Factors associated with acute limb ischemia in cardiogenic shock and downstream clinical outcomes: Insights from the Cardiogenic Shock Working Group

BACKGROUND

There are limited data depicting the prevalence and ramifications of acute limb ischemia (ALI) among cardiogenic shock (CS) patients.

METHODS

We employed data from the Cardiogenic Shock Working Group (CSWG), a consortium including 33 sites. We constructed a multi-variable logistic regression to examine the association between clinical factors and ALI, we generated another logistic regression model to ascertain the association of ALI with mortality.

RESULTS

There were 7,070 patients with CS and 399 (5.6%) developed ALI. Patients with ALI were more likely to be female (40.4% vs 29.4%) and have peripheral arterial disease (13.8% vs 8.3%). Stratified by maximum society for cardiovascular angiography & intervention (SCAI) shock stage, the rates of ALI were stage B 0.0%, stage C 1.8%, stage D 4.1%, and stage E 10.3%. Factors associated with higher risk for ALI included: peripheral vascular disease OR 2.24 (95% CI: 1.53-3.23; p < 0.01) and ≥2 mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices OR 1.66 (95% CI: 1.24-2.21, p < 0.01). ALI was highest for venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) patients (11.6%) or VA-ECMO+ intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP)/Impella CP (16.6%) yet use of distal perfusion catheters was less than 50%. Mortality was 38.0% for CS patients without ALI but 57.4% for CS patients with ALI. ALI was significantly associated with mortality, adjusted OR 1.40 (95% CI 1.01-1.95, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of ALI was 6% among CS patients. Factors most associated with ALI include peripheral vascular disease and multiple MCS devices. The downstream ramifications of ALI were dire with a considerably higher risk of mortality.

The Price We Pay for Progression in Shock Care: Economic Burden, Accessibility, and Adoption of Shock-Teams and Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with high in-hospital and long-term mortality and morbidity that results in significant socio-economic impact. Due to the high costs associated with CS care, it is important to define the short- and long-term burden of this disease state on resources and review strategies to mitigate these.

RECENT FINDINGS

In recent times, the focus on CS continues to be on improving short-term outcomes, but there has been increasing emphasis on the long-term morbidity. In this review we discuss the long-term outcomes of CS and the role of hospital-level and system-level disparities in perpetuating this. We discuss mitigation strategies including developing evidence-based protocols and systems of care, improvement in risk stratification and evaluation of futility of care, all of which address the economic burden of CS. CS continues to remain the pre-eminent challenge in acute cardiovascular care, and a combination of multi-pronged strategies are needed to improve outcomes in this population.

Serial Shock Severity Assessment Within 72 Hours After Diagnosis: A Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Report

BACKGROUND

The Cardiogenic Shock Working Group-modified Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (CSWG-SCAI) staging was developed to risk stratify cardiogenic shock (CS) severity. Data showing progressive changes in SCAI stages and outcomes are limited.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated serial changes in CSWG-SCAI stages and outcomes of patients presenting with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction (MI-CS) and heart failure-related CS (HF-CS).

METHODS

The multicenter CSWG registry was queried. CSWG-SCAI stages were computed at CS diagnosis and 24, 48, and 72 hours.

RESULTS

A total of 3,268 patients (57% HF-CS; 27% MI-CS) were included. At CS diagnosis, CSWG-SCAI stage breakdown was 593 (18.1%) stage B, 528 (16.2%) stage C, 1,659 (50.8%) stage D, and 488 (14.9%) noncardiac arrest stage E. At 24 hours, >50% of stages B and C patients worsened, but 86% of stage D patients stayed at stage D. Among stage E patients, 54% improved to stage D and 36% stayed at stage E by 24 hours. Minimal SCAI stage changes occurred beyond 24 hours. SCAI stage trajectories were similar between MI-CS and HF-CS groups. Within 24 hours, unadjusted mortality rates of patients with any SCAI stage worsening or improving were 44.6% and 34.2%, respectively. Patients who presented in or progressed to stage E by 24 hours had the worst prognosis. Survivors had lower lactate than nonsurvivors.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with CS changed SCAI stages within 24 hours from CS diagnosis. Stage B patients were at high risk of worsening shock severity by 24 hours, associated with excess mortality. Early CS recognition and serial assessment may improve risk stratification.

