1
|
Dengsø KE, Berg A, Hansen CP, Burgdorf SK, Krohn PS, Sillesen M, Spiegelhauer N, Bach MT, Melton M, Nielsen B, Christensen BM, Finderup J, Hillingsø J. Have a vital end-user been overlooked? Developing a shared decision intervention for patients with potential pancreatic cancer regarding the choice of surgery. PEC Innov 2024; 4:100269. [PMID: 38435237 PMCID: PMC10907832 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
Objective To develop a patient decision aid facilitating shared decision making for patients with potential pancreatic cancer deciding about no treatment, surgical or medical treatment. Methods Based on a user-centred design by Wittemann et al., we developed a shared decision making intervention in three phases: 1) Understanding decision needs 2) Development of a patient decision aid (PtDA) based on a generic template 3) Assessment of the intervention from interviews with patients (n = 11), relatives (n = 11), nurses (n = 4) and surgeons (n = 2) analysed with thematic analysis, and measuring patients' perceptions of choice of options with the Decisional Conflict Scale. Results Results showed varying experiences with the use of the PtDA, with surgeons not finding PtDA useful as it was impractical and constraining with patients' conversations. There was no difference in patients' perceptions in choosing options for those being presented vs those patients not being presented for the PtDA. Conclusion The format and structure of the PtDA was not feasible for the surgeons as fundamental users in the present clinic. Innovation This study highlights the urgent need to consider clinical context before introducing a predefined tool and shows the importance of a multistakeholder approach. Research should focus on finding means to successful implement shared decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristine Elberg Dengsø
- The Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Transplantation, Center for Cancer and Organ and Disease, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne Berg
- Center for Cancer and Organ and Disease, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Carsten Palnæs Hansen
- The Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Transplantation, Center for Cancer and Organ and Disease, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Stefan K. Burgdorf
- The Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Transplantation, Center for Cancer and Organ and Disease, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Paul S. Krohn
- The Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Transplantation, Center for Cancer and Organ and Disease, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Martin Sillesen
- The Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Transplantation, Center for Cancer and Organ and Disease, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nina Spiegelhauer
- The Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Transplantation, Center for Cancer and Organ and Disease, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mette Tholstrup Bach
- The Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Transplantation, Center for Cancer and Organ and Disease, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marianne Melton
- The Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Transplantation, Center for Cancer and Organ and Disease, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Betina Nielsen
- The Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Transplantation, Center for Cancer and Organ and Disease, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Bo Marcel Christensen
- The Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Transplantation, Center for Cancer and Organ and Disease, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jeanette Finderup
- Department of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark
- Research Centre for Patient Involvement, Aarhus University & Central Region, Denmark
| | - Jens Hillingsø
- The Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Transplantation, Center for Cancer and Organ and Disease, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Czerniecki JM, Matlock D, Henderson AW, Rohs C, Suckow B, Turner AP, Norvell DC. Development of the AMPDECIDE Decision Aid to Facilitate Shared Decision Making in Patients Facing Amputation Secondary to Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia. J Surg Res 2024; 299:68-75. [PMID: 38714006 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/09/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We developed a patient decision aid to enhance patient participation in amputation level decision making when there is a choice between a transmetatarsal or transtibial amputation. METHODS In accordance with International Patient Decision Aid Standards, we developed an amputation level patient decision aid for patients who are being considered for either a transmetatarsal or transtibial amputation, incorporating qualitative literature data, quantitative literature data, qualitative provider and patient interviews, expert panel input and iterative patient feedback. RESULTS The rapid qualitative literature review and qualitative interviews identified five domains outcome priority domains important to patients facing amputation secondary to chronic limb threatening ischemia: 1) the ability to walk, 2) healing and risk for reamputation, 3) rehabilitation program intensity, 4) ease of prosthetic use, and 5) limb length after amputation. The rapid quantitative review identified only two domains with adequate evidence comparing differences in outcomes between the two amputation levels: mobility and reamputation. Patient, surgeon, rehabilitation and decision aid expert feedback allowed us to integrate critical facets of the decision including addressing the emotional context of loss of limb, fear and anxiety as an obstacle to decision making, shaping the decision in the context of remaining life years, and how to facilitate patient knowledge of value tradeoffs. CONCLUSIONS Amputation level choice is associated with significant outcome trade-offs. The AMPDECIDE patient decision aid can facilitate acknowledgment of patient fears, enhance knowledge of amputation level outcomes, assist patients in determining their personal outcome priorities, and facilitate shared amputation level decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph M Czerniecki
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; CLiMB - Center for Limb Loss and Mobility, Seattle VA Medical Center, Seattle, Washington; VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Daniel Matlock
- Departments of Medicine and Geriatrics, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado; VA Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Denver, Colorado
| | - Alison W Henderson
- CLiMB - Center for Limb Loss and Mobility, Seattle VA Medical Center, Seattle, Washington; VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
| | - Carly Rohs
- VA Seattle - Denver COIN (Center of Innovation), Seattle, Washington & Denver, Colorado
| | - Bjoern Suckow
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Aaron P Turner
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; CLiMB - Center for Limb Loss and Mobility, Seattle VA Medical Center, Seattle, Washington; VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Daniel C Norvell
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; CLiMB - Center for Limb Loss and Mobility, Seattle VA Medical Center, Seattle, Washington; VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Earnshaw VA, Sepucha KR, Laurenceau JP, Subramanian SV, Hill EC, Wallace J, Brousseau NM, Henderson C, Brohan E, Morrison LM, Kelly JF. Disclosing Recovery: A pilot randomized controlled trial of a patient decision aid to improve disclosure processes for people in treatment for opioid use disorder. J Subst Use Addict Treat 2024; 160:209291. [PMID: 38272118 PMCID: PMC11060902 DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION People engaged in treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) report struggling with whether and how to disclose, or share information about their OUD history and/or treatment with others. Yet, disclosure can act as a gateway to re-establishing social connection and support during recovery. The current study describes a pilot randomized controlled trial of Disclosing Recovery: A Decision Aid and Toolkit, a patient decision aid designed to facilitate disclosure decisions and build disclosure skills. METHODS Participants (n = 50) were recruited from a community-based behavioral health organization in 2021-2022 and randomized to receive the Disclosing Recovery intervention versus an attention-control comparator. They responded to surveys immediately after receiving the intervention as well as one month following the intervention at a follow-up appointment. Primary outcome analyses examined indicators of implementation of the intervention to inform a future efficacy trial. Secondary outcome analyses explored impacts of the intervention on the decision-making process, disclosure rates, and relationships. RESULTS Participants were successfully recruited, randomized, and retained, increasing confidence in the feasibility of future efficacy trials to test the Disclosing Recovery intervention. Moreover, participants in the Disclosing Recovery intervention agreed that the intervention is acceptable, feasible, and appropriate. They additionally reported a higher quality of their decision-making process and decisions than participants in the comparator condition. At their follow-up appointment, participants with illicit opioid use who received the Disclosing Recovery intervention were less likely to disclose than those who received the comparator condition. Moreover, significant interactions between illicit opioid use and the intervention condition indicated that participants without illicit opioid use who received the Disclosing Recovery intervention reported greater closeness to and social support from their planned disclosure recipient than those who received the comparator condition. CONCLUSIONS The Disclosing Recovery intervention appears to be an acceptable, feasible, and appropriate patient decision aid for addressing disclosure processes among people in treatment for OUD. Moreover, preliminary results suggest that it shows promise in improving relationship closeness and social support in patients without illicit opioid use. More testing is merited to determine the intervention's efficacy and effectiveness in improving relationship and treatment outcomes for people in treatment for OUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerie A Earnshaw
- Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Delaware, 111 Alison Hall West, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
| | - Karen R Sepucha
- Health Decision Sciences Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 100 Cambridge St, Suite 1600, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Jean-Philippe Laurenceau
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, 231 Wolf Hall, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
| | - S V Subramanian
- Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Cambridge, MA, USA; Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - E Carly Hill
- Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Delaware, 111 Alison Hall West, Newark, DE 19716, USA; Center for Research on Education and Social Policy, University of Delaware, 125 Academy Street, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
| | - James Wallace
- Center for Research on Education and Social Policy, University of Delaware, 125 Academy Street, Newark, DE 19716, USA; Department of Epidemiology, University of Delaware, 100 Discovery Blvd, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
| | - Natalie M Brousseau
- Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology, Rutgers University, 152 Frelinghuysen Rd, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8020, USA.
| | - Claire Henderson
- Health Services and Population Research Department, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
| | - Elaine Brohan
- Health Services and Population Research Department, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
| | - Lynn M Morrison
- Brandywine Counseling and Community Services, 2713 Lancaster Avenue, Wilmington, DE 19805, USA.
| | - John F Kelly
- Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Recovery Research Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, 151 Merrimac St, 6th Floor, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dumausé M, Mouillard M, Balézeaux Q, Ducasse E, Caradu C, Vincent YM. Creation of a shared medical decision support tool for the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 2024:S0890-5096(24)00186-9. [PMID: 38614258 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Revised: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with an unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) at the surgical threshold may benefit from aneurysmal exclusion either by open surgery or endovascular repair. A patient decision aid (PtDA) could be useful to help patients and their surgeons choose between the two techniques. The aim of this study was to develop a shared medical decision support tool, in french language, for the surgical treatment of AAA. METHODS Following the steps recommended by the International Patient Decision Aids Standards, we carried out a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with patients and vascular surgeons and focus group with patients to identify their main points of interest. After analyzing the interviews using grounded theory with independent double coding, the verbatims were discussed at a steering committee, at the end of which a prototype of the tool was created. RESULTS 4 surgeons and 14 patients were interviewed. No new codes emerged from the last two interviews. At the end of the steering committee meeting, the informations selected for inclusion in the PtDA tool were the definition of an AAA, a description of the two surgical techniques (approach, duration of operation), the main complications, the peri-operative mortality rate, and post operative follow-up (length of hospital stay, monitoring frequency, risk of re-intervention). It had to be produced on a synthetic paper format, with six illustrations and a simple vocabulary. CONCLUSION We developed a PtDA tool for use in a sharing decision making process with the patient during the consultation with the vascular surgeon and the general practitioner. Further studies are needed to validate the tool and to test it in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Dumausé
- Department of General Medicine, University of Bordeaux - College of Health Sciences, Bordeaux, France.
| | - Marie Mouillard
- Department of General Medicine, University of Bordeaux - College of Health Sciences, Bordeaux, France
| | - Quentin Balézeaux
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Eric Ducasse
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Caroline Caradu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Yves-Marie Vincent
- Department of General Medicine, University of Bordeaux - College of Health Sciences, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Müskens JLJM, van Dulmen SA, Hek K, Westert GP, Kool RB. Low-value chronic prescription of acid reducing medication among Dutch general practitioners: impact of a patient education intervention. BMC Prim Care 2024; 25:106. [PMID: 38575887 PMCID: PMC10996147 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02351-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dyspepsia is a commonly encountered clinical condition in Dutch general practice, which is often treated through the prescription of acid-reducing medication (ARM). However, recent studies indicate that the majority of chronic ARM users lack an indication for their use and that their long-term use is associated with adverse outcomes. We developed a patient-focussed educational intervention aiming to reduce low-value (chronic) use of ARM. METHODS We conducted a randomized controlled study, and evaluated its effect on the low-value chronic prescription of ARM using data from a subset (n = 26) of practices from the Nivel Primary Care Database. The intervention involved distributing an educational waiting room posters and flyers informing both patients and general practitioners (GPs) regarding the appropriate indications for prescription of an ARM for dyspepsia, which also referred to an online decision aid. The interventions' effect was evaluated through calculation of the odds ratio of a patient receiving a low-value chronic ARM prescription over the second half of 2021 and 2022 (i.e. pre-intervention vs. post-intervention). RESULTS In both the control and intervention groups, the proportion of patients receiving chronic low-value ARM prescriptions slightly increased. In the control group, it decreased from 50.3% in 2021 to 49.7% in 2022, and in the intervention group it increased from 51.3% in 2021 to 53.1% in 2022. Subsequent statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in low-value chronic prescriptions between the control and intervention groups (Odds ratio: 1.11 [0.84-1.47], p > 0.05). CONCLUSION Our educational intervention did not result in a change in the low-value chronic prescription of ARM; approximately half of the patients of the intervention and control still received low-value chronic ARM prescriptions. The absence of effect might be explained by selection bias of participating practices, awareness on the topic of chronic AMR prescriptions and the relative low proportion of low-value chronic ARM prescribing in the intervention as well as the control group compared to an assessment conducted two years prior. TRIAL REGISTRATION 10/31/2023 NCT06108817.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joris L J M Müskens
- IQ Health Science Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Simone A van Dulmen
- IQ Health Science Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Karin Hek
- Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Gert P Westert
- IQ Health Science Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Rudolf B Kool
- IQ Health Science Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Knudsen BM, Søndergaard SR, Stacey D, Steffensen KD. Impact of timing and format of patient decision aids for breast cancer patients on their involvement in and preparedness for decision making - the IMPACTT randomised controlled trial protocol. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:336. [PMID: 38475758 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12086-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND After curative surgery for early-stage breast cancer, patients face a decision on whether to undergo surgery alone or to receive one or more adjuvant treatments, which may lower the risk of recurrence. Variations in survival outcomes are often marginal but there are differences in the side effects and other features of the options that patients may value differently. Hence, the patient's values and preferences are critical in determining what option to choose. It is well-researched that the use of shared decision making and patient decision aids can support this choice in a discussion between patient and clinician. However, it is still to be investigated what impact the timing and format of the patient decision aid have on shared decision making outcomes. In this trial, we aim to investigate the impact of a digital pre-consult compared to a paper-based in-consult patient decision aid on patients' involvement in shared decision making, decisional conflict and preparedness to make a decision. METHODS The study is a randomised controlled trial with 204 patients at two Danish oncology outpatient clinics. Eligible patients are newly diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer and offered adjuvant treatments after curative surgery to lower the risk of recurrence. Participants will be randomised to receive either an in-consult paper-based patient decision aid or a pre-consult digital patient decision aid. Data collection includes patient and clinician-reported outcomes as well as observer-reported shared decision making based on audio recordings of the consultation. The primary outcome is the extent to which patients are engaged in a shared decision making process reported by the patient. Secondary aims include the length of consultation, preparation for decision making, preferred role in shared decision making and decisional conflict. DISCUSSION This study is the first known randomised, controlled trial comparing a digital, pre-consult patient decision aid to an identical paper-based, in-consult patient decision aid. It will contribute evidence on the impact of patient decision aids in terms of investigating if pre-consult digital patient decisions aids compared to in-consult paper-based decision aids support the cancer patients in being better prepared for decision making. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05573022).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bettina Mølri Knudsen
- Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Beriderbakken 4, 7100, Vejle, Denmark.
