Impact of Timing of Targeted Muscle Reinnervation on Pain and Opioid Intake Following Major Limb Amputation

BACKGROUND

Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) has been shown to play an important role in managing neuromas. However, the impact of the timing of TMR on pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores or patient opioid use has not been thoroughly explored. We hypothesized that TMR performed acutely would lead to lower VAS scores and decreased opioid intake.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data from an amputation registry at a single institution were utilized to identify patients who underwent TMR. Acute TMR was defined as TMR performed within 1 month of the major limb amputation. Primary outcomes included VAS pain scores and patient-reported opioid consumption.

RESULTS

In all, 25 patients (26 limbs) were identified in the acute group, and 18 patients (18 limbs) were identified in the delayed group. At intermediate follow-up (between 4 and 8 months postoperatively) and at final follow-up, the average pain VAS score in the delayed TMR group was significantly higher than that in the acute group (5.2 vs. 1.9 at intermediate P = .01 and 6.2 vs. 1.9 at final P = .002). In all, 84% of the amputees overall were not consuming opioid medications at the time of final follow-up (79% acute, 88% delayed, P = .72). There were no statistically significant differences in opioid consumption between the acute and delayed group at intermediate follow-up (P = .35) or at final follow-up (P = .68).

CONCLUSIONS

TMR is an effective procedure to reduce pain following major limb amputation. Patients with TMR performed acutely had significantly lower VAS pain scores at both intermediate and final follow-up than patients with TMR performed in a delayed setting.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic II.

A Novel Multimodal Postoperative Pain Protocol for 1- to 2-Level Open Lumbar Fusions: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

There has been increased interest in exploring methods to reduce postoperative pain without opioid medications. In 2015, a multimodal analgesia protocol was used involving the perioperative use of celecoxib, gabapentin, intravenous acetaminophen, lidocaine, and liposomal bupivacaine. Overall, the goal was to reduce the utilization of scheduled opioids in favor of nonopioid pain management.

METHODS

The results of a consecutive series of 1- to 2-level open primary lumbar fusions were compared to a cohort of patients after the implementation the perioperative multimodal pain management protocol. Primary endpoints included patient-reported pain scores and secondary endpoints included length of stay.

RESULTS

There were 87 patients in the preprotocol cohort and 184 in the protocol cohort. Comparing protocol and preprotocol patients, there were no significant differences in patient demographics. There was significantly average lower pain in the protocol group on postoperative day (POD) 1 (4.50 vs 5.00, P < 0.02) and POD2 (4.42 vs 5.50, P < 0.03). There was a lower pain score on POD0 (4.80 vs 5.00), but it was only clinically significant. There was a correlation between pain and duration of surgery in the preprotocol patients (POD0 R = 0.23, POD1 R = 0.02, POD2 R = 0.38), but not in the protocol patients (POD0 R = -0.05, POD1 R = -0.08, POD2 R = -0.04). There was a shorter length of stay in the protocol cohort (2.0 vs 3.0, P < 0.01). Finally, there was an approximately 35% reduction in morphine milligram equivalents of opioids in the protocol vs preprotocol cohorts (36.2 vs 57.0, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our novel multimodal pain management protocol significantly reduced postoperative pain, length of stay, and opioid consumption in this patient cohort. Opioid usage correlated to pain in the protocol patients, while the preprotocol patients had no correlation between opioid use and pain medication.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In this study, we demonstrated that preoperative and intraoperative analgesia can reduce postoperative pain medication requirements. Furthermore, we introduced a novel concept of a correlation of pain with opioid consumption as a marker of effective pain management of breakthrough pain.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

A Novel Prescription Method Reduces Postoperative Opioid Distribution and Consumption: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Prescription opioid abuse in the United States has risen substantially over the past 2 decades. Narcotic prescription refill restrictions may paradoxically be contributing to this epidemic. We investigated a novel, refill-based opioid prescription method to determine whether it would alter postoperative narcotic distribution or consumption.

METHODS

In this randomized controlled trial, patients undergoing internal fixation of distal radius fractures or thumb carpometacarpal joint arthroplasty received either a single prescription for all postoperative narcotics (control arm) or the same amount of pain medication divided into 3 equal prescriptions to be filled as needed (experimental arm). Outcomes included total narcotics dispensed, measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) through a prescription monitoring program, patient-reported opioid consumption versus opioid not consumed, and a satisfaction survey.

RESULTS

Forty-eight participants were enrolled; 25 were randomized to the control arm and 23 to the experimental arm. At 8 weeks post-op, fewer opioids had been dispensed to the experimental arm (177 ± 94 vs 287 ± 123 MME, P = .0025). At 6-week follow-up, the experimental arm reported lower narcotic consumption (124 ± 105 vs 214 ± 110 MME, P = .0131). Subanalysis of the independent surgeries yielded similar results. Some patients reported insurance issues when filling subsequent prescriptions. Consequently, although 100% of control arm patients reported good pain control, only 82.6% of experimental arm patients said likewise (P = .0455).

CONCLUSIONS

This randomized clinical trial demonstrated that patients obtained and consumed fewer narcotics when postoperative opioids were given in a refill-based prescription method. More research is needed to determine whether this opioid distribution method is reproducible, translatable, and feasible.

Postoperative Opioid Consumption Following Hallux Valgus and Rigidus Surgery: A Guide to Postoperative Prescription Writing

Prescribing postoperative pain medications is essential to foot and ankle surgery; however, prescribing an amount that results in an excess of pills has shown to lead to opioid abuse. The opioid epidemic has forced surgeons to analyze how we manage postoperative pain with a goal to prescribe the optimal number of pills that will reduce a patient's pain while limiting the amount that is left over. The purpose of this study was to develop a guideline for prescribing postoperative pain medication for hallux valgus and rigidus procedures. One hundred eighty-five opioid naive patients were followed after undergoing surgery for hallux valgus or hallux rigidus. The number of opioids consumed was obtained and compared to a number of variables. There were 28 different prescriptions given during the study. As the number of pills given decreased, so did the number of pills consumed (p = .08). Of the 185 patients, 14 (7.56%) received a refill. Ninety-five patients were available for opioid consumption data analysis. Those patients consumed a median of 36.7% and 39.1% of their prescription for hallux valgus and hallux rigidus procedures respectively. Smokers consumed 2.4 times the number of narcotics compared to nonsmokers (p = .002). The median number of 5-325 mg hydrocodone-acetaminophen pills consumed was 8.5 for distal metatarsal osteotomies and 10 for first metatarsophalangeal joint procedures. Body mass index, gender, number of procedures performed did not have a statistical difference in the number of opioids taken. Foot and ankle surgeons can reduce the amount of excess opioids by decreasing the initial prescription and educating the patient on proper pain management modalities.

Use of narcotics and sedatives among very preterm infants in neonatal intensive care units in China: an observational cohort study

Background

Narcotics and sedatives are widely used in neonatal intensive care units for very preterm infants. This study aimed to describe the current use of narcotics and/or sedatives among very preterm infants in Chinese neonatal intensive care units, with an emphasis on infants on invasive mechanical ventilation, and to investigate the association of exposure to narcotics and/or sedatives with neonatal outcomes.

Methods

This was a retrospective observational cohort study that enrolled all infants born at 24⁺⁰-31⁺⁶ weeks and admitted to 57 tertiary neonatal intensive care units in the Chinese Neonatal Network in 2019. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to assess the association between narcotics and/or sedatives exposure and major neonatal outcomes.

Results

Among 9,442 very preterm infants enrolled, 1,566 (16.6%) received at least one dose of narcotics or sedatives, 111 (1.2%) received only narcotics, 1,301 (13.8%) received sedatives solely, and 154 (1.6%) received both narcotics and sedatives during their hospital stay. Of 4,172 very preterm infants who underwent invasive mechanical ventilation, 1,117 (26.8%) received at least one dose of narcotics or sedatives, with 883 (21.2%) only received sedatives. Significant site variation of narcotics/sedatives use existed among hospitals, with the application rate ranging from 0-72.5% in individual hospital. The narcotics and/or sedatives use by very preterm infants was independently associated with increased risks for periventricular leukomalacia, severe retinopathy of prematurity, and bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Conclusions

Narcotic and/or sedative administration is relatively conservative for very preterm infants in Chinese neonatal intensive care units, with significant variation among hospitals. Since narcotic and sedative use might be related to adverse neonatal outcomes, a pressing and developing need for national quality improvement initiatives is seen with respect to pain/stress management for very preterm infants.

Synthesis and Modification of Morphine and Codeine, Leading to Diverse Libraries with Improved Pain Relief Properties

Morphine and codeine, two of the most common opioids, are widely used in the clinic for different types of pain. Morphine is one of the most potent agonists for the μ-opioid receptor, leading to the strongest analgesic effect. However, due to their association with serious side effects such as respiratory depression, constriction, euphoria, and addiction, it is necessary for derivatives of morphine and codeine to be developed to overcome such drawbacks. The development of analgesics based on the opiate structure that can be safe, orally active, and non-addictive is one of the important fields in medicinal chemistry. Over the years, morphine and codeine have undergone many structural changes. The biological investigation of semi-synthetic derivatives of both morphine and codeine, especially morphine, shows that studies on these structures are still significant for the development of potent opioid antagonists and agonists. In this review, we summarize several decade-long attempts to synthesize new analogues of morphine and codeine. Our summary placed a focus on synthetic derivatives derived from ring A (positions 1, 2, and 3), ring C (position 6), and N-17 moiety.

Risk Factors For Prolonged Opioid Use After Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to evaluate factors associated with increased risk of prolonged post-operative opioid pain medication usage following spine surgery, as well as identify the risk of various post-operative complications that may be associated with pre-operative opioid usage.

