Analyzing the Costs and Impact of the TakeMeHome Program, a Public-Private Partnership to Deliver HIV Self-Test Kits in the United States

BACKGROUND

HIV testing is an entry point to access HIV care and prevention services. Building Healthy Online Communities developed a website ( TakeMeHome.org ) where participants can order HIV home test kits. The purpose of this study was to analyze the costs and impact of the TakeMeHome program.

METHODS

We estimated the costs of TakeMeHome across all participating jurisdictions for the first year of the program. We estimated program costs using purchase orders and invoices, contracts, and allocation of staff time, and the costs included website design, participant recruitment, administration and overhead, HIV self-test kits, and shipping and handling. Primary outcomes of the analysis were total program cost, cost per HIV test, and cost per new HIV diagnosis.

RESULTS

The TakeMeHome program distributed 5323 HIV self-tests to 4859 participants over a 12-month period. The total program cost over this period was $314,870. The cost per HIV test delivered was estimated at $59, and the cost per person tested was $65. The program identified 18 confirmed new HIV diagnoses (0.6% positivity) verified with surveillance data in 7 health jurisdictions at $169,890. The cost per confirmed new HIV diagnosis was estimated at $9440.

CONCLUSIONS

The TakeMeHome program delivered HIV self-testing at a reasonable cost, and the program may be a cost-effective use of HIV prevention resources. The public-private partnership can be an effective mechanism to validate HIV diagnoses identified with self-testing and provide HIV prevention and linkage to care services.

Home-based HIV testing strategies for middle-aged and older adults in rural South Africa

OBJECTIVE

More than one in four adults over 40 years with HIV in South Africa are unaware of their status and not receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART). HIV self-testing may offer a powerful approach to closing this gap for aging adults. Here, we report the results of a randomized comparative effectiveness trial of three different home-based HIV testing strategies for middle-aged and older adults in rural South Africa.

DESIGN

Two thousand nine hundred and sixty-three individuals in the 'Health and Ageing in Africa: a Longitudinal Study of an INDEPTH Community in South Africa (HAALSI)' cohort study were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to one of three types of home-based and home-delivered HIV testing modalities: rapid testing with counseling; self-testing, and both rapid testing with counselling and self-testing.

METHOD

In OLS regression analyses, we estimated the treatment effects on HIV testing and HIV testing frequency at about 1 year after delivery. Finally, we assessed the potential adverse effects of these strategies on the secondary outcomes of depressive symptom as assessed by the CESD-20, linkage to care, and risky sexual behavior.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in HIV testing uptake or testing frequency across groups. However, respondents in the self-testing treatment arms were more likely to shift from testing at home and a facility [self-testing (HIVST), -8 percentage points (pp); 95% confidence interval (CI) -14 to -2 pp; self-testing plus rapid testing and counselling (ST+RT+C); -9 pp, 95% CI -15 to -3 pp] to testing only at home (HIVST 5 pp; 95% CI 2 to 9 pp; ST+RT+C: 5 pp, 95% CI 1 to 9 pp) - suggesting a revealed preference for self-testing in this population. We also found no adverse effects of this strategy on linkage to care for HIV and common comorbidities, recent sexual partners, or condom use. Finally, those in the self-testing only arm had significantly decreased depressive symptom scores by 0.58 points (95% CI -1.16 to -0.01).

CONCLUSION

We find HIV self-testing to be a well tolerated and seemingly preferred home-based testing option for middle-aged and older adults in rural South Africa. This approach should be expanded to achieve the UNAIDS 95-95-95 targets.

Economic evaluation of improving HIV self-testing among MSM in China using a crowdsourced intervention: a cost-effectiveness analysis

OBJECTIVES

Crowdsourcing, which taps into the wisdom of crowds, has been successful in generating strategies to enhance HIV self-testing (HIVST) uptake. We determined the cost-effectiveness of a crowdsourced intervention (one-off or annual) compared with a control scenario (no crowdsourcing) among MSM living in China.

DESIGN

Economic evaluation.

METHODS

We used data from our cluster randomized controlled trial of MSM (NCT02796963). We used a micro-costing approach to measure direct health costs ($USD2017) from a health provider perspective. Using outputs from a dynamic transmission model over a 20-year time horizon, we estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios using cost per disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted with 3% discounting. An intervention was considered highly cost-effective if it was less than one gross domestic product (GDP, $8823) per DALY averted.

