Unlocking the Medicinal Mysteries: Preventing Lacunar Stroke with Drug Repurposing

Currently, only the general control of the risk factors is known to prevent lacunar cerebral infarction, but it is unknown which type of medication for controlling the risk factors has a causal relationship with reducing the risk of lacunar infarction. To unlock this medical mystery, drug-target Mendelian randomization analysis was applied to estimate the effect of common antihypertensive agents, hypolipidemic agents, and hypoglycemic agents on lacunar stroke. Lacunar stroke data for the transethnic analysis were derived from meta-analyses comprising 7338 cases and 254,798 controls. We have confirmed that genetic variants mimicking calcium channel blockers were found to most stably prevent lacunar stroke. The genetic variants at or near HMGCR, NPC1L1, and APOC3 were predicted to decrease lacunar stroke incidence in drug-target MR analysis. These variants mimic the effects of statins, ezetimibe, and antisense anti-apoC3 agents, respectively. Genetically proxied GLP1R agonism had a marginal effect on lacunar stroke, while a genetically proxied improvement in overall glycemic control was associated with reduced lacunar stroke risk. Here, we show that certain categories of drugs currently used in clinical practice can more effectively reduce the risk of stroke. Repurposing several drugs with well-established safety and low costs for lacunar stroke prevention should be given high priority when doctors are making decisions in clinical practice. This may contribute to healthier brain aging.

Laboratory medicine in arterial hypertension

In the initial diagnostics of arterial hypertension (AH) laboratory medicine is a cornerstone, along with a blood pressure (BP) measurement and an electrocardiogram. It mainly refers to routine blood and urine tests for diagnosis and monitoring primary hypertension and its associated conditions such as asymptomatic hypertension-mediated organ damage, chronic kidney disease and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. In addition, long term non-fatal and fatal risks for cardiovascular (CV) events in hypertension are assessed based on clinical and laboratory data. Furthermore, laboratory medicine is involved in the management of hypertension, especially in monitoring the disease progression. However, antihypertensive drugs may interfere with laboratory test results. Diuretics, especially thiazides, can affect blood and urine sodium concentrations, or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers can affect the blood biomarkers of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS). It's dysfunction plays a critical role in primary aldosteronism (PA), the most common endocrine disorder in secondary hypertension, which accounts for only small proportion of AH in relative terms but substantial proportion of hypertensives in absolute terms, affecting younger population and carrying a higher risk of CV mortality and morbidity. When screening for PA, aldosterone-to-renin ratio still contributes massively to the increased incidence of the disease, despite certain limits. In conclusion, laboratory medicine is involved in the screening, diagnosis, monitoring and prognosis of hypertension. It is of great importance to understand the preanalytical and analytical factors influencing final laboratory result.

Trends in using of antihypertensive medication among US CKD adults, NHANES 2001-2018

Objective

Blood pressure (BP) control rates among adult patients taking antihypertensive medications in the United States have not improved over the last decade. Many CKD adults require more than one class of antihypertensive agent to reach the BP target recommended by the guidelines. However, no study has quantified the proportion of adult CKD patients taking antihypertensive medication who are on monotherapy or combination therapy.

Methods

National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data during 2001-2018 was used, including adults with CKD taking antihypertensive medication (age ≥ 20 years, n = 4,453). BP control rates were investigated under the BP targets recommended by the 2021 KDIGO, the 2012 KDIGO, and the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines.

Results

The percentages of uncontrolled BP among US adults with CKD taking antihypertensive medication were 81.4% in 2001-2006 and 78.2% in 2013-2018. The proportion of monotherapy of antihypertensive regimen were 38.6, 33.3, and 34.6% from 2001 to 2006, 2007-2012, and 2013-2018, with no obvious difference. Similarly, there was no significant change in percentages of dual-therapy, triple-therapy, and quadruple-therapy. Although proportion of CKD adults not treated with ACEi/ARB decreased from 43.5% in 2001-2006 to 32.7% in 2013-2018, treatment of ACEi/ARB among patients with ACR > 300 mg/g had no significant change.

Conclusion

The BP control rates among US adult CKD patients taking antihypertensive medications have not improved from 2001 to 2018. Mono-therapy accounted for about one third of adult CKD patients taking antihypertensive medication and not changed. Increasing antihypertensive medication combination therapy may help improve BP control in CKD adults in the United States.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Monogenic Hypertension in Children

Although the majority of individuals with hypertension (HTN) have primary and polygenic HTN, monogenic HTN is a secondary type that is widely thought to play a key role in pediatric HTN, which has the characteristics of early onset, refractory HTN with a positive family history, and electrolyte disorders. Monogenic HTN results from single genetic mutations that contribute to the dysregulation of blood pressure (BP) in the kidneys and adrenal glands. It is pathophysiologically associated with increased sodium reabsorption in the distal tubule, intravascular volume expansion, and HTN, as well as low renin and varying aldosterone levels. Simultaneously increased or decreased potassium levels also provide clues for the diagnosis of monogenic HTN. Discovering the genetic factors that cause an increase in BP has been shown to be related to the choice of and responses to antihypertensive medications. Therefore, early and precise diagnosis with genetic sequencing and effective treatment with accurate antihypertensive agents are critical in the management of monogenic HTN. In addition, understanding the genetic architecture of BP, causative molecular pathways perturbing BP regulation, and pharmacogenomics can help with the selection of precision and personalized medicine, as well as improve morbidity and mortality in adulthood.

