[Cardiometabolic effects of weight loss]

The prevalence of overweight and obesity, and, consequently, associated comorbidities, is increasing significantly worldwide. The guidelines recommend a percentage of weight loss> 5% to achieve beneficial effects on metabolic comorbidities associated with obesity. Furthermore, greater weight losses (> 10%) produce more significant improvements, and may even produce remission of some of these comorbidities. In this chapter, we review the evidence of the effect of weight loss through different strategies (lifestyle intervention, pharmacological treatment, or bariatric surgery) on the main cardiometabolic pathologies associated with excess adipose tissue (type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, dyslipidemia, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, inflammation, cardiovascular diseases, and mortality).

SEA 2024 Standards for Global Control of Vascular Risk

One of the objectives of the Spanish Society of Arteriosclerosis is to contribute to the knowledge, prevention and treatment of vascular diseases, which are the leading cause of death in Spain and entail a high degree of disability and health expenditure. Atherosclerosis is a multifactorial disease and its prevention requires a global approach that takes into account the associated risk factors. This document summarises the current evidence and includes recommendations for patients with established vascular disease or at high vascular risk: it reviews the symptoms and signs to evaluate, the laboratory and imaging procedures to request routinely or in special situations, and includes the estimation of vascular risk, diagnostic criteria for entities that are vascular risk factors, and general and specific recommendations for their treatment. Finally, it presents aspects that are not usually referenced in the literature, such as the organisation of a vascular risk consultation.

Clinical-epidemiological analysis of patients with elevated lipoprotein A in a third level hospital

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study is to describe the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of our patients with elevated Lp(a).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on 316 patients with elevated Lp(a) (>125 nmol/L) in a random sample between January and August 2022. We measured epidemiological, anthropometric, clinical and laboratory variables (lipid metabolism parameters, carbohydrates and hormones).

RESULTS

Mean age of our sample subject's was 59 ± 15 years with 56% males. The average BMI was 27.6 kg/m2 (71% with elevated BMI). Elevated waist circumference was observed in 54.1% of men and 77.8% of women. 48% had hypertension, 30.7% had diabetes mellitus and 91.5% dyslipidemia. Only 39.7% of the patients had never smoked. The mean values of total cholesterol were 158 ± 45 mg/dl, LDL was 81 ± 39 mg/dl, HDL was 53 ± 17 mg/dl, Triglycerides were 127 ± 61 mg/dl, and Lp(a) was 260 ± 129 nmol/L. Regarding lipid lowering treatment, 89% were on statins, 68.6% on ezetimibe, and 13.7% on PCSK9 inhibitors. 177 patients (57,7%) had established cardiovascular disease (CVD), 16.3% had polyvascular disease, 11.7% had subclinical CVD, and 30.6% had no known CVD. Among patients with established CVD, 174 (98.3%) were on lipid-lowering treatment (97.2% on statins) and 86.4% were on antiplatelet therapy. The mean age of cardiovascular events was 55 ± 12 years in males and 60 ± 11 years in females. 65,1% of female and 56,2% of male patients suffered an early cardiovascular event.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with elevated Lp(a) are at very high cardiovascular risk, particularly for early cardiovascular disease.

Hyperthyroidism and cardiovascular risk factors: A nationwide study

BACKGROUND

Thyroid hormones (THs) have important effects on cardiovascular (CV) physiology. Thyroid disorders are accompanied by serious effects on the CV system.

OBJECTIVE

To study the association between hyperthyroidism and the main CV risk factors (CVRFs), such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes and smoking in the Spanish population.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An observational, retrospective, non-interventional study was performed using the statistical portal of the Spanish Ministry of Health associated with the Base de Datos Clínicos de Atención Primaria (BDCA) database.

RESULTS

In 2019, 384,182 people [300,243 women (78.1%)] were diagnosed with hyperthyroidism, which represents 1.0% of the population with health problems registered in the BDCAP database (38,365,258 people). The prevalence of hyperthyroidism was more frequent in women (2.48 times) than in men and increased with age. When the whole population was considered, the prevalence of hypertension (34.90% vs. 19.90%; odds ratio, OR 2.16, 95% CI 2.14-2.17), dyslipidemia (34.47% vs. 21.57%; OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.88-1.91), diabetes (12.88% vs. 8.12%; OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.65-1.68) and smoking (10.89% vs. 7.61%; OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.46-1.49) was significantly (p<0.0001) higher in the population diagnosed with hyperthyroidism compared to those without this diagnosis. These significant differences were maintained in both women and men. A separate analysis of the age group 65 years or older showed statistically significant (p<0.0001) differences in the prevalence of hypertension (66.26% vs. 59.43%; OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.33-1.36), dyslipidemia (52.61% vs. 49.05%; OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.14-1.17) and smoking (6.29% vs. 5.93%; OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.09) between patients with and without a diagnosis of hyperthyroidism, but not in the prevalence of diabetes, which was similar (24.63% vs. 24.63%; OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.99-1.01; p=0.89).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that the diagnosis of hyperthyroidism is significantly associated with the main CVRFs in Spanish population attended by primary care regardless of the gender of the patients. This association disappears in those patients aged 65 years or older diagnosed with diabetes.