Transradial stenting of left subclavian artery origin using shockwave intravascular lithotripsy balloon plasty: Technical report and literature review

Lesions of the subclavian artery often involve pathologic stenosis due to high degrees of calcification within the vessel wall. While endovascular angioplasty and stenting is generally the preferred method for obtaining flow reconstitution, calcification of the vessel wall has proven to significantly impair the efficacy of successful stent deployment. Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a technology that has been very successful in addressing this challenge in other vascular territories, however its use has yet to be approved for supra-aortic vessels such as the subclavian artery. In this report, the use of IVL for a case of subclavian steal syndrome due to a highly stenosed left subclavian artery is described along with a review of the literature. Although several cases utilizing this technology in subclavian arteries have been reported, none have described the use of a left transradial approach. Therefore the purpose of this report is to demonstrate the efficacy of IVL for supra-aortic vessels so that its benefits can be expanded to a broader patient population.

Delaying reperfusion plus left ventricular unloading reduces infarct size: Sub-analysis of DTU-STEMI pilot study

INTRODUCTION

The STEMI-DTU pilot study tested the early safety and practical feasibility of left ventricular (LV) unloading with a trans-valvular pump before reperfusion. In the intent-to-treat cohort, no difference was observed for microvascular obstruction (MVO) or infarct size (IS) normalized to either the area at risk (AAR) at 3-5 days or total LV mass (TLVM) at 3-5 days We now report a per protocol analysis of the STEMI-DTU pilot study.

METHODS

In STEMI-DTU STUDY 50 adult patients (25 in each arm) with anterior STEMI [sum of precordial ST-segment elevation (ΣSTE) ≥4 mm] requiring primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were enrolled. Only patients who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in this analysis. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging 3-5 days after PCI quantified IS/AAR and IS/TLVM and MVO. Group differences were assessed using Student's t-tests and linear regression (SAS Version-9.4).

RESULTS

Of the 50 patients enrolled, 2 died before CMR imaging. Of the remaining 48 patients those without CMR at 3-5 days (n = 8), without PCI of a culprit left anterior descending artery lesion (n = 2), with OHCA (n = 1) and with ΣSTE < 4 mm (n = 5) were removed from this analysis leaving 32/50 (64 %) patients meeting all inclusion and exclusion criteria (U-IR, n = 15; U-DR, n = 17) as per protocol. Despite longer symptom-to-balloon times in the U-DR arm (228 ± 80 vs 174 ± 59 min, p < 0.01), IS/AAR was significantly lower with 30 min of delay to reperfusion in the presence of active LV unloading (47 ± 16 % vs 60 ± 15 %, p = 0.02) and remained lower irrespective of the magnitude of precordial ΣSTE. MVO was not significantly different between groups (1.5 ± 2.8 % vs 3.5 ± 4.8 %, p = 0.15). Among patients who received LV unloading within 180 min of symptom onset, IS/AAR was significantly lower in the U-DR group.

CONCLUSION

In this per-protocol analysis of the STEMI-DTU pilot study we observed that LV unloading for 30 min before reperfusion significantly reduced IS/AAR compared to LV unloading and immediate reperfusion, whereas in the ITT cohort no difference was observed between groups. This observation supports the design of the STEMI-DTU pivotal trial and suggests that strict adherence to the study protocol can significantly influence the outcome.

Impact of Female Sex on Cardiogenic Shock Outcomes: A Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Report

BACKGROUND

Studies reporting cardiogenic shock (CS) outcomes in women are scarce.

OBJECTIVES

The authors compared survival at discharge among women vs men with CS complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) and heart failure (HF-CS).

METHODS

The authors analyzed 5,083 CS patients in the Cardiogenic Shock Working Group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed with the use of baseline characteristics. Logistic regression was performed for log odds of survival.

