were extracted and compared by experimental measurements and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations.

Results

The mean absorbed doses in the presence of the GNPs in prostate were 14% higher than the corresponding values without the GNPs in the brachytherapy. The gamma index analysis (between gel and MC) using 7%/7 mm was also applied to the data and a high pass rate achieved (91.7% and 86.4% for analysis with/without GNPs, respectively).

Conclusions

The real three-dimensional analysis shows the comparison of the dose-volume histograms measured for planning volumes and the expected one from the MC calculation. The results indicate that the polymer gel dosimetry method, which developed and used in this study, could be recommended as a reliable method for investigating the dose enhancement factor of GNPs in brachytherapy.

Comparison of the hypothetical (57)Co brachytherapy source with the (192)Ir source

Aim of the study

The ⁵⁷Co radioisotope has recently been proposed as a hypothetical brachytherapy source due to its high specific activity, appropriate half-life (272 days) and medium energy photons (114.17 keV on average). In this study, Task Group No. 43 dosimetric parameters were calculated and reported for a hypothetical ⁵⁷Co source.

Material and methods

A hypothetical ⁵⁷Co source was simulated in MCNPX, consisting of an active cylinder with 3.5 mm length and 0.6 mm radius encapsulated in a stainless steel capsule. Three photon energies were utilized (136 keV [10.68%], 122 keV [85.60%], 14 keV [9.16%]) for the ⁵⁷Co source. Air kerma strength, dose rate constant, radial dose function, anisotropy function, and isodose curves for the source were calculated and compared to the corresponding data for a ¹⁹²Ir source.

Results

The results are presented as tables and figures. Air kerma strength per 1 mCi activity for the ⁵⁷Co source was 0.46 cGyh^–1 cm 2 mCi^–1. The dose rate constant for the ⁵⁷Co source was determined to be 1.215 cGyh^–1U^–1. The radial dose function for the ⁵⁷Co source has an increasing trend due to multiple scattering of low energy photons. The anisotropy function for the ⁵⁷Co source at various distances from the source is more isotropic than the ¹⁹²Ir source.

Conclusions

The ⁵⁷Co source has advantages over ¹⁹²Ir due to its lower energy photons, longer half-life, higher dose rate constant and more isotropic anisotropic function. However, the ¹⁹²Ir source has a higher initial air kerma strength and more uniform radial dose function. These properties make ⁵⁷Co a suitable source for use in brachytherapy applications.

Study of the dosimetric differences between (192)Ir and (60)Co sources of high dose rate brachytherapy for breast interstitial implant

AIM

The study intends to compare (192)Ir source against the (60)Co source for interstitial breast metal implant in high dose rate brachytherapy.

BACKGROUND

Few studies have been reported to compare (60)Co and (192)Ir on HDR brachytherapy in gynaecology and prostate cancer and very few with reference to breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty patients who had undergone interstitial template guided breast implant were treated in HDR (192)Ir brachytherapy unit. Plans were generated substituting (60)Co source without changing the dwell positions and optimization. Cumulative dose volume histograms were compared.

RESULTS

The reference isodose line enclosing CTV (CTVref) and the 2.34% difference seen in the volume enclosed by the reference isodose line (V ref) between the two isotopes show small but statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). In DHI, no difference was observed in the relative dose between the two sources (p = 0.823). The over dose volume index showed 11% difference. The conformity index showed 2.32% difference compared to (192)Ir (p < 0.05). D mean (%) and D max (%) for the heart, ipsilateral lung, ipsilateral ribs, skin presented very small difference. V 5% and V 10% of the heart shows 25% and 32% difference in dose. D 2cc (%) and D 0.1cc (%) for the contralateral breast, contralateral lung and D 2cc (%) of the skin displayed significant difference (p < 0.05). However, D 0.1cc (%) of the skin indicated no noteworthy difference with p = 0.343.

CONCLUSION

Based on the 3D dosimetric analysis of patient plans considered in this study, most of the DVH parameters showed statistically significant differences which can be reduced by treatment planning optimization techniques. (60)Co isotope can be used as a viable alternative because of its long half-life, logistic advantages in procurement, infrequent need of source replacement and disposal of used source.