- Department of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.
| | - Stine Rauff Søndergaard
- Department of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Lillebaelt Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Beriderbakken 4, 7100, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Dawn Stacey
- Department of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8M5, Canada
- Centre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 725 Parkdale Ave, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 4E9, Canada
| | - Karina Dahl Steffensen
- Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Beriderbakken 4, 7100, Vejle, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Savchenko A, Tariman JD, Kohon A, Simonovich SD, Dahan T, Bishop-Royse J. Multiple Myeloma: Validation of the Values and Preferences Elicitation Questionnaire- Cure and Survival Preference Scale (VPEQ-CSPS). Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 2024; 24:e96-e103. [PMID: 38185586 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2023.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the emergence of many novel therapies, the treatment decisions for multiple myeloma (MM) are increasingly guided by concerns of quality of life, achievement of cancer-free remission, living a longer overall survival, and a relentless search for a cure; however, the impact of various decision-making factors on patients' actual therapy choices and the patients' desire for cure and survival is mainly unknown. The lack of a valid and reliable measure for uncovering patients' preferences for cure and survival makes it more challenging to put this factor into the actual treatment decision equation. PURPOSE This study examined the psychometric properties of the Values and Preferences Elicitation Questionnaire-Cure and Survival Preference Scale (VPEQ-CSPS) instrument. METHODS The VPEQ-CSPS instrument was deployed using an anonymous Qualtrics online survey to patients diagnosed with MM within the network of International Myeloma Foundation online patient support groups across the United States. One hundred seventy-four (N = 174) valid responses were obtained and used to examine the validity and reliability of the VPEQ-CSPS. RESULTS Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value of 0.72 indicating excellent sample adequacy. A statistically significant Bartlett's test of sphericity (P < .001) indicated significant correlations among the variables of the dataset to conduct the EFA. The internal consistency coefficients indicated adequate reliability of the instrument with Cronbach's alpha value at 0.80. The EFA and parallel analysis revealed the 5-item VPEQ-CSPS as a valid and reliable unidimensional scale that can be used by oncology clinicians to elicit their patient's preferences for cure and survival. This new instrument has the potential to contribute to the achievement of shared decision-making for myeloma treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Thomas Dahan
- Rutgers University-Camden, School of Nursing, Camden, NJ
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Johnson JA, Itiola A, Rahman S, Smith C, Soprovich A, Wozniak LA, Marshall DA. Exploring patient perspectives on EQ-5D-5L data visualization within an individualized decision aid for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in Alberta, Canada. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2024; 25:183. [PMID: 38424523 PMCID: PMC10902977 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07304-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decision aids can help patients set realistic expectations. In this study, we explored alternative presentations to visualise patient-reported outcomes (EQ-5D-5L) data within an online, individualized patient decision aid for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) that, in part, generates individualized comparisons based on age, sex and body mass index, to enhance usability prior to implementation into routine clinical practice. METHODS We used data visualization techniques to modify the presentation of EQ-5D-5L outcomes data within the decision aid. The EQ-5D-5L data was divided into two parts allowing patients to compare themselves to similar individuals (1) pre-surgery and (2) 1-year post-surgery. We created 2 versions for each part and sought patient feedback on comprehension, usefulness, and visual appeal. Patients from an urban orthopedic clinic were recruited and their ratings and comments were recorded using a researcher-administered checklist. Data were managed using Microsoft Excel, R version 3.6.1 and ATLAS.ti V8 and analyzed using descriptive statistics and directed content analysis. RESULTS A total of 24 and 25 patients participated in Parts 1 and 2, respectively. Overall, there was a slight preference for Version 1 in Part 1 (58.3%) and Version 2 in Part 2 (64%). Most participants demonstrated adequate comprehension for all versions (range 50-72%) and commented that the instructions were clear. While 50-60% of participants rated the content as useful, including knowing the possible outcomes of surgery, some participants found the information interesting only, were unsure how to use the information, or did not find it useful because they had already decided on a treatment. Participants rated visual appeal for all versions favorably but suggested improvements for readability, mainly larger font and image sizes and enhanced contrast between elements. CONCLUSIONS Based on the results, we will produce an enhanced presentation of EQ-5D-5L data within the decision aid. These improvements, along with further usability testing of the entire decision aid, will be made before implementation of the decision aid in routine clinical practice. Our results on patients' perspectives on the presentation of EQ-5D-5L data to support decision making for TKA treatments contributes to the knowledge on EQ-5D-5L applications within healthcare systems for clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey A Johnson
- School of Public Health, University of Alberta, 2-040 Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E1, Canada.
| | - Ademola Itiola
- School of Public Health, University of Alberta, 2-040 Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E1, Canada
| | - Shakib Rahman
- Cumming School of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Foothills campus, Calgary, AB, T2N 4N1, Canada
| | - Christopher Smith
- Alberta Bone and Joint Health Institute, 400 Crowfoot Crescent NW Suite 316, Calgary, AB, T3G 5H6, Canada
| | - Allison Soprovich
- School of Public Health, University of Alberta, 2-040 Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E1, Canada
| | - Lisa A Wozniak
- School of Public Health, University of Alberta, 2-040 Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E1, Canada
| | - Deborah A Marshall
- Cumming School of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Foothills campus, Calgary, AB, T2N 4N1, Canada
- Alberta Bone and Joint Health Institute, 400 Crowfoot Crescent NW Suite 316, Calgary, AB, T3G 5H6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Verghote F, Van Praet C, Berquin C, Lumen N, Decaestecker K, Vanneste B, Rammant E, Fonteyne V. Radical cystectomy or trimodality therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a qualitative study exploring patient priorities and counselling needs when making a treatment choice. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:160. [PMID: 38297192 PMCID: PMC10832089 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-11927-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to explore the priorities and counselling needs of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer faced with a decision between radical cystectomy and trimodality therapy. METHODS We performed a qualitative study according to the phenomenological approach. Sixteen muscle-invasive bladder cancer survivors who underwent radical cystectomy or trimodality therapy completed a semi-structured interview between May 2022 and February 2023. Patients were recruited via Ghent University Hospital and a patient organisation. Data were analysed with inductive thematic analysis by a multi-disciplinary team using an iterative approach and investigators' triangulation. RESULTS Four main priorities determining the treatment decision were identified. (1) curing the disease; (2) health-related quality of life (physical, mental and social); (3) confidence in the treatment, which was mainly based on trust in the clinician; and (4) personal attributes. Trust in the clinician can be achieved by fulfilling the patient's information needs (accurate, complete, clear, impartial, personalised, realistic, and transparent information), ensuring accessibility of the clinician, and creating a clear and personalised treatment plan, involving patients to the extend they desire. Many patients considered a patient decision aid as a valuable asset in this process. CONCLUSION Priorities vary between patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Identifying individual priorities and offering personalised information about them is crucial for ensuring trust in the clinician and confidence in the treatment. Use of a patient decision aid can be beneficial in this process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flor Verghote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.
| | - Charles Van Praet
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, 9000, Belgium
- Department of Urology, ERN eUROGEN accredited centre, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, 9000, Belgium
| | - Camille Berquin
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, 9000, Belgium
- Department of Urology, ERN eUROGEN accredited centre, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, 9000, Belgium
| | - Nicolaas Lumen
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, 9000, Belgium
- Department of Urology, ERN eUROGEN accredited centre, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, 9000, Belgium
| | - Karel Decaestecker
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, 9000, Belgium
- Department of Urology, ERN eUROGEN accredited centre, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, 9000, Belgium
- Department of Urology, AZ Maria Middelares Hospital, Buitenring-Sint-Denijs 30, Ghent, 9000, Belgium
| | - Ben Vanneste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, 9000, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, 9000, Belgium
| | - Elke Rammant
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, 9000, Belgium
| | - Valérie Fonteyne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, 9000, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, 9000, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kingsmore D, Meiklem R, Stevenson K, Thomson P, Bouamrane M, Dunlop M. A national co-design workshop of a mobile-based application for vascular access as a patient decision aid. J Vasc Access 2024; 25:187-192. [PMID: 35686488 DOI: 10.1177/11297298221091140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing options for vascular access have increased the need for more effective communication to optimize patient engagement and ensure effective consent. An advanced prototype of the mobile application (VA App) was developed over 3 years as a patient decision aid. For the first time, entry to the 2021 UK Kidney Week was opened to all professions and patients and was held online. The VA App was presented in an inter-active session. This report summarizes the findings. METHODS A 30-min interactive session was allocated with the session delivered in four sections: (1) demographic data was collected; (2) an overall opinion was obtained about current patient information sources and satisfaction with these; (3) the participants were asked a series of eight questions regarding the main problem areas previously identified; (4) following a 6-min demonstration video, the participants were then re-asked the same questions to determine if the VA App would improve/worsen these areas. RESULTS Completed data from 30 participants showed great variation in all demographics. The most cited source was verbal and rated the best, whilst all other sources were felt to be poor by 90%. All eight aspects of current information sources rated poorly. There was a unanimous agreement that the VA App could make this better. Interestingly, when the eight aspects were ranked by order of the worst to best, this matched the order of the benefits of the VA App. DISCUSSION This is the first report of an on-line, multi-professional co-design workshop. With a unanimous view that current systems are very limited and that better patient information systems are required, the VA App was found to be a potential solution as a patient decision aid. Interestingly, paper leaflets were widely viewed as the least used and the least effective mechanism for communicating information to patients. Funding for a commercially produced mobile application has been secured and will be further tested in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Kingsmore
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
- Renal Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | - Ramsay Meiklem
- Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | - Karen Stevenson
- Renal Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | - Peter Thomson
- Department of Nephrology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | - Matt Bouamrane
- Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Mark Dunlop
- Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Brandt S, Lauer HC, Güth JF, Bühling S, Sayahpour B, Romanos G, Winter A. Impact of two different patient decision aids in prosthodontic consultations: a prospective randomized controlled study. Clin Oral Investig 2023; 27:7841-7849. [PMID: 38010423 PMCID: PMC10713710 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05375-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Different approaches to prosthodontic consultation, all involving a strong focus on shared decision-making, were analyzed from the perspective of patients by inter-group comparisons. No patient decision aid (PDA) was used in the control group, a paper-based PDA in test group 1, and a software-based PDA in test group 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS Seventy-five patients were prospectively randomized to the control group or a test group. All patients then rated the consultation on a questionnaire, six key items of which were analyzed, along with the time spent on each consultation. RESULTS Overall satisfaction was highest in test group 2, with a significant difference from the control group (p = 0.015). Test group 2 showed the most favorable ratings for all six questionnaire items, which invariably was significant compared to the control group (p = 0.032). Test group 1 significantly differed from test group 2 based on two items (consultation was adequately intelligible: p = 0.011; consultation was adequately comprehensive: p = 0.034) but not from the control group based on any item (p = 0.070). CONCLUSIONS Within the limitations of this study, the use of a software-based PDA, in particular, can be recommended based on patient satisfaction and was associated with the shortest sessions for consultation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Patients are routinely faced with a wealth of information in dental offices and may be overwhelmed especially by prosthetic treatment options and decision requirements. Our findings shed some light on the nature of aids that may truly be helpful in the process of shared decision-making. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov.Identifier: ISRCTN11472465.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Brandt
- Department of Prosthodontics, Center for Dentistry and Oral Medicine (Carolinum), Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Building 29, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| | - Hans-Christoph Lauer
- Department of Prosthodontics, Center for Dentistry and Oral Medicine (Carolinum), Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Building 29, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Jan-Frederik Güth
- Department of Prosthodontics, Center for Dentistry and Oral Medicine (Carolinum), Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Building 29, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Sarah Bühling
- Department of Prosthodontics, Center for Dentistry and Oral Medicine (Carolinum), Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Building 29, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Babak Sayahpour
- Department of Prosthodontics, Center for Dentistry and Oral Medicine (Carolinum), Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Building 29, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Georgios Romanos
- Department of Periodontics and Endodontics, Stony Brook School of Dental Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anna Winter
- Department of Prosthodontics, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hæe M, Wulff CN, Fokdal L, Olling K, Jensen KM, Hansen DG, Knudsen AØ, Lemley B, Blou D, Büchmann H, Steffensen KD. Development, implementation and evaluation of patient decision aids supporting shared decision making in women with recurrent ovarian cancer. PEC Innov 2023; 2:100120. [PMID: 37214495 PMCID: PMC10194391 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Revised: 11/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/26/2022] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Objective Shared decision making (SDM) and use of patient decision aids (PtDAs) are key components in patient-centered care in relapsed ovarian cancer. This paper describes the development and implementation process of PtDAs into a clinical routine in three departments. Methods Two PtDAs were developed in collaboration between patients and clinicians. Acceptability and usability of the PtDAs were tested on clinicians and patients using items from the internationally validated questionnaire "Preparation for Decision Making Scale". Results Ten patients and 15 clinicians participated in the study. Most patients indicated that PtDAs would be helpful as preparation for the decision-making process with the clinicians. Ten (75%) of the clinicians responded that the PtDAs helped the patients to understand the benefits and disadvantages of each treatment option. Generally, the clinicians indicated that they would use SDM if they had a PtDA tailored to the clinical situation. Conclusions Two PtDAs were systematically developed, tested, and implemented thereby supporting an SDM intervention. The PtDAs are still in use at the participating departments. Innovation This study was successful in reusing a generic template for a patient decision aid (PtDA) developed at one institution and implemented in two other institutions. This was guided by a well-described systematic development process for PtDAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mette Hæe
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, DK- 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Christian Nielsen Wulff
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, DK- 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Lars Fokdal
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, DK- 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Karina Olling
- Centre for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Beridderbakken 4, DK-7100 Vejle, Denmark
| | - Karina Mølgaard Jensen
- Centre for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Beridderbakken 4, DK-7100 Vejle, Denmark
| | - Dorte Gilså Hansen
- Centre for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Beridderbakken 4, DK-7100 Vejle, Denmark
- Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Anja Ør Knudsen
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Dorte Blou
- Patient Representative
- KIU (Patient organisation)
| | | | - Karina Dahl Steffensen
- Centre for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Beridderbakken 4, DK-7100 Vejle, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Lillebaelt Hospital – University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Beridderbakken 4, DK-7100 Vejle, Denmark
- Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
van Delft LCJ, Essers BAB, Nelemans PJ, Mosterd K, van Winden MEC, Romaen IFL, Retra SJJ, Arits AHMM, Steijlen PM, Lubeek SFK, Kelleners-Smeets NWJ. Effectiveness of a patient decision aid for patients with superficial basal cell carcinoma: A pre- and post-implementation study. Patient Educ Couns 2023; 115:107907. [PMID: 37487347 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study evaluates whether using a patient decision aid (PDA) for patients with superficial basal-cell carcinoma (sBCC) results in a decreased decisional conflict level and increased knowledge. METHODS In a prospective multicentre study, patient groups were included before and after implementation of a PDA. Decisional conflict levels were compared directly after making the treatment decision, measured once as the mean score on the decisional conflict scale (DCS). Higher scores correspond with higher conflict levels (0-100). Secondary outcomes were knowledge on treatment options, recognizing a BCC, and risk factors for developing a BCC measured on an adapted version of a validated knowledge questionnaire for melanoma patients, and patient satisfaction with the PDA. RESULTS Data was available for 103 patients in the control-group and 109 in the PDA-group. The mean DCS score in the control-group was 22.78 (SD 14.76) compared to 22.34 (SD 14.54) in the PDA-group; the decrease was non-significant (p = 0.828). The average percentage correct answers on the knowledge questionnaire increased from 76.5% in the control-group to 80.5% in the PDA-group (p = 0.044). According to the majority of patients in the PDA-group (73.7%) the PDA had added value. CONCLUSION Using the PDA had no significant effect on decisional conflict levels, but increased overall knowledge on relevant issues concerning sBCC. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS The PDA can be used as an informational tool by patients with sBCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lieke C J van Delft
- Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, the Netherlands.