RESULTS

Among 5,083 patients, 1,522 were women (30%), whose mean age was 61.8 ± 15.8 years. There were 30% women and 29.1% men with AMI-CS (P = 0.03). More women presented with de novo HF-CS compared with men (26.2% vs 19.3%; P < 0.001). Before PSM, differences in baseline characteristics and sex-specific outcomes were seen in the HF-CS cohort, with worse survival at discharge (69.9% vs 74.4%; P = 0.009) and a higher rate of maximum Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions stage E (26% vs 21%; P = 0.04) in women than in men. Women were less likely to receive pulmonary artery catheterization (52.9% vs 54.6%; P < 0.001), heart transplantation (6.5% vs 10.3%; P < 0.001), or left ventricular assist device implantation (7.8% vs 10%; P = 0.01). Regardless of CS etiology, women had more vascular complications (8.8% vs 5.7%; P < 0.001), bleeding (7.1% vs 5.2%; P = 0.01), and limb ischemia (6.8% vs 4.5%; P = 0.001). More vascular complications persisted in women after PSM (10.4% women vs 7.4% men; P = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Women with HF-CS had worse outcomes and more vascular complications than men with HF-CS. More studies are needed to identify barriers to advanced therapies, decrease complications, and improve outcomes of women with CS.

Medical Management and Device-Based Therapies in Chronic Heart Failure

Heart failure (HF) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Major advancements in optimal guideline-directed medical therapy, including novel pharmacological agents, are now available for the treatment of chronic HF including HF with reduced ejection fraction and HF with preserved ejection fraction. Despite these efforts, there are several limitations of medical therapy including but not limited to: delays in implementation and/or initiation; inability to achieve target dosing; tolerability; adherence; and recurrent and chronic costs of care. A significant proportion of patients remain symptomatic with poor HF-related outcomes including rehospitalization, progression of disease, and mortality. Driven by these unmet clinical needs, there has been a significant growth of innovative device-based interventions across all HF phenotypes over the past several decades. This state-of-the-art review will summarize the current landscape of guideline-directed medical therapy for chronic HF, discuss its limitations including barriers to implementation, and review device-based therapies which have established efficacy or demonstrated promise in the management of chronic HF.

Neuromodulation Therapies in Heart Failure: A State-of-the-Art Review

Heart failure (HF) continues to impact the population globally with increasing prevalence. While the pathophysiology of HF is quite complex, the dysregulation of the autonomic nervous system, as evident in heightened sympathetic activity, serves as an attractive pathophysiological target for newer therapies and HF. The degree of neurohormonal activation has been found to correlate to the severity of symptoms, decline in functional capacity, and mortality. Neuromodulation of the autonomic nervous system aims to restore the balance between sympathetic nervous system and the parasympathetic nervous system. Given that autonomic dysregulation plays a major role in the development and progression of HF, restoring this balance may potentially have an impact on the core pathophysiological mechanisms and various HF syndromes. Autonomic modulation has been proposed as a potential therapeutic strategy aimed at reduction of systemic inflammation. Such therapies, complementary to drug and device-based therapies may lead to improved patient outcomes and reduce disease burden. Most professional societies currently do not provide a clear recommendation on the use of neuromodulation techniques in HF. These include direct and indirect vagal nerve stimulation, spinal cord stimulation, baroreflex activation therapy, carotid sinus stimulation, aortic arch stimulation, splanchnic nerve modulation, cardiopulmonary nerve stimulation, and renal sympathetic nerve denervation. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of neuromodulation in HF.