Balloon-based adjuvant radiotherapy in breast cancer: comparison between (99m)Tc and HDR (192)Ir

OBJECTIVE

To perform a comparative dosimetric analysis, based on computer simulations, of temporary balloon implants with (99m)Tc and balloon brachytherapy with high-dose-rate (HDR) (192)Ir, as boosts to radiotherapy. We hypothesized that the two techniques would produce equivalent doses under pre-established conditions of activity and exposure time.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Simulations of implants with (99m)Tc-filled and HDR (192)Ir-filled balloons were performed with the Siscodes/MCNP5, modeling in voxels a magnetic resonance imaging set related to a young female. Spatial dose rate distributions were determined. In the dosimetric analysis of the protocols, the exposure time and the level of activity required were specified.

RESULTS

The (99m)Tc balloon presented a weighted dose rate in the tumor bed of 0.428 cGy.h(-1).mCi(-1) and 0.190 cGyh(-1).mCi(-1) at the balloon surface and at 8-10 mm from the surface, respectively, compared with 0.499 and 0.150 cGyh(-1).mCi(-1), respectively, for the HDR (192)Ir balloon. An exposure time of 24 hours was required for the (99m)Tc balloon to produce a boost of 10.14 Gy with 1.0 Ci, whereas only 24 minutes with 10.0 Ci segments were required for the HDR (192)Ir balloon to produce a boost of 5.14 Gy at the same reference point, or 10.28 Gy in two 24-minutes fractions.

CONCLUSION

Temporary (99m)Tc balloon implantation is an attractive option for adjuvant radiotherapy in breast cancer, because of its availability, economic viability, and similar dosimetry in comparison with the use of HDR (192)Ir balloon implantation, which is the current standard in clinical practice.

Dose error from deviation of dwell time and source position for high dose-rate 192Ir in remote afterloading system

The influence of deviations in dwell times and source positions for (192)Ir HDR-RALS was investigated. The potential dose errors for various kinds of brachytherapy procedures were evaluated. The deviations of dwell time ΔT of a (192)Ir HDR source for the various dwell times were measured with a well-type ionization chamber. The deviations of source position ΔP were measured with two methods. One is to measure actual source position using a check ruler device. The other is to analyze peak distances from radiographic film irradiated with 20 mm gap between the dwell positions. The composite dose errors were calculated using Gaussian distribution with ΔT and ΔP as 1σ of the measurements. Dose errors depend on dwell time and distance from the point of interest to the dwell position. To evaluate the dose error in clinical practice, dwell times and point of interest distances were obtained from actual treatment plans involving cylinder, tandem-ovoid, tandem-ovoid with interstitial needles, multiple interstitial needles, and surface-mold applicators. The ΔT and ΔP were 32 ms (maximum for various dwell times) and 0.12 mm (ruler), 0.11 mm (radiographic film). The multiple interstitial needles represent the highest dose error of 2%, while the others represent less than approximately 1%. Potential dose error due to dwell time and source position deviation can depend on kinds of brachytherapy techniques. In all cases, the multiple interstitial needles is most susceptible.

Comparison of (60)Co and (192)Ir sources in HDR brachytherapy

This paper compares the isotopes ⁶⁰Co and ¹⁹²Ir as radiation sources for high-dose-rate (HDR) afterloading brachytherapy. The smaller size of ¹⁹²Ir sources made it the preferred radionuclide for temporary brachytherapy treatments. Recently also ⁶⁰Co sources have been made available with identical geometrical dimensions. This paper compares the characteristics of both nuclides in different fields of brachytherapy based on scientific literature. In an additional part of this paper reports from medical physicists of several radiation therapy institutes are discussed. The purpose of this work is to investigate the advantages or disadvantages of both radionuclides for HDR brachytherapy due to their physical differences. The motivation is to provide useful information to support decision-making procedures in the selection of equipment for brachytherapy treatment rooms. The results of this work show that no advantages or disadvantages exist for ⁶⁰Co sources compared to ¹⁹²Ir sources with regard to clinical aspects. Nevertheless, there are potential logistical advantages of ⁶⁰Co sources due to its longer half-life (5.3 years vs. 74 days), making it an interesting alternative especially in developing countries.