Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Exploring Plastic Surgeon Practice Patterns and Perspectives

BACKGROUND

Within the multidisciplinary management of breast cancer, variations exist in the reconstructive options offered and care provided. The authors evaluated plastic surgeon perspectives on important issues related to breast cancer management and reconstruction and provide some insight into factors that influence these perspectives.

METHODS

Women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer (stages 0 to II) between July of 2013 and September of 2014 were identified through the Georgia and Los Angeles Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries. These women were surveyed and identified their treating plastic surgeons. Surveys were sent to the identified plastic surgeons to collect data on specific reconstruction practices.

RESULTS

Responses from 134 plastic surgeons (74.4 percent response rate) were received. Immediate reconstruction (79.7 percent) was the most common approach to timing, and expander/implant reconstruction (72.6 percent) was the most common technique reported. Nearly one-third of respondents (32.1 percent) reported that reimbursement influenced the proportion of autologous reconstructions performed. Most (82.8 percent) reported that discussions about contralateral prophylactic mastectomy were initiated by patients. Most surgeons (81.3 to 84.3 percent) felt that good symmetry is achieved with unilateral autologous reconstruction with contralateral symmetry procedures in patients with small or large breasts; a less pronounced majority (62.7 percent) favored unilateral implant reconstructions in patients with large breasts. In patients requiring postmastectomy radiation therapy, one-fourth of the surgeons (27.6 percent) reported that they seldom recommend delayed reconstruction, and 64.9 percent reported recommending immediate expander/implant reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

Reconstructive practices in a modern cohort of plastic surgeons suggest that immediate and implant reconstructions are performed preferentially. Respondents perceived a number of factors, including surgeon training, time spent in the operating room, and insurance reimbursement, to negatively influence the performance of autologous reconstruction.

Free Versus Pedicled TRAM Flaps: Cost Utilization and Complications

INTRODUCTION

Conventionally, free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (fTRAM) flap breast reconstruction has been associated with decreased donor site morbidity and improved flap inset. However, clinical success depends upon more sophisticated technical expertise and facilities. This study aims to characterize postoperative outcomes undergoing free versus pedicled TRAM (pTRAM) flap breast reconstruction.

METHODS

Nationwide inpatient sample database (2008-2011) was reviewed for cases of fTRAM (ICD-9-CM 85.73) and pTRAM (85.72) breast reconstruction. Inclusion criteria were females undergoing pTRAM or fTRAM breast reconstruction; males were excluded. We examined demographics, hospital setting, insurance information, patient income, and comorbidities. Clinical endpoints included postoperative complications, length-of-stay (LOS), and total charges (TC). Bivariate/multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors associated with increased complications and resource utilization.

RESULTS

Overall, 21,655 cases were captured. Seventy-percent were Caucasian, 95 % insured, and 72 % treated in an urban teaching hospital. There were 9 pTRAM and 6 fTRAM in-hospital mortalities. On bivariate analysis, the fTRAM cohort was more likely to be obese (OR 1.2), undergo revision (OR 5.9), require hemorrhage control (OR 5.7), suffer hematoma complications (OR 1.9), or wound infection (OR 1.8) (p < 0.003). The pTRAM cohort was more likely to suffer pneumonia (OR 1.6) and pulmonary embolism (OR 2.0) (p < 0.004). Reconstruction type did not affect risk of flap loss or seroma occurrence. TC were higher with fTRAM (p < 0.001). LOS was not affected by procedure type. On risk-adjusted multivariate analysis, fTRAM was an independent risk factor for increased LOS (OR 1.6), TC (OR 1.8), and postoperative complications (OR 1.3) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Free TRAM has an increased risk of postoperative complications and resource utilization versus pTRAM on the current largest risk-adjusted analysis. Further analyses are required to elucidate additional factors influencing outcomes following these procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the A3 online Instructions to Authors. www.springer.com/00266 .

Free Tissue Transfer versus Pedicled Flap Cost in Head and Neck Cancer

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the overall 1-year management costs for patients receiving a free tissue transfer with those of patients receiving a pedicled flap reconstruction as a component of their primary head and neck cancer treatment.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Case-control, cost identification analysis of 21 matched pairs of patients and multivariate analysis of variables associated with treatment costs was conducted in a tertiary referral academic institution.

RESULTS: No significant difference in total 1-year charges between the pedicled and free tissue transfer groups was found. A structured measure of patient comorbidity was the only variable significantly associated with total 1-year charges.

CONCLUSIONS: Total 1-year treatment costs of primary upper aerodigestive tract cancers are similar for patients reconstructed with free tissue transfer or a pedicled flap.

SIGNIFICANCE: Within the context of overall 1-year management costs, the primary determinants of health care expense for these patients are comorbidity and extent of disease, not reconstructive technique.

Reimbursement for tissue reconstruction by pedicled and free flaps across five European countries. The importance of autologous breast reconstruction

AIM

Case payment mechanisms have become the principle means of remunerating hospitals in many countries. We analysed the reimbursement for different types of autologous tissue transfer in five European countries.

METHODS

We looked at common surgical options for breast reconstruction and flaps at other body regions. The principle diagnosis was systematically modified and processed with national grouper software to identify the relevant Diagnosis-Related Groups.

RESULTS

The mean difference in payment was 4509 € in breast reconstruction versus only 2599 € in other locations. According to the underlying diagnosis for reconstruction, procedures after resection of malignant breast cancer showed higher reimbursement (mean 8319 €) than of other body parts (mean 6454 €). Sweden had the highest mean reimbursement (9589 €) followed by Austria (8032 €), Germany (7259 €), Italy (6667 €) and the UK (6037 €). Austria, Italy and the UK showed significant differences of reimbursement between pedicled flaps of the breast and other parts of the body.

CONCLUSION

International data for the benchmarking and refinement of a national compensation system can be a useful instrument in identifying ways of improving each system. Across a spectrum of European countries, reimbursement for the reconstruction of the breast and other body parts was analysed and characteristics were identified. As rationalisation of healthcare becomes widespread in European countries, the need for individualised reimbursement which correlates accordingly is becoming ever more important.

Use of tissue sealant for day surgery parotidectomy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the use of tissue sealant in facilitating day surgery parotidectomy without the use of surgical drains and to consider the potential economic benefit using this technique.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective cohort study of 21 patients undergoing parotidectomy for nonmalignant disease in a university hospital. Surgery as a day procedure without the use of surgical drains was planned. The costs associated with parotidectomy, including the use of tissue sealant and its delivery system, versus in-patient admission with a drain were calculated and compared.

METHODS AND OUTCOME MEASURES

Parotidectomy was undertaken by one surgeon. Prior to wound closure, the skin flap and wound bed were approximated using Tisseel tissue sealant (Baxter Corp., Mississauga, ON). Data regarding the costs of the tissue sealant, the delivery system, and hospital in-patient stay were obtained to enable an economic comparison. Patients were followed to assess surgical outcome and document any complications.

RESULTS

There were no major surgical complications. One patient required admission for control of postoperative nausea. None of the patients felt that discharge had been premature. The estimated cost advantage of this technique applied to institutions in Canada was $1,775 per case.

CONCLUSIONS

Parotidectomy can be undertaken safely in a day surgery setting without the need for surgical drains. The increased cost associated with the use of tissue sealant compared with surgical drains is greatly overshadowed by the economic advantage of undertaking day surgery. There is a significant potential cost saving to the health care system.