Risk of hypertension and treatment on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence: A case-control study

Hypertension (HTN) is a high risk factor for major cardiovascular adverse events. This study aimed to investigate the effect of HTN risk on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) incidence and determine whether the effect of HTN on OHCA incidence differs according to antihypertensive medication.This case-control study used the Korean Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation Consortium and Korean Community Health Survey (CHS). Cases were defined as emergency medical service-treated adult OHCA patients presumed to have a cardiac etiology from 2015 to 2017. Patients without information on HTN diagnosis were excluded from the study. The Korean CHS database's controls were matched at a 1:2 ratio with strata, including age, gender, and county of residence. Multivariable conditional logistic regression analysis was conducted to estimate HTN risk and antihypertensive treatment on OHCA incidence,A total of 2633 OHCA patients and 5266 community-based controls were enrolled in this study. Among them, 1176 (44.7%) patients and 2049 (38.9%) controls were diagnosed with HTN. HTN was associated with an increased risk of OHCA (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 1.19 [1.07-1.32]). On comparing HTN with or without the antihypertensive treatment group with the non-HTN-diagnosed group (as a reference), the HTN without treatment group had the highest AOR (95% confidence interval) (3.41 [2.74-4.24]). The AOR in the HTN treatment group was reduced to that in the non-HTN-diagnosed group (0.96 [0.86-1.08]).HTN increased OHCA risk, and the HTN without treatment group had the highest OHCA risk. Conversely, OHCA risk decreased to the non-HTN-diagnosed group level with HTN treatment.

Associations between initiating antihypertensive regimens on stage I-III colorectal cancer outcomes: A Medicare SEER cohort analysis

Purpose

Colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis is associated with high mortality in the United States and thus warrants the study of novel treatment approaches. Vascular changes are well observed in cancers and evidence indicates that antihypertensive (AH) medications may interfere with both tumor vasculature and in recruiting immune cells to the tumor microenvironment based on preclinical models. Extant literature also shows that AH medications are correlated with improved survival in some forms of cancer. Thus, this study sought to explore the impact of AH therapies on CRC outcomes.

Patients and Methods

This study was a non‐interventional, retrospective analysis of patients aged 65 years and older with CRC diagnosed from January 1, 2007 to December 31st, 2012 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End‐Results (SEER)‐Medicare database. The association between AH drug utilization on AJCC stage I–III CRC mortality rates in patients who underwent treatment for cancer was examined using Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

The study cohort consisted of 13,982 patients diagnosed with CRC. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression showed that among these patients, the use of AH drug was associated with decreased cancer‐specific mortality (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.75–0.83). Specifically, ACE inhibitors (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.80–0.87), beta‐blockers (HR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.84–0.91), and thiazide diuretics (HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.80–0.87) were found to be associated with decreased mortality. An association was also found between adherence to AH therapy and decreased cancer‐specific mortality (HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.90–0.98).

Conclusion

Further research needs to be performed, but AH medications may present a promising, low‐cost pathway to supporting CRC treatment for stage I–III cancers.

Pharmacological characterization of MT-1207, a novel multitarget antihypertensive agent

Hypertension is a serious public health problem worldwide. MT-1207, chemically named 3-(4-(4-(1H-benzotriazole-1-yl)butyl)piperazine-1-yl) benzisothiazole hydrochloride, is a new chemical entity that has entered into clinical trial as antihypertensive agent in China. In this paper we report the pharmacological profile of MT-1207 regarding its acute, subacute, and long-term effects on hypertensive animal models, and its actions on isolated organs in vitro as well as its molecular targets. Blood pressure (BP) was measured in conscious animals; amlodipine was taken as a positive control drug. We showed that both single dose of MT-1207 (1.25-20 mg/kg, ig) in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and MT-1207 (0.25-6 mg/kg, ig) in two-kidney one-clip (2K1C) dogs dose-dependently decreased BP. MT-1207 quickly decreased BP within 5 min after administration; the hypotensive effect lasted for 8 and 12 h, respectively, in SHR and 2K1C dogs without reflex increase in heart rate. Multiple doses of MT-1207 (5 mg · kg-1 · d-1 in SHR; 2 mg · kg-1 · d-1 in 2K1C dogs, for 7 days) significantly decreased BP, slightly reduced heart rate, and both of them recovered after withdrawal. Long-term administration of MT-1207 (10 mg · kg-1 · d-1 for 4 months or more time) produced a stable BP reduction, improved baroreflex sensitivity, reduced renal and cardiovascular damage in SHR, and delayed stroke occurrence and death in stroke-prone SHR. In isolated rat aortic rings precontracted by adrenaline, KCl, noradrenaline or 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), MT-1207 (10-9-10-4 M) caused concentration-dependent relaxation. In a panel of enzyme activity or radioligand binding assays of 87 molecular targets, MT-1207 potently inhibited adrenergic α1A, α1B, α1D, and 5-HT2A receptors with Ki < 1 nM. The antagonism of MT-1207 against these receptors was confirmed in isolated rabbit arteries. We conclude that MT-1207 is a novel and promising single-molecule multitarget agent for hypertension treatment to reduce hypertensive organ damage and stroke mortality.

Frequency and Patterns of Prescribing Antihypertensive Agents in Outpatient Kidney Transplant Recipients Among Six Cities in China from 2011 to 2018

PURPOSE

Antihypertensive agents are frequently prescribed in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). However, the frequency and patterns of prescribing antihypertensive agents remain uncharacterized in KTRs in China. Therefore, this investigation was carried out.

METHODS

Retrospective prescription data dated 2011 to 2018 from KTRs in China were accessed using the Hospital Prescription Analysis Program database. Information about sex, birth date, and identification number of the patient; city, date, and department of the medical visit; major diagnoses; and the generic names, specifications, quantities, and usage of prescribed drugs were collected. Antihypertensive agents were grouped into 5 classes: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), β-blockers (BBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), and diuretics. The frequency and patterns of prescribing these antihypertensive agents were analyzed.

