Inner-ear decompression sickness in nine trimix recreational divers

INTRODUCTION

Recreational technical diving, including the use of helium-based mixes (trimix) and the experimentation of new decompression algorithms, has become increasingly popular. Inner-ear decompression sickness (DCS) can occur as an isolated clinical entity or as part of a multi-organ presentation in this population. Physiological characteristics of the inner ear make it selectively vulnerable to DCS. The inner ear has a slower gas washout than the brain thus potentially making it more vulnerable to deleterious effects of any bubbles that cross a persistent foramen ovale (PFO) and enter the basilar artery, whilst the inner ear remains supersaturated but the brain does not.

METHODS

A questionnaire was made widely available to divers to analyse the incidence of inner-ear DCS after technical dives. One-hundred-and-twenty-six divers submitted completed questionnaires, and we studied each incident in detail.

RESULTS

Nine (7.1%) of the 126 responders reported to have had at least one episode of inner-ear DCS, of which seven occurred without having omitted planned decompression stops. Of these seven, four suffered from DCS affecting just the inner ear, while three also had skin, joint and bladder involvement. Five of the nine divers affected were found to have a PFO. All affected divers suffered from vestibular symptoms, while two also reported cochlear symptoms. Three divers reported to have balance problems long after the accident.

CONCLUSIONS

This small study is consistent with a high prevalence of PFO among divers suffering inner-ear DCS after trimix dives, and the pathophysiological characteristics of the inner ear could contribute to this pathology, as described previously. After an episode of DCS, vestibular and cochlear injury should always be examined for.

The five-minute prebreathe in evaluating carbon dioxide absorption in a closed-circuit rebreather: a randomized single-blind study

INTRODUCTION

Closed-circuit underwater rebreather apparatus (CCR) recycles expired gas through a carbon dioxide (CO₂) 'scrubber'. Prior to diving, users perform a five-minute 'prebreathe' during which they self-check for symptoms of hypercapnia that might indicate a failure in the scrubber. There is doubt that this strategy is valid.

METHODS

Thirty divers were block-randomized to breathe for five minutes on a circuit in two of the following three conditions: normal scrubber, partly-failed scrubber, and absent scrubber. Subjects were blind to trial allocation and instructed to terminate the prebreathe on suspicion of hypercapnia.

RESULTS

Early termination was seen in 0/20, 2/20, and 15/20 of the normal, partly-failed, and absent absorber conditions, respectively. Subjects in the absent group experienced a steady, uncontrolled rise in inspired (PICO₂) and end-tidal CO₂ (PETCO₂). Seven subjects exhibited little or no increase in minute volume yet reported dyspnoea at termination, suggesting a biochemically-mediated stimulus to terminate. This was consistent with results in the partly-failed condition (which resulted in a plateaued mean PICO₂ near 20 mmHg), where a small increase in ventilation typically compensated for the inspired CO₂ increase. Consequently, mean PETCO₂ did not change and in the absence of a hypercapnic biochemical stimulus, subjects were very insensitive to this condition.

CONCLUSIONS

While prebreathes are useful to evaluate other primary functions, the five-minute prebreathe is insensitive for CO₂ scrubber faults in a rebreather. Partly-failed conditions are dangerous because most will not be detected at the surface, even though they may become very important at depth.

Analysis of recreational closed-circuit rebreather deaths 1998-2010

INTRODUCTION

Since the introduction of recreational closed-circuit rebreathers (CCRs) in 1998, there have been many recorded deaths. Rebreather deaths have been quoted to be as high as 1 in 100 users.

METHODS

Rebreather fatalities between 1998 and 2010 were extracted from the Deeplife rebreather mortality database, and inaccuracies were corrected where known. Rebreather absolute numbers were derived from industry discussions and training agency statistics. Relative numbers and brands were extracted from the Rebreather World website database and a Dutch rebreather survey. Mortality was compared with data from other databases. A fault-tree analysis of rebreathers was compared to that of open-circuit scuba of various configurations. Finally, a risk analysis was applied to the mortality database.

RESULTS

The 181 recorded recreational rebreather deaths occurred at about 10 times the rate of deaths amongst open-circuit recreational scuba divers. No particular brand or type of rebreather was over-represented. Closed-circuit rebreathers have a 25-fold increased risk of component failure compared to a manifolded twin-cylinder open-circuit system. This risk can be offset by carrying a redundant 'bailout' system. Two-thirds of fatal dives were associated with a high-risk dive or high-risk behaviour. There are multiple points in the human-machine interface (HMI) during the use of rebreathers that can result in errors that may lead to a fatality.

CONCLUSIONS

While rebreathers have an intrinsically higher risk of mechanical failure as a result of their complexity, this can be offset by good design incorporating redundancy and by carrying adequate 'bailout' or alternative gas sources for decompression in the event of a failure. Designs that minimize the chances of HMI errors and training that highlights this area may help to minimize fatalities.