Postoperative Medical Complications???-Not Microsurgical Complications???-Negatively Influence the Morbidity, Mortality, and True Costs after Microsurgical Reconstruction for Head and Neck Cancer

BACKGROUND

Immediate reconstruction of composite head and neck defects using free tissue transfer is an accepted treatment standard. There remains, however, ongoing debate on whether the costs associated with this reconstructive approach merit its selection, especially considering poor patient prognoses and the high cost of care.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the last 100 consecutive patients undergoing microsurgical reconstruction for head and neck cancer by the two senior surgeons was performed to determine whether microsurgical complications or postoperative medical complications had the more profound influence on morbidity and mortality outcomes and the true costs of these reconstructions.

RESULTS

Two patients required re-exploration of the microsurgical anastomoses, for a re-exploration rate of 2 percent, and one flap failed, for a flap success rate of 99 percent. The major surgical complication rate requiring a second operative procedure was 6 percent. Sixteen percent had minor surgical complications related to the donor site. Major medical complications, defined as a significant risk to the patient's life, occurred in 5 percent of the patients, but there was a 37 percent incidence of "minor" medical complications primarily caused by pulmonary problems and alcohol withdrawal. Postsurgical complications almost doubled the average hospital stay from 13.5 days for those patients without complications to 24 days for patients with complications. Thirty-six percent of the true cost of microsurgical reconstruction of head and neck cancer was due to the intensive care unit and hospital room costs, and 24 percent was due to operating room costs. Postsurgical complications resulted in a 70.7 percent increase in true costs, reflecting a prolonged stay in the intensive care unit and not an increase in operating room costs or regular hospital room costs.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative medical complications in these elderly, debilitated patients related to pulmonary problems and alcohol withdrawal were statistically far more important in negatively affecting the outcomes and true costs of microsurgical reconstruction.

[Cost effectiveness of V.A.C. therapy after post-sternotomy mediastinitis]

Since November 2001 all patients with postoperative sternum bone infections were treated with V.A.C. therapy. The mean length of stay at intensive care unit was reduced from 9 to 1 day and reduces costs for 33 714.- USD per patient. Additionally patients who had to be closed with pectoralis muscle flap had significant reduced length of stay at ICU (1 vs 4 days, cost effectiveness 14 984.- USD per patient). The V.A.C. therapy after post-sternotomy mediastinitis significantly reduces morbidity and mortalità and is cost effective.

Comparisons of Resource Costs and Success Rates between Immediate and Delayed Breast Reconstruction Using DIEP or SIEA Flaps under a Well-Controlled Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Every year many patients diagnosed with breast cancer are subjected to mastectomy. Some of them choose to undergo breast reconstruction to restore their body image. Immediate or delayed reconstruction is possible, depending on medical, financial, and emotional considerations. High success rate and cost-effectiveness are two important factors that may guide decision making in the management plan. The objective of this study was to compare the resource costs and success rates of immediate and delayed breast reconstructions using either deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) or superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flaps. The resource cost is referred to as the cost of operation and hospitalization.

METHODS

From September of 2000 through August of 2001, 42 patients underwent immediate (n = 21) or delayed (n = 21) unilateral breast reconstruction using either a DIEP (n = 30) or SIEA (n = 12) flap by one surgeon.

RESULTS

There were no statistical differences in resource costs, success, and complication rates between DIEP and SIEA flaps in both the immediate and delayed breast reconstruction groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Using either a DIEP or SIEA flap as the autologous tissue, delayed breast reconstruction is as cost-effective as immediate reconstruction.

Comparison of Clinical and Functional Outcomes and Hospital Costs following Pharyngoesophageal Reconstruction with the Anterolateral Thigh Free Flap versus the Jejunal Flap

BACKGROUND

Pharyngoesophageal defects are commonly reconstructed with free jejunal or fasciocutaneous flaps, with various outcomes, and a direct comparison is lacking.

METHODS

Fifty-seven circumferential pharyngoesophageal reconstructions with an anterolateral thigh flap (n = 26 patients) performed by a single surgeon or jejunal flap (n = 31 patients) performed by six experienced surgeons between 1998 and 2004 were reviewed and outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Total flap loss occurred in one (4 percent) and two (6 percent) patients, fistula rates were 8 percent and 3 percent, and stricture rates were 15 percent and 19 percent in the anterolateral thigh and jejunal flap groups, respectively (p > 0.5). A completely oral diet was achieved in 95 percent and 65 percent, and fluent tracheoesophageal speech was achieved in 89 percent and 22 percent of patients with the anterolateral thigh and jejunal flaps, respectively (p < 0.01). The mean lengths of postoperative ventilator support, intensive care unit stay, and hospital stay were 1.0 +/- 0.2, 1.7 +/- 1.0, and 8.0 +/- 3.7 days for the anterolateral thigh flap group and 2.2 +/- 3.0, 3.0 +/- 3.2, and 12.6 +/- 7.9 days for the jejunal flap group (p < 0.001 for all), respectively. Mean hospital charges per patient were $8694 and $12,651 for the anterolateral thigh and jejunal flap groups, respectively (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

With the limitations of comparing a single surgeon's results with those of multiple surgeons, the anterolateral thigh flap appears to offer better speech and swallowing functions and quicker recovery and to be more cost-effective than the jejunal flap for pharyngoesophageal reconstruction. The complication rates were similar.

Devascularizing complications of free fibula harvest: peronea arteria magna

The authors present a case report of devascularizing complications following free fibula harvest. A retrospective review of 93 consecutively imaged limbs demonstrated a peronea arteria magna (PAM) prevalence of 5.3 percent in an urban population, which was used to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis for preoperative vascular imaging of the donor limb using magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and traditional angiography (TA). Donor-site complications of fibula harvest range from 15 to 30 percent, but are rarely limb-threatening. Limb loss is a dreaded complication of congenital PAM, which can be present with a normal vascular exam. Some microsurgery groups advocate using no preoperative imaging of the donor limb; they rely on intraoperative assessment of the vascular anatomy. An aborted harvest due to aberrant anatomy leads to both direct and indirect added costs. The authors believe that MRA imaging of the donor limb, being minimally invasive, is cost-effective and indicated for free fibula transfers. For equivocal results, conversion to more invasive and costly TA may be necessary.

Cost Analysis of Functional Restoration Surgery for Extremity Soft-Tissue Sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Limb-sparing surgery, consisting of wide-margin tumor resection and preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy/chemotherapy, has become the surgical treatment of choice for extremity sarcomas. However, adequate tumor resection can sometimes compromise crucial limb function, necessitating functional restoration surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine the cost impact and functional outcomes of such procedures.

METHODS

Patients receiving either functional restoration surgery or soft-tissue-only reconstruction following extremity soft-tissue sarcoma excision were identified. Patients were then compared along several dimensions: overall length of stay and its subdivisions, surgical time, and total charges and its subdivisions. Patients' functional outcomes were assessed with the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients who underwent 69 limb-sparing procedures were identified. Fifteen of these procedures (eight upper extremity, seven lower extremity) required functional restoration surgery; 54 of these procedures (13 upper extremity, 41 lower extremity) required only soft-tissue coverage. In the upper extremity, there was a statistically significant increase in overall length of stay (2.8 days) and its subdivisions, surgical time (3.7 hours), and total charges (12,484 dollars) and its subdivisions associated with performing functional restoration surgery. In lower extremity cases, statistically significant increases were determined in only the total charges (9190 dollars) and medical supply charges (13,204 dollars) following functional restoration. Patients who underwent functional restoration surgery had better postoperative function (mean Toronto Extremity Salvage Score, 82 versus 80), but this difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Although functional restoration surgery is more costly than soft-tissue reconstruction alone, the authors believe that the associated better functional outcome justifies its performance.

