Renin-Angiotensin System Modulation With Synthetic Angiotensin (1-7) and Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor-Biased Ligand in Adults With COVID-19: Two Randomized Clinical Trials

Importance

Preclinical models suggest dysregulation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection may increase the relative activity of angiotensin II compared with angiotensin (1-7) and may be an important contributor to COVID-19 pathophysiology.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of RAS modulation using 2 investigational RAS agents, TXA-127 (synthetic angiotensin [1-7]) and TRV-027 (an angiotensin II type 1 receptor-biased ligand), that are hypothesized to potentiate the action of angiotensin (1-7) and mitigate the action of the angiotensin II.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Two randomized clinical trials including adults hospitalized with acute COVID-19 and new-onset hypoxemia were conducted at 35 sites in the US between July 22, 2021, and April 20, 2022; last follow-up visit: July 26, 2022.

Interventions

A 0.5-mg/kg intravenous infusion of TXA-127 once daily for 5 days or placebo. A 12-mg/h continuous intravenous infusion of TRV-027 for 5 days or placebo.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was oxygen-free days, an ordinal outcome that classifies a patient's status at day 28 based on mortality and duration of supplemental oxygen use; an adjusted odds ratio (OR) greater than 1.0 indicated superiority of the RAS agent vs placebo. A key secondary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality. Safety outcomes included allergic reaction, new kidney replacement therapy, and hypotension.

Results

Both trials met prespecified early stopping criteria for a low probability of efficacy. Of 343 patients in the TXA-127 trial (226 [65.9%] aged 31-64 years, 200 [58.3%] men, 225 [65.6%] White, and 274 [79.9%] not Hispanic), 170 received TXA-127 and 173 received placebo. Of 290 patients in the TRV-027 trial (199 [68.6%] aged 31-64 years, 168 [57.9%] men, 195 [67.2%] White, and 225 [77.6%] not Hispanic), 145 received TRV-027 and 145 received placebo. Compared with placebo, both TXA-127 (unadjusted mean difference, -2.3 [95% CrI, -4.8 to 0.2]; adjusted OR, 0.88 [95% CrI, 0.59 to 1.30]) and TRV-027 (unadjusted mean difference, -2.4 [95% CrI, -5.1 to 0.3]; adjusted OR, 0.74 [95% CrI, 0.48 to 1.13]) resulted in no difference in oxygen-free days. In the TXA-127 trial, 28-day all-cause mortality occurred in 22 of 163 patients (13.5%) in the TXA-127 group vs 22 of 166 patients (13.3%) in the placebo group (adjusted OR, 0.83 [95% CrI, 0.41 to 1.66]). In the TRV-027 trial, 28-day all-cause mortality occurred in 29 of 141 patients (20.6%) in the TRV-027 group vs 18 of 140 patients (12.9%) in the placebo group (adjusted OR, 1.52 [95% CrI, 0.75 to 3.08]). The frequency of the safety outcomes was similar with either TXA-127 or TRV-027 vs placebo.

Conclusions and Relevance

In adults with severe COVID-19, RAS modulation (TXA-127 or TRV-027) did not improve oxygen-free days vs placebo. These results do not support the hypotheses that pharmacological interventions that selectively block the angiotensin II type 1 receptor or increase angiotensin (1-7) improve outcomes for patients with severe COVID-19.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04924660.

Telmisartan plus propranolol improves liver fibrosis and bile duct proliferation in the PSC-like Abcb4-/- mouse model

BACKGROUND

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease leading to cirrhosis and cholangiocellular carcinoma. Inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system or the sympathetic nervous system delay liver fibrogenesis in animal models.

AIMS

We investigated the antifibrotic potential of telmisartan, an angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist, and the β-adrenoceptor blocker propranolol in the PSC-like Abcb4 knockout mouse model.

METHODS

Sixty-five Abcb4 (-/-) mice were treated with telmisartan for 3 or 5 months (T) and with telmisartan plus propranolol for 3, 5, or 8 months (TP), or for 2 or 5 months starting with a delay of 3 months (TP delayed). Liver hydroxyproline content, inflammation, fibrosis, and bile duct proliferation were assessed; fibrosis-related molecules were analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting.