RESULTS

Across all cities, the crowdsourced intervention was highly cost-effective compared with the control scenario (incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ranged from $2263 to 6152 per DALY averted for annual crowdsourcing; $171 to 204 per DALY averted for one-off crowdsourcing). The one-off intervention was cost-saving in Guangzhou and Qingdao. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the findings; specifically, changes in discounting, costs of the crowdsourced intervention, costs of HIV testing and cost of antiretroviral therapy did not alter our conclusions.

CONCLUSION

Scaling up a one-off or annual crowdsourced HIV prevention intervention in four cities in China was very likely to be cost-effective. Further research is warranted to evaluate the feasibility of scaling up crowdsourced HIV prevention interventions in other settings and populations.

Routine programmatic data show a positive population-level impact of HIV self-testing: the case of Côte d'Ivoire and implications for implementation

OBJECTIVES

We estimate the effects of ATLAS's HIV self-testing (HIVST) kit distribution on conventional HIV testing, diagnoses, and antiretroviral treatment (ART) initiations in Côte d'Ivoire.

DESIGN

Ecological study using routinely collected HIV testing services program data.

METHODS

We used the ATLAS's programmatic data recorded between the third quarter of 2019 and the first quarter of 2021, in addition to data from the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief dashboard. We performed ecological time series regression using linear mixed models. Results are presented per 1000 HIVST kits distributed through ATLAS.

RESULTS

We found a negative but nonsignificant effect of the number of ATLAS' distributed HIVST kits on conventional testing uptake (-190 conventional tests; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -427 to 37). The relationship between the number of HIVST kits and HIV diagnoses was significant and positive (+8 diagnosis; 95% CI: 0 to 15). No effect was observed on ART initiation (-2 ART initiations; 95% CI: -8 to 5).

CONCLUSIONS

ATLAS' HIVST kit distribution had a positive impact on HIV diagnoses. Despite the negative signal on conventional testing, even if only 20% of distributed kits are used, HIVST would increase access to testing. The methodology used in this paper offers a promising way to leverage routinely collected programmatic data to estimate the effects of HIVST kit distribution in real-world programs.

Targeted Implementation of HIV Self-Testing Increases Testing Uptake Among Partners of Index Persons Known to Have HIV in Kenya

BACKGROUND

Partners of persons living with HIV (PLHIV) are at a high risk of HIV acquisition, particularly if PLHIV are newly diagnosed or not virally suppressed. A focused partner HIV testing strategy could stimulate efficient identification of persons for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) or antiretroviral therapy (ART) programs.

METHODS

We sequentially implemented 2 partner testing strategies at 2 Kenyan HIV clinics: (1) an invitation for clinic-based testing and (2) HIV self-testing (HIVST) kits distribution to index PLHIV. For each testing strategy, we enrolled approximately 150 consecutive index PLHIV with partners of unknown HIV status, not on ART, <6 months on ART, or who had detectable viral load. We compared partner engagement, testing uptake, and linkage for ART or PrEP between the 2 testing strategies.

RESULTS

Of 313 index PLHIV enrolled (160 in invitation, 153 in HIVST), the median age was 32 years (interquartile range 26-40) and 76% were women. Overall, 73% of participants (229) discussed HIV testing with their partners: 76% (121) in the invitation strategy vs 71% (108) in the HIVST strategy [adjusted odds ratio (adjOR): 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.31 to 0.97]. Overall, 52% (79) partners in the HIVST strategy tested vs 38% (60) in the invitation strategy (adjOR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.13 to 2.78). Among partners engaged, 73% in the HIVST strategy vs 50% in the invitation tested (adjOR: 2.68, 95% CI: 1.46 to 4.96); 25% (35/139) tested positive for HIV. Eighty-nine percentage (31/35) who tested positive initiated treatment, but only 21% (20/93) who tested negative initiated PrEP.

CONCLUSIONS

HIVST kit distribution to PLHIV with partners of unknown HIV status effectively increased partner testing. Only one-fifth of partners who tested negative initiated PrEP-thus innovations to link to prevention services are urgently needed.

Correlates of HIV Status Nondisclosure by Pregnant Women Living With HIV to Their Male Partners in Uganda: A Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

HIV status disclosure by pregnant women living with HIV (PWLHIV) to their male partners is associated with improved maternal and infant outcomes. Understanding relationship factors associated with nondisclosure of HIV status by PWLHIV to their partners can inform the design of interventions to facilitate disclosure.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study using enrollment data from 500 PWLHIV unaware of their male partners' HIV status and participating in a randomized clinical trial assessing secondary distribution of HIV self-testing kits in Kampala, Uganda. The primary outcome was women's HIV status nondisclosure to their partners. We conducted univariate and multivariate binomial regressions to assess the association between baseline sociodemographic, HIV history, and relationship characteristics with HIV status nondisclosure.