Comparing the cost of delayed and immediate autologous breast reconstruction in Belgium

This study documents the cost of immediate and delayed DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Immediate reconstruction is more attractive from an economic perspective since it only requires one operation, one anaesthetic procedure and one recovery period in hospital. From the perspective of healthcare budget management, assessing the possible cost savings from immediate reconstruction yields interesting results. Since charges do not reflect the real costs of providing care, we calculated resource costs using the micro-costing method. About 95% of the initial mastectomy costs could be saved when performing an immediate breast reconstruction. This was about 35% of total standard direct and indirect costs due to mastectomy and delayed breast reconstruction. In a growing cost conscious environment of managed care, the economic evaluation should, therefore, encourage the trend towards more immediate reconstructions.

Reconstruction of limited soft-tissue defect with open tibial fracture in the distal third of the leg: a cost and outcome study

This study was conducted to analyze the cost and outcome of free-tissue transfers versus local muscle flaps for reconstruction of limited soft-tissue defects associated with tibial fractures in the distal third of the leg. Twelve adult patients underwent either free (n = 6) or local muscle (n = 6) flap reconstruction were retrospectively reviewed. Total operative time for local muscle flap reconstruction was 215 +/- 47 minutes compared with 450 +/- 90 minutes (P < 0.0002) for free-muscle transfer. Median length of hospital stay after reconstruction was 7 days for local muscle flap compared with 9 days for free-muscle transfer. Total cost of the local muscle flap procedure was US dollars 11,729 +/- US dollars 4460 compared with US dollars 19,989 +/- US dollars 3295 (P < 0.0004) for free-flap reconstruction. Five of 6 patients in each group had excellent soft-tissue contours. Fracture healing was evident in all patients of each group. Thus, a local muscle flap for reconstruction of a limited distal tibial wound appears to be more cost-effective than free-tissue transfer because of equivocal outcomes achieved but at approximately half of the cost.

[500 reconstructive flaps in oncological surgery of the head and neck: critical review of 10 years experience]

AIM

Oncologic surgery of the head and neck, according to the principle of oncological radicality, involves large demolition often including skin, soft tissues and bone structures. The aim of this study is to provide a high-level perspective of results achieved in terms of functionality and softness with the different reconstructive techniques during the last ten years.

METHODS

The test group was composed of 467 patients, hospitalised in the "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute in Rome and treated for head and neck cancer; 86% of the treated patients suffered from stage III or IV of the disease. For the reconstructive phase, 506 flaps were used, 45.5% were myocutaneous flaps, 37.1% cutaneous and fasciocutaneous flaps and 17.4% free flaps. Ischemic complications occurred in 5.2% of the myocutaneous flaps group and in 10.3% of the free flaps group.

RESULTS

"Minor complications" affected 3.9% of the cases in the free flaps group and 20.8% of cases in the myocutaneous flaps group.

CONCLUSION

The analysis of the results shows that generally free flaps are more reliable than myocutaneous flaps in terms of minor complications, however they tend to prolong the patient's hospitalisation and increase the overall treatment cost. Furthermore in morpho-functional terms, free flaps ensure results, in defined anatomical areas (such as the cervical-esophageal region, jaw, tongue) that today cannot be compared to the "conventional" procedures. As for myocutaneous and cutaneous/ fasciocutaneous flaps, according to personal opinion they are still the first choice for reconstruction having minimal or no functional implications.

Comparison of the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap and Free Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap in Postmastectomy Reconstruction: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

This study compared the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap and the free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap in postmastectomy reconstruction using a cost-effectiveness analysis. A decision analytic model was used. Medical costs associated with the two techniques were estimated from the Ontario Ministry of Health Schedule of Benefits for 2002. Hospital costs were obtained from St. Joseph's Healthcare, a university teaching hospital in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. The utilities of clinically important health states related to breast reconstruction were obtained from 32 "experts" across Canada and converted into quality-adjusted life years. The probabilities of these various clinically important health states being associated with the DIEP and free TRAM flaps were obtained after a thorough review of the literature. The DIEP flap was more costly than the free TRAM flap ($7026.47 versus $6508.29), but it provided more quality-adjusted life years than the free TRAM flap (28.88 years versus 28.53 years). The baseline incremental cost-utility ratio was $1464.30 per quality-adjusted life year, favoring adoption of the DIEP flap. Sensitivity analyses were performed by assuming that the probabilities of occurrence of hernia, abdominal bulging, total flap loss, operating room time, and hospital stay were identical with the DIEP and free TRAM techniques. By assuming that the probability of postoperative hernia for the DIEP flap increased from 0.008 to 0.054 (same as for TRAM flap), the incremental cost-utility ratio changed to $1435.00 per quality-adjusted life year. A sensitivity analysis was performed for the complication of hernia because the DIEP flap allegedly diminishes this complication. Increasing the probability of abdominal bulge from 0.041 to 0.103 for the DIEP flap changed the ratio to $2731.78 per quality-adjusted life year. When the probability of total flap failure was increased from 0.014 to 0.016, the ratio changed to $1384.01 per quality-adjusted life year. When the time in the operating room was assumed to be the same for both flaps, the ratio changed to $4026.57 per quality-adjusted life year. If the hospital stay was assumed to be the same for both flaps, the ratio changed to $1944.30 per quality-adjusted life year. On the basis of the baseline calculation and sensitivity analyses, the DIEP flap remained a cost-effective procedure. Thus, adoption of this new technique for postmastectomy reconstruction is warranted in the Canadian health care system.

Cost-utility analysis comparing free and pedicled TRAM flap for breast reconstruction

The purpose of this study was to compare the free TRAM to the unipedicled TRAM flap in postmastectomy reconstruction, using a cost-utility analysis. A decision analytic model was used for this study. Medical costs associated with the two techniques were estimated from the Ontario Ministry of Health Schedule of Benefits (1998). Hospital costs were obtained from St. Joseph's Healthcare, a university hospital in Hamilton, Ontario. Utilities were obtained from 33 "experts" across Canada and then converted into quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The probabilities of various health states associated with unipedicled and free TRAM flaps were obtained by reviewing several key articles. The free TRAM flap was more costly than the unipedicled TRAM flap, but it provided more QALYs. The baseline incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) was $5,113.73/QALY, favoring adoption of the free TRAM flap. This study showed that the free TRAM flap is a cost-effective procedure for postmastectomy reconstruction in the Canadian healthcare system.

