Understanding wound healing in obesity

Obesity has become more prevalent in the global population. It is associated with the development of several diseases including diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, and metabolic syndrome. There are a multitude of factors impacted by obesity that may contribute to poor wound healing outcomes. With millions worldwide classified as obese, it is imperative to understand wound healing in these patients. Despite advances in the understanding of wound healing in both healthy and diabetic populations, much is unknown about wound healing in obese patients. This review examines the impact of obesity on wound healing and several animal models that may be used to broaden our understanding in this area. As a growing portion of the population identifies as obese, understanding the underlying mechanisms and how to overcome poor wound healing is of the utmost importance.

An Efficient Probe-Based Quantitative PCR Assay Targeting Human-Specific DNA in ST6GALNAC3 for the Quantification of Human Cells in Preclinical Animal Models

Precise quantification of human cells in preclinical animal models by a sensitive and specific approach is warranted. The probe-based quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay as a sensitive and swift approach is suitable for the quantification of human cells by targeting human-specific DNA sequences. In this study, we developed an efficient qPCR assay targeting human-specific DNA in ST6GALNAC3 (termed ST6GAL-qPCR) for the quantification of human cells in preclinical animal models. ST6GAL-qPCR probe was synthesized with FAM and non-fluorescent quencher-minor groove binder conjugated to the 5' and 3' end of the probe, respectively. Genomic DNA from human, rhesus monkeys, cynomolgus monkeys, New Zealand White rabbits, SD rats, C57BL/6, and BALB/c mice were utilized for analyzing the specificity and sensitivity of the ST6GAL-qPCR assay. The ST6GAL-qPCR assay targeted human-specific DNA was cloned to pUCM-T vector and released by EcoR I/Hind III digestion for generating a calibration curve. Cell mixing experiment was performed to validate the ST6GAL-qPCR assay by analysis of 0.1%, 0.01%, and 0.001% of human leukocytes mixed with murine thymocytes. The ST6GAL-qPCR assay detected human DNA rather than DNA from the tested animal species. The amplification efficiency of the ST6GAL-qPCR assay was 93% and the linearity of calibration curve was R2 = 0.999. The ST6GAL-qPCR assay detected as low as 5 copies of human-specific DNA and is efficient to specially amplify as low as 30-pg human DNA in the presence of 1 μg of DNA from the tested species, respectively. The ST6GAL-qPCR assay was able to quantify as low as 0.01% of human leukocytes within murine thymocytes. This ST6GAL-qPCR assay can be used as an efficient approach for the quantification of human cells in preclinical animal models.

An efficient qPCR assay for the quantification of human cells in preclinical animal models by targeting human specific DNA in the intron of BRCA1

BACKGROUND

Precise quantification of grafted human cells in preclinical animal models such as non-human primates, rodents and rabbits is needed for the evaluations of the safety and efficacy of cell therapy. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) as a swift, sensitive and powerful assay is suitable for human cell quantification. However, it is a formidable challenge due to that the genome of non-human primates share more than 95% of similarity as human.

METHODS

In the present study, we developed a probe-based quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay for the quantification of human cells in preclinical animal models via targeting human specific DNA in the intron of BRCA1 (termed BRCA1-qPCR). The 5' and 3' end of BRCA1-qPCR probe was conjugated with FAM and non-fluorescent quencher-minor groove binder (NFQ-MGB), respectively. 1 µg of genomic DNA from human and preclinical animal models including rhesus monkeys, cynomolgus monkeys, New Zealand white rabbits, SD rats, C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice were used for determining the specificity and sensitivity of the BRCA1-qPCR assay. A calibration curve was generated by BRCA1-qPCR analysis of linearized plasmid containing targeted human specific DNA in BRCA1. The BRCA1-qPCR assay was validated by analysis of 0.003%, 0.03% and 0.3% of human leukocytes mixed within murine leukocytes.

RESULTS

The BRCA1-qPCR assay detected human DNA rather than DNA from tested species. The amplification efficiency of the BRCA1-qPCR assay was 95.4% and the linearity of the calibration curve was R2 = 0.9997. The BRCA1-qPCR assay detected as low as 5 copies of human specific DNA and is efficient to specially amplify 30 pg human DNA in the presence of 1 µg of genomic DNA from tested species, respectively. The BRCA1-qPCR assay was able to quantify as low as 0.003% of human cells within murine leukocytes.

CONCLUSION

The BRCA1-qPCR assay is efficient for the quantification of human cells in preclinical animal models.