METHODS

The MarketScan commercial claims and encounters database includes approximately 39 million patients per year. Patients undergoing cervical and lumbar spine surgery between the years 2005-2014 were identified using CPT codes. Pre-operative comorbidities including DSM-V mental health disorders, chronic pain, chronic regional pain syndrome (CRPS), obesity, tobacco use, medications, and diabetes were queried and documented. Patients who utilized opioids from 1-3 months prior to surgery were identified. This timeframe was chosen to exclude patients who had been prescribed pre- and post-operative narcotic medications up to 1 month prior to surgery. We utilized odds ratios (OR), 95% Confidence Intervals (CI), and regression analysis to determine factors that are associated with prolonged post-operative opioid use at 3 time intervals.

RESULTS

553,509 patients who underwent spine surgery during the 10-year period were identified. 34.9% of patients utilized opioids 1-3 months pre-operatively. 25% patients were still utilizing opioids at 6 weeks, 17.3% at 3 months, 12.7% at 6 months, and 9.0% at 1 year after surgery. Pre-operative opioid exposure was associated with increased likelihood of post-operative use at 6-12 weeks (OR 5.45, 95% CI 5.37-5.53), 3-6 months (OR 6.48, 95% CI 6.37-6.59), 6-12 months (OR 6.97, 95% CI 6.84-7.11), and >12 months (OR 7.12, 95% CI 6.96-7.29). Mental health diagnosis, tobacco usage, diagnosis of chronic pain or CRPS, and non-narcotic neuromodulatory medications yielded increased likelihood of prolonged post-op opioid usage.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-operative narcotic use and several patient comorbidities diagnoses are associated with prolonged post-operative opioid usage following spine surgery. Chronic opioid use, diagnosis of chronic pain, or use of non-narcotic neuromodulatory medications have the highest risk of prolonged post-operative opioid consumption. Patients using opiates pre-operatively did have an increased 30 and 90-day readmission risk, in addition to a number of serious post-operative complications. This data provides spine surgeons a number of variables to consider when determining post-operative analgesia strategies, and provides health systems, providers, and payers with information on complications associated with pre-operative opioid utilization.

Predictive Factors for Postoperative Opioid Use in Elective Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery

OBJECTIVE

In 2017, the United States opioid epidemic was declared a public health emergency. Increased efforts have been made to understand and reduce patient opioid use in neurosurgery. However, the factors associated with postoperative opioid use remain understudied in endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (EESBS). We identified the demographic and surgical factors associated with postoperative opioid use in EESBS.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent elective EESBS between January 2015 and December 2020. Patient demographics, relevant clinical history, and operative data were collected and analyzed. Total opioid use was calculated 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively. Multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with opioid use.

RESULTS

There were 454 patients included. A history of anxiety/depression and younger patient age were associated with a significant increase in opioid use at 24 (28.2 MME, p < 0.001), 48 (53.4 MME, p < 0.001), and 72 (89.4 MME, p < 0.001) hours after surgery. Nasoseptal flap use was significantly associated with increased opioid use at 24 (12.8 MME, p < 0.49) and 48 (19.6 MME, p < 0.048) h postoperatively while controlling for intraoperative variables and surgical approach (trans-sellar vs. expanded). No significant association was observed for patient sex, history of migraines, preoperative opioid use, length of surgery, or surgical approach.

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing EESBS, patient history of anxiety/depression, younger patient age, and nasoseptal flap use are associated with increased postoperative opioid use. Knowledge of these risk factors may guide perioperative prescribing patterns to both adequately control postoperative pain and reduce opioid use.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 133:494-499, 2023.

Opioid Consumption Patterns and Prolonged Opioid Use Among Opioid-Naïve Ankle Fracture Patients

INTRODUCTION

Previous literature has demonstrated an association between acute opioid exposure and the risk of long-term opioid use. Here, the investigators assess immediate postoperative opioid consumption patterns as well as the incidence of prolonged opioid use among opioid-naïve patients following ankle fracture surgery.

METHODS

Included patients underwent outpatient open reduction and internal fixation of an ankle or tibial plafond fracture over a 1-year period. At patients' first postoperative visit, opioid pills were counted and standardized to the equivalent number of 5-mg oxycodone pills. Prolonged use was defined as filling a prescription for a controlled substance more than 90 days after the index procedure, tracked by the New Jersey Prescription Drug Monitoring Program up to 1 year postoperatively.

RESULTS

At the first postoperative visit, 173 patients consumed a median of 24 out of 40 pills prescribed. The initial utilization rate was 60%, and 2736 pills were left unused. In all, 32 (18.7%) patients required a narcotic prescription 90 days after the index procedure. Patients with a self-reported history of depression (P = .11) or diabetes (P = .07) demonstrated marginal correlation with prolonged narcotic use.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that, on average, patients utilize significantly fewer opioid pills than prescribed and that many patient demographics are not significant predictors of continued long-term use following outpatient ankle fracture surgery. Large variations in consumption rates make it difficult for physicians to accurately prescribe and predict prolonged narcotic use.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Comparison of Toxoplasmosis in Narcotic Drug-addicted and Healthy Persons in the Southwest of Iran; A Case-control Study

INTRODUCTION

Toxoplasmosis and narcotic drug addiction are endemic in various regions of Iran. These drugs can provide situations for infections by disrupting the immune system. The current case-control study was designed to determine the prevalence of toxoplasmosis in narcotic drugaddicted persons in comparison with healthy subjects using serology and molecular techniques in the southwest of Iran.

METHODS

A total of 201 subjects (including 101 individuals with drug addiction and 100 control participants) were randomly selected. Chronic and acute toxoplasmosis was detected using the enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) IgG avidity. T. gondii immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin M (IgM) were also determined by the ELISA. Moreover, the presence of T. gondii in blood samples was diagnosed using the nested-polymerase chain reaction (Nested-PCR).

RESULTS

For T. gondii IgG, 17 (17.0%) of 100 and 39 (38.6%) of 101 cases were diagnosed in the control participants and drug-addicted people, respectively [P=0.001, OR=3.071, CI= (1.591-5.929)]. Moreover, 16 (15.8) and 5 (5.0%) cases were positive for the B1 gene in the drug-addicted patients and controls by the nested-PCR technique, respectively [P=0.019, OR=3.576, CI= (1.257-10.179)]. However, no significant differences were found between the opium (n=64) and crystal methamphetamine (n=37) groups in terms of T. gondii IgG and IgM antibodies and the presence of the parasite in the blood (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The present results demonstrated that the outbreak of the infection was more frequent in narcotic drug-addicted persons than the controls using serology and molecular techniques.

The Impact of Time and State Opioid Legislation on Opioid Prescription Filling in Total Ankle Arthroplasty

Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is an increasingly utilized treatment for ankle arthritis, and opioids are commonly used as part of perioperative pain control. However, many states have enacted opioid-limiting legislation to reduce perioperative opioid prescribing. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of time and state legislation on perioperative opioid prescribing in TAA. This study is a retrospective, observational review of 90-day perioperative opioid prescribing in 1,829 patients undergoing TAA throughout the United States using a large insurance database. Initial and cumulative volumes and rates of opioid prescription filling were recorded along with baseline patient and operative characteristics. Dates of state legislation enactment were also recorded. Student t-tests, analysis of variance, and multivariable linear and logistic regression were utilized to analyze the impact of time and state legislation on opioid prescription filling. In the 90-day perioperative time period, initial and cumulative opioid prescription filling in oxycodone 5-mg equivalents has decreased significantly from 2010 (63.8 initial and 163.3 cumulative) to 2019 (41.1 initial and 67.2 cumulative). States with opioid-limiting legislation saw larger and more significant reductions in initial and cumulative opioid prescription filling preact to postact (63.3-50.6 with legislation vs 61.4-51.9 without legislation initial and 146.4-93.3 with legislation vs 125.1-108.6 without legislation cumulative). This study demonstrates that foot and ankle surgeons in states with opioid-limiting legislation have responded by significantly reducing 90-day perioperative opioid prescribing in TAA. These results encourage states without legislation to enact opioid-specific laws to reduce opioid prescribing.

Sniffing out what Australians know and believe about Drug Detector Dogs

The ways in which drugs are policed, differs from country to country, with Drug Detector Dogs (DDDs) a commonly used detection strategy in Australia. However, their effectiveness has been scrutinized by Australian media and research. Despite this, their work and lives "on the job" continue to be portrayed in a positive light on popular television shows such as Border Security. The aim of the current study was to ascertain public perceptions and knowledge surrounding DDDs using a sample of 129 Australians. Results revealed participants believed DDDs were equally as interesting and as happy as companion dogs. However, while there was general support for both dog roles in human lives, participants were relatively less supportive of the use of DDDs. Importantly, findings suggest general Australians have little awareness of the lives of DDDs "off the job," including housing and handling practices that directly impact animal welfare. We suggest that greater transparency around these aspects of the dogs' lives and welfare experience be made publicly available so that the DDD industry can maintain their social license to operate.

Compliance With Opioid Disposal Following Opioid Disposal Education in Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

The present opioid epidemic in the United States is a significant cause for concern in healthcare. In 1995, the concept of pain was introduced as the fifth vital sign. Since then, the sales of opioids have increased dramatically, as have the number of opioid deaths. The misuse and diversion of retained opioids following surgical procedures contribute to the problem. The objective of this project was to review the latest scholarly work and evaluate the findings related to patient education and disposal of opioid medications to decrease opioid misuse and increase disposal.

DESIGN

A systematic review.

METHODS

The systematic search strategy included PubMed, Ovid Technologies (OVID), and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) electronic databases.