Achievement of long-term lipid targets in a cohort of patients with acute coronary syndrome in real-world clinical practice

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

According to the recent European epidemiological studies, the degree of lipid control in patients with very high vascular risk is suboptimal. This study analyzes the epidemiological characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors, lipid profile, recurrence, and degree of achievement of long-term lipid targets, according to the ESC/EAS Guidelines, in a cohort of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in a real-world clinical practice setting.

METHODS

This work is a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with ACS admitted to the Coronary Unit of a tertiary hospital from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2015 and followed-up on until March 2022.

RESULTS

A total of 826 patients were studied. During the follow-up period, greater prescribing of combined lipid-lowering therapy was observed, mainly high- and moderate-intensity statins and ezetimibe. At 24 months after the ACS, 33.6% of living patients had LDL levels <70 mg/dl and 9.3% had LDL levels <55 mg/dl. At the end of the follow-up (101 [88-111] months), the corresponding figures were 54.5% and 21.1%. Some 22.1% of patients had a recurrent coronary event and only 24.6% achieved an LDL level <55 mg/dl.

CONCLUSIONS

Achievement of the LDL targets recommended by the ESC/EAS guidelines is suboptimal in patients with ACS, both at two years and in the long-term (7-10 years), especially in patients with recurrent ACS.

[Overcoming the barriers in the approach of the chronic patient]

At least one in three adults has multiple chronic conditions. The assistance of patients with chronic conditions is mandatory. This is one of the main tasks of the primary care physicians. The approach in these patients is challenging, as there are many barriers at different levels (sanitary system, healthcare professionals and patients). In addition, COVID-19 pandemic has worsened this situation even more. Therefore, it is necessary to take actions that try to improve this state. For this purpose, with the aim to find solutions/recommendations that may be helpful to attain a better diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with chronic diseases, a group of experts of SEMERGEN have tried to identify the problems in the attention to these patients, searching for potential solutions and areas of improvement. The present document has specifically focused on four prevalent chronic conditions in primary care: dyslipidemia, arterial hypertension, chronic venous disease and depression.

GALIPDIA study: Reaching lipid targets in a population with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) from the Northwest of Spain

AIM

To assess the degree of compliance with the European ESC/EAS 2016 and 2019 dyslipidaemia guidelines in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

Multicentre retrospective cross-sectional study, conducted in 380 adults with T2DM and dyslipidaemia in 7 Spanish health areas.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

minimum follow-up of one year in Endocrinology Units, at least one visit in 2020 and a lipid profile measurement in the last 3 months.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

familial hypercholesterolaemia, recent hospitalisation, active oncological pathology and dialysis.

RESULTS

According to the 2016 and 2019 guidelines the majority of patients were classified as being at very high cardiovascular risk (86.8% vs. 72.1%, respectively). LDL-c compliance was adequate in 62.1% of patients according to the 2016 guidelines and 39.7% according to the 2019 guidelines (p<0.001). Clinical conditions such as history of cardiovascular disease and therapy-related aspects (use of statins, especially high-potency statins, combination therapies and good adherence) were significantly associated with greater achievement of lipid targets.

CONCLUSION

There is a discrepancy between dyslipidaemia guideline recommendations and the reality of lipid control in patients with T2DM, despite most of these patients being at very high cardiovascular risk. Strategies to optimise lipid-lowering treatments need to be implemented.

Prevalence and risk factors associated with different comorbidities in obese children and adolescents

INTRODUCTION

Different obesity-related comorbidities already present in childhood, such as: vitamin D deficiency, impaired carbohydrate metabolism, dyslipidaemia, arterial hypertension and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. In this study, we aim to analyse the prevalence of comorbidities and to determine the predictive factors that affect these comorbidities.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Anthropometric, demographic and biochemical variables were collected from obese patients between six and 18 years of age. Subsequently, a statistical analysis was performed to describe the characteristics of the patients and the prevalence of comorbidities, as well as their predictive factors.

RESULTS

A total of 158 obese children (76 boys and 82 girls) with a mean age at diagnosis of 12.48 years and a BMI Z-score of +3.24 SDS were included. The most prevalent comorbidities were vitamin D deficiency (64.2%), insulin resistance (45.1%), dyslipidaemia (32.2%), hyperuricaemia (18.5%) and arterial hypertension (15%). Age, BMI Z-score, percentage of fat mass and male sex have been found to be predictors of these comorbidities.

CONCLUSION

Obese children and adolescents have a high prevalence of comorbidities. Once the diagnosis of obesity has been established, it would be very useful to identify early those patients with a higher risk of comorbidities, knowing their relationship with sex, age, BMI Z-score, percentage of fat mass and pubertal stage.

