Primary tumor resection enhances the survival of pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma patients with liver metastasis under the definition of 2019 WHO classification

BACKGROUND

With the update and release of the newest version of WHO classification (2019) for neuroendocrine neoplasm, the clinical features, risk factors of prognosis and the effect of surgical treatment on newly classified pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (pNEC) patients with liver metastasis were not deeply analyzed. In the present study, we tried to reveal the clinical features, and prognostic factors of pNEC patients with liver metastasis with the newest definition of WHO 2019, and explore whether primary tumor resection (PTR), chemotherapy and radiotherapy affect overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in those patients.

METHODS

We collected data from pNEC patients with liver metastasis from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database who were diagnosed between 2010 and 2019. We strictly selected pNEC patients according to the 2019 WHO classification criteria. The univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to determine independent predictors of the survival of these patients. The forest plots map was drawn by R-4.2.2 software to display the results of the multivariate analysis visually. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the OS and CSS. Based on the multivariate analysis outcomes, we established the predictable nomogram model to predict the prognosis of pNEC patients with liver metastasis. The calibration plots were shown to prove the predictive value of the nomogram predictable model.

RESULTS

We identified 205 eligible pNEC patients with liver metastasis. According to the multivariable Cox regression analysis in this study, we found that PTR, chemotherapy, primary tumor size and diagnosis to treatment time were independent prognostic factors for both OS and CSS. Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated that PTR and chemotherapy were correlated with increased survival for pNEC patients with liver metastasis. The accuracy of the nomogram model was visually proved by the calibration plot with acceptable predictive performance.

CONCLUSION

Four independent predictors of prognosis in pNEC patients with liver metastasis were identified in this study, including PTR, chemotherapy, tumor size and diagnosis to treatment time. PTR and chemotherapy for pNEC with liver metastasis could lead to a better prognosis, which may provide inspiration for practical clinical guidelines.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma and pancreatic high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma: two sides of the moon

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is the seventh leading cause of cancer death in the world and the most common type pf pancreatic cancer. Unfortunately, less than 20% of patients are surgically resectable and the great majority of cases are treated with palliative chemotherapy with unsatisfactory results. No targeted agents or personalized approaches have been validated in the last decades. On the other side, neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas are generally considered indolent tumours. However, high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma is a rare subtype of neuroendocrine neoplasm of the pancreas (accounting up to 10% of the neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas), with particularly aggressive behaviour and poor prognosis. Even in this case, the treatment is represented by palliative chemotherapy with dismal results and no personalized therapies are available, so far. Notably, the quality of life of these patients is disappointingly low and the future perspectives of more personalized diagnostic and therapeutic strategies are scarce. In this review, we discuss relevant and current information on epidemiology, pathology, diagnosis, clinical presentation, treatment and ongoing clinical trials of these two entities, in order to illustrate the two sides of the moon.

A case of pancreatic endocrine carcinoma with a different clinical diagnosis before chemotherapy and pathological autopsy

We encountered a case of pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (pNEC) diagnosed via pathological autopsy that was initially diagnosed clinically as G3 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (G3 pNET) and discussed the differences between these entities in the literature. A 76-year-old man was admitted to our department because of jaundice. Computed tomography revealed multiple round nodules in both lung fields, suggesting metastasis, and a mass lesion was detected in the head of the pancreas with poor contrast in the arterial phase and slight contrast enhancement in the equilibrium phase. Biopsy of the lungs and pancreas led to a diagnosis of multiple pulmonary metastases of G3 pNET. Because the lesions were unresectable, chemotherapy was administered. Treatment was started with everolimus for 5 weeks. However, the patient experienced severe loss of appetite and malaise, and the lung lesions progressed, prompting treatment discontinuation. Subsequently, the patient's disease progressed rapidly, and he died 99 days after the start of chemotherapy. We performed a pathological autopsy with the consent of the family because of the rapid tumor growth. A pathological autopsy revealed a final diagnosis of pNEC, which differed from the clinical diagnosis.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma in a pregnant woman: A case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Portal venous thromboembolism caused by malignant pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor metastasis, as the initial presentation of portal hypertension and upper gastrointestinal bleeding, is a rare entity. To our knowledge, there are no reports of this entity in pregnant women. We describe a case of pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma during pregnancy with hematemesis and hematochezia as the initial presentation and review the literature to analyze the demographic, clinical, and pathological features to provide a reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment.