RESULTS

Compared to controls, telmisartan monotherapy had no significant influence on hydroxyproline; however, telmisartan plus propranolol reduced hydroxyproline (TP 3 months, p = 0.008), fibrosis score (TP 3 months and TP 8 months, p = 0.043 and p = 0.008, respectively; TP delayed 8 months, p < 0.0005), bile duct proliferation (TP 8 months and TP delayed 8 months, p = 0.006 and p < 0.0005, respectively), and procollagen α1(I), endothelin-1, TIMP-1 and MMP3 mRNA as well as α-SMA, CK-19, and TIMP-1 protein.

CONCLUSIONS

Telmisartan plus propranolol reduces liver fibrosis and bile duct proliferation in the PSC-like Abcb4 (-/-) mouse model, even when started at late stages of fibrosis, and may thus represent a novel therapeutic option for cholestatic liver diseases such as PSC.

Angiotensin II-mediated calcium signals and mitogenesis in human prostate stromal cell line hPCPs

Western blots and immunocytochemistry were used to detect angiotensin 1 (AT(1)) and angiotensin 2 (AT(2)) receptors in human primary cultures of the prostate stromal compartment (hPCPs). Immunohistochemistry was performed on human prostate tissue-embedded paraffin. In addition, pharmacological tools were applied in combination with photometry experiments to characterize the physiological activity of AT(1) and AT(2) receptors in hPCPs cell culture. A proliferation assay was used to describe the mitogenic activity of angiotensin II (Ang II) on hPCPs cells. Only the AT(1) receptor was detected in Western blot analysis. Immunocytochemistry of hPCPs cells showed that the AT(1) receptor is present in both the smooth muscle type and the fibroblastic type. In the stromal compartment of human prostate tissue, immunoreaction with antibodies against the AT(1) receptor was detectable.Fura-2-loaded hPCPs cells showed an instantaneous and linear rise in free intracellular calcium ion concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) after local perfusion with Ang II in concentrations of 10 nM. Removing of external calcium or emptying intracellular calcium stores before Ang II application diminished or abolished this [Ca(2+)](i) response. The response to Ang II was also diminished when hPCPs cells were perfused with the AT(1) receptor inhibitor losartan prior to Ang II application. No inhibition of the [Ca(2+)](i) increase was detectable after perfusion with PD 123319, a specific inhibitor of the AT(2) receptor.hPCPs cells were stimulated with Ang II in various concentrations over a period of 2 days. The subsequently performed proliferation assay revealed a mitogenic effect of Ang II on hPCPs in concentrations starting at 10 nM. This effect could be inhibited by losartan.

Challenges in improving prognosis and therapy: The Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination with Ramipril Global End point Trial Programme

Hypertension is one of the most important modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular pathology, such as atherosclerosis and cardiac left ventricular hypertrophy, including acute events such as stroke and myocardial infarction (MI). In particular, the risk of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke is directly and continuously related to high blood pressure levels. The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) plays an important role in volume homeostasis and blood pressure regulation. It also helps to prevent cell and organ damage from ischaemia during acute volume loss. However, angiotensin-II (A-II)--the main effector peptide of the RAS--also exerts a number of pathological effects, which are mediated by the AT 1 receptor. The Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination with Ramipril Global End point Trial (ONTARGET) programme consists of two parallel trials where ONTARGET as a large, long-term study compares the efficacy of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist, telmisartan, the renin-angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, ramipril and combination therapy with telmisartan plus ramipril for reducing cardiovascular and cerebral risk. Telmisartan, due to its long duration of action, compares favourably with other angiotensin-receptor antagonists. In the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) study, ramipril was shown to reduce the risk for MI and other cardiovascular events in patients at high risk for pathological cardiac events, but without heart failure or a low ejection fraction. The cardiovascular outcomes of high-risk patients using the same criteria as those of the HOPE study will be assessed in both trials. TRANSCEND differs from ONTARGET in that this trial will enrol patients who do not tolerate ACE inhibitors. This parallel study will therefore be able to compare telmisartan and placebo treatment. Both ONTARGET and TRANSCEND trials feature the same primary composite end point: death caused by cardiovascular disease, acute MI, stroke and hospitalisation because of congestive heart failure. The secondary end points will focus on reductions in the development of Type 2 diabetes mellitus, nephropathy, cognitive decrease and dementia as well as atrial fibrillation.

Stroke prevention with the angiotensin II type 1-receptor blocker candesartan in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension: the Study on Cognition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE)

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB) candesartan can reduce the risk of stroke in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH).