| | - Brigitte A B Essers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Patty J Nelemans
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Klara Mosterd
- Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, the Netherlands
| | | | - Ine F L Romaen
- Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, the Netherlands
| | - Sean J J Retra
- Department of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Aimee H M M Arits
- Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Dermatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Peter M Steijlen
- Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, the Netherlands
| | - Satish F K Lubeek
- Department of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Nicole W J Kelleners-Smeets
- Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mainz H, Frandsen L, Fauno P, Lomborg K, Lind M. The impact of a patient decision aid on treatment choices after anterior cruciate ligament injuries. J Exp Orthop 2023; 10:82. [PMID: 37584784 PMCID: PMC10429475 DOI: 10.1186/s40634-023-00633-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The present study aimed to investigate whether exposure to a patient decision aid (PDA) had an impact on the proportion of patients selecting non-surgical or surgical treatments after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and whether exposure to a PDA affected the proportion of patients switching from non-surgical to surgical treatment within the first year. METHODS In a consecutive case series, proportions of surgery and non-surgery were compared before and after patients' exposure to a PDA. Data were collected from the health records of patients with ACL injuries who presented to the Clinic of Sports Traumatology. To identify proportional differences between the two groups, t-tests and proportion tests were used. RESULTS In total, 1,053 patients with ACL injuries were included: 563 patients with no exposure to the PDA (January 2015 to January 2017) and 490 patients with exposure to the PDA (January 2017 to January 2019). Before implementing the PDA, 27% of the patients selected non-surgical treatment. After implementing the PDA, 30% choose non-surgical treatment (p > 0.05). Before implementing the PDA, 21% of patients who initially chose non-surgical treatment had surgery within the first year. After implementation of the PDA, this number fell to 16%, but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0,05). CONCLUSION Exposure to the PDA did not significantly alter the proportion of ACL injury patients selecting non-surgical or surgical treatments or the proportion of patients switching to surgery within the first year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanne Mainz
- Clinic of Sports Traumatology, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
- Research Centre of Patient Involvement, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Lone Frandsen
- Clinic of Sports Traumatology, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Peter Fauno
- Clinic of Sports Traumatology, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kirsten Lomborg
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital - Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Martin Lind
- Clinic of Sports Traumatology, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hsu MY, Chen YS, Chen YC, Wu YL. Nurse-led coaching of shared decision-making for wound treatment of pressure injury: A pilot study of a randomized trial. Tzu Chi Med J 2023; 35:260-266. [PMID: 37545793 PMCID: PMC10399837 DOI: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_256_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 12/26/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives International guidelines for managing pressure injury (PI) and ulcers recommend that family members and caregivers should be involved in making decisions for appropriate wound care. However, the effect of shared decision-making (SDM) in the context of PI remains unknown. This study investigated the efficacy of nurse-led medical SDM for PI treatment. Materials and Methods We constructed a patient decision aid (PDA) for PI treatment on the basis of nursing evidence. Subsequently, we conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of SDM compared with that of usual care (control group, [CG]) for PI treatment. Participants with stage 3, stage 4, or unstageable PI were included and randomized into two groups. In the SDM group (SDMG), 10 participants received the SDM intervention for PI before treatment. All participants were followed up for 4 weeks. Primary outcomes were measured using the nine-item SDM Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) and Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS). Secondary outcomes included wound size and cost of wound management. Results The expert validity (medical professors and general population) of the PDA designed for PI was measured, and the content validity index was 0.96-0.97. A total of 20 participants were enrolled (10 received SDM and 10 received usual care). The mean age of the participants was 55.7 ± 8.8 years. No significant difference in baseline characteristics (sex, age, staging, or wound area) was observed between the two groups. The SDMG had higher SDM-Q-9 (P < 0.001) and DCS (P < 0.01) scores than did the CG. For the secondary outcomes, the SDMG had a decreased change of wound size and lower wound management costs than did the CG; nevertheless, the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion We constructed a PDA for PI treatment, which can be applied in clinical care. The pilot test results revealed that the participants had a lower cost related wound treatment and decreasing wound size in SDMG than CG after the intervention of SDM-PI for 4 weeks. In the future, clinical studies should conduct large-scale randomized trials based on the results of this pilot study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mei-Yu Hsu
- Department of Nursing, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Sin Chen
- Department of Nursing, Kuang Tien General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Ying-Chun Chen
- Department of Nursing, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Lin Wu
- Post-Baccalaureate Program in Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhu MM, Choy BNK, Lam WWT, Shum JWH. Randomized Control Trial of the Impact of Patient Decision Aid Developed for Chinese Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients. Ophthalmic Res 2023; 66:846-853. [PMID: 36893745 DOI: 10.1159/000530071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient decision aid (PDA) is a tool to prompt shared decision-making. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a PDA on Chinese primary open-angle glaucoma patients. METHODS All subjects were randomized into control and PDA group. The questionnaires, including 1) glaucoma knowledge; 2) 8-item Morisky medication adherence scale (MMAS-8); 3) 10-item glaucoma medication adherence self-efficacy scale (GMASES-10); and 4) 16-item decision conflict scale (DCS), were evaluated at baseline, 3- and 6-month follow-up. RESULTS Totally, 156 subjects participated in this study, including 77 in the control group and 79 in the PDA group. Compared to the control group, PDA group showed around 1 point more improvement in disease knowledge at both 3 and 6 months (both p < 0.05), 2.5 (95% CI: [1.0, 4.1]) and 1.9 (95% CI: [0.2, 3.7]) points more improvement in GMASES-10 at 3 and 6 months, respectively, and reduction in DCS by 8.8 (95% CI: [4.6, 12.9]) points more at 3 months and 13.5 (95% CI: [8.9, 18.0]) points more at 6 months. No difference was detected in MMAS-8. CONCLUSION PDA led to improvement in disease knowledge and self-confidence in medication adherence and reduced decision conflict compared to control group for at least 6 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Ming Zhu
- Department of Ophthalmology, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China,
| | - Bonnie N K Choy
- Department of Ophthalmology, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Wendy W T Lam
- School of Public Health, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Jennifer W H Shum
- Department of Ophthalmology, Caritas Medical Centre, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hochstenbach LM, Determann D, Fijten RR, Bloemen-van Gurp EJ, Verwey R. Taking shared decision making for prostate cancer to the next level: Requirements for a Dutch treatment decision aid with personalized risks on side effects. Internet Interv 2023; 31:100606. [PMID: 36844795 PMCID: PMC9945792 DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Different curative treatment modalities need to be considered in case of localized prostate cancer, all comparable in terms of survival and recurrence though different in side effects. To better inform patients and support shared decision making, the development of a web-based patient decision aid including personalized risk information was proposed. This paper reports on requirements in terms of content of information, visualization of risk profiles, and use in practice. METHODS Based on a Dutch 10-step guide about the setup of a decision aid next to a practice guideline, an iterative and co-creative design process was followed. In collaboration with various groups of experts (health professionals, usability and linguistic experts, patients and the general public), research and development activities were continuously alternated. RESULTS Content requirements focused on presenting information only about conventional treatments and main side effects; based on risk group; and including clear explanations about personalized risks. Visual requirements involved presenting general and personalized risks separately; through bar charts or icon arrays; and along with numbers or words, and legends. Organizational requirements included integration into local clinical pathways; agreement about information input and output; and focus on patients' numeracy and graph literacy skills. CONCLUSIONS The iterative and co-creative development process was challenging, though extremely valuable. The translation of requirements resulted in a decision aid about four conventional treatment options, including general or personalized risks for erection, urinary and intestinal problems that are communicated with icon arrays and numbers. Future implementation and validation studies need to inform about use and value in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura M.J. Hochstenbach
- Center of Expertise for Innovative Care and Technology (EIZT), School of Nursing, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 550, 6400 AN Heerlen, the Netherlands,Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, the Netherlands,Corresponding author at: Maastricht University, Department of Health Services Research, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, the Netherlands.
| | | | - Rianne R.R. Fijten
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Esther J. Bloemen-van Gurp
- Center of Expertise for Innovative Care and Technology (EIZT), School of Nursing, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 550, 6400 AN Heerlen, the Netherlands,Expertise Center Empowering Healthy Behavior, Fontys University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 347, 5600 AH Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Renée Verwey
- Center of Expertise for Innovative Care and Technology (EIZT), School of Nursing, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 550, 6400 AN Heerlen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Whybrow R, Sandall J, Girling J, Brown H, Seed PT, Green M, Findlay S, Webster L, Chappell LC. Implementation of a novel shared decision-making intervention in women with chronic hypertension in pregnancy: multiple-site multiple-method investigation. Pregnancy Hypertens 2022; 30:137-44. [PMID: 36194966 DOI: 10.1016/j.preghy.2022.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Revised: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many women with chronic hypertension are conflicted about antihypertensive medication during pregnancy and some are non-adherent to prescribed medication. OBJECTIVES Codesign, implement and evaluate a novel shared decision-making (SDM) intervention for use with pregnant women with chronic hypertension. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Pregnant women with chronic hypertension and their principal healthcare professionals (obstetricians, midwives, and physicians), at three National Health Service hospital trusts with different models of care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The RE-AIM framework guided the evaluation. Primary: Decisional conflict scale, medication intention survey and women's acceptability. Secondary: Healthcare professionals' acceptability and the barriers and facilitators to SDM implementation with pregnant women with chronic hypertension. RESULTS Fifty women participated. Nearly half (46 %; n = 23) of women were from Black and Asian backgrounds. The SDM intervention was effective at reducing decisional conflict (mean reduction from baseline 42 %, 95 % CI 35-49, p ≤ 0.05). In 36 women (72 %), the reduction was of clinical importance. 24 women (48 %) were uncertain about or planned not to take antihypertensives prior to the SDM intervention, compared to two women (4 %) after the intervention. The intervention was acceptable to women and healthcare professionals. 10 of 14 healthcare professionals felt that the in-consultation aid facilitated SDM in current antenatal contexts, a similar proportion (10/14) felt the length of consultations hindered SDM. CONCLUSION A novel codesigned SDM intervention reduced decisional conflict and increased women's intention to take antihypertensive agents during pregnancy. This intervention could be adopted into practice for women making pregnancy decisions where there is uncertainty around the medication management option.