RESULTS

68.2% of the 500 PWLHIV had not disclosed their HIV status to their partner(s). Factors associated with higher likelihood of nondisclosure included relationship duration <1 year [adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR = 1.25); 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02 to 1.54], being in a polygamous relationship (aPR = 1.21; 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.36), unmarried (aPR = 1.20; 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.35), uncertainty about whether their partner had ever tested for HIV (aPR = 1.55; 95% CI: 1.28 to 1.88), and a lack of social support from people aware of their status (aPR = 1.32; 95% CI: 1.18 to 1.49).

CONCLUSION

Relationship factors, including shorter-term, unmarried, and polygamous relationships and uncertainty about partner's HIV testing history, were associated with higher likelihood of pregnant women's nondisclosure of HIV status to their partner. Interventions that facilitate couples' HIV testing and disclosure, provide counseling to reduce relationship dissolution in serodiscordant couples, and offer peer support for women may increase disclosure.

CLINICALTRIALSREGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov ID number: NCT03484533.

Sexual Relationship Types, Partner HIV Self-Testing, and Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Among South African Adolescent Girls and Young Women: A Latent Class Analysis

BACKGROUND

Sexual relationships among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) are influenced by social, economic, and gender dynamics. Understanding AGYW's different relationship types and their implications for HIV risk is important for development of tailored interventions. We sought to identify relationship typologies among AGYW and their impact on uptake of HIV prevention interventions.

METHODS

From May 2018 to February 2019, 2200 HIV-negative AGYW (ages 16-24) in Johannesburg, South Africa, participated in an HIV prevention intervention involving distribution of HIV self-test kits to their male partners. AGYW were also offered pre-exposure prophylaxis. At baseline, AGYW completed a questionnaire, and outcomes were assessed for 3 months. We used latent class analysis to identify relationship types and mixture modeling to estimate the impact of relationship type on engagement in prevention interventions.

RESULTS

We identified 3 relationship types: "stable, empowered relationships with older partners" (class 1, n = 973); "shorter, empowered relationships with peer partners" (class 2, n = 1067); and "shorter relationships with risky partners" (class 3, n = 160). Compared with AGYW in class 1 relationships, AGYW in class 2 and 3 relationships were less likely to complete partner testing alongside HIV results sharing (class 2 adjusted risk ratio: 0.89, 95% confidence interval: 0.85 to 0.95; class 3 adjusted risk ratio: 0.84, 95% confidence interval: 0.73 to 0.94). Pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake was highest in class 3 (11.2%) compared with class 2 (3.8%) and class 1 (1.0%; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Relationship type impacts uptake of HIV prevention interventions among South African youth. Intervention effectiveness could be optimized by using tailored approaches to HIV risk mitigation among AGYW.

Who Accepts and Who Uses Community-Based Secondary Distribution HIV Self-Testing (HIVST) Kits? Findings From the Intervention Arm of a Cluster-Randomized Trial of HIVST Distribution Nested in Four HPTN 071 (PopART) Communities in Zambia

BACKGROUND

HPTN 071 (PopART) was a community-randomized trial of a universal testing-and-treatment intervention on HIV incidence at population level in Zambia and South Africa. In Zambia, a trial of community-based distribution of HIV self-testing (HIVST) kits, including secondary distribution, as an option for HIV-testing was nested within 4 PopART intervention communities. We used data from the intervention arm of the nested trial to measure levels of and factors associated with acceptance and use of secondary distribution HIVST kits.

METHODS

Community HIV care providers offered the PopART combination HIV-prevention intervention door-to-door, systematically visiting all households and enumerating all household members. From 1 February to 30 April 2017, individuals aged 16 years and older consenting to PopART were offered the option to HIV self-test, if eligible for HIV-testing services. Individuals aged 18 years and older who reported a partner absent during household visits were offered an HIVST kit for secondary distribution to this partner. We used two data sources to measure acceptance and use of secondary distribution HIVST kits.