SEA 2022 Standards for Global Control of Cardiovascular Risk

One of the objectives of the Spanish Society of Arteriosclerosis is to contribute to better knowledge of vascular disease, its prevention and treatment. It is well known that cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death in our country and entail a high degree of disability and health care costs. Arteriosclerosis is a multifactorial disease and therefore its prevention requires a global approach that takes into account the different risk factors with which it is associated. Therefore, this document summarizes the current level of knowledge and includes recommendations and procedures to be followed in patients with established cardiovascular disease or at high vascular risk. Specifically, this document reviews the main symptoms and signs to be evaluated during the clinical visit, the laboratory and imaging procedures to be routinely requested or requested for those in special situations. It also includes vascular risk estimation, the diagnostic criteria of the different entities that are cardiovascular risk factors, and makes general and specific recommendations for the treatment of the different cardiovascular risk factors and their final objectives. Finally, the document includes aspects that are not usually referenced in the literature, such as the organization of a vascular risk consultation.

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors in secondary prevention of vascular events in patients with stroke: Consensus document and practice guidance

INTRODUCTION

Patients with history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack present considerable risk of future vascular events. Reducing levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol decreases the incidence of new vascular events, although in a substantial number of patients, the currently available lipid-lowering therapies fail to achieve the therapeutic goals recommended in clinical guidelines. The aim of this consensus statement is to provide updated information on the role of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors alirocumab and evolocumab in the secondary prevention of vascular events in patients with history of ischaemic stroke.

METHODS

A literature review was performed to identify the main evidence on the use of PCSK9 inhibitors in these patients and the recommended therapeutic targets of LDL cholesterol. The results were discussed in 2 consensus meetings that constituted the basis for the drafting of the document.

CONCLUSIONS

PCSK9 inhibitors are effective in reducing vascular risk in secondary prevention; evolocumab specifically has achieved this reduction in patients with history of ischaemic stroke. Moreover, both alirocumab and evolocumab present good safety profiles, even in patients achieving LDL cholesterol levels <20 mg/dL, and no signs of cognitive impairment have been observed in patients treated with evolocumab who achieved very low levels of LDL cholesterol. In the light of this evidence, we provide practical recommendations about the use of PCSK9 inhibitors in secondary prevention of vascular events in patients with history of ischaemic stroke and follow-up of these patients.

Diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular risk: an update of the recommendations of the Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease Working Group of the Spanish Society of Diabetes (SED, 2021)

This document is an update to the clinical practice recommendations for the management of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) in diabetes mellitus. The consensus has been developed by a multidisciplinary team made up of members of the Cardiovascular Risk Group of the Spanish Diabetes Society (SED). The work is a necessary update as, since the last review three years ago, there have been many clinical trials that have studied the cardiovascular outcomes of numerous drugs in the diabetic population. We believe that this guideline update may be of interest to all clinicians treating patients with diabetes.

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors in secondary prevention of vascular events in patients with stroke: Consensus document and practice guidance

INTRODUCTION

Patients with history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack present considerable risk of future vascular events. Reducing levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol decreases the incidence of new vascular events, although in a substantial number of patients, the currently available lipid-lowering therapies fail to achieve the therapeutic goals recommended in clinical guidelines. The aim of this consensus statement is to provide updated information on the role of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors alirocumab and evolocumab in the secondary prevention of vascular events in patients with history of ischaemic stroke.

METHODS

A literature review was performed to identify the main evidence on the use of PCSK9 inhibitors in these patients and the recommended therapeutic targets of LDL cholesterol. The results were discussed in 2 consensus meetings that constituted the basis for the drafting of the document.

CONCLUSIONS

PCSK9 inhibitors are effective in reducing vascular risk in secondary prevention; evolocumab specifically has achieved this reduction in patients with history of ischaemic stroke. Moreover, both alirocumab and evolocumab present good safety profiles, even in patients achieving LDL cholesterol levels < 20 mg/dL, and no signs of cognitive impairment have been observed in patients treated with evolocumab who achieved very low levels of LDL cholesterol. In the light of this evidence, we provide practical recommendations about the use of PCSK9 inhibitors in secondary prevention of vascular events in patients with history of ischaemic stroke and follow-up of these patients.

Medium/long term evaluation of lipid profile after bariatric surgery (gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy)

INTRODUCTION

Bariatric surgery aims to reduce weight and resolve the comorbidities associated with obesity. Few studies have assessed mid/long-term changes in lipid profile with sleeve gastrectomy versus gastric bypass. This study was conducted to assess and compare changes in lipid profile with each procedure after 60 months.

METHODS

This was an observational, retrospective study of analytical cohorts enrolling 100 patients distributed into two groups: 50 had undergone gastric bypass (GBP) surgery and 50 sleeve gastrectomy (SG) surgery. Total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and triglyceride (TG) levels were measured before surgery and at 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months. Weight loss and the resolution of dyslipidemia with each of the procedures were also assessed.