Collapse
|
19
|
Frigon MP, Lavoie M, Emond MJ, Bouchard L, Poitras ME, Tremblay K. Family planning decisional needs assessment for recessive hereditary disorders: Insights from carrier couples and professionals. Patient Educ Couns 2022; 105:2537-2545. [PMID: 34872805 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.11.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Revised: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Carrier couples of recessive diseases face an important decision-making process regarding their familial planning that can become a significant source of discomfort and potential regrets. To date, no study has described the decisional needs of carrier couples of Leigh syndrome French-Canadian type, hereditary tyrosinemia type 1, hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy with or without agenesis of the corpus callosum and autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay undergoing family planning decision-making process. Our study aimed to describe the decisional needs of carrier couples according to the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. METHODS A qualitative descriptive study was conducted. Qualitative individual and joint couple interviews were performed among 39 carrier individuals and 11 health and social care professionals. RESULTS Carrier couples' decision-making process is complex, and their decisional needs include, among others, sufficient knowledge about the disease and the reproductive options, personal values and available support. Increased decisional conflict was observed among carriers of diseases associated with low morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSION Family planning decision-making is an evolutive deliberative process that requires appropriate shared decision-making to insure decisional comfort. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Carrier couples family planning decision-making process needs to be better supported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Pier Frigon
- Medicine Faculty, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada; Community Genomic Medicine Centre & Biocluster ECOGENE-21, Saguenay, QC, Canada
| | - Mélissa Lavoie
- Department of Health Science, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Saguenay, QC, Canada; Groupe de recherche interdisciplinaire sur les maladies neuromusculaires, Saguenay, QC, Canada
| | - Marie-Josée Emond
- Department of Health Science, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Saguenay, QC, Canada
| | - Luigi Bouchard
- Department of Medical Biology, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean, Saguenay, QC, Canada; Department of Biochemistry and Functional Genomics, Université de Sherbrooke, Saguenay, QC, Canada
| | - Marie-Eve Poitras
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
| | - Karine Tremblay
- Medicine Faculty, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada; Department of Medical Biology, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean, Saguenay, QC, Canada; Department of Pharmacology-Physiology, Université de Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Vanesa RG, Lilisbeth PP, Amado RS, Wenceslao PC, Andrea DD, Yolanda ÁP, Del Mar MM, Isabel DCM, Pedro SA. Decision aids linked to the recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: results of the acceptability of a decision aid for patients with generalized anxiety disorder. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2022; 22:171. [PMID: 35773665 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-022-01899-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is one of the most prevalent mental health problems. Patients with GAD have unmet needs related to the information received about their disorder, its treatments and their participation in the decision-making process. The aim of this study is to develop and assess the acceptability of a patient decision aid (PtDA) for patients with GAD. Method The PtDA was developed following the International Patient Decision Aid Standards. The recommendations of the Spanish clinical practice guideline (CPG) for patients with GAD were used as the basis. The first prototype was developed by an expert committee, further improvements were made with patients (n = 2), clinical experts (n = 13) and the project management group (n = 7). The acceptability of this second draft was assessed by patients non-involved in the previous phases (n = 11). Results The final PtDA version included a brief description of GAD and its treatments. Most participants agreed that the PtDA was easy to use, visually appealing and useful. At least half of the participants learned new things about treatments and adverse effects. Conclusions A PtDA was developed for patients with GAD based on recommendations from the Spanish CPG. It was improved and accepted by patients and clinical experts involved. An evaluation of its effectiveness on the shared decision-making process during the clinical encounter is planned.
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-022-01899-2.
Collapse
|
21
|
Sunjaya AP, Bao L, Martin A, DiTanna GL, Jenkins CR. Systematic review of effectiveness and quality assessment of patient education materials and decision aids for breathlessness. BMC Pulm Med 2022; 22:237. [PMID: 35725454 DOI: 10.1186/s12890-022-02032-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Around 10% of adults suffer from clinically significant breathlessness. High quality and actionable patient education materials (PEMs) and patient decision aids (PDAs) have an important role for shared decision making and patient self-management. OBJECTIVE To systematically assess the effectiveness of patient education materials (PEMs) and patient decision aids (PDAs) on clinical outcomes. Secondly, to assess the quality of PEMs and PDAs for breathlessness that are accessible online. METHODS A systematic review of PEM or PDA intervention for breathlessness published between 1 January 2010 and November 2020 was conducted. An environmental scan and quality assessment of publicly available PEMs and PDAs was also conducted. RESULTS Out of 2985 records, five studies were eligible for inclusion in this systematic review. Results of two randomised controlled trials suggest potential effectiveness of PEMs to improve patient reported outcomes and reduce healthcare utilization. In the environmental scan, 88 materials were included. Minimum reading age for most was high (Grade 10) and PEMs scored an average of 87% for understandability and 67% for actionability. Based on the DISCERN tool only 10 were classified as high quality. CONCLUSION There is a paucity of evidence on the effectiveness of PEMs and PDAs for improvement in breathlessness. There is a need to develop higher quality PEMs for breathlessness.
Collapse
|
22
|
Lin SQ, Su CM, Wu HC, Chou YY, Yen YC, Tam KW. Effect of patient decision aids on decisional conflict and regret associated with breast cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Breast Cancer 2022; 29:880-888. [PMID: 35589905 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-022-01370-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with breast cancer encounter difficulties in making surgical treatment decisions. Shared decision-making (SDM) with patient decision aids (PDAs) can minimize patients' decisional conflicts. However, the effect of PDAs in Asia remains inconclusive. This study investigated the effect of SDM assisted by PDAs on the decisional conflict of patients with breast cancer. METHODS In this two-group, outcome assessor-blind, randomized controlled trial, 151 patients diagnosed as having breast cancer were assigned to the PDA (SDM with PDA) group or the standard (SDM without PDA) group. Demographic and clinical variables were analyzed to identify variables affecting the treatment choice. The patients' decision-making difficulties were evaluated using the four-item SURE scale during preoperative hospitalization, and decisional conflicts were examined using the five-item Decision Regret scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) 1 month after surgery. RESULTS The choice of breast conservation therapy and mastectomy did not significantly differ between the PDA and standard groups. The PDA group had a higher level of depression after making decisions (P = 0.029) than did the standard group. No significant difference in the total scores of the SURE scale and Decision Regret scale were noted between the groups. CONCLUSION PDAs did not assist the patients with breast cancer in making breast surgery-related decisions. Clinicians should focus on SDM grounded in evidence-based medicine with care and help patients consider their individual preferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT03105076; April 7, 2017 ( http://www. CLINICALTRIALS gov ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shi-Qian Lin
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Ming Su
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei, Taiwan.,Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsueh-Chi Wu
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yun-Yun Chou
- Shared Decision Making Resource Center, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, 291, Zhongzheng Road, Zhonghe District, New Taipei City, 23561, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Chun Yen
- Biostatistics and Research Consultation Center, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ka-Wai Tam
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei, Taiwan. .,Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. .,Shared Decision Making Resource Center, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, 291, Zhongzheng Road, Zhonghe District, New Taipei City, 23561, Taiwan. .,Cochrane Taiwan, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hussain-Shamsy N, Somerton S, Stewart DE, Grigoriadis S, Metcalfe K, Oberlander TF, Schram C, Taylor VH, Dennis CL, Vigod SN. The development of a patient decision aid to reduce decisional conflict about antidepressant use in pregnancy. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2022; 22:130. [PMID: 35562801 PMCID: PMC9099318 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-022-01870-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background People with moderate to severe depression in pregnancy must weigh potential risks of untreated or incompletely treated depression against the small, but uncertain risks of fetal antidepressant drug exposure. Clinical support alone appears insufficient for helping individuals with this complex decision. A patient decision aid (PDA) has the potential to be a useful tool for this population. The objective of our work was to use internationally recognized guidelines from the International Patient Decision Aids Standards Collaboration to develop an evidence-based PDA for antidepressant use in pregnancy. Methods A three-phased development process was used whereby, informed by patient and physician perspectives and evidence synthesis, a steering committee commissioned a web-based PDA for those deciding whether or not to start or continue antidepressant treatment for depression in pregnancy (Phase 1). A prototype was developed (Phase 2) and iteratively revised based on feedback during field testing based on a user-centred process (Phase 3). Results We developed a web-based PDA for people deciding whether to start or continue antidepressant use for depression in pregnancy. It has five interactive sections: (1) information on depression and treatment; (2) reasons to start/continue an antidepressant and to start/stop antidepressant medication; (3) user assessment of values regarding each issue; (4) opportunity to reflect on factors that contribute to decision making; and (5) a printable PDF that summarizes the user’s journey through the PDA. Conclusions This tool, which exclusively focuses on depression treatment with Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Serotonin–Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors, can be used by individuals making decisions about antidepressant use to treat depression during pregnancy. Limitations of the PDA are that it is not for other conditions, nor other medications that can be used for depression, and in its pilot form cannot be used by women who do not speak English or who have a visual impairment. Pending further study, it has the potential to enhance quality of care and patient experience. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-022-01870-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neesha Hussain-Shamsy
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, 4th Floor, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sarah Somerton
- Garry Hurvitz Centre for Brain and Mental Health, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Donna E Stewart
- Centre for Mental Health, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sophie Grigoriadis
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and Research Institute, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Women's College Hospital and Research Institute, 76 Grenville Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada
| | - Kelly Metcalfe
- Women's College Hospital and Research Institute, 76 Grenville Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada.,Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tim F Oberlander
- BC Children's Hospital, 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 317-2194 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Carrie Schram
- Women's College Hospital and Research Institute, 76 Grenville Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada
| | - Valerie H Taylor
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr NW, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Cindy-Lee Dennis
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Simone N Vigod
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, 4th Floor, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,Women's College Hospital and Research Institute, 76 Grenville Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Williams A, Cunningham A, Hutchings H, Harris DA, Evans MD, Harji D. Quality of internet information to aid patient decision making in locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer. Surgeon 2022; 20:e382-e391. [PMID: 35033455 DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2021.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Revised: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To review whether online decision aids are available for patients contemplating pelvic exenteration (PE) for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer (LARC and LRRC). METHODS A grey literature review was carried out using the Google Search™ engine undertaken using a predefined search strategy (PROSPERO database CRD42019122933). Written health information was assessed using the DISCERN criteria and International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) with readability content assessed using the Flesch-Kincaid reading ease test and Flesch-Kincaid grade level score. RESULTS Google search yielded 27, 782, 200 results for the predefined search criteria. 131 sources were screened resulting in the analysis of 6 sources. No sources were identified as a decision aid according to the IPDAS criteria. All sources provided an acceptable quality of written health information, scoring a global score of 3 for the DISCERN written assessment. The median Flesch-Kincaid reading ease was 50.85 (32.5-80.8) equating to a reading age of 15-18 years and the median Flesch-Kincaid grade level score was 7.65 (range 3-9.7), which equates to a reading age of 13-14. CONCLUSIONS This study has found that there is a paucity of online information for patients contemplating PE. Sources that are available are aimed at a high health literate patient. Given the considerable morbidity associated with PE surgery there is a need for high quality relevant information in this area. A PDA should be developed to improve decision making and ultimately improve patient experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Williams
- Department of Surgery, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Singleton Hospital, Swansea, SA2 8QA, UK; Swansea University Medical School, Institute of Life Science 2, Swansea, SA2 8QA, UK.
| | - A Cunningham
- Department of Surgery, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Singleton Hospital, Swansea, SA2 8QA, UK; Swansea University Medical School, Institute of Life Science 2, Swansea, SA2 8QA, UK.
| | - H Hutchings
- Swansea University Medical School, Institute of Life Science 2, Swansea, SA2 8QA, UK.
| | - D A Harris
- Department of Surgery, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Singleton Hospital, Swansea, SA2 8QA, UK.
| | - M D Evans
- Department of Surgery, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Singleton Hospital, Swansea, SA2 8QA, UK.
| | - D Harji
- Population Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
van den Heuvel JFM, Hogeveen M, Lutke Holzik M, van Heijst AFJ, Bekker MN, Geurtzen R. Digital decision aid for prenatal counseling in imminent extreme premature labor: development and pilot testing. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2022; 22:7. [PMID: 34991580 PMCID: PMC8734286 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01735-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In case of extreme premature delivery at 24 weeks of gestation, both early intensive care and palliative comfort care for the neonate are considered treatment options. Prenatal counseling, preferably using shared decision making, is needed to agree on the treatment option in case labor progresses. This article described the development of a digital decision aid (DA) to support pregnant women, partners and clinicians in prenatal counseling for imminent extreme premature labor.
