RISK OF INTRAOCULAR INFLAMMATION AFTER INJECTION OF ANTIVASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR AGENTS: A Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis investigates the incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI) after intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor injections in neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed on Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central from January 2005 to April 2021. Randomized controlled trials comparing IOI after intravitreal bevacizumab, ranibizumab, brolucizumab, or aflibercept in neovascular age-related macular degeneration were included. Primary outcomes were sight-threatening IOI, final best-corrected visual acuity, and change in best-corrected visual acuity from baseline. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of other IOI events. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Overall, 11,460 unique studies were screened, of which 14 randomized controlled trials and 6,759 eyes at baseline were included. There was no difference between agents for the risk of endophthalmitis and retinal vascular occlusion. Compared with aflibercept, brolucizumab had a higher incidence of generalized IOI (risk ratio = 6.24, 95% confidence interval = [1.40-27.90]) and vitreous haze/floaters (risk ratio = 1.64, 95% confidence interval = [1.00-2.67]). There were no significant differences between comparators for other secondary end points.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in the risk of severe sight-threatening IOI outcomes between intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor agents. There was a significantly higher risk of generalized IOI after brolucizumab relative to aflibercept. Our results alongside other recent safety findings suggest the need for further investigation in the risk-benefit profile of brolucizumab for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Onconephrology: What Should the Internist Know About Targeted Therapy in Solid Tumors?

Advances in medical oncology has led cancer patients to live longer. Moreover, the field of molecular oncology is rapidly evolving, new therapies emerge, and drugs are approved quickly. This has led nephrologists to encounter new and partially unrecognized treatments of the targeted therapy agents with kidney adverse effects. These agents fall mainly into 2 categories affecting the vascular endothelial growth factor and endothelial growth factor pathways. This review covers the incidence of kidney disease induced by these agents, pathophysiologic mechanisms, and clinical presentation, and is the first to recommend an adequate management for each pathophysiology.

Regional Angiogenesis With Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Peripheral Arterial Disease

Background— “Therapeutic angiogenesis” seeks to improve perfusion by the growth of new blood vessels. The Regional Angiogenesis with Vascular Endothelial growth factor (RAVE) trial is the first major randomized study of adenoviral vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene transfer for the treatment of peripheral artery disease (PAD).

Methods and Results— This phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was designed to test the efficacy and safety of intramuscular delivery of AdVEGF121, a replication-deficient adenovirus encoding the 121-amino-acid isoform of vascular endothelial growth factor, to the lower extremities of subjects with unilateral PAD. In all, 105 subjects with unilateral exercise-limiting intermittent claudication during 2 qualifying treadmill tests, with peak walking time (PWT) between 1 to 10 minutes, were stratified on the basis of diabetic status and randomized to low-dose (4×10 9 PU) AdVEGF121, high-dose (4×10 10 PU) AdVEGF121, or placebo, administered as 20 intramuscular injections to the index leg in a single session. The primary efficacy end point, change in PWT (ΔPWT) at 12 weeks, did not differ between the placebo (1.8±3.2 minutes), low-dose (1.6±1.9 minutes), and high-dose (1.5±3.1 minutes) groups. Secondary measures, including ΔPWT, ankle-brachial index, claudication onset time, and quality-of-life measures (SF-36 and Walking Impairment Questionnaire), were also similar among groups at 12 and 26 weeks. AdVEGF121 administration was associated with increased peripheral edema.

Conclusions— A single unilateral intramuscular administration of AdVEGF121 was not associated with improved exercise performance or quality of life in this study. This study does not support local delivery of single-dose VEGF 121 as a treatment strategy in patients with unilateral PAD.