RESULTS

Among 9105 individuals aged 18 years and older consenting to PopART, 9.1% (n = 825) accepted an HIVST kit for secondary distribution. Approximately 55.8% reported that the kit had been used. Women were more likely to accept, and men more likely to use, secondary distribution HIVST kits. Kits were more likely to be used by individuals aged 30+ and who had not participated in a previous round of PopART. Approximately 6.8% had a reactive result.

CONCLUSIONS

Community-based secondary distribution of HIVST kits reached men absent during community HIV care provider household visits and is a complement to facility- and community-based HIV-testing services, which often miss men.

Employers' and Employees' Perspectives of HIV Self-Testing at Male-Dominated Work Sites and Linkage to Posttest Services in Uganda

This study explored men's views of workplace-based HIV self-testing and the barriers and facilitators of linkage to posttest services. Six focus group discussions and individual in-depth interviews were held with employers and employees in private security companies in Uganda (N = 70). Using content analysis, five categories emerged. The first category was the mitigation of potential harm, including reduction of stigma and discrimination, and the need for posttest support. The second category was a perceived need for on-site services where the men proposed on-site prevention services and HIV treatment and care. In the third category, which was strengthening linkage mechanisms, participants proposed expanded clinic hours, improved health facility efficiency, and provision of referral documentation. The fourth and fifth categories were organizational support and social support, respectively. There is need for employers and employees to work together for the success of workplace-based HIV initiatives.

Acceptability and outcomes of distributing HIV self-tests for male partner testing in Kenyan maternal and child health and family planning clinics

BACKGROUND

Providing HIV self-tests to women for distribution to male partners may provide a unique opportunity to increase male partner and couples testing among women in HIV high-burden settings.

METHODS

Between November 2017 and June 2018, we offered self-tests for at-home couples or partner HIV testing to HIV-uninfected women seeking routine maternal and child health and family planning services at eight facilities in Kisumu, Kenya. Women accepting self-tests were offered at least two self-tests (OraQuick) to take to their partner(s) with instructions on use. HIV self-testing (HIVST) outcomes were evaluated using available programmatic data.

RESULTS

Overall, 3620 women were offered self-tests for at-home male partner HIV testing. The median age was 24 years (interquartile range 21-28) and 81% were in monogamous marriages. Overall, 1422 (39%) women reported having a partner of unknown HIV status, of whom 755 (53%) accepted self-tests. Among women with partners of unknown HIV status who declined self-tests (n = 667), 49% reported needing to consult their partner. Pregnant women were more likely to accept HIVST than nonpregnant women (prevalence ratio = 1.2, 95% confidence interval 1.0-1.4, P = 0.013). Self-testing outcomes were ascertained for 389 (44%) women who accepted self-tests. Among these women, 93% offered HIVSTs to their male partner; of these, 95% reported their male partners used the self-test and 99% used a self-test with their partner.

CONCLUSION

Among women attending routine maternal and child health and family planning services who had male partners of unknown HIV status, over half accepted self-tests for partner testing. Most women with outcomes ascertained reported that male partners accepted and used self-tests and that couples testing occurred.

High Acceptability and Increased HIV-Testing Frequency After Introduction of HIV Self-Testing and Network Distribution Among South African MSM

BACKGROUND

South African men who have sex with men (MSM) have a high burden of undiagnosed HIV infection and HIV-testing rates incommensurate with their risk. HIV self-testing (HIVST) may increase testing uptake, frequency, and earlier HIV detection and treatment.

SETTING

Gert Sibande and Ehlanzeni districts, Mpumalanga Province, South Africa.

METHODS

We conducted a longitudinal HIVST study among MSM between June 2015 and May 2017. Overall 127 HIV-negative MSM were provided with up to 9 test kits of their choice-oral fluid or blood fingerstick-to use themselves and distribute to their networks. Surveys conducted 3- and 6-month post-enrollment elicited information on HIVST experiences, preferences, acceptability, utilization, and distribution. We used generalized estimating equations to assess changes in testing frequency.

RESULTS

Ninety-one percent of participants self-tested. All participants who self-tested reported being likely to self-test again, with over 80% preferring HIVST to clinic-based testing. Fingerstick was preferred to oral fluid tests by approximately 2:1. Returning participants distributed 728 tests to sexual partners (18.5% of kits), friends (51.6%), and family (29.8%). Six participants seroconverted during the study, and 40 new diagnoses were reported among test recipients. Frequent (semi-annual) testing increased from 37.8% before the study to 84.5% at follow-up (P < 0.001), and participants reported anticipated frequent testing of 100% if HIVST were available compared with 84% if only clinic-testing were available in the coming year (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

HIVST use and network distribution is acceptable and feasible for MSM in South Africa and can increase testing uptake and frequency, potentially improving early detection among MSM and their networks.