FINDINGS

Prescriptions from 174,749 KTRs (67.2% male; mean age, 42.5 [9.4] years) were obtained, and 58.2% of the patients were prescribed antihypertensive agents. The percentage of patients who received antihypertensive treatment increased from 52.9% in 2011 to 61.6% in 2018 and varied by city. Cyclosporine was associated with higher prescription frequency of antihypertensive agents than was tacrolimus (71.7% vs 63.4%; P < 0.0001). During the 8-year study period, CCBs were most frequently prescribed (39.0%), followed by ARBs (31.9%), BBs (14.3%), ACEIs (11.6%), and diuretics (3.2%). The mean (SD) number of antihypertensive drugs prescribed per KTR was 1.7 (0.8). Almost half of KTRs (51.2%) received just 1 antihypertensive drug. Co-administration of 2 or more antihypertensive drugs presented an obviously upward trend. The most commonly prescribed 2-drug combination was CCB + ARB (44.8%), followed by CCB + BB (20.1%) and CCB + ACEI (13.0%). In the patients who received 3 antihypertensive drugs, the 2 most frequently prescribed combinations were CCB + ARB + BB (37.5%) and CCB + ARB + ACEI (32.7%). Specific data varied by both year and city.

IMPLICATIONS

The prescribing patterns of antihypertensive agents in KTRs varied by city even within same country. Hence, more high-quality research studies on the use of antihypertensive agents in KTRs are needed.

Antihypertensive Drugs and the Risk of Cancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study

We sought to assess the association between common antihypertensive drugs and the risk of incident cancer in treated hypertensive patients. Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, the risk of cancer incidence was analyzed in patients with hypertension who were initially free of cancer and used the following antihypertensive drug classes: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs); angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs); beta blockers (BBs); calcium channel blockers (CCBs); and diuretics. During a median follow-up of 8.6 years, there were 4513 (6.4%) overall cancer incidences from an initial 70,549 individuals taking antihypertensive drugs. ARB use was associated with a decreased risk for overall cancer in a crude model (hazard ratio (HR): 0.744, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.696-0.794) and a fully adjusted model (HR: 0.833, 95% CI: 0.775-0.896) compared with individuals not taking ARBs. Other antihypertensive drugs, including ACEIs, CCBs, BBs, and diuretics, did not show significant associations with incident cancer overall. The long-term use of ARBs was significantly associated with a reduced risk of incident cancer over time. The users of common antihypertensive medications were not associated with an increased risk of cancer overall compared to users of other classes of antihypertensive drugs. ARB use was independently associated with a decreased risk of cancer overall compared to other antihypertensive drugs.

A Flounder Fish Peptide Shows Anti-Hypertensive Effects by Suppressing the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System and Endothelin-1

BACKGROUND

Many fishes have been known for their good nutritional effects especially in the cardiovascular aspect. Some specific fish peptides have anti-hypertensive effects.

OBJECTIVE

In the present study, we hypothesized that the hexapeptide (MEVFVP) from flounder fish muscle can be a potent antihypertensive peptide, therefore, decided to perform this experiment.

METHODS

The peptide MEVFVP from flounder fish muscle (40 mg/kg) and vehicle were administered per os to spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) (SHR-M and SHR-C, respectively). Additionally, plasma MEVFVP was measured serially before and after its oral administration to Sprague Dawley rats.

RESULTS

Blood pressures (BPs), especially systolic BP, in SHR rats were decreased around 3-6 hours after MEVFVP administration. Compared with SHR-C rats, endothelin-1 (ET-1) mRNA expression in multiple tissues, and plasma levels of ET-1, angiotensin II, and aldosterone were lower in SHR-M rats, whereas the phosphorylation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) was increased in the kidney of SHR-M rats. The administered peptide was not detected in rat plasma, while ex vivo incubation of the peptide in rat plasma caused its rapid degradation within minutes.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that the MEVFVP has an antihypertensive effect by regulating renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, ET-1 and AMPK despite its limited bioavailability.

Worsening Kidney Function Is the Major Mechanism of Heart Failure in Hypertension: The ALLHAT Study

OBJECTIVES

The authors aimed to quantify the extent to which the effect of antihypertensive drugs on incident heart failure (HF) is mediated by their effect on kidney function.

BACKGROUND

The authors hypothesized that the dynamic change in kidney function is the mechanism behind differences in the rate of incident HF in ALLHAT (Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial) participants randomized to lisinopril and chlorthalidone, in comparison with those randomized to amlodipine and doxazosin.

METHODS

Causal mediation analysis of ALLHAT data (1994 to 2002) included participants with available baseline and 24- to 48-month estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (N = 27,918; mean age 66 ± 7.4 years; 32.4% Black, 56.3% men). Change in eGFR was the mediator. Incident symptomatic HF was the primary outcome. Hospitalized/fatal HF was the secondary outcome. Linear regression (for mediator) and logistic regression (for outcome) analyses were adjusted for demographics, cardiovascular disease, and risk factors.

RESULTS

There were 1,769 incident HF events, including 1,359 hospitalized/fatal HF events. In fully adjusted causal mediation analysis, the relative change in eGFR mediated 18% of the effect of chlorthalidone, and 33% of lisinopril on incident symptomatic HF, and 25% of the effect of chlorthalidone, and 41% of lisinopril on hospitalized/fatal HF. In participants with diabetes, the relative change in eGFR mediated nearly 50% of the effect of lisinopril on incident symptomatic HF, whereas in diabetes-free participants, only 17%.

CONCLUSIONS

On the risk difference scale, change in eGFR accounts for up to 50% of the mechanism by which antihypertensive medications affect HF. (Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial [ALLHAT]; NCT00000542).

Prevention of Heart Failure in Hypertension-Disentangling the Role of Evolving Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Blood Pressure Lowering: The ALLHAT Study

Background

Hypertension is a known risk factor for heart failure (HF), possibly via the mechanism of cardiac remodeling and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). We studied the extent to which blood pressure (BP) change and evolving LVH contribute to the effect that lisinopril, doxazosin, and amlodipine have on HF compared with chlorthalidone.