Resource cost comparison of implant-based breast reconstruction versus TRAM flap breast reconstruction

Relatively little has been published to date comparing the resource costs of transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap and prosthetic breast reconstruction. The data that have been published reflect the experience at just one medical center with a previously known clear preference for autologous breast reconstruction. The goal of this study was to compare the resource costs of TRAM flap and prosthetic reconstruction in an institution where both procedures continue to be performed using modern techniques and at a relatively equivalent frequency. All available medical records were reviewed for patients who had completed their breast reconstruction between 1987 and 1997. Records of patients who had undergone TRAM flap or prosthetic reconstruction were reviewed to compare resource costs, including hospital stay, operating room time, anesthesia time, prosthetic devices, and physician's fees. Of 835 patients reviewed who had completed breast reconstruction, a total of 140 suitable patients were identified who had all the necessary financial information available. The patient population comprised 64 patients who received TRAM flaps and 76 patients who had undergone prosthetic reconstruction. The length of stay for the TRAM flap group, including all subsequent admissions for each patient, ranged from 2 to 24 days (mean, 6.25 days), and that for the prosthetic reconstruction group ranged from 0 to 20 days (mean, 4.36 days). Operating room time for the complete multistage reconstructive process for a TRAM flap ranged from 5 hours, 20 minutes to 12 hours, 25 minutes (mean, 7 hours, 34 minutes); with implant-based reconstruction, operating time ranged from 1 hour, 45 minutes to 8 hours, 56 minutes (mean, 4 hours, 6 minutes). With prostheses costing from $600 to $1200, a surgeon's fee of $160/hour, and an assistant's fee of $45/hour, the average cost of TRAM flap reconstructions was $19,607 (range, $11,948 to $49,402), compared with $15,497 for prosthetic reconstructions (range, $6422 to $40,015). The results were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Several factors weigh into the decision as to which reconstructive operation best suits the patient's needs. These factors include surgical risk, potential morbidity, and aesthetic results. On the basis of this review of autologous and prosthetic breast reconstruction in an institution where both are performed frequently, during a 10-year period with a mean time elapsed since reconstruction of 7.45 years, prosthetic reconstruction was significantly less expensive.

Prevention of Postlaryngectomy Pharyngocutaneous Fistula: The Memorial University Experience

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of a pectoralis major myogenous flap in the prevention of pharyngocutaneous fistula in patients who have undergone total laryngectomy. Our secondary objective was to estimate the economic saving to our health care system.

DESIGN

Retrospective clinical study.

SETTING

Grace General Hospital, St. Clare's Mercy Hospital, H. Bliss Murphy Cancer and Research Centre, St. John's, Newfoundland.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred and twenty-three consecutive total laryngectomy procedures performed between June 1978 and December 2001 were reviewed. The fistula rate in laryngectomy patients prior to 1988 without pectoralis major myogenous flaps (group A) was compared with that of patients after June 1988 who had this flap routinely used at primary surgery (group B). Analysis of risk factors within those two groups was essentially similar.

RESULTS

In group A, the overall pharyngocutaneous fistula rate was 22.9%. The fistula rate in group B was less than 1%.

CONCLUSION

Our study has demonstrated that at our tertiary care head and neck oncology centre, we have dramatically decreased the incidence of postlaryngectomy pharyngocutaneous fistula. By the routine addition of a pectoralis major myogenous flap to cover the pharyngeal defect at surgery, we have substantially and dramatically reduced patient morbidity and mortality and reduced hospital stay, with major financial savings to the health care system.

The influence of reconstructive modality on cost of care in head and neck oncologic surgery

OBJECTIVE

To determine the differential costs of 3 reconstructive modalities in patients undergoing head and neck oncologic surgery.

DESIGN

Cost-identification analysis.

SETTING

Academic tertiary care medical center.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 104 major head and neck resections involving primary tumors of the upper aerodigestive tract requiring a tracheotomy (primary hospital discharge, diagnosis related group 482 from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification) from July 2, 1999, through June 30, 2000. Patients were stratified by reconstruction modality: (1) microvascular free tissue transfer (MFFT), (2) pedicle myocutaneous flaps (PMF), and (3) primary reconstruction and/or skin graft (PR). Dependent variables included length of hospitalization, direct and indirect hospital costs, total hospital costs, the percentage of total costs attributable to direct costs, and the percentage of total costs attributable to indirect costs.

RESULTS

No significant age differences existed among the 3 patient groups. Significant differences (Kruskal-Wallis) were observed for all variables. The PR group was compared with the PMF and MFFT groups. Total patient charges were greatest in the MFFT group (mean, $22 821.04) and least for the PR group (mean, $13 125.70). Length of stay was greatest in the PMF group (mean, 7.53 days) and shortest in the PR group (mean, 5.53 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Intricate reconstructions are frequently more times consuming than primary closure, and the additional surgical procedures are more likely to use more hospital resources. Efforts at providing superior functional outcomes must be balanced against increasing restrictions on the use of health care dollars. Careful evaluation of functional outcomes and quality of life will be required to justify the increased expenditure incurred when providing complex reconstructions.

Free tissue transfer versus pedicled flap in head and neck reconstruction

OBJECTIVES

Free flaps are often criticized as being medically risky for the patient, expensive, and too time-consuming when compared with the traditional rotational flap repair. Perhaps the costs do not outweigh the benefits. The study analyzes many aspects of resource utilization and patient outcome to determine whether these criticisms hold true.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective patient review.

METHODS

Sixty-five patient charts were reviewed. The following data were abstracted: flap type, tumor location and stage, preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists score, preoperative irradiation, postoperative medical complications, flap outcome, length of hospital stay, date of first intake by mouth, and date of decannulation. The data were analyzed for free flaps and rotational flaps. Then data were analyzed again for free and rotational flaps performed for only patients who underwent a composite resection, to further standardize the results.

RESULTS

For all defect types, free flap operative time was statistically greater (9 h 35 min for free flaps vs. 4 h 58 min for rotational flaps). Regarding hospital charges, only patients who had a free flap after composite resection differed in amount charged when free versus rotational flaps were compared (53,585 dollars for free flaps vs. 32,984 dollars for rotational flaps). Length of intensive care unit stay differed between patients having composite resection of the two flap types (0.1 d after rotational flap vs. 1.4 d after free flap).

CONCLUSIONS

The differences between the two reconstruction methods are only a few. We do not think that longer operative time, longer length of intensive care unit stay, and increased hospital charges are significant enough to deny a patient a superior repair. We also think that as surgeons' experience increases, these differences may one day no longer hold true.

Randomized clinical trial of no wound drains and early discharge in the treatment of women with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Women undergoing surgery for primary breast cancer routinely have suction drains inserted deep to the wounds, which are removed approximately 6-8 days after operation, requiring a period of stay of that duration in hospital. The aim of this study was to perform a prospective randomized clinical trial to evaluate a new surgical technique of suturing flaps without wound drainage, combined with early discharge, in women undergoing surgery for breast cancer.

METHODS

A total of 375 patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer were randomized to conventional surgery or suturing of flaps with no drain. The main outcome measures were length of hospital stay, surgical morbidity, psychological morbidity and health economics.

RESULTS

Suturing of flaps and avoiding wound drainage in women undergoing surgery for breast cancer resulted in a significantly shorter hospital stay. Adopting this surgical technique with early discharge did not lead to any difference in surgical or psychological morbidity. Health economic benefits to the National Health Service resulted from saved bed days with no impact on community costs.

CONCLUSION

Wound drainage following surgery for breast cancer can be avoided, thereby facilitating early discharge with no associated increase in surgical or psychological morbidity.