FINDINGS

A total of 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 2 quasi-experimental studies, and 2 quality improvement projects met the criteria for inclusion. The studies found that as many as 92% of patients had leftover unused opioids. The retention rate of opioids among surgical patients was found to be 33 to 95%. When educational material was provided about disposal, the studies found that the disposal rate was as high as 71%.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient education about opioid misuse, diversion, and disposal are essential topics that need to be addressed with patients and caregivers.

Preoperative opioid use is a risk factor for complication following revision total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The demand for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures continues to increase. A growing body of evidence in primary THA suggests that preoperative opioid use confers increased risk for complication. However, it is unknown whether the same is true for patients undergoing revision procedures. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether or not there was a relationship between preoperative opioid use and surgical complications, medical complications, and healthcare utilisation following revision THA.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study using the Truven Marketscan database. Patients undergoing revision THA were identified. Preoperative opioid prescriptions were queried for 1 year preoperatively and were used to divide patients into cohorts based on temporality and quantity of opioid use. This included an opioid naïve group as well as an "opioid holiday" group (6 months opioid naïve period after chronic use). Demographic and complication data were collected and both univariate and multivariate analysis was then performed.

RESULTS

62.5% of patients had received an opioid prescription in the year preceding surgery. Patients with continuous preoperative opioid use had higher odds of the following: infection (superficial or deep surgical site infection; OR 1.29; 95% CI, 1.03-1.62, p = 0.029), wound complication (OR 1.36; 95% CI, 1.02-1.82, p = 0.037), sepsis (OR 1.90; 95% CI 1.08-3.34, p = 0.026), and revision surgery (OR 1.54, 95% CI, 1.28-1.85, p < 0.001). This group also had higher care utilisation including extended length of stay, non-home discharge, 90-day readmission, and emergency room visits (p < 0.001). An opioid holiday mitigated some of this increased risk as this cohort has baseline (i.e. same as opioid naïve) risk (p > 0.05 for all comparison).

CONCLUSIONS

Opioid use prior to revision THA is common and is associated with increased risk of postoperative complication. Given that risk was reduced by a preoperative opioid holiday, this represents a modifiable risk factor which should be discussed and addressed preoperatively to optimise outcomes.

Effect of State Legislation on Opioid Prescribing Practices After Surgery at a Pediatric Hospital

OBJECTIVE

As abuse of prescription narcotics continues to create a growing healthcare crisis throughout the United States, states have passed legislation designed to alter narcotic prescribing habits. West Virginia State Bill 273 limited the quantity of narcotics practitioners were able to prescribe. Our objective was to determine the effect of this bill on narcotic prescribing practices for pediatric surgical patients.

METHODS

A hospital-wide database at a pediatric trauma center was queried to identify all pediatric patients undergoing surgery between January 1, 2017 and December 9, 2019 and all medications prescribed to this cohort. Narcotic prescriptions written for these patients in the 2 months following surgery were isolated. The percent of patients receiving a postoperative narcotic prescription and the morphine milligram equivalents (MME) per prescription were compared before and after the law's implementation.

RESULTS

The number of pediatric patients identified as having surgery in the study period was 10,176; 6069 were before the law passed and 4107 were after. The percentage of patients receiving a narcotic prescription was 46.0% before the law was passed, decreasing to 36.8% after the law (P < .0001). Adjusted for age, the average MME of each prescription before the law's implementation was 104.0, which decreased to 79.2 after the law (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The amount of narcotic per prescription written for pediatric patients after surgery and the percentage of patients receiving a prescription decreased after West Virginia State Bill 273 was implemented. This law was associated with decreased narcotics written by providers, providing an example for future legislation targeting opioid prescribing and abuse.

Impact of an Asynchronous Spaced Education Learning Intervention on Emergency Medicine Clinician Opioid Prescribing

Introduction

Opioid prescribing has contributed to the opioid crisis and education has focused on improved opioid stewardship. We aimed to evaluate the impact of an asynchronous high-quality education to change emergency medicine (EM) clinician opioid prescribing.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of a spaced-education intervention in EM clinicians who work at an urban, university-affiliated academic medical center emergency department. We developed opioid prescribing educational content and investigated whether prescriber participation in a novel asynchronous educational program, QuizTime, was associated with a change in EM clinician opioid prescribing practices and whether those prescribing practice changes would be maintained. The primary outcome was the frequency of opioid prescriptions by attributable emergency department discharges. We compared the frequency during the post-intervention period, 24 months following QuizTime education (July 2018 - June 2020) to the baseline period (November 2016 - March 2018). The secondary outcomes were total morphine milligram equivalent (MME) and the number of tablets dispensed per prescription. We analyzed the outcomes by EM clinicians’ level of participation in QuizTime education.

Results

During the study period, there was an overall reduction in opioid prescribing per attributable emergency department discharge (p < 0.001). Among the 45 prescribers who enrolled in QuizTime, there was a significant reduction of 4.3 (95% CI: 3.9, 4.6, p < 0.001) opioid prescriptions per 100 ED discharges in the post-intervention period compared to baseline. Among the 11 non-enrollees, there was a significant reduction of 2.4 (95% CI: 1.7, 3.1, p < 0.001) opioid prescriptions per 100 emergency department discharges in the post-intervention period compared to baseline. The prescribers enrolled in QuizTime had a significantly larger reduction in prescriptions compared to those who did not enroll (p < 0.001). A decreasing trend of total MME and the number of tablets dispensed was observed (p < 0.001). However, there was insufficient evidence to show a reduction in the number of tablets dispensed or MME per day.

Conclusion

EM clinician participation in the QuizTime Pain Management educational program was associated with a nearly two-fold decrease in opioid prescriptions per emergency department discharge compared to peers who chose not to enroll.

Burden of preoperative opioid use and its impact on healthcare utilization after primary single level lumbar discectomy

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The complication profile and higher cost of care associated with preoperative opioid use and spinal fusion is well described. However, the burden of opioid use and its impact in patients undergoing lumbar discectomy is not known. Knowledge of this, especially for a relatively benign and predictable procedure will be important in bundled and value-based payment models.

PURPOSE

To study the burden of pre-operative opioid use and its effect on postoperative healthcare utilization, cost, and opioid use in patients undergoing primary single level lumbar discectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A 29,745 patients undergoing primary single level lumbar discectomy from the IBM MarketScan (2000-2018) database.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Ninety-day and 1-year utilization of lumbar epidural steroid injections, emergency department (ED) services, lumbar magnetic resonance imaging, hospital readmission, and revision lumbar surgery. Continued opioid use beyond 3-months postoperatively until 1-year was also studied. We have reported costs associated with healthcare utilization among opioid groups.

METHODS

Patients were categorized in opioid use groups based on the duration and number of oral prescriptions before discectomy (opioid naïve, < 3-months opioid use, chronic preoperative use, chronic preoperative opioid use with 3-month gap before surgery, and other). The risk of association of preoperative opioid use with outcome measures was studied using multivariable logistic regression analysis with adjustment for various demographic and clinical variables.

RESULTS

A total of 29,745 patients with mean age of 45.3±9.6 years were studied. Pre-operatively, 29.0% were opioid naïve, 35.0% had < 3-months use and 12.0% were chronic opioid users. There was a significantly higher rate of post-operative lumbar epidural steroid injections, magnetic resonance imaging , ED visits, readmission and revision surgery within 90-days and 1-year after surgery in chronic pre-operative opioid users as compared with patients with < 3-months use and opioid naïve patients (p<.001). Chronic post-operative opioid use was present in 62.6% of the preoperative chronic opioid users as compared with 5.6% of patients with < 3-months opioid use. A 3-month prescription free period before surgery in chronic pre-operative opioid users cut the incidence of chronic post-operative opioid use by more than half, at 25.7%. Cost of care and adjusted analysis of risk have been described.

CONCLUSION

Chronic preoperative opioid use was present in 12% of a national cohort of lumbar discectomy patients. Such opioid use was associated with significantly higher post-operative healthcare utilization, risk of revision surgery, and costs at 90-days and 1-year postoperatively. Two-third of chronic preoperative opioid users had continued long-term postoperative opioid use. However, a 3-month prescription free period before surgery in chronic opioid users reduces the risk of long-term postoperative use. This data will be useful for patient education, pre-operative opioid use optimization, and risk-adjustment in value-based payment models.

Mandatory Prescription Limits and Opioid Use After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background:

Because of the need for perioperative pain management, orthopaedic surgeons play an important role in opioid use.

Purpose/Hypothesis:

To evaluate the impact of opioid-limiting legislation on postoperative opioid use and pain-related complications after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The hypothesis was that the opioid-limiting legislation would reduce postoperative opioid use after ACLR.

Study Design:

Cohort study; level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent ACLR 1 year before and 1 year after Ohio's opioid-limiting legislation, which was passed in August 2017. Clinicians were prohibited from prescribing more than 30 morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) per day, with a maximum duration of 7 days for adults. The Ohio Automated Rx Reporting System database and patients’ medical charts were reviewed for prescriptions of all controlled substances (oral oxycodone, hydrocodone, morphine, codeine, tramadol, and hydromorphone) filled from 30 days before and 90 days after ACLR. The total number of postoperative prescriptions, total MMEs, the number of pills in each patient’s prescription, and pain-related complications (emergency department visits, office calls for pain control issues, unplanned readmissions, unplanned surgeries, and provider notes indicating opioid prescription refill demands) were evaluated.

Results:

A total of 243 patients (127 prelegislation, 116 postlegislation) were included in the study. There were no significant differences in demographics or preoperative opioid use between the study groups. The number of pills prescribed initially decreased by 34% after legislation (63.5 ± 16.7 [prelegislation] vs 42 ± 15.7 pills [postlegislation]; P < .001). Correspondingly, there was a significant decrease in total quantity of initial prescriptions in the postlegislation period (474.6 ± 123.8 vs 310.7 ± 115.3 MMEs; P < .001). The number of documented pain medication refill demands and pain-related complications did not increase in the postlegislation period (42 prelegislation vs 43 postlegislation; P = .514). Preoperative opioid use was the strongest predictor of opioid-refill demand (odds ratio, 4.19 [95% CI, 1.76-9.99]; P = .001).