Methods and Results

We conducted causal mediation analysis of ALLHAT (Antihypertensive and Lipid‐Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial) data (1994‐2002; in‐trial follow‐up). ALLHAT participants with available serial ECGs and BP measurements were included (n=29 892; mean age 67±4 years; 32% black; 56% men): 11 008 were randomized to chlorthalidone, 5967 to doxazosin, 6593 to amlodipine, and 6324 to lisinopril. Evolving ECG LVH and BP lowering served as mediators. Incident symptomatic HF was the primary outcome. Linear regression (for mediator) and logistic regression (for outcome) models were adjusted for mediator‐outcome confounders (demographic and clinical characteristics known to be associated both with both LVH/hypertension and HF). A large majority of participants (96%) had ECG LVH status unchanged, but 4% developed evolving ECG LVH. On average, BP decreased by 11/7 mm Hg. In adjusted Cox regression analyses, progressing ECG LVH (hazard ratio [HR] 1.78 [95% CI 1.43‐2.22]), resolving ECG LVH (HR 1.33 [95% CI 1.03‐1.70]), and baseline ECG LVH (1.17 [95% CI 1.04‐1.31]) carried risk of incident HF. After full adjustment, evolving ECG LVH mediated 4% of the effect of doxazosin on HF. Systolic BP lowering mediated 12% of the effect of doxazosin, and diastolic BP lowering mediated 10% of the effect of doxazosin, 7% of the effect of amlodipine, and borderline 9% of the effect of lisinopril on HF.

Conclusions

Evolving ECG LVH and BP change account for 4% to 13% of the mechanism by which antihypertensive medications prevent HF.

Clinical Trial Registration

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00000542.

See Editorial Ferdinand and Maraboto

Delay to Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Hypertensive Stroke Patients: An Analysis of Delay Duration Across Agents

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

A subset of ischemic stroke patients present with blood pressures above that considered safe for thrombolytic administration, requiring antihypertensive therapy. Guideline statements are ambivalent regarding which antihypertensive agent should be used to obtain a satisfactory blood pressure < 185/110 mm Hg prior to alteplase.

METHODS

We reviewed data from consecutive patients at a single institution treated with alteplase from January 2014 to January 2019, collecting door-to-needle times, antihypertensive agent (if used), and antihypertensive-to-needle times. Patients were grouped by initial agent administered. We assessed for differences in door-to-needle times between those needing antihypertensive(s) and those who did not. Antihypertensive-to-needle times were compared across 3 antihypertensive groups (labetalol, nicardipine, and hydralazine).

RESULTS

Analysis included 239 patients: 177 receiving no antihypertensive, 44 labetalol, 13 nicardipine, and 5 hydralazine. Those not administered an antihypertensive prior to alteplase had shorter door-to-needle times (52.6 minutes versus 62.1 minutes, P = .016). We found no statistical differences when comparing door-to-needle times across all groups (no med 52.6 minutes, labetalol 64.3 minutes, nicardipine 53.0 minutes, hydralazine 67.4 minutes, P = .052). No differences were found in antihypertensive-to-needle amongst the 3 antihypertensive groups (labetalol 18.75 minutes, nicardipine 12.15 minutes, hydralazine 25.40 minutes, P = .239).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients requiring antihypertensives experienced slower door-to-needle times. No statistically significant changes were observed in door-to-needle times by antihypertensive used, however these results may have clinical importance. This study is limited by relatively small sample size. Pooling data from multiple institutions could provide more robust assessment and inform clinical practice.

Income Inequality and Hypertension Control

See Article Shahu et al

Blood Pressure Lowering With Nilvadipine in Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer Disease Does Not Increase the Prevalence of Orthostatic Hypotension

Background Hypertension is common among patients with Alzheimer disease. Because this group has been excluded from hypertension trials, evidence regarding safety of treatment is lacking. This secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial assessed whether antihypertensive treatment increases the prevalence of orthostatic hypotension (OH) in patients with Alzheimer disease. Methods and Results Four hundred seventy-seven patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer disease were randomized to the calcium-channel blocker nilvadipine 8 mg/day or placebo for 78 weeks. Presence of OH (blood pressure drop ≥20/≥10 mm Hg after 1 minute of standing) and OH-related adverse events (dizziness, syncope, falls, and fractures) was determined at 7 follow-up visits. Mean age of the study population was 72.2±8.2 years and mean Mini-Mental State Examination score was 20.4±3.8. Baseline blood pressure was 137.8±14.0/77.0±8.6 mm Hg. Grade I hypertension was present in 53.4% (n=255). After 13 weeks, blood pressure had fallen by -7.8/-3.9 mm Hg for nilvadipine and by -0.4/-0.8 mm Hg for placebo ( P<0.001). Across the 78-week intervention period, there was no difference between groups in the proportion of patients with OH at a study visit (odds ratio [95% CI]=1.1 [0.8-1.5], P=0.62), nor in the proportion of visits where a patient met criteria for OH, corrected for number of visits (7.7±13.8% versus 7.3±11.6%). OH-related adverse events were not more often reported in the intervention group compared with placebo. Results were similar for those with baseline hypertension. Conclusions This study suggests that initiation of a low dose of antihypertensive treatment does not significantly increase the risk of OH in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer disease. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02017340.