Transgenic delivery of VEGF to mouse skin leads to an inflammatory condition resembling human psoriasis

Gene therapy approaches involving vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) to promote therapeutic angiogenesis are under consideration for conditions ranging from ischemic heart disease to nonhealing skin ulcers. Here we make the surprising observation that the transgenic delivery of VEGF to the skin results in a profound inflammatory skin condition with many of the cellular and molecular features of psoriasis, including the characteristic vascular changes, epidermal alterations, and inflammatory infiltrates. Even longstanding psoriatic disease remains dependent on the transgenic VEGF in this model because it can be effectively reversed by the addition of VEGF Trap, a potent VEGF antagonist. Previous attempts to faithfully replicate the psoriatic phenotype through the transgenic delivery of epidermal keratinocyte growth factors or inflammatory mediators generated phenotypes with only partial resemblance to human psoriasis, leaving unanswered questions about the etiology of this disease. The ability of transgenic VEGF to induce a psoriasiform phenotype suggests a new etiology and treatment approach for this disease and further substantiates emerging concerns about possible proinflammatory adverse effects that might be associated with therapeutic attempts to deliver VEGF.

The VIVA trial: Vascular endothelial growth factor in Ischemia for Vascular Angiogenesis

BACKGROUND

Recombinant human vascular endothelial growth factor protein (rhVEGF) stimulates angiogenesis in animal models and was well tolerated in Phase I clinical trials. VIVA (Vascular endothelial growth factor in Ischemia for Vascular Angiogenesis) is a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intracoronary and intravenous infusions of rhVEGF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 178 patients with stable exertional angina, unsuitable for standard revascularization, were randomized to receive placebo, low-dose rhVEGF (17 ng x kg(-1) x min(-1)), or high-dose rhVEGF (50 ng x kg(-1) x min(-1)) by intracoronary infusion on day 0, followed by intravenous infusions on days 3, 6, and 9. Exercise treadmill tests, angina class, and quality of life assessments were performed at baseline, day 60, and day 120. Myocardial perfusion imaging was performed at baseline and day 60. At day 60, the change in exercise treadmill test (ETT) time from baseline was not different between groups (placebo, +48 seconds; low dose, +30 seconds; high dose, +30 seconds). Angina class and quality of life were significantly improved within each group, with no difference between groups. By day 120, placebo-treated patients demonstrated reduced benefit in all three measures, with no significant difference compared with low-dose rhVEGF. In contrast, high-dose rhVEGF resulted in significant improvement in angina class (P=0.05) and nonsignificant trends in ETT time (P=0.15) and angina frequency (P=0.09) as compared with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

rhVEGF seems to be safe and well tolerated. rhVEGF offered no improvement beyond placebo in all measurements by day 60. By day 120, high-dose rhVEGF resulted in significant improvement in angina and favorable trends in ETT time and angina frequency.

Angiogenesis of the heart

Despite continued advances in the prevention and treatment of coronary artery disease, there are still a large number of patients who are not candidates for the conventional revascularization techniques of balloon angioplasty and stenting, or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Therapeutic angiogenesis, in the form of the administration of growth factor protein or gene therapy, has emerged as a promising new method of treatment for patients with coronary artery disease. The goal of this strategy is to promote the development of supplemental blood conduits that will act as endogenous bypass vessels. New vessel formation occurs through the processes of angiogenesis, vasculogenesis, and arteriogenesis, under the control of growth factors such as those that belong to the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and angiopoeitin (Ang) families of molecules. Preclinical studies have suggested that such an approach is both feasible and effective; however many questions remain to be answered. This review will address the elements of pharmacologic revascularization, focusing on gene and protein-based therapy. The important growth factors, the vector (for gene therapy), routes of delivery, the desired therapeutic effect, and quantifiable clinical end points for trials of angiogenesis will all be addressed.

[Anti-angiogenic drugs probable complement in cancer therapy]

This review outlines the current status of anti-angiogenic treatment, with emphasis on clinical trials. In pathological growth, vessels become hyperstimulated and dysfunctional, due to overexpression of angiogenic growth factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Thus, various anti-angiogenic substances have been developed that neutralize VEGF; others aim to reduce the capacity of the cells to respond to this factor. In addition, substances that are inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases or agents that induce programmed cell death (apoptosis) of endothelial cells are being tested. Another class of angiogenesis inhibitors includes those that already are in clinical use but on other indications. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) in the USA provides information on on-going clinical trials, which are being conducted on patients suffering from different solid tumor diseases, such as cancer of the colon, lung, prostate and breast. For treatment regimens with anti-angiogenic substances it is important to consider the appropriate dosing and dose interval. The clinical trials have in many instances only recently been initiated and it is premature to predict the outcome, especially as patients in the trials suffer from seriously progressive disease that has previously been treated and found to be therapy-resistant. In many cases combination therapy with an anti-angiogenic substance together with radiation, chemotherapy or other types of conventional tumor treatment, appears promising.