Conclusion:

After the Ohio legislation was passed limiting opioid prescription, there was a significant reduction in opioids provided for patients undergoing ACLR. In spite of this decrease, no rebound increase in refill demands or postoperative pain-related complications were observed.

Standardization and Reduction of Narcotics After Pediatric Tonsillectomy

OBJECTIVES

(1) To measure caregiver satisfaction with a nonstandardized postoperative pain regimen after pediatric tonsillectomy. (2) To implement a quality improvement project (QIP) to reduce the number and volume of narcotics prescribed and to describe the effect on caregiver satisfaction.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study at a tertiary children's hospital examined postoperative narcotics prescribed to children following adenotonsillectomy. A QIP was implemented 3 months into the observation, with the goal to standardize nonnarcotic analgesics and reduce the volume of narcotics prescribed. Caregivers were called 2 to 3 weeks postoperatively to assess pain control and caregiver satisfaction.

RESULTS

Over an 8-month period, 118 patients were recruited (66 before the QIP, 52 after induction). Prior to the QIP, 47% of patients were prescribed postoperative narcotics, as opposed to 27% after the QIP (P < .05). There was a significant reduction in the volume of narcotics prescribed before (mean ± SD, 300 ± 150 mL) versus after (180 ± 111 mL) the initiative (P < .05). The per-kilogram dose did not change over the study time frame. On a 5-point Likert scale, there was no difference in the caregivers' satisfaction regarding pain control before (4.37 ± 0.85) versus after (4.35 ± 1.0) the project started.

DISCUSSION

A system shift was identified with the establishment of a posttonsillectomy pain control protocol associated with a reduction in prescribed narcotics without a significant change in caregiver satisfaction.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Implementing a standardized plan for the use of nonnarcotic medications was associated with reduced frequency and volume of narcotics prescribed. Future work will further standardize our postoperative pain regimen.

Significant Pain Reduction in Hospitalized Patients Receiving Integrative Medicine Interventions by Clinical Population and Accounting for Pain Medication

Background: Prior research has reported that integrative medicine (IM) therapies reduce pain in inpatients, but without controlling for important variables. Here, the authors extend prior research by assessing pain reduction while accounting for each patient's pain medication status and clinical population. Methods: The initial data set consisted of 7,106 inpatient admissions, aged ≥18 years, between July 16, 2012, and December 15, 2014. Patients' electronic health records were used to obtain data on demographic, clinical measures, and pain medication status during IM. Results: The final data set included first IM therapies delivered during 3,635 admissions. Unadjusted average pre-IM pain was 5.33 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.26 to 5.41) and post-IM pain was 3.31 (95% CI: 3.23 to 3.40) on a 0-10 scale. Pain change adjusted for severity of illness, clinical population, sex, treatment, and pain medication status during IM was significant and clinically meaningful with an average reduction of -1.97 points (95% CI: -2.06 to -1.86) following IM. Adjusted average pain was reduced in all clinical populations, with largest and smallest pain reductions in maternity care (-2.34 points [95% CI: -2.56 to -2.14]) and orthopedic (-1.71 points [95% CI: -1.98 to -1.44]) populations. Pain medication status did not have a statistically significant association on pain change. Decreases were observed regardless of whether patients were taking narcotic medications and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs versus no pain medications. Conclusions: For the first time, inpatients receiving IM reported significant and clinically meaningful pain reductions during a first IM session while accounting for pain medications and across clinical populations. Future implementation research should be conducted to optimize identification/referral/delivery of IM therapies within hospitals. Clinical Trials.gov #NCT02190240.

Intrapartum opioid analgesia and childhood neurodevelopmental outcomes among infants born preterm

BACKGROUND

There are concerns regarding neurobehavioral changes in infants exposed to parenteral opioids during labor; however, long-term neurodevelopment remains unstudied.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to examine the association between parenteral opioids used as labor analgesia and perinatal outcomes and childhood neurodevelopment until 2 years of age among infants born prematurely. We hypothesized that intrapartum exposure to parenteral opioids is associated with impaired neurodevelopment and adverse perinatal outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter, randomized controlled trial assessing magnesium for the prevention of cerebral palsy in infants at risk for preterm birth. Women delivering a singleton, nonanomalous, live infant before 37 weeks' gestation were considered for inclusion. Women were excluded if they had missing exposure or primary outcome data, were exposed to general anesthesia, or reported use of heroin or unspecified illicit drugs. Women reporting use of nonopioid illicit drugs such as cocaine and marijuana were not excluded. Groups were compared based on exposure or nonexposure to parenteral opioids (intravenous or intramuscular) used as labor analgesia. The primary outcome was any psychomotor or mental developmental delay at 24 months according to the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II. Secondary outcomes were the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II subdomains and adverse perinatal outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression models were performed and adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were estimated.

RESULTS

Of the 1404 women included, 535 (38%) received parenteral opioids as labor analgesia. Women receiving parenteral opioids were more likely to be younger, Hispanic, and present with cervical dilation ≥4 cm. Parenteral opioid recipients had lower rates of illicit nonopioid drug or tobacco use, a lower rate of cesarean delivery, lower educational level and were less likely to be undergoing induction. Women receiving parenteral opioids who underwent cesarean delivery were less likely to do so because of a nonreassuring fetal status. In the unadjusted and adjusted analyses, there were no significant differences in the primary outcomes of psychomotor or mental developmental delay at 2 years of age (adjusted odds ratio, 0.96; confidence interval, 0.76-1.20). The only significant difference in secondary outcomes was a shorter O₂ requirement duration in the parenteral opioid group (2 vs 4 days; P=.002).

CONCLUSION

Among a population of preterm infants vulnerable to neurologic impairment, intrapartum exposure to parenteral opioids was not associated with an increased risk for neurodevelopmental delay up to 2 years of age, nor did these infants have worse perinatal outcomes.

Sustained reduction in discharge opioid volumes through provider education: Results of 1168 cancer surgery patients over 2 years

BACKGROUND

An opioid reduction education program to decrease discharge opioid prescriptions was initiated in our Department of Surgical Oncology. The study's aim was to measure the results and sustainability of these interventions 1 year later.

METHODS

This prospective quality improvement project identified patients undergoing resection in five index tumor sites (peritoneal surface, sarcoma, stomach, pancreas, liver) at a high-volume cancer center. Patients were grouped into pre-education (PRE: July 2017-July 2018) and posteducation (POST: September 2018-July 2019) periods, before and after departmental education talks and videos in August 2018. Opioids were converted to oral morphine equivalents (OME) to compare the groups.

RESULTS

Of 1168 evaluable patients (PRE 646, 55%; POST 522, 45%), the median last-24-h inpatient OME was 15 mg in PRE patients and 10 mg in POST patients (p < .001). Median discharge OME decreased from 200 mg in PRE to 100 mg in POST patients (p < .001). The frequency of patients with zero discharge opioids increased from 11% to 19% (p < .001). This discharge OME reduction amounted to 52,200 mg OME saved, or the equivalent of 6960 5-mg oxycodone pills not disseminated.

CONCLUSIONS

A perioperative opioid reduction education program targeted to providers halved discharge OME, with sustained reductions 1 year later.

Evaluation of Self-medication for Management of Odontogenic Pain in Iranian Patients

PURPOSE

Analgesics (painkillers) are one of the most widely used medications to reduce and control pain. The objective of this study was to investigate the self-medication with analgesics (narcotic or non-narcotic) in controlling odontogenic pain in patients visiting dental offices, dental clinics, and the dental school of Kerman.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a descriptive-analytic study, conducted in 2018. The study sample included patients referring to dental offices, dental clinics and the dental school of Kerman. After obtaining informed consent, a questionnaire consisting of demographic data and questions regarding the consumption of different types of analgesics for relieving and controlling odontogenic pain and their impact on patients was given by the researcher to the respondents. The patients were asked to complete and return the forms. The questionnaire consisted of three categories of questions, including demographic data, pain characteristics (severity, aggravating factors, relieving factors, etc) and the drug used to relieve the pain. Pain severity was measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Mann-Whitney and chi-squared tests were used for statistical analysis in SPSS.

RESULTS

This study included 230 males and 351 females (male:female ratio = 0.66) in the age range of 18 to 71 years old (38.21 ± 7.45). 2.6% of respondents were illiterate and 11.3% of respondents were unemployed. The mean value of pain intensity was 6.21 ± 1.11 on a scale of 1 to 10. The types of drugs used for pain relief included 71.8% analgesics, 12.1% complementary medicines and 16.1% antibiotics. The most commonly used medication was NSAIDS, followed by acetaminophen codeine. In this study, the fourth most common medication consumed by patients as an analgesic was amoxicillin. Moreover, it showed that 44.3% (257 individuals) of study participants had used analgesics as self-medication to relieve odontogenic pain, of which 46.08% were males (N = 107) and 42.68% were females (N = 150). The gender of respondents, level of education, and occupation were significantly associated with the consumption of opioid drugs (p = 0.023, p = 0.041, p = 0.011, respectively). Consumption of opioid medications was not statistically significantly correlated with pain intensity (p = 0.115).

CONCLUSION

The factors affecting the appropriate use of medications are social, economic, cultural, and flaws in the health-care system of a society. This study showed that the medications used to reduce pain included analgesics, traditional drugs, and antibiotics. The rate of self-medication was higher among men and among those having a higher level of education.