Detrimental Effect of Chronic Hypertension on Leptomeningeal Collateral Flow in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Background and Purpose- We aimed to evaluate the effect of chronic hypertension on acute leptomeningeal collateral flow in patients with large-vessel ischemic stroke using digital subtraction angiography, which is the gold standard for the assessment of collateral circulation. Methods- Of the consecutive ischemic stroke patients from October 2011 to December 2017 seen in our institution, patients with acute occlusion of the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery confirmed on initial digital subtraction angiography were enrolled. Chronic hypertension was defined as its documentation before the index stroke or as the administration of antihypertensive medications before onset. Angiographic leptomeningeal collateral flow was evaluated according to the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology/Society of Interventional Radiology Collateral Flow Grading System and dichotomized the findings into excellent (grade 3-4) or poor (grade 0-2) collateral status for analysis. Results- Of the 3759 consecutive ischemic stroke patients, 100 patients were analyzed. Thirty-nine patients (39%) had poor collateral status. Patients with poor collateral status were older, more frequently male, and had chronic hypertension more frequently, shorter time from onset to angiography, and higher admission systolic blood pressure than those with excellent collateral status. Multivariable logistic analysis with prespecified covariates showed a significantly positive association between chronic hypertension and poor collateral status (odds ratio, 2.80; 95% CI, 1.08-7.70; P=0.034). This association was independent of admission systolic blood pressure. The proportion of patients with poor collateral status increased in a stepwise manner in patients without chronic hypertension, hypertensive patients with premorbid antihypertensive medications, and hypertensive patients without antihypertensive medications ( P for trend <0.001). Conclusions- Our data suggest that chronic hypertension has a detrimental effect on acute leptomeningeal collateral flow in patients with cerebral large-vessel occlusion. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02251665.

Practical application of the ATOM study: Treatment efficacy of antihypertensive drugs in monotherapy or combination (ATOM metaanalysis according to PRISMA statement); tables for the use of antihypertensive drugs in monotherapy or combination

BACKGROUND

The response to antihypertensive drugs is predictable. The absence of precise prescription recommendations to treat arterial hypertension (HT) lead to use drugs unable to reduce blood pressure (BP) to target values.We published ATOM study, in which we found significant differences in the ability to reduce BP between the different drugs.The objective of the study was to determine the expected decrease in blood pressure with the use of commercialized doses of the drugs commonly used in the treatment of HT in clinical practice, to avoid the use of drugs or combinations that even with the best response, are unable to obtain the necessary BP decrease to reach the goal.

METHODS

The analysis was based on the results of the ATOM study. To convert the mean doses of the different drugs and combinations in commercialized doses, the conclusions of the study by Law et al have been applied.

RESULTS

Based on the results, two tables were drawn, one for systolic BP and the other for diastolic BP, where the doses of the different drugs and combinations are classified according to the BP decrease that can be expected from them. In order to favor the use of the tables in clinical practice, the different drugs have been grouped in intervals of 10 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) for the decrease of the systolic BP and of 5 mmHg for the diastolic BP.

CONCLUSIONS

Recommendations for the use of antihypertensive treatments should not be limited to pharmacological families. They should also consider differences between drugs or specific combinations. From the data of the ATOM study we have implemented tables that express the effect of the drugs commonly used in clinical practice and that should allow the clinicians to choose with care the treatment to use.

Sustained Captopril-Induced Reduction in Blood Pressure Is Associated With Alterations in Gut-Brain Axis in the Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat

Background We have demonstrated that the antihypertensive effect of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, captopril ( CAP ), is associated with beneficial effects on gut pathology. Coupled with the evidence that CAP exerts prolonged reduction in blood pressure ( BP ) after discontinuation of treatment, we investigate whether persistent beneficial actions of CAP are linked to alterations of gut microbiota and improvement of hypertension-induced gut pathology. Methods and Results Spontaneously hypertensive rats ( SHR ) and Wistar Kyoto rats were treated with CAP (250 mg/kg/day) for 4 weeks followed by withdrawal for 16 weeks. Gut microbiota, gut pathology, BP, and brain neuronal activity were assessed. CAP resulted in a ≈60 mm Hg decrease in systolic BP after 3 weeks of treatment in SHR , and the decrease remained significant at least 5 weeks after CAP withdrawal. In contrast, CAP caused modest decrease in systolic BP in Wistar Kyoto. 16S rRNA gene-sequencing-based gut microbial analyses in SHR showed sustained alteration of gut microbiota and increase in Allobaculum after CAP withdrawal. Phylogenetic investigation of communities by reconstruction of unobserved states analysis revealed significant increase in bacterial sporulation upon CAP treatment in SHR . These were associated with persistent improvement in gut pathology and permeability. Furthermore, manganese-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging showed significantly decreased neuronal activity in the posterior pituitary of SHR 4 weeks after withdrawal. Conclusions Decreased BP , altered gut microbiota, improved gut pathology and permeability, and dampened posterior pituitary neuronal activity were maintained after CAP withdrawal in the SHR . They suggest that CAP influences the brain-gut axis to maintain the sustained antihypertensive effect of CAP after withdrawal.

Effects of Lipid-Lowering and Antihypertensive Treatments in Addition to Healthy Lifestyles in Primary Prevention: An Analysis of the HOPE-3 Trial

Background

It is not clear whether the effects of lipid‐lowering or antihypertensive medications are influenced by adherence to healthy lifestyle factors. We assessed the effects of both drug interventions in subgroups by the number of healthy lifestyle factors in participants in the HOPE‐3 (Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation) trial.

Methods and Results

In this primary prevention trial, 4 healthy lifestyle factors (nonsmoking status, physical activity, optimal body weight, and healthy diet) were recorded in 12 521 participants who were at intermediate risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and were randomized to rosuvastatin, candesartan/hydrochlorothiazide, their combination, or matched placebos. Median follow‐up was 5.6 years. The outcome was a composite of CVD events. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox regression models. Participants with ≥2 healthy lifestyle factors had a lower rate of CVD compared with those with fewer factors (HR: 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73–1.00). Rosuvastatin reduced CVD events in participants with ≥2 healthy lifestyle factors (HR: 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62–0.90) and in participants with <2 factors (HR: 0.79; 95% CI, 0.61–1.01). Consistent results were observed with combination therapy (≥2 factors: HR: 0.74; 95% CI, 0.57–0.97; <2 factors: HR: 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43–0.88). Candesartan/hydrochlorothiazide tends to reduce CVD only in participants with <2 healthy lifestyle factors (HR: 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61–1.00).