Phase I study of direct administration of a replication deficient adenovirus vector containing the vascular endothelial growth factor cDNA (CI-1023) to patients with claudication

The long-term safety and efficacy of adenoviral delivery of growth factors in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is unknown. CI-1023 (Ad(GV)VEGF(121.10)) is a replication-deficient adenovirus encoding human vascular endothelial growth factor isoform 121. In this phase I trial, we investigated the safety and efficacy of CI-1023 in subjects with advanced claudication symptoms secondary to infra-inguinal disease. Eighteen subjects >35 years of age with a median ankle brachial index (ABI) at rest of 0.525 (interquartile range 0.4) and angiographic disease involving the infra-inguinal vessels underwent intramuscular injection of CI-1023 (4 x10(8) to 4 x10(10) particle units, n = 15) or placebo (n = 3). Eleven of 15 patients (73%) who received CI-1023 and 1 of 3 subjects (33%) who received placebo, completed 1 year of follow-up. Edema and rash were the most common early adverse event. One infra-inguinal bypass procedure occurred in each of the placebo and CI-1023 groups at days 29 and 104, respectively. One death (day 160) and 1 malignancy (day 274) occurred in the CI-1023 group. Conclusions on efficacy could not be made due to the small number of patients. However, there were encouraging trends in ABI at rest and peak walking time at follow-up.

KDR (VEGF receptor 2) is the major mediator for the hypotensive effect of VEGF

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) exerts vasodilation-induced hypotension as a major side effect for treatment of ischemic diseases. VEGF has 2 receptor tyrosine kinases, KDR and Flt-1. Little is known about which receptor mediates VEGF-induced hypotension. To elucidate the role of each receptor in mediating hypotension, KDR-selective and Flt-1-selective mutants were used for in vitro and in vivo studies. The KDR-selective mutant induced vascular endothelial cell proliferation comparable to VEGF, whereas the Flt-1- selective mutant had no effect on proliferation. Intravenous injection of KDR-selective mutant, Flt-selective mutant, or VEGF caused a dose-related decrease in mean arterial pressure in conscious rats. The hypotensive response to KDR-selective mutant was significantly less than that to VEGF (P<0.01) but was greater than that to Flt-selective mutant (P<0.01). Similarly, VEGF and KDR-selective mutant induced more potent vasorelaxation than Flt-selective mutant or placenta growth factor that binds Flt-1 only (P<0.01), and the vasorelaxation to KDR-selective mutant was not significantly different at low concentrations but less than that to VEGF at high concentrations. The results indicate that the vasodilation and hypotensive effect of VEGF may involve both receptors, but KDR is the predominant receptor mediating this effect. Because KDR-selective mutant induced proliferation and angiogenesis similar to VEGF but was associated with 36% attenuation in hypotension, the data suggest that the KDR-selective mutant may represent an alternative treatment for ischemic diseases.

Intraventricular infusion of vascular endothelial growth factor promotes cerebral angiogenesis with minimal brain edema

OBJECTIVE

Therapeutic cerebral angiogenesis, i.e., using angiogenic factors to enhance collateral vessel formation within the central nervous system, is a potential method for cerebral revascularization. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a potent endothelial cell mitogen that also increases capillary permeability, particularly in ischemic tissue. The purpose of this study was to assess the angiogenic and capillary permeability effects of chronic intraventricular infusion of exogenous VEGF in nonischemic brain tissue, because many patients with impaired cerebrovascular reserve do not exhibit chronic cerebral ischemia.

