|
103
|
Milone M, Elmore U, Manigrasso M, Ortenzi M, Botteri E, Arezzo A, Silecchia G, Guerrieri M, De Palma GD, Agresta F, Agresta F, Pizza F, D’Antonio D, Amalfitano F, Selvaggi F, Sciaudone G, Selvaggi L, Prando D, Cavallo F, Guerrieri M, Ortenzi M, Lezoche G, Cuccurullo D, Tartaglia E, Sagnelli C, Coratti A, Tribuzi A, Di Marino M, Anania G, Bombardini C, Zago MP, Tagliabue F, Burati M, Di Saverio S, Colombo S, Adla SE, De Luca M, Zese M, Parini D, Prosperi P, Alemanno G, Martellucci J, Olmi S, Oldani A, Uccelli M, Bono D, Scaglione D, Saracco R, Podda M, Pisanu A, Murzi V, Agrusa A, Buscemi S, Muttillo IA, Picardi B, Muttillo EM, Solaini L, Cavaliere D, Ercolani G, Corcione F, Peltrini R, Bracale U, Lucchi A, Vittori L, Grassia M, Porcu A, Perra T, Feo C, Angelini P, Izzo D, Ricciardelli L, Trompetto M, Gallo G, Luc AR, Muratore A, Calabrò M, Cuzzola B, Barberis A, Costanzo F, Angelini G, Ceccarelli G, Rondelli F, De Rosa M, Cassinotti E, Boni L, Baldari L, Bianchi PP, Formisano G, Giuliani G, Ceretti AAP, Mariani NM, Giovenzana M, Farfaglia R, Marcianò P, Arizzi V, Piccoli M, Pecchini F, Pattacini GC, Botteri E, Vettoretto N, et alMilone M, Elmore U, Manigrasso M, Ortenzi M, Botteri E, Arezzo A, Silecchia G, Guerrieri M, De Palma GD, Agresta F, Agresta F, Pizza F, D’Antonio D, Amalfitano F, Selvaggi F, Sciaudone G, Selvaggi L, Prando D, Cavallo F, Guerrieri M, Ortenzi M, Lezoche G, Cuccurullo D, Tartaglia E, Sagnelli C, Coratti A, Tribuzi A, Di Marino M, Anania G, Bombardini C, Zago MP, Tagliabue F, Burati M, Di Saverio S, Colombo S, Adla SE, De Luca M, Zese M, Parini D, Prosperi P, Alemanno G, Martellucci J, Olmi S, Oldani A, Uccelli M, Bono D, Scaglione D, Saracco R, Podda M, Pisanu A, Murzi V, Agrusa A, Buscemi S, Muttillo IA, Picardi B, Muttillo EM, Solaini L, Cavaliere D, Ercolani G, Corcione F, Peltrini R, Bracale U, Lucchi A, Vittori L, Grassia M, Porcu A, Perra T, Feo C, Angelini P, Izzo D, Ricciardelli L, Trompetto M, Gallo G, Luc AR, Muratore A, Calabrò M, Cuzzola B, Barberis A, Costanzo F, Angelini G, Ceccarelli G, Rondelli F, De Rosa M, Cassinotti E, Boni L, Baldari L, Bianchi PP, Formisano G, Giuliani G, Ceretti AAP, Mariani NM, Giovenzana M, Farfaglia R, Marcianò P, Arizzi V, Piccoli M, Pecchini F, Pattacini GC, Botteri E, Vettoretto N, Guarnieri C, Laface L, Abate E, Casati M, Feo C, Fabri N, Pesce A, Maida P, Marte G, Abete R, Casali L, Marchignoli A, Dall’Aglio M, Scabini S, Pertile D, Aprile A, Andreuccetti J, Di Leo A, Crepaz L, Maione F, Vertaldi S, Chini A, Rosati R, Puccetti F, Maggi G, Cossu A, Sartori A, De Luca M, Piatto G, Perrotta N, Celiento M, Scorzelli M, Pilone V, Tramontano S, Calabrese P, Sechi R, Cillara N, Putzu G, Podda MG, Montuori M, Pinotti E, Sica G, Franceschilli M, Sensi B, Degiuli M, Reddavid R, Puca L, Farsi M, Minuzzo A, Gia E, Baiocchi GL, Ranieri V, Celotti A, Bianco F, Grassia S, Novi A. ERas and COLorectal endoscopic surgery: an Italian society for endoscopic surgery and new technologies (SICE) national report. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:7619-7627. [DOI: https:/doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09212-y] [Show More Authors] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 03/10/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Several reports demonstrated a strong association between the level of adherence to the protocol and improved clinical outcomes after surgery. However, it is difficult to obtain full adherence to the protocol into clinical practice and has still not been identified the threshold beyond which improved functional results can be reached.