Conclusions

Healthy lifestyles are associated with lower CVD. Rosuvastatin alone and combined with candesartan/hydrochlorothiazide is beneficial regardless of healthy lifestyle status; however, the benefit of antihypertensive treatment appears to be limited to patients with less healthy lifestyles.

Clinical Trial Registration

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00239681.

The efficacy and safety of valsartan and a combination of valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate arterial hypertension: a subgroup analysis of the effect of valsartan and its combination with…

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The aim of the study was to establish the effect of valsartan and combination of valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) on pulse wave velocity (PWV) and central blood pressure (CBP) in a large population of patients with mild to moderate arterial hypertension.

METHODS

This was an international, multicentre, open-label, prospective trial. After one week of washout in previously treated patients, 74 subjects were treated with valsartan or valsartan combined with HCTZ for 16 weeks according to the protocol. Naïve patients received the treatment immediately. During the active treatment, four visits were planned for each patient to obtain data for the primary and secondary efficacy. At the beginning and at the end of the study PWV and CBP were determined with central arterial pressure waveform analysis (SphygmoCor®, Atcor Medical). This study is registered with clinicaltrialsregister.eu, EudraCT number 2012-005129-57.

RESULTS

The results of the present VICTORY trial showed that valsartan and combination of valsartan and HCTZ effectively reduced the brachial blood pressure in patients with mild to moderate arterial hypertension as well as PWV, central systolic blood pressure and central diastolic blood pressure. The effects on the augmentation index were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Valsartan and valsartan/HCTZ improve arterial stiffness in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

Impact of Antihypertensive Treatment on Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes in Pregnancy Complicated by Chronic Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic hypertension complicates around 3% of all pregnancies. There is evidence that treating severe hypertension reduces maternal morbidity. This study aimed to systematically review randomized controlled trials of antihypertensive agents treating chronic hypertension in pregnancy to determine the effect of this intervention.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Medline (via OVID), Embase (via OVID) and the Cochrane Trials Register were searched from their earliest entries until November 30, 2016. All randomized controlled trials evaluating antihypertensive treatments for chronic hypertension in pregnancy were included. Data were extracted and analyzed in Stata (version 14.1). Fifteen randomized controlled trials (1166 women) were identified for meta-analysis. A clinically important reduction in the incidence of severe hypertension was seen with antihypertensive treatment versus no antihypertensive treatment/placebo (5 studies, 446 women; risk ratio 0.33, 95%CI 0.19-0.56; I2 0.0%). There was no difference in the incidence of superimposed pre-eclampsia (7 studies, 727 women; risk ratio 0.74, 95%CI 0.49-1.11; I2 28.1%), stillbirth/neonatal death (4 studies, 667 women; risk ratio 0.37, 95%CI 0.11-1.26; I2 0.0%), birth weight (7 studies, 802 women; weighted mean difference -60 g, 95%CI -200 to 80 g; I2 0.0%), or small for gestational age (4 studies, 369 women; risk ratio 1.01, 95%CI 0.53-1.94; I2 0.0%) with antihypertensive treatment versus no treatment/placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Antihypertensive treatment reduces the risk of severe hypertension in pregnant women with chronic hypertension. A considerable paucity of data exists to guide choice of antihypertensive agent. Adequately powered head-to-head randomized controlled trials of commonly used antihypertensive agents are required to inform prescribing.

AT2 Receptors: Potential Therapeutic Targets for Hypertension

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is arguably the most important and best studied hormonal system in the control of blood pressure (BP) and the pathogenesis of hypertension. The RAS features its main effector angiotensin II (Ang II) acting via its 2 major receptors, angiotensin type-1(AT1R) and type-2 (AT2R). In general, AT2Rs oppose the detrimental actions of Ang II via AT1Rs. AT2R activation induces vasodilation and natriuresis, but its effects to lower BP in hypertension have not been as clear as anticipated. Recent studies, however, have demonstrated that acute and chronic AT2R stimulation can induce natriuresis and lower BP in the Ang II infusion model of experimental hypertension. AT2R activation induces receptor recruitment from intracellular sites to the apical plasma membranes of renal proximal tubule cells via a bradykinin, nitric oxide, and cyclic guanosine 3',5' monophosphate signaling pathway that results in internalization and inactivation of sodium (Na+) transporters Na+-H+ exchanger-3 and Na+/K+ATPase. These responses do not require the presence of concurrent AT1R blockade and are effective both in the prevention and reversal of hypertension. This review will address the role of AT2Rs in the control of BP and Na+ excretion and the case for these receptors as potential therapeutic targets for hypertension in humans.

Relative Contributions of Arterial Stiffness and Hypertension to Cardiovascular Disease: The Framingham Heart Study

BACKGROUND

The presence and implications of abnormal arterial stiffness, a potential independent predictor of outcomes, in community-dwelling treated hypertensives is unknown. Furthermore, limited data exist regarding the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) associated with arterial stiffness across the entire range of blood pressure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We measured carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) and classical CVD risk factors in 2127 community-dwelling participants (mean age 60 years, 57% women) of The Framingham Offspring Cohort. The participants were divided into 4 groups according to hypertension (yes/no, defined as blood pressure ≥140/90 mm Hg or use of antihypertensive treatment) and PWV status (high/low based on age- and sex-specific median values) and followed up for CVD events (CVD death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, heart failure, and stroke). Sixty percent (233 of 390) of controlled and 90% (232 of 258) of uncontrolled treated hypertensives had high PWV. The multivariable-adjusted risk for CVD events (n=248, median follow-up 12.6 years) rose from normotension with low PWV (reference) to normotension with high PWV (hazard ratio 1.29, 95% CI 0.83-2.00) and from hypertension with low PWV (hazard ratio 1.54, 95% CI 1.01-2.36) to hypertension with high PWV (hazard ratio 2.25, 95% CI 1.54-3.29).