CASE SUMMARY

A 40-year-old woman presented with hematemesis and hematochezia at 26-wk gestation; she had no other remarkable medical history. The physical examination revealed normal vital signs, an anemic appearance, and lower abdominal distension. Abdominal color Doppler ultrasonography showed portal vein thrombosis, splenomegaly, intrauterine pregnancy, and intrauterine fetal death. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed esophageal and gastric varicose veins and portal hypertensive gastropathy. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography demonstrated multiple emboli formation in the portal and splenic veins, multiple round shadows in the liver with a slightly lower density, portal vein broadening, varicose veins in the lower esophagus and gastric fundus, splenomegaly, bilateral pleural effusion, ascites and pelvic effusion, broadening of the common bile duct, and increased uterine volume. According to the results of Positron emission tomography-computed tomography and immunohistochemical staining, the final diagnoses were that the primary lesion was a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor and that there were secondary intrahepatic metastases and venous cancer thrombogenesis.

CONCLUSION

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a pregnant woman may be caused by portal hypertension due to a malignant pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor.

Molecular drivers and cells of origin in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most common causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The two major histological subtypes of pancreatic cancer are pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), accounting for 90% of all cases, and pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (PanNEN), which makes up 3-5% of all cases. PanNEN is classified into well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor and poorly-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (PanNEC). Although PDAC and PanNEN are commonly thought to be different diseases with distinct biology, cell of origin, and genomic abnormalities, the idea that PDAC and PanNEC share common cells of origin has been gaining support. This is substantiated by evidence that the molecular profiling of PanNEC is genetically and phenotypically related to PDAC. In the current review, we summarize published studies pointing to common potential cells of origin and speculate about how the distinct paths of differentiation are determined by the genomic patterns of each disease. We also discuss the overlap between PDAC and PanNEC, which has been noted in clinical observations.

Unexpected response to palliative radiotherapy for subcutaneous metastases of an advanced small cell pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: a case report of two different radiation schedules

Background

Skin metastases from pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (PNEC) are rare and their palliative treatment is challenging. We report our experience in the multimodal management of one of the few reported cases of metastatic PNEC with multiple visceral and subcutaneous secondary lesions, focusing on the effectiveness of palliative radiotherapy for skin metastases.

Case presentation

A 61-years old woman affected by a metastatic PNEC – with subcutaneous growing and bleeding secondary lesions (at the scalp, right scapular region and at the back of the left thoracic wall, respectively) – obtained a successful control of visceral metastases with the use of chemotherapy and an unexpected local response of her skin metastases with palliative radiotherapy. In particular, two subsequent radiation treatments were performed using different fractionation schedules (30 Gy in 10 fractions and 20 Gy in 5 fractions, respectively). Both radiation treatments were well-tolerated and patient’s quality of life was improved. Local response was maintained until patient’s death – that occurred due to cachexia.

Conclusions

The presented case highlights the effectiveness and the good tolerance of radiotherapy in the treatment of subcutaneous metastases; nevertheless, further knowledge of the optimal local palliative approach for PNEC metastatic sites is necessary. The experience gained in this work is the occasion to encourage a routine integrated multidisciplinary team management of metastatic PNECs because of their clinical complexity. The aim is to guarantee the optimization of the care with personalized and more effective systemic and local treatments – also including supportive cares and treatment-related side effects management.

Validation and modification of staging Systems for Poorly Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

Background

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) staging classifications are two broadly used systems for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. This study aims to identify the most accurate and useful tumor–node–metastasis (TNM) staging system for poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (pNECs).

Methods

An analysis was performed to evaluate the application of the ENETS, 7th edition (7th) AJCC and 8th edition (8th) AJCC staging classifications using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry (N = 568 patients), and a modified system based on the analysis of the 7th AJCC classification was proposed.

Results

In multivariable analyses, only the 7th AJCC staging system allocated patients into four different risk groups, although there was no significant difference. We modified the staging classification by maintaining the T and M definitions of the 7th AJCC staging and adopting new staging definitions. An increased hazard ratio (HR) of death was also observed from class I to class IV for the modified 7th (m7th) staging system (compared with stage I disease; HR for stage II =1.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.73–2.06, P = 0.44; HR for stage III =2.20, 95% CI =1.06–4.56, P = 0.03; HR for stage IV =4.95, 95% CI =3.20–7.65, P < 0.001). The concordance index (C-index) was higher for local disease with the m7th AJCC staging system than with the 7th AJCC staging system.

