Neurologists' Evaluations of Experience and Effectiveness of Teleneurology Encounters

Background and Objectives: To better understand neurologists' assessments of the experiences and effectiveness of teleneurology encounters. Methods: After completing an audio-video telehealth visit with verbally consenting patients, neurologists recorded their evaluations of the encounter. Data were analyzed using standard quantitative and qualitative techniques. Results: The study included unique encounters between 187 patients and 11 neurologists. The mean patient age was 49 ± 17.5 years. Two thirds of patients (66.8%, 125/187) were female. One third of patients (33.2%; 62) were new patients. The most common patient complaints were headache (69/187, 36.9%), focal and generalized numbness or tingling (21, 11.2%), memory difficulty (15, 8%), spine-related symptoms (12, 6.4%), and vertigo (11, 5.9%). Neurologists reported that they completed a virtual examination that provided enough information for medical decision-making in 94.9% of encounters (169/178, 9 missing responses). Fourteen of 25 examination elements important for medical decision-making could be performed sufficiently during virtual encounters. Examination assistance was needed for 16.4% (30/183) of patients, who were, on average, 17.3 years older than those who did not require assistance (62.9 years vs. 45.6 years, p = 0.0002). In 19.1% (34/178) of encounters, neurologists learned clinically relevant information from seeing patients in their homes. Neurologists' assessments of the effectiveness of encounters were not related to the presence (97.2%, 35/36 effective) or absence (95%, 134/141 effective) of technical difficulties (p = 0.5729) in 177 encounters (10 missing responses). Discussion: Neurologists reported that nearly 95% of teleneurology encounters were effective despite limitations of the virtual examination, occasional need for patient assistance, and technical difficulties.

Recognizing Aphemia and How to Differentiate From Aphasia in the Era of Telemedicine

Background

Aphemia, or pure motor mutism, is a phenomenon that has been reported previously in the literature and typically is associated with small infarcts in the inferior dominant precentral gyrus, pars opercularis, or inferior perirolandic gyrus. Clinically, it is important to distinguish aphemia from aphasia syndromes. Telemedicine is becoming more prevalent and involving neurologists across the country. This is an important consideration when addressing aphemic patients as many mistakes can be made during a virtual exam clouding a patient's clinical picture.

Case Presentation

Our patient is a 61-year-old female with a past medical history of hypertension, diabetes, and an old right frontoparietal stroke without any residual deficits. She presented after her family stated that she "quit speaking" for about seven hours. Initial neurological evaluation was done via telemedicine due to the COVID-19 pandemic and was pertinent for decreased consciousness, inability to answer either orientation question, a right facial droop, and aphasia. Later it was found that the patient exhibited a pure motor mutism rather than aphasia and had an MRI lesion in the left inferior precentral gyrus.

Conclusion

Differentiating aphemia from aphasia is an important clinical skill for a neurologist to foster especially in the era of telemedicine. An intimate knowledge of the parts of a speech exam are vital in directing emergency staff during stroke evaluation. Additionally, distinguishing these clinical syndromes has implications with respect to prognosis and long-term rehabilitation.

The Inter-rater Variability of Clinical Assessment in Post-anoxic Myoclonus

Background

Acute post-anoxic myoclonus (PAM) can be divided into an unfavorable (generalized/subcortical) and more favorable ((multi)focal/cortical) outcome group that could support prognostication in post-anoxic encephalopathy; however, the inter-rater variability of clinically assessing these PAM subtypes is unknown.

Methods

We prospectively examined PAM patients using a standardized video protocol. Videos were rated by three neurologists who classified PAM phenotype (generalized/(multi)focal), stimulus sensitivity, localization (proximal/distal/both), and severity (Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale (CGI-S) and Unified Myoclonus Rating Scale (UMRS)).

Results

Poor inter-rater agreement was found for phenotype and stimulus sensitivity (κ=−0.05), moderate agreement for localization (κ=0.46). Substantial agreement was obtained for the CGI-S (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)=0.64) and almost perfect agreement for the UMRS (ICC=0.82).

Discussion

Clinical assessment of PAM is not reproducible between physicians, and should therefore not be used for prognostication. PAM severity measured by the UMRS appears to be reliable; however, the relation between PAM severity and outcome is unknown.