Methods This DA is developed following the International Patient Decision Aid Standards. The Dutch treatment guideline and the Dutch recommendations for prenatal counseling in extreme prematurity were used as basis. Development of the first prototype was done by expert clinicians and patients, further improvements were done after alpha testing with involved clinicians, patients and other experts (n = 12), and beta testing with non-involved clinicians and patients (n = 15). Results The final version includes information, probabilities and figures depending on users’ preferences. Furthermore, it elicits patient values and provides guidance to aid parents and professionals in making a decision for either early intensive care or palliative comfort care in threatening extreme premature delivery. Conclusion A decision aid was developed to support prenatal counseling regarding the decision on early intensive care versus palliative comfort care in case of extreme premature delivery at 24 weeks gestation. It was well accepted by parents and healthcare professionals. Our multimedia, digital DA is openly available online to support prenatal counseling and personalized, shared decision-making in imminent extreme premature labor. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-021-01735-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josephus F M van den Heuvel
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina's Children Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marije Hogeveen
- Department of Neonatology, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Center, Internal Code 804, PO Box 9101, 6500HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Margo Lutke Holzik
- Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Arno F J van Heijst
- Department of Neonatology, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Center, Internal Code 804, PO Box 9101, 6500HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina's Children Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rosa Geurtzen
- Department of Neonatology, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Center, Internal Code 804, PO Box 9101, 6500HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Yu CH, Medleg F, Choi D, Spagnuolo CM, Pinnaduwage L, Straus SE, Cantarutti P, Chu K, Frydrych P, Hoang-Kim A, Ivers N, Kaplan D, Leung FH, Maxted J, Rezmovitz J, Sale J, Sodhi S, Stacey D, Telner D. Integrating shared decision-making into primary care: lessons learned from a multi-centre feasibility randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2021; 21:323. [PMID: 34809626 PMCID: PMC8609876 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01673-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background MyDiabetesPlan is a web-based, interactive patient decision aid that facilitates patient-centred, diabetes-specific, goal-setting and shared decision-making (SDM) with interprofessional health care teams. Objective Assess the feasibility of (1) conducting a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) and (2) integrating MyDiabetesPlan into interprofessional primary care clinics. Methods We conducted a cluster RCT in 10 interprofessional primary care clinics with patients living with diabetes and at least two other comorbidities; half of the clinics were assigned to MyDiabetesPlan and half were assigned to usual care. To assess recruitment, retention, and resource use, we used RCT conduct logs and financial account summaries. To assess intervention fidelity, we used RCT conduct logs and website usage logs. To identify barriers and facilitators to integration of MyDiabetesPlan into clinical care across the IP team, we used audiotapes of clinical encounters in the intervention groups. Results One thousand five hundred and ninety-seven potentially eligible patients were identified through searches of electronic medical records, of which 1113 patients met the eligibility criteria upon detailed chart review. A total of 425 patients were randomly selected; of these, 213 were able to participate and were allocated (intervention: n = 102; control: n = 111), for a recruitment rate of 50.1%. One hundred and fifty-one patients completed the study, for a retention rate of 70.9%. A total of 5745 personnel-hours and $6104 CAD were attributed to recruitment and retention activities. A total of 179 appointments occurred (out of 204 expected appointments—two per participant over the 12-month study period; 87.7%). Forty (36%), 25 (23%), and 32 (29%) patients completed MyDiabetesPlan at least twice, once, and zero times, respectively. Mean time for completion of MyDiabetesPlan by the clinician and the patient during initial appointments was 37 min. From the clinical encounter transcripts, we identified diverse strategies used by clinicians and patients to integrate MyDiabetesPlan into the appointment, characterized by rapport building and individualization. Barriers to use included clinician-related, patient-related, and technical factors. Conclusion An interprofessional approach to SDM using a decision aid was feasible. Lower than expected numbers of diabetes-specific appointments and use of MyDiabetesPlan were observed. Addressing facilitators and barriers identified in this study will promote more seamless integration into clinical care. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02379078. Date of Registration: February 11, 2015. Protocol version: Version 1; February 26, 2015. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-021-01673-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine H Yu
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada. .,Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 190 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada. .,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.
| | - Farid Medleg
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephen's Green, Dublin, D02 YN77, Ireland
| | - Dorothy Choi
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada
| | - Catherine M Spagnuolo
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.,School of Medicine, Queen's University, 99 University Ave, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Lakmini Pinnaduwage
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 190 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada
| | - Sharon E Straus
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 190 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M6, Canada
| | - Paul Cantarutti
- Southlake Regional Health Centre, 596 Davis Dr, Newmarket, ON, 3Y 2P9, Canada
| | - Karen Chu
- Bridgepoint Active Healthcare (Sinai Health System), 1 Bridgepoint Dr, Toronto, ON, M4M 2B5, Canada
| | - Paul Frydrych
- Mount Dennis Weston Health Centre, Humber River Family Health Team, 2050 Weston Rd, York, ON, M9N 3M4, Canada
| | - Amy Hoang-Kim
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada
| | - Noah Ivers
- Department of Family Medicine, Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville St, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada.,University of Toronto, 1 King's College Cir, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - David Kaplan
- University of Toronto, 1 King's College Cir, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada.,North York Family Health Team, 240 Duncan Mill Rd, North York, ON, M3B 3S6, Canada
| | - Fok-Han Leung
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada
| | - John Maxted
- Markham Stouffville Hospital, 381 Church St, Markham, ON, L3P 7P3, Canada
| | - Jeremy Rezmovitz
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Joanna Sale
- Musculoskeletal Health and Outcomes Research - Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, 209 Victoria St, Toronto, ON, M5B 1T8, Canada
| | - Sumeet Sodhi
- Toronto Western Family Health Team, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 440 Bathurst St, Toronto, ON, M5T 2S8, Canada
| | - Dawn Stacey
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8M5, Canada.,Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Deanna Telner
- South East Toronto Family Health Team (Toronto East Health Network), 833 Coxwell Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4C 3E8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Broughton LC, Medlicott NJ, Smith AJ. Effectiveness of patient decision aids in women considering psychotropic medication use during pregnancy: a literature review. Arch Womens Ment Health 2021; 24:569-78. [PMID: 33751206 DOI: 10.1007/s00737-021-01118-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2020] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Women face complicated decisions regarding psychotropic medication use during pregnancy. Patient decision aids (PDAs) could be a valuable tool to assist with decision-making. The objective of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of PDAs in this population. A systematic search of the literature was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. Three major databases were searched to identify articles published between 2006 and June 2020. Studies were included if they evaluated use of a PDA for women considering medication for mental illness during pregnancy. A total of 4629 titles were returned from the search; however, only three studies met inclusion criteria and were selected for analysis. Two were pilot randomised controlled trials in women considering antidepressant use during pregnancy, and one was a non-randomised study in women considering medication for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD). The PDAs had good acceptability across all three studies. The randomised trials assessed knowledge, decisional conflict, depression, and anxiety, with non-significant trends towards reduced decisional conflict and anxiety in the PDA groups. PDAs have the potential to assist women with mental illnesses to make decisions regarding medication use during pregnancy; however, current evidence is too limited to evaluate the effectiveness of PDAs for this population.
Collapse
|
28
|
Søndergaard SR, Madsen PH, Hilberg O, Bechmann T, Jakobsen E, Jensen KM, Olling K, Steffensen KD. The impact of shared decision making on time consumption and clinical decisions. A prospective cohort study. Patient Educ Couns 2021; 104:1560-1567. [PMID: 33390303 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2020] [Revised: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Concerns of increased time consumption and of the impact on clinical decisions may restrain doctors from shared decision making (SDM). This paper evaluates consultation length and decisions made when using an in-consult patient decision aid (PtDA). METHODS This prospective cohort study compared an unexposed cohort with a cohort exposed to SDM and a PtDA in two preference-sensitive decision situations: invasive lung cancer diagnostics and adjuvant treatment for early breast cancer. Outcome measures were consultation length and decisions made. RESULTS The study included 261 consultations, 115 were in the SDM-exposed cohort. Consultations were inconsiderably longer in the SDM cohort; 2 min, 11 s (p = 0.2217) for lung cancer diagnostics and 3 min, 57 s (p = 0.1128) for adjuvant breast cancer treatment. In lung cancer diagnostics, consultation length became more uniform and decisions tended to become conservative after introduction of SDM. For adjuvant breast cancer, slightly more patients in the SDM cohort chose to decline treatment. CONCLUSION Shared decision making did not take significantly longer time and led to slightly more conservative decisions. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS SDM may be implemented without considerable impact on consultation length. The impact on clinical decisions depends mainly on the clinical situation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stine R Søndergaard
- Department of Oncology, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark; Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark; Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| | - Poul H Madsen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark
| | - Ole Hilberg
- Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Department of Internal Medicine, The Lung Cancer Diagnostic Organization, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Troels Bechmann
- Department of Oncology, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark; Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Erik Jakobsen
- Department of Oncology, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Karina M Jensen
- Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Karina Olling
- Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Karina D Steffensen
- Department of Oncology, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark; Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark; Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Zheng LF, Ngoh SHA, Ng JYX, Tan NC. Clinician perspectives on a culturally adapted patient decision aid concerning maintenance therapy for asthma. J Asthma 2021; 59:1463-1472. [PMID: 33926335 DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2021.1923736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Patients with persistent asthma often show poor adherence to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). Shared decision-making can improve adherence rates in this population. Patient decision aids (PDAs) are tools to facilitate shared decision-making. To date, only one PDA, developed in a Canadian French-speaking population, exists for patients considering ICS maintenance therapy. This PDA has been culturally adapted in this study to contextualize to the needs of multi-ethnic Asian patients in Singapore. This study explored the views of local clinicians on the content, design and implementation of this newly-adapted PDA. METHODS 24 clinicians, who were purposively sampled from polyclinics and a tertiary institution, were interviewed on the content, design and implementation of the PDA. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analyzed via thematic analysis. RESULTS Clinicians generally accepted the design of the PDA. They suggested for the target users to be patients on Step 2 of GINA guidelines and the number of options to be reduced from four to two (do nothing or start inhaled corticosteroids). Moreover, they supported including a list of values for patients to select from given that Asian patients often do not articulate their values readily. The addition of more visual aids, the production of multilingual Asian editions and the involvement of nurses to administer the PDA was also suggested. CONCLUSION The PDA was culturally-adapted with local clinicians' perspectives to target multi-ethnic Asian patients with persistent asthma (Step 2 GINA guidelines). The main changes include a list of values and addition of visual aids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L F Zheng
- SingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore.,SingHealth-Duke NUS Family Medicine Academic Clinical Programme, Singapore, Singapore
| | - S H A Ngoh
- SingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore
| | - J Y X Ng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - N C Tan
- SingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore.,SingHealth-Duke NUS Family Medicine Academic Clinical Programme, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Grabbe P, Gschwendtner KM, Maatouk I, Strobel SB, Salzmann M, Bossert J, Eich W, Wild B, Meier F, Hassel JC, Bieber C. Development and validation of a web-based patient decision aid for immunotherapy for patients with metastatic melanoma: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial. Trials 2021; 22:294. [PMID: 33879219 PMCID: PMC8056554 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05234-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with metastatic melanoma and their physicians are confronted with a complex decision regarding first-line therapy. Risks and benefits vary considerably between various treatment options. With this in mind, we aim to develop and evaluate a patient decision aid (PtDA) to inform patients about the risks and benefits of treatment options, namely, immunotherapy as monotherapy, immunotherapy as combination therapy, and treatment with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. We aim to test whether the use of this PtDA before medical consultation will increase patients’ knowledge of treatment options and thus promote shared decision-making (SDM) and patient decision satisfaction. Methods In total, 128 patients with metastatic melanoma from two German cancer centers will be randomized to the intervention group (IG), receiving access to the PtDA before medical consultation, or the control group (CG), receiving treatment as usual (TAU), i.e., medical consultation alone. There will be three major assessment points (before intervention, T0; after intervention, T1; and 3 months after intervention, T2). The main outcome is the patient’s knowledge of their treatment options, measured by a self-developed, piloted multiple-choice test at T1. Secondary outcome measures will include the extent of SDM during medical consultation, assessed by Observer OPTION 5, and patient decision satisfaction, assessed by the Satisfaction with Decision Scale (SwD), at T1 and T2. Discussion This trial will assess the effectiveness of a developed PtDA to enhance patient knowledge of treatment options for metastatic melanoma, SDM, and patient decision satisfaction. If the efficacy can be proven, the PtDA will be implemented nationwide in Germany to close a relevant gap in the education and care of patients with metastatic melanoma. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04240717. Registered on 27 January 2020
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pia Grabbe
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Thibautstraße 4, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Kathrin M Gschwendtner
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Thibautstraße 4, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Imad Maatouk
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Thibautstraße 4, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sophia B Strobel
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Salzmann
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Julia Bossert
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany.,TAKEPART Media + Science, Köln, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Eich
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Thibautstraße 4, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Beate Wild
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Thibautstraße 4, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Friedegund Meier
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jessica C Hassel
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christiane Bieber
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Thibautstraße 4, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kremer IEH, Jongen PJ, Evers SMAA, Hoogervorst ELJ, Verhagen WIM, Hiligsmann M. Patient decision aid based on multi-criteria decision analysis for disease-modifying drugs for multiple sclerosis: prototype development. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2021; 21:123. [PMID: 33836742 PMCID: PMC8033667 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01479-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Since decision making about treatment with disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) is preference sensitive, shared decision making between patient and healthcare professional should take place. Patient decision aids could support this shared decision making process by providing information about the disease and the treatment options, to elicit the patient’s preference and to support patients and healthcare professionals in discussing these preferences and matching them with a treatment. Therefore, a prototype of a patient decision aid for MS patients in the Netherlands—based on the principles of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) —was developed, following the recommendations of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards. MCDA was chosen as it might reduce cognitive burden of considering treatment options and matching patient preferences with the treatment options. Results After determining the scope to include DMDs labelled for relapsing-remitting MS and clinically isolated syndrome, users’ informational needs were assessed using focus groups (N = 19 patients) and best-worst scaling surveys with patients (N = 185), neurologists and nurses (N = 60) to determine which information about DMDs should be included in the patient decision aid. Next, an online format and computer-based delivery of the patient decision aid was chosen to enable embedding of MCDA. A literature review was conducting to collect evidence on the effectiveness and burden of use of the DMDs. A prototype was developed next, and alpha testing to evaluate its comprehensibility and usability with in total thirteen patients and four healthcare professionals identified several issues regarding content and framing, methods for weighting importance of criteria in the MCDA structure, and the presentation of the conclusions of the patient decision aid ranking the treatment options according to the patient’s preferences. Adaptations were made accordingly, but verification of the rankings provided, validation of the patient decision aid, evaluation of the feasibility of implementation and assessing its value for supporting shared decision making should be addressed in further development of the patient decision aid. Conclusion This paper aimed to provide more transparency regarding the developmental process of an MCDA-based patient decision aid for treatment decisions for MS and the challenges faced during this process. Issues identified in the prototype were resolved as much as possible, though some issues remain. Further development is needed to overcome these issues before beta pilot testing with patients and healthcare professionals at the point of clinical decision-making can take place to ultimately enable making conclusions about the value of the MCDA-based patient decision aid for MS patients, healthcare professionals and the quality of care. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-021-01479-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I E H Kremer
- Department of Health Services Research, School CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - P J Jongen
- MS4 Research Institute, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - S M A A Evers
- Department of Health Services Research, School CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Public Mental Health, Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - E L J Hoogervorst
- Department of Neurology, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - W I M Verhagen
- Department of Neurology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - M Hiligsmann
- Department of Health Services Research, School CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Esmaeili M, Ayyoubzadeh SM, Javanmard Z, R Niakan Kalhori S. A systematic review of decision aids for mammography screening: Focus on outcomes and characteristics. Int J Med Inform 2021; 149:104406. [PMID: 33640838 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Revised: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Decision Aid systems (DAs) provide information on the pros and cons of mammography. This study aimed to review the research on mammography DAs, synthesize the findings related to their outcomes and characteristics, and address the existed research gap. METHODS Relevant studies were identified through a comprehensive search on some e-databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science in August 2020; by searching the keywords of "Breast cancer", "Screening", and "Decision aid systems" as well as their synonyms in the titles and abstracts of the papers with no time limits. Among the selected English journal papers with the interventional study design, those measuring outcome values of using mammography DAs were recognized as eligible for being included in this review. RESULTS The systematic search results in 16 DAs regarding mammography that were designed and then evaluated from 18 selected studies. The results showed that DAs provide improvements in knowledge and informed choice, the decreased decisional conflicts and decisional confidence, almost without changing any attitude towards mammography, mammography participation rates, psychological issues, anticipated regret, and perceived risk of breast cancer. The DAs' effects on women's inclination to screening were divergent. In other words, the DAs affect individuals' inclination in rare cases; however, on occasion, they could affect women's decision to undergo screening. CONCLUSION DAs could correct the bias attached to the existing knowledge on mammography and breast cancer in women so that they are more likely to make a precise decision. Additionally, it might be of central importance in shared decision-making and assisting health providers, in order to promote the quality of care. Accordingly, performing more studies is needed to develop more professional DAs in various countries with different facilities, cultures, and languages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marzieh Esmaeili
- Department of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Students' Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Seyed Mohammad Ayyoubzadeh
- Department of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Students' Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Zohreh Javanmard
- Department of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Health Information Technology, Ferdows School of Paramedical and Health, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.