Standardized Definitions for Cardiogenic Shock Research and Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices: Scientific Expert Panel From the Shock Academic Research Consortium (SHARC)

The Shock Academic Research Consortium is a multi-stakeholder group, including representatives from the US Food and Drug Administration and other government agencies, industry, and payers, convened to develop pragmatic consensus definitions useful for the evaluation of clinical trials enrolling patients with cardiogenic shock, including trials evaluating mechanical circulatory support devices. Several in-person and virtual meetings were convened between 2020 and 2022 to discuss the need for developing the standardized definitions required for evaluation of mechanical circulatory support devices in clinical trials for cardiogenic shock patients. The expert panel identified key concepts and topics by performing literature reviews, including previous clinical trials, while recognizing current challenges and the need to advance evidence-based practice and statistical analysis to support future clinical trials. For each category, a lead (primary) author was assigned to perform a literature search and draft a proposed definition, which was presented to the subgroup. These definitions were further modified after feedback from the expert panel meetings until a consensus was reached. This manuscript summarizes the expert panel recommendations focused on outcome definitions, including efficacy and safety.

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is a resuscitation method for patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is lacking.

METHODS

We searched several electronic databases until March 2023 for RCTs comparing ECPR with conventional CPR in OHCA patients. RevMan 5.4 was used to pool risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A total of four RCTs were included. The results of our meta-analysis showed no statistically significant benefit of ECPR regarding mid-term survival (RR 1.21; 95% CI 0.64 to 2.28; I2 = 48%; p = .55). We found a significant improvement with ECPR in mid-term favorable neurological outcome (RR 1.59; 95% CI 1.09 to 2.33; I2 = 0%; p = .02). There was no significant difference between ECPR and conventional CPR in long-term survival (RR 1.32; 95% CI 0.18 to 9.50; I2 = 64%; p = .79), and long-term favorable neurological outcome (RR 1.47; 95% CI 0.89 to 2.43; I2 = 25%; p = .13). There was an increased incidence of adverse events in the ECPR group (RR 3.22; 95% CI 1.18 to 8.80; I2 = 63%; p = .02).

CONCLUSION

ECPR in OHCA patients was not associated with improved survival or long-term favorable neurological outcome but did improve favorable neurological outcome in the mid-term. However, these results are likely underpowered due to the small number of available RCTs. Large-scale confirmatory RCTs are needed to provide definitive conclusions.

Pulmonary Artery Catheter Use and Risk of In-hospital Death in Heart Failure Cardiogenic Shock

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) are increasingly used to guide management decisions in cardiogenic shock (CS). The goal of this study was to determine if PAC use was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality in CS owing to acute heart failure (HF-CS).

METHODS AND RESULTS

This multicenter, retrospective, observational study included patients with CS hospitalized between 2019 and 2021 at 15 US hospitals participating in the Cardiogenic Shock Working Group registry. The primary end point was in-hospital mortality. Inverse probability of treatment-weighted logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI), accounting for multiple variables at admission. The association between the timing of PAC placement and in-hospital death was also analyzed. A total of 1055 patients with HF-CS were included, of whom 834 (79%) received a PAC during their hospitalization. In-hospital mortality risk for the cohort was 24.7% (n = 261). PAC use was associated with lower adjusted in-hospital mortality risk (22.2% vs 29.8%, OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.50-0.94). Similar associations were found across SCAI stages of shock, both at admission and at maximum SCAI stage during hospitalization. Early PAC use (≤6 hours of admission) was observed in 220 PAC recipients (26%) and associated with a lower adjusted risk of in-hospital mortality compared with delayed (≥48 hours) or no PAC use (17.3% vs 27.7%, OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.37-0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

This observational study supports PAC use, because it was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality in HF-CS, especially if performed within 6 hours of hospital admission.

CONDENSED ABSTRACT

An observational study from the Cardiogenic Shock Working Group registry of 1055 patients with HF-CS showed that pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) use was associated with a lower adjusted in-hospital mortality risk (22.2% vs 29.8%, odds ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.50-0.94) compared with outcomes in patients managed without PAC. Early PAC use (≤6 hours of admission) was associated with a lower adjusted risk of in-hospital mortality compared with delayed (≥48 hours) or no PAC use (17.3% vs 27.7%, odds ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.37-0.81).