Comparison of cost for DIEP and free TRAM flap breast reconstructions

A recent article by Kaplan and Allen suggested that deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction was less expensive than reconstruction performed with free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flaps. To test that hypothesis, a series of patients who had undergone unilateral breast-mound reconstruction by the first author using DIEP or free TRAM flaps between November 1, 1996, and March 30, 2000, were reviewed. Bilateral reconstructions and reconstructions performed by other surgeons in the department were excluded to eliminate all variables except the choice of flap. All hours in the operating room and days in the hospital until discharge were included. Early readmissions for the treatment of complications were included, as were the costs of the mastectomy in the case of immediate reconstructions, but late revisions and nipple reconstructions were not. The totals were then converted into resource costs in 1999 dollars, and the DIEP and free TRAM flap groups compared. There were 21 DIEP flaps and 24 free TRAM flaps in the series. In this series, there was no significant difference between the cost of DIEP and free TRAM flap breast reconstruction.

Microsurgery in private practice: is it feasible economically?

Microsurgical free tissue transfer and replantations have long been the bailiwick of academic training centers and tertiary referral centers. However, the authors' experience with more than 350 consecutive free tissue transfers during a span of 15 years in a purely private setting illustrates the changing economics of the medical environment in that time frame. These data provide insight into the feasibility and practicality of maintaining a microsurgical practice outside an academic medical center.

Cost-based comparison between perforator flaps and TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction

More women than ever before are undergoing mastectomies secondary to increased awareness and screening. This increase has also caused a corresponding increase in the number of breast reconstructions requested each year. The increased demand for reconstruction has fueled recent advances in new techniques. Aside from foreign-body reconstruction such as implants, the methods now being used are related to autogenous donations and reconstruction. Transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flaps and perforator flaps are currently being used for autogenous breast reconstruction. This study will compare these two techniques on the basis of cost and length of stay. A retrospective study of 49 patients undergoing a total of 64 perforator flap breast reconstructions at Memorial Medical Center in New Orleans, Louisiana, during the 1997 calendar year was used. There were 59 deep inferior epigastric perforator and five gluteal artery perforator breast reconstructions. All patients underwent some form of breast reconstruction and differed only in respect to whether a mastectomy was performed and whether the reconstruction was unilateral or bilateral. Those patients who underwent a mastectomy with immediate perforator flap reconstruction (n = 26) were then compared with patients undergoing mastectomy with immediate TRAM flap reconstruction (n = 154) at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. The data from the Anderson Study were obtained from material published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery in 1996. Comparison of patients was limited to those who underwent mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction because this was the design of the M. D. Anderson study. This approach allowed a cost and length of stay comparison while keeping other variables relatively similar. Patients in the perforator flap series enjoyed a marginally shorter operating time and a much shorter length of stay. On average, the operative time for all perforator flap reconstructions was approximately 2 hours shorter than for all TRAM flaps. As for length of stay, perforator flap patients were discharged, on average, 3 days after the initial reconstruction. In contrast, TRAM flap patients remained in the hospital for an average of approximately 7 days after the initial reconstruction. The overall total, average cost for the perforator flap reconstruction in this study is $9625, whereas the average cost of all TRAM flaps performed in the Anderson study is $18,070.

Behavior of implants in bone grafts or free flaps after tumor resection

The authors compared bone resorption of autogenous bone grafts and revascularized free flaps used for the reconstruction of mandibular continuity defects following resection for tumors, before and after the placement of endosseous implants. Ten patients (group 1) were treated with autogenous bone grafts taken from the fibula or the anterior iliac crest; 8 patients (group 2) were treated with iliac or fibula revascularized flaps. Four to 8 months later, 72 endosseous implants were placed in the reconstructed areas. After a further healing period of 4-6 months, patients were rehabilitated with implant-borne prostheses. The following parameters were evaluated and compared between the two groups: 1) bone resorption of grafts and free flaps before and after implant placement; 2) peri-implant bone resorption mesial and distal to each implant, immediately after prosthetic rehabilitation and then during yearly follow-ups. Bone resorption before implant placement showed mean values of 3.53 mm in group 1, and 0.96 mm in group 2. Peri-implant bone resorption was: 0.49 mm (39 implants) in group 1, and 0.45 mm (30 implants) in group 2, at time of prosthetic rehabilitation; 0.78 mm (39 implants) in group 1, and 0.89 mm (30 implants) in group 2, 12 months after prosthetic load; 1.16 mm (24 implants) in group 1, and 1.02 mm (13 implants) in group 2, 24 months after the prosthetic load. A significant difference in bone resorption before implant placement was found between the two groups, whereas it was not found after implant placement and prosthetic load. The failure rate according to Albrektsson criteria was 4.9% (2/41 implants) in group 1, and was 3.2% (1/31) in group 2.

Economics of microsurgical cases and routine cases in a medical center

This report describes the economic impact of microsurgical cases and routine plastic surgery cases in our medical center. The study is based on a financial analysis of the practices of two surgeons. Financial data of patient encounters (admission to the hospital or a surgical unit) identified with each surgeon were categorized into microsurgical and related cases and routine cases (including cosmetic procedures and general hand cases). Revenues, costs, and profits were tabulated. Data were analyzed for 2 fiscal years (1994-95 and 1995-96). Analysis of the first fiscal year showed that microsurgery encounters (n = 188) generated $4.4 million in revenue with a profit margin after direct costs of $2.5 million (57 percent) and a net profit, after indirect costs, of $1 million (23 percent). Routine encounters (n = 262) generated $1.7 million with a net loss of -$145,000 after direct and indirect costs. In the second fiscal year, microsurgery encounters (n = 230) had income of $4.7 million, a profit over direct costs of $2.5 million (53 percent), and a net profit after indirect costs of $0.9 million (19 percent). Routine cases (n = 202) in the same period earned $1.3 million with a net loss of -$107,000. This analysis formulates a comprehensive definition of microsurgical practice and shows that cases within this definition generated dramatically higher hospital incomes and profits compared with routine plastic surgical practice. In the circumstances of our medical center, development of this subspecialty is fiscally justifiable.

[Ambulatory skin grafting in leg ulcers: a feasibility study of 34 patients]

OBJECTIVES

Despite the advent of modern dressings, management of leg ulcers remains a long costly process, particularly if no etiological treatment is possible. Autologous skin grafting is more and more widely used in this indication. The aim of this open single center noncomparative study was to analyze the feasibility of ambulatory procedures for skin grafting and the incidence of ambulatory care in a medical nursing clinic as an alternative to traditional hospitalization on total cost in this pathological condition.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine grafts were performed in 34 consecutive patients. No selection was made for etiology or duration of the leg ulcers. Three grafting techniques were used after debridement-cleansing: flap grafts for medium sized ulcers (29 cases), mesh grafts for large ulcers (6 cases) and patch grafts for small ulcers or ulcers with irregular contours (4 cases). The dressing was opened on day 5, nursing care was provided every 2 days and daily in case of infection. Percentage of healing was evaluated clinically on days 5, 15 and 30 then at months 3, 6 and 12. Photographs were taken.

RESULTS

Four patients were lost to follow-up and one died. Among the 34 grafts assessed at 6 months, we obtained total healing in 56 p. 100, 75 p. 100 healing in 6 p. 100, 50 p. 100 healing in 9 p. 100 and failure in 29 p. 100. Healing rates were those expected for arterial ulcers and necrotic angiodermas. For venous leg ulcers, the rate of total healing was only 30 p. 100 at 6 months and 43 p. 100 at 1 year. Outcome depended on duration of the lesion and not on the type of skin graft or patient age.