| | - Sharareh R Niakan Kalhori
- Department of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Chandrasekar T, Boorjian SA, Capitanio U, Gershman B, Mir MC, Kutikov A. Collaborative Review: Factors Influencing Treatment Decisions for Patients with a Localized Solid Renal Mass. Eur Urol 2021; 80:575-588. [PMID: 33558091 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.01.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2020] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT With the addition of active surveillance and thermal ablation (TA) to the urologist's established repertoire of partial (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) as first-line management options for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC), appropriate treatment decision-making has become increasingly nuanced. OBJECTIVE To critically review the treatment options for localized, nonrecurrent RCC; to highlight the patient, renal function, tumor, and provider factors that influence treatment decisions; and to provide a framework to conceptualize that decision-making process. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A collaborative critical review of the medical literature was conducted. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS We identify three key decision points when managing localized RCC: (1) decision for surveillance versus treatment, (2) decision regarding treatment modality (TA, PN, or RN), and (3) decision on surgical approach (open vs minimally invasive). In evaluating factors that influence these treatment decisions, we elaborate on patient, renal function, tumor, and provider factors that either directly or indirectly impact each decision point. As current nomograms, based on preselected patient datasets, perform poorly in prospective settings, these tools should be used with caution. Patient decision aids are an underutilized tool in decision-making. CONCLUSIONS Localized RCC requires highly nuanced treatment decision-making, balancing patient- and tumor-specific clinical variables against indirect structural influences to provide optimal patient care. PATIENT SUMMARY With expanding treatment options for localized kidney cancer, treatment decision is highly nuanced and requires shared decision-making. Patient decision aids may be helpful in the treatment discussion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thenappan Chandrasekar
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | | | - Umberto Capitanio
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Boris Gershman
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maria Carmen Mir
- Department of Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Alexander Kutikov
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Vincent YM, Frachon A, Buffeteau C, Conort G. Construction of a patient decision aid for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection in primary care. BMC Fam Pract 2021; 22:26. [PMID: 33499824 PMCID: PMC7839208 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01374-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Background Uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) is very common among women in primary care. The risk of developing pyelonephritis remains low after uUTI, nonetheless, empiric antibiotic therapy is frequently prescribed for symptomatic purposes. This may lead to adverse effects and antibiotic resistance. Furthermore, patients may express the will to limit the use of antibiotics. Some European countries recommend discussing a delayed prescription with the patient and developing a shared decision. The aim of this study is to create a patient decision aid (PtDA) used in primary care settings to make a shared decision between practitioners and women about whether or not to treat uUTI with antibiotics. Methods We followed the steps recommended by the International Patient Decision Aids Standards, with a scoping phase, a design phase (including focus groups and literature review), and an alpha-testing phase. A steering group, made of patients and physicians, met throughout the study to develop a prototype PtDA. Results The information included in the PtDA is the definition of uUTI, information on the options, their benefits, risks, and consequences, based on a review of the literature. The results of the focus group made possible to determine the patient’s values and preferences to consider in decision-making, including: the discomfort felt, the impact on daily life, patients’ perceptions of antibiotics, and the position relative to the risk of adverse effect. The choices in presentation, organisation and design are the result of the work of the steering group, improved by feedback from alpha testing. We confirmed the need for shared decision-making and the equipoise in this situation. Conclusions We developed a PtDA to be used in primary care for sharing decision on the use of antibiotic in uUTI. It needs to be validated in a beta-testing phase, with complementary advice from peers, and then tested in a clinical study comparing its use with the systematic prescription approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yves-Marie Vincent
- Département de Médecine Générale, Université de Bordeaux, Collège Sciences de la santé, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33076, Bordeaux Cedex, France.
| | - Adèle Frachon
- Département de Médecine Générale, Université de Bordeaux, Collège Sciences de la santé, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33076, Bordeaux Cedex, France
| | - Clotilde Buffeteau
- Département de Médecine Générale, Université de Bordeaux, Collège Sciences de la santé, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33076, Bordeaux Cedex, France
| | - Guillaume Conort
- Département de Médecine Générale, Université de Bordeaux, Collège Sciences de la santé, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33076, Bordeaux Cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Raphael Daniela DB, Russell NS, van Werkhoven E, Immink JM, Westhoff DPG, Stenfert Kroese MC, Stam MR, van Maurik LM, van Gestel CMJ, van der Weijden T, Boersma LJ. Implementing a patient decision aid, a process evaluation of a large-scale pre- and post-implementation trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 185:685-95. [PMID: 33099691 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05975-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Patient decision aids (PtDAs) have been reported to have a positive influence on patients making a health care decision in trials. Nevertheless, post-trial implementation is poor. The aim of this study is to explore patient, clinician, and organizational success factors for implementing a PtDA designed for breast cancer patients, facing a decision on their radiation treatment. Methods We performed a process evaluation within a multi-center pre- and post-implementation trial. The PtDA was incorporated as much as possible in the logistics of 13 participating centers. Tracking data were collected on PtDA use. Process characteristics were recorded by both clinicians and patients. A logistic regression method was applied to investigate which process characteristics were significantly related to the probability that patients logged in to the PtDA. Results 189 patients received the PtDA of whom140 (77%) used the PtDA. If patients received the link via the surgery department they were more likely to use the PtDA (OR 9.77 (1.28–74.51)), compared to patients that received the link via the radiation oncology department. If the report of the multidisciplinary team stated that radiation treatment “had to be discussed with the patient”, patients were more likely to use the PtDA (OR 2.29 (1.12–4.71)). Educational level was not related to the probability of PtDA use. Conclusions We accomplished a high level of PtDA use. Patients were more likely to use the PtDA if they received the link via the surgery department and if “to be discussed with the patient” was written in the multidisciplinary team report.
Collapse
|
36
|
Fisher A, Keast R, Costa D, Sharpe L, Manicavasagar V, Anderson J, Juraskova I. Improving treatment decision-making in bipolar II disorder: a phase II randomised controlled trial of an online patient decision-aid. BMC Psychiatry 2020; 20:447. [PMID: 32943031 PMCID: PMC7495840 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-020-02845-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Accepted: 08/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many patients with bipolar II disorder (BPII) prefer to be more informed and involved in their treatment decision-making than they currently are. Limited knowledge and involvement in one's treatment is also likely to compromise optimal BPII management. This Phase II RCT aimed to evaluate the acceptability, feasibility, and safety of a world-first patient decision-aid website (e-DA) to improve treatment decision-making regarding options for relapse prevention in BPII. The e-DA's potential efficacy in terms of improving quality of the decision-making process and quality of the decision made was also explored. METHODS The e-DA was based on International Patient Decision-Aid Standards and developed via an iterative co-design process. Adults with BPII diagnosis (n = 352) were recruited through a specialist outpatient clinical service and the social media of leading mental health organisations. Participants were randomised (1:1) to receive standard information with/without the e-DA (Intervention versus Control). At baseline (T0), post-treatment decision (T1) and at 3 months' post-decision follow-up (T2), participants completed a series of validated and purpose-designed questionnaires. Self-report and analytics data assessed the acceptability (e.g., perceived ease-of-use, usefulness; completed by Intervention participants only), safety (i.e., self-reported bipolar and/or anxiety symptoms), and feasibility of using the e-DA (% accessed). For all participants, questionnaires assessed constructs related to quality of the decision-making process (e.g., decisional conflict) and quality of the decision made (e.g., knowledge of treatment options and outcomes). RESULTS Intervention participants endorsed the e-DA as acceptable and feasible to use (82.1-94.6% item agreement); most self-reported using the e-DA either selectively (51.8%; relevant sections only) or thoroughly (34%). Exploratory analyses indicated the e-DA's potential efficacy to improve decision-making quality; most between-group standardised mean differences (SMD) were small-to-moderate. The largest potential effects were detected for objective treatment knowledge (- 0.69, 95% CIs - 1.04, - 0.33 at T1; and - 0.57, 95% CIs - 0.99,-0.14 at T2), decisional regret at T2 (0.42, 95% CIs 0.01, 0.84), preparation for decision-making at T1 (- 0.44, 95% CIs - 0.81, - 0.07), and the Decisional Conflict Scale Uncertainty subscale (0.42, 95% CIs 0.08, 0.08) and Total (0.36, 95% CIs 0.30, 0.69) scores, with all SMDs favouring the Intervention over the Control conditions. Regarding safety, e-DA use was not associated with worse bipolar symptoms or anxiety. CONCLUSION The e-DA appears to be acceptable, feasible, safe and potentially efficacious at improving patients' decision-making about BPII treatment. Findings also support the future adoption of the e-DA into patient care for BPII to foster treatment decisions based on the best available evidence and patient preferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12617000840381 (prospectively registered 07/06/2017).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alana Fisher
- The University of Sydney, The School of Psychology, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. .,The University of Sydney, The Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
| | - Rachael Keast
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XThe University of Sydney, The School of Psychology, Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia ,grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XThe University of Sydney, The Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia
| | - Daniel Costa
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XThe University of Sydney, The School of Psychology, Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia
| | - Louise Sharpe
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XThe University of Sydney, The School of Psychology, Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia
| | - Vijaya Manicavasagar
- grid.1005.40000 0004 4902 0432The Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052 Australia
| | - Josephine Anderson
- grid.1005.40000 0004 4902 0432The Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052 Australia
| | - Ilona Juraskova
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XThe University of Sydney, The School of Psychology, Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia ,grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XThe University of Sydney, The Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Madden T, Holttum J, Maddipati R, Secura GM, Nease RF, Peipert JF, Politi MC. Evaluation of a computerized contraceptive decision aid: A randomized controlled trial. Contraception 2020; 102:339-45. [PMID: 32771369 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Revised: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of a contraceptive decision aid in reducing decisional conflict among women seeking reversible contraception. STUDY DESIGN We conducted a randomized trial of a computer-based decision aid compared to a control group for women presenting for reversible contraception at two clinics affiliated with an academic medical center. The primary outcome was change in decisional conflict, measured before and after the healthcare visit using the validated Decisional Conflict Scale. We hypothesized the decision aid would reduce the decisional conflict score by 10 points on a 100-point scale (0 = no conflict, 100 = high conflict) compared to the control group. Secondary outcomes included contraceptive method chosen and satisfaction with the healthcare visit. RESULTS We enrolled and randomized 253 women, and 241 had complete data for our primary outcome. Overall, pre-visit decisional conflict scores were low, reflecting low levels of decisional conflict in our sample; median score 15 (range 0-80) in the decision aid and 10 (0-85) in the control group (p = 0.45). Both groups had a similar reduction in median decisional conflict after the healthcare visit: -10 (-80 to 25) and -10 (-60 to 5) in the decision aid and control groups respectively (p = 0.99). Choice of contraception (p = 0.23) and satisfaction with healthcare provider (p = 0.79) also did not differ by study group. CONCLUSIONS Decisional conflict around contraception was low in both groups at baseline. Use of a computerized contraceptive decision aid did not reduce decisional conflict, alter method choice, or impact satisfaction compared to the control group among women choosing reversible contraception. IMPLICATIONS Use of a computerized contraceptive decision aid did not reduce decisional conflict or alter method choice compared to the control group among women choosing reversible contraception. Future studies could focus on testing the decision aid in different clinical settings, especially where barriers to providing comprehensive contraceptive counseling exist.