BACKGROUND

Isolated systolic hypertension is the predominant form of hypertension in the elderly, and stroke is the most common cardiovascular (CV) complication.

METHODS

In the Study on Cognition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE), 4,964 patients age 70 to 89 years were randomly assigned to double-blind candesartan or placebo with open-label antihypertensive therapy (mostly thiazide diuretics) added as needed to control blood pressure. Of the 4,964 patients, 1,518 had ISH (systolic blood pressure >160 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg). The present study is a predefined subgroup analysis of outcome results in the ISH patients.

RESULTS

Of the ISH patients, 754 were randomized to the candesartan group and 764 to the control group. Over the study period, blood pressure was reduced by 22/6 mm Hg in the candesartan group and by 20/5 mm Hg in the control group (difference between treatments 2/1 mm Hg; p = 0.101 and 0.064). A total of 20 fatal/non-fatal strokes occurred in the candesartan group (7.2/1,000 patient-years) and 35 in the control group (12.5/1,000 patient-years); relative risk (RR) was 0.58 (95% confidence interval 0.33 to 1.00), that is, a RR reduction of 42% (p = 0.050 unadjusted, p = 0.049 adjusted for baseline risk). There were no marked or statistically significant differences between the treatment groups in other CV end points or all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In elderly patients with ISH, antihypertensive treatment based on the ARB candesartan resulted in a significant 42% RR reduction in stroke in comparison with other antihypertensive treatment, despite little difference in blood pressure reduction.

Cerebrovascular protection and antihypertensive therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Our aim is to review the association between blood pressure and stroke and analyse data from randomized controlled trials involving diverse therapies, especially those regarding the renin-angiotensin system. In addition, an overview of stroke pathogenesis is given and its relationship with treatment action mechanisms reviewed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Stroke is a leading cause of death worldwide. In addition, many survivors of stroke suffer different degrees of disability. Because of the ageing of the global population, especially in regions of rapid economic growth, stroke will remain the second leading cause of death and in terms of disability it will be among the five most important causes in both developing and developed countries. High blood pressure is the most important risk factor for stroke, either ischemic or haemorrhagic, and established hypertension is the most prevalent modifiable risk factor. Data from controlled trials of blood-pressure-lowering treatment have demonstrated that treatment considerably lowers the risk of stroke within a few years of starting treatment. However, there exists controversy about the most efficient treatment regimen for primary and secondary prevention of stroke among the different blood-pressure-lowering treatments.

SUMMARY

Debate rages as to whether the benefits of treating high blood pressure are simply determined by the quality of blood-pressure control, or whether the choice of drug therapy adds or detracts from the expected benefits of blood-pressure reduction. The desirable future interventional comparative studies should consent to determine specific effects of drug classes on cardiovascular risk in the absence of the confounding effect of a relevant blood-pressure reduction that may counteract the potential blood-pressure-independent benefits of specific drug classes.

Effects of angiotensin II and insulin on ERK1/2 activation in fibroblasts from hypertensive patients

BACKGROUND

Insulin resistance, a frequent finding in hypertensive patients, leads to accelerated cardiovascular damage. It has been suggested that a crosstalk between angiotensin II and insulin signaling pathways may provoke insulin resistance, and may contribute to the development of cardiovascular damage. To identify a common pathophysiologic pathway between metabolic disorders and cardiovascular remodeling, we investigated the effect of angiotensin II and insulin on extracellular signal regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2), isoforms of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) involved in cellular proliferation and extracellular matrix deposition.

METHODS

Skin fibroblasts from normotensive subjects, insulin sensitive hypertensive subjects, and insulin resistant hypertensive subjects were cultured and used after four passages. The ERK1/2 expression and phosphorylation were measured by Western blot using specific antibodies, respectively anti-ERK1/2 and anti-pERK1/2. Expression of AT1 receptor for angiotensin II was determined by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction in real time.

RESULTS

The ERK1/2 were similarly expressed in skin fibroblasts from all groups; ERK1/2 phosporylation evoked by angiotensin II was significantly higher in fibroblasts from hypertensive patients in comparison to normotensive subjects, but the increase was observed only in insulin resistant hypertensive subjects. The effect of insulin on ERK1/2 phosphorylation was not significantly different in the three groups. Treatment with the combination of insulin and angiotensin II increased ERK1/2 phosphorylation to a greater extent in comparison to the single agonists in normotensive subjects and in insulin sensitive but not in insulin resistant hypertensive subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Angiotensin II stimulated ERK1/2 activation is increased in insulin resistant hypertensive subjects, and it may play a role in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance and accelerated cardiovascular damage.