Scaling up HIV self-testing in sub-Saharan Africa: a review of technology, policy and evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

HIV self-testing (HIVST) can provide complementary coverage to existing HIV testing services and improve knowledge of status among HIV-infected individuals. This review summarizes the current technology, policy and evidence landscape in sub-Saharan Africa and priorities within a rapidly evolving field.

RECENT FINDINGS

HIVST is moving towards scaled implementation, with the release of WHO guidelines, WHO prequalification of the first HIVST product, price reductions of HIVST products and a growing product pipeline. Multicountry evidence from southern and eastern Africa confirms high feasibility, acceptability and accuracy across many delivery models and populations, with minimal harms. Evidence on the effectiveness of HIVST on increased testing coverage is strong, while evidence on demand generation for follow-on HIV prevention and treatment services and cost-effective delivery is emerging. Despite these developments, HIVST delivery remains limited outside of pilot implementation.

SUMMARY

Important technology gaps include increasing availability of more sensitive HIVST products in low and middle-income countries. Regulatory and postmarket surveillance systems for HIVST also require further development. Randomized trials evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness under multiple distribution models, including unrestricted delivery and with a focus on linkage to HIV prevention and treatment, remain priorities. Diversification of studies from west and central Africa and around blood-based products should be addressed.

Using technology to support HIV self-testing among MSM

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Technology-based HIV self-testing (HST) interventions have the potential to improve access to HIV testing among gay, bisexual, and other MSM, as well as address concerns about HST use, including challenges with linkage to appropriate follow-up services. This review examines studies that use technology-based platforms to increase or improve the experience of HST among MSM.

RECENT FINDINGS

Seven published studies and eight funded studies were included in this review. Comprehensive prevention interventions with free HST kit distribution and interventions that provide free HST kits and support the HST process address a greater number of barriers (e.g., access, correct use of testing kits, and correct interpretation of results) than studies that only distribute free HST kits through technology-based platforms.

SUMMARY

By addressing HIV-testing barriers and specific HST concerns, these interventions address a critical need to improve first time and repeat testing rates among MSM. Additional research is needed to determine the efficacy of recent formative HST interventions. If proven efficacious, scale-up of these strategies have the potential to increase HIV testing among MSM via expanded HST uptake.

'I will choose when to test, where I want to test': investigating young people's preferences for HIV self-testing in Malawi and Zimbabwe

OBJECTIVES

The current study identifies young people's preferences for HIV self-testing (HIVST) delivery, determines the relative strength of preferences and explores underlying behaviors and perceptions to inform youth-friendly services in southern Africa.

DESIGN

A mixed methods design was adopted in Malawi and Zimbabwe and includes focus group discussions, in-depth interviews and discrete choice experiments.

METHODS

The current study was conducted during the formative phase of cluster-randomized trials of oral-fluid HIVST distribution. Young people aged 16-25 years were purposively selected for in-depth interviews (n = 15) in Malawi and 12 focus group discussions (n = 107) across countries. Representative samples of young people in both countries (n = 341) were administered discrete choice experiments on HIVST delivery, with data analyzed to estimate relative preferences. The qualitative results provided additional depth and were triangulated with the quantitative findings.

RESULTS

There was strong concordance across methods and countries based on the three triangulation parameters: product, provider and service characteristics. HIVST was highly accepted by young people, if provided at no or very low cost. Young people expressed mixed views on oral-fluid tests, weighing perceived benefits with accuracy concerns. There was an expressed lack of trust in health providers and preference for lay community distributors. HIVST addressed youth-specific barriers to standard HIV testing, with home-based distribution considered convenient. Issues of autonomy, control, respect and confidentiality emerged as key qualitative themes.

CONCLUSION

HIVST services can be optimized to reach young people if products are provided through home-based distribution and at low prices, with respect for them as autonomous individuals.

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Testing Practices and Interest in Self-Testing Options Among Young, Black Men Who Have Sex With Men in North Carolina

BACKGROUND

Young, black men who have sex with men (YBMSM) experience disproportionately high human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) incidence in the United States. Relative to other at-risk populations, less is known about their HIV testing behaviors and preferences regarding self-testing.