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial proportion of treated hypertensives have high arterial stiffness, a finding that may explain some of the notable residual CVD risk associated with even well-controlled hypertension. High PWV is associated with a trend towards increasing CVD risk in both nonhypertensives and hypertensives, a finding that may support the use of arterial stiffness measurements in both populations.

Zofenopril Protects Against Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury by Increasing Nitric Oxide and Hydrogen Sulfide Bioavailability

Background

Zofenopril, a sulfhydrylated angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), reduces mortality and morbidity in infarcted patients to a greater extent than do other ACEIs. Zofenopril is a unique ACEI that has been shown to increase hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) bioavailability and nitric oxide (NO) levels via bradykinin‐dependent signaling. Both H₂S and NO exert cytoprotective and antioxidant effects. We examined zofenopril effects on H₂S and NO bioavailability and cardiac damage in murine and swine models of myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury.

Methods and Results

Zofenopril (10 mg/kg PO) was administered for 1, 8, and 24 hours to establish optimal dosing in mice. Myocardial and plasma H₂S and NO levels were measured along with the levels of H₂S and NO enzymes (cystathionine β‐synthase, cystathionine γ‐lyase, 3‐mercaptopyruvate sulfur transferase, and endothelial nitric oxide synthase). Mice received 8 hours of zofenopril or vehicle pretreatment followed by 45 minutes of ischemia and 24 hours of reperfusion. Pigs received placebo or zofenopril (30 mg/daily orally) 7 days before 75 minutes of ischemia and 48 hours of reperfusion. Zofenopril significantly augmented both plasma and myocardial H₂S and NO levels in mice and plasma H₂S (sulfane sulfur) in pigs. Cystathionine β‐synthase, cystathionine γ‐lyase, 3‐mercaptopyruvate sulfur transferase, and total endothelial nitric oxide synthase levels were unaltered, while phospho‐endothelial nitric oxide synthase¹¹⁷⁷ was significantly increased in mice. Pretreatment with zofenopril significantly reduced myocardial infarct size and cardiac troponin I levels after I/R injury in both mice and swine. Zofenopril also significantly preserved ischemic zone endocardial blood flow at reperfusion in pigs after I/R.

Conclusions

Zofenopril‐mediated cardioprotection during I/R is associated with an increase in H₂S and NO signaling.

Treatment efficacy of anti-hypertensive drugs in monotherapy or combination: ATOM systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials according to PRISMA statement

BACKGROUND

The relative efficacy of antihypertensive drugs/combinations is not well known. Identifying the most effective ones and the patients' characteristics associated with best performance of the drugs will improve management of hypertensive patients.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the blood pressure (BP) reduction attributed to antihypertensive drugs and identify characteristics associated with BP decrease.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception through July 2012 and selected papers.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Double-blind, randomized clinical trials whose main result was the reduction in BP by antihypertensive treatment, with study population ≥50 or ≥25 if the study was a crossover, follow-up of at least 8 weeks, and available required data.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Study data were independently extracted by multiple observers and introduced in an electronic database. Inconsistencies were resolved by discussion and referral back to the original articles. Meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA statement and using a Bayesian framework.

MAIN OUTCOME(S) AND MEASURE(S)

Mean decrease in systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) achieved by each drug or combination.

RESULTS

Two hundred eight trials including 94,305 patients were identified. In monotherapy, most drugs achieved 10 to 15 mm Hg SBP and 8 to 10 mm Hg DBP decreases.Olmesartan/amlodipine, olmesartan/hydrochlorothiazide, felodipine/metoprolol, and valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide were the combinations leading to the greatest mean SBP reductions (>20 mm Hg). Female sex and body mass index >25 kg/m were associated with more pronounced SBP and DBP reductions, whereas Afro-American ethnicity was associated with BP reductions smaller than the median. Results were adjusted by study duration, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes mellitus. Still, the estimation was performed using the mean administered doses, which do not exactly match those of the available drug formats.

LIMITATIONS

Data corresponded to those obtained in each of the included trials; the analysis of the combinations was limited to the most recent ones; estimations were performed using the mean administered doses.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Certain drug combinations achieve BP reductions ranging from 20 to 25/10 to 15 mm Hg. Sex, ethnicity, and obesity are associated with antihypertensive response. This information can contribute to better selection of the antihypertensive drug, depending on the magnitude of pretreatment BP elevation. Guidelines should be revised.

Transdermal delivery of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and others for management of hypertension

CONTEXT

Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) are some of the most commonly prescribed medications for hypertension.

OBJECTIVE

Most of all conventional dosage forms of ARBs and ACEIs undergo extensive first-pass metabolism, which significantly reduces bioavailability. Majority of ARBs and ACEIs are inherently short acting due to a rapid elimination half-life. In addition, oral dosage forms of ARBs and ACEIs have many high incidences of adverse effects due to variable absorption profiles, higher frequency of administration and poor patient compliance.

METHODS

Many attempts have been made globally at the laboratory level to investigate the skin permeation and to develop transdermal therapeutic systems of various ARBs, ACEIs and other anti-hypertensives, to circumvent the drawbacks associated with their conventional dosage form.