A novel application of teleneurology: robotic telepresence in supervision of neurology trainees

BACKGROUND

Telemedicine is used for specialist consultation, patient evaluation, and remote monitoring. We propose that telemedicine has a valuable role in medical education through facilitating faculty supervision of trainees.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We surveyed resident physician trainees and faculty at a single institution who provided service for acute neurologic consultations over 29 months. The survey compared experiences using the supervisory methods of telephone, robotic telepresence (RTP), and in-person interaction. Participants answered 10 questions addressing their experience relevant to faculty-trainee interaction quality and clinical supervision, achieved with the three supervisory methods under study.

RESULTS

Surveys were received from 20 of 36 trainees (56%) and 8 of 10 faculty members (80%). More than 90% of trainees and faculty strongly agreed that in-person communication was satisfactory for patient data review, problem synthesis, and refinement of the trainees' impressions, with RTP ranking a close second. Moreover, 38% of faculty and 70% of trainees reported the telephone method as unsatisfactory for reacquisition of patient history, data synthesis, and direct observation of trainees' clinical skills. RTP provided more than 90% of trainees with sufficient staff support and facilitated trainee autonomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, 85% of both trainees and faculty preferred in-person supervision most, with RTP ranked second and telephone being least favored. Although in-person faculty supervision of trainees' management of neurologic emergencies is always preferred, it is not always practical. This survey highlights the valuable role of RTP in graduate medical education and RTP as preferred over telephone as an adjunctive supervision tool in residency.

Clinical evaluation of the bed cycling test

OBJECTIVE

Additionally to the forearm rolling test to detect mild unilateral upper limb dysfunction, the bed cycling test (BCT) for detection of mild to moderate lower limb dysfunction was developed, evaluated and compared to the leg holding test.

METHODS

In a prospective observer-blinded study, 60 patients with MRI/CT-proven focal cerebral hemisphere lesions and a mild to moderate unilateral paresis of the lower limb (graduated MRC 3-4/5), and 60 control persons with normal imaging were examined and filmed. Nine observers blinded to the diagnosis evaluated these videos. The sensitivity, specificity and the positive and negative predictive values of the clinical tests were analyzed.

RESULTS

The observers gave a correct evaluation of BCT in 35.5% of all patients with focal cerebral lesions compared to 26.0% for the leg holding test. On the other hand, observers had false negative results in 29.1% of cases with BCT and 44.7% with leg holding test. In 36.7% of patients, only BCT was pathological while leg holding test was unremarkable. The sensitivity of the combination of both tests was 0.68 (95% CI 0.61-0.75). The BCT is more sensitive (64.3%) than leg holding test (46.2%) while the specificity of leg holding test (85.6%) is higher than of BCT (70.1%) to detect a cerebral lesion affecting the lower limb. The inter-rater variability is high with no differences comparing different types of clinical experience.

CONCLUSIONS

The BCT is a useful additional clinical bedside test to detect subtle unilateral cerebral lesions. The BCT is easy to perform and can be added to the routine neurological examination.

Objective pulsatile tinnitus

Tinnitus is the usually unwanted perception of sound, in most cases there is no genuine physical source of sound. Less than 10% of tinnitus patients suffer from pulsatile tinnitus. Objective Pulsatile tinnitus can also be the first indication of dural arteriovenous fistula, so examination for such vascular origin must be performed.

Measuring the rate of progression in Friedreich ataxia: implications for clinical trial design

Friedreich ataxia is an autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by ataxia of all four limbs, dysarthria, and arreflexia. A variety of measures are currently used to quantify disease progression, including the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale, examiner-rated functional disability scales, self-reported activities of daily living and performance measures such as the timed 25-foot walk, 9-hole pegboard test, PATA speech test, and low-contrast letter acuity vision charts. This study examines the rate of disease progression over one and two years in a cohort of 236 Friedreich ataxia patients using these scales and performance measure composites. The Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale and performance-measure composites captured disease progression, with a greater sensitivity to change over 2 years than over 1 year. The measures differed in their sensitivity to change and in possible bias. These results help to establish norms for progression in FRDA that can be useful in measuring the long-term success of therapeutic agents and defining sample-size calculations for double-blind clinical trials.