METHODS

Recombinant human VEGF(165) was infused into the right lateral ventricle of rats at a rate of 1 microl/h for 7 days, at concentrations of 1 to 25 microg/ml, with osmotic minipumps. Control animals received vehicle only. Vessels were identified in laminin immunohistochemical analyses. Capillary permeability and brain edema were assessed with Evans blue extravasation, [(3)H]inulin permeability, and brain water content measurements.

RESULTS

Vessel density was dose-dependently increased by VEGF(165) infusions, with significant increases occurring in animals treated with 5 or 25 microg/ml, compared with control animals (P h 0.01). Significant enlargement of the lateral ventricles was observed for the highest-dose group but not for animals treated with other doses. Capillary permeability was assessed in animals treated with a dose of 5 microg/ml. An increase in capillary permeability in the diencephalon was identified with Evans blue extravasation and [(3)H]inulin permeability assessments; however, the brain water content was not significantly increased.

CONCLUSION

Chronic intraventricular infusions of VEGF(165) increased vascular density in a dose-dependent manner. There seems to be a therapeutic window, because infusion of VEGF(165) at a concentration of 5 microg/ml resulted in a significant increase in vessel density with minimal associated brain edema and no ventriculomegaly.

[Growth factors for therapeutic angiogenesis in cardiovascular diseases]

Therapeutic angiogenesis based on the administration of growth factors with angiogenic activity allows enhancement of collateral vessels able to palliate insufficient tissue perfusion secondary to obstruction of native arteries. At present, this type of therapy is addressed to patients that fail to respond to conventional treatment (surgical or percutaneous revascularization). The most extensively investigated angiogenic growth factors are vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF). These cytokines can be administered either as recombinant proteins or as the genes encoding for these proteins. Both approaches have pros and cons that are under investigation in animal models and in clinical studies. Although clinical trials consist so far of small, often non-randomized series, preliminary results are promising. For example, administration of VEGF or FGF has been associated to objective evidence of increased tissue perfusion in patients with myocardial ischemia, and to a significant improvement of pain and ischemia in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Contrarily to expected, these interventions have been associated to scant adverse side effects, although larger clinical trials will be necessary in order to prove the safety and effectiveness of these interventions. Nevertheless, it seems clear that it is feasible to induce effective therapeutic angiogenesis in selected patients without significant associated toxicity.

Effect of human recombinant vascular endothelial growth factor165 on progression of atherosclerotic plaque

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to evaluate the impact of recombinant human vascular endothelial growth factor165 (rhVEGF) on atherosclerotic plaque progression.

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic angiogenesis represents a promising treatment for ischemic diseases. However, angiogenesis may impact atherosclerosis.

METHODS

Albumin or rhVEGF was administered by a single intramuscular injection (2 microg/kg body weight) to New Zealand White rabbits fed with a 0.25% cholesterol diet beginning three weeks before therapy. Subsets of rabbits from each group underwent perfusion-fixation and harvesting of the thoracic aorta for morphometric and immunohistochemical analyses at 7 or 21 days.

RESULTS

The mean plaque area was 15.75+/-2.28% and 22.00+/-3.24% with VEGF and 0.67+/-0.22% and 1.17+/-0.34% with albumin at 7 and 21 days, respectively. The plaque circumference was 13.00+/-2.58% and 23.75+/-2.86% with VEGF and 2.50+/-0.65% and 6.25+/-1.88% with albumin at 7 and 21 days, respectively. The maximal plaque thickness was 0.11+/-0.002 and 0.15+/-0.007 mm with VEGF and 0.04+/-0.009 and 0.07+/-0.003 mm with albumin at 7 and 21 days, respectively. The endothelial density (reported as percent total plaque area) was 31.75+/-4.42% and 63.00+/-8.45% with VEGF and 7.75+/-1.65% and 12.75+/-1.93% with albumin at 7 and 21 days, respectively. The macrophage density was 4.5+/-0.86 and 19.25+/-1.54 with VEGF and 4.26+/-0.75 and 6.00+/-1.08 with albumin at 7 and 21 days, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Recombinant human VEGF increases the rate and degree of atherosclerotic plaque formation in the thoracic aorta in a cholesterol-fed rabbit model.