METHODS

We used an online survey to investigate testing practices and interest in self-testing among HIV-uninfected, 18- to 30-year-old YBMSM in North Carolina.

RESULTS

From July 2014 to March 2015, 212 completed the survey; median age was 24 years. Among 175 (83%) who had ever been tested, 160 (91%) reported testing in the prior year, 124 (71%) tested at least every 6 months, and 71 (40%) tested at least quarterly. About three quarters (77%; n = 164) were aware of HIV self-testing; 35 (17%) had ever purchased rapid (n = 27) or dried blood spot-based (n = 14) kits. Participants aware of kits had greater intention to test in the next 6 months, were more likely to have income for basic necessities and to ask sex partners about HIV status, and were less likely to have a main sex partner or to have had transactional sex. Among 142 participants at least somewhat likely to self-test in the future, convenience (35%), privacy (23%), and rapid result delivery (18%) were the principal motivators.

CONCLUSIONS

Eight of every 10 YBMSM have ever been tested for HIV, but intertest intervals remain unacceptably long for many. Awareness of and interest in self-testing is substantial, but few have used this method. Expanded use of self-tests could help increase the frequency of HIV testing in this epidemiologically important population.

Cost and quality of life analysis of HIV self-testing and facility-based HIV testing and counselling in Blantyre, Malawi

BACKGROUND

HIV self-testing (HIVST) has been found to be highly effective, but no cost analysis has been undertaken to guide the design of affordable and scalable implementation strategies.

METHODS

Consecutive HIV self-testers and facility-based testers were recruited from participants in a community cluster-randomised trial ( ISRCTN02004005 ) investigating the impact of offering HIVST in addition to facility-based HIV testing and counselling (HTC). Primary costing studies were undertaken of the HIVST service and of health facilities providing HTC to the trial population. Costs were adjusted to 2014 US$ and INT$. Recruited participants were asked about direct non-medical and indirect costs associated with accessing either modality of HIV testing, and additionally their health-related quality of life was measured using the EuroQol EQ-5D.

RESULTS

A total of 1,241 participants underwent either HIVST (n = 775) or facility-based HTC (n = 446). The mean societal cost per participant tested through HIVST (US$9.23; 95 % CI: US$9.14-US$9.32) was lower than through facility-based HTC (US$11.84; 95 % CI: US$10.81-12.86). Although the mean health provider cost per participant tested through HIVST (US$8.78) was comparable to facility-based HTC (range: US$7.53-US$10.57), the associated mean direct non-medical and indirect cost was lower (US$2.93; 95 % CI: US$1.90-US$3.96). The mean health provider cost per HIV positive participant identified through HIVST was higher (US$97.50) than for health facilities (range: US$25.18-US$76.14), as was the mean cost per HIV positive individual assessed for anti-retroviral treatment (ART) eligibility and the mean cost per HIV positive individual initiated onto ART. In comparison to the facility-testing group, the adjusted mean EQ-5D utility score was 0.046 (95 % CI: 0.022-0.070) higher in the HIVST group.

CONCLUSIONS

HIVST reduces the economic burden on clients, but is a costlier strategy for the health provider aiming to identify HIV positive individuals for treatment. The provider cost of HIVST could be substantially lower under less restrictive distribution models, or if costs of oral fluid HIV test kits become comparable to finger-prick kits used in health facilities.

Factors shaping initial decision-making to self-test amongst cohabiting couples in urban Blantyre, Malawi

In sub-Saharan Africa, most new HIV infections occur in stable relationships, making couples testing an important intervention for HIV prevention. We explored factors shaping the decision-making of cohabiting couples who opted to self-test in Blantyre, Malawi. Thirty-four self-tested participants (17 couples) were interviewed. Motivators for HIV self-testing (HIVST) emerged at three main levels. Individual motivations included perceived benefits of access to treatment, and self-checking of serostatus in the hope of having been cured by prolonged treatment or faith-healing. HIVST was considered convenient, confidential, reassuring and an enabling new way to test with one's partner. Partnership motivations included both positive (mutual encouragement) and negative (suspected infidelity) aspects. For women, long-term health and togetherness were important goals that reinforced motivations for couples testing, whereas men often needed persuasion despite finding HIVST more flexible and less onerous than facility-based testing. Internal conflict prompted some partners to use HIVST as a way of disclosing their previously concealed HIV positive serostatus. Thus, the implementation of community-based HIVST should acknowledge and appropriately respond to decision-making processes within couples, which are shaped by gender roles and relationship dynamics.