Methods
The ERCOLE (ERas and COLorectal Endoscopic surgery) study was as a cohort, prospective, multi-centre national study evaluating the association between adherence to ERAS items and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive colorectal surgery. The primary endpoint was to associate the percentage of ERAS adherence to functional recovery after minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery. The secondary endpoints of the study was to validate safety of the ERAS programme evaluating complications’ occurrence according to Clavien-Dindo classification and to evaluate the compliance of the Italian surgeons to each ERAS item.
Results
1138 patients were included. Adherence to the ERAS protocol was full only in 101 patients (8.9%), > 75% of the ERAS items in 736 (64.7%) and > 50% in 1127 (99%). Adherence to > 75% was associated with a better functional recovery with 90.2 ± 98.8 vs 95.9 ± 33.4 h (p = 0.003). At difference, full adherence to the ERAS components 91.7 ± 22.1 vs 92.2 ± 31.6 h (p = 0.8) was not associated with better recovery.
Conclusions
Our results were encouraging to affirm that adherence to the ERAS program up to 75% could be considered satisfactory to get the goal. Our study could be considered a call to simplify the ERAS protocol facilitating its penetrance into clinical practice.
Collapse
|
|
3 |
|
|
104
|
Fugazzola P, Cobianchi L, Di Martino M, Tomasoni M, Dal Mas F, Abu-Zidan FM, Agnoletti V, Ceresoli M, Coccolini F, Di Saverio S, Dominioni T, Farè CN, Frassini S, Gambini G, Leppäniemi A, Maestri M, Martín-Pérez E, Moore EE, Musella V, Peitzman AB, de la Hoz Rodríguez Á, Sargenti B, Sartelli M, Viganò J, Anderloni A, Biffl W, Catena F, Ansaloni L, Augustin G, Morić T, Awad S, Alzahrani AM, Elbahnasawy M, Massalou D, De Simone B, Demetrashvili Z, Kimpizi AD, Schizas D, Balalis D, Tasis N, Papadoliopoulou M, Georgios P, Lasithiotakis K, Ioannidis O, Bains L, Magnoli M, Cianci P, Conversano NI, Pasculli A, Andreuccetti J, Arici E, Pignata G, Tiberio GAM, Podda M, Murru C, Veroux M, Distefano C, Centonze D, Favi F, Bova R, Convertini G, Balla A, Sasia D, Giraudo G, Gabriele A, Tartaglia N, Pavone G, D’Acapito F, Fabbri N, Ferrara F, Cimbanassi S, Ferrario L, Cioffi S, Ceresoli M, Fumagalli C, Degrate L, Degiuli M, Sofia S, Licari L, Improta M, Patriti A, Coletta D, Conti L, Malerba M, Andrea M, Calabrò M, De Zolt B, Bellio G, Giordano A, Luppi D, Corbellini C, Sampietro GM, Marafante C, Rossi S, Mingoli A, Lapolla P, Cicerchia PM, Siragusa L, Grande M, Arcudi C, et alFugazzola P, Cobianchi L, Di Martino M, Tomasoni M, Dal Mas F, Abu-Zidan FM, Agnoletti V, Ceresoli M, Coccolini F, Di Saverio S, Dominioni T, Farè CN, Frassini S, Gambini G, Leppäniemi A, Maestri M, Martín-Pérez E, Moore EE, Musella V, Peitzman AB, de la Hoz Rodríguez Á, Sargenti B, Sartelli M, Viganò J, Anderloni A, Biffl W, Catena F, Ansaloni L, Augustin G, Morić T, Awad S, Alzahrani AM, Elbahnasawy M, Massalou D, De Simone B, Demetrashvili Z, Kimpizi AD, Schizas D, Balalis D, Tasis N, Papadoliopoulou M, Georgios P, Lasithiotakis K, Ioannidis O, Bains L, Magnoli M, Cianci P, Conversano NI, Pasculli A, Andreuccetti J, Arici E, Pignata G, Tiberio GAM, Podda M, Murru C, Veroux M, Distefano C, Centonze D, Favi F, Bova R, Convertini G, Balla A, Sasia D, Giraudo G, Gabriele A, Tartaglia N, Pavone G, D’Acapito F, Fabbri N, Ferrara F, Cimbanassi S, Ferrario L, Cioffi S, Ceresoli M, Fumagalli C, Degrate L, Degiuli M, Sofia S, Licari L, Improta M, Patriti A, Coletta D, Conti L, Malerba M, Andrea M, Calabrò