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is one of the cytokines causative and predictive of hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) in stem cell transplantation

Hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) is one of the most serious complications in patients receiving stem cell transplantation (SCT). However, the cause of VOD remained to be elucidated. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has been reported to have various physiological effects including neovascularization and acceleration of vasopermeability. Because we postulated that VEGF could be one of the causative factors in VOD after SCT, serum VEGF levels were measured by ELISA in 50 patients receiving SCT. Six of the patients showed typical manifestations of VOD and four of them died due to VOD. The mean maximum serum VEGF level in the six patients with VOD was markedly increased compared to that in the patients without VOD (P < 0.001) and in normal controls (P < 0.001). Moreover, the mean maximum serum VEGF level in patients with VOD before conditioning chemoradiotherapy for SCT was also high compared to patients without VOD (P = 0.0012) in the same period. Similarly, serum VEGF levels were significantly higher in patients whose plasma protein C activities decreased below 40% (P < 0.001). During the clinical course of VOD after SCT, the increase of serum VEGF synchronized fairly well with the development of VOD. Since VEGF causes the expression of tissue factor on circulating monocyte/macrophages and results in hypercoagulability, our observation suggests that in the patients with VOD who showed high serum VEGF it might account for the development of VOD. Furthermore, this observation may indicate a novel therapeutic strategy for prevention of VOD.

AdGVVEGF121.10 (GenVec)

GenVec, in collaboration with Pfizer (formerly Parke-Davis), is developing AdGVVEGF121.10 (BioBypass), a gene therapy involving the 121-residue isoform of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), licensed from Scios, for the potential treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD) and peripheral vascular disease (PVD) [262000]. By March 2000, phase II trials in CAD had commenced [359531], [359532], [359538]. By August 2000, phase II trials were also underway for PVD [386293]. The initial phase II trial will include approximately 70 patients with severe CAD who are not candidates for bypass surgery and will assess exercise capacity and patient well-being, before and after treatment, as well as safety and drug tolerance [364137]. Scios licensed the gene transfer applications of VEGF121 to GenVec in June 1996 [263381]. In September 1997, GenVec entered into an agreement with Parke-Davis, a subsidiary of Warner-Lambert (now Pfizer), to develop the therapy [262000]. In May 1999, Warner-Lambert signed an agreement with Bioscience for a device for the administration of AdGVVEGF121.10 1325443]. In May 2000, Merrill Lynch predicted a US filing in the first half of 2003 [375962]. In January 2001, AG Edwards predicted the product would generate $70 million in revenues to Pfizer and $12 million in royalties to GenVec in 2005. In February 1999, GenVec was awarded US-05846782, covering vectors for targeting the transfer of therapeutic genes to specific tissues in the human body [316038].

Vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular permeability factor in the pathogenesis of primary effusion lymphomas

Primary effusion lymphomas (PEL), rare lymphomas associated with Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV or HHV-8) infection, present as malignant lymphomatous effusions in body cavities. We have recently found that PEL effusions contain high levels of vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular permeability factor (VEGF/VPF). VEGF/VPF, an important regulator of tumor-angiogenesis in vivo, exerts its effects acting through the receptors KDR/Flk-1 and Flt-1 on the endothelial cell membrane. In vitro, the PEL cell lines BC-1, BCP-1 and BCBL-1 produce high levels of VEGF. RT-PCR analysis of RNA from the PEL cell lines amplified the three VEGF/VPF secreted isoforms, VEGF/VPF(121), VEGF/VPF(145) and VEGF/VPF(165). Two of the PEL cell lines express the VEGF/VPF receptor Flt-1, but VEGF did not stimulate proliferation in these cells. SCID/beige mice inoculated intraperitoneally with BCBL-1 cells developed effusion lymphoma of human cell origin with prominent bloody ascites. In contrast, none of the mice treated with a neutralizing anti-human VEGF/VPF antibody developed ascites and effusion lymphoma. Although the precise mechanisms by which VEGF/VPF can promote vascular permeability are not fully understood, VEGF/VPF stimulation of vascular leakage may be critical to the pathogenesis of PEL.