DISCUSSION

This prospective study reports outcome of ambulatory skin grafting in a large representative sample of patients with leg ulcers of various etiologies. The less favorable outcome for venous ulcers can be explained by the duration of the ulcerations and infection in these often neglected lesions. The risk of graft displacement, contact eczema, and infection must be recognized for early treatment. There were no cases with general complications. This ambulatory technique has the enormous advantage of limiting the risk of hospital-related problems in this elderly population and of reducing overall cost of care for leg ulcers, and finally of limiting the risk of recurrence by regular post-graft follow-up in a specialized center and by treatment of the causal disease.

Free microvascular tram flaps: report of 185 breast reconstructions

The free TRAM flap is the most elegant technique currently available for breast reconstruction. We describe here the surgical technique, the complications, the possible effects of the prognosis of the breast cancer, and the learning curve of the surgical team. From December 1990 to the end of 1995 we reconstructed 185 breasts (10 bilateral) in 175 patients with free TRAM flaps; 27 were immediate reconstructions. We harvested the flap based on the inferior epigastric pedicle on the opposite side to the affected breast. To dissect the rectus muscle we used a muscle-sparing technique. The flap was designed and de-epithelialised while still on the abdomen, and was anastomosed to the thoracodorsal or circumflex scapular vessels with loupes only. In the immediate reconstructions we removed the breast tissue through a periareolar incision; we dissected the group I axillary lymph nodes and exposed the recipient vessels through a separate incision. The areolar complex was autotransplanted as a free skin graft. Only two flaps were lost. Eight patients were reoperated on for thrombosis of the vessels. The complication rate was nearly 50% among the first 50 patients. However, as surgical experience grew, the figure was reduced, eventually being down to 20%-25%. Of the patients who had delayed reconstructions only two died during the follow-up period of 48 months. One patient had a local recurrence above the TRAM skin. During the last eight years the free TRAM flap has been our main method of breast reconstruction. Free flaps today are reliable and the reconstruction does not seem to worsen the prognosis of breast cancer.

Microsurgery costs and outcome

Reliable information on cost and value in microsurgery is not readily available in the literature. Driving factors for cost, determinants of complications, and cost-reduction strategies have not been elucidated in this population, despite such progress in other areas of medicine. Clearly, the time-consuming and costly nature of this endeavor demands that appropriate indications and patient management be delineated; to operate proactively in this cost-conscious time, financial and outcome determinations are critical. One hundred seven consecutive free-tissue transfers performed from 1991 to 1994 by a single microsurgeon were studied. Retrospective chart review for clinical parameters was combined with analysis of hospital costs and professional charges. Operating room and anesthesia costs were based on a microcost analysis of actual operating room time, materials, labor, and overhead. Other patient level costs were generated by Transition 1, a hospital cost-accounting system. The following issues were addressed: (1) flap survival; (2) total costs and length of stay for all free flaps; (3) payments received from various insurers; (4) breakdown of operating room costs by labor, supplies, and overhead; (5) breakdown of inpatient costs by category; (6) additional costs of complications and takebacks; (7) factors associated with complications and flap takebacks; and (8) cost-reduction strategies. Mean free flap operating room costs (exclusive of professional fees) ranged among case types from $4439 to $6856 and were primarily a function of operating room times. Elective patient cases lasted a mean 440 minutes. There was a large disparity in reimbursement: private insurers covered hospital costs (not charges) completely, whereas Medicare paid 79 percent and Medicaid only 64 percent. Length of stay, operative procedures, and complications had the greatest influence on inpatient costs in this group of free flap patients. Potential cost savings as a result of possible practice changes (e.g., shortening intensive care unit stays and avoiding staged operations) can be predicted. This analysis has caused a revision in these institutions' practice patterns and lays the foundation for planned outcome studies in this population.

A retrospective comparison of the morbidity and cost of different reconstructive strategies in oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma

PURPOSE

Evaluate and compare the morbidity and costs of different reconstructive strategies in oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred twenty-seven consecutive patients treated surgically for oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma between 1990 and 1996 were evaluated. Sixty-three patients had segmental mandibulectomies with 30 plate-soft tissue reconstructions and 33 bone-soft tissue flaps. Sixty-four patients had soft-tissue-only reconstructions. The following outcome parameters were analyzed: operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative admission length, ICU and coronary care unit admission length, surgical interventions for complications, re-admissions, and prolonged (>6 mo) gastrostomy tube feeding, and all costs within the disease-free interval. Means and standard deviations were calculated for continuous parameters. Differences among the three groups were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance. For discontinuous parameters, the chi-square test was applied.

RESULTS

Longer operative time (1.8 h) and more blood loss (150 mL) for bone-soft tissue flaps were the only statistically significant findings (P<.05) between the three groups.

CONCLUSION

There is no rationale for allowing presumed factors of morbidity or cost select for type of reconstruction in patients with oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma.

Reduced cost of extremity free flap monitoring

We analyzed the results and cost-effectiveness of our protocol for free flap monitoring in extremity patients. Of 70 consecutive free flaps to the upper and lower extremity that were monitored by laser Doppler flowmeter, 62 were managed on the hospital ward immediately after recovery from general anesthesia. The duration of laser Doppler monitoring was 5 days. Perfusion compromise occurred in three flaps, two of which occurred in the recovery room and were initially detected by the laser Doppler and successfully salvaged by early exploration. The average equipment cost for the use of the laser Doppler flowmeter for 5 days was significantly less than the cost of an intensive care unit bed for a single day. Our experience confirms that monitoring free flaps with laser Doppler is cost-effective and indicates that a specialized care bed after the recovery room is not necessary in routine extremity cases. Since no vascular complication occurred beyond the second postoperative day, this study suggests that the duration of laser Doppler monitoring can be discontinued on the third postoperative day.

Why autologous tissue?

Breast reconstruction with autologous tissue achieves more natural results and a better simulation of a real breast than reconstruction based on prosthetic implants. Unlike implant-based reconstructions, which tend to develop capsular contractures, the results of autologous tissue reconstruction tend to improve with time. In the long run, the costs of autologous breast reconstruction with transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flaps are equal to or lower than those of reconstruction with tissue expansion and implants. Consequently, autologous tissue is preferable for most patients, provided they are suitable candidates for the surgery required by autologous reconstruction.

A comparison of resource costs of immediate and delayed breast reconstruction

The resource cost (cost to our hospital) of providing mastectomy plus breast reconstruction was calculated for 276 patients who had received both mastectomy and breast reconstruction at our institution. All patients had completed the entire reconstructive process, including reconstruction of the nipple. The resource costs of providing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction were compared with those of mastectomy with subsequent delayed reconstruction. We found that the mean resource cost for the 57 patients who had separate mastectomy followed by delayed breast reconstruction ($28,843) was 62 percent higher than that of mastectomy with immediate reconstruction ($17,801; n = 219, p < 0.001). Similar differences were found when patients were subgrouped by type of reconstruction (TRAM versus tissue expansion and implants), by laterality (unilateral versus bilateral), and by history of preoperative irradiation. We conclude that mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction is significantly less expensive than mastectomy followed by delayed reconstruction and can potentially conserve resources.