Is the angiotensin ii type 2 receptor cerebroprotective?

Most of the deleterious effects of angiotensin II (Ang II) on blood pressure (BP), cardiovascular remodeling, and atherosclerosis are mediated by Ang II type 1 (AT1)-receptor activation. This explains why Ang-II-decreasing or blocking drugs have been successful in decreasing global cardiovascular morbimortality in patients with cardiac complications. However, in primary or secondary stroke prevention trials in patients with low cardiac risk, b-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), which decrease Ang II formation, seem to be less protective than thiazides and dihydropyridines, which increase Ang II. When compared with a beta-blocker, an Ang II-increasing AT1-receptor blocker better protects against stroke but not against cardiac events, whereas an ACEI gives the same protection against both cardiac and cerebral events. This dissociation between blood-pressure-independent cardiac and cerebral protection between b-blockers or ACEIs versus AT1-blockers in patients with low cardiac risk can be best explained if, besides the beneficial vascular effect of AT1-receptor blunting, there is evidence of a beneficial effect of non-AT1-receptor activation. In this review, we present experimental evidence for AT2- and AT4-receptor-mediated brain-anti-ischemic mechanisms and propose a direct comparison of AT1-blockers with ACEIs to prove the clinical effectiveness of non-AT1-mediated mechanisms in stroke prevention, particularly in patients with a higher risk for stroke than for cardiac complications.

Potential renoprotective effects of the angiotensin receptor blocker eprosartan: a review of preliminary renal studies

The importance of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) in the pathogenesis of hypertension and in renal disease, particularly in patients with diabetes, has become increasingly evident. Pharmacological blockade of the RAAS offers potential for the therapeutic management of these pathologies. Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II (AII) receptor blockers have been shown to exhibit effectiveness in the treatment of hypertension. AII receptor blockers have a renal protective effect owing to their ability to reduce systemic blood and intraglomerular pressures. Eprosartan is a chemically distinct AII blocker, which displays a dual mode of action whereby it blocks both pre- and postsynaptic AT(1) receptors, potentially benefiting patients with hypertension and renal disease. In addition, evidence suggests that eprosartan is well tolerated by both healthy subjects and patients with varying degree of renal impairment, such that the dose does not need to be modified in patients with mild to moderate renal impairment. Results from preliminary studies demonstrates that eprosartan doses will below those required for blood pressure control have a pronounced effect on the kidney and do not compromise renal autoregulatory mechanisms. Therefore, eprosartan may have a benefit in the prevention or delay of renal damage in hypertensive patients with renal impairment, although this remains to be determined in a clinical setting.

Eprosartan effect on fibrinolytic/hemostatic variables in arterial hypertension: a comparative study to losartan

Essential hypertension is often accompanied by abnormalities of the coagulation/fibrinolytic system predisposing to a procoagulant state. The aim of the present study was to examine the comparative efficacy of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists eprosartan and losartan on plasma levels of hemostatic/fibrinolytic and endothelial function markers in a cohort of previously untreated hypertensive patients. A total of 86 patients whose hypertension was controlled by monotherapy with eprosartan 600 mg (45 patients) or losartan 100 mg (41 patients) were studied. The plasma levels of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) antigen, tissue plasminogen activator inhibitor (tPA) antigen, thrombomodulin (TM), tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) antigen, and fibrinogen were determined before and after 6 months of therapy. Age, sex distribution, body mass index, lipid profile, systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels, and baseline values of the measured markers were similar in both groups. After 6 months of therapy, systolic blood pressure was significantly lower in patients treated with eprosartan, while no differences were observed with respect to diastolic blood pressure. Treatment with both drugs was associated with a significant decrease in PAI-1 antigen, TM, fibrinogen plasma levels and an increase in tPA antigen. The favorable modification of all the above parameters was significantly greater in the eprosartan than in the losartan group, while TFPI plasma levels were decreased to a similar extent with both drugs. In conclusion, the results of our study indicate that 6-month monotherapy with a new angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker, eprosartan, is associated with a more favorable modification of hemostatic/fibrinolytic status than with losartan.