Collapse
|
38
|
Finderup J, Lomborg K, Jensen JD, Stacey D. Choice of dialysis modality: patients' experiences and quality of decision after shared decision-making. BMC Nephrol 2020; 21:330. [PMID: 32758177 PMCID: PMC7409698 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-020-01956-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2019] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with kidney failure experience a complex decision on dialysis modality performed either at home or in hospital. The options have different levels of impact on their physical and psychological condition and social life. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the implementation of an intervention designed to achieve shared decision-making for dialysis choice. Specific objectives were: 1) to measure decision quality as indicated by patients' knowledge, readiness and achieved preferences; and 2) to determine if patients experienced shared decision-making. METHOD A mixed methods descriptive study was conducted using both questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Eligible participants were adults with kidney failure considering dialysis modality. The intervention, based on the Three-Talk model, consisted of a patient decision aid and decision coaching meetings provided by trained dialysis coordinators. The intervention was delivered to 349 patients as part of their clinical pathway of care. After the intervention, 148 participants completed the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire and the Decision Quality Measurement, and 29 participants were interviewed. Concordance between knowledge, decision and preference was calculated to measure decision quality. Interview transcripts were analysed qualitatively. RESULTS The participants obtained a mean score for shared decision-making of 86 out of 100. There was no significant difference between those choosing home- or hospital-based treatment (97 versus 83; p = 0.627). The participants obtained a knowledge score of 82% and a readiness score of 86%. Those choosing home-based treatment had higher knowledge score than those choosing hospital-based treatment (84% versus 75%; p = 0.006) but no significant difference on the readiness score (87% versus 84%; p = 0.908). Considering the chosen option and the knowledge score, 83% of the participants achieved a high-quality decision. No significant difference was found for decision quality between those choosing home- or hospital-based treatment (83% versus 83%; p = 0.935). Interview data informed the interpretation of these results. CONCLUSIONS Although there was no control group, over 80% of participants exposed to the intervention and responded to the surveys experienced shared decision-making and reached a high-quality decision. Both participants who chose home- and hospital-based treatment experienced the intervention as shared decision-making and made a high-quality decision. Qualitative findings supported the quantitative results. TRIAL REGISTRATION The full trial protocol is available at ClinicalTrials. Gov ( NCT03868800 ). The study has been registered retrospectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanette Finderup
- Department of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus, Aarhus N Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kirsten Lomborg
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jens Dam Jensen
- Department of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus, Aarhus N Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Dawn Stacey
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Savelberg W, Smidt M, Boersma LJ, van der Weijden T. Elicitation of preferences in the second half of the shared decision making process needs attention; a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:635. [PMID: 32646422 PMCID: PMC7346491 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05476-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2018] [Accepted: 06/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is known that the use of a Patient Decision Aid (PtDA), combined with advice for professionals on how and when to use it, can enhance the involvement of patients in the treatment decision. However, we need more knowledge with respect to the intention-behaviour gap. This study aims to analyse patients' experiences with the Shared Decision Making (SDM) process to find clues to close this gap. METHODS This qualitative study was part of a pilot study aiming to implement SDM in early adopter breast cancer teams. Patients were given access to a personalised PtDA. Breast cancer teams were instructed on how and when to deliver the PtDA. We interviewed 20 patients about their experience with the PtDA and SDM in general. RESULTS Most patients experienced SDM, though to a certain extent. Choice talk and option talk were commonly experienced, however the elicitation of preferences and decision talk was rare. The PtDA was used by the majority of patients (N = 13), all indicating that it was useful, especially to recall all the information given. Patients appreciated the contribution of breast cancer nurses in the SDM process. They considered them as true case managers, easy to approach and supportive. CONCLUSION Although patients felt well-informed and satisfied about risk-communication, the elicitation of preferences appeared very limited to non-existent. We recommend that breast cancer teams divide tasks in the SDM process and reallocate the elicitation of preferences to the nurses in a well-defined clinical pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W. Savelberg
- Department of Quality and Safety, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - M. Smidt
- Oncology Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - L. J. Boersma
- Oncology Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Department of Radiotherapy (MAASTRO clinic), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Dr. Tanslaan 12, 6229 ET Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - T. van der Weijden
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, Debyeplein 1, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Zheng Y, Qu B, Shi W, Wang C, Chen S, Zhong Y, He M, Liu Y. Development and preliminary evaluation of a decision aid to support informed choice among patients with age-related cataract. Int Ophthalmol 2020; 40:1487-99. [PMID: 32080793 DOI: 10.1007/s10792-020-01318-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 02/10/2020] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Shared decision making and meaningful patient involvement are key in improving cataract treatment outcomes, but no decision aid has been formally developed and validated for this purpose. Our aims were to develop a patient decision aid to guide patients' decision about when to undergo cataract surgery, and to determine patient's comprehension and booklet's acceptability. METHODS The patient decision aid was developed and included evidence-based information about general cataract, its benefits, risks of treatment options, and value clarification exercise. A total of 30 patients with age-related cataract aged between 50 and 80 years were interviewed after using either the patient decision aid (n = 15) or the traditional education booklet (n = 15). RESULTS The patients who received the decision aid agreed that the information was new (n = 15, 100%), the length of the aid was "just about right" (n = 13, 87%), the information was clear and easy to understand (n = 13, 87%), the decision aid was helpful in making decision (n = 13, 87%) and would like to recommend this decision aid to others (n = 14, 93%). CONCLUSIONS The decision aid was assessed positively by patients with age-related cataract. There is a need for its further verification in the context of primary eye care setting.
Collapse
|
41
|
Lawson ML, Shephard AL, Feenstra B, Boland L, Sourial N, Stacey D. Decision coaching using a patient decision aid for youth and parents considering insulin delivery methods for type 1 diabetes: a pre/post study. BMC Pediatr 2020; 20:1. [PMID: 31900152 PMCID: PMC6941252 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-019-1898-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2019] [Accepted: 12/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Choice of insulin delivery for type 1 diabetes can be difficult for many parents and children. We evaluated decision coaching using a patient decision aid for helping youth with type 1 diabetes and parents decide about insulin delivery method. Methods A pre/post design. Youth and parent(s) attending a pediatric diabetes clinic in a tertiary care centre were referred to the intervention by their pediatric endocrinologist or diabetes physician between September 2013 and May 2015. A decision coach guided youth and their parents in completing a patient decision aid that was pre-populated with evidence on insulin delivery options. Primary outcomes were youth and parent scores on the low literary version of the validated Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS). Results Forty-five youth (mean age = 12.5 ± 2.9 years) and 66 parents (45.8 ± 5.6 years) participated. From pre- to post-intervention, youth and parent decisional conflict decreased significantly (youth mean DCS score was 32.0 vs 6.6, p < 0.0001; parent 37.6 vs 3.5, p < 0.0001). Youth’s and parents’ mean decisional conflict scores were also significantly improved for DCS subscales (informed, values clarity, support, and certainty). 92% of youth and 94% of parents were satisfied with the decision coaching and patient decision aid. Coaching sessions averaged 55 min. Parents (90%) reported that the session was the right length of time; some youth (16%) reported that it was too long. Conclusion Decision coaching with a patient decision aid reduced decisional conflict for youth and parents facing a decision about insulin delivery method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret L Lawson
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L1, Canada.
| | - Allyson L Shephard
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO), 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L1, Canada
| | - Bryan Feenstra
- University of Ottawa, School of Nursing, 451 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8M5, Canada
| | - Laura Boland
- University of Ottawa, Population Health, 25 University Private, Ottawa, ON, K1N 7K4, Canada
| | - Nadia Sourial
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO), 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L1, Canada
| | - Dawn Stacey
- University of Ottawa, School of Nursing, 451 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8M5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Klaassen LA, Friesen-Storms JHHM, Bours GJJW, Dirksen CD, Boersma LJ, Hoving C. Perceived facilitating and limiting factors for healthcare professionals to adopting a patient decision aid for breast cancer aftercare: A cross-sectional study. Patient Educ Couns 2020; 103:145-151. [PMID: 31471071 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.07.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2018] [Revised: 06/30/2019] [Accepted: 07/23/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Effective healthcare innovations are often not adopted and implemented. An implementation strategy based on facilitators and barriers for use as perceived by healthcare professionals could increase adoption rates. This study therefore aimed to identify the most relevant facilitators and barriers for use of an innovative breast cancer aftercare decision aid (PtDA) in healthcare practice. METHODS Facilitators and barriers (related to the PtDA, adopter and healthcare organisation) were assessed among breast cancer aftercare health professionals (n = 81), using the MIDI questionnaire. For each category, a backward regression analysis was performed (dependent = intention to adopt). All significant factors were then added to a final regression analysis to identify to most relevant determinants of PtDA adoption. RESULTS Expecting higher compatibility with daily practice and clinical guidelines, more positive outcomes of use, higher perceived relevance for the patient and increased self-efficacy were significantly associated with a higher intention to adopt. Self-efficacy and perceived patient relevance remained significant in the final model. CONCLUSIONS Low perceived self-efficacy and patient relevance are the most important barriers for health professions to adopt a breast cancer aftercare PtDA. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS To target self-efficacy and perceived patient relevance, the implementation strategy could apply health professional peer champions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda A Klaassen
- Maastricht University, Department of Radiotherapy/GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology/CAPHRI Care and Public Health, Research Institute, P. O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Jolanda H H M Friesen-Storms
- Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Zuyd Health, Research Centre Autonomy and Participation for Persons with a Chronic Illness, Nursing Department, Heerlen, the Netherlands; Maastricht University, Department of Family Medicine/CAPHRI Care and Public Health, Research Institute, Nieuw Eyckholt 300, 6419 DJ Heerlen, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Gerrie J J W Bours
- Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Zuyd Health, Research Centre for Community Care, Nursing Department, Heerlen, the Netherlands; Maastricht University, Department of Health Services Research/CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Nieuw Eyckholt 300, 6419 DJ Heerlen, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Carmen D Dirksen
- Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Department of KEMTA/CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Liesbeth J Boersma
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO Clinic)/GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, P.O. Box 3035, 6202 NA Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Ciska Hoving
- Maastricht University, Department of Health Promotion/CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, P. O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Raphael DB, Ter Stege JA, Russell NS, Boersma LJ, van der Weijden T. What do patients and health care professionals view as important attributes in radiotherapy decisions? Input for a breast cancer patient decision aid. Breast 2019; 49:149-156. [PMID: 31812074 PMCID: PMC7375659 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2019] [Revised: 11/04/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and aim There is increased attention for shared decision making (SDM) when deciding on radiotherapy for selected patients with Stage 0–2 breast cancer. This study aimed to explore patients' and health care professionals’ experiences, decisional attributes and needs as input for the development of a patient decision aid to facilitate SDM. Methods Qualitative semi-structured interviews were held with fifteen breast cancer patients, being confronted with a radiotherapy decision one month to eight years earlier. Another fifteen interviews were held with professionals specialized in breast cancer care. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and independently coded by two researchers, who agreed upon relevant issues. Results Most patients made their decision by weighing the advantages of radiotherapy, i.e. comparing the decrease in recurrence risk with and without radiotherapy, and disadvantages, i.e. possible side effects. Patients and professionals agreed that recurrence risks should be communicated, but not on how to deal with uncertainty. There was wide variation in which, and how, side effects were explained by professionals. The most common side effects mentioned by both patients and professionals were skin toxicity, fatigue and breast deformity. Conclusion Patients and professionals appeared to agree on what type of attributes should be communicated during SDM on radiotherapy, but how this should be done is up for discussion. To ensure the patient's voice these attributes and needs need to be incorporated in the risk communication and value elicitation part of the patient decision aid. The format in which the attributes are communicated should be critically evaluated. Patients and professionals agree on most important attributes. These attributes need to be used in a patient decision aid. There is unwarranted inter doctor variation in informing about side effects. Professionals differ in opinion how to inform patients about epistemic uncertainties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D B Raphael
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI School for Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - J A Ter Stege
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - N S Russell
- Department of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - L J Boersma
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - T van der Weijden
- Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI School for Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Søndergaard SR, Madsen PH, Hilberg O, Jensen KM, Olling K, Steffensen KD. A prospective cohort study of shared decision making in lung cancer diagnostics: Impact of using a patient decision aid. Patient Educ Couns 2019; 102:1961-1968. [PMID: 31129012 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2019] [Revised: 04/25/2019] [Accepted: 05/15/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to describe the impact on patient-reported outcomes of introducing Shared Decision Making (SDM) and a Patient Decision Aid (PtDA) in the initial process of lung cancer diagnostics. METHODS We conducted a prospective cohort study, where a control cohort was consulted according to usual clinical practice. After introducing SDM through a PtDA and training of the staff, the SDM cohort was enrolled in the study. All patients completed four questionnaires: the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) before and after the consultation, the CollaboRATE scale after the consultation, and the Decision Regret Scale (DRS). RESULTS Patients exposed to SDM and a PtDA had significantly improved DCS scores after the consultation compared to the control group (a difference of 10.26, p = 0.0128) and significantly lower DRS scores (a difference of 8.98, p = 0.0197). Of the 82 control patients and 52 SDM patients 29% and 54%, respectively, gave the maximum score on the CollaboRATE scale (Pearson's chi2 8.0946, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION The use of SDM and a PtDA had significant positive impact on patient-reported outcomes. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Our results may encourage the increased uptake of SDM in the initial process of lung cancer diagnostics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stine R Søndergaard
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Lung Cancer Diagnostic Organization, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark.