RESULTS

Ninety-five of the 100 patients completed follow-up. At 60 months, TC and LDL levels had significantly decreased in the BPG group (167.42 ± 31.22 mg/dl and 88.06 ± 31.37 mg/dl, respectively), while there were no differences in the SG group. Increased HDL levels were seen with both procedures (BPG: 62.69 ± 16.3 mg/dl vs. SG: 60.64 ± 18.73 mg/dl), with no difference between the procedures. TG levels decreased in both groups (BPG: 86.06 ± 56.57 mg/dl vs. SG: 111.09 ± 53.08 mg/dl), but values were higher in the BPG group (P < .05). The percentage of overweight lost (PSP) was higher in the BPG group: 75.65 ± 22.98 mg/dl vs. the GV group: 57.83 ± 27.95 mg/dl.

CONCLUSION

Gastric bypass achieved better mid/long-term results in terms of weight reduction and the resolution of hypercholesterolemia as compared to sleeve gastrectomy. While gastric bypass improved all lipid profile parameters, sleeve gastrectomy only improved HDL and triglyceride levels.

Real-life effect on the control of risk factors associated with initiation of the cardiovascular polypill created from equipotent drugs

OBJECTIVE

This work aims to analyze the impact of Spain's National Center for Cardiovascular Research (CNIC-Ferrer)'s cardiovascular (CV)-polypill on blood pressure (BP) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (cLDL) levels in patients in our healthcare area who previously took equipotent doses of statins and antihypertensives.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All patients in our healthcare area (Santiago de Compostela, Spain) who, as of December 31, 2019, had an active prescription for the CV-polypill (CNIC-Ferrer) since January 16, 2015 were registered. The index date was the start date of the CV-polypill prescription. The drugs the patient had previously received for dyslipidemia and hypertension were analyzed, classifying them by their equivalent potency to atorvastatin and ramipril. Changes in cLDL and BP were analyzed by means of Student's t-test for paired samples.

RESULTS

We analyzed 547 patients with a mean age of 71.5 ± 11.5 years. The majority were men (60.6%). We observed a decrease in cLDL (-10.6 [95% CI: -7.0, -14.3], p < 0.001) in patients who started taking the CV-polypill who had previously taken equally potent doses of atorvastatin (n = 471). We documented a reduction in systolic BP (-3.7 [95% CI: -0.4, -6.9], p = 0.029) in patients who had previously taken equally potent doses of ramipril (n = 360). In 88 patients, the CV-polypill was started via equally potent doses of atorvastatin and ramipril, with a decrease in cLDL (-8.7 [95% CI: -3.8, -13.6], p = 0.001) and systolic BP (-3.6 [95% CI: -7.8, 0.5], p = 0.085).

CONCLUSIONS

The initiation of treatment with the CV-polypill in patients who previously received equally potent treatment with atorvastatin and ramipril was associated with a greater reduction in cLDL and systolic BP.

Incidence of electrocardiographic alterations in the preoperative period of non-cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

The electrocardiogram is the most widely used test to assess cardiovascular risk during the preoperative period. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the incidence of electrocardiographic alterations in the general population scheduled for non-cardiac surgery and to determine if the age greater than or equal to 65 years or the revised cardiac risk index ≥1 represent a risk factor for presenting these alterations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Over a period of one month, all preoperative electrocardiograms (ECG) from the anesthesia clinic were analyzed. Various epidemiological data were collected and the revised cardiac risk index was calculated. Major alterations were defined as those requiring Cardiology follow-up.

RESULTS

476 patients were recruited, of whom 40.8% were ≥65 years, 32.6% had HTN, 14.4% DM and 27.9% dyslipidemia. 16.16% of the patients had a Lee Index ≥1. Of the entire sample, 80.5% had a normal ECG, 6.5% minor alterations and 13.0% major alterations. In the multivariate analysis, age ≥65 years and the presence of HTN were shown as independent risk factors for presenting alterations in the total and major ECG. The Lee index ≥1 was not associated with an increased risk of electrocardiographic abnormalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients ≥65 years old and those with HTN are at greater risk of presenting major electrocardiographic abnormalities, so we recommend including the ECG as a routine diagnostic test in the preoperative period of non-cardiac surgery.

Medium/long term evaluation of lipid profile after bariatric surgery (gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy)

INTRODUCTION

Bariatric surgery aims to reduce weight and resolve the comorbidities associated with obesity. Few studies have assessed mid/long-term changes in lipid profile with sleeve gastrectomy versus gastric bypass. This study was conducted to assess and compare changes in lipid profile with each procedure after 60 months.

METHODS

This was an observational, retrospective study of analytical cohorts enrolling 100 patients distributed into two groups: 50 had undergone gastric bypass (GBP) surgery and 50 sleeve gastrectomy (SG) surgery. Total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and triglyceride (TG) levels were measured before surgery and at 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months. Weight loss and the resolution of dyslipidemia with each of the procedures were also assessed.