[The cost as an additional variable in the choice among different techniques of postmastectomy breast reconstruction]

Breast reconstruction is an important step for patients after mastectomy. In our Department for immediate reconstruction, smooth or textured temporary tissue expanders filled with saline solution or permanent expandable implants (PEI) with silicon gel saline solution or soyabean oil are usually used. Only in a few selected cases reconstruction using autologous tissues are performed. Delayed reconstruction is performed using autologous tissues: Transversus Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneus Flap (TRAMF) or Latissimus Dorsi flap (LD). The choice between reconstruction with prostheses or muscular flaps depends on previous demolition, local skin condition, contralateral breast size and ptosis, body structure, medical problems, patients' wishes and expectation. Following the legislation defining the privatisation of Italian Health Care Structure and in particular the Decree of December 14, 1994, the need to accurately assess the costs incurred for surgical operations is very important. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical limits of each surgical technique and their cost in order to optimize the cost-benefit relationship.

Free versus the pedicled TRAM flap: a cost comparison and outcome analysis

Proponents for the free TRAM flap have advocated enhanced tissue vascularity, easier inset, and limited abdominal dissection. Equal aesthetic results without increased morbidity and without the risks of microvascular surgery have been suggested by surgeons using the pedicled technique. The free TRAM flap has been criticized for its considerably higher costs. The purpose of this study was to provide a cost comparison and outcome analysis of the free versus the pedicled TRAM flap. All patients who had had a TRAM flap performed in the authors' teaching institutions between March of 1990 and April of 1995 were evaluated. Outpatient and hospital records, and hospital and surgeon billing records, were reviewed for patient demographics, TRAM technique, delayed versus immediate, operating room time, length of stay, hospital and surgeon reimbursement, and surgical complications and their costs. All patients were sent a questionnaire asking about time back to work, abdominal strength, fitness, symmetry, and satisfaction. During the 5-year period, 125 TRAM flaps were performed. Of these flaps, 72 were free flaps and 53 were pedicled. Seventy percent were immediate reconstructions regardless of the technique used. Four percent of the free and 17 percent of the pedicled TRAM flaps were bilateral. There were no significant differences between the two techniques with regard to patient age, weight, or percentage of smokers, diabetes, hypertension, or preoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Average operating room time was 7 hours with both techniques either delayed or immediate. Average length of stay was 7 days with the free (immediate and delayed) and 8 days with the pedicled (immediate and delayed) technique, although the difference was not significant. Average hospital reimbursement was $5300 for both the free and pedicled TRAM patients. Average surgeon reimbursement was significantly different, with $5000 for the free and $3500 for the pedicled TRAM flap. There were no differences in the occurrence of hematoma, partial/total flap loss, wound infection, hernia/bulge, fat necrosis, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolus with regard to the technique used. The cost of the treatment of the complications was not significantly different between the two techniques. There was a significant difference in the complication rate for the free TRAM patients compared with those treated by a routine reconstructive microsurgeon versus a more occasional microsurgeon. Ninety percent of both the free and pedicled patients responded to the questionnaire. There were no statistical differences between the free flap and pedicled flap survey results. The free flap patients returned to work 9 weeks after surgery; the pedicled flap patients returned at 10 weeks. Abdominal strength and overall fitness ranged from 74 to 79 percent for both groups. Symmetry and overall satisfaction averaged 3.4 of 4 for all. Average follow-up for the survey respondents was 20 months. This study did not demonstrate any significant differences in outcome or complications between the free and pedicled TRAM flaps. A modest cost difference of $1500 occurred for the free TRAM patients. An experienced microsurgeon had significantly fewer complications with the free TRAM patients. The authors recommend that surgeons use the technique with which they are comfortable and obtain predictable results.

Comparison of cost and function in reconstruction of the posterior oral cavity and oropharynx. Free vs pedicled soft tissue transfer

OBJECTIVE

To compare the cost and functional results of free and pedicled soft tissue reconstruction after posterior oral cavity and oropharyngeal extirpation.

DESIGN

Retrospective study of 53 consecutive patients undergoing extirpation with primary soft tissue reconstruction from January 1, 1991, to December 31, 1995. Median follow-up was 298 days.

SETTING

Academic tertiary care medical center.

INTERVENTION

Twenty-four patients underwent reconstruction with a pedicled pectoralis major myocutaneous flap (PMMF); 29 patients, with a fasciocutaneous free flap (FF) (27 radial forearm, 1 lateral arm, and 1 scapular).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Direct (inpatient hospital resources used and monetary costs) and intangible (post-operative complications and function) costs.

RESULTS

Operative time was longer for FF reconstructions (P = .003), but both patient groups had similar intensive care unit and hospital stays. Treatment cost for FF reconstructions was $41,122, compared with $37,160 for PMMF reconstructions (P = .003). This difference was due to increased professional fees for FF reconstruction (P < .001) which was offset by intangible cost differences. The PMMF group tended toward an increased rate of flap-related complications, compared with the FF group. At last follow-up, 4 patients in the FF group (15%) and 3 in the PMMF group (15%) had their tracheotomy. In contrast, 17 (85%) patients in the PMMF group and 11 (39%) patients in the FF group required enteral tube feedings (P = .002). Also, 18 (64%) patients in the FF group were eating at least a soft diet compared with 6 (30%) patients in the PMMF group (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Comparison of direct costs reveals only a modest difference in reconstruction costs that is outweighed by the intangible costs of PMMF reconstruction. The functional benefits of FF reconstruction appear to justify its slight increased expense and its use rather than PMMF reconstruction after extirpation in the posterior oral cavity and oropharynx.

A comparison of resource costs for head and neck reconstruction with free and pectoralis major flaps

A series of 178 immediate reconstructions with regional or distant tissue for repair of oropharyngeal defects caused by treatment of head and neck cancer was reviewed to determine whether reconstruction with free flaps was more or less expensive than reconstruction with regional myocutaneous flaps. In this series, three types of flaps were used: the radial forearm free flap (n = 89), the rectus abdominis free flap (n = 56), and the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap (n = 33). Resource costs were determined by adding all costs to the institution of providing each service studied using salaried employees (including physicians). The two free-flap groups were combined to compare free flaps with the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap, a regional myocutaneous flap. Failure rates in the two groups were similar (3.0 percent for pectoralis major myocutaneous flap, 3.4 percent for free flaps). The mean costs of surgery were slightly higher for the free flaps, but the subsequent hospital stay costs were lower. Therefore, the total mean resource cost for the free-flap group ($28,460) was lower than the cost for the myocutaneous flap group ($40,992). The pectoralis major myocutaneous flap may have been selected for more patients with advanced disease and systemic medical problems, contributing to longer hospitalization and added cost. Nevertheless, this study suggests that free flaps are not more expensive than other methods and may provide cost savings for selected patients.

Critical pathways for head and neck surgery. Development and implementation

OBJECTIVE

To design, implement, and study the effectiveness of 4 new critical pathways relevant to head and neck oncological care.

DESIGN

Before-after trial.

SETTING

Tertiary referral academic institution.

PATIENTS

Sixty-eight patients admitted for head and neck oncological surgery or chemotherapy from December 1, 1995, through May 31, 1996; 30 patients with similar diagnoses and who underwent surgical procedures from December 1, 1994, to December 1, 1995, who served as historical controls.

INTERVENTIONS

Implementation of 4 critical pathways: chemotherapy, clean head and neck surgery, clean contaminated head and neck surgery, clean contaminated head and neck surgery with reconstructive flap.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Length of stay, cost of hospitalization, and variance tracking (deviations from established standards).