| | | | - Ole Hilberg
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Lung Cancer Diagnostic Organization, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark; Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Karina M Jensen
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Lung Cancer Diagnostic Organization, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Karina Olling
- Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Karina D Steffensen
- Department of Oncology, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark; Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark; Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Obadeyi O, Baffoe N, Paxton J. A patient's decision aid for vascular access placement in the emergency department. J Vasc Access 2019; 21:419-425. [PMID: 31595808 DOI: 10.1177/1129729819879828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vascular access device placement is one of the most routinely performed procedures in the emergency department. Despite its high usage, most patients have limited knowledge about vascular access device placement. Patient decision aids have been utilized heavily in non-emergency department settings to provide basic clinical information regarding a patient's medical care options. In this study, we investigated whether exposure to a patient decision aid on vascular access devices and patients' experiences with vascular access devices would influence their vascular access device preference during an acute care episode. METHODS Patients in this institutional review board-approved study were enrolled prospectively in the emergency department at a busy level 1 trauma institution. A patient decision aid on vascular access device was constructed using criteria developed by the International Patient Decision Aid Standards. All participants were exposed to the patient decision aid and were asked to complete two questionnaires, and two tests. RESULTS Fifty subjects (50) were enrolled prospectively in the emergency department. The mean pretest score was 17.2% (95% confidence interval, 0.54-1.18), while the mean post-test score was 72.4% (95% confidence interval, 3.15-4.09). We found that patients who were exposed to the patient decision aid preferred landmark-based peripheral intravenous lines over ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous lines in this data set. CONCLUSION The result from this analysis indicated that most patients visiting the emergency department are not knowledgeable about their options related to vascular access device placement. The observed increase in the average correct responses on the post-test indicates that a patient decision aid can be an effective educational tool in the emergency department.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oluseyi Obadeyi
- School of Medicine, Wayne state University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Nana Baffoe
- School of Medicine, Wayne state University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - James Paxton
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Andersen SB, Andersen MØ, Carreon LY, Coulter A, Steffensen KD. Shared decision making when patients consider surgery for lumbar herniated disc: development and test of a patient decision aid. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2019; 19:190. [PMID: 31585534 PMCID: PMC6778367 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-019-0906-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2019] [Accepted: 08/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Shared decision making (SDM) is a systematic approach aimed at improving patient involvement in preference-sensitive health care decisions. Choosing between surgical or non-surgical treatment for lumbar disc herniation, can be difficult as the evidence of a superior treatment is unclear, which makes it a preference-sensitive decision. The objectives of this study was therefore to assess the degree of SDM and afterwards to develop and test a patient decision aid (PtDA) to support SDM during the clinical encounter between surgeon and patient, when patients choose between surgical and non-surgical treatment for Lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Methods The study was conducted in four steps.
Assessment of the extent to which SDM was practiced in the spine clinic. Development of a PtDA to support SDM. Testing its usability and acceptability amongst potential users (patients). Pilot-test of its usability in the clinical setting.
Results Results from our small baseline study (n = 40) showed that between a third and two-thirds of the patients reported not being fully engaged in a shared decision. A pre-designed template (BESLUTNINGSHJÆLPER™) was adapted to support the decision about whether or not to have surgery for LDH. Testing the prototype with patients led to minor refinements. A subsequent pilot test of its usability in a clinical setting achieved positive responses from both patients and clinicians. Conclusion Our baseline study demonstrated that SDM was not universally practiced in the clinic. The PtDA we have developed was rated as acceptable and usable by both patients and clinicians for helping those with LDH choose between surgical or non- surgical treatment. This tool now requires further testing to assess its effectiveness. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12911-019-0906-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stina Brogård Andersen
- Spine Surgery and Research, Spine Center of Southern Denmark, Lillebaelt Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Øster Hougvej 55, Middelfart, Denmark. .,Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark. .,Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| | - Mikkel Ø Andersen
- Spine Surgery and Research, Spine Center of Southern Denmark, Lillebaelt Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Øster Hougvej 55, Middelfart, Denmark.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Leah Y Carreon
- Spine Surgery and Research, Spine Center of Southern Denmark, Lillebaelt Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Øster Hougvej 55, Middelfart, Denmark.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Angela Coulter
- Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Karina Dahl Steffensen
- Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Oncology, Lillebaelt Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Yu CH, Ke C, Jovicic A, Hall S, Straus SE. Beyond pros and cons - developing a patient decision aid to cultivate dialog to build relationships: insights from a qualitative study and decision aid development. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2019; 19:186. [PMID: 31533828 PMCID: PMC6749701 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-019-0898-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2018] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An individualized approach using shared decision-making (SDM) and goal setting is a person-centred strategy that may facilitate prioritization of treatment options. SDM has not been adopted extensively in clinical practice. An interprofessional approach to SDM with tools to facilitate patient participation may overcome barriers to SDM use. The aim was to explore decision-making experiences of health professionals and people with diabetes (PwD), then develop an intervention to facilitate interprofessional shared decision-making (IP-SDM) and goal-setting. METHODS This was a multi-phased study. 1) Feasibility: Using a descriptive qualitative study, individual interviews with primary care physicians, nurses, dietitians, pharmacists, and PwD were conducted. The interviews explored their experiences with SDM and priority-setting, including facilitators and barriers, relevance of a decision aid for priority-setting, and integration of SDM and a decision aid into practice. 2) Development: An evidence-based SDM toolkit was developed, consisting of an online decision aid, MyDiabetesPlan, and implementation tools. MyDiabetesPlan was reviewed by content experts for accuracy and comprehensiveness. Usability assessment was done with 3) heuristic evaluation and 4) user testing, followed by 5) refinement. RESULTS Seven PwD and 10 clinicians participated in the interviews. From interviews with PwD, we identified that: (1) approaches to decision-making were diverse and dynamic; (2) a trusting relationship with the clinician and dialog were critical precursors to SDM; and, (3) goal-setting was a dynamic process. From clinicians, we found: (1) complementary (holistic and disease specific) approaches to the complex patient were used; (2) patient-provider agendas for goal-setting were often conflicting; (3) a flexible approach to decision-making was needed; and, (4) conflict could be resolved through SDM. Following usability assessment, we redesigned MyDiabetesPlan to consist of data collection and recommendation stages. Findings were used to finalize a multi-component toolkit and implementation strategy, consisting of MyDiabetesPlan, instructional card and videos, and orientation meetings with participating patients and clinicians. CONCLUSIONS A decision aid can provide information, facilitate clinician-patient dialog and strengthen the therapeutic relationship. Implementation of the decision aid can fit into a model of team care that respects and exemplifies professional identity, and can facilitate intra-team communication. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02379078. Date of Registration: 11 February 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine H Yu
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada. .,Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 190 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada. .,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.
| | - Calvin Ke
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 190 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada
| | | | - Susan Hall
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada
| | - Sharon E Straus
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 190 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada.,Department of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Ter Stege JA, Woerdeman LAE, Hahn DEE, van Huizum MA, van Duijnhoven FH, Kieffer JM, Retèl VP, Sherman KA, Witkamp AJ, Oldenburg HSA, Bleiker EMA. The impact of an online patient decision aid for women with breast cancer considering immediate breast reconstruction: study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2019; 19:165. [PMID: 31426772 PMCID: PMC6701008 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-019-0873-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2019] [Accepted: 07/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Most breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy are candidates for breast reconstruction. Deciding about breast reconstruction is complex and the preference-sensitive nature of this decision requires an approach of shared decision making between patient and doctor. Women considering breast reconstruction have expressed a need for decision support. We developed an online patient decision aid (pDA) to support decision making in women considering immediate breast reconstruction. The primary aim of this study is to assess the impact of the pDA in reducing decisional conflict, and more generally, on the decision-making process and the decision quality. Additionally, we will investigate the pDA’s impact on health outcomes, explore predictors, and assess its cost-effectiveness. Methods A multicenter, two-armed randomized controlled trial (1:1) will be conducted. Women with breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ who will undergo a mastectomy and are eligible for immediate breast reconstruction will be invited to participate. The intervention group will receive access to the online pDA, whereas the control group will receive a widely available free information leaflet on breast reconstruction. Participants will complete online questionnaires at: baseline (T0), 1 week after consultation with a plastic surgeon (T1), and 3 (T2) and 12 months (T3) after surgery. The primary outcome is decisional conflict. Secondary outcomes include other measures reflecting the decision-making process and decision quality (e.g., decision regret), patient-reported health outcomes (e.g., satisfaction with the breasts) and costs. Discussion This study will provide evidence about the impact of an online pDA for women who will undergo mastectomy and are deciding about breast reconstruction. It will contribute to the knowledge on how to optimally support women in making this difficult decision. Trial registration This study is retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03791138).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline A Ter Stege
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leonie A E Woerdeman
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela E E Hahn
- Department of Psychosocial Counseling, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martine A van Huizum
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederieke H van Duijnhoven
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jacobien M Kieffer
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Valesca P Retèl
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kerry A Sherman
- Centre for Emotional Health, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Balaclava Rd, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW, 2019, Australia
| | - Arjen J Witkamp
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hester S A Oldenburg
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eveline M A Bleiker
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
Individuals have different preferences in how they wish to relate to healthcare professionals such as doctors. Given choice, they also have preferences in relation to the type and location of support they want for their health and healthcare decisions. We argue that preference-based clusters within this heterogeneity constitute different contexts and that evaluations of decision aids should be context-sensitive in this respect. We draw attention to two distinct preference-based clusters: individuals with a preference for 'intermediative' decision support as a patient, implemented in a largely qualitative deliberative model, on the one hand, and for 'apomediative' decision support as a person, implemented in a largely quantitative multi-criteria decision analytic model, on the other. For convenience, we refer to the latter as Person Decision Support Tools (PDSTs), leaving Patient Decision Aids (PDAs) for its former, conventional use. Seeking to establish proof of method, we present an online PDST that can help individuals establish which of these two types of decision support they would find optimal. It is based on nine key attributes on which PDAs and PDSTs can be contrasted. Within population heterogeneity, preference clusters should be identified, and acknowledged and respected as contexts relevant to the evaluation of decision support tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Dowie
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.,University of Southern Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Ong HL, Sokolova I, Bekarma H, Curtis C, Macdonald A, Agur W; NHS Ayrshire & Arran Continence Multidisciplinary Team. Development, validation and initial evaluation of patient-decision aid (SUI-PDA©) for women considering stress urinary incontinence surgery. Int Urogynecol J 2019; 30:2013-22. [PMID: 31377841 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-019-04047-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2019] [Accepted: 07/08/2019] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS Following the design, face validation and publication of a novel PDA for women considering SUI surgery, the main objective of the study is to evaluate the usefulness of SUI-PDA© by using a validated tool to obtain patient feedback. METHODS From July 2018 to March 2019, the PDA, already incorporated into the patient care pathway, was objectively evaluated using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) to determine patients' views. Patients recorded their values and reasons for requests and declines of treatment. The total DCS score, scores from each DCS subgroup and individual patient responses were calculated and analysed. RESULTS The mean age of the first 20 patients to complete the DCS was 54 years, the mean BMI was 30.1 and the median parity was 3. The average total DCS score was only 9.29 out of 100 (range 0-29.69) suggesting that the PDA was quite useful for patients considering SUI surgery. Overall, the PDA had largely favourable responses across all five DCS subgroups. The 'informed' subgroup had the best score (6.67) while the 'uncertainty' subgroup had the least favourable score (14.58). Despite the procedure pause, the mesh tape option remained on the PDA; however, no patient had chosen this option, with a large proportion citing 'safety' issues as the main reason. Bulking agent injections were the most popular choice (40.0%) and the most commonly performed procedures (50.0%) mainly because of quicker 'recovery'. The second most popular participant choice was colposuspension (35.0%) followed by autologous fascial sling (25.0%), with women citing 'efficacy' as the main reason behind their choice. CONCLUSION SUI-PDA© was reported by patients and clinicians to be useful with clinical decision-making for SUI surgery. Further validation in a larger patient group is underway.
Collapse
|