Therapeutic interventions for enhancing collateral development by administration of growth factors: basic principles, early results and potential hazards

The importance of spontaneously developing collateral vessels to supplement perfusion of tissue rendered ischemic by vascular obstruction was recognized many years ago. However, it was not until potent angiogenesis factors were identified, purified, and produced in sufficient quantities, that the field began its rapid development. In the early 1990s it was first shown that basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) proteins could actually stimulate collateral flow. However, additional studies also demonstrated that the duration of exposure of the vessels to angiogenesis factors was critical, and that the administration of proteins, with their relatively brief half-lives, may pose important practical limitations. The demonstration that gene therapy can improve collateral function presents one of the solutions to the conundrum, since gene therapy can be considered a sophisticated form of a sustained delivery system. The results of several clinical trials have been reported. All involve administration of single angiogenesis agents, and most are Phase I trials. The two studies rising to Phase II status demonstrated no treatment effect on the primary end-point. It may therefore be relevant to consider that the molecular mechanisms responsible for angiogenesis are extraordinarily complex, and an optimal angiogenesis intervention may require a 'multiple factor' strategy. It is important to note that no serious side-effects ascribable to an angiogenesis agent were recognized in these trials. However, angiogenesis agents are potent molecules with multiple activities. It is therefore possible that they might occasionally cause side-effects, some serious. Among these, based on their biologic activities, are neovascularization of non-targeted tissues, expansion and induction of instability of atherogenic plaque, and growth of tumors. In summary, there is ample experimental evidence justifying an optimistic outlook relating to our eventually being successful in enhancing collateral flow to ischemic tissue in a clinical setting. However, we are not there yet, and identification of the optimal angiogenesis strategy is still unclear. Additional experimental work, in parallel with large, carefully controlled clinical trials are needed to continue the exciting advances of the last decade, and to achieve the goal of providing patients with alternative potent therapies to improve collateral flow, and thereby to alleviate their symptoms and perhaps to prolong their lives.

Simultaneous elevation in the serum concentrations of the angiogenic growth factors VEGF and bFGF is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a single-institution study of 200 patients

High serum concentrations of vascular endothelial growth factor (S-VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (S-bFGF) are associated with unfavorable clinical characteristics in cancer. The combined effect of S-VEGF and S-bFGF on the survival of 200 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) was studied. High S-VEGF and S-bFGF at diagnosis were associated with poor survival with the medians, the highest tertiles, or the highest quartiles as the cutoff values. The highest prognostic power was obtained when S-VEGF and S-bFGF were examined as a combination. Patients who had both S-VEGF and S-bFGF within the highest quartiles had only a 21% 5-year survival rate in contrast to a 64% 5-year survival rate among patients with both factors within the 3 lowest quartiles (P <.0001). Simultaneous elevation of S-VEGF and S-bFGF was associated with poor survival in different grades of lymphomas and in the largest histologic subgroup, the large-cell diffuse and immunoblastic lymphomas. S-VEGF (relative risk [RR], 1.83; P =.019) and S-bFGF (RR, 2.02; P =.0049) had independent influences on survival in multivariate models when tested together with the components of the International Prognostic Index (IPI). Patients with both S-VEGF and S-bFGF within the highest quartiles had nearly 3 times higher risk for death (RR, 2.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.56-5.40; P =.0008) than the rest of the patients. This RR was higher than the relative risks associated with any of the components of the IPI in the same model. The authors conclude that the combination of S-VEGF and S-bFGF is a powerful prognostic variable in NHL. (Blood. 2000;96:3712-3718)

Clinical trials in coronary angiogenesis: issues, problems, consensus: An expert panel summary

The rapid development of angiogenic growth factor therapy for patients with advanced ischemic heart disease over the last 5 years offers hope of a new treatment strategy based on generation of new blood supply in the diseased heart. However, as the field of therapeutic coronary angiogenesis is maturing from basic and preclinical investigations to clinical trials, many new and presently unresolved issues are coming into focus. These include in-depth understanding of the biology of angiogenesis, selection of appropriate patient populations for clinical trials, choice of therapeutic end points and means of their assessment, choice of therapeutic strategy (gene versus protein delivery), route of administration, and the side effect profile. The present article presents a summary statement of a panel of experts actively working in the field, convened by the Angiogenesis Foundation and the Angiogenesis Research Center during the 72nd meeting of the American Heart Association to define and achieve a consensus on the challenges facing development of therapeutic angiogenesis for coronary disease.