Preoperative Analgesia, Complications, and Resource Utilization After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Tramadol Is Associated With Less Risk Than Other Preoperative Opioid Medications

BACKGROUND

Preoperative opioid use is known to be detrimental to outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This is concerning as multiple societies recommend tramadol for the management of arthritis. The purpose of this study was to determine if tramadol is associated with postoperative complications, increased resource utilization, and revision when compared with patients receiving nontramadol opioids (NTOs) and those who are opioid naive (ON).

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study using the Truven MarketScan databases (Truven Health, Ann Arbor, MI). Adult patients undergoing primary THA were identified and divided into 4 cohorts based on preoperative opioid medications (ie, ON, tramadol-only [TO], or NTOs; ±tramadol). Demographics, comorbidities, and 90-day complications were collected and compared between cohorts. Revision rates were compared at 3 years. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Finally, preoperative prescription patterns were trended during the study period.

RESULTS

About 198,357 patients, including 18,694 TO and 106,768 ON, were identified. Compared with ON, TO patients had similar rates of complications and revision surgery (P > .05) but had slightly higher emergency department visits (odds ratio [OR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.01-1.12; P = .027), readmissions (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.09-1.22; P < .001), and nonhome discharges (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.12; P = .010). TO patients had significantly lower odds of incurring most examined complications, including revision surgery, when compared with NTO (P < .05). From 2009 to 2018, the proportion of patients prescribed preoperative opioids decreased.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative TO is associated with less postoperative risk than NTO use and is similar to opioid naivety. Fortunately, the number of patients receiving preoperative NTOs appears to be decreasing. Our results support tramadol as an appropriate pre-THA analgesic.

Regional Anesthetic Blocks for Donor Site Pain in Burn Patients: A Meta-Analysis on Efficacy, Outcomes, and Cost

Background

Skin graft donor site pain significantly affects pain management, narcotic use, and hospital length of stay. This study is intended to evaluate the efficacy of regional anesthesia in the burn population to decrease narcotic consumption and to assess the impact on hospitalization costs.

Methods

PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and ScienceDirect were searched with the following inclusion criteria: comparative studies, adult populations, burn patients, autologous skin grafting, regional nerve blocks, and traditional narcotic regimens. Outcomes assessed included narcotic consumption, pain scores, and opioid side effects. Meta-analysis obtained pooled values for morphine consumption and side effects. Cost analysis was performed using published data in the literature.

Results

Final analysis included 101 patients. Cumulative morphine consumption at 72 hours was lower for patients treated with regional anesthesia versus patient-controlled analgesia (PCA; single shot 25 ± 12 mg, continuous regional 23 ± 16 mg, control 91.5 ± 24.5 mg; P < .05). Regional anesthesia decreased nausea/vomiting (P < .05) and lowered subjective pain scores. Regional anesthesia interventions cost less than PCA, single shot less than continuous (P < .05).

Conclusion

Regional anesthesia at skin graft donor sites significantly decreases narcotic consumption in burn patients. Regional anesthesia is cost-effective, decreases side effects, and may result in shorter hospital stays due to improved pain management.

Impact of pain and nonpain co-morbidities on opioid use in women with endometriosis

Aim: To evaluate impact of co-morbidities on opioid use in endometriosis. Patients & m ethods: This was a retrospective analysis of data obtained from the Symphony Health database (July 2015-June 2018), which contains medical and pharmacy claims information on 79,947 women with endometriosis. Relative risk (RR) of postdiagnosis opioid use and supply duration associated with baseline co-morbidities were determined. Results: Women with endometriosis using opioids at baseline were 61% more likely to receive opioids postdiagnosis (RR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.59-1.63). Risk of prolonged opioid supply postdiagnosis was highest for those with prolonged supply at baseline (RR: 21.14; 20.14-22.19), and was 1.32 (1.26-1.38) for patients with ≥1 co-morbidity, 1.37 (1.31-1.43) for pain co-morbidities and 1.07 (1.04-1.11) for psychiatric co-morbidities. Conclusion: Risk of opioid use after endometriosis diagnosis was greater in patients who used opioids before diagnosis. Risk of prolonged opioid use was greater if co-morbidities existed before diagnosis.

Shifts in Prescribers' Initial Postoperative Opioid Prescriptions Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Between 2014 and 2018

BACKGROUND

The opioid epidemic is a public health crisis impacting the practice of surgeons performing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Seeking to evaluate changes in prescribers' practices, we asked the following questions: (1) Have the initial discharge opioids following THA changed and (2) Have initial total oral morphine milligram equivalents (OME) prescribed following THA decreased since 2014?

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed discharge prescriptions for 4233 primary THAs performed between fiscal years (FYs) 2014 and 2018 throughout our healthcare system. Drug, dosing, and total OMEs were recorded. We categorized prescriptions into 3 groups: short-acting narcotics only, short-acting plus long-acting narcotics, and short-acting narcotics plus tramadol. Mean age was 59 and 63% were males.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients receiving tramadol increased from 2% (FY14) to 25% (FY18) while long-acting opioid prescriptions decreased from 44% (FY14) to 14% (FY18). Oxycodone (82%) was the most common short-acting narcotic. In total, we observed a 27% decrease in initial OME prescribed to a mean of 683 mg (FY18) (P < .0001). Short-acting only protocols had a 19% OME decrease to 589 mg (FY18). Short plus long-acting protocols haed a 23% OME decrease to 939 mg (FY18). Short-acting plus tramadol had an OME of 849 mg (FY18).

CONCLUSION

Despite a 27% observed decrease in initial OME prescription following THA, the 683 mg mean OME in FY18 was high. Substituting tramadol for a long-acting narcotic failed to have a dramatic clinical impact on decreasing OME. These data suggest that decreasing the number of short-acting narcotic pills is a critical factor in decreasing OME.

Comparison of 3 Surveillance Methods to Detect Potential Controlled Substance Diversion in an Academic Medical Center

Objectives: To compare 3 methods of detecting potential diversion of controlled substances (CS) by health care personnel from inpatient units in a large, academic medical center. Methods: Three different reports were retrospectively analyzed and evaluated to determine which employees are "high-risk" for diversion over a 30-day period using defined criteria. Reports were derived from automated dispensing machines (ADMs), purchased third-party software (TPS), and the electronic health record (EHR). The primary outcome was the percentage of employees in each report who were deemed to be high-risk for CS diversion (positive predictive value [PPV]). Secondary outcomes included the number of false positives and description of high-risk users on each report. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze differences between methods. Results: The PPV was highly variable between reports. The PPVs among the ADM, TPS, and EHR reports were 3.28%, 6.82%, and 23.88%, respectively. False positives were high among all reports (96.72%, 93.18%, and 76.12% for the ADM, TPS, and EHR reports, respectively). Conclusions: A report from the EHR has the highest PPV to detect high-risk employees who may be diverting CS. However, false positives were high for all reports, indicating that significant improvements are needed in the development of accurate and reliable software to detect potential and actual CS diversion.

Effect of Opioid Limiting Legislation on Postoperative Opioid Utilization in Patients Treated for Ankle Fractures

BACKGROUND

The state of Ohio implemented legislation in August of 2017 limiting the quantity of opioids a provider could prescribe. The purpose of this study was to identify if implementation of legislation affected opioid and nonopioid utilization in patients operatively treated for ankle fractures in the initial 90-day postoperative period after controlling for injury severity and preoperative narcotic usage.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 144 patients treated for isolated ankle fractures in a pre-law group (January 2017-July 2017; n = 73) and post-law group (January 2018-July 2018; n = 71) was completed using electronic medical records and a legal prescriber database. Total number of opioid prescriptions, pills, milligrams of morphine equivalents (MMEs), and nonopioid prescriptions were recorded. Multiple regression analysis was run to identify predictors of opioid prescribing after controlling for law group, demographic, preoperative narcotic use, and injury severity characteristics.

RESULTS

Mean MME prescribed per patient significantly decreased from 817.2 MME pre-law to 380.9 post-law (P < .01). Mean number of opioid pills prescribed per patient decreased from 99.1 in the pre-law group and 55.3 in the post law group (P < .001), respectively. Multiple linear regression analysis to predict the mean number of opioid pills prescribed was statistically significant (R 2 = 0.33; P < .001), with law group adding significantly to the prediction (P < .001). The multiple linear regression analysis to predict MME per patient was found to be statistically significant (R 2 = 0.31; P < .001), with the law group contributing significantly (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The Ohio prescriber law successfully contributed to the decreased number of opioid pills and MME prescribed in the initial 90-day postoperative period after controlling for injury severity and preoperative narcotic usage. Policies on opioid prescriptions may serve as an important public health tool in the fight against the opioid epidemic.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative series.

Opioid Prescribing and Use After Pediatric Umbilical Hernia Repair

BACKGROUND

Opioid overuse is a concern in adult and pediatric populations. Physician education may improve appropriate opioid prescribing and patient instruction for use. Prescribing and use of opioids for pain control after pediatric umbilical hernia (UH) repair before and after surgeon education was evaluated. This is a substudy of a multi-institutional study assessing prescribing practice before and after surgeon education. This study further assessed patient prescription filling patterns and parent report of pain control.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed evaluating children who underwent UH 6 months before and after an educational presentation on opioid use. Prescriptions, prescription fills, patient medication use, and pain control effectiveness were assessed. Adverse events were collected.

RESULTS

There were 78 subjects in the pre-education and 99 in the post-education group. Opioid prescribed changed from 98.7% to 61.6% (P < .0001), and nonopioid prescriptions increased following education (P = .0063). The number of opioid prescriptions filled decreased (P = .0296). There were limited data on opioid doses used and quality of pain control, but the post-education group showed good pain control. There was no difference in adverse events.