RESULTS

Ninety-five of the 100 patients completed follow-up. At 60 months, TC and LDL levels had significantly decreased in the GBP group (167.42±31.22mg/dl and 88.06±31.37mg/dl, respectively), while there were no differences in the SG group. Increased HDL levels were seen with both procedures (GBP: 62.69±16.3mg/dl vs. SG: 60.64±18.73mg/dl), with no difference between the procedures. TG levels decreased in both groups (GBP: 86.06±56.57mg/dl vs. SG: 111.09±53.08mg/dl), but values were higher in the GBP group (p<0.05). The percentage of overweight lost (PSP) was higher in the GBP group: 75.65±22.98mg/dl vs. the GV group: 57.83±27.95mg/dl.

CONCLUSION

Gastric bypass achieved better mid/long-term results in terms of weight reduction and the resolution of hypercholesterolemia as compared to sleeve gastrectomy. While gastric bypass improved all lipid profile parameters, sleeve gastrectomy only improved HDL and triglyceride levels.

Incidence of electrocardiographic alterations in the preoperative period of non-cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

The electrocardiogram is the most widely used test to assess cardiovascular risk during the preoperative period. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the incidence of electrocardiographic alterations in the general population scheduled for non-cardiac surgery and to determine if the age greater than or equal to 65 years or the revised cardiac risk index ≥ 1 represent a risk factor for presenting these alterations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Over a period of one month, all preoperative electrocardiograms (ECG) from the anesthesia clinic were analyzed. Various epidemiological data were collected and the revised cardiac risk index was calculated. Major alterations were defined as those requiring Cardiology follow-up.

RESULTS

476 patients were recruited, of whom 40.8% were ≥ 65 years, 32.6% had HTN, 14.4% DM and 27.9% dyslipidemia. 16.16% of the patients had a Lee Index ≥ 1. Of the entire sample, 80.5% had a normal ECG, 6.5% minor alterations and 13.0% major alterations. In the multivariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years and the presence of HTN were shown as independent risk factors for presenting alterations in the total and major ECG. The Lee index ≥ 1 was not associated with an increased risk of electrocardiographic abnormalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients ≥ 65 years old and those with HTN are at greater risk of presenting major electrocardiographic abnormalities, so we recommend including the ECG as a routine diagnostic test in the preoperative period of non-cardiac surgery.

Morbid obesity and dyslipidaemia: The impact of bariatric surgery

Obesity prevalence has presented an exponential increase in the last decades, becoming a first order public health issue. Dyslipidemia of obesity, characterized by low levels of high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, hypertriglyceridemia and small and dense low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles, is partly responsible for the high residual cardiovascular risk of this clinical situation. On the other hand, bariatric surgery (BS) is the most effective treatment for obesity, obtaining a greater weight loss than achieved with conventional medical therapy and favoring the improvement or remission of associated comorbidities. The most commonly used BS techniques nowadays are laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Both of these procedures have obtained similar results in terms of weight loss and comorbidity remission such as type2 diabetes mellitus or hypertension. A differential feature between both techniques could be the different impact on the lipoprotein profile. In this respect, previous studies with short and mid-term follow-up have proved LRYGB to be superior to LSG in total and LDL cholesterol reduction. Results regarding triglycerides and HDL cholesterol are contradictory. Therefore, we consider of interest to review the effects of BS at short and mid-term follow-up on lipoprotein profile, as well as the remission rates of the different lipid abnormalities and the possible related factors.

Have the Government's prescription algorithm and the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for managing dyslipidaemia influenced the management of dyslipidaemia? The MEJORALO-CV Project

OBJECTIVE

To determine the management of dyslipidaemia in primary care after the publication of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) 2013 guidelines and Valencian government's algorithm.

METHOD

We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study that employed a survey of primary care physicians of the Community of Valencia between January and October 2016.

RESULTS

A total of 199 physicians (mean age, 48.9±11.0 years; experience, 21.3±11.1 years) participated in the survey. The most followed guidelines were those of the European Society of Cardiology (37.5% of respondents) and Valencian government (23.4% of respondents). Some 6.3% of the respondents followed the 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines, and 88.0% established objectives based on LDL cholesterol and cardiovascular risk. The choice of lipid-lowering drug was based on its LDL cholesterol lowering capacity (28.6% of respondents), on the Valencian government's algorithm (23.4%) and on the drug's safety (20.4%). Statins, ezetimibe and fibrates were the preferred hypolipemiant agents, and their combination (51% of respondents) and dosage increases (35%) were the strategies employed for poor control. Lipid profile and transaminase and creatine kinase levels were measured every 6 (59.5%, 52.3% and 54.3% of respondents, respectively) or 12 months (25.1%, 29.2% and 30.3%, respectively). Forty-one percent of the respondents were aware of the controversy surrounding the 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines. Although 60% of the respondents acknowledged its relevance, only 21% changed their daily practices accordingly.