AT1-receptor blockade and sympathetic neurotransmission in cardiovascular disease

1. The present survey is dealing with the interactions between the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) in various organs and tissues, with an emphasis on the angiotensin AT-receptors located at the sympathetic nerve endings. 2. Angiotensin II, the main effector of the RAAS is known to stimulate sympathetic nerve traffic and its sequelae in numerous organs and tissues, such as the central nervous system, the adrenal medulla, the sympathetic ganglia and the sympathetic nerve endings. These stimulatory effects are mediated by AT(1)-receptors and counteracted by AT(1)-receptor antagonists. 3. Sympatho-inhibition at the level of the sympathetic nerve ending appears to be a class effect of the AT(1)-receptor blockers, mediated by presynaptic AT(1)-receptors. With respect to the ratio pre-/postsynaptic AT(1)-receptor antagonism important quantitative differences between the various compounds were found. 4. Both the pre- and postjunctional receptors at the sympathetic nerve endings belong to the AT(1)-receptor population. However, the presynaptic receptors belong to the AT(1B)-subtype, whereas the postjunctional receptors probably belong to a different AT(1)-receptor subpopulation. 5. Sympatho-inhibition is a class effect of the AT(1)-receptor antagonists. In conditions in which the SNS plays a pathophysiological role, such as hypertension and congestive heart failure, this property may well be of therapeutic relevance.

Clinical studies on the blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system

The clinical value of inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system (RAAS) in heart failure has clearly been documented for the ACE-inhibitors as well as for the angiotensin-I-receptor blocker (AT1) by extensive intervention studies (AIRE, CONSENSUS, SAVE, ELITE II, ValHeFT and others). The additional specific vascular and renal protection, acting beyond the lowering of blood pressure, has been investigated in the past years in numerous studies in patients with arterial hypertension, often accompanied by diabetes mellitus type II. Whereas for nephroprotection, especially also in additionally present diabetes mellitus type II, study results clearly support the assumption of additional protective effects, which exceed the purely blood-pressure lowering effect; the data available for vascular protection (coronary and cerebral vessels) are insufficient.

AT1-receptor blockade in experimental myocardial ischemia/reperfusion

The renin-angiotensin system is activated during myocardial ischemia, and angiotensin II is locally formed in ischemic hearts. At least four angiotensin II receptor subtypes have been identified, the AT1- and the AT2-receptor being the most prominent in the cardiovascular system. AT1-receptor blockade--like inhibition of the angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE)--limits infarct size, improves functional recovery following myocardial ischemia and attenuates ventricular remodeling, post-myocardial infarction and the resulting development of heart failure. The potential mechanisms responsible for the cardioprotection by AT1-receptor blockade remain to be elucidated in detail, but appear to involve AT2-receptor activation and--like ACE-inhibitors--bradykinin and prostaglandins. Combined treatment with ACE-inhibitors and AT1-receptor blockers has the potential to further reduce infarct size and improve ventricular remodeling over each monotherapy alone.

Eprosartan for the treatment of hypertension

Antihypertensive agents are proven to reduce the cardiovascular risk of stroke, coronary heart disease and cardiac failure. The ideal antihypertensive agent should control all grades of hypertension and have a placebo-like side effect profile. Angiotensin II (AII) receptor antagonists are a relatively new class of antihypertensive agent that block AII Type 1 (AT(1)) receptors, and reduce the pressor effects of AII in the vasculature. By this mechanism, they induce similar pharmacological effects compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, resulting in a lowering of blood pressure. However, AII receptor blockers differ from ACE inhibitors with respect to side effects, and induce less cough, a side effect which may be related to bradykinin or other mediators such as substance P. Within the class of AII blockers, eprosartan differs from other currently available agents in terms of chemical structure, as it is a non-biphenyl, non-tetrazole, non-peptide antagonist with a dual pharmacological mode of action. Eprosartan acts at vascular AT(1) receptors (postsynaptically) and at presynaptic AT(1) receptors, where it inhibits sympathetically stimulated noradrenaline release. Its lack of metabolism by cytochrome P450 enzymes confers a low potential for metabolic drug interactions and may be of importance when treating elderly patients and those on multiple drugs. In clinical trials, eprosartan has been demonstrated to be at least as effective in reducing blood pressure as the ACE inhibitor enalapril, and has significantly lower side effects. Eprosartan is safe, effective and well-tolerated in long-term treatment, either as a monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensive drugs such as hydrochlorothiazide.