DISCUSSION

Surgeon education on the current opioid epidemic and strategies for opioid stewardship improves opioid prescribing and use without adversely impacting pain control or clinical outcome.

One-Year Post Hoc Analysis of Renal Function for Live Kidney Donors That Were Enrolled in an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway With Ketorolac

Background and Objective Opioid exposure is a concern after live donation for kidney transplants (LDKT). We previously theorized that an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for LDKT will reduce perioperative narcotic use. The aim of this post hoc analysis of merged data from two ERAS trials was to review the one-year follow-up to determine if the exposure to ketorolac versus placebo had any significant impact on long-term kidney function after LDKT. Methods One-year post hoc analysis of merged data from two ERAS LDKT, prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trials were combined involving a total of 72 patients undergoing nephrectomy for LDKT. Kidney functions of both the ERAS groups' versus placebo were compared prospectively and blinded at one year using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and total protein (TP) in the urine in compliance with United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) live donor requirements. Results There was no significant difference in postoperative eGFR at one year between ERAS and placebo groups. TP urine at one-year post-operative was significantly lower in the ERAS cohort by 4.7 mg/dl (95% CI 0.48 ~ 8.82, p = 0.025). Conclusions The ERAS groups' exposure to ketorolac did not negatively affect kidney function at one year after LDKT.

Medication-Assisted Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder in a Rural Family Medicine Practice

Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a cause of significant morbidity and mortality in the United States. Although efforts are being made to limit access to prescription opioids, the use of heroin and synthetic opioids as well as death due to opioid overdose has increased. Medication-assisted treatment (MAT) is the pairing of psychosocial intervention with a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medication (methadone, buprenorphine plus naltrexone) to treat OUD. MAT has resulted in reductions in overdose deaths, criminal activity, and infectious disease transmission. Access to MAT in rural areas is limited by shortages of addiction medicine-trained providers, lack of access to comprehensive addiction programs, transportation, and cost-related issues. Rural physicians express concern about lack of mentorship and drug diversion as reasons to avoid MAT. The prescribing of MAT with buprenorphine requires a Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) waiver that can easily be obtained by Family Medicine providers. MAT can be incorporated into the outpatient practice, where patient follow-up rates and number needed to treat to effect change are similar to that of other chronic medical conditions. We describe a case of opioid overdose and a suggested protocol for the induction of MAT with buprenorphine/naloxone (Suboxone) for OUD in a rural family medicine outpatient practice. Treatment access is facilitated by utilizing the protocol, allowing office staff work to the extent allowed by their licensure, promoting teamwork and minimizing physician time commitment. We conclude that improved access to MAT can be accomplished in a rural family medicine outpatient clinic by staff that support and mentor one another through use of a MAT protocol.

Opioid Use After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does Tramadol Have Lower Risk Than Traditional Opioids?

BACKGROUND

Preoperative opioid use has been shown to increase postoperative opioid use following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Tramadol is recommended for symptomatic treatment of osteoarthritis; however, it acts on opioid receptors and may confer similar adverse effects. The purpose of this study is to assess postoperative opioid use with preoperative opioid and tramadol use.

METHODS

Patients undergoing primary TKA were identified in the Humana administrative claims database. Patients were stratified by whether they filled a prescription for an opioid, tramadol, either, or neither within 3 months of TKA. Prescription claims were tracked for 12 months postoperatively and relative risk for each group was calculated.

RESULTS

In total, 107,973 patients undergoing TKA were identified. Preoperatively, 29,890 (27.7%) patients filled a prescription for opioids, 8049 (7.5%) for tramadol, 44,403 (41.1%) for tramadol or opioids, and 63,570 (58.9%) did not fill a prescription for either. At 12 months postoperatively, an opioid prescription was filled by 6.0% of preoperative narcotic-free patients, 35.2% opioid users (relative risk [RR] 5.83 [5.63-6.03]), 9.2% tramadol users (RR 1.52 [1.40-1.63]), and 29.5% opioid or tramadol users (RR 4.88 [4.72-5.05]). Opioid or tramadol prescriptions were filled by 7.7% of preoperative narcotic-free patients, 37.3% opioid users (RR 4.84 [4.70-4.99]), 26.2% tramadol users (RR 3.40 [3.26-3.57]), and 35.7% opioid or tramadol users (RR 4.64 [4.50-4.78]) at 12 months.

CONCLUSION

Patients taking tramadol preoperatively were found to be at lower risk for prolonged postoperative opioid use following TKA. Patients taking either narcotics preoperatively continued use of these medications at a higher rate than those who were not.

Accuracy of Patient-Reported Preoperative Opioid Use and Impact on Continued Opioid Use After Outpatient Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The opioid epidemic has created a national healthcare crisis, and little is known about the accuracy of self-reported narcotic usage in arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of self-reported opioid usage in patients undergoing outpatient arthroplasty.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on all primary unilateral arthroplasty procedures performed in 2018 at a free-standing ambulatory surgery center, yielding a cohort of 959 arthroplasties. Patient's prescription records were queried in the Ohio Automated Rx Reporting System for 3 months before surgery and minimum 9 months after surgery. These data were cross-referenced against the patient-reported preoperative use of narcotics. Three groups were evaluated: (G1) no preoperative narcotics, (G2) accurately self-reported on narcotics, and (G3) on narcotics but did not disclose.

RESULTS

One hundred fourteen patients (12%) were on preoperative opioids based on the Ohio Automated Rx Reporting System query, with only 35 of these patients (31%) self-reporting. G2 had significantly lower postoperative knee range of motion, Knee Society Pain score, Knee Society Clinical score, Knee Society Functional score, Harris Hip Score, and University of California Los Angeles activity scores than G1. Overnight stays occurred in 1.2% of patients in G1, 3% of patients in G2 (P = .5), and 6.3% of patient in G3 (P = .002). All aspects of postoperative narcotic use were significantly higher in G2 and G3 compared to G1. The relative risk for narcotic refill after 90 days in G2 was 4.6 (95% confidence interval 3.7-5.8, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients on preoperative narcotics did not disclose their use. Patients on narcotics preoperatively had significantly greater postoperative narcotic use including refills, total morphine milliequivalent, and risk of being on narcotics 90 days after surgery.

Youth Perspectives of Prescription Pain Medication in the Opioid Crisis

OBJECTIVE

To characterize current youth perspectives of prescription pain medication.

STUDY DESIGN

In total, 1047 youths aged 14-24 years were recruited by targeted social media advertisements to match national demographic benchmarks. Youths were queried by open-ended text message prompts about exposure and access to prescription pain medication, perceived safety of prescribed and nonprescribed medication, and associations with the word "opioid." Responses were analyzed inductively for emerging themes and frequencies.

RESULTS

Among 745 respondents (71.2% response rate), 439 identified as female (59.3%), 561 as white (75.8%), and mean age was 18.3 ± 3.2 years. Previous exposure to prescription pain medication was reported by 377 respondents (52.0%), most commonly related to dentistry (32.8%), surgery (19.2%), and injury (12.0%). Nonmedical sources of access to prescription pain medication were identified by 256 respondents (36.9%) and medical sources other than their doctor by an additional 111 respondents (16.0%). Three additional themes emerged from youth responses: (1) prescribed medication was thought to be safer than nonprescribed medication, based on trust in doctors; (2) risks of addiction and overdose were thought to be greater for nonprescribed medication; (3) respondents had a widely ranging understanding of the word "opioid," from historical to current events, medical to illicit substances, and personal to public associations.

CONCLUSIONS

Although youths are aware of the opioid crisis, they perceive less risk of prescription pain medication prescribed by a doctor, than from other sources. Policies should target education to youth in clinical and nonclinical settings, highlighting the risks of addiction and overdose with all opioids.

Opioid Use After Discharge Following Primary Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: How Much Are We Over-Prescribing?

BACKGROUND

The opioid crisis pressures orthopedic surgeons to reduce the amount of narcotics prescribed for post-operative pain management. This study sought to quantify post-operative opioid use after hospital discharge for primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of primary unilateral TKA patients performed by one of 5 senior fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons were enrolled at a single institution. Detailed pain journals tracked all prescriptions and over-the-counter pain medications, quantities, frequencies, and visual analog scale pain scores. Narcotic and narcotic-like pain medications were converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test with α < 0.05.

RESULTS

Data from 89 subjects were analyzed; the average visual analog scale pain score was 6.92 while taking narcotics. The average number of days taking narcotics was 16.8 days. The distribution of days taking narcotics was right shifted with 52.8% of patients off narcotics after 2 week, and 74.2% off by 3 weeks post-op. The average MME prescribed was significantly greater than MME taken (866.6 vs 428.2, P < .0001). The average number of narcotic pills prescribed was significantly greater than narcotic pills taken (105.1 vs 52.0, P < .0001). The average excess narcotic pills prescribed per patient was 53.1 pills. About 48.3% took fewer than 40 narcotic pills; 75.3% took fewer than 75 narcotic pills. About 3.4% did not require any narcotics; 40.5% required a refill of narcotics. Also, 9.0% went home the day of surgery.

CONCLUSION

Significantly more narcotics were prescribed than were taken in the post-operative period following TKA with an average 53.1 excess narcotic pills per patient. Adjusting prescribing patterns to match patient narcotic usage could reduce the excess narcotic pills following TKA.