RESULTS

The length of stay for the clean contaminated group without flap reconstruction decreased by 1.5 days, and costs decreased by $7407 per patient (P < .05, Student t test). The length of stay decreased 1.6 days in the clean contaminated group with flap reconstruction, and costs decreased $9845 per patient (P < .05, Student t test). Nine patients (13%) experienced a prolonged length of stay while on a critical pathway.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of critical pathways has resulted in a decreased overall length of stay and cost of hospitalization. It has also allowed for better coordination and documentation of patient care, while the tracking of variances has simplified problem identification and correction.

Amputation versus reconstruction in traumatic defects of the leg: outcome and costs

This retrospective review covers global aspects of reconstructive efforts to salvage severely injured legs. Eighteen patients with traumatic lower leg amputation were compared to 21 patients who underwent complex microvascular reconstruction. The mean number of interventions was 3.5 for amputation and 8 for reconstruction (p < 0.009). Total rehabilitation time was 12 months for amputation and 30 months for reconstruction (p < 0.009). Changes in lifestyle were consistently more important in the amputee group. The mean annual hospital costs for amputated patients were 15,112 Swiss Francs (SD 7,094 SF) for the first 4 years. The mean annual hospital costs for reconstructed patients were 17,365 Swiss Francs (SD 8,702 SF) for the first 4 years. Fifty-six percent of the amputees and 19% of the reconstructed patients were retrained to a different profession (p < 0.025). Fifty-four percent of the amputees and 16% of the reconstructed patients were drawing an extremely costly and life long invalidity pension (p < 0.02). We conclude that for potentially salvageable legs reconstruction is advisable because the functional outcome was better than for amputation and there was no permanent social disintegration due to the long treatment. Total costs (including pensions) for reconstruction were far lower than for amputation.

Cost and outcome of osteocutaneous free-tissue transfer versus pedicled soft-tissue reconstruction for composite mandibular defects

Thirty-nine patients underwent reconstruction of composite mandibular defects following resection for squamous cell carcinoma. Thirty-four underwent immediate reconstruction, while 5 were reconstructed secondarily. Twenty-one received soft-tissue reconstruction only with a pectoralis major myocutaneous flap, 14 underwent osteocutaneous free-tissue transfer, and 4 received a reconstruction plate with free-tissue transfer for soft-tissue coverage. The mandibular defects in the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap group tended to be posterolateral, while free-tissue transfer defects were more severe, usually involving the anterior mandible. Length of surgery and duration of intensive care unit care were significantly longer for free-tissue transfer patients, while flap complications were more common in the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap patients. Facial appearance scores were higher for the free-tissue transfer group by both patient and physician assessment. Social function, speech, and oral function did not differ significantly. Patients reconstructed secondarily with free-tissue transfer reported significant improvement in appearance, oral continence, and social function, with little change in speech intelligibility, deglutition, or diet tolerance. The cost of the main hospitalization was significantly higher in the free-tissue transfer group than in the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap group, although when the costs of subsequent hospitalizations are included, the difference in total cost narrows. Despite more adverse defects, free-tissue transfer provided more predictable aesthetic results and expeditious return to normal social function than did pectoralis major myocutaneous flap reconstruction. The fiscal impact of these complex reconstructions is, however, significant. Cost-containment issues are presented and recommendations are made.

Comparison of resource costs between implant-based and TRAM flap breast reconstruction

Resource costs, as measured by hours of time in the operating room, days of stay in the hospital, and other costs of care, were evaluated for 240 patients who underwent mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction using either TRAM flaps or breast implants at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. To make costs comparable, only patients who completed reconstruction of the nipple were included. As expected, the initial resource costs of implant-based reconstruction were much lower than those of TRAM flap reconstruction. After correcting for patients whose reconstructions were unsuccessful and including the costs of surgery subsequent to the initial reconstruction, however, the cost advantage of implant-based reconstruction disappeared. If current trends continue, it is likely that with increased follow-up, the long-term resource costs of implant-based reconstructions will continue to increase, while those of autogenous tissue reconstructions will not. Autogenous breast reconstruction with the TRAM flap therefore appears to be more cost-effective, in terms of time as well as dollars, in the long run than reconstruction based on prosthetic implants.

Comparative clinical study of the sure-closure device with conventional wound closure techniques

The Sure-Closure device, designed for wound closure, harnesses the viscoelastic properties of the skin. It has been used in clinical studies in the past. We have evaluated the role of this device in complex wound problems and compared it to closure achieved by conventional wound closure methods such as skin grafts and flaps. A total of 40 patients with multiple wound etiologies were examined. We used the device under local and general anesthesia. In addition, we performed cost analysis on the use of the device and compared this to traditional methods. We found a cost reduction trend associated with the Sure-Closure method (p < .05). All of the 24 patients in whom the device was used to close the wounds had complete primary closure. The device is also easy to use. When used for delayed stretching, as in some of our patients, the compliance rate was high.

Toynbee Memorial Lecture 1994: mastoid surgery and the Hong Kong Flap

Critical evaluation of the outcome of surgery for cholesteatoma has favoured open cavity techniques. These methods have however been plagued by an inability to consistently produce healthy well healed cavities. The strength and stability of the normal tympanic membrane depends upon the separation of squamous epithelium from the middle ear mucosa by a fibrous tissue layer. Traditional methods of dealing with the cavity fail to reproduce a similar anatomically stable arrangement. In order to achieve the highest percentage of dry, stable disease-free ears after employing basic surgical principles of wide access to facilitate meticulous removal of all cholesteatoma, we have utilized a vascularized deep temporalis fascia flap for complete coverage of the cavity eliminating all raw areas. This fibrous layer provides the optimal substrate for epithelial resurfacing. Excellent healing even under unfavourable circumstances is ensured by the rich blood supply to the pedicled temporalis fascia flap. Considering patient preferences and cost effectiveness, the optimal treatment for cholesteatoma must be one operation, provided it achieves a dry safe ear. Based upon rational concepts, the 'Hong Kong Flap' technique of reconstructing the mastoid cavity involves a straightforward procedure requiring no special technical skill that consistently achieves this ideal.

Various methods of breast reconstruction after mastectomy: an economic comparison

This study is an economic comparison of various methods of breast reconstruction after mastectomy. The hospital bills of 287 patients undergoing breast reconstruction at three institutions from June of 1988 to March of 1991 were analyzed. The procedures examined included mastectomy, implant and tissue-expander reconstruction, and TRAM and latissimus pedicle flaps, as well as free TRAM and free gluteal flaps. These procedures were subdivided into those which were performed at the time of mastectomy and those performed at a later admission. In addition, auxiliary procedures (i.e., revision, nipple reconstruction, tissue-expander exchange, and contralateral mastopexy/reduction) also were examined. Where appropriate, these procedures were subdivided into those performed under general or local anesthesia and by inpatient or outpatient status. Data from the three institutions were converted to N.Y.U. Medical Center costs for standardization. A table is presented that summarizes the costs of each individual procedure with all the pertinent variations. In addition, a unique and novel method of analyzing the data was developed. This paper describes a menu system whereby other data regarding morbidity, mortality, and revision rates may be superimposed. With this information, the final cost of reconstruction can be extrapolated and the various methods of reconstruction can be compared. This method can be applied to almost any complex series of multiple procedures. The most salient points elucidated by this study are as follows: The savings generated by performing immediate reconstruction varies between $5092 (p < 0.05) for free gluteal flaps and $10,616 (p < 0.05) for pedicled TRAM flaps.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)