Conclusions

The m7th AJCC staging system for pNECs proposed in this study provides improvements and may be assessed for potential adoption in the next edition.

Surgical resection of the primary tumor leads to prolonged survival in metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Palliative resection of the primary tumor for metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (pNEC) patients is not recommended because of the poor prognosis compared to that of patients with well-differentiated, lower grade tumors. However, the published data supporting this recommendation regarding pNEC are limited. In the present study, we assessed whether palliative primary tumor resection in stage IV pNEC patients affects survival and identified other factors that affect survival in these patients.

METHODS

We collected data from stage IV pNEC patients registered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 1988 and 2014. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to compare overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients who did or did not undergo primary tumor resection.

RESULTS

We identified 350 patients with metastatic, poorly differentiated, and undifferentiated pNEC. A total of 14.3% (50/350) of patients underwent primary tumor resection. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that primary tumor resection provided a significant benefit for both OS and CSS in stage IV pNEC patients. Additionally, chemotherapy and the presence of the primary tumor in the pancreatic tail were independent positive prognostic factors for metastatic pNEC patients in the multivariate Cox regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests that chemotherapy, location of the primary tumor in the pancreatic tail, and, most importantly, surgical removal of the primary tumor are associated with prolonged survival in stage IV pNEC patients.

Textural analysis on contrast-enhanced CT in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: association with WHO grade

PURPOSE

Grades of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs) are associated with the choice of treatment strategies. Texture analysis has been used in tumor diagnosis and staging evaluation. In this study, we aim to evaluate the potential ability of texture parameters in differentiation of PNENs grades.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

37 patients with histologically proven PNENs and underwent pretreatment dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography examinations were retrospectively analyzed. Imaging features and texture features at contrast-enhanced images were evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine the cut-off values and the sensitivity and specificity of prediction.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in tumor margin, pancreatic duct dilatation, lymph nodes invasion, size, portal enhancement ratio (PER), arterial enhancement ratio (AER), mean grey-level intensity, kurtosis, entropy, and uniformity among G1, G2, and pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (PNEC) G3 (p < 0.01). Similar results were found between pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) G1/G2 and PNEC G3. AER and PER showed the best sensitivity (0.86-0.94) and specificity (0.92-1.0) for differentiating PNEC G3 from PNETs G1/G2. Mean grey-level intensity, entropy, and uniformity also showed acceptable sensitivity (0.73-0.91) and specificity (0.85-1.0). Mean grey-level intensity was also showed acceptable sensitivity (91% to 100%) and specificity (82% to 91%) in differentiating PNET G1 from PNET G2.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicated that texture parameters have potential in grading PNENs, in particular in differentiating PNEC G3 from PNETs G1/G2.

The differentiation of pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: the values of CT imaging features and texture analysis

BACKGROUND

Imaging findings for pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (PNEC) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) often overlap. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the value of computed tomography (CT) imaging features and texture analysis to differentiate PNEC from PDAC.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients with pathologically-proved PDAC and 14 patients with PNEC were included in this study. CT imaging findings, including tumor boundary, size, enhancement degree, duct dilatation and parenchymal atrophy were used to compare PDAC and PNEC. CT texture features were extracted from CT images at the arterial and portal phases.

RESULTS

More PNEC than PDAC had well-defined margins (57.1% vs 25.0%, p = 0.04). Parenchymal atrophy was more common in PDAC than in PNEC (67.9% vs 28.1%, p = 0.02). CT attenuation values (HU) and contrast ratios of PNEC inthe arterial and portal phases were higher than those of PDAC (p < 0.05 or 0.01). Entropy was lower and uniformity was higher in PNEC compare to PDAC at the arterial phase (p < 0.05). Contrast ratio showed the highest area under curve (AUC) for differentiating PNEC from PDAC (AUC = 0.98-0.99). Entropy and uniformity also showed an acceptable AUC (0.71-0.72).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that CT imaging features, including tumor margin, enhanced degree and parenchymal atrophy, as well as texture parameters can aid in the differentiation of PNEC from PDAC.

Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms include well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) with well-differentiated PanNETs accounting for most cases. Other pancreatic primaries and metastatic carcinomas from other sites can mimic pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Immunohistochemical studies can be used to aid in the differential diagnosis. However, no specific markers are available to differentiate PanNETs from NETs of other sites. Although NECs are uniformly deadly, PanNETs have variable prognosis. Morphology alone cannot predict the tumor behavior. Although some pathologic features are associated with an aggressive course, Ki67 is the only prognostic molecular marker routinely used in clinical practice.

Metronomic temozolomide as second line treatment for metastatic poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma

Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (NEN) are a group of heterogeneous malignancies derived from neuroendocrine cell compartment, with different roles in both endocrine and nervous system. Most NETs have gastroentero-pancreatic (GEP) origin, arising in the foregut, midgut, or hindgut. The 2010 WHO classification divides GEP-NETs into two main subgroups, neuroendocrine tumors (NET) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC), according with Ki-67 levels. NET are tumors with low (<20 %) Ki-67 value, and NECs, including small cell lung carcinomas and Merkel Cell carcinomas, are all NETs with high Ki-67 levels (>20 %–G3). Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) are usually treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens. Here we present a case of a patient with pancreatic NEC progressing after cisplatin and etoposide, treated with temozolomide as palliative, second line treatment. According with the poor Performance Status (PS = 2) and to reduce the toxicity of the treatment was chosen an intermittent dosing regimen of metronomic temozolomide (75 mg/m²/day—one-week-on/on-week-off). MGMT resulted methylated. On July 2014 the patient started the treatment. On August 2014 the patient obtained a significant clinical benefit (PS = 0) and the total body CT scan performed on October 2014 showed a RECIST partial response on all the sites of disease. No drug-related side effects were reported by the patient. After 18 months of therapy the treatment continues without significant toxicity, and with further remission of the metastases. Treatment with metronomic “one-week-on/on-week-off” Temozolomide can be considered a good treatment option in patients with poor performance status, affected by pNEC with MGMT methylation.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A single-center 20-year experience with 100 patients

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare tumors, exhibiting several morphological, functional, and behavioral characteristics. However, only few reports have evaluated large case series of pancreatic NEN.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 100 consecutive patients with pancreatic NEN diagnosed pathologically and treated at the National Cancer Center Hospital between 1991 and 2010.

RESULTS

The study included 48 males and 52 females (median age: 55 years). Fourteen patients had clinical symptoms caused by excess hormone secretion at diagnosis. Twelve patients were diagnosed with neuroendocrine tumor (NET) G1, 54 with NET G2, and 32 with neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) as per the 2010 World Health Organization classification. Distant metastases were observed in 25%, 43%, and 84% of the patients with NET G1, NET G2, and NEC, respectively. Serum levels of neuron-specific enolase and lactate dehydrogenase significantly increased in patients with NEC compared with those in patients with NET G1/G2. The 5-year survival rates of patients with NET G1, NET G2, and NEC were 91%, 69%, and 10%, respectively. Good performance status (PS), lower stage, and histopathological grade were identified as independent favorable prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with NET G1/G2 treated with surgical resection had a good prognosis. Most patients with NEC exhibited distant metastases and had a poor prognosis. Staging classification and the WHO 2010 grading are important factors for selecting the appropriate treatment strategy and predicting prognosis for patients with pancreatic NEN.

Clinicopathological features of small nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

AIM: To present our experiences in studying the clinicopathological features of small nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-pNETs).

METHODS: The subjects included 9 patients with NF-pNETs who underwent pancreatectomy between April 1996 and September 2012. The surgical procedure, histopathological findings, and prognosis were assessed.

RESULTS: All tumors were incidentally detected by computed tomography. The median diameter was 10 mm (5-32 mm). One patient was diagnosed with von Hippel-Lindau disease, and the others were sporadic cases. For the histopathological findings, 7 patients were G1; 1 patient was G2; and 1 patient, whose tumor was 22 mm, had neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). One patient who had a tumor that was 32 mm had direct invasion to a regional lymph node and 1 patient with NEC, had regional lymph node metastases. Six of the 7 patients with sporadic NF-pNETs, excluding the patient with NEC, had tumors that were smaller than 10 mm. Tumors smaller than 10 mm showed no malignancy and lacked lymph node metastasis.

CONCLUSION: Sporadic NF-pNETs smaller than 10 mm tend to have less malignant potential. These findings suggest that lymphadenectomy may be omitted for small NF-pNETs after further investigation.