Cannabis and Its Permissibility Status

Cannabis has been used and misused to treat many disorders. Δ⁹-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) are the most important components of cannabis and could be used for recreational and medical purposes. The permissibility (Halal) status of cannabis is controversial, and its rational use is ambiguous. Global awareness and interest in cannabis use are increasing and its permissibility status, especially for recreational and medical purposes, needs to be addressed. Rationalizing the scientific value and Halal status of cannabis is useful for the rational use and maintenance of the compatible system. It is rare in Muslim countries to discuss the permissibility status of cannabis from the perspective of its value and composition. Using the analogy concept, the CBD component extracted from a cannabis plant in a clean and pure form is permissible to use in industry, particularly in cosmetics and pharmaceuticals. If THC component is present in <1% and CBD is >99%, the mixture is considered permissible as long as THC is not intentionally added or intentionally left, but is mainly present due to the limited capabilities and efficiency of the purification methods. However, any amount of THC prepared with the intention to be used as an intoxicant is considered non-Halal.

Early Postoperative Improvement in Sleep and Pain After Carpal Tunnel Release

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common compressive neuropathy of the upper extremity. We sought to assess the subjective improvement in preoperative symptoms related to CTS, particularly those affecting sleep, and describe opioid consumption postoperatively. Methods: All patients undergoing primary carpal tunnel release (CTR) for electromyographically proven CTS were studied prospectively. All procedures were performed by hand surgery fellowship-trained adult orthopedic and plastic surgeons in the outpatient setting. Patients underwent either endoscopic or open CTR from June 2017 to December 2017. Outcomes assessed were pre- and postoperative Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), visual analog scale (VAS), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores as well as postoperative pain control. Results: Sixty-one patients were enrolled. At 2 weeks, all showed significant (P < .05) improvement in QuickDASH scores. At 6 weeks, 40 patients were available for follow-up. When compared with preoperative scores, QuickDASH (51 vs 24.5; P < .05), VAS (6.7 vs 2.9; P < .05), and PSQI (10.4 vs 6.4; P < .05) scores continued to improve when compared with preoperative scores. At 2-week follow-up, 39 patients responded to the question, "How soon after your carpal tunnel surgery did you notice an improvement in your sleep?" Seventeen patients (43.6%) reported they had improvement in sleep within 24 hours, 12 patients (30.8%) reported improvement between 2 and 3 days postoperatively, 8 patients (20.5%) reported improvement between 4 and 5 days postoperatively, and 2 patients (5.1%) reported improvement between 6 and 7 days postoperatively. Conclusions: The present study demonstrates rapid and sustained improvement in sleep quality and function following CTR.

Intrauterine Substance Exposure and the Risk for Subsequent Physical Abuse Hospitalizations

OBJECTIVE

To describe the relative risk for a physical abuse hospitalization among substance exposed infants (SEI) with and without neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS).

METHODS

We created a nationally representative US birth cohort using the 2013 and 2014 Nationwide Readmissions Databases. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes were used to identify newborns, predictor variables, and subsequent hospitalizations for physical abuse within 6 months of discharge from newborns' birth hospitalization. Predictor variables included newborn demographics, prematurity or low birth weight, and intrauterine substance exposure: non-SEI, SEI without NAS, and SEI with NAS. Multiple logistic regression calculated adjusted relative risks and 95% confidence intervals. A subanalysis of newborns with narcotic exposure was performed.

RESULTS

There were 3,740,582 newborns in the cohort; of which 13,024 (0.4%) were SEI without NAS and 20,196 (0.5%) SEI with NAS. Overall, 1247 (0.03%) newborns were subsequently hospitalized for physical abuse within 6 months. Compared to non-SEI, SEI with NAS (adjusted relative risks: 3.84 [95% confidence intervals: 2.79-5.28]) were at increased risk for having a subsequent hospitalization for physical abuse, but SEI without NAS were not. A similar pattern was observed among narcotic-exposed infants; infants with NAS due to narcotics were at increased risk, but narcotic-exposed infants without NAS were not.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that newborns diagnosed with NAS are at increased risk of physical abuse during early infancy, above that of substance-exposed infants without NAS. These results should improve the identification of higher-risk infants who may benefit from more rigorous safety planning and follow-up care.

Preoperative Depression Is Associated With Increased Risk Following Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The incidence of revision total hip (rTHA) and knee (rTKA) arthroplasty continues to increase. Preoperative depression is known to influence outcomes following primary arthroplasty. Despite this, it remains unknown whether the same relationship exists for patients undergoing revision procedures. The purpose of this study, therefore, is to investigate this relationship.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study. Patients undergoing rTHA and rTKA were identified from the Truven MarketScan database. Patients with a diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection were excluded. Two cohorts were created: those with preoperative depression and those without. We included patients who were enrolled in the database for 1 year preoperatively and postoperatively. Demographic and complication data were collected, and statistical analysis was then performed comparing complications between cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 10,017 patients undergoing rTHA and 13,973 patients undergoing rTKA were included in this study. Of these, 1305 (13.1%) and 2012 (14.4%) had depression, respectively. Multivariate analysis found that, after rTHA, preoperative depression was associated with extended length of stay, nonhome discharge, 90-day readmission, 90-day emergency department visit, prosthetic joint infection, revision surgery, and increased costs (P < .001). Similarly, following rTKA, depression was associated with extended length of stay, nonhome discharge, 90-day readmission, 90-day emergency department visit, revision surgery, and increased costs (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Depression before revision total joint arthroplasty is common and is associated with increased risk of complication and increased healthcare resource utilization following both rTHA and rTKA. Further research will be needed to delineate to what degree this represents a modifiable risk factor.

Outpatient narcotic consumption following total shoulder arthroplasty

Introduction

In the setting of the opioid epidemic, physicians continue to scrutinize ways to minimize exposure to narcotic medications. Several studies emphasize improvements in perioperative pain management following total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). However, there is a paucity of literature describing outpatient narcotic consumption requirements following TSA.

Methods

A single-institution, prospective study of patients undergoing primary TSA was performed. Preoperative demographics including exposure to narcotics, smoking history, and alcohol exposure were collected. The primary outcome was measurement of total outpatient narcotic consumption 6 weeks from surgery. Narcotic consumption was verified by counting leftover pills at the final follow-up visit.

Results

Overall, 50 patients were enrolled. The median narcotic consumption in the cohort was 193 morphine equivalent units (MEUs), approximately 25 (5-mg) tablets of oxycodone, and the mean consumption was 246 MEUs, approximately 32 (5-mg) tablets. Almost 25% of patients consumed fewer than 10 total tablets, with 10% of patients taking no narcotics at home. Multivariate regression found preoperative narcotic exposure associated with increased consumption of 31 MEUs (P = .004). Older age was found to be protective of narcotic consumption, with increasing age by 1 year associated with 0.75 MEU decrease in consumption (P = .04).

Conclusions

Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in general provides quick, reliable pain relief and does not require a significant amount of narcotic medication postoperatively. For most patients, it is reasonable to prescribe the equivalent of 25-30 (5-mg) oxycodone tablets following TSA.

A Review on the Antinociceptive Effects of Mitragyna speciosa and Its Derivatives on Animal Model

Mitragyna speciosa is a tropical plant with narcotic effects. The antinociceptive effects of its crude extracts, bioactive compounds and structurally modified derivatives have been examined in rodent models. This review aims to summarize the evidence on the antinociceptive effects of M. speciosa and its derivatives and explore whether they can offer an alternative to morphine in pain management. Methanolic and alkaloid extracts of M. speciosa were shown to attenuate the nociceptive response in rodents. Mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine offered better antinociceptive effects than crude extracts. Structurally modified derivatives of 7-hydroxymitragynine, such as MGM-9, MGM- 15, MGM-16, demonstrated superior antinociceptive effects compared to morphine. M. speciosa and its derivatives mainly act on the opioid receptor, but receptor subtypes specificity differs between each compound. The tolerance and adverse side effects of M. speciosa and its derivatives are similar with morphine. The affinity of MGM-9 on kappa-opioid receptor could potentially limit the effects of drug dependence. In conclusion, M speciosa derivatives can offer alternatives to morphine in controlling chronic pain. Structural modification of mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine can generate compounds with higher potency and lesser side-effects. Human clinical trials are required to validate the use of these compounds in clinical setting.

Multicenter study on the effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on postoperative pain after endoscopic sinus and nasal surgery

BACKGROUND

The taboo of avoiding nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) has been waning. The impetus to reduce opioid prescriptions in view of the opioid epidemic led the authors to change their practices to include NSAIDs after sinus surgery. This study's aim was to analyze the differences between patients before and after we began recommending NSAIDs after FESS.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was performed on patients undergoing FESS or other endoscopic nasal surgeries at 3 institutions, by 5 rhinologists and 1 facial plastic surgeon. Before introducing NSAIDs, all patients were given a prescription for hydrocodone-acetaminophen 5/325 mg and also recommended preferentially to use acetaminophen 325 mg. After the addition of NSAIDs, ibuprofen 200 mg and acetaminophen 325 mg were recommended preferentially, using the narcotic as a rescue medication. Patients kept a pain diary and medication log, and gave a visual analog scale (VAS) score for overall pain. Demographics, surgical variables, and comorbidities were also analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-six total patients were recruited and had data that could be analyzed (65 without NSAIDs, 101 with NSAIDs). Overall, mean pain VAS score was 3.12 ± 1.95 for the non-NSAID group and 2.33 ± 2.30 for the NSAID group (p value = 0.006). The day with the highest mean pain was the first postoperative day. The mean number of total opioid pills taken was 6.94 ± 6.85 without NSAIDs vs 3.77 ± 4.56 with NSAIDs (p = 0.018). Age and gender were found to be the only consistently significant patient variables to affect pain. There were no bleeding complications.

CONCLUSION

NSAID use was introduced into the practices of 5 practicing rhinologists and 1 facial plastic surgeon. No bleeding complications were seen. Both pain and overall opioid usage were reduced significantly.