Evaluation of the effects of intramyocardial injection of DNA expressing vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in a myocardial infarction model in the rat--angiogenesis and angioma formation

OBJECTIVES

The effects of direct intramyocardial injection of the plasmid encoding vascular endothelial growth factor (phVEGF165) in the border zone of myocardial infarct tissue in rat hearts were investigated.

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists concerning the ability of VEGF to induce angiogenesis and enhance coronary flow in the myocardium.

METHODS

Sprague-Dawley rats received a ligation of the left coronary artery to induce myocardial infarction (MI). At 33.1 +/- 6.5 days, the rats were injected with phVEGF165 at one location and control plasmid at a second location (500 microg DNA, n = 24) or saline (n = 16). After 33.1 +/- 5.7 days, the hearts were excised for macroscopic and histologic analysis. Regional blood flow ratios were measured in 18 rats by radioactive microspheres.

RESULTS

phVEGF165-treated sites showed macroscopic angioma-like structures at the injection site while control DNA and saline injection sites did not. By histology, 21/24 phVEGF165-treated hearts showed increased focal epicardial blood vessel density and angioma-like formation. Quantitative morphometric evaluation in 20 phVEGF165-treated hearts revealed 44.4 +/- 10.5 vascular structures per field in phVEGF165-treated hearts versus 21.4 +/- 4.7 in control DNA injection sites (p < 0.05). Regional myocardial blood flow ratios between the injection site and noninfarcted area did not demonstrate any difference between phVEGF,165-treated hearts (0.9 +/- 0.2) and saline-treated hearts (0.7 +/- 0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Injection of DNA for VEGF in the border zone of MI in rat hearts induced angiogenesis. Angioma formation at the injection sites did not appear to contribute to regional myocardial blood flow, which may be a limitation of gene therapy for this application.

Delivery strategies to achieve therapeutic myocardial angiogenesis

The use of recombinant genes or growth factors to enhance myocardial collateral blood vessel function may represent a new approach to the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Proof of concept has been demonstrated in animal models of myocardial ischemia, and clinical trials are underway. Currently, it is unknown which is the safest and most effective delivery strategy to induce clinically important therapeutic angiogenic responses in ischemic myocardium. Most strategies for transcatheter delivery of angiogenic factors have used an intracoronary route, which may have limitations because of imprecise localization of genes or proteins and systemic delivery to noncardiac tissue. The effect of direct intraoperative intramyocardial injection of angiogenic factors on collateral function has been reported in experimental models, and angiogenesis is being studied after direct intramyocardial injection of angiogenic peptides or plasmid vectors during open heart surgery in patients. Catheter-based transendocardial injection of angiogenic factors may provide equivalent benefit without the need for surgery. Intrapericardial delivery of angiogenic factors may offer a theoretical advantage of prolonged exposure of either coronary or myocardial tissue to the administered drug as result of a reservoir function of the pericardium. In this article, we review the different modes of administration for therapeutic myocardial angiogenesis therapy.

VEGF gene delivery to muscle: potential role for vasculogenesis in adults

Constitutive expression of VEGF after implantation of genetically engineered myoblasts into non-ischemic muscle led to an increase in vascular structures. Previously, effects of VEGF delivery to adult muscle have only been reported in ischemic tissues. The resulting vascular structures were reminiscent of those formed during embryonic vasculogenesis, rather than angiogenesis, sprouting from preexisting vessels. Initially, VEGF caused an accumulation of endothelial cells and macrophages, followed by networks of vascular channels and hemangiomas with locally high serum VEGF levels. No effects were evident in adjacent tissue or contralateral legs, where low serum VEGF was detected. These data suggest that the induction by VEGF of angiogenesis or vasculogenesis may be dose-dependent. Furthermore, VEGF expression must be carefully modulated, as overexpression is deleterious.