Treatment Intensity for the Management of Cardiogenic Shock: Comparison Between STEMI and Non-STEMI

Background

Cardiogenic shock is a leading cause of mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Objectives

The authors sought to compare clinical characteristics, hospital trajectory, and drug and device use between patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock (STEMI-CS) and those without (non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock [NSTEMI-CS]).

Methods

We analyzed data from 1,110 adult admissions with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) across 17 centers within Cardiogenic Shock Working Group. The primary end point was in-hospital mortality.

Results

Our study included 1,110 patients with AMI-CS, of which 731 (65.8%) had STEMI-CS and 379 (34.2%) had NSTEMI-CS. Most patients were male (STEMI-CS: 71.6%, NSTEMI-CS: 66.5%) and White (STEMI-CS: 53.8%, NSTEMI-CS: 64.1%). In-hospital mortality was 41% and was similar among patients with STEMI-CS and NSTEMI-CS (43% vs 39%, P = 0.23). Patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest had higher in-hospital mortality in patients with NSTEMI-CS (63% vs 36%, P = 0.006) as compared to patients with STEMI-CS (52% vs 41%, P = 0.16). Similar results were observed for in-hospital cardiac arrest in patients with STEMI-CS (63% vs 33%, P < 0.001) and NSTEMI-CS (60% vs 32%, P < 0.001). Only 27% of patients with STEMI-CS and 12% of NSTEMI-CS received both a drug and temporary mechanical circulatory support device during the first 24 hours, which increased to 78% and 61%, respectively, throughout the course of the hospitalization (P < 0.001 for both).

Conclusions

Despite increasing use of inotropic and vasoactive support and mechanical circulatory support throughout the hospitalization, both patients with STEMI-CS and NSTEMI-CS remain at increased risk for in-hospital mortality. Randomized controls trials are needed to elucidate whether timing and sequence of escalation of support improves outcomes in patients with AMI-CS.

Clinical Presentation and In-Hospital Trajectory of Heart Failure and Cardiogenic Shock

BACKGROUND

Heart failure-related cardiogenic shock (HF-CS) remains an understudied distinct clinical entity.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to profile a large cohort of patients with HF-CS focused on practical application of the SCAI (Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions) staging system to define baseline and maximal shock severity, in-hospital management with acute mechanical circulatory support (AMCS), and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

The Cardiogenic Shock Working Group registry includes patients with CS, regardless of etiology, from 17 clinical sites enrolled between 2016 and 2020. Patients with HF-CS (non-acute myocardial infarction) were analyzed and classified based on clinical presentation, outcomes at discharge, and shock severity defined by SCAI stages.

RESULTS

A total of 1,767 patients with HF-CS were included, of whom 349 (19.8%) had de novo HF-CS (DNHF-CS). Patients were more likely to present in SCAI stage C or D and achieve maximum SCAI stage D. Patients with DNHF-CS were more likely to experience in-hospital death and in- and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and they escalated more rapidly to a maximum achieved SCAI stage, compared to patients with acute-on-chronic HF-CS. In-hospital cardiac arrest was associated with greater in-hospital death regardless of clinical presentation (de novo: 63% vs 21%; acute-on-chronic HF-CS: 65% vs 17%; both P < 0.001). Forty-five percent of HF-CS patients were exposed to at least 1 AMCS device throughout hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large contemporary HF-CS cohort, we identified a greater incidence of in-hospital death and cardiac arrest as well as a more rapid escalation to maximum SCAI stage severity among DNHF-CS. AMCS use in HF-CS was common, with significant heterogeneity among device types. (Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Registry [CSWG]; NCT04682483).