Effect of sex and food on the pharmacokinetics of different classes of BCS drugs in rats after cassette administration

The cassette dosing technique is employed in the drug discovery stage of non-clinical studies to obtain pharmacokinetic data from multiple drug candidates in a single experiment. The objective of the current investigation was to evaluate the effect of sex and food on the selected pharmacokinetic parameters of four biopharmaceutical classification system (BCS) drugs (BCS-I: propranolol, BCS-II: diclofenac, BCS-III: atenolol, and BCS-IV: acetazolamide) utilizing cassette dosing in male and female rats under fed and fasting conditions. Different animal groups were dosed intravenous (i.v) and oral at 1 and 10 mg/kg, respectively, in the form of cassette at a dose of 5 mL/kg. Blood samples were analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetics parameters were calculated using Phoenix software version 8.1. A significant increase (p < 0.05) of the area under the plasma concentration-time (AUC_0-last) was observed for diclofenac and acetazolamide in females over males after i.v dosing. Additionally, acetazolamide showed greater instantaneous concentration at the time of dosing, and clearance in females (p < 0.05) compared to males after i.v administration. After oral dosing, propranolol exhibited significant variations (p < 0.05) in the maximum drug concentration (C_max), AUC_0-last, the volume of distribution (V_d), and bioavailability in females as compared to males under fed state. Diclofenac showed significant changes (p < 0.05) in AUC_0-last, and clearance (Cl) in females as compared to males under fasting and fed state. However, acetazolamide exhibited a significant enhancement (p < 0.05) in AUC_0-last, V_d, and Cl in fasting females than the males. The data here illustrates that there is an appreciable difference in AUC and C_max values exist in male and female rats under fed and fasting conditions administered with the cassette dosing of tested BCS class drugs.

Extracellular vesicles as a drug delivery system: A systematic review of preclinical studies

During the past decades, extracellular vesicles (EVs) have emerged as an attractive drug delivery system. Here, we assess their pre-clinical applications, in the form of a systematic review. For each study published in the past decade, disease models, animal species, EV donor cell types, active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), EV surface modifications, API loading methods, EV size and charge, estimation of EV purity, presence of biodistribution studies and administration routes were quantitatively analyzed in a defined and reproducible way. We have interpreted the trends we observe over the past decade, to define the niches where to apply EVs for drug delivery in the future and to provide a basis for regulatory guidelines.

Improving safety of cancer immunotherapy via delivery technology

Breakthroughs in molecular mechanisms underlying immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment and paradigm shifts in the cancer-immunity response cycle have profoundly changed the landscape of cancer immunotherapy. However, one of the challenges is to mitigate the serious side effects caused by systemic autoimmunity and autoinflammatory responses following immunotherapy. Thus, restraining the activation of the immune system in healthy tissues is highly desirable to address this problem. Bioengineering and delivery technologies provide a solution to the issue. In this Review, we first introduce immune-related adverse effects of main immunotherapies and the underlying mechanisms, summarize strategies of designingde bioengineering and delivery systems to reduce their immunotoxicities, and highlight the importance of the development of immunotoxicity-related animal models.

Is it possible to overcome issues of external validity in preclinical animal research? Why most animal models are bound to fail

Background

The pharmaceutical industry is in the midst of a productivity crisis and rates of translation from bench to bedside are dismal. Patients are being let down by the current system of drug discovery; of the several 1000 diseases that affect humans, only a minority have any approved treatments and many of these cause adverse reactions in humans. A predominant reason for the poor rate of translation from bench to bedside is generally held to be the failure of preclinical animal models to predict clinical efficacy and safety. Attempts to explain this failure have focused on problems of internal validity in preclinical animal studies (e.g. poor study design, lack of measures to control bias). However there has been less discussion of another key factor that influences translation, namely the external validity of preclinical animal models.

Review of problems of external validity

External validity is the extent to which research findings derived in one setting, population or species can be reliably applied to other settings, populations and species. This paper argues that the reliable translation of findings from animals to humans will only occur if preclinical animal studies are both internally and externally valid. We review several key aspects that impact external validity in preclinical animal research, including unrepresentative animal samples, the inability of animal models to mimic the complexity of human conditions, the poor applicability of animal models to clinical settings and animal–human species differences. We suggest that while some problems of external validity can be overcome by improving animal models, the problem of species differences can never be overcome and will always undermine external validity and the reliable translation of preclinical findings to humans.

Conclusion

We conclude that preclinical animal models can never be fully valid due to the uncertainties introduced by species differences. We suggest that even if the next several decades were spent improving the internal and external validity of animal models, the clinical relevance of those models would, in the end, only improve to some extent. This is because species differences would continue to make extrapolation from animals to humans unreliable. We suggest that to improve clinical translation and ultimately benefit patients, research should focus instead on human-relevant research methods and technologies.