RESULTS

This manuscript presents an outline of the transdermal research specifically in the area of ARBs, ACEIs and other anti-hypertensives reported in various pharmaceutical journals.

CONCLUSION

The transdermal delivery has gained a significant importance for systemic treatment as it is able to avoid first-pass metabolism and major fluctuations of plasma levels typical of repeated oral administration. As we can experience from this review article that transdermal delivery of different ARBs and ACEIs improves bioavailability as well as patient compliance by many folds. In fact, the rationale development of some newer ARBs, ACEIs and other anti-hypertensives transdermal systems will provide new ways of treatment, circumventing current limitations for conventional dosage forms.

The joint association of physical activity, blood-pressure control, and pharmacologic treatment of hypertension for all-cause mortality risk

BACKGROUND

We conducted a study to determine the joint association of physical activity, pharmacologic treatment for hypertension, and the control of blood pressure (BP) on all-cause mortality risk.

METHODS

The study subjects were 10,665 adults from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) and the Continuous NHANES survey (1999-2000 and 2000-2001). Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to estimate differences in mortality risk according to physical activity, pharmacologic treatment for hypertension, and BP control, with physically active, treated, and controlled as the referent category.

RESULTS

The average follow-up time in the study was 8.6±4.8 years. The main effect of physical activity was significant independently of pharmacologic treatment and BP control (P < 0.001). Physically inactive adults with hypertension had a higher risk of mortality than did physically active adults with treated and controlled hypertension (inactive, treated and controlled hypertension: HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.17-1.72; P < 0.01; inactive, treated, and uncontrolled hypertension: HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.30-1.84; P < 0.01; inactive, untreated, and uncontrolled hypertension: HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.07-1.52, P < 0.01). However, the risk of mortality for physically active adults with hypertension did not differ significantly with or without treatment for hypertension if their hypertension remained uncontrolled (active, treated and uncontrolled hypertension: HR, 1.17; 95% CI 0.98-1.40; P = 0.08; active, untreated and uncontrolled hypertension: HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.76-1.08; P = 0.25). Physically active, normotensive individuals had a lower all-cause mortality risk than did the referent group of physically active individuals being treated with antihypertensive medication and who had controlled hypertension (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.60-0.86; P < 0.01), whereas physically inactive, normotensive individuals had a risk of mortality similar to that of the referent group (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.90-1.30; P = 0.42).

CONCLUSION

Physical activity may be as or even more important than pharmacotherapy for reducing the risk of mortality in adults with hypertension. However, the risk of mortality remained higher for physically active adults with treated and controlled hypertension than did the risk of mortality for physically active normotensive populations. Prevention of hypertension is therefore imperative for reducing the all-cause risk of premature mortality in adults.

Treatment options for hypertension in high-risk patients

Patients are considered to be at high risk of cardiovascular events if they have diabetes, chronic kidney disease, stroke, established coronary artery disease, or a coronary artery disease equivalent. Blood pressure-lowering therapy has been shown to reduce cardiovascular events in these patients significantly. Identification of high-risk patients by global risk evaluation is recommended for every hypertensive patient. Treatment of hypertension in high-risk patients with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or an angiotensin receptor antagonist, with or without addition of a dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist, is a reasonable approach based on current clinical trials.

Management of hypertension in diabetes mellitus

Overall, approximately 40% of diabetic patients have hypertension at the time of diagnosis of diabetes and a similar percentage may develop hypertension during their follow-up. Factors contributing to this high prevalance of hypertension in diabetes include obesity, old age, insulin resistance, increased extracelluar volume, diabetic nephropathy and increased arterial stiffness. Well-conducted clinical trials that have been completed in the last decade demonstrated a major impact of hypertension on the micro- and macrovascular complications of diabetes and remarkable benefits of its control. Based on this large trial database, the currently accepted level of blood pressure used in diabetes for definition and target of therapy is 130/80 mmHg. Dietary and behavioral lifestyle modifications should be an intergral part of any management regimen. These include weight reduction, low sodium diet, exercise, moderate alcohol intake and smoking cessation. Effective control of blood pressure to target levels is more important than the drug(s) used. Combination drug therapy is needed frequently to achieve a target blood pressure. Although blockers of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system seem to have a favorable effect in diabetes, high-level evidence suggests that low-dose thiazide diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers and calcium channel blockers are all good choices, both as initial and add-on therapy. Frequently, more than one drug is needed, and a low-dose thiazide diuretic combined with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker is a commonly used effective combination. Other drugs that can be added include calcium channel blockers and β-blockers. In certain clinical situations, specific drug classes are indicated. These include angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers in the case of diabetic nephropathy, β-blockers in the case of ischemic heart disease, and calcium channel blockers and loop diuretics in the case of advanced renal insufficiency, where the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers carries a significant risk of hyperkalemia.

Is the fixed-dose combination of telmisartan and hydrochlorothiazide a good approach to treat hypertension?

Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system with selective AT1 receptor antagonists is recognized as an effective mean to lower blood pressure in hypertensive patients. Among the class of AT1 receptor antagonists, telmisartan offers the advantage of a very long half-life. This enables blood pressure control over 24 hours using once-daily administration. The combination of telmisartan with hydrochlorothiazide is a logical step because numerous previous studies have demonstrated that sodium depletion enhances the antihypertensive efficacy of drugs interfering with the activity of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). In accordance with past experience using similar compounds blocking the RAS, several controlled studies have now demonstrated that the fixed-dose combination oftelmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide is superior in lowering blood pressure than either telmisartan or hydrochlorothiazide alone. Of clinical interest also is the observation that the excellent clinical tolerance of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist is not affected by the association of the low-dose thiazide. Thus telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide is an effective and well-tolerated antihypertensive combination. Finally, the development of fixed-dose combinations should improve drug adherence because of the one-pill-a-day regimen.