Association of HIV infection with clinical features and outcomes of patients with aortic aneurysms

Data on the characteristics and outcomes of hospitalized patients with aortic aneurysms (AA) and HIV remain scarce. This is a cohort study of hospitalized adult patients with a diagnosis of AA from 2013 to 2019 using the US National Inpatient Readmission Database. Patients with a diagnosis of HIV were identified. Our outcomes included trends in hospitalizations and comparison of clinical characteristics, complications, and mortality in patients with AA and HIV compared to those without HIV. Among 1,905,837 hospitalized patients with AA, 4416 (0.23%) were living with HIV. There was an overall age-adjusted increase in the rate of HIV among patients hospitalized with AA over the years (14-29 per 10,000 person-years; age-adjusted p-trend < 0.001). Patients with AA and HIV were younger than those without HIV (median age: 60 vs 76 years, p < 0.001) and were less likely to have a history of smoking, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and obesity. Thoracic aortic aneurysms were more prevalent in those with HIV (37.5% vs 26.7%, p < 0.001). On multivariable logistic regression, HIV was not associated with increased risk of aortic rupture (OR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.61-1.01, p = 0.06), acute aortic dissection (OR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.51-1.06, p = 0.3), readmissions (OR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.95-1.13, p = 0.4), or aortic repair (OR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.79-1.00, p = 0.05). Hospitalized patients with AA and HIV had a lower crude mortality rate compared to those without HIV (OR: 0.75 (0.63-0.91), p = 0.003). Hospitalized patients with AA and HIV likely constitute a distinct group of patients with AA; they are younger, have fewer traditional cardiovascular risk factors, and a higher rate of thoracic aorta involvement. Differences in clinical features may account for the lower mortality rate observed in patients with AA and HIV compared to those without HIV.

Overview of the FDA's Circulatory System Devices Panel virtual meeting on the TransMedics Organ Care System (OCS) Heart - portable extracorporeal heart perfusion and monitoring system

There are a limited number of donor hearts available for transplantation every year, and an even lower number of these hearts actually undergo transplantation. One of the barriers to utilizing donor hearts is the inferior outcomes associated with prolonged ischemic times. There have been increasing attempts to develop alternative techniques for prolonged storage to raise the number of heart transplants while maintaining acceptable outcomes. One such new technology utilizes continuous ex vivo perfusion of the donor heart with oxygenated blood and allows for prolonged storage and preservation times. The TransMedics Organ Care System (OCS) Heart (TransMedics; Andover, MA) claims to optimize the condition of the donor organs by preserving them in a warm, functioning environment. On April 6, 2021, the United States Food and Drug Administration convened a virtual meeting of the Circulatory System Devices Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory Committee to provide guidance on the TransMedics OCS Heart System's application for premarket approval. This application was subsequently approved on September 7, 2021. We provide an overview of the meeting, including the results of the clinical trials that were presented.

Device profile of the Impella 5.0 and 5.5 system for mechanical circulatory support for patients with cardiogenic shock: overview of its safety and efficacy

INTRODUCTION

Trans-valvular micro-axial flow pumps such as Impella are increasingly utilized in patients with cardiogenic shock [CS]. A number of different Impella devices are now available providing a wide range of cardiac output. Among these, the Impella 5.0 and recently introduced Impella 5.5 pumps can provides 5.55 L/min of flow, enabling complete left ventricular support with more favorable hemodynamic effects on myocardial oxygen consumption and left ventricular unloading. These devices require placement of a surgical conduit graft for endovascular delivery, but are increasingly being used in patients with CS due to acutely decompensated heart failure [ADHF], acute myocardial infarction [AMI] and after cardiac surgery as a bridge to transplant or durable ventricular assist device surgery or myocardial recovery.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on the device profile and use of the Impella 5.0 and 5.5 systems in patients with CS. Specifically; we reviewed the published literature for Impella 5.0 device to summarize data regarding safety and efficacy.

EXPERT OPINION

The Impella 5.0 and 5.5 are trans-valvular micro-axial flow pumps for which the current data suggest excellent safety and efficacy profiles as approaches to provide circulatory support, myocardial unloading, and axillary placement enabling patient mobilization and rehabilitation.

ABBREVIATIONS

pMCS, Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices; CS, Cardiogenic shock; ADHF, Acute decompensated heart failure; AMI, Acute myocardial infarction; LVAD, Left ventricular assist deviceI; ABP, Intra-aortic balloon pump; VA-ECLS, Veno-arterial extracorporeal life support.