CONCLUSIONS

The Valencian government's algorithm had a greater impact than the 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines in primary care in Valencia. Areas for improvement included the low use of validated guidelines and risk tables and the streamlining of laboratory test periodicity.

Long term management of obstructive sleep apnea and its comorbidities

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a worldwide highly prevalent disease associated with systemic consequences, including excessive sleepiness, impairment of neurocognitive function and daytime performance, including driving ability. The long-term sequelae of OSA include and increase risk for cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and metabolic syndrome disorders that ultimately lead to premature death if untreated. To ensure optimal long-term outcomes, the assessment and management of OSA should be personalized with the involvement of the appropriate specialist. Most studies have demonstrated inmediate improvement in daytime somnolence and quality of life with CPAP and other therapies, but the effect of long-term treatment on mortality is still under debate. Currently, the long-term management of OSA should be based on a) identifying physiological or structural abnormalities that are treatable at the time of patient evaluation and b) comprehensive lifestyle interventions, especially weight-loss interventions, which are associated with improvements in OSA severity, cardiometabolic comorbidities, and quality of life. In long-term management, attention should be paid to the clinical changes related to a potential reoccurrence of OSA symptoms and it is also necessary to monitor throughout the follow up how the main associated comorbidities evolve.

Standards for global cardiovascular risk management arteriosclerosis

One of the main goals of the Spanish Society of Arteriosclerosis is to contribute to a wider and greater knowledge of vascular disease, its prevention and treatment. Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death in our country and also lead to a high degree of disability and health expenditure. Arteriosclerosis is a multifactorial disease, this is why its prevention requires a global approach that takes into account the different risk factors with which it is associated. Thus, this document summarizes the current level of knowledge and integrates recommendations and procedures to be followed for patients with established cardiovascular disease or high vascular risk. Specifically, this document reviews the main symptoms and signs to be evaluated during the clinical visit, the laboratory and imaging procedures to be routinely requested or those in special situations. It also includes the estimation of vascular risk, the diagnostic criteria of the different entities that are cardiovascular risk factors, and presents general and specific recommendations for the treatment of the different cardiovascular risk factors and their final objectives. Finally, the document includes aspects that are not often mentioned in the literature, such as the organisation of a vascular risk consultation.

Erectile dysfunction in patients with arterial hypertension. Cardiovascular risk and impact on their quality of life

OBJECTIVES

Estimate the frequency of erectile dysfunction in patients with essential hypertension and associated variables, degree of control, cardiovascular risk and the impact on quality of life.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Type of study: Observational study of prevalence in men with essential hypertension.

MEASUREMENTS

Sociodemographic and comorbidity variables were collected from each patient (age, Charlson index, dyslipidaemia and prostatic hyperplasia), degree of control of essential hypertension and treatment, cardiovascular risk and metabolic syndrome. The erectile dysfunction was diagnosed by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15). Quality of life questionnaires were carried out in essential hypertension (MINICHAL), and the international scale of prostatic symptoms (IPSS).

RESULTS

The study included 262 hypertensive men with an average age of 65.84years. Erectile dysfunction was presented in 46.1%, being severe in 54.9%. The bivariate analysis shows an independent association between erectile dysfunction and the variables: age, Charlon index, dyslipidaemia, benign prostatic hypertrophy, diastolic blood pressure, years of diagnosis of hypertension, number of treatments, Regicor and Framingham-Wilson, glycaemia, creatinine and GPT, glomerular filtration through the MDRD formula, irritative symptomatology (IPSS) and somatic manifestations (MINICHAL). The final multivariate model found association with age, presentation of dyslipidaemia, prostatic hyperplasia and metabolic syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

Erectile dysfunction is significantly associated with age, dyslipidaemia, benign prostatic hypertrophy and metabolic syndrome.

Lipid control and associated risk factors, before suffering from the first cardiovascular event

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain the degree of lipidic control before the first cardiovascular accident in population attended during 2013 at Primary Care. To analyze the distribution of these events depending on control intervals of cholesterol LDL (LDL-chol), cholesterol HDL (HDL-chol) and triglycerides (TG).

METHOD

A multicentric cross-sectional, descriptive study on above 18-year-old people attended at the centres of the Primari Care Service (PCS) Baix Llobregat Nord, who had suffered a first cardiac or cerebral ischemic attack from 01/01/2013 to 31/12/2013. Variables collected included age,sex, smoking, high blood preassure,diabetes, dyslipidemia (DLP), obesity, total cholesterol (chol-tot), LDL-chol, HDL-chol, TG, systolic and diastolic blood preassure (SBP,DBP), IMC, HbA1c, atherogenic indices, REGICOR, drugs.