Reduction of Opioid Use After Upper-Extremity Surgery through a Predictive Pain Calculator and Comprehensive Pain Plan

PURPOSE

For outpatient hand and upper-extremity surgeries, opioid prescriptions may exceed the actual need for adequate pain control. The purposes of this study were to (1) determine rates of opioid wasting and consumption after these procedures and (2) create and implement a patient-specific calculator for opioid requirements with a detailed multimodal analgesic plan to guide postoperative prescriptions.

METHODS

Patients undergoing hand and upper-extremity surgery at a single ambulatory surgery center were recruited before (n = 305) and after (n = 221) implementation of a postoperative pain control program. On the first postoperative visit, patients were given a questionnaire regarding opioid use and pain control satisfaction. Demographic and procedural data were collected via chart review. With these data from the first cohort, we developed a patient-specific opioid calculator and pain plan that was implemented for the second cohort of patients. Bivariate analysis and multivariable regression analysis were used to determine the effect of the intervention.

RESULTS

Pre-intervention data suggested that younger age; baseline opioid use; use of regional block; unemployment; procedures involving bony, tendinous, or ligamentous work (as opposed to soft tissue alone); and longer procedure time were predictive of higher opioid consumption. Pre- and post-intervention cohorts had similar age and sex distributions as well as procedure length. After the intervention, opioids prescribed decreased 63% from a mean of 32.0 ± 15.0 pills/surgery or 194.5 ± 120.2 morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) to 11.7 ± 8.9 pills/surgery or 86.4 ± 67.2 MMEs. Opioid consumption decreased 58% from a mean of 21.7 ± 25.0 pills/surgery (137.7 ± 176.4 MMEs) to 9.3 ± 16.7 (64.4 ± 113.4 MMEs). Opioid wastage decreased 62% from 13.8 ± 13.5 pills/surgery (62.8 ± 138.0 MMEs) to 5.2 ± 10.3 (24.8 ± 89.9 MMEs). Implementation of the pain plan and calculator did not affect the odds of unsatisfactory patient-rated pain control or unplanned opioid refills.

CONCLUSIONS

With implementation of a comprehensive pain plan for ambulatory upper-extremity surgery, it is possible to reduce opioid prescription, consumption, and wastage rates without compromising patient satisfaction with pain control or increasing rates of unplanned pain medication refills.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic II.

Postoperative Opioid Consumption in Opioid-Naïve Patients Undergoing Hallux Valgus Correction

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain management following orthopedic surgeries can be challenging, and the opioid epidemic has made it essential to better individualize opioid prescriptions by patient and procedure. The purpose of this subgroup analysis of a prospective study was to investigate immediate postoperative opioid pill consumption and prolonged use in patients undergoing operative correction of hallux valgus (HV).

METHODS

Patients undergoing outpatient HV correction procedures with 5 fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeons over a 1-year period were included. Patients were excluded if they were being prescribed chronic opioid analgesics for an underlying condition prior to the date of initial injury or if they underwent concomitant nonforefoot procedures. At the patient's first postoperative visit, opioid pills were counted, and these were standardized to the equivalent number of 5-mg oxycodone pills. Linear regression analysis was performed to determine if any of the procedure categories or patient factors were independently associated with postoperative opioid consumption. Prolonged use of opioids 90 to 180 days after the procedure was also examined using our state's online Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP). One-hundred thirty-seven patients (86% female) were included. Thirty-six patients (26%) underwent primary chevron osteotomies, 78 (57%) underwent primary proximal osteotomies (Ludloff, scarf), 10 (7%) underwent soft tissue-only procedures with or without a first proximal phalanx osteotomy (modified McBride, Akin), and 13 (9%) underwent first metatarsophalangeal arthrodeses.

RESULTS

Overall, patients consumed a median of 27 pills. There was no significant difference in postoperative opioid intake between the 4 procedures, including when subdivided into those with and without lesser toe procedures. Higher preoperative visual analog scale pain levels (P = .028) and younger patient age (P = .042) were associated with higher opioid pill consumption. A total of 1.5% of patients demonstrated prolonged opioid use.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated a lack of difference between HV procedures in terms of postoperative opioid consumption and an overall low rate of prolonged use in opioid-naïve patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, comparative study.

The prescription opioid crisis: role of the anaesthesiologist in reducing opioid use and misuse

Reports of strategies to prevent and treat the opioid epidemic are growing. Significant attention has been paid to the benefits of opioid addiction research, clinical prescribing, and public policy initiatives in curbing the epidemic. However, the role of the anaesthesiologist in minimising opioid use and misuse remains underexplored. For many patients with an opioid use disorder, the perioperative period represents the source of initial exposure. As perioperative physicians, anaesthesiologists are in the unique position to manage pain effectively while simultaneously decreasing opioid consumption. Multiple opportunities exist for anaesthesiologists to minimise opioid exposure and prevent subsequent persistent opioid use. We present a global strategy for decreasing perioperative opioid use and misuse among surgical patients. A historical perspective of the opioid epidemic is presented, together with an analysis of opioid supply and demand forces. We then present specific temporal strategies for opioid use reduction in the perioperative period. We emphasise the importance of preoperative identification of patients at risk for long-term opioid use and misuse, review the evidence supporting the opioid sparing capacity of individual multimodal analgesic agents, and discuss the benefits of regional anaesthesia for minimising opioid consumption. We describe postoperative and post-discharge tools, including effective multimodal analgesia and the role of a transitional pain service. Finally, we offer general institutional strategies that can be led by anaesthesiologists, identify gaps in knowledge, and offer directions for future research.

Benchmarks of Duration and Magnitude of Opioid Consumption After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Database Analysis of 69,368 Patients

BACKGROUND

Opioid prescribing after orthopedic surgeries varies widely, and there is little consensus establishing proper standards of care. This retrospective cohort study examines opioid prescribing trends following total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty and evaluates preoperative opioid use as a predictor of duration and magnitude of postoperative opioid use.

METHODS

Patients who underwent THA or TKA in a nationwide insurance database were stratified by preoperative opioid use. Naive, sporadic, and chronic users were defined as 0, 1, or 2+ prescriptions filled 6 months before surgery. Patients were excluded for readmission or subsequent surgery. Duration of opioid use was defined as time between the procedure and the last opioid prescription record, and magnitude of opioid use was defined as quantity of pills filled by 30 days postop.

RESULTS

Naive patients were less likely than chronic users to fill any opioid prescription after surgery (THA: 61.5% naive vs 90.4% chronic, TKA: 72.0% naive vs 95.9% chronic), and they obtained fewer pills (THA: 73 pills naive vs 126 pills chronic, TKA: 86 pills naive vs 126 pills chronic, 5-mg oxycodone equivalent). Between 10% (THA) and 13% (TKA) of naive and between 47% (THA) and 62% (TKA) of chronic users continued opioid use at 1 year postop.

CONCLUSION

Chronic users obtain more opioids postoperatively and continue filling prescriptions for longer than naive patients. This work benchmarks norms regarding opioid use and furthermore these data highlight the powerful effect of opioid exposure during surgery as 10%-13% of naive patients continued opioids at 1 year postop.

Effect of Preoperative Gabapentin With a Concomitant Adductor Canal Block on Pain and Opioid Usage After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background

An adductor canal block (ACB) and preoperative oral gabapentin have each been shown to decrease postoperative pain scores and opioid usage in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Purpose/Hypothesis

This study evaluated the efficacy of preoperative gabapentin on postoperative analgesia in patients who received an ACB. We hypothesized that patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with an ACB who utilized a single dose of preoperative oral gabapentin would have decreased pain and opioid consumption in the 24 to 72 hours after surgery compared with patients who did not utilize gabapentin.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Between January and October 2016, patients at a single institution who underwent ACL reconstruction and received an ACB were identified. Patients who underwent surgery before May 2016 were placed in the control group, and patients seen after May 2016 received a preoperative dose of gabapentin and were placed in the gabapentin group. All patients completed a pain log via a smartphone application to record pain scores and opioid usage after surgery.

Results

A total of 74 patients were identified: 41 in the gabapentin group and 33 in the control group. There were no significant differences between groups in demographics and operative characteristics. There were no differences in pain scores on postoperative day 1 (gabapentin vs control: 5.53 vs 5.56; P = .95), day 2 (4.58 vs 4.83; P = .59), or day 3 (4.15 vs 3.87; P = .59). The mean opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents was not different on postoperative day 1 (gabapentin vs control: 47.2 vs 48.1; P = .90), day 2 (29.9 vs 33.5; P = .60), or day 3 (17.4 vs 18.7; P = .80).

Conclusion

Preoperative gabapentin did not reduce pain scores or opioid usage in patients who received an ACB and underwent ACL reconstruction in this retrospective cohort study.

Opioid Prescribing Practices for Pediatric Headache

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the frequency of opioid prescribing for pediatric headache in both ambulatory and emergency department (ED) settings, including prescribing rates by provider type.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study of Washington State Medicaid beneficiaries, aged 7-17 years, with an ambulatory care or ED visit for headache between January 1, 2012, and September 30, 2015. The primary outcome was any opioid prescribed within 1 day of the visit.

RESULTS

A total of 51 720 visits were included, 83% outpatient and 17% ED. There was a predominance of female (63.2%) and adolescent (59.4%) patients, and 30.5% of encounters involved a pediatrician. An opioid was prescribed in 3.9% of ED and 1.0% of ambulatory care visits (P < .001). Pediatricians were less likely to prescribe opioids in both ED (-2.70 percentage point; 95% CI, -3.53 to -1.88) and ambulatory settings (-0.31 percentage point; 95% CI, -0.54 to -0.08; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Opioid prescribing rates for pediatric headache were low, but significant variation was observed by setting and provider specialty. We identified opioid prescribing by nonpediatricians as a potential target for quality improvement efforts.