M, De Zolt B, Bellio G, Giordano A, Luppi D, Corbellini C, Sampietro GM, Marafante C, Rossi S, Mingoli A, Lapolla P, Cicerchia PM, Siragusa L, Grande M, Arcudi C, Antonelli A, Vinci D, De Martino C, Armellino MF, Bisogno E, Visconti D, Santarelli M, Montanari E, Biloslavo A, Germani P, Zaghi C, Oka N, Fathi MA, Ríos-Cruz D, Hernandez EEL, Garzali IU, Duarte L, Negoi I, Litvin A, Chowdhury S, Alshahrani SM, Carbonell-Morote S, Rubio-Garcia JJ, Moreira CCL, Ponce IA, Mendoza-Moreno F, Campaña AM, Bayo HL, Serra AC, Landaluce-Olavarria A, Serradilla-Martín M, Cano-Paredero A, Dobón-Rascón MÁ, Hamid H, Baraket O, Gonullu E, Leventoglu S, Turk Y, Büyükkasap Ç, Aday U, Kara Y, Kabuli HA, Atici SD, Colak E, Chooklin S, Chuklin S, Ruta F, Estraviz-Mateos B, Markinez-Gordobil I. Prediction of morbidity and mortality after early cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: results of the S.P.Ri.M.A.C.C. study. World J Emerg Surg 2023; 18:20. [DOI: https:/doi.org/10.1186/s13017-023-00488-6] [Show More Authors] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/27/2023] [Imported: 11/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Less invasive alternatives than early cholecystectomy (EC) for acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) treatment have been spreading in recent years. We still lack a reliable tool to select high-risk patients who could benefit from these alternatives. Our study aimed to prospectively validate the Chole-risk score in predicting postoperative complications in patients undergoing EC for ACC compared with other preoperative risk prediction models.
Method
The S.P.Ri.M.A.C.C. study is a World Society of Emergency Surgery prospective multicenter observational study. From 1st September 2021 to 1st September 2022, 1253 consecutive patients admitted in 79 centers were included. The inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of ACC and to be a candidate for EC. A Cochran-Armitage test of the trend was run to determine whether a linear correlation existed between the Chole-risk score and a complicated postoperative course. To assess the accuracy of the analyzed prediction models—POSSUM Physiological Score (PS), modified Frailty Index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, American Society of Anesthesiologist score (ASA), APACHE II score, and ACC severity grade—receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was used to compare the diagnostic abilities.
Results
A 30-day major morbidity of 6.6% and 30-day mortality of 1.1% were found. Chole-risk was validated, but POSSUM PS was the best risk prediction model for a complicated course after EC for ACC (in-hospital mortality: AUC 0.94, p < 0.001; 30-day mortality: AUC 0.94, p < 0.001; in-hospital major morbidity: AUC 0.73, p < 0.001; 30-day major morbidity: AUC 0.70, p < 0.001). POSSUM PS with a cutoff of 25 (defined in our study as a ‘Chole-POSSUM’ score) was then validated in a separate cohort of patients. It showed a 100% sensitivity and a 100% negative predictive value for mortality and a 96–97% negative predictive value for major complications.
Conclusions
The Chole-risk score was externally validated, but the CHOLE-POSSUM stands as a more accurate prediction model. CHOLE-POSSUM is a reliable tool to stratify patients with ACC into a low-risk group that may represent a safe EC candidate, and a high-risk group, where new minimally invasive endoscopic techniques may find the most useful field of action.
Trial Registration: ClinicalTrial.gov NCT04995380.
Collapse
|
|
2 |
|