RESULTS

379 affected people, among them 197 (52%) heart attack and 182 (48%) stroke (ictus). Two hundred and twenty-five (54.4%) males, diagnosis median age 68.9 years (DS 13.7), 71.2 (DS 14.4) in CV (p: .001). High blood preassure 214 (56.5%), diabetes 113 (29.8%), DLP 193 (50.9%). Cases in LDL<100-159: 88%, HDL≥40/50: 72.8%, TG<150: 71.3%. chol-tot average: 198.3 mg/dl (DS 40.2), LDL-chol:121 (DS 33.8), LDL-chol<130:170 (58.6%). HDL-chol average: 52.5 mg/dl (DS 15.4) and TG: 130.9 mg/dl (DS 73.2) (CI:139.5 [DS 84.2] vs. CV: 120.9 [DS 55.9] [p: .003]). Optimal chol-tot/HDL-chol 67%, optimal TG/HDL-chol 39.8%. CI:optimal chol-tot/HDL-chol male vs. female: 51.2% vs. 76.9% (p: .002); optimal TG/HDL-chol male vs. female: 28% vs. 53.8% (p: .004).

CONCLUSIONS

The quantity of events was similar in both cardiac and cerebral territories, whereas the median age in the diagnosis was a little higher in CV. High blood preassure, DLP and obesity are the most prevalent FRCV, and its control at primary prevention is improvable. Most of the cases were grouped in the LDL lipid ranges <100-159mg/dl, HDL ≥ 40/50mg/dl and TG <150mg/dl.

Effect of an individualised physical exercise program on lipid profile in sedentary patients with cardiovascular risk factors

Physical exercise has become in an important tool in the reduction of cardiovascular risk.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of an unsupervised physical exercise program that on the physical condition and the lipid profile.

METHOD

The final sample included 49 sedentary men and women, who were non-smokers, with dyslipidaemia, overweight, and type1 obesity. The 4-month program included walking for 30-60minutes every day, and for three days a week, 30minutes of cycling at an intensity of 40-60% of maximum functional capacity, as well as isometric abdominals and static stretching. Anthropometrics, physical condition (6minute test), and the lipid profile were evaluated before and after the physical exercise program. The objective was to achieve a caloric expenditure between 1200-2000kcal/week.

RESULTS

At the end of the program it was observed, in both sexes, that there was a decrease in total cholesterol (P<0.02), LDL cholesterol (P<0.01), VLDL cholesterol (P<0.01), and triglycerides (P<0.05), and an increase HDL cholesterol (P<0.05). There was also an increase in the distance travelled in the 6minute test of 52m in men and 39.5m in women (P<0.002), plus a decrease in the perception of fatigue on the Borg scale of 1.19 in men, and 0.96 in women (P<0.01). There were no anthropometric changes.

CONCLUSIONS

The physical exercise improved physical condition and the lipid profile in the sample that has been studied, with 64% of participants continuing to do it.

[Dyslipidemia management in patients with high cardiovascular risk in Spain. ALMA study]

Objetivo

Evaluar la actitud de los médicos de atención primaria (MAP) y de atención especializada (MAE) ante el tratamiento de pacientes con dislipemia, especialmente en aquellos con factores de riesgo cardiovascular (RCV).

Diseño

Estudio observacional, descriptivo, multicéntrico, basado en una encuesta.

Emplazamiento

Diferentes áreas sanitarias de España.

Participantes

1.402 MAP y 596 MAE.

Mediciones principales

Perfil de los médicos, hábitos de tratamiento en pacientes con dislipemia.

Resultados

El 84,3% consideraban el RCV para establecer el tratamiento. El objetivo de concentración de cLDL en pacientes sin factores de RCV fue < 130 mg/dl y < 160 mg/dl para el 51,9 y el 29,0%, respectivamente. En pacientes con hipertensión, tabaquismo o diabetes el objetivo de cLDL fue < 100 mg/dl para el 49-55%, mientras que en pacientes con complicación cardiovascular, cardiopatía isquémica o ictus fue < 70 mg/dl para el 71-88%. El fármaco de elección en pacientes sin factores de RCV fue atorvastatina (66%), mientras que en pacientes con diabetes, enfermedad renal o síndrome metabólico fue pitavastatina (80-89%). Los MAE mostraron una mayor tendencia que los MAP a considerar un objetivo de cLDL < 70 mg/dl en pacientes con antecedentes de ictus (77,5% vs 66,8%) o enfermedad coronaria (92,1% vs 80,6%) (p < 0,0001), y una mayor preferencia por el tratamiento combinado al no alcanzar el objetivo de cLDL (58,1% vs 50,2%; p = 0,0013).

Conclusiones

Aunque el cálculo del RCV se acepta de forma general, existe disparidad en los objetivos del cLDL. Los MAE consideran unos objetivos más ambiciosos y la asociación de fármacos hipolipemiantes con más frecuencia que los MAP.

Degree of Lipid Control in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease and Measures Adopted by Physicians. REPAR Study

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Lipid control is insufficient in patients with coronary heart disease but this situation may be improving with the implementation of the latest clinical practice guidelines. The aim of this study was to analyze whether target values of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol are achieved and to identify associated factors and physicians' attitudes to deficient control.

METHODS

We conducted a national, multicenter, prospective, observational study of 1103 patients with stable coronary heart disease, analyzing lipid values and a broad set of clinical variables. The statistical analysis involved a binary logistic regression model using backward stepwise elimination.

RESULTS

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was < 70 mg/dL in only 26% of patients, even though 95.3% were receiving cholesterol-lowering agents, 45% of which were high-intensity therapies. Independent predictors of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol < 70 mg/dL were diabetes mellitus, wholegrain bread, shorter history of dyslipidemia, and, especially, high-intensity cholesterol-lowering therapies. Physicians increased therapy in only 26% of poorly controlled patients. The main predictor of increased therapy was low-intensity baseline therapy (odds ratio=5.05; 95% confidence interval, 3.3-9.2). A more proactive approach was observed in older physicians (P=.019) and longer physician practice (P=.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the new guidelines, only 26% of patients with coronary heart disease have adequate lipid control. In 70% of patients, physicians continue the same therapy, even though high-intensity cholesterol-lowering therapies are a key factor in good control.

Trends in Risk Factors and Treatments in Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease Seen at Cardiology Clinics Between 2006 and 2014

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Chronic ischemic heart disease is the most prevalent of all cardiovascular diseases. Patients are at high risk of complications. In recent decades, changes may have occurred in the clinical characteristics of the disease, its treatment and control of risk factors.

METHODS

A direct comparison of 2 national registries of patients with chronic ischemic heart disease carried out in 2006 (n=1583) and 2014 (n=1110).

RESULTS

We observed statistically significant differences between the 2 registries, with a higher percentage of men and smokers in the 2014 registry, but a lower prevalence of diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Heart failure and stroke were more prevalent in the 2006 registry. Patients in the 2014 registry had better results for lipid profile, blood glucose, creatinine, and glomerular filtration rate. We observed higher use of recommended drugs for secondary prevention and an increased percentage of patients receiving optimal medical therapy, from 32.5% to 49.5% (P<.01). Use of high-intensity statin doses also increased from 10.5% to 42.8% (P<.01). We found better control of some risk factors (improved dyslipidemia, heart rate, and blood glucose in patients with diabetes) but worse blood pressure control.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical profile of patients with chronic ischemic heart disease is similar in the 2 registries. There has been an improvement in patients' medical therapy and dyslipidemia control, blood glucose, and heart rate, but there is still much room for improvement in the control of other cardiovascular risk factors.

[Guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia]

The AHA/ACC 2013 guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in adults contains major differences with the previous ESC/EAS 2011 guidelines and the remaining international guidelines, which has generated major controversies. The AHA/ACC document has developed a new model for estimating cardiovascular risk for primary prevention which is not comparable with the SCORE recommended in the European guidelines. This guideline does not establish a fixed target for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc). Instead, it identifies 4 major statin benefit groups at risk for the development ASCVD, who should receive low-, moderate-, and high-intensity statin therapy to reduce LCLc. In contrast, the European guidelines maintain LDLc as the main treatment target and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol as a secondary treatment target. The document recommends calculating cardiovascular risk for the overall treatment of patients with dyslipidemia according to 4 risk levels (low, moderate, high, and very high), establishes LDLc treatment targets, and recommends a statin-based therapeutic strategy and other, lipid-lowering strategies, aimed at achieving these targets. The American guidelines cannot be extrapolated to the European population. Target-based treatment, as recommended in the EAS/ESC guidelines, is the best strategy for Europe. In Spain, the Primary Care Guidelines of the Spanish Society of Family and Community Medicine (semFYC) and the Spanish Society of Primary Care Physicians (SEMERGEN) are based on the European recommendations. Finally, the Spanish Society of Arteriosclerosis (SEA), SEMERGEN, semFYC and the Spanish Society of General Medicine (SEMG) are reaching a consensus on the approach and management of patients with atherogenic dyslipidemia in primary care.

[Indications for the combination of pravastatin and fenofibrate according to the type of dyslipidemia]

The combination with fixed doses of pravastatin (40 mg) and fenofibrate (160 mg) offers a therapeutic alternative, especially in the comprehensive approach to mixed hyperlipidemia in patients with high cardiovascular risk of metabolic origin. It also ensures the efficacy and safety as a result of the evidence that supports the clinical benefit of both pravastatin in primary and secondary prevention and fenofibrate in patients with atherogenic dyslipidemia. This combination also has few adverse effects, which are similar in all cases to those produced by the isolated monotherapy of each of the drugs. Consequently, the possible indications for this combination include patients with mixed hyperlipidemia, patients with atherogenic dyslipidemia (increased triglyceride levels, reduced HDL-c levels and moderately increased LDL-c levels), patients with hypertriglyceridemia who need to reduce their LDL-c levels, patients with low HDL syndrome who also require a reduction in LDL-c levels, patients with moderate hypercholesterolemia who require an additional reduction of triglyceride levels and especially patients with high atherogenic metabolic risk who require an overall